High-Precision Evaluation of Ultra-Shallow Impurity Profiles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Similar documents
Characterization of Ultra-Shallow Implants Using Low-Energy Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: Surface Roughening under Cesium Bombardment

Analysis of Ion Implantation Profiles for Accurate Process/Device Simulation: Analysis Based on Quasi-Crystal Extended LSS Theory

Ion Implant Part 1. Saroj Kumar Patra, TFE4180 Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology ( NTNU )

Ion Implantation ECE723

Calculation of Ion Implantation Profiles for Two-Dimensional Process Modeling

Single ion implantation for nanoelectronics and the application to biological systems. Iwao Ohdomari Waseda University Tokyo, Japan

Xing Sheng, 微纳光电子材料与器件工艺原理. Doping 掺杂. Xing Sheng 盛兴. Department of Electronic Engineering Tsinghua University

Microscopy AND Microanalysis MICROSCOPY SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006

A. Burenkov, P. Pichler, J. Lorenz, Y. Spiegel, J. Duchaine, F. Torregrosa

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

Evaluation of plasma strip induced substrate damage Keping Han 1, S. Luo 1, O. Escorcia 1, Carlo Waldfried 1 and Ivan Berry 1, a

Graphene Novel Material for Nanoelectronics

Metrology is not a cost factor, but a profit center

Dopant and Self-Diffusion in Semiconductors: A Tutorial

ION IMPLANTATION - Chapter 8 Basic Concepts

Electrochemical Society Proceedings Volume

Chapter 9 Ion Implantation

Atomic configuration of boron pile-up at the Si/SiO 2 interface

Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB)

Ion Implantation. alternative to diffusion for the introduction of dopants essentially a physical process, rather than chemical advantages:

September 21, 2005, Wednesday

Lecture 22 Ion Beam Techniques

Superconducting Single-photon Detectors

ECE 335: Electronic Engineering Lecture 2: Semiconductors

EE 212 FALL ION IMPLANTATION - Chapter 8 Basic Concepts

CMOS. Technology Doping Profiles. Simulation of 0.35 Ixm/0.25 INTRODUCTION

Transmutation Reaction Induced by Deuterium Permeation Through Nanostructured Multi-layer Thin Film

Diffusion in Extrinsic Silicon and Silicon Germanium

Fabrication Technology, Part I

Changing the Dopant Concentration. Diffusion Doping Ion Implantation

Dose loss and segregation of boron and arsenic at the Si/SiO 2 interface by atomistic kinetic Monte Carlo simulations

Introduction to Photolithography

Processing of Semiconducting Materials Prof. Pallab Banerji Department of Metallurgy and Material Science Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Diffusion in Extrinsic Silicon

Fast Monte-Carlo Simulation of Ion Implantation. Binary Collision Approximation Implementation within ATHENA

Photon Energy Dependence of Contrast in Photoelectron Emission Microscopy of Si Devices

DIFFUSION - Chapter 7

Chapter 8 Ion Implantation

Vapor Phase Doping with N-type Dopant into Silicon by Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition

A semiconductor is an almost insulating material, in which by contamination (doping) positive or negative charge carriers can be introduced.

Semiconductors Reference: Chapter 4 Jaeger or Chapter 3 Ruska Recall what determines conductor, insulator and semiconductor Plot the electron energy

Atoms? All matters on earth made of atoms (made up of elements or combination of elements).

3C3 Analogue Circuits

EE 5211 Analog Integrated Circuit Design. Hua Tang Fall 2012

Modelling for Formation of Source/Drain Region by Ion Implantation and Diffusion Process for MOSFET Device

Asymmetrical heating behavior of doped Si channels in bulk silicon and in silicon-on-insulator under high current stress

Self-study problems and questions Processing and Device Technology, FFF110/FYSD13

Diffusion and Ion implantation Reference: Chapter 4 Jaeger or Chapter 3 Ruska N & P Dopants determine the resistivity of material Note N lower

Compact Sensor for Environmental Monitoring

Lecture 0: Introduction

Defect Formation in 18 MeV Electron Irradiated MOS Structures

Dynamics of the ion beam induced nitridation of silicon

Secondaryionmassspectrometry

The second part of this study examined depth profiles of sample surfaces that have been previously exposed to Cs primary beam.

