The BIPM key comparison database, Aug /10

Similar documents
BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Am-241, CCRI(II)-K2.Am-241, and COOMET.RI(II)-K2.Am.241

APMP Key Comparison of DC Voltage at V and 10 V

BIPM.RI(II)-K1.F-18, BIPM.RI(II)-K4.F18, CCRI(II)-K3.F-18 and APMP.RI(II)-K3.F-18

Final Report. APMP.EM-K4.1 APMP Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf

National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW

Lab i x i u i Lab i x i u i / (mg/kg) / (mg/kg) / (mg/kg) / (mg/kg)

NPL REPORT ENG 13. Report on EUROMET key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (EUROMET.M.M-K2) M Perkin NOT RESTRICTED

FINAL REPORT. RMO Key Comparison EUROMET.EM-K2 Comparison of Resistance Standards at 10 M and 1 G. Beat Jeckelmann and Markus Zeier

A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs

Force Key Comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2. (50 kn and 100 kn) EURAMET Project No 518. Final Report. 14 July Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom

Final Report on COOMET Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf (COOMET.EM-K4)

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

LINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg. Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico,

CCT Working Group for Humidity

Interamerican Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization (RMO) Capacitance Comparison, Final Report

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the LNE-LNHB, France and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

The BIPM key comparison database (KCDB): linkage of key comparison results

Force Key Comparison CCM.F-K1.a and CCM.F-K1.b 5 kn and 10 kn. Aimo Pusa MIKES Finland

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

APMP.M.P-K9 (Absolute pressure up to 110 kpa) 21 May, 2013 In-Mook CHOI*, Sam-Yong WOO

Force Key Comparison CCM.F-K4.a and CCM.F-K4.b for 4 MN and 2 MN Forces. Final Report. T.W. Bartel NIST Mass and Force Group U.S.A.

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS LEADING TO A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE KELVIN

Final Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K2)

Overview. TC Thermometry Graham Machin. Introduction to TC-T Annual meeting Selected comparisons TC-T training for future thermal metrologists

by S. Solve +, R. Chayramy +, M. Stock +, D. Vlad*

Date h UTC APR 29 MAY 4 MAY 9 MAY 14 MAY 19 MAY 24 MAY 29 Uncertainty/ns Notes MJD u A

Final Report on the APMP Air Speed Key Comparison (APMP.M.FF-K3)

APMP TCTF Working Group on the Mutual Recognition Agreement

Force Key Comparison APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b (50 kn and 100 kn) Final Report 6 August Pilot: KRISS, Republic of Korea Yon-Kyu Park

EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4

The ITS-90 after definition of neon isotopic reference composition: extent of the isotopic effect tested on previous inter-comparison results

by A.Tonina*, R.Iuzzolino*, M.Bierzychudek* and M.Real* S. Solve + R. Chayramy + and M. Stock +

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the NIM, China and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

A Collaboration Between Ten National Measurement Institutes To Measure The Mass Of Two One Kilogram Mass Standards

NPL REPORT TQE4. EUROMET Projects 473 and 612: Comparison of the measurement of current transformers (CTs) EUROMET.EM-S11 Final report

CCQM-P28: An international comparison of ground-level ozone reference standards

Euromet project 691 Calibration Inter-comparison of a 5 litre Volume Standard

SIM.EM-K2, 1 GΩ SIM.EM-S6, 1 MΩ. RMO COMPARISON FINAL REPORT R. E. Elmquist, D. G. Jarrett, and N. F. Zhang

Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum

REEVALUATION OF THE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY OF UTC TIME TRANSFER

CCT-K5: Comparison of local realizations of the ITS-90 between the silver point and 1700 C using vacuum tungsten strip lamps as transfer standards

CCQM-K27.2 Second Subsequent Study: Determination of Ethanol in Aqueous Media Final Report

Final Report. 4 September 2006

APMP-K3: KEY COMPARISON OF REALIZATIONS OF THE ITS-90 OVER THE RANGE o C TO o C Final Report Prepared by M. K. Nguyen and M. J.

