Improved estimates for the Ginzburg-Landau equation: the elliptic case
|
|
- Gary Waters
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Improved estimates for the Ginzburg-Landau equation: the elliptic case F. Bethuel, G. Orlandi and D. Smets May 9, 2007 Abstract We derive estimates for various quantities which are of interest in the analysis of the Ginzburg-Landau equation, and which we bound in terms of the GL-energy E ε and the parameter ε. These estimates are local in nature, and in particular independent of any boundary condition. Most of them improve and extend earlier results on the subject Mathematics Subject Classification : 35J60, 35B40, 35Q40, 31B35, 46E35. 1 Introduction. Let Ω be a smooth bounded domain in R N, N 2. For 0 < ε < 1 we consider the complex elliptic Ginzburg-Landau equation (GL) ε u ε = 1 ε 2 u ε(1 u ε 2 ) on Ω for maps u ε : Ω C. This equation is the Euler-Lagrange equation for the Ginzburg- Landau (GL-) energy functional u ε 2 E ε (u ε ) = e ε (u ε ) + (1 u ε 2 ) 2, 2 4ε 2 Ω Ω and we will be concerned only with solutions u ε with finite GL-energy. The purpose of this paper is to derive estimates for various quantities which are of interest in the analysis of (GL) ε, and which will be bounded in terms of the GLenergy E ε and the parameter ε. These estimates are of local nature, and in particular independent of any boundary condition. Most of them extend and generalize earlier results on the subject. The GL-energy has two components: the kinetic energy u 2 on one side, and the 2 potential energy V ε (u) (1 u 2 ) 2 on the other. Our first result yields an improved 4ε 2 local bound for the integral of the potential, and shows that, for suitable energy regimes, it is of lower order. 1
2 Theorem 1. Let Ω = B 1 and u ε be a solution to (GL) ε. We have ( E ε (u ε ) V ε (u ε ) C 0 B 12 log 2 + E ) ε(u ε ), (1) where C 0 is some constant depending on N. Estimate (1) provides some non trivial information only if the energy is not too large, more precisely only if E ε (u ε ) ε 1/C 0. On the other hand, it is well-known 1 that there exists real-valued solutions to (GL) ε such that the energy balance u 2 2 = (1 u 2 ) 2 4ε 2 holds pointwise, and such that E ε (u ε ) is of order ε 1. In this case, log(2 + Eε(uε) ), and therefore estimate (1) is optimal in this respect. 2 In another direction, the factor appearing on the r.h.s. of inequality (1) is the typical energy of a vortex solution 3 in dimension 2. It is known 4 that for these solutions the integral of the potential remains bounded independently of the parameter ε: Theorem 1 gives therefore a generalization of this fact for local integrals of the potential in arbitrary dimension, without imposing any boundary datum. More precisely, if for some constant M 0 > 0, E ε (u ε ) M 0, then (1) yields the bound B 1/2 V ε (u ε ) C 0 M 0 log(2 + M 0 ), which is uniform in ε. We would like also to emphasize that Theorem 1 is an improvement of earlier results given in [15, 36, 33, 29, 8]. 5 1 take for instance u ε (x 1,..., x N ) = tanh( x1 2ε ) 2 However, the optimal value of the constant C 0 is not known. 3 A typical example is provided by a solution of the form u ε (x) = f( x ) exp(iθ) on B 1 C, with f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1 and f verifying the ordinary differential equation f + f r = 1 ε f(1 f 2 ) (see 2 e.g. [25]). 4 This is a consequence of Pohozaev identity (see e.g. [7]). 5 in particular, in [8] it was proved B 12 { u ε 1/2} V ε (u ε ) C ( ) 2 Eε (u ε ). 2
3 Remark 1. Using the various tools presented in this paper, one may actually derive a better estimate for the potential when the energy is small. More precisely, there exist positive constants η 1, β and C such that, if B 1 e ε (u ε ) η 1, (2) then B 1/2 V ε (u ε ) Cε β E ε (u ε ), (3) so that estimate (1) is far from being optimal for low energy regimes. The proof of (3) can be obtained combining the clearing-out property (see Theorem 2.2 in Section 2) with Proposition A.2 of the Appendix. We leave it to the reader. Using various elliptic estimates, we are able to relate, in the same spirit, local estimates for the gradient of the modulus to the potential as follows. Proposition 1. Let u ε be a solution of (GL) ε on B 1. We have ( ) u ε 2 C 1 V ε (u ε ) + ε( V ε (u ε )) 1/2 B 12 B 1 B 1 (4) where C 1 is some constant depending only on N. In contrast with Theorem 1, the result in Proposition 1 remains valid for vectorvalued solutions u ε : B 1 R d, for arbitrary integer d ( the proof carries over word for word). In the course of the proof, we invoke a bound on the L 4 -norm of u ε (stated in Lemma 3.1), which we hope is of independent interest. Combining Theorem 1 and Proposition 1 with covering and scaling arguments, we deduce the global bound Corollary 1. Let Ω be a smooth bounded domain in R N, N 2, and u ε be a solution of (GL) ε. We have, for a constant C depending on Ω, ( uε 2 + V ε (u ε ) ) ( ) 1 + log(dist (x, Ω)) 1 Eε (u ε ) dx CΛ, (5) Ω where, for t 0, we have set Λ(t) = t log(2 + t). As a consequence of the above analysis, we see that in some sense the main contribution to the GL-energy stems from the gradient of the phase, at least in the appropriate energy regime. In a slightly different direction, a highly involved result of Bourgain, Brezis and Mironescu yields improved interior integral estimates for u ε p, with p < 2 (i.e. p subcritical), in dimension three and for the energy regime E ε (u ε ) M 0 (see [18], Theorem 8). Our purpose is to obtain a similar result in arbitrary dimension and for 3
4 possibly larger energy regimes. Our approach is of somewhat different nature and relies heavily on results in harmonic analysis which state that measures with suitable growth over all balls are elements of the dual of W 1,p (see [38] and references therein). In view of possible oscillations in the phase, which essentially propagate in the domain through an elliptic equation, it is not possible to expect a general improved estimate involving only the energy (see e.g. [20, 12]). However, these oscillations can be controlled by a weaker norm, say for instance the L 1 -norm of the gradient. More precisely, we will show, as a consequence of Theorem 1 and [1, 2, 38], that for every 1 p < 2, the following estimate holds 6 (here Ω = B 1 ) ( B 1/2 u ε p ) 1/p C p ( Λ( E ε(u ε ) ) + ) u ε. (6) B 1 Estimate (6) can ever be slightly improved if instead of Theorem 1 we invoke Jacobian estimates introduced by Jerrard and Soner [28] and Alberti, Baldo and Orlandi [3]. Relying on our result in [13], and the aforementioned results in [38], we obtain Theorem 2. Let 1 < p < 2. There exist C p > 0 such that if u ε is a solution to (GL) ε, then ( ) 1/p ( ) u ε p Eε (u ε ) C p B 1/2 + u ε. (7) B 1 Remark 2. For boundary value problems, the term u ε L 1 can be controlled by the trace on Ω. More precisely, it has been shown in [7, 29, 8, 18, 5, 9, 3] that global bounds for u ε L p (Ω) with p < N could be obtained under various restrictive assumptions N 1 on g ε = u ε Ω and u ε. The case g ε belonging to H 1/2 with the additional assumption 7 g ε = 1 was considered in [17] and then in [5, 9]. The case p = N was settled in [18] N 1 assuming a conjecture which we proved in [13] 8. More precisely, the results in [3, 18, 13] yield, for g ε = 1 and Ω smooth bounded and simply connected, 9 ( ) N 1 ( ) u ε N N Eε (u ε ) N 1 C Ω + g ε 2 H. (8) 1/2 Notice however that in the global estimate (8) and the case g ε H 1/2 the exponent N is the best possible (see [18]), in contrast with the result of Theorem 2. N 1 Combining (8) and Theorem 2 one obtains the announced generalization of [18], Theorem 8. 2 log 2. 6 Inequality (6) yields only a nontrivial result if E ε (u ε ) 7 The proof in [5] actually carries over to the case g ε is bounded away from zero, i.e. β > g ε > α > 0. 8 Using a new linear estimate given in [18], Proposition 4, see also [37, 16]. 9 In [9], the assumption g ε = 1 is replaced by an assumption on the GL-energy on the boundary. 4
