U = 1 b. We fix the identification G a (F ) U sending b to ( 1 b
|
|
- Darren Blair
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LECTURE 11: ADMISSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS AND SUPERCUSPIDALS I LECTURE BY CHENG-CHIANG TSAI STANFORD NUMBER THEORY LEARNING SEMINAR JANUARY 10, 2017 NOTES BY DAN DORE AND CHENG-CHIANG TSAI Let L is a global field, G a reductive group over L, and π an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation of GA L. Recall that this implies that π is an admissible representation and that Flath s theorem says we may decompose π as π = π v with π v an irreducible admissible representation of GL v at least for non-archimedean v, and v running through the places of L. Some properties of π may be read off from the corresponding properties of π v : for example, the levels correspond, and the Hecke eigenvalue a p of π corresponds to the Hecke eigenvalue of π p e.g. when L = Q and G = GL 2. Today, we will restrict our attention to the case of a non-archimedean local field F, and the group G = GL 2 F. Recall that an admissible representation π of G is a complex vector space π with a G-action such that: π = K G K open compact where π K = {v π πk v = v k K}. A representation satisfying this condition is called smooth. π K dim C π K < for any open compact subgroup K G. Inside the group G = GL 2 F, recall that there is a particular subgroup, called the mirabolic subgroup: { } M = a b a F, b F This has a unipotent subgroup { } U = 1 b b F We fix the identification G a F U sending b to 1 b, and think of U as Ga F. Fix a non-trivial additive character ψ : F C. Via the above identification, we think of this as a character on U. If π is an irreducible admissible representation of G, we define: Definition 1. A Whittaker model for π is a G-embedding ι: π Ind G Uψ. Recall that CG is the complex vector space of C-valued functions on G that are invariant by right translation by some open compact subgroup K G. G acts on this space by right translation. We may think of Ind G Uψ as: Likewise, we have: We define: Ind G Uψ = {f CG fug = ψufg u U, g G} Ind M U ψ = {f CM fum = ψufm u U, m M} 1
2 Definition 2. A Kirillov model for π is an M-embedding π Ind M U ψ. Remark 3. Since π might not be irreducible as an M-module, it is no longer obvious that a non-zero M-homomorphism from π to Ind M U ψ is an embedding. Nevertheless, this is true, as we will show later. For f Ind M U ψ we may identify f as a function on F via: fx := f x 0 We may compute the M-action on such f by: a b f x = f x 0 a b = f ax bx = f 1 bx ax 0 = ψbxfax Let KF be the space of functions on F that are left translation-invariant by some 1 + p n F and are supported on a compact subset of F. Here, p is the maximal ideal of O F. Now, we have: Lemma 4. The map given by restricting f Ind M U CM to F 0 defines an isomorphism Ind M U ψ KF. Proof. First, we see that this map lands inside KF : i We have a 0 f x = fax. Since f is right translation-invariant by an open compact subgroup of M, if we take a sufficiently close to 1, this shows fx = fax. i Similarly, fx = 1 b f x = ψbxfx = fx for b p n for some large enough n, i.e. ψbx = 1 for all x suppf, b p n. Suppose ψ is non-trivial on some p m. Then we have suppf p m n+1 is compact. Next, if f KF, we may extend f to an element of Ind M U ψ by defining f a b = ψbfa. The arguments above run in reverse show that f CM because any element of M can be written as a product 1 b a 0 is stable by right translation by an open compact subgroup of M. The same calculations let us easily check that these operations are inverse to each other. Now, Frobenius reciprocity gives: Hom G π, Ind G U ψ = Hom G π, Ind G M Ind M U ψ = Hom M Res G Mπ, Ind M U ψ Thus, if π has a Kirillov model, then π has a Whittaker model since maps from the irreducible G-representation π to Ind G U ψ must be embeddings. We have: Theorem 5. Let π be an irreducible admissible representation of GL 2 that is not one-dimensional. Then π has a Kirrilov model for any fixed choice of ψ. Proof. See [3, ], [1, 4.4], or [2, 3.6]. In addition, the Kirrilov model for π is essentially unique: 2
