On the Detection Possibility of Extragalactic Objects Redshift Change

Similar documents
q The study of the structure and evolution of the universe is Cosmology. q The universe is

Outline. Covers chapter 2 + half of chapter 3 in Ryden

Doppler shifts in astronomy

THE FIFTH DIMENSION EQUATIONS

3 The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric

Model of the Universe based on the Repulsive Dark Matter

COSMOLOGY The Universe what is its age and origin?

κ = f (r 0 ) k µ µ k ν = κk ν (5)

Tuesday: Special epochs of the universe (recombination, nucleosynthesis, inflation) Wednesday: Structure formation

Observational Cosmology

General Relativity and Cosmology. The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang

Test of General Relativity Theory by Investigating the Conservation of Energy in a Relativistic Free Fall in the Uniform Gravitational Field

Outline. The Cosmological Principle II. The Perfect Cosmological Principle. The cosmological principle. Covers chapter 2 + half of chapter 3 in Ryden

Cosmology Dark Energy Models ASTR 2120 Sarazin

1. This question is about Hubble s law. The light received from many distant galaxies is red-shifted. (a) State the cause of this red-shift (1)

PAPER 73 PHYSICAL COSMOLOGY

Lecture 10: Cosmology and the Future of Astronomical Research

The Definition of Density in General Relativity

New Blackhole Theorem and its Applications to Cosmology and Astrophysics

BROCK UNIVERSITY. Test 2, March 2015 Number of pages: 9 Course: ASTR 1P02 Number of Students: 420 Date of Examination: March 5, 2015

D.V. Fursaev JINR, Dubna. Mysteries of. the Universe. Problems of the Modern Cosmology

Chapter 1 Introduction. Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology SS

Cosmology ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Hubble Ultra-Deep Field

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

Cosmology AS7009, 2008 Lecture 2

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

The Perfect Cosmological Principle

PHY 475/375. Lecture 5. (April 9, 2012)

AST 101 General Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

MATHEMATICAL MODELLING AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE FLOW DYNAMICS IN

3.1 Cosmological Parameters

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Research Article Hubble Diagram Test of Expanding and Static Cosmological Models: The Case for a Slowly Expanding Flat Universe

THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY FACULTY OF SCIENCE INTERMEDIATE PHYSICS PHYS 2913 ASTROPHYSICS AND RELATIVITY (ADVANCED) ALL QUESTIONS HAVE THE VALUE SHOWN

Chapter 1. The Postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity

DO PHYSICS ONLINE. WEB activity: Use the web to find out more about: Aristotle, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo and Newton.

Why is the Universe Expanding?

Introduction to Cosmology (in 5 lectures) Licia Verde

Lecture 22: The expanding Universe. Astronomy 111 Wednesday November 15, 2017

A Panoramic Tour in Black Holes Physics

Type Ia Supernova Observations. Supernova Results:The Context. Supernova Results. Physics 121 December 4, fainter. brighter

Galaxy structures described by ECE theory

12. Relativistic Cosmology I. Simple Solutions to the Einstein Equations

Olbers Paradox. Lecture 14: Cosmology. Resolutions of Olbers paradox. Cosmic redshift

IB Physics - Astronomy

Cosmology AS

Hubble s Law and the Cosmic Distance Scale

Lecture 37 Cosmology [not on exam] January 16b, 2014

A A + B. ra + A + 1. We now want to solve the Einstein equations in the following cases:

Classical Mechanics NEWTONIAN SYSTEM OF PARTICLES MISN NEWTONIAN SYSTEM OF PARTICLES by C. P. Frahm

Why does Saturn have many tiny rings?

Astr 2320 Tues. May 2, 2017 Today s Topics Chapter 23: Cosmology: The Big Bang and Beyond Introduction Newtonian Cosmology Solutions to Einstein s

The structure of the Pivot universe

Possible Solutions to Olbers Paradox

Ta-Pei Cheng PCNY 9/16/2011

(Part 1) Recycling Universe

Modeling the Universe Chapter 11 Hawley/Holcomb. Adapted from Dr. Dennis Papadopoulos UMCP

The Kinetic Theory of Gases

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

λ λ CHAPTER 7 RED-SHIFTS AND ENERGY BALANCE Red-shifts Energy density of radiation Energy density of matter Continuous creation 7.

