Paolo Perazzelli Pini Swiss Engineers, Zurich Bolt reinforcement of the tunnel face

Similar documents
"The dimensioning of tunnel face reinforcement"

"Analysing the stability of reinforced tunnel faces"

YOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)

Theory of Shear Strength

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Monitoring of underground construction

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

Theory of Shear Strength

UNIT V. The active earth pressure occurs when the wall moves away from the earth and reduces pressure.

ON THE FACE STABILITY OF TUNNELS IN WEAK ROCKS

Underground Excavation Design Classification

On the Effects of Subgrade Erosion on the Contact Pressure Distribution under Rigid Surface Structures

Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Advanced numerical modelling methods of rock bolt performance in underground mines

Shear strength model for sediment-infilled rock discontinuities and field applications

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

OP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT

Preliminary analysis of tunnel face stability for risk or back analysis

Verification Manual GT


Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

N.Nikolaev Antech TFA ltd, Sofia, Bulgaria. V.Parushev University of Mining and Geology, Sofia, Bulgaria. S.Nikolaev Antech TFA Ltd.

BEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS

Calculation types: drained, undrained and fully coupled material behavior. Dr Francesca Ceccato

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Introduction to Soil Mechanics

NNN99. Rock Engineering for the Next Very Large Underground Detector. D. Lee Petersen CNA Consulting Engineers

Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. ground

Soil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required

SOIL MECHANICS: palgrave. Principles and Practice. Graham Barnes. macmiiian THIRD EDITION

(Refer Slide Time: 02:18)

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

Landslide FE Stability Analysis

PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Structurally controlled instability in tunnels

Laboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis

1 of 46 Erik Eberhardt UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition

Table of Contents Development of rock engineering 2 When is a rock engineering design acceptable 3 Rock mass classification

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Pile-clayey soil interaction analysis by boundary element method

2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room

INTERPRETATION OF UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF UNSATURATED SOILS IN TERMS OF STRESS STATE VARIABLES

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement

SELECTION OF PARAMETERS AND CALCULATION OF LATERALLY LOADED PILES BY TRADITIONAL METHODS

Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics

Nonlinear Time-Dependent Soil Behavior due to Construction of Buried Structures

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

A Pile Pull Out Test

The San Jacinto Monument Case History

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Building on Past Experiences Worker Safety

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

ELASTIC CALCULATIONS OF LIMITING MUD PRESSURES TO CONTROL HYDRO- FRACTURING DURING HDD

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

Observational Methods and

Degree of saturation effect on the grout-soil interface shear strength of soil nailing

Key Factors in the Face Stability Analysis of Shallow Tunnels

Towards Efficient Finite Element Model Review Dr. Richard Witasse, Plaxis bv (based on the original presentation of Dr.

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Geotechnical Properties of Soil


Geotechnical Parameters for Retaining Wall Design

9/23/ S. Kenny, Ph.D., P.Eng. Lecture Goals. Reading List. Students will be able to: Lecture 09 Soil Retaining Structures

Pullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH PREDICTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF GEOCOMPOSITE REINFORCED EMBANKMENT WITH CLAYEY BACKFILL

TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL

LANDSLIDES IN THE WHITE MOUNTAIN (GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES AND ENGINEERING TESTS)

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

1 Introduction. Abstract

Computer-Aided Data for Machinery Foundation Analysis and Design. Galal A. Hassaan*, Maha M. Lashin** and Mohammed A. Al-Gamil***

1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION 1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION

Stress arch bunch and its formation mechanism in blocky stratified rock masses

Sample Chapter HELICAL ANCHORS IN SAND 6.1 INTRODUCTION

CONSOLIDATION BEHAVIOR OF PILES UNDER PURE LATERAL LOADINGS

Slope stability software for soft soil engineering. D-Geo Stability. Verification Report

Clayey sand (SC)

(Refer Slide Time: 01:15)

EARTH PRESSURES ON RETAINING STRUCTURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Influences of material dilatancy and pore water pressure on stability factor of shallow tunnels

Net load displacement estimation in soil-nail pullout tests

Associate Professor. Tel:

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

Rock slope rock wedge stability

Project: Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free Earth Support In accordance Eurocode 7.

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES

Cyclic lateral response of piles in dry sand: Effect of pile slenderness

EFFECT OF SOIL TYPE LOCATION ON THE LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Transcription:

Paolo Perazzelli Pini Swiss Engineers, Zurich Bolt reinforcement of the tunnel face Kolloquium Bauhilfsmassnahmen im Tunnelbau ETH Zürich

Outline Introduction Analysis method On the effect of the design parameters grounds above the water table grounds below the water table (drained and undrained) Conclusions

Introduction General overview Ground reinforcement using bolts is a very effective measure for stabilizing the face in conventional tunnelling

Introduction General overview A pipes umbrella 9.8 m 12 m Detail 1 face bolt 1.25 m excavation round A installation interval (l) 16 total length of the bolt (L) A-A bolting density (n) Detail 1 diameter of the borehole (d) ground shotcrete and steel sets face bolt grout diameter of the bolt (d b ) bolt

