Estec final presentation days 2018

Similar documents
Radiation Effects on Electronics. Dr. Brock J. LaMeres Associate Professor Electrical & Computer Engineering Montana State University

Introduction to Radiation Testing Radiation Environments

R&T PROTON DIRECT IONIZATION

The Radiation Assurance Test Facility at LNS-INFN in Catania. Behcet ALPAT INFN Sezione di Perugia

Radiation damage considerations in accelerator beam environments

Introduction. Neutron Effects NSEU. Neutron Testing Basics User Requirements Conclusions

Future trends in radiation hard electronics

Electron-induced Single-Event Upsets in integrated memory device

H4IRRAD generic simulation results

Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro- Electronics (CRÈME) Tools Brian Sierawski 2017 SEESAW

RussianSEE test approach: available standards, test variables, difficulties and future trends

Radiation Transport Tools for Space Applications: A Review

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Radiation Requirements. September 14, 2006

Predicting On-Orbit SEU Rates

RAD Hard Selection Process for RHA Devices as an Element of Design

ICALEPCS Oct. 6-11, 2013

Development of a Radiation Hard CMOS Monolithic Pixel Sensor

Attivita di Qualificazione dei Componenti Elettronici in Italia: L Esperienza MAPRAD. Behcet ALPAT INFN Sezione di Perugia

Space Radiation Mitigation for Fox-1

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Radiation Requirements. August 5, 2005

Jovian radiation models for JUICE mission

Reliability issues of photonic components for space applications

SDR Forum Technical Conference 2007

Geant4 simulation for LHC radiation monitoring

Geant4 Space Users Workshop ESA status report. Outline ESA projects and Geant4 support Tool developments Perspectives

Comparison of JGO and JEO

Single Event Effects: SRAM

ESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet

Application of the RADSAFE Concept

Shielding Considerations

NEUTOR: Neutrons Monitor for. Project financed by: Radiotherapy

Radiation Belt Analyses: needs, data and analysis

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Radiation Environment Specification. August 25, 2005

Reliability issues of photonic components for space applications Juan Barbero

Single-photon and two-photon absorption induced charge model calibration

Virtual Irradiation: Single Event Rate Prediction for Advanced Technologies

JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) Status report for OPAG. N. Altobelli (on behalf of O. Witasse) JUICE artist impression (Credits ESA, AOES)

Radiation Effects in MMIC Devices

Irradiation results. SEU Test setup Cross section measurement Error estimate per run. K.Røed, D.Röhrich, K. Ullaland University of Bergen, Norway

The heavy ion irradiation facility at KVI-CART

Estimate of Undulator Magnet Damage Due to Beam Finder Wire Measurements

Impact of Ion Energy and Species on Single Event Effect Analysis

Test Simulation of Neutron Damage to Electronic Components using Accelerator Facilities

Simulation of Radiation Effects on NGST. Bryan Fodness, Thomas Jordan, Jim Pickel, Robert Reed, Paul Marshall, Ray Ladbury

Radiation Environments, Effects and Needs for ESA Missions

S5p INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Those Upsetting Ions-The Effects of Radiation on Electronics

Simulation of Radiation Monitors for Future Space Missions

IAC-08-A MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF ENERGY LOSSES BY SPACE PROTONS IN THE CRATER DETECTOR

A method of space radiation environment reliability prediction

Open Research Online The Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs

Geant4 simulation of SOI microdosimetry for radiation protection in space and aviation environments

SPENVIS Tutorial: Radiation models in SPENVIS and their accuracy

Activities at the Calliope facility at ENEA - Casaccia

The Interior of Giant Planets. Cyrill Milkau

LNL IRRADIATION FACILITIES

THE RADIATION ASSURANCE TEST FACILITY AT INFN-LNS CATANIA

Neutron testing of the IS1009RH voltage reference

Irradiation characterization of EEE components for space application

The electron accelerator of the ISOF-CNR Institute: its characteristics and use

This paper should be understood as an extended version of a talk given at the

Radiation damage in diamond sensors at the CMS experiment of the LHC

New perspectives for CMOS image sensors in harsh radiative environments

Space Environments and Effects Section. Pioneer. Voyager. New Horizons. D.J. Rodgers ESA-ESTEC, The Netherlands

