C100 Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis Gary G. Cheng, William R. Hicks, and Edward F. Daly
|
|
- Alfred Thornton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction C100 Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis Gary G. Cheng, William R. Hicks, and Edward F. Daly Cryomodule (CM) prototypes for CEBAF 12GeV upgrade project have been built in the past and the design has been improved since then. The vacuum vessel, as an essential component of the CM, has adopted a few changes. A previous JLab technical note [1] has described the structural analysis procedures per requirements in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division I for the vacuum vessel used in the prototype CMs. This technical note serves as an amendment to JLAB-TN to reflect changes in design and the associated analyses. Mechanical loads include those occur at normal work condition and the transportation loads (termed as abnormal loading in JLAB-TN ). Formulas and rules are cited from the 2007 ASME BPV code [2] and mechanical engineering design reference books. I. Vacuum Vessel Design A brief introduction of the 12GeV upgrade project CM vacuum vessel was given in JLAB- TN Changes have been made since then include: 1. In each vacuum vessel, four instrumentation ports accommodating NW200 half nipples (8.0" tube OD) are added. 2. Space frame is anchored to the vacuum vessel through 6 sets of studs distributed along the length of the vessel. Each set contains three studs located 120 o apart from one another along the circumference of the vacuum vessel. The space frame wheels are suspended while studs are functioning so that they don t provide any form of support after the assembly process is completed. 3. Openings for waveguide attachments are smaller. Currently, there are six 11.72" diameter openings and one 14.9" diameter openings. The half nipples and tubes are all welded to, instead of being pulled out from, the openings on vacuum vessel. 4. The two ground supports are relocated toward ends of the vacuum vessel. The code design analyses in this report will take into account all above changes. II. Mechanical Loads 1. Structural Loads During Normal Operation Weight of end cans: 750 lbf/each Weight of cavities and tuners: 3,000 lbf Weight of space frame: 850 lbf Internal design pressure: 29.6 psi (2.0 atm) External design pressure: 29.6 psi (2.0 atm) 2. Transportation Loads (cited from JLAB-TN ) 1/27
2 4.0g vertically (which includes the initial weight) 2.0g axially 0.5g horizontally III. Analyses per ASME BPV Code 1. Determine Wall Thickness of Vacuum Vessel (UG-22 and UG-23) The BPV code section VIII, Division 1, para. UG-23 (c) requires that the wall thickness of a vessel computed by these rules shall be determined such that, for any combination of loadings listed in UG-22 that induce primary stress and are expected to occur simultaneously during normal operation of the vessel, the induced maximum general primary membrane stress does not exceed the maximum allowable stress in tension JLAB-TN addressed this provision by conducting stress analyses via shear-moment diagram. Herein a simplified model for finite element stress analysis is used to estimate the membrane and bending stresses in the vacuum vessel subjected to both normal loads and transportation loads. 1.1 Assumptions for Model Simplification 1) Small openings, including the eight tuner openings and other openings with diameters smaller than 4.5", are omitted from the model for brevity. 2) With the 18 studs, the space frame and cavities are tied tightly to the vacuum vessel. It is thus assumed that the weights of all parties are evenly distributed along the length of the vacuum vessel. This assumption allows a beam-like finite element model. 3) Flanges are omitted from the model. 4) Ground supports are assumed to be fixed to the vacuum vessel by welding. 1.2 Finite Element Model The model is created in ANSYS by use of PIPE16 element. The element has three translational and three rotational degree of freedoms (DOF) at each of its two nodes. Pipe outer diameter and wall thickness are input as real constants. Figure 1 is a snapshot of the finite element model. 1.3 Applied Loads and Boundary Conditions 1) Two ground supports are added at nodes that are (100.58"+96.08")/2 = 98.33" away from the center of the vessel. They are welded (all DOFs fixed) to the vessel. 2) End can weights of 750 lbf are applied at both ends of the vacuum vessel. A bending moment of /2 = 13, lbf-in is also applied at each end of the vessel. The 37.23" is the estimated overall length of the end cans. 3) Normal load is applied by specifying 1.0g acceleration in the y coordinate direction. 4) Transportation loads are applied by specifying accelerations in all three axes. End can inertias are included by scaling the weight and bending moments. 5) Equivalent axial forces to simulate pressures on capped ends are applied. 2/27
