Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 DOI 10.1186/s13660-017-1383- RESEARCH Open Access Monotonicity rule for the quotient of two functions and its application Zhen-Hang Yang1, Wei-Mao Qian, Yu-Ming Chu1* and Wen Zhang3 * Correspondence: chuyuming005@16.com Department of Mathematics, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China Full list of author information is available at the end of the article 1 Abstract In the article, we provide a monotonicity rule for the function [Px + Ax]/[Px + Bx], where Px is a positive and decreasing function defined on R, R differentiable n n R > 0, and Ax = n=n0 an x and Bx = n=n0 bn x are two real power series converging on R, R such that the sequence {an /bn } n=n0 is increasing decreasing. As applications, we present new bounds with an0 /bn0 1 and bn > 0 for all n n0 π / 1 r sin t dt 0 < r < 1 of the second for the complete elliptic integral Er = 0 kind. MSC: 6A48; 33E05 Keywords: monotonicity rule; complete elliptic integral; absolute error; relative error 1 Introduction The most commonly used monotonicity rule in elementary calculus is that f is increasing decreasing on [a, b] if f : [a, b] R is continuous on [a, b] and has a positive negative derivative on a, b, and it can be proved easily by the Lagrange mean value theorem. The functions whose monotonicity we prove in this way are usually polynomials, rational functions, or other elementary functions. But we often find that the derivative of a quotient of two functions is quite messy and the process is tedious. Therefore, the improvements, generalizations and refinements of the method for proving monotonicity of quotients have attracted the attention of many researchers. In, Biernacki and Krzyż [ ] see also [ ], Lemma., [ ] found an important criterion for the monotonicity of the quotient of power series as follows. k k Theorem. [ ] Let At = k= ak t and Bt = k= bk t be two real power series converging on r, r r > with bk > for all k. If the non-constant sequence {ak /bk } is increasing decreasing for all k, then the function t At/Bt is strictly increasing decreasing on, r. In [ ], Cheeger et al. presented the monotonicity rule for the quotient of two functions. Theorem. [ ] If f and g are positive integrable functions on R such that f /g is de x x creasing, then the function x f t dt/ gt dt is decreasing. The Authors 017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page of 13 Unaware of Theorem 1., Anderson et al. [5], Lemma. see also [6], Theorem 1.5 established l Hôpital s monotone rule that can be applied to a wide class of quotients of functions. Theorem 1.3 [5] Let < a < b <, f, g :[a, b] R be continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on a, b, and g x 0on a, b. If f x/g x is increasing decreasing on a, b, then so are the functions f x f a gx ga, f x f b gx gb. If f x/g x is strictly monotone, then the monotonicity in the conclusion is also strict. Pinelis [7] provided the following monotonicity theorem. Theorem 1.4 [7] Let f and g be differentiable and g nevervanishonanopeninterval a, b R. Then the following statements are true: 1 If gg >0on a, b, lim sup x a g xf x/gx / g x 0 and f /g is increasing on a, b, then f /g >0on a, b. If gg >0on a, b, lim inf x a g xf x/gx / g x 0 and f /g is decreasing on a, b, then f /g <0on a, b. 3 If gg <0on a, b, lim inf x b g xf x/gx / g x 0 and f /g is increasing on a, b, then f /g <0on a, b. 4 If gg <0on a, b, lim sup x b g xf x/gx / g x 0 and f /g is increasing on a, b, then f /g >0on a, b. Recently, Yang et al. [8], Theorem 1., established a more general monotonicity rule for the ratio of two power series. Theorem 1.5 [8] Let