arxiv: v3 [math.fa] 1 Aug 2013

Transcription

1 THE EQUIVALENCE AMONG NEW MULTISTEP ITERATION, S-ITERATION AND SOME OTHER ITERATIVE SCHEMES arxiv:.570v [math.fa] Aug 0 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES Abstract. I this paper, we show that Picard, Krasoselskij, Ma, Ishikawa, ew two step, Noor, multistep, ew multistep, SP ad S-iterative schemes are equivalet for cotractive-like mappigs.. Itroductio ad Prelimiaries I the last four decades, attetio of researchers has bee focused o the itroductio ad the covergeces of various iteratio procedures for approximate fixed poits of certai classes of self- oliear mappigs, e.g. see [7,, 6, 8, 0,, 4, 9, 4]. The most celebrated fixed poit iterative procedures are the Picard [], Ma [4], ad Ishikawa [4] iterative procedures. Numerous covergece results have bee proved through these iterative procedures for approximatig fixed poits of differet tpe oliear mappigs, e.g. see [4,,, 4, 6, 7]. But i some cases, some particular iteratio procedure ma fail to coverge for some class of oliear mappigs. For istace, (i) the Picard iteratio procedure [] does ot covergece to the fixed poit of oexpasive mappigs, (for more detail see pp.8, Example.8 i []),while the Ishikawa iteratio [4] ad Ma iteratio [4] coverges. (ii) B providig a couter example, Chidume ad Mutagadura [9] showed that the Ma iteratio [4] fails to coverge for the class of Lipschitzia pseudocotractive mappigs while the Ishikawa iteratio [4] coverges. I the light of the above facts, a cojecture was put forwad i [5, 7] as follows: While the Ma iteratio [4] coverges to a fixed poit of a particular class of mappigs, does the Ishikawa iteratio [4] coverges too? Durig the past ears, this cojecture was prove affirmativel b ma researchers ad cosequetl a large literature has developed aroud the theme of establishig the equivalece amog covergeces of some well-kow iterative schemes deal with various classes of mappigs. Some authors who have made cotributios to the stud of equivalece amog various iterative schemes are Rhoades ad Şoltuz [,,, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], Beride [], Şoltuz [5, 6], Olaleru ad Akewe [4], Chag et al [] ad several of the refereces therei. The mai objective of this paper is attepmt to verif the above cojecture for a ew multistep iteratio [] ad some other well-kow iterative procedures i the literature. As a backgroud for our expositio, we ow metio some cotractive mappigs ad iteratio schemes. 000 Mathematics Subject Classificatio. Primar 47H0. Ke words ad phrases. New multistep iteratio, S-iteratio, Equivalece of iteratios, Cotractive-like mappigs.

2 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES I [0] Zamfirescu established a importat geeralizatio of the Baach fixed poit theorem usig the followigcotractivecoditio: For a mappig T : E E, there exist real umbers a,b,c satisfig 0 < a <, 0 < b,c < / such that, for each pair x, X, at least oe of the followig is true: (.) (z ) Tx T a x, (z ) Tx T b( x Tx + T ), (z ) Tx T c( x T + Tx ). A mappig T satisfig the cotractive coditios (z ), (z ) ad (z ) i (.) is called a Zamfirescu mappig. As show i [], the cotractive coditio (.) leads to (.) (b ) Tx T δ x +δ x Tx if oe use (z ), ad (b ) Tx T δ x +δ x T if oe use (z ), for all x, E where δ := max { a, b b, c c }, δ [0,), ad it was show that this class of mappigs is wider tha the class of Zamfirescu mappigs. A mappig satisfig coditio (b ) or (b ) is called a quasi-cotractive mappig. Extedig the above defiitio, Osilike ad Udomee [7] cosidered mappigs T for which there exist real umbers L 0 ad δ [0,) such that for all x, E, (.) Tx T δ x +L x Tx. Imoru ad Olatiwo [0] gave a more geeral defiitio: The mappig T is called a cotractive-like mappig if there exists a costat δ [0, ) ad a strictl icreasig ad cotiuous fuctio ϕ : [0, ) [0, ) with ϕ(0) = 0, such that, for each x, E, (.4) Tx T δ x +ϕ( x Tx ). Remark. [] A map satisfig (.4) eed ot have a fixed poit. However, usig (.4), it is obvious that if T has a fixed poit, the it is uique. Throughout the rest of this paper N deotes the set of all oegative itegers. Let X be a Baach space ad E X be a oempt closed, covex subset of X, ad T be a self map o E. Defie F T := {p X : p = Tp} to be the set of fixed poits of T. Let {α } =0, {β } =0,{γ } =0 ad { β i }, i =,k, k be =0 real sequeces i [0, ) satisfig certai coditios. Rhoades ad Şoltuz [7], itroduced a multistep iterative algorithm b x 0 E, x + = ( α )x +α T (.5), i = ( β i ) x +β i T i+ k = ( β k ), x +β k Tx, N. The followig multistep iteratio was emploed i [] x 0 E, x + = ( α ) +α T, (.6) i = ( β i ) i+ ( ) +β i Ti+, k = β k x +β k Tx, N.

