Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Similar documents
Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

Fundamentals of Sound

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations

A Unique Building For the Discerning Client P O S T ROA D E A S T W E S T P O R T, C O N N E C T I C U T

Monitoring Survey in the Vicinity of St. Marys Cement: Interim Report

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens

Investigations on effect of the orientation on thermal comfort in terraced housing in Malaysia

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency

conceptdesigns C0NCEPTDESIGNSARCHITETURE.CO.NZ architecture S t a g e Gisborne Beach House

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

P r O P e r t y L I S T I N G. 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle. The Most Prominent Building in the Seattle Skyline JOHN HANSEN.

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC

PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA

schematic lighting design courtesy of william rawn associates

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

Solar Control in Traditional Architecture, Potentials for Passive Design in Hot and Arid Climate

Regal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL

DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1.

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008

ARCHITECTURE IN THE DAYLIGHT

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING

Energy Use in Homes 2007

APPENDIX B. Noise Primer

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

ADVANCED ROOF COATINGS: MATERIALS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS

Mitigation of Gypsum Mine Voids Under SR-2 in Ottawa County, Ohio

Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

THE HISTORY OF WEATHER OBSERVING IN CHEYENNE, WYOMING,

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

APPENDIX 11A: BASELINE NOISE MONITORING RESULTS

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5

Experimental Performance and Numerical Simulation of Double Glass Wall Thana Ananacha

Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation

Transcription:

383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-104 - Prepared For: Anand Aggarwal 2507701 Ontario Inc. Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, Ontario K1K 0R8 Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Partner Omar Daher, B.Eng., EIT, Junior Environmental Scientist April 20, 2017 127 Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613) 836-0934 www.gradientwind.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes a roadway traffic noise impact study for three proposed buildings that form part of a single development located at 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street in downtown Ottawa, Ontario. The three towers are known as Towers A, B, and C, and are 10, 27, and 27 storeys above grade, respectively. Tower A is nearest to Albert Street, located north on the site; Tower B is nearest to Bay Street and Slater Street on the southwest corner of the site; Tower C is nearest to Slater Street and Lyon Street on the southeast corner of the site. Figure 1 illustrates a site plan with surrounding context. The major source of noise affecting the development is roadway traffic along Albert Street, Slater Street, and Lyon Street. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); (iii) future vehicular traffic volumes based on the City of Ottawa s Official Plan roadway classifications; and (iv) architectural drawings received from Woodman Architect & Associates Ltd. The results of the current study indicate that the dominant source of noise impacting the site is due to roadway traffic. Noise levels from roadway traffic will range between approximately 50 and 70 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 42 and 62 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 70 dba) occurs along the south and east façades of Tower C. Upgraded building components with higher sound attenuation properties are required where noise levels exceed 65 dba, as indicated in Figures 3-4. In addition to upgraded building components, all units in Towers A, B, and C will require air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, it will also be required to include Warning Clauses in all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized in Section 6. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway i

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 3. OBJECTIVES 2 4. METHODOLOGY 2 4.1 Background 2 4.2 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise 2 4.3 Roadway Noise Assessment 4 4.3.1 Theoretical Roadway Traffic Noise Predictions 4 4.3.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes 4 4.4 Indoor Noise Calculations 5 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6 5.1 Roadway Traffic Noise Levels 6 5.2 Noise Control Measures 8 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data (CD) Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway ii

