SECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016)"

Transcription

1 SECOND QUANTIZATION notes by Luca G. Molinari (oct revised oct 2016) The appropriate formalism for the quantum description of identical particles is second quantisation. There are various equivalent ways to introduce it. In the present approach, it is a procedure to rewrite the operators corresponding to observables from the basis of the fundamental single-particle operators (such as { x i, p i, s i } N i=1) to a new basis of operators {ĉ r, ĉ r } r=1 that create and destroy a particle in single particle states r. Their commutation rules take care of the particle statistics. Second-quantized operators are defined in a broader Hilbert space, the Fock space (Vladimir Fock, 1928), that accomodates any number of particles. The formalism is very advantageous, and becomes necessary to describe absorption or emission processes of particles or excitations such as photons, phonons, magnons, plasmons etc. Creation and destruction operators with commutation rules for Bose statistics were introduced by Paul M. A. Dirac for the quantization of the electromagnetic field (1926, Quantum theory of light radiation and absorption). Jordan extended the formalism to massive bosons (Jordan and Klein, 1927) and then to fermions, whose statistics requires anti-commutation rules (Jordan and Wigner, 1928). 1 Systems of N identical particles In quantum mechanics a particle is objectified by a set of observables, i.e. a set of fundamental operators, such as position, momentum and spin, characterized by their commutation relations. If the relations are represented irreducibly (any operator commuting with them is multiple of the identity), then any other observable of the particle is a function of them, and the fundamental operators are identified up to a unitary transformation. Operators of different particles commute: this translates the concept of a particle being an autonomous entity. It follows that the Hilbert space of N 1

2 particles is H (N) = H 1 H N, where H k is the Hilbert space for the description of the k-th particle. H (N) is the closure of the finite linear combinations of factored vectors u 1,..., u N = u 1... u N, where u k belongs to H k. The inner product among factored states is: v 1,..., v N u 1,..., u N = v 1 u 1 1 v N u N N (1) where k is the inner product in H k. The tensor product is linear in each term: u 1,..., αu i + βv i,..., u N = α u 1,..., u i,..., u N + β u 1,..., v i,..., u N A single particle operator  on H k corresponds to an operator Â(k) on H (N) with action Â(k) u 1,..., u k,... u N = u 1,..., Âu k,..., u N. Single particle operators of different particles commute: [Â(k), ˆB(k )] = 0. A particle with spin s may be described by a normalised function f in L 2 (R 3 ) 2s+1. f( x, m) 2 d 3 x is the probability that the particle is localised in the volume d 3 x centred in x, with z component of spin equal to m. The products f 1 ( x 1, m 1 ) f N ( x N, m N ) and their linear combinations form a linear space whose closure is the Hilbert space of functions f( x 1 m 1,..., x N m N ) such that d 3 x 1... d 3 x N f( x 1 m 1,..., x N m N ) 2 <. m 1...m N 1.1 Identical particles If the N particles are identical, the spaces H 1,..., H N are copies of the same one-particle Hilbert space H (symbolically H (N) = N H ). Since the vectors that form u 1,... u N belong to the same space, it is possible to introduce the permutation operators. If σ is the permutation σ(1,..., N) = (σ 1,..., σ N ), the corresponding operator on factored states is ˆP σ u 1,... u N = u σ1,..., u σn (2) They extend by linearity to unitary operators on the whole space H (N), and form a representation of the symmetric group S N : ˆP σ ˆPσ = ˆP σσ, ˆP σ = ˆP σ 1 (3) An important subclass are the exchange operators. The exchange of particles i and j is ˆP ij u 1... u i... u j... u N = u 1... u j... u i... u N. Since ˆP ij 2 = I, it follows that ˆP ij is self-adjoint with eigenvalues ±1. 2

3 Any permutation can be factored into exchanges, in various ways. However, the parity of the number of exchange factors in any factorization is the same: a permutation is even or odd if the number of exchanges is even or odd 1. Let s introduce the simmetrization operator Ŝ(N) (or Ŝ(N) +) and the antisimmetrization operator Â(N) (or Ŝ(N) ) of N particles: Ŝ(N) ± = 1 (±1) σ ˆPσ (4) N! σ S N (+1) σ = 1 applies to the simmetrization, while for the antisimmetrization ( 1) σ is +1 if σ is even, 1 if σ is odd. We omit the simple proofs of ˆP σ Ŝ(N) ± = Ŝ(N) ± ˆP σ = (±1) σ Ŝ(N) ± (5) Proposition 1.1. Ŝ(N) ± are projection operators: Ŝ(N) ± = Ŝ(N) ±, Ŝ(N) 2 ± = Ŝ(N) ± (6) Proof. Ŝ(N) ± = 1 N! σ (±1)σ ˆPσ 1, the sum on σ coincides with the sum on inverse permutations σ 1, and σ has the same parity of σ 1. This gives self-adjointness. The other property follows from (5): Ŝ(N) 2 ± = 1 N! σ (±1)σ Ŝ(N) ± ˆPσ = 1 N! σ Ŝ(N) ± = Ŝ(N) ±. Exercise 1.2. Show that Ŝ(N)Â(N) = 0 (i.e. S(N) +S(N) = 0). Exercise 1.3. Show that A(N) u 1... u N = 0 if two of the N vectors are equal. The two subspaces of projection are the Hilbert spaces: H (N) + = Ŝ(N) +H (N), H (N) = Ŝ(N) H (N) A vector in H (N) + is invariant under the action of any exchange operator, while a vector in H (N) changes sign under the action of any exchange operator. In other words, H (N) + is the eigenspace with eigenvalue 1 for all exchange operators, while H (N) is the eigenspace with eigenvalue 1 for all exchange operators. Therefore, H (N) + and H (N) are orthogonal subspaces of H (N). 1 If S N is represented by N N matrices σ ij with elements 0 and a single 1 in each column and row, the determinant may be 1 or -1. The exchange matrix among elements ij has matrix elements σ rs = δ rs for r, s i, j, σ ii = σ jj = 0, σ ij = σ ji = 1. Its determinant is 1. All factorizations that produce the matrix must give the same value of the determinant. 3