5 Going back to Theorem 2, notice that estimate (7) is immediate if E ε (u ε ) 2, since by Hölder s inequality, ( ( ) 1/p u ε p C Ω ) 1/2 u ε 2 CE ε (u ε ) 1/2. Ω In view of Theorem 2 as well as the mentioned Jacobian estimates, it is tempting to believe that estimate (1) can also be improved replacing possibly Λ( Eε(uε) Eε(uε) ) by for suitable energy ranges. 10 In another direction, it would be interesting to extend our estimates to boundary value problems (see e.g. [22]) and to the corresponding parabolic equation. 2 Estimates for the potential V ε (u ε ) The purpose of this section is to provide the proof of Theorem 1. The vorticity set V ε = {x Ω, u ε 1 σ 0 }, enters in an essential way in our discussion. The constant 0 < σ 0 1/2 appearing in the definition of V ε depends only on the dimension N, and will be defined at a later stage of our analysis (see Appendix). The main point in the proof is to provide integral estimates of the potential V ε (u ε ) on small balls B(x, r), distinguishing carefully the case where the balls are included in Ω \ V ε from the case where they intersect the vorticity set V ε. 2.1 Potential estimates off the vorticity set We first have Theorem 2.1. Let x Ω and r > 0 such that B(x, r) Ω \ V ε. There are some constants 0 < α 0 < 1 and 0 σ 0 1/2 such that if r ε, Ẽ ε (u ε, x, r) 1 ( ε ) α0 e r N 2 ε (u ε ), (2.1) r and u ε 1 σ 0 on B 1, then B(x,r) u ε 1 Cε2 r 2 (1 + Ẽε(u ε, x, r)) on B(x, r/2). (2.2) The proof of Theorem 2.1 follows some arguments in [11, 14]. The necessary adaptation will be exposed in a separate Appendix. Theorem 2.1 provides a lower bound for u ε off the vorticity set. On the other hand, we recall some important well-known global upper bounds. 10 For instance, for E ε (u ε ) ε γ, for a given 0 < γ < 1. 5
6 Proposition 2.1. Let Ω be a smooth domain in R N and u ε be a solution of (GL) ε on Ω. There exists a constant C > 0 depending only on N such that, if dist (x, Ω) > ε, then Cε 2 u ε (x) 1 + dist (x, Ω), (2.3) u ε (x) C ε. (2.4) Combining Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.1, we deduce immediately the following uniform estimate for the potential on balls included in Ω \ V ε. Proposition 2.2. Let x, r and u ε be as in Theorem 2.1 and assume r ε. Then sup V ε (u ε ) C ε2 B(x,r/2) r (1 + Ẽε(u 4 ε, x, r)) 2. (2.5) In the proof of Theorem 1 we will invoke Corollary 2.2 for balls of fixed radius r = r 0, specifying throughout the choice of r 0 in a somewhat arbitrary way as For this choice of r 0, the factor ε2 r 4 0 r 0 = ε1/4 2. is equal to 8ε, and hence small. 2.2 Potential estimates on the vorticity set In this section, we consider the case where B(x, r 0 ) intersects the vorticity set V ε, that is dist (x, V ε ) ε1/4 2. (2.6) In this situation, we show Proposition 2.3. Assume that dist (x, Ω) ε 1/8 and that (2.6) holds. Then there exists some radius ε 1/4 r(x) ε 1/8 depending only on u ε and x such that ( ) V ε (u ε ) C log 2 + Ẽε(x, u ε, ε 1/8 ) e ε (u ε ), (2.7) B(x,r(x)) B(x,r(x)) where C > 0 is some constant depending only on N. Comment. 1) We would like to draw the attention of the reader to the fact that the l.h.s. of (2.7) is the potential integrated on the same domain B(x, r(x)) as the energy e ε (u ε ) on the r.h.s. of the inequality. However the scaled energy Ẽε(x, u ε, ε 1/8 ) is considered on the larger domain B(x, ε 1/8 ). 2) In contrast with Proposition 2.2, the radius r(x) for which this inequality holds is not fixed a priori, but depends on x. The main tools in the proof are the monotonicity formula and the clearing-out theorem which we recall first. 6
7 Proposition 2.4 (Monotonicity formula 11 ). Assume u ε is a solution of (GL) ε in B(x, R). Then we have d dr (Ẽε(u ε, x, r)) = 1 r N 2 B(x,r) u ε n Remark 2.1. Note in particular that d dr (Ẽε(u ε, x, r)) 1 r N (1 u ε 2 ) 2, for 0 < r < R. r N 1 B(x,r) 2ε 2 B(x,r) (1 u ε 2 ) 2 2ε 2 0, (2.8) so that for fixed x, the function F (r) Ẽε(u ε, x, r) is a nondecreasing function of the radius r. Moreover, setting G(r) = r 2 N (1 u ε 2 ) 2, 2ε 2 (2.8) yields the differential inequality B(x,r) rf G, (2.9) which relates in a simple way the energy integral and the potential integral on B(x, r). This relation will be exploited in the proof of Proposition 2.3. Theorem 2.2 (Clearing-out 12 for vorticity). Let u ε be a solution to (GL) ε, x Ω, r ε such that B(x, r) Ω. If then V ε B(x, r 2 ), Ẽ ε (u ε, x, r) η 0 log( ε r ), where η 0 > 0 is some constant depending only on N. Proof of Proposition 2.3. For s I ε [ 1 log ε, 1 log ε], set f(s) = F (exp s), 4 8 g(s) = G(exp s), so that relation (2.9) writes, for f and g, For this ODE we invoke the next elementary lemma. f (s) g(s) s I ε. (2.10) 11 Here we consider the version given in [8]. Earlier versions were given in [36, 33, 29]. 12 This kind of result was proved under various assumptions in [15, 36, 33, 29, 30, 8, 10] and termed η-compactness in [33, 29, 30], η-ellipticity in [8, 10]. Here we follow the terminology in [27, 11], which was introduced by Brakke [19]. 7
8 Lemma 2.1. Let I = [a, b] be a bounded interval of R, f and g two nonnegative absolutely continuous functions such that Then there exists s 0 I such that f g on I. g(s 0 ) 1 b a log ( ) f(b) f(s 0 ). (2.11) f(a) Applying Lemma 2.1 to (2.10) we deduce that there exists some r(x) [ε 1/2, ε 1/4 ] such that G(r(x)) 1 ( ) F (ε 1/8 log ) F (r(x)). (2.12) F (ε 1/4 ) On the other hand, by the clearing-out theorem, since B(x, ε1/4 2 ) V ε, we have F (ε 1/4 ) = Ẽε(x, u ε, ε 1/4 ) η 0 log( ε ε ) = 3η 0. (2.13) 1/4 4 Combining (2.12) and (2.13), we deduce the conclusion (2.7). Proof of Lemma 2.1. The argument is by contradiction. If (2.11) were false, we would have f (s) > λf(s) s [a, b], where we have set so that Hence, by integration a contradiction. 2.3 Proof of Theorem 1 λ = 1 b a log d ds (exp( λs)f(s)) > 0 ( ) f(b), f(a) on [a, b]. f(b) > exp( λ(a b))f(a) = f(b), Recall that in this section Ω B 1. First, notice that we may assume throughout that u ε satisfies the energy bound E ε (u ε ) ε β 0, (2.14) where β 0 = α 0 2, α 0 being the constant appearing in Theorem A.1. Indeed, if otherwise E ε (u ε ) ε β 0, then, as already mentioned in the introduction, the conclusion is straightforward, choosing C 0 = 2 β 0. 8
9 We next consider the sets Λ ε = {x B 1/2, dist (x, V ε ) r 0 = ε1/4 2 } and Γ ε = B 1/2 \ Λ ε, so that Λ ε Γ ε = B 1/2. Step 1: bounds for the potential on Γ ε. If x Γ ε, then B(x, r 0 ) B 3/4 \ V ε provided ε is sufficiently small, and we may therefore invoke Corollary 2.2 to assert that V ε (u ε (x)) Cε(1 + Ẽε(u ε, x, r 0 )) 2. (2.15) By monotonicity we have Ẽ ε (u ε, x, r 0 ) Ẽε(u ε, x, r ) CE ε(u ε ). (2.16) Combining (2.15) with (2.16), together with the fact that E ε (u ε ) ε β ε 1/2, we deduce sup V ε (u ε ) Cε 1/2 (1 + E ε (u ε )). (2.17) Γ ε Step 2: integrating the potential on Λ ε. If x Λ ε, then dist (x, V ε ) r 0, so that we may apply Proposition 2.3. Combining (2.7) with the monotonicity formula as above, we deduce B(x,r(x)) V ε (u ε ) C ( e ε (u ε ) log 2 + E ) ε(u ε ). (2.18) B(x,r(x)) We next consider the covering x Λε B(x, r(x)) of Λ ε and apply Besicovitch covering Theorem. This yields a finite set A = {x 1,..., x m } Λ ε such that Λ ε x A B(x, r(x)) and the balls B(x i, r(x i )), i = 1,..., m can be distributed in l families B k, k = 1,..., l of disjoint closed balls, where l is a constant depending only on N. We write m V ε (u ε ) V ε (u ε ) Λ ε B(x i,r(x i )) On the other hand, m i=1 B(x i,r(x i )) i=1 C log e ε (u ε ) ( 2 + E ε(u ε ) l k=1 le ε (u ε ). ) m i=1 B(x i,r(x i )) B k B(x i,r(x i )) B(x i,r(x i )) e ε (u ε ). e ε (u ε ) (2.19) (2.20) 9
10 Combining (2.18), (2.19) and (2.20), we obtain V ε (u ε ) C ( Λ ε E ε(u ε ) log 2 + E ) ε(u ε ), (2.21) Step 3: Proof of Theorem 1 completed. We distinguish two cases. Case A: E ε (u ε ) ε 1/2. It follows from (2.17) that so that the conclusion (1) follows from (2.22) and (2.21). sup Γ ε V ε (u ε ) C E ε(u ε ), (2.22) Case B: E ε (u ε ) ε 1/2. In this case it follows from the clearing-out theorem that if ε is sufficiently small, u ε 1 σ 0 on B 9/10, so that Λ ε =, and Γ ε = B 1/2. The conclusion (1) then follows from Proposition A.2 of the Appendix. Remark 2.2. Let ε < r < 1. The analogue of (1) for the ball B r writes, by scaling, V ε (u ε ) E ( ε(u ε, r) B r/2 log ε log 2 + E ) ε(u ε, r) r r N 2 log ε, (2.23) r where E ε (u ε, r) B r e ε (u ε ) = r N 2 Ẽ ε (u ε, 0, r). Indeed, setting ũ ε ( x) = u ε (r x) for x B 1, we verify that ũ ε is a solution of (GL) ε on B 1, for ε = ε/r. Moreover, we have E ε (ũ ε ) = 1 r E ε(u N 2 ε, r), V ε (ũ ε ) = 1 V B 1 r N 2 ε (u ε ). B r 3 Gradient estimates for the modulus u ε. The aim of this section is to prove Proposition 1. The starting point is the elliptic equation for the function ζ 1 ρ 2 ε 1 u ε 2, ζ + ρ2 ε ε 2 ζ = u ε 2, (3.1) which is a straightforward consequence of (GL) ε. We introduce next a test function χ Cc (B 1 ) such that χ 1 on B 1/2 and χ = 0 on B 1 \ B 3/4. Multiplying (3.1) by χ 2 ζ and integrating by parts, we obtain, after a few standard computations, 1 ζ 2 ζ u ε ζ 2 χ 2. (3.2) 2 B 1/2 B 3/4 B 3/4 10
