UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING ONE VALUE OR A FUNCTION WITH FINITE WEIGHT
|
|
- Bryce Watson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Volume ), Issue 3, Article 88, 4 pp. UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING ONE VALUE OR A FUNCTION WITH FINITE WEIGHT HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATICS AND ENGINEERING JINGDEZHEN CERAMIC INSTITUTE XIANGHU XIAOQU) JINGDEZHEN, JIANGXI , CHINA xhyhhh@26.com DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS NANCHANG UNIVERSITY NANCHANG, JIANGXI 33003, CHINA tbcao@ncu.edu.cn Received 3 December, 2008; accepted 27 August, 2009 Communicated by S.S. Dragomir ABSTRACT. The purpose of this paper is to deal with some uniqueness problems of entire functions or meromorphic functions concerning differential polynomials that share one value or fixedpoints with finite weight. We obtain a number of theorems which generalize some results due to M.L. Fang & X.H. Hua, X.Y. Zhang & W.C. Lin, X.Y. Zhang & J.F. Chen and W.C. Lin. Key words and phrases: Meromorphic function, Entire function, Weighted sharing, Uniqueness Mathematics Subject Classification. 30D30, 30D35.. INTRODUCTION AND MAIN RESULTS Let f be a non-constant meromorphic function in the whole complex plane. We shall use the following standard notations of value distribution theory: T r, f), mr, f), Nr, f), Nr, f),... see Hayman [6],Yang [3] and Yi and Yang [6]). We denote by Sr, f) any quantity satisfying Sr, f) = ot r, f)), as r +, possibly outside of a set with finite measure. A meromorphic function a is called a small function with respect to f if T r, a) = Sr, f). Let Sf) be the set of meromorphic functions in the complex plane C which are small functions with respect to f. For some a C, we define Nr, a; f) Θa, f) = lim r T r, f). The research was supported by the NNSF of China No ), the NSF of Jiangxi of China 2008GQS0075)
2 2 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO For a C and k a positive integer, we denote by Nr, a; f = ) the counting function of simple a-points of f, and denote by Nr, a; f k) Nr, a; f k)) the counting functions of those a-points of f whose multiplicities are not greater less) than k where each a-point is counted according to its multiplicity see [6]). Nr, a; f k)nr, a; f k)) are defined similarly, where in counting the a-points of f we ignore the multiplicities. Set N k r, a; f) = Nr, a; f) + Nr, a; f 2) + + Nr, a; f k). We define N k r, a; f) δ k a, f) = lim. r T r, f) Let f and g be two nonconstant meromorphic functions defined in the open complex plane C. If for some a Sf) Sg) the roots of f a and g a coincide in locations and multiplicities we say that f and g share the value a CM counting multiplicities) and if they coincide in locations only we say that f and g share a IM ignoring multiplicities). In 997, Yang and Hua [4] proved the following result. Theorem A [4]). Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, n 6 a positive integer. If f n f and g n g share the value CM, then either f = c e cz and g = c 2 e cz, where c, c, and c 2 are constants satisfying c c 2 ) n+ c 2 = or f = tg for a constant t such that t n+ =. Using the same argument as in [4], Fang [3] proved the following result. Theorem B [3]). Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions and let n, k be two positive integers with n > 2k +4. If [f n ] k) and [g n ] k) share the value CM, then either f = c e cz, g = c 2 e cz, where c, c 2 and c are three constants satisfying ) k c c 2 ) n nc) 2k =, or f tg for a constant t such that t n =. Fang [5] obtained some unicity theorems corresponding to Theorem B. Theorem C [5]). Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, and let n, k be two positive integers with n > 2k + 8. If [f n f )] k) and [g n g )] k) share CM, then f g. Recently, Zhang and Lin [7], Zhang, Chen and Lin [8] extended Theorem C and obtained the following results. Theorem D [7]). Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, n, m and k be three positive integers with n > 2k + m + 4, and λ, µ be constants such that λ + µ 0. If [f n µf m + λ)] k) and [g n µg m + λ)] k) share CM, then i) when λµ 0, f g; ii) when λµ = 0, either f tg, where t is a constant satisfying t n+m =, or f = c e cz, g = c 2 e cz, where c, c 2 and c are three constants satisfying ) k λ 2 c c 2 ) n+m [n + m)c] 2k = or ) k µ 2 c c 2 ) n+m [n + m)c] 2k =. Theorem E [8]). Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, and let n, m and k be three positive integers with n 3m + 2k + 5, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0 or P z) c 0, where a 0 0, a,..., a m, a m 0, c 0 0 are complex constants. If [f n P f)] k) and [g n P g)] k) share CM, then i) when P z) = a m z m +a m z m + +a z+a 0, either f tg for a constant t such that t d =, where d = n + m,..., n + m i,..., n), a m i 0 for some i = 0,,..., m, or f and g satisfy the algebraic equation Rf, g) 0, where Rω, ω 2 ) = ω n a m ω m + a m ω m + + a ω + a 0 ) ω n 2 a m ω m 2 + a m ω m a ω 2 + a 0 );
3 UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 3 ii) when P z) c 0, either f = c / n c 0 e cz, g = c 2 / n c 0 e cz, where c, c 2 and c are three constants satisfying ) k c c 2 ) n nc) 2k =, or f tg for a constant t such that t n =. Regarding Theorems D and E, it is natural to ask the following question. Problem.. In Theorems D and E, can the nature of sharing CM be further relaxed? For meromorphic functions, Yang and Hua [4] proved the following result corresponding to Theorem A. Theorem F [4]). Let f and g be two nonconstant meromorphic functions, n an integer, and a C {0}. If f n f and g n g share the value a CM, then either f = dg for some n + )th root of unity d or g = c e cz and f = c 2 e cz, where c, c, and c 2 are constants satisfying c c 2 ) n+ c 2 = a 2. Lin and Yi [7] obtained some unicity theorems corresponding to Theorem F. Theorem G [7]). Let f and g be two nonconstant meromorphic functions satisfying Θ, f) > 2 n+, n 2. If [f n f )]f and [g n g )]g share CM, then f g. Lin and Yi [8] extended Theorem G by replacing the value with the function z and obtained the following result. Theorem H [8]). Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, n 2 an integer. If f n f )f and g n g )g share z CM, then either f g or g = n+2) hn+ ) n+) h n+2 ) and f = n+2)h hn+ ), where h is a nonconstant meromorphic function. n+) h n+2 ) Recently, Zhang, Chen and Lin [8] extended Theorems F and G and obtained the following result. Theorem I [8]). Let f and g be two nonconstant meromorphic functions, and let n and m be two positive integers with n > max{m + 0, 3m + 3}, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0, where a 0 0, a,..., a m, a m 0 are complex constants. If f n P f)f and g n P g)g share CM, then either f tg for a constant t such that t d =, where d = n + m +,..., n + m + i,..., n + ), a m i 0 for some i = 0,,..., m, or f and g satisfy the algebraic equation Rf, g) 0, where Rω, ω 2 ) = ω n am ω m n + m + + a m ω m n + m + + a ) 0 n + ω2 n am ω2 m n + m + + a m ω2 m n + m + + a ) 0. n + Regarding Theorem I, it is natural to ask the following questions. Problem.2. Is it possible that the value can be replaced by a function z in Theorem I? Problem.3. Is it possible to relax the nature of sharing z in Theorem I and if possible, how far? In 200, Lahiri [9, 0] first employed the idea of weighted sharing of values which measures how close a shared value is to being shared IM or to being shared CM. Recently, many mathematicians such as H. X. Yi, I. Lahiri, M. L. Fang, A. Banerjee, W. C. Lin, X. Yan) have been interested in investigating meromorphic functions sharing values with finite weight in the field of complex analysis. We first introduced the notion of weighted sharing of values as follows.
