Turing Machines. Human-aware Robotics. 2017/10/17 & 19 Chapter 3.2 & 3.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement:

Similar documents
Finite Automata. Human-aware Robo.cs. 2017/08/22 Chapter 1.1 in Sipser

Decidability. Human-aware Robotics. 2017/10/31 Chapter 4.1 in Sipser Ø Announcement:

You need to be able to define the following terms and answer basic questions about them:

Lab 1 The Scientific Method

More Turing Machines. CS154 Chris Pollett Mar 15, 2006.

Mapping Reducibility. Human-aware Robotics. 2017/11/16 Chapter 5.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement:

CS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 12: Computability III (Decidable Languages relating to DFA, NFA, and CFG)

Activity Guide Loops and Random Numbers

Differentiation Applications 1: Related Rates

Foundations of

CHM112 Lab Graphing with Excel Grading Rubric

CS21 Decidability and Tractability

Experiment #3. Graphing with Excel

Physics 2010 Motion with Constant Acceleration Experiment 1

CS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 10: Computability Theory I (Turing Machine)

CS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 10: Computability Theory I (Turing Machine)

Admin. MDP Search Trees. Optimal Quantities. Reinforcement Learning

Computability Theory

CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION

TURING MAHINES

An example of a decidable language that is not a CFL Implementation-level description of a TM State diagram of TM

Paragraph 1: Introduction

SPH3U1 Lesson 06 Kinematics

What languages are Turing-decidable? What languages are not Turing-decidable? Is there a language that isn t even Turingrecognizable?

Five Whys How To Do It Better

o o IMPORTANT REMINDERS Reports will be graded largely on their ability to clearly communicate results and important conclusions.

CS 477/677 Analysis of Algorithms Fall 2007 Dr. George Bebis Course Project Due Date: 11/29/2007

Chem 163 Section: Team Number: ALE 24. Voltaic Cells and Standard Cell Potentials. (Reference: 21.2 and 21.3 Silberberg 5 th edition)

Computability Theory. CS215, Lecture 6,

Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion

Homework Assignment 6 Answers

CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION

CS20a: Turing Machines (Oct 29, 2002)

Chapter 3: Cluster Analysis

FORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA AND COMPUTABILITY

Administrativia. Assignment 1 due thursday 9/23/2004 BEFORE midnight. Midterm exam 10/07/2003 in class. CS 460, Sessions 8-9 1

V Honors Theory of Computation

1 Showing Recognizability

If (IV) is (increased, decreased, changed), then (DV) will (increase, decrease, change) because (reason based on prior research).

Trigonometric Ratios Unit 5 Tentative TEST date

ENSC Discrete Time Systems. Project Outline. Semester

Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Waterloo. Introduction

CHAPTER 24: INFERENCE IN REGRESSION. Chapter 24: Make inferences about the population from which the sample data came.

Computational modeling techniques

CS453 Intro and PA1 1

ENG2410 Digital Design Sequential Circuits: Part A

Turing Machines Part II

MODULE FOUR. This module addresses functions. SC Academic Elementary Algebra Standards:

READING STATECHART DIAGRAMS

THE LIFE OF AN OBJECT IT SYSTEMS

Please Stop Laughing at Me and Pay it Forward Final Writing Assignment

INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES

Pipetting 101 Developed by BSU CityLab

Hiding in plain sight

Determining the Accuracy of Modal Parameter Estimation Methods

Chomsky Normal Form and TURING MACHINES. TUESDAY Feb 4

Computability and Complexity

An example of a decidable language that is not a CFL Implementation-level description of a TM State diagram of TM

Chap. 4,5 Review. Algorithms created in proofs from prior chapters

Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama

Turing Machines Part III

Decidability (What, stuff is unsolvable?)

CSE355 SUMMER 2018 LECTURES TURING MACHINES AND (UN)DECIDABILITY

CSCC63 Worksheet Turing Machines

AIP Logic Chapter 4 Notes

Medium Scale Integrated (MSI) devices [Sections 2.9 and 2.10]

Recap DFA,NFA, DTM. Slides by Prof. Debasis Mitra, FIT.

