UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

Similar documents
(Round up to the nearest inch.)

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

Local Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture

NYIT Instructors: Alfred Sanabria and Rodrigo Suarez

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

DNV DESIGN. POU_Rect - Design Report Page 1 of 11

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

SHEAR CONNECTION: DESIGN OF W-SHAPE BEAM TO RECTANGULAR/SQUARE HSS COLUMN SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION

Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design

Towards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

Appendix K Design Examples

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

Biaxial Analysis of General Shaped Base Plates

THROUGH PLATE-TO-ROUND HSS CONNECTIONS

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).

Steel connections. Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[ mm] Connection ID : 1

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

host structure (S.F.D.)

Basis of Design, a case study building

the Steel Construction Manual

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Example Stayed beam with two pylons

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

CIV 207 Winter For practice

TRANSVERSE PLATE-TO-SQUARE/RECTANGULAR HSS CONNECTIONS

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

Anchor Bolt Design (Per ACI and "Design of Reinforcement in Concrete Pedestals" CSA Today, Vol III, No. 12)

It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! F y = 50 ksi F u = 65 ksi ASD LRFD ASD LRFD

WRAP-AROUND GUSSET PLATES

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

RESEARCH REPORT RP02-2 MARCH 2002 REVISION Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson

Details of Check for Boundary Element Requirements

Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi BEAM COLUMNS

Critical Load columns buckling critical load

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Steel Design. Notation:

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

50 ksi Steel H-pile Capacity

Direct Strength Method for Steel Deck

Appendix. A 1 Properties of areas.* *Symbols used are: A = area I = moment of inertia S = Section modulus

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Torsional Analysis of

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual

Steel Design. Notation: a A A b A e

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

Improved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011

of I Section Members

51st Annual Transmission & Substation Design & Operation Symposium DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR SPLICED LEG MEMBERS

Study of Rotational Column with Plastic Hinge

Minimum-weight design of built-up wideflange

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

The Influence of a Weld-Affected Zone on the Compressive and Flexural Strength of Aluminum Members

5 Compression Members

PERFORATED METAL DECK DESIGN

SHEAR CONNECTION: W BEAM WITH SHEAR PLATE ONE-WAY SHEAR CONNECTION TO W COLUMN WEB

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E

research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)

Direct Strength Method (DSM) Design Guide

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

APPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

AISC Live Webinars. Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please stand by.

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

Beam Design and Deflections

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Reports RESEARCH REPORT RP00-3 RESEARCH REPORT RP01-1 OCTOBER REVISION 2006 REVISION

Direct Strength Design for Cold-Formed Steel Members with Perforations. Progress Report 5 C. Moen and B.W. Schafer AISI-COS Meeting February 2008

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of Shear Tab Connections for Gravity and Seismic Loads

DESIGN OF BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF COMPRESSED HSS - CHANNELS

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering 4300:401-301 July 9, 2013 Steel Design Sample Quiz 2 1. The W10 x 54 column shown has both ends pinned and consists of A992 steel (F y = 50 ksi, F u = 65 ksi). a) Check for slender elements. b) Determine the LRFD design strength φ c P n and the ASD allowable strength P n /Ω c using Table 4-22 of c) Determine the LRFD design strength φ c P n and the ASD allowable strength P n /Ω c using Table 4-1 of d) Determine the LRFD design strength φ c P n and the ASD allowable strength P n /Ω c using the column formulas from Specification Chapter E. Use the recommended design K value for the support conditions shown. W10 x 54 (A = 15.8 in 2, b f /2t f = 8.15, h/t w = 21.2, r x = 4.37, r y = 2.56 ) K = 1.00 (AISC Table C-A-7.1, p. 16.1-511) a) Check for slender elements (AISC Table B4.1a). Flanges (Case 1): λ r = 0.56 (E/F y ) 1/2 = 0.56 (29,000/50) 1/2 = 13.49 > b f /2t f = 8.15 Web (Case 5): λ r = 1.49 (E/F y ) 1/2 = 1.49 (29,000/50) 1/2 = 35.88 > h/t w = 21.2 The section has no slender elements. b) Using the critical stress values in Table 4-22 of the AISC Manual: (KL/r) max = (KL/r) y = 1.00 (16) (12 / )/2.56 = 75.0 By interpolating from Table 4-22 of the AISC Manual, LRFD: φ c F cr = 29.8 ksi ASD: F cr /Ω c = 19.8 ksi φ c P n = (φ c F cr ) A g = 29.8 (15.8) = 470.8 kips P n /Ω c = (F cr /Ω c ) A g = 19.8 (15.8) = 312.8 kips

