arxiv: v1 [nlin.si] 28 Aug 2016

Transcription

1 Integrable geometric flows of interacting curves/surfaces, multilayer spin systems and the vector nonlinear Schrödinger equation Akbota Myrzakul and Ratbay Myrzakulov Eurasian International Center for Theoretical Physics and Department of General & Theoretical Physics, Eurasian National University, Astana , Kazakhstan arxiv: v1 [nlin.si] 28 Aug 2016 Abstract In this paper, we study integrable multilayer spin systems, namely, the multilayer M-LIII equation. We investigate their relation with the geometric flows of interacting curves and surfaces in some space R n. Then we present their the Lakshmanan equivalent counterparts. We show that these equivalent counterparts are, in fact, the vector nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE). It is well-known that the vector NLSE is equivalent to the Γ-spin system. Also, we have presented the transformations which give the relation between solutions of the Γ-spin system and the multilayer M-LIII equation. It is interesting to note that the integrable multilayer M-LIII equation contains constant magnetic field H. It seems that this constant magnetic vector plays an important role in theory of integrable multilayer spin system and in nonlinear dynamics of magnetic systems. Finally, we present some classes of integrable models of interacting vortices. 1 Introduction There is an interesting geometric relationship between geometric flows of curves and surfaces and integrable nonlinear differential equations [1]-[38]. In the pionering works of nineteenth-century geometers were already established main connections between the theory of ordinary and partial differential equations and differential geometry of curves and surfaces. In soliton theory, the wellknown Darbou and Bäcklund transformations have origins in the relationship between solutions of the sine-gordon equation and pseudospherical surfaces. In this and previous our papers, we launch the programm to study integrable flows of curves and surfaces related with the vector (multicomponent) nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) and with multilayer spin systems. Under curve flows we usually mean the following equations e i = C e i, e it = D e i, (1.1) where C = τe 1 +κ, D = ω 1 e 1 +ω 2 +ω 3. (1.2) Similarly, we can write the geometric flows of immersed surfaces in some Euclidean space. They are given by the following Gauss-Weingarden equations akbota.myrzakul@gmail.com rmyrzakulov@gmail.com χ = Nχ, χ t = Mχ. (1.3) 1

2 Integrability conditions of these equations are given by the following Gauss-Mainardi-Codazzi equation N t M +[N,M] = 0. (1.4) The aim of the present work is to provide geometric formulations of multilayer spin systems. We will demonstrate that the multilayer M-LIII equation arises from the flow of interacting curves. The Lakshmanan equivalent counterparts of the multilayer M-LIII equations are derived from inelastic curve flows in the Euclidean space. Several new results are obtained by considering different classes of curves and surfaces. The outline of this paper is as follows. In the net two sections we give a brief review of the vector NLSE and the M-LIII equation. In Sections 4-7, we consider the multilayer M-LIII equations and their relations with the vector NLSE. In Section 8, we provide a Hamilton structure of the multilayer M-LIII equation. The Γ-spin system which is the gauge equivalent counterpart of the vector NLSE is presented. The relation between solutions of the multilayer M-LIII equation and the Γ-spin system is considered in Section 10. The geometric flows of curves and surfaces were studied in Sections 11 and 12. In Section 13 we present an integrable filament equations of interacting vortices. At last, in Section 14, we give our conclusions. 2 Brief review of the vector NLSE In this section we recall some general facts about the vector NLS equation. The vector NLS equation has many physical significant applications such as modeling crossing sea waves and in propagation of elliptically birefringent optical fibers. 2.1 The equation The vector NLSE reads as where iq 1t +q 1 vq 1 = 0, (2.1) iq 2t +q 2 vq 2 = 0, (2.2). (2.3) iq Nt +q N vq N = 0, (2.4) v +2( q q q N 2 ) = 0. (2.5) The Manakov system is the particular case of the vector NLSE when N = 2. The Manakov system we studied in [39]-[45]. 2.2 La representation The vector NLS equation (2.1)-(2.3) is integrable by the inverse scattering method. Its La representation (LR) reads as where Φ = (φ 1,φ 2,φ 3 ) and Φ = UΦ, (2.6) Φ t = VΦ, (2.7) U = iλσ+u 0, V = 2iλ 2 Σ+2λU 0 +V 0. (2.8) Here Σ = , U 0 = 0 q 1 q 2 q 3 q q q , (2.9) 2

3 V 0 = i q q q 3 2 q 1 q 2 q 3 q 1 q 1 2 q 1 q 2 q 1 q 3 q 2 q 2 q 1 q 2 2 q 2 q 3 q 3 q 3 q 1 q 3 q 2 q 3 2. (2.10) 3 Brief review of the 1-layer M-LIII equation 3.1 The equation The general form For the pedagogical reason, in this section, we present some informations on the M-LIII equation for the 1-layer case. Consider the spin vector A = (A 1,A 2,A 3 ), where A 2 = 1. Let this spin vector obey the 1-layer M-LIII equation which reads as A t +A A +u 1 A +F = 0, (3.1) where u 1 (,t,a j,a j ) is the real function (potential), F is some vector function. The matri form of the M-LIII equation looks like ia t [A,A ]+iu 1 A +F = 0, (3.2) where ( ) A3 A A = A +, A A 2 = I = diag(1,1), A ± = A 1 ±ia 2. (3.3) 3 ( ) F3 F F = F +, F ± = F F 1 ±if 2. (3.4) The vector form Sometime we consider the following particular case of the M-LIII equation A t +A A +u 1 A +v 1 H A = 0, (3.5) where v 1 (,t,a j,a j ) is the real function (potential), H = (0,0,1) is the constant magnetic field The matri form The matri form of this equation has the form ia t [A,A ]+iu 1 A +v 1 [σ 3,A] = 0. (3.6) The w form We now introduce a new comple function w as Then the M-LIII equation takes the form where F is some comple function of the form It is the w-form of the M-LIII equation. w = A+ 1+A 3. (3.7) iw t w + 2 ww2 1+ w 2 = F, (3.8) F = F (w,w, w, w,u,v,). (3.9) 3