1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by Manor Park Management to undertake a traffic noise impact study for three proposed buildings that form part of a single development located at 383 Slater Street/400 Albert Street in Ottawa, Ontario. This report summarizes the methodology, results, and recommendations related to a roadway traffic noise assessment. GWE s scope of work involved assessing exterior and interior noise levels generated by local roadway traffic, throughout the site. The assessment was performed on the basis of theoretical noise calculation methods conforming to the City of Ottawa 1 and Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) 2 guidelines. Noise calculations were based on architectural drawings provided by Woodman Architect Inc., with future traffic volumes corresponding to the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) roadway classifications. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this roadway traffic noise impact study is the proposed mixed-use, multi-building, development to be located at 383 Slater Street/400 Albert Street in Ottawa, Ontario. The site is situated on a parcel of land bounded by Albert Street to the north, Lyon Street north to the east, Slater Street to the south, and Bay Street to the west. In the near-field, the site is surrounded by the urban environment of downtown Ottawa, with the exception of the Nanny Goat Hill Community Garden to the southwest west. The proposed development features three buildings, referred to as Blocks A, B, and C, located on the north, southwest, and southeast portions of the site, respectively. The three buildings share four levels of underground parking, accessed from Bay Street, at the northwest corner of Block B. Block A is a 10-storey hotel, rising 26.22 meters, measured from grade to the top of the roof slab. The main hotel entrance is along Albert Street, at the centre of the north elevation. The building features an exterior dining terrace at the ground floor and a rooftop terrace serving as an outdoor living area. Blocks B and C both feature 27-storey towers, which reach a height of 79.79 meters, measured from grade to the top of the mechanical penthouse. The towers rise above six-storey podia with rectangular planforms, the long axis aligned in the east-west directions. At grade, Block B contains a residential lobby accessible from the south elevation and retail space accessible from the east elevation. Block C contains 1 City of Ottawa, Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, January 2016 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Publication NPC-300 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 1

a residential lobby accessible from the east elevation and retail spaces accessible from the east and west elevations. There is a rooftop terrace serving as an outdoor living area above the 6 th floor of Tower C. The major source of noise is roadway traffic along Albert Street, Lyon Street, and Slater Street. The site is surrounded with a mix of residential and commercial, low to high-rise buildings. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of this work are to: (i) calculate the future noise levels on the study buildings produced by local roadway traffic, (ii) ensure that interior noise levels do not exceed the allowable limits specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG) as outlined in Section 4.2 of this report. 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that particular source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Measurement of noise is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level (2 10-5 Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which better represents how the noise is perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of power results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. 4.2 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise For surface transportation, the equivalent sound energy level, L eq, provides a measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a period of time. For roadways, the L eq is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour (L eq16) daytime (07:00-23:00) / 8-hour (L eq8) nighttime (23:00-07:00) split to assess its impacts on buildings. Table 1 below describes the applicable indoor noise level limits for both roadway and railway. The City of Ottawa s ENCG specifies that the recommended indoor noise limit range (that is relevant to this study) is 45 and 40 for residence living/dining areas and Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 2

sleeping quarters respectively, as listed in Table 1. Based on GWE s experience, more comfortable indoor noise levels should be targeted toward 42 and 37 dba to control peak noise, and deficiencies in building envelope construction. TABLE 1: INDOOR SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA (ROAD & RAIL) 3 Type of Space Time Period Road L EQ (dba) Rail General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc. 07:00 23:00 50 45 Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing/retirement homes, day-care centres, theatres, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, etc. 07:00 23:00 45 40 Sleeping quarters of hotels/motels 23:00 07:00 45 40 Sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, nursing/retirement homes, etc. 23:00 07:00 40 35 Predicted noise levels at the plane of window (POW) dictate the action required to achieve the recommended sound levels. An open window is considered to provide a 10 dba reduction in noise, while a standard closed window is capable of providing a minimum 20 dba noise reduction. Therefore, where noise levels exceed 55 dba daytime and 50 dba nighttime, the ventilation for the building should consider the need for having windows and doors closed, which normally triggers the need for central air conditioning (or similar systems). Where noise levels exceed 65 dba daytime and 60 dba nighttime, building components will require higher levels of sound attenuation. 3 Adapted from ENCG Table 1.6 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 3