SIMULATION OF SPACE RADIATION FOR NANOSATELLITES IN EARTH ORBIT *

Occupational Radiation Protection at Accelerator Facilities: Challenges

The Radiation Environment for the Next Generation Space Telescope

APPLICATION OF POLYMERIC NANO COMPOSITES AT LOW EARTH ORBIT AND GEOSYNCHRONOUS EARTH ORBIT

CRaTER Science Requirements

Measurement of the n_tof beam profile in the second experimental area (EAR2) using a silicon detector

NGRM Next Generation Radiation Monitor new standard instrument for ESA

Comparison of Direct Electron and Photon Activation Measurements with FLUKA Predictions

First Evaluation of Neutron Induced Single Event Effects on the CMS Barrel Muon Electronics

Nonionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) for Protons

This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.

Radiation damage calculation in PHITS

Beam diagnostics: Alignment of the beam to prevent for activation. Accelerator physics: using these sensitive particle detectors.

Radiological safety studies for the TeraFERMI beamline at

CMOS Pixel Sensor for a Space Radiation Monitor with very low cost, power and mass. Outline:

ENERGETIC ELECTRON-INDUCED SINGLE EVENT UPSETS IN STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY. Michael Patrick King. Dissertation. Submitted to the Faculty of the

596 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 64, NO. 1, JANUARY 2017

RADIATION DAMAGE IN HST DETECTORS

D E S I R E Dose Estimation by Simulation of the ISS Radiation Environment

Overview and Status of the Austrian Particle Therapy Facility MedAustron. Peter Urschütz

Electromagnetic Compatibility!

Magnetospheric Ion Implantation in the Icy Moons of Giant Planets

RT54SX72SU Heavy Ion Beam Test Report. August 6, 2004 J.J. Wang (650)

Cosmic Rays. This showed that the energy of cosmic rays was many times that of any other natural or artificial radiation known at that time.

CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Science Requirements Update

K.I. Tapero RISI,

Photofission of 238-U Nuclei

Radiation Shielding Simulation For Interplanetary Manned Missions

JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) Status report for OPAG. O. Witasse and N. Altobelli. JUICE artist impression (Credits ESA, AOES)

Radiation Effect Modeling

Overview of Single Event Effects

D E S I R E Dose Estimation by Simulation of the ISS Radiation Environment

Simulation for LHC Radiation Background

Neutron Sources Fall, 2017 Kyoung-Jae Chung Department of Nuclear Engineering Seoul National University

Development of Contactless Method of the DUT Heating during Single-Event Effect Tests

Transcription:

Estec final presentation days 2018

Background VESPER Facility Conclusion & Outlook Jovian environment Radiation Effects VESPER history VESPER status Overview Experimental Results External Campaign Summary Outlook

Vesper Facility Motivation Juice Mission JUICE - JUpiter ICy moons Explorer is the first largeclass mission of ESA. Planned for launch in 2022 and arrival at Jupiter in 2029, it will spend at least three years making detailed observations of the giant gaseous planet Jupiter and three of its largest moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa. Harsh radiation environment Magnetically trapped charged particles, solar protons and galactic cosmic rays. Main contribution to dose: high-energy trapped electrons. Secondary radiation generated by the interaction of the environment with the spacecraft VESPER - Very energetic Electron facility for Space Planetary Exploration Missions in harsh Radiative environments. Part of a high energy electron linac line. Main purpose test bench for general purpose radiation testing, e.g. electronics

SEL Single Event Upset is caused by a single particle changing the state of a node. In case of memories a change of 1 -> 0 or 0->1, non-detsructive SEL Single Event Latchup is a potentially destructive event caused by a single particle, leads to a sudden increase in device current consumption, critical TID Total Ionizing Dose a cumulative dose effect, degradation of device characteristics and performance, can lead to total failure DD Displacement Damage cumulative damage to the silicon lattice in electronic devices