c) Using Table 4-1 of the AISC Manual: KL = 1.00 (16) = 16.0 LRFD design compression strength: φ c P n = 471 kips ASD allowable compression strength: P n /Ω c = 314 kips d) Using Specification Chapter E: Since there are no slender elements, use Specification Section E3. (KL/r) max = (KL/r) y = 1.00 (16) (12 / )/2.56 = 75.0 (same as before) Determine the flexural buckling stress F cr. F e = π 2 E/(KL/r) 2 = π 2 (29,000)/(75.0) 2 = 50.88 ksi KL/r y = 75.0 < 4.71 (E/F y ) 1/2 = 4.71 (29,000/50) 1/2 = 113.43 Use AISC Eq. E3-2 F cr = [0.658 Fy/Fe ] F y = [0.658 50/50.88 ] 50 = 33.14 ksi φ c P n = φ c (F cr A g ) = 0.90(33.14)(15.8) = 471.3 kips P n /Ω c = (F cr A g )/Ω c = 33.14 (15.8)/1.67 = 313.5 kips 0:08

2. The HSS 10 x 10 x 3/8 column shown has both ends pinned and consists of A500 Grade B steel (F y = 46 ksi, F u = 58 ksi). a) Check for slender elements. b) Determine the LRFD design strength φ c P n and the ASD allowable strength P n /Ω c using Table 4-22 of c) Determine the LRFD design strength φ c P n and the ASD allowable strength P n /Ω c using Table 4-4 of d) Determine the LRFD design strength φ c P n and the ASD allowable strength P n /Ω c using the column formulas from Specification Chapter E. Use the recommended design K value for the support conditions shown. HSS 10 x 10 x 3/8 (A = 13.2 in 2, b/t = 25.7, r x = r y = 3.92 ) K = 1.00 (AISC Table C-A-7.1, p. 16.1-511) a) Check for slender elements (AISC Table B4.1a). Walls (Case 6); λ r = 1.40 (E/F y ) 1/2 = 1.40 (29,000/46) 1/2 = 35.15 > b/t = 25.7 The section has no slender elements. b) Using the critical stress values in Table 4-22 of the AISC Manual: (KL/r) max = (KL/r) y = 1.00 (18) (12 / )/3.92 = 55.10 By interpolating from Table 4-22 of the AISC Manual, LRFD: φ c F cr = 33.77 ksi ASD: F cr /Ω c = 22.48 ksi φ c P n = (φ c F cr ) A g = 33.77 (13.2) = 445.8 kips P n /Ω c = (F cr /Ω c ) A g = 22.48 (13.2) = 296.7 kips c) Using Table 4-4 of the AISC Manual: KL = 1.00 (18) = 18.0 LRFD design compression strength: φ c P n = 446 kips ASD allowable compression strength: P n /Ω c = 296 kips d) Using Specification Chapter E: Since there are no slender elements, use Specification Section E3. (KL/r) max = (KL/r) y = 1.00 (18) (12 / )/3.92 = 55.10 (same as before)

Determine the flexural buckling stress F cr. F e = π 2 E/(KL/r) 2 = π 2 (29,000)/(55.10) 2 = 94.27 ksi KL/r y = 55.10 < 4.71 (E/F y ) 1/2 = 4.71 (29,000/46) 1/2 = 118.26 Use AISC Eq. E3-2 F cr = [0.658 Fy/Fe ] F y = [0.658 46/94.27 ] 46 = 37.50 ksi φ c P n = φ c (F cr A g ) = 0.90(37.50)(13.2) = 445.5 kips P n /Ω c = (F cr A g )/Ω c = 37.50 (13.2)/1.67 = 296.4 kips 0:08