4 1.2 Indistinguishability of identical particles In quantum mechanics identical particles are indistinguishable. This means that the operators associated to observables are symmetric functions of the fundamental 1-particle operators: Ô(1, 2,..., N) = Ô(σ 1, σ 2,..., σ N ), where for brevity we put i = ( x i, p i, s i ). Therefore, they commute with permutation operators: [Ô, ˆP σ ] = 0. Examples are the one-particle operators Ô1 = N i=1 o 1(i), (e.g. total momentum P = i p i, particle density ˆn( x) = i δ 3( x x i )), and two-particle operators Ô2 = i<j o 2(i, j), with o 2 (i, j) = o 2 (j, i) (e.g. two-particle interaction ˆV = i<j v( x i, x j )). The only subspaces that are left invariant by the action of the observables, and in particular by the time evolution, are H (N) ±. This makes them the Hilbert spaces for the physics of N identical particles. The spin-statistics connection states that: H (N) + is the space for N bosons (integer spin), H (N) is the space for N fermions (half-integer spin). This is a fundamental result of the relativistic quantum field theory, where a violation would correspond to a violation of causality. 1.3 Slater determinants and permanents The inner product of two vectors Ŝ(N) ± u 1,... u N and Ŝ(N) ± v 1,... v N is: u 1,..., u N Ŝ(N)2 ± v 1,..., v N = 1 (±1) σ u 1,..., u N N! ˆP σ v 1,..., v N σ = 1 (±1) σ u 1 v σ1... u N v σn N! σ = 1 u 1 v 1... u 1 v N N! D ±.. (7) u N v 1... u N v N D + is the permanent 2 and D is the determinant. When the inner product is evaluated with the bra x 1, m 1 ;... ; x N, m N, one gets the permanent or the determinant of a matrix whose elements are 2 The permanent of a matrix is evaluated as a determinant, but omitting the weights ±1. Note that D + (AB) D + (A)D + (B). 4

5 functions: D ± v 1 ( x 1 m 1 )... v N ( x 1 m 1 ).. v 1 ( x N m N )... v N ( x N m N ) (8) The result is a totally symmetric or antisymmetric function. Exercise 1.4. In d = 1 consider the first N eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator 1 u k (x) = 2k k! 1 π e 2 x2 H k (x) where H k (x) = 2 k x k +... are the Hermite polinomials. Show that x 1... x N Â(N) u 1... u N = cost. e 1 2 (x x2 N ) i>j(x i x j ) Exercise 1.5. Given N vectors u 1,..., u N and a N N matrix M, construct the vectors v k = M kj u j, k = 1... N. Show that A(N) v 1... v N = (det M)A(N) u 1... u N (9) 1.4 The basis of occupation numbers Given a 1-particle orthonormal (complete) basis of vectors r, r = 1, 2, 3..., the factored vectors r 1, r 2,..., r N form an orthonormal basis in H (N). We study their projections Ŝ(N) ± r 1, r 2,... r N. Since r i r j = δ ij, by eq.(7) two vectors Ŝ(N) ± r 1,... r N and Ŝ(N) ± r 1,... r N are orthogonal if r 1,... r N is not a permutation of r 1,... r N. Bosons. In evaluating the squared norm, the sum on permutations in eq.(7) gives nonzero terms in correspondence of the identity permutation and permutations among vectors that are repeated. Then: Ŝ(N) r 1, r 2,... r N 2 = n 1!n 2!... n! N! where n r is the number of times that the ket r is present in the sequence r 1,..., r N. Since n 1 + n n = N, most occupation numbers n r are zero. Consider the normalized and orthogonal vectors N! r 1,..., r N + = Ŝ(N) r 1,... r N, (10) n 1!... n! 5

6 where, conventionally, 1-particle basis vectors are in ascending order, r 1 r 2... r N, to avoid replicas of the same symmetric vector. These vectors form an othonormal basis in the space of N bosons H (N) +. Fermions. A state r cannot appear twice in r 1,..., r N, therefore n r = 0, 1. In evaluating the norm, only the identity permutation contributes, then Â(N) r 1, r 2,... r N 2 = 1 The vectors N! r 1, r 2,... r N = N! Â(N) r 1, r 2,... r N (11) where r 1 < r 2 <... < r N, form an orthonormal basis in the space of N fermions H (N). A vector r 1,... r N ± is proportional to a symmetric or antisymmetric sum on all permutations of r 1,..., r N. It carries the information that N particles are distribuited with equal probability in the specified 1-particle states. The same information is encoded by the occupation numbers. We therefore introduce the useful notation: n 1, n 2,..., n ± r 1, r 2,... r N ± (12) where n r is the occupation number of the single particle state r, i.e. the number of times that the vector r appears in r 1,... r N. For bosons n r = 0, 1, 2,..., for fermions n r = 0, 1, and n n = N. The ortogonality and completeness relations in H (N) ± are: ± n 1, n 2,... n 1, n 2,... ± = δ n1,n δ 1 n 2,n... (13) 2 ± n 1, n 2,... n 1, n 2,... ± = Î (14) n 1,n 2,... n 1 +n =N 2 The Fock space Even though the number of particles might be a constant of the motion, it is advantageous to immerse the Hilbert space of N bosons or fermions in the larger Fock spaces for bosons or fermions: F ± = 0 H (1) H (2) ±... H (N) ±... 0 is the vacuum state (zero particle), H (1) is the one-particle Hilbert space H, H (N) ± is the Hilbert space of N bosons or fermions. In this construction, vectors with different content of particles are orthogonal. The occupation number vectors n 1,..., n ± without the restriction on n n 6

7 are a basis for F ±. If H is separable, the Fock spaces F ± are separable. In the larger ambient of Fock space, operators that change the number of particles may be defined. The basic ones are the operators that create or destroy one boson, ˆb, ˆb, or the operators that create or destroy one fermion, â, â. Since many properties can be derived jointly, we ll also use the single notation ĉ, ĉ (for bosons they act on F +, for fermions they act on F ). 2.1 Creation and destruction operators The creation operator of a particle in a single particle state u is defined through its action on a factored vector: ĉ u Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = N + 1 Ŝ(N + 1) ± u, u 1,..., u N (15) The creation operator simply adds a new particle in state u to the existing N particles, and reshuffles the N + 1 states. Therefore ĉ u : H (N) ± H (N + 1) ±, N = 0, 1,.... In particular, ĉ u 0 = u. The action on a generic vector in F ± is defined by linearity, once the vector is expanded into factored vectors. The destruction operator of a particle in a state u is defined as the adjoint of ĉ u. As such, to find out its action on vectors, we must consider the matrix element between two factored states v 1,..., v N Ŝ(N ) ± ĉ u Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N As ĉ u adds a particle in the bra-vector, the matrix element is zero if N N 1, meaning that ĉ u acts on the ket by removing a particle. Let s then consider the matrix element v 1,..., v N 1 Ŝ(N 1) ±ĉ u Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = N u, v 1,..., v N 1 Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N u u 1 u u 2... u u N N = N! D v 1 u v 1 u N ± v N 1 u 1 v N 1 u N 7