3 Support ring Instrumentation port Waveguide ports with (11.72" diameter) Waveguide ports with 14.9" diameter Fig. 1 Finite element model of the vacuum vessel 1.4 Results: Internal Pressure and Normal Load A picture of the deformed vacuum vessel under internal pressure and normal load is shown in Fig. 2. The 1 st principal stress in the vacuum vessel is plotted in Fig. 3. The moment diagram in vacuum vessel is plotted in Fig. 4. The peak bending moment is found to be 69,555 lbf-in occurring at support points. Stresses of interest to know are: Peak stress induced by bending is 354 psi. Peak axial stress is 1,850 psi. Peak shear stress is 112 psi. Peak hoop stress is 1,850 psi. 1.5 Results: Internal Pressure and Transportation Load The deformed vacuum vessel under internal pressure and transportation load is shown in Fig. 5. More stress results are summarized in a subsequent table. 3/27
4 Fig. 2 Deformed vacuum vessel under internal pressure and normal load Fig. 3 1 st Principal stress in vacuum vessel under internal pressure and normal load 4/27
5 Fig. 4 Moment diagram for vacuum vessel under internal pressure and normal loading Fig. 5 Deformed vacuum vessel under internal pressure and transportation load 5/27
6 1.6 Stress Results Summary Table 1. A summary of peak stresses in vacuum vessel subjected to various loadings Peak Stresses internal pressure Internal pressure & External pressure External pressure & (psi) & normal load transportation load & normal load transportation load Bending stress 354 1, ,429 Axial stress 1,850 1,960 1,909 2,020 Hoop stress 1,850 1,850 1,880 1,880 Shear stress Max. Principal Stress 2,204 3,390 2,264 3,446 None of the peak membrane stresses (axial, hoop, and shear) in Table 1 exceed the 20,000 psi allowable stress for 304 stainless steel (cited from Table 1A of reference [3]), neither does the sum of the membrane stress and bending stress. 2. Thickness of Shells under Internal Pressure (UG-27) In JLAB-TN-00-03, the minimum required shell thickness was calculated per UG-27 c-1 and c-2. The greater of the two calculated minimum thicknesses is found to be t = 0.038". Therefore the actual vacuum vessel wall thickness of 0.25" is sufficient. 3. Thickness of Shells under External Pressure (UG-28) Due to the fact that the supporting scheme for the vacuum vessel has been changed since the prototype designs, the shell thickness calculations per UG-28 need to be revisited. Fig. 6 illustrates how the vacuum vessel is supported by flanges, ground supports, and support rings. The length of the end can is roughly 37.23". It can be treated as the head of the vacuum vessel " 53.22" Ring 1 Ring 2 Ring 3 Ring 4 Ring 5 Ring " 5.57" Symmetry plane Fig. 6 Vacuum vessel supports and stiffening rings layout The calculation of allowable pressures is performed for each segment of the vacuum vessel. A few parameters are common in all calculations: vessel outer diameter is D o = 32 in, design 6/27
7 pressure is P = 29.6 psi, actual wall thickness is t = 0.25", D o /t = 128, and the young s modulus of 304 stainless steel is E = 2.8e7 psi [1]. Table 2 presents the steps (refer to UG-28c) and results. Segments of vessel are numbered from left to right. Note that the length of the leftmost segment, which is connected to the end can that is treated as the vessel head, is added by 1/3 of the end can length. The formula used for calculating the allowable pressure P a is: 4B Pa = (1) 3( D / t) o Table 2. Calculation of allowable pressure in vacuum vessel segments Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4 Length, L L/D o Factor A Factor B 6,230 11,350 6,230 7,000 P a, psi The allowable pressures in Table 2 for all four segments are much higher than the design pressure of 29.6 psi. Therefore the wall thickness of 0.25" is sufficient to resist 2 atm of external pressure. 4. Stiffening Rings for Cylindrical Shells under External Pressure (UG-29) The ASME BPV Sec. VIII Div. I para. UG-29 requires that the available moment of inertia (MOI) of a circumferential stiffening ring shall be not less than that determined by the following formula (pick one from two candidate equations suggested in the code): where Ls As I 2 s o s + = [ D L ( t A / L ) A]/14 (2) s s = one-half of the distance from the centerline of the stiffening ring to the next line of support on one side, plus one-half of the centerline distance to the next line of support on the other side of the stiffening ring. See Fig. 6 for stiffening ring arrangement. = cross-sectional area of the stiffening ring = ( )/ /2 ( ) = in 2 Similar to what is done in Table 2, the required MOI for two representative stiffening rings (see Fig. 6) are evaluated following steps in Table 3. Note that the formula used to determine the factor B is: 3 P D o B = (3) 4 t + As / Ls Once factor B is calculated, value for factor A can be looked up in Fig. HA-1 of section II, part D, subpart 3. 7/27