Physics of Galaxies 2016 Exercises with solutions batch I

Gravitational Lensing

Homework 6 Name: Due Date: June 9, 2008

Clusters are Very Large Magnets. U NM December 1, 2009

The Expanding Universe

On computing Gaussian curvature of some well known distribution

Introduction and Fundamental Observations

Lecture 32: The Expanding Universe Readings: Sections 26-5 and 28-2

Cosmic Inflation and Energy Conservation of the Universe

Einstein Equation and Self-Graviting Objects. Connotations for High Density Stars

Isotropy and Homogeneity

The State of the Universe

AU/Mpc km/au s 1 (2) = s 1 (3) n(t 0 ) = ɛ(t 0) mc 2 (7) m(h) = m p = kg (8)

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 26. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Astronomy 114. Lecture35:TheBigBang. Martin D. Weinberg. UMass/Astronomy Department

Lecture 34: The Big Bang Readings: Sections 28-3 and 28-6

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Cosmology. Lecture Topics. Colliding Galaxy Simulations The expanding universe Cosmology. The Age of the Universe The Big Bang

IoP. An Introduction to the Science of Cosmology. Derek Raine. Ted Thomas. Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics

A glimpse on Cosmology: Mathematics meets the Data

Cosmology - Contents

The Cosmological Distance Ladder. It's not perfect, but it works!

CH 14 MODERN COSMOLOGY The Study of Nature, origin and evolution of the universe Does the Universe have a center and an edge? What is the evidence

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

Licia Verde. ICREA & ICC-UB-IEEC CERN Theory Division.

HSC Physics Core 9.2 Space! Part 2: Launching into orbit! Overview of Part 2:!

Lecture 1 General relativity and cosmology. Kerson Huang MIT & IAS, NTU

Overview DARK MATTER & DARK ENERGY. Dark Matter and Dark Energy I. Definition Current Understanding Detection Methods Cosmological Impact

Cosmology II. Shape and Geometry of the Universe. Physics 113 Goderya. Back to our 2- dimensional analogy:

VU lecture Introduction to Particle Physics. Thomas Gajdosik, FI & VU. Big Bang (model)

Supernovae and cosmology

Tools for Investigation of Dynamics of DC-DC Converters within Matlab/Simulink

Velocity, Acceleration and Equations of Motion in the Elliptical Coordinate System

One of elements driving cosmological evolution is the presence of radiation (photons) Early universe

PHY323:Lecture 7 Dark Matter with Gravitational Lensing

Astro 101 Fall 2013 Lecture 12. Cosmology. T. Howard

The Early Universe: A Journey into the Past

Integrated Activities in the High Energy Astrophysics Domain (AHEAD)

BASICS OF COSMOLOGY Astro 2299

The Early Universe: A Journey into the Past

Transcription:

