arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 17 Jun 2014

Transcription

1 Light-Cone Analysis of the Pure Spinor Formalism for the Superstring arxiv: v [hep-th] 17 Jun 014 Nathan Berkovits and Renann Lipinski Jusinskas ICTP South American Institute for Fundamental Research Instituto de Física Teórica, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista Rua Dr. Bento T. Ferraz 71, , São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Abstract Physical states of the superstring can be described in light-cone gauge by acting with transverse bosonic α j n and fermionic qȧ n operators on an SO8-covariant superfield where j,ȧ = 1 to 8. In the pure spinor formalism, these states are described in an SO9,1-covariant manner by the cohomology of the BRST charge Q = 1 λα d πi α. In this paper, a similarity transformation is found which simplifies the form of Q and maps the light-cone description of the superstring vertices into DDF-like operators in the cohomology of Q. Contents 1 Introduction Superparticle 3.1 Review of the pure spinor superparticle Similarity transformation Relation with light-cone vertex operators Superstring Review of the pure spinor superstring Similarity transformation Relation with light-cone vertex operators nberkovi@ift.unesp.br renannlj@ift.unesp.br 1

2 4 Conclusion 13 A SO9,1 to SO8 decomposition 14 1 Introduction Although the covariant description of string theory is convenient for amplitude computations and for describing curved backgrounds, the light-cone description is convenient for computing the physical spectrum and for proving unitarity. For the manifestly spacetime supersymmetric string, the light-cone description was worked out over 30 years ago [1] but the covariant description using the pure spinor formalism [] is still being developed. In this paper, the relation between this covariant and light-cone superstring descriptions will be analyzed. As in other string theories, physical states in the pure spinor formalism are covariantly described by the cohomology of a nilpotent BRST operator. However, because the pure spinor worldsheet ghost is constrained, evaluation of the BRST cohomology is not straightforward. By partially solving the pure spinor constraint, it was proven in [3] that the BRST cohomology reproduces the correct light-cone spectrum. However, the proof was complicated and involved an infinite set of ghosts-for-ghosts. In this paper, the proof will be simplified considerably and an explicit similarity transformation will be given for mapping light-cone superstring vertex operators constructed from the SO8-covariant superfields of [4] into DDF-like vertex operators in the cohomology of the pure spinor BRST operator. In bosonic string theory, the covariant BRST operator Q B = 1 { } 1 πi c Xm X m +ibc c, 1 can be mapped by a similarity transformation R to the operator ˆQ B = e R Q B e R = k + n 0c n α n +c 0 km k m + n 0α i n αi n 1, where α n, αi n and c n are modes of the X, X i and c variables, and k m is the momentum, with k + = k 0 +k d 1 assumed to be non-vanishing. Because of the quartet argument, the cohomology of ˆQ B is independent of the c n,b n,α + n,α n modes, so the physical spectrum is the usual light-cone spectrum constructed by acting with the transverse α i n modes on the tachyonic ground state. Furthermore, the similarity transformation R maps light-cone vertex operators V LC which only depend on the transverse variables into the physical DDF vertex operators V DDF = e R V LC e R which are in the cohomology of Q B [5]. In the pure spinor formalism, the covariant BRST operator is Q = 1 πi λ α d α, 3