8 Table 3. Calculation of allowable pressure in vacuum vessel segments Ring 1 Ring 2 Ring 3 Length, L s 52.67"/2=26.335" (5.57"+66.15")/2=35.86" (66.15"+53.22")/2=59.685" Factor B ,437 2,584 Factor A I s, in The actual rings have a MOI > /12 = in 4. Therefore all six rings meet the ASME BPV requirements. 5. Openings and Reinforcements (UG-36, UG-37, UG-40, UG-41, UW-15, UW-16) According to ASME BPV VIII D1 para. UG-36 (b), all openings in the vacuum vessel can be examined for required reinforcement areas by applying rules and formulas given in para. UG-37. There are five sizes of openings in the vacuum vessel: 1) 8 NW40 (1.5" OD and 0.065" wall) weld-on half nipples for cavity/space frame/ vacuum vessel alignments. 2) one 14.9" OD and 0.25" wall waveguide port locating in the center of the vessel. 3) " OD and 0.25" wall waveguide ports scattered along the length of the vessel. 4) 4 NW200 (8.0" OD and 0.12" wall) weld-on half nipples as instrumentation ports. 5) 8 4.5" OD and 0.12" wall tuner ports. Per UG-36(c)(3), the NW40 openings, which have an OD = 1.5" < 3.5", are exempt from the reinforcement requirements. Also according to UW-15(b)(2), no detailed weld strength calculations are required for such small openings. These ports are attached to the vacuum vessel by full penetration bevel welds (refer to Fig. UW-16.1(a)). An outward fillet weld is omitted since no mechanical loads are transferred to these ports and the design pressure is comparatively low. The other openings are evaluated using reinforcement and weld strength calculations per UG- 37, UW-15, and UW-16. The procedures are demonstrated in numerical examples given in the code s nonmandatory appendix L, part L-7. The waveguide ports having a small amount of eccentricity and the instrumentation ports are abutting the vessel wall so that the procedures in example 4 in L-7.4 can be adapted for these openings. The 8 tuner ports have hill-side nozzles so that example 7 in L-7.7 better resembles these ports. Following the two mentioned examples, calculations are carried out as follows. 5.1 Openings Abutting Vessel Wall These openings include: one 14.9" OD and 0.25" wall waveguide port, " OD and 0.25" wall waveguide ports, and 4 NW200 instrumentation ports Wall Thickness Required Shell wall thicknesses required have been determined earlier. The required nozzle neck thicknesses are calculated in Table 4: 8/27
9 5.1.2 Size of Weld Required Table 4. Nozzle wall thicknesses calculation Nozzle OD Actual nozzle wall, t n Nozzle inner radius, R n Req d nozzle wall, t rn Is t n > t rn? yes yes yes Full penetration bevel welds are adopted for mounting the waveguide and instrumentation ports to the vacuum vessel. The Fig. UW-16.1 (a) depicts a code acceptable weld pattern. Herein the outward fillet weld is omitted. The weld strength verifications conducted later will prove the weld size is sufficient Area of Reinforcement Required and Available UG-37 shows how to calculate the required reinforcement area, A, corresponding to an opening with diameter of d by use of the following formula: A = d t F + t t F (1 f ) (4) r 2 n r r1 For calculation of the area available in vessel shell, A 1, two formulas are suggested: A = d ( E1 t F tr ) 2tn ( E1 t F tr )(1 f 1) (5a) A = ( t + t )( E t F t ) 2t ( E t F t )(1 f ) (5b) 1 r 1 2 n 1 r n 1 r r1 The larger value from Eqs. (5a) and (5b) shall be used for A 1. The area available in nozzle projecting outward should take the smaller value from the following two equations: A = 5( tn trn fr2 t (6a) A2 = 5( tn trn ) fr2 tn (6b) 2 ) The sum of areas available is compared to the required reinforcement area A calculated from Eq. (4). If A 1 +A 2 >A, no additional reinforcement is needed. Otherwise, extra reinforcement material is necessary. Refer to UG-37 for a detailed explanation of all dimensional variables. There are a few parameters that are common in calculations for all pertinent openings: t r = PR /( SE.6P) = /(18, ) = 0.025" S n = S v = S p =18800 psi f r1 = f r2 = f r3 = f r4 = 1.0 F = 1 E 1 = 1 for opening in solid plate t = 0.25" is the specified vessel wall thickness The calculations and results are presented in Table 5. It can be easily concluded that none of the three types of openings need additional reinforcement. 9/27