8 The permanent or determinant is expanded with respect to the first row: = N N! = 1 N N (±1) j+1 u u j D ± { v i u k } k j j=1 N j=1 (±1) j+1 u u j v 1,..., v N 1 Ŝ(N 1) ± u 1,..., /u j,..., u N By the arbitrariness of the bra vector, and being the linear combinations such vectors a dense set in H (N 1) ±, we obtain the final formula: ĉ u Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = 1 N N j=1 (±1) j+1 u u j Ŝ(N 1) ± u 1..., /u j,..., u N Destruction operators annihilate the vacuum state: ĉ u 0 = 0. (16) From the definition of creation operator on factored states, and being the destruction operator its adjoint, the following properties of linearity and antilinearity follow: ĉ α u +β v = αĉ u + βĉ v, ĉ α u +β v = α ĉ u + β ĉ v (17) 2.2 The algebra of (anti)commutation rules Creation and destruction operators obey a simple and important algebra. Consider the creation of two particles in the single particle states u and v ĉ u ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = (N + 2)(N + 1)Ŝ(N + 2) ± u, v, u 1,..., u N If the order is exchanged, the boson state with vectors exhanged remains the same, while for fermions an exchange means a minus sign: ĉ v ĉ u Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = ± (N + 2)(N + 1)Ŝ(N + 2) ± u, v, u 1,..., u N 8

9 By respectively subtracting and summing, the following exact commutation and anti-commutation properties result 3 : [ˆb u, ˆb v ] = 0, (bosons) (18) {â u, â v } = 0, (fermions) (19) By taking their adjoint, it follows that destruction operators exactly commute or anticommute: [ˆb u, ˆb v ] = 0, (bosons) (20) {â u, â v } = 0, (fermions) (21) In particular, (â u )2 = 0 and (â u ) 2 = 0 (Pauli principle). To obtain the relations among creation and destruction operators, their actions in different order are evaluated: ĉ v ĉ u S(N) ± u 1,..., u N = N (±1) j+1 u u j S(N) ± v, u 1..., /u j,..., u N j=1 ĉ u ĉ v S(N) ± u 1,..., u N = N + 1 c u S(N + 1) ± v, u 1,..., u N = N = u v S(N) ± u 1,..., u N ± (±1) j+1 u u j S(N) ± v, u 1,..., /u j,..., u N j=1 By comparing the two expressions one concludes that [ˆb u, ˆb v ] = u v (bosons) (22) {â u, â v } = u v (fermions) (23) Symmetric or antisymmetric factored states are obtained by acting with creation operators on the vacuum (the state is not normalized, in general): Ŝ(N) ± u 1, u 2,... u N = 1 ĉ u N! 1 ĉ u 2... ĉ u N 0 (24) In the formula bosonic creation operators commute, and may be exchanged. Fermionic ones anticommute, and their exchange may imply a sign change. 3 [A, B] = AB BA, {A, B} = AB + BA 9

10 2.3 Canonical (anti)-commutation relations In most applications, creation and destruction operators are introduced in association with a complete orthonormal basis r, r = 1, 2,.... For brevity we write ĉ r = ĉ r and ĉ r = ĉ r. The action of such operators is simple on the occupation number states n 1, n 2,... n ± referred to the basis r itself. Starting from eqs.(10) and (12), for Bose operators we obtain N! ˆb r n 1... n r... n = n 1!... n r!...ˆb rŝ(n) r 1, r 2,..., r N (N + 1)! = n 1!... n r!...ŝ(n + 1) r, r 1, r 2,..., r N N! 1 ˆbr n 1... n r... n = n 1!... n r!... N for Fermi operators: = n r + 1 n 1... n r n (25) N i=1 δ r,ri Ŝ(N 1) r 1..., /r i,... r N = n r n 1... n r 1... n (26) â r n 1... n r,... n = N! N + 1Â(N + 1) r, r 1, r 2..., r N â r n 1... n r... n = = (N + 1)!( 1) n n r 1 Â(N + 1) r 1,..., r,..., r N { ( 1) n 1+ +n r 1 n 1... n r n if n r = 0 = 0 if n r = 1 (27) { 0 if n r = 0 ( 1) n 1+ +n r 1 n 1... n r 1... n if n r = 1 (28) The factor ( 1) n n r 1 results from the number of exchanges that bring the vector r, r 1... r N to the vector with r 1 < < r < < r N. The operators ˆn r = ˆb rˆb r and ˆn r = â râ r are the occupation number operators of the state r : ˆn r n 1... n r... n = n r n 1... n r... n (29) The algebra of the creation and destruction operators of states in an orthonormal basis, is very simple. For bosons the canonical commutation relations (CCR) hold: [ˆb r, ˆb s ] = 0, [ˆb r, ˆb s] = 0, [ˆb r, ˆb s] = δ rs (30) 10