ECE 142: Electronic Circuits Lecture 3: Semiconductors

Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam Processing of Ultra-thin Membranes to Enhance EUV Transmittance. February 22, 2015

Ion sputtering yield coefficients from In thin films bombarded by different energy Ar + ions

Semiconductor Detectors

Imaging of Quantum Confinement and Electron Wave Interference

Chapter 3 Engineering Science for Microsystems Design and Fabrication

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. College of Engineering. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Professor Ali Javey.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Fall Exam 1

Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS)

VLSI Technology Dr. Nandita Dasgupta Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Feature-level Compensation & Control. Process Integration September 15, A UC Discovery Project

Chapter 1 Overview of Semiconductor Materials and Physics

LOW-TEMPERATURE Si (111) HOMOEPITAXY AND DOPING MEDIATED BY A MONOLAYER OF Pb

Gaetano L Episcopo. Scanning Electron Microscopy Focus Ion Beam and. Pulsed Plasma Deposition

Ultra Shallow Depth Profiling by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Techniques

FLCC Seminar. Spacer Lithography for Reduced Variability in MOSFET Performance

Supporting Information. A differential Hall effect measurement method with. sub-nanometre resolution for active dopant

Atomic Level Analysis of SiC Devices Using Numerical Simulation

Introduction to Semiconductor Physics. Prof.P. Ravindran, Department of Physics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India

Evaluation of the plasmaless gaseous etching process

Accelerated ions. ion doping

Simulation of the cathode surface damages in a HOPFED during ion bombardment

CLUSTER SIZE DEPENDENCE OF SPUTTERING YIELD BY CLUSTER ION BEAM IRRADIATION

EE301 Electronics I , Fall

In situ electrical characterization of dielectric thin films directly exposed to plasma vacuum-ultraviolet radiation

Make sure the exam paper has 9 pages (including cover page) + 3 pages of data for reference

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic characterization of molybdenum nitride thin films

Mechanisms of Visible Photoluminescence from Size-Controlled Silicon Nanoparticles

Processing of Semiconducting Materials Prof. Pallab Banerji Department of Material Science Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

ABNORMAL X-RAY EMISSION FROM INSULATORS BOMBARDED WITH LOW ENERGY IONS

Ion implantation Campbell, Chapter 5

MICRO-SCALE SHEET RESISTANCE MEASUREMENTS ON ULTRA SHALLOW JUNCTIONS

MOSFET: Introduction

SURFACE PROCESSING WITH HIGH-ENERGY GAS CLUSTER ION BEAMS

Chem 481 Lecture Material 3/20/09

Thus, it is difficult to use conventional

Surface analysis techniques

Identification and Quantification of Impurities Critical to the Performance of Nitride Semiconductor Devices

PHI 5000 Versaprobe-II Focus X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy

IC Fabrication Technology

Manufacturable AlGaAs/GaAs HBT Implant Isolation Process Using Doubly Charged Helium

Wafer Charging in Process Equipment and its Relationship to GMR Heads Charging Damage

ToF-SIMS or XPS? Xinqi Chen Keck-II

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Silver Thin Film Characterization

David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Transcription:

High-Precision Evaluation of Ultra-Shallow Impurity Profiles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Yoko Tada Kunihiro Suzuki Yuji Kataoka (Manuscript received December 28, 2009) As complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) processes evolve and device structures become finer, semiconductor manufacturers are having to form transistor gates with thin films 1 3 nm thick and ultra-shallow junctions of 40 nm or less. For better reliability and performance, these device structures must be controlled at the nanometer level. This requires the nanometer-level analysis and evaluation of the profiles of elements in thin films and the profiles of impurities in ultra-shallow junctions. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is ideal for analyzing compositions and impurity profiles. Although the latest developments in SIMS equipment do enable nanometer-level element profile analysis, this analysis method works by exploiting complex physical phenomena, so it is important to optimize the analysis conditions in order to obtain the profiles precisely. In this paper, we discuss the latest achievements in our study of analysis conditions where high precision is obtained by considering factors that degrade precision in the SIMS analysis of element profiles across surface regions ranging from 3 5 to 10 20 nm from the surface. 1. Introduction With recent advances in the miniaturization of LSI devices, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) transistors are now being made with ultrathin gate layers (a few nanometers thick) and very shallow junctions (40 nm or less). 1),2) To achieve reliable high-performance devices, it is essential to control the composition of thin films and the dopant profile at junctions and to analyze and evaluate the composition and dopant profile on the nanometer scale. A suitable technique for this sort of analysis is dynamic secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). 3),4) Its principle is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. One of the major benefits of SIMS is its ability to measure minute impurity concentrations of the order of parts per million or billion of any chemical element. It can also obtain information about the profiles of elements in the depth direction because the ions emitted from the sample (secondary ions) are captured in sequence when the surface of the sample is sputtered by. In recent years, low-energy SIMS equipment has been developed to facilitate the analysis of ultra-shallow doping profiles. This Primary ions Secondary ions Detector Figure 1 Principle of SIMS analysis (cross-sectional view). FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 231 236 (July 2010) 231

