Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance for Aviation Forecasting

Similar documents
Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback

2.7 A PROTOTYPE VERIFICATION SYSTEM FOR EXAMINING NDFD FORECASTS

AN OVERVIEW OF THE REDEVELOPED LOCALIZED AVIATION MOS PROGRAM (LAMP) FOR SHORT-RANGE FORECASTING

Experimental MOS Precipitation Type Guidance from the ECMWF Model

FAA-NWS Aviation Weather Weather Policy and Product Transition Panel. Friends and Partners in Aviation Weather October 22, 2014 NOAA NOAA

Allison Monarski, University of Maryland Masters Scholarly Paper, December 6, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

540 THE UTILIZATION OF CURRENT FORECAST PRODUCTS IN A PROBABILISTIC AIRPORT CAPACITY MODEL

BUILDING A GRIDDED CLIMATOLOGICAL DATASET FOR USE IN THE STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION MODELS

The future role of statistical post-processing in weather forecasting. Klaus Knüpffer Philip Lorenz

7.2 GRIDDED CLOUD LAYER GUIDANCE TO SUPPORT THE TAF

P3.1 Development of MOS Thunderstorm and Severe Thunderstorm Forecast Equations with Multiple Data Sources

RTMA Flowchart (CONUS)

NextGen Update. Cecilia Miner May, 2017

5.4 USING PROBABILISTIC FORECAST GUIDANCE AND AN UPDATE TECHNIQUE TO GENERATE TERMINAL AERODROME FORECASTS

Add NOAA nowcoast Layers to Maps

Transitioning NCAR s Aviation Algorithms into NCEP s Operations

Mark Miller NOAA NextGen Weather Program Manager July 21, 2010

A Performance Assessment of the National Ceiling and Visibility Analysis Product

P1.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF NUMERICAL MODEL OUTPUT USED FOR FORECASTING DURING JOINT URBAN 2003

4.3. David E. Rudack*, Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and Technology National Weather Service, NOAA 1.

STUDY UNIT SEVENTEEN GRAPHICAL AIRMAN S METEOROLOGICAL ADVISORY (G-AIRMET)

ASSIMILATION OF METAR CLOUD AND VISIBILITY OBSERVATIONS IN THE RUC

2.4 EXPERIMENTAL UPGRADED LAMP CONVECTION AND TOTAL LIGHTNING PROBABILITY AND POTENTIAL GUIDANCE FOR CONUS

Weather Evaluation Team (WET)

Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society and American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction 31 May 2012

Bruce L. Rose The Weather Channel Atlanta, GA. and. Peter P. Neilley 1 Weather Services International, Inc. Andover, MA 01810

Multi Radar Multi Sensor NextGen Weather Program. Presentation materials sourced from: Ken Howard HydroMet Research Group NSSL Warning R&D Division

USING GRIDDED MOS TECHNIQUES TO DERIVE SNOWFALL CLIMATOLOGIES

Introduction to NCEP's time lagged North American Rapid Refresh Ensemble Forecast System (NARRE-TL)

David Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA. Measuring Forecast Continuity

An Investigation of Reforecasting Applications for NGGPS Aviation Weather Prediction: An Initial Study of Ceiling and Visibility Prediction

Optimal combination of NWP Model Forecasts for AutoWARN

MxVision WeatherSentry Web Services Content Guide

1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE NWS PROBABILISTIC EXTRA-TROPICAL STORM SURGE MODEL AND POST PROCESSING METHODOLOGY

Measuring In-cloud Turbulence: The NEXRAD Turbulence Detection Algorithm

NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) Yuejian Zhu Ensemble Team Leader Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA February

Evaluation of Ensemble Icing Probability Forecasts in NCEP s SREF, VSREF and NARRE-TL Systems

Extended-range Fire Weather Products within the Canadian Wildland Fire Information System

Probabilistic Forecast Verification. Yuejian Zhu EMC/NCEP/NOAA

NWS Operational Marine and Ocean Forecasting. Overview. Ming Ji. Ocean Prediction Center National Weather Service/NCEP. CIOSS/CoRP

Emerging Aviation Weather Research at MIT Lincoln Laboratory*

The Impact of Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size on Probabilistic Forecasts of Precipitation by the ECMWF EPS

A Realtime Forecasting System for the Chesapeake Bay Tributaries: Interoperability and Metadata for Automation