3 THE EQUIVALENCE AMONG VARIOUS ITERATIVE SCHEMES Btakigk = ad k = i (.5)weobtai the well-kownoor[6] ad Ishikawa [4] iterative schemes, respectivel. SP iteratio [8] ad a ew two-step iteratio [9] processes are obtaied b takig k = ad k = i (.6), respectivel. Both i (.5) ad i (.6), if we take k = with β = 0 ad k = with β 0, α λ (cost.), the we get the iterative procedures itroduced i [4] ad [5], which are commol kow as the Ma ad Krasoselskij iteratios, respectivel. The Krasoselskij iteratio reduces to the Picard iteratio [] for λ =. A sequece {x } =0 defied b (.7) x 0 E, x + = ( α )Tx +α T, = ( β )x +β Tx, N is kow as the S-iteratio process [9, 0]. The followig lemma will be useful to prove the mai results of this work ad is importat b itself. Lemma. [5] Let {a } =0 be a oegative sequece which satisfies the followig iequalit (.8) a + ( µ )a +ρ, where µ (0,), for all 0, µ =, adρ = o(µ ). The lim a = =0 0.. Mai Results Theorem. Let T : E E be a mappig satisfig coditio (.4) with F T. If x 0 = u 0 E ad α A > 0, N, the the followig are equivalet: () The Ma iteratio [4] coverges to p F T, () The ew multistep iteratio (.6) coverges to p F T. Proof. We first prove the implicatio () (): Suppose that the Ma iteratio [4] coverges to p. Usig the Ma iteratio [4], (.6), ad (.4) we have the followig estimates: u + x + = ( α ) ( u ) ( +α Tu T) ( α ) u +α Tu T ( α ) u { +α δ u +ϕ( u Tu ) } = [ α ( δ)] (.) u +α ϕ( u Tu ),

4 4 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES u = u ( β ) β T = u β u +β u ( β ) β T = ( β )( u ) ( +β u T) ( β) u +β u T = ( β ) u +β u Tu +Tu T ( β ) u +β Tu T +β u Tu ( β u ) +β δ u +β ϕ( u Tu ) (.) +β u Tu = [ β ( δ) ] u +β { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )}, u ( )( = β u ) ( ) +β u T ( β ) u +β u T ( β ) u +β Tu T +β u Tu ( β u ) +β δ u +β ϕ( u Tu ) (.) +β u Tu = [ β ( δ) ] u +β { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )}, u ( )( = β u 4 ) ( ) +β u T 4 ( β ) u 4 +β u T 4 ( β ) u 4 +β Tu T 4 +β u Tu ( β u ) 4 +β δ u 4 +β ϕ( u Tu ) (.4) +β u Tu = [ β ( δ) ] u 4 +β { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )}. B combiig (.), (.), (.), ad (.4) we obtai u + x + [ α ( δ)] [ β ( δ) ][ β ( δ) ] [ β ( δ) ] u 4 (.5) +[ α ( δ)] {[ β ( δ) ][ β ( δ) ] β + [ β ( δ)] β +β } { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )} +α ϕ( u Tu ) Cotiuig the above process we have u + x + [ α ( δ)] [ β ( δ) ] [ [ β +[ α ( δ)]{ ( δ) ] [ (.6) β k β k ] u ( δ) k ] ( δ) β k + + [ β ( δ)] β +β } { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )} +α ϕ( u Tu ).