4.3 Roadway Noise Assessment 4.3.1 Theoretical Roadway Traffic Noise Predictions Noise predictions were performed with the aid of the MOECC computerized noise assessment program, STAMSON 5.04, for road analysis. Appendix A includes the STAMSON 5.04 input and output data. Roadway noise calculations were performed by treating each road segment as separate line sources of noise, and by using existing building locations as noise barriers. In addition to the traffic volumes summarized in Table 2 below, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following parameters: Truck traffic on all roadways was taken to comprise 5% heavy trucks and 7% medium trucks, as per ENCG requirements for noise level predictions The day/night split was taken to be 92% / 8% respectively for all streets Absorptive and reflective intermediate ground surfaces based on specific source-receiver path ground characteristics The study site was treated as having flat/gently sloping topography In some cases, the building is closer than 15 m to the centreline of the roadway. It should be noted that the minimum distance which can be specified in STAMSON is 15 m. Noise levels within this distance are not expected to vary significantly and the only acceptable noise model for use by the City of Ottawa is STAMSON. Noise receptors were strategically identified at 30 locations around the study area, as illustrated in Figure 2. 4.3.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes The ENCG dictates that noise calculations should consider future sound levels based on a roadway s classification at the mature state of development. Therefore, traffic volumes are based on the roadway classifications outlined in the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) and Transportation Master Plan 4, which provide additional details on future roadway expansions. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes are then based on data in Table B1 of the ENCG for each roadway classification. Table 2 (below) summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. 4 City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, November 2013 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 4

TABLE 2: ROADWAY TRAFFIC DATA Roadway Roadway Class Speed Limit (km/h) Official Plan AADT Albert Street Slater Street Lyon Street 2- Lane Urban Arterial (2-UAU) 2- Lane Urban Arterial (2-UAU) 2- Lane Urban Arterial (2-UAU) 50 15,000 50 15,000 50 15,000 4.4 Indoor Noise Calculations When calculations reveal that outdoor noise levels are sufficiently high as to require investigation of indoor noise levels, calculations are performed to verify the Sound Transmission Class (STC) requirements for building components. The difference between outdoor and indoor noise levels is the noise attenuation provided by the building envelope. According to common industry practice, complete walls and individual wall elements are rated according to the Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC ratings of common residential walls built in conformance with the Ontario Building Code (2012) typically exceed STC 35, depending on exterior cladding, thickness, and interior finish details. For example, brick veneered walls can achieve STC 55. Standard good quality double-glazed non-operable windows can have STC ratings ranging from 25 to 40, depending on the window manufacturer, pane thickness, and inter-pane spacing. As previously mentioned, windows are the known weak point in a partition. When daytime noise levels (from road and rail sources) at the plane of the window exceed 65 dba, calculations must be performed to evaluate the sound transmission quality of the building components to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. As a guideline, the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise levels). Note the City of Ottawa may require detailed window STC calculations be competed prior to building permit based on window sizes and floor plan layouts. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 5

5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Roadway Traffic Noise Levels The results of the roadway noise calculations are summarized below in Table 3 for receptors identified at the various heights, as well as for two outdoor living areas (OLA). Appendix A contains the complete set of input and output data from all STAMSON 5.04 calculations. The results of the current study indicate that noise levels due to roadway traffic over the site will range between 50 and 70 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 42 and 62 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 70 dba) occurs on the east and south facades of Tower C (Receptors 2, 4, 15, and 22), which are nearest and most exposed to Lyon Street and Slater Street. Outdoor noise levels are below the ENCG objective noise level of 55 dba. As such, noise control measures or mitigation are not required. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 6

TABLE 3: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROADWAY TRAFFIC Receptor Number Zone Location STAMSON 5.04 Noise Level (dba) Day Night 1 POW Ground Level Tower A East Façade 68 61 2 POW Ground Level Tower C East Façade 70 62 3 POW 3 nd Floor Tower C East Façade 69 62 4 POW 3 nd Floor Tower C South Façade 70 63 5 POW 3 nd Floor Tower C West Façade 65 58 6 POW 3 nd Floor Tower B South Façade 68 61 7 POW 3 nd Floor Tower B West Façade 65 58 8 POW 3 nd Floor Tower B East Façade 66 58 9 POW 6 th Floor Tower A North Façade 69 61 10 POW 6 th Floor Tower A East Façade 67 59 11 POW 6 th Floor Tower A West Façade 65 58 12 POW 9 th Floor Tower A South Façade 59 51 13 POW 9 th Floor Tower A West Façade 65 58 14 POW 18 th Floor Tower C East Façade 69 62 15 POW 18 th Floor Tower C South Façade 70 62 16 POW 18 th Floor Tower C West Façade 65 57 17 POW 18 th Floor Tower B East Façade 66 58 18 POW 18 th Floor Tower B South Façade 68 61 19 POW 18 th Floor Tower B West Façade 65 57 20 POW 18 th Floor Tower B North Façade 63 55 21 POW 26 th Floor Tower C East Façade 69 62 22 POW 26 th Floor Tower C South Façade 70 62 23 POW 26 th Floor Tower C West Façade 65 57 24 POW 26 th Floor Tower B East Façade 66 58 25 POW 26 th Floor Tower B South Façade 68 61 26 POW 26 th Floor Tower B West Façade 65 57 27 POW 26 th Floor Tower C North Façade 65 58 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 7