11 On the other hand, we have the pointwise equality ζ 2 = u ε 2 2 = 4 u ε 2 u ε 2, so that and hence (3.2) yields u ε 2 = 1 4 ζ 2 + ( u ε 2 1) u ε ζ 2 + ζ u ε 2, B 1/2 u ε B 3/4 ζ u ε B 3/4 ζ 2 χ 2. (3.3) To complete the proof of Proposition 1, we apply Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the first integral on the r.h.s. of (3.3). This involves the term u ε L 4 (B 3/4 ), which is handled by the following Lemma 3.1. We have B 3/4 u ε 4 C (1 + 1ε2 B 4/5 V ε (u ε ) where C > 0 is a constant depending only possibly on N. ), (3.4) Comment. The factor ε 2 in (3.4) is somewhat optimal. This can be checked both for vortices and kinks. for vortices, i.e. planar complex solutions of the form u ε = f ε (r) exp(iθ), we have B 3/4 u ε 4 C 3/4 whereas for the standard kink tanh( x 2ε ) we have B 3/4 u ε 4 C ε ε ε 1 r rdr C 4 ε C V 2 ε 2 ε (u ε ), B 1 1 ε dx C 4 ε C V 3 ε 2 ε (u ε ). B 1 Proof of Lemma 3.1. On the ball B 4/5 we decompose the function u ε as u ε v ε +w ε, where w ε is a harmonic function and verifies w ε = u ε on the boundary B 4/5. In view of Proposition 2.1, u ε, and hence w ε are uniformly bounded on B 4/5, so that, since w ε is harmonic, w ε C on B 31/40, (3.5) where C depends only on the dimension N. Turning to v ε, we notice that by construction v ε = 0 on B 4/5, and that v ε = 2 ε V ε(u ε ) 1/2. 11
12 Hence by standard elliptic theory v ε 2 H 2 (B 4/5 ) C ε 2 B 4/5 V ε (u ε ). (3.6) Moreover, since u ε and w ε are uniformly bounded on B 4/5, the same holds for v ε, i.e. v ε L (B 4/5 ) C, (3.7) where C > 0 is depending only on N. We next invoke a classical Gagliardo-Nirenberg type inequality which asserts that v ε 2 L 4 (B 4/5 ) C v ε H 2 v ε L, (3.8) where C depends only on N. An elementary proof of (3.8) may actually be derived as follows. Since v v ε is compactly supported in B 4/5, we may write, for i = 1,..., N, integrating by parts, v xi 4 L 4 (B 4/5 ) = vx 3 i v xi = (vx 3 i ) xi v = 3 v xi x i (v xi ) 2 v (3.9) 3 v xi x i L 2 v xi 2 L 4 v L, which yields (3.8). Combining (3.6), (3.7) and (3.8), we obtain v ε 4 L 4 (B 4/5 ) C ε 2 B 4/5 V ε (u ε ). (3.10) Invoking finally (3.5) together with the decomposition u ε = v ε + w ε we complete the proof of Lemma 3.1. Remark 3.1. In view of the inequality u ε C/ε, we deduce by (3.5) that v ε C/ε on B 3/4. It follows that for any p 4 we have v ε p L p (B 3/4 ) C p V ε p 2 ε (u ε ), B 4/5 and hence, for every p 4, ( ) u ε p 1 C p V B 3/4 ε p 2 ε (u ε ) + 1. (3.11) B 4/5 As in the case p = 4, the exponent ε (p 2) is somewhat optimal. We conjecture actually that inequality (3.11) is true for every p > 2. 12
13 Proof of Proposition 1 completed. We go back to inequality (3.3). In view of Lemma 3.1, we have, by Cauchy-Schwarz inequality The conclusion follows. ζ u ε 2 ζ L 2 (B 3/4 ) u ε 2 L 4 (B 3/4 ) B 3/4 ( C( ε 2 V ε (u ε )) 1/2 1 + ε 2 V ε (u ε ) B 3/4 B 4/5 ( ) C V ε (u ε ) + ε( V ε (u ε )) 1/2. B 4/5 B 4/5 ) 1/2 (3.12) Remark 3.2. Combining Theorem 1 and Proposition 1 we are immediately led to the inequality ( ) u ε 2 Eε (u ε ) C 2 Λ. (3.13) B 1/2 Indeed, as in the proof of Theorem 1 one distinguishes two cases: Case 1: B 4/5 V ε (u ε ) ε 2. In this case ε( B 4/5 V ε (u ε )) 1/2 B 4/5 V ε (u ε ) and the conclusion follows directly from (4). Case 2: B 4/5 V ε (u ε ) ε 2. One concludes in this case using Proposition A.2. Remark 3.3. As in Remark 2.2 we may argue by scaling to assert that, for ε < r < 1, we have u ε 2 + V ε (u ε ) E ( ε(u ε, r) B r/2 log ε log 2 + E ) ε(u ε, r) r r N 2 log ε. (3.14) r Proof of Corollary 1. Let Ω be an arbitrary smooth domain in R N. Let ε 1/2 r 1 and consider a ball B(x, r) Ω. As a direct consequence of (3.14) and the elementary inequality log(2 + E ) log(2 + E)(1 + log r ), it follows that r N 2 B(x,r/2) u ε 2 + V ε (u ε ) Using a covering argument, we deduce {dist(x, Ω) ε 1/4 } C ( log 2 + E ) ε(u ε ) (1 + log r ) e ε (u ε ). (3.15) B(x,r) ( uε 2 + V ε (u ε ) ) 1 + log(dist (x, Ω)) 1 dx CΛ ( Eε (u ε ) On the other hand, ( uε 2 + V ε (u ε ) ) 1+log(dist (x, Ω)) 1 dx E ε(u ε ) C E ε(u ε ). 4 {dist(x, Ω) ε 1/4 } Combining the last two inequalities, the conclusion (5) follows. ). 13
14 4 L p estimates for u ε, p < 2 The purpose of this section is to prove (6) and its improvement (7) stated in Theorem 2. Throughout this section, our arguments follow closely methods introduced in the afore quoted literature. We first decompose the gradient into contributions of phase and modulus, writing (here and in the sequel u u ε ) so that 4 u 2 u 2 = 4 u u 2 + u 2 2, (4.1) 4 u 2 = 4 u u 2 + u (1 u 2 ) u 2. (4.2) For the two last terms on the r.h.s. of (4.2) we invoke our previous estimate (3.13) and (3.12), so that ( ) u u 2 u 2 Eε (u ε ) CΛ, B 1/2 so that, by Hölder inequality, ( ) 1/p ( ( )) 1/p u 2 p + 4( 1 u 2 u 2 ) p/2 Eε (u ε ) C Λ. (4.3) B 1/2 It follows in particular, that if E ε (u ε ) η 1 (where η 1 is the constant appearing ( ( )) 1/p in Theorem A.3 of the Appendix), then since Λ Eε(uε) E ε(u ε) Cp, we deduce ( 4.1 Decomposing u u B 1/2 u 2 p + 4( 1 u 2 u 2 ) p/2 ) 1/p C p E ε (u ε ). (4.4) Recall that the term u u represents essentially the gradient of the phase, 13 and verifies the equation div (u u) = It is convenient to rewrite this equation in the formalism of differential forms 15 d (u du) = 0. (4.5) In order to derive an elliptic system for u du it is useful to consider the Jacobian Ju d(u du) = 2 i<j u x i u xj dx i dx j as well as the truncated quantity J = d(χu du) = χju + dχ (u du), (4.6) 13 Indeed, if u 0, then u = u exp(iϕ) and u u = u 2 ϕ. 14 take the exterior product of (GL) ε with u. 15 d denotes the exterior differential, and d = ± d its formal adjoint. 14
15 where 0 χ 1 denotes a smooth function, compactly supported in B 7/8, and such that χ 1 on B 6/7. Let ψ be the solution of the elliptic equation ψ = J on R N, obtained through convolution with the fundamental solution of the Laplacian. Since d J = 0, it follows that (dψ) = 0, so that dψ = 0 on R N. Hence, we are led to so that dd ψ = dd ψ + d dψ = ψ = J, d(u du d ψ) = 0 on B 6/7. By Poincaré Lemma, there exists some function Φ on B 6/7 such that Moreover, applying d to both sides we deduce By standard elliptic estimates it follows u du = dφ + d ψ on B 6/7. (4.7) Φ = 0 on B 6/7. Φ L (B 5/6 ) C u L 1 (B 6/7 ) + ψ L 1 (B 6/7 ). (4.8) Next, we write ψ = ψ 1 + ψ 2, where ψ 2 is the solution (obtained through convolution with the fundamental solution of the Laplacian) of the equation Clearly, by standard elliptic estimates, ψ 2 = dχ (u du) on R N. ψ 2 L (B 7/8 ) C u L 1 (B 8/9 ). (4.9) At this stage it remains to analyze the term ψ 1, solution of ψ 1 = χju on R N, (4.10) which is the central part of the proofs of inequalities (6) and (7). We begin with the proof of (6). 4.2 Proof of (6) In order to avoid oscillations of u when u 1 we first reproject u. To that aim let f : R + [1, 2] be a function such that f(t) = 1 if t 1/2, f(t) = 1 if t 1/4 and t f 4. Set ũ = f( u ) u on B 1. 15
16 Notice that Jũ = d(f 2 ( u )u du) and 1 f 2 ( u ) C(1 u 2 ). Moreover, a property which is central in the proof is that Jũ C (1 u 2 ) 2 ε 2 = CV ε (u ε ). (4.11) Indeed, if u 1/2, then by construction Jũ = 0. On the other hand, if u 1/2, then V ε (u ε ) 1, whereas Jũ C, as a consequence of estimate (2.4). 64ε 2 ε 2 Let us show next that the difference Jũ Ju is small in a suitable norm. Step 1: comparing Jũ to Ju. We claim that for 1 p < 2, Jũ Ju p W 1,p (B 7/8 ) C pε 2 p E ε (u ε ). (4.12) In particular, if ψ 1 is the solution of ψ 1 = χjũ on R N, then we have, ( ψ 1 ψ 1 ) p C p ε 2 p E ε (u ε ). (4.13) Proof. We have Jũ Ju = d((1 f 2 ( u ))u du), and (1 f 2 ( u ))u du p L p (B 7/8 ) C C C (1 u 2 ) p u p B 7/8 ( ) 1 p (1 u 2 ) 2p 2 2 p E ε (u ε ) p/2 B 7/8 ( B 7/8 (1 u 2 ) 2 Cε 2 p E ε (u ε ), ) 1 p 2 E ε (u ε ) p/2 (4.14) so that (4.12) and (4.13) follow. In order to handle ψ 1, we consider the (vector) measure µ defined by µ = χjũ dx on R N. In view of (4.11) we have µ CχV ε (u ε ) dx on R N. (4.15) Next we consider, for q > 2, the maximal fractional operator (see e.g. [38], p.204) M q µ (x) = sup{r q N µ (B(x, r)), r > 0}, 16
17 Step 2: estimate of M q µ L (R N ). We have, for every q > 2, ( ) Eε (u ε ) M q µ L C q Λ. (4.16) Proof of (4.16). In view of the definition of µ we have, by Theorem 1 ( ) µ (R N Eε (u ε ) ) V ε (u ε ) CΛ. (4.17) B 7/8 Next, for x R N and ε 1/2 r 1/16 we have, by (3.15), µ (B(x, r)) C ( log 2 + E ) ε(u ε ) (1 + log r ) B(x,r) e ε (u ε ). (4.18) Combining (4.18) with the monotonicity formula, we are led to the inequality, for x R N, ε 1/2 r 1/16, ( ) µ (B(x, r)) Cr N 2 Eε (u ε ) (1 + log r )Λ. (4.19) Finally, for small radii 0 < r < ε 1/2, we have the straightforward estimate µ (B(x, r)) χe ε (u ε ) Cr N 2 E ε (u ε ), so that, in this case B(x,r) Combining (4.17), (4.18) and (4.20), (4.16) follows. Step 3: estimate for ψ 1. Recall that r q N µ (B(x, r)) Cε 2 q 2 Eε (u ε ). (4.20) ψ 1 = µ on R N. By Theorem of [38], 16 for every 1 < q 0 < q 1 < N we have µ [W 1,q 1 (R N )] C(q 0, q 1 ) M q0 µ L. By duality, since µ is compactly supported in B 1 it follows ψ 1 L q 1 (B 1 ) C(q 0, q 1 ) M q0 µ L. (4.21) Finally we choose q 1 = p so that q 1 > 2. Choosing q 0 = q 1+2 we have q 2 0 > 2 so that we may estimate the r.h.s. of (4.21) by Step 3. this yields ψ 1 L p (B 1 ) C p Λ ( Eε (u ε ) 16 which goes back to results in [1]. See also related issues in [26, 2, 31]. ). (4.22) 17
