On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy of RP 1 - foliations
|
|
- Lesley Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy of RP 1 - foliations Slaheddine Chihi and Souad ben Ramdane Abstract. A transversely projective codimension one foliation F on a manifold M is defined by a triplet of 1-forms (ω, ω 1, ω 2 such that ω define F, dω = 2ω ω 1, dω 1 = ω ω 2 and dω 2 = 2ω 2 ω 1. The cohomology class gv(f of the 3-form ω ω 1 ω 2 is independent of the choice of the triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2, it s called the Godbillon-Vey invariant of the foliation F. Moreover, the same triplet defines a homomorphism group, h : π 1 (M PSL(2, R whose the conjugacy class of its image Γ(F, called the global holonomy of the foliation F, depends only on F. In the present paper we prove that when gv(f is non zero then the orbits of Γ(F are dense in RP 1 and Γ(F is either discrete uniform or dense in PSL(2, R. In addition we prove the existence of transversely projective codimension one foliations with non zero Godbillon-Vey invariant and a dense global holonomy. M.S.C. 2000: 57R30, 57R20. Key words: transverse structure, Godbillion-Vey invariant, foliation. 1 Introduction In [1], C.Godbillon and J.Vey introduced a characteristic class associated to codimension one foliations which lies in the third real cohomology group of the ambient manifold. Several authors studied the relation between this invariant and the structure of leaves. In the present paper we study the relation between the Godbillon-Vey invariant and the global holonomy of a transversely projective codimension one foliations (or RP 1 - foliations(i.e. foliations which are modelled on the projective real line RP 1 with coordinate changes lying in the group PSL(2, R of projective transformations of RP 1. See section 2 for more detailed discussion. It is interesting to note that the first example of a foliation with non zero Godbillon-Vey invariant (due to Roussarie is an RP 1 - foliation with global holonomy a discrete uniform subgroup of PSL(2, R. Our main results are the following: Balkan Journal of Geometry and Its Applications, Vol.13, No.2, 2008, pp c Balkan Society of Geometers, Geometry Balkan Press 2008.
2 On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy 25 Theorem 3.4. Let F be a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M. If the Godbillon-Vey invariant gv(f is non zero, then the orbits of Γ(F in RP 1 are everywhere dense in RP 1. In particular, if the foliation is transverse to a fibration by circles, then every leaf of F is dense in M Theorem 3.5. Let F be a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M. If gv(f is non zero, then Γ(F is discrete or everywhere dense in PSL(2, R. Theorem 4.2. There exists a transversely projective foliations on a manifolds M ( dimm 5, having an invariant different from zero and a global holonomy dense in PSL(2, R. This paper is organized as follows: In section 1, we review the notion of transverse structures on foliations and recall some known results and definitions concerning RP 1 - foliations. Section 3 is occupied by the proofs of the theorems (3.4 and (3.5 listed previously. In section 4, we expose a manner to construct RP 1 -foliations with non zero GodbillonVey invariant and global holonomy dense in PSL(2, R provided that the dimension of the ambient manifold is at least equal to five, this is Theorem Transverse structures on foliations Recall that, a smooth codimension-k foliation on a smooth manifold M, can be defined by an open cover {U α } α I of M and a family of maps {ϕ α } α I, where ϕ α : U α R k is a submersion, with the following property: For each α, β I, there exist a transition functions g αβ : U α U β diff(r k, locally constant, such that ϕ α = g αβ ϕ β. When the family {(U α, ϕ α, α I} is maximal, we call it a transverse structure. We can obtain finer transverse structures, if we put a special conditions on the transition functions g αβ. Suppose that X is a manifold of dimension k, and G a group of diffeomorphisms of X, then F has a transverse structure (G, X if the submersions ϕ α can be defined from U α to an open set V α of X, and g αβ can be chosen belonging in G. More precisely, a transverse (G,X-structure on F is a maximal atlas {(U α, ϕ α, α I} where {U α } α I is an open cover of M, and ϕ α : U α X, are submersions with transition functions g αβ belonging in G. When G is a Lie-group and X is an homogeneous space of G, then the foliation obtained is said transversely homogeneous foliation. For k = 1, we have as examples, the following transverse structures: 1 - If G is the group of translations of R, F is called transversely euclidian. 2 - If G is the group of the affine transformations of R, F is called transversely affine. 3 - If G is the group of projective transformations PSL(2, R of RP 1, F is called transversely projective or RP 1 - foliation(for more details see [3]. In terms of differential forms, a codimension-k foliation can be locally defined by a k differential 1-forms ω 1, ω 2,..., ω k linearly independent in each point, such that
3 26 Slaheddine Chihi and Souad ben Ramdane dω i = ω ij ω j for some 1-forms ω ij. In particular, when k = 1, a transversely oriented codimension-1 foliation F is defined by a 1-form ω, without singularity, such that for some 1-form ω 1 we have dω = ω ω 1. It was shown, in this case, that the real cohomology class [Ω] of the closed form Ω = ω 1 dω 1 in H 3 (M, R depends only on the given foliation. It is called the Godbillon-Vey invariant of the foliation and denoted by gv(f (for more details see [1]. Now we are going to give some well known results. Theorem 2.1. Let G be a connected Lie group, g the Lie algebra of G and π its Maurer-Cartan s form. Then, a dπ [π, π] = 0. b If Ω : T (M g is a g- valued 1-form defined on M such that dω + 1 [Ω, Ω] = 0, 2 then each point x M has a neighborhood U on which is defined a map h : U G verifying h π = Ω U. Moreover, any map k : U G verifying k π = Ω U, is of the form: k = γh where γ G. In addition if M is simply connected, then there exists a map F : M G, globally defined, such that F π = Ω. The Lie algebra G of the Lie group PSL(2, R has a basis (X, Y, Z such that [X, Z] = Y, [Z, Y] = 2Z, [Y, X] = 2X, and in this basis every G-valued 1-form: can be written of the form Ω : T (M G Ω = ωx + ω 1 Y + ω 2 Z where ω, ω 1, ω 2 are real valued 1-forms called the components of Ω. Moreover the identity is verified, if and only if, we have dω + 1 [Ω, Ω] = 0 2 dω = 2ω ω 1 dω 1 = ω ω 2 dω 2 = 2ω 2 ω 1. These equalities are called the Maurer-cartan s equations. Corollary 2.2. A codimension one foliation is transversely projective, if and only if, it is defined by a 1-form, ω, such that, for some tow 1-forms ω 1 and ω 2, the triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2 satisfies the Maurer-cartan s equations.