3 where α = 1 to 16 is an SO9,1 spinor index, λ α is a bosonic spinor ghost satisfying the pure spinor constraint λ α γ m αβ λβ = 0, 4 and d α is the Green-Schwarz-Siegel fermionic constraint which has 8 first-class and 8 second-class components. A similarity transformation R will be found which maps Q into ˆQ = e R Qe R = 1 [λ ] a p a + πi ˆTθ a + λȧ pȧ + X+ θȧ, 5 where θ α = θ a, θȧ and p α = p a, pȧ, and a ȧ represent the chiral antichiral SO8 spinor indices. ˆT will include part of the energy-momentum tensor and will impose the usual Virasoro-like conditions. The cohomology of ˆQ will be argued to consist of states which are independent of θ a,p a and which are constructed from the SO8-covariant light-cone superfields f a θe ik X of [4] by hitting with the transverse raising operators α j n bosonic and qȧ n fermionic as V LC = n,j,ȧ α j Nn,j Nn,ȧ n qȧ n λ a f a θe ik X 6 where k m k m = nn n,i +N n,ȧ. Furthermore, it will be shown that the similarity transformation R maps the light-cone vertex operators of 6 into DDF-like vertex operatorsv DDF = e R V LC e R, which are in the cohomology of the pure spinor BRST operator and which will be described in a separate paper by one of the authors [6]. DDF-like vertex operators in the pure spinor formalism were first constructed by Mukhopadhyay [7] using a Wess-Zumino-like gauge choice which breaks manifest supersymmetry, whereas the recent construction of Jusinskas [6] uses a supersymmetric gauge choice which simplifies the analysis and enables an explicit SO8 superfield description of the whole physical spectrum. In section, the superparticle will be discussed and a similarity transformation R will be constructed which maps the superparticle BRST operator into a simple quadratic form and maps the light-cone SO8-covariant superfield of [4] into the super-yang-mills vertex operator in the pure spinor formalism. In section 3, this construction will be generalized to the superstring such that the similarity transformation maps the light-cone vertex operators of 6 into the DDF-like vertex operators of [6] in the cohomology of the pure spinor BRST operator. Superparticle In this section, the pure spinor formulation of the superparticle will first be reviewed and a similarity transformation will then be presented which makes the massless constraint explicit in the BRST operator and maps the super-yang-mills vertex operator into the light-cone SO8 superfield of [4]. 3

4 .1 Review of the pure spinor superparticle The pure spinor superparticle was extensively discussed in [8] and is described by the first order action ˆ S = dτ {Ẋ m P m 1 Pm P m + λ α ω α i θ α p α }, 7 containing the pure spinor ghost λ α and the anti-ghost ω α. Note that the dot above the fields represent derivatives with respect to τ. The BRST charge is defined as Q = λ α d α, 8 where d α = p α i P mγ m θ α 9 is the supersymmetric derivative, and the supersymmetry generators are q α = p α + i P mγ m θ α. 10 Canonical quantization of 7 gives [X m,p n ] = iη mn, 11a {θ α,p β } = iδ α β. 11b Note that {q α,d β } = [q α,p m ] = 0 and {d α,d β } = P m γ m αβ. To compare this covariant description with the light-cone description, chiral and antichiral SO9,1 spinors will be decomposed into their SO8 components as θ α θ a, θȧ and d α d a, dȧ where a,ȧ = 1,...,8, and the SO9,1 vectors will be decomposed as X m X j,x +,X for j = 1,...,8. The precise conventions of this SO8 decomposition are discussed in appendix A, where the SO9,1 gamma-matrices are expressed in terms of the SO8 Pauli matricesσaȧ i. In terms of these Pauli matrices, the D = 10 pure spinor constraint λ α γαβ m λβ = 0 takes the form λ a λ a = 0, λȧ λȧ = 0, λ a σ i aȧ λȧ = Similarity transformation Since the cohomology of 8 is described by the N = 1 D = 10 super Yang-Mills superfield, the BRST operator must impose the Siegel constraint P m γ + γ m d a = 0, which is the generator of 8 independent kappa symmetries [9] in the Green-Schwarz formalism. To see that, first note that we can make the constraint explicit in Q by performing a similarity transformation generated by R = i Pi Ni P +, 13 4

5 where N i = 1 λ a σ i aȧ ωȧ. 14 Observe that Q e R Qe R = λ a G a + λȧ dȧ, 15 where and satisfies G a Pm P +γ+ γ m d a = d a P i σ i d a P + 16 { } Ga, dȧ = 0, 17a {G a,g b } = η ab P P +, 17b with P = P + P +P i P i. It will be important to note that equation 17a implies that nilpotency of Q p does not rely any more on the pure spinor constraint λ a λȧσ i aȧ = 0. The next step in simplifying the BRST operator is to perform the further similarity transformation generated by ˆR iθ a p a G a 18 = i θ a σ i aȧ pȧ P i P +. Unlike R of 13, ˆR does not commute with the supersymmetry generators and transforms the various operators as Ô eˆroe ˆR: ˆ dȧ = pȧ i P + θȧ, 19a Ĝ a = p a + iθ a P P +, 19b ˆ qȧ = pȧ + i P + θȧ, 19c ˆq a = p a + 1 P i σiˆ q a P + iθ a P P +. 19d As expected, ˆ dȧ and Ĝa are supersymmetric with respect to the transformed supersymmetry generators ˆq a and ˆ qȧ. After performing this second similarity transformation, the BRST charge ˆQ eˆrq e ˆR takes the simple form ˆQ = λ a p a + i P P +θ a + λȧ pȧ i P + θȧ, 0 5