5 THE EQUIVALENCE AMONG VARIOUS ITERATIVE SCHEMES 5 Agai usig (.6), ad (.4) we get ) u k = ( β k (u x )+β k (u Tx ) ( ) β k u x +β k u Tx ( ) β k u x +β k [ ] (.7) ( δ) β k Tu Tx +β k u Tu u x +β k { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )}. Sice δ [0,) ad {α } =0,{ β i } [0,) for i =,k, we have =0 (.8) [ α ( δ)] [ [ ] β ( δ)] ( δ) [ α ( δ)]. β k Usig iequalit (.8) ad the assumptio α A > 0, N i the resultat iequalit obtaied b substitutig (.7) i (.6) we get u + x + [ A( δ)] u x [ β +[ A( δ)]{ ( δ) ] [ Defie (.9) a : = u x, β k ] ( δ) β k + + [ β ( δ) ] β +β } { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )} +α ϕ( u Tu ). µ : = A( δ) (0,), [ β ρ : = [ A( δ)]{ ( δ) ] [ β k ] ( δ) β k + + [ β ( δ)] β +β } { u Tu +ϕ( u Tu )} +α ϕ( u Tu ). Sice lim u p = 0 ad Tp = p F T, it follows from (.4) that (.0) 0 u Tu u p + Tp Tu u p +δ p u +ϕ( p Tp ) = (+δ) u p 0 as, which implies lim u Tu = 0; amel ρ = o(µ ). Hece a applicatio of Lemma to (.0) ields lim u x = 0. Sice u p as b assumptio, we derive (.) x p x u + u p ad this implies that lim x = p. () () : Assume that x p as. Usig the Ma iteratio [4], (.6), ad (.4), we have the followig estimates: x + u + = ( α ) ( u ) +α ( T Tu ) (.) ( α ) u +α T Tu ( α ) { ( u +α δ u +ϕ T )} = [ α ( δ)] u +α ϕ ( T ),

6 6 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES ( ) u = β +β T u = ( β ) +β T ( u β +β) = ( β )( u ) +β ( T u ) ( β) u +β T u ( β ) u +β T + u ( β ) u +β u +β T = (.) u +β T, u = ( β ) +β T u = ( β ) ( ) )( u +β T u (.4) ( β ) u +β T u ( β) u +β u +β T = u +β T. B combiig (.), (.), ad (.4) we obtai x + u + [ α ( δ)] u +[ α ( δ)]β T +[ α ( δ)]β T +α ϕ ( (.5) T ) I a similar wa, we have x + u + [ α ( δ)] k u +[ α ( δ)]β k T k k + +[ α ( δ)]β T +α ϕ ( (.6) T ) Usig ow (.6) we have ( k u = ( ( (.7) β k β k β k ) ) ) x +β k Tx u x u +β k Tx u x u +β k x u +β k Tx x. x u +β k Tx x Substitutig (.7) i (.6) ad utilizig the assumptio α A > 0, N we get x + u + [ A( δ)] x u { +[ A( δ)] β k Tx x +β k T k + +β T } +α ϕ ( (.8) T ). Now defie a : = u x, µ : = A( δ) (0,), { ρ : = [ A( δ)] β k Tx x +β k T k + +β T } +α ϕ ( T ). k k

7 THE EQUIVALENCE AMONG VARIOUS ITERATIVE SCHEMES 7 Sice lim x p = 0 ad Tp = p F T, it follows from (.4) that (.9) 0 x Tx x p + Tp Tx x p +δ p x +ϕ( p Tp ) = (+δ) x p 0 as. Utilizig (.4), (.6), ad the coditio { β i } [0,), i =,k, we have =0 0 T = p+p T p + Tp T p +δ p +ϕ( p Tp ) = (+δ) p = (+δ) ( β ) +β T p( β ) +β (+δ) {( β ) p +β T Tp } (+δ) {( ) β p +β δ p } = (+δ) [ β ( δ) ] p = (+δ) [ β ( δ) ] ( β ) +β T p ( β +β) (+δ) [ β ( δ) ]{( β ) p +β T Tp } (+δ) [ β ( δ)][ β ( δ)] p (+δ) [ β ( δ) ] [ (+δ) [ [ β ( δ)] β k β k ] k ( δ) ] ( δ) x p p (.0) (+δ) x p 0 as. Itiseastoseefrom(.0)thatthisresultisalsovalidfor T,..., T k Sice ϕ is cotiuous, we have lim x Tx = lim ϕ( T ) (.) = lim T = = lim k T k = 0, k. thatisρ = o(µ ). HeceaapplicatioofLemmato(.8)leadtolim x u = 0. Sice x p as b assumptio, we derive (.) u p u x + x p ad this implies that lim u = p. Theorem. Let T : E E be a mappig satisfig coditio (.4) with F T. If x 0 = u 0 E ad α A > 0, N, the the followig are equivalet: () The Ma iteratio [4] coverges to p F T, () The S-iteratio (.7) coverges to p F T. Proof. To prove the implicatio () (), suppose that the Ma iteratio [4] coverges to p. Usig (.4), the Ma iteratio [4], ad (.7) we have the followig