Final Report on Key Comparison EUROMET.M.P-K3.a in the Gauge Pressure Range 50 kpa to 1000 kpa. May 2005

Project 887 Force Uncertainty Guide. Andy Knott, NPL EUROMET TC-M Lensbury, Teddington, United Kingdom 1 March 2007

Improving the accuracy of NO 2 and Ozone monitoring

Comparison of national air kerma standards for ISO 4037 narrow spectrum series in the range 30 kv to 300 kv

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Sèvres, France. *KEBS, Kenya Bureau of Standards P.O. Box , Nairobi, Kenya

The Journey from Ω Through 19 Orders of Magnitude

C. Michotte*, G. Ratel* and S. Courte*, T. Dziel #, A. Listkowska #, I. Csete, K. Rózsa, L. Szücs, A. Zsinka, C. Fréchou**, C. Bobin**, S.

EURAMET Project no Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank

Comparisons of the standards for air kerma of the GUM and the BIPM for 60 Co and 137 Cs gamma radiation

Table 4. Equipment and source of UTC(k) of the laboratories contributing to TAI in Lab k Equipment Source of UTC(k) (1) TA(k) UTCr SF

FINAL REPORT ON KEY COMPARISON APMP.AUV.A-K3

INTERCOMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS FROM INTIBS AND INRIM 1. INTRODUCTION

Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu

Intercomparison results for the case of separate treatment of groups 1 and 2 (without link)

APMP.T-S6 APMP SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETER. Final Report. Prepared by

ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME

Highlights in the work of the BIPM during 2017

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the CMI, Czech Republic and the BIPM in mammography x-rays

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES

NMIJ-BIPM workshop, May 16, 2005

Final Report on Key Comparison APMP.M.P-K13 in Hydraulic Gauge Pressure from 50 MPa to 500 MPa

Purpose of the comparison. Time schedule

EMRP JRP SIB-05. NewKILO. Developing a practical means of disseminating the redefined kilogram (June 2012 May 2015) Stuart Davidson, NPL, UK

Final Report on APMP.T-K7

APMP.T-K3.4: Key comparison of realizations of the ITS-90 over the range C to C

EUROMET Comparison L-K1: Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Interferometry. EUROMET L - K1 Calibration of gauge blocks by interferometry.

Final Report on Key Comparison APMP.M.P-K7 in Hydraulic Gauge Pressure from 10 MPa to 100 MPa

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

Final Report. CCEM Comparison of 10 pf Capacitance Standards. Anne-Marie Jeffery Electricity Division NIST May 2000 Revised March 2002

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Euromet.M.D.K1 (Euromet Project n 339) Intercomparison of volume standards by hydrostatic weighing

Jayalath Ekanayake Jonas Tappolet Harald Gall Abraham Bernstein. Time variance and defect prediction in software projects: additional figures

Final Report August 2010

Final report to the CCT on key comparison CCT-K6 Comparison of local realisations of dew-point temperature scales in the range -50 C to +20 C

Electricity and Magnetism Supplementary Guide to the JCRB Instructions for Appendix C of MRA

Report on the Key Comparison. CCPR-K2.a Spectral Responsivity in the Range of 900 nm to 1600 nm. Final Report November 30, 2009

Report on APMP Supplementary Comparison High precision roundness measurement APMP.L-S4. Final report

Calibration of line scales Final Report

Final Report EUROMET.M.FF-K4 Euromet Key Comparison for Volume Intercomparison of 100 ml Gay- Lussac Pycnometer

FINAL REPORT Bilateral Comparison of DC Magnetic Flux Density Between NML-SIRIM and KRISS

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

G. Ratel*, C. Michotte*, Y. Hino** *BIPM and **NMIJ, Japan

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

High pressure comparisons between seven European National Laboratories

Calibration of line scales Final Report

Long-term Water Quality Monitoring in Estero Bay

Algae and Dissolved Oxygen Dynamics of Landa Lake and the Upper Spring Run

Record date Payment date PID element Non-PID element. 08 Sep Oct p p. 01 Dec Jan p 9.85p

National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Report on CCM Pilot Study CCM.R-kg-P1. Comparison of future realizations of the kilogram. Final Report