TABLE 3: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROADWAY TRAFFIC (CONTINUED) Receptor Number Zone Location STAMSON 5.04 Noise Level (dba) Day Night 28 POW 3 rd Floor Tower C North Façade 67 59 29 OLA Tower A Roof terrace 50 42 30 OLA Tower C Outdoor terrace at 6 th floor 51 44 5.2 Noise Control Measures The noise levels predicted due to roadway traffic on certain façades of the three towers exceed the criteria listed in ENCG for building components. Therefore, upgraded building components will be required. The STC requirements for the windows of the three towers are summarized in Table 4 below for various units on various building facades within the development (see Figures 3-4): TABLE 4: STC REQUIREMENTS Location Facade Retail room window STC Living room window STC Bedroom window STC Tower A (Hotel) North - - 33 East - - 30 South 28 28 33 Tower B West 25 25 30 East 25 25 30 North 25 25 30 Tower C South 28 28 33 East 28 28 33 Note: Exterior wall components on these façades require a minimum STC of 45, where a window/wall system is used. Wall assemblies meeting STC 45 would include steel stud walls minimum 92 mm deep filled with batt insulation, exterior dense glass sheeting, and 16 mm gypsum board on the inside. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 8

A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any particular window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. Results of the calculations also indicate that all units in Towers A, B, and C will require air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, it will also be required to include Warning Clauses in all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized in Section 6. 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the current study indicate that roadway traffic is the dominant source of noise impacting the site. Noise levels due to roadway traffic will range between 50 and 70 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 42 and 62 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 70 dba) occurs along the south and east façades of Tower C. In addition, higher Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceeded 65 dba, as described in Section 5.2 (See Figures 3-4). Results of the calculations also indicate that all units in Towers A, B, and C will require air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, it will also be required to include Warning Clauses in all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized below: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing roadway traffic Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 9

APPENDIX A STAMSON 5.04 - INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA A1

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 09:11:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 67.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 9.00 / 9.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A2

Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg -23.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 59.00 / 59.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -58.00 deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 33.00 / 33.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A3

Road data, segment # 3: Lyon2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: Lyon2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -23.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 59.00 / 59.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -23.00 deg Angle2 : 0.00 deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 9.00 / 9.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A4

Results segment # 1: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (67.89 + 45.93 + 0.00) = 67.91 dba -90 67 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.89 67 90 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-8.94 0.00 0.00-13.62 45.93 Segment Leq : 67.91 dba A5

Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (0.00 + 44.27 + 55.42) = 55.74 dba -90-58 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.95-7.50 0.00 0.00-10.76 44.27-58 -23 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.95-7.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.42 Segment Leq : 55.74 dba A6

Results segment # 3: Lyon2 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (0.00 + 33.60 + 0.00) = 33.60 dba -23 0 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.95-8.94 0.00 0.00-20.00 33.60 Segment Leq : 33.60 dba Total Leq All Segments: 68.17 dba A7

Results segment # 1: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (60.29 + 38.33 + 0.00) = 60.32 dba -90 67 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.29 67 90 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-8.94 0.00 0.00-13.62 38.33 Segment Leq : 60.32 dba A8

Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (0.00 + 36.67 + 47.82) = 48.14 dba -90-58 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.95-7.50 0.00 0.00-10.76 36.67-58 -23 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.95-7.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.82 Segment Leq : 48.14 dba A9

Results segment # 3: Lyon2 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (0.00 + 26.00 + 0.00) = 26.00 dba -23 0 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.95-8.94 0.00 0.00-20.00 26.00 Segment Leq : 26.00 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.58 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 68.17 (NIGHT): 60.58 A10