Turing Machine Variants

BASD HIGH SCHOOL FORMAL LAB REPORT

Fall 2013 Physics 172 Recitation 3 Momentum and Springs

CSE 2001: Introduction to Theory of Computation Fall Suprakash Datta

COMP 551 Applied Machine Learning Lecture 11: Support Vector Machines

CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION

Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2018, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama

I.S. 239 Mark Twain. Grade 7 Mathematics Spring Performance Task: Proportional Relationships

Chapter 3: The Church-Turing Thesis

Physics 212. Lecture 12. Today's Concept: Magnetic Force on moving charges. Physics 212 Lecture 12, Slide 1

k-nearest Neighbor How to choose k Average of k points more reliable when: Large k: noise in attributes +o o noise in class labels

How do scientists measure trees? What is DBH?

CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION

Resampling Methods. Cross-validation, Bootstrapping. Marek Petrik 2/21/2017

Lesson Plan. Recode: They will do a graphic organizer to sequence the steps of scientific method.

Intro to Theory of Computation

Interference is when two (or more) sets of waves meet and combine to produce a new pattern.

Harvard CS 121 and CSCI E-121 Lecture 14: Turing Machines and the Church Turing Thesis

Building to Transformations on Coordinate Axis Grade 5: Geometry Graph points on the coordinate plane to solve real-world and mathematical problems.

Your appetizing introduction should consist of three important ingredients:

2017/08/31 Chapter 1.2 & 1.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement:

The Church-Turing Thesis

Computational Models Lecture 8 1

Section 5.8 Notes Page Exponential Growth and Decay Models; Newton s Law

CHAPTER 4 DIAGNOSTICS FOR INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

Hypothesis Tests for One Population Mean

This section is primarily focused on tools to aid us in finding roots/zeros/ -intercepts of polynomials. Essentially, our focus turns to solving.

Assessment Primer: Writing Instructional Objectives

[COLLEGE ALGEBRA EXAM I REVIEW TOPICS] ( u s e t h i s t o m a k e s u r e y o u a r e r e a d y )

Turing Machines (TM) The Turing machine is the ultimate model of computation.

CS20a: Turing Machines (Oct 29, 2002)

AP Physics Kinematic Wrap Up

Decidability and Undecidability

Transcription:

Turing Machines Human-aware Rbtics 2017/10/17 & 19 Chapter 3.2 & 3.3 in Sipser Ø Annuncement: q q q q Slides fr this lecture are here: http://www.public.asu.edu/~yzhan442/teaching/cse355/lectures/tm-ii.pdf N quiz fr the next class Review sessin next Tuesday N late hmewrk will be accepted fr HW5 1

Last time Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learned abut TM 2

Outline fr tday Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM Variants f TMs Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 3

Rbustness f TMs Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add STAY in additin t L, R Add kl, kr (k < N) in additin t L, R Randm access memry Multitape TMs Add nndeterminism 4

Equivalence Human-aware Rbtics Hw d prve that tw machines are equivalent? 5

Equivalence Human-aware Rbtics Hw d prve that tw machines are equivalent? They must recgnize the same languages what did we d with DFA and NFA? 6

Equivalence Human-aware Rbtics Hw d prve that tw machines are equivalent? what did we d with DFA and NFA (add nndeterminism)? q DFA -> NFA (simple) use NFA t simulate DFA q NFA -> DFA (mre difficult) use DFA t simulate NFA Given a TM M and a mdified M q q M simulates M (simple when M is mre general) M simulates M (simple when M is mre general) 7

Add STAY Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add STAY in additin t L, R M =? q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R, S} Given a TM M and a mdified M Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 8

Add STAY Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add STAY in additin t L, R M = (Q,,,,q 0,q accept,q reject ) q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R, S} Given a TM M and a mdified M Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: Just cpy everything frm M t M! q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 9

Add STAY Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add STAY in additin t L, R M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R, S} Given a TM M and a mdified M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate Ø M: Just cpy everything frm M t M! M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M =? q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 10

Add STAY Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Add STAY in additin t L, R M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R, S} Given a TM M and a mdified M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: Just cpy everything frm M t M! Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M =? Hw t simulate q i, a -> q j, b, S? q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 11