18 Step 4: proof of (6) completed. Combining (4.9), (4.13) and (4.22) we obtain ( ) Eε (u ε ) ψ 1 L p (B 6/7 ) C p Λ. (4.23) Combining (4.23) with (4.9), we deduce and hence by (4.8) ψ 1 L p (B 6/7 ) C p (Λ Φ L (5/6) C Going back to (4.7) we are led to u u L p (B 6/7 ) C p (Λ Next we distinguish two cases. ( ) ) Eε (u ε ) + u L 1 (B 8/9 ), ( ( ) ) Eε (u ε ) Λ + u L 1 (B 8/9 ). ( ) ) Eε (u ε ) + u L 1 (B 8/9 ). (4.24) Case 1. E ε (u ε ) η 1, where η 1 is the constant appearing in Theorem A.3 of the Appendix. Then we may apply Theorem A.3, and (6) is an immediate consequence of (A.39). Case 2. E ε (u ε ) η 1. Then (6) follows combining (4.2), (4.3), (4.4) and (4.24). 4.3 Proof of Theorem 2 As mentioned in the introduction, and in view of Theorem A.3 it suffices to consider the case η 1 E ε (u ε ) 2, (4.25) where η 1 is the constant appearing in Theorem A.3. We therefore assume (4.25) holds throughout this section. The main difference with the proof of (6) is the treatment of equation (4.10), and the way we approximate the Jacobian Ju ε. The main new ingredient is an approximation procedure, taken from [13]. The monotonicity formula, which is crucial in the above proof of (6), (see e.g. (4.20)) does not hold however for the approximating map, at least at very small scales. In order to overcome this difficulty we smooth out Ψ using a convolution by a mollifier. More precisely, we introduce a small scale δ 0 of the form ( ) k0 1 δ 0 = δ 0 (ε) =, (4.26) where k 0 > 0 will be determined later. Let ζ a smooth positive function compactly supported in B 1 such that B 1 ζ = 1, and set ζ ε (x) = δ N 0 ζ( x δ 0 ). 18
19 We introduce next the 2-form ψ 1 = ψ 1 ζ ε, so that ψ 1 satisfies the equation ψ 1 = (χju ε ) ζ ε on R N. The first observation is that ψ 1 is close to ψ Comparing ψ 1 to ψ 1 Proposition 4.1. We have so that for any 1 p < 2 we have by interpolation ψ 1 ψ 1 L 1 Cδ 0 E ε (u ε ), (4.27) ψ 1 L 2 + ψ 1 L 2 CE ε (u ε ) 1/2 (4.28) ψ 1 ψ 1 L p C p δ 2 p 1 0 E ε (u ε ) 1/p. (4.29) Proof. Recall that for any function w and 1 p < +, w ζ ε w L p C p δ 0 w L p. (4.30) We apply (4.30) to w = ψ 1, p = 1. To that aim, we claim ψ 1 W 1,1 CE ε (u ε ), (4.31) Proof of the claim: It follows from a result in [23] that if v H 1 (R N ; C), then the Jacobian Jv belongs to the Hardy space H 1, and that Jv H 1 (R N ) C v L 2 (R N ). (4.32) On the other hand, a classical result in harmonic analysis states that if f H 1 (R N ), then 2 ( 1 f) L 1 (R N ) C f H 1 (R N ). (4.33) We apply (4.32) to a suitable extension of u ε to the whole of R N, so that by (4.33) and a few auxiliary computations we deduce 2 ( 1 (χju ε )) L 1 (R N ) u ε L 2 (R N ), and the claim follows. Inequality (4.27) is then a direct consequence of (4.31), whereas for (4.28) we invoke the identity Ju ε = d(u ε du ε ). 19
20 4.3.2 Approximation with vorticity bounds The main result of [13] is Proposition 4.2. Let 0 < γ < 1 and u ε : B 1 C be such that E ε (u ε ) ε γ. There exists constants C > 0 and α > 0 depending only on γ and N such that there exists a smooth function v ε : B 1 C such that where v ε 1, E ε (v ε ) CE ε (u ε ) (4.34) Jv ε L 1 C E ε(u ε ) (4.35) v ε u ε L 2 (B 1 ) Cε α E ε (u ε ) 1/2. (4.36) Notice in particular that if u ε and v ε are as above, then Ju ε = Jv ε + κ ε, (4.37) κ ε dh ε d ((u ε v ε ) d(u ε + v ε )). (4.38) If u ε itself is uniformly bounded, we have the following Lemma 4.1. Assume u ε is as in Proposition 4.2 and verifies moreover Then, for any 1 p < 2, we have where C p > 0 and 0 < α p < 1 depend only on p. u ε 2 on B 1. (4.39) h ε L p C p ε αp E ε (u ε ) 1/p, (4.40) Comment. In the case considered above, Ju ε has been split in a term bounded in L 1 by Eε(uε) and a term which is small in W 1,p, for every 1 p < 2. Proof of Lemma 4.1. Since by (4.34) and assumption (4.39) u ε v ε L 3 it follows by interpolation and (4.36) that, for any r 2, u ε v ε L r (B 1 ) u ε v ε 2/r L 2 (B 1 ) u ε v ε (r 2)/r L (B 1 ) Cε2α/r E ε (u ε ) 1/r. Hence, for 1 p < 2, h ε L p (B 1 ) u ε v ε L 2p/(p 2) (B 1 )E ε (u ε ) p/2 Cε (2 p)α E ε (u ε ), so that the conclusion follows. We provide next a more localized version of Proposition
21 Proposition 4.3. Let 1 p < 2 and assume u ε satisfies (4.25). Let k 1 > 0 and set δ 1 = δ 1 (ε) = k 1. Then we may decompose χju ε as χju ε = ν ε + r ε, where ν ε is compactly supported in B 7/8 and satisfies, for some constant C(k 1 ) > 0 depending only on N and k 1, sup{r 2 N ν ε B(x, r), x R N, r δ 1 (ε)} C(k 1 ) E ε(u ε ), (4.41) and where r ε satisfies, for some 0 < β < 1 depending only on p and k 1, r ε W 1,p (B 1 ) C p ε β E ε (u ε ) 1/p. (4.42) Proof. The argument is to apply Proposition 4.2 on balls of size δ 1 (ε) and then reconnect the resulting functions thanks to a partition of unity. More precisely, cover B 1 by balls B i B(x i, δ 1 (ε)), i = 1,..., l ε such that the balls B(x i, δ 1 /8) do not intersect, and consider a partition of unity {χ i } 1 i lε for the previous covering, i.e. such that χ i is smooth, compactly supported in B(x i, δ 1 ) and moreover χ i C δ 1, (4.43) for some constant C depending only on N. On each ball B i we apply Proposition 4.2 to the restriction of u ε, after a suitable change of scales. This yields maps vε i : B i C such that vε i 1 and and e ε (vε) i C e ε (u ε ), B i B i B i Jv i ε C B i e ε (u ε ) (4.44) u ε v ε 2 L 2 (B i ) Cδ2 1ε 2α B i e ε (u ε ). (4.45) Moreover, for κ i ε = Ju ε Jv i ε = dh i = d ((u ε v ε ) d(u ε + v ε )) we have, for every 1 p < 2, h i L p (B i ) C p δ (2 p)/p 1 ε αp (B i e ε (u ε )) 1/p. (4.46) Setting ν ε = χ( i χ ijv i ε), we may write χju ε = ν ε + r ε, with r ε = χ( l ε i=1 χ i κ i ε) = l ε i=1 d(χχ i h i ε) + l ε i=1 d(χχ i )h i ε. In view of (4.46) and (4.43), we derive (4.42). Concerning ν ε, we have to bound uniformly r 2 N ν B(x,r) ε. Firstly we notice that by (4.44) and the properties of the covering, we have, for sufficiently small ε and r δ 1 (ε) ν ε C χe ε (u ε ), B(x,r) B(x i,8r) 21
22 where χ χ is some smooth function with compact support in B 8/9. Hence, by monotonicity, sup{r 2 N ν ε, r δ 1, x R N } C E ε(u ε ), (4.47) and the proof is complete. B(x,r) We now turn to the measure ν ε = ν ε ζ ε. Lemma 4.2. Assume k 0 = k 1, i.e. δ 0 (ε) = δ 1 (ε). Then we have where the constant C depends only on k 0 = k 1. M 2 ν ε L (R N ) C E ε(u ε ), (4.48) Proof. In view of the definition of ν ε we have, for any y R N, ν ε (y) Cδ0 N ν ε. (4.49) B(x,δ 0 ) In order to bound r 2 N B(x,r) ν ε(y) dy uniformly on R, we distinguish two cases. Case 1: r δ 0. By Proposition 4.2 and (4.49), we have Integrating, we deduce r 2 N B(x,r) Case 2: r δ 0. We write ν ε (y) dy = B(x,r) = ν ε (y) Cδ0 2 E ε (u ε ). ν ε (y) Cr 2 δ0 2 E ε (u ε ) C E ε(u ε ). = B(x,r) B(x,r) B(0,δ 0 ) B(0,δ 0 ) B(0,δ 0 ) B(0,δ 0 ) B(x,r) Cr N 2 E ε(u ε ), ζ ε (z)ν ε (y z)dz dy ζ ε (z) ν ε (y z) dzdy ζ ε (z) ν ε (y z) dydz ( ) ζ ε (z) ν ε (w) dw dz B(x z,r) (4.50) where we invoke Proposition 4.3 for the last inequality. Combining the two cases, the conclusion follows. 22
23 4.3.3 Proof of Theorem 2 completed The main difference with the proof of (6) is that instead of (4.23) we are now in position to use the stronger estimate, if u ε verifies (4.25), ψ 1 L p (B 6/7 ) C p E ε (u ε ). (4.51) When (4.51) is established, then the proof carries out almost verbatim. Proof of (4.51). We determine the constant k 0 in (4.26), going back to (4.29). Indeed, choosing we obtain by (4.29) k 0 = k 1 = (1 2 p )2, ψ 1 ψ 1 L p C p E ε (u ε ). (4.52) Next, we write ψ 1 = ψ ψ 1 1, where ψ 0 1 is the solution obtained by convolution with the fundamental solution of the Laplacian of and where similarly ψ 1 1 solves ψ 0 1 = ν ε on R N, ψ 0 1 = r ε r ε ζ ε on R N. In view of Lemma 4.2 and invoking once more Theorem of [38], we obtain By (4.42) in Proposition 4.2, we deduce ψ 0 1 L p M 2 ν ε L C p E ε (u ε ). (4.53) ψ 1 1 L p C p ε β E ε (u ε ) C p E ε (u ε ), (4.54) so that combining (4.52), (4.53) and (4.54), we obtain (4.51). Appendix In this Appendix we consider the following situation. Consider the unit ball B 1 R N, and u ε a solution to (GL) ε verifying u ε 1 2 on B 1, (A.1) 23
