Locally Convex Vector Spaces II: Natural Constructions in the Locally Convex Category
|
|
- Rosanna Todd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LCVS II c Gabriel Nagy Locally Convex Vector Spaces II: Natural Constructions in the Locally Convex Category Notes from the Functional Analysis Course (Fall 07 - Spring 08) Convention. Throughout this note K will be one of the fields R or C, and all vector spaces are over K. This section is divided into two parts. In the first part we review those general constructions from TVS II and we see that those fit nicely within the framework of locally convex spaces. In the second part we introduce some new constructions, that are analogous to some standard ones from Topology (push-forwards and direct sums), but were not available in the general framework of linear topologies (see the discussion at the end of TVS II). As it turns out, Theorem 1 from LCVS I will be an essential ingredient in these constructions. The first construction in TVS II was the quotient topology, for which we now have the following result (see Proposition-Definition 1 from TVS II for notations): Proposition 1. If is a locally convex vector space and Y is a linear subspace, then, when equipped with the quotient topology, the quotient space /Y is also locally convex. Proof. Let π : /Y denote the quotient map. Start with some neighborhood V of 0 in /Y, and let us indicate how to construct an open convex set B /Y, with 0 A V. First of all, since V is a neighborhood of 0 and π is continuous, the pre-image π 1 (V) will be a neighborhood of 0 in. Secondly, since is locally convex, there exists an open convex set A, with 0 A π 1 (V). Now we are done, by taking B = π(a), which is convex and open (since π is open). The next construction from TVS II was the joint pull-back (see Proposition-Definition 3 from TVS II for notation and terminology). Proposition 2. Suppose (Y i ) i I is a family of locally convex vector spaces, and a vector space is given, together with a system Ψ = ( Y i ) i I of linear maps. Let T be the topology obtained as the joint Ψ-pull-back, that is, T is the weakest among all topologies on, that make all maps ψ i : Y i continuous. Then T is locally convex. Proof. We know from the construction joint pull-back that S = i I ψ i { ψ 1 (A) : A open in Y i } constitutes a sub-base for T. As in the previous proof, we start with some T-neighborhood V of 0 in, and we wish to construct some convex T-open subset B in, with 0 B V. 1
2 Since S defined above is a sub-base, there exists a set S, which is a finite intersection of sets in S, such that 0 S V. In other words, there exist indices i 1,..., i n I, and open sets A k ik, k = 1,..., n, such that 0 ψ 1 (A k ) V. Obviously, since the ψ ik s are linear, each A k is an open neighborhood of 0 in ik, so by local convexity, for each k = 1,..., n, there exists an open convex set C k in ik, with 0 C k A k. By linearity, the sets ψ 1 (C k ) ψ 1 (A k ) are then convex and T-open, and so will be their intersection B = ψ 1 (C k ) ψ 1 (A k ) V, which is also a neighborhood of 0. Example 1. Suppose (Y, T) is locally convex, and Y is a linear subspace. If we apply the (joint) pull-back construction to the collection consisting of a single map the inclusion ι : Y we obtain the induced topology T = {A : A T-open }, which is again locally convex. We also know that if T is Hausdorff, then so is T. Example 2. If we start with a collection ( i ) i I of locally convex spaces, the product topology on = i I i is constructed as the joint Π-pull-back, where Π = ( π i i ) i I are the coordinate maps. By Proposition 2, the product topology is locally convex. Moreover, is Hausdorff, when equipped with this topology, if and only if all the i are (see TVS II). As noticed in TVS II (the end comments) one important construction from Topology does not carry on directly to the case of linear topologies. As we shall shortly see, it is possible to correct this deficiency if we work with locally convex topologies. Theorem-Definition 1. Suppose ( i ) i I is a family of locally convex vector spaces, and a vector space Y is given, together with a system Φ = ( i Y)i I of linear maps. Let { C = C Y C balanced, absorbing, convex (C) neighborhood of 0 in i, i I φ 1 i φ i }. (1) (i) There exists a unique locally convex topology T on, which has C as a fundamental system of neighborhoods for 0. (ii) T (defined above) is the strongest among all locally convex topologies on, that make all maps φ i : i Y continuous. (iii) Given a locally convex space space Z, a linear map θ : Y Z is continuous relative to T (defined above), if and only if all the compositions θ φ i : i Y are continuous. The topology T is referred to as the joint locally convex Φ-push-forward topology. 2