At= k=0 a kt k and Bt= k=0 b kt k be two real power series converging on r, r and b k >0for all k, and H A,B = A B/B A. Suppose that for certain m N, the non-constant sequence {a k /b k } is increasing decreasing for 0 k manddecreasing increasing for k m. Then the function A/B is strictly increasing decreasing on 0, r if and only if H A,B r 0.Moreover, if H A,B r < >0, then there exists t 0 0, r such that the function A/B is strictly increasing decreasing on 0, t 0 and strictly decreasing increasing on t 0, r. The foregoing monotonicity rules have been used very effectively in the study of special functions [9 3], differential geometry [4, 4], probability [5] and approximation theory [6]. The main purpose of the article is to present the monotonicity rule for the function [Px+ a n x n ]/[Px+ b n x n ] and to provide new bounds for the complete elliptic integral of the second kind. Some complicated computations are carried out using Mathematica computer algebra system. Monotonicity rule Theorem.1 Let Px be a positive differentiable and decreasing function defined on 0,r r >0,let Ax= a n x n and Bx= b n x n be two real power series converging on
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 3 of 13 r, r. If a n0 /b n0 1,b n >0for all n n 0 and the non-constant sequence {a n /b n } is increasing decreasing, then the function x [Px+Ax]/[Px+Bx] is strictly increasing decreasing on 0,r. Proof Let x 0, r, and [ I 1 = npx xp x ] a n b n x n 1, I = na n x n 1 b n x n a n x n nb n x n 1..1 Then differentiating [Px+Ax]/[Px+Bx] gives [ [ ] Px+Ax Px+Bx Px+Bx = P x+ na n x n 1 Px+ b n x n Px+ a n x n P x+ nb n x n 1 ] = I 1 + I.. Note that I can be rewritten as I = = = = 1 ja j x j 1 b i x i a i x i jb j x j 1 j=n 0 i=n 0 i=n 0 j=n 0 aj jb i b j a i x i+j 1 b j=n j b i 0 i=n 0 j=n 0 i=n 0 ib j b i i=n 0 ai j=n 0 b i b j i j a j x i+j 1 b i b j ai a j x i+j 1..3 b i b j If a n0 /b n0 1,b n >0foralln n 0 and the non-constant sequence {a n /b n } is increasing decreasing, then we clearly see that a n b n.4 for all n n 0 and i=n 0 j=n 0 b i b j i j for all x 0, r. a j x i+j 1 > < 0.5 b i b j ai
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 4 of 13 It followsfrom Px is a positive differentiable and decreasing function on 0, r that npx xp x>0.6 for all x 0, r. Therefore, [Px+Ax/Px+Bx] > < 0 for all x 0, r follows easily from.1-.6, and the proof of Theorem.1 is completed. 3 Bounds for the complete elliptic integral of the second kind For r 0, 1, Legendre s complete elliptic integral [7] of the second kind is given by Er= π/ 0 1 r sin t dt. It is well known that E0 + =π/, E1 =1,andEr is the particular case of the Gaussian hypergeometric function Fa, b; c; x= n=0 a n b n c n x n 1 < x <1, where a n = Ɣa + n/ɣaandɣx= 0 tx 1 e t dt x > 0 is the gamma function. Indeed, we have Er= π F 1, 1 ;1;r = π n=0 1 n 1 n r n. 3.1 Recently, the bounds for the complete elliptic integral Er of the second kind have been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities for Ercan be found in the literature [8 41]. Vuorinen [4] conjectured that the inequality 1+r 3/ /3 3. Er π holds for all r 0, 1, where, and in what follows, r =1 r 1/.Inequality3.wasproved by Barnard et al. in [43]. Very recently, the accurate bounds for Er in terms of the Stolarsky mean S p,q 1, r were given in [44, 45]: π S 11/4,7/4 1, r < Er< 11 7 S 11/4,7/4 1, r, 3.3 5 16 S 5/, 1, r < Er< π S 5/, 1, r, 3.4 where S p,q a, b=[qa p b p /pa q b q ] 1/p q. In this section, we shall use Theorem.1 to present new bounds for the complete elliptic integral Er of the second kind. In order to prove our main result, we need three lemmas, which we present in this section.