24 or the even more restrictive assumption u ε 1 σ 0, where 0 < σ 0 < 1/2 is some constant which will be introduced later. In particular we may write u ε = ρ ε e iϕε on B 1, (A.2) where ϕ ε is a real-valued function defined on B 1 and ρ ε denotes the modulus u ε of u ε. Our aim is to derive a number of improved estimates, in particular pointwise estimates, under the additional assumption (A.1). This will lead us among other things to the proof of Theorem 2.1. A.1 Pointwise estimates We first have Proposition A.1. Let u ε be a solution of (GL) ε on B 1 verifying (A.1), then u ε 1 Cε 2 (1 + ϕ ε 2 L (B 34 )) on B 1, (A.3) 2 where C > 0 is some constant depending only on N. Proof. The equation for θ ε = 1 ρ ε writes θ ε + aθ ε = b, (A.4) where we have set a = 1 + (1 θ ε) 2 ε 2, b = (1 θ ε ) ϕ ε 2. (A.5) We can conclude applying the maximum principle as in [14], Proposition C.1. Our next purpose is to obtain pointwise bounds for u ε, and hence ϕ ε. To that aim, we introduce a bound on the energy of the form (H α ) E ε (u ε ) ε α, for 0 < α < 1. We then have Theorem A.1. Let u ε be a solution of (GL) ε on B 1. There exist constants 0 < α 0 < 1 and 0 < σ depending only on N such that if (H α 0 ) is satisfied and if u ε 1 σ 0 on B 1, (A.6) then e ε (u ε )(x) C e ε (u ε ), on B 3 4 B 1 where the constant C depends only on N. (A.7) 24
25 Remark A.1. In a more general context, Chen and Struwe [21] (see also [34]) established (A.7) replacing (H α ) by the stronger assumption E ε (u ε ) γ 0, (A.8) where γ 0 > 0 is some constant depending only on N. Our proof of Theorem A.1 will rely on the Chen-Struwe result in an essential way. The main point is to show that (A.8) is met locally, after suitable scalings. Proof of Theorem A.1. Changing u ε possibly by a constant phase, we may impose the additional condition 1 ϕ ε = 0. (A.9) B 1 B 1 Inserting (A.2) into (GL) ε we are led to the elliptic equation div(ρ 2 ε ϕ ε ) = 0 in B 1. (A.10) In contrast with the equation for the modulus, (A.10) has the advantage that the explicit dependence on ε has been removed. We will handle (A.10) as a linear equation for the function ϕ ε, ρ ε being considered as a coefficient. In the sequel, we write ϕ = ϕ ε and ρ = ρ ε when this is not misleading. In order to avoid boundary conditions, we consider the truncated function ϕ defined by ϕ = ϕ χ, where χ is a smooth cut-off function such that χ 1 on B 4 5 The function ϕ then verifies the equation and χ 0 on R N \ B 5. 6 div(ρ 2 ϕ) = div(ρ 2 ϕ χ) + ρ 2 χ ϕ in B 1. (A.11) Moreover, by construction supp( ϕ) B 5. 6 Since by assumption ρ is close to 1, it is natural to treat the l.h.s. perturbation of the Laplace operator, and to rewrite (A.11) as follows of (A.11) as a ϕ = div((ρ 2 1) ϕ) + div(ρ 2 ϕ χ) + ρ 2 χ ϕ in B 5. 6 We introduce the function ϕ 0 defined on B 5 6 as the solution of { ϕ0 = div(ρ 2 ϕ χ) + ρ 2 χ ϕ in B 5, 6 ϕ 0 = 0 on B 5 6. (A.12) In particular, since χ 1 on B( 4 ), we have 5 ϕ 0 = 0 in B( 4 ). (A.13) 5 25
26 We set ϕ 1 = ϕ ϕ 0, i.e. ϕ = ϕ 0 + ϕ 1. We will show that ϕ 1 is essentially a perturbation term. At this stage, we divide the estimates into several steps. We start with linear estimates for ϕ 0. Step 1 : Estimates for ϕ 0. We claim that [ ] ϕ 0 2 L 2 (B 56 ) C 1 e ε (u ε ) B 1 (A.14) and ] ϕ 0 2 L (B 34 ) C 2 e ε (u ε ), (A.15) [B 1 where 2 = 2N N 2 is the Sobolev exponent in dimension N. Proof. The first estimate follows from the linear theory for the Laplace operator, whereas the second follows from the first one and the fact that ϕ 0 is harmonic on B(4/5). Step 2 : The equation for ϕ 1. The function ϕ 1 verifies the elliptic problem { ϕ1 = div((ρ 2 1) ϕ) in B 5, ϕ 1 = 0 6 on B 5. 6 (A.16) It is convenient to rewrite equation (A.16) as ϕ 1 = div((ρ 2 1) ϕ 1 ) + div (g 0 ), (A.17) where we have set g 0 = (ρ 2 1) ϕ 0. Using (A.14) and by assumption (H α0 ) we obtain, for any 2 q < 2, the estimate for g 0 g 0 q L q (B 56 ) Cε(2 α 0) (2 q) 2 e ε (u ε ) q 2 L 1. (A.18) Indeed, since 2 q 2 and ρ C on B 2 q 5, 6 ( ) q ( ) ρ 2 1 q ϕ 0 q 2 2 q ϕ 0 2 ρ q 2 2 q B 56 B 1 B1 C e ε (u ε ) q 2 ( L ε 2(2 q) 1 2 ρ B 1 4ε 2 and the conclusion (A.18) follows. We now estimate ϕ 1 from (A.17) through a fixed point argument. ) 2 q 2, 26
27 Step 3 : The fixed point argument. Equation (A.17) may be rewritten as which is of the form ϕ 1 = T (div((ρ 2 1) ϕ 1 )) + T (div g 0 ), (Id A)ϕ 1 = b where T = 1, A is the linear operator v T (div((ρ 2 1) v)) and b = T (div g 0 ). Consider the Banach space X q = W 1,q 0 (B 5 ). It follows from the linear theory for T 6 that A : X q X q is linear continuous and that A L(Xq) C(q) 1 ρ L (B 56 ). In particular, we may choose the constant σ > 0 in (A.6) such that C(q) 1 ρ L (B(1)) C(q)σ 0 < 1 2. With this choice of σ, we deduce that I A is invertible on X q and Finally, by (A.18) we obtain ϕ 1 Xq C b Xq. (A.19) b Xq = T (div g 0 ) Xq C g 0 L q C ε (2 α 0 )(2 q) q2 e ε (u ε ) 1 2 L. 1 Going to (A.19) we deduce ϕ 1 L q (B 1 ) Cε (2 α 0 )(2 q) 2 q e ε (u ε ) 1 2 L 1 (B 1 ). (A.20) We now combine the estimates for ϕ 0 and ϕ 1. Step 4 : Improved integrability of ϕ. Since α 0 < 2, we obtain, combining (A.14) and (A.20), ϕ L q (B 1 ) Cε (2 α 0 )(2 q) 2 q e ε (u ε ) 1 2 L 1 (B 1 ). (A.21) Comment. Since q > 2, the previous estimate presents a substantial improvement over the corresponding inequality with q replaced by 2, which is immediate. This improvement is crucial in order to prove the smallness of both the modulus and potential terms in the energy, which we derive now. Step 5 : Estimates for the modulus and potential terms. Recall that the function ρ satisfies the equation ρ + ρ ϕ 2 = ρ (1 ρ2 ) ε 2. (A.22) 27
28 Since χ 1 on B 4 5 such that ξ 1 on B 3 4 integrating by parts we obtain B 1 2ρ ρ 2 ξ +, we have ϕ = ϕ on B 4 5 and ξ 0 outside B 4 5 B1 ρ (1 ρ2 ) 2 ε 2 = Hence, since ρ 1 2 on B 1 we obtain ( ρ 2 + V ε (u ε ) Cε ρ 2 B 34 B 1. Let ξ be a non-negative cut-off function. Multiplying (A.22) by (1 ρ 2 )ξ and ρ ξ(1 ρ 2 ) + ρ(1 ρ 2 ) ϕ 2 ξ. B 1 B 1 ) 1 ( 2 B1 + C ) 1 2 V ε (u ε ) B 45 ) 2 q ϕ q (1 ρ 2 ) q B 45 q 2 q 2 q so that using (A.21) we finally infer that B 34 [ uε 2 + V ε (u ε )] Cε βq B 1 e ε (u ε ), (A.23) where β q = (4 2α 0 ) (2 q) 2 q. To summarize, we have proved at this stage that for some r ε 0 which verifies e ε (u ε ) ϕ r ε, r ε Cε βq e ε (u ε ). B 34 B 1 (A.24) (A.25) Step 6 : Proof of Theorem A.1 completed. We are going to apply the result by Chen and Struwe [21] (see Remark A.1) to a suitably scaled version of u ε. Let 0 < r 0 < 1 ε, to be determined later, set ɛ = 8 r 0 and let x 0 B 1 be fixed. 2 Consider the map v ɛ defined on B 1 by v ɛ (x) = u ε ( x x0 r 0 ) so that u ε (x 0 ) = v ɛ (0). By scaling, we have e ɛ (v ɛ ) = 1 e B 1 r0 N 2 ε (u ε ). B(x 0,r 0 ) (A.26) 28
29 Note in particular, since r 0 < 1, that B(x 8 0, r 0 ) B(3/4), and we may invoke the decomposition (A.24) to assert that e ε (u ε ) meas(b(x 0, r 0 ) ) ϕ 0 2 L + r B ε 34 B(x 0,r 0 ) Hence, going back to (A.26) Cr N 0 e ε (u ε ) L 1 (B 1 ) + Cε βq e ε (u ε ) L 1 (B 1 ). B 1 e ɛ (v ɛ ) Cr 2 0 e ε (u ε ) L 1 (B 1 ) + Cr 2 N 0 ε βq e ε (u ε ) L 1 (B 1 ), (A.27) so that, in view of assumption (H α0 ), B 1 e ɛ (v ɛ ) Cr 2 0ε α 0 + Cr 2 N 0 ε βq α 0. (A.28) We next determine the constants q, α 0 and r 0 so that the r.h.s. of (A.28) is less than γ 0. First, we choose q arbitrarily in the interval (2, 2 ), say for instance q = We then notice that, varying r 0, the maximum of r0ε 2 α 0 + r0 2 N ε βq α 0 is achieved for r 0 = ( N 2 2 )1/N ε βq/n, (A.29) so that the r.h.s. of (A.28) is less than Cε 2 βq N α 0. Since β q = (4 2α 0 ) (2 q), we may 2 q choose α 0 sufficiently small so that β q > 0 and 2 βq α N 0 > 0. In particular, for such a choice we have B 1 e ɛ (v ɛ ) γ 0 for ε sufficiently small. We are now in position to apply the Chern-Struwe result described in Remark A.1. This yields, in view of (A.27), r0e 2 ε (u ε )(x 0 ) = e ɛ (v ɛ )(x 0 ) C e ɛ (v ɛ ) B 1 (A.30) Cr0 e 2 ε (u ε ) L 1 (B 1 ) + Cr0 2 N ε βq e ε (u ε ) L 1 (B 1 ), and hence and the proof is complete. e ε (u ε )(x 0 ) C e ε (u ε ), B 1 (A.31) Notice that in the course of the proof, we have shown that the contribution of the modulus to the energy is small: More precisely, inequality (A.23) yields 29