11 For fermions the canonical anti-commutation relations (CAR) hold: {â r, â s } = 0, {â r, â s} = 0, {â r, â s} = δ rs (31) A canonical transformation of creation and destruction operators is a map to another set of operators, that preserves the CCR or CAR rules. For example, the exchange of â r with â r is canonical (particle-hole symmetry). If r is a basis, the following are normalized occupation number vectors: n 1, n 2,..., n = 1 n1!... n!ˆb n 1 n 1 ˆb 0 (32) n 1, n 2,..., n = â n 1 1 â n 0 (33) For Fermi statistics n i = 0, 1 and the order of the operators, if changed, may produce a sign. 2.4 Field operators The formalism is extended to operators that create and destroy particles in states belonging to a continuum basis. An important example is the single particle basis of position x and spin s z d 3 x x, m x, m = I, x, m x, m = δ mm δ 3 ( x x ) m The operators that create or destroy a particle in the unphysical states x, m are named field operators. In place of the symbols c x,m e c x,m, it is customary to use the symbols ˆψ m ( x) and ˆψ m( x). For bosons: For fermions: [ ˆψ m ( x), ˆψ m ( x )] = δ 3 ( x x )δ m,m (34) [ ˆψ m ( x), ˆψ m ( x )] = 0, [ ˆψ m( x), ˆψ m ( x )] = 0 (35) { ˆψ m ( x), ˆψ m ( x )} = δ 3 ( x x )δ m,m (36) { ˆψ m ( x), ˆψ m ( x )} = 0, { ˆψ m( x), ˆψ m ( x )} = 0 (37) Given the one-particle state u and the function u( x, m) = x, m u, one has the expansions ĉ u = d 3 x u( x, m) ˆψ m ( x), ĉ u = d 3 x u( x, m) ˆψ m( x) (38) m m 11

12 On the other hand, given a single particle basis r : ˆψ m ( x) = r x, m r ĉ r, ˆψ m ( x) = r r x, m ĉ r (39) Let s introduce the operators that create and destroy a particle in eigenstates of p and s z : p k, m = k k, m and s z k, m = m k, m. In a box of volume V with periodic b.c. the eigenstates form a discrete basis, and we associate to them the canonical operators ĉ km and ĉ km. Then, for example: ĉ km = V d 3 x e i k x ˆψm ( x), ˆψm ( x) = 1 V V k e i k xĉ km (40) In the infinite domain, the basis k, m is continuous, and we associate to it the field operators ˆψ m( k) and ˆψ m ( k). it is: ˆψ m ( k) = d 3 x (2π) 3/2 e i k x ˆψm ( x), ˆψm ( x) = 3 Second quantization of operators d 3 x (2π) 3/2 ei k x ˆψm ( k) (41) By acting with creation operators on the vacuum state, one generates factored states that generate the Fock spaces. For this reason creation and destruction operators associated to a basis, are themselves a basis of operators on F ±. The operators associated to the observables of identical particles commute with the projectors S(N) ±, and leave the subspaces H (N) ± invariant. In this section, they are expanded as linear combinations of products of creation and destruction operators. The proof of the following identity is left to the reader. If u and v are any two single-particle states, for any factored state: ĉ u ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = N v u j Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u,..., u N (42) j=1 (in the right-hand side, the vector u replaces the vector u j ). The iteration 12

13 of the formula with new vectors u and v gives: N ĉ u ĉ v ĉ u ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = v u j ĉ u ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u,..., u N j=1 = v u N v u j Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u,..., u N j=1 + j k v u j v u k Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u,..., u,... u N In the last line u replaces u k and u replaces u j. The term with a single sum is v u ĉ u ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N. We end up with another useful identity (the generalization is simple to guess). An exchange of operators is done, by means of (anti)commutation relation v u = c v c u c u c v : ĉ u ĉ u ĉ v ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = ±(ĉ u ĉ v ĉ u ĉ v v u ĉ u ĉ v )Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = ± j k v u j v u k Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u,..., u,... u N = j k v u j v u k Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u,..., u,... u N (43) In the last line, u and u replace u j and u k. 3.1 One-particle operators The operators are the sum of N identical operators acting on 1-particle subspaces: Ô = N k=1 o(k); o( ) is a function of the fundamental 1-particle operators (e.g. position, momentum and spin). Upon insertion of two resolutions of the identity (not necessarily with same basis): ÔŜ(N) ± u 1,... u N = Ŝ(N) ± = Ŝ(N) ± = r,s r r o s N u 1,..., ou k,... u N k=1 N r o u k u 1,..., r,..., u N k=1 N s u k S(N) ± u 1,..., r,..., u N k=1 13

14 The last line compared with (42) and, since the vectors S(N) ± u 1... u N generate the Fock spaces: Ô = r,s ĉ r r o s ĉ s (44) If the basis vectors are eigenvectors of the single particle operator o, with eigenvalues o r, the expansion is simple and suggestive: Ô = r o rˆn r, being ˆn r = ĉ rĉ r the occupation number operator of the state r. If the continuous basis of position-spin is used, the expansion reads: Ô = mm d 3 xd 3 x ˆψ m ( x) xm o x m ˆψ m ( x ) (45) For local operators it is x, m o x m = δ 3 ( x x ) o m,m ( x). example is the particle density operator: A notable ˆn( x) = N δ 3 ( x x i ) = m i=1 ˆψ m( x) ˆψ m ( x) (46) In the basis k, m the kinetic energy operator is diagonal, while in the basis x, m it recalls a 1-particle expectation value ˆT = N i=1 p 2 i 2m = k,m 2 k 2 2m ĉ k,m ĉ k,m = 2 2m 3.2 Two-particle operators m d 3 x ˆψ m( x) 2 ˆψm ( x) (47) The operators are the sum of identical two-particle operators: ˆV = 1 2 i j v(i, j) where v(i, j) = v(j, i). The symmetry implies the exchange symmetry of matrix elements on 2-particle states 1, 2 v 1, 2 = 2, 1 v 2, 1. Let us evaluate ˆV Ŝ(N) ± u 1,..., u N = 2Ŝ(N) 1 ± v(i, j) u 1,..., u i,..., u j,..., u N = 1 2 i j r, s v r, s r u i s u j S(N) ± u 1,..., r,..., s,... u N r,s;r,s i j After using (43) we obtain the following expression: ˆV = 1 ĉ 2 rĉ s r, s v r, s ĉ s ĉ r (48) r,s;r,s 14