4 4 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO Definition. [9, 0]). Let k be a nonnegative integer or infinity. For a C { }, we denote by E k a; f) the set of all a-points where an a-point of multiplicity m is counted m times if m k and k + times if m > k. If E k a; f) = E k a; g), we say that f, g share the value a with weight k. We denote by E m) a; f) the set of all a-points of f with multiplicities not exceeding m, where an a-point is counted according to its multiplicity. If for some a C { }, E ) a; f) = E ) a; g), then we say that f, g share the value a CM. The definition implies that if f, g share a value a with weight k then z 0 is a zero of f a with multiplicity m k) if and only if it is a zero of g a with multiplicity m k); and z 0 is a zero of f a with multiplicity m> k) if and only if it is a zero of g a with multiplicity n> k), where m is not necessarily equal to n. We write f, g share a, k) to mean that f, g share the value a with weight k, clearly if f, g share a, k), then f, g share a, p) for all integers p 0 p k).also, we note that f, g share a value a IM or CM if and only if they share a, 0) or a, ), respectively. With the notion of weighted sharing of values, we investigate the solution of the above question and obtain the following results. Theorem.. Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, and let n, m and k be three positive integers with n 5m + 5k + 8. If [f n P f)] k) and [g n P g)] k) share, 0), then the conclusion of Theorem E still holds. Theorem.2. Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, and let n, m and k be three positive integers with n > 9 2 m + 4k If [f n P f)] k) and [g n P g)] k) share, ), then the conclusion of Theorem E still holds. Theorem.3. Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, and let n, m and k be three positive integers with n 3m + 3k + 5. If [f n P f)] k) and [g n P g)] k) share, 2), then the conclusion of Theorem E still holds. Remark. From Theorems..3, we obtain a positive answer to Question.. Theorem.4. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, and let n and m be two positive integers with n > m + 0, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0, where a 0 0, a,..., a m, a m 0 are complex constants. If f n P f)f and g n P g)g share z CM, then either f tg for a constant t such that t d =, where d = n + m +,..., n + m + i,..., n + ), a m i 0 for some i = 0,,..., m, or f and g satisfy the algebraic equation Rf, g) 0, where Rω, ω 2 ) = ω n am ω m n + m + + a m ω m n + m + + a ) 0 n + ω2 n am ω2 m n + m + + a m ω2 m n + m + + a ) 0. n + Theorem.5. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, and let n and m be two positive integers with n > 4m + 22, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0, where a 0 0, a,..., a m, a m 0 are complex constants. If f n P f)f and g n P g)g share z IM, then the conclusion of Theorem.4 still holds. Theorem.6. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, let n, l and m be three positive integers, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0, where a 0 0, a,..., a m, a m 0 are complex constants. If E l) z, f n P f)f ) = E l) z, g n P g)g ), i) If l = and n > 3m + 8, then the conclusion of Theorem.4 still holds.
5 UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 5 ii) If l = 2 and n > 3 m + 2, then the conclusion of Theorem.4 still holds. 2 Remark 2. Theorem.4 is an improvement of Theorem H. Theorem.5 and.6 are complements to Theorem H. Though the standard definitions and notations of value distribution theory are available in [6, 3], we explain the ones which are used in the paper. Definition.2 [, 6]). When f and g share IM, We denote by N L r, ; f) the counting function of the -points of f whose multiplicities are greater than -points of g, where each zero is counted only once; Similarly, we have N L r, ; g). Let z 0 be a zero of f of multiplicity p and a zero of g of multiplicity q, we also denote by N r, ; f) the counting function of those -points of f where p = q = ; N 2 E r, ; f) denotes the counting function of those -points of f where p = q 2, each point in these counting functions is counted only once. In the same way, one can define N r, ; g), N 2 E r, ; g). Definition.3 [9, 0]). Let f, g share a value IM. We denote by N r, ; f, g) the reduced counting function of those -points of f whose multiplicities differ from the multiplicities of the corresponding -points of g. Clearly N r, ; f, g) N r, ; g, f) and N r, ; f, g) = N L r, ; f) + N L r, ; g). 2. SOME LEMMAS For the proof of our results we need the following lemmas. Lemma 2. [5, p. 27, Theorem.2]). Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function and P f) = a 0 + a f + a 2 f a n f n, where a 0, a, a 2,..., a n are constants and a n 0. Then T r, P f)) = nt r, f) + Sr, f). Lemma 2.2 [8]). Let f be a transcendental entire function, let n, k, m be positive integers with n k +2, and P z) = a 0 +a z +a 2 z 2 + +a m z m, where a 0, a, a 2,..., a m are complex constants. Then [f n P f)] k) = has infinitely many solutions. Lemma 2.3 [8]). Let f and g be two nonconstant entire functions, and let n, k be two positive integers with n > k, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0 be a nonzero polynomial, where a 0, a,..., a m, a m are complex constants. If [f n P f)] k) [g n P g)] k), then P z) is reduced to a nonzero monomial, that is, P z) = a i z i 0 for some i = 0,,..., m; further,f = c / n+i ai e cz, g = c 2 / n+i ai e cz, where c, c 2 and c are three constants satisfying ) k c c 2 ) n [n + )c)] 2k =. Let f be an entire function; we have Θ, f) =. Using the same argument as [2, Lemma 2.2], we can easily obtain the following lemma. Lemma 2.4. Let f and g be two entire functions, and let k be a positive integer.if f k) and g k) share, l) l = 0,, 2). Then i) If l = 0, 2.) Θ0, f) + δ k 0, f) + δ k+ 0, f) + δ k+ 0, g) + δ k+2 0, f) + δ k+2 0, g) > 5, then either f k) g k) or f g; ii) If l =, 2.2) 2 Θ0, f) + δ k0, f) + δ k+2 0, f)) + δ k+ 0, f) + δ k+ 0, g) + Θ0, g) + δ k 0, g) > 9 2, then either f k) g k) or f g;