30 Proposition A.2. Let u ε be a solution of (GL) ε on B 1. There exist constants 0 < α 0 < 1 and 0 < σ depending only on N such that if (H α 0 ) is satisfied and if u ε 1 σ 0 on B 1, (A.32) then [ uε 2 + V ε (u ε )] Cε β e ε (u ε ), B 34 B 1 where β > 0 and C depend only on N. (A.33) Remark A.2. Notice that we also have derived under assumption (A.32) a pointwise estimate for the potential in Proposition 2.2. In Theorem A.2 we also derive a pointwise bound for ρ. Proof of Theorem 2.1. Since we have the pointwise inequalities ϕ ε 2 4 u ε 2 8e ε (u ε ), the conclusion of Theorem 2.1 in case R = 1 follows combining (A.7) and (A.3). The general case is deduced by scaling. Finally we derive pointwise estimates for derivatives. More precisely, we have Theorem A.2. Assume that (A.2) and (H α0 ) hold, where α 0 is the constant appearing in Theorem 2.1. Then ρ ε L (B 1/2 ) Cε(1 + E ε (u ε )), (A.34) where C is a constant depending only on N. Proof. We deduce from Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 2.1 that θ ε L (B 5/6 ) Cε 2 (1 + E ε (u ε )), (A.35) where θ ε = 1 ρ ε. Hence, going back to (A.5), we have aθ ε L (B 5/6 ) C(1 + E ε (u ε )), (A.36) so that (A.4), (A.5) and (A.7) yield θ ε L (B 5/6 ) C(1 + E ε (u ε )). (A.37) On the other hand, we have the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality θ ε L (B 1/2 ) C( θ ε L (B 5/6 ) θ ε L (B 5/6 ) + θ ε 2 L (B 5/6 )), (A.38) (see e.g. Lemma A.2 in [6]) and the conclusion follows combining (A.34), (A.35) and (A.38). 30
31 A.2 Higher integrability In the proof of inequality (6) and Theorem 2 we invoke the following Theorem A.3. Let u ε be a solution of (GL) ε on B 1. There exists constants η 1 > 0 and C > 0 such that if E ε (u ε ) η 1, then ( ) 1/2 u 2 C u. (A.39) B 1/2 B 1 Proof. In view of the Clearing-Out property, there exists some constant η 1 > 0 such that, if E ε (u ε ) η 1 (A.40) then u ε 1 σ 0 on B 7/8. For this choice of η 1, we may therefore write on B 7/8 u ε = ρ ε exp(iϕ ε ). Step 1: estimate for the phase. The phase ϕ ε satisfies the equation Expanding the differential operator, we are led to div (ρ 2 ε ϕ ε ) = 0 on B 7/8. (A.41) ϕ ε + c ϕ ε = 0 on B 7/8, (A.42) where we have set c = ρε ρ ε. In view of Theorem A.2, we derive the bound c L (B 7/8 ) Cε 2, so that, by standard elliptic estimates for (A.42) we have ϕ ε L (B 6/7 ) C u ε. B 7/8 (A.43) Step 2: estimate for the modulus. In this step, we will derive similarly the bound ρ ε L 2 (B 1/2 ) C u L 1 (B 1 ) (A.44) which, combined with (A.43) will yield the conclusion. In order to prove (A.44) we distinguish two cases. Case A : u L 1 (B 1 ) 1. This is the easiest case. Let 0 χ 1 be a smooth cutoff function with compact support in B 6/7 and such that χ 1 on B 5/6. Multiplying equation (A.4) by χ 2 θ ε we are led to ( ) θ ε 2 + ε 2 θε 2 C(χ) b L (B 6/7 ) θ ε L (B 6/7 ) + θ ε L (B 1 ) θ ε L (B 6/7 ). B 5/6 31
32 Since θ ε = 1 ρ ε, we have θ ε C by Proposition 2.1, and in view of (A.43) we have b L (B 6/7 ) C u ε 2 L (B 1 ). Hence, we are led to ) θ ε 2 L 2 (B 5/6 ) + ε 2 θ ε 2 L 2 (B 5/6 ) ( u C ε L 1 (B 1 ) u ε 2 L 1 (B 1 ) (A.45) C u ε 2 L 1 (B 1 ) where we have used the assumption u L 1 (B 1 ) 1; the conclusion (A.44) follows in this case. Case B : u L 1 (B 1 ) 1. In view of (A.43) and (A.45), we have u ε L 2 (B 5/6 ) C, and we deduce from Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 2.1 that θ ε L (B 4/5 ) Cε 2. (A.46) In particular, setting α(x) = a(x) 2ε 2 we have α L (B 4/5 ) C. Next, let r (3/4, 4/5). Multiplying (A.4) by 1 and integrating over B r we obtain 2ε 2 θ ε b + B r B θ ε r B r n + C ε 2 θε. 2 B r In particular we may choose some r such that 2ε B 2 θ ε C ( θ ε L 1 (B 1 ) + u ε L 1 (B 1 )) C uε L 1 (B 1 ). r Therefore, we obtain by Sobolev embedding θ ε W 1,1 (B r) C u ε L 1 (B 1 ). (A.47) Going back once more to (A.4), we decompose on B 3/4 the function θ ε as θ ε = θ 0 ε + θ 1 ε, where θ 1 ε is the solution of { θ 1 ε + aθε 1 = b on B 3, 4 θε 1 = 0 on B 3 4 (A.48) so that θ 0 ε verifies the equation Multiplying (A.48) by θ 1 ε, we obtain θε 0 + aθε 0 = 0 on B 3. (A.49) 4 θ 1 ε 2 L 2 (B 3/4 ) + ε 2 θ 1 ε 2 L 2 (B 3/4 ) C u ε 2 L 1 (B 1 ), 32
33 so that θ 1 ε H 1 (B 3/4 ) C u ε L 1 (B 1 ). (A.50) We claim that similarly, we have the estimate for θ 0 ε θ 0 ε L 2 (B 1/2 ) C θ 0 ε W 1,1 (B 3/4 ), (A.51) where the constant C is independent of ε. We postpone the proof of (A.51) and complete the proof of (A.43) in Case B. Combining (A.50) and (A.51), we have ρ ε L 2 (B 1/2 ) θε 1 L 2 (B 1/2 ) + θε 0 L 2 (B 1/2 ) ( ) C u ε L 1 (B 1 ) + θ ε θε 1 W 1,1 (B 3/4 ) ( ) C u ε L 1 (B 1 ) + θ ε W 1,1 (B 3/4 ) + θε 1 H 1 (B 3/4 ) C u ε L 1 (B 1 ) where we have used (A.50) for the third inequality. Inequality (A.43) is therefore established. Proof of the claim (A.51). Let 0 χ 1 be a smooth cut-off function with compact support in B 3/4, and consider the operator L ε = + 2ε 2 on R N. We have, for θε 0,χ = χθε, 0 L ε (θε 0,χ ) = fε χ 2 χ θε 0 + ( χ αχ)θε. 0 (A.52) Notice that for any 1 p +, we have f ε L p (R N ) C(χ) θ 0 ε W 1,p (supp χ). (A.53) The kernel K ε associated to the operator L ε is given by and K ε (x) = c N x 2 N exp( x ε ) if N 3 K ε (x) = c 2 log( x ) exp( x ) if N = 2. ε In particular, we have for any 1 r < N N 1 K ε W 1,r (R N ) C(r), where the constant C(r) is independent of ε. It follows that for every 1 q < p Np N p θε 0,χ W 1,q (R N ) C(χ, q) θε 0 W 1,p (supp χ). We iterate the previous inequality for suitable choices of cut-off functions χ and q = 1, 1, up to q = 2. This yields θ 0 ε H 1 (B 1/2 ) C θ 0 ε W 1,1 (B 1 ). 33
34 References [1] D. ADAMS, A Trace inequality for generalized potentials, Stud. Math. 48 (1973), [2] D. ADAMS, Weighted nonlinear potential theory, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 297 (1986), [3] G. ALBERTI - S. BALDO - G. ORLANDI, Variational convergence of functionals of Ginzburg-Landau type, Indiana Univ. Math. J., to appear [4] L. AMBROSIO - M. SONER, A measure theoretic approach to higher codimension mean curvature flow, Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa, Cl. Sci. 25 (1997), [5] F. BETHUEL - J. BOURGAIN - H. BREZIS - G. ORLANDI, W 1,p estimates for solutions to the Ginzburg-Landau equations with boundary data in H 1/2, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Série I 333 (2001), 1 8. [6] F. BETHUEL - H. BREZIS - F. HÉLEIN, Asymptotics for the minimization of a Ginzburg-Landau functional, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 1 (1993), [7] F. BETHUEL - H. BREZIS - F. HÉLEIN, Ginzburg-Landau vortices, Birkhäuser, Boston, [8] F. BETHUEL - H. BREZIS - G. ORLANDI, Asymptotics for the Ginzburg-Landau equation in arbitrary dimensions, J. Funct. Anal. 186 (2001), Erratum 188 (2002), [9] F. BETHUEL - G. ORLANDI, Uniform estimates for the parabolic Ginzburg- Landau equation, ESAIM C.O.C.V. 9 (2002), [10] F. BETHUEL - G. ORLANDI - D. SMETS, Vortex rings for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 6 (2004), [11] F. BETHUEL - G. ORLANDI - D. SMETS, Convergence of the parabolic Ginzburg-Landau equation to motion by mean curvature, Ann. of Math., to appear [12] F. BETHUEL - G. ORLANDI - D. SMETS, Motion of concentration sets in Ginzburg-Landau equations, Ann. Sci. Fac. Toulouse XIII (2004), [13] F. BETHUEL - G. ORLANDI - D. SMETS, Approximations with vorticity bounds for the Ginzburg-Landau functional, Commun. Contemp. Math., to appear. [14] F. BETHUEL - G. ORLANDI - D. SMETS, Collisions and phase-vortex interactions in dissipative Ginzburg-Landau dynamics, preprint (2004). 34
Improved estimates for the Ginzburg-Landau equation: the elliptic case
Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) Vol. IV (2005), 319-355 Improved estimates for the Ginzburg-Landau equation: the elliptic case FABRICE BETHUEL, GIANDOMENICO ORLANDI AND DIDIER SMETS Abstract.
More informationOn Moving Ginzburg-Landau Vortices
communications in analysis and geometry Volume, Number 5, 85-99, 004 On Moving Ginzburg-Landau Vortices Changyou Wang In this note, we establish a quantization property for the heat equation of Ginzburg-Landau
More informationMean Field Limits for Ginzburg-Landau Vortices
Mean Field Limits for Ginzburg-Landau Vortices Sylvia Serfaty Université P. et M. Curie Paris 6, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions & Institut Universitaire de France Jean-Michel Coron s 60th birthday, June
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationVortex collisions and energy-dissipation rates in the Ginzburg Landau heat flow
J. Eur. Math. Soc. 9, 177 17 c European Mathematical Society 007 Sylvia Serfaty Vortex collisions and energy-dissipation rates in the Ginzburg Landau heat flow Part I: Study of the perturbed Ginzburg Landau
More informationA Ginzburg-Landau approach to dislocations. Marcello Ponsiglione Sapienza Università di Roma
Marcello Ponsiglione Sapienza Università di Roma Description of a dislocation line A deformed crystal C can be described by The displacement function u : C R 3. The strain function β = u. A dislocation
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE BLOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION
DETERMINATION OF THE LOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION y FRANK MERLE and HATEM ZAAG Abstract. In this paper, we find the optimal blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation with a power nonlinearity.