15 (note the order of the destruction operators, which is opposite to that of the ket states in the matrix element). If field operators are used: ˆV = 1 d 3 x d 3 x 4 ˆψ m1 ( x 1 ) ˆψ m 2 ( x 2 ) (49) m i x 1 m 1, x 2 m 2 v x 3 m 3, x 4 m 4 ˆψ m4 ( x 4 ) ˆψ m3 ( x 3 ) The notation can be significantly simplified: ˆV = 1 d(1234) ˆψ (1) ˆψ (2) 1, 2 v 3, 4 2 ˆψ(4) ˆψ(3) If v depends only on the particle s positions: x 1 m 1, x 2 m 2 v x 3 m 3, x 4 m 4 = v( x 3, x 4 ) x 1 m 1, x 2 m 2 x 3 m 3, x 4 m 4 = = v( x 3, x 4 )δ 3 ( x 1 x 3 )δ 3 ( x 2 x 4 )δ m1,m 3 δ m2,m 4 The operator gains a form similar to the first-quantized expectation value: ˆV = 1 d 3 xd 3 x ˆψ 2 m ( x) ˆψ m ( x ) v( x, x ) ˆψ m ( x ) ˆψ m ( x) (50) m,m Remark 3.1. In their second-quantized expression, the operators share some general properties: 1) the dependence on the total number N of particles is lost: the operators act on the Fock space, and have the same expression for any N; 2) if the numbers of creation and destruction operators are the same, they leave the subspaces of N identical particles invariant; 3) they are normally ordered, with destruction operators at the right of creation operators. As a consequence, the expectation value of the operator on the vacuum state (zero particle) is zero. Exercise 3.2. Given Ĥ = rs h rsĉ rĉ s, which is the transformation that diagonalizes the Hamiltonian? In particular, study the Hamiltonian Ĥ = t r (ĉ rĉ r+1 + ĉ rĉ r 1 ) 4 Symmetries A unitary operator u on one-particle states in H defines a unitary operator on H (N): Û N = u u... u. Û N commutes with exchange operators and leaves the subspaces H (N) ± invariant. The unitary operator on Fock spaces is Û = I u Û2... ÛN

16 Proposition 4.1. A one-particle unitary operator u induces a canonical transformation on creation and destruction operators: Û ĉ v Û = ĉ u v, Û ĉ v Û = ĉ u v (51) Proof. Û ĉ v ÛŜ(N) ± v 1,... v N = Û ĉ v Ŝ(N) ± uv 1,..., uv N = N + 1Û Ŝ(N +1) ± v, uv 1,..., uv N = N + 1Ŝ(N +1) ± u v, v 1,..., v N = ĉ u v Ŝ(N) ± v 1,... v N. The second relation follows by adjunction. We present the unitary representations of space translations, rotations, dilatations and parity on Fock space. They are important in the study of correlators. 4.1 Translations For one particle, translations are represented by the unitary group u( a) with the following action on the fundamental one-particle operators: u ( a)x i u( a) = x i +a i, u ( a)p i u( a) = p i, and u ( a)s i u( a) = s i. They imply u( a) = exp( i a p) and the following transformations of eigenvectors u( a) x, m = x + a, m, u( a) k, m = e i k a k, m (52) On F ± translations are represented by the unitary operators Û( a) = e i a P, P = k ĉ km ĉ km (53) k,m with action: Û( a) ˆψ m ( x)û( a) = ˆψ m( x a), Û( a) ˆψm ( x)û( a) = ˆψ m ( x a) (54) 4.2 Rotations Û( a) ĉ km Û( a) = e i k aĉ km, Û( a) ĉ km Û( a) = e i k aĉ km. (55) On the Hilbert space of a particle with spin, space rotations act as unitary operators specified by the vector transformation of the fundamental operators: u(r) x i u(r) = R ij x j, u(r) p i u(r) = R ij p j and u(r) s i u(r) = R ij s j. The infinitesimal transformations yield the commutation rules of x i, p i, s i with the generator (angular momentum) j k = ɛ ijk x i p j + s k. The action on the basis vectors is u(r) x, m = m D(R) m m R x, m, u(r) k, m = m D(R) m m R k, m 16

17 where D(R) is a unitary representation of rotations, of dimension 2s + 1, generated by the spin matrices. To the single-particle representation there corresponds a representation on Fock space. The generators are the operators of total angular momentum. The field operators transform as follows: Û(R) ˆψ m ( x)û(r) = m ˆψ m (R 1 x)d(r) m m (56) Û(R) ˆψm ( x)û(r) = m D(R) mm ˆψm (R 1 x) (57) The same relations hold for the field operators in the basis of momentum. 4.3 Dilations Dilations, or scale trasformations, are here illustrated in the isotropic case. They form a 1-parameter group of unitary transformations u(t) with the following action on fundamental operators: u(t) x i u(t) = e t x i, u(t) p i u(t) = e tˆp i, u(t) s i u(t) = s i (58) and on position and momentum eigenvectors u(t) x, m = e 3 2 t e t x, m u(t) k, m = e 3 2 t e t k, m With u(t) = exp( itd), from (58) one obtains the generator D = 1 ( x p + 2 p x). The representation on Fock space has action: Û(t) ˆψ m ( x)û(t) = e 3 2 t ˆψ m (e t x) (59) Û(t) ˆψm ( x)û(t) = e 3 2 t ˆψm (e t x) (60) Û(t) ˆψ m ( k)û(t) = e 3 2 t ˆψ m (e t k) (61) Û(t) ˆψm ( k)û(t) = e 3 2 t ˆψm (e t k) (62) Teorema 4.2 (Virial theorem). Let Ĥ = i Ĥi, where Û(t) Ĥ i Û(t) = e nit Ĥ i. If E is an eigenstate of Ĥ, then n i E Ĥi E = 0. (63) i Proof. From Û (t)ĥ E = EÛ (t) E one obtains: i enit H i Û (t) E = EÛ (t) E. A derivative in t = 0 gives i n iĥi E + iĥ ˆD E = ie ˆD E. The inner product with E gives the result. 17

18 Example 4.3 (Coulomb Hamiltonian). Ĥ = ˆT + Û, ˆT = n i=1 p 2 i 2m, Û = i<j e 2 x i x j For a scale transformation the kinetic term has weight n T = 2 while the Coulomb interaction has weight n U = 1. Therefore E ˆT E = 1 E Û E Parity Parity is the unitary and self-adjoint operator p defined by the properties: px i p = x i, pp i p = p i and ps i p = s i. They imply p x, m = x, m and p k, m = k, m. The corrisponding unitary operator on Fock space is Û p ˆψ m( x)ûp = ˆψ m( x), Û p ˆψ m ( k)ûp = ˆψ m ( k) (64) 18

