arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 17 Jan 2007

Transcription

1 A covariant Quantum Geometry Model February 27, 2008 arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 17 Jan 2007 Ricardo Gallego Torrome Abstract Caianiello s fundamental derivation of Quantum Geometry through an isometric immersion procedure is reconsidered. In the new derivation, the non-linear connection and the bundle formalism induces a metric in the 4-dimensional space-time manifold M that is covariant under arbitrary local coordinate transformations of M. These models have the intrinsic feature that gravity should be supplied with other interactions, if non-trivial models with imal acceleration are required. This fact can be understood in the general contest of Deterministic Finslerian Models. 1 Introduction The imal proper acceleration of a massive particle in an arbitrary motion has been introduced by Caianiello as a consequence of its re-interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in the contest of Information Theory and System Theory ([1]). The value of the imal acceleration is given in Caianiello s theory by the relation: A := 2mc3 h. (1.1) This value was obtained considering the evolution of a free particle in a flat, torsion-free phase-space and is one notable element of his theory. There are two different interpretations of the formula (1.1). In the first one m is the rest mass of the particle being accelerated. In the second interpretation m is of universal, typically of the order similar to the Planck mass M p. In this case, the order of the imal acceleration coincides with the value obtained from string theory ([2]). Other possibility is considered in [7], where the imal acceleration have an universal value with m the 1

2 mass of the lightest neutrino. Let us note that in all the interpretations the value of the imal acceleration is given in terms of relativistic constants and that it is invariant under arbitrary local coordinate changes. In Quantum Geometry the space-time manifold M is 4-dimensional, the tangent bundle TM is 8-dimensional and the projection π : TM M induces an effective 4-dimensional geometry different from the original metric geometry of M. This can be achieved through an immersion procedure ([3]). As result, the metric of the space-time M is modified from to the new line element ( ds 2 = ds 2 0 = g µν dx µ dx ν, µ,ν = 0,1,2,3 1 + ẍσ (s 0 )ẍ σ (s 0 ) A 2 ) ds 2 0 = λ(x(s 0))ds 2 0, σ = 0,1,2,3. (1.2) g µν (x) is the semi-riemannian space-time metric at the point x TM and ẍ µ are the components of the acceleration at this point, ẍ µ (s 0 ) = d2 x µ. ds 2 0 When it is possible to invert the equation ẋ µ (s 0 ) = y µ (s 0 ), the immersion procedure is an embedding and the metric (1.2) lives in M. Due to the factor λ(x(s 0 )), the metric (1.2) is not invariant under arbitrary coordinate transformations of the space-time manifold M. The aim of this note is to provide a solution to this problem with the minimal geometric content and using standard Differential Geometry methods. First we recall in Section 2 the deduction of equation (1.2) in usual Quantum Geometry. Then, after the introduction of the particular notion of non-linear connection in Section 3, we localize the problem and we show how using this geometric tool it is possible to solve it in Section 4 re-deriving the immersion procedure but using the corrected formalism. In order to provide a general framework for the new formulation, we briefly show the relation with Finslerian Deterministic Systems. A discussion of some implications of the new formulation and its connection with the old one is also done and conclusions are presented in Section 5. 2 Elements of Quantum Geometry Let us consider the 8-dimensional tangent bundle TM. It is endowed with a metric defined by ds 2 = g AB dx A dx B, A,B = 0,...,7 (2.1) 2