3 Proof. (i). By linearity of the φ i s and the definition of C, it is quite obvious that C C, then εc C, ε > 0, so the existence and uniqueness of T follows immediately from Theorem 1 from LCVS I. (ii). Let us show first that all φ i : i Y, i I are T-continuous. By linearity we only need to show that φ i is continuous at 0. Since C is a fundamental system of T-neighborphoods of 0, all we need is the fact that, for each C C, the pre-image φ 1 i (C) is a neighborhood of 0, for each i I. But this is trivial by construction. Let S be another locally convex topology on Y, which makes all the φ i s continuous, and let us prove the inclusion S T. Start with some S-open set A, and let us show that A is also T-open. To get this, we are going to prove that ( ) A is a T-neighborhood of every one of its points. Fix some a A. Since A is S-open, there exists some convex, balanced, S-open set C, such that C + a A. (2) Since all φ i : i Y are continuous with respect to S, it follows that φ 1 i (C) is open in i, ini. Therefore, by (1), C belongs to C. In particular C is a T-neighborhood of 0, so by (2), A is indeed a T-neighborhood of a. (iii). Let Z be a locally convex space, and let θ : Y toz be linear. Assume first θ is T-continuous. Then by (ii) the compositions θ φ i, i I, are continuous. Conversely, assume all these compositions are continuous, and let us prove that θ is T-continuous. Let S be the θ-pull-back of the topology from Z, that is S = {θ 1 (A) : A open in Z}. (3) By Proposition 2, S is a locally convex topology on Y. Notice that, by construction, if we start with some B S, written as B = θ 1 (A), for some open set A Z, we have φ 1 i (B) = (θ φ i ) 1 (A), so by our assumption, it follows that φ 1 i (B) is open in i, for every i I. In other words, S is a locally convex topology on Y, which makes all the φ i s continuous, so by (ii) we must have the inclusion S T. But now (3) yields which means that θ is indeed continuous. θ 1 (A) T, for every open set A Z, Example 3. The above construction is interesting even in the case when the system Φ consists of a singleton, that is, we start with one linear map φ : Y and with a locally convex topology S on. If we apply the locally convex push-forward, we get a locally convex topology T, which is the strongest among all locally convex topologies on Y which makes φ continuous. The reader is warned that there exists another topology (not necessarily locally convex!) which is the strongest topology that makes φ continuous, namely the topological push-forward φ S = {A Y : φ 1 (A) S}. 3
4 In general one only has the inclusion T φ S. (Any set A disjoint from φ( ) is in φ S, but not all such A s are in T. For instance A can be a singleton!) Exercises With the notations as in the Example above, prove that φ S = T, if and only if φ is surjective. (In this case T is just the quotient topology.) 2. Suppose (, S) is locally convex, and is contained as a linear subspace in a (bigger) vector space Y. Let T be the locally convex topology on obtained by the locally convex (single) push-forward described in Example 3, using the inclusion map φ : Y, so that by construction T is the strongest locally convex topology on Y such that T S. (i) Show there exists a locally convex topology T 0 on Y, such that T 0 = S. Conclude that T = S. (ii) Show that, if S is Hausdorff, then so is T. Example 4. Let ( i ) i I be a collection of locally convex spaces and consider their direct sum 1 = i I i, described as the vector space of all I-tuples x = (x i ) i I i I i, for which the support set supp x = {i I : x i 0} is finite. For every i, j I, let φ ij : i j be either the identity (if i = j), or the zero (if i j) map. Using these maps we then define the standard inclusions φ i : i by φ i (x) = ( φ ij (x) ) j I, x i. The locally convex joint push-forward topology on, associated with the system Φ = (φ i ) i I is called the locally convex sum topology. Exercises 3-7. Let ( i ) i I,, and φ i : i be as above, and let T sum denote the locally convex sum topology. Denote the product space i I i by Y, and let T prod denote the product topology. 