Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results. Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands

Similar documents
NEW VSL Conditioning plate!

RECENT ILC ACTIVITY IN ROMANIAN MASS MEASUREMENTS

Metrology and Environment

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

Document No: TR 12 Issue No: 1

METHODS FOR CERTIFYING MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT. Scott Crone

CALIBRATION REPORT FOR THERMOHYDROMETER

OA03 UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC Table of contents

SWGDRUG GLOSSARY. Independent science-based organization that has the authority to grant

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Demonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities

Measurement & Uncertainty - Basic concept and its application

STATISTIQUE DE PERFORMANCE

R SANAS Page 1 of 7

A61-02 CALA Guidance on Traceability Revision 1.2 October 15, 2012

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

Measurement & Uncertainty - Concept and its application

Technical Procedure for Measurement Assurance

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005. ALLOMETRICS, INC Bayport Blvd. Seabrook, TX Terry Baldwin Phone: CALIBRATION

Reference Materials and Proficiency Testing. CropLife International Meeting October 2015 Gina M. Clapper

SPECIFIC CRITERIA for CALIBRATION LABORATORIES IN MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE : Torque Measuring Devices

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

Establishment of a Traceability Chain in Metrology for Materials

Mason Technology Ltd

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Calcium, Iron, Potassium,

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

ANALYSIS CERTIFICATE OF

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

Establishing traceability and estimating measurement uncertainty in physical, chemical and biological measurements

Euramet project 1075 Bilateral comparison

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Aluminum, Potassium, Magnesium, ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE

ANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons

Infrared Thermometer Calibration A Complete Guide

Metrology Principles for Earth Observation: the NMI view. Emma Woolliams 17 th October 2017

HOW TO EXPRESS THE RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENT RESULTS. The role of metrological traceability and measurement uncertainty-

Mason Technology Ltd

SPECIFIC CRITERIA for CALIBRATION LABORATORIES IN MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE : Force Proving Instruments

EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical Simulation and Measurement

Morehouse. Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA PH: web: sales:

Final Results of Bilateral Comparison between NIST and PTB for Flows of High Pressure Natural Gas

High pressure comparison among seven European national laboratories

Final Report CCEM.RF-K8.CL COMPARISON CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

Introduction of RIC Tsukuba (Japan, RAII)

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY PREPARED FOR ENAO ASSESSOR CALIBRATION COURSE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER Prepared by MJ Mc Nerney for ENAO Assessor Calibration

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Introduction. Martin J. T. Milton. Director of the BIPM. Monday 27th June 2016

CALIBRATION. Calibration. General Principles & Theory, Equipment Considerations. Copyright Caltech 2014

OIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air

The Fundamentals of Moisture Calibration

APPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT

Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

TRACEABILITY STRATEGIES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF GEAR AND SPLINE ARTEFACTS

Test report CVN Project number Page 2 of 2

A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs

High pressure comparisons between seven European National Laboratories

Comparability and Traceability Point of view from a metrological institute

H1: Metrological support. Milena Horvat, Polona Vreča, Tea Zuliani, Radojko Jaćimović, Radmila Milačič

Flowchart for the extraordinary calibrations prior to the redefinition of the kilogram. (BIPM proposal)

CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503

Calibration Traceability Guidelines

MEASUREMENT TRACEABILITY AND ERRORS RELATED TO FORCE MEASUREMENT

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

MICHELL TECHNOLOGIES FOR MOISTURE. Calibration. General Principles & Theory, Equipment Considerations

On the redefinition of the kilogram. Dr Philippe RICHARD

New Thermometer Guidance Document from AASHTO Accreditation Program. Maria Knake Asphalt Binder ETG Meeting May 10, 2018

SIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn

Dedicated solvents for Headspace GC

ISO/IEC requirements. General matters of quality system, requirements for documentation and the list of the documents required for a

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

Certificate of Accreditation

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

Low gauge pressure comparisons between MIKES, Metrosert and FORCE Technology

APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

CCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram

EA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE

Vocabulary of Metrology

Joint Research Centre (JRC)

LINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg. Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico,

NIST CERTIFICATION OF ITS-90 FIXED-POINT CELLS FROM K TO K: METHODS AND UNCERTAINTIES

TRACEABILITY AND CAPABILITY CONTROL OF MASS MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT AND DRIFT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL MASS STANDARDS IN LATVIA

Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR

WGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty

SAMPLE. Accuracy Calibration Certificate. Instrument Type: EURAMET cg-18 v. 4.0 Sample ACC ISO17025 WI v.1.0

Technical Note A Quantification and NIST Traceability of Micromatter Thin Film Standards for XRF Analysis. Version March 16, 2017

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

The Journey from Ω Through 19 Orders of Magnitude

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

Analysis of interlaboratory comparison when the measurements are not normally distributed

Measurement and Calibration of a High-Sensitivity Microwave Power Sensor with an Attenuator

Progress in organizing national and international comparisons for nuclear medicine measurements

Maha Ireland Ltd. 629 Jordanstown Avenue, Greenogue Business Park, Rathcoole, Co. Dublin. Calibration Laboratory Registration number: 287C

CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators

Hp(0.07) Photon and Beta Irradiations for the EURADOS Extremity Dosemeter Intercomparison 2015

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Transcription:

Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands 1

Calibration Calibrating an instrument involves comparing the measurements of two instruments; one with a known magnitude or correctness (standard/reference device - REF), against which you measure the device under test (DUT) REF 2

Calibration Calibration is required for: Testing a new measurement instrument Testing a measurement instrument after it has been repaired or modified Periodic testing of measurement instruments Testing after the specific usage has elapsed Prior to and/or after a critical measurement When observations are not accurate or instrument indicators do not match the output of a surrogate measurement instrument After events such as: An measurement instrument has had a shock, vibration, or exposure to adverse conditions, which can put it out of calibration or damage it. 3

Calibration Risks involved in not calibrating an instrument Safety procedure Wastage Faulty or questionable quality Fines or litigations Increased downtime 4

Calibration Calibration frequency Manufacturer-recommended calibration interval. Before a major critical measuring project. After a major critical measuring project. After an event (error, damage, shocks) Per requirements. Monthly, quarterly, or semiannually. Annually. Biannually. Never. 5

Metrological Traceability property of a measurement result whereby the result can be related to a reference through a documented unbroken chain of calibrations, each contributing to the measurement uncertainty BIPM Paris Traceability Process industry, Aviation, Meteorology, Pharmacy, Science 6

Metrological Traceability 7

Metrological Traceability Certificate Primary Pressure Standard 0,003 % National Metrology Institute (NMI) Process Certificate 0,2 % Calibration Validation 0,05 % 0,01 % Certificate Accredited Calibration Laboratory Traceability from Industry to a NMI Certificate

Metrological Traceability weights Piston cylinder unit time Pressure medium mass length

Metrological Traceability BIPM Paris Grand K (BIPM) 1 kg 0 mg PtIr (NMI) 1 kg 0,010 mg Reference standards (NMI) 1 kg 0,026 mg Working standards (NMI) 1 kg 0,150 mg (E1) Mass standards (Accr. laboratories) 1 kg 0,50 mg (E2) Mass standards/scales (Industry) 1 kg 1,50 mg t/m 500 mg (F1 M3) 10

Measurement Uncertainty U = 1 mm U = 0,00000002 mm

Measurement Uncertainty U = 0,02 bar U = 0,0002 bar

Measurement Uncertainty U = 0,1 kg U = 0,000 001 kg

Measurement Uncertainty U = 1 C U = 0,0001 C

Measurement Uncertainty U = 2 L U = 0,0025 L

Measurement Uncertainty Type A evaluation Several (in)dependent observations Observable scatter in the values obtained Statistical methods Type B evaluation Calibration of the reference standard Ambient conditions Calibration method Calibration/test engineer 16

Measurement Uncertainty 17

Measurement Uncertainty 18

Measurement Uncertainty 19

Interlaboratory Comparisons Competenc e personnel Participation ILC s and PTS Approved Test and Calibration Methods Improvement of Quality Test and Calibration Results 20

Interlaboratory Comparisons NMI Regional NORAMET comparison NMI BIPM NMI Global CIPM comparison NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI EA lab RvA lab lab RvA lab National comparison or PTS NMI VSL, Delft NMI lab NMI Regional EURAMET/COOMET/AFRIMET comparison National comparison RvA lab NMI EA lab EA lab EA lab lab Regional EA comparison EA lab 21

Lref L001 L002 L003 L004 L005 L006 L007 L008 L009 L010 L011 L012 L013 L014 L015 L016 L017 Deviations Lref - participants /kpa Interlaboratory Comparisons Agreement Lref - participants at 60000 kpa g 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 22

Nominal pressure Deviation Uncertainty Deviation Uncertainty Deviation Uncertainty Deviation Uncertainty Deviation Uncertainty Lref L013 L014 L015 L016 Interlaboratory Comparisons Lab Normalized Error E N kpa kpa kpa kpa kpa 0 0 1,3 0,0 0,7 0,00 0,0 3,0 0,00 0,0 3,0 0,00 0,0 0,0 0,00 10000-11 2,0-7,0 1,7 1,56-6,5 4,2 0,99-11,0 5,0 0,02-7,7 5,0 0,63 20000-10 3,1-4,5 2,7 1,38-6,0 6,3 0,60-13,0 6,0-0,41-6,6 7,2 0,46 30000-1 4,0 5,0 3,7 1,16 3,5 8,0 0,54-6,0 6,0-0,65 3,7 9,4 0,49 40000 13 5,0 19,5 4,7 0,94 18,0 10,0 0,44 6,0 8,0-0,75 18,4 11,6 0,42 50000 30 6,3 35,5 5,7 0,71 35,5 13,0 0,41 22,0 10,0-0,64 35,5 13,7 0,40 60000 47 7,6 53,5 6,7 0,60 54,0 15,0 0,39 40,0 11,0-0,56 53,0 15,9 0,32 70000 66 8,7 72,0 18,0 0,31 58,0 13,0-0,49 69,9 18,1 0,21 Normalized Error E N Normalized Error E N Normalized Error E N 23

ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Key-issues: Competence staff Calibration/testing method Equipment and/or instruments Uncertainty calculation Traceability Ambient condition and facilities Interlaboratory comparisons and Proficiency Testing Uncertainty Tracebility Competence personnel Participation ILC s and PTS Approved Test and Calibration Methods 24 Quality Test and Calibration Results

ISO/IEC 17025:2005 25

Thank you for your attention! Any Questions? 26