3. Select the lightest available W10 section to support the axial compression loads P D = 120 kips and P L = 250 kips if KL = 16 feet and A992 Grade 50 steel is used. Use the trial and error procedure in which the stress φ c F cr is determined from AISC Table 4-22, required areas calculated, and trial sections selected and revised as necessary until the lightest section is determined. Assume an initial value for KL/r of 50. This problem is to be solved using the LRFD procedure only. P u = 1.2 D + 1.6 L = 1.2 (120) + 1.6 (250) = 544.0 kips Assume KL/r = 50. From AISC Table 4-22: φ c F cr = 37.5 ksi A g = P u /φ c F cr = 544.0/37.5 = 14.51 in 2 Try W10 x 54 (A = 15.8 in 2, r x = 4.37, r y = 2.56 ) KL/r y = 16(12)/2.56 = 75.00 From AISC Table 4-22: φ c F cr = 29.80 ksi φ c P n = φ c F cr A g = 29.80 (15.8) = 470.8 kips < P u = 544.0 kips Try W10 x 60 (A = 17.7 in 2, r x = 4.39, r y = 2.57 ) KL/r y = 16(12)/2.57 = 74.71 From AISC Table 4-22: φ c F cr = 29.92 ksi φ c P n = φ c F cr A g = 29.92 (17.7) = 529.6 kips < P u = 544.0 kips Try W10 x 68 (A = 19.9 in 2, r x = 4.44, r y = 2.59 ) KL/r y = 16(12)/2.59 = 74.13 From AISC Table 4-22: φ c F cr = 30.15 ksi φ c P n = φ c F cr A g = 30.15 (19.9) = 600.0 kips > P u = 544.0 kips NG NG OK Select W10 x 68 0:09

4. Select the lightest available wide flange section (W8, W10, W12 or W14) to support the axial compression loads P D = 220 kips and P L = 350 kips if KL = 18 feet and F y = 50 ksi. Compare the available strength in axial compression for the selected member with the required strength for the column. Use the column tables in Part 4 of This problem is to be solved by both the LRFD and the ASD procedures. LRFD P u = 1.2 D + 1.6 L = 1.2 (220) + 1.6 (350) = 824.0 kips Possible selections from AISC Table 4-1: W8 None W10 x 112 φ c P n = 921 kips > P u = 824.0 kips OK W12 x 96 φ c P n = 888 kips > P u = 824.0 kips OK W14 x 90 φ c P n = 929 kips > P u = 824.0 kips OK Select W14 x 90 ASD P a = D + L = 220 + 350 = 570.0 kips Possible selections from AISC Table 4-1: W8 None W10 x 112 P n /Ω c = 613 kips > P a = 570.0 kips OK W12 x 96 P n /Ω c = 591 kips > P a = 570.0 kips OK W14 x 90 P n /Ω c = 618 kips > P a = 570.0 kips OK Select W14 x 90 0:05

5. Design a square column base plate for a W12 x 35 column with P D = 180 kips and P L = 400 kips using A36 steel for the plate and f c = 4.0 ksi for the concrete in a 6 x 6 footing. Specify the plate length and width to the nearest inch; specify the plate thickness to the nearest 1/4 inch. This problem is to be solved by the LRFD procedure only. W12 x 35 (d = 12.5, b f = 6.56 ) P u = 1.2 D + 1.6 L = 1.2 (180) + 1.6 (400) = 856.0 kips Determine the base plate area (φ c = 0.65). The area of the supporting concrete is much greater than the base plate area, such that (A 2 /A 1 ) 1/2 = 2.0. A 1 = P u /[φ c (0.85 f c )(A 2 /A 1 ) 1/2 ] = 856.0/[0.65(0.85)(4.0)(2.0)] = 193.7 in 2 The base plate must be at least as large as the column. b f d = 6.56 (12.5) = 82.0 in 2 < 193.7 in 2 OK Determine the base plate dimensions. Simplify the base plate dimensions by making it square. B = N = (193.7) 1/2 = 13.92 (Say 14 x 14 ) Check the bearing strength of the concrete (φ c = 0.65). φ c P p = φ c 0.85 f c A 1 (A 2 /A 1 ) 1/2 = 0.65(0.85)(4.0)(14 x 14)(2.0) = 866.3 kips > P u = 856.0 kips OK Compute the required base plate thickness. m = (N 0.95d)/2 = [14 0.95(12.5)]/2 = 1.063 n = (B - 0.80b f )/2 = [14 0.80(6.56)]/2 = 4.376 n = ¼ (d b f ) 1/2 = ¼ [12.5 (6.56)] 1/2 = 2.264 l = max (m, n, or λn ) = 4.376 t min = l (2 P u /0.9 F y B N) 1/2 = 4.376 [2(856.0)/0.90(36.0)(14)(14)] 1/2 = 2.272 (Say 2.50 ) Use PL 2½ x 14 x 14 (A36 steel) 0:07