The metrology of radioactivity. C. Michotte, BIPM

Transcription:

BIPM.EM-K11.b, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6, SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b, COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 and APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.b x i : result of measurement carried out by laboratory i expressed as the difference from the BIPM value u i : combined standard uncertainty of x i x i u i Date of continued Lab i / µv / µv measurement x i u i Date of Lab i NML(IE) 0.73 2.50 Mar 1997 / µv / µv measurement SPRING Singapore 0.16 0.11 Apr 1998 NML(IE) -0.55 1.40 Mar 2007 NML(IE) -2.5 2.5 Apr 1998 VNIIM -0.22 0.34 Sep 2007 SMU -0.31 0.32 Aug 1998 KRISS -0.03 0.10 Feb 2008 NIST 0.26 0.14 Nov 1998 NML(IE) -0.56 1.32 May 2008 METAS -0.14 0.14 Apr 1999 NML(IE) -0.19 1.14 May 2009 NML(IE) 0.3 2.3 Jun 1999 INTI -0.24 0.38 Sep 2009 NML(IE) -1.7 2.4 Apr 2000 NSAI NML* -1.03 1.13 Apr 2010 CMI 0.77 0.73 Apr 2000 NSAI NML* 0.16 1.40 Apr 2011 NML(IE) -0.3 2.3 Mar 2001 NSAI NML* 0.83 1.35 Mar 2012 BEV -0.04 0.10 Apr 2001 NSAI NML* -0.63 1.31 Feb 2013 SMU -0.04 0.86 Apr 2001 NSAI NML* -0.64 1.35 Mar 2014 GUM -0.06 0.13 May 2001 NSAI NML* -0.82 1.35 Fev 2015 NML(IE) 0.37 1.11 Mar 2002 NSAI NML* 0.22 1.35 Fev 2016 NML(IE) -0.91 1.03 Mar 2003 INM(RO) -0.43 0.34 Aug 2013 NMISA -0.01 0.33 Nov 2003 DMDM 0.39 0.12 Feb 2014 NMIA 0.13 0.14 Nov 2003 NIS 0.22 0.14 Sep 2014 NML(IE) -1.86 1.01 Apr 2004 NIMT -0.03 0.11 Nov 2014 NML(IE) 0.30 1.36 Apr 2005 SMD 0.09 0.49 Nov 2014 NML(IE) 0.87 1.40 May 2006 JV 0.63 0.28 Jan 2015 NCM -0.99 4.00 May 2006 DEFNAT 0.38 0.10 Feb 2016 Laboratories having an independant realization of the volt by means of a Josephson Array Voltage Standard * NSAI NML stands for NSAI National Metrology Laboratory from Ireland and is used for the measurement results obtained starting 2010. The acronym NML(IE) is kept for the measurement laboratory results obtained before 2010. The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 1/10

Key comparison EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Pilot laboratory: NMi-VSL x i -EUR : U' i -EUR : result of a participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 for its voltage measurements on a group of electronic DC voltage standards. This results (designated as D G in the EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Final Report) is calculated as the weighted mean of the voltage differences between the participant's measured values and interpolated values based on the measurements of the Pilot laboratory expanded uncertainty (k = 2) in a participant's measurement result for the group of travelling standards (designated as U TG in the EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Final Report) Lab i x i -EUR U' i -EUR Date of / µv / µv measurement LNE 0.497 0.529 2 Dec 1998 NPL -0.217 0.416 16 Jan 1999 NML(IE) -0.042 4.114 30 Jan 1999 UME 0.097 0.409 06 Mar 1999 DFM 0.134 0.424 24 Apr 1999 SP 0.076 0.428 08 May 1999 MIKES 0.034 0.450 09 Jun 1999 JV -0.154 0.438 27 Jun 1999 SMD -0.055 3.716 05 Sep 1999 CMI 0.867 1.509 23 Oct 1999 BEV -0.048 0.551 04 Nov 1999 SMU -0.030 0.411 24 Nov 1999 NMi-VSL -0.019 0.425 19 Dec 1999 CEM 0.449 0.420 15 Jan 2000 INETI -2.549 6.515 27 Jan 2000 METAS 0.140 0.415 12 Mar 2000 PTB 0.291 0.410 14 Apr 2000 Laboratories having an independant realization of the volt BIPM 0.125 0.419 30 Apr 2000 by means of a Josephson Array Voltage Standard EIM -0.411 0.490 07 Oct 2000 MIRS/SIQ 0.439 6.100 22 Oct 2000 OMH -0.513 6.484 05 Nov 2000 The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 2/10