6 6 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO iii) If l = 2, 2.3) Θ0, f) + δ k 0, f) + δ k+ 0, f)} + δ k+2 0, g) > 3, then either f k) g k) or f g. Lemma 2.5. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, let n and m be three positive integers with n > 7, and let P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0, where a 0 0, a,..., a m, a m 0 are complex constants. If f n P f)f and g n P g)g share z IM, then Sr, f) = Sr, g). Proof. Using the same arguments as in [8] and [8], we easily obtain Lemma 2.5. Lemma 2.6. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, and let n and m be three positive integers with n m + 3, F = f n P f)f and G z = gn P g)g, where n 4) is z a positive integer. If F G, then either f tg for a constant t such that t d =, where d = n + m +,..., n + m + i,..., n + ), a m i 0 for some i = 0,,..., m, or f and g satisfy the algebraic equation Rf, g) 0, where Rω, ω 2 ) is as stated in Theorem.4. Proof. Using the same arguments as those in [] and [8], we can easily get Lemma 2.6. Lemma 2.7. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions. Then where n m + 4 is a positive integer. f n P f)f g n P g)g z 2, Proof. Using the same argument as in [] and [8], we easily obtain Lemma 2.7. Lemma 2.8 [3]). Let f and g be two meromorphic functions. If f and g share CM, one of the following three cases holds: i) T r, f) N 2 r,, f) + N 2 r,, g) + N 2 r, 0, f) + N 2 r, 0, g) + Sr, f) + Sr, g), the same inequality holding for T r, g); ii) f g; iii) f g. Lemma 2.9 [4]). Let f and g be two meromorphic functions, and let l be a positive integer. If E l), f) = E l), g), then one of the following cases must occur: i): T r, f) + T r, g) N 2 r, ; f) + N 2 r, 0; f) + N 2 r, ; g) + N 2 r, 0; g) + Nr, ; f) + Nr, ; g) N r, ; f) + Nr, ; f l + ) + Nr, ; g l + ) + Sr, f) + Sr, g); ii): f = b+)g+a b ), where a 0), b are two constants. bg+a b) Lemma 2.0 [4]). Let f and g be two meromorphic functions. If f and g share IM, then one of the following cases must occur: i): T r, f) + T r, g) 2[N 2 r, ; f) + N 2 r, 0; f) + N 2 r, ; g) + N 2 r, 0; g)] ii): f = b+)g+a b ), where a 0), b are two constants. bg+a b) + 3N L r, ; f) + 3N L r, ; g) + Sr, f) + Sr, g);
7 UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 7 Lemma 2.. Let f and g be two transcendental meromorphic functions, n > m + 6 be a positive integer, and let F = f n P f)f and G z = gn P g)g. If z 2.4) F = b + )G + a b ), bg + a b) where a 0), b are two constants, then the conclusion of Theorem.4 still holds. Proof. By Lemma 2. we know that T r, F ) = T r, f ) n P f)f 2.5) z T r, f n P f)) + T r, f ) + log r 2.6) So n + m)t r, f) = T r, f n P f)) + Sr, f) n + m)t r, f) + 2T r, f) + log r + Sr, f) = n + m + 2)T r, f) + log r + Sr, f), = Nr, ; f n P f)) + mr, f n P f)) + Sr, f) N r, ; f ) n P f)f Nr, ; f ) z + m r, f ) n P f)f + m r, f ) + log r + Sr, f) z T r, f ) n P f)f + T r, f ) Nr, ; f ) Nr, 0; f ) + log r + Sr, f) z T r, F ) + T r, f) Nr, ; f) Nr, 0; f ) + log r + Sr, f). 2.7) T r, F ) n + m )T r, f) + Nr, ; f) + Nr, 0; f ) + log r + Sr, f). Thus, by 2.5), 2.7) and n > m + 6, we get Sr, F ) = Sr, f). Similarly, 2.8) T r, G ) n + m )T r, g) + Nr, ; g) + Nr, 0; g ) + log r + Sr, g). Without loss of generality, we suppose that T r, f) T r, g), r I, where I is a set with infinite measure. Next, we consider three cases. Case. b 0,, If a b 0, then by 2.4) we know N r, a b ) b + ; G = Nr, 0; F ). Since 2.9) Nr, 0; g ) Nr, ; g) + Nr, 0; g) + Sr, g) 2T r, g) + Sr, g). By Nevanlinna s second fundamental theorem and 2.9) we have T r, G ) Nr, ; G ) + Nr, 0; G ) + N r, a b ) b + ; G + Sr, G ) Nr, ; g) + Nr, 0; g) + mt r, g) + Nr, 0; g ) + Nr, 0; f) + mt r, f) + Nr, 0; f) + Nr, ; f) + 2 log r + Sr, g) 2m + 4)T r, g) + Nr, ; g) + Nr, 0; g ) + 2 log r + Sr, g).
8 8 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO Hence, by n > m + 6 and 2.8), we know T r, g) Sr, g), r I, this is impossible. If a b = 0, then by 2.4) we know F = b + )G )/bg + ). Obviously, N r, ) b ; G = Nr, ; F ). By the Nevanlinna second fundamental theorem and 2.9) we have T r, G ) Nr, ; G ) + Nr, 0; G ) + N r, ) b ; G + Sr, G ) Nr, ; g) + Nr, 0; g) + mt r, g) + Nr, 0; g ) + Nr, ; f) + 2 log r + Sr, g) m + 2)T r, g) + Nr, ; g) + Nr, 0; g ) + 2 log r + Sr, g). Then by n > m + 6 and 2.8), we know T r, g) Sr, g), r I, a contradiction. Case 2. b =. Then 2.4) becomes F = a/a + G ). If a + 0, then Nr, a + ; G ) = Nr, ; F ). Applying a similar argument to that for Case, we can again deduce a contradiction. If a + = 0, then F G, that is, f n P f)f g n P g)g z 2. Since n m + 6, by Lemma 2.7 we get a contradiction. Case 3. b = 0. Then 2.4) becomes F = G + a )/a. If a 0, then Nr, a; G ) = Nr, 0; F ). Applying a similar argument to that for Case, we can again deduce a contradiction. If a = 0, then F G, that is f n P f)f g n P g)g. By Lemma 2.6, we obtain the conclusions of Lemma 2.. Thus we complete the proof of Lemma Proof of Theorem.. 3. THE PROOFS OF THEOREMS..3 Proof. i) P z) = a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0. By the assumptions of Theorem. and Lemma 2.2, we know that either both f and g are transcendental entire functions or both f and g are polynomials. First, we consider the case when f and g are transcendental entire functions. Let F = f n P f) and G = g n P g), from the condition of Theorem., we know that F, G share, 0). By Lemma 2. we can easily get Θ0, F ) = lim sup r = lim sup r = lim sup r Nr, 0; F ) T r, F ) Nr, 0; f n P f)) n + m)t r, f) Nr, 0; f) + Nr, 0; P f)), n + m)t r, f)
9 UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 9 i.e. 3.) Θ0, F ) m + n + m = n n + m. Similarly, we have 3.2) Θ0, G) n n + m. Next, by the definition of N k r, a; f) we have Therefore δ k+ 0, f) = lim sup r N k+ r, 0; f) T r, f) δ k+ 0, F ) = lim sup r 3.3) δ k+ 0, F ) lim sup r Similarly we get lim sup r N k+ r, 0; f n P f)). T r, F ) m + k + )T r, f) n + m)t r, f) k + )Nr, 0; f), T r, f) = n k n + m. 3.4) δ k+ 0, G) n k n + m and 3.5) δ k+2 0, F ) n k 2 n + m, δ k+20, G) n k 2 n + m. From 3.) 3.5) and F, G share, 0), we can get Θ0, f) + δ k 0, f) + δ k+ 0, f) + δ k+ 0, g) + δ k+2 0, f) + δ k+2 0, g) n n + m + n k n + m + 2n k n + m + 2n k 2 n + m By n > 5m + 5k + 7, we have = 6n 5k 7 n + m. Θ0, f) + δ k 0, f) + δ k+ 0, f) + δ k+ 0, g) + δ k+2 0, f) + δ k+2 0, g) > 5. Therefore, by Lemma 2.4, we deduce either F k) G k) or F G. If F k) G k), that is 3.6) [f n a m f m + a m f m + + a 0 )] k) [g n a m g m + a m g m + + a 0 )] k), then by the assumptions of Theorem. and Lemma 2.3 we can get a contradiction. Hence, we deduce that F G, that is 3.7) f n a m f m + a m f m + + a 0 ) = g n a m g m + a m g m + + a 0 ). Let h = f/g. If h is a constant, then substituting f = gh into 3.7) we deduce a m g n+m h n+m ) + a m g n+m h n+m ) + + a 0 g n h n ) = 0, which implies h d =, where d = n + m,..., n + m i,..., n),a m 0 for some i = 0,,..., m. Thus f tg for a constant t such that t d =, where d = n + m,..., n + m i,..., n),a m i 0 for some i = 0,,..., m. If h is not a constant, then we know by 3.7) that f and g satisfy the algebraic equation Rf, g) = 0, where Rω, ω 2 ) = ω n a m ω m + a m ω m + + a ω + a 0 ) ω2 n a m ω2 m + a m ω2 m + + a ω 2 + a 0 ). This proves i) of Theorem..