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of

More information

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory Dr. P.J.H. Denteneer Fall 2008 2 SECOND QUANTIZATION 1. Introduction and history 3 2. The N-boson system 4 3. The many-boson system 5 4. Identical

More information

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields Second Quantization: Quantum Fields Bosons and Fermions Let X j stand for the coordinate and spin subscript (if any) of the j-th particle, so that the vector of state Ψ of N particles has the form Ψ Ψ(X

More information

Attempts at relativistic QM

Attempts at relativistic QM Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and

More information

Second quantization (the occupation-number representation)

Second quantization (the occupation-number representation) Second quantization (the occupation-number representation) February 14, 2013 1 Systems of identical particles 1.1 Particle statistics In physics we are often interested in systems consisting of many identical

More information

ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ

ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION In Chapter 1, F&W explain the basic theory: Review of Section 1: H = ij c i < i T j > c j + ij kl c i c j < ij V kl > c l c k for fermions / for bosons [ c i, c j ] = [ c

More information

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section

More information

LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS

LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS February 18, 2011 2 Contents 1 Need for Statistical Mechanical Description 9 2 Classical Statistical Mechanics 13 2.1 Phase Space..............................

More information

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of

More information

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS 1.1 PARTICLES AND FIELDS The two great structures of theoretical physics, the theory of special relativity and quantum mechanics, have been combined

More information

We can instead solve the problem algebraically by introducing up and down ladder operators b + and b

We can instead solve the problem algebraically by introducing up and down ladder operators b + and b Physics 17c: Statistical Mechanics Second Quantization Ladder Operators in the SHO It is useful to first review the use of ladder operators in the simple harmonic oscillator. Here I present the bare bones

More information

N-particle states (fermions)

N-particle states (fermions) Product states ormalization -particle states (fermions) 1 2... ) 1 2... ( 1 2... 1 2... ) 1 1 2 2... 1, 1 2, 2..., Completeness 1 2... )( 1 2... 1 1 2... Identical particles: symmetric or antisymmetric

More information

1 Mathematical preliminaries

1 Mathematical preliminaries 1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical

More information

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation 1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables

More information

The quantum state as a vector

The quantum state as a vector The quantum state as a vector February 6, 27 Wave mechanics In our review of the development of wave mechanics, we have established several basic properties of the quantum description of nature:. A particle

More information

Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS

Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS Erik Koch Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich N (x) = p N! ' (x ) ' 2 (x ) ' N (x ) ' (x 2 ) ' 2 (x 2 ) ' N (x 2 )........ ' (x N ) ' 2 (x N ) ' N (x N ) Slater determinant

More information

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic Fock

More information

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

Lecture notes for QFT I (662) Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION Lecture notes for QFT I (66) Martin Kruczenski Department of Physics, Purdue University, 55 Northwestern Avenue, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-036. E-mail: markru@purdue.edu

More information

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist

More information

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 Bibliography Dirac, P. A. M., The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, (Oxford University Press, London, 1958). Feynman, R. P. and A. P. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics

More information

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 2016-17 Dr Judith A. McGovern Maths of Vector Spaces This section is designed to be read in conjunction with chapter 1 of Shankar s Principles of Quantum Mechanics,

More information

1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics

1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics Chapter Second Quantization. Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator.

More information

Second quantization. Emmanuel Fromager

Second quantization. Emmanuel Fromager Institut de Chimie, Strasbourg, France Page 1 Emmanuel Fromager Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg - Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique - Université de Strasbourg /CNRS M2 lecture, Strasbourg, France. Institut

More information

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) 1 Definition of Clifford Algebra A set of N Hermitian matrices γ 1, γ,..., γ N obeying the anti-commutator γ i, γ j } = δ ij I (1) is the basis for an algebra called

More information

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

Quantization of the Spins

Quantization of the Spins Chapter 5 Quantization of the Spins As pointed out already in chapter 3, the external degrees of freedom, position and momentum, of an ensemble of identical atoms is described by the Scödinger field operator.

More information

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function 1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory

More information

Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18)

Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18) Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18) Prof. Dr. G. M. Pastor Institut für Theoretische Physik Fachbereich Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Universität Kassel January 29, 2018 Contents 1 Fundamental concepts

More information

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle Chapter 1 Identical particles 1.1 Distinguishable particles The Hilbert space of N has to be a subspace H = N n=1h n. Observables Ân of the n-th particle are self-adjoint operators of the form 1 1 1 1

More information

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator Lecture 12 The harmonic oscillator 107 108 LECTURE 12. THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR 12.1 Introduction In this chapter, we are going to find explicitly the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues for the time-independent

More information

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet Physics 58, Fall Semester 018 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 018, 5:00 pm 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet In this

More information

Lecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Lecture 6 Fermion Pairing WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Experimental indications for Cooper-Pairing Solid state physics: Pairing of electrons near the Fermi surface with antiparallel

More information

Quantum Mechanics II

Quantum Mechanics II Quantum Mechanics II Prof. Boris Altshuler March 8, 011 1 Lecture 19 1.1 Second Quantization Recall our results from simple harmonic oscillator. We know the Hamiltonian very well so no need to repeat here.

More information

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces

More information

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

Ch 125a Problem Set 1 Ch 5a Problem Set Due Monday, Oct 5, 05, am Problem : Bra-ket notation (Dirac notation) Bra-ket notation is a standard and convenient way to describe quantum state vectors For example, φ is an abstract

More information

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2002 Last Revised: June 2003 1 Introduction The purpose of these

More information

Quantum field theory and Green s function

Quantum field theory and Green s function 1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory

More information

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics Rotations in Quantum Mechanics We have seen that physical transformations are represented in quantum mechanics by unitary operators acting on the Hilbert space. In this section, we ll think about the specific

More information

in-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators

in-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators (by A. A. Shanenko) in-medium wave functions in-medium pair-wave functions and spatial pair particle correlations momentum condensation and ODLRO (off-diagonal long range order) U(1) symmetry breaking

More information

Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory

Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory Philippe A. Martin Francois Rothen Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory An Introduction Translated by Steven Goldfarb, Andrew Jordan and Samuel Leach Second Edition With 102 Figures, 7 Tables and

More information

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how the harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic

More information

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12 C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12 In this and the next lecture we summarize the essential physical and mathematical aspects of quantum mechanics relevant to