6 where the mass-shell constraint P m P m now appears explicitly..3 Relation with light-cone vertex operators Because of the simple form of ˆQ, it is easy to compute its cohomology and show equivalence to the lightcone vertex operators. Consider a state with momentum k m assuming k + 0 which is represented by the ghost-number 1 vertex operator Û = λ a  a + λȧ ˆĀȧ. 1 The λȧ λḃ component of ˆQÛ = 0 implies ˆ Dȧ ˆĀḃ + ˆ Dḃ ˆĀȧ = ηȧḃ Ω for some superfield Ω, where ˆ Dȧ k+ = ȧ θȧ. The above equation implies that ˆĀȧ = 1 k ˆ DȧΩ, which + can be set to zero by the gauge transformation δâα = 1 k ˆD + α Ω. In the gauge ˆĀȧ = 0, the λ a λȧ component of ˆQÛ = 0 together with the constraint λ a λȧσ aȧ i = 0 implies that ˆ Dȧ a = Âiσaȧ i, 3 for some superfield Âi. Equation 3 is precisely the constraint on the SO8-covariant superfield described in [4], and the most general solution is  a = Φθf a θe ik X, 4 where Φθ is a generic scalar function of θ a and, as shown in [4], f a θ is a light-cone super-yang-mills superfield depending on an SO8 vector a j and an SO8 chiral spinor χ a, denoting the transverse polarizations of the gluon and gluino. The explicit formula for f a θ is where θ ij f a θ = a i σ l θa k + θȧ θċσ ij ȧċ. { 1 η il + 3! + χσ i θ σ l θa Finally, the λ a λ b component of { 1! 1 θ il + 5! η il + 1 4! ˆQÛ = 0 implies that 1 θ ij θjl + 7! 1 θ il + 6! θ ij θjk θkl }+ } 1 θ ij θjl + θ ij θjk θkl 8! k + χ a 5 f a θˆd b Φθ+f b θˆd a Φθ = δ ab Σ 6 for some superfield Σ where ˆD b θ b + 4 k m k m k + θ b. 7 Equation 6 can only be satisfied if ˆD a Φ = 0. Since ˆD a ˆDa = k m k m k +, ˆD a Φ = 0 implies both that 6

7 k = 0 and that θ a Φ = 0 i.e. Φ is constant. After rescaling the polarizations by the constant Φ, one finally obtains that the states in the ghost-number one cohomology of ˆQ are described by Û = λ a f a θe ik X, 8 where f a θ is the SO8-covariant light-cone superfield of 5 and k m k m = 0. States in the cohomology of the original pure spinor BRST operator are directly obtained from Û by defining where ˆθȧ U e R+ˆR Ûe R+ ˆR = λ a f a ˆθe ik X, 9 ki θȧ+ k + σ i θ ȧ. Note that when the state has vanishing transverse momentum, ki = 0, the similarity transformations R and ˆR of 13 and 18 vanish and U ki =0 = Û = λa f a θe ik+ X. 30 It is easy to verify that U is the usual vertex operator λ α A α X,θ in the gauge γ + Aȧ = 0. Now we will proceed to the more intricate case of the superstring. 3 Superstring In this section, we will repeat the analysis done for the superparticle. After reviewing the pure spinor description of the superstring, we will show that the pure spinor BRST charge Q = 1 πi λ α d α can be written after a similarity transformation as ˆQ = 1 [λ ] a p a + πi ˆTθ a + λȧ pȧ + X+ θȧ, 31 where ˆT 1 X m X m X + i 4 +i ˆ dȧ ˆ dȧ X Ĵ X + pȧ θȧ X + 1 ln X + X + 3 and Ĵ ωȧ λȧ, 33 ˆ dȧ pȧ + X+ θȧ. 34 The structure of ˆQ for the superstring closely resembles 0 for the superparticle, and one can verify 7