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 5 of 13 Lemma 3.1 see [46], Lemma 7 Let n N and m N {0} with n > m, a i 0 for all 0 i n, a n a m >0and P n t= m a i t i + i=0 n a i t i. i=m+1 Then there exists t 0 0, such that P n t 0 =0,P n t<0for t 0, t 0 and P n t>0for t t 0,. Lemma 3. see [47, 48] Thedoubleinequality 1 Ɣx + a < x + a 1 a Ɣx +1 < 1 x 1 a holds for all x >0and a 0, 1. Lemma 3.3 Let n N, p 1 n, p n, p 3 n and w n be defined by p 1 n=15n 4 +1,48n 3 +1,601n 7,53n +1,944, 3.5 p n=4,375n 6 +13,47n 5 + 1,696,697n 4 4,433,167n 3 1,571,83n + 4,66,360n 1,555,00, 3.6 p 3 n=65n 6 +,583n 5 304,413n 4 +34,181n 3 +1,906,38n,918,064n + 675,360, 3.7 1 1 w n = 648np 1 n + p n + 5np 3n 3, 4 n n 3 n 5 4 n 3 3.8 respectively. Then w n 0 for all n 3. Proof Let p 0 n, p 4 n, p 5 n, α n and β n be defined by p 0 n=65n 4,018n 3 +3,985n 4,03n +1,080, 3.9 p 4 n=875n 7 81,18n 6,341,894n 5 10,10,98n 4 + 19,839,719n 3,615,904n +73,667,340n 71,971,00, 3.10 p 5 n=50n 6 1,834n 5 +391,75n 4 + 975,000n 3 7,770,415n + 7,980,844n +98,140, 3.11 α n = p 4n 1, 3.1 nn +1 n 3 β n = 10n 1p 5n 3, 3.13 n 3n 5 4 n 3 respectively. Then from 3.5-3.13 and elaborated computations we get w 3 = w 4 = w 5 = w 6 =0, 3.14
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 6 of 13 w 7 =,848,355 > 0, 3.15 16 w n+1 n +1p 1 n +1 n 7/4w n np 1 n = p n +1 n +1p 1 n +1 1 n 7/4p n n np 1 n 1 5p 3 n +1 3 + 5n 7/4p 3n n 3p 1 n +1 4 n n 5p 1 n [ n 5/p n +1 = n 7/4p ] n 1 n +1p 1 n +1 np 1 n n 3 [ 5n 9/4p3 n +1 + 5n 7/4p ] 3n 3 n 3p 1 n +1 n 5p 1 n 4 = p 0 n +1p 4 n 4nn +1p 1 np 1 n +1 + 1 n 3 5n 1p 0 n +1p 5 n n 3n 5p 1 np 1 n +1 3 4 n 3 p 0 n +1 = 4p 1 np 1 n +1 α n + β n, 3.16 α n = n 3n 5p 4n 1 n 3 β n 10nn 1n +1p 5 n 3 4, n 3 3.17 α 7 = 7,313,056 β 7 7,313,875, 3.18 10 3 4 n 3 αn+1 1 α n n 1 β n+1 β n = n 1n 3n 5/p 4n +1 nn +1n +n 9/4p 5 n +1 n 3n 5p 4n nn 1n +1p 5 n = n 3n 5n 3n 415n4 +1,98n 3 +6,797n +616n,380 n4n 9n 1n +1n +p 5 np 5 n +1 n 3 3 4 1,750n 8 80,64n 7 54,353,513n 6 +811,7,431n 5 4,748,597,075n 4 + 1,568,863,989n 3 80,185,046,0n + 144,08,55,644n 85,5,499,160 = n 3n 5n 3n 415n4 +1,98n 3 +6,797n +616n,380 n4n 9n 1n +1n +p 5 np 5 n +1 [ 40,331,641,10 714,515,,844n 7 475,749,995,856n 7 n 3 15,56,681,341n 7 3 5,64,55,865n 7 4,63,535,771n 7 5 91,63,449n 7 6 704,64n 7 7 +1,750n 7 8]. 3.19 n 3 From Lemma 3.1 and 3.19 together with the facts that p 5 n>0andp 5 n +1>0for n 7, we clearly see that there exists n 0 > 7 such that the sequence {α n /β n } n=7 is increasing