Applied Physics Research; Vol. 7, No. ; 15 ISSN 1916-9639 E-ISSN 1916-9647 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education On the Detection Possibility of Extragalactic Objects Redshift Change Jarosla ynecek 1 1 Isetex, Inc., 95 Pampa Drie, Allen, TX 7513, USA Correspondence: Jarosla ynecek, Isetex, Inc., 95 Pampa Drie, Allen, TX 7513, USA. E-mail: jhynecek@netscape.net Receied: February 11, 14 Accepted: February 6, 15 Online Published: February 8, 15 doi:1.5539/apr.7np58 URL: http://dx.doi.org/1.5539/apr.7np58 Abstract This paper describes the detail calculations of expected redshift change in the galaxies or other distant objects light after a certain amount of time between obserations has elapsed. The detection of this phenomenon has been proposed since the ubble s discoery of the galaxies redshift dependence on their distance from Earth and their significant recession elocities. Various astrophysicists hae performed such calculations for seeral cosmological models of the Unierse, but not for the model introduced by the author of this paper. This is now addressed in this publication. Keywords: galaxy redshift change in time, finite size model of the Unierse, Big Bang theory, graitational redshift, Doppler redshift, ubble constant, deformable dark matter, cosmological graitational potential, gamma ray bursts, CMBR temperature 1. Introduction Seeral astrophysicists hae proposed the measurement of change in the galaxies redshift with the elapsed time of obserations. The most comprehensie and early ealuation of this phenomenon was published by Sandage (196, 1 with possibly the earliest ersion suggested by Tolman (193, 1934. Seeral recent publications on this subject are by Loeb (1998 and by Lerner, Falomo, and Scarpa (15. oweer, all of these publications are using some ariations of the classical models of the Unierse based either on the main stream Big Bang (BB model or on the Newtonian flat space model. In the preious publication ynecek (1a has introduced a new model of the Unierse that assumes the Unierse being finite in size and filled with a repulsie and deformable Dark (transparent Matter (DM. The DM is repulsie to isible radiating matter but attractie to itself. In this model the galaxies are treated only as small test bodies floating from the bulk of the Unierse to the edge where they explode and generate the well-known immense Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB detected here on Earth. The GRBs that are reflected back to the bulk of the Unierse then contribute to the generation of new matter. This model is in line with the theory proposed by oyle, Burbidge & Narlikar ( of a steady state Unierse with a constant matter creation. The new matter then condenses to stars and eentually to new galaxies endlessly repeating the cycle of creation and destruction. The galaxies explosions residue at the edge of the Unierse generates also the Cosmic Microwae Background Radiation (CMBR with its temperature of.75 K. The repulsie DM density is ery small but its graitational effects dominate the isible matter graitation at large distances. The graitational field of galaxies is thus compensated and screened by the DM after a certain distance. The galaxies thus for the most part moe in this Unierse independently of each other. The one of the significant contributions of this model to the theory of the Unierse, in comparison to other models of the Unierse in particular the BB model, is in the deriation of the relation between the ubble constant and the CMBR temperature (ynecek, 13. These two parameters are typically considered independent of each other. In this model they hae been found dependent and one can be deried from the other. This is only possible in a finite and thermodynamically enclosed model as this one is and not in the open models such as the BB. The details of the model mathematical background and its excellent agreement with the arious obserations hae been published earlier by ynecek (1a, 14. The important equations needed for the deriation of the redshift time dependence are presented in the next section. 58

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15. Mathematical Background Since the long range graitational effects of the isible radiating mater and all of the radiation can be neglected, the space-time metric can be considered static, spherically symmetric, and described by the following differential metric line element (ynecek, 11, 1b: ds ( c g dr g Ω = gtt rr ttd (1 where: dω = dϑ + sin ϑdφ, g tt = exp(φ, g tt g rr = 1, and c is the local intergalactic speed of light. The cosmological Newton graitational potential for the isible matter φ normalized to c is calculated using the well-known equation: ( r 4πκ ϕ ( r = m( ( r ( c ( r where κ is the Newton graitational constant. Due to the deformation of the obsered natural radius r by the DM graity, the physical radius (r must be used in the formula instead of r and this parameter is found from the differential equation that follows from the metric: ϕ = g dr = e dr (3 rr Since any particular galaxy now represents only a small test body in this Unierse, the well-known and many times erified Lagrange formalism can be used to describe the motion of such galaxies. The Lagrangian is therefore as follows: ϕ c ϕ dr ϕ dω (4 L = e e e dτ dτ dτ For a purely radial motion the Lagrangian can be simplified and the first integrals of the corresponding Euler-Lagrange equations easily found using the initial condition at the origin where the recession elocity is zero and where: dτ =. The results are: dτ ϕ = e (5 dr ϕ (6 = c c e dτ Eliminating the non-obserable dτ from these equations then leads to the formula for the recession elocity: dr ϕ = c e ϕ 1 e (7 For the relatiely near objects, where the cosmological graitational potential for the isible matter φ is still small, it holds that: (r ~ r, and m( = m. This simplifies Equation 7 as follows: dr 8 c ϕ = π κ m r = r (8 3 From this result it is then clear that the recession elocity is linearly proportional to the natural coordinate distance r of such nearby objects from the origin and that the ubble constant is related to the DM density m at the origin according to the following Equation: 8 = π κ m (9 3 The recession elocity and the ubble constant are referenced to the DM coordinate system, so the alue of the ubble constant should be corrected and referenced to the Earth's centered coordinate system from where it is actually measured. oweer, the correction is ery small and it will be neglected. Earth and its Milky Way galaxy are located relatiely near the center of the Unierse in comparison to its immense size. In order to proceed further in the model description it is necessary to find the relation for the DM density m( as a function of the physical radius. This is obtained by adapting the well-known approach described, for example, 59