4 3.1.5 The r form Let us introduce the new function R as Then the r-form of the M-LIII equation reads as where R = 1 S. (3.10) R t = R R +ur +2vH R+L, (3.11) 3.2 The Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart L = 1 [u R +2v H R]. (3.12) Let us find the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of the 1-layer M-LIII equation (2.1)-(2.2). To do that, consider 3-dimensional curve in R 3. This curve is given by the following vectors e k. These vectors satisfy the following equations = C, t = D. (3.13) Here e 1, and are the unit tangent, normaland binormalvectorsto the curve, is its arclength parametrising the curve. The matrices C and G have the forms C = 0 k 1 0 k 1 0 τ 1, G = 0 ω 3 ω 2 ω 3 0 ω 1. (3.14) 0 τ 1 0 ω 2 ω 1 0 The curvature and torsion of the curve are given by the following formulas k 1 = 1, τ 1 = e 1 (e 1 e 1 ). (3.15) 1 The compatibility condition of the equations (3.7) is given by or in elements Now we do the following identifications: Then we have C t G +[C,G] = 0, (3.16) k 1t = ω 3 +τ 1 ω 2, (3.17) τ 1t = ω 1 k 1 ω 2, (3.18) ω 2 = τ 1 ω 3 k 1 ω 1. (3.19) A e 1, F = F 1 e 1 +F 2 +F 3. (3.20) and k1 2 = A 2, (3.21) τ 1 = A (A A ) A 2, (3.22) ω 1 = k 1 +F 2 τ 1 +F 3 +(τ 1 u 1 )τ 1, k 1 (3.23) ω 2 = k 1 +F 3, (3.24) ω 3 = k 1 (τ 1 u 1 ) F 2, (3.25) 4

5 with F 1 = E 1 = 0. The equations for k 1 and τ 1 reads as k 1t = 2k 1 τ 1 +k 1 τ 1 (u 1 k 1 ) F 2 +F 3 τ 1, (3.26) [ τ 1t = k 1 +F 2 τ 1 +F 3 +(τ 1 u 1 )τ 1 1 ] k 1 2 k2 1 F 3 k 1. (3.27) Net we introduce a new comple function as q 1 = κ 1 This function satisfies the following equation 1 2 e i τ1. (3.28) iq 1t +q 1 +2 q 1 2 q = 0. (3.29) It is the desired Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of the M-LIII equation (3.5). If u 1 = v 1 = 0, it turns to the NLSE 4 Th-layer M-LIII equation iq 1t +q 1 +2 q 1 2 q 1 = 0. (3.30) In this section we consider th-layer M-LIII equation. As shown in [39]-[45], th-layer M-LIII equation is integrable by the inverse scattering transform (IST). 4.1 The equation In this paper, we consider two spin vectors A = (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) and B = (B 1,B 2,B 3 ), where A 2 = B 2 = 1. Let these spin vectors satisfy the following 2-layer M-LIII equation or the coupled M-LIII equation or in matri form A t +A A +u 1 A +2v 1 H A = 0, (4.1) B t +B B +u 2 B +2v 2 H B = 0, (4.2) ia t [A,A ]+iu 1 A +v 1 [σ 3,A] = 0, (4.3) ib t [B,B ]+iu 2 B +v 2 [σ 3,B] = 0, (4.4) where H = (0,0,1) T is the constant magnetic field, u j and v j are coupling potentials. Here where u 1 = i[( q 2 g 1 ḡ 3 q 2 ḡ 1 g 3 )+( q 3 g 1 ḡ 4 q 3 ḡ 1 g 4 )], (4.5) v 1 = [ q 2 2 ( 1 + g 3 2 )+ q 3 2 ( 1 + g 4 2 )+q 2 q 3 g 3 ḡ 4 + q 2 q 3 ḡ 3 g 4 ], (4.6) u 2 = i[( q 2 g 1 ḡ 3 q 2 ḡ 1 g 3 )+( q 3 g 1 ḡ 4 q 3 ḡ 1 g 4 )], (4.7) v 2 = [ q 2 2 ( 1 + g 3 2 )+ q 3 2 ( 1 + g 4 2 )+q 2 q 3 g 3 ḡ 4 + q 2 q 3 ḡ 3 g 4 ], (4.8) In components, the coupled M-LIII equation (4.1)-(4.2) reads as 1 = g g 2 2, (4.9) 2 = g g 3 2, (4.10) = g g g 3 2. (4.11) ia + t +(A+ A 3 A + A 3)+iu 1 A + 2v 1A + = 0, (4.12) ia t (A A 3 A A 3 )+iu 1 A +2v 1 A = 0, (4.13) ia 3t (A A + A A + )+iu 1 A 3 = 0, (4.14) ib + t +(B + B 3 B + B 3)+iu 2 B + +2v 2B + = 0, (4.15) ib t (B B 3 B B 3 )+iu 2 B +2v 2 B = 0, (4.16) ib 3t (B B + B B+ )+iu 2 B 3 = 0, (4.17) 5