8 8 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES estimates: u + x + = ( α )(u Tx )+α (Tu T ) ( α ) u Tx +α Tu T (.) ( α ) u Tx +α δ u +α ϕ( u Tu ), (.4) u = u ( β )x β Tx = u β u +β u ( β )x β Tx ( β ) u x +β u Tx, (.5) u Tx = u Tu +Tu Tx u Tu + Tu Tx u Tu +δ u x +ϕ( u Tu ). B combiig (.),(.4), ad (.5) we obtai (.6) u + x + {( α )δ +α δ[ β ( δ)]} u x Sice δ,α,β [0,) for all N, +[ α +α β δ] u Tu +[+α β δ]ϕ( u Tu ). (.7) ( α )δ < α, β ( δ) <. Usig (.7) ad the assumptio α A > 0, N i (.6) we derive (.8) Defie u + x + [ A( δ)] u x a : = u x, µ : = A( δ) (0,), +[ A( δ)] u Tu +[+α β δ]ϕ( u Tu ). ρ : = [ A( δ)] u Tu +[+α β δ]ϕ( u Tu ). Sice lim u p = 0, lim u Tu = 0 as i the proof of Theorem. It therefore follows, usig the same argumet as that emploed i the proof of Theorem that lim x = p. We will prove ow that, if the S-iteratio coverges, the the Ma iteratio does too. Usig (.4), the Ma iteratio [4], ad (.7) we have x + u + = ( α )(Tx u )+α (T Tu ) (.9) ( α ) Tx u +α T Tu ( α ) Tx u +α δ u +α ϕ( T ). We ow have the followig estimates (.0) u = ( β )x +β Tx u = ( β )x +β Tx u β u +β u ( β ) x u +β Tx u,

9 THE EQUIVALENCE AMONG VARIOUS ITERATIVE SCHEMES 9 (.) Tx u = Tx x +x u Relatios (.9),(.0), ad (.) lead to (.) Tx x + x u. x + u + [ α ( δ)] x u Sice β [0,) for all N, (.) α β δ < α δ. +[ α +α β δ] Tx x +α ϕ( T ). Utilizig iequalit (.) ad the assumptio α A > 0, N i (.) we get (.4) Now defie u + x + [ A( δ)] x u a : = x u, µ : = A( δ) (0,), +[ A( δ)] Tx x +α ϕ( T ). ρ : = [ A( δ)] Tx x +α ϕ( T ). Sice lim x p = 0, lim Tx x = 0 as i the proof of Theorem. Now we have (.5) 0 T p + Tp T p +δ p +ϕ( p Tp ) = (+δ) p (+δ)( β ) x p +(+δ)β Tx Tp (+δ)[ β +β ] x p +(+δ)β ϕ( p Tp ) = (+δ) x p 0 as, that is, lim T = 0, threfore usig the same argumet as i the proof of Theorem, it ca be show that lim u = p. As show b Şoltuz ad Grosa ([7], Theorem.), i a real Baach space X, the Ishikawa iteratio [4] coverges to the fixed poit of T, where T : E E is a mappig satisfig coditio (.4). I 007, Şoltuz ([8], Corollar ) proved that the Krasoselskij [5], Ma [4], Ishikawa [4], Noor [6] ad multistep (.5) iteratios are equivalet for quasicotractive mappigs i a ormed space settig. I 0, Chugh ad Kumar ([], Corollar.) proved that the Picard [], Ma [4], Ishikawa [4], ew two step [9], Noor [6] ad SP [8] iteratios are equivalet for quasi-cotractive mappigs i a Baach space settig. From the argumet used i the proofs of ([7], Theorem.), ([8], Corollar ) ad ([], Corollar.) we easil obtai the followig corollar: Corollar. T : E E be a mappig satisfig coditio (.4) with F T. If the iitial poit is the same for all iteratios, α A > 0, N, the the followig are equivalet: () The Picard iteratio [] coverges to p F T ;