3. Prove that T prod T sum. Conclude that, if all the i are Hausdorff, then so is. 4. Assume, for each i I, an open set A i i is given, and let A = i I A i Y. (i) Show that A T sum. (i) Show that, if A i i, for infinitely many i s, then A T prod. Therefore, it this case, one has a strict inclusion T prod T sum 5. Suppose (E i ) i I is another collection of locally convex spaces. Let E = i I E i be equipped with the locally convex sum topology T sum, and let the product space F = i I E i be equipped with the product topology T prod. Show that, if for every i I a linear continuous map φ i : E i i is given, then (i) the product map φ = i I φ i : (F, T prod ) (Y, T prod ) is continuous; 1 See TVS II. 4
5 (ii) the restriction φ E : (E, T sum ) (, T sum ) is also continuous. 6. Define, for every subset J I, the set (J) = {(x i ) i I i I i : x i = 0, i J}. (i) Show that, when we equip (J) with the induced topology T sum (J) and the sum j J j with the locally convex sum topology, the obvious linear isomorphism (J) j J j is a homeomorphism. (ii) Show that, if all i are Hausdorff, then (J) is a closed linear subspace both in (, T sum ) and in (Y, T prod ). (iii) Show that the restriction map R J : i I i (x i ) i I (x j ) j J j J j is continuous. 7. Show that, when I is finite, in which case = Y, the two topologies T sum and T prof coincide. 5
Topological Vector Spaces III: Finite Dimensional Spaces
TVS III c Gabriel Nagy Topological Vector Spaces III: Finite Dimensional Spaces Notes from the Functional Analysis Course (Fall 07 - Spring 08) Convention. Throughout this note K will be one of the fields
More informationBanach Spaces II: Elementary Banach Space Theory
BS II c Gabriel Nagy Banach Spaces II: Elementary Banach Space Theory Notes from the Functional Analysis Course (Fall 07 - Spring 08) In this section we introduce Banach spaces and examine some of their
More informationBanach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies
BS V c Gabriel Nagy Banach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies Notes from the Functional Analysis Course (Fall 07 - Spring 08) In this section we discuss two important, but highly non-trivial,
More informationMATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION. Problem 1
MATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION ELEMENTS OF SOLUTION Problem 1 1. Let X be a Hausdorff space and K 1, K 2 disjoint compact subsets of X. Prove that there exist disjoint open sets U 1 and
More informationINVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS
INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS BRIAN OSSERMAN We discuss the inverse limit construction, and consider the special case of inverse limits of finite groups, which should best be considered as topological
More information2. The Concept of Convergence: Ultrafilters and Nets
2. The Concept of Convergence: Ultrafilters and Nets NOTE: AS OF 2008, SOME OF THIS STUFF IS A BIT OUT- DATED AND HAS A FEW TYPOS. I WILL REVISE THIS MATE- RIAL SOMETIME. In this lecture we discuss two
More informationMath 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group. and by the product formula it lies in the kernel (A K )1 of the continuous idelic norm
Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group 1. Introduction Let K be a global field, so K is naturally a discrete subgroup of the idele group A K and by the product formula it lies in the kernel
More informationHomework 3 MTH 869 Algebraic Topology
Homework 3 MTH 869 Algebraic Topology Joshua Ruiter February 12, 2018 Proposition 0.1 (Exercise 1.1.10). Let (X, x 0 ) and (Y, y 0 ) be pointed, path-connected spaces. Let f : I X y 0 } and g : I x 0 }
More informationMethods of constructing topological vector spaces
CHAPTER 2 Methods of constructing topological vector spaces In this chapter we consider projective limits (in particular, products) of families of topological vector spaces, inductive limits (in particular,
More information(c) For each α R \ {0}, the mapping x αx is a homeomorphism of X.
A short account of topological vector spaces Normed spaces, and especially Banach spaces, are basic ambient spaces in Infinite- Dimensional Analysis. However, there are situations in which it is necessary
More information10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.