Introduction Research at the ETH Zurich Anagnostou, G., Serafeimidis, K., 2007. The dimensioning of tunnel face reinforcement. World Tunnel Congress 2007 (Prague) Serafeimidis, K., Ramoni, M., and Anagnostou, G. (2007). Analysing the stability of reinforced tunnel faces. Europ. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geotech. Eng. (Rotterdam) Perazzelli, P., Anagnostou, G., 2013. Stress analysis of reinforced tunnel faces and comparison with the limit equilibrium method. Tunnel. Undergr. Space Techn. 38, 87 98 Anagnostou, G., Perazzelli, P., 2015. Analysis method and design charts for bolt reinforcement of the tunnel face in cohesive-frictional soils. Tunnel. Undergr Space Techn. 47, 162 181 Perazzelli, P., Anagnostou, G., 2017. Analysis method and design charts for bolt reinforcement of the tunnel face in purely cohesive soils. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 143 (9), American Society of Civil Engineers. Perazzelli, P., Cimbali, G., Anagnostou, G., 2017. Stability under seepage flow conditions of a tunnel face reinforced by bolts. EUROCK 2017 (Ostrava)

Introduction Relevant design parameters Surface load Unit weight of the ground Level of the water table Overburden Shape and dimension of the tunnel Unsupported span Load Strength of the ground (c,, s u ) Bond strength of bolt/grout and grout/ground Tensile resistance of the bolt Bolting density Bolting type (diameter, with/without plate, ) Bolting length and installation interval Resistance

Introduction Relevant design parameters Surface load Unit weight of the ground Level of the water table Overburden Shape and dimension of the tunnel Unsupported span Load Strength of the ground (c,, s u ) Bond strength of bolt/grout and grout/ground Tensile resistance of the bolt Bolting density Bolting type (diameter, with/without plate, ) Bolting length and installation interval Resistance

Introduction Relevant design parameters (a) Large installation interval Total lenght L = 12 m

Introduction Relevant design parameters (a) Large installation interval Total lenght L = 12 m Installation interval l = 8 m

Introduction Relevant design parameters (a) Large installation interval Total lenght L = 12 m New bolts Installation interval l = 8 m Overlapping L = 4 m

Introduction Relevant design parameters (a) Large installation interval Total lenght L = 12 m New bolts Installation interval l = 8 m Overlapping L = 4 m (b) Small installation interval Total lenght L = 12 m New bolts Installation interval l = 3 m Overlapping L1 = 3 m, L2 = 6 m, L3 = 9 m

Analysis method General concept - Failure mechanism Ground above the water table Ground below the water table drained Ground below the water table undrained

Analysis method General concept - Failure mechanism Limit equilibrium condition Trapdoor load V trap = Bearing capacity of wedge V res 1 H V trap 2 3 B Depth of cover (h) 2 3 1 2

Analysis method General concept - Failure mechanism Ground above the water table Ground below the water table drained Ground below the water table undrained

Analysis method Ground above the water table Trapdoor load Limit equilibrium of slices (silo theory) Ground surface c,, dry dn dts x = p y dn dt dt V trap Bearing capacity of wedge Limit equilibrium of slices x = w y c,, dry

Analysis method Ground above the water table Comparison with experimental results and other methods Ground surface c =0, h s [kpa] s D p = w = 1 [ ]

Analysis method General concept - Failure mechanism Ground above the water table Ground below the water table drained Ground below the water table undrained

Analysis method Ground below the water table drained Trapdoor load Limit equilibrium of slices (silo theory) Ground surface c,, dn dts x = p y dn dt dt V trap df y Bearing capacity of wedge Limit equilibrium of slices x = w y c,, df x

Analysis method General concept - Failure mechanism Ground above the water table Ground below the water table drained Ground below the water table undrained

Analysis method Ground below the water table undrained Trapdoor load Upper bound approach s u, sat Bearing capacity of wedge Limit equilibrium of the entire wedge s u, sat

Analysis method Ground below the water table undrained Comparison with experimental results and other methods Ground surface s u h s D

Analysis method Support pressure given by the bolts

Analysis method Support pressure given by the bolts s = n*min [F t, max(min(d m, d b g ) a, F p ), min(d m, d b g ) a(l -a)] Bearing capacity of the bolt plate Tensile resistance of the bolt Bolting density

Analysis method Support pressure given by the bolts s = n*min [F t, max(min(d m, d b g ) a, F p ), min(d m, d b g ) a(l -a)] Pull-out resistance inside the sliding wedge a Pull-out resistance outside the sliding wedge L -a m m d b overlapping length L

Analysis method Support pressure given by the bolts z 2 z 1 35 150 100 50 0 s [kpa] L-l=3m n=1 bolt/m 2 L=12 m l=9 m

Analysis method Support pressure given by the bolts z 2 35 z 1 20 35 150 100 50 0 s [kpa] L-l=3m n=1 bolt/m 2 L=12 m l=9 m

Analysis method Support pressure given by the bolts z 2 z 1 35 35 150 100 50 0 s [kpa] L-l=3m n=1 bolt/m 2 L=12 m l=9 m L-2l=3m L-l=7.5m n=1 bolt/m 2 L=12 m l=4.5 m