10 Table 5. Required reinforcement areas for openings on vacuum vessel center waveguide port side waveguide port instrumentation port diameter of opening d= wall thickness of nozzle t n = required nozzle thickness t rn = From Eq. (4), A= From Eq. (5a), A 1 = From Eq. (5b), A 1 = larger A1 from above two = From Eq. (6a), A 2 = From Eq. (6b), A 2 = smaller A2 from above two = A 1 +A 2 = A 1 +A 2 >A? Yes Yes Yes Verifications of Weld Strength Figure 7 shows the waveguides and their supports. The waveguide ports carry the weights from waveguides and some accessories. Rough estimation of the weights and bending moments can be obtained using dimensions in Fig. 7. The total weight of components in Fig. 8 is approximately 380 lbs (based on 1,300 in 3 volume and lbf/in 3 density). To be conservative, the side waveguide ports, holding one waveguide each, are assumed to carry 190 lbs and the center waveguide port holding two waveguides supports 380 lbs. In reality, the total weight of components in Fig. 8 is also carried by two other supports in the system. The instrumentation port is not subjected to noticeable mechanical loads besides the pressure load. Stresses due to inner pressure are considered in evaluation of the weld strength. Table 6 presents the weld strength verification (some of the formulas are quoted from reference [4]) for the side and center waveguide ports, as well as the instrumentation port. It is seen that all welds are sufficiently strong to withstand the mechanical loads applied. 10/27
11 Average weld boundary on waveguide port tube 26.0" Support bracket Waveguides 13.5" 13.2" 9.989" z y x Fig. 7 Waveguides and supports Fig. 8 Components used in weight estimation 11/27
12 Table 6. Weld strength verifications for waveguide and instrumentation ports Side ports Center port Instrumentation ports Weld leg h, in Weld inner radius, i.e. port tube outer radius r o, in Port tube inner radius r i, in Throat area A=1.414π h r o, in Unit 2nd moment of area, I u = π r o 2, in MOI, I = 0.707h*I u, in stainless steel yield strength S y, psi * 30,000 30,000 30,000 Internal pressure P i, psi Logitudinal force due to pressure F x = P i π r 2 i, lbf 2,927 4,821 1,400 Vertical force F y, lbf Distance from C.G. to weld center, in Moment M z, lbf-in 4,940 4,940 - Shear stress due to F y, τ y =F y /A, psi Shear stress due to F x and M z, τ x = F x /A+M z *r/i, psi Hoop stress due to pressure, τ z = 2 r i 2 P i /(r o 2 -r i 2 ), psi 1,968 1, Total shear stress, τ=(τ x 2 +τ y 2 +τ y 2 ) 1/2, psi 2,073 1,965 1,147 Safety factor = 0.577*S y /τ * From [3], Table Y-1, 18Cr-8Ni, SA-240, 304 stainless steel. This yield strength is used in subsequent calculations. 5.2 Hill-side Openings Only the tuner ports belong to this type. Follow the steps in L-7.7 example 7, a series of calculations regarding the tuner ports are conducted: Wall Thickness Required The required vessel wall thickness has been determined earlier. For the tuner port half nipples, the required nozzle wall thickness is 12/27
13 t P Rn 29.6 ( ) / 2 = = S E 0.6P 18, rn = in. The actual half nipple wall thickness is t n =0.12", which is greater than the required t rn Size of Weld Required Full penetration bevel welds are employed to fix the tuner ports onto the vacuum vessel. The weld size is verified by mechanical strength calculations described in paragraph The Strength Reduction Factors f r1 = 1.0 f r2 = S n /S v = 18,800/18,800 = Non-radial Opening Chord Length at Midsurface Rm = R + tr / 2 = ( ) / / 2 = in. L = 8.0" from drawing. Nozzle inner radius R n = = 4.26 in. 1 L + Rn o α 1 = cos = cos = R m L Rn o α 2 = cos = cos = R m α = α 2 -α 1 = 36 o 2 2 d = 2Rm 1 cos ( α / 2) = cos (37.33/ 2) = in. F = 1.0 because no integral reinforcement is used Area of Reinforcement Required and Available Required area of reinforcement is A = d t r F+2 t n t r F(1-f r1 ) = = in 2 Area available in vacuum vessel shell is A 1 = larger of the following = d (E 1 t-f t r )-2 t n (E 1 t-f t r )(1-f r1 ) = ( )-0.0 = 2.27 in 2 or = 2(t+t n )(E 1 t-f t r )-2 t n (E 1 t-f t r ) (1-f r1 ) = 2( )( )-0.0 = in 2 So, A 1 = 2.27 in 2 Area available in nozzle A 2 = smaller of the following: = 5(t n -t rn )f r2 t = 5( ) = in 2 13/27