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 7 of 13 for 7 n n 0 and decreasing for n n 0, which implies that { α n α7 min, lim β n β 7 n α n β n It follows from Lemma 3. that }. 3.0 Ɣ 3 4 n 5 1/4 Ɣ 1 < 1 n 3 3 4 = Ɣ 3 4 Ɣn 13 4 + 3 4 n 3 Ɣ 1 Ɣn 13 4 +1 < Ɣ 3 13 n 4 4 1/4 Ɣ 1 3.1 for all n 7. From 3.10, 3.11, 3.17, 3.18, 3.0and3.1weget α n β n α 7 β 7 > 1 3. for all n 7. Therefore, Lemma 3.3 followseasily from 3.14-3.16and3.together with the facts that p 1 n>0,p 0 n +1>0andp 1 n +1>0forn 7. Theorem 3.4 Thedoubleinequality 40π J r 51π 160 < Er< π 9 58 J r 3.3 holds for all r 0, 1, where J r = 51r +0r r +50r +0 r +51 165r +. 3.4 r +5 Proof Let r 0, 1, x = r, Px, f 1 r, f randfrbedefinedby Px = 1,536 1,48x, 3.5 f 1 r=,59 r 1 r 3/4 +15 45r 4 64r +19 1 r 1/ 50 r 4 96r +96 1 r 1/4 105r 4 +3,600r +,880, 3.6 f r=65r 4 384r +384, 3.7 Fr= 1 Jr 1 Er/π, 3.8 respectively. Then from 3.1and3.4-3.8wehave f 1 r=,880+3,600r 105r 4 +,59 1 +15 45 n n! rn 64 n= n=1 n=0 3 4 n r n n=1 1 n 1 n 1! rn +19 3 4 n 1 n 1! rn n=0 1 n r n
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 8 of 13 50 n= 1 4 n n! rn 96 n=1 = 6,144 7,680r 105r 4 +,59 15 50 n= n= 1 4 n 1 n 1! rn +96 n= 7n 367n 70 1 n r n n 11n + 70 1 4 n r n = 6,144 7,680r + 11,48r 4 1,944 + 15 + 5 16f r f 1 r =1,536r 1,48r 4 5 15 =1,536r 1,48r 4 + n=0 n 7 3 4 n 1 r n 7n 367n 70 1 n 3 r n n 11n +70 3 4 n 3 r n, n 7 1 4 n r n n 11n +70 3 4 n 3 r n 7n 367n 70 1 n 3 r n +1,944 u n r n, 1 4 n r n n 7 1 4 n r n where u n = 1 π Er 97n 7 1 4 n 157n 367n 70 1 = n 1 n r n = n=1 n=1 16f r 1 π Er 1 5n 11n +70 n 3 1 n 1 1 n r n, =8 65r 4 384r +384 1 n 1 1 n =1,536r 1,48r 4 + n=1 v n r n, r n 3, 3.9 4 n 3
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 9 of 13 where v n = 8p 0n 1 n 3 1 n 3.30 and p 0 nisdefinedby3.9. J r = 51r +0r r +50r +0 r + 515r r + 55r 46r +5 165r + r + 55r r + 55r 46r +5 = f 1r 16f r, 16f r f 1 r Px+ n= Fr= 16f r1 = u n+1x n Er Px+ π n= v n+1x. 3.31 n It follows from 3.9, 3.9, 3.30 and elaborated computations that u 3 =1, v 3 