3 Lemma 6. dim Hom M Res G Mπ, Ind M U ψ = 1 Proof. Suppose we have a Kirrilov model j : π Ind M U ψ KF. Consider the linear functional on π given by L j : f jf1. Since for a F we have jfa = a 0 jf 1 = j a 0 f 1, the functional L j : π C determines j : π KF. Now, note that if f ker L j, then jf1 = 0, so jfa = 0 for all a F sufficiently close to 1, i.e. when va 1 n 0 where v is the valuation on F for some n 0 sufficiently large. Suppose ψ is non-trivial on p m for some m, so that p ψbdb = 0. Now, we have, for all m x F and for all n m + n 0 ψb 1 j π 1 b f x db = ψb 1 ψbxjfx db p n p n = ψbx 1jfx db = 0 p n Now, since j is an embedding of π into a space of functions on F, this says that: I n f := ψb 1 π 1 b f db = 0 p n whenever n n 0. Thus, the kernel of L j is contained in the space of f such that I n f = 0 for all sufficiently large n. We ll see that this is an equality: if jf1 0, then we have: π 1 b f ji n f1 = ψb 1 j p n = ψ0jf1 db p n = jf1 volp n 0 1 db Thus, the kernel of I n is contained in the kernel of L j, so they are equal. This shows that the kernel of L j does not depend on j, so different choices of j can only change L j by a constant multiple. This shows an embedding j : Res G Mπ Ind M U ψ is unique up to a constant. But it is not a priori clear that a non-trivial homomorphism j from Res G Mπ to Ind M U ψ is injective. Choose some such j, and let j be an embedding of Res G Mπ into Ind M U ψ. Since j is non-trivial, we see that L j 0. Now, if f ker L j = {f I n f = 0 n 0}, the argument above shows that L j f = 0, so ker L j ker L j. Since these are both codimension-one subspaces of π, we must have ker L j = ker L j and thus L j = cl j for some c 0. As before, this implies that j = cj for some c 0 and we see that j is an embedding after all. Let us now fix an irreducible admissible representation π of dimension greater than 1, and fix a Kirillov model j : π Ind M U ψ. We will drop j from the notation and regard π as a subspace of Ind M U ψ. Define SF KF to be the subspace of functions that are compactly supported in F, i.e. the elements of KF that vanish in a neighborhood of 0. We call these Schwarz functions on F. 3
4 Lemma 7. SF π. Proof. sketch First, we verify that SF is an irreducible representation of M. This can be done as follows: Suppose ψ is trivial on p m+1 but not on p m. Let f SF be non-trivial, and suppf a + p n for some a F. Then we have 1 ψba 1 ψbxfxdb = p m n p m n { fx if x a + p n+1 0 else In other words, f p m n ψba 1 1 b fdb restricts f to a + p n+1 suppf. By using this, one can construct from any non-zero function in SF any characteristic on F and thus any function in SF. Then, we have π SF 0, because π 1 b f f SF for any b F. We claim that we may choose b, f such that this is non-zero. This is because: π 1 b f f x = ψbx 1 fx Since ψ is non-trivial, this is not always equal to 0. Since SF is irreducible, this means that SF π. This allows us to state the next lemma: Lemma 8. Let w = 1 0. Then we have: π = SF + πwsf Proof. Since π is an irreducible G-representation, π is spanned by πg SF for g G. Now, we may use the Bruhat decomposition to write G = B UwB for B = M Z the upper triangular Borel subgroup of G Z is the center of G = GL 2 F, i.e. the scalar matrices. Thus, π is generated by SF and πuwsf for u U. But we have: πuwf πwf = πu 1πwf SF as we may see by writing u = 1 b and using the explicit description of the action of M on KF. We will need the following general definition: Definition 9. Let π be a smooth representation of G. The contragredient representation ˇπ is the space of smooth functionals on π, i.e. we have: ˇπ = {l: π C compact open K such that lπkf = lf f π} In other words, ˇπ is the subspace of smooth vectors in the linear dual of π. If π is admissible, then for all K, π = π K π K, where π K is the kernel of e K = 1 µk 1 K HG, K, since e K acts on π as projection onto π K. This implies that the linear dual of π splits as π = π K π K, so π K = π K. Since π K = ˇπ K, this shows that ˇπ K is 4