Aviation Weather Observations vs. LAMP Forecasts with the Onset of Precipitation

A New Numerical Weather Prediction Approach to the NDFD's Sky Cover Grid

1. INTRODUCTION 3. VERIFYING ANALYSES

July 13, 2017 Session #1 In Lieu of the Surface Observation Including EWINS Authority, RTMA, Web Cams, and Remote Observation Systems

CMO Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) Verification Programme (CMOTafV)

10.5 PROBABLISTIC LIGHTNING FORECASTS AND FUEL DRYNESS LEVEL FORECASTS IN THE GRAPHICAL FOREAST EDITOR: EXPANDED DOMAIN AND DISTRIBUTION FOR 2009

Calculates CAT and MWT diagnostics. Paired down choice of diagnostics (reduce diagnostic redundancy) Statically weighted for all forecast hours

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

J19.3 EXPERIMENTAL LAMP 2-H CONVECTION GUIDANCE FORECASTS ON A 20-KM GRID

QA/QC of Aleutian Buoy and Airport Observation Data

FAA Weather Research Plans

CASE STUDY OF THE NOVEMBER WINDSTORM IN SOUTH CENTRAL COLORADO

Strategic Radar Enhancement Project (SREP) Forecast Demonstration Project (FDP) The future is here and now

FPAW October Pat Murphy & David Bright NWS Aviation Weather Center

Blend of UKMET and GFS 3hr increments F06 to F degree downloadable grid available on WIFS

Automated Thunderstorm Alert Service (ATSAS) User Guide

Development of Ensemble Based Probabilistic Guidance

NOAA Research and Development Supporting NextGen. Darien Davis NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research June 22, 2009

Real-time PBL analysis system using profilers observations from The New York State Mesonet

NAM-WRF Verification of Subtropical Jet and Turbulence

Consolidated Storm Prediction for Aviation (CoSPA) Overview

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008

Return periods of prolonged fog events in Canada

Analysis of an Observing System Experiment for the Joint Polar Satellite System

Implementing Relevant Performance Measures for Traffic Flow Management

Applying Statistical Tool CLIPER in Forecasting Visibility at Airports

2.4 Selecting METARs to Verify Ceiling and Visibility Forecasts

MADIS Airlines for America Briefing

Verification of Surface Temperature Forecasts from the National Digital Forecast Database over the Western United States

1. Collect All Weather Data

The Role of Meteorological Forecast Verification in Aviation. Günter Mahringer, November 2012

Amy Harless. Jason Levit, David Bright, Clinton Wallace, Bob Maxson. Aviation Weather Center Kansas City, MO

WEATHER FORECASTING Acquisition of Weather Information WFO Regions Weather Forecasting Tools Weather Forecasting Tools Weather Forecasting Methods

Utilising Radar and Satellite Based Nowcasting Tools for Aviation Purposes in South Africa. Erik Becker

WMO AMDAR Programme Overview

Aeronautical Information Service

CONDUIT Update Cooperative Opportunity for NCEP Data using IDD Technology Rebecca Cosgrove NCEP/NCO/Production Management Branch September 15, 2014

Hyperlocal Marine Weather: What s Happening?

PREDICTION OF OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY WITH THE MMD-JMA OIL SPILL MODEL

KCCI SchoolNet8 and the Iowa Mesonet

Analysis of 3, 6, 12, and 24 Hour Precipitation Frequencies Over the Southern United States

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

Bugs in JRA-55 snow depth analysis

6.3 A REAL-TIME AUTOMATED CEILING AND VISIBILITY ANALYSIS SYSTEM

2B.3 ASSESSING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY IN THE NATIONAL DIGITAL FORECAST DATABASE

Robert Shedd Northeast River Forecast Center National Weather Service Taunton, Massachusetts, USA

New applications using real-time observations and ECMWF model data

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

AMDAR Forecast Applications. Richard Mamrosh NWS Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA

Decoding Observations and Terminal Aerodrome Forecasts. Weather Observer/Forecaster O-LD 18 th Weather Squadron Ft Polk, LA

The enduring fog and low cloud episode of 5-10 December 2015: Big Bubble Fog Trouble

WEATHER SOURCES FSS WXBRIEF

An overview of Wet Season Forecasting in the Northern Territory

Recent Data Assimilation Activities at Environment Canada

Observations needed for verification of additional forecast products

The MSC Beaufort Wind and Wave Reanalysis

Richard L. Bankert* and Michael Hadjimichael Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA

Transcription:

Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance for Aviation Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli and Bob Glahn National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory August 2, 2011 15th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology Los Angeles, CA 1

LAMP: LAMP/Gridded LAMP (GLMP) Guidance of sensible weather at stations Guidance of thunderstorms ( 1 CTG lightning strike) on grid GLMP: Gridded observations and Gridded LAMP forecasts of: Status: Temperature Dewpoint Ceiling Height (100 s of ft) Visibility (miles) Other elements later GLMP running experimentally at NCEP as of 9/28/2010, will be operational 9/27/2011 Data available in Experimental NDGD Available in MDL s test Web Coverage Service Exp. GLMP grids can be brought into AWIPS via the LDM data feed Can be used in the creation of NWS digital aviation products Images available on LAMP web page Will be available via the NextGen 4-D Data Cube 2

Gridded LAMP Details Gridded LAMP analyses of observations for checkout and verification Temperature and Dewpoint: Observations from METAR, Mesonet, synoptic stations, C-MAN, tide gauges, and moored buoys (Roughly 10,000 12,000 observations per hour) Error estimates of temperature and dewpoint available in gridded format Ceiling Height and Visibility: Observations from METAR Gridded Analysis of LAMP forecasts Temperature and dewpoint: Continuous values are analyzed < 1500 LAMP stations (input points) in CONUS, so SREF forecasts are used to augment LAMP forecasts Ceiling Height and Visibility: Categorical values are converted to continuous values No augmentation Technique: MDL Gridding Technique used in Gridded MOS, with modifications 3

Temperature Gridded LAMP: 0-25 hours Dewpoint Ceiling Height Visibility 4

Temperature and Dewpoint Gridded Verification Compared GLMP vs. GMOS 0600 UTC GLMP vs 0000 UTC GMOS 1800 UTC GLMP vs 1200 UTC GMOS (in paper) Data Sample: November-December 2010 Area: CONUS, 2.5-km grid Variables: Temperature (Dewpoint results shown in paper) Verification using two methods: GLMP 0-hr gridded observations RTMA Computed: MAE over all gridpoints Fractional Improvement in MAE of GLMP over GMOS at each gridpoint Purpose: to determine if GLMP improves on GMOS as LAMP improves on MOS 5

6

7

GLMP Temperature Verified w/ 0-hr GLMP GLMP Temperature Verified w/ RTMA 8

Ceiling Height and Visibility Station Verification No Gridded ceiling/visibility verifying observations other than from Gridded LAMP verification done at stations only Two cycle times: 0600 (1800 UTC in paper) Verified for Nov-Dec, 2010 Verifying at stations At LAMP 300 stations Purpose: to see if GLMP interpolated to the stations is as good as actual LAMP at the stations. At 115 non-lamp stations 115 stations where LAMP station forecasts were not available, but obs were available Mimics with-held data testing 9

Future Improvements Persistence Effect for temperature and dewpoint: Uses spatial detail seen in 0-hr GLMP observations (10,000-12,000 input points) as well as additional MOS input points to provide more spatial detail in GLMP forecast analyses Redeveloped ceiling height Extension to 30 hrs Adding Stations 119 new MOS stns (116 in CONUS) 306 Marine stns 274 Canadian stns 4 new TAF stns 15 military stns (13 in CONUS) 12

Summary GLMP running experimentally at NCEP for temperature, dewpoint, ceiling height, and visibility; GLMP useful in the creation of digital aviation products GLMP for temperature and dewpoint : Overall, GLMP shows improvement over GMOS, as expected, independent of verifying data (GLMP gridded obs or RTMA) By gridpoint, GMOS temperature is better than GLMP temperature in Western Region for some gridpoints, some projections Potential solution developed and soon to be tested. Would be implemented in 2012. GLMP for ceiling height and visibility: Overall, GLMP interpolated to LAMP stations shows no degradation compared to LAMP guidance at stations, as expected GLMP interpolated to non-lamp stations potentially worse than GLMP interpolated to LAMP stations, as expected Improvements were seen in Canada after adding Canadian stations (to be implemented in future) LAMP Website: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/mdl/gfslamp/gfslamp.shtml Contact: Judy.Ghirardelli@noaa.gov 15

Temperature Gridded LAMP Observations Dewpoint Ceiling Height Visibility 16