Add STAY Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add STAY in additin t L, R M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R, S} Given a TM M and a mdified M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate Ø M: Just cpy everything frm M t M! M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: cpy everything frm M t M; add intermediate state ad M = transitins when encuntering q i, a -> q j, b, S (Q 0,,, 0,q 0,q accept,q reject ) Hw t simulate q i, a -> q j, b, S? q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 12

Add kl and kr Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add kl, kr (k < N) in additin t L, R Ø Similar t adding STAY M q i, a -> q j, b, {L k, R k } Given a TM M and a mdified M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: Just cpy everything frm M t M! q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: cpy everything frm M t M; add intermediate state ad transitins when encuntering q i, a -> q j, b, L k R k M q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 13

Randm access memry Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Randm access memry Given a TM M and a mdified M Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M =? Hw t simulate q i, a -> q j, b, {L,R}? q i, a -> q j, b, {addr} Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 14

Randm access memry Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Randm access memry Given a TM M and a mdified M Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: must add address blck n the tape fr all symbls befre simulating q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M = (Q 0,, 0, 0,q 0,q accept,q reject ) Hw t simulate q i, a -> q j, b, {L,R}? q i, a -> q j, b, {addr} M = q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 15

Randm access memry Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Randm access memry M = q i, a -> q j, b, {addr} Given a TM M and a mdified M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: must add address blck n the tape fr all symbls befre simulating Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M M =? Hw t simulate q i, a -> q j, b, addr q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 16

Randm access memry Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Randm access memry M = q i, a -> q j, b, {addr} Given a TM M and a mdified M q M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: must add address blck n the tape fr all symbls befre simulating Ø M simulates M --- Given M and its input, use M t simulate M: must add intermediate states t mve t the left mst psitin and step by step t addr; must als add a blank symbl t the head M = (Q 0,, 0, 0,q 0,q accept,q reject ) Hw t simulate q i, a -> q j, b, addr q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 17

Last time 10/17 Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM (review) Variants f TMs Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 18

Design f Turing machines {w#w w 2 {0, 1} } Human-aware Rbtics General idea high level descriptin Cmpare each symbl n the left hand side f # with that n the right hand side sequentially; if match, crss bth (using x ) and cntinue; therwise, reject Accept if all match and n symbls are left n bth sides; therwise, reject Can we implement a Turing machine t achieve this? 19

Design f Turing machines {w#w w 2 {0, 1} } Human-aware Rbtics M n input u: implementatin descriptin (by default what we need in midterm #2) 1. Start frm the first nne x symbl, dented as c, t the left f # 2. Crss it ff as x and mve t the first nne x symbl t the right f #. If the symbl is als c in stage 1, crss it ff and mve t the left end f the tape; if n such symbl is fund befre reaching, reject 3. G t stage 1 unless all nne x symbls are crssed ff t the left f # ; g t stage 4 therwise. 4. If all the symbls are als crssed ff t the right f #, accept; therwise, reject 20

Design f Turing machines Human-aware Rbtics Example tape state: x1#x1 {w#w w 2 {0, 1} } Cnsider input 01#01. M n input u: -- frmal descriptin At q 1, if the input symbl is, reject; therwise, if the input symbl is #, mve right (q 1, # ->q 8, R); add self lp q 8, q 8 (q 8, x ->q 8, R); At q 8, if the input symbl is, accept; therwise, reject At q 1, if the current symbl is c (0 r 1), crss it ff and mve right (q 1, c ->q 2 q 3, x, R) At q 2 r q 3, self lp n 0 r 1 while mving right (q 2 q 3, 0 1 ->q 2 q 3, R) At q 2 r q 3, if the current symbl is #, mve right (q 2 q 3, # ->q 4 q 5, R) At q 4 q 5, self lp n x and if the current symbl is c, mve left (q 4 q 5, c ->q 6, L) At q 6, self lp n 0, 1, x (q 6, 0 1 x ->q 6, L) when n # (q 6, # ->q 7, L) At q 7, self lp n 0, 1 (q 7, 0 1 ->q 7, L) when n x mve right (q 7, x ->q 1, R) G back t q 1 21