equipment accelerates the to 1 kev or less (instead of the several kiloelectron volts of conventional SIMS equipment) and can achieve nanometer-order depth resolution. However, one problem with the analysis of the region from 3 5 to 10 20 nm below the surface is that the impurity profiles obtained vary depending on the analysis conditions (primary ion species, energy, angle of incidence, oxygen flooding, etc.). 5) Moreover, some elements can sometimes undergo segregation towards the surface or deeper into the substrate during the analysis. 6) Consequently, to obtain the profiles precisely, one must perform a detailed investigation of how the profile varies with the analysis conditions and select analysis conditions under which high precision can be obtained by taking these factors into consideration. In this paper, we discuss an analysis method established to obtain element concentration profiles with high precision in nanometer-scale SIMS analysis and evaluation. 2. Effects of native oxide film and transient region During a subsurface evaluation, the main factors that affect the profiles are the native oxide film and the transient region affected by unstable sputtering (sputtering is initially unstable but then stabilizes). 7),8) Of these, the native oxide film has a different composition to that of the substrate and thus causes localized variations in the sputtering rate and secondary ionization rate. However, if the sample is bombarded with oxygen (O 2 ) at a near-normal angle of incidence, an oxide film is formed at the silicon substrate surface when a sufficient quantity of oxygen has accumulated, 9),10) and the sputtering becomes stable. By minimizing this transient region, one can obtain very precise data. The profile of silicon intensity in a silicon substrate bombarded with O 2 at an incidence angle of 0 (with respect to the surface normal) is shown in Figure 2. A depth of 0 nm corresponds Secondary ion intensity (arb. units) 10 7 10 6 to the substrate surface. The region in which the silicon profile fluctuates is the transient region. In the results obtained for primary ion energy of 1.00 kev, the silicon intensity was affected more by the native oxide film closest to the surface, and after an initial drop it increased again to reach a fixed value. This occurred owing to the presence of an unoxidized region between the native oxide film and the oxide film formed by the primary ion bombardment. On the other hand, for primary ion energy of 0.20 kev, the silicon intensity remained more or less constant from the outermost surface. These results indicate that a subsurface analysis with O 2 accelerated to 0.20 kev at a near-normal angle of incidence gives an element profile closer to the true value with fewer effects from the native oxide film and transient region. Oxygen, 0 0.20 kev 0.25 kev 0.50 kev 0.75 kev 1.00 kev 30Si 10 5 0 1 2 Figure 2 Variation in transient region with primary ion energy. 3. Impurity profile variation with analysis conditions Next, taking as an example a silicon substrate implanted with arsenic (As) or gallium (Ga), we investigated how the profiles of impurity elements varied with primary ion energy. As and Ga profiles obtained in SIMS analysis with O 2 232 FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 46, No. 3 (July 2010)

