arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 13 Feb 2009

Transcription

1 YITP-SB-7-7 Path Integration in QCD with Arbitrary Space-Depenent Static Color Potential Gouranga C. Nayak, arxiv:75.5v3 [hep-th] 3 Feb 29 C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook University, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY , USA (Date: June 2, 28) Abstract We perform the path integral for a quark (antiquark) in the presence of an external backgroun chromo-electric SU(3) gauge fiel E a (x = x) with arbitrary color inex a=,2,...8 an obtain an exact non-perturbative expression for the generating functional. The only nonzero fiel strength component consiere is E a = F a which is allowe to epenon a singlespatial coorinate x = x. We show that such a path integration is possible even if one can not solve the Dirac equation in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent potential. This result crucially epens on the valiity of the shift conjecture which has not yet been establishe. It may be possible to further explore this path integral technique to stuy non-perturbative boun state formation. PACS numbers: PACS: t,.5.-q,.5.Tk,.5.Me Electronic aress: nayak@max2.physics.sunysb.eu Typeset by REVTEX

2 I. INTRODUCTION In QED an in Newtonian gravity the potential (ue to charge an mass respectively) is inversely proportional to istance. However, the exact form of the potential ue to color charge is not known in QCD. This is a funamental problem in physics. Quarks an gluons which carry color charges are confine insie harons. Lattice QCD simulation attempts to compute the form of the static potential between quark an antiquark insie quarkonium [, 2]. The static potential insie heavy quarkonia can be approximate to be a Coulomb plus linear form [3]. However, the exact form of the potential insie light q q mesons an insie other harons is expecte to be quite complicate. The long istance confinement physics is non-perturbative, an one can not perform path integrations analytically. On the other han the lattice QCD metho implements extensive numerical simulations an hence the physical picture is not as clear as it coul be if one ha explicit analytic results. From this point of view path integration in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent static color potential woul be esirable. In this paper we present an analytical metho to perform the path integral for a quark (antiquark) in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent static color potential A a (x)(= xe a (x)) with arbitrary color inex a=,2,..8 in SU(3). We show that such a path integration is possible even if one can not solve the Dirac equation in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent potential. This result crucially epens on the valiity of the shift conjecture which has not yet been establishe. Unlike QED, the above potential in QCD is motivate because the color quark-antiquark potential may be one imensional. In particular we obtain the following exact non-perturbative expression for the generating functional for a quark (antiquark) in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent static color potential A a (x) = xe a (x): Z[A] [ ψ][ψ]e i 4 x ψ j (x)(δ jkˆp/ gt a Z[] = jk A/a δ jk m)ψ k (x) = [ ψ][ψ]e i 4 x ψ j (x)(ˆp/ m)ψ k (x) exp{ i 8π 2 t 3 s x iǫ) [gλ j (x) coth(gsλ j (x)) s 2e is(m2 3 sg2 Λ 2 j (x) s ]}. () The gauge invariant Λ j (x) s are given by C (x) C (x) Λ (x) = cosθ(x), Λ 2,3 (x) = cos( 2π ±θ(x)), cos2 3θ(x) = 3C 2(x) C(x) 3 2