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15 by Zel'doich and Noiko (11 where the DM pressure gradient is expressed as a function of the physical radial distance: dp 4π κ m( = m( (1 After substituting for the DM pressure from the relation: c = P / m, and defining the normalized mass density function: m n ( = m(/m, Equation 1 can be rearranged with the help of the Green's function as: ( m n ( = exp A mn ( ξ ξ ξ / dξ (11 where A is a constant equal to: A = 4πκm /c. There is no known analytic closed form solution for this equation, so it is necessary to use the numerical iteratie approach or find an approximating function. The approximating function approach was selected for the next steps to aoid ery long computing times during iterations. The selected function, howeer, underestimates the true alue of the DM mass density at large, but the error has only a small oerall effect. The first two iterations and the approximating function: 4 6 8 1 3 4 61 457 m a ( = exp + + +... (1 4 6 8 1 h 1 h 35 h 16 h 31 h are shown in a graph in Figure 1..8 ma ( x.6 m1 ( x m ( x.4..1.1 1 1 Figure 1. The graphs of the first two iterations (dashed and dot-dashed lines and the approximating function describing the dark matter mass density as a function of the physical radius where: x = / h. The introduced parameter defined as: h = c/, is called the ubble distance or the ubble physical radius x Another adantage of using the approximating function is that the DM concentration tail extending past the maximum radial distance can be easily cut off by suitably truncating the power series expansion in the exponent. This feature is adantageous if it is considered that the isible matter debris from explosions of galaxies are accumulating at the edge of the unierse and are forming a loosely bound shell there. Of course, it is possible to add more terms than shown in Equation 1; howeer, this will not be pursued any further in this paper, since the accuracy of the approximation was found reasonable. Once the mass density function is known it is easy to find the normalized graitational potential for the isible matter using the formula in Equation, and for the dark matter using the Green's function formula deried also from the Gauss law as follows: ξ dξ m ( ζ ζ dζ 3.33 = A m ( ξ ( ξ ξ / ξ a a ϕd ( = A d 3. 33 ξ Both potentials are plotted in the graphs shown in Figure. In the next step of the model description it is necessary to find the formula for the Z shift, since this is the parameter that is directly measured by astronomers. The Z shift typically consists of the three components: the star graity (13 6

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15 induced redshift, the cosmological potential induced redshift, and the Doppler redshift resulting from the recession elocity. The star graity induced redshift does not hae to be considered here, since after the star or the galaxy explosions hae occurred when the Supernoa explosions or the GRB data are compiled, most of the principal source of the graitational field has been conerted to radiation and radiated away and only the remnants or the afterglow produce the light that is obsered. The cosmological potential induced redshift does not hae to be considered either, since in this model the galaxies are in a radial free fall and this compensates for the shift..5 1 ϕ( s 1.5 ϕd( s.5 3 3.5 11 8 11 9 11 1 11 11 11 1 11 13 Figure. The graphs of dependencies of normalized graitational potentials for the isible matter (solid line and for the dark matter as functions of the physical radius. The integration constants were adjusted such that the potentials at infinity are zero ( s Ly The only remaining redshift component is thus the Doppler redshift resulting from the radial recession elocity r. The Doppler redshift obsered on Earth, therefore, is: r / cr gtt exp( ϕ Z( = 1 = 1 = 1 (14 / c g exp(ϕ r r where c r indicates the light speed at the galaxy location in reference to Earth. The graph of the Z dependency on the natural coordinate radius r is shown in Figure 3. tt 1 1 Zs ( 1.1.1 11 8 11 9 11 1 11 11 rs ( Ly Figure 3. The graph of the dependency of redshift on the natural radial distance r. The maximum redshift that can 9 be obsered is: Z mx = 1.35. The isible matter does not exist at the distances larger than: r mx =.11 1 Ly, since it disintegrates a the Unierse's edge 61