incident at 0 with energies ranging from 0.20 1.00 kev are shown in Figure 3. The As and Ga profiles obtained by high-resolution Rutherford backscattering spectrometry () are also shown for reference. is an analysis method that works for only a limited range of elements and has a detection limit 2 3 orders of magnitude worse than SIMS. However, in recent years it has become possible to use this technique to acquire impurity profiles from shallow regions. Figure 3 (a) shows that for As, a lower primary ion energy produces results that are closer to : indeed, for 0.20 kev the profile is almost identical to that of. On the other hand, Figure 3 (b) shows that for Ga, a lower primary ion energy causes the profile to spread deeper into the substrate. The behavior observed for Ga has also been reported to occur with indium (In). 11) 4. Angle of incidence optimization A possible cause of the spreading of Ga into the substrate is that Ga segregated deeper into the substrate from the oxide layer formed by the O 2. 12) In the range of depths to which the O 2 penetrate, the agitation causes a mixing layer to form, and sputter etching causes secondary ions to be emitted from the vicinity of this surface. 3),4) When the primary ion incidence angle is close to normal, an oxide film is formed in the mixing layer, 9),10) and it is thinner when the primary energy is lower. 13),14) Consequently, if impurity segregation does not occur, then lower primary ion energy increases the resolution in the depth direction. This is illustrated by the results for As in Figure 3 (a). However, for Ga, there was more spreading into the substrate as the primary ion energy was decreased. We assume that this was caused by a kind of segregation into the substrate from the oxide film formed by O 2. One possible factor causing this phenomenon is the reduced sputtering rate. Since the sputtering rate drops as the primary ion energy decreases, 15) this might have caused the Ga segregation to become more pronounced. On the other hand, the sputtering rate depends on the primary ion incidence angle, and up to about 70, a higher incidence angle produced a higher sputtering rate. 3),4) We therefore investigated how the profiles varied with incidence angle for As Oxygen, 0 Oxygen, 0 0.20 kev 0.20 kev 0.50 kev 0.50 kev 1.00 kev 1.00 kev 0 5 10 15 20 (a) Arsenic 0 30 40 50 (b) Gallium Figure 3 Variation in impurity profiles with primary ion energy. FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 46, No. 3 (July 2010) 233

Oxygen, 0.20 kev 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Oxygen, 0.20 kev 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 5 10 15 20 (a) Arsenic 0 30 40 50 (b) Gallium Figure 4 Variation in impurity profiles with primary ion incidence angle. and Ga under O 2 bombardment with ion energy of 0.20 kev. The results are shown in Figure 4, together with the results obtained by. They show that profiles almost identical to those of were obtained at 0 40 for As and at around 40 for Ga, while at approximately 50 60, the peak shifted towards the surface for both As and Ga. The silicon profile obtained under the same analysis conditions as in Figure 4 is shown in Figure 5. The silicon intensity remained more or less constant over the range of 0 40, while the profile peaked at the outermost surface above the range of 50 60. As the incidence angle increased, the O 2 ions became unable to form an oxide layer because a smaller amount of oxide was deposited on the substrate. 9),10) On the other hand, the secondary ionization of silicon was higher in the oxide film than in the substrate. 4) Accordingly, the peak observed near the surface at incidence angles of 50 60 is thought to result from the effects of the native oxide film. The range of 50 60 is thought to correspond to the angle range where no longer form an oxide film. From the above investigation, taking into Secondary ion intensity (arb. units) Oxygen, 0.20 kev 0 2 4 6 8 10 30 Si 0 10 30 40 50 60 Figure 5 Variation in silicon profile with primary ion incidence angle. consideration the effects of the native oxide film, transient region, segregation, and other factors, it seems that the best conditions for high-precision analysis are an angle of incidence of around 40 and O 2 ion acceleration energy of 0.20 kev. 234 FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 46, No. 3 (July 2010)

5. Application to ultra-shallow impurity analysis Next, we introduce an example where the optimized analysis conditions (O 2 acceleration of 0.20 kev and incidence angle of around 40 ) were applied to the analysis of boron (B), which is used as a p-type dopant in CMOS transistors. Figure 6 shows the B profiles obtained when ions were implanted in a silicon substrate under the following conditions (B ion acceleration energy, doping concentration, incidence angle: substrate tilt): 0.5 kev, 1 10 13 1 10 15 cm -2, 7 (silicon substrate) 0.5 kev, 1 10 13 1 10 15 cm -2, 0 (silicon substrate) 0.5 kev, 1 10 15 cm -2, 7 (silicon substrate made amorphous by implantation of germanium (Ge) ions) The shape of the B peak varied with the doping level in the near-surface region, and that the profile in the B tail region varied by about 1 nm depending on the tilt angle, so the B profile depended on the ion implantation conditions. Furthermore, the tail profile of B implanted into the amorphous substrate decreased rapidly, and 10 22 10 18 10 17 Ion implantation energy: 0.5 kev 13 1 10 cm -2, tilt 7 14 1 10 cm -2, tilt 7 15 1 10 cm -2, tilt 7 15 1 10 cm -2, tilt 0 Ge I.I. B I.I. 15 (1 10, tilt 7 ) cm -2 0 30 Figure 6 Change in B profile with ion implantation conditions. that the tail profile of B seen in implantation into a silicon substrate was a channeling distribution, which is not a problem for SIMS analysis. By using optimized analysis conditions, one can ascertain differences in impurity profiles at the nanometer level caused by differences in fabrication conditions. 6. Topics for future study It is possible to evaluate the atomic profile of any element at the nanometer level when the analysis is performed with O 2 accelerated to 0.20 kev and the incidence angle is around 40. However, these conditions do not yield sufficient sensitivity for the analysis of elements that have a high negative secondary ionization rate or elements whose signals are subject to interference from molecular ions, including oxygen. Such elements are usually analyzed using cesium, for which optimized analysis conditions are also necessary, so an investigation of these conditions is a topic for future study. 7. Conclusion In this paper, we introduced a technique for analyzing the profiles of elements in regions from 3 5 to 10 20 nm below the surface of a silicon substrate. The profile shape is affected by factors such as the transient region that exists until sputtering becomes stable, native oxide films, and impurity segregation occurring during analysis. These effects can be minimized by performing the analysis with O 2 accelerated to 0.20 kev with an incidence angle of around 40. In the future, we will continue investigating methods for evaluating elements for which these conditions do not give adequate sensitivity. References 1) T. Yamamoto et al.: Advantages of a New Scheme of Junction Profile Engineering with Laser Spike Annealing and Its Integration into a 45-nm Node High Performance CMOS Technology. FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 46, No. 3 (July 2010) 235