10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10.1. The concept of a Lie subgroup of a Lie group. We have seen that if G is a Lie group and H G a subgroup which is at the same time a
More informationF 1 =. Setting F 1 = F i0 we have that. j=1 F i j
Topology Exercise Sheet 5 Prof. Dr. Alessandro Sisto Due to 28 March Question 1: Let T be the following topology on the real line R: T ; for each finite set F R, we declare R F T. (a) Check that T is a
More informationMath General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions
Math 535 - General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions Problem 1. (Willard Exercise 19B.1) Show that the one-point compactification of R n is homeomorphic to the n-dimensional sphere S n. Note that
More informationCW complexes. Soren Hansen. This note is meant to give a short introduction to CW complexes.
CW complexes Soren Hansen This note is meant to give a short introduction to CW complexes. 1. Notation and conventions In the following a space is a topological space and a map f : X Y between topological
More information1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3
Index Page 1 Topology 2 1.1 Definition of a topology 2 1.2 Basis (Base) of a topology 2 1.3 The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3 1.4 Basic topology concepts: limit points, closed sets,
More informationGeometry 2: Manifolds and sheaves
Rules:Exam problems would be similar to ones marked with! sign. It is recommended to solve all unmarked and!-problems or to find the solution online. It s better to do it in order starting from the beginning,
More informationCHAPTER 7. Connectedness
CHAPTER 7 Connectedness 7.1. Connected topological spaces Definition 7.1. A topological space (X, T X ) is said to be connected if there is no continuous surjection f : X {0, 1} where the two point set
More informationNOTES IN COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PART 2
NOTES IN COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PART 2 KELLER VANDEBOGERT 1. Completion of a Ring/Module Here we shall consider two seemingly different constructions for the completion of a module and show that indeed they
More informationTopology Final Exam. Instructor: W. D. Gillam Date: January 15, 2014
Topology Final Exam Instructor: W. D. Gillam Date: January 15, 2014 Instructions: Print your name and Topology Final Exam in the upper right corner of the first page. Also be sure to put your name in the
More informationTOPOLOGY TAKE-HOME CLAY SHONKWILER
TOPOLOGY TAKE-HOME CLAY SHONKWILER 1. The Discrete Topology Let Y = {0, 1} have the discrete topology. Show that for any topological space X the following are equivalent. (a) X has the discrete topology.
More informationMath 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008
Math 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008 Closed sets We have been operating at a fundamental level at which a topological space is a set together
More informationGenerell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 6, 2013
Generell Topologi Richard Williamson May 6, 2013 1 5 Tuesday 29th January 5.1 Limits points, closure, boundary continued Definition 5.1. Let (X, O X ) be a topological space, and let A be a subset of X.
More informationVARIETIES OF ABELIAN TOPOLOGICAL GROUPS AND SCATTERED SPACES
Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 78 (2008), 487 495 doi:10.1017/s0004972708000877 VARIETIES OF ABELIAN TOPOLOGICAL GROUPS AND SCATTERED SPACES CAROLYN E. MCPHAIL and SIDNEY A. MORRIS (Received 3 March 2008) Abstract
More informationMath 637 Topology Paulo Lima-Filho. Problem List I. b. Show that a contractible space is path connected.
Problem List I Problem 1. A space X is said to be contractible if the identiy map i X : X X is nullhomotopic. a. Show that any convex subset of R n is contractible. b. Show that a contractible space is
More informationContents. Index... 15
Contents Filter Bases and Nets................................................................................ 5 Filter Bases and Ultrafilters: A Brief Overview.........................................................
More informationChapter 2 Metric Spaces
Chapter 2 Metric Spaces The purpose of this chapter is to present a summary of some basic properties of metric and topological spaces that play an important role in the main body of the book. 2.1 Metrics
More informationLectures - XXIII and XXIV Coproducts and Pushouts
Lectures - XXIII and XXIV Coproducts and Pushouts We now discuss further categorical constructions that are essential for the formulation of the Seifert Van Kampen theorem. We first discuss the notion
More information3 Hausdorff and Connected Spaces
3 Hausdorff and Connected Spaces In this chapter we address the question of when two spaces are homeomorphic. This is done by examining two properties that are shared by any pair of homeomorphic spaces.
More informationConnectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ).
