MEMORANDUM. Date: May 8, Planning & Development Committee. From: Ilidia Sa Melo, Deputy City Clerk. Re: Items Further to the Agenda May 8, 2018

Similar documents
Re: Draft OPA 320 Recommended Amendments to Various Neighbourhood Policies Statutory Public Meeting to be held on Monday 16 November 2015

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10

CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 27, 2015 AGENDA 2015 ANNEXATION MISC

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

1. Departmental Presentation - Away Goes Trouble Down the Drain - Highway Division. 3. Continued Discussion an Ordinance for Disorderly Residences

Community and Infrastructure Services Committee

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Growth & Intensification Study Secondary Plan Stakeholder Session June 26th, 2017

Growth Management: Analysis of Comments Received and Responses Comments received as of October 16, 2017

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

Waikato District Plan. Plan Change document

Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

City of Grand Island Tuesday, August 14, 2018 Council Session

City of Cambridge. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

Draft Urban Hamilton Official Plan. Amendment No. XX

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

GIS in Community & Regional Planning

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

From: Sanderson, Kerry Sent: Monday, July 22, :02 PM To: Kathleen Larsen Subject: 1620 Westover Rd. Hello Kathleen,

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

A Method for Mapping Settlement Area Boundaries in the Greater Golden Horseshoe

Los Alamos Planning Advisory Committee. Stephen Peterson March 19, 2007

OTTER POINT ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION. Notice of Meeting on Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7 p.m.

Local Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities

HIGHLANDS REGIONAL MASTER PLAN MONITORING PROGRAM FUTURE LAND USE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Conservation Authority Regulations and Mapping

2267 N o r t h 1500 W C l i n t o n U T 84015

(fc) BPC Policy No , IIM7fyilK Office of the District Clerk TRANSITION ZONE POLICY

CONGLETON INDUSTRIAL PARK LT 6 EX W 300' & E 350' LT 7 BLK 1, a subdivision of land in the City of Overland Park, Johnson County, Kansas.

Town of Round Hill Virginia

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

OXFORD HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

Council Workshop on Neighbourhoods Thursday, October 4 th, :00 to 4:00 p.m. Burlington Performing Arts Centre

4. TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE MODIFICATION EMOND STREET MODIFICATION APPORTÉE À LA FERMETURE TEMPORAIRE DE LA RUE EMOND

High Speed / Commuter Rail Suitability Analysis For Central And Southern Arizona

Edexcel Geography Advanced Paper 2

Frequently Asked Questions

TOWN OF LOGY BAY-MIDDLE COVE-OUTER COVE MUNICIPAL PLAN

MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT. Hutson, Chair Dillard Alberty Iski, D.A. Charney, Vice Chair Butler West, Co.

TAKE ROLL CALL TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A QUORUM OF MEMBERS PRESENT

Appendix I-1: Archaeological Records Search

WORK SESSION AGENDA COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE APRIL 1, 2019 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL MEETING

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING

PREAMBLE. Planning and Development staff are available to answer any questions that you may have concerning dark sky principles.

Winter Operations Differences Between Rural & Urban Areas

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

Allo Fiber City Checklist

Appendix C: City of Mississauga Transportation Strategy Update

Evaluation of the Boundary for the Waiatarua Local Area Plan

G.1. Motion to approve Project Calendar regarding Planning and Development Department Payments as follows:

VILLAGE OF MANHATTAN REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF MANHATTAN DECEMBER 4, 2018

Local Flood Hazards. Click here for Real-time River Information

City of Kingston Public Safety/General Government Committee Meeting Agenda Thursday, November 30, 2017

SNOW REMOVAL GUIDE. City Of Orange Township. Public Works Snow Removal Hotline: (973) My Orange Hotline: (973)

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

ENVISIONING OUR CITY: 2041 PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 November 16, 2017

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes

The following maps must be provided as a part of the ADA. The appropriate scale for each map should be determined at the pre application conference.

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

Country Residential High and Low Density Areas

Albuquerque City-wide Zoning Remapping

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

Former U.S. 59 Amelia Earhart Memorial Bridge Demolition Project Information *** Third & Final Blast ***

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

October 16, Dear Mr. Hawkins:

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

An online data and consulting resource of THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO THE JACK FORD URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER

Population Density. Population density: A measure of how crowded a place is.

Economic and Social Council

Economic Activity Economic A ctivity

Shaping Your Neighbourhood

AGENDA CLAYTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Creating a Pavement Management System Using GIS

Factors Affecting Human Settlement

The purpose of this report is to recommend a Geographic Information System (GIS) Strategy for the Town of Richmond Hill.

VOLUME 2 RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA PLANS & SECONDARY PLANS

FIRST CONTACT. Astronomy 101, Section 4 at the Domed Theater Professor Neil McFadden Professor John McGraw

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Capital & Planning Division

City of Grand Island Tuesday, October 13, 2015 Council Session

Committee Meeting November 6, 2018

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Six (6) Unit Apartment Building Along Garfield Boulevard - Bank Owned WEST GARFIELD BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL DETAILS PROPERTY OVERVIEW

Thoughts toward autonomous land development. Introduction

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England proposals for new electoral arrangements for Leeds City Council

Agenda Item 8 Planning Applications Last year Cllrs Symonds and King were appointed to review planning applications.

YONGE STREET AT WELLINGTON STREET LEFT TURN PROHIBITION PRE-PLANNING MEETING

Unit 1, Lesson 2. What is geographic inquiry?