14 or = 5(t n -t rn ) f r2 t n = 5( ) = 0.07 in 2 So, A 2 = 0.07 in 2 Total area available = A 1 + A 2 = 2.34 in 2. This is greater than the area required A = in 2. Therefore, no reinforcement is needed Weld Strength Verification At the tuner ports, internal/external pressures are the major mechanical loads. The weld strength is thus checked against shear stresses created by pressures. The elliptical cross-section of the weld is projected as an annulus for simplification. The shear stresses inside weld can be evaluated as follows: Weld length h = 0.12 in. Weld inner radius = tuner tube outer radius = r o = 4.5/2 = 2.25 in. Tuner tube inner radius is r i = ( )/2 = 2.13 in. Throat area A = πhr o = 1.2 in 2 For internal pressure P i = 29.6 psi: The hoop stress at outer surface of tuner tube is: 2 2 2ri Pi σ t = = = 511 psi ro ri The longitudinal force caused by internal pressure is: F L = P i π r 2 i = 29.6 π = 422 psi The shear force in weld due to longitudinal force is: σ L = F L /A = /1.2 = 352 psi The resultant shear stress in weld is: τ = (σ 2 t +σ 2 L ) 1/2 = 663 psi The 304 stainless steel has a typical yield stress of S y = 30,000 psi. The safety factor in weld is: Sy/τ = ,000/663 = This indicates a very conservative weld size. 6. Stresses in Space Frame Lockdown Studs Studs clustered on 6 cross sectional areas perpendicular to the vessel s longitudinal axis are used to anchor the space frame onto the vacuum vessel. On each cross section, there are three studs evenly distributed: one at the top and the other two are 120 o apart from the top stud. Therefore, there are a total of 6 3 = 18 studs. The strength of these studs needs to be verified for the worst loading scenario: the transportation load case. A few conservative assumptions are taken to quantify the loads per stud: 1) Total weight of space frame plus cavities is 3,850 lbf per cryomodule. 2) Vertical acceleration of 4g will be carried all 18 studs. That means each top stud takes a vertical load of F z = /18 = 856 lbf. 3) Horizontal acceleration of 0.5g is carried by all 18 studs. That means the top stud carries 14/27
15 horizontal load if F y = /18 = 107 lbf 4) Axial acceleration of 2.0g is shared by all 18 studs. That means each stud carries a F x = /18 = 428 lbf Fig. 9 Stepped stud design concept The resultant of F x and F y is F xy = ( ) 1/2 = lbf. F xy is applied as a bending load and F z as the axial tensile force. Figure 9 shows a schematic of a stepped stud design concept. The bending and tensile stresses are evaluated as follows: The peak stress in stud segment with diameter of d 1 is calculated as follows: d 1 = 0.75 inch A 1 = π d 2 1 /4 = in 2 Moment of inertia, I 1 = π d 4 1 /64 = in 4 c 1 = d 1 / in Force arm to left end, L_arm1 = 2.25 in Bending moment M 1 = 992 lbf-in Maximum bending stress at left end, σ_b1 = M 1 c 1 / I 1 = 23,954 psi Tensile stress at left end, σ_z1= F z /A 1 = 1,937 psi Total stress at left end, σ_tot1= 25,891 psi The peak stress in stud segment with d 2 diameter: d 2 = 0.5 inch A 2 = π d 2 2 /4 = in 2 Moment of inertia, I 2 = in 4 c 2 = 0.25 in σ_z2 = F z /A 2 = 4,357 psi By varying the dimension L 2 in Fig. 9, the peak stress in the 0.5" stud can be adjusted. Table 7 lists the stress magnitudes when L 2 takes various values. Note that L_arm2 = L r_fillet. 15/27
16 Table 7. Peak stress in 0.5" stud as L 2 varies L 2, in. L 1, in. L_arm2, in. M 2, lbf-in σ_b2, psi σ_tot2, psi , , , , , , , , The yield strength of 304 stainless steel is 30,000 psi. The studs are therefore safe when subjected to transportation loads. 7. Support Bracket Structural Analysis There are eight stainless steel square tubes (see Fig. 10) used as support brackets attached to the vacuum vessel. Each bracket supports one ion pump and partial weight of a waveguide. The design of the support bracket is observing a conservative approach. Structural integrity of the tubular bracket and the root weld is analyzed. Two types of loads are identified to be exerted onto the support brackets: 1) partial weight from the waveguide and 2) weight from the ion pump. To be conservative, it is assumed that each bracket carries 1) the total weight of waveguide and its accessories, which is approximately 190 lbf and 2) the weight of ion pump, 34 lbf. A preliminary design required Wall square tubes, refer to Fig. 10. The strength analyses for weld and support bracket tube are performed to verify if tubes with smaller sizes are possible. The following calculations show that square 304 stainless steel tubes can yield sufficient safety factors both in the welds and the tubes. Dimensions of the square tube is: b := 2.0 in d := 2.0 in t := in L := ( ) in Self weight of the bracket is estimated as: cross-section area: A tube := bd ( b 2 t) ( d 2 t) A tube = 1.363in 2 W tube := lbf in 3 A tube L W tube = 7.8lbf Refer to Fig. 7, y-direction force is calculated as: F y := 190 lbf + 34 lbf + W tube F y = 231.8lbf Yield strength of stainless steel is: Sy = 30,000 psi The bending or torsional moments created by F x and F y are: M x := 190 lbf 13.5 in M x = 2,565 lbf in 3.75 ( ) in M z := 190 lbf in + 34lbf ( ) in + W tube 2 2 M z = 3,739.7 lbf in 16/27
17 Fig. 10 Support bracket dimensions Stresses in the weld Weld leg h := 0.25 in Weld throat area A weld := h ( b + d) A weld = 1.414in 2 17/27
