Reconnaissance of Coal-Slurry Deposits in Indiana. IGS Web Report

Similar documents
asters, Colin G. Treworgy, an

Fate of historic metal releases from the Coeur d Alene mining district Northern Idaho

Electronic Submission Format Guide Anthracite Preparation Plant Permit Application

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

USING ESRI s ARCSCENE TO VISUALIZE THE GEOSPATIAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A COAL REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA, AMD SEEPS, AND UNDERGROUND MINING OPERATIONS 1

Electronic Submission Format Guide Bituminous Coal Surface Mine Permit Application (5600-PM-BMP0311)

Coal Loss and Dilution Considerations for Western Canadian Foothills Open Pit Coal Projects

April 9, Phosphate Mining and Reclamation Overview

City of Six Project. Gold Mining Property in Downieville, CA. 60 Acres of Claims. Estimated Resource of over 8,800 ounces of Gold

Coal Basin History; Geology, Mining, Reclamation. You have to know the past to understand the future - Carl Sagan

Infilled Kettle Hole, Easton, Aroostook County, Maine

Compiling historic YCGC data for lower Hunker Creek and reconstructing gold distribution. Sydney van Loon Yukon Geological Survey

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Curriculum Support Maps for the Study of Indiana Coal

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

Electronic Submission Format Guide Large Noncoal (Industrial Minerals) Mine Permit Application (5600-PM-BMP0315)

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

Lecture 15: Subsidence

*COAL RECOVERY FROM MINE WASTES OF THE HISTORIC LONGWALL MINING DISTRICT OF NORTH-CENTRAL ILLINOIS

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

MESOZOIC BASINS. North Carolina Geological Survey

Chapter Three: Coalbed Gas in the Cherokee Basin

Legislative Subcommittee to Study Water. March 9, 2016

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Prairie View A&M University Cemetery. By Rene DeLaFuente, Tammy Oldani, Stacey Rogers

*Anne Carter Witt Matt Heller

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

LAKE FOREST MAPPING STUDY

Leslie F. Ruppert U.S. Geological Survey, National Center

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

SOUTHWEST & NORTHWEST EXPLORATION PROJECTS BINGHAM CANYON MINING DISTRICT

Subsurface Geology of the Kennebec River

Oklahoma Geological Survey Oklahoma Coal Database ANALYTICAL HEADER TABLE DOCUMENTATION

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

Introduction 3. Basic Mine Fill Materials 13

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

CCR Surface Impoundment Location Restrictions Demonstration. MidAmerican Energy Company, Louisa Generating Station

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

Chemical Variation of Feed Coal and Coal Combustion Products from an Indiana Power Plant Utilizing Low Sulfur Powder River Basin Coal

Sedimentation Survey of Lake Paradise and Lake Mattoon, Mattoon, Illinois

ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT EAST AND WEST RECYCLE PONDS DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA , FAULT AREAS.

WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. Mining, Geology and Energy Consultants

Historical Sedimentation at the Mouths of Five Deltas on Peoria Lake

THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND ENERGY INDUSTRIES MINERALS DIVISION MINE DESIGN TEMPLATE OPERATOR NAME: OPERATOR ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FACSIMILE:

Predicting Settlement and Stability of Wet Coal Ash Impoundments using Dilatometer Tests

ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT RECYCLE POND A AND RECYCLE POND B DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA 257.

Aquitard Characterization The Legend of Indiana s Magic Clay Layer. Juliet Port, LPG #2214 July 2014

SECTION2 Drainage Control for Surface Mines

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Geotechnical Aspects of the Ohio River Bridges Project

DIRECTORY OF COAL MINES IN ILLINOIS 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLE SERIES MT. PULASKI QUADRANGLE LOGAN COUNTY. G. K. Coats M. H. Bargh C. G.