10 0 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO Now we consider the case when f and g are two polynomials. From F, G share,0), we have 3.8) [f n a m f m + a m f m + + a 0 )] k) = c{[g n a m g m + a m g m + + a 0 )] k) }, where c is a nonzero constant. Let deg f = l. Then by 3.8) we know that deg g = l. Differentiating the two sides of 3.8), we can get 3.9) f n k q = g n k q 2, where q, q 2 are two polynomials with deg q = deg q 2 = m + k + )l k + ). By n 4m + 4k + 8, we have deg g n k = n k )l > deg q 2. Therefore by 3.9) we know that there exists z 0 such that fz 0 ) = gz 0 ) = 0. Hence, by 3.8) and fz 0 ) = gz 0 ) = 0, we deduce that c =, i.e., 3.0) [f n a m f m + a m f m + + a 0 )] k) [g n a m g m + a m g m + + a 0 )] k). Then we have 3.) f n a m f m + a m f m + + a 0 ) g n a m g m + a m g m + + a 0 ) = pz), where pz) is a polynomial of degree at most k. Next, we prove pz) = 0 by rewriting 3.0) as 3.2) f n k p = g n k p 2, where p, p 2 are two polynomials with deg p = deg p 2 = m + k)l k and deg f = l. Therefore, the total number of the common zeros of f n k and g n k is at least k. Then by 3.) we deduce that pz) 0, i.e., f n a m f m + a m f m + + a f + a 0 ) g n a m g m + a m g m + + a g + a 0 ). Then using the same argument of 3.7), we can also get the case i) of Theorem.. ii) P z) c 0. From Theorem B, we can easily see that the case ii) of Theorem. holds. Thus, we complete the proof of Theorem Proof of Theorem.2. Proof. From the condition of Theorem.2 and Lemma 2.4ii), using the same argument of Theorem., Theorem.2 can be easily proved Proof of Theorem.3. Proof. From the condition of Theorem.3 and Lemma 2.4iii), using the same argument of Theorem., Theorem.3 can be easily proved. and 4. THE PROOFS OF THEOREMS.4.6 Let F and G be defined as in Lemma 2. and F = a mf n+m+ n + m + + a m f n+m n + m + + a 0f n+ n + G = a mg n+m+ n + m + + a m g n+m n + m + + a 0g n+ n +.
11 UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 4.. Proof of Theorem.4. Proof. From the condition of Theorem.4, then F and G share z CM. By Lemma 2., we have 4.) T r, F ) = n+m+)t r, f)+sr, f), T r, G ) = n+m+)t r, g)+sr, g). Since F ) = F z, we deduce ) ) m r, m r, F zf and by Nevanlinna s first fundamental theorem ) + Sr, f) m r, F + log r + Sr, f), 4.2) T r, F ) T r, F ) + Nr, 0; F ) Nr, 0; F ) + log r + Sr, f) T r, F ) + Nr, 0; f) + Nr, b ; f) + + Nr, b m ; f) Nr, c ; f) Nr, c m ; f) Nr, 0; f ) + log r + Sr, f), where b, b 2,..., b m are roots of the algebraic equation a m z m n + m + + a m z m n + m + + a 0 n + = 0, and c, c 2,..., c m are roots of the algebraic equation By the definition of F, G, we have a m z m + a m z m + + a z + a 0 = ) N 2 r, 0; F ) + N 2 r, ; F ) 2Nr, ; f) + 2Nr, 0; f) + Nr, c ; f) Similarly, we obtain + + Nr, c m ; f) + Nr, 0; f ) + 2 log r. 4.4) N 2 r, 0; G ) + N 2 r, ; G ) 2Nr, ; g) + 2Nr, 0; g) + Nr, c ; g) If Lemma 2.8i) holds, from 4.2) 4.4) we have + + Nr, c m ; g) + Nr, 0; g ) + 2 log r. 4.5) T r, F ) m + 5)T r, f) + m + 6)T r, g) + 4 log r + Sr, f) + Sr, g). Similarly, we obtain 4.6) T r, G ) m + 5)T r, g) + m + 6)T r, f) + 4 log r + Sr, f) + Sr, g). By 4.), 4.5), 4.6) and n > m + 0, we can obtain a contradiction. If Lemma 2.8ii) holds, then F G. By Lemma 2.6, we can get the conclusion of Theorem.4. If Lemma 2.8iii) holds, then F G. By Lemma 2.7 and n > m + 0, we can get a contradiction. Therefore, we complete the proof of Theorem.4.
12 2 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO 4.2. Proof of Theorem.5. Proof. Suppose that i) in Lemma 2.0 holds. Since N L r, ; F ) N r, ; F ) 4.7) F = N r, ; F ) + Sr, f) F Nr, ; F ) + Nr, 0; F ) + Sr, f) similarly, we have m + 4)T r, f) + 2 log r + Sr, f), 4.8) N L r, ; G ) m + 4)T r, g) + 2 log r + Sr, g). By 4.2) 4.4), 4.7) 4.8) and Lemma 2.0i), we have 4.9) n 4m 22)[T r, f) + T r, g)] 20 log r + Sr, f) + Sr, g). By n > 4m + 22, we get a contradiction. Hence F and G satisfy ii) in Lemma 2.0. By Lemma 2., we can get the conclusion of Theorem.5. Thus, we complete the proof of Theorem Proof of Theorem.6. Proof. i) If l =. Since Nr, ; F )+Nr, ; G ) N r, ; F ) 2 Nr, ; F ) + 2 Nr, ; G ) Suppose that i) in Lemma 2.9 holds, then we have 2 T r, F ) + 2 T r, G ) + Sr, f) + Sr, g). 4.0) T r, F ) + T r, G ) 2[N 2 r, 0; F ) + N 2 r, ; F ) + N 2 r, 0; G ) Since 4.) similarly, we have + N 2 r, ; G ) + Nr, ; F 2) + Nr, ; G 2)] + Sr, f) + Sr, g). N r, ; F 2) N r, ; F ) F = N r, ; F ) + Sr, f) F Nr, ; F ) + Nr, 0; F ) + Sr, f) m + 4)T r, f) + 2 log r + Sr, f), 4.2) Nr, ; G 2) m + 4)T r, g) + 2 log r + Sr, g). By 4.2) 4.4), 4.0) 4.2) and Lemma 2.9i), we have 4.3) n 3m 8)[T r, f) + T r, g)] 6 log r + Sr, f) + Sr, g). By n > 3m + 8, we get a contradiction. Hence F and G satisfy ii) in Lemma 2.9. By Lemma 2., we can get the conclusion of Theorem.6i).
13 UNIQUENESS OF ENTIRE OR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 3 ii) If l = 2. Since Nr, ; F ) + Nr, ; G ) N r, ; F ) + 2 N r, ; F 3) + 2 N r, ; G 3) 2 Nr, ; F ) + 2 Nr, ; G ) 2 T r, F ) + 2 T r, G ) + Sr, f) + Sr, g). Suppose that i) in Lemma 2.9 holds, then we have 4.4) T r, F ) + T r, G ) 2[N 2 r, 0; F ) + N 2 r, ; F ) + N 2 r, 0; G ) Since 4.5) similarly, we have + N 2 r, ; G ) + Nr, ; F 3) + Nr, ; G 3)] + Sr, f) + Sr, g). N r, ; F 3) 2 N r, ; F ) F = 2 N r, ; F ) F + Sr, f) m + 4)T r, f) + log r + Sr, f), 2 4.6) Nr, ; G 3) m + 4)T r, g) + log r + Sr, g). 2 By 4.2) 4.4), 4.4) 4.6) and Lemma 2.9i), we have 4.7) n 32 ) m 2 [T r, f) + T r, g)] 6 log r + Sr, f) + Sr, g). By n > 3m + 2, we get a contradiction. Hence F 2 and G satisfy ii) in Lemma 2.9. By Lemma 2., we can get the conclusion of Theorem.6ii). 5. REMARKS It follows from the proof of Theorem.4.5) that if the condition f n P f)f and g n P g)g share z CM IM) are replaced by the condition f n P f)f and g n P g)g share az) CM IM), where az) is a meromorphic function such that az) 0, and T r, f) = o{t r, f), T r, g)}, the conclusion of Theorem.4.5) still holds. Similarly, if the condition E l) z, f n P f)f ) = E l) z, g n P g)g )l =, 2) is replaced by the condition E l) az), f n P f)f ) = E l) az), g n P g)g )l =, 2) respectively, then the conclusion of Theorem.6 still holds. REFERENCES [] A. BANERJEE, Weighted sharing of a small function by a meromorphic function and its derivative, Comput. Math. Appl., ), [2] S.S. BHOOSNURMATH AND R.S. DYAVANAL, Uniqueness and value-sharing of meromorphic functions, Comput. Math. Appl., ), [3] M.-L. FANG AND X.-H. HUA, Entire functions that share one value, J. Nanjing Univ. Math., Biquarterly 3 996), [4] C.-Y. FANG AND M.-L. FANG, Uniqueness of meromorphic functions and differential polynomials, Comput. Math. Appl., )
14 4 HONG-YAN XU AND TING-BIN CAO [5] M.-L. FANG, Uniqueness and value-sharing of entire functions, Comput. Math. Appl., ), [6] W.K. HAYMAN, Meromorphic Functions, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 964. [7] W.-C. LIN AND H.-X. YI, Uniqueness theorems for meromorphic function, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 352) 2004), [8] W.-C. LIN AND H.-X. YI, Uniqueness theorems for meormorphic functions concerning fixedpoints, Complex Variables Theory Appl., 49) 2004), [9] I. LAHIRI, Weighted sharing and uniqueness of meromorphic functions, Nagoya Math.J., 6) 200), [0] I. LAHIRI, Weighted value sharing and uniqueness of meromorphic functions, Complex Variables Theory Appl., 463) 200), [] H.-Y. XU, Uniqueness of Transcendental Meromorphic Functions with Their Nonlinear Differential Polynomials Sharing the Small Function, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2007, Article ID 8496, 4 pages, doi:0.55/2007/8496 [2] H.-Y. XU, C.-F. YI AND T.-B. CAO, Uniqueness of meromorphic functions and differential polynomials sharing one value with finite weight, Ann. Polon. Math., ), [3] L. YANG, Value Distribution Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 993. [4] C.-C. YANG AND X.-H. HUA, Uniqueness and value-sharing of meromorphic functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 222) 997), [5] C.-C. YANG AND H.-X. YI, Uniqueness theory of meromorphic functions, Science Press/Kluwer Academic Publishers, Beijing/New York, 995/2003). [6] H.-X. YI, Meromorphic functions that share one or two values II, Kodai Math. J., 222) 999), [7] X.-Y. ZHANG AND W.-C. LIN, Uniqueness and value-sharing of entire functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 432) 2008), [8] X.-Y. ZHANG, J.-F. CHEN AND W.C. LIN, Entire or meromorphic functions sharing one value, Comput. Math. Appl., ),
1 Introduction, Definitions and Results
Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 46, No. 2, 2016, 33-44 VALUE DISTRIBUTION AND UNIQUENESS OF q-shift DIFFERENCE POLYNOMIALS 1 Pulak Sahoo 2 and Gurudas Biswas 3 Abstract In this paper, we deal with the distribution
More informationWEIGHTED SHARING AND UNIQUENESS OF CERTAIN TYPE OF DIFFERENTIAL-DIFFERENCE POLYNOMIALS
Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 7(1)(2018), 121 130 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2018 WEIGHTED SHARING AND UNIQUENESS OF CERTAIN TYPE OF DIFFERENTIAL-DIFFERENCE POLYNOMIALS Pulak Sahoo and
More informationUNIQUENESS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING THREE VALUES
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics Volume 38(1) (2014), Pages 105 123. UNIQUENESS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING THREE VALUES ARINDAM SARKAR 1 AND PAULOMI CHATTOPADHYAY 2 Abstract. We prove four uniqueness
More informationAnalog of Hayman Conjecture for linear difference polynomials
Analog of Hayman Conjecture for linear difference polynomials RAJ SHREE DHAR Higher Education Department, J and K Government Jammu and Kashmir,INDIA dhar.rajshree@jk.gov.in September 9, 2018 Abstract We
More informationHouston Journal of Mathematics. c 2008 University of Houston Volume 34, No. 4, 2008
Houston Journal of Mathematics c 2008 University of Houston Volume 34, No. 4, 2008 SHARING SET AND NORMAL FAMILIES OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS AND THEIR DERIVATIVES FENG LÜ AND JUNFENG XU Communicated by Min Ru
More informationZeros and value sharing results for q-shifts difference and differential polynomials
Zeros and value sharing results for q-shifts difference and differential polynomials RAJ SHREE DHAR Higher Education Department, J and K Government Jammu and Kashmir,INDIA dhar.rajshree@jk.gov.in October
More informationMEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS AND ALSO THEIR FIRST TWO DERIVATIVES HAVE THE SAME ZEROS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 30, 2005, 205 28 MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS AND ALSO THEIR FIRST TWO DERIVATIVES HAVE THE SAME ZEROS Lian-Zhong Yang Shandong University, School of Mathematics
More informationFixed points of the derivative and k-th power of solutions of complex linear differential equations in the unit disc
Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 2009, No. 48, -9; http://www.math.u-szeged.hu/ejqtde/ Fixed points of the derivative and -th power of solutions of complex linear differential
More informationJournal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics SOME NORMALITY CRITERIA INDRAJIT LAHIRI AND SHYAMALI DEWAN Department of Mathematics University of Kalyani West Bengal 741235, India. EMail: indrajit@cal2.vsnl.net.in
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF MEROMORPHIC SOLUTIONS FOR q-difference EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 207 207, No. 75, pp. 2. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu SOME PROPERTIES OF MEROMORPHIC SOLUTIONS FOR q-difference
More informationn(t,f) n(0,f) dt+n(0,f)logr t log + f(re iθ ) dθ.
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 53 (2016), No. 1, pp. 29 38 http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/bkms.2016.53.1.029 VALUE DISTRIBUTION OF SOME q-difference POLYNOMIALS Na Xu and Chun-Ping Zhong Abstract. For a transcendental
More informationJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 352 2009) 739 748 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal o Mathematical Analysis Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa The growth, oscillation ixed points o solutions
More informationJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 377 20 44 449 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal o Mathematical Analysis and Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Value sharing results or shits o meromorphic unctions
More informationResearch Article Uniqueness Theorems on Difference Monomials of Entire Functions
Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 202, Article ID 40735, 8 pages doi:0.55/202/40735 Research Article Uniqueness Theorems on Difference Monomials of Entire Functions Gang Wang, Deng-li Han, 2 and Zhi-Tao
More informationPROPERTIES OF SCHWARZIAN DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2015 (2015), No. 199, pp. 1 11. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu PROPERTIES OF
More informationDeficiency And Relative Deficiency Of E-Valued Meromorphic Functions
Applied Mathematics E-Notes, 323, -8 c ISSN 67-25 Available free at mirror sites of http://www.math.nthu.edu.tw/ amen/ Deficiency And Relative Deficiency Of E-Valued Meromorphic Functions Zhaojun Wu, Zuxing
More informationResearch Article Uniqueness Theorems of Difference Operator on Entire Functions
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 203, Article ID 3649, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/0.55/203/3649 Research Article Uniqueness Theorems of Difference Operator on Entire Functions Jie Ding School
More informationFIXED POINTS OF MEROMORPHIC SOLUTIONS OF HIGHER ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 3, 2006, 9 2 FIXED POINTS OF MEROMORPHIC SOLUTIONS OF HIGHER ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Liu Ming-Sheng and Zhang Xiao-Mei South China Normal
More informationRELATION BETWEEN SMALL FUNCTIONS WITH DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS GENERATED BY MEROMORPHIC SOLUTIONS OF HIGHER ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics Volume 38(1) (2014), Pages 147 161. RELATION BETWEEN SMALL FUNCTIONS WITH DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS GENERATED BY MEROMORPHIC SOLUTIONS OF HIGHER ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL
More informationResearch Article Unicity of Entire Functions concerning Shifts and Difference Operators
Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 204, Article ID 38090, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/0.55/204/38090 Research Article Unicity of Entire Functions concerning Shifts and Difference Operators Dan Liu, Degui
More informationON FACTORIZATIONS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS OF BOUNDED TYPE
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 29, 2004, 345 356 ON FACTORIZATIONS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS OF BOUNDED TYPE Liang-Wen Liao and Chung-Chun Yang Nanjing University, Department of Mathematics
More informationGROWTH OF SOLUTIONS TO HIGHER ORDER LINEAR HOMOGENEOUS DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS IN ANGULAR DOMAINS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol 200(200), No 64, pp 7 ISSN: 072-669 URL: http://ejdemathtxstateedu or http://ejdemathuntedu ftp ejdemathtxstateedu GROWTH OF SOLUTIONS TO HIGHER ORDER
More informationNonhomogeneous linear differential polynomials generated by solutions of complex differential equations in the unit disc
ACTA ET COMMENTATIONES UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS DE MATHEMATICA Volume 20, Number 1, June 2016 Available online at http://acutm.math.ut.ee Nonhomogeneous linear differential polynomials generated by solutions
More informationGrowth of solutions and oscillation of differential polynomials generated by some complex linear differential equations
Hokkaido Mathematical Journal Vol. 39 (2010) p. 127 138 Growth of solutions and oscillation of differential polynomials generated by some complex linear differential equations Benharrat Belaïdi and Abdallah
More information1 Introduction, Definitions and Notations
Acta Universitatis Apulensis ISSN: 1582-5329 No 34/2013 pp 81-97 THE GROWTH ESTIMATE OF ITERATED ENTIRE FUNCTIONS Ratan Kumar Dutta Abstract In this paper we study growth properties of iterated entire
More informationOn Picard value problem of some difference polynomials
Arab J Math 018 7:7 37 https://doiorg/101007/s40065-017-0189-x Arabian Journal o Mathematics Zinelâabidine Latreuch Benharrat Belaïdi On Picard value problem o some dierence polynomials Received: 4 April
More informationProperties of higher order differential polynomials generated by solutions of complex differential equations in the unit disc
J o u r n a l of Mathematics and Applications JMA No 37, pp 67-84 (2014) Properties of higher order differential polynomials generated by solutions of complex differential equations in the unit disc Zinelâabidine
More informationSOLUTIONS OF NONHOMOGENEOUS LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH EXCEPTIONALLY FEW ZEROS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 23, 1998, 429 452 SOLUTIONS OF NONHOMOGENEOUS LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH EXCEPTIONALLY FEW ZEROS Gary G. Gundersen, Enid M. Steinbart, and
More informationMEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING ONE VALUE AND UNIQUE RANGE SETS
E. MUES AND M. REINDERS KODAI MATH. J. 18 (1995), 515-522 MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING ONE VALUE AND UNIQUE RANGE SETS E. MUES AND M. REINDERS Abstract We show that there exists a set S with 13 elements
More informationUNIQUE RANGE SETS FOR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT AN INJECTIVITY HYPOTHESIS
UNIQUE RANGE SETS FOR MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT AN INJECTIVITY HYPOTHESIS TA THI HOAI AN Abstract. A set is called a unique range set (counting multiplicities) for a particular family of
More informationChapter 1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Chapter Introduction and Preliminaries . Introduction Nevanlinna theory ( also called Value Distribution Theory ) is a branch of complex analysis developed by Finnish mathematician Rolf Nevanlinna. Nevanlinna
More informationMEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS THAT SHARE TWO FINITE VALUES WITH THEIR DERIVATIVE
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 105, No. 2, 1983 MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS THAT SHARE TWO FINITE VALUES WITH THEIR DERIVATIVE GARY G. GUNDERSEN It is shown that if a nonconstant meromorphic function /
More informationOn the value distribution of composite meromorphic functions
On the value distribution of composite meromorphic functions Walter Bergweiler and Chung-Chun Yang Dedicated to Professor Klaus Habetha on the occasion of his 60th birthday 1 Introduction and main result
More informationON THE UNIQUENESS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING THREE WEIGHTED VALUES. Indrajit Lahiri and Gautam Kumar Ghosh
MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 60 (008), 5 3 UDK 517.546 originalni nauqni rad reearch aer ON THE UNIQUENESS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING THREE WEIGHTED VALUES Indrajit Lahiri and Gautam Kumar Ghoh Abtract. We
More informationUNIQUENESS OF NON-ARCHIMEDEAN ENTIRE FUNCTIONS SHARING SETS OF VALUES COUNTING MULTIPLICITY
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 127, Number 4, April 1999, Pages 967 971 S 0002-9939(99)04789-9 UNIQUENESS OF NON-ARCHIMEDEAN ENTIRE FUNCTIONS SHARING SETS OF VALUES COUNTING MULTIPLICITY
More informationGrowth properties at infinity for solutions of modified Laplace equations
Sun et al. Journal of Inequalities and Applications (2015) 2015:256 DOI 10.1186/s13660-015-0777-2 R E S E A R C H Open Access Growth properties at infinity for solutions of modified Laplace equations Jianguo
More informationA Special Type Of Differential Polynomial And Its Comparative Growth Properties
Sanjib Kumar Datta 1, Ritam Biswas 2 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Dist- Nadia, PIN- 741235, West Bengal, India 2 Murshidabad College of Engineering Technology, Banjetia,
More informationJ. Nonlinear Funct. Anal (2016), Article ID 16 Copyright c 2016 Mathematical Research Press.
J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2016 2016, Article ID 16 Copyright c 2016 Mathematical Research Press. ON THE VALUE DISTRIBUTION THEORY OF DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS IN THE UNIT DISC BENHARRAT BELAÏDI, MOHAMMED
More informationVALUE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PRODUCT OF A MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION AND ITS DERIVATIVE. Abstract