5 finite-dimensional, and thus ˇπ is admissible. Moreover, the natural pairing, : π ˇπ C is non-degenerate, as it restricts to a non-degenerate pairing on π K ˇπ K. Additionally, this shows that the natural map π ˇπ is an isomorphism, since both sides are the sum of K-fixed subspaces, yet the map restricts to an isomorphism π K = ˇπ K for each K. Let us also remark that if π, π are admissible representations, and there exists a non-degenerate pairing, : π π C such that πgf, π gf = f, f for all f π, f π, g G, then the natural map π ˇπ is an isomorphism. Non-degeneracy implies that the map is injective, and we can check surjectivity by passing to π K, ˇπ K, and comparing dimensions. Now, fix an irreducible admissible representation π and a Kirillov model π KF. Recall that π 0 c 0 c acts by a constant by Schur s lemma. Thus, we may write: We have: π c 0 0 c = w π c id π Theorem 10. The contragredient representation ˇπ of π can be realized in the same underlying abstract vector space as π with the action ˇπg = w π det g 1 πg. Proof. See [3, 1.6]. Then, a Kirillov model ǰ for ˇπ is given by ǰfx = w π x 1 jfx. This gives us an embedding j ǰ : π ˇπ KF KF. This lets us define a pairing on π ˇπ by: f, ˇf := f 1 x ˇf x d x + F f 2 xˇπ ˇf x d x F Here, we choose f 1, f 2 SF such that f = f 1 + πwf 2. We may define a pairing, for f, f π: f, f = f 1 xw π x 1 f x d x + F f 2 xw π x 1 πwf x d x F Thus, the essential content of Theorem 10 says that this pairing is non-degenerate, well-defined i.e. it does not depend on the choice of representation of f in terms of f 1, f 2, and that: Now, we may define: πgf, πgf = w π det gf, f Definition 11. An irreducible admissible representation π of G is called supercuspidal if for all f π, ˇf ˇπ, the matrix coefficient g πgf, f is a compactly supported function on G mod the center Z of G. Note that this definition makes sense for any reductive group G, since the definition of ˇπ of the pairing between π and ˇπ are both perfectly general. We have the following theorem: Theorem 12. π is supercuspidal iff π = SF in the Kirillov model. 5
6 Remark 13. This theorem does not yet show that any supercuspidal representations exist! Note that in general SF is only a M-subrepresentation of π. Proof. First, suppose that π = SF. Note that by the previous discussion, this implies that ˇπ = SF as well, since they have the same underlying space and essentially the same Kirillov model up to a central character, which does not affect the condition of being compactly supported away from 0. Then for all f π, ˇf ˇπ, we have: π a 0 f, ˇf = F fax ˇf x d x Since f, ˇf SF, we have ˇf x = 0 for x outside a compact subset of F. Thus since inversion and multiplication are continuous on F, Supp ˇf 1 Suppf is a compact subset of F and the integrand vanishes for a outside this set. Recall that we have the Cartan decomposition: G = a F K a 0 K Z for K = GL 2 O F. Fix f π, ˇf ˇπ, and let K 1 K be such that K 1 fixes both f and ˇf. Since [K : K 1 ] <, the K-orbit of f is finite and similarly for ˇf. Let f 1,..., f s, ˇf 1,..., ˇf r be the elements of these orbits. We see that there is a compact subset Ω F such that π a 0 f i, ˇf j = 0 for all i, j and any a F Ω. Then, for any g, we may write: πgf, ˇf = πk 1 a 0 k 2 zf, ˇf = w π z π a 0 πk 2 f, πk1 1 ˇf = w π z π a 0 f i, ˇf j Thus, this is 0 unless g K Ω 0 K Z, and this set is compact mod Z. Therefore, π is supercuspidal. Conversely, suppose that π is supercuspidal. Take any ˇf ˇπ. For any f SF π and a F we again have: π a 0 f, ˇf = fax ˇf xd x F and we know that as a function of a, this is compactly supported in F. As ˇf is smooth, as a function on F it is locally constant under some 1 + p n. By taking f = 1 1+p n, the above compact support property implies that ˇf SF. Thus, ˇπ = SF and therefore we know that π = SF by the relationship between the Kirillov models of π and ˇπ. 6
7 References [1] D. Bump, Automorphic forms and representations, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, [2] Colin J. Bushnell and Guy Henniart, The local Langlands conjecture for GL2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, [3] R. Godement, Notes on Jacquet Langlands Theory, IAS lecture notes, Princeton, Online at stanford.edu/ conrad/conversesem/refs/godement-ias.pdf. 7
LECTURE 16: UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS LECTURE BY SHEELA DEVADAS STANFORD NUMBER THEORY LEARNING SEMINAR FEBRUARY 14, 2018 NOTES BY DAN DORE
LECTURE 16: UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS LECTURE BY SHEELA DEVADAS STANFORD NUMBER THEORY LEARNING SEMINAR FEBRUARY 14, 2018 NOTES BY DAN DORE Let F be a local field with valuation ring O F, and G F the group
More informationAHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.
AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations. Nate Harman September 16, 2014 1 Introduction and motivation Let k be a locally compact non-discrete field with non-archimedean valuation
More informationDiscrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 261 267 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups Jeffrey D. Adler and Alan Roche Communicated by S. Gindikin Abstract.
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationA note on trilinear forms for reducible representations and Beilinson s conjectures
A note on trilinear forms for reducible representations and Beilinson s conjectures M Harris and A J Scholl Introduction Let F be a non-archimedean local field, and π i (i = 1, 2, 3) irreducible admissible
More information# 1 χ ramified χ unramified
LECTURE 14: LOCAL UNCTIONAL EQUATION LECTURE BY ASI ZAMAN STANORD NUMBER THEORY LEARNING SEMINAR JANUARY 31, 018 NOTES BY DAN DORE AND ASI ZAMAN Let be a local field. We fix ψ P p, ψ 1, such that ψ p d
More informationRepresentation Theory
Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim
More informationOn the Notion of an Automorphic Representation *
On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation * The irreducible representations of a reductive group over a local field can be obtained from the square-integrable representations of Levi factors of parabolic
More informationRepresentations of Totally Disconnected Groups
Chapter 5 Representations of Totally Disconnected Groups Abstract In this chapter our goal is to develop enough of the representation theory of locally compact totally disconnected groups (or td groups
More informationSince G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =
Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π = π, and another for which π π. Is this true for
More informationThe Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2
The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2 Chris Nicholls December 12, 2014 1 Introduction These notes are based heavily on Kevin Buzzard s excellent notes on the Langlands Correspondence. The aim is
More informationOn the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group
IMRN International Mathematics Research Notices 1999, No. 8 On the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group Dipendra Prasad In an earlier paper [P1], we studied self-dual complex representations of
More informationWhat is in the book Automorphic forms on GL(2) by Jacquet and Langlands?
What is in the book Automorphic forms on GL(2) by Jacquet and Langlands? Kevin Buzzard February 9, 2012 This note, sadly, is unfinished, which is a shame because I did actually make it through to the last-but-one
More informationCENTRAL CHARACTERS FOR SMOOTH IRREDUCIBLE MODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF GL 2 (Q p ) Laurent Berger
CENTRAL CHARACTERS FOR SMOOTH IRREDUCIBLE MODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF GL 2 (Q p by Laurent Berger To Francesco Baldassarri, on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract. We prove that every smooth irreducible
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationIntroduction to L-functions II: of Automorphic L-functions.
Introduction to L-functions II: Automorphic L-functions References: - D. Bump, Automorphic Forms and Representations. - J. Cogdell, Notes on L-functions for GL(n) - S. Gelbart and F. Shahidi, Analytic
More information9 Artin representations
9 Artin representations Let K be a global field. We have enough for G ab K. Now we fix a separable closure Ksep and G K := Gal(K sep /K), which can have many nonabelian simple quotients. An Artin representation
More informationFINITE GROUP THEORY: SOLUTIONS FALL MORNING 5. Stab G (l) =.
FINITE GROUP THEORY: SOLUTIONS TONY FENG These are hints/solutions/commentary on the problems. They are not a model for what to actually write on the quals. 1. 2010 FALL MORNING 5 (i) Note that G acts
More informationBruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups
Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups Maarten Solleveld Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen joint work with Ralf Meyer 26 November 2013 Starting point Let G be a reductive p-adic
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationLemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.
Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group
More information15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem
15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem Let q > 3 be a prime (and later p will be a prime which has no relation which q). Suppose that there exists a non-trivial integral solution to the Diophantine
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007
arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gr] 8 Nov 2008
SUBSPACES OF 7 7 SKEW-SYMMETRIC MATRICES RELATED TO THE GROUP G 2 arxiv:0811.1298v1 [math.gr] 8 Nov 2008 ROD GOW Abstract. Let K be a field of characteristic different from 2 and let C be an octonion algebra
More informationInertial types and automorphic representations with prescribed ramification. William Conley
Inertial types and automorphic representations with prescribed ramification William Conley May, 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Notation.............................. 5 2 Types and K-types for p-adic
More informationRepresentations and Linear Actions
Representations and Linear Actions Definition 0.1. Let G be an S-group. A representation of G is a morphism of S-groups φ G GL(n, S) for some n. We say φ is faithful if it is a monomorphism (in the category
More informationA correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire
A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire Hervé Jacquet December 5, 2011 Nadir Matringe has indicated to me that the paper Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire ([JPSS81a],
More informationIRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2,F q ) A main tool that will be used is Mackey's Theorem. The specic intertwiner is given by (f) = f(x) = 1
IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2,F q ) NAVA CHITRIK Referenced heavily from Daniel Bump (99), Automorphic Representations, Section 4. In these notes I will give a complete description of the irreducible
More informationAUTOMORPHIC FORMS ON GL 2 JACQUET-LANGLANDS
AUTOMORPHIC ORMS ON GL 2 JACQUET-LANGLANDS Contents. Introduction and motivation 2 2. Representation Theoretic Notions 3 2.. Preliminaries on adeles, groups and representations 3 2.2. Some categories of
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5. B : V V k
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5 1. Invariant forms Recall that a bilinear form on a vector space V is a map satisfying B : V V k B (cv, dw) = cdb (v, w), B (v 1 + v, w) = B (v 1, w)+b (v, w), B (v, w 1 +
More informationSMOOTH REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SMOOTH REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS FLORIAN HERZIG These are notes for my expository talk at the Instructional Conference on Representation Theory and Arithmetic at Northwestern University,
More informationNOTES ON REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(r) OVER A FINITE FIELD. by Daniel Bump
NOTES ON REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(r) OVER A FINITE FIELD by Daniel Bump 1 Induced representations of finite groups Let G be a finite group, and H a subgroup Let V be a finite-dimensional H-module The induced
More informationMarko Tadić. Introduction Let F be a p-adic field. The normalized absolute value on F will be denoted by F. Denote by ν : GL(n, F ) R the character
ON REDUCIBILITY AND UNITARIZABILITY FOR CLASSICAL p-adic GROUPS, SOME GENERAL RESULTS Marko Tadić Abstract. The aim of this paper is to prove two general results on parabolic induction of classical p-adic
More informationNOTES ON MODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic GROUPS, AND THE LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE
NOTES ON MODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic GROUPS, AND THE LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE DIPENDRA PRASAD These are expanded notes of some lectures given by the author for a workshop held at the Indian Statistical
More informationTraces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials
June 28, 20 Traces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/. Example: GL 2 2. GL n C and Un 3. Decomposing holomorphic polynomials over GL
More informationL(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 61 5. Root systems and semisimple Lie algebras 5.1. Characteristic 0 theory. Assume in this subsection that chark = 0. Let me recall a couple of definitions made earlier: G is called reductive
More informationRepresentations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett/ 1. Generic algebras
(February 19, 2005) Representations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Generic algebras Strict Iwahori-Hecke algebras Representations with Iwahori-fixed
More informationMaster Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry Lecture notes allowed
Université de Bordeaux U.F. Mathématiques et Interactions Master Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry 2018-2019 Lecture notes allowed Exercise 1 We call H (like
More informationEssays on representations of p-adic groups. Smooth representations. π(d)v = ϕ(x)π(x) dx. π(d 1 )π(d 2 )v = ϕ 1 (x)π(x) dx ϕ 2 (y)π(y)v dy
10:29 a.m. September 23, 2006 Essays on representations of p-adic groups Smooth representations Bill Casselman University of British Columbia cass@math.ubc.ca In this chapter I ll define admissible representations
More informationOn Partial Poincaré Series
Contemporary Mathematics On Partial Poincaré Series J.W. Cogdell and I.I. Piatetski-Shapiro This paper is dedicated to our colleague and friend Steve Gelbart. Abstract. The theory of Poincaré series has
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.
INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7. 7. Killing form. Nilpotent Lie algebras 7.1. Killing form. 7.1.1. Let L be a Lie algebra over a field k and let ρ : L gl(v ) be a finite dimensional L-module. Define
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable
More information5 Structure of 2-transitive groups
Structure of 2-transitive groups 25 5 Structure of 2-transitive groups Theorem 5.1 (Burnside) Let G be a 2-transitive permutation group on a set Ω. Then G possesses a unique minimal normal subgroup N and
More informationRepresentation Theory
Part II Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 Paper 1, Section II 19I 93 (a) Define the derived subgroup, G, of a finite group G. Show that if χ is a linear character
More informationRepresentations. 1 Basic definitions
Representations 1 Basic definitions If V is a k-vector space, we denote by Aut V the group of k-linear isomorphisms F : V V and by End V the k-vector space of k-linear maps F : V V. Thus, if V = k n, then
More informationLECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)
LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationUnitarity of non-spherical principal series
Unitarity of non-spherical principal series Alessandra Pantano July 2005 1 Minimal Principal Series G: a real split semisimple Lie group θ: Cartan involution; g = k p: Cartan decomposition of g a: maximal
More informationComputational Approaches to Finding Irreducible Representations
Computational Approaches to Finding Irreducible Representations Joseph Thomas Research Advisor: Klaus Lux May 16, 2008 Introduction Among the various branches of algebra, linear algebra has the distinctions
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationAUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I
AUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I DANIEL LITT The goal of these notes are to take the classical theory of modular/automorphic forms on the upper half plane and reinterpret them, first in terms L 2 (Γ \ SL(2,
More informationGroups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order
Journal of Algebra 219, 625 657 (1999) Article ID jabr.1998.7909, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Simon R. Blackburn*
More informationBranching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.
Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I Set-up. Let K be an algebraically closed field. By convention all our algebraic groups will be linear algebraic
More informationHecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands
Hecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands S. M.-C. 18 October 2016 Today we re going to be associating L-functions to automorphic things and discussing their L-function-y properties, i.e. analytic continuation
More informationMath 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems
Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems 12.1.2. Let M be a module over the integral domain R. (a) Assume that M has rank n and that x 1,..., x n is any maximal set of linearly independent elements
More informationBLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER Let k be an algebraically closed field. varieties unless otherwise stated. 1. Definitions and Examples For simplicity we will work strictly with affine Definition 1.1. An algebraic
More informationKirillov Theory. TCU GAGA Seminar. Ruth Gornet. January University of Texas at Arlington
TCU GAGA Seminar University of Texas at Arlington January 2009 A representation of a Lie group G on a Hilbert space H is a homomorphism such that v H the map is continuous. π : G Aut(H) = GL(H) x π(x)v
More informationWHITTAKER MODELS AND THE INTEGRAL BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR GL n
WHITTAKER MODELS AND THE INTEGRAL BERNSTEIN CENTER OR GL n DAVID HELM Abstract. We establish integral analogues of results of Bushnell and Henniart [BH] for spaces of Whittaker functions arising from the
More informationTHE RESIDUAL EISENSTEIN COHOMOLOGY OF Sp 4 OVER A TOTALLY REAL NUMBER FIELD
THE RESIDUAL EISENSTEIN COHOMOLOGY OF Sp 4 OVER A TOTALLY REAL NUMBER FIELD NEVEN GRBAC AND HARALD GROBNER Abstract. Let G = Sp 4 /k be the k-split symplectic group of k-rank, where k is a totally real
More informationTree-adjoined spaces and the Hawaiian earring
Tree-adjoined spaces and the Hawaiian earring W. Hojka (TU Wien) Workshop on Fractals and Tilings 2009 July 6-10, 2009, Strobl (Austria) W. Hojka (TU Wien) () Tree-adjoined spaces and the Hawaiian earring
More informationGroup Representation Theory
Group Representation Theory Ed Segal based on notes latexed by Fatema Daya and Zach Smith 2014 This course will cover the representation theory of finite groups over C. We assume the reader knows the basic
More informationColette Mœglin and Marko Tadić