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Harmonic Analysis
JUHA KINNUNEN Harmonic Analysis Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University 27 Contents Calderón-Zygmund decomposition. Dyadic subcubes of a cube.........................2 Dyadic cubes
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationVortex collisions and energy-dissipation rates in the Ginzburg-Landau heat flow
Vortex collisions and energy-dissipation rates in the Ginzburg-Landau heat flow Part I: Study of the perturbed Ginzburg-Landau equation Sylvia Serfaty Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences 5 Mercer
More informationΓ-CONVERGENCE OF THE GINZBURG-LANDAU ENERGY
Γ-CONVERGENCE OF THE GINZBURG-LANDAU ENERGY IAN TICE. Introduction Difficulties with harmonic maps Let us begin by recalling Dirichlet s principle. Let n, m be integers, Ω R n be an open, bounded set with
More informationThe De Giorgi-Nash-Moser Estimates
The De Giorgi-Nash-Moser Estimates We are going to discuss the the equation Lu D i (a ij (x)d j u) = 0 in B 4 R n. (1) The a ij, with i, j {1,..., n}, are functions on the ball B 4. Here and in the following
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationConvergence of the parabolic Ginzburg-Landau equation to motion by mean curvature
Annals of Mathematics, 63 (006), 37 63 Convergence of the parabolic Ginzburg-Landau equation to motion by mean curvature By F. Bethuel, G. Orlandi, and D. Smets* Abstract For the complex parabolic Ginzburg-Landau
More informationDEGREE AND SOBOLEV SPACES. Haïm Brezis Yanyan Li Petru Mironescu Louis Nirenberg. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 13, 1999, 181 190 DEGREE AND SOBOLEV SPACES Haïm Brezis Yanyan Li Petru Mironescu Louis Nirenberg Dedicated to Jürgen
More informationSYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS. M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 12, 1998, 47 59 SYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationSmall energy regularity for a fractional Ginzburg-Landau system
Small energy regularity for a fractional Ginzburg-Landau system Yannick Sire University Aix-Marseille Work in progress with Vincent Millot (Univ. Paris 7) The fractional Ginzburg-Landau system We are interest
More informationUniform estimates for Stokes equations in domains with small holes and applications in homogenization problems
Uniform estimates for Stokes equations in domains with small holes and applications in homogenization problems Yong Lu Abstract We consider the Dirichlet problem for the Stokes equations in a domain with
More informationA NOTE ON ZERO SETS OF FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE POWER OF INTEGRABILITY. 1. Introduction
A NOTE ON ZERO SETS OF FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE POWER OF INTEGRABILITY ARMIN SCHIKORRA Abstract. We extend a Poincaré-type inequality for functions with large zero-sets by Jiang and Lin
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL AND STRANGE TERM FOR A STOKES PROBLEM IN PERFORATED DOMAINS
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 59 Fasc. 2 2002 Nova Série OPTIMAL CONTROL AND STRANGE TERM FOR A STOKES PROBLEM IN PERFORATED DOMAINS J. Saint Jean Paulin and H. Zoubairi Abstract: We study a problem of
More informationAnalysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version
Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version Frank Pacard To cite this version: Frank Pacard. Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version. 3rd cycle. Téhéran (Iran, 2006, pp.75.
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationNonlinear aspects of Calderón-Zygmund theory
Ancona, June 7 2011 Overture: The standard CZ theory Consider the model case u = f in R n Overture: The standard CZ theory Consider the model case u = f in R n Then f L q implies D 2 u L q 1 < q < with
More informationMean Field Limits for Ginzburg-Landau Vortices
Mean Field Limits for Ginzburg-Landau Vortices Sylvia Serfaty Courant Institute, NYU & LJLL, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Conference in honor of Yann Brenier, January 13, 2017 Fields Institute, 2003
More informationMean Field Limits for Ginzburg-Landau Vortices
Mean Field Limits for Ginzburg-Landau Vortices Sylvia Serfaty Courant Institute, NYU Rivière-Fabes symposium, April 28-29, 2017 The Ginzburg-Landau equations u : Ω R 2 C u = u ε 2 (1 u 2 ) Ginzburg-Landau
More informationLIMITING MOTION FOR THE PARABOLIC GINZBURG-LANDAU EQUATION WITH INFINITE ENERGY DATA
LIMITING MOTION FOR THE PARABOLIC GINZBURG-LANDAU EQUATION WITH INFINITE ENERGY DATA DELPHINE CÔTE AND RAPHAËL CÔTE ABSTRACT. We study a class of solutions to the parabolic Ginzburg-Landau equation in
More information2. Function spaces and approximation
2.1 2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1. The space of test functions. Notation and prerequisites are collected in Appendix A. Let Ω be an open subset of R n. The space C0 (Ω), consisting of the C
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter Hölder spaces
Chapter 2 Sobolev Spaces Sobolev spaces turn out often to be the proper setting in which to apply ideas of functional analysis to get information concerning partial differential equations. Here, we collect
More informationHOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION
HOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION STANISLAV HENCL, PEKKA KOSKELA AND JANI ONNINEN Abstract. We show that the inverse of a planar homeomorphism of bounded variation is also of bounded variation. In higher
More informationUniform estimates for Stokes equations in domains with small holes and applications in homogenization problems
Uniform estimates for Stokes equations in domains with small holes and applications in homogenization problems Yong Lu Abstract We consider the Dirichlet problem for the Stokes equations in a domain with
More informationThreshold solutions and sharp transitions for nonautonomous parabolic equations on R N
Threshold solutions and sharp transitions for nonautonomous parabolic equations on R N P. Poláčik School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 Abstract This paper is devoted to
More informationP(E t, Ω)dt, (2) 4t has an advantage with respect. to the compactly supported mollifiers, i.e., the function W (t)f satisfies a semigroup law:
Introduction Functions of bounded variation, usually denoted by BV, have had and have an important role in several problems of calculus of variations. The main features that make BV functions suitable
More informationEverywhere differentiability of infinity harmonic functions
Everywhere differentiability of infinity harmonic functions Lawrence C. Evans and Charles K. Smart Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Abstract We show that an infinity harmonic
More informationESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS. Zhongwei Shen
W,p ESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS Zhongwei Shen Abstract. Let L = div`a` x, > be a family of second order elliptic operators with real, symmetric coefficients on a
More informationThe continuity method
The continuity method The method of continuity is used in conjunction with a priori estimates to prove the existence of suitably regular solutions to elliptic partial differential equations. One crucial
More informationEXISTENCE AND REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
EXISTECE AD REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME OLIEAR PARABOLIC EUATIOS Lucio BOCCARDO 1 Andrea DALL AGLIO 2 Thierry GALLOUËT3 Luigi ORSIA 1 Abstract We prove summability results for the solutions of nonlinear
More informationVANISHING-CONCENTRATION-COMPACTNESS ALTERNATIVE FOR THE TRUDINGER-MOSER INEQUALITY IN R N
VAISHIG-COCETRATIO-COMPACTESS ALTERATIVE FOR THE TRUDIGER-MOSER IEQUALITY I R Abstract. Let 2, a > 0 0 < b. Our aim is to clarify the influence of the constraint S a,b = { u W 1, (R ) u a + u b = 1 } on
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationA Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequality with variable exponent and applications to PDE s
A Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type ineuality with variable exponent and applications to PDE s Mihai Mihăilescu a,b Vicenţiu Rădulescu a,c Denisa Stancu-Dumitru a a Department of Mathematics, University of
More informationu( x) = g( y) ds y ( 1 ) U solves u = 0 in U; u = 0 on U. ( 3)
M ath 5 2 7 Fall 2 0 0 9 L ecture 4 ( S ep. 6, 2 0 0 9 ) Properties and Estimates of Laplace s and Poisson s Equations In our last lecture we derived the formulas for the solutions of Poisson s equation
More informationGINZBURG-LANDAU FUNCTIONALS AND RENORMALIZED ENERGY: A REVISED Γ-CONVERGENCE APPROACH
GINZBURG-LANDAU FUNCTIONALS AND RENORMALIZED ENERGY: A REVISED Γ-CONVERGENCE APPROACH ROBERTO ALICANDRO AND MARCELLO PONSIGLIONE Abstract. We give short and self-contained proofs of Γ-convergence results
More informationNon-radial solutions to a bi-harmonic equation with negative exponent
Non-radial solutions to a bi-harmonic equation with negative exponent Ali Hyder Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC V6TZ2, Canada ali.hyder@math.ubc.ca Juncheng Wei
More informationREMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID
REMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID DRAGOŞ IFTIMIE AND JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. In [Math. Ann. 336 (2006), 449-489] the authors consider the two dimensional
More informationOn non negative solutions of some quasilinear elliptic inequalities
On non negative solutions of some quasilinear elliptic inequalities Lorenzo D Ambrosio and Enzo Mitidieri September 28 2006 Abstract Let f : R R be a continuous function. We prove that under some additional
More informationON MAPS WHOSE DISTRIBUTIONAL JACOBIAN IS A MEASURE
[version: December 15, 2007] Real Analysis Exchange Summer Symposium 2007, pp. 153-162 Giovanni Alberti, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy. Email address:
More informationHamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik
Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik Numerical analysis of a control and state constrained elliptic control problem with piecewise constant control approximations Klaus Deckelnick and Michael
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationMinimization problems on the Hardy-Sobolev inequality
manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Minimization problems on the Hardy-Sobolev inequality Masato Hashizume Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract We study minimization problems on Hardy-Sobolev
More informationOn the distributional divergence of vector fields vanishing at infinity
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 141A, 65 76, 2011 On the distributional divergence of vector fields vanishing at infinity Thierry De Pauw Institut de Recherches en Mathématiques et Physique,
More informationA COUNTEREXAMPLE TO AN ENDPOINT BILINEAR STRICHARTZ INEQUALITY TERENCE TAO. t L x (R R2 ) f L 2 x (R2 )
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2006(2006), No. 5, pp. 6. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) A COUNTEREXAMPLE
More informationSobolev spaces. May 18
Sobolev spaces May 18 2015 1 Weak derivatives The purpose of these notes is to give a very basic introduction to Sobolev spaces. More extensive treatments can e.g. be found in the classical references
More informationExistence of a ground state and blow-up problem for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with critical growth
Existence of a ground state and blow-up problem for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with critical growth Takafumi Akahori, Slim Ibrahim, Hiroaki Kikuchi and Hayato Nawa 1 Introduction In this paper, we
More informationLIFE SPAN OF BLOW-UP SOLUTIONS FOR HIGHER-ORDER SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 21(21), No. 17, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu LIFE SPAN OF BLOW-UP
More informationMixed exterior Laplace s problem
Mixed exterior Laplace s problem Chérif Amrouche, Florian Bonzom Laboratoire de mathématiques appliquées, CNRS UMR 5142, Université de Pau et des Pays de l Adour, IPRA, Avenue de l Université, 64000 Pau
More informationBoundary problems for the Ginzburg-Landau equation
Boundary problems for the Ginzburg-Landau equation David CHIRON Laboratoire Jacques-Louis LIONS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, 4, place Jussieu BC 87, 755 Paris, France E-Mail : chiron@ann.jussieu.fr
More informationUniversité de Cergy-Pontoise. Insitut Universitaire de France. joint work with Frank Merle. Hatem Zaag. wave equation
The blow-up rate for the critical semilinear wave equation Hatem Zaag CNRS École Normale Supérieure joint work with Frank Merle Insitut Universitaire de France Université de Cergy-Pontoise utt = u + u
More informationHeat kernels of some Schrödinger operators
Heat kernels of some Schrödinger operators Alexander Grigor yan Tsinghua University 28 September 2016 Consider an elliptic Schrödinger operator H = Δ + Φ, where Δ = n 2 i=1 is the Laplace operator in R
More informationNONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH MEASURES REVISITED
NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH MEASURES REVISITED Haïm Brezis (1),(2), Moshe Marcus (3) and Augusto C. Ponce (4) Abstract. We study the existence of solutions of the nonlinear problem (P) ( u + g(u)
More informationfor all subintervals I J. If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D J only, we will write ϕ BMO d (J). In fact, the following is true
3 ohn Nirenberg inequality, Part I A function ϕ L () belongs to the space BMO() if sup ϕ(s) ϕ I I I < for all subintervals I If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D only, we will write ϕ BMO
More informationMINIMAL SURFACES AND MINIMIZERS OF THE GINZBURG-LANDAU ENERGY
MINIMAL SURFACES AND MINIMIZERS OF THE GINZBURG-LANDAU ENERGY O. SAVIN 1. Introduction In this expository article we describe various properties in parallel for minimal surfaces and minimizers of the Ginzburg-Landau
More informationMATH 263: PROBLEM SET 1: BUNDLES, SHEAVES AND HODGE THEORY
MATH 263: PROBLEM SET 1: BUNDLES, SHEAVES AND HODGE THEORY 0.1. Vector Bundles and Connection 1-forms. Let E X be a complex vector bundle of rank r over a smooth manifold. Recall the following abstract
More informationPoint topological defects in ordered media in dimension two
Point topological defects in ordered media in dimension two David CHIRON Laboratoire J.A. DIEUDONNE, Université de Nice - Sophia Antipolis, Parc Valrose, 68 Nice Cedex, France e-mail : chiron@math.unice.fr
More informationON SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS IN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS
Chin. Ann. Math.??B(?), 200?, 1 20 DOI: 10.1007/s11401-007-0001-x ON SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS IN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS Michel CHIPOT Abstract We present a method allowing to obtain existence of a solution for
More information2 A Model, Harmonic Map, Problem
ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS JOHN E. HUTCHINSON Department of Mathematics School of Mathematical Sciences, A.N.U. 1 Introduction Elliptic equations model the behaviour of scalar quantities u, such as temperature or
More informationSome lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016
Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.
More informationR. M. Brown. 29 March 2008 / Regional AMS meeting in Baton Rouge. Department of Mathematics University of Kentucky. The mixed problem.
mixed R. M. Department of Mathematics University of Kentucky 29 March 2008 / Regional AMS meeting in Baton Rouge Outline mixed 1 mixed 2 3 4 mixed We consider the mixed boundary value Lu = 0 u = f D u
More informationNECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES
NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES JUHA LEHRBÄCK Abstract. We establish necessary conditions for domains Ω R n which admit the pointwise (p, β)-hardy inequality u(x) Cd Ω(x)
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 9 Oct 2017
A refined estimate for the topological degree arxiv:70.02994v [math.ap] 9 Oct 207 Hoai-Minh Nguyen October 0, 207 Abstract We sharpen an estimate of [4] for the topological degree of continuous maps from
More informationOn Friedrichs inequality, Helmholtz decomposition, vector potentials, and the div-curl lemma. Ben Schweizer 1
On Friedrichs inequality, Helmholtz decomposition, vector potentials, and the div-curl lemma Ben Schweizer 1 January 16, 2017 Abstract: We study connections between four different types of results that
More informationOn the leapfrogging phenomenon in fluid mechanics
On the leapfrogging phenomenon in fluid mechanics Didier Smets Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris Based on works with Robert L. Jerrard U. of Toronto) CIRM, Luminy, June 27th 2016 1 / 22 Single vortex
More informationCompactness in Ginzburg-Landau energy by kinetic averaging
Compactness in Ginzburg-Landau energy by kinetic averaging Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin École Normale Supérieure de Paris AND Benoît Perthame École Normale Supérieure de Paris Abstract We consider a Ginzburg-Landau
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationBLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED
BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED TAOUFIK HMIDI AND SAHBI KERAANI Abstract. In this note we prove a refined version of compactness lemma adapted to the blowup analysis
More informationPropagation of Smallness and the Uniqueness of Solutions to Some Elliptic Equations in the Plane
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 267, 460 470 (2002) doi:10.1006/jmaa.2001.7769, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Propagation of Smallness and the Uniqueness of Solutions
More informationEconomics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions
Economics 24 Fall 211 Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions 1. Determine whether the following sets are open, closed, both or neither under the topology induced by the usual metric. (Hint: think about limit
More informationRegularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian
Regularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian Lan Tang at BCAM Seminar July 18th, 2012 Table of contents 1 1. Introduction 1.1. Background 1.2. Some Classical Results for Local Case 2
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 25 Jul 2012
THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM FOR THE FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN: REGULARITY UP TO THE BOUNDARY XAVIER ROS-OTON AND JOAQUIM SERRA arxiv:1207.5985v1 [math.ap] 25 Jul 2012 Abstract. We study the regularity up to the boundary
More informationNONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS INVOLVING EXPONENTIAL CRITICAL GROWTH IN R Introduction
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 014 (014), No. 59, pp. 1 1. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER
More informationOn m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry
On m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry Ognjen Milatovic Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA. Abstract
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 12 Mar 2009
LIMITING FRACTIONAL AND LORENTZ SPACES ESTIMATES OF DIFFERENTIAL FORMS JEAN VAN SCHAFTINGEN arxiv:0903.282v [math.ap] 2 Mar 2009 Abstract. We obtain estimates in Besov, Lizorkin-Triebel and Lorentz spaces
More informationWave equation on manifolds and finite speed of propagation
Wave equation on manifolds and finite speed of propagation Ethan Y. Jaffe Let M be a Riemannian manifold (without boundary), and let be the (negative of) the Laplace-Beltrami operator. In this note, we
More informationTD M1 EDP 2018 no 2 Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle
TD M EDP 08 no Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle Estimates in the sup-norm I Let be an open bounded subset of R d of class C. Let A = (a ij ) be a symmetric matrix of functions of class
More informationPartial Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces
Partial Differential Equations, nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces Shih-Hsin Chen, Yung-Hsiang Huang 7.8.3 Abstract In these exercises always denote an open set of with smooth boundary. As
More informationESTIMATES OF LOWER CRITICAL MAGNETIC FIELD AND VORTEX PINNING BY INHOMO- GENEITIES IN TYPE II SUPERCONDUCTORS
Chin. Ann. Math. 5B:4(004,493 506. ESTIMATES OF LOWER CRITICAL MAGNETIC FIELD AND VORTEX PINNING BY INHOMO- GENEITIES IN TYPE II SUPERCONDUCTORS K. I. KIM LIU Zuhan Abstract The effect of an applied magnetic
More informationSobolev regularity for the Monge-Ampère equation, with application to the semigeostrophic equations
Sobolev regularity for the Monge-Ampère equation, with application to the semigeostrophic equations Alessio Figalli Abstract In this note we review some recent results on the Sobolev regularity of solutions
More informationat time t, in dimension d. The index i varies in a countable set I. We call configuration the family, denoted generically by Φ: U (x i (t) x j (t))
Notations In this chapter we investigate infinite systems of interacting particles subject to Newtonian dynamics Each particle is characterized by its position an velocity x i t, v i t R d R d at time
More informationComplex Ginzburg-Landau equations in high dimensions and codimension two area minimizing currents
J Eur Math Soc 2, 87 91 c Springer-Verlag & EMS 2000 Erratum Fang-Hua Lin Tristan Rivière Complex Ginzburg-Landau equations in high dimensions and codimension two area minimizing currents J Eur Math Soc
More informationS chauder Theory. x 2. = log( x 1 + x 2 ) + 1 ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. ( 5) x 1 + x 2 x 1 + x 2. 2 = 2 x 1. x 1 x 2. 1 x 1.
Sep. 1 9 Intuitively, the solution u to the Poisson equation S chauder Theory u = f 1 should have better regularity than the right hand side f. In particular one expects u to be twice more differentiable
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter 10
Chapter 1 Sobolev Spaces We now define spaces H 1,p (R n ), known as Sobolev spaces. For u to belong to H 1,p (R n ), we require that u L p (R n ) and that u have weak derivatives of first order in L p
More informationREGULARITY AND COMPARISON PRINCIPLES FOR p-laplace EQUATIONS WITH VANISHING SOURCE TERM. Contents
REGULARITY AND COMPARISON PRINCIPLES FOR p-laplace EQUATIONS WITH VANISHING SOURCE TERM BERARDINO SCIUNZI Abstract. We prove some sharp estimates on the summability properties of the second derivatives
More informationOn some weighted fractional porous media equations
On some weighted fractional porous media equations Gabriele Grillo Politecnico di Milano September 16 th, 2015 Anacapri Joint works with M. Muratori and F. Punzo Gabriele Grillo Weighted Fractional PME
More informationEuler Equations: local existence
Euler Equations: local existence Mat 529, Lesson 2. 1 Active scalars formulation We start with a lemma. Lemma 1. Assume that w is a magnetization variable, i.e. t w + u w + ( u) w = 0. If u = Pw then u
More informationNOTE ON A REMARKABLE SUPERPOSITION FOR A NONLINEAR EQUATION. 1. Introduction. ρ(y)dy, ρ 0, x y
NOTE ON A REMARKABLE SUPERPOSITION FOR A NONLINEAR EQUATION PETER LINDQVIST AND JUAN J. MANFREDI Abstract. We give a simple proof of - and extend - a superposition principle for the equation div( u p 2
More informationRegularity and nonexistence results for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations in convex domains
Regularity and nonexistence results for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations in convex domains Ilaria FRAGALÀ Filippo GAZZOLA Dipartimento di Matematica del Politecnico - Piazza L. da Vinci - 20133
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationNONHOMOGENEOUS ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT AND WEIGHT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 08, pp. 1 1. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NONHOMOGENEOUS ELLIPTIC
More informationCOMBINED EFFECTS FOR A STATIONARY PROBLEM WITH INDEFINITE NONLINEARITIES AND LACK OF COMPACTNESS
Dynamic Systems and Applications 22 (203) 37-384 COMBINED EFFECTS FOR A STATIONARY PROBLEM WITH INDEFINITE NONLINEARITIES AND LACK OF COMPACTNESS VICENŢIU D. RĂDULESCU Simion Stoilow Mathematics Institute
More informationStationary Kirchhoff equations with powers by Emmanuel Hebey (Université de Cergy-Pontoise)
Stationary Kirchhoff equations with powers by Emmanuel Hebey (Université de Cergy-Pontoise) Lectures at the Riemann center at Varese, at the SNS Pise, at Paris 13 and at the university of Nice. June 2017
More informationNONLOCAL DIFFUSION EQUATIONS
NONLOCAL DIFFUSION EQUATIONS JULIO D. ROSSI (ALICANTE, SPAIN AND BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA) jrossi@dm.uba.ar http://mate.dm.uba.ar/ jrossi 2011 Non-local diffusion. The function J. Let J : R N R, nonnegative,
More information