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 09:11:59 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 62.00 / 62.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 33.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 72.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 48.00 / 48.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A11

Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 16.00 / 16.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A12

Road data, segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 17.00 / 17.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A13

Results segment # 1: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (54.95 + 37.54 + 0.00) = 55.03 dba 0 33 0.00 68.48 0.00-6.16-7.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.95 33 90 0.00 68.48 0.00-6.16-4.99 0.00 0.00-19.78 37.54 Segment Leq : 55.03 dba A14

Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 68.20 + 0.00) = 68.20 dba -90 90 0.00 68.48 0.00-0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.20 Segment Leq : 68.20 dba Results segment # 3: Slater (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 64.93 + 0.00) = 64.93 dba -90 0 0.00 68.48 0.00-0.54-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.93 Segment Leq : 64.93 dba Total Leq All Segments: 70.02 dba A15

Results segment # 1: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD (47.35 + 29.95 + 0.00) = 47.43 dba 0 33 0.00 60.88 0.00-6.16-7.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.35 33 90 0.00 60.88 0.00-6.16-4.99 0.00 0.00-19.78 29.95 Segment Leq : 47.43 dba A16

Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 60.60 + 0.00) = 60.60 dba -90 90 0.00 60.88 0.00-0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.60 Segment Leq : 60.60 dba Results segment # 3: Slater (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 57.33 + 0.00) = 57.33 dba -90 0 0.00 60.88 0.00-0.54-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.33 Segment Leq : 57.33 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.42 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 70.02 (NIGHT): 62.42 A17

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 13:11:45 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 44.00 / 44.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 44.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 72.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 30.00 / 30.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A18

Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A19

Road data, segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 34.00 / 34.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -54.00 deg Barrier height : 72.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 21.00 / 21.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A20

Results segment # 1: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 3.79! 3.79 ROAD (57.69 + 38.15 + 0.00) = 57.74 dba 0 44 0.00 68.48 0.00-4.67-6.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.69 44 90 0.00 68.48 0.00-4.67-5.93 0.00 0.00-19.73 38.15 Segment Leq : 57.74 dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 68.48 + 0.00) = 68.48 dba -90 90 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.48 Segment Leq : 68.48 dba A21

Results segment # 3: Slater (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 4.25! 4.25 ROAD (0.00 + 38.25 + 59.70) = 59.73 dba -90-54 0.00 68.48 0.00-3.55-6.99 0.00 0.00-19.68 38.25-54 0 0.00 68.48 0.00-3.55-5.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.70 Segment Leq : 59.73 dba Total Leq All Segments: 69.34 dba A22

Results segment # 1: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 3.79! 3.79 ROAD (50.09 + 30.55 + 0.00) = 50.14 dba 0 44 0.00 60.88 0.00-4.67-6.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.09 44 90 0.00 60.88 0.00-4.67-5.93 0.00 0.00-19.73 30.55 Segment Leq : 50.14 dba A23

Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 60.88 + 0.00) = 60.88 dba -90 90 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.88 Segment Leq : 60.88 dba Results segment # 3: Slater (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 4.25! 4.25 ROAD (0.00 + 30.66 + 52.10) = 52.13 dba -90-54 0.00 60.88 0.00-3.55-6.99 0.00 0.00-19.68 30.66-54 0 0.00 60.88 0.00-3.55-5.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.10 Segment Leq : 52.13 dba Total Leq All Segments: 61.74 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 69.34 (NIGHT): 61.74 A24

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 13:12:29 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A25

Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 16.00 / 16.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A26

Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 68.48 + 0.00) = 68.48 dba -90 90 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.48 Segment Leq : 68.48 dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 65.19 + 0.00) = 65.19 dba 0 90 0.00 68.48 0.00-0.28-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.19 Segment Leq : 65.19 dba Total Leq All Segments: 70.15 dba A27

Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 60.88 + 0.00) = 60.88 dba -90 90 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.88 Segment Leq : 60.88 dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 57.59 + 0.00) = 57.59 dba 0 90 0.00 60.88 0.00-0.28-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.59 Segment Leq : 57.59 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.55 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 70.15 (NIGHT): 62.55 A28