3.3 u n+1 v n+1 15n 5 u n = v n 8n +1p 0 nn +1! w n, 3.33 where w n is defined by 3.8. It is not difficult to verify that p 0 n=65n 4,018n 3 +3,985n 4,03n +1,080>0 3.34 for all n 3. From Lemma 3.3,3.30, 3.33and3.34weknowthat v n >0 3.35 for all n 3, and the sequence {u n /v n } is decreasing. Equation 3.5impliesthat Px>0 3.36 for x 0, 1, and Px is decreasing on 0, 1. It follows from Theorem.1, 3.31 and3.3 together with the monotonicity of the sequence {u n /v n } and the function Px on 0, 1 that the function Fr isstrictlydecreasing on 0, 1 and lim r 1 Fr<Fr< lim Fr 3.37 + r 0 for all r 0, 1. Note that 3.4, 3.8and3.31leadtotheconclusionthat lim Fr= 1 J0+ r 1 1 E1 /π = 1 51/80 1 /π = 9π 80π, lim Fr=1. 3.38 r 0 +
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 10 of 13 Therefore, Theorem 3.4 followsfrom 3.8, 3.37and3.38. Remark 3.5 Let λ 1 r= π S 11/4,7/4 1, r, μ 1 r= 11 7 S 11/4,7/4 1, r, 3.39 λ r= 5 16 S 5/, 1, r, μ r= π S 5/, 1, r, 3.40 λr= 40π J r 9 51π 160, μr= π 58 J r, 3.41 where Jr isdefinedby3.4. Then simple computations lead to λ 1 1 = 7π = 0.999597..., μ 1 0 + = 11 =1.57148..., 3.4 7 λ 0 + = 5 16 =1.565, μ 1 = π = 1.56637..., 3.43 5 λ 0 + = π = μ 0 + =1.5707963..., 3.44 λ 1 =1, μ 1 = 51π =1.00138... 3.45 160 From 3.3, 3.4, 3.3 and3.39-3.45 we clearly see that there exists small enough δ 0, 1 such that the lower bound given in 3.3forEr is better than the lower bound given in 3.3 forr δ,1 δ, the lower bound given in 3.3 forer is better than the lowerbound given in 3.4 for r 0,δ, the upper bound given in 3.3 for Er is better than the upper bound given in 3.3for r 0, δ, and the upper bound given in 3.3for Er is better than the upper bound given in 3.4forr δ,1 δ. Corollary 3.6 Let Jr be defined by 3.4. Then the double inequality π J r 51π 160 1 < Er< π J r 3.46 holds for all r 0, 1. Proof Let Frbedefinedby3.8and Ar=J r Er. 3.47 π Then we clearly see that A 0 + = J 1 π E 0 + =0, A 1 = J 0 + π E 1 51π 160 =, 3.48 80π Ar= [1 π ][ ] [ Er 1 1 Jr 1 π Er = 1 ] [1 Fr π Er ]. 3.49 From 3.49 and the proof of Theorem 3.4 we know that Fr is strictly decreasing on 0, 1 and Ar is strictly increasing on 0, 1. Therefore, inequality 3.46 follows from 3.47 and3.48 together with the monotonicity of Ar on the interval0,1.