More information

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators Chapter 7 Second Quantization Creation and annihilation operators. Occupation number. Anticommutation relations. Normal product. Wick s theorem. One-body operator in second quantization. Hartree- Fock

More information

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017) Lecture 19 8.31 Quantum Theory I, Fall 017 8 Lecture 19 Nov. 15, 017) 19.1 Rotations Recall that rotations are transformations of the form x i R ij x j using Einstein summation notation), where R is an

More information

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 *

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 * 1. Rotations in 3D, so(3, and su(2. * version 2.0 * Matthew Foster September 5, 2016 Contents 1.1 Rotation groups in 3D 1 1.1.1 SO(2 U(1........................................................ 1 1.1.2

More information

Many Body Quantum Mechanics

Many Body Quantum Mechanics Many Body Quantum Mechanics In this section, we set up the many body formalism for quantum systems. This is useful in any problem involving identical particles. For example, it automatically takes care

More information

Summary lecture II. Graphene exhibits a remarkable linear and gapless band structure

Summary lecture II. Graphene exhibits a remarkable linear and gapless band structure Summary lecture II Bloch theorem: eigen functions of an electron in a perfectly periodic potential have the shape of plane waves modulated with a Bloch factor that possess the periodicity of the potential

More information

QM and Angular Momentum

QM and Angular Momentum Chapter 5 QM and Angular Momentum 5. Angular Momentum Operators In your Introductory Quantum Mechanics (QM) course you learned about the basic properties of low spin systems. Here we want to review that

More information

Angular Momentum set II

Angular Momentum set II Angular Momentum set II PH - QM II Sem, 7-8 Problem : Using the commutation relations for the angular momentum operators, prove the Jacobi identity Problem : [ˆL x, [ˆL y, ˆL z ]] + [ˆL y, [ˆL z, ˆL x

More information

Problem Set No. 1: Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 14, Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid

Problem Set No. 1: Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 14, Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid Physics 56, Fall Semester 5 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. : Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 4, 5 Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid Consider a three-dimensional

More information

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional

More information

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3 Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 00 Assignment Readings The readings below will take you through the material for Problem Sets and 4. Cohen-Tannoudji Ch. II, III. Shankar Ch. 1 continues to be helpful. Sakurai

More information

CONTENTS. vii. CHAPTER 2 Operators 15

CONTENTS. vii. CHAPTER 2 Operators 15 CHAPTER 1 Why Quantum Mechanics? 1 1.1 Newtonian Mechanics and Classical Electromagnetism 1 (a) Newtonian Mechanics 1 (b) Electromagnetism 2 1.2 Black Body Radiation 3 1.3 The Heat Capacity of Solids and

More information

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19 Page 404 Lecture : Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 008/11/19 Date Revised: 008/11/19 Coordinate Basis Section 6. The One-Dimensional Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Coordinate Basis Page

More information

Systems of Identical Particles

Systems of Identical Particles qmc161.tex Systems of Identical Particles Robert B. Griffiths Version of 21 March 2011 Contents 1 States 1 1.1 Introduction.............................................. 1 1.2 Orbitals................................................

More information

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction Lecture 5 Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction WS0/3: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics,, Part I I. Angular Momentum Operator Rotation R(θ): in polar coordinates the

More information

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics Physics 215 Winter 2018 Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics 1. The time reversal operator is antiunitary In quantum mechanics, the time reversal operator Θ acting on a state produces

More information

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics 1 The postulates of quantum mechanics The postulates of quantum mechanics were derived after a long process of trial and error. These postulates provide a connection between the physical world and the

More information

Introduction to Group Theory

Introduction to Group Theory Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)

More information

QUANTUM MECHANICS. Franz Schwabl. Translated by Ronald Kates. ff Springer

QUANTUM MECHANICS. Franz Schwabl. Translated by Ronald Kates. ff Springer Franz Schwabl QUANTUM MECHANICS Translated by Ronald Kates Second Revised Edition With 122Figures, 16Tables, Numerous Worked Examples, and 126 Problems ff Springer Contents 1. Historical and Experimental

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

Coordinate and Momentum Representation. Commuting Observables and Simultaneous Measurements. January 30, 2012

Coordinate and Momentum Representation. Commuting Observables and Simultaneous Measurements. January 30, 2012 Coordinate and Momentum Representation. Commuting Observables and Simultaneous Measurements. January 30, 2012 1 Coordinate and Momentum Representations Let us consider an eigenvalue problem for a Hermitian

More information

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers kets ϕ> and complex numbers α with two operations Addition of two kets ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 > is also a ket ϕ 3 > Multiplication with complex numbers α ϕ 1 >

More information

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of Chapter 2 Linear Algebra In this chapter, we study the formal structure that provides the background for quantum mechanics. The basic ideas of the mathematical machinery, linear algebra, are rather simple

More information

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13 The Dirac Equation Dirac s discovery of a relativistic wave equation for the electron was published in 1928 soon after the concept of intrisic spin angular momentum was proposed by Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck

More information

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory 1. Classical and Quantum Mechanics of Particle Systems 3 1.1 Introduction. 3 1.2 Classical Mechanics of Mass Points 4 1.3 Quantum Mechanics: The Harmonic

More information

Continuous symmetries and conserved currents

Continuous symmetries and conserved currents Continuous symmetries and conserved currents based on S-22 Consider a set of scalar fields, and a lagrangian density let s make an infinitesimal change: variation of the action: setting we would get equations

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Quantum Mechanics Solutions Quantum Mechanics Solutions (a (i f A and B are Hermitian, since (AB = B A = BA, operator AB is Hermitian if and only if A and B commute So, we know that [A,B] = 0, which means that the Hilbert space H

More information

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008. PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.. First, an exercise in bosonic commutation relations [â α, â β = 0, [â α, â β = 0, [â α, â β = δ αβ. ( (a Calculate the commutators [â αâ β, â γ, [â αâ β,

More information

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises Symmetries and particle physics Exercises Stefan Flörchinger SS 017 1 Lecture From the lecture we know that the dihedral group of order has the presentation D = a, b a = e, b = e, bab 1 = a 1. Moreover

More information

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5) LECTURE 12 Maxwell Velocity Distribution Suppose we have a dilute gas of molecules, each with mass m. If the gas is dilute enough, we can ignore the interactions between the molecules and the energy will

More information

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries

More information

Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals

Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals Kurt Gottfried Tung-Mow Yan Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals Second Edition With 75 Figures Springer Preface vii Fundamental Concepts 1 1.1 Complementarity and Uncertainty 1 (a) Complementarity 2 (b) The

More information

Mathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators

Mathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators John Magorrian, magog@thphysoxacuk These are work-in-progress notes for the second-year course on mathematical methods The most up-to-date version is available from http://www-thphysphysicsoxacuk/people/johnmagorrian/mm

More information

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday. PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday. Q1. Scattering with identical particles The quantum statistics have some interesting consequences for the scattering of identical particles. This is

More information

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions Nicolas Lanzetti lnicolas@student.ethz.ch 1 Contents 1 The Wave Function and the Schrödinger Equation 3 1.1 Quick Checks......................................