4 On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy 27 We say that the foliation is defined by the triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2. Clearly if F is an RP 1 - foliation defined by a triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2, then gv(f = 4[ω 1 ω ω 2 ]. Corollary 2.3. Let F be an RP 1 - foliation on a manifold M defined by a triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2, and let p : M Mbe the universal covering of M. Then there exist a homomorphism group Φ : Aut( M PSL(2, R and a smooth function F : M PSL(2, R such that for every g Aut( M, F g = Φ(gF. The homomorphism Φ induces, via the natural isomorphism π 1 (M = Aut( M, a homomorphism group h : π 1 (M PSL(2, R called the homomorphism of global holonomy. The subgroup Γ(F = h(π 1 (M of PSL(2, R is called the global holonomy group of the foliation F. Let M = M/ker(Φ and p : M M the canonical projection. Then we have the following basic result: Proposition 2.4. Let F be a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M. Then there exists a galoisian covering p : M M, an injective homomorphism ϕ : Aut( M PSL(2, R and a submersion f : M RP 1, satisfying the following properties a p F is the foliation defined by the submersion f. b f is equivariant with respect to ϕ : f(g(x = ϕ(g(f(x, x M, g Aut( M. c The holonomy group of a leaf L of F is isomorphic to the subgroup of the Aut( M living L invariant, where L is any connected component of p 1 (L. It follows from Proposition 2.4 that to each leaf L of F correspond an orbit O(L = f(p 1 (L of Γ(F in RP 1 and, Corollary 2.5. aif L is dense in M, then O(L is dense in f( M and, if O(L is proper, then L is proper. blet θ f( M, then the holonomy group of a leaf of p(f 1 (θ is a subgroup of the isotropy group of θ. If the foliation is transverse to a fibration by circles, then L is proper if and only if O(L is proper and, L is dense if and only if O(L is dense in RP 1. Concerning transverse structures, an RP 1 - foliation can admits several transverse projective structures and the triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2 which defines F is not necessarily unique. On the other hand, it was shown that if M is compact, then every RP 1 - foliation having holonomy has a unique transverse projective structure. In the general case we have the following
5 28 Slaheddine Chihi and Souad ben Ramdane Proposition 2.6. Let F be an RP 1 - foliation on a manifold M. Then aany transverse projective structure on F is defined by a triplet (ω, ω 1, ω 2 of 1-forms satisfying the Maurer-cartan s equations. btow triplets (ω, ω 1, ω 2 and (ϖ, ϖ 1, ϖ 2 define the same transverse projective structure on F, if and only if, there exist tow functions f, g : M R with f > 0 and iϖ = fω. iiϖ 1 = ω 1 + gω + df 2f. iiiϖ 2 = 1 f (g2 ω 2gω 1 + ω 2 dg. Tow triplets (ω, ω 1, ω 2 and (ϖ, ϖ 1, ϖ 2 satisfying the relations i, ii, iii of Proposition 2.6 are said equivalent. Now we are going to close this section by giving tow examples in order to illustrate Proposition 2.4. Examples 1- Example of Roussarie Let (α, α 1, α 2 be the components of the Maurer-Cartan s form of PSL(2, R and H a discrete uniform subgroup of PSL(2, R (see 3.1. The triplet of 1-forms (α, α 1, α 2 verifies the Maurer-Cartan s equations, it is left-invariant, (so invariant by the natural action of H on V = PSL(2, R/H and consequently gives a triplet (β, β 1, β 2 verifying the same equations on the quotient V and therefore defines a transversely projective foliation R on V. Note that the canonical projections p : PSL(2, R V, and q : PSL(2, R RP 1, are, respectively, a galoisian covering and a submersion satisfying the conditions of Proposition 2.4. The global holonomy group of R being, precisely, the subgroup H. On the other hand, the form β β 1 β 2 is a volume form on the compact manifold V is not be exact. This implies that gv(f is non zero. 2- Transversely projective foliation transverse to a fibration by circles Let M be a manifold and ϕ : π 1 (M PSL(2, R be an homomorphism group. Consider the universal covering M of M. Then the group π 1 (M acts on the product Ṽ = M RP 1 by γ : (x, t (γ(x, ϕ(γ(t. The foliation { M {t}, t RP 1 } is invariant under this action, and consequently gives, by dropping down, a transversely projective foliation F(ϕ on the quotient manifold V = Ṽ /π 1(M. The galoisian covering p : ( M/kerϕ RP 1 V and the canonical projection p 2 : Ṽ RP1 are satisfying the conditions of Proposition 2.4. The global holonomy of F(ϕ is the group ϕ(π 1 (M. 3 The Godbillon-Vey invariant and the global holonomy In this section we identify PSL(2, R with SL(2, R/{±id} and RP 1 with R { }. Under this identification, a projective transformation of RP 1 is of the form