3 and where the natural coordinates are defined by ( X A = (x µ,y µ ) = x µ c 2 dx µ ) ;, µ = 0,..,3. A ds 0 The metric g AB is defined in terms of the space-time metric by g AB = g µν g µν. The associated line element in TM can be written as ds 2 = (dx µ dx ν + c4 dẋ µ dẋ ν) g µν, A 2 where it was supposed that the set {dx µ,dẋ µ } = {dx µ,dy µ } is a basis for the dual frame along physical trajectories. The theory of Caianiello is based on the fact that the geometry of the associated Semi-Riemannian cotangent bundle induces a geometric description of Quantum Mechanics where, for instance, the curvature tensor components obtained from the above metric are related with Heisenberg s indeterminacy relations ([1]). Maximal acceleration is obtained as consequence of the geometric approach to Quantum Mechanics. Let us consider the embedding or immersion procedure. It can be performed in the simplest way when the vector field dxµ ds 0, µ = 0,...,3 is given in terms of the coordinates of the particle along its physical trajectory. That means that trajectories are injective curves. This is one assumption in Caianiello and co-workers papers; there is a 1 to 1 correspondence between the values of the parameter s 0 and the value of x(s 0 ). The immersion procedure is then an embedding procedure and it consist on the inversion x(s 0 ) s 0 (x). However, we should note that in general, trajectories are not injective and that the above procedure to invert is not complete. Intersections, implies higher order knowledge of the trajectory, just implying intrinsic Finsler or generalized metric for the metric metric of M: (x(s 0 ),ẋ(s 0 )) s 0 (x,ẋ). For a particle of mass m, the line element is reduced to (1.2) (modulo a possible Finslerian character of the distance s 0 ). The associated metric components are ( g µν = 1 + ẍσ ẍ ) σ A 2 g µν, (2.2) which depends on the squared length of the space-time 4-acceleration ẍ 2 := g µν ẍ µ ẍ ν. The term h µν = ẍσ ẍ σ A 2 g µν is called the quantum correction, because it vanishes when h goes to zero. 3

4 3 The Non-Linear Connection In this section we introduce the mathematical notions and tools that we need in order to formulate in a covariant way Caianiello s Quantum Geometry Model. The reference for basic Finsler Geometry that we use for notation is [4], adapting definitions and notions to the semi-definite case. Definition 3.1 A semi-finsler structure F defined on the n-dimensional manifold M is a real function F : TM [0, [ such that it is smooth in the split tangent bundle N = TM\{0}, F(x,λy) = λf(x,y) for every λ > 0 and the Hessian matrix is semi-positive definite in N. g µν (x,y) is the matrix of the fundamental tensor. g µν (x,y) := 1 2 F 2 (x,y) 2 y µ y ν (3.1) Definition 3.2 Let (M,F) be a semi-finsler structure and (x,y,u) a local coordinate system on TM. The Cartan tensor components are defined by the set of functions, A µνρ = F 2 g µν, µ,ν,ρ = 1,...,n. (3.2) yρ The components of the Cartan tensor are zero if and only if the semi-finsler structure (M,F) is semi-riemannian. There is a non-linear connection in the manifold N. First, the non-linear connection coefficients are defined by the formula N ν µ F = y ρ γµ νρ F Aµ νρ γρ rs y r F y s F, µ,ν,ρ,r,s = 1,...,n. The coefficients γ µ νρ are defined in local coordinates by γ µ νρ = 1 2 gµs ( g sν x ρ g ρν x s + g sρ x ν ), µ,ν,ρ,s = 1,...,n; A µ νρ = g µl A lνρ and g µl g lν = δ µ ν. Using these coefficients one obtains a splitting of TM. Let us consider the local coordinate system (x,y) of the manifold TM. Consider an open set U N. The induced tangent basis for T u N is { δ δx 1 δ u,..., δx n u,f y 1 u,...,f y n u}, 4 δ δx ν u = x ν u N ν µ y µ u.

5 The set of local sections { δ δ δx 1 u,..., δx n u, u U} generates the local horizontal distribution H U while { y 1 u,..., y n u,u U} the vertical distribution V U. The subspaces V u and H u are such that the splitting of T u N holds: T u N = V u H u, u U. This decomposition is invariant by the right action of GL(2n,R). The corresponding dual basis in the dual vector bundle T N is {dx 1,...,dx n, δy1 δyn,..., F F }, δy µ F = 1 F (dyµ + N ν µ dx ν ). This covariant splitting is equivalent to the existence of the non-linear connection, related with a connection in the sense of Ehresmann ([5]). In order to clarify this point, let us introduce the semi-riemannian metric in N ( δy g AB = g µν dx µ dx ν µ + g µν F δyν ) F (3.3) known as Sasaki-type metric. With respect to this metric, the horizontal subspace spanned by the distributions { δ δx, µ = 1,...,n} is orthogonal respect µ the distribution developed by { y, µ = 1,...,n}. µ 4 Covariant Quantum Geometry In order to investigate the differential geometry of the semi-finslerian bundle (TM,g AB ), we must first note that the distribution {(dx µ,dy µ ), µ = 0,...3} do not form a consistent basis of T un for a general non-flat space. The problem is localized in the second half {dy µ, µ = 0,...3}; under local coordinate transformations of M, the induced transformation rules are given by, d x µ = xµ x ρ dxρ, dỹ µ = xµ x ν dyν + 2 x µ x ν x ρyν dx ρ. Therefore the non-covariance problem is at the begin of the construction: the basis {(dx µ,dy µ ), µ = 0,...,3} is not convenient to describe differential forms and produces non-covariant results. We think that it is the reason why the embedding procedure in Caianiello s model does not produce a covariant result (apart from the correct inversion procedure, which can be solve as was shown in section 2). In order to solve this problem we propose to consider the analogous construction as in Caianiello s model but using the basis (3.2). Let us start 5