Ground Improvement by Dynamic Compaction at a Tailings Disposal Facility

Density of Air & Water Part 2

Geosynthetics Applications and Performance Reviews Select Case Histories

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

List of Sites in District 2C Source Number

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

=%REPORT RECONNAISSANCE OF CHISHOLM LAKE PROSPECT. October 25, 1977

Shoreline Evolution: Prince William County, Virginia Potomac River, Occoquan Bay, and Occoquan River Shorelines

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Location Restrictions Certification Report NIPSCO Michigan City Generating Station Boiler Slag Pond

Shoreline Evolution: City of Hampton, Virginia Chesapeake Bay, Back River, and Hampton River Shorelines

Geophysical Methods for Screening and Investigating Utility Waste Landfill Sites in Karst Terrain

USE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS FOR FILL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUANTITY ESTIMATION AT BROWNFIELD SITES A CASE HISTORY. Abstract

MEMORANDUM. wa.tsr..-z.n~.e.s-t.i~at.i.o.ns... Branch... Mr. Webster contends that prior to excavation of the gravel

SL GEOLOGY AND MINING. Coal bearing strata in the project area are referable primarily to the Allegheny Group of

Shoreline Evolution: Lancaster County, Virginia Rappahannock River and Chesapeake Bay Shorelines

WITTKOP, BENNETT, CHORMANN AND WUNSCH

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

b Blackwell Science Environmental Geology PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

DIRECTORY OF COAL MINES IN ILLINOIS 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLE SERIES KINSMAN QUADRANGLE GRUNDY & LASALLE COUNTIES. Jennifer M. Obrad

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Resource Classification Systems by Dan Alexander

Remote sensing supported surveillance of tailings dams and impoundments: A case study of a Finnish paste tailings impoundment

ESRI GIS For Mining Seminar, 10 th August, 2016, Nairobi, Kenya. Spatial DATA Solutions for Mining

GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE MAPPING using digital photogrammetry

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Wetland Mapping. Wetland Mapping in the United States. State Wetland Losses 53% in Lower US. Matthew J. Gray University of Tennessee

For Sale - 56 Acre Sandstone Quarry State Route 511, Oberlin/Kipton, OH 44075

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

DIRECTORY OF COAL MINES IN ILLINOIS 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLE SERIES BROADWELL QUADRANGLE LOGAN COUNTY. Margaret H. Bargh

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Background. Valley fills Sites in the Area. Construction over Mine Spoil Fills

T his map is for illus trative purpos es only and does not repres ent a s urvey. I t is provided 'as is ' without warranty or any repres entation of

Clyde River Landslide

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map


Water Inflow Issues above Longwall Panels

DIRECTORY OF COAL MINES IN ILLINOIS 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLE SERIES WOOD RIVER QUADRANGLE MADISON COUNTY Cheri Chenoweth & Melony E.

CHAPTER 7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Open-file Report 540

Transcription:

Reconnaissance of Coal-Slurry Deposits in Indiana Denver Harper Chris Dintaman Maria Mastalerz Sally Letsinger August 1, 2006 - April 30, 2007 Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana 1 IGS Web Report http://igs.indiana.edu/survey/projects/coal_fines/index.cfm 2

Definitions Spoil = displaced overburden Gob = coarse-grained refuse Slurry (tailings) = fine-grained refuse Surface Mine Spoil (Fragmented and displaced overburden) Mine-Run Coal (Raw Coal) Preparation Plant (Washer) Ash Power Plant Clean Coal Reject (Refuse) Coarse-grained (gob) Fine-grained (slurry, tailings) 3 Objectives Map areal extents of coal-slurry deposits Estimate thicknesses Calculate volumes Collect preexisting chemical analyses Statistically analyze chemistry values Loss of slurry or fines in washeries is a step in the march of progress and eventually some method of utilization will be found. - Coal Age, 1936 4

Mapping Data Sources Historical aerial photographs Dates: 1937 to 1980 Source: IGS archive (160 photos) Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads (1998) National Agricultural Imagery Program (2003) Indiana Orthophotography Project (2005) 5 Mapping Feature Identification Coal-preparation plants Old Ben No. 2 2003 Tecumseh 1953 Pre 1978 Post 1978 6

Mapping Feature Identification Coal slurry deposits Slurry (fine-grained) Gob (coarse-grained) Friar Tuck Mine 1974 7 Mapping Depositional Settings Berms Minnehaha - 1954 Final-cut pit Airline - 1949 Spoil Chieftain 1946 1954 8