Key comparison APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1 Pilot laboratory: NMIA This is a bilateral key comparison between SCL and NMIA. Mean date of the period of measurements: 23 June 2002 x SCL-NMIA : result of measurement carried out by SCL expressed as the difference from the NMIA value x SCL-NMIA = -0.46 µv U SCL-NMIA : expanded uncertainty of x SCL-NMIA U SCL-NMIA = 0.54 µv using a coverage factor close to 2. Key comparison EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5 Pilot laboratory: DFM This is a bilateral key comparison between VMT/PFI and DFM. Mean date of the period of measurements: 11 June 2005 x VMT/PFI-DFM : result of measurement carried out by VMT/PFI expressed as the difference from the DFM value x VMT/PFI-DFM = -0.10 µv U VMT/PFI-DFM : expanded uncertainty of x VMT/PFI-DFM U VMT/PFI-DFM = 0.30 µv using a coverage factor equal to 2 Key comparison EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6 Pilot laboratory: BEV This is a trilateral key comparison between BEV, INM(RO) and UME. Mean measurement date at INM(RO): 30 June 2005 The difference between the INM(RO) measurement and a calculated expected value at the mean measurement date at INM(RO), together with its uncertainty, is given on page 6 of the EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6 Final Report. The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 3/10

Key comparison SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b Pilot laboratory: NIST This is a bilateral key comparison between NIST and CENAM Period of measurements: 21 to 23 March 2006 x CENAM-NIST : result of measurement carried out by CENAM and NIST expressed as the difference from the NIST value x CENAM-NIST = -34.7 nv U CENAM-NIST : expanded uncertainty of x CENAM-NIST U CENAM-NIST = 43.2 nv using a coverage factor equal to 2 Key comparison COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Pilot laboratory: VNIIM This is a bilateral key comparison between BelGIM and VNIIM. Mean date of the period of measurements: 27 July 2011 x BelGIM-VNIIM : mean of the results of measurement carried out by BelGIM expressed as the difference from the VNIIM value x BelGIM-VNIIM = -0.06 µv u BelGIM-VNIIM : combined standard uncertainty of x i BelGIM-VNIM u BelGIM-VNIIM = 0.29 µv Key comparison APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 Pilot laboratory: KRISS This is a bilateral key comparison between VMI-STAMEQ and KRISS. Date of measurement: July 2012. x VMI-STAMEQ - KRISS : result of measurement carried out by VMI-STAMEQ x VMI-STAMEQ - KRISS = 0.935 µv expressed as the difference from the KRISS value u VMI-STAMEQ - KRISS : combined standard uncertainty of x VMI-STAMEQ - KRISS u VMI-STAMEQ - KRISS = 0.757 µv The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 4/10

Key comparison APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Pilot laboratory: KRISS This is a key comparison with 10 participants. Date of measurement: frtom 2009 to 2011 The measurement results are listed in Section 7 (p. 26) of the the APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Final Report. The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 5/10