6 with the definition of the metric in N. In a similar way as in Caianiello s model, we consider the Sasaki type metric in N dl 2 = g µν dx µ dx ν + ( ) 2 g µν δy µ δy ν, A It is because the existence of the non-linear connection, represented by the above splitting of TN that this construction have an invariant meaning. This metric can be expressed at the point u N as c 2 dl 2 u = ds 2 + ( ) 2 g µν (N ρ µ A Nν ξ dxρ dx ξ + dy µ Nρ ν dxρ + dy ν N ρ µ dxρ ). From this metric structure in N we obtain a metric structure (in general it could be Finslerian) in the space-time manifold M. Using the standard pull-back of differential forms; the canonical projection π : TM M induces π u (dx µ p ) = dx µ u, with u π 1 (p) TM. Let us recall that ds 2 0 = g µν(x)dx µ pdx ν p. Then, ds 2 0 c 2 ( dy µ dy ν ) = dy µ dy ν. ds 0 ds 0 When the constraint y µ = dxµ ds 0 = ẋ µ is imposed and replacing dx µ u by dx µ p, the metric (3.3) induces an embedding in M given by ( dlp 2 = ds ( c 2 ) ) ( c 2 ) 2(N 2ẍσẍ µ σ + g µν (x) A A ρ Nξ ν dxρ dx ξ + ) +dẋ µ Nρ ν dxρ + dẋ ν N ρ µ dxρ ). Therefore the new space-time metric can be written as ( ( c dlp 2 2 ) ) = ds (ẍσẍ σ + g µν (N ρ µ A Nν ξ ẋρ ẋ ξ + ẍ µ Nρ ν ẋρ + ẍ ν N ρ µ ẋρ )). Let us denote the quantum contributions by h 1 = ds 2 0 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 2gµν 2(ẍσẍ σ ), h 2 = ds 2 0 (N ρ µ A A Nν ξ ẋρ ẋ ξ + +ẍ µ N ν ρ ẋρ + ẍ ν N µ ρ ẋρ ). (4.1) When both contributions are comparable, one must expect h 1 h 2 (in module). In the case of Riemannian structure, the Cartan tensor is zero 6

7 and the non-linear connection is reduced to N µ ν = γ µ νρy ρ. Then the above condition can be expressed as a differential equation, ẍ µ + kγ µ νρẋν ẋ ρ = 0, µ,ν,ρ = 0,...,3 and where factor k is of order 1 when h 1 h 2. Conversely, when the motion is classical in the space-time M, both quantum corrections have exactly the same size, although then h 1 = h 2 and the metric is the initial one g. In this case k = 1. We obtain that, for semiclassical particles, the new correction h 2 is so important as h 1 or at least of the same order, producing a natural almost cancelation of the quantum geometry corrections. Nevertheless, for pure quantum particles this is not necessary and a strong difference can appear between them. It seems therefore the existence of a link between gravity (described the connection) and the appearance of classical evolution. For flat phase-space models ([1]), there is a local coordinate system where the connection coefficients are zero, recovering the original Caianiello s flat model: dl 2 = ds 2 0 (1 + h 1 + h 2 ) dl 2 = ds 2 0 (1 + h 1) with metric coefficients g µν = (1 + ( 1 A ) 2ẍσẍ σ )η µν, being η µν the Minkowski metric. This is the typical metric tensor appearing in flat Quantum Geometry. Therefore, the predictions and corrections coming from this particular model are also maintained in ours. However important deviations could happen in the case of a curved space-time manifold. On the other hand, from the expression (4.1), following an easy calculation, one obtains the general formula: ds 2 = (1 + Dµ ẋd µ ẋ A 2 )ds 2 0. (4.2) For Berwald spaces with a linear connection D, the geodesic is just given by (D µ ẋ) σ = ẍ σ + N σ ρ ẋ = ẍσ + γ σ νρẋρ ẋ ν = 0. From here, follows our main result, 7