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 11 of 13 Corollary 3.7 Let Jr be defined by 3.4. Then the double inequality 80 51 J r < Er< π J r 3.50 holds for all r 0, 1. Proof Let Arbedefinedby3.47and Br= Jr 3.51 Er. π Then we clearly see that B 0 + = J1 π E0+ =1, B 1 = J0+ π E1 = 51π 160, 3.5 1 Br= [J r π ] Er +1= Ar +1. 3.53 Er π Er π From 3.53 and the proof of Corollary 3.6 we know that both Ar andbr arestrictly increasing on 0, 1. Therefore, inequality 3.50 follows from 3.51 and3.5 together with the monotonicity of Brontheinterval0,1. Remark 3.8 FromCorollaries3.6and3.7we have Er π J r < 51π 160 1=0.00138..., Er π Jr Er < 51π 160 1=0.00138.... for all r 0, 1, which implies that both the absolute and relative errors using πjr / to approximate Erarelessthan0.14%. 4 Conclusions In this paper, we find a monotonicity rule for the function [Px + a n x n ]/[Px + b n x n ]. As applications, we present new bounds for the complete elliptic integral Er = π/ 0 1 r sin tdt 0 < r < 1 of the second kind, and we show that our bounds are sharper than the previously known bounds for some r 0, 1. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors contributions All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Author details 1 Department of Mathematics, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China. School of Distance Education, Huzhou Broadcast and TV University, Huzhou, 313000, China. 3 Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 1009, USA. Acknowledgements The research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China Grants Nos. 61673169, 61374086, 1137115, 11401191, the Tianyuan Special Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 1166101 and the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province Grant No. Y0163535.
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 1 of 13 Publisher s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Received: 17 March 017 Accepted: 6 April 017 References 1. Biernacki, M, Krzyż, J: On the monotonicity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. A 9, 135-147 1955. Ponnusamy, S, Vuorinen, M: Asymptotic expansions and inequalities for hypergeometric functions. Mathematika 44, 78-301 1997 3. Heikkala, V, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Generalized elliptic integrals. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 91, 75-109 009 4. Cheeger, J, Gromov, M, Taylor, M: Finite propagation speed, kernel estimates for functions of the Laplace operator, and the geometry of complete Riemannian manifolds. J. Differ. Geom. 171, 15-53 198 5. Anderson, GD, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Inequalities for quasiconformal mappings in space. Pac. J. Math. 1601, 1-18 1993 6. Anderson, GD, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Conformal Invariants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1997 7. Pinelis, I: L Hospital type rules for oscillation, with applications. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 3,Article ID33 001 8. Yang, Z-H, Chu, Y-M, Wang, M-K: Monotonicity criterion for the quotient of power series with applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 481, 587-604 015 9. Balasubramanian, R, Ponnusamy, S, Vuorinen, M: Functional inequalities for the quotients of hypergeometric functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 181, 56-68 1998 10. Anderson, GD, Qiu, S-L, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations. Pac. J. Math. 191, 1-37 000 11. Anderson, GD, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Topics in special functions. In: Papers on Analysis. Rep. Univ. Jyväskylä Dep. Math. Stat., vol. 83, pp. 5-6. Univ. Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 001 1. Alzer, H, Qiu, S-L: Monotonicity theorems and inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 17, 89-31 004 13. Baricz, Á: Landen-type inequality for Bessel functions. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 5, 373-379 005 14. Zhu, L: Sharpening Jordan s inequality and the Yang Le inequality. Appl. Math. Lett. 193, 40-43 006 15. Anderson, GD, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Generalized convexity and inequalities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 355, 194-1308 007 16. Zhu, L: New inequalities for hyperbolic functions and their applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 01, Article ID303 01 17. Yang, Z-H: New sharp bounds for identric mean in terms of logarithmic mean and arithmetic mean. J. Math. Inequal. 