January 12, Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF LAMBTON SHORES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

Dark Sky Initiative Draft Terms of Reference

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM Date: May 8, 2018 To: Planning & Development Committee From: Ilidia Sa Melo, Deputy City Clerk Re: Items Further to the Agenda May 8, 2018 Notes: Item 1, re: Boulevard Appeal Committee Minutes and Item 9, re: 25 Linnwood Avenue Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendments have been removed from the Consent Agenda. Delegations 1. Judy Sauder, re: item 10, North Cambridge Urban Boundary Expansion 2. Dale Buller-Power, re: item 10, North Cambridge Urban Boundary Expansion 3. Christopher Young, re: item 10, North Cambridge Urban Boundary Expansion Correspondence 1. Grainne Aitken, re: item 10, North Cambridge Urban Boundary Expansion PP. 3-4 2. Mark Kindrachuk, Intermarket Properties, re: item 10, North Cambridge PP. 5-6 Urban Boundary Expansion Ilidia Sa Melo Deputy City Clerk

CORRESPONDENCE #1 May 8, 2018 Planning & Development Committee meeting North Cambridge Urban Boundary Expansion. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the above. Firstly I wish to say that I support the council staff s recommendation to endorse the proposed new Urban Area boundary as presented at the recent public meeting of the Planning and Works Committee at the Region of Waterloo. At that meeting, I was one of many delegations who spoke in support of the proposal. I also represented a number of my neighbours and fellow Riverbank Drive residents who could not be present. I included some background and images of our street to give some context to the Regional Councillors but I suspect that our street needs no introduction to this Committee. I would like to state that I am very concerned about the fourth recommendation being presented to this Committee, namely that Cambridge Council request the Region of Waterloo to consider long range planning for the remaining lands outside the Urban Area along Riverbank Drive in a comprehensive way through the upcoming Municipal Comprehensive Review. At the Region s Planning and Works meeting last Tuesday, I made a presentation highlighting the many reasons why I do not support further development to the west of Riverbank Drive. I am concerned about the proximity of proposed development to the floodplain of the Grand River and other significant environmental features including woodland and wetland. I am concerned about the impact of increased traffic on Riverbank Drive which is Cambridge s last scenic route. The City s Heritage Master Plan states very clearly that this should be preserved and the East Side Lands Study has included this as a Guiding Principle from the start. I am concerned that development of the lands to the west of Riverbank Drive would necessitate the extension of municipal services which my family and the neighbours that I represent do not wish to connect to. I am concerned that development to the rear of 10 existing residences on Riverbank Drive would be extremely disruptive to me and my neighbours, bringing with it noise, dust and vibration during construction and light and noise pollution upon

completion. Not only that, but our privacy would be greatly compromised as the land to the rear is at a much lower elevation than the existing homes. The Planning Rationale Report produced by the consultants WSP gives background to the proposed new urban area boundary and highlights reasons why it is the preferred solution. It also details the many reasons why development west of Riverbank Drive is not. East Side Lands has been a long and expensive process. My fellow residents and I have offered our support for the proposed residential development which will take place directly across the street from our homes. Whilst we do not welcome development coming to our quiet rural pocket of Cambridge, we understand that the Region is growing and greenfield sites are necessary. We hope that we can continue to be engaged in the planning process to ensure that the new community is one that we can live in harmony with and that respects the existing qualities of Riverbank Drive. Subjecting the residents of Riverbank Drive to years of more expensive studies and analysis during the upcoming Municipal Comprehensive Review for the benefit of a few select landowners wishing to develop just doesn t seem right. I would like to see Cambridge City Council following through with its Heritage Master Plan to preserve Riverbank Drive and to that end I propose that the fourth and final recommendation is not accepted by the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to provide my input. Grainne Aitken

CORRESPONDENCE #2 From: Mark Kindrachuk [mailto:mmk@intermarketinc.com] Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:54 PM To: Elaine Brunn Shaw; Michelle Sergi Cc: Michelle Sergi; dcurrie@mhbcplan.com; SANDY ACCHIONE; James Goodram; Rod Regier; helen@mcdonaldgreen.com; Karl Kiefer; Kathy Padgett; Peter Markine; Tom Galloway Subject: Parcel 2 ONLY in Urban Boundary: MESP Stage 2 Elaine and Michelle: As a follow-up to our discussion at the PIC last week and my vmail message to Elaine from today, we are requesting that our Parcel 2, which is a 2.5 ha lot at the corner of Riverbank Drive and Allendale Road be included in the Urban Boundary as part of the on-going MESP Stage 2 process. We have reduced our request by removing Parcel 1, in addition to removing Parcel 3, from the Urban Boundary request. Our plan is to include Parcel 2 in the Urban Boundary now; and then re-zone in the future for residential uses with rear lane access. We reviewed this plan with the local City councillor (Donna Reid), James Goodram and local residents and they thought it was a very good compromise. This revised plan addresses the key issues: maintain scenic route quality of Riverbank Drive the rear lane lots do not increase traffic on Riverbank Drive Parcel 2 provides a buffer to industrial uses to Riverbank residents Parcel 2 with rear lane lots provides built-in separation to industrial uses by planning for deep lots with garages; as well as a laneway and fence Resolution to this issue now provides certainty to residents and developer

Sincerely, Mark Kindrachuk President Intermarket Properties 489 Queen Street East; Suite 201 Toronto, ON M5A 1V1 www.intermarketinc.com