6 or A 1t +A 2 A 3 A 2 A 3 +u 1 A 1 2v 1 A 2 = 0, (4.18) A 2t +A 3 A 1 A 3 A 1 +u 1 A 2 2v 1 A 1 = 0, (4.19) A 3t +A 1 A 2 A 1 A 2 +u 1 A 3 = 0, (4.20) B 1t +B 2 B 3 B 2 B 3 +u 2 B 1 2v 2 B 2 = 0, (4.21) B 2t +B 3 B 1 B 3 B 1 +u 2 B 2 2v 2 B 1 = 0, (4.22) 4.2 The Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart B 3t +B 1 B 2 B 1 B 2 +u 2 B 3 = 0. (4.23) In this subsection we present the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of th-layer M-LIII equation (2.1)-(2.2) Now we consider two interacting 3-dimensional curves in R n. These curves are given by the following two basic vectors e k and l k. The motion of these curves is defined by the following equations and l 1 l 2 l 3 = C = L l 1 l 2 l 3,, l 1 l 2 l 3 t t = D = N l 1 l 2 l 3, (4.24). (4.25) Here e 1, and are the unit tangent, normal and binormal vectorsrespectively to the first curve, l 1,l 2 and l 3 are the unit tangent, normal and binormal vectors respectively to the second curve, is the arclength parametrising these both curves. The matrices C,D,L,N are given by C = 0 k 1 0 k 1 0 τ 1 0 τ 1 0, G = 0 ω 3 ω 2 ω 3 0 ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 0, (4.26) L = 0 k 2 0 k 2 0 τ 2 0 τ 2 0, N = 0 θ 3 θ 2 θ 3 0 θ 1 θ 2 θ 1 0. (4.27) For the curvatures and torsions of curves we obtain k 1 = 1, τ 1 = e 1 (e 1 e 1 ), (4.28) k 2 = The equations (3.9) and (3.11) are compatible if In elements these equations take the form 1 l 2 1, τ 2 = l 1 (l 1 l 1 ) l 2. (4.29) 1 C t G +[C,G] = 0, (4.30) L t N +[L,N] = 0. (4.31) k 1t = ω 3 +τ 1 ω 2, (4.32) τ 1t = ω 1 k 1 ω 2, (4.33) ω 2 = τ 1 ω 3 k 1 ω 1, (4.34) 6

7 and k 2t = θ 3 +τ 2 θ 2, (4.35) τ 2t = θ 1 k 2 θ 2, (4.36) θ 2 = τ 2 θ 3 k 2 θ 1. (4.37) Our net step is the following identifications: A e 1, B l 1. (4.38) We also assume that F = F 1 e 1 +F 2 +F 3, E = E 1 l 1 +E 2 l 2 +E 3 l 3, (4.39) where F = 2v 1 H A, E = 2v 2 H B. (4.40) Then we obtain and k1 2 = A 2, (4.41) τ 1 = A (A A ) A 2, (4.42) k2 2 = B 2, (4.43) τ 2 = B (B B ) B 2, (4.44) ω 1 = k 1 +F 2 τ 1 +F 3 +(τ 1 u 1 )τ 1, k 1 (4.45) ω 2 = k 1 +F 3, (4.46) ω 3 = k 1 (τ 1 u 1 ) F 2, (4.47) θ 1 = k 2 +E 2 τ 2 +E 3 +(τ 2 u 2 )τ 2, k 2 (4.48) θ 2 = k 2 +E 3, (4.49) θ 3 = k 2 (τ 2 u 2 ) E 2. (4.50) with We now can write the equations for k j and τ j. They look like F 1 = E 1 = 0. (4.51) k 1t = 2k 1 τ 1 +k 1 τ 1 (u 1 k 1 ) F 2 +F 3 τ 1, (4.52) [ τ 1t = k 1 +F 2 τ 1 +F 3 +(τ 1 u 1 )τ 1 1 ] k 1 2 k2 1 F 3 k 1, (4.53) k 2t = 2k 2 τ 2 +k 2 τ 2 (u 2 k 2 ) E 2 +E 3 τ 2, (4.54) [ τ 2t = k 2 +E 2 τ 2 +E 3 +(τ 2 u 2 )τ 2 1 ] k 2 2 k2 2 E 3 k 2. (4.55) Let us now introduce new four real functions α j and β j as α 1 = 0.5k 1 1+ζ1, (4.56) β 1 = τ 1 (1+ξ 1 ), (4.57) α 2 = 0.5k 2 1+ζ2, (4.58) β 2 = τ 2 (1+ξ 2 ), (4.59) 7