18 ( b + d) 3 Unit polar 2nd monent of area J u := J u = in 3 6 Polar 2nd moment of area J weld := h J u J weld = 1.885in 4 d 2 Unit 2nd moment of area I u := ( 3b + d) I u = 5.333in 3 6 2nd moment of area I weld := h I u I weld = 0.943in 4 M z d Shear stress in x-direction: τ x := 2I τ weld x = 3,967 psi 2 F y M x b + d 2 Shear stress in y-direction: τ y := + A weld 2J τ weld y = 2,088 psi 2 2 Total shear stress τ weld := τ x + τ y τ weld = 4,483 psi S y Safety factor: Sf weld := Sf weld = 3.9 τ weld Stresses in support bracket tube 2nd Moment of area: bd 3 ( b 2 t) ( d 2 t) 3 I tube := I tube = 0.754in Polar 2nd moment of area: bd b 2 + d 2 J tube ( ) ( b 2 t) ( d 2 t) ( b 2 t) 2 + ( d 2 t) 2 := J tube = 1.507in 4 M z d Tensile stress in x-direction: σ x := 2I σ tube x = 4,962 psi 2 F y M x b + d 2 Shear stress in yz plane: τ yz := + A tube 2J tube 2 2 Von Mises stress σ tube := σ x + 3 τ yz τ yz = 2,577 psi σ tube = 6,674 psi S y Safety factor: Sf tube := Sf tube = 4.5 σ tube 18/27
19 8. Stiffening Ring Weld Strength Verification The stiffening rings as shown in Fig. 6 are carrying loadings transferred from cavity, tuners, and end cans in the four cases listed in Table 1: Case 1: Internal pressure and normal load Case 2: Internal pressure and transportation load Case 3: External pressure and normal load Case 4: External pressure and transportation load Thus, the welds applied on these rings have to be robust to withstand not only pressure loads, but also the mechanical loads. A combination of bevel welding on the interior surface of vacuum vessel wall and intermittent fillet welds on the exterior wall are adopted. Figure 11 illustrates the welding schemes. The strength of the bevel welds are checked against loads in all four cases. The finite element model described in section 1.2 is utilized to generate the shear force and bending moment at each stiffening ring s interface with the vessel wall. The throat area of weld and weld cross section second moment of area are evaluated and shear stresses are calculated on basis of these. The procedure and results are presented as follows (see Fig. 6 for numbering of stiffening rings): End ring Fillet welds Intermediate ring Fillet weld Bevel weld Bevel weld Weld properties(bevel welds only) Fig. 11 Stiffening ring weld scheme Weld leg h = 0.25 in. Weld inner radius r = in. Throat area A=1.414π h r in 2 Unit 2nd moment of area, I u = π r in 2 2nd moment of area, I = 0.707h*I u in Stainless steel yield strength, S y = 30,000 psi 19/27
20 The safety factors calculated in Tables 8 and 9 are greater than 1.0. That means even with the bevel welds only, the stiffening rings welds are sufficiently robust. In reality, there are outside fillet welds, although discontinuous along the circumference of vacuum vessel wall, providing additional strength. Therefore, the overall weld size design is conservative in consideration of all cases of loadings. For reference, the shear diagrams and moment diagrams for the studied cases are exhibited in Figs. 12~22. Table 8. Stiffening ring weld strength verification for vacuum vessel with internal pressure Case 1 Case 2 Ring 1 Ring2 Ring3 Ring 1 Ring2 Ring3 Axial force F x, lbf 23,068 9,688 9,688 24,590 12,052 10,343 Vertical force F y, lbf 761 1, ,044 4,729 1,312 Horizontal force F z, lbf F yz = (F y 2 +F z 2 ) 1/2, lbf 761 1, ,067 4,768 1,325 Moment M y, lbf-in ,361 16,832 8,503 Moment M z, lbf-in 14,722 34,502 16,670 58, ,030 66,805 M yz =(M y 2 +M z 2 ) 1/2, lbf-in 14,722 34,502 16,670 59, ,053 67,344 Shear stress due to F yz, τ 1 =F yz /A, psi Shear stress due to F x and Myz, τ 2 =F x /A+M yz *r/i, psi Total shear stress, τ=(τ 1 2 +τ 2 2 ) 1/2, psi Safety factor = 0.577*S y /τ ,002 4,499 2,460 8,192 16,589 8,292 3,003 4,500 2,460 8,194 16,591 8, /27
21 Table 9. Stiffening ring weld strength verification for vacuum vessel with external pressure Case 3 Case 4 Ring 1 Ring2 Ring3 Ring 1 Ring2 Ring3 Axial force F x, lbf 23,806 10,004 10,004 22,284 7,641 9,349 Vertical force F y, lbf 761 1, ,044 4,729 1,312 Horizontal force F z, lbf F yz = (F y 2 +F z 2 ) 1/2, lbf 761 1, ,067 4,768 1,325 Moment M y, lbf-in ,361 16,832 8,503 Moment M z, lbf-in 14,722 34,502 16,670 58,889 13, ,805 M yz =(M y 2 +M z 2 ) 1/2, lbf-in 14,722 34,502 16,670 59, ,053 67,344 Shear stress due to F yz, τ 1 =F yz /A, psi Shear stress due to F x and Myz, τ 2 =F x /A+M yz *r/i, psi Total shear stress, τ=(τ 1 2 +τ 2 2 ) 1/2, psi Safety factor = 0.577*S y /τ ,044 4,517 2,478 8,060 16,337 8,235 3,045 4,518 2,478 8,062 16,339 8, /27
22 Fig. 12 Y-direction shear force diagram for case 1 Fig. 13 Y-direction shear force diagram for case 2 22/27
23 Fig. 14 Z-direction shear force for case 2 Fig. 15 Y-direction bending moment diagram for case 2 23/27