More information

Fermionic tensor networks

Fermionic tensor networks Fermionic tensor networks Philippe Corboz, Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich Bosons vs Fermions P. Corboz and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165129 (2009) : fermionic 2D MERA P. Corboz, R. Orus,

More information

Lecture Notes 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics

Lecture Notes 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics Quantum Field Theory for Leg Spinners 18/10/10 Lecture Notes 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics Lecturer: Prakash Panangaden Scribe: Jakub Závodný This lecture will briefly review some of the basic concepts

More information

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

Isotropic harmonic oscillator Isotropic harmonic oscillator 1 Isotropic harmonic oscillator The hamiltonian of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is H = h m + 1 mω r (1) = [ h d m dρ + 1 ] m ω ρ, () ρ=x,y,z a sum of three one-dimensional

More information

L = e i `J` i `K` D (1/2,0) (, )=e z /2 (10.253)

L = e i `J` i `K` D (1/2,0) (, )=e z /2 (10.253) 44 Group Theory The matrix D (/,) that represents the Lorentz transformation (.4) L = e i `J` i `K` (.5) is D (/,) (, )=exp( i / /). (.5) And so the generic D (/,) matrix is D (/,) (, )=e z / (.53) with

More information

Elements of Quantum Field Theory

Elements of Quantum Field Theory Elements of Quantum Field Theory Arthur Jaffe Harvard University Cambridge, MA 038, USA c by Arthur Jaffe. Reproduction only with permission of the author. 5 October, 007 at :47 ii Contents I Scalar Bosons

More information

The Klein-Gordon equation

The Klein-Gordon equation Lecture 8 The Klein-Gordon equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The bosons in field theory Bosons with spin 0 scalar (or pseudo-scalar) meson fields canonical field quantization

More information

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation Chapter 6 The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation 6.1 Angular Momentum To study how angular momentum is represented in quantum mechanics we start by reviewing the classical vector of orbital angular momentum

More information

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics.

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics. Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics. R. C. Johnson March 10, 2015 1 Brief review of the language and concepts of Quantum Mechanics. We begin with a review of the basic concepts involved in the quantum

More information

b c a Permutations of Group elements are the basis of the regular representation of any Group. E C C C C E C E C E C C C E C C C E

b c a Permutations of Group elements are the basis of the regular representation of any Group. E C C C C E C E C E C C C E C C C E Permutation Group S(N) and Young diagrams S(N) : order= N! huge representations but allows general analysis, with many applications. Example S()= C v In Cv reflections transpositions. E C C a b c a, b,

More information

QFT PS1: Bosonic Annihilation and Creation Operators (11/10/17) 1

QFT PS1: Bosonic Annihilation and Creation Operators (11/10/17) 1 QFT PS1: Bosonic Annihilation and Creation Operators (11/10/17) 1 Problem Sheet 1: Bosonic Annihilation and Creation Operators Comments on these questions are always welcome. For instance if you spot any

More information

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition

More information

Lorentz Invariance and Second Quantization

Lorentz Invariance and Second Quantization Lorentz Invariance and Second Quantization By treating electromagnetic modes in a cavity as a simple harmonic oscillator, with the oscillator level corresponding to the number of photons in the system

More information

Lecture 4: Hartree-Fock Theory

Lecture 4: Hartree-Fock Theory Lecture 4: Hartree-Fock Theory One determinant to rule them all, One determinant to find them, One determinant to bring them all and in the darkness bind them Second quantization rehearsal The formalism

More information

σ 2 + π = 0 while σ satisfies a cubic equation λf 2, σ 3 +f + β = 0 the second derivatives of the potential are = λ(σ 2 f 2 )δ ij, π i π j

σ 2 + π = 0 while σ satisfies a cubic equation λf 2, σ 3 +f + β = 0 the second derivatives of the potential are = λ(σ 2 f 2 )δ ij, π i π j PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #4. Problem 1a: The linear sigma model has scalar potential V σ, π = λ 8 σ + π f βσ. S.1 Any local minimum of this potential satisfies and V = λ π V σ = λ σ + π f =

More information

Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization

Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization General remarks about quantum field theory. What is quantum field theory about? Why relativity plus QM imply an unfixed number of particles? Creation-annihilation

More information

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Quantum mechanics in one hour Chapter 2 Quantum mechanics in one hour 2.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to refresh your knowledge of quantum mechanics and to establish notation. Depending on your background you might

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i. Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =

More information

arxiv:quant-ph/ v5 10 Feb 2003

arxiv:quant-ph/ v5 10 Feb 2003 Quantum entanglement of identical particles Yu Shi Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom and Theory of

More information

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in Lecture #3. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in classical and QM 5. Exchange degeneracy - the fundamental problem

More information

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in LONDON BEIJING HONG TSINGHUA Report and Review in Physics Vol2 PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS From Quantum Field Theory to Classical Mechanics Ni Jun Tsinghua University, China NEW JERSEY \Hp SINGAPORE World Scientific

More information

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Quantum Physics 2006/07 Quantum Physics 6/7 Lecture 7: More on the Dirac Equation In the last lecture we showed that the Dirac equation for a free particle i h t ψr, t = i hc α + β mc ψr, t has plane wave solutions ψr, t = exp

More information

Representations of Lorentz Group

Representations of Lorentz Group Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: How do we find the smallest (irreducible) representations of the

More information