arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 6 Aug 2009

Transcription

1 Output entanglement and squeezing of two-mode fields generated by a single atom Ling Zhou, Qing-Xia Mu, Zhong-Ju Liu School of physics and optoelectronic technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 64, P.R.China A single four-level atom interacting with two-mode cavities is investigated. Under large detuning condition, we obtain the effective Hamiltonian which is unitary squeezing operator of two-mode fields. Employing the input-output theory, we find that the entanglement and squeezing of the output fields can be achieved. By analyzing the squeezing spectrum, we show that asymmetric detuning and asymmetric atomic initial state split the squeezing spectrum from one valley into two minimum values, and appropriate leakage of the cavity is needed for obtaining output entangled fields. arxiv:98.87v [quant-ph] 6 Aug 9 PACS numbers: 4.5.Dv, 3.67.Mn I. INTRODUCTION One of the most intriguing features of quantum mechanics is entanglement, which has been recognized as a valuable resource for quantum information process. Discontinuous variables and continuous variables entanglement, as two kinds of entanglement resource, both have been concentrated much more attention. Continuous variables entanglement, compared with its partner discontinuous variables, has many advantages in quantuminformation science [] and can be used to efficiently implement quantum information process by utilizing the continuous quadrature variables of the quantized electromagnetic fields. Conventionally, two-mode squeezed state emerging from the nonlinear optical interaction of a laser with a crystal (from parametric amplification or oscillation ) is a typical continuous variables entanglement. Recently, it has been shown that correlated spontaneous emission laser can also work as continuous variables entanglement producer and amplifier [-7]. Guzmán [8] proposed a method of generating unitary single and two-mode field squeezing in an optical cavity with an atomic cloud. As a result of realization of a single atom laser in experiment [9, ], people began to interest in generating twomode entanglement via single-atom system [-6]. Morigi [, ] et al have shown that a single trapped atom allows for the generation of entangled light under certain conditions. One of our authors Zhou [3] has proposed generating unitary two-mode field squeezing in a single three-level atom interacting dispersively with two classical fields inside a doubly resonant cavity, which can produce a macroscopic entangled light. Our group also proposed schemes to generate continuous variables entanglement in a single atom system [7, 4]. Most recently, based on the same atomic level scheme as single-atom laser experiment [], Kiffner [6] investigated a single atom system to generate a two-mode entangled laser via standard linear laser theory. Although output entanglement and squeezing have been studied extensively in other system, the existence of a squeezing operator in the system which is similar to that of the single atom laser experiment [] has never been exhibited before. In this paper, we study a similar atomic level as the experiment in [] ( but with twomode fields ). However, there they studied one mode laser, here we concentrate on the output entanglement of the cavity. Under large detuning condition, we deduce unitary squeezing operator of two-mode fields. By means of the input-output theory, we show that entanglement and squeezing of two-mode fields can be achieved at the output. This paper differ from [6] in these aspects: We use effective Hamiltonian method to obtain a squeezing field operator decoupled from the atomic degrees of freedom rather than by tracing the atomic degrees of freedom. Instead of studying intracavity fields, we show output entanglement. II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND CALCULATIONS We consider a single four-level atom trapped in a doubly resonant cavity, see Fig.. The atom interacts with two nondegenerate cavity modes. The first cavity mode couples to atomic transition a c with the detuning, and the second mode interacts with the atom on b d with detuning. The two classical laser fields with Rabi frequencies Ω 3 and Ω 4 drive the transitions a d and b c with detunings and 4, respectively. The atomic configuration is the same as that in [6]. In the interaction picture, the Hamiltonian is H = g a e i t a c +g a e i t b d +Ω 3 a d e i 3t +Ω 4 b c e i 4t +h.c.. () Under large detuning condition k { g j, Ω l } (k =...4,j =,,l = 3,4), wecanadiabaticallyeliminate the excited level a and b and obtain the effective Hamiltonian H = ( g a a + Ω 4 ) c c 4 +( g a a + Ω 3 ) d d () +[( Ω 3 g a e iδt + Ω 4g a e iδt ) d c +h.c.],

2 a Ω 3 g 4 Ω 4 g b with λ = Ω 3g δ 3 λ = Ω 4g δ 4 δ +δ, (7) + g δ +δ, c d FIG. : The configuration of the atom. Two cavity modes interact with atomic transition a c and b d with detuning and respectively while the two classical fields Ω 3 and Ω 4 drive the atomic level between a d and b c with detuning and 4, respectively. where δ =, δ = 4, = ( + ), = ( + 4 ). By making unitary transformation U = e ith with H = Ω 4 c c + Ω 3 d d + δ +δ (a 4 a +a a ), (3) we have the new Hamiltonian H 3 = δ +δ (a a +a a ) (4) + g a a c c + g a a d d +[( Ω 3 g a + Ω 4g a )eiδt d c +h.c.], where δ = Ω3 Ω4 4 + δ δ. If δ { Ω 3 g, Ω4g }, we can perform adiabatic elimination once more and have H 4 = δ +δ (a a +a a ) + g a a c c + g a a d d (5) + δ [(Ω 3 g a + Ω 4g a )(Ω 3g a + Ω 4 g a ) d d ( Ω 3g a + Ω 4 g a )( Ω 3 g a + Ω 4g a ) c c ]. If the atom is initially in state d, we finally have the effective Hamiltonian taken on the atomic state d as H eff = λ a a +λ a a (6) +ηa a +η a a, η = g g Ω 3 Ω 4 δ. In Eq.(6), we have thrown off a constant which does not affect the dynamics of the system. Because the initial atomic state is d, only the terms which take action on d survive. The stark shift g a a c c has no contribution and g a a d d remain ( see the second line in Eq.(5)). Thus, λ and λ are asymmetric in form. We will show the effect of the asymmetry on the output squeezing and entanglement. If the initial cavity fields are in coherent state ǫ,ǫ (with the help of two laser pumping, we can easy obtain theinitial two-mode coherentstate), wecanusesu(,) algebra to obtain evolution of wave function of the fields with Ψ f (τ) = e iheffτ Ψ f (). The exact expression of the fields evolution is a two-mode coherent-squeezed state as Ψ f (τ) = S(ϑ) ǫ,ǫ, (8) where ϑ = re iε, and the squeeze parameter r (ε) is determined by r = tanh τη b sinhφ (tanε = Im( iη b sinhφ)/re( iη b sinhφ)) with φ = [ η ( λ+λ ) ]τ, b = [φcoshφ+iτ(λ +λ )/sinhφ] [3]. The evolution time τ is limited by the τ diss = min( κ, κ ) where κ and κ are the decay rates of modes and. So, the intensity of the fields can not be increased into infinity with time evolution although the initial coherent state can effectively enhance the intensity of the cavity fields. Actually, the intensity of fields can not be increased largely due to the loss of the cavity and the large detunings condition. Consequently, the adiabatic elimination still can be used within τ diss only if the intensity of the quantum fields is not larger than the intensity of two classical fields Ω 3 and Ω 4. The decay effects will be discussed in next section where we do not need narrow the evolution time because physical quantities are automatically limited by time evolution after considering the decays. On the other hand, from Eq.(7) we see that the enhanced intensity of the fields do not affect the entanglement of the two modes because the entanglement results from the squeeze parameter. III. OUTPUT SQUEEZING AND ENTANGLEMENT We now concentrate on the squeezing properties of the outgoing cavity fields which can be detected and used as entanglement source. To evaluate the entangled light

3 3 outside the cavity, we employ the input-output theory [7, 8]. We assume that the two cavitymodes aredriven by external laser fields besides the interaction with the atom in Eq.(6). The classical laser drive the cavity modes with strengths µ and µ, respectively. The Langvein equations of motion for the two-mode fields are given by S.. ȧ = iλ a iµ iη a κ a κ a in, (9) ȧ = iλ a iµ iη a κ a κ a in. Here, a in and a in are annihilation operators associated with the input fields, and κ and κ are the cavity decay rates of modes a and a. Using the transformation a = a +α, () a = a +β, we can rewrite the Eq. (9) as ȧ = iλ a iη a κ a κ a in, () ȧ = iλ a iη a κ a κ a in, iµ where α = (κ+iλ) 4µ η (κ +iλ )(κ +iλ )+4η, β = iµ (κ+iλ) 4µ η (κ +iλ )(κ +iλ )+4η. Performing Fourier transformation, we can solve the above equation and then use the relation a jout = a jin + κ j a j (j =,) to obtain the output fields as a out (ω) = κ α δ(ω)+ () (α α + η )a in (ω)+iη κ κ a in ( ω) α α η, a out (ω) = κ β δ(ω)+ where iη κ κ a in ( ω) (β β + η )a in (ω) β β η, α = κ +i(λ ω), (3) α = κ i(λ +ω); β = κ +i(λ ω), β = κ i(λ +ω). Observingthat α and β arein proportionto µ and µ, therefore, we see that the driving parameters µ and µ yield effective displacements to the two mode output fields. Now, we discuss the output entanglement of the fields. Define I + = (a +a a a ), I = i (a a + a a ). The squeezing spectrum can be defined as [9] I ± (ω)i ± (ω )+I ± (ω )I ± (ω) = S ± (ω)δ(ω +ω ), (4) κ/g.5 FIG. : The output squeezing change with ω and κ. The parameters are g = g = g, = g, = g, =.5g, 4 =.5g, Ω 3 =.5ig, Ω 4 =.5g. where I ± (ω) is Fourier transformation of I ±. With the definition ofi ±, wehaves + (ω) = S (ω) foruncorrelated vacuum input noise. The squeezing spectrum has been connected with entanglement criterion [9]. The sum criterion of Duan et al.[] can be rewritten with S ± (ω) as S + (ω)+s (ω) <. (5) So, the two output modes are entangled if [9] S ± (ω) <. (6) Thus, the time evolution of entanglement is transformed into frequency domain. The spectrum S ± (ω) will be not only squeezing but also entanglement judge. We assume that the input field is in the vacuum. From Eq.(), we have S + (ω) = η +α α + η κ κ α α η (7) i κ κ [η( η +α α ) η ( η +α α )] α α η +α j β j. We also find that the squeezing spectrum has not been affected by the displacements α and β because Eq.(7) has no relation with α and β. S + (ω) is connected with the squeezing parameters η, decay rate κ, as well as λ and λ. Fig. shows that the squeezing S + (ω) change with κ and ω where we choose κ = κ = κ. With the group of the parameters, k is about ten times the values of {g j,ω l }, which means that the first adiabatic elimination condition k { g j, Ω l } is fulfilled. With the parameters used in Fig., we have δ =.48g, Ω 3 g =.4g, and Ω4g =.3g, so the second adiabatic elimination condition δ { Ω 3 g, Ω4g } satisfies. Therefore, all of the approximation conditions are fulfilled for the parameters in Fig.. As presented in Fig., we see that ω

4 4.35 S.5. N (ω) ω.5.5 ω/g FIG. 3: The output squeezing spectrum for several value of loss of the cavity where κ =.5g (dotted line),.5g (solid line), g (dashed line). The other parameters are the same as Fig.. FIG. 4: The curve for N (ω) where the parameters are g = g = g, = g, = g, =.5g, 4 =.5g, Ω 3 =.5ig, Ω 4 =.5g, κ = κ =.g. fields amplitude. With Eq.(), we have a out (ω)a out(ω ) = κ α δ(ω)δ(ω ) (8) the entanglement is achievable and S + (ω) changes with the leakage rate. For small value of κ, we can not obtain ideal squeezing outside the cavity. For large value of κ, the degree of squeezing will be decreased. That is to say, there is a suitable value of κ for achieving maximum degree squeezing. In Fig. 3, we show the squeezing spectrum for several values of leakage rate κ. For κ =.5g, we observe two minimum values in the squeezing spectrum which also can be seen in Fig.. However, usually the squeezing spectrum should has one valley if κ = κ []. The split from one valley into two minima is similar to the effect of asymmetric loss for each mode [8] where if the loss of each mode differs, the squeezing spectrum shows two minima. Here, although we set κ = κ = κ, we still can observe the interesting split. Actually, the split originates from the nonzero and asymmetric λ and λ [λ λ seen Eq.(7)]. If λ = λ =, we will have only onevalleyevenifforsmallvalueκ. Withtheincreasingof κ, the split disappears. Following the relation Eq.(3), we know that because of the larger value of κ, i.e. κ λ i, thedifferenceinλ andλ willhavelittleeffectsothatwe have one minimum squeezing. Physically, the asymmetry originates from the asymmetric detuning and asymmetric atomic initial state. In addition, we can also observe the existence of a appropriate value of κ where squeezing are better than others. For example the squeezing for κ =.5g is better than that for κ =.5g,g. Moreover, one can see that the bandwidth of the squeezing spectrum becomes wide when the minimum values of squeezing are increased. We now discuss the correlation between the output + η κ κ α α η δ(ω ω ), a out (ω)a out(ω ) = κ β δ(ω)δ(ω ) + η κ κ β β η δ(ω ω ) We let N (ω) = η κ κ α α η which is one of the contributors in intensity spectrum. In Fig.4, we plot N (ω) as a function of ω. We see that for resonance ω = (the output frequency equal to the frequency of the cavity fields ), N (ω) achieve its maximum value but the intensity is relative smaller than that in [6]. This might be because there [6] the detuning i is not so larger and the inputoutput effect is not considered. However, in this paper, we consider the atom dispersively interacts with the cavity as well as the input-output effect, so the output fields are decreased much more. From Eq.(7), we know that when ω = ω =, the output fields are enhanced by κ α and κ β with δ function. With the same parameters with Fig. 4, we have κ α 9, κ β 8 if µ = µ =.8g. So, the fields will be enhanced largely. IV. CONCLUSION In summary, we study a single four-level atom interacting with two-mode cavity system. We deduce unitary squeezing operator of the two-mode fields via adiabatic elimination technique. By means of the input-output theory, we show that two-mode entanglement and squeezing can be achieved at the output fields in frequency domain. The squeezing spectrum reveals that asymmetric detuning and asymmetric atomic initial state split the squeezing into two minimum values, and appropriate leakage of the cavity is needed for obtaining output entangled fields.

5 5 Acknowledgments: The project was supported by NSFC under Grant No.774, and also supported by SRF for ROCS, SEM. [] S. L. Braunstein and P. van Look, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (5) 53. [] H. Xiong, M. O. Scully, and M. S. Zubairy, Phys.Rev.Lett. 94 (5) 36. [3] H. T. Tan, S. Y. Zhu,M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 7 (5) 35. [4] M. Ikram, G. X. Li and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 76 (7) 437. [5] G. X. Li, H. T. Tan, and M. Macovei, Phys. Rev. A 76 (7) [6] Y. Ping, B. Zhang, Z. Cheng, Phys. Lett. A 366 (7) 596. [7] L. Zhou, Y. H. Ma and X. Y. Zhao, J. Phys. B 4 (8) 55; Y. H. Ma, Q. X. Mu and G. H. Yang and L. Zhou, J. Phys. B, Phys. 4 (8) 55. [8] R. Guzmán, J.C. Retamal, E. Solano, and N. Zagury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (6) 5. [9] K. An, J. J. Childs, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 ( 994 ) [] J. McKeever, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, J. R. Buck, and H. J. Kimble, Nature (London ) 45 (3) 68. [] G. Morigi, J. Eschner, S. Mancini, and D. Vitali, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (6) 36. [] G. Morigi, J. Eschner, S. Mancini, and D. Vitali, Phys. Rev. A 73 (6) 338. [3] L. Zhou, H. Xiong,and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 74, 3 6. [4] Q. X. Mu, Y. H. Ma and L. Zhou, J. Phys. B 4 (7) 34 [5] J. Jing, Z. G. Lü, G. H. Yang, Physics Letters A 37 (8) 83 [6] M. Kiffner, M. S. Zubairy, J. Evers, and C.H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. A 75 ( 7 ) [7] C.W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, ). [8] D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 994). [9] D. Vitali, G. Morigi, J. Eschner, Phys. Rev. A 74 (6) [] L. M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 () 7. [] A. S. Labne, M. O. Reid, D. F. Wall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (988) 94.