Connectedness 1 Motivation Connectedness is the sort of topological property that students love. Its definition is intuitive and easy to understand, and it is a powerful tool in proofs of well-known results.
More informationB 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.
Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2
More informationLECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY
LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY In this lecture we want to cover some basic concepts from homological algebra. These prove to be very helpful in our discussion of singular homology. The following
More information(convex combination!). Use convexity of f and multiply by the common denominator to get. Interchanging the role of x and y, we obtain that f is ( 2M ε
1. Continuity of convex functions in normed spaces In this chapter, we consider continuity properties of real-valued convex functions defined on open convex sets in normed spaces. Recall that every infinitedimensional
More informationReflexive cum Coreflexive Subcategories in Topology*
Math. Ann. 195, 168--174 (1972) ~) by Springer-Verlag 1972 Reflexive cum Coreflexive Subcategories in Topology* V. KANNAN The notions of reflexive and coreflexive subcategories in topology have received
More informationCHAPTER V DUAL SPACES
CHAPTER V DUAL SPACES DEFINITION Let (X, T ) be a (real) locally convex topological vector space. By the dual space X, or (X, T ), of X we mean the set of all continuous linear functionals on X. By the
More information3 COUNTABILITY AND CONNECTEDNESS AXIOMS
3 COUNTABILITY AND CONNECTEDNESS AXIOMS Definition 3.1 Let X be a topological space. A subset D of X is dense in X iff D = X. X is separable iff it contains a countable dense subset. X satisfies the first
More informationSection 31. The Separation Axioms
31. The Separation Axioms 1 Section 31. The Separation Axioms Note. Recall that a topological space X is Hausdorff if for any x,y X with x y, there are disjoint open sets U and V with x U and y V. In this
More informationTopology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski
Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, 2017 1 Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski Class of August 17: Course and syllabus overview. Topology
More informationTopology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:
Topology Xiaolong Han Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA E-mail address: Xiaolong.Han@csun.edu Remark. You are entitled to a reward of 1 point toward a homework
More informationSheaves. S. Encinas. January 22, 2005 U V. F(U) F(V ) s s V. = s j Ui Uj there exists a unique section s F(U) such that s Ui = s i.
Sheaves. S. Encinas January 22, 2005 Definition 1. Let X be a topological space. A presheaf over X is a functor F : Op(X) op Sets, such that F( ) = { }. Where Sets is the category of sets, { } denotes
More informationis holomorphic. In other words, a holomorphic function is a collection of compatible holomorphic functions on all charts.
RIEMANN SURFACES 2. Week 2. Basic definitions 2.1. Smooth manifolds. Complex manifolds. Let X be a topological space. A (real) chart of X is a pair (U, f : U R n ) where U is an open subset of X and f
More informationi = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39)
2.3 The derivative A description of the tangent bundle is not complete without defining the derivative of a general smooth map of manifolds f : M N. Such a map may be defined locally in charts (U i, φ
More informationWalker Ray Econ 204 Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions July 22, 2017
Walker Ray Econ 204 Problem Set 2 Suggested s July 22, 2017 Problem 1. Show that any set in a metric space (X, d) can be written as the intersection of open sets. Take any subset A X and define C = x A
More informationGALOIS EXTENSIONS ZIJIAN YAO
GALOIS EXTENSIONS ZIJIAN YAO This is a basic treatment on infinite Galois extensions, here we give necessary backgrounds for Krull topology, and describe the infinite Galois correspondence, namely, subextensions
More informationMATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS
MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS Steven Sy December 7, 2005 I MATRIX LIE GROUPS Definition: A matrix Lie group is a closed subgroup of Thus if is any sequence of matrices in, and for some, then either
More informationTopological properties
CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological
More informationSOME OPERATIONS ON SHEAVES
SOME OPERATIONS ON SHEAVES R. VIRK Contents 1. Pushforward 1 2. Pullback 3 3. The adjunction (f 1, f ) 4 4. Support of a sheaf 5 5. Extension by zero 5 6. The adjunction (j!, j ) 6 7. Sections with support
More informationMath 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism
Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism 1. Motivation Let f : X Y be a C p map between two C p -premanifolds with corners, with 1 p. Assuming f is bijective, we would like a criterion to tell us that f 1
More informationBoolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem
Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Hongtaek Jung December 27, 2017 Abstract This is a part of a supplementary note for a Logic and Set Theory course. The main goal is to
More information1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability Let E R N, let f : E R and let x 0 E. Given a direction v R N, let L be the line through x 0 in the direction v, that is, L :=
More informationExercises for Algebraic Topology
Sheet 1, September 13, 2017 Definition. Let A be an abelian group and let M be a set. The A-linearization of M is the set A[M] = {f : M A f 1 (A \ {0}) is finite}. We view A[M] as an abelian group via
More informations P = f(ξ n )(x i x i 1 ). i=1
Compactness and total boundedness via nets The aim of this chapter is to define the notion of a net (generalized sequence) and to characterize compactness and total boundedness by this important topological
More informationNotas de Aula Grupos Profinitos. Martino Garonzi. Universidade de Brasília. Primeiro semestre 2018
Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos Martino Garonzi Universidade de Brasília Primeiro semestre 2018 1 Le risposte uccidono le domande. 2 Contents 1 Topology 4 2 Profinite spaces 6 3 Topological groups 10 4
More informationMATH 8020 CHAPTER 1: COMMUTATIVE RINGS
MATH 8020 CHAPTER 1: COMMUTATIVE RINGS PETE L. CLARK Contents 1. Commutative rings 1 1.1. Fixing terminology 1 1.2. Adjoining elements 4 1.3. Ideals and quotient rings 5 1.4. The monoid of ideals of R
More informationTopology Exercise Sheet 2 Prof. Dr. Alessandro Sisto Due to March 7
Topology Exercise Sheet 2 Prof. Dr. Alessandro Sisto Due to March 7 Question 1: The goal of this exercise is to give some equivalent characterizations for the interior of a set. Let X be a topological
More informationP.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction
MATEMATIČKI VESNIK MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 70, 2 (208), 0 9 June 208 research paper originalni nauqni rad GROUPS OF GENERALIZED ISOTOPIES AND GENERALIZED G-SPACES P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis Abstract. The
More informationLECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY
LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem Recall that a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called geodesically complete if the maximal defining interval of any geodesic is R. On the other
More informationEquivalence of the Combinatorial Definition (Lecture 11)
Equivalence of the Combinatorial Definition (Lecture 11) September 26, 2014 Our goal in this lecture is to complete the proof of our first main theorem by proving the following: Theorem 1. The map of simplicial
More informationSheaves of C*-Algebras
Banach Algebras 2009 at Bedlewo, 16 July 2009 Dedicated to the memory of John Dauns, 24 June 1937 4 June 2009 joint work in progress with Pere Ara (Barcelona) based on P. Ara and M. Mathieu, Local multipliers
More informationMA651 Topology. Lecture 9. Compactness 2.
MA651 Topology. Lecture 9. Compactness 2. This text is based on the following books: Topology by James Dugundgji Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology
More informationLecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018
Lecture 9: Sheaves February 11, 2018 Recall that a category X is a topos if there exists an equivalence X Shv(C), where C is a small category (which can be assumed to admit finite limits) equipped with
More informationTHE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter
THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter Abstract. In previous work, the second author introduced a topology, for spaces of irreducible representations,
More information0.1 Diffeomorphisms. 0.2 The differential