Last time 10/17 Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM (review) Variants f TMs (STAY, {L k, R k } ) Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 22

Let us play a game! Human-aware Rbtics Each f yu represents a small Turing machine Mi n the tape f a large Turing machine, input is <M1, M2, M3, Mk, Q1, Q2., Qm> 1. We start with a randm number [-max, max], which is yur seat index 2. ANSWER the questin in rder AND prvide the crrect explanatin 3. The chsen persn may chse t SKIP the questin, it becmes the next persn s term (in increasing rder) 4. If the current persn failed, the next persn may chse t ANSWER r SKIP it 5. The persn that chse t skip a questin, hwever, must share with the next persn f his/her current thught (it culd be a guess but can als include hints t the next persn) 6. The persn succeeded can chse t perfrm randm memry access [-max, max], LEFT r RIGHT [1, 10]. Clear and ready t g? 23

Let us play a game! Human-aware Rbtics 1. There is a nn-regular language that can be recgnized by a Turing Machine. 2. A Turing Machine can have infinitely many states in Q. 3. A Turing Machine can have infinitely many input symbls. 4. A Turing Machine can have infinitely many tape symbls. 5. A Turing Machine can have infinitely many cnfiguratins. 6. If TM M decides L, then M recgnizes L. 7. If TM M recgnizes L, then M decides L. 8. If a TM M recgnizes L and M lps n sme string, then L is nt decidable. 9. A Turing machine may fail t accept given a string in the language that it recgnizes 10. An FA (PDA) can als lp, s RLs (r CFLs) are Turing recgnizable but nt decidable 24

Outline fr tday Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM Variants f TMs Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 25

Multitape Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Multitape TMs: Turing machines with multiple tapes and R/W heads; when starting, input is kept n the first tape, and ther tapes are empty M q i, a 1, a 2 a n -> q j, b 1, b 2 b n, {L, R} n q i, s a -> q j, s, b, {L, R} M 26

Multitape Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Multitape TMs: Turing machines with multiple tapes and R/W heads; when starting, input is kept n the first tape, and ther tapes are empty M q i, a 1, a 2 a n -> q j, b 1, b 2 b n, {L, R} n What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? q i, s a -> q j, s, b, {L, R} M 27

Multitape Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Multitape TMs: Turing machines with multiple tapes and R/W heads; when starting, input is kept n the first tape, and ther tapes are empty M q i, a 1, a 2 a n -> q j, b 1, b 2 b n, {L, R} n What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? All tape cntent R/W heads infrmatin q i, s a -> q j, s, b, {L, R} M 28

Multitape Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Multitape TMs: Turing machines with multiple tapes and R/W heads; when starting, input is kept n the first tape, and ther tapes are empty M q i, a 1, a 2 a n -> q j, b 1, b 2 b n, {L, R} n What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? All tape cntent R/W heads infrmatin q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} M Valid? 29

Multitape Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Multitape TMs: Turing machines with multiple tapes and R/W heads; when starting, input is kept n the first tape, and ther tapes are empty M q i, a 1, a 2 a n -> q j, b 1, b 2 b n, {L, R} n What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? All tape cntent R/W heads infrmatin q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} M Valid? (finite steps & symbls) yes! 30

Multitape Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Multitape TMs: Turing machines with multiple tapes and R/W heads; when starting, input is kept n the first tape, and ther tapes are empty TM M n input string w: 1. Frmat the tape in a way that represents all strings, i.e., 2. Scan L t R t find ut which the current symbls under the virtual heads. Make a secnd pass and update tapes accrding t finite cntrl. 3. If a virtual tape mves right nt a #, then add and shift cntents ne psitin t the right. 4. Repeat. M M 31

Outline fr tday Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM Variants f TMs Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 32

Nndeterminism Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add nndeterminism " D we need? Fr an NTM t accept a string, we require that at least ne f its cmputatins end up accepting the input Ø Sme f the ther cmputatin paths culd be rejecting Fr an NTM t decide a language, we require that all f its cmputatins halt. 33

Nndeterminism Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add nndeterminism M q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} q i, a -> q k, c, {L, R} M q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} 34