Electrons have been neglected as a source of SEEs due to their relatively low LET (e.g. compared to ions), very low nuclear reaction probability, and/or low relative flux and energy in operational scenarios (e.g. Earth trapped electron belts). Recent studies (2013-..) show that single electrons are capable of inducing SEEs, active research topic in terms of (I) underlying physical mechanisms and (II) implications on qualification approaches Spacecraft near Jupiter where the trapped electron energies can reach up to hundreds of MeV Delta-ray electrons from high energy protons and heavy ions in cosmic rays and high-energy accelerators Electro-magnetic contribution to damage /degradation of electronics/detectors in high-energy physics experiments High-energy electron linear accelerators

overview Main application of the test bench is that of characterizing electronic components for the operation in a Jovian environment Beam monitoring using the FBCT (fast beam current transformer), BTV screens and radiochromic films Calibration of the facility using RadFET, the ESA SEU monitor and gold activation measurements Facility can operate with laser driven beam and without dark current Typical beam parameters pulse charge 1 15 pc, Flux 7 x 10 6-1 x 10 8, dose rate 2 mgy/s - 31.6 mgy/s

Beam Characterization RadFET, gold foils and radiosensitive films were used to determine the real beam intensity, effort was put into the logging and analysis of beam characteristics SEU Testing ESA SEU monitor (SRAM 250nm technology) was irradiated with 200 MeV electrons. Large amounts of statistic were gathered over long runs over nights/weekends Shielding Effect 5mm of aluminium was placed in front of the ESA SEU monitor. A factor 6 increase of the SEU crosssection was observed High-energy electron included SEUs in 0.25 um technology compatible with FLUKA simulated value for electro-nuclear process SEU cross sections roughly 3 orders of magnitude lower than for hadrons Strong impact of bremsstrahlung photons on SEU probability through photo-nuclear processes Secondary neutrons are also considered but have a negligible contribution with respect to photons Fluka Modelling Energy deposition simulations and secondary particle simulation, gold foil simulation

FLUKA is a particle physics MonteCarlo simulation package. Simulation of interaction of beam with different elements in the beamline that create secondary particles through the interaction with the beam (e.g. vacuum window) Event-by-event energy deposition scoring focusing on indirect energy deposition through nuclear interactions

CMOS tech. G. Hubert, Integration, the VLSI Journal (2015) CMOS CMOS technology integration represented by minimum distance between source and drain in basic transistor gate width SEU cross-section For indirect energy deposition (i.e. through nuclear interaction such as neutrons in the graph above) the SEU cross section per bit is expected to be roughly constant with integration due to compensation of lower critical charge and smaller sensitive volume Technologies used The SEU rate per chip increases due to larger number of bits in highly integrated parts. VESPER tests: SEUs in 0.25um (250nm) and 28 nm technologies

energy Scan Tests from 60 MeV to 200 MeV at VESPER. Shown dependency of cross-section with energy. Crosssection remains constant with the change of flux, excluding prompt dose effects Impact of technology node Tests with two different device generations show a higher sensitivity for more integrated devices. The 28nm technology roughly a magnitude higher crosssection than 250nm technology Tests at medical linac Complementary tests at lower energy in medical LINAC facility adapted to electronics testing (RADEF Jyvaskyla, Finland) Important for SEU threshold determination; 20MeV not sufficient to reproduce saturation value Effect of Scaling Proton cross section (indirect energy deposition) decreases by factor 3 from 0.25um (black) to 28nm (red). Same trend would be expected for electronuclear dominated process however, 28nm electron SEU bit cross section is factor 10 larger

Setup Devices tested are commercially available SRAM. The memories were tested for latchups, the current consumption was monitored. Tests from 60 MeV to 170 MeV performed Results Latchups were observed in the memories. The results will be published in 2018 NSREC. Conclusion Destructive events induced by electrons have been observed. More test are planned with several other memories and differing charge rates.

An array of different device generations were tested, both destructive and non-destructive effects were evaluated Due to the possibility to run experiments during the night and during the weekend, an impressive total number of testing time could be accumulated Useful for effects with a very low cross-section, requiring large fluence Not decreased sensitivity for more integrated technology to be further investigated A first time a destructive effect caused by electrons was shown

First proof of electron induced SEE in larger technology nodes. First tests providing a more complete picture with test from 20 200 MeV. Further research on destructive SEEs and SEU dependence with technology node. Main contributor at different tech. nodes and energies to be investigated First potentially destructive single event effects observed. Different effects still observable with the dark current beam - SEB There are still other possible application for the laser driven beam other destructive single event effects (displacement damage)