10 0 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES () The Krasoselskij iteratio [5] coverges to p F T ; () The Ma iteratio [4] coverges to p F T ; (4) The Ishikawa iteratio [4] coverges to p F T ; (5) The ew two step iteratio [9] coverges to p F T ; (6) The Noor iteratio [6] coverges to p F T ; (7) The SP iteratio [8] coverges to p F T ; (8) The Multistep iteratio (.5) coverges to p F T ; Together with Theorem ad Theorem,Corollar leads to the followig corollar: Corollar. T : E E be a mappig satisfig coditio (.4) with F T. If the iitial poit is the same for all iteratios, α A > 0, N, the the followig are equivalet: () The Picard iteratio [] coverges to p F T ; () The Krasoselskij iteratio [5] coverges to p F T ; () The Ma iteratio [4] coverges to p F T ; (4) The Ishikawa iteratio [4] coverges to p F T ; (5) The ew two step iteratio [9] coverges to p F T ; (6) The Noor iteratio [6] coverges to p F T ; (7) The SP iteratio [8] coverges to p F T ; (8) The Multistep iteratio (.5) coverges to p F T ; (9) The ew multistep iteratio (.6) coverges to p F T ; (0) The S-iteratio (.7) coverges to p F T. Ackowledgemet. The first two authors would like to thak Yıldız Techical Uiversit Scietific Research Projects Coordiatio Departmet uder project umber BAPK DOP0 for fiacial support durig the preparatio of this mauscript. Refereces [] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece of Ma iteratio ad Ishikawa iteratio for o-lipschitzia operators, It. J. Math. Math. Sci. 4(00) [] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece betwee the covergeces of Ishikawa ad Ma iteratios for a asmptoticall pseudocotractive map, J. Math. Aal. Appl. 8(00) [] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, O the equivalece of Ma ad Ishikawa iteratio methods, It. J. Math. Math. Sci. 7(00) [4] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece of Ma iteratio ad Ishikawa iteratio for a Lipschitzia Ψ-uiforml pseudocotractive ad Ψ-uiforml accretive maps, Tamkag J. Math. 5(004) [5] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece betwee the covergeces of Ishikawa ad Ma iteratios for a asmptoticall oexpasive i the itermediate sese ad strogl successivel pseudocotractive maps, J.Math. Aal. Appl. 89(004) [6] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece of Ma ad Ishikawa iteratio for Ψ-uiforml pseudocotractive or Ψ-uiforml accretive maps, It. J. Math. Math. Sci. 46(004) [7] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece betwee Ma-Ishikawa iteratios ad multistep iteratio, Noliear Aalsis 58(004) 9-8. [8] B.E. Rhoades, S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece of Ma ad Ishikawa iteratio dealig with strogl pseudocotractive or strogl accretive maps, Paamer. Math. J. 4(004) [9] C.E. Chidume, S.A. Mutagadura, A example o the Ma iteratio method for Lipschitz pseudocotractios, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 9 (00) 59 6.