3 (2) where C (x) = [E a (x)e a (x)] an C 2 (x) = [ abc E a (x)e b (x)e c (x)] 2 are two inepenent space-epenent casimir/gauge invariants in SU(3). The color inices a, b, c=,2,...8. We will present a erivation of eq. () in this paper. It may be possible to further explore this path integral technique to stuy non-perturbative boun state formation, for example, by stuying various non-perturbative correlation functions. II. PATH INTEGRATION WITH ARBITRARY SPACE-DEPENDENT STATIC COLOR POTENTIAL The Lagrangian ensity for quark in a classical chromofiel A a µ is given by where ˆp µ = i L = ψ j [(δ jk ˆp/ gt a jk A/ a ) mδ jk ] ψ k = ψ j M jk [A] ψ k (3) is the momentum operator an T a x µ jk is the generator in the funamental representation of gauge group SU(3) with a=,2...8 an j, k =,2,3. The generating functional is given by This gives Z[A] Z[] = [ ψ][ψ]e i 4 x ψ j M jk [A]ψ k [ ψ][ψ]e i 4 x ψ j M jk [] ψ k = Det[M[A]] Det[M[]] = eiw. (4) W = i 2 Tr ln[(δ jkˆp/ gt a jk A/a ) 2 m 2 δ jk ]+ i 2 Tr ln[δ jk(ˆp 2 m 2 )] (5) where TrO = tr Dirac tr color t x y z < t < x < y < z O z > y > x > t >. (6) Eq. (5) can be written as W = i 2 s s Tr[eis[(δ jkˆp gta Aa )2 g jk + 2 σµν T a jk Fa µν δ jkm 2 +iǫ] e is[δ jk(ˆp 2 m 2 )+iǫ] ]. (7) A. Suitable Gauge Choice for Evaluation of this Path Integral A physical quantity constructe from the arbitrary space-epenent static color potential A a µ (x) = δ µ xe a (x) (8) 3

4 may be expresse in terms of two space-epenent casimir/gauge invariants in SU(3) C (x) = [E a (x)e a (x)], an, C 2 (x) = [ abc E a (x)e b (x)e c (x)] 2. (9) However, it is not possible to perform the above path integration by irectly using eq. (8) in eq. (7). For this reason we use the gauge invariance argument. Since A a µ(x) is not gauge invariant we can work in a ifferent gauge to obtain the same E a (x). For example, if we choose A a µ (t,x) = δ µe a (x)t () then we reprouce the same chromo-electric fiel E a (x) as in eq. (8). Note that both the equations (8) an () are relate by a gauge transformation an reprouce the same E a (x) but eq. () is preferre to o path integration because the t variable will allow us to cast this as a harmonic oscillator problem. This is not possible by eq. (8). Hence we can use eq. () instea of eq. (8) to perform path integration in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent static color potential. Using eq. () in (7) we fin W = i 2 tr s Diractr color t x y z < t < x < y < z s [e is[ (δ jkˆp +gtjk a E(x)t)2 +δ jk (ˆp 2 ˆp2 y ˆp2 z )+igγ γ Tjk a Ea (x) δ jk m 2 +iǫ] e is(δ jk(ˆp 2 m 2 )+iǫ) ] z > y > x > t >. () Inserting complete set of p > states ( p p >< p = ) as appropriate we obtain (we use the normalization < q p >= 2π e iqp ) W = i s + + 2(2π) 2Tr DiracTr color [ y z s [< x < t e is[ (δ jk i p y x +gta jk Ea (x)t) 2 +δ jkˆp 2 +igγ γ T a jk Ea (x)] t > x > δ jk s To perform the Dirac trace we use the eigenvalues of the Dirac matrix p z e is(p2 y+p 2 z+m 2 iǫ) x t ]]. (2) (γ γ ) eigenvalues = (λ,λ 2,λ 3,λ 4 ) = (,,, ) (3) an fin W = i 2(2π) 2 4 l= s s + + y z p y p z e is(p2 y +p2 z +m2 iǫ) x t [F l 3 s ], (4) 4

5 where F l = tr color + + x < x t < t e is[ (δ jk i x +gta jk Ea (x)t) 2 +δ jkˆp 2 +igλ ltjk a Ea (x)] t > x >. (5) In the matrix notation we write the above equation as where F l = tr color [ + x < x + t < t e is[ ( i x +gm(x)t)2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x)] t > x >] jk (6) M jk (x) = T a jke a (x). (7) B. Trouble with the Color Trace Evaluation in this Path Integral Unlike the constant chromo-electric fiel case [5] it is not straight forwar to take the color trace by iagonalizing the color matrix T a jke a (x) by an orthogonal matrix U jk (x). This is because the orthogonal matrix U jk (x) is x epenent an oes not commute with x. This was not a problem for constant chromo-electric fiel Ea case [5] because the orthogonal matrix U jk was space-time inepenent. This trouble was also not there in Schwinger mechanism stuy in QED [6] because there are no colors in QED. This implies that as long as the erivative operator x is present in the expression for F l we can not take the color trace by iagonalizing the space-epenent color matrix M jk (x) = T a jk Ea (x) by an orthogonal matrix U jk (x). We will come back to this color trace issue later. We note that since M(x) an t in eq. (6) commutes with each other one can not change the integration variable from t to t via: t = t M(x) an x M jk (x) an δ jk x which gives igm(x) x in color space. This is because o not commute with each other. To eal with the x-epenent color matrix we use the similarity transformation of t in the color space [t± igm(x) [gm(x)t+ i x ] jk = [e Using this in eq. (6) we fin F l = tr color [ + x ] jk = [e ± igm(x) x t [e + x < x igm(x) x igm(x) x t < t e t te t gm(x)e igm(x) x igm(x) x t igm(x) x t ]jk (8) t t]e igm(x) x e is[ [e igm(x) x t gm(x)eigm(x) x t t] 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ le igm(x) x t M(x)eigM(x) x t ] e igm(x) x t ]jk. (9) t t > x >]jk. (2) 5

6 It can be seen that eq. (6) contains the prouct tm(x) which satisfies t M(x) = M(x) t (2) because M(x) is inepenent of t. However, when we change the variable t = t igm(x) x (22) we fin t M(x) M(x) t. (23) Hence one can not change the variable t by eq. (22) in (6). However, in eq. (2) there is no prouct t M(x) present. Hence we can change the integration variable t to t via: t = t igm(x) x in the color space in eq. (2). Since the t integration limit is from to +, the t integration limit also remains from to +. Hence we fin from eq. (2) + + F l = tr color [ x < x t < t igm(x) x e igm(x) x t e is[ [e igm(x) x t gm(x)eigm(x) x t (t igm(x) x )]2 +ˆp 2 +igλ le igm(x) x t M(x)eigM(x) x t ] e igm(x) x t t igm(x) Using the similarity transformation of [t equation + + F l = tr color [ x < x t < t x > x >] jk. (24) ] igm(x) x jk from eq. (8) we fin from the above igm(x) x e igm(x) x t e is[ [e igm(x) x t gm(x)eigm(x) x t e igm(x) x t teigm(x) x t ] 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ le igm(x) x t M(x)eigM(x) x t ] e igm(x) x which gives t t igm(x) x > x >] jk (25) + + F l = tr color [ x < x t < t igm(x) x eis[ g2 M2 (x)t2 +ˆp2 +igλ l M(x)] t x >] jk. igm(x) It has to be remembere that eq. (26) is not vali if the t integration limit was finite [4]. Hence we must perform the t integration from to + in F l which we will o later in the erivation. 6 x > (26)

7 Inserting complete set of p > states we fin + + F l = tr color [ x < x t p < p M 2 (x)t 2 +ˆp 2 eis[ g2 +igλlm(x)] p >< p t = + + 2π tr color[ x < x t p e itp e gm(x) x x >]jk. The above equation contains x p p < t p x p > igm(x) igm(x) x > x >] jk e itp e p gm(x) x < p e is[ g2 M 2 (x)t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x)] p an hence we can not perform the color trace by iagonalizing the color matrix M jk (x) by an orthogonal matrix U jk (x). Inserting complete sets of states as appropriate we fin F l = p + 2π tr color[ x p eitp < px e x gm(x) x p x t > x >< x p x >< t p >< p x e Since the matrix [< p x e p x p x + p x < x p x > t t x p p x >< p t >< p x x >< x < t e is[ g2 M 2 (x)t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x)] gm(x) x p p gm(x) x p p t x > e itp < p x x >] jk. (28) x >] jk is insie the trace an is inepenent of (it x epens on c-numbers p x an p x ), we can move it to the left. We fin F l = + + (2π) 4tr color[ x x p x p x p x p x t t eixpx p p eitp < p x e gm(x) x p p x >< p x e gm(x) x p p x > e ip t e ix p x < t e is[ g2 M 2 (x )t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x )] t > e ix p x e ip t e itp e ixp x ]jk. (29) The matrix [< p x e < p x f(x) = x p gm(x) x p p x >= x >] jk is also inepenent of x. This can be shown as follows x x p x < p x x >< x f(x) x >< x p x >< p x x p x > x e ix (p x p x ) f(x )ip x (3) which is inepenent of x an. Hence all the expressions in eq. (29) are inepenent of x x except e ix(px p x ). This implies that we can easily perform the x integration in eq. (29) (by using + x eix(px p x ) = 2πδ ( p x p x )) to obtain F l = (2π) 3tr color[ x p x p x p x e itp < p x e gm(x) x p p x >< p x e gm(x) + t x p p x > e ip t t t e ix p x < t e is[ g2 M 2 (x )t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x )] t > e ix p x e ip t e itp ]jk. (3) 7 p p t > (27)

8 As avocate earlier in eq. (26) we must integrate over t from to + in F l. Since < t e is[ g2 M 2 (x )t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x )] t > is inepenent of t variable (it epens on t an t variables) all the expressions in eq. (3) are inepenent of t except e it(p p ). Hence we can easily integrate over t (by using + t eit(p p ) = 2πδ(p p )) to obtain F l = (2π) 2tr color[ < p x e x p x p x gm(x) x p p x >< p x e gm(x) p x t x p p x > e ip t t e ix p x < t e is[ g2 M 2 (x )t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x )] t > e ix p x e ip t ] jk. (32) Since p x p x >< p x = we fin from the above equation F l = (2π) 2tr color[ x p x t t p e it p < t e is[ g2 M 2 (x )t 2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lm(x )] t > e it p ]jk. (33) p C. Evaluation of the Color Trace As the above equation oes not contain any erivative x operator we can perform the color trace by iagonalizing the space-epenent color matrix M jk (x) by a space-epenent orthogonal matrix U jk (x). In the funamental representation the matrix M jk (x) has three eigenvalues: [M jk (x)] eigenvalues = [T a jke a (x)] eigenvalues = (Λ (x), Λ 2 (x), Λ 3 (x)). (34) Evaluating the traces of M jk (x), Mjk 2 (x) an M3 jk (x) we fin Λ (x)+λ 2 (x)+λ 3 (x) =, the solution of which is given by eq. (2). fin Λ 2 (x)+λ2 2 (x)+λ2 3 (x) = Ea (x)e a (x), 2 Λ 3 (x)+λ3 2 (x)+λ3 3 (x) = 4 [ abce a (x)e b (x)e c (x)] (35) Using the eigenvalues of M jk (x) from eq. (2) we perform the color trace in eq. (33) an F l = (2π) 2 [ x p x t t p e it p < t e is[ g2 Λ 2 j (x)t2 +ˆp 2 +igλ lλ j (x)] t > e it p ]. (36) 8

9 Since the eigenvalues Λ j s are c-numbers, the above equation involves one harmonic oscillator [ 2 ω2 (x)t 2 + 2ˆp2 ] n >= (n+ )ω(x) n > (37) 2 with space-epenent frequency ω(x). The harmonic oscillator wave function < t n >= ψ n (t) = ( ω(x) π )/4 (2 n n!) /2H n(t ω(x))e ω(x) 2 t2 (38) with space epenent frequency ω(x) is normalize, t < t n > 2 =, (39) where H n is the Hermite polynomial. Inserting complete set of harmonic oscillator states (by using n n >< n = ) in eq. (36) we fin F l = (2π) 2 < n t > e it p = 2π = 4π tr color[ n x x p x x t p x e sgλ lm(x) t p e it p < t n > e s[gλ j(x)(2n+)+gλ l Λ j (x)] t < t n > 2 e sgλ lλ j (x) 2 sinh(sgλ j (x)) p x sinh(sgm(x)) ] jk. (4) where we have use eq. (39). The Lorentz force equation: δ jk p µ = gt a jk Faµν (x)x ν, of the quark in color space becomes (when E a (x) is along the x-axis, eq. ()) δ jk p x = gt a jk Ea (x)t = gm jk (x)t. (4) Implementing this in eq. (4) we fin F l = 4π x t gλ j(x)e sgλ lλ j (x) sinh(sgλ j (x)). (42) D. The Generating Functional Using the above expression of F l in eq. (4) we obtain W = i 32π 3 4 l= s s t 3 x 2 p T e is(p2 T +m2 iǫ) [ gλ j(x)e sgλ lλ j (x) sinh(sgλ j (x)) s ] (43) 9