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 13:12:54 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A29

Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 65.47 + 0.00) = 65.47 dba 0 90 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.47 Segment Leq : 65.47 dba Total Leq All Segments: 65.47 dba Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 57.87 + 0.00) = 57.87 dba 0 90 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.87 Segment Leq : 57.87 dba Total Leq All Segments: 57.87 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 65.47 (NIGHT): 57.87 A30

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 13:15:44 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A31

Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 68.48 + 0.00) = 68.48 dba -90 90 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.48 Segment Leq : 68.48 dba Total Leq All Segments: 68.48 dba Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 60.88 + 0.00) = 60.88 dba -90 90 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.88 Segment Leq : 60.88 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.88 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 68.48 (NIGHT): 60.88 A32

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 13:16:23 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 16.00 / 16.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A33

Road data, segment # 2: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 62.00 / 62.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -23.00 deg Barrier height : 14.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 47.00 / 47.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A34

Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 65.19 + 0.00) = 65.19 dba 0 90 0.00 68.48 0.00-0.28-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.19 Segment Leq : 65.19 dba Results segment # 2: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 3.24! 3.24 ROAD (0.00 + 40.96 + 53.38) = 53.62 dba -90-23 0.00 68.48 0.00-6.16-4.29 0.00 0.00-17.07 40.96-23 0 0.00 68.48 0.00-6.16-8.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.38 Segment Leq : 53.62 dba Total Leq All Segments: 65.48 dba Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 57.59 + 0.00) = 57.59 dba A35

0 90 0.00 60.88 0.00-0.28-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.59 Segment Leq : 57.59 dba Results segment # 2: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 3.24! 3.24 ROAD (0.00 + 33.36 + 45.78) = 46.03 dba -90-23 0.00 60.88 0.00-6.16-4.29 0.00 0.00-17.07 33.36-23 0 0.00 60.88 0.00-6.16-8.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.78 Segment Leq : 46.03 dba Total Leq All Segments: 57.88 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 65.48 (NIGHT): 57.88 A36

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 13:16:57 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r8.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 16.00 / 16.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A37

Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg -14.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 90.00 / 90.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -14.00 deg Barrier height : 79.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 20.00 / 20.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A38

Road data, segment # 3: Lyon 2 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: Lyon 2 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -14.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 62.00 / 62.00 m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 23.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 8.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 60.00 / 60.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A39

Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD (0.00 + 65.19 + 0.00) = 65.19 dba -90 0 0.00 68.48 0.00-0.28-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.19 Segment Leq : 65.19 dba A40

Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 7.10! 7.10 ROAD (0.00 + 37.14 + 0.00) = 37.14 dba -90-14 0.00 68.48 0.00-7.78-3.74 0.00 0.00-19.82 37.14 Segment Leq : 37.14 dba Results segment # 3: Lyon 2 (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 1.73! 1.73 ROAD (55.45 + 40.97 + 0.00) = 55.60 dba -14 23 0.00 68.48 0.00-6.16-6.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.45 23 90 0.00 68.48 0.00-6.16-4.29 0.00 0.00-17.06 40.97 Segment Leq : 55.60 dba Total Leq All Segments: 65.65 db A41

Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD (0.00 + 57.59 + 0.00) = 57.59 dba -90 0 0.00 60.88 0.00-0.28-3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.59 Segment Leq : 57.59 dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 7.10! 7.10 ROAD (0.00 + 29.54 + 0.00) = 29.54 dba -90-14 0.00 60.88 0.00-7.78-3.74 0.00 0.00-19.82 29.54 Segment Leq : 29.54 dba A42

Results segment # 3: Lyon 2 (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 8.70! 1.73! 1.73 ROAD (47.85 + 33.37 + 0.00) = 48.00 dba -14 23 0.00 60.88 0.00-6.16-6.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.85 23 90 0.00 60.88 0.00-6.16-4.29 0.00 0.00-17.06 33.37 Segment Leq : 48.00 dba Total Leq All Segments: 58.05 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 65.65 (NIGHT): 58.05 A43

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 15-02-2017 09:12:58 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r9.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 16.62 / 16.62 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A44