8 that ˆQ is nilpotent using the OPE s ˆT z λȧˆ dȧy regular, 35 ˆT z ˆT y regular. 36 The cohomology of ˆQ will be shown to reproduce the usual light-cone superstring spectrum where the similarity transformation maps the DDF-like vertex operators of [6] into the 8 transverse bosonic and fermionic operators, α j n and qȧ n, which create massive superstring states from the massless ground state in light-cone gauge. 3.1 Review of the pure spinor superstring The matter holomorphic sector of the pure spinor formalism is constructed from the Green-Schwarz- Siegel variables of [10] and is described by the free action and the free field OPE s S matter = 1 ˆ π 1 d z Xm Xm β +ip β θ, 37 X m z, zx n y,ȳ η mn ln z y, 38a p α zθ β y iδ β α z y. 38b The supersymmetry charge is q α = 1 { p α + 1 π Xm γ m θ α + i } 4 θγm θγ m θ α, 39 satisfying {q α,q β } = P m γαβ m, where Pm 1 π X m. The usual supersymmetric invariants are Π m = X m + i θγm θ, 40 d α = p α + 1 Xm γ m θ α + i 8 θγm θγ m θ α, 41 and the OPE s among them are easily computed to be Π m zπ n y ηmn, 4a z y d α zπ m y γm αβ θβ z y, 4b d α zd β y i γm αβ Π m z y. 4c 8

9 The main feature of the formalism is its simple BRST charge, given by Q = 1 πi λ α d α, 43 where λ α is the bosonic ghost. Nilpotency of Q is achieved when λ α is constrained by λγ m λ = 0, the pure spinor condition. The conjugate of λ α will be represented by ω α and they can be described by the Lorentz covariant action S λ = 1 ˆ π d z ω α λ α, 44 which has the gauge invariance δω α = φ m γ m λ α due to the pure spinor constraint. The gauge invariant quantities are the Lorentz current, N mn = 1 ωγmn λ, the ghost number current, J = ωλ, and the energy-momentum tensor of the ghost sector, T λ = ω λ. The pure spinor constraint also implies the classical constraints on the currents: N mn γ n λ α + 1 J γm λ α = N mn γ mn λ α +J λ α = 4λ α T λ. 46 The physical open string spectrum is described by the ghost number one cohomology of Q. For example, the massless states are described by the unintegrated vertex U = λ α A α X,θ, 47 where A α is a superfield composed of the zero-modes of X m,θ α. Note that {Q,U} = λ α λ β D α A β, 48 where D α i α 1 γm θ α m, 49 with α = θ α, m = X m. Since λ α is a pure spinor, λ α λ β γ αβ mnpqr λγmnpqr λ and {Q,U} = 0 implies the linearized super Yang-Mills equation of motion [11]: Dγ mnpqr A = The integrated version of 47 is given by V = 1 πi where A m and W α are the super Yang-Mills fields, constrained by {Π m A m +i θ α A α +id α W α +N mn F mn }, 51 A m 1 Dα γ αβ m A β, 8i 5a γ m W α D α A m + m A α, 5b 9

10 and F mn = 1 ma n n A m. 3. Similarity transformation To show that the cohomology of 43 describes the light-cone superstring spectrum, it will be convenient to follow the same procedure as in the previous section for the superparticle. The superstring version of the similarity transformation of 13 is and transforms λ α and d α as R = 1 πi { Ni Π i Π + }, 53 e R λ a e R = λ a, e R λȧe σ i R λ = λȧ ȧ Π i Π + 4 σ i e R d a e R θ N a i = d a e R dȧe R = dȧ Π + σ i θ ȧ N i Π +. σ i λ ȧ N i Π +, θ a N i Π i Π +, Using the above relations together with the properties N i σ i λa = λ a Ĵ and N i Ni = 0, which follow from the SO8 decomposition of 45, we obtain where Q = 1 πi 1 πi e R λ α d α e R 54 {λ a G a θ a λ a σ aȧ dȧ i Π +Ĵ + λȧ dȧ } i 4 Π +, 55 G a d a σ i d a Π i Π Note that although normal-ordering contributions are being ignored in the explicit computations, the only terms that can receive quantum corrections are θ a Π + and θa Π + and their coefficients can be determined by requiring nilpotency of Q. The term proportional to N i in 55 did not appear in the superparticle BRST operator of 15, however, it can fortunately be removed by performing a second similarity transformation generated by 57 { } R Ni θσ i d = 8π Π

11 After this transformation, the BRST operator Q = e R Q e R is where Q = {λ 1 a G a + θ b H ab πi H ab = H ba = } θ a Ĵ Π + + λȧ dȧ, 59 i σ i d a σ i d b 4 Π +, 60 and the possible normal-ordering contributions have the same form of those in 57 and can be determined in an analogous manner. Similar to the superparticle BRST charge Q of 15, Q of 59 is manifestly supersymmetric and is nilpotent without requiring the pure spinor constraint λσ i λ = 0 because G a + θ b H ab θ a Ĵ Π + z λȧ dȧ y regular. 61 To reduce Q to the form of ˆQ in 31, one needs to perform a further similarity transformation which is a generalization of ˆR presented in 18 for the superparticle. Expanding in powers of θ a, one finds that ˆR = { 1 i X i θσi p θσ i θ θσi p πi X X + θσ i θ iˆ d θσ 8 X + 1 θσ iˆ d θσ iˆ d 8 X + + i θ θ X + Ĵ where... denotes terms which are at least cubic order in θ a, θ ij = θ a θ c σ ij ac and ˆ dȧ pȧ + X+ θȧ. The first term in 6 is the same as in the superparticle ˆR of 18 while the second is required to transform the supersymmetry generator ˆ qȧ eˆr qȧe ˆR to the simple form ˆ qȧ = 1 { } pȧ π X+ θȧ. 63 The terms in the second line of 6 commute with ˆ qȧ and are necessary so that ˆQ eˆrq e ˆR has at most linear dependence on θ a. Using the explicit terms in 6, it was verified up to linear order in θ a that ˆQ = 1 [λ ] a p a + πi ˆTθ a + λȧ pȧ + X+ θȧ, 64 where ˆT is defined in 3. 11

12 3.3 Relation with light-cone vertex operators To compute the cohomology of ˆQ of 64, note that the zero mode structure of ˆQ is the same as in the superparticle ˆQ of 0, so the superstring ground state describing the massless states is Û = λ a f a θe ik X 65 of 8 where f a θ is the SO8-covariant light-cone superfield of 5 and k m k m = 0. To construct massive states in the cohomology, first note that the integrated vertex operators α j n 1 πi qȧn 1 π in X j exp pȧ k +X+ X+ θȧ, 66a in exp k +X+, 66b are in the cohomology of ˆQ for any value of n. The relation to the usual Laurent modes becomes clear when X + z = ik + lnz, i.e. in light-cone gauge where X + is the worldsheet time coordinate. In this gauge, exp in k + X + = z n and we recover the usual Laurent expansion. One interpretation of the integrated vertex operators of 66 is as massless integrated vertex operators for the 8 physical polarizations of the gluon and gluino with momenta p j = p + = 0 and p = n k +. However, as will be discussed in [6], another interpretation of 66 is as DDF-like operators which act on the ground state vertex operator of 65 with k i = 0 to create excited state vertex operators that describe the massive superstring states. If X + in 66 is treated as a holomorphic variable with the OPE X + zx y lnz y and n is a positive integer, the contour integral of α j n and qȧ n around the ground state vertex operator Û = λa f a θe ik X will produce the excited state vertex operators α j nû = 1 n X j +... λ a f a θe ikj X j k + X k + n k n 1! + X +, qȧ nû = 1 n 1! 67a ] [ pȧ n 1 + ik+ n θȧ +... λ a f a θe ikj X j k + X k + n k + X +, 67b where... denotes terms proportional to derivatives of X +. One can similarly act with any number of α j n and qȧ n operators on the ground state vertex operator to construct the general excited state vertex operator α j Nn,j Nn,ȧ n qȧ n Û. 68 n>0 ȧ j Since α j n and qȧ n commute with ˆQ, it is clear that the vertex operators of 68 are BRST-closed. And it is easy to see they are not BRST-exact since the worldsheet variables X j and pȧ X+ θȧ only appear in ˆQ through ˆT. Furthermore, one expects that there are no other states in the cohomology of ˆQ λȧˆ dȧ as the terms λ a p a and in 64 imply that the cohomology is independent of θ a,p a, and depends on θȧ, pȧ only through combinations that anticommute with ˆ dȧ. Also, as in bosonic string theory, the dependence on X +,X is completely fixed by ˆT. So the cohomology of ˆQ is expected 1

13 to be described by the states of 68 which are in one-to-one correspondence with the usual light-cone Green-Schwarz states of the superstring spectrum. Since the original pure spinor BRST operator Q is related to ˆQ by Q = e R R e ˆR ˆQeˆRe R+R, where the similarity transformations R, R and ˆR are defined in 53, 58 and 6, covariant BRST-invariant vertex operators in the pure spinor formalism can be related to the vertex operators of 68 by acting with these same similarity transformations. To see how this works, it will be useful to interpret α j n and qȧn of 66 as integrated vertex operators for a massless gluon and gluino with momenta p j = p + = 0 and p = n k +, and to combine them into a super-yang-mills vertex operator by contracting them with the gluon and gluino polarization a j and χȧ as ˆV n a j α j n i χȧ qȧ n. 69 After performing the similarity transformation with ˆR of 6, one finds up to terms quadratic in θ a that V n e ˆRˆV n eˆr = 1 { Π i A i + i θȧ + n } dȧ Aȧ πi k + where D a Aȧ = iσ j aȧ A j, with D a = a n k + θa. Aȧ is an SO8-superfield that depends only on θ a and X +, in an exact parallel to f a θ e ik + X which depends only on θȧ and X and satisfies the constraint 3. See [6] for further details on Aȧ and how it emerges in the pure spinor cohomology. Finally, the gauge fixed version of the integrated massless vertex of 51 is obtained by acting with the similarity transformation R+R of 53 and 58 which transforms V n into 70 V n e R R V ne R+R 71 { 1 = Π i i n πi k N + i A i + i θȧ + n } dȧ Aȧ. k + It is straightforward to see that R commutes with V n, and that R is responsible for reintroducing the ghost Lorentz current N i in the vertex. A detailed discussion of the properties of the DDF-like operators 71 is presented in [6]. As shown there, the superstring spectrum is obtained by acting with the above operators on the SO8-covariant ground state Û k i =0 of 65, allowing a systematic description of all massive pure spinor vertex operators in terms of SO8 superfields. 4 Conclusion In this paper, the pure spinor BRST operator Q = 1 πi λ α d α was mapped by the similarity transformations of R, R and ˆR of 53, 58 and 6 into the nilpotent operator ˆQ = 1 [λ ] a p a + πi ˆTθ a + λȧˆ dȧ, 7 13