8 where ζ 1 = 2 WA MA 2 W 2 (1+A 3 ) 2 A 2 1, (4.60) ζ 2 = 2 W[(1+A 3)(1+B 3 ) 1 B ] M[(1+A 3 )(1+B 3 ) 1 B ] 2 W 2 (1+A 3 ) 2 B 2 1, (4.61) ξ 1 ξ 2 = R R RR 4i R 2 ν 2iα 2 1 W2 (1+A 3 ) 2 τ 1 1, (4.62) = Z Z ZZ 4i Z 2 ν 2iα 2 2 W2 (1+A 3 ) 2 τ 2 1. (4.63) Here W = 2+ (1+A 3)(1 B 3 ) 1+B 3 = 2+K, (4.64) M = A 3 + A+ A + A 3(1 B 3 ) + (1+A 3)B + B 1+A 3 1+B 3 (1+B 3 ) 2 (1+A 3)(1 B 3 )B 3 (1+B 3 ) 2, (4.65) R = WA MA, (4.66) Z = W[(1+A 3 )(1+B 3 ) 1 B ] M[(1+A 3 )(1+B 3 ) 1 B ]. (4.67) with [ ν = 1 A1 A 2 A 1 A 2 (1+A 3 )W (1+A ] 3)(B 1 B 2 B 1 B 2 ) (1+B 3 ) 2. (4.68) W We now ready to write the equations for the functions α i and β j. They satisfy the following four equations α 1t 2α 1 β 1 α 1 β 1 = 0, (4.69) [ ] α1 β 1t + β1 2 α +2(α2 1 +α2 2 ) = 0, (4.70) 1 α 2t 2α 2 β 2 α 2 β 2 = 0, (4.71) [ ] α2 β 2t + β2 2 α +2(α2 1 +α2 2 ) = 0. (4.72) 2 Let us now we introduce new two comple functions as q 1 = α 1 e i 1 β1, (4.73) q 2 = α 2 e i 1 β2. (4.74) It is not difficult to verify that these functions satisfy the following Manakov system iq 1t +q 1 +2( q q 2 2 )q 1 = 0, (4.75) iq 2t +q 2 +2( q q 2 2 )q 2 = 0. (4.76) Thus we have shown that the Manakov system (3.60)-(3.61) is the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of th-layer M-LIII equation or, in other terminology, the coupled M-LIII equation (4.1)-(4.2). 5 Th-layer M-LIII equation 5.1 The equation In this paper, we consider three spin vectors A = (A 1,A 2,A 3 ), B = (B 1,B 2,B 3 ) and C = (C 1,C 2,C 3 ), where A 2 = B 2 = C 2 = 1. Let these spin vectors satisfy th-layer M-LIII equation 8

9 of the form A t +A A +u 1 A +2v 1 H A = 0, (5.1) B t +B B +u 2 B +2v 2 H B = 0, (5.2) C t +C C +u 3 C +2v 3 H C = 0, (5.3) or in matri form ia t [A,A ]+iu 1 A +v 1 [σ 3,A] = 0, (5.4) ib t [B,B ]+iu 2 B +v 2 [σ 3,B] = 0, (5.5) ic t [C,C ]+iu 3 C +v 3 [σ 3,C] = 0. (5.6) Here u j and v j are coupling potentials and have the forms where u 1 = i[( q 2 g 1 ḡ 3 q 2 ḡ 1 g 3 )+( q 3 g 1 ḡ 4 q 3 ḡ 1 g 4 )], (5.7) v 1 = [ q 2 2 ( 1 + g 3 2 )+ q 3 2 ( 1 + g 4 2 )+q 2 q 3 g 3 ḡ 4 + q 2 q 3 ḡ 3 g 4 ], (5.8) u 2 = i[( q 1 ḡ 2 + q 3 ḡ 4 )g 1 (q 1 g 2 +q 3 g 4 ) q 1 ], (5.9) v 2 = 2 2 [ q 1 2 ( 2 + g 2 2 )+ q 3 2 ( 2 + g 4 2 )+q 1 q 3 g 2 ḡ 4 + q 1 q 3 ḡ 2 g 4 ], (5.10) u 3 = 2i 3 [( q 1 ḡ 2 + q 2 ḡ 3 )g 1 (q 1 g 2 +q 2 g 3 )ḡ 1 ], (5.11) v 3 = 2 3 [ q 1 2 ( 3 + g 2 2 )+ q 2 2 ( 3 + g 3 2 )+q 1 q 2 g 2 ḡ 3 + q 1 q 2 ḡ 2 g 3 ], (5.12) 1 = g g 2 2, (5.13) 2 = g g 3 2, (5.14) 3 = g g 4 2, (5.15) 5.2 The Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart = g g g g 4 2. (5.16) In this subsection we obtain the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of th-layer M-LIII equation (2.1)-(2.2). For this purpose we consider three interacting 3-dimensional curves in some Eucledian space. These curves are given by the following three vectors e k, l k and n k. These vectors are governed by the following equations l 1 l 2 l 3 n 1 n 2 n 3 = C = L = M l 1 l 2 l 3 n 1 n 2 n 3,,, l 1 l 2 l 3 n 1 n 2 n 3 t t = D = N t = J l 1 l 2 l 3 n 1 n 2 n 3, (5.17), (5.18). (5.19) The matrices C,D,L,N are given by C = 0 k 1 0 k 1 0 τ 1, G = 0 ω 3 ω 2 ω 3 0 ω 1, (5.20) 0 τ 1 0 ω 2 ω 1 0 9

10 L = M = 0 k 2 0 k 2 0 τ 2 0 τ k 3 0 k 3 0 τ 3 0 τ 3 0, N =, J = 0 θ 3 θ 2 θ 3 0 θ 1 θ 2 θ δ 3 δ 2 δ 3 0 δ 1 δ 2 δ 1 0, (5.21). (5.22) For the curvatures and torsions of curves we obtain k 1 = 1, τ 1 = e 1 (e 1 e 1 ), (5.23) k 2 = k 3 = The equations (3.9) and (3.11) are compatible if In elements these equations take the form and As in the previous section we assume the following identifications: We also assume that where 1 l 2 1, τ 2 = l 1 (l 1 l 1 ), (5.24) l 2 1 n 2 1, τ 3 = n 1 (n 1 n 1 ) n 2. (5.25) 1 C t G +[C,G] = 0, (5.26) L t N +[L,N] = 0, (5.27) M t J +[M,J] = 0. (5.28) k 1t = ω 3 +τ 1 ω 2, (5.29) τ 1t = ω 1 k 1 ω 2, (5.30) ω 2 = τ 1 ω 3 k 1 ω 1 (5.31) k 2t = θ 3 +τ 2 θ 2, (5.32) τ 2t = θ 1 k 2 θ 2, (5.33) θ 2 = τ 2 θ 3 k 2 θ 1. (5.34) k 3t = δ 3 +τ 2 δ 2, (5.35) τ 3t = δ 1 k 3 δ 2, (5.36) δ 2 = τ 3 δ 3 k 3 δ 1. (5.37) A e 1, B l 1, C n 1. (5.38) F = F 1 e 1 +F 2 +F 3, E = E 1 l 1 +E 2 l 2 +E 3 l 3, P = P 1 n 1 +P 2 n 2 +P 3 n 3, (5.39) Then we obtain F = 2v 1 H A, E = 2v 2 H B, P = 2v 3 H C. (5.40) k1 2 = A 2, (5.41) τ 1 = A (A A ) A 2, (5.42) k2 2 = B 2, (5.43) τ 2 = B (B B ) B 2, (5.44) k3 2 = C 2, (5.45) τ 3 = C (C C ) C 2, (5.46) 10

11 and ω 1 = k 1 +F 2 τ 1 +F 3 +(τ 1 u 1 )τ 1, k 1 (5.47) ω 2 = k 1 +F 3, (5.48) ω 3 = k 1 (τ 1 u 1 ) F 2, (5.49) θ 1 = k 2 +E 2 τ 2 +E 3 +(τ 2 u 2 )τ 2, k 2 (5.50) θ 2 = k 2 +E 3, (5.51) θ 3 = k 2 (τ 2 u 2 ) E 2, (5.52) δ 1 = k 3 +P 2 τ 3 +P 3 +(τ 3 u 3 )τ 3, k 3 (5.53) δ 2 = k 3 +P 3, (5.54) δ 3 = k 3 (τ 3 u 3 ) P 2, (5.55) with F 1 = E 1 = P 1 = 0. (5.56) As a result, we obtain the following equations for k j and τ j. They read as k 1t = 2k 1 τ 1 +k 1 τ 1 (u 1 k 1 ) F 2 +F 3 τ 1, (5.57) [ τ 1t = k 1 +F 2 τ 1 +F 3 +(τ 1 u 1 )τ 1 1 ] k 1 2 k2 1 F 3 k 1, (5.58) k 2t = 2k 2 τ 2 +k 2 τ 2 (u 2 k 2 ) E 2 +E 3 τ 2, (5.59) [ τ 2t = k 2 +E 2 τ 2 +E 3 +(τ 2 u 2 )τ 2 1 ] k 2 2 k2 2 E 3 k 2, (5.60) k 3t = 2k 3 τ 3 +k 3 τ 3 (u 3 k 3 ) P 2 +P 3 τ 3, (5.61) [ τ 3t = k 3 +P 2 τ 3 +P 3 +(τ 3 u 3 )τ 3 1 ] k 3 2 k2 3 P 3 k 3. (5.62) According to our approach (see e.g. the refs. [39]-[45]), we now introduce the following new functions α j and β j as α 1 = 0.5k 1 1+ζ1, (5.63) β 1 = τ 1 (1+ξ 1 ), (5.64) α 2 = 0.5k 2 1+ζ2, (5.65) β 2 = τ 2 (1+ξ 2 ), (5.66) α 3 = 0.5k 3 1+ζ3, (5.67) β 3 = τ 3 (1+ξ 3 ). (5.68) where ζ j and ξ j are some real functions. We now can show that the equations for the functions α i and β j read as α 1t 2α 1 β 1 α 1 β 1 = 0, (5.69) [ ] α1 β 1t + β1 2 +2(α 2 1 +α 2 2 +α 2 α 3) = 0, (5.70) 1 α 2t 2α 2 β 2 α 2 β 2 = 0, (5.71) [ ] α2 β 2t + β2 2 α +2(α2 1 +α2 2 +α2 3 ) = 0, (5.72) 2 α 3t 2α 3 β 3 α 3 β 3 = 0, (5.73) [ ] α3 β 3t + β3 2 α +2(α2 1 +α2 2 +α2 3 ) = 0. (5.74) 3 11

12 Net we introduce new three comple functions q j as q 1 = α 1 e i 1 β1, (5.75) q 2 = α 2 e i 1 β2, (5.76) q 3 = α 3 e i 1 β3. (5.77) The straight calculation shows that these functions obey the following vector NLS equation iq 1t +q 1 +2( q q q 3 2 )q 1 = 0, (5.78) iq 2t +q 2 +2( q q q 3 2 )q 2 = 0, (5.79) iq 3t +q 3 +2( q q q 3 2 )q 3 = 0. (5.80) Thus we have proved that th-component NLS equation (5.78)-(5.80) is the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of th-layer M-LIII equation (2.1)-(2.2). 6 The 4-layer M-LIII equation 6.1 The equation In this section we study the 4-layer M-LIII equation. It is given as A t +A A +u 1 A +2v 1 H A = 0, (6.1) B t +B B +u 2 B +2v 2 H B = 0, (6.2) C t +C C +u 3 C +2v 3 H C = 0, (6.3) D t +D D +u 4 D +2v 4 H D = 0. (6.4) (6.5) In matri form, this equation takes the form ia t [A,A ]+iu 1 A +v 1 [σ 3,A] = 0, (6.6) ib t [B,B ]+iu 2 B +v 2 [σ 3,B] = 0, (6.7) ic t [C,C ]+iu 3 C +v 3 [σ 3,C] = 0, (6.8) id t [D,D ]+iu 4 D +v 4 [σ 3,D] = 0, (6.9) where A = (A 1,A 2,A 3 ), B = (B 1,B 2,B 3 ), C = (C 1,C 2,C 3 ), D = (D 1,D 2,D 3 ) and A 2 = B 2 = C 2 = D 2 = 1. Here u j and v j are coupling potentials. 6.2 The Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart The similar algebra as in the previous sections shows that the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of the 4-layer M-LIII equation (2.1)-(2.2) reads as iq 1t +q 1 +2( q q q q 4 2 )q 1 = 0, (6.10) iq 2t +q 2 +2( q q q q 4 2 )q 2 = 0. (6.11) iq 3t +q 3 +2( q q q q 4 2 )q 3 = 0. (6.12) iq 4t +q 4 +2( q q q q 4 2 )q 4 = 0. (6.13) 12

13 7 The N-layer M-LIII equation 7.1 The equation In this section we present the N-layer M-LIII equation. This equation can be written as A (N) t Let us rewrite this equation in the matri form as ia (N) t where A (j) = (A (j) 1,A(j) 2,A(j) 3 ) and A(j)2 = 1 with ( ) A (j) = A (1) t +A (1) A (1) +u 1 A (1) +2v 1 H A (1) = 0, (7.1) A (2) t +A (2) A (2) +u 2 A (2) +2v 2 H A (2) = 0, (7.2). (7.3) +A (N) A (N) +u NA (N) +2v N H A (N) = 0. (7.4) ia (1) t [A(1),A (1) ]+iu 1A (1) +v 1[σ 3,A (1) ] = 0, (7.5) ia (2) t [A(2),A (2) ]+iu 2A (2) +v 2[σ 3,A (2) ] = 0, (7.6). (7.7) [A(N),A (N) ]+iu NA (N) +v N [σ 3,A (N) ] = 0, (7.8) A (j) 3 A (j) A (j)+ A (j) 3 and u j and v j are some coupling potentials. 7.2 The Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart, A (j)2 = I, A (j)± = A (j) 1 ±ia (j) 2, (7.9) We now can write the Lakshmanan equivalent counterpart of the N-layer M-LIII equation (7.1)- (7.4). It is the following vector NLSE 8 Hamiltonian structure iq 1t +q 1 +2( q q q N 2 )q 1 = 0, (7.10) iq 2t +q 2 +2( q q q N 2 )q 2 = 0, (7.11). (7.12) iq Nt +q N +2( q q q N 2 )q N = 0. (7.13) In this section we briefly present main elements of the Hamiltonian structure of the multilayer M- LIII equation. As eample, here we consider only N = 3 case that is th-layer M-LIII equation (5.1)-(5.3). Let us start from quantum Heisenberg magnetic model for th-layer case. We write it as In classical limit, this model takes the form The continuum limit of this model looks like Ĥ = J (ÂiÂi+1 + ˆB i ˆBi +ĈiĈi)+Ĥint. (8.1) H = J (A i A i+1 +B i B i +C i C i )+H int. (8.2) H = H a +H b +H c +H int, (8.3) 13

14 where H a = 0.5 A 2 d, H b = 0.5 B 2 d, H c = 0.5 C 2 d,h int = 0.5 h int d, (8.4) with h int = h int (A j,b j,c j,a j,b j,c j ). The Hamilton form of th-layer M-LIII equation (5.1)-(5.3) is given by A it B it C it = {H,A i } = ǫ ijk δh δa j A k, (8.5) = {H,B i } = ǫ ijk δh δb j B k, (8.6) = {H,C i } = ǫ ijk δh δc j C k. (8.7) Here the Poisson bracket is given by [ δp δq {P,Q} = ǫ ijk A k + δp δq B k + δp ] δq C k d. (8.8) δa i δa j δb i δb j δc i δc j Hence for the components of the spin vectors we obtain and 9 The Γ spin system {A i,a j } = ǫ ijk A k δ( y), (8.9) {B i,b j } = ǫ ijk B k δ( y), (8.10) {C i,c j } = ǫ ijk C k δ( y). (8.11) {A i,b j } = {A i,b j } = {A i,c j } = 0. (8.12) In the previous section we have shown that between the multilayer M-LIII equation and the vector NLSE takes place the Lakshmanan equivalence. But it is well known that there eists another spin system, namely, the Γ-spin system which is also (gauge) equivalent to the vector NLSE. The Γ-spin system reads as where iγ t [Γ,Γ ] = 0, (9.1) Γ = (Γ ij ) su(n +1). (9.2) 10 The relation between solutions of the multilayer M-LIII equation and the Γ-spin system It is natural that the solutions of the multilayer M-LIII equation (4.3)-(4.4) and the Γ-spin system (9.1) is related to each other by some eact transformations. As eample, here we present these transformations for th-layer M-LIII equation that is for N = 2 case Direct M-transformation Let A and B be the solution of th-layer M-LIII equation (4.3)-(4.4). Then, according to the direct M-transformation [39]-[45], the solutions of the Γ-spin system (9.1) are epressed as 2A 3 K 2A 2(1+A 3)B 1+B 3 Γ = 1 2+K 2A + (2A 3 +K) 2A + B 1+B 3 2(1+A 3)B + 1+B 3 2A B + 1+B 3 K 2 14, (10.1)

15 where 10.2 Inverse M-transformation K = (1+A 3)(1 B 3 ) 1+B 3. (10.2) We now consider the inverse M-transformation. Let Γ ij be solutions of the Γ spin system (9.1). Then the solutions of the coupled or (that same) 2-layer M-LIII equation (4.3)-(4.4) are defined as ( ) 1 Γ11 Γ A = 22 2Γ 12, (10.3) 1 Γ 33 2Γ 21 Γ 22 Γ 11 ( ) 1 Γ11 Γ B = 33 2Γ 13, (10.4) 1 Γ 22 2Γ 31 Γ 33 Γ 11 whereγ ij aregivenbytheformulas(9.2). Similarly,wefindthedirectandinverseM-transformations for N 2 cases. 11 Geometric flows of immersed surfaces Let r j = r j (,t) be the position vector of the immersed j-th surface in the some Euclidean space. Such surfaces are given by the following set of first fundamental forms I 1 = d 2 +2r 1 r 1t ddt+r 2 1tdt 2, (11.1) I 2 = d 2 +2r 2 r 2t ddt+r 2 2t dt2, (11.2). (11.3) I N = d 2 +2r N r Nt ddt+r 2 Ntdt 2, (11.4) where we assumed that r 2 = 1. We write the set of the second fundamental forms as II 1 = L 1 d 2 +2M 1 ddt+n 1 dt 2, (11.5) II 2 = L 2 d 2 +2M 2 ddt+n 2 dt 2, (11.6). (11.7) II N = L N d 2 +2M N ddt+n N dt 2. (11.8) Finally, we can also write the third fundamental forms. As it is well known, the third fundamental forms can be written in terms of the first and second forms as III 1 = 2H 1 II 1 K 1 I 1, (11.9) III 2 = 2H 2 II 2 K 2 I 2, (11.10). (11.11) III N = 2H N II N K N I N, (11.12) where H j and K j are the mean curvature and the Gaussian curvature of the j-th surface respectively. 12 Geometric flows of curves In this section we want to present another but the equivalent approach to derive the Lakshmanan equivalent of the 1-layer M-LIII equation (3.5). For this purpose we consider the curve which is given by r t = ae 1 +b +c, (12.1) 15

16 where e 1, and denote the tangent, normal and binormal vectors of the curve, respectively. The velocities a, b and c depend on the κ and τ as well as their derivatives with respect to arclength parameter. The arclength parameter is defined implicitly by ds = hdp, h = r(p), where p is a free parameter and is independent of time. From the flow (12.1), the time evolutions of the vectors e j are given by and ė 3 = (a τb+κc)e 1 +(b +τa), (12.2) ( [ ) 1 ė 1 = a τb+κc) + κ (b +τa + τ ] κ (a τb+κc), (12.3) [ 1 ė 2 = (b +τa) κ (b +τa) + τ ] κ (a τb+κc) e 1, (12.4) ḣ = 2h(c κa) (12.5) τ t = [ 1 κ (b +τa)+ τ ] κ (a τb)+τ κad +κτa+κb, (12.6) κ t = a + ( κ 2 τ 2) a+κ κad 2τb τ b. (12.7) Assuming that the flow is intrinsic, namely that the arclength does not depend on time, it implies from (12.5) that c s = κa. (12.8) Let a = 0, b = κ, where κ is a real function, then (12.8) implies that c = c 1, where c 1 is a constant. Let c 1 = 0, then the set of equations (12.2)-(12.4) takes the form ė 3 = τκe 1 +κ, [ κ ė 1 = τκ + κ τ2], [ κ ė 2 = κ κ τ2] e 1. (12.9) 13 Integrable filament equations of interacting vortices Let us consider the following r-form of the multilayer M-LIII equation, shortly, the multilayer r-m-liii equation where j = 1,2,,N and r jt = r j r j +u j r j +2v j H r j +L j, (13.1) L j = 1 [u j r j +2v j H r j ]. (13.2) This closed set of equations is integrable. It describes the (integrable) interaction of N vortices. Indeed, this system is the closed set of the filament equations for interacting N vortices. In the case u j = v j = 0, we obtain the following uncoupled (noninteracting) N vorticesfilament equations 14 Conclusion r jt = r j r j. (13.3) In this paper, we have shown that the N-layer M-LIII equation can be related with the geometric flows of interacting curves and surfaces in some space R n. Then we have found the Lakshmanan equivalent counterparts of the N-layer M-LIII equations. After some algebra we have proved that these counterparts in fact are the vector NLSE. On the other hand, it is well-known that the vector NLSE is equivalent to the Γ-spin system. Also, we have presented the transformations which give the relation between solutions of the Γ-spin system and the multilayer M-LIII equation. It is interesting to understand the role of the constant magnetic field H. It seems that this constant magnetic vector plays an important role in our construction of integrable multilayer spin systems and in nonlinear dynamics of multilayer magnetic systems. 16