6 On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy 29 We denote it by t at + b ct + d, ad bc = 1. ( a b ɛ c d where ɛ means ±. The projective transformations which are fixing are of the form ( a b ɛ 1 0 a Their set is a subgroup of PSL(2, R called the affine group, and denoted by A. The projective transformations which, globally, fixe the pair {0, } are of the form ( a 0 ɛ 1 0 a. ( 0 b or ɛ 1 b 0 Their set is a subgroup of PSL(2, R. We denote it by P. The projective transformations of the form ( a b ɛ b a are without fixed point and called rotations. Their set is a subgroup denoted by R. The elements ( 1 b ɛ 0 1 fixe only the point and called translations. Their set is a subgroup denoted by T. The elements ( a 0 ɛ 1 0 a of PSL(2, R admit exactly tow fixed points, 0 and, are called homotheties. Their set is a subgroup denoted by H. Remark 3.1. A projective transformation different from the identity can not have more than tow distinct fixed points. Definition. A discrete subgroup H of PSL(2, R is said uniform if the quotient PSL(2, R/H is a compact manifold. Lemma 3.2. Let α, α 1, α 2 be the components of the Maurer-Cartan s form of PSL(2, R. If H is one of the subgroups A, P or a non uniform discrete subgroup of PSL(2, R, then there exists a 2-form ϖ on PSL(2, R invariant by the group H and such that: dϖ = α α 1 α 2 ( x u Proof. Let PSL(2, R = SL(2, R/{±id} and denote by X = ɛ y v element. Then we have α = xdy ydx, α 1 = xdv ydu = udy vdx, α 2 = vdu udv.. its generic
7 30 Slaheddine Chihi and Souad ben Ramdane On the other hand, by a simple calculation, we prove that the 2-form ( xy + uv β = (vdy ydv d y 2 + v 2 is invariant by the affine group A and verifies the equality dβ = α α 1 α 2. In this case we take ϖ = β. If H = P we consider the matrix σ = the left translation τ σ : PSL(2, R PSL(2, R defined by τ σ (X = σx. Because τ 2 σ = id, the 2-form ( and β = 1 2 (β + τ σβ is invariant by the subgroup P and verifies the equality dβ = α α 1 α 2. In this case we take ϖ = β. Now Suppose that H is a discrete non uniform subgroup of PSL(2, R, and consider the canonical projection q : PSL(2, R PSL(2, R/H. The volume form α α 1 α 2 is left-invariant on PSL(2, R. Then it drops down to the quotient giving a volume form ν on PSL(2, R/H. Because this quotient is not compact, ν is exact. Let η be a 2-form on PSL(2, R/H such that dη = ν, then the 2-form ϖ = q η is invariant under H on PSL(2, R and satisfies dϖ = α α 1 α 2. Theorem 3.3. Let F be a transversely projective foliation with global holonomy group Γ(F. Each of the flowing conditions implies that the GodbillonVey invariant gv(f of F is zero. i Γ(F is conjugated to a subgroup of the affine group A. ii Γ(F is conjugated to a subgroup of the group P. iii Γ(F is a non uniform discrete subgroup of PSL(2, R. iv Γ(F is conjugated to a subgroup of the group R.
8 On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy 31 Proof. If Γ(F verifies i, ii or iii then there exist, by Lemma.3.2, a 2-form ϖ on PSL(2, R invariant by Γ(F with dϖ = α α 1 α 2. Let p : M M be the universal covering of M. Then by Corollary 2.3, there exists a map F : M PSL(2, R, such that F (α, α 1, α 2 = p (ω, ω 1, ω 2 and for every g Aut( M, F g = ϕ(gf. It follows that, the 2-form F ϖ is invariant by the group of Aut( M and d(f ϖ = p (ω ω 1 ω 2. Consequently the 2-form F ϖ drops down to M giving a 2-form λ such that dλ = ω ω 1 ω 2. This means that the GodbillonVey invariant gv(f is zero. This proves the parts i, ii and iii of the Theorem. In the case iv, the elements of Γ are without fixed point and consequently, by Corollary 2.5, F is without holonomy, therefore gv(f is zero. Theorem 3.4. Let F be a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M. If the GodbillonVey invariant gv(f is non zero, then the orbits of Γ(F in RP 1 are everywhere dense in RP 1. In particular, if the foliation is transverse to a fibration by circles, then every leaf of F is dense in M. Proof. Let Γ(F = Γ be the global holonomy group of F. Suppose at first that Γ has a proper orbit O. Then: aif O is reduced to a single point {θ 0 }, Γ is conjugated to a subgroup of the affine group A. bif O is reduced to a pair {θ 1, θ 2 }, then Γ is conjugated to a subgroup of the group P. c If O contains more than two points, then for any point θ 0 O, and any γ Γ {id} we have γ(θ 0 θ 0. Indeed, suppose that γ id and γ(θ 0 = θ 0. Then there exists θ O such that γ(θ θ and therefore the sequence γ n (θ (or γ n (θ converges to the fixed point θ 0, this implies that O is not proper which is a contradiction. So γ(θ 0 is an other point of O. It follows that if θ 0, θ 1 are tow consecutive points in O and A =]θ 0, θ 1 [, then γ(a A = hence A dos not contain two distinct points equivalent by Γ, and so q 1 (A (q : PSL(2, R RP 1 is the canonical projection is a non relatively compact open set of PSL(2, R having no distinct points equivalent by Γ. Consequently, Γ is a non uniform discrete subgroup of PSL(2, R. Now suppose that Γ has an exceptional minimal set M, and let ]θ 1, θ 2 [ be an interval(i.e: a connected component of RP 1 M. If γ is an element of Γ which fixes θ 1, it fixes also θ 2, because otherwise one of the sequences γ n (θ 2 or γ n (θ 2 converges to θ 1 and so the interval ]θ 1, θ 2 [ would contain points of the orbit of θ 2 which are points of M. On the other hand the isotropy group of θ 1 is cyclic, because otherwise, the orbits would be locally dense in a neighborhood of θ 1. Consequently, an element which does not fixe θ 1, sends ]θ 1, θ 2 [ to another connected component of RP 1 M, this implies that the orbit of any point of ]θ 1, θ 2 [ is proper and infinite. We conclude as previously that Γ is a non uniform discrete subgroup of PSL(2, R. Now the proof is an immediate consequence of Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.5. Let F be a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M. If gv(f is non zero then Γ(F is discrete uniform or everywhere dense in PSL(2, R.
9 32 Slaheddine Chihi and Souad ben Ramdane Proof. If Γ is neither discrete nor everywhere dense in PSL(2, R, then the closure Γ of Γ in PSL(2, R is a Lie-subgroup of dimension one or tow of PSL(2, R. If Γ is of dimension one, the connected component Γ 0 of Γ containing the identity element, is a normal subgroup of Γ, so only the three following cases are possible. i Γ 0 is conjugated to R, and in this case Γ = Γ 0. ii Γ 0 is conjugated to the group T of translations, also in this case Γ = Γ 0. iii Γ 0 is conjugated to the group H of homotheties, and therefore Γ is conjugated to a subgroup of P. If Γ is of dimension tow, then Γ 0 is conjugated to the affine group A. Consequently, Γ is conjugated to a subgroup of the affine group A. Now the conclusion is an easy consequence of Theorem An existence theorem The example of Roussarie is a transversely projective foliation with a discrete uniform global holonomy and non zero GodbillonVey invariant. In this section we are going to construct a transversely projective foliation with a dense global holonomy, and a non zero GodbillonVey invariant. For this we need the next Proposition where S 1 = R/Z. Proposition 4.1. Let F be a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M. Then there exists a transversely projective foliation H on M S 1 transverse to the factor S 1 and H M {0} = F. Proof. Let (ω, ω 1, ω 2 be a triplet of 1-forms defining the foliation F on M and denote by dθ the canonical volume form of S 1. Then the triplet (ϖ, ϖ 1, ϖ 2 given by ϖ = (cos 2 θω (sin 2θω 1 (sin 2 θω 2 + dθ ϖ 1 = 1 2 (sin 2θω (sin 2θω 2 + (cos 2θω 1 ϖ 2 = (cos 2 θω 2 (sin 2 θω (sin 2θω 1 dθ where θ is the generic element of S 1, defines a transversely projective foliation H on M S 1 verifying the intended conditions. Observe that Γ(H = Γ(F and gv(h is non zero if and only if gv(f is non zero. In addition, the projective structure induced by the foliation H on the factor S 1 is the canonical projective structure of S 1 defined by the triplet (dθ, 0, dθ. Theorem 4.2. There exists a transversely projective foliation on a manifold M (dim M 5, having an invariant different from zero, and a dense global holonomy in PSL(2, R. Proof. By Proposition 4.1, we can easily construct two transversely projective foliations F 0 and F 1 on manifolds M 0 and M 1, respectively, having the following properties 1The invariant gv(f 0 is different from zero. 2Γ(F 1 is not discrete. 3There exists two closed transversal τ 0 and τ 1 to F 0 and F 1, respectively, such that the projective structures induced by F 0 on τ 0 and by F 1 on τ 1 are identical.
10 On the Godbillon-Vey invariant and global holonomy 33 Denote by V α, α = 1, 2 a tubular foliated neighborhood of τ α diffeomorphic to S 1 R n 1, and by M α the manifold M α S 1 D n 1 with boundary M α = S 1 S n 2 and by F α the restriction of F α to M α. We can suppose, by changing if necessary the triplets defining F 0 and F 1 by equivalent triplets, that the two foliations F 0 and F 1 define the same structures on a neighborhood of M 0 = M 1 = S 1 S n 2. Consequently, by sticking the two foliations F 0 and F 1, we obtain a transversely projective foliation F on the manifold M = M 0 S 1 S n 2 M 1. Now the proof is a immediate consequence of the next lemmas. Lemma 4.3. The global holonomy Γ(F of F is everywhere dense in PSL(2, R. Proof. - We prove by the Van-Kampen s theorem that Γ(F α = Γ(F α, α = 0, 1 and Γ(F is generated by Γ(F 0 and Γ(F 1. Since gv(f 0 0, then Γ(F 0 is either discrete uniform or dense in PSL(2, R. Now Γ(F 1 is not discrete, so in both cases, Γ(F is everywhere dense in PSL(2, R. Lemma 4.4. If the dimension of M 0 is superior or equal to 5, then gv(f 0. Proof. - Let i : M 0 M 0 be the canonical injection, then i : H 3 (M 0 H 3 (M 0 is injective. Indeed, we have M 0 = M 0 S 1 D n 1 S 1 S n 2 and an exact sequence H 2 (S 1 S n 2 H 3 (M 0 H 3 (M 0 H 3 (S 1 D n 1. Since n 5, we have H 2 (S 1 S n 2 = 0 and so i is injective. Consider the canonical injection j : M 0 M 0 we have that S 1 S n 2 M 1 = M, j gv(f = gv(f 0 = i gv(f 0. Since i is injective and gv(f 0 is non zero, it follows that gv(f 0. This proves Lemma 4.4. References [1] C. Godbillon, J. Vey, 1971, Un invariant des feuilletages de codimension un, 1971, C.R.Acad.Sci, Paris, 273, (1971, [2] C. Godbillon, 1985, Feuilletage: Etude geometriquei. ULP (1985
11 34 Slaheddine Chihi and Souad ben Ramdane [3] S. Chihi, 1979, Sur les feuilletages de codimension un transversalement homographiques, Publication de l IRMA, Strasbourg(1979. [4] G. Duminy, V. Sergiescu, 1981, Sur la nullite de l invariant de Godbillon-Vey, C.R.Acad.Sci, Paris, Sr A-B, 292, (1981, [5] R. Bott, 1977, On the characteristic classes of groups of diffeomorphisms, Enseignement Math. (2, 23, (1977, [6] R. Brooks, 1979, Volume and characteristic classes of foliations, Topology, 18, (1979, [7] R.Brooks, W.Goldman, 1984, The Godbillon-vey invariant of a transversely homogeneous foliations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 286, (1984, [8] J. Dupont, 1976, Simplicial de Rham cohomology and characteristic classes of flat bundles, Topology, 15, (1976, [9] J. Dupont, 1978, Curvture and caracteristic classes, Lecture Notes in Math., 640, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1978. [10] J. Heitsch, 1986, Secondary invariants of transversely homogeneous foliations, Michigan Math. J., 33, (1986, [11] S. Hurder, 2002, Dynamics and the Godbilon-Vey class, World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., River Edge, N.J., (2002, [12] S. Nishikawa, H. Sato, 1976, On characteristic classes of Riemannian, conformal and projective foliations, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 28, (1976, Authors addresses: Slaheddine Chihi Département de Mathématiques, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Campus Universitaire 1060, Tunis, Tunisia. slaheddinechihi@yahoo.fr Souad Ben Ramdhan Département de Mathématiques, Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte, Jarzouna, Bizerte, Tunisia. souad.b.benramdane@fsb.rnu.tn
ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES
ASIAN J. MATH. c 2008 International Press Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 289 298, September 2008 002 ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES RAUL QUIROGA-BARRANCO Abstract.
More informationPoisson geometry of b-manifolds. Eva Miranda
Poisson geometry of b-manifolds Eva Miranda UPC-Barcelona Rio de Janeiro, July 26, 2010 Eva Miranda (UPC) Poisson 2010 July 26, 2010 1 / 45 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Classification of b-poisson manifolds
More informationRiemannian foliation with dense leaves on a compact manifold
Riemannian foliation with dense leaves on a compact manifold Cyrille Dadi, Adolphe Codjia To cite this version: Cyrille Dadi, Adolphe Codjia. Riemannian foliation with dense leaves on a compact manifold.
More informationEva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona. (joint with Victor Guillemin and Ana Rita Pires) Zaragoza, February
From b-poisson manifolds to symplectic mapping torus and back Eva Miranda UPC-Barcelona (joint with Victor Guillemin and Ana Rita Pires) Zaragoza, February 8 2011 Eva Miranda (UPC) Poisson Day February
More informationA MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS
A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS FRANCESCO BOTTACIN Abstract. In this paper we prove an analogue of the Marsden Weinstein reduction theorem for presymplectic actions of
More informationTwisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations
Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations Chi-Kwong Fok National Center for Theoretical Sciences Math Division National Tsing Hua University (Joint work
More informationBredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press
1 Introduction Outline Section 3: Topology of 2-orbifolds: Compact group actions Compact group actions Orbit spaces. Tubes and slices. Path-lifting, covering homotopy Locally smooth actions Smooth actions
More informationSYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5
SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 LIAT KESSLER Let (M, ω) be a connected compact symplectic manifold, T a torus, T M M a Hamiltonian action of T on M, and Φ: M t the assoaciated moment map. Theorem 0.1 (The
More informationSubgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold.
Recollections from finite group theory. The notion of a group acting on a set is extremely useful. Indeed, the whole of group theory arose through this route. As an example of the abstract power of this
More informationLECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY
LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 1. Blowing up and symplectic cutting In complex geometry the blowing-up operation amounts to replace a point in
More informationTransverse Euler Classes of Foliations on Non-atomic Foliation Cycles Steven HURDER & Yoshihiko MITSUMATSU. 1 Introduction
1 Transverse Euler Classes of Foliations on Non-atomic Foliation Cycles Steven HURDER & Yoshihiko MITSUMATSU 1 Introduction The main purpose of this article is to give a geometric proof of the following
More informationSYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction
SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS CRAIG JACKSON 1. Introduction Generally speaking, geometric quantization is a scheme for associating Hilbert spaces
More informationHard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds
Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds Antonio De Nicola CMUC, University of Coimbra, Portugal joint work with B. Cappelletti-Montano (Univ. Cagliari), J.C. Marrero (Univ. La Laguna) and I. Yudin
More informationMath 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim
SOLUTIONS Dec 13, 218 Math 868 Final Exam In this exam, all manifolds, maps, vector fields, etc. are smooth. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each).
More informationA CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS
UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE ACTA MATHEMATICA, FASCICULUS XLI 2003 A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS by J. Szenthe Abstract. In case of Riemannian manifolds isometric actions admitting submanifolds
More informationB 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.
Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2
More informationSpin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy
Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy 0. Introduction. The purpose of this addendum to the earlier notes on spinors is to outline the construction of Lorentzian metrics in
More informationTHE H-PRINCIPLE, LECTURE 14: HAEFLIGER S THEOREM CLASSIFYING FOLIATIONS ON OPEN MANIFOLDS
THE H-PRINCIPLE, LECTURE 14: HAELIGER S THEOREM CLASSIYING OLIATIONS ON OPEN MANIOLDS J. RANCIS, NOTES BY M. HOYOIS In this lecture we prove the following theorem: Theorem 0.1 (Haefliger). If M is an open
More informationLECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE
LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE JOHANNES EBERT 1.1. October 11th. 1. Recapitulation from differential topology Definition 1.1. Let M m, N n, be two smooth manifolds
More informationPseudogroups of foliations Algebraic invariants of solenoids The discriminant group Stable actions Wild actions Future work and references
Wild solenoids Olga Lukina University of Illinois at Chicago Joint work with Steven Hurder March 25, 2017 1 / 25 Cantor laminations Let M be a compact connected metrizable topological space with a foliation
More informationLipschitz matchbox manifolds
Lipschitz matchbox manifolds Steve Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder F is a C 1 -foliation of a compact manifold M. Problem: Let L be a complete Riemannian smooth manifold
More informationDynamics of Group Actions and Minimal Sets
University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder First Joint Meeting of the Sociedad de Matemática de Chile American Mathematical Society Special Session on Group Actions: Probability and Dynamics
More informationFoliations of Three Dimensional Manifolds
Foliations of Three Dimensional Manifolds M. H. Vartanian December 17, 2007 Abstract The theory of foliations began with a question by H. Hopf in the 1930 s: Does there exist on S 3 a completely integrable
More informationExercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1
Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 1. Conformal change of Riemannian metrics [3 points] Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. A conformal change is a nonnegative function λ : M (0, ). Such a function defines
More information10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.
10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10.1. The concept of a Lie subgroup of a Lie group. We have seen that if G is a Lie group and H G a subgroup which is at the same time a
More informationTRANSVERSE LS-CATEGORY FOR RIEMANNIAN FOLIATIONS
TRANSVERSE LS-CATEGORY FOR RIEMANNIAN FOLIATIONS STEVEN HURDER AND DIRK TÖBEN Abstract. We study the transverse Lusternik-Schnirelmann category theory of a Riemannian foliation F on a closed manifold M.
More informationFoliate fiield of an extension of a minimal Lie foliation on a compact manifold
Foliate fiield of an extension of a minimal Lie foliation on a compact manifold Cyrille Dadi, Adolphe Codjia To cite this version: Cyrille Dadi, Adolphe Codjia Foliate fiield of an extension of a minimal
More informationDynamics and topology of matchbox manifolds
Dynamics and topology of matchbox manifolds Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder 11th Nagoya International Mathematics Conference March 21, 2012 Introduction We present
More informationLECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM
LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM Contents 1. The Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg Convexity Theorem 1 2. Proof of the Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg Convexity theorem 3 3. Morse theory
More informationFoliation dynamics, shape and classification
Foliation dynamics, shape and classification Steve Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder Theorem: [Denjoy, 1932] There exist a C 1 -foliation F of codimension-1 with an exceptional
More informationOn the group of real analytic diffeomorphisms
On the group of real analytic diffeomorphisms Takashi TSUBOI the University of Tokyo partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research KAKENHI (S) 24224002, Japan Society for Promotion of Science.
More informationDynamical Invariants of Foliations 1
Dynamical Invariants of Foliations 1 Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago October 19, 2012 1 Colloquium GT3, IRMA, Université de Strasbourg Steven Hurder (University of Illinois at Chicago)
More informationHyperkähler geometry lecture 3
Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3 Misha Verbitsky Cohomology in Mathematics and Physics Euler Institute, September 25, 2013, St. Petersburg 1 Broom Bridge Here as he walked by on the 16th of October 1843
More informationNilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions
NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions Tokyo Metropolitan University November 29, 2011 (Tokyo NilBottMetropolitan Tower of Aspherical University) Manifolds and Torus ActionsNovember 29,
More information1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.
1. Riemannian symmetric spaces Definition 1.1. A (globally, Riemannian) symmetric space is a Riemannian manifold (X, g) such that for all x X, there exists an isometry s x Iso(X, g) such that s x (x) =
More informationClassifying Foliations
Classifying Foliations after Bott, Haefliger & Thurston Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder Séminaire général Institut de Mathématiques de Bourgogne November 7, 2012
More informationIntersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions
Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) March 14, 2011 Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) ()Intersection of stable and
More informationSelf-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds
Self-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds John Douglas Moore Department of Mathematics University of California Santa Barbara, CA, USA 93106 e-mail: moore@math.ucsb.edu
More informationA REMARK ON THE GROUP OF AUTOMORPHISMS OF A FOLIATION HAVING A DENSE LEAF
J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 7 (1972) 597-601 A REMARK ON THE GROUP OF AUTOMORPHISMS OF A FOLIATION HAVING A DENSE LEAF J. LESLIE Introduction When f is a C foliation of a compact manifold, the connected component
More informationClassification of matchbox manifolds
Classification of matchbox manifolds Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder Workshop on Dynamics of Foliations Steven Hurder (UIC) Matchbox Manifolds April 28, 2010 1
More informationHOLONOMY GROUPOIDS OF SINGULAR FOLIATIONS
j. differential geometry 58 (2001) 467-500 HOLONOMY GROUPOIDS OF SINGULAR FOLIATIONS CLAIRE DEBORD Abstract We give a new construction of Lie groupoids which is particularly well adapted to the generalization
More informationTitleOn manifolds with trivial logarithm. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(2)
TitleOn manifolds with trivial logarithm Author(s) Winkelmann, Jorg Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(2) Issue 2004-06 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/11094/7844 DOI Rights
More informationLECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES
LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES 1. Proper actions Suppose G acts on M smoothly, and m M. Then the orbit of G through m is G m = {g m g G}. If m, m lies in the same orbit, i.e. m = g m for
More informationLifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 447 456 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag Lifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions Marja Kankaanrinta Communicated by J. D. Lawson Abstract. By
More informationThe coincidence Nielsen number for maps into real projective spaces
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 140 (1992) The coincidence Nielsen number for maps into real projective spaces by Jerzy J e z i e r s k i (Warszawa) Abstract. We give an algorithm to compute the coincidence
More informationChapter 1. Smooth Manifolds
Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Theorem 1. [Exercise 1.18] Let M be a topological manifold. Then any two smooth atlases for M determine the same smooth structure if and only if their union is a smooth atlas.
More informationSymplectic varieties and Poisson deformations
Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations Yoshinori Namikawa A symplectic variety X is a normal algebraic variety (defined over C) which admits an everywhere non-degenerate d-closed 2-form ω on the
More informationTransversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2
Transversality Abhishek Khetan December 13, 2017 Contents 1 Basics 1 2 The Transversality Theorem 1 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2 4 Intersection Number Mod 2 4 5 Degree Mod 2 4 1 Basics Definition. Let
More informationON SL(3,R)-ACTION ON 4-SPHERE
ON SL(3,R)-ACTION ON 4-SPHERE SHINTARÔ KUROKI Abstract. We construct a natural continuous SL(3, R)-action on S 4 which is an extension of the SO(3)-action ψ in [8]. The construction is based on the Kuiper
More informationQuaternionic Complexes
Quaternionic Complexes Andreas Čap University of Vienna Berlin, March 2007 Andreas Čap (University of Vienna) Quaternionic Complexes Berlin, March 2007 1 / 19 based on the joint article math.dg/0508534
More informationPractice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.
Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Solutions (1) Let Γ be a discrete group acting on a manifold M. (a) Define what it means for Γ to act freely. Solution: Γ acts
More informationFoliations, Fractals and Cohomology
Foliations, Fractals and Cohomology Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder Colloquium, University of Leicester, 19 February 2009 Steven Hurder (UIC) Foliations, fractals,
More informationMaster Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry Lecture notes allowed
Université de Bordeaux U.F. Mathématiques et Interactions Master Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry 2018-2019 Lecture notes allowed Exercise 1 We call H (like
More informationA bundle-theoretic perspective to Kac Moody groups
A bundle-theoretic perspective to Kac Moody groups Christoph Wockel May 31, 2007 Outline Kac Moody algebras and groups Central extensions and cocycles Cocycles for twisted loop algebras and -groups Computation
More information1 Introduction and preliminaries notions
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 2(51) - 2009 Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 193-198 A NOTE ON LOCALLY CONFORMAL COMPLEX LAGRANGE SPACES Cristian IDA 1 Abstract In
More information1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces
Classifying Spaces 1. Classifying Spaces. To make our lives much easier, all topological spaces from now on will be homeomorphic to CW complexes. Fact: All smooth manifolds are homeomorphic to CW complexes.
More informationCritical point theory for foliations
Critical point theory for foliations Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder TTFPP 2007 Bedlewo, Poland Steven Hurder (UIC) Critical point theory for foliations July 27,
More informationGODBILLON-VEY CLASSES OF SYMPLECTIC FOLIATIONS. Kentaro Mikami
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 194, No. 1, 2000 GODBILLON-VEY CLASSES OF SYMPLECTIC FOLIATIONS Kentaro Mikami Dedicated to the memory of Professor Shukichi Tanno Each transversally oriented foliation
More informationNotes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.
Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem. Version 0.00 with misprints, The are a few obvious, but important consequences of the theorem of Eli Cartan on the maximal tori. The first one is the observation
More informationComplex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let
Chapter 1 Complex line bundles 1.1 Connections of line bundle Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let be the space of k-forms with values in L. Ω k (M, L) = C (M, L k (T M)) Definition
More informationDIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND COHOMOLOGY
DIFFERENIAL FORMS AND COHOMOLOGY ONY PERKINS Goals 1. Differential forms We want to be able to integrate (holomorphic functions) on manifolds. Obtain a version of Stokes heorem - a generalization of the
More informationTitle fibring over the circle within a co. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 42(1)
Title The divisibility in the cut-and-pas fibring over the circle within a co Author(s) Komiya, Katsuhiro Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 42(1) Issue 2005-03 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/11094/9915
More informationAN ALMOST KÄHLER STRUCTURE ON THE DEFORMATION SPACE OF CONVEX REAL PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical ciences Volume 5, Number 1, June 2002, Pages 23 29 AN ALMOT KÄHLER TRUCTURE ON THE DEFORMATION PACE OF CONVEX REAL PROJECTIVE TRUCTURE HONG CHAN
More informationCohomology and Vector Bundles
Cohomology and Vector Bundles Corrin Clarkson REU 2008 September 28, 2008 Abstract Vector bundles are a generalization of the cross product of a topological space with a vector space. Characteristic classes
More informationLie algebra cohomology
Lie algebra cohomology Relation to the de Rham cohomology of Lie groups Presented by: Gazmend Mavraj (Master Mathematics and Diploma Physics) Supervisor: J-Prof. Dr. Christoph Wockel (Section Algebra and
More informationDifferential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit
Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit 1. (a) Show that the set M R 3 defined by the equation (1 z 2 )(x 2 + y 2 ) = 1 is a smooth submanifold of R 3.
More informationLECTURE 4: SYMPLECTIC GROUP ACTIONS
LECTURE 4: SYMPLECTIC GROUP ACTIONS WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 1. Symplectic circle actions We set S 1 = R/2πZ throughout. Let (M, ω) be a symplectic manifold. A symplectic S 1 -action on (M, ω) is
More information1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups
An undergraduate approach to Lie theory Slide 1 Andrew Baker, Glasgow Glasgow, 12/11/1999 1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups A continuous g : V 1 V 2 with V k R m k open is called smooth if it is infinitely
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.sg] 6 Nov 2015
A CHIANG-TYPE LAGRANGIAN IN CP ANA CANNAS DA SILVA Abstract. We analyse a simple Chiang-type lagrangian in CP which is topologically an RP but exhibits a distinguishing behaviour under reduction by one
More informationTorus actions and Ricci-flat metrics
Department of Mathematics, University of Aarhus November 2016 / Trondheim To Eldar Straume on his 70th birthday DFF - 6108-00358 Delzant HyperKähler G2 http://mscand.dk https://doi.org/10.7146/math.scand.a-12294
More informationON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS
ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS DUSA MCDUFF AND SUSAN TOLMAN Abstract. Recall that an effective circle action is semifree if the stabilizer subgroup of each point is connected. We show that if (M, ω)
More informationGlobal Properties of Integrable Hamiltonian Systems
ISSN 1560-3547, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 2008, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 588 630. c Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2008. JÜRGEN MOSER 80 Global Properties of Integrable Hamiltonian Systems O. Lukina *, F. Takens,
More informationESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction
ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES ANDREAS ČAP AND KARIN MELNICK Abstract. We use the general theory developed in our article [1] in the setting of parabolic
More informationThe existence of homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous pseudo-riemannian manifolds
The existence of homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous pseudo-riemannian manifolds Zdeněk Dušek Palacky University, Olomouc Porto, 2010 Contents Homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous affine manifolds General
More informationA 2-COCYCLE ON A GROUP OF SYMPLECTOMORPHISMS
A 2-COCYCLE ON A GROUP OF SYMPLECTOMORPHISMS RAIS S. ISMAGILOV, MARK LOSIK, PETER W. MICHOR Abstract. For a symplectic manifold (M, ω) with exact symplectic form we construct a 2-cocycle on the group of
More informationSELF-EQUIVALENCES OF DIHEDRAL SPHERES
SELF-EQUIVALENCES OF DIHEDRAL SPHERES DAVIDE L. FERRARIO Abstract. Let G be a finite group. The group of homotopy self-equivalences E G (X) of an orthogonal G-sphere X is related to the Burnside ring A(G)
More informationThe transverse index problem for Riemannian foliations
The transverse index problem for Riemannian foliations John Lott UC-Berkeley http://math.berkeley.edu/ lott May 27, 2013 The transverse index problem for Riemannian foliations Introduction Riemannian foliations
More informationMath 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems
Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall 2014 Problems Please note: This list was last updated on November 30, 2014. Problems marked with * are challenge problems. Some problems are adapted from the course texts;
More informationClassifying foliations
Classifying foliations Steven Hurder Abstract. We give a survey of the approaches to classifying foliations, starting with the Haefliger classifying spaces and the various results and examples about the
More informationCOTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS
COTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS ANNA KIESENHOFER AND EVA MIRANDA Abstract. We associate cotangent models to a neighbourhood of a Liouville torus in symplectic and Poisson manifolds focusing on
More informationMetrics and Holonomy
Metrics and Holonomy Jonathan Herman The goal of this paper is to understand the following definitions of Kähler and Calabi-Yau manifolds: Definition. A Riemannian manifold is Kähler if and only if it
More informationLet F be a foliation of dimension p and codimension q on a smooth manifold of dimension n.
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 5, Number 2,December 2002, Pages 59 64 VARIATIONAL PROPERTIES OF HARMONIC RIEMANNIAN FOLIATIONS KYOUNG HEE HAN AND HOBUM KIM Abstract.
More informationThe symplectic structure on moduli space (in memory of Andreas Floer)
The symplectic structure on moduli space (in memory of Andreas Floer) Alan Weinstein Department of Mathematics University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 USA (alanw@math.berkeley.edu) 1 Introduction The
More informationQUASI-HOMOGENEOUS DOMAINS AND PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 5, Number 1, June 2002, Pages 17 22 QUASI-HOMOGENEOUS DOMAINS AND PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS KYEONGHEE JO Abstract. To understand compact
More informationABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF FOLIATIONS
ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF FOLIATIONS C. PUGH, M. VIANA, A. WILKINSON 1. Introduction In what follows, U is an open neighborhood in a compact Riemannian manifold M, and F is a local foliation of U. By this
More informationEXTENSION OF HÖLDER S THEOREM IN Diff 1+ɛ
EXTENSION OF HÖLDER S THEOREM IN Diff 1+ɛ + (I) Azer Akhmedov Abstract: We prove that if Γ is subgroup of Diff 1+ɛ + (I) and N is a natural number such that every non-identity element of Γ has at most
More informationBordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem
Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem Richard Wong Differential Topology Term Paper December 2, 2016 1 Introduction Given the classification of low dimensional manifolds up to equivalence relations such
More informationSOME REMARKS ON THE TOPOLOGY OF HYPERBOLIC ACTIONS OF R n ON n-manifolds
SOME REMARKS ON THE TOPOLOGY OF HYPERBOLIC ACTIONS OF R n ON n-manifolds DAMIEN BOULOC Abstract. This paper contains some more results on the topology of a nondegenerate action of R n on a compact connected
More informationOn Properly Discontinuous Actions and Their Foliations
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 12, 2017, no. 19, 901-913 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2017.7872 On Properly Discontinuous Actions and Their Foliations N. O. Okeke and
More informationLECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS
LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS 1. Smooth actions Let M be a smooth manifold, Diff(M) the group of diffeomorphisms on M. Definition 1.1. An action of a Lie group G on M is a homomorphism of groups τ : G
More informationLECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES
LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very non-linear. However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice partial linear structures.
More informationA PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM
A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM MAN SHUN JOHN MA 1. Introduction In this short note, we prove the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem. Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra. One basic question in representation
More informationTHE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM
THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM WOLFGANG SCHMALTZ Abstract. The Classical Jordan Curve Theorem says that every simple closed curve in R 2 divides the plane into two pieces, an inside and an outside
More informationLIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society Submitted Paper Paper 14 June 2011 LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM MICHAEL C. CRABB AND PEDRO L. Q. PERGHER Institute of Mathematics,
More informationLECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY
LECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY 1. Invariant Polynomials We start with some necessary backgrounds on invariant polynomials. Let V be a vector space. Recall that a k-tensor T k V is called symmetric if
More informationDifferential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18
Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18 Required problems (to be handed in): 2bc, 3, 5c, 5d(i). In doing any of these problems, you may assume the results
More informationBirational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits
arxiv:math/0611129v1 [math.ag] 6 Nov 2006 Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits Yoshinori Namikawa In order to explain what we want to do in this paper, let us begin with an explicit
More informationA Crash Course in Topological Groups
A Crash Course in Topological Groups Iian B. Smythe Department of Mathematics Cornell University Olivetti Club November 8, 2011 Iian B. Smythe (Cornell) Topological Groups Nov. 8, 2011 1 / 28 Outline 1
More informationGeometry and Dynamics of singular symplectic manifolds. Session 9: Some applications of the path method in b-symplectic geometry
Geometry and Dynamics of singular symplectic manifolds Session 9: Some applications of the path method in b-symplectic geometry Eva Miranda (UPC-CEREMADE-IMCCE-IMJ) Fondation Sciences Mathématiques de
More informationAlmost-Bieberbach groups with prime order holonomy
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 151 (1996) Almost-Bieberbach groups with prime order holonomy by Karel D e k i m p e* and Wim M a l f a i t (Kortrijk) Abstract. The main issue of this paper is an attempt
More information