Lectures 6 and 7, October 10 and 12 Easy fact: An open subset of a differentiable manifold is a differentiable manifold of the same dimension the ambient space differentiable structure induces a differentiable
More information8 Complete fields and valuation rings
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2017 Lecture #8 10/02/2017 8 Complete fields and valuation rings In order to make further progress in our investigation of finite extensions L/K of the fraction field K of a
More informationStone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces
The Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto June 27, 2014 1 Completely regular spaces and Tychonoff spaces A topological
More informationf(a)(\c = f(f l(c)c A). K.1 Compactly generated spaces
K.1 Compactly generated spaces Definition. A space X is said to be compactly generated if it satisfies the following condition: A set A is open in X if An C is open in C for each compact subspace C of
More information6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings
6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings 6.1 Introduction Recall from Definition 5.2.4 that a Huber ring is a commutative topological ring A equipped with an open subring A 0, such that the subspace
More informationGLOBALIZING LOCALLY COMPACT LOCAL GROUPS
GLOBALIZING LOCALLY COMPACT LOCAL GROUPS LOU VAN DEN DRIES AND ISAAC GOLDBRING Abstract. Every locally compact local group is locally isomorphic to a topological group. 1. Introduction In this paper a
More informationLinear Vector Spaces
CHAPTER 1 Linear Vector Spaces Definition 1.0.1. A linear vector space over a field F is a triple (V, +, ), where V is a set, + : V V V and : F V V are maps with the properties : (i) ( x, y V ), x + y
More information1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps
1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps Last updated: April 14, 2011. 1.1 Examples and definitions Roughly, manifolds are sets where one can introduce coordinates. An n-dimensional manifold is a set
More informationLECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY
LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY Let f : M N be a smooth map. In the past three lectures, we are mainly studying the image of f, especially when f is an embedding. Today we would like to study the pre-image
More informationAN EXPLORATION OF THE METRIZABILITY OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
AN EXPLORATION OF THE METRIZABILITY OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES DUSTIN HEDMARK Abstract. A study of the conditions under which a topological space is metrizable, concluding with a proof of the Nagata Smirnov
More informationNAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key
NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination Answer Key 1 1. [25 points] Let X be a set with 2 or more elements. Show that there are topologies U and V on X such that the identity map J : (X, U)
More informationChapter 1. Smooth Manifolds
Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Theorem 1. [Exercise 1.18] Let M be a topological manifold. Then any two smooth atlases for M determine the same smooth structure if and only if their union is a smooth atlas.
More informationMath 210B. Profinite group cohomology
Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology 1. Motivation Let {Γ i } be an inverse system of finite groups with surjective transition maps, and define Γ = Γ i equipped with its inverse it topology (i.e., the
More informationLecture 7. This set is the set of equivalence classes of the equivalence relation on M S defined by
Lecture 7 1. Modules of fractions Let S A be a multiplicative set, and A M an A-module. In what follows, we will denote by s, t, u elements from S and by m, n elements from M. Similar to the concept of
More informationTOPOLOGY HW 2. x x ± y
TOPOLOGY HW 2 CLAY SHONKWILER 20.9 Show that the euclidean metric d on R n is a metric, as follows: If x, y R n and c R, define x + y = (x 1 + y 1,..., x n + y n ), cx = (cx 1,..., cx n ), x y = x 1 y
More informationLinear Algebra. Chapter 5
Chapter 5 Linear Algebra The guiding theme in linear algebra is the interplay between algebraic manipulations and geometric interpretations. This dual representation is what makes linear algebra a fruitful
More informationCHODOUNSKY, DAVID, M.A. Relative Topological Properties. (2006) Directed by Dr. Jerry Vaughan. 48pp.