10 where p 2 T = p2 y +p2 z. Summing over l, by using the eigenvalues (λ l) of the Dirac matrix γ γ from eq. (3) an integrating over p T we fin W = 8π 2 t 3 s x iǫ) [gλ j (x) coth(gsλ j (x)) ]. (44) s 2e is(m2 s This equation is ivergent as s. This ultraviolet ivergence can be remove by charge renormalization [7] by subtracting also the term linear in s in the expansion of cosh(sgλ j(x)) sinh(sgλ j (x)). Hence after renormalization we obtain W = 8π 2 t 3 s x iǫ) [gλ j (x) coth(gsλ j (x)) s 2e is(m2 3 sg2 Λ 2 j(x) ]. (45) s Using eq. (45) in (4) we fin the following expression for the generating functional of quark (antiquark) in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent static color potential A a (x) = xe a (x) with arbitrary color inex a=,2,...8 in SU(3), Z[A] [ ψ][ψ]e i 4 x ψ j (x)(δ jkˆp/ gt a Z[] = jk A/a δ jk m)ψ k (x) [ ψ][ψ]e i 4 x ψ j (x)(ˆp/ m)ψ k (x) exp{ i 8π 2 t = 3 s x iǫ) [gλ j (x) coth(gsλ j (x)) s 2e is(m2 3 sg2 Λ 2 j (x) s ]} (46) which reprouces eq. (). The gauge invariant expressions for Λ j (x) s are given in eq. (2). III. CONCLUSION To conclue we have performe the path integral for a quark (antiquark) in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent static color potential A a (x)(= xe a (x)) with arbitrary color inex a=,2,...8. We have shown that such a path integration is possible even if one can not solve the Dirac equation in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent potential. In particular we have obtaine an exact expression of the non-perturbative generating functional of quark (antiquark) in the presence of arbitrary space-epenent color potential A a (x)(= xe a (x)) with arbitrary color inex a=,2,...8 in SU(3). This result crucially epens on the valiity of the shift conjecture which has not yet been establishe. It may be possible to further explore this path integral technique to stuy nonperturbative boun state formation, for example, by stuying various non-perturbative correlation functions.

11 Acknowlegments I thank Robert Shrock, Jack Smith an George Sterman for useful iscussions. I also thank Jack Smith an George Sterman for careful reaing of the manuscript. This work was supporte in part by the National Science Founation, grants PHY an PHY [] K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D (974) [2] H. J. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories, worl scientific lecture notes in physics-vol. 74, (25); an references therein. [3] J. D. Stack, Phys. Rev. D27 (983) 42; Phys. Rev. D29 (984) 23; H.-Q. Ding, Phys. Rev. D42 (99) 235; M. Baker, J. S. Ball an F. Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. D56 (997) 44; an an references therein. [4] F. Cooper an G. C. Nayak, hep-th/6992. [5] G. C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. D72 (25) 25; G. C. Nayak an P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. D 7 (25) 25; F. Cooper an G. C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. D 73 (26) 655. [6] F. Cooper an G. C. Nayak, hep-th/625; hep-th/ [7] J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82 (95) 664.