CONSTRUCTION OF DISCRETE SERIES FOR CLASSICAL p-adic GROUPS Colette Mœglin and Marko Tadić Introduction The goal of this paper is to complete (after [M2] the classification of irreducible square integrable
More informationMath 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition
Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ Φ, and let B be the unique
More informationSERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE FOR GL(2)
SERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE OR GL(2) HARUZO HIDA 1. Quaternion class sets A quaternion algebra B over a field is a simple algebra of dimension 4 central over a field. A prototypical example is the
More information14 From modular forms to automorphic representations
14 From modular forms to automorphic representations We fix an even integer k and N > 0 as before. Let f M k (N) be a modular form. We would like to product a function on GL 2 (A Q ) out of it. Recall
More informationQuadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation
(December 19, 010 Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ I show that over global fields k (characteristic not the quadratic norm residue symbol
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF REDUCTIVE p-adic GROUPS. Under revision March Table of Contents
REPRESENTATIONS OF REDUCTIVE p-adic GROUPS Under revision March 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................. 2 2. Valuations and local fields....................................................
More informationis an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent
Lecture 4. G-Modules PCMI Summer 2015 Undergraduate Lectures on Flag Varieties Lecture 4. The categories of G-modules, mostly for finite groups, and a recipe for finding every irreducible G-module of a
More informationKIRILLOV THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS
KIRILLOV THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS LECTURE BY JU-LEE KIM, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Motivation (Akshay Venkatesh) 1 2. Howe s Kirillov theory 2 3. Moy-Prasad theory 5 4. Applications 6 References
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationChapter 2 Linear Transformations
Chapter 2 Linear Transformations Linear Transformations Loosely speaking, a linear transformation is a function from one vector space to another that preserves the vector space operations. Let us be more
More informationTHE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT
THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT ANKE D. POHL Abstract. Incomplete notes of the talk in the IRTG Student Seminar 07.06.06. This is a draft version and thought for internal use only. The Theorem of the
More informationON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8. Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia
GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 4464)2009), 11 81 ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8 Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia Abstract. In this paper we decompose the residual
More informationWHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2)
WHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2 ALEXANDRU A. POPA Abstract. In this note, we present a complete theory of Whittaker newforms for local representations π of GL(2, which are functions
More informationInduced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations
Induced Representations Frobenius Reciprocity Math G4344, Spring 2012 1 Generalities about Induced Representations For any group G subgroup H, we get a restriction functor Res G H : Rep(G) Rep(H) that
More informationAn Introduction to Gelfand Pairs of Finite and Compact Groups
An Introduction to Gelfand Pairs of Finite and Compact Groups Robert Barrington Leigh Assignment for MAT445 Representation Theory Submitted to Fiona Murnaghan Autumn 2005 1 General Approach for Finite
More informationLecture 2: Smooth representations and Hecke algebras for p-adic groups
Lecture 2: Smooth representations and Hecke algebras for p-adic groups 1. Introduction Let F be a non-archimedean local field, with valuation ring O having maximal ideal m, uniformizer ϖ, and finite residue
More informationWeyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.
Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 β ν 1 = ν 2 S α S β ν S β ν S α ν S α S β S α S β ν
More informationalgebraic groups. 1 See [1, 4.2] for the definition and properties of the invariant differential forms and the modulus character for
LECTURE 2: COMPACTNESS AND VOLUME FOR ADELIC COSET SPACES LECTURE BY BRIAN CONRAD STANFORD NUMBER THEORY LEARNING SEMINAR OCTOBER 11, 2017 NOTES BY DAN DORE Let k be a global field with adele ring A, G
More information6 Orthogonal groups. O 2m 1 q. q 2i 1 q 2i. 1 i 1. 1 q 2i 2. O 2m q. q m m 1. 1 q 2i 1 i 1. 1 q 2i. i 1. 2 q 1 q i 1 q i 1. m 1.