Nndeterminism Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add nndeterminism M What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? M 35

Nndeterminism Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Add nndeterminism M What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? Ø Need t iterate the tree! q The current cnfiguratin q The branch infrmatin up t the current cnfiguratin M 36

Nndeterminism Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Add nndeterminism M What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? Ø Need t iterate the tree! q q The current cnfiguratin Hw? need t backtrack The branch infrmatin up t the current cnfiguratin M 37

Nndeterminism Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Add nndeterminism M What infrmatin is needed t simulate M n M? Ø Need t iterate the tree! q q The current cnfiguratin Hw? need t backtrack The branch infrmatin up t the current cnfiguratin Hw? need t systematically traverse the tree M 38

Nndeterminism Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add nndeterminism M q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} q i, a -> q k, c, {L, R} M M 39

Nndeterminism Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Human-aware Rbtics Add nndeterminism TM M n input string w (fr M ): 1. Cpy tape 1 t cntain w, tape 2 and 3 are empty 2. Cpy tape 1 t tape 2 3. Use tape 2 t simulate M based n branch infrmatin frm tape 3; accept accrdingly t M ; if nt accept, g t step 4 4. Iterate the string n tape 3 using shrtlex rder and gt step 2 M q i, a -> q j, b, {L, R} q i, a -> q k, c, {L, R} M 40

Rbustness f TMs Human-aware Rbtics Variatins d nt imprve TMs! Add STAY in additin t L, R Add kl, kr (k < N) in additin t L, R Randm access memry Multitape TMs Add nndeterminism and many crllaries! 41

Remark: undecidable Human-aware language Rbtics M (decider)= On input p : where p is a plynmial ver the variable V. 1. Evaluate p with V successively t all pssible integral assignments t V. If at any pint the plynmial evaluates t 0, accept 2. If we have explre all pssible assignments, reject. Crrect? 42

Remark: undecidable Human-aware language Rbtics M (decider)= On input p : where p is a plynmial ver the variable V. 1. Evaluate p with V successively t all pssible integral assignments t V. If at any pint the plynmial evaluates t 0, accept 2. If we have explre all pssible assignments, reject. Crrect? N. (See Prblem 3.21 fr a similar prblem that is decidable) 43

Remark: undecidable Human-aware language Rbtics M (decider)= On input p : where p is a plynmial ver the variable V. 1. Evaluate p with V successively t all pssible integral assignments t V. If at any pint the plynmial evaluates t 0, accept 2. If we have explre all pssible assignments, reject. Crrect? N. (See Prblem 3.21 fr a similar prblem that is decidable) Undecidable but recgnizable! M= On input p : where p is a plynmial ver the variable x. 1. Evaluate p with V set successively t the all pssible integral assignments t V. If at any pint the plynmial evaluates t 0, accept. Crrect? 44

Remark: undecidable Human-aware language Rbtics M (decider)= On input p : where p is a plynmial ver the variable V. 1. Evaluate p with V successively t all pssible integral assignments t V. If at any pint the plynmial evaluates t 0, accept 2. If we have explre all pssible assignments, reject. Crrect? N. (See Prblem 3.21 fr a similar prblem that is decidable) Undecidable but recgnizable! M= On input p : where p is a plynmial ver the variable x. 1. Evaluate p with V set successively t the all pssible integral assignments t V. If at any pint the plynmial evaluates t 0, accept. Crrect? Yes but with tweaks that ensure prper rdering f assignments 45

Outline fr tday Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM Variants f TMs Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 46

Enumeratr Human-aware Rbtics A TM that des nt require any input Print ut strings in the language Ø Given a string w in the languge, it will eventually be printed ut 47

Enumeratr Human-aware Rbtics Valid? 48

Enumeratr Human-aware Rbtics Valid? Yes but with tweaks f rdering f pssible strings 49

Outline fr tday Human-aware Rbtics The church-turing thesis Turing machines q Definitin f TM q Cmputatin f TM q Design f TM Variants f TMs Multitape TM Nndeterminstic TM Enumeratrs FA (DFA & NFA) express Regular Expressins (RE) CFL Recursively enumerable Ø Gals: Learn abut variants f TM and their equivalences 50