CHODOUNSKY, DAVID, M.A. Relative Topological Properties. (2006) Directed by Dr. Jerry Vaughan. 48pp. In this thesis we study the concepts of relative topological properties and give some basic facts and
More informationSequence convergence, the weak T-axioms, and first countability
Sequence convergence, the weak T-axioms, and first countability 1 Motivation Up to now we have been mentioning the notion of sequence convergence without actually defining it. So in this section we will
More informationLectures on Analysis John Roe
Lectures on Analysis John Roe 2005 2009 1 Lecture 1 About Functional Analysis The key objects of study in functional analysis are various kinds of topological vector spaces. The simplest of these are the
More informationSTRONGLY CONNECTED SPACES
Undergraduate Research Opportunity Programme in Science STRONGLY CONNECTED SPACES Submitted by Dai Bo Supervised by Dr. Wong Yan-loi Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore Academic
More informationFUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM. Contents
FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM SAMUEL BLOOM Abstract. In this paper, we define the fundamental group of a topological space and explore its structure, and we proceed to prove Van-Kampen
More informationIntegral Jensen inequality
Integral Jensen inequality Let us consider a convex set R d, and a convex function f : (, + ]. For any x,..., x n and λ,..., λ n with n λ i =, we have () f( n λ ix i ) n λ if(x i ). For a R d, let δ a
More informationB. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces
B.1 B. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces B.1. Fréchet spaces. In this appendix we go through the definition of Fréchet spaces and their inductive limits, such as they are used for definitions of function
More informationFunctional Analysis HW #3
Functional Analysis HW #3 Sangchul Lee October 26, 2015 1 Solutions Exercise 2.1. Let D = { f C([0, 1]) : f C([0, 1])} and define f d = f + f. Show that D is a Banach algebra and that the Gelfand transform
More informationFinite dimensional topological vector spaces
Chapter 3 Finite dimensional topological vector spaces 3.1 Finite dimensional Hausdor t.v.s. Let X be a vector space over the field K of real or complex numbers. We know from linear algebra that the (algebraic)
More information14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces
14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces 14.1 Introduction The aim of this lecture and the next two is to address general adic spaces and their connection to rigid geometry. 14.2 Two open questions
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY (NMAG401) Contents. 2. Polynomial and rational maps 9 3. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz and consequences 23 References 30
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY (NMAG401) JAN ŠŤOVÍČEK Contents 1. Affine varieties 1 2. Polynomial and rational maps 9 3. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz and consequences 23 References 30 1. Affine varieties The basic objects
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ag] 24 Jun 2015
TRIANGULATIONS OF MONOTONE FAMILIES I: TWO-DIMENSIONAL FAMILIES arxiv:1402.0460v2 [math.ag] 24 Jun 2015 SAUGATA BASU, ANDREI GABRIELOV, AND NICOLAI VOROBJOV Abstract. Let K R n be a compact definable set
More informationNotes for Functional Analysis
Notes for Functional Analysis Wang Zuoqin (typed by Xiyu Zhai) October 16, 2015 1 Lecture 11 1.1 The closed graph theorem Definition 1.1. Let f : X Y be any map between topological spaces. We define its
More informationSECTION 9: FIBER BUNDLES AND PRINCIPAL BUNDLES
SECTION 9: FIBER BUNDLES AND PRINCIPAL BUNDLES Definition 1. A fiber bundle with fiber F is a map p: E X with the property that any point x X has a neighbourhood U X for which there exists a homeomorphism
More informationA NICE PROOF OF FARKAS LEMMA
A NICE PROOF OF FARKAS LEMMA DANIEL VICTOR TAUSK Abstract. The goal of this short note is to present a nice proof of Farkas Lemma which states that if C is the convex cone spanned by a finite set and if
More informationCONTINUOUS FIELDS OF POSTLIMINAL C -ALGEBRAS
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 47, Number 3, 2017 CONTINUOUS FIELDS OF POSTLIMINAL C -ALGEBRAS ALDO J. LAZAR ABSTRACT. We discuss a problem of Dixmier [6, Problem 10.10.11] on continuous
More informationFilters in Analysis and Topology
Filters in Analysis and Topology David MacIver July 1, 2004 Abstract The study of filters is a very natural way to talk about convergence in an arbitrary topological space, and carries over nicely into
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationAn Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees
An Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees Francesc Rosselló 1, Gabriel Valiente 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Research Institute
More information10 Excision and applications
22 CHAPTER 1. SINGULAR HOMOLOGY be a map of short exact sequences of chain complexes. If two of the three maps induced in homology by f, g, and h are isomorphisms, then so is the third. Here s an application.
More information6. Duals of L p spaces
6 Duals of L p spaces This section deals with the problem if identifying the duals of L p spaces, p [1, ) There are essentially two cases of this problem: (i) p = 1; (ii) 1 < p < The major difference between
More informationLarge Sets in Boolean and Non-Boolean Groups and Topology
axioms Article Large Sets in Boolean and Non-Boolean Groups and Topology Ol ga V. Sipacheva ID Department of General Topology and Geometry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991,
More informationE. The Hahn-Banach Theorem
E. The Hahn-Banach Theorem This Appendix contains several technical results, that are extremely useful in Functional Analysis. The following terminology is useful in formulating the statements. Definitions.
More information