64, 533-543 01 18. Yang, Z-H, Jiang, Y-L, Song, Y-Q, Chu, Y-M: Sharp inequalities for trigonometric functions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 014, Article ID 601839 014 19. Baricz, Á: Landen inequalities for special functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 149, 3059-3066 014 0. Wang, MK, Chu, Y-M, Song, Y-Q: Asymptotical formulas for Gaussian and generalized hypergeometric functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 76,44-60 016 1. Yang, Z-H, Chu, Y-M: On approximating the modified Bessel function of the second kind. J. Inequal. Appl. 017, Article ID 41 017. Wang, M-K, Chu, Y-M: Refinements of transformation inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions. Acta Math. Sci. 37B3, 607-6 017 3. Wang, M-K, Li, Y-M, Chu, Y-M: Inequalities and infinite product formula for Ramanujan generalized modular equation function. Ramanujan J. doi:10.1007/s11139-017-9888-3 4. Chavel, I: Riemannian Geometry - A Modern Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993 5. Pinelis, I: L Hospital type rules for monotonicity: applications to probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 31,Article ID700 6. Pinelis, I: Monotonicity properties of the relative error of a Padé approximation for Mills ratio. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 3,Article ID 0 00 7. Abramowitz, M, Stegun, IA: Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 1964 8. Anderson, GD, Vamanamurthy, MK, Vuorinen, M: Functional inequalities for hypergeometric functions and complete elliptic integrals. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3, 51-54 199 9. Guo, B-N, Qi, F: Some bounds for the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds. Math. Inequal. Appl. 14, 33-334 001 30. Chu, Y-M, Wang, M-K, Qiu, S-L: Optimal combinations bounds of root-square and arithmetic means for Toader mean. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Soc. 11, 41-51 01 31. Chu, Y-M, Wang, M-K: Optimal Lehmer mean bounds for the Toader mean. Results Math. 613-4, 3-9 01 3. Chu, Y-M, Wang, M-K, Qiu, S-L, Jiang, Y-P: Bounds for complete elliptic integrals of the second kind with applications. Comput. Math. Appl. 637, 1177-1184 01 33. Wang, M-K, Chu, Y-M, Qiu, S-L, Jiang, Y-P: Bounds for the perimeter of an ellipse. J. Approx. Theory 1647, 98-937 01 34. Wang, M-K, Chu, Y-M: Asymptotical bounds for the complete elliptic integrals of the second kind. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 401, 119-16 013 35. Song,Y-Q,Jiang,W-D,Chu,Y-M,Yan,D-D:OptimalboundsforToadermeanintermsofarithmeticand contraharmonic means. J. Math. Inequal. 74,751-757 013 36. Wang, M-K, Chu, Y-M, Jiang, Y-P, Qiu, S-L: Bounds of the perimeter of an ellipse using arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means. Math. Inequal. Appl. 171,101-111 014
Yang et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 017 017:106 Page 13 of 13 37. Li, Y, Qi, F: Some inequalities for complete elliptic integrals. Appl. Math. E-Notes 14, 193-199 014 38. Hua, Y, Qi, F: The best bounds for Toader mean in terms of the centroidal and arithmetic means. Filomat 84, 775-780 014 39. Hua, Y, Qi, F: A double inequality for bounding Toader mean by the centroidal mean. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 144, 57-531 014 40. Jiang, W-D, Qi, F: A double inequality for the combination of Toader mean and the arithmetic mean in terms of the contraharmonic mean. Publ. Inst. Math. 99113,37-4 016 41. Yang, Z-H, Chu, Y-M, Zhang, W: Monotonicity of the ratio for the complete elliptic integral and Stolarsky mean. J. Inequal. Appl. 016, Article ID 176 016 4. Vuorinen, M: Hypergeometric functions in geometric function theory. In: Special Functions and Differential Equations, Madras, 1997, pp. 119-16. Allied Publ., New Delhi 1998 43. Barnard, RW, Pearce, K, Richards, KC: A monotonicity property involving 3 F and comparisons of the classical approximations of elliptical arc length. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3, 403-419 000 44. Yang, Z-H, Chu, Y-M, Zhang, W: Accurate approximations for the complete elliptic integral of the second kind. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 438, 875-888 016 45. Yang, Z-H, Chu, Y-M, Zhang, X-H: Sharp Stolarsky mean bounds for the complete elliptic integral of the second kind. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 103, 99-936 017 46. Yang, Z-H, Chu, Y-M, Tao, X-J: A double inequality for the trigamma function and its applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 014, Article ID 70718 014 47. Wendel, JG: Note on the gamma function. Am. Math. Mon. 55, 563-564 1948 48. Qi, F: Bounds for the ratio of two gamma functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 010, Article ID 493058 010