I. LAHIRI AND S. DEWAN KODAI MATH. J. 26 (2003), 95 100 VALUE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PRODUCT OF A MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION AND ITS DERIVATIVE Indrajit Lahiri and Shyamali Dewan* Abstract In the paper we discuss
More informationÄ D C Ã F D {f n } F,
2016, 37A(2):233 242 DOI: 1016205/jcnkicama20160020 Í Æ ß È Õ Ä Ü È Ø Ó Đ * 1 2 3 Ð Ã µ½ ¹Ï ½» ÒÄà µ½ Í ÞÞ Ï Å ¹Ï µ½ MR (2010) Î 30D35, 30D45 Ð ÌÎ O17452 Ñ A ÛÁ 1000-8314(2016)02-0233-10 1 Ú Ö Ä D C Ã
More informationOn the Uniqueness Results and Value Distribution of Meromorphic Mappings
mathematics Article On the Uniqueness Results and Value Distribution of Meromorphic Mappings Rahman Ullah, Xiao-Min Li, Faiz Faizullah 2, *, Hong-Xun Yi 3 and Riaz Ahmad Khan 4 School of Mathematical Sciences,
More informationGrowth of meromorphic solutions of delay differential equations
Growth of meromorphic solutions of delay differential equations Rod Halburd and Risto Korhonen 2 Abstract Necessary conditions are obtained for certain types of rational delay differential equations to
More informationBANK-LAINE FUNCTIONS WITH SPARSE ZEROS
BANK-LAINE FUNCTIONS WITH SPARSE ZEROS J.K. LANGLEY Abstract. A Bank-Laine function is an entire function E satisfying E (z) = ± at every zero of E. We construct a Bank-Laine function of finite order with
More informationGrowth of Solutions of Second Order Complex Linear Differential Equations with Entire Coefficients
Filomat 32: (208), 275 284 https://doi.org/0.2298/fil80275l Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Growth of Solutions
More informationJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 355 2009 352 363 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Value sharing results for shifts of meromorphic
More informationOscillation Criteria for Delay Neutral Difference Equations with Positive and Negative Coefficients. Contents
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 21 1/2 (2003): 1 12. c SPM Oscillation Criteria for Delay Neutral Difference Equations with Positive and Negative Coefficients Chuan-Jun Tian and Sui Sun Cheng abstract:
More informationON THE LINEAR INDEPENDENCE OF THE SET OF DIRICHLET EXPONENTS
ON THE LINEAR INDEPENDENCE OF THE SET OF DIRICHLET EXPONENTS Abstract. Given k 2 let α 1,..., α k be transcendental numbers such that α 1,..., α k 1 are algebraically independent over Q and α k Q(α 1,...,
More informationBank-Laine functions with periodic zero-sequences
Bank-Laine functions with periodic zero-sequences S.M. ElZaidi and J.K. Langley Abstract A Bank-Laine function is an entire function E such that E(z) = 0 implies that E (z) = ±1. Such functions arise as
More informationMeromorphic functions sharing three values
J. Math. Soc. Japan Vol. 56, No., 2004 Meromorphic functions sharing three values By Xiao-Min Li and Hong-Xun Yi* (Received Feb. 7, 2002) (Revised Aug. 5, 2002) Abstract. In this paper, we prove a result
More informationResearch Article Fixed Points of Difference Operator of Meromorphic Functions
e Scientiic World Journal, Article ID 03249, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/0.55/204/03249 Research Article Fixed Points o Dierence Operator o Meromorphic Functions Zhaojun Wu and Hongyan Xu 2 School o Mathematics
More informationSome Results on the Growth Properties of Entire Functions Satifying Second Order Linear Differential Equations
Int Journal of Math Analysis, Vol 3, 2009, no 1, 1-14 Some Results on the Growth Properties of Entire Functions Satifying Second Order Linear Differential Equations Sanjib Kumar Datta Department of Mathematics,
More informationA NOTE ON THE COMPLETE MOMENT CONVERGENCE FOR ARRAYS OF B-VALUED RANDOM VARIABLES
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 52 (205), No. 3, pp. 825 836 http://dx.doi.org/0.434/bkms.205.52.3.825 A NOTE ON THE COMPLETE MOMENT CONVERGENCE FOR ARRAYS OF B-VALUED RANDOM VARIABLES Yongfeng Wu and Mingzhu
More informationResearch Article Subnormal Solutions of Second-Order Nonhomogeneous Linear Differential Equations with Periodic Coefficients
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2009, Article ID 416273, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2009/416273 Research Article Subnormal Solutions of Second-Order Nonhomogeneous
More informationComplex Analysis. Chapter V. Singularities V.3. The Argument Principle Proofs of Theorems. August 8, () Complex Analysis August 8, / 7
Complex Analysis Chapter V. Singularities V.3. The Argument Principle Proofs of Theorems August 8, 2017 () Complex Analysis August 8, 2017 1 / 7 Table of contents 1 Theorem V.3.4. Argument Principle 2
More informationOn Bank-Laine functions
Computational Methods and Function Theory Volume 00 0000), No. 0, 000 000 XXYYYZZ On Bank-Laine functions Alastair Fletcher Keywords. Bank-Laine functions, zeros. 2000 MSC. 30D35, 34M05. Abstract. In this
More informationQUASINORMAL FAMILIES AND PERIODIC POINTS
QUASINORMAL FAMILIES AND PERIODIC POINTS WALTER BERGWEILER Dedicated to Larry Zalcman on his 60th Birthday Abstract. Let n 2 be an integer and K > 1. By f n we denote the n-th iterate of a function f.
More informationOscillatory Behavior of Third-order Difference Equations with Asynchronous Nonlinearities
International Journal of Difference Equations ISSN 0973-6069, Volume 9, Number 2, pp 223 231 2014 http://campusmstedu/ijde Oscillatory Behavior of Third-order Difference Equations with Asynchronous Nonlinearities
More informationWARING S PROBLEM FOR LINEAR POLYNOMIALS AND LAURENT POLYNOMIALS
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 35, Number 5, 005 WARING S PROBLEM FOR LINEAR POLYNOMIALS AND LAURENT POLYNOMIALS DONG-IL KIM ABSTRACT Waring s problem is about representing any function in
More informationCOMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS
Series Logo Volume 00, Number 00, Xxxx 19xx COMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS RICH STANKEWITZ Abstract. Let G be a semigroup of rational functions of degree at least two, under composition
More informationOn multiple points of meromorphic functions
On multiple points of meromorphic functions Jim Langley and Dan Shea Abstract We establish lower bounds for the number of zeros of the logarithmic derivative of a meromorphic function of small growth with
More informationSome Recent Results and Problems in the Theory of Value-Distribution
Some Recent Results and Problems in the Theory of Value-Distribution Lo Yang Dedicated to Professor Wilhelm Stoll on the occasion of his inauguration as the Duncan Professor of Mathematics. For meromorphic
More informationON THE LIMIT POINTS OF THE FRACTIONAL PARTS OF POWERS OF PISOT NUMBERS
ARCHIVUM MATHEMATICUM (BRNO) Tomus 42 (2006), 151 158 ON THE LIMIT POINTS OF THE FRACTIONAL PARTS OF POWERS OF PISOT NUMBERS ARTŪRAS DUBICKAS Abstract. We consider the sequence of fractional parts {ξα
More informationPoles and α-points of Meromorphic Solutions of the First Painlevé Hierarchy
Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 40 2004), 471 485 Poles and α-points of Meromorphic Solutions of the First Painlevé Hierarchy By Shun Shimomura Abstract The first Painlevé hierarchy, which is a sequence of higher
More informationNon-real zeroes of real entire functions and their derivatives
Non-real zeroes of real entire functions and their derivatives Daniel A. Nicks Abstract A real entire function belongs to the Laguerre-Pólya class LP if it is the limit of a sequence of real polynomials
More informationA NOTE ON LINEAR FUNCTIONAL NORMS
A NOTE ON LINEAR FUNCTIONAL NORMS YIFEI PAN AND MEI WANG Abstract. For a vector u in a normed linear space, Hahn-Banach Theorem provides the existence of a linear functional f, f(u) = u such that f = 1.
More informationInternational Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 60 No ,
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 60 No. 3 200, 259-267 ON CERTAIN CLASS OF SZÁSZ-MIRAKYAN OPERATORS IN EXPONENTIAL WEIGHT SPACES Lucyna Rempulska, Szymon Graczyk 2,2 Institute
More informationA NOTE ON RATIONAL OPERATOR MONOTONE FUNCTIONS. Masaru Nagisa. Received May 19, 2014 ; revised April 10, (Ax, x) 0 for all x C n.
Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae Online, e-014, 145 15 145 A NOTE ON RATIONAL OPERATOR MONOTONE FUNCTIONS Masaru Nagisa Received May 19, 014 ; revised April 10, 014 Abstract. Let f be oeprator monotone
More informationSOLUTION TO RUBEL S QUESTION ABOUT DIFFERENTIALLY ALGEBRAIC DEPENDENCE ON INITIAL VALUES GUY KATRIEL PREPRINT NO /4
SOLUTION TO RUBEL S QUESTION ABOUT DIFFERENTIALLY ALGEBRAIC DEPENDENCE ON INITIAL VALUES GUY KATRIEL PREPRINT NO. 2 2003/4 1 SOLUTION TO RUBEL S QUESTION ABOUT DIFFERENTIALLY ALGEBRAIC DEPENDENCE ON INITIAL
More informationAPPROXIMATION OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS OF SLOW GROWTH ON COMPACT SETS. G. S. Srivastava and Susheel Kumar
ARCHIVUM MATHEMATICUM BRNO) Tomus 45 2009), 137 146 APPROXIMATION OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS OF SLOW GROWTH ON COMPACT SETS G. S. Srivastava and Susheel Kumar Abstract. In the present paper, we study the polynomial
More informationMath 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative
Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative This chapter is another review of standard material in complex analysis. See for instance
More informationSemigroups of transcendental entire functions and their dynamics
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 127, No. 2, April 2017, pp. 349 360. DOI 10.1007/s12044-016-0298-z Semigroups of transcendental entire functions and their dynamics DINESH KUMAR 1, and SANJAY
More informationXiyou Cheng Zhitao Zhang. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 34, 2009, 267 277 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS TO SYSTEMS OF NONLINEAR INTEGRAL OR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Xiyou
More informationProperties of Entire Functions
Properties of Entire Functions Generalizing Results to Entire Functions Our main goal is still to show that every entire function can be represented as an everywhere convergent power series in z. So far
More informationAn Investigation on Minimal Surfaces of Multivalent Harmonic Functions 1
General Mathematics Vol. 19, No. 1 (2011), 99 107 An Investigation on Minimal Surfaces of Multivalent Harmonic Functions 1 Hakan Mete Taştan, Yaşar Polato glu Abstract The projection on the base plane
More informationTHAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION LE QUANG NINH
THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION LE QUANG NINH ON THE DETERMINATION OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTION AND MAPPING THROUGH INVERSE MAPPING OF POINT SETS Specialty: Mathematical Analysis Code: 62.46.01.02
More informationON THE GROWTH OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS WITH ZERO SETS HAVING INFINITE EXPONENT OF CONVERGENCE
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 7, 00, 69 90 ON THE GROWTH OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS WITH ZERO SETS HAVING INFINITE EXPONENT OF CONVERGENCE Joseph Miles University of Illinois, Department
More informationEntire functions sharing an entire function of smaller order with their shifts
34 Proc. Japan Acad., 89, Ser. A (2013) [Vol. 89(A), Entire functions sharing an entire function of smaller order with their shifts By Xiao-Min LI, Þ Xiao YANG Þ and Hong-Xun YI Þ (Communicated by Masai
More informationMATH 566 LECTURE NOTES 6: NORMAL FAMILIES AND THE THEOREMS OF PICARD
MATH 566 LECTURE NOTES 6: NORMAL FAMILIES AND THE THEOREMS OF PICARD TSOGTGEREL GANTUMUR 1. Introduction Suppose that we want to solve the equation f(z) = β where f is a nonconstant entire function and
More informationTHE NEARLY ADDITIVE MAPS
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 46 (009), No., pp. 199 07 DOI 10.4134/BKMS.009.46..199 THE NEARLY ADDITIVE MAPS Esmaeeil Ansari-Piri and Nasrin Eghbali Abstract. This note is a verification on the relations between
More informationMEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING FOUR VALUES WITH THEIR DIFFERENCE OPERATORS OR SHIFTS
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 53 206, No. 4, pp. 23 235 http://dx.doi.org/0.434/bkms.b50609 pissn: 05-8634 / eissn: 2234-306 MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING FOUR VALUES WITH THEIR DIFFERENCE OPERATORS OR SHIFTS
More informationSUPERSTABILITY FOR GENERALIZED MODULE LEFT DERIVATIONS AND GENERALIZED MODULE DERIVATIONS ON A BANACH MODULE (II)
Volume 0 (2009), Issue 2, Article 85, 8 pp. SUPERSTABILITY FOR GENERALIZED MODULE LEFT DERIVATIONS AND GENERALIZED MODULE DERIVATIONS ON A BANACH MODULE (II) HUAI-XIN CAO, JI-RONG LV, AND J. M. RASSIAS
More informationIV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function
IV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function 1 IV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function Note. We now explore factoring series in a way analogous to factoring a polynomial. Recall that if p is a polynomial with a zero
More informationVII.5. The Weierstrass Factorization Theorem
VII.5. The Weierstrass Factorization Theorem 1 VII.5. The Weierstrass Factorization Theorem Note. Conway motivates this section with the following question: Given a sequence {a k } in G which has no limit
More informationBoundedness of solutions to a retarded Liénard equation
Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 21, No. 24, 1-9; http://www.math.u-szeged.hu/ejqtde/ Boundedness of solutions to a retarded Liénard equation Wei Long, Hong-Xia Zhang
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.cv] 3 Dec 2014
NORMAL CRITERIA FOR FAMILIES OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS Gerd Dethloff a and Tran Van Tan b, and Nguyen Van Thin c arxiv:2.460v2 [math.cv] 3 Dec 204 a Université de Brest, LMBA, UMR CNRS 6205, 6, avenue Le
More informationSlowly Changing Function Oriented Growth Analysis of Differential Monomials and Differential Polynomials
Slowly Chanin Function Oriented Growth Analysis o Dierential Monomials Dierential Polynomials SANJIB KUMAR DATTA Department o Mathematics University o kalyani Kalyani Dist-NadiaPIN- 7235 West Benal India
More informationFORMAL AND ANALYTIC SOLUTIONS FOR A QUADRIC ITERATIVE FUNCTIONAL EQUATION
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 202 (202), No. 46, pp. 9. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu FORMAL AND ANALYTIC SOLUTIONS
More informationTensor Complementarity Problem and Semi-positive Tensors
DOI 10.1007/s10957-015-0800-2 Tensor Complementarity Problem and Semi-positive Tensors Yisheng Song 1 Liqun Qi 2 Received: 14 February 2015 / Accepted: 17 August 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New
More informationTHE STRUCTURE OF A RING OF FORMAL SERIES AMS Subject Classification : 13J05, 13J10.
THE STRUCTURE OF A RING OF FORMAL SERIES GHIOCEL GROZA 1, AZEEM HAIDER 2 AND S. M. ALI KHAN 3 If K is a field, by means of a sequence S of elements of K is defined a K-algebra K S [[X]] of formal series
More informationCLASSIFYING CAMINA GROUPS: ATHEOREMOFDARKANDSCOPPOLA
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 44, Number 2, 2014 CLASSIFYING CAMINA GROUPS: ATHEOREMOFDARKANDSCOPPOLA MARK L. LEWIS ABSTRACT. Recall that a group G is a Camina group if every nonlinear irreducible
More informationMath 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative
Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative This chapter is another review of standard material in complex analysis. See for instance
More informationA New Characterization of Boolean Rings with Identity
Irish Math. Soc. Bulletin Number 76, Winter 2015, 55 60 ISSN 0791-5578 A New Characterization of Boolean Rings with Identity PETER DANCHEV Abstract. We define the class of nil-regular rings and show that
More informationWEIERSTRASS THEOREMS AND RINGS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS
WEIERSTRASS THEOREMS AND RINGS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS YIFEI ZHAO Contents. The Weierstrass factorization theorem 2. The Weierstrass preparation theorem 6 3. The Weierstrass division theorem 8 References
More informationSome Inequalities for Commutators of Bounded Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces
Some Inequalities for Commutators of Bounded Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces S.S. Dragomir Abstract. Some new inequalities for commutators that complement and in some instances improve recent results
More informationMeromorphic solutions of Painlevé III difference equations with Borel exceptional values
Zhang Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2014, 2014:330 R E S E A R C H Open Access Meromorphic solutions of Painlevé III difference equations with Borel exceptional values Jilong Zhang * * Correspondence:
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR AN INDEFINITE KIRCHHOFF-TYPE EQUATION WITH SIGN-CHANGING POTENTIAL
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2015 (2015), o. 274, pp. 1 9. ISS: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIOS
More informationIrreducible multivariate polynomials obtained from polynomials in fewer variables, II
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 121 No. 2 May 2011 pp. 133 141. c Indian Academy of Sciences Irreducible multivariate polynomials obtained from polynomials in fewer variables II NICOLAE CIPRIAN
More informationSingular Value Inequalities for Real and Imaginary Parts of Matrices
Filomat 3:1 16, 63 69 DOI 1.98/FIL16163C Published by Faculty of Sciences Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Singular Value Inequalities for Real Imaginary
More informationExistence of Positive Periodic Solutions of Mutualism Systems with Several Delays 1
Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications. ISSN 973-5321 Volume 1 Number 2 (26), pp. 29 217 c Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/adsa.htm Existence of Positive Periodic Solutions
More informationAngular Derivatives of Holomorphic Maps in Infinite Dimensions
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATCAL ANALYSS AND APPLCATONS 0, 18 1996 ARTCLE NO. 01 Angular Derivatives of Holomorphic Maps in nfinite Dimensions Kazimierz Włodarczyk Alina Szałowska nstitute of Mathematics, Uniersity
More information