17 References [1] Gutshabash E. Sh. Zapiski nauqnyh seminarov POMI, 269, (2000) [2] Nian-Ning Huang, Bing Xu. Commun. Theor. Phys., 12, ). [3] G. Nugmanova, Z. Zhunussova, K. Yesmakhanova, G. Mamyrbekova, R. Myrzakulov. International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Statistical, Natural and Physical Engineering, 9, N8, (2015). [4] J.-S. He, Y. Cheng, Y.-S. Li. Commun. Theor. Phys., 38, (2002). [5] U. Saleem, M. Hasan. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43, (2010). [6] M. Lakshmanan, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, (2011). [7] M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Lett. A, 64, (1977). [8] L.A. Takhtajan, Phys. Lett. A, 64, (1977). [9] C. Senthilkumar, M. Lakshmanan, B. Grammaticos, A. Ramani, Phys. Lett. A (2006). [10] Y. Ishimori, Prog. Theor. Phys (1984). [11] R. Myrzakulov, S. Vijayalakshmi, G. Nugmanova, M. Lakshmanan Physics Letters A, 233, 14-6, (1997). [12] R. Myrzakulov, S. Vijayalakshmi, R. Syzdykova, M. Lakshmanan, J. Math. Phys., 39, (1998). [13] R. Myrzakulov, M. Lakshmanan, S. Vijayalakshmi, A. Danlybaeva, J. Math. Phys., 39, (1998). [14] Myrzakulov R, Danlybaeva A.K, Nugmanova G.N. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, V.118, 13, P (1999). [15] Myrzakulov R., Nugmanova G., Syzdykova R. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & Theoretical, V.31, 147, P (1998). [16] Myrzakulov R., Daniel M., Amuda R. Physica A., V.234, 13-4, P (1997). [17] Myrzakulov R., Makhankov V.G., Pashaev O.. Letters in Mathematical Physics, V.16, N1, P (1989) [18] Myrzakulov R., Makhankov V.G., Makhankov A. Physica Scripta, V.35, N3, P (1987) [19] Myrzakulov R., Pashaev O.., Kholmurodov Kh. Physica Scripta, V.33, N4, P (1986) [20] Anco S.C., Myrzakulov R. Journal of Geometry and Physics, v.60, (2010) [21] Myrzakulov R., Rahimov F.K., Myrzakul K., Serikbaev N.S. On the geometry of stationary Heisenberg ferromagnets. In: Non-linear waves: Classical and Quantum Aspects, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, P (2004) [22] Myrzakulov R., Serikbaev N.S., Myrzakul Kur., Rahimov F.K. On continuous limits of some generalized compressible Heisenberg spin chains. Journal of NATO Science Series II. Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, V 153, P (2004) [23] R.Myrzakulov, G. K. Mamyrbekova, G. N. Nugmanova, M. Lakshmanan. Symmetry, 7(3), (2015). [arxiv: ] [24] R.Myrzakulov, G. K. Mamyrbekova, G. N. Nugmanova, K. Yesmakhanova, M. Lakshmanan. Physics Letters A, 378, N30-31, (2014). [arxiv: ] 17

18 [25] Myrzakulov R., Martina L., Kozhamkulov T.A., Myrzakul Kur. Integrable Heisenberg ferromagnets and soliton geometry of curves and surfaces. In book: Nonlinear Physics: Theory and Eperiment. II. World Scientific, London, P (2003) [26] Myrzakulov R. Integrability of the Gauss-Codazzi-Mainardi equation in 2+1 dimensions. In Mathematical Problems of Nonlinear Dynamics, Proc. of the Int. Conf. Progress in Nonlinear sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, July 2-6, 2001, V.1, P (2001) [27] Chen Chi, Zhou Zi-Xiang. Darbou Tranformation and Eact Solutions of the Myrzakulov-I Equations. Chin. Phys. Lett., 26, N8, (2009) [28] Chen Hai, Zhou Zi-Xiang. Darbou Transformation with a Double Spectral Parameter for the Myrzakulov-I Equation. Chin. Phys. Lett., 31, N12, (2014) [29] Zhao-Wen Yan, Min-Ru Chen, Ke Wu, Wei-Zhong Zhao. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 81, (2012) [30] Yan Zhao-Wen, Chen Min-Ru, Wu Ke, Zhao Wei-Zhong. Commun. Theor. Phys., 58, (2012) [31] K.R. Ysmakhanova, G.N. Nugmanova, Wei-Zhong Zhao, Ke Wu. Integrable inhomogeneous Lakshmanan-Myrzakulov equation, [nlin/ ] [32] Zhen-Huan Zhang, Ming Deng, Wei-Zhong Zhao, Ke Wu. On the integrable inhomogeneous Myrzakulov-I equation, [arxiv: nlin/ ] [33] Martina L, Myrzakul Kur., Myrzakulov R, Soliani G. Journal of Mathematical Physics, V.42, 13, P (2001). [34] Xiao-Yu Wu, Bo Tian, Hui-Ling Zhen, Wen-Rong Sun and Ya Sun. Journal of Modern Optics, [35] Z.S. Yersultanova, M. Zhassybayeva, K. Yesmakhanova, G. Nugmanova, R. Myrzakulov. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 13, N1, (2016).. [arxiv: ] [36] Bordag L.A., Yanovski A.B. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 28, (1995) [37] Bordag L.A., Yanovski A.B. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 29, (1996) [38] N. A. Kostov, R. Dandoloff, V. S. Gerdjikov, G. G. Grahovski. The Manakov system as two moving interacting curves, In the Proceedings of the International Workshop Comple structures and vector fields, August 21 26, 2006, Sofia, Bulgaria. Eds.: K. Sekigawa, S. Dimiev. World Scientific (2007) [39] Myrzakul Akbota. Integrability of two coupled curves and geometrically equivalent spin analogue of the Manakov equation. Vestnik ENU, N2, (2016) [40] Myrzakul Akbota. Equivalence between the coupled M-LIII equation and the Γ-spin system. Vestnik ENU, N3, (2016) [41] Myrzakul Akbota. Gauge equivalence between the coupled M-LIII equation and the Manakov system. Vestnik ENU, N1, (2016) [42] Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Motion of two interacting curves and surfaces: integrable reductions and soliton equations. Vestnik ENU, N4, (2014) [43] Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Integrable Motion of Two Interacting Curves and Heisenberg Ferromagnetic Equations, Abstracts of XVIII-th Intern. Conference Geometry, Integrability and Quantization, Jun-8, 2016, Bulgaria. [44] Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Integrable motion of two interacting curves, spin systems and the Manakov system, [arxiv: ] [45] Myrzakul Akbota and Myrzakulov Ratbay. Darbou transformations and eact soliton solutions of integrable coupled spin systems related with the Manakov system, [arxiv: ] 18