BIPM.EM-K11.b, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6, SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b, COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 and APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.b The key comparison reference value is the BIPM value, x R. Its standard uncertainty, u R, is evaluated to be 0.1 µv and is included in the u i 's values. The degree of equivalence of laboratory i with respect to the reference value x R is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in µv: D i = x i and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U i = 2u i. When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in µv: D ij = (D i - D j ) = (x i - x j ) and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2) expressed as U ij = 2[u i 2 + u j 2 ] 1/2. Key comparison EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 The EUROMET reference value x R-EUR is obtained from the weighted mean of the results of those fifteen participants which have an independent realization of the volt by means of a Josephson Array Voltage Standard. x R-EUR = 0.067 µv with an expanded uncertainty (k = 2) U R-EUR = 0.113 µv. The EUROMET degree of equivalence of each laboratory i participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 with respect to the reference value x R-EUR is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in µv: D i -EUR = (x i -EUR - x R-EUR ) and its expanded uncertainty U i -EUR = (U' i -EUR 2 - U R-EUR 2 ) 1/2 for independent laboratories, and U i -EUR = (U' i -EUR 2 + U R-EUR 2 ) 1/2 for laboratories which do not have an independent realisation of the volt. When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in µv: D ij -EUR = (D i -EUR - D j -EUR ) and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U ij -EUR = (U' i -EUR 2 + U' j -EUR 2 ) 1/2. Linking EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 to BIPM.EM-K11.b The link is computed using the results of the common participants which have an independent realization of the volt by means of a Josephson Array Voltage Standard: the BIPM, BEV, SMU and METAS. For each of these four laboratories, an estimate of (x R-EUR - x R ) is obtained as (D i - D i -EUR ). Its uncertainty is the root sum square of U i and U i -EUR. The weighted mean of these four estimates leads to: (x R-EUR - x R ) = -0.075 µv and U LINK = 0.283 µv. The degree of equivalence of each laboratory i participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 with respect to the reference value x R is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in µv: D i = (x i -EUR - x R ) = (x i -EUR - x R-EUR ) + (x R-EUR - x R ) and its expanded uncertainty U i = (U i -EUR 2 + U LINK 2 ) 1/2. When required, the degree of equivalence between one laboratory participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 and one laboratory participant in BIPM.EM-K11.b is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in µv: D ij = (D i - D j ) and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U ij = (U i 2 + U j 2 ) 1/2. The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 6/10

Linking APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1 to BIPM.EM-K11.b The degree of equivalence of SCL with respect to the reference value x R is given by a pair of terms: D SCL = x SCL-NMIA + D NMIA and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U SCL = (U 2 SCL-NMIA + U 2 NMIA ) 1/2, both expressed in µv: D SCL = -0.33 µv and U SCL = 0.60 µv. Linking EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5 to BIPM.EM-K11.b The degree of equivalence of VMT/PFI with respect to the reference value x R is given by a pair of terms: D VMT/PFI = x VMT/PFI-DFM + D DFM and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U VMT/PFI = (U 2 VMT/PFI-DFM + U 2 DFM ) 1/2, both expressed in µv: D VMT/PFI = -0.11 µv and U VMT/PFI = 0.58 µv. Linking EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6 to BIPM.EM-K11.b The linkage is computed as explained on pages 8 and 9 of the EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6 Final Report, using the results of BEV which participated in both comparisons, and the results of UME which participated in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6 and EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11. Linking SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b to BIPM.EM-K11.b The degree of equivalence of CENAM with respect to the reference value x R is given by a pair of terms: D CENAM = x CENAM-NIST + D NIST and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U CENAM = (U CENAM-NIST 2 + U NIST 2 ) 1/2, both expressed in µv: D CENAM = 0.23 µv and U CENAM = 0.28 µv. Linking key comparison COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11 to key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.b The degree of equivalence of BelGIM participant in COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11 relative to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: D BelGIM = x BelGIM-VNIIM + D VNIIM and its expanded uncertainty at a 95% level of confidence, U BelGIM, both expressed in µv. The computation of U BelGIM is explained in page 8 of the COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Final Report. Linking key comparison APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 to key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.b The degree of equivalence of VMI-STAMEQ relative to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms D VMI-STAMEQ, and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U VMI-STAMEQ both expressed in µv. The computation of D VMI-STAMEQ and U VMI-STAMEQ is explained in section 7.2 of the APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 Final Report. Linking key comparison APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 to key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.b The linking of APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 to the BIPM.EM-K11.a is made via the BIPM, KRISS and NMIA who participated in both comparisons. The lining procedure is described in Section 8 (p. 33) of the APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Final Report. The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 7/10