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15 The radial distance r, also called in this paper the natural radial distance, which is the obserable parameter, is calculated according to Equation 3 as follows: r( = exp( ϕ (15 To complete the model description the graphs of the galaxies recession elocity and the speed of light as functions of the natural radial distance r are shown in Figure 4. 11 6 11 5 s (1 3 cr(1 s 3 11 4 11 3 1 1 11 6 11 7 11 8 11 9 11 1 11 11 Ly Figure 4. The graphs of the speed of light (dashed line and the galaxies recession elocity in km/sec as functions of the natural radial distance r from the center of the Unierse in light-years rs ( 3. Deriation of the redshift rate change The redshift Z dependency on time can be found by first differentiating Equation 14 with respect to distance and then by differentiating the distance with respect to time. The result of differentiating Equation 14 with respect to distance is as follows: dz dϕ exp( ϕ = (16 (1 exp(ϕ exp(ϕ The differential of the physical distance with respect to natural time t is found from Equation 3 and Equation 7. = c exp( ϕ exp(ϕ (17 By combining Equations 16 and 17 the result for the rate change of the redshift Z is: dz dϕ exp(ϕ = c (18 exp(ϕ To proceed further it is useful to find the expression for the potential of the isible matter in terms of the redshift Z. This is obtained again from Equation 14 with the result: ( Z + 1 exp( ϕ = (19 1+ ( Z + 1 Using this formula in Equation 18 results in a suitable expression for the numerical ealuation as follows: 6

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15 dz n d = c 1+ ( Z + 1 ϕ ( Z + 1 ( It is also possible to find an approximation for the nearby galaxies where the redshift is still small. For this case it holds that the DM density is still reasonably constant and from Equation therefore follows that: ϕ c (1 dϕ = ϕ ( c c By combining these formulas together, using also the logarithm of formula in Equation 19 to substitute for the isible matter potential, the small Z approximation for the redshift rate change is: dz ( Z + 1 1 1 a ln Z + 1+ 1+ ( + 1 (3 Z Z + 1 Both of these Equations; and 3 were graphically ealuated using conenient Mathcad 15 numerical symbolic calculations and the results are plotted in graphs in Figure 5. 1 9 1.5 1 9 ΔZn ( s 1 Yr ΔZa ( s 1 Yr 11 9 5 1 1 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 Figure 5. The plots of the dependency of redshift change for the 1 year time period between obserations as a function of the galaxy redshift Z. The dotted line is the Z < 1 approximation Zs ( The ubble constant used in all these calculations was: = 68. km/secmpc (Keel, 7. This alue is in an excellent agreement with the alue deried by ynecek (1a, 13 from the precisely measured CMBR temperature: T =.75±. K. The preiously deried formula relating these two parameters is as follows: T 3 5 exp(ϕ 3 h c = =. 77 K (4 4 k 8 π B κ where k B is the Boltzmann constant, h is the Planck constant, and the isible matter cosmological graitational potential: φ = -1.7436 is calculated, using Equations and 1, at the Unierse s edge. 63

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15 The time interal between the two consecutie obserations was selected to be 1 years. From the graphs it is thus clearly seen that for the small Z, less than unity, the approximation of constant DM density is reasonable, but fails for the larger alues. The interesting result is that there is an optimum redshift rate change for 3 < Z < 4 where the redshift rate is the largest. The obserations should therefore focus on such cosmological objects. The galaxy deceleration together with the slower speed of light at large distances cause the redshift change rate for large Z objects to be lower and eentually drop to zero at the maximum Z shift: Z mx = 1.35. This finding may seem somewhat counterintuitie, since one would expect the larger rate for the larger redshifts. This result is an unaoidable consequence of the finite size model of the Unierse that is cured by the DM graity. Such an interesting finding will most likely not be the same for the BB model or any other similar Unierse model deried from the BB theory and, therefore, could be used to confirm the eracity of a particular model. For a better clarity another plot of the redshift rate change as a function of the natural radial distance r is shown in Figure 6. From this graph it is clear that the redshift rate drops to zero at the edge of the Unierse een though the redshift itself is the largest there. 1 9 1.5 1 9 ΔZn ( s 1 Yr 1 1 9 5 1 1 1 1 8 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 11 r( s Ly Figure 6. The plot of the dependency of redshift change for the 1 year time period between obserations as a function of the natural radial distance r in light-years 4. Discussion It is clear from the graph in Figure 5 that the maximum of the redshift rate that can be obsered is not much larger than1 9 /1 Years. This is an extremely small alue that may be difficult to detect. oweer, with the unprecedented progress in the obserational astronomy and in the atomic clock long term stability, the detection might perhaps be possible. It is, of course, necessary to also subtract the rate changes due to the arious peculiar motions, such as of Earth in the Sun s orbit, the Sun s motion in our galaxy, and our galaxy motion in the Unierse, but this should not present an unsurmountable problem. The reference for subtraction can either be the local galaxy cluster background or the CMBR. Another problem could be the galaxies intrinsic redshift change. But this effect could also be subtracted by obsering the nearby similar galaxies or selected objects. An adantage of the described measurement analysis is that it inoles only one ariable, the redshift, which can be relatiely precisely detected in the light spectrum of distant objects of the Unierse. The successful detection of the redshift rate maximum and the confirmation of the redshift rate dependency on the Z shift as is shown in Figure 5 would represent yet another confirmation of correctness of the finite size model of the Unierse, in addition to the determination of the precise alue of ubble constant from the CBMR temperature, and proe the BB dogma deried from the simplistic extrapolation of obserations to be wrong. 64