6 Orthogonal groups We now turn to the orthogonal groups. These are more difficult, for two related reasons. First, it is not always true that the group of isometries with determinant 1 is equal to its
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEK 4
REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEK 4 VERA SERANOVA 1. uced modules Let B A be rings and M be a B-module. Then one can construct induced module A B M = A B M as the quotient of a free abelian group with generators
More informationLocal root numbers of elliptic curves over dyadic fields
Local root numbers of elliptic curves over dyadic fields Naoki Imai Abstract We consider an elliptic curve over a dyadic field with additive, potentially good reduction. We study the finite Galois extension
More informationMath 306 Topics in Algebra, Spring 2013 Homework 7 Solutions
Math 306 Topics in Algebra, Spring 203 Homework 7 Solutions () (5 pts) Let G be a finite group. Show that the function defines an inner product on C[G]. We have Also Lastly, we have C[G] C[G] C c f + c
More information5 Quiver Representations
5 Quiver Representations 5. Problems Problem 5.. Field embeddings. Recall that k(y,..., y m ) denotes the field of rational functions of y,..., y m over a field k. Let f : k[x,..., x n ] k(y,..., y m )
More informationRepresentation Theory of GL(n) over Non-Archimedean Local Fields
Representation Theory of GL(n) over Non-Archimedean Local Fields Dipendra Prasad 1 and A. Raghuram 2 1 Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Jhusi, Allahabad, India 2 School of Mathematics, Tata Institute
More informationON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS LISA CARBONE Abstract. We outline the classification of K rank 1 groups over non archimedean local fields K up to strict isogeny,
More informationLECTURE NOTES AMRITANSHU PRASAD
LECTURE NOTES AMRITANSHU PRASAD Let K be a field. 1. Basic definitions Definition 1.1. A K-algebra is a K-vector space together with an associative product A A A which is K-linear, with respect to which
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More information294 Meinolf Geck In 1992, Lusztig [16] addressed this problem in the framework of his theory of character sheaves and its application to Kawanaka's th
Doc. Math. J. DMV 293 On the Average Values of the Irreducible Characters of Finite Groups of Lie Type on Geometric Unipotent Classes Meinolf Geck Received: August 16, 1996 Communicated by Wolfgang Soergel
More informationWeeks 6 and 7. November 24, 2013
Weeks 6 and 7 November 4, 03 We start by calculating the irreducible representation of S 4 over C. S 4 has 5 congruency classes: {, (, ), (,, 3), (, )(3, 4), (,, 3, 4)}, so we have 5 irreducible representations.
More informationLocal Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture
Local Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture Ahmed Moussaoui UPMC Paris VI - IMJ 23/08/203 Notation F non-archimedean local field : finite extension of Q p or F p ((t)) O F = {x F, v(x)
More informationGeometric proof of the local Jacquet-Langlands correspondence for GL(n) for prime n
Geometric proof of the local Jacquet-Langlands correspondence for GL(n) for prime n Yoichi Mieda Abstract. In this paper, we give a purely geometric proof of the local Jacquet-Langlands correspondence
More informationA Satake isomorphism for representations modulo p of reductive groups over local fields
A Satake isomorphism for representations modulo p of reductive groups over local fields Guy Henniart, Marie France Vignéras Abstract Let F be a local field with finite residue field of characteristic p.
More informationTWO SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF METAPLECTIC GROUPS. In memory of Sibe Mardešić
TWO IMPLE OBERVATION ON REPREENTATION OF METAPLECTIC GROUP MARKO TADIĆ arxiv:1709.00634v1 [math.rt] 2 ep 2017 Abstract. M. Hanzer and I. Matić have proved in [8] that the genuine unitary principal series
More informationOn Artin s L-Functions*
On Artin s L-Functions* by R.P. Langlands The nonabelian Artin L-functions and their generalizations by Weil are known to be meromorphic in the whole complex plane and to satisfy a functional equation
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More information