BIPM.EM-K11.b, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6, SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b, COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 and APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference Degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value Lab i D i U i Lab i D i U i / µv / µv BIPM.EM-K11.b BIPM 0.00 0.20 EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 LNE 0.35 0.59 SPRING Singapore 0.16 0.22 NPL -0.36 0.49 NIST 0.26 0.28 NML(IE) -0.18 4.13 METAS -0.14 0.28 UME -0.05 0.48 CMI 0.77 1.46 DFM -0.01 0.50 BEV -0.04 0.20 SP -0.07 0.50 SMU -0.04 1.72 MIKES -0.11 0.52 GUM -0.06 0.26 JV -0.30 0.51 NMISA -0.01 0.66 SMD -0.20 3.73 NMIA 0.13 0.28 CMI 0.73 1.54 NSAI NML* 0.22 2.70 BEV -0.19 0.61 NCM -0.99 8.00 SMU -0.17 0.49 VNIIM -0.22 0.68 NMi-VSL -0.16 0.50 KRISS -0.03 0.20 CEM 0.31 0.49 INTI -0.24 0.76 INETI -2.69 6.52 INM(RO) -0.43 0.68 METAS 0.00 0.49 DMDM 0.39 0.24 PTB 0.15 0.49 NIS 0.22 0.28 BIPM -0.02 0.49 NIMT -0.03 0.22 EIM -0.55 0.56 SMD 0.09 0.98 MIRS/SIQ 0.30 6.11 JV 0.63 0.56 OMH -0.65 6.49 DEFNAT 0.38 0.20 most recent value retained *NSAI NML stands for NSAI National Metrology Laboratory from Ireland and is used for the measurement results obtained starting 2010. The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 8/10

BIPM.EM-K11.b, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6, SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b, COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 and APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value Degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value Lab i D i U i / µv APMP.EM-K11.1 SCL -0.33 0.60 EUROMET.EM-K11.5 VMT/PFI -0.11 0.58 EUROMET.EM-K11.6 INM(RO) 3.34 5.06 SIM.EM-K11.b CENAM 0.23 0.28 COOMET.EM-K11 BelGIM -0.28 0.88 APMP.EM-K11.4 VMI-STAMEQ 1.0 1.5 APMP.EM-K11.3 NMIA -0.27 0.62 NMC ASTAR* -0.23 0.63 KRISS -0.04 0.62 NML SIRIM (a) -0.02 0.63 CMS ITRI -0.06 0.66 NMIJ 0.24 0.62 NIMT 0.40 0.63 BIPM 0.27 0.63 SCL 0.06 0.62 KazInMetr -0.37 0.65 (a) Now NMIM The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 9/10

BIPM SPRING NIST METAS CMI BEV SMU GUM NMISA NMIA NSAI NML NCM VNIIM KRISS INTI INM(RO) DMDM NIS NIMT SMD JV DEFNAT LNE NPL NML(IE) UME DFM SP MIKES JV SMD CMI BEV SMU NMi-VSL CEM INETI METAS PTB BIPM EIM MIRS/SIQ OMH SCL VMT/PFI INM(RO) CENAM BelGIM VMI-STAMEQ NMIA NMC ASTAR* KRISS NML SIRIM (a) CMS ITRI NMIJ NIMT BIPM SCL KazInMetr D i / µv 5 BIPM.EM-K11.b; EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11, -K11.5, -K11.6; APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1; SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b; COOMET.EM.BIPM- K11; APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4; APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 10 V Zener diode Degrees of equivalence [ D i and its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), U i ] U NCM = 8.00 µv U MIRS = 6.11 µv 4 3 U OMH = 6.49 µv 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 Red diamonds: participants in BIPM.EM-K11.b Blue circles: participants in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Black square: participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6 Green triangle: participant in APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1 Orange square: participant in EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5 Pink circle: participant in SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b White square: participant in COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11 Blue square: participant in APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 Violet diamonds: participants in APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 The BIPM key comparison database, Aug 2017 10/10