2007 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 2007, pp. 122 123. 2) K. Ikeda et al.: Advanced Junction Profile Design Scheme by Low-temperature Millisecond Annealing and Co-implant for High Performance CMOS. 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 188 189. 3) Surface Science Society of Japan: Secondary ion mass spectrometry. (in Japanese), Maruzen, 1999. 4) D. Briggs et al.: Surface analysis SIMS The fundamentals and applications of secondary ion mass spectroscopy. (in Japanese), Agne Shofu Publishing Inc., 2003. 5) Y. Kataoka et al.: Surprisingly large apparent profile shifts of As and Sb markers in Si bombarded with ultra-low-energy Cs ion beams. Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 203 204, pp. 329 334 (2003). 6) Y. Tada et al.: Segregation under low-energy oxygen bombardment in the near-surface region. Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 255, Issue 4. pp. 1320 1322 (2008). 7) S. R. Bryan et al.: Characterization and removal of ion yield transients in the near surface region of secondary in mass spectrometry depth profiles. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 9 14 (1987). 8) K. Wittmaak: Apparent and real transient effects in SIMS depth profiling using oxygen bombardment. Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 203 204, pp. 20 26 (2003). 9) J. S. Williams et al.: Oxidation of silicon by low energy oxygen bombardment. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 1840 1846 (1994). 10) H. De Witte et al.: Modeling of bombardment induced oxidation of silicon. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 89, Issue 5, pp. 3001 3011 (2001). 11) Y. Kataoka: Using low-energy oxygen ions for SIMS depth analysis. (in Japanese), Surface Science, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 72 77 (2007). 12) N. Menzel et al.: RBS study on bombardmentinduced redistribution of copper impurities in silicon using neon, oxygen and nitrogen ion beams at different impact angles. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, Vol. 45, Issue 1-4, pp. 219 222 (1990). 13) W. Vandervorst et al.: Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry SIMS IX. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1994, pp. 599 608. 14) A. Christofi et al.: SIMS depth profiling and TEM imaging of the SIMS altered layer. Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 255, Issue 4, pp. 1381 1383 (2008). 15) M. G. Dowsett: Depth profiling using ultra-lowenergy secondary ion mass spectrometry. Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 203 204, pp. 5 12 (2003). Yoko Tada Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Ms. Tada received a B.S. degree in Physics from Toho University, Chiba, Japan in 1986. She joined Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan in 1986 and has been engaged in materials characterization for semiconductor development, especially the application of secondary ion mass spectrometry to advanced CMOS devices. Yuji Kataoka Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Dr. Kataoka received a B.S. degree in Applied Chemistry from Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan in 1984 and Ph.D. degree in Engineering from Osaka University, Osaka, Japan in 2008. He joined Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Atsugi, Japan in 1984 and has been engaged in materials characterization for semiconductor devices. He is a member of the Surface Science Society of Japan. Kunihiro Suzuki Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Dr. Suzuki received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electronics Engineering from Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan in 1981, 1983, and 1996, respectively. He joined Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Atsugi, Japan in 1983 and has been engaged in the design and modeling of high-speed bipolar and MOS transistors. He is a member of IEEE. 236 FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., Vol. 46, No. 3 (July 2010)