Mapping Complex Histories 9 Results Areal Extents Area (acres) Berms 1,213 Final-cut pits 764 Spoil deposits 788 Total 2,765 Berm Final-cut pit Spoil Impoundment Not slurry 10

Thickness Estimates Data Sources Digital Line Graphs (USGS) Coal Mine Information System (IGS) National Coal Resource Data System (USGS) Historical aerial photographs 11 Thickness Estimations - Berms Air Quality No. 1 2003 (NOTE: Active operation. Impoundment not yet filled. Not included in final calculations.) Elevation of top of berm ~ 545 ft Elevation of bottom of impoundment ~ 445 ft Total height of Impoundment ~ 100 ft 12

Thickness Estimations Final-cut pits Lynnville Mine Elevation of coal ~ 395 ft Elevation of top of final-cut pit ~ 470 500 ft Depth of final-cut pit ~ 75 to 105 ft 13 Thickness Estimations Spoil deposits Assumptions: (1) Troughs completely filled. (2) Angle of draw = 30 degrees. (3) Aver. thickness = 1/8 ridge spacing. Latta Mine 1954 Average depth of troughs ~ 8 9 ft 14

Results Thickness Estimations Thickness Estimates (feet) Range Average Berms 0 to 54 10 to 14 Final-cut pits 0 to 125 38 to 56 Spoil deposits 0 to 49 6 to 8 15 Results Volumetric Calculations Volumetric estimates (million cubic yards) Berms 29 to 39 Final-cut pits 56 to 86 Spoil deposits 9 to 12 Total 94 to 136 volume of mapped CSDs represents from 22 to 69 million tons of recoverable coal. This compares with an earlier estimate made by Miller and Eggert (1982) of about 20 million tons. -Final Report 16

Chemical Characterization Mine sites 10 Drill holes 93 Samples 473 Collection dates 1970s through early 1980s Analyses Sulfur (weight percent, as received) Ash (weight percent, as received) Btu per pound (as received, moisture- and ash-free) 17 Selected statistical values for 473 individual samples of coal slurry AR: as-received; MAF: moisture- and ash-free; wt %: weight percent Ash, AR (wt %) Sulfur, AR (wt %) Btu/lb, AR Btu/lb, MAF Minimum 5.6 0.4 1069 3725 Maximum 76.8 23.7 11720 24975 Average 32.2 4.0 7095 12849 Mode 26.7 2.8 7540 13210 18

Selected statistical values for samples from various mine sites AR: as-received; MAF: moisture- and ash-free; wt %: weight percent Mine ID_IGS No. of drill holes No. of samples Ash AR (wt %) Sulfur AR (wt %) Btu/lb AR Btu/lb MAF Minnehaha D3 18 74 20.2 2.2 6893 13680 Green Valley B4 9 23 20.9 5.1 9780 13305 Otter Creek B1 4 4 26.7 2.6 8893 13025 Friar Tuck D4 9 37 28.1 2.1 8092 13663 Buckskin K3 7 17 29.0 2.7 8589 12873 Chinook C1 14 81 30.5 3.2 5577 13310 Lynnville K1 6 36 35.0 4.3 8150 13344 Tecumseh K2 4 28 35.9 8.9 7168 11942 Airline E3 11 99 42.4 4.4 7143 12657 Hawthorn E4 11 55 45.2 5.8 6608 11920 SUM 93 454 AVERAGE 31.4 4.1 7689 12972 19 Slurry Disposal Preparation plant pipeline pipe discharge = entry point Cell 1 large, dense fragments of coal and rock Cell 2 subaerial fan coarse coal slurry pond ultrafine coal and clay a manmade prograding fan-delta system -- Eggert, Miller, and Irwin (1980) 20

Chemical Trends Spatial trends Mixed results. See final report. Historical trends Overall quality can not be predicted on basis of the age of the preparation plant. Source coal beds Overall quality can not be predicted on basis of the coal beds that were processed. Type of mining Overall quality in slurry deposits produced from underground mines might be somewhat better. 21