Analysis method Computation of the minimum required number of bolts

Analysis method Computation of the minimum required number of bolts - For fixed failure mechanism i, required density of bolts n i is such that limit equilibrium condition fulfilled - Minimum required number of bolts n cr = max (n i ) V trap s (n)

Analysis method Computation of the minimum required number of bolts For the special case of a homogeneous ground with uniform face reinforcement Limit equilibrium condition c =0, c,, z n = n( z f ) (closed form solution) z f n cr = max [n( z f )] n (bolts / m 2 ) simple optimization problem (one-variable)

Analysis method Computation of the minimum required number of bolts For the most general case of heterogeneous ground and arbitrary bolt distribution c =0, N = min n k A k c 3, 3, 3 V res ( z f ) V trap ( z f ) V( z f, z i ) 0 n 2 z z i c 2, 2, 2 complex optimization problem (multi-variable): numerical solution based on the simplex method n 1 z f c 1, 1, 2 n (bolts / m 2 )

Analysis method Design tools For the special case of a homogeneous ground with uniform face reinforcement Design charts

Analysis method Design tools For the special case of a homogeneous ground with uniform face reinforcement Tunnel+ (free App for smartphones) Tunnel+

Analysis method Design tools For the most general case of heterogeneous ground and arbitrary bolt distribution Standalone computer application with Graphical User Interface

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds above the water table

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds above the water table Overburden and shape of the face n n 2 cr [bolts/m 2 ] ] 1.4 1.2 1 = 25 A 8 m A B C c =0, = 25 4 m c = var 8 m = 20 kn/m 3 8 m 8 m 4 m h = var 0.8 h (m) = z 0.6 0.4 0.2 B C 8 4 n (bolts / m 2 ) L = 12 m l = 9 m, m = 150 kpa, d = 114 mm 0 0 5 10 15 20 c [kpa]

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds above the water table Overburden and shape of the face 53 bolts 12 + 5 = 17 11 + 11 = 22 n n 2 cr [bolts/m 2 ] ] 1.4 1.2 1 = 25 A 8 m A B C 4 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 4 m c =0, = 25 c = 5 kpa = 20 kn/m 3 h = 0.8 h (m) = z 0.6 0.4 0.2 B C 8 4 n (bolts / m 2 ) L = 12 m l = 9 m, m = 150 kpa, d = 114 mm 0 0 5 10 15 20 c [kpa]

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds above the water table Installation interval n cr [bolts/m 2 ] 1.4 1.2 1 = 25 8 m 8 m c =0, = 25 c = var = 20 kn/m 3 h = 0.8 L = 12m l = 9m z 0.6 0.4 0.2 L = 12m l = 4.5m n (bolts / m 2 ) L = 12 m l = var, m = 150 kpa, d = 114 mm 0 0 5 10 15 20 c [kpa]

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds above the water table Installation interval meters of bolts installed per linear meter of tunnel 102.4 m/m n cr [bolts/m 2 ] 1.4 1.2 1 = 25 8 m 8 m c =0, = 25 c = var = 20 kn/m 3 h = 0.8 L = 12m l = 9m z 0.6 0.4 0.2 68.3 m/m L = 12m l = 4.5m n (bolts / m 2 ) L = 12 m l = var, m = 150 kpa, d = 114 mm 0 0 5 10 15 20 c [kpa]

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds above the water table Spatial bolt distribution 108 m 8 m 10 m 0.22 0.35 0.52 0.0 z H 3H/4 H/2 H/4 0.59 0.23 0.04 z H 2H/3 H/3 0.39 0.28 z H H/2 c =0, = 25 c = 10 kpa = 20 kn/m 3 0.35 e= 1 m z h = 30 m L = 12 m l = 6 m, m = 150 kpa, d = 114 mm n (bolts / m 2 ) n (bolts / m 2 ) n (bolts / m 2 ) n (bolts / m 2 ) 28 bolts 29 bolts 34 bolts 35 bolts

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds below the water table - drained

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds below the water table - drained Drainage boreholes 8 m 88 m c =0, = var c = var t = 0 = 12 kn/m 3 h = 8 m z h 0 = 2H L = 16 m l = 8 m, m = 150 kpa, d = 114 mm Without advance drainage With advance drainage n (bolts / m 2 ) 35 bolts

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds below the water table - undrained

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds below the water table - undrained Over-consolidation ratio

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds below the water table - undrained Overburden OCR = 1.0

On the effect of the design parameters Grounds below the water table - undrained Overlapping length OCR = 1.0

Conclusions Experience and predictions prove that ground reinforcement using bolts is a very effective measure for stabilizing the tunnel face Excavation method and installation interval of the bolts affect significantly the required quantity of bolts (Top heading and Bench excavation method and small installation intervals allow to reduce the quantity of bolts) Big overlapping length are required in undrained soils Drainage boreholes are required in soils below the water table under drained conditions The uniform distribution is not the optimal one. A computational method was developed for the optimization of the face reinforcement

Paolo Perazzelli Pini Swiss Engineers, Zurich Thank you for the attention!