11 THE EQUIVALENCE AMONG VARIOUS ITERATIVE SCHEMES [0] C.O. Imoru, M.O. Olatiwo, O the stabilit of Picard ad Ma iteratio processes, Carpathia Joural of Mathematics 9(00) [] E. Picard, Memoire sur la theorie des equatios aux derivees partielles et la methode des approximatios successives, J. Math. Pures et Appl. 6(890), [] F. Gürso, V. Karakaa, B.E. Rhoades, Data depedece results of a ew multistep ad S-iterative schemes for cotractive-like operators, Fixed Poit Theor ad Applicatios 0, 0:76. doi:0.86/ [] H. Akewe, Strog covergece ad stabiliti of Jugck-multistep-SP iteratio for geeralized cotractive-like iequalit operators, Advaces i Natural Sciece 5(0) -7. [4] J.O. Olaleru, H. Akewe, The equivalece of Jugck-tpe iteratios for geeralized cotractivelike operators i a Baach space, Fasciculi Mathematici (0) [5] M.A. Krasoselkij, Two remarks o the method of successive approximatios, Uspehi Mat. Nauk. 6()(955) -7. [6] M.A. Noor, New approximatio schemes for geeral variatioal iequalities, Joural of Mathematical Aalsis ad Applicatios 5(000) 7-9. [7] M.O. Osilike, A. Udomee, Short proofs of stabilit results for fixed poit iteratio procedures for a class of cotractive-tpe mappigs, Idia Joural of Pure ad Applied Mathematics 0(999) 9-4. [8] Phuegrattaa, Withuad, Suatai, Suthep, O the rate of covergece of Ma, Ishikawa, Noor ad SP iteratios for cotiuous fuctios o a arbitrar iterval, Joural of Computatioal ad Applied Mathematics 5(0) [9] R.P. Agarwal, D. O Rega, D.R. Sahu, Fixed poit theor for lipschitzia tpe-mappigs with applicatios, Spriger 009. [0] R.P. Agarwal, D. O Rega, D.R. Sahu, Iterative costructio of fixed poits of earl asmptoticall oexpasive mappigs, J. Noliear Covex Aal. 8(007) [] R. Chugh, V. Kumar, Strog covergece of SP iterative scheme for quasi-cotractive operators i Baach spaces, Iteratioal Joural of Computer Applicatios (0) -7. [] R. Glowiski, P. Le Tallec, Augmeted Lagragia ad operatorsplittig methods i oliear mechaics, SIAM, Philadelphia,989. [] S.S. Chag, Y.J. Cho, J.K. Kim, The equivalece betwee the covergece of modified Picard, modified Ma, ad modified Ishikawa iteratios, Math. Comput. Modellig 7(00) [4] S. Ishikawa, Fixed poits b a ew iteratio method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44(974) [5] S.M. Şoltuz, A equivalece betwee the covergeces of Ishikawa, Ma ad Picard iteratios, Math. Commu. 8(00) 5. [6] S.M. Şoltuz, A remark cocerig the paper: A equivalece betwee the covergeces of Ishikawa, Ma ad Picard iteratios, Rev. Aal. Numer. Theor. Approx. (004) [7] S.M. Şoltuz, T. Grosa, Data depedece for Ishikawa iteratio whe dealig with cotractive like operators, Fixed Poit Theor ad Applicatios 008(008) Article ID pages. [8] S.M. Şoltuz, The equivalece betwee Krasoselskij, Ma, Ishikawa, Noor ad multistep iteratios, Mathematical Commuicatios (007) 5-6. [9] S. Thiawa, Commo fixed poits of ew iteratios for two asmptoticall oexpasive oself mappigs i a Baach space, J. Comput. Appl. Math. (008) doi: 0.06/j.cam [0] T. Zamfirescu, Fix poit theorems i metric spaces, Archiv der Mathematik (97) [] V. Beride, Picard iteratio coverges faster tha the Ma iteratio i the class of quasicotractive operators, Fixed Poit Theor Appl. (004) [] V. Beride, O the covergece of the Ishikawa iteratio i the class of quasi cotractive operators, Acta Mathematica Uiversitatis Comeiaae 7(004) 9-6. [] V. Beride, Iterative approximatio of fixed poits, Spriger Berli Heidelberg, New York, 007. [4] W.R. Ma, Mea value methods i iteratios, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4(95) [5] X. Weg, Fixed poit iteratio for local strictl pseudocotractive mappig, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (99) [6] Y. Xu, Ishikawa ad Ma Iterative Processes with Errors for Noliear Strogl Accretive Operator Equatios, Joural of Mathematical Aalsis ad Applicatios 4(998) 9-0.

12 FAIK GÜRSOY, VATAN KARAKAYA, AND B. E. RHOADES [7] Z. Huag, Ma ad Ishikawa iteratios with errors for asmptoticall oexpasive mappigs, Computers & Mathematics with Applicatios 7(999) -7. Departmet of Mathematics, Yildiz Techical Uiversit, Davutpasa Campus, Eseler, 40 Istabul, Turke address: URL: Curret address: Departmet of Mathematical Egieerig, Yildiz Techical Uiversit, Davutpasa Campus, Eseler, 40 Istabul address: URL: Departmet of Mathematics, Idiaa Uiversit, Bloomigto, IN , USA address: URL: