GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBERS AND DISTINCTION
|
|
- Jessie Smith
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN Abstract. We study a relation between distinction and special values of local invariants for representations of the general linear group over a quadratic extension of p-adic fields. We show that the local Rankin-Selberg root number of any pair of distinguished representation is trivial and as a corollary we obtain an analogue for the global root number of any pair of distinguished cuspidal representations. We further study the extent to which the gamma factor at 1/ is trivial for distinguished representations as well as the converse problem. 1. Introduction This work continues to study the relations between distinguished representations and triviality at 1/ of the local gamma and epsilon factors in the context of GL n over a quadratic extension. Let /F be a quadratic extension of p-adic fields and fix a non-trivial character ψ of that is trivial on F. A (smooth, complex valued) representation of GL n () is called distinguished if it admits a non-zero GL n (F )-invariant linear form. In his dissertation [Ok97], Ok showed that for n > 1 and an irreducible, cuspidal representation π of GL n () with a central character that is trivial on F we have the following. The representation π is distinguished if and only if for every irreducible, unitary, generic and distinguished representation π of GL n 1 () the local Rankin-Selberg gamma factor γ(s, π, π, ψ) satisfies γ(1/, π, π, ψ) = 1. Ok suggests that relations of this nature, may hold more generally. This was further explored by the second named author in [Off11], a paper that, unfortunately, contains some sloppy mistakes. The errors occur in the very last part of the paper [Off11, 7.] where local L-values are cancelled out at points where there may be poles. The upshot is that the main result, [Off11, Theorem 0.1], is partially wrong and even the proof of the parts that are correct is invalid. The mistake was recently noted by the first named author. This led to the current collaboration, aiming to correct the mistakes and explore further the relation between distinction and special values of local factors. We remark that in addition, the proof of [Off11, Corollary 7.] is not valid, although the statement is correct and a proof can be found in the recent work of Anandavardhanan and Matringe, [AM17]. Date: April 1, 017. Omer Offen, partially supported by ISF grant No. 1394/1. 1
2 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN We now summarize our main results. The first one says that the local Rankin-Selberg root number attached to a pair of distinguished representations is trivial. It was conjectured in [Ana08, Conjecture 5.1]. More explicitly (see Theorem 3.6): Theorem 1.1. Let π i be an irreducible and distinguished representation of GL ni (), i = 1,. Then ɛ(1/, π 1, π, ψ) = 1. Together with an archimedean analogue carried out in 6.1, this gives triviality of the global Rankin-Selberg root number of a pair of distinguished automorphic cuspidal representations. This is Theorem 6.6. For the local gamma factors, we have the following (see Theorem 3.7 for a slightly more general statement): Theorem 1.. Let π i be an irreducible and distinguished representation of GL ni (), i = 1,. If π 1 is unitary and generic and π is tempered then γ(1/, π 1, π, ψ) = 1. In xample 3.8 we provide many pairs of distinguished representations for which gamma at 1/ is not trivial. (In fact, γ(1/, π 1, π, ψ) = 1 if π i is the trivial representation of GL i (), i = 1,.) Conversely, for essentially square-integrable representations, we show that the triviality of gamma at 1/ for enough twists by distinguished representations characterizes distinction. More explicitly, if δ is an irreducible, essentially square integrable representation of GL n () and γ(1/, δ, π, ψ) = 1 for any distinguished, irreducible representation π of GL m () for all m n then δ is distinguished. In fact, only tempered twists are necessary and in many cases only for m n. Theorem 5.5 is a generalization of the following. Theorem 1.3. Let δ be an essentially square integrable representation of GL n (). If γ(1/, δ, π, ψ) = 1 for every m n and every irreducible, tempered and distinguished representation π of GL m () then δ is distinguished. If δ is not of the form St (ρ) then taking m n is enough. Here ρ is cuspidal and the generalized Steinberg representation St (ρ) is the unique irreducible quotient of the parabolically induced representation det 1/ ρ det 1/ ρ. xample 5.6 shows that we cannot expect such a converse theorem for more general distinguished representations. For essentially square integrable representations of the form St (ρ) we do expect twists up to n to characterize distinction but a proof will require different methods. We remark that the above relative converse theorem is an analogue of the local converse theorem of Henniart [Hen93] or rather the improvement by Chen [Che06] (see [HO15, ]). We do not explore the extent to which it can be improved in the direction of [JL15]. Let us now outline the structure of the paper, and give the ideas behind some proofs.
3 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 3 Theorem 3.6, which is the triviality of the non-archimedean Rankin-Selberg root number of a pair of irreducible distinguished representations is proved in Section 3, using the cuspidal case due to Ok [Ok97], and the classification of distinguished standard modules due to Gurevich [Gur15]. Section 4 is devoted to the proof of Proposition 4.5, which is the relative analogue of the well known fact that the gamma factors of twists by characters of an irreducible representation determine its central character [JNS15, Corollary.7]. Our result says that if the gamma factors of the twists of an irreducible representation π by distinguished characters are trivial at 1/, then the central character of π is itself distinguished. Our proof is an adaptation of that in [JNS15]. In Section 5, we prove Theorem 5.5, our relative converse theorem for discrete series representations. Once again the idea is to reduce to Ok s cuspidal converse theorem, or rather its refinement due to Hakim and the second named author [HO15], using good twists and analytic methods. More precisely, twisting a generalised Steinberg representation St k (ρ) by representations of the form det s ρ det s ρ σ (see Section for undefined notation) allows to reduce to conjugate self-dual discrete series representations, and then use [HO15], where this case was taken care of. Then we observe that it is in fact enough to twist by such representations with s ir, thanks to extension of meromorphic identities, and this allows us to twist only by distinguished tempered representations. Finally, Theorem 6.3 in Section 6, which is the archimedean analogue of Theorem 3.6 is a consequence of Kemarsky s classification of distinguished standard modules [Kem15]. The triviality of the global root numer of a pair of distinguished cuspidal automorphic representations then follows, and is Theorem Notation and Preliminaries Let be a p-adic field (a finite extension of Q p ) and ψ a non-trivial character of. We denote by p = ϖ o the maximal ideal of the ring of integers o of. Here ϖ is a uniformizer of. Let G n = GL n (), and consider the involution g g ι := t g 1 on G n. By a representation of G n we mean a complex valued, smooth representation. For a representation π of G n let π ι be the representation on the space of π given by π ι (g) = π(g ι ) and let π be the smooth dual of π. For representations π i of G ni, i = 1,..., k we denote by π 1 π k the representation of G n1 + +n k obtained from π 1 π k by normalized parabolic induction. For a representation π and a character χ of G n let χπ be the representation on the space of π given by (χπ)(g) = χ(g)π(g). Let ν denote the character det of G n. Let Π(n) be the collection of all irreducible representations of G n. By convention, we also let Π(0) be the set containing only the trivial representation of the trivial group G 0 and let Π = n=0π(n). If π Π then π π ι [GK75]. More generally, if π i Π, i = 1,..., k then (π 1 π k ) ι π k π 1.
4 4 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN Let U n be the group of upper triangular unipotent matrices in G n and, by abuse of notation, let ψ also denote the character on U n defined by ψ(u) = ψ(u 1, + + u n 1,n ). Definition.1. A representation π of G n is of Whittaker type if it is of finite length and dim Hom Un (π, ψ) = 1. An irreducible representation of Whittaker type is called generic. We use a lower index to denote special classes of representations in Π as follows: Π cusp cuspidal representations in Π; Π sqr essentially square integrable representations in Π; Π temp tempered representations in Π; Π gen generic representations in Π; Π u unitary representations in the class Π. We have Π u-cusp Π u-sqr Π temp Π u-gen and Π cusp Π sqr Π gen. Recall that Π sqr = {St k (ρ) : ρ Π cusp, k N} where St k (ρ) is the unique irreducible quotient of ν (1 k)/ ρ ν (3 k)/ ρ ν (k 1)/ ρ (see [Zel80, Theorem 9.3]) and St k (ρ) St k (ρ ) (see [Zel80, Proposition 9.4]). For δ Π sqr let e = e(δ) R be the unique real number such that ν e δ Π u-sqr. A representation of the form λ = δ 1 δ k where δ 1,..., δ k Π sqr, e(δ 1 ) e(δ k ) is called a standard module. It is of Whittaker type and admits a unique irreducible quotient π, the Langlands quotient of λ. The Langlands classification, is the bijection λ π from the set of all standard modules to Π (see [Sil78]). We denote by λ(π) the standard module with unique irreducible quotient π Π. Note that λ(π ) = λ(π) ι, π Π. For δ 1, δ Π sqr we say that δ 1 precedes δ and write δ 1 δ if δ i = St ki (ρ i ), where ρ i Π cusp, i = 1, are such that ρ ν (k 1+k )/+1 i ρ 1 for some i {1,..., min(k 1, k )}. By [Zel80, Theorem 9.7], for δ 1,..., δ k Π sqr we have δ 1 δ k Π if and only if δ i δ j for all i j and Π gen = {δ 1 δ k : δ 1,..., δ k Π sqr, δ i δ j, 1 i j k}. More generally, if δ 1,..., δ k is ordered so that δ i δ j for all 1 i < j k then λ = δ 1 δ k is a standard module, independent of any such order. We will say that such a realization δ 1 δ k of λ is in standard form. For representations π of G n and τ of G m of Whittaker type let L(s, π, τ) and ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) be the local Rankin-Selberg L and ɛ-factors defined by [JPSS83] and let γ(s, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) L(1 s, πι, τ ι ). L(s, π, τ)
5 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 5 For any π, τ Π the local L, ɛ and γ-factors for the pair (π, τ) are defined as the corresponding factors for the pair (λ(π), λ(τ)). In particular, we have (1) γ(s, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) L(1 s, π, τ ). L(s, π, τ) We list below, some basic properties of the local rankin-selberg L and ɛ factors. They are immediate from the definitions and will be used freely in the sequel. Let π and τ be either in Π or of Whittaker type. Then (1) L(s, π, τ) = L(s, τ, π) and ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s, τ, π, ψ). () L(s, ν t π, τ) = L(s + t, π, τ) and ɛ(s, ν t π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s + t, π, τ, ψ). (3) γ(s, π, τ, ψ)γ(1 s, π ι, τ ι, ψ 1 ) = 1 = ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ)ɛ(1 s, π ι, τ ι, ψ 1 ). The following is a consequence of [JPSS83, Proposition 8.1]. Lemma.. Let ρ 1, ρ Π cusp. Then L(s, ρ 1, ρ ) = 1 unless ρ = ν u ρ 1 for some u C. More generally, the meromorphic function L(s, ρ 1, ρ ) has at most simple poles. It has a pole at s = u if and only if ρ ν u ρ 1. In particular, if ρ 1, ρ Π u-cusp then L(s, ρ 1, ρ ) is holomorphic whenever Re(s) 0. Lemma.3. Let δ 1, δ Π sqr. Then L(s, δ 1, δ ) has at most simple poles. It has a pole at s = u if and only if δ 1 ν 1 u δ. In particular, if δ i Π u-sqr, i = 1, then L(s, δ 1, δ ) is holomorphic whenever Re(s) > 0. Proof. Write δ i = St ki (ρ i ) for ρ i Π cusp and k i N, i = 1,. It follows from [JPSS83, Proposition 8.] (and Lemma.) that L(s, δ 1, δ ) = min(k 1,k ) i=1 L(s + k 1 + k i, ρ 1, ρ ). It follows from Lemma. that at most one factor on the right hand side can have at most a simple pole at s = u and that this is the case, if and only if ρ ν u+ k 1 +k i ρ 1 for some i = 1,..., min(k 1, k ). quivalently, if and only if ν 1 u ρ ν k 1 +k +1 i ρ 1 for some i = 1,..., min(k 1, k ). Since ν 1 u St k (ρ ) St k (ν 1 u ρ ), this is equivalent to the condition δ 1 ν 1 u δ. Lemma.4. We have the following multiplicative properties. (1) [JPSS83, Theorem 3.1] Let π = π 1 π k and τ be of Whittaker type. Then γ(s, π, τ, ψ) = k γ(s, π i, τ, ψ). i=1
6 6 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN () [JPSS83, Proposition 9.4] Let λ = δ 1 δ k and ξ = δ 1 δ l be standard modules in standard form. Then k l L(s, λ, ξ) = L(s, δ i, δ j) and consequently, ɛ(s, λ, ξ, ψ) = i=1 j=1 k i=1 j=1 l ɛ(s, δ i, δ j, ψ). Lemma.5. For π, τ Π, the γ-factor γ(s, π, τ, ψ) depends only on the cuspidal support of π and τ. More explicitly, if τ 1,..., τ k Π cusp are such that τ τ 1 τ k then k γ(s, π, τ, ψ) = γ(s, π, τ i, ψ). i=1 Proof. By passing to the standard modules λ(π) and λ(τ) and applying Lemma.4 (1) we may assume that τ Π sqr. In that case, write τ = St k (ρ) for ρ Π cusp. Then, the Whittaker space for τ is contained in that for ν (k 1)/ ρ ν (1 k)/ ρ. Since the gamma factor is a quotient of Rankin-Selberg integrals for any choice of Whittaker functions that provide non-zero integrals, γ(s, π, τ, ψ) = γ(s, π, ν (k 1)/ ρ ν (1 k)/ ρ, ψ). The Lemma now follows by applying Lemma.4 (1) to the right hand side..1. Distinguished representations. Assume from now on that F is a p-adic field, /F a quadratic extension and ψ F = 1. Let σ denote the associated Galois action. In particular, we have ψ σ = ψ 1. It is further obvious from the definitions of the local factors that for π and τ either in Π or of Whittaker type we have () L(s, π, τ) = L(s, π σ, τ σ ) and ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s, π σ, τ σ, ψ σ ). Let η /F be the order two character of F that is trivial on norms from to F and fix a character η of extending η /F. Let H n = GL n (F ). Definition.6. A representation π of G n is distinguished if and η /F -distinguished if Hom Hn (π, 1) 0 Hom Hn (π, η /F det) 0. Clearly, π is distinguished if and only if ηπ is η /F -distinguished. Flicker showed the following: Lemma.7. [Fli91, Propositions 11 and 1] For π Π(n) we have (1) dim Hom Hn (π, 1) 1. () If π is distinguished then π σ π.
7 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 7 We record here some results regarding distinguished representaitons. Proposition.8. (1) ([AKT04, Corollary 1.6] and [Kab04]) Let δ Π sqr be such that δ σ δ. Then δ is either distinguished or η /F -distinguished but not both. () ([Ana08, Theorem 1.3], see [AR05, 4.4] or [Mat09a, Corollary 4.]) Let δ = St k (ρ) Π sqr. Then δ is distinguished if and only if one of the following two conditions hold ρ is distinguished and k is odd ρ is η /F -distinguished and k is even. Proposition.9. Let λ be a standard module. Then λ is distinguished if and only if there exist δ i Π sqr, i = 1,..., t with e(δ 1 ) e(δ t ) 0 and distinguished τ j Π sqr, j = 1,..., s such that (3) λ δ σ 1 δ σ t τ 1 τ s δ t δ 1. Proof. If λ is distinguished then it follows from [Gur15, Proposition 3.4] that λ can be realized as λ = δ 1 δ k in standard form, so that there exists an involution w S k such that (δ i) σ (δ w(i) ) for all i = 1,..., k and δ i is distinguished whenever w(i) = i. Let k = s+t where s = {i : w(i) = i}, {i 1,..., i s } = {i : w(i) = i} and (τ 1,..., τ s ) = (δ i 1,..., δ i s ). Let {j 1,..., j t } = {i : w(i) i and either e(δ i) > 0 or e(δ i) = 0 and i < w(i)} be ordered in such a way that e(δ j 1 ) e(δ j t ) and set (δ 1,..., δ t ) = ((δ j 1 ) σ,..., (δ j t ) σ ). Then (3) holds by the independence of the standard module on a standard form realization. Assume now that λ is of the form (3). By a standard, closed orbit contribution, argument τ 1 τ s is distinguished (see e.g. [Off11, Lemma 6.4]) and it therefore follows from [Gur15, Proposition.3] that λ is distinguished. 3. The local root number of a distinguished representation We first record straight-forward consequences of the basic properties of L and ɛ factors for representations that are isomorphic to the Galois twist of their smooth dual. Lemma 3.1. Let π, τ Π satisfy π σ π and τ σ τ. Then we have (1) L(s, π, τ) = L(s, π, τ ). () Therefore, if L(s, π, τ) is holomorphic at s = 1/ then γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ). (3) γ(s, π, τ, ψ)γ(1 s, π, τ, ψ) = 1 = ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ)ɛ(1 s, π, τ, ψ). (4) In particular, ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1. We recall the following result from Ok s thesis [Ok97]. Lemma 3. (Ok). If ρ 1, ρ Π cusp are both distinguished then γ(1/, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) = 1. We therefore also have Corollary 3.3. If ρ 1, ρ Π cusp are both distinguished then ɛ(1/, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) = 1.
8 8 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN Proof. It follows from Lemma.7 () that ρ σ i ρ i and in particular that ρ i Π u-cusp, i = 1,. It therefore follows from Lemma. that L(s, ρ 1, ρ ) is holomorphic at s = 1/ and therefore from Lemma 3.1 () that ɛ(1/,, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) = γ(1/, ρ 1, ρ, ψ). The corollary now follows from Lemma 3.. Lemma 3.4. Let π be either in Π or of Whittaker type and satisfy π σ π ι and let δ Π sqr be such that e(δ) 0. Then ɛ(1/, π, δ σ δ, ψ) = 1. Proof. It follows from Lemma.4 that Applying () we have and the lemma follows. ɛ(1/, π, δ σ δ, ψ) = ɛ(1/, π, δ σ, ψ)ɛ(1/, π, δ, ψ). ɛ(1/, π, δ σ, ψ) = ɛ(1/, π ι, δ, ψ 1 ) = ɛ(1/, π, δ, ψ) 1 Lemma 3.5. Let δ 1, δ Π sqr be such that δi σ δi, i = 1,. Then (1) γ(1/, δ 1, δ, ψ) = ɛ(1/, δ 1, δ, ψ); () If δ 1 and δ are distinguished then γ(1/, δ 1, δ, ψ) = 1; Proof. Note that by the given symmetry δ 1, δ Π u-sqr. The first equality therefore follows from Lemma 3.1 () and Lemma.3. Write δ i = St ki (ρ i ), i = 1,, where ρ i Π u-cusp and k i N. It follows from Lemma.5 that (4) γ(s, δ 1, δ, ψ) = k 1 k i 1 =1 i =1 γ(s + k 1 + k + 1 i 1 i, ρ 1, ρ, ψ). By Lemma. for u R the function γ(s, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) is holomorphic and non-zero at s = u unless ρ ρ 1 and u {0, 1}. By Lemma 3.1 (3) we therefore have that (5) γ(1/ + k 1 + k + 1 i 1 i, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) γ(1/ + k 1 + k + 1 (k i 1 ) (k + 1 i ), ρ 1, ρ, ψ) = 1 whenever either ρ ρ 1 or (k 1 + k + 3)/ i 1 i {0, 1}. If δ 1 and δ are distinguished then it follows from Proposition.8 that k 1 k mod and that ρ i is distinguished if and only if k i 1 mod, i = 1,. Therefore, all the terms on the right hand side of (4) cancel out in pairs except for the term γ(1/, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) that occurs only if k 1 k 1 mod. In addition, if this is the case then γ(1/, ρ 1, ρ, ψ) = 1 by Lemma 3.. The lemma follows. We are now ready to prove [Ana08, Conjecture 5.1]. Theorem 3.6. Let π, τ Π both be distinguished. Then ɛ( 1, π, τ, ψ) = 1.
9 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 9 Proof. If π Π is distinguished, then λ(π) is also distinguished and by definition ɛ( 1, π, τ, ψ) =, λ(π), λ(τ), ψ). By Lemma.4 and Proposition.9 it is enough to show that: ɛ( 1 ɛ(1/, δ 1, δ, ψ) = 1 for every distinguished δ 1, δ Π sqr ; ɛ(1/, δ 1, δ σ δ, ψ) = 1 for every δ 1, δ Π sqr with δ 1 distinguished and e(δ ) 0; ɛ(1/, δ σ 1 δ 1, δ σ δ, ψ) = 1 for every δ 1, δ Π sqr with e(δ i ) 0, i = 1,. The first equality follows from Lemma 3.5. The last two equalities follow from Lemma 3.4. Let Π < 1 Then Π u-gen Π < 1 = {δ 1 δ k : δ i Π sqr, e(δ i ) < 1/, i = 1,..., k}. Π gen. Theorem 3.7. Let π, τ Π both be distinguished. If π Π < 1 γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1. and τ Π temp, then Proof. If π Π < 1 and τ Π temp then it follows from Lemmas.3 and.4 that L(s, π, τ) is holomorphic at s = 1/, from Lemmas.7 () and 3.1 () that γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) and from Theorem 3.6 that ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1. The theorem follows. xample 3.8. Let ρ 0 Π u-cusp be such that ρ σ 0 ρ 0 and set ρ = ν α ρ 0 for some α R. Let π = ν 1/ ρ ν 1/ ρ σ and τ = ρ (ρ σ ). Then π, τ Π gen are both distinguished. It follows as in the above proof that ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1, and L(1 s, π, τ) γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = lim s 1/ L(s, π, τ) L(s, π, τ) = L(s 1/, ρ, ρ)l(s 1/, ρ, (ρ σ ) )L(s + 1/, ρ σ, ρ)l(s + 1/, ρ σ, (ρ σ ) ). By Lemma.3 we have that L(s 1/, ρ, ρ) has a simple pole at s = 1/ while L(s 1/, ρ, (ρ σ ) )L(s + 1/, ρ σ, ρ)l(s + 1/, ρ σ, (ρ σ ) ) = L(s + 1/, ρ σ, (ρ σ ) ) is holomorphic at s = 1/ and therefore L(1 s, π, τ) lim = 1. s 1/ L(s, π, τ) This gives examples of distinguished π, τ Π such that γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1. Note that if α = 0 then π Π gen and τ Π temp while if 1/ < α < 0 then π, τ Π < 1. For an example where π, τ Π u-gen, let ρ Π cusp be such that ρ σ ρ and let 0 < α, β < 1/ be such that α + β = 1/. Set π = ν α ρ ν α ρ and τ = ν β ρ ν β ρ and note that π, τ Π u-gen are both distinguished. Also L(s, π, τ) = L(s + α + β, ρ, ρ )L(s + α β, ρ, ρ )L(s α + β, ρ, ρ )L(s α β, ρ, ρ ).
10 10 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN The first three terms on the right hand side are holomorphic at s = 1/ while the last has a simple pole at s = 1/. Therefore, L(1 s, π, τ) γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = lim s 1/ L(s, π, τ) = 1. In fact, one can even take τ Π u-sqr, for example if ρ is cuspidal and distinguished, choose τ = St 3 (ρ) and π = ν 3/ ρ ν 3/ ρ. 4. A local relative converse theorem for central characters The purpose of this section is to show that if the gamma factor at 1/ is trivial for twists by all distinguished characters of then the central character is distinguished. We begin with some simple observations about additive and multiplicative characters. Lemma 4.1. For every integer m, one has F + p m F + pm 1 if is unramified over F, whereas F + p m+1 = F + p m F + pm 1 if is ramified over F. Proof. Note that ϖf k (F + pm ) = F + pm+fk where f is the degree of the residual field extension for /F. This shows that if the statement is true for some m 0 then it is true for all m. If F +p = F +o then for u o write u = x+y with x F and y p. Then, clearly x o F and therefore u = x(1 + x 1 y) o F (1 + p ). This shows that o = o F (1 + p ), i.e., that /F is ramified. The case where /F is unramified follows. Assume now that /F is ramified. Then o = o F (1 + p ) F + p and therefore o = p o F + p. It follows that F + o = F + p. Assume that ϖ 1 = x + y with x F and y o. Then, x 1 = (ϖ 1 y) 1 is a uniformizer of that lies in F contradicting the assumption that the extension ramifies. It follows that F + o F + p 1 and the lemma follows. Recall that the conductor of a non-trivial character ξ of is the minimal integer m such that ξ is trivial on p m. For a let ψ a(x) = ψ(ax), x, so that {ψ a : a } is the group of all characters of. Lemma 4.. for every integer m, if /F is unramified then there exists a character of trivial on F of conductor m; if /F is ramified then there exists a character of trivial on F of conductor m. Furthermore all non trivial characters of which are trivial on F have even conductor. Proof. If is ramified over F then it follows from the identity F + p m+1 = F + p m of Lemma 4.1 that the conductor of any non-trivial character of that is trivial on F must be even. Note that the set of non-trivial characters of that are trivial on F is {ψ a : a F }. Since the conductor of ψ a is c v where c is the conductor of ψ and v is the -valuation
11 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 11 of a and since the image of F under the -valuation is Z if is unramified over F and Z otherwise, the lemma follows. If A is an abelian locally compact totally disconnected group, we denote by  its group of smooth characters. Recall that the conductor of χ Ê is zero if χ is unramified (i.e., trivial on o ) and is the minimal positive integer m such that χ 1+p m = 1 otherwise. For m 0, we denote by ( /F )(m) the subset of Ê consisting of characters of trivial on F, and of conductor m. Note that, in fact, ( /F )(m) is the group of characters of the finite group /F (1+ p m ). Lemma 4.3. Let m 1 be an integer. If /F is unramified then ( /F )(m 1) ( /F )(m) and the natural map from ( /F )(m) to ( 1+p ) induced by restriction is surjective. 1+p F +p m If is ramified over F then ( /F )(m 1) 1), and the natural map from ( /F )(m) to ( surjective. ( /F )(m) = ( /F )(m + 1+p ) induced by restriction is 1+p F +p m Proof. Note that (1+p ) F (1+p m ) = 1+p F +p m. It follows that (1+p )/(1+p F +p m ) imbeds as a subgroup of the finite abeliean group /F (1+p m ) and the surjectivity of the restriction map follows. Furthermore, the trivial cahracter is the only unramified character of that is trivial of F while the group F (1 + p ) is strictly contained in if /F is unramified (it consists of elements of even -valuation). In the unramified case, the inequality for m = 1 follows. To complete the proof of the lemma it is now enough to show that 1 + p F + p m 1 + p F + p m 1 if is unramified over F and m > 1; 1 + p F + p m+1 = 1 + p F + p m 1 + p F + p m 1 if is ramified over F. If 1 + p F + p m = 1 + p F + p m 1 then it is easy to see that F + p m = F + pm 1. The inequalities are therefore immediate from Lemma 4.1. If /F is ramified, the same lemma shows that p m F + pm+1. Write y p m as y = a + z with a F and z pm+1. Then a = y z F p m p F. Therefore, 1 + p F + p m = 1 + p F + p m+1. The rest of the lemma follows. Corollary 4.4. Assume that ψ has conductor zero and let m 1 be an integer. For any c (F p m ) \ p m+1, there exists a character χ of, trivial on F and of conductor m such that ψ(cx) = χ(1 + x) for all x p m. Proof. Note that ψ c is a character of that is trivial on F and has conductor m. It therefore restricts to a character of p F + p m that is trivial on p F + p m. Also, x 1 + x defines an isomorphism (p F + p m )/(p F + p m ) (1 + p F + p m )/(1 + p F + p m ). There is therefore a unique character ξ of (1+p F +p m )/(1+p F +p m ) such that ψ(cx) = ξ(1+x) for x p F + p m. Since any character on a subgroup of a finite abeliean group can be extended
12 1 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN to the group, it follows from Lemma 4.3 that there exists χ ( /F )(m) such that ψ(cx) = χ(1 + x) for x p m. This identity also implies that the conductor of χ equals m. Proposition 4.5. Let n 1 and π Π(n). If there is a constant γ such that γ(1/, π, χ, ψ) = γ for any distinguished character χ of, then γ = 1 and the central character c π of π is trivial on F. Proof. The proof is an adaptation of [JNS15, Corollary.7]. First, since γ(1/, π, χ, ψ a ) = c π (a)γ(1/, π, χ, ψ), a F, by Lemma 4. we may assume that ψ has conductor 0. According to [JS85, (.7)] (to which we refer directly rather than to [JNS15, Proposition.6] as the conductor of the additive character is 1 in [ibid.], and 0 here as in [JS85]), there is a positive integer m(π) such that for m m(π), any character χ of of conductor m m(π) and any c p m which satisfies χ ((1 + x)) = ψ(cx) for all x p (m+1)/, we also have (6) γ(s, π, χ, ψ) = ɛ(s, π, χ, ψ) = c π (c) 1 ɛ(s, 1, χ, ψ) n. Let m be such that m m(π) and take any c p m F any c p m F \ p m+1 F character ψ c restricted to p m otherwise. Then, c (F p m \ p m+1 F if /F is ramified and and by Corollary 4.4, the ) \ p m+1 is of the form x χ(1 + x) for χ a character of /F of conductor m. As ɛ(1/, 1 F, χ, ψ) = 1 for a distinguished character χ, we deduce from (6) with s = 1/ and χ = χ that c π (c) 1 = γ. As any element of F can be expressed as the quotient of two elements of F -valuation at most d, for any fixed d (take d = m(π)/ if /F is ramified and d = m(π) otherwise), we deduce that c π F = 1 F and hence that γ = The relative converse theorem for discrete series In this section we study the extent to which the property γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1 for enough distinguished representations τ, implies that π is distinguished. For a class Π of representations in Π let Π (n) = Π Π(n). We will build our relative converse theorem for discrete series upon the following cuspidal relative converse theorem of [HO15], which itself builds upon and refines the results of [Ok97]. Theorem 5.1 ([HO15]). Let n > and ρ Π cusp (n) have a central character that is trivial on F. Then ρ is distinguished if and only if γ(1/, ρ, τ, ψ) = 1 for any distinguished τ Π u-gen (n ). In fact, it follows from Proposition 4.5 that the assumption on the central character can be replaced by the further requirement γ(1/, ρ, τ, ψ) = 1 for any distinguished character τ Π(1). We extend Theorem 5.1 to representations in Π sqr and furthermore, show that it is enough to twist by distinguished tempered representations of G m, m n, except for discrete series of G n of the form St (ρ) with ρ a cuspidal representation. For these discrete
13 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 13 series we only obtain a weaker result, which says that it is enough to twist by tempered distinguished representations of G m for m n. We focus on the case n > 3, as for n =, 3, it is known by [Hak91] and [HO15] that the converse theorem with twists by distinguished characters of holds for all generic unitary representations (and in fact for all generic representations when n = by [Mat09b]). When n > 3, xample 5.6 shows that even for tempered representations, such a converse theorem cannot hold, so we restrict to discrete series. For the rest of this section, we assume n > 3. Let c π denote the central character of π Π. Our proof is based on three key observations that we first formulate as lemmas. The first is [HO15, Proposition 3.0.3], together with the observation that n/ n for n 3. Lemma 5.. Let δ Π sqr (n) \ Π cusp (n) satisfy δ σ δ and c δ F = 1. If δ is not distinguished then there exists k n and a distinguished δ Π sqr (k) such that γ(1/, δ, δ, ψ) = 1. The following observation will also prove itself useful. Lemma 5.3. Let ρ Π u-cusp and k N. If lim γ(1/ + s, St k(ρ), ρ σ, ψ)γ(1/ s, St k (ρ), ρ, ψ) = 1 s k/ then ρ σ ρ and therefore St k (ρ) σ St k (ρ). Proof. Since, as meromorphic functions of s C we have it follows from the assumption that (7) lim s k+1 and By Lemma.5 we have γ(1/ s, St k (ρ), ρ, ψ)γ(1/ + s, St k (ρ ), ρ, ψ 1 ) = 1, γ(s, St k (ρ), ρ σ, ψ) = γ(s, St k (ρ ), ρ, ψ 1 ) = γ(s, St k (ρ), ρ σ, ψ) γ(s, St k (ρ ), ρ, ψ 1 ) = 1. k i=1 k i=1 γ(s + k + 1 γ(s + k + 1 i, ρ, ρ σ, ψ) i, ρ, ρ, ψ 1 ). It follows from Lemma. that both γ(s + k+1 i, ρ, ρ σ, ψ) and γ(s + k+1 i, ρ, ρ, ψ 1 ) are holomorphic and non-zero at s = k+1 for all i = 1,..., k 1 and γ(s + 1 k, ρ, ρ, ψ 1 ) has a simple pole at s = k+1 1 k. It therefore follows from (7) that γ(s+, ρ, ρσ, ψ) must also have a pole at s = k+1. By Lemma. we deduce that ρσ ρ. Since St k (ρ) σ St k (ρ σ ) and St k (ρ) St k (ρ ) the lemma follows.
14 14 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN Let Γ m be the class of representations τ m k=1 Π temp(k) that are of one of the following two forms: τ Π sqr is distinguished or τ = δ σ δ where δ Π u-sqr. It is a class of distinguished tempered representations. The key lemma allowing us to twist only by tempered representations is the following application of holomorphic continuation. Lemma 5.4. Let π Π(n) and m N. (1) If ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1 for all τ Γ m then ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1 for every distinguished τ m k=1 Π(k). () If π Π temp and γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1 for all τ Γ m then γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1 for every distinguished τ m k=1 Π < 1 (k). Proof. Let δ Π u-sqr (d) where d m and for s C let τ s = ν s δ σ ν s δ. It follows from Lemma.4 () that for Re(s) 0 we have ɛ(1/, π, τ s, ψ) = ɛ(1/ + s, π, δ σ, ψ)ɛ(1/ s, π, δ, ψ). The right hand side is an entire function of s C and by assumption, it equals 1 on the imaginary axis. By holomorphic continuation, it is therefore the constant function 1. It follows that ɛ(1/, π, δ σ δ, ψ) = 1, δ Π sqr, e(δ) 0. Assume now in addition that π is tempered. Then, by Lemmas.3 and.4 the function γ(s, π, τ, ψ) is holomorphic and non-zero at s = 1/ for all τ Π < 1. Furthermore, for Re(s) < 1/ we have γ(1/, π, τ s, ψ) = γ(1/ + s, π, δ σ, ψ)γ(1/ s, π, δ, ψ) where, by the same lemmas, each factor on the right hand side is holomorphic for Re(s) < 1/. By assumption, the right hand side is identically 1 for all s in the imaginary axis and therefore, by holomorphic continuation, also whenever Re(s) < 1/. It follows that γ(1/, π, δ σ δ, ψ) = 1, δ Π sqr, 1/ > e(δ) 0. The two conclusions of the lemma now follow from Lemma.4 and Proposition.9. For discrete series we can now obtain a relative converse theorem with tempered twists. Theorem 5.5. Let δ = St k (ρ) Π sqr (n). Suppose that k, and that γ(1/, δ, τ, ψ) = 1 for all τ Γ n, then δ is distinguished. If k =, and γ(1/, δ, τ, ψ) = 1 for all τ Γ n, then δ is distinguished. Proof. Write δ = St k (ρ) where ρ Π cusp. Notice that according to Proposition 4.5, the central character of δ is trivial on F, so in fact δ Π u-sqr (n), i.e. ρ Π u-cusp. If k = 1 then the statement is that of Theorem 5.1. Assume that k 3. As n > 3, this implies that if k = 3, then ρ is a representation of G m for some m. In particular ν s ρ σ ν s ρ is a
15 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 15 representation of G n (k )m for any s, and n (k )m n. Hence by assumption, we have γ(1/, δ, ν s ρ σ ν s ρ, ψ) = 1, s ir while, by Lemma.3, γ(1/, δ, ν s ρ σ ν s ρ, ψ) = γ(1/ + s, δ, ρ σ, ψ)γ(1/ s, δ, ρ, ψ), s ir. Since the right hand side is a product of two meromorphic functions for s C it follows by meromorphic continuation that γ(1/ + s, δ, ρ σ, ψ)γ(1/ s, δ, ρ, ψ) = 1 as meromorphic functions of s C and in particular that lim γ(1/ + s, δ, s k/ ρσ, ψ)γ(1/ s, δ, ρ, ψ) = 1. It therefore follows from Lemma 5.3 that δ σ δ. The theorem now follows from Lemma 5.. The case k = is in fact the same, but in this case ν s ρ σ ν s ρ is also a representation of G n, hence we are forced to allow twists by Γ n. xample 5.6. For every n 4 we now exhibit a non-distinguished representation τ Π temp (n) so that ɛ(1/, τ, π, ψ) = 1 for all distinguished π Π and γ(1/, τ, π, ψ) = 1 for all distinguished π Π < 1. Let τ = St 3 (η) η n 4 {}}{ 1 1. Then, τ is not distinguished e.g. by Proposition.9 and for any π Π we have ɛ(1/, τ, π, ψ) = ɛ(3/, η, π, ψ)ɛ( 1/, η, π, ψ)ɛ(1/, η, π, ψ) ɛ(1/, 1, π, ψ) n 4. If π is distinguished it follows from part (3) of Lemma 3.1 that ɛ(3/, η, π, ψ)ɛ( 1/, η, π, ψ) = 1, from part (4) that ɛ(1/, η, π, ψ) = 1 and from Theorem 3.6 that ɛ(1/, 1, π, ψ) = 1. Since τ is tempered, it further follows from Lemmas.3 and.4 that L(s, τ, π) is holomorphic at s = 1/ whenever π Π < 1 and therefore, that γ(1/, τ, π, ψ) = 1 by Lemma 3.1 (). 6. Triviality of root numbers-archimedean and global complements Let K be either R or C and in this section only, let G n = GL n (K). By a representation of G n we mean an admissible, smooth Fréchet representation of moderate growth (see [Wal9, ]). Let Π(n) be the set of irreducible representations of G n and Π = n=1π(n). Fix a non-trivial character ψ and for π, τ Π let L(s, π, τ) and ɛ(s, π, τ) be the archimedean L and ɛ-factors defined via Langlands parameterization in terms of representations of the Weil group (see [Sha85]). The γ-factor γ(s, π, τ, ψ) is defined by (1) where π is the contragredient of π. Recall that the subset Π sqr of essentially square integrable representation in Π is contained in Π(1) if = C and in Π(1) Π() if = R. As in the p-adic case, let ν = det denoted the absolute value of the determinant on G n for any n and for π 1,..., π k Π
16 16 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN let π 1 π k denote the associated normalized parabolic induction. For δ Π sqr let e = e(δ) R be such that ν e δ is unitary. By the Langlands classification for any π Π there exist δ 1,..., δ k Π sqr such that e(δ 1 ) e(δ k ) and π is the unique irreducible quotient of the standard module λ(π) = δ 1 δ k. If furthermore, τ Π has associated standard module λ(τ) = δ 1 δ l with δ 1,..., δ l Π sqr then it essentially follows from the definitions that k l k l (8) L(s, π, τ) = L(s, δ i, δ j) and ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s, δ i, δ j, ψ). i=1 j=1 i=1 j= Triviality of the archimedean root number for distinguished representations. Assume here that = C and let z σ = z, z C be complex conjugation and x + iy = x + y, x, y R be the normalized absolute value. Let ψ(z) = e π(z z). For a character ξ of C we further denote by L(s, ξ), ɛ(s, ξ, ψ) the local Tate L and ɛ factors and let γ(s, ξ, ψ) = ɛ(s, ξ, ψ)l(1 s, ξ 1 ). L(s, ξ) We recall the functional equation (9) γ(s, ξ, ψ)γ(1 s, ξ 1, ψ 1 ) = 1 = ɛ(s, ξ, ψ)ɛ(1 s, ξ 1, ψ 1 ). A representation π of G n is distinguished if there exists a continuous linear form 0 l Hom GLn(R)(π, 1). very character of C is of the form ξ u,m (z) = z u ( z z σ )m, u C, m Z. The character ξ u,m is distinguished if and only if u = 0 and m Z. Let ρ k = ξ 0,k, k Z parameterise all distinguished characters. It follows from the explicit computations of Tate s thesis that (10) ɛ(1/, ρ k, ψ) = γ(1/, ρ k, ψ) = 1, k Z. As in Proposition.9, based on the Langlands classification, the following is immediate from [Kem15, Theorem 1.]. Proposition 6.1. Let λ be a distinguished standard module of G n. Then there exist characters ξ 1,..., ξ t, χ 1,..., χ s of C with e(ξ 1 ) e(ξ t ) 0 and χ i distinguished for i = 1,..., s such that λ ξ σ 1 ξ σ t χ 1 χ s ξ 1 t ξ 1 1. By the uniqueness of the Langlands data, as an immediate consequence we have (for generic representations this is [Kem15, Theorem 1.4]) Corollary 6.. Let π Π be distinguished then π σ π.
17 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 17 We can now formulate the triviality of the local root number for distinguished representations. Theorem 6.3. Let π, τ Π be distinguished. Then ɛ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1. Proof. It follows from (8), (10) and Proposition 6.1 that it is enough to show that ɛ(1/, ξ σ, ψ)ɛ(1/, ξ 1, ψ) = 1 for all characters ξ of C. Since ψ σ = ψ 1 we have ɛ(1/, ξ σ, ψ) = ɛ(1/, ξ, ψ 1 ) and the required identity follows from (9). Let Γ C (s) = (π) s Γ(s) where Γ is the standard gamma function. It is a meromorphic function of C that is nowhere vanishing, has simple poles at s Z 0 and is holomorphic everywhere else. Recall further from Tate s thesis that L(s, ξ u,m ) = Γ C (s + u + m ). In particular, we have L(s, ρ k ) is holomorphic at s = 1/ for all k Z; L(s, ξ u,m ) has a (simple) pole at s = 1/ if and only if u + 1/ + m Z 0. As in the p-adic case we consider the following classes of representations in Π. tempered representations and Π temp = {ξ 1 ξ k : ξ i Π(1), e(ξ i ) = 0, i = 1,..., k}; Π < 1 = {ξ 1 ξ k : ξ i Π(1), e(ξ i ) < 1/, i = 1,..., k} which is a set of generic irreducible representations containing all unitary, generic ones. Based on the above, the following is obtained, as in Theorem 3.7. We omit the proof. Theorem 6.4. Let π, τ Π be distinguished representations. If π Π < 1 then γ(1/, π, τ, ψ) = 1. The and τ Π temp, 6.. The split case. Let F be a local field and = F F. Let (x, y) σ = (y, x), x, y F. Fix a non-trivial character ψ 0 of F and let ψ(x, y) = ψ 0 (x y), x, y F. Set here, G n = GL n () = GL n (F ) GL n (F ) and let Π(n) be the set of irreducible representations of G n and Π = n=1π(n). A representation π Π is of the form π = π 1 π where π i are irreducible representations of GL n (F ), i = 1,. We say that π is distinguished if π π1. For π = π 1 π, τ = τ 1 τ Π the local Rankin-Selberg ɛ-factor is defined by ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) = ɛ(s, π 1, τ 1, ψ 0 )ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ 1 0 ). As an immediate consequence of the standard functional equation for ɛ-factors (Lemma 3.1 (3)) we have Lemma 6.5. Let π, τ Π be distinguished. Then ɛ(s, π, τ, ψ) = 1.
18 18 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN 6.3. Triviality of the global root number for distinguished cuspidal representations. Let be a number field and A = A the ring of adeles of. Fix a character ψ of A/ and let V be the set of places of. For a pair of irreducible cuspidal automorphic representaions π v V π v of GL n (A) and τ v V τ v of GL m (A) consider the Rankin-Selberg L and ɛ functions defined as the meromorphic continuation of the products L(s, π, τ) = L(s, π v, τ v ) and ɛ(s, π, τ) = ɛ(s, π v, τ v, ψ v ). v V v V The first converges for Re(s) 1 and the second converges everywhere to an entire function, independent of ψ. They satisfy the functional equation L(s, π, τ) = ɛ(s, π, τ)l(1 s, π, τ ). Assume now that /F is a quadratic extension of number fields and let GL n (A F ) 1 = {g GL n (A F ) : det g = 1} (where is the standard absolute value on A F ). We say that π as above is distinguished, if there exists a cusp form φ in the space of π such that GL n(f )\ GL n(a F ) 1 φ(h) dh 0. For v V F let v = F v F and consider F v as a subfield of the algebra v via a a 1. Then A = v V F v and GL n (A) = v V F GL n ( v ). We may decompose accordingly, ψ = v V F ψ v and π v V F π v. If v is inert in and w V is the unique place above v then v = w, GL n ( v ) = GL n ( w ) ψ v = ψ w and π v = π w. If v splits in and w 1, w V lie above v then v w1 w F v F v, GL n ( v ) GL n (F v ) GL n (F v ), ψ v = ψ w1 ψ w and π v π w1 π w accordingly. Finally, clearly + A F is strictly contained in A. Indeed, if σ is the Galois action for /F, then x x σ for all x + A F. If a \ F is such that a F and w 0 V lies over a place of F that is split in let x A be such that x w0 = a and x w = 0 for all w 0 w V. Then x x σ. Consequently, there exists a non-trivial character of A/ that is trivial on A F. Theorem 6.6. For a pair of integers n, m and irreducible cuspidal automorphic representaions π v V π v of GL n (A) and τ v V τ v of GL m (A), if both π and τ are distinguished then ɛ(1/, π, τ) = 1. Proof. vidently, π v and τ v are distinguished for all v V F. Note that ɛ(1/, π, τ) = v V F ɛ(s, π v, τ v, ψ v ) for any choice of non-trivial character ψ of A/. We may choose ψ to be trivial on A F and then ψ v is a non-trivial character of v that is trivial on F v for all v V F. The theorem therefore follows from Theorems 3.6 and 6.3 and Lemma 6.5. References [AKT04] U. K. Anandavardhanan, Anthony C. Kable, and R. Tandon, Distinguished representations and poles of twisted tensor L-functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (004), no. 10, MR
19 GAMMA FACTORS ROOT NUMBRS AND DISTINCTION 19 [AM17] U. K. Anandavardhanan and Nadir Matringe, Test vectors for local periods, to appear in Forum Math., DOI: /forum [Ana08] U. K. Anandavardhanan, Root numbers of Asai L-functions, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (008), [AR05] Art. ID rnn15, 5. MR U. K. Anandavardhanan and C. S. Rajan, Distinguished representations, base change, and reducibility for unitary groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. (005), no. 14, MR [Che06] Jiang-Ping Jeff Chen, The n (n ) local converse theorem for GL(n) over a p-adic field, J. Number Theory 10 (006), no., MR 5754 (007g:01) [Fli91] Yuval Z. Flicker, On distinguished representations, J. Reine Angew. Math. 418 (1991), MR (9i:019) [GK75] I. M. Gel fand and D. A. Kajdan, Representations of the group GL(n, K) where K is a local field, Lie groups and their representations (Proc. Summer School, Bolyai János Math. Soc., Budapest, 1971), Halsted, New York, 1975, pp MR (53 #8334) [Gur15] Maxim Gurevich, On a local conjecture of Jacquet, ladder representations and standard modules, Math. Z. 81 (015), no. 3-4, MR [Hak91] Jeff Hakim, Distinguished p-adic representations, Duke Math. J. 6 (1991), no. 1, 1. MR MR (9c:037) [Hen93] Guy Henniart, Caractérisation de la correspondance de Langlands locale par les facteurs ɛ de paires, Invent. Math. 113 (1993), no., MR 1818 (96e:11078) [HO15] Jeffrey Hakim and Omer Offen, Distinguished representations of GL(n) and local converse theorems, Manuscripta Math. 148 (015), no. 1-, 1 7. MR [JL15] Hervé Jacquet and Baiying Liu, On the local converse theorem for p-adic gl n, 015, [JNS15] arxiv: Dihua Jiang, Chufeng Nien, and Shaun Stevens, Towards the Jacquet conjecture on the local converse problem for p-adic GL n, J. ur. Math. Soc. (JMS) 17 (015), no. 4, MR [JPSS83] H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetskii-Shapiro, and J. A. Shalika, Rankin-Selberg convolutions, Amer. J. Math. 105 (1983), no., MR (85g:11044) [JS85] Hervé Jacquet and Joseph Shalika, A lemma on highly ramified ɛ-factors, Math. Ann. 71 (1985), no. 3, MR (87i:048) [Kab04] Anthony C. Kable, Asai L-functions and Jacquet s conjecture, Amer. J. Math. 16 (004), no. 4, MR (005g:11083) [Kem15] Alexander Kemarsky, Gamma factors of distinguished representations of GL n (C), Pacific J. Math. 78 (015), no. 1, MR [Mat09a] Nadir Matringe, Conjectures about distinction and local Asai L-functions, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (009), no. 9, MR (011a:00) [Mat09b], Distinguished principal series representations of GL(n) over a p-adic field, Pacific J. Math. 39 (009), no. 1, MR (010a:04) [Off11] Omer Offen, On local root numbers and distinction, J. Reine Angew. Math. 65 (011), MR [Ok97] Youngbin Ok, Distinction and gamma factors at 1/: Supercuspidal case, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1997, Thesis (Ph.D.) Columbia University. MR [Sha85] Freydoon Shahidi, Local coefficients as Artin factors for real groups, Duke Math. J. 5 (1985), no. 4, MR (87m:11049) [Sil78] Allan J. Silberger, The Langlands quotient theorem for p-adic groups, Math. Ann. 36 (1978), no., MR (58 #413) [Wal9] Nolan R. Wallach, Real reductive groups. II, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, Academic Press Inc., Boston, MA, 199. MR (93m:018)
20 0 NADIR MATRING AND OMR OFFN [Zel80] A. V. Zelevinsky, Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups. II. On irreducible representations of GL(n), Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 13 (1980), no., MR (83g:01) Laboratoire de Mathmatiques et Applications Tlport - BP 30179, 11 Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie, 8696 Futuroscope Chasseneuil Cedex, France -mail address: nadirmatringe@outlook.fr Department of Mathematics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa , Israel -mail address: offen@tx.technion.ac.il
A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire
A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire Hervé Jacquet December 5, 2011 Nadir Matringe has indicated to me that the paper Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire ([JPSS81a],
More informationON THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE AND RELATED PROBLEMS OVER p-adic LOCAL FIELDS
ON THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE AND RELATED PROBLEMS OVER p-adic LOCAL FIELDS DIHUA JIANG AND CHUFENG NIEN Abstract. We discuss two issues related to the local Langlands conjecture over p-adic local
More informationFORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS
Sairaiji, F. Osaka J. Math. 39 (00), 3 43 FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS FUMIO SAIRAIJI (Received March 4, 000) 1. Introduction Let be an elliptic curve over Q. We denote by ˆ
More informationIMAGE OF FUNCTORIALITY FOR GENERAL SPIN GROUPS
IMAGE OF FUNCTORIALITY FOR GENERAL SPIN GROUPS MAHDI ASGARI AND FREYDOON SHAHIDI Abstract. We give a complete description of the image of the endoscopic functorial transfer of generic automorphic representations
More informationTWO SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF METAPLECTIC GROUPS. In memory of Sibe Mardešić
TWO IMPLE OBERVATION ON REPREENTATION OF METAPLECTIC GROUP MARKO TADIĆ arxiv:1709.00634v1 [math.rt] 2 ep 2017 Abstract. M. Hanzer and I. Matić have proved in [8] that the genuine unitary principal series
More informationTRILINEAR FORMS AND TRIPLE PRODUCT EPSILON FACTORS WEE TECK GAN
TRILINAR FORMS AND TRIPL PRODUCT PSILON FACTORS W TCK GAN Abstract. We give a short and simple proof of a theorem of Dipendra Prasad on the existence and non-existence of invariant trilinear forms on a
More informationTWO SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF METAPLECTIC GROUPS. Marko Tadić
RAD HAZU. MATEMATIČKE ZNANOTI Vol. 21 = 532 2017: 89-98 DOI: http://doi.org/10.21857/m16wjcp6r9 TWO IMPLE OBERVATION ON REPREENTATION OF METAPLECTIC GROUP Marko Tadić In memory of ibe Mardešić Abstract.
More informationMarko Tadić. Introduction Let F be a p-adic field. The normalized absolute value on F will be denoted by F. Denote by ν : GL(n, F ) R the character
ON REDUCIBILITY AND UNITARIZABILITY FOR CLASSICAL p-adic GROUPS, SOME GENERAL RESULTS Marko Tadić Abstract. The aim of this paper is to prove two general results on parabolic induction of classical p-adic
More informationU = 1 b. We fix the identification G a (F ) U sending b to ( 1 b
LECTURE 11: ADMISSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS AND SUPERCUSPIDALS I LECTURE BY CHENG-CHIANG TSAI STANFORD NUMBER THEORY LEARNING SEMINAR JANUARY 10, 2017 NOTES BY DAN DORE AND CHENG-CHIANG TSAI Let L is a global
More informationOn Local γ-factors. Dihua Jiang School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. February 27, 2006.
On Local γ-factors Dihua Jiang School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA February 27, 2006 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Basic Properties of Local γ-factors 5 2.1 Multiplicativity..........................
More informationON THE STANDARD MODULES CONJECTURE. V. Heiermann and G. Muić
ON THE STANDARD MODULES CONJECTURE V. Heiermann and G. Muić Abstract. Let G be a quasi-split p-adic group. Under the assumption that the local coefficients C defined with respect to -generic tempered representations
More informationReducibility of generic unipotent standard modules
Journal of Lie Theory Volume?? (??)???? c?? Heldermann Verlag 1 Version of March 10, 011 Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules Dan Barbasch and Dan Ciubotaru Abstract. Using Lusztig s geometric
More informationResults from MathSciNet: Mathematical Reviews on the Web c Copyright American Mathematical Society 1998
98m:11125 11R39 11F27 11F67 11F70 22E50 22E55 Gelbart, Stephen (IL-WEIZ); Rogawski, Jonathan (1-UCLA); Soudry, David (IL-TLAV) Endoscopy, theta-liftings, and period integrals for the unitary group in three
More informationOn the cuspidality criterion for the Asai transfer to GL(4)
On the cuspidality criterion for the Asai transfer to GL(4) Dipendra Prasad and Dinakar Ramakrishnan Introduction Let F be a number field and K a quadratic algebra over F, i.e., either F F or a quadratic
More informationColette Mœglin and Marko Tadić
CONSTRUCTION OF DISCRETE SERIES FOR CLASSICAL p-adic GROUPS Colette Mœglin and Marko Tadić Introduction The goal of this paper is to complete (after [M2] the classification of irreducible square integrable
More information9 Artin representations
9 Artin representations Let K be a global field. We have enough for G ab K. Now we fix a separable closure Ksep and G K := Gal(K sep /K), which can have many nonabelian simple quotients. An Artin representation
More informationON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS SUPPORTED IN THE SIEGEL MAXIMAL PARABOLIC SUBGROUP
ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS SUPPORTED IN THE SIEGEL MAXIMAL PARABOLIC SUBGROUP NEVEN GRBAC Abstract. For the split symplectic and special orthogonal groups over a number field, we
More informationOn the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms
On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms Liubomir Chiriac Abstract The generalized Ramanujan Conjecture for unitary cuspidal automorphic representations π on GL 2 posits
More informationIntroduction to L-functions II: of Automorphic L-functions.
Introduction to L-functions II: Automorphic L-functions References: - D. Bump, Automorphic Forms and Representations. - J. Cogdell, Notes on L-functions for GL(n) - S. Gelbart and F. Shahidi, Analytic
More informationSOME REMARKS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF QUATERNION DIVISION ALGEBRAS
SOME REMARKS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF QUATERNION DIVISION ALGEBRAS DIPENDRA PRASAD Abstract. For the quaternion division algebra D over a non-archimedean local field k, and π an irreducible finite dimensional
More informationA comparison of automorphic and Artin L-series of GL(2)-type agreeing at degree one primes
A comparison of automorphic and Artin L-series of GL(2)-type agreeing at degree one primes Kimball Martin and Dinakar Ramakrishnan To James Cogdell, with friendship and admiration Introduction Let F be
More information15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem
15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem Let q > 3 be a prime (and later p will be a prime which has no relation which q). Suppose that there exists a non-trivial integral solution to the Diophantine
More informationHolomorphy of the 9th Symmetric Power L-Functions for Re(s) >1. Henry H. Kim and Freydoon Shahidi
IMRN International Mathematics Research Notices Volume 2006, Article ID 59326, Pages 1 7 Holomorphy of the 9th Symmetric Power L-Functions for Res >1 Henry H. Kim and Freydoon Shahidi We proe the holomorphy
More informationA. I. BADULESCU AND D. RENARD
ZELEVINSKY INVOLUTION AND MOEGLIN-WALDSPURGER ALGORITHM FOR GL n (D) A. I. BADULESCU AND D. RENARD Abstract. In this short note, we remark that the algorithm of Moeglin and Waldspurger for computing the
More informationThe Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2
The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2 Chris Nicholls December 12, 2014 1 Introduction These notes are based heavily on Kevin Buzzard s excellent notes on the Langlands Correspondence. The aim is
More informationDiscrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 261 267 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups Jeffrey D. Adler and Alan Roche Communicated by S. Gindikin Abstract.
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II
COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II LECTURES BY JOACHIM SCHWERMER, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Review 1 2. Lifting differential forms from the boundary 2 3. Eisenstein
More information14 From modular forms to automorphic representations
14 From modular forms to automorphic representations We fix an even integer k and N > 0 as before. Let f M k (N) be a modular form. We would like to product a function on GL 2 (A Q ) out of it. Recall
More informationOn the Non-vanishing of the Central Value of Certain L-functions: Unitary Groups
On the Non-vanishing of the Central Value of Certain L-functions: Unitary Groups arxiv:806.04340v [math.nt] Jun 08 Dihua Jiang Abstract Lei Zhang Let π be an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation
More informationA REMARK ON A CONVERSE THEOREM OF COGDELL AND PIATETSKI-SHAPIRO
A REMARK ON A CONVERSE THEOREM OF COGDELL AND PIATETSKI-SHAPIRO HERVÉ JACQUET AND BAIYING LIU Abstract. In this paper, we reprove a global converse theorem of Cogdell and Piatetski-Shapiro using purely
More informationFourier Coefficients and Automorphic Discrete Spectrum of Classical Groups. Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota
Fourier Coefficients and Automorphic Discrete Spectrum of Classical Groups Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota KIAS, Seoul November 16, 2015 Square-Integrable Automorphic Forms G a reductive algebraic
More informationIntroduction to L-functions I: Tate s Thesis
Introduction to L-functions I: Tate s Thesis References: - J. Tate, Fourier analysis in number fields and Hecke s zeta functions, in Algebraic Number Theory, edited by Cassels and Frohlich. - S. Kudla,
More informationLocal Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture
Local Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture Ahmed Moussaoui UPMC Paris VI - IMJ 23/08/203 Notation F non-archimedean local field : finite extension of Q p or F p ((t)) O F = {x F, v(x)
More information10 l-adic representations
0 l-adic representations We fix a prime l. Artin representations are not enough; l-adic representations with infinite images naturally appear in geometry. Definition 0.. Let K be any field. An l-adic Galois
More informationON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8. Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia
GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 4464)2009), 11 81 ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8 Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia Abstract. In this paper we decompose the residual
More informationRankin-Selberg L-functions.
Chapter 11 Rankin-Selberg L-functions...I had not recognized in 1966, when I discovered after many months of unsuccessful search a promising definition of automorphic L-function, what a fortunate, although,
More informationLECTURE 2: LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR G. 1. Introduction. If we view the flow of information in the Langlands Correspondence as
LECTURE 2: LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR G J.W. COGDELL. Introduction If we view the flow of information in the Langlands Correspondence as Galois Representations automorphic/admissible representations
More informationGeometric proof of the local Jacquet-Langlands correspondence for GL(n) for prime n
Geometric proof of the local Jacquet-Langlands correspondence for GL(n) for prime n Yoichi Mieda Abstract. In this paper, we give a purely geometric proof of the local Jacquet-Langlands correspondence
More informationHecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands
Hecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands S. M.-C. 18 October 2016 Today we re going to be associating L-functions to automorphic things and discussing their L-function-y properties, i.e. analytic continuation
More informationThe Casselman-Shalika Formula for a Distinguished Model
The Casselman-Shalika ormula for a Distinguished Model by William D. Banks Abstract. Unramified Whittaker functions and their analogues occur naturally in number theory as terms in the ourier expansions
More informationThe following theorem is proven in [, p. 39] for a quadratic extension E=F of global elds, such that each archimedean place of F splits in E. e prove
On poles of twisted tensor L-functions Yuval. Flicker and Dmitrii inoviev bstract It is shown that the only possible pole of the twisted tensor L-functions in Re(s) is located at s = for all quadratic
More informationMA 162B LECTURE NOTES: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26
MA 162B LECTURE NOTES: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26 1. Abelian Varieties of GL 2 -Type 1.1. Modularity Criteria. Here s what we ve shown so far: Fix a continuous residual representation : G Q GLV, where V is
More informationON THE MODIFIED MOD p LOCAL LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 2 (Q l )
ON THE MODIFIED MOD p LOCAL LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 2 (Q l ) DAVID HELM We give an explicit description of the modified mod p local Langlands correspondence for GL 2 (Q l ) of [EH], Theorem 5.1.5,
More informationOn Cuspidal Spectrum of Classical Groups
On Cuspidal Spectrum of Classical Groups Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota Simons Symposia on Geometric Aspects of the Trace Formula April 10-16, 2016 Square-Integrable Automorphic Forms G a reductive
More informationON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS LISA CARBONE Abstract. We outline the classification of K rank 1 groups over non archimedean local fields K up to strict isogeny,
More informationOn the Notion of an Automorphic Representation *
On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation * The irreducible representations of a reductive group over a local field can be obtained from the square-integrable representations of Levi factors of parabolic
More informationWeyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.
Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 β ν 1 = ν 2 S α S β ν S β ν S α ν S α S β S α S β ν
More informationOn the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group
IMRN International Mathematics Research Notices 1999, No. 8 On the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group Dipendra Prasad In an earlier paper [P1], we studied self-dual complex representations of
More informationA Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields
A Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields by Shinichi MOCHIZUKI* Section 0: Introduction The purpose of this paper is to prove an absolute version of the Grothendieck Conjecture
More informationCUSPIDALITY OF SYMMETRIC POWERS WITH APPLICATIONS
DUKE MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL Vol. 112, No. 1, c 2002 CUSPIDALITY OF SYMMETRIC POWERS WITH APPLICATIONS HENRY H. KIM and FREYDOON SHAHIDI Abstract The purpose of this paper is to prove that the symmetric fourth
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More informationTHE RESIDUAL EISENSTEIN COHOMOLOGY OF Sp 4 OVER A TOTALLY REAL NUMBER FIELD
THE RESIDUAL EISENSTEIN COHOMOLOGY OF Sp 4 OVER A TOTALLY REAL NUMBER FIELD NEVEN GRBAC AND HARALD GROBNER Abstract. Let G = Sp 4 /k be the k-split symplectic group of k-rank, where k is a totally real
More informationREDUCIBLE PRINCIPAL SERIES REPRESENTATIONS, AND LANGLANDS PARAMETERS FOR REAL GROUPS. May 15, 2018 arxiv: v2 [math.