www.ccsenet.org/apr Applied Physics Research Vol. 7, No. ; 15 5. Conclusions The article described the detail calculations of the expected redshift change in the galaxies light after a certain amount of time between the obserations has elapsed. This deriation was made for a new model of the Unierse. The maximum alue of the redshift rate was also deried suggesting the best redshifts at which the obserations should be carried out. The possibility of detection of this phenomenon has been proposed since the ubble s discoery of the galaxies redshift dependence on their distance from Earth and their significant recession elocities. The detection of this effect would represent a dramatic confirmation of an alternate model of the Unierse that is static, finite in space and infinite in time. The Unierse without a Big Bang was also recently proposed by Ali and Das (14. References Tolman, R. C. (193. On the estimation of distances in a cured unierse with a non-static line element. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 16(7, 511. http://dx.doi.org/1.173/pnas.16.7.511 Tolman, R. C. (1934. Relatiity Thermodynamic and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford Uniersity Press. Sandage, A. (196. The Change of Redshift and Apparent Luminosity of Galaxies due to the Deceleration of Selected Expanding Unierses. The Astrophysical Journal, 136, 319. http://dx.doi.org/1.186/147385 Loeb, A. (1998. Direct Measurement of Cosmological Parameters from the Cosmic Deceleration of Extragalactic Objects. The Astrophysical Journal, 499, L111-L114. http://dx.doi.org/1.186/311375 oyle, F. G. Burbidge, F. G., & Narlikar, J. V. (. A Different Approach to Cosmology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Uniersity Press. Keel, W. C. (7. The Road to Galaxy Formation (nd ed., pp. 7 8. Springer. Sandage, A. (1. The Tolman surface brightness test for the reality of the expansion. V. Proenance of the test and a new representation of the data for three remote ubble space telescope galaxy clusters. The Astronomical Journal, 139(, 78. http://dx.doi.org/1.188/4-656/139//78 Zel doich, Ya. B., & Noiko, I. D. (11. Stars and Relatiity. NY: Doer Publications, Inc., Mineola. ynecek, J. (11. Geometry based critique of general relatiity theory. Physics Essays, 4(, 18. Retrieed from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1g1-585469.html ynecek, J. (1a. Repulsie dark matter model of the unierse. Physics Essays, 5(4, 561. Retrieed from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1g1-336643.html ynecek, J. (1b. The Theory of Static Graitational Field. Applied Physics Research, 4(4, 44-57. http://dx.doi.org/1.5539/apr.4n4p44 ynecek, J. (13. The Repulsie Dark Matter Model of the Unierse Relates the ubble Constant to the Temperature of the CMBR. Applied Physics Research, 5(, 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/1.5539/apr.5np76 ynecek, J. (14. An Interesting Journey of Discoery of Many Errors in Einstein s General Relatiity Theory. Retrieed from http://ixra.org/abs/147.136 Ali, A. F., & Das, S. (14. Cosmology from quantum potential. Retrieed from http://arxi.org/abs/144.3933 Lerner, E., Falomo, R., & Scarpa, R. (15. U V surface brightness of galaxies from the local Unierse to Z ~5. International Journal of Modern Physics D (to be published. Retrieed from http://arxi.org/abs/145.75 Copyrights Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s, with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creatie Commons Attribution license (http://creatiecommons.org/licenses/by/3./. 65