8 Theorem 4.1 Consider a Finsler structure such that the geodesics of an associated connection are defined by the expression ẍ σ + N σ ρ ẋ ρ = 0. Then, or the particles follow a non-geodesic evolution or the geometry induced from the Quantum Geometry is the same as the initial geometry. This result implies that a coherent, non-trivial Quantum Geometry will imply departures from pure gravity. Unification and conjunction with other non-geometric interaction, implying geodesic deviation, are required. One possible general scheme for imal acceleration is Deterministic Finslerian Models ([6]). In these models, imal acceleration is contained in a general phase space, as well as a imal speed. But the motion of the fundamental degrees of freedom is not geodesic and a natural division of gravity and the rest of interactions arise at the average level. 5 Conclusions The approach advocated in this note to Quantum Geometry has shown that the non-linear connection, in both Finslerian and Riemannian frameworks, can play an important role in the foundations of the theory and in some of the predictions of the Quantum Geometry model in the case of non-zero curvature. These deviations from standard Quantum Geometry are not negligible and are in principle so large as the original corrections of Caianiello s model. For instance, semi-classical condition requires small deviations from classical evolution and therefore h 1 h 2. Corrections coming from the non-linear connection terms could be also important for the modified Schwarzschild geometry and for the study of neutrinos oscillations in this framework and Kerr spaces([8],[9]). In addition, important changes can also be produced in the astrophysical and cosmological consequences of imal acceleration ([10],[11]). However, in the case of flat space models, these new corrections h 2 disappear and no new corrections must be added to the original Quantum Geometry model. Quantum Geometry must be considered as coming from an unified framework, if a consistent general covariant model is required. This is also understandable because the existence of a imal acceleration is unnatural only with gravity. However with other interactions, in a unification scheme, imal acceleration could be in harmony with the absence of singularities. 8

9 References [1] E.R. Caianiello,Quantum and Other Physics as Systems Theory, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, Vol 15, Nr 4, [2] R. Parentani and R. Potting, Accelerating Observer and the Hagedorn Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.63(1989), 945; M.J. Bowick and S.B. Giddins, High-Temperature Strings, Nucl. Phys. B 325(1989), 631. [3] E.R. Caianiello, A. Feoli, M. Gasperini, G. Scarpetta, Int. Journal of Theor. Physics, 29, 131, (1990). [4] D. Bao, S.S. Chern and Z. Shen, An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 200, Springer-Verlag. [5] S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol I, Wiley Intersciencie, New York (1969). [6] R. Gallego, A Finslerian version of t Hooft Deterministic Quantum Models, J. Math. Phys. 47, (2006). [7] R. Gallego On the Maximal Universal Acceleration in Deterministic Finslerian Models, gr-qc/ [8] V. Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase, G. Scarpetta, Neutrino Oscillations in Caianiello s Quantum Geometry Model, Int. Jour. Theo. Phys. Vol 40 (2001), 849. [9] V. Bozza, A. Feoli, G. Lambiase, G. Papini, G. Scarpetta, Maximal acceleration in Kerr Space, Physics Letters A 283 (2001), 53. [10] G. Papini, G. Scarpetta, V. Bozza, A. Feoli, G. Lambiase, Radiation bursts from particles in the field of compact, impenetrable, astrophysical objects, Physics Letters A 300 (2002), 603. [11] S. Capozziello, G. Lambaise and G. Scarpetta, Cosmological perturbations in singularity-free deflationary models, Il Nuovo Cimento, Vol 114 B, Nr. 1 (1999), 93. [12] S. Vacaru, P. Stavrinos, E. Gaburon and D. Gonta, Clifford and Riemannian-Finsler Structures in Geometric Mechanics and Gravity, Geometry Balkan Press, 2005, gr-qc/