REDUCIBLE PRINCIPAL SERIES REPRESENTATIONS, AND LANGLANDS PARAMETERS FOR REAL GROUPS DIPENDRA PRASAD May 15, 2018 arxiv:1705.01445v2 [math.rt] 14 May 2018 Abstract. The work of Bernstein-Zelevinsky and
More informationGelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions
Gelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions A. Aizenbud Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://math.mit.edu/~aizenr Examples Example (Fourier Series) Examples Example (Fourier Series) L 2 (S 1 ) =
More informationA partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group
A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group joint work with Ahmed Moussaoui and Maarten Solleveld Anne-Marie Aubert Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu - Paris
More informationCuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters
Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters Maarten Solleveld Universiteit Nijmegen joint with Anne-Marie Aubert and Ahmed Moussaoui 12 April 2016 Maarten Solleveld Universiteit Nijmegen Cuspidality
More informationARCHIMEDEAN ASPECTS OF SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF DEGREE 2
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 47, Number 7, 207 ARCHIMEDEAN ASPECTS OF SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF DEGREE 2 RALF SCHMIDT ABSTRACT. We survey the archimedean representations and Langlands parameters
More informationCLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation
CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK 1 JAVIER FRESÁN 1. Motivation In a 1640 letter to Mersenne, Fermat proved the following: Theorem 1.1 (Fermat). A prime number p distinct from 2 is a sum of two squares if and only
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.nt] 12 Dec 2018
LANGLANDS LAMBDA UNCTION OR QUADRATIC TAMELY RAMIIED EXTENSIONS SAZZAD ALI BISWAS Abstract. Let K/ be a quadratic tamely ramified extension of a non-archimedean local field of characteristic zero. In this
More informationWhittaker models and Fourier coeffi cients of automorphic forms
Whittaker models and Fourier coeffi cients of automorphic forms Nolan R. Wallach May 2013 N. Wallach () Whittaker models 5/13 1 / 20 G be a real reductive group with compact center and let K be a maximal
More informationA note on trilinear forms for reducible representations and Beilinson s conjectures
A note on trilinear forms for reducible representations and Beilinson s conjectures M Harris and A J Scholl Introduction Let F be a non-archimedean local field, and π i (i = 1, 2, 3) irreducible admissible
More informationLIFTING OF GENERIC DEPTH ZERO REPRESENTATIONS OF CLASSICAL GROUPS
LIFTING OF GENERIC DEPTH ZERO REPRESENTATIONS OF CLASSICAL GROUPS GORDAN SAVIN 1. Introduction Let G be a split classical group, either SO 2n+1 (k) or Sp 2n (k), over a p-adic field k. We assume that p
More informationRepresentation Theory & Number Theory Workshop April April 2015 (Monday) Room: S
Programme 20 April 2015 (Monday) Room: S17-04-05 9.30am 10.30am 10.30am 11.00am Local and global wave-front sets Gordan SAVIN, University of Utah 11.00am 12.00pm Local symmetric square L-functions and
More informationLecture 4: Examples of automorphic forms on the unitary group U(3)
Lecture 4: Examples of automorphic forms on the unitary group U(3) Lassina Dembélé Department of Mathematics University of Calgary August 9, 2006 Motivation The main goal of this talk is to show how one
More informationOn Stability of Root Numbers
Contemporary Mathematics On Stability of Root Numbers J.W. Cogdell, F. Shahidi, and T.-L. Tsai To the Memory of Ilya Piatetski-Shapiro Abstract. The purpose of this article is a brief review of the progress
More informationQuadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation
(December 19, 010 Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ I show that over global fields k (characteristic not the quadratic norm residue symbol
More informationResidual modular Galois representations: images and applications
Residual modular Galois representations: images and applications Samuele Anni University of Warwick London Number Theory Seminar King s College London, 20 th May 2015 Mod l modular forms 1 Mod l modular
More informationTwists and residual modular Galois representations
Twists and residual modular Galois representations Samuele Anni University of Warwick Building Bridges, Bristol 10 th July 2014 Modular curves and Modular Forms 1 Modular curves and Modular Forms 2 Residual
More informationA PRODUCT OF TENSOR PRODUCT L-FUNCTIONS OF QUASI-SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS OF HERMITIAN TYPE
A PRODUCT OF TENSOR PRODUCT L-FUNCTIONS OF QUASI-SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS OF HERMITIAN TYPE DIHUA JIANG AND LEI ZHANG Abstract. A family of global zeta integrals representing a product of tensor product
More informationPrimitive Ideals and Unitarity
Primitive Ideals and Unitarity Dan Barbasch June 2006 1 The Unitary Dual NOTATION. G is the rational points over F = R or a p-adic field, of a linear connected reductive group. A representation (π, H)
More informationON RESIDUAL COHOMOLOGY CLASSES ATTACHED TO RELATIVE RANK ONE EISENSTEIN SERIES FOR THE SYMPLECTIC GROUP
ON RESIDUAL COHOMOLOGY CLASSES ATTACHED TO RELATIVE RANK ONE EISENSTEIN SERIES FOR THE SYMPLECTIC GROUP NEVEN GRBAC AND JOACHIM SCHWERMER Abstract. The cohomology of an arithmetically defined subgroup
More informationArtin Conjecture for p-adic Galois Representations of Function Fields
Artin Conjecture for p-adic Galois Representations of Function Fields Ruochuan Liu Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research Peking University, Beijing, 100871 liuruochuan@math.pku.edu.cn
More information(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)
1 Langlands classification for L-parameters A talk dedicated to Sergei Vladimirovich Vostokov on the occasion of his 70th birthday St.Petersburg im Mai 2015 (E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger) In the representation
More informationLocal root numbers of elliptic curves over dyadic fields
Local root numbers of elliptic curves over dyadic fields Naoki Imai Abstract We consider an elliptic curve over a dyadic field with additive, potentially good reduction. We study the finite Galois extension
More informationWHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2)
WHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2 ALEXANDRU A. POPA Abstract. In this note, we present a complete theory of Whittaker newforms for local representations π of GL(2, which are functions
More informationSERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE FOR GL(2)
SERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE OR GL(2) HARUZO HIDA 1. Quaternion class sets A quaternion algebra B over a field is a simple algebra of dimension 4 central over a field. A prototypical example is the
More informationReport on the Trace Formula
Contemporary Mathematics Report on the Trace Formula James Arthur This paper is dedicated to Steve Gelbart on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Abstract. We report briefly on the present state of
More informationA proof of Selberg s orthogonality for automorphic L-functions
A proof of Selberg s orthogonality for automorphic L-functions Jianya Liu, Yonghui Wang 2, and Yangbo Ye 3 Abstract Let π and π be automorphic irreducible cuspidal representations of GL m and GL m, respectively.
More informationDiscrete Series and Characters of the Component Group
Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group Jeffrey Adams April 9, 2007 Suppose φ : W R L G is an L-homomorphism. There is a close relationship between the L-packet associated to φ and characters
More informationOn Certain L-functions Titles and Abstracts. Jim Arthur (Toronto) Title: The embedded eigenvalue problem for classical groups
On Certain L-functions Titles and Abstracts Jim Arthur (Toronto) Title: The embedded eigenvalue problem for classical groups Abstract: By eigenvalue, I mean the family of unramified Hecke eigenvalues of
More informationAN ALGEBRAIC CHEBOTAREV DENSITY THEOREM
AN ALGEBRAIC CHEBOTAREV DENSITY THEOREM C. S. RAJAN Abstract. We present here results on the distribution of Frobenius conjugacy classes satisfying an algebraic condition associated to a l-adic representation.
More informationMaximal Class Numbers of CM Number Fields
Maximal Class Numbers of CM Number Fields R. C. Daileda R. Krishnamoorthy A. Malyshev Abstract Fix a totally real number field F of degree at least 2. Under the assumptions of the generalized Riemann hypothesis
More information9 Artin representations
9 Artin representations Let K be a global field. We have enough for G ab K. Now we fix a separable closure Ksep and G K := Gal(K sep /K), which can have many nonabelian simple quotients. An Artin representation
More informationJacquet modules and induced representations
Jacquet modules and induced representations Marko Tadić 1. Introduction In this paper, we shall review some possible applications of Jacquet modules to the study of parabolically induced representations
More informationTATE CONJECTURES FOR HILBERT MODULAR SURFACES. V. Kumar Murty University of Toronto
TATE CONJECTURES FOR HILBERT MODULAR SURFACES V. Kumar Murty University of Toronto Toronto-Montreal Number Theory Seminar April 9-10, 2011 1 Let k be a field that is finitely generated over its prime field
More informationOn the Langlands Program
On the Langlands Program John Rognes Colloquium talk, May 4th 2018 The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters has decided to award the Abel Prize for 2018 to Robert P. Langlands of the Institute for
More informationQuadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation
(September 17, 010) Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ I show that over global fields (characteristic not ) the quadratic norm residue
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationWhat is in the book Automorphic forms on GL(2) by Jacquet and Langlands?
What is in the book Automorphic forms on GL(2) by Jacquet and Langlands? Kevin Buzzard February 9, 2012 This note, sadly, is unfinished, which is a shame because I did actually make it through to the last-but-one
More informationUniversität Regensburg Mathematik
Universität Regensburg Mathematik On projective linear groups over finite fields as Galois groups over the rational numbers Gabor Wiese Preprint Nr. 14/2006 On projective linear groups over finite fields
More informationFrom K3 Surfaces to Noncongruence Modular Forms. Explicit Methods for Modularity of K3 Surfaces and Other Higher Weight Motives ICERM October 19, 2015
From K3 Surfaces to Noncongruence Modular Forms Explicit Methods for Modularity of K3 Surfaces and Other Higher Weight Motives ICERM October 19, 2015 Winnie Li Pennsylvania State University 1 A K3 surface
More informationCUBIC UNIPOTENT ARTHUR PARAMETERS AND MULTIPLICITIES OF SQUARE INTEGRABLE AUTOMORPHIC FORMS
CUBIC UNIPOTNT ARTHUR PARAMTRS AND MULTIPLICITIS OF SQUAR INTGRABL AUTOMORPHIC FORMS W TCK GAN, NADYA GURVICH AND DIHUA JIANG 1. Introduction Let G be a connected simple linear algebraic group defined
More informationRepresentations of Totally Disconnected Groups
Chapter 5 Representations of Totally Disconnected Groups Abstract In this chapter our goal is to develop enough of the representation theory of locally compact totally disconnected groups (or td groups
More informationTraces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials
June 28, 20 Traces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/. Example: GL 2 2. GL n C and Un 3. Decomposing holomorphic polynomials over GL
More informationOn the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 16 (2006) 57 65 c 2006 Heldermann Verlag On the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2 Hervé Sabourin and Rupert W.T. Yu Communicated
More informationOn Artin s L-Functions*
On Artin s L-Functions* by R.P. Langlands The nonabelian Artin L-functions and their generalizations by Weil are known to be meromorphic in the whole complex plane and to satisfy a functional equation
More informationA Corollary to Bernstein s Theorem and Whittaker Functionals on the Metaplectic Group William D. Banks
A Corollary to Bernstein s Theorem and Whittaker Functionals on the Metaplectic Group William D. Banks In this paper, we extend and apply a remarkable theorem due to Bernstein, which was proved in a letter
More informationSUPERCUSPIDAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(n) DISTINGUISHED BY A UNITARY SUBGROUP. Jeffrey Hakim and Zhengyu Mao. 1. Introduction.
pacific journal of mathematics Vol. 185, No. 1, 1998 SUPERCUSPIDAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(n) DISTINGUISHED BY A UNITARY SUBGROUP Jeffrey Hakim and Zhengyu Mao When E/F is a quadratic extension of p-adic
More informationEXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.
EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) EYAL GOREN, MCGILL UNIVERSITY, FALL 2007 (1) We define a (full) lattice L in R n to be a discrete subgroup of R n that contains a basis for R n. Prove that L is
More informationl-modular LOCAL THETA CORRESPONDENCE : DUAL PAIRS OF TYPE II Alberto Mínguez
l-modular LOCAL THETA CORRESPONDENCE : DUAL PAIRS OF TYPE II by Alberto Mínguez Abstract. Let F be a non-archimedean locally compact field, of residual characteristic p, and (G, G a reductive dual pair
More information