14 where ˆT is defined in 3. The cohomology of ˆQ is the usual light-cone Green-Schwarz superstring spectrum and is described by the vertex operators [ pȧ n 1 + ik+ Nn,ȧ n +...] θȧ n X j +... N n,j λ a f a θe ikj X j k + X k X +, 73 n>0 ȧ j where [ k = 1 k i k i k + + n nn n,ȧ +N n,j ], 74 f a θ is the SO8-covariant superfield 5 of reference [4], and... involves derivatives of X +. Finally, the similarity transformations of R, R and ˆR were argued to map the vertex operators of 73 into pure spinor BRST-invariant vertex operators constructed using the DDF-operators described in [6]. Acknowledgements NB would like to thank CNPq grant 30056/94-9 and FAPESP grants 009/ and 011/ for partial financial support, and RLJ would like to thank FAPESP grant 009/ for financial support. A SO9, 1 to SO8 decomposition Given an SO9,1 chiral spinor λ α antichiral λ α, one can write down its SO8 components through the use of the projectors PI α and Pα I 1 Pα I, where I generically indicates the SO8 indices, defined in such a way that λ α = P α a λa +P α ȧ λȧ, λ a = P a α λα, λȧ = Pȧα λα, λ α = P a α λ a +Pȧα λȧ, λa = P α a λ α, λȧ = P α ȧ λ α. Being invertible, they satisfy Pa αpb α = δb a, Pα ȧ Pḃα = δḃȧ, Pa α Pȧα = 0, δβ α = Pα a Pβ a +Pα ȧ Pȧβ, where a, ȧ = 1,..., 8 are the SO8 spinorial indices, representing different chiralities. Note that upper and lower indices in the SO8 language do not distinguish chiralities, i.e., one can define a spinorial metric, η ab ηȧḃ, and its inverse, ηab ηȧḃ, such that η ac η cb = δ b a η ȧċηċḃ = δḃȧ and are responsible for lowering and raising spinorial indices, respectively, acting as charge conjugation. For example, σ i ȧa ηȧḃ = η ab σi bḃ. Using the projectors, one can build a representation for the gamma matrices γ m in terms of the 14

15 8-dimensional equivalent of the Pauli matrices, where γ i αβ, γ i σ i αβ aȧ Pα apȧβ +Pȧα Pa β, σ i ȧa Pȧ αpβ a +Pα a Pβ ȧ γ αβ η ab Pa αpβ b, γ αβ ηȧḃ Pȧα Pḃβ, γ + αβ ηȧḃp ȧ αpβ, ḃ γ+ αβ 75 η ab PαP a β b, σ i aȧ σ j ȧb + σ j aȧ σ i ȧb = η ij δa b, 76a σ i ȧa σ j aḃ + σ j ȧa σ i = η ij δȧḃ aḃ, 76b σ i aȧ σ i cċ + σ i cȧ σ i aċ = η ac ηȧċ, 76c σ ij a b σ ij c = 8η ac η d bd 8δdδ a b, c 76d σ ij a b σ ij ȧ = ḃ 4σȧa i σ i bḃ 4δa b δȧḃ, 76e and η ij is the flat SO8 inverse metric, with i,j = 1,...,8. As usual, η ik η kj = δ j i. Note that { γ i,γ j} = η ij, {γ +,γ } =, { γ ±,γ i} = {γ +,γ + } = {γ,γ } = Given a SO9,1 vector N m, the SO8 decomposition used in this work is, N ± 1 N 0 ±N 9, 78 and N i, with i = 1,...,8, stands for the spatial components. Therefore, the scalar product between N m e P m is given by N m P m = N + P N P + +N i P i. For a rank- antisymmetric tensor N mn, the SO8 components will be represented as { N ij,n i = N i, N i = N +i,n = N + }. References [1] J. H. Schwarz, Superstring Theory, Phys. Rept. 89, [] N. Berkovits, Super Poincare covariant quantization of the superstring, JHEP 0004, [hep-th/ ]. [3] N. Berkovits, Cohomology in the pure spinor formalism for the superstring, JHEP 0009, [hep-th/ ]. [4] L. Brink, M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Ten-dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory With SO8 - Covariant Light Cone Superfields, Nucl. Phys. B 3,

16 [5] Y. Aisaka and Y. Kazama, Relating Green-Schwarz and extended pure spinor formalisms by similarity transformation, JHEP 0404, [hep-th/ ]. [6] R. L. Jusinskas, Spectrum generating algebra for the pure spinor superstring, arxiv: [hep-th]. [7] P. Mukhopadhyay, DDF construction and D-brane boundary states in pure spinor formalism, JHEP 0605, [hep-th/051161]. [8] N. Berkovits, Covariant quantization of the superparticle using pure spinors, JHEP 0109, [hep-th/ ]. [9] W. Siegel, Hidden Local Supersymmetry in the Supersymmetric Particle Action, Phys. Lett. B 18, [10] W. Siegel, Classical Superstring Mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 63, [11] P. S. Howe, Pure spinors lines in superspace and ten-dimensional supersymmetric theories, Phys. Lett. B 58, [Addendum-ibid. B 59, ]. 16