24 Fig. 16 Z-direction bending moment diagram for case 2 Fig. 17 Y-direction shear force diagram for case 3 24/27
25 Fig. 18 Z-direction bending moment diagram for case 3 Fig. 19 Y-direction shear force diagram for case 4 25/27
26 Fig. 20 Z-direction shear force diagram for case 4 Fig. 21 Y-direction bending moment diagram for case 4 26/27
27 IV. Summary Fig. 22 Z-direction bending moment diagram for case 4 The vacuum vessel design has been reviewed observing provisions in ASME BPV VIII D1. Issues such as the vessel wall thickness, nozzle thickness, weld size and strength, and necessity of reinforcement areas are investigated in details and the current design is found to be satisfactory in accordance with the code requirements. Code calculation results are displayed in data tables for information. Lockdown studs strength and stiffening ring weld strength are specially investigated and found to be conservative. Flanges on the vacuum vessel are off-shelf standard vacuum flanges or previous designs. Such flanges were found to be robust when used in previous cryomodules. Hence, detailed structural analysis on flanges is waived. REFERENCES [1]. T. Whitlatch, Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis for JLAB Cryo Upgrade, JLAB-TN , Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA. [2] ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. [3] ASME Bolier & Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part D, Material Properties (Customary), The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. [4]. J. E. Shigley, C. R. Mischke, and R. G. Budynas, Mechanical Engineering Design 7 th Ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, /27
C100 Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis An Addendum to JLAB-TN
Introduction C100 Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis An Addendum to JLAB-TN-07-081 Gary G. Cheng and Edward F. Daly The C100 cryomodule (CM) vacuum vessel structural analysis per ASME Boiler
More informationC100 Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis Addendum II to JLAB-TN
Introduction C100 Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel Structural Analysis Addendum II to JLAB-TN-07-081 Gary G. Cheng, Edward F. Daly, and Mark Wiseman The C100 cryomodule (CM) vacuum vessel structural analysis per
More informationLCLS-II 2K Cold Box Transfer Line Nozzle. Analysis and Allowable Loads
Author(s): Connor Kaufmann Page 1 of 12 LCLS-II 2K Cold Box Transfer Line Nozzle Analysis and Allowable Loads Revision History: Revision Date Released Description of Change - 01/03/2018 Original release,
More informationDownloaded from Downloaded from / 1
PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their
More information2.1 Background of Piping Stresses
2 Research Review One of the major additions to Tmin was the inclusion of analysis of a 2-Dimensional vertical piping span. The original plan from Dupont was to include several types of 2-D and 3-D vertical
More informationPVP BUTANE STORAGE BULLET CALCULATION AND FEA VERIFICATION
Proceedings of PVP2005 2005 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference July 17-21, 2005, Denver, Colorado USA PVP2005-71123 BUTANE STORAGE BULLET CALCULATION AND FEA VERIFICATION Zhanghai Wang
More informationASME VIII div.1 verification document
ASME VIII div. verification document August July, a AutoPIPE Vessel... No changes 5 Mar July, a Microprotol..7.6 Feb Same as Rev 9 including Bentley Inc. 4 Oct 9 July, a Microprotol..7.5 Oct Including
More informationFigure 1 Lifting Lug Geometry with Weld
Should you Perform Nonlinear Stress Analysis? Many of our clients inquire whether nonlinearity should be considered in their analyses. The answer to that question is not simple. Sometimes, as in certain
More informationTuesday, February 11, Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE
1 Chapter 3 Load and Stress Analysis 2 Chapter Outline Equilibrium & Free-Body Diagrams Shear Force and Bending Moments in Beams Singularity Functions Stress Cartesian Stress Components Mohr s Circle for
More informationName :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS
Name :. Roll No. :..... Invigilator s Signature :.. 2011 SOLID MECHANICS Time Allotted : 3 Hours Full Marks : 70 The figures in the margin indicate full marks. Candidates are required to give their answers
More informationASME BPVC VIII Example E E4.3.8 PTB
ASME BPVC VIII-1 217 Example E4.3.7 - E4.3.8 PTB-4-213 Table of contents Comparison - Form for equations... 2 Example E4.3.7- Conical Transitions Without a Knuckle... 3 E4.3.7 Large End - Dished heads
More informationSOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling.
SOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling. Find: Determine the value of the critical speed of rotation for the shaft. Schematic and
More information2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
R10 SET - 1 II B.Tech II Semester, Regular Examinations, April 2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, MM) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry Equal Marks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More informationSamantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2
Samantha Ramirez, MSE Stress The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. Δ ΔA Δ z Δ 1 2 ΔA Δ x Δ y ΔA is an infinitesimal size area with a uniform force
More informationR13. II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) PART-A
SET - 1 II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan - 2015 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 70 Note: 1. Question Paper consists of two parts (Part-A and Part-B)
More informationAnalysis of Catalyst Support Ring in a pressure vessel based on ASME Section VIII Division 2 using ANSYS software
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 1, Issue 3, 2013 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Analysis of Catalyst Support Ring in a pressure vessel based on ASME Section VIII Division
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More informationArberi Ferraj. Wentworth Institute of Technology. Design of Machine Elements MECH 420
P a g e 1 Arberi Ferraj Wentworth Institute of Technology Design of Machine Elements MECH 420 P a g e 2 1. Executive Summary A scissor car jack was designed and must be reverse-engineered in order to discover
More informationCreated by Neevia docuprinter LT trial version
October 10, 003 Agenda Item 650-464 Appendix for External Pressure Resp: John Lieb, TIC, lieb@tankindustry.com, FA 630-6-080 Purpose: The purpose of this item is to develop an appendix for API 650 to address
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationKey Design Engineering
Key Design Engineering 194-55 Northfield Dr. East Waterloo, ON N2K 3T6 COMPRESS Pressure Vessel Design Calculations Item: Sample Calculation: 36" ir Receiver Customer: BC Industries Job: KEY-Design-ir
More informationD : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.
D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having
More informationSRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA
SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA (Declared as Deemed-to-be University under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956, Vide notification No.F.9.9/92-U-3 dated 26 th May 1993 of the Govt. of
More information10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax
C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. ATTN: Chris Hanstad 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 27 March 2013 SUBJ: CRL SRS STANDOFF RAILING SYSTEM GLASS BALUSTRADE GUARDS The SRS Standoff Railing System is an engineered
More informationPrinciples of Finite Element for Design Engineers and Analysts. Ayman Shama, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE
Principles of Finite Element for Design Engineers and Analysts Ayman Shama, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE Outline Principles of Engineering Analysis The development of the finite element method Types of elements
More information7. Design of pressure vessels and Transformation of plane stress Contents
7. Design of pressure vessels and Transformation of plane stress Contents 7. Design of pressure vessels and Transformation of plane stress... 1 7.1 Introduction... 7. Design of pressure vessels... 7..1
More informationC50 Cryomodule Magnetic Shielding Design and Analysis Gary G. Cheng and Edward F. Daly
JLAB-TN-08-072 C50 Cryomodule Magnetic Shielding Design and Analysis C50 Cryomodule Magnetic Shielding Design and Analysis Gary G. Cheng and Edward F. Daly Introduction The C50 cryomodule testing reveals
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST
More informationMAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE TIRUCHIRAALLI - 6113. QUESTION WITH ANSWERS DEARTMENT : CIVIL SEMESTER: V SUB.CODE/ NAME: CE 5 / Strength of Materials UNIT 3 COULMNS ART - A ( marks) 1. Define columns
More information3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.
*17304* 17304 14115 3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No. Instructions : (1) All questions are compulsory. (2) Illustrate your answers with neat sketches wherever necessary. (3) Figures to the right indicate full
More informationFor ASME Committee use only.
ð15þ KD-232 PROTECTION AGAINST LOCAL FAILURE In addition to demonstrating protection against plastic collapse as defined in KD-231, the local failure criteria below shall be satisfied. KD-232.1 Elastic
More informationASTRA EVANGELISTA S.A.
(1) STR EVNGELIST S.. PLNT CNNING COMPRESS Pressure Vessel Design Calculations Vessel No: Customer: FIUB Contract: Designer: HRI/SEG Date: lunes, agosto 09, 2004 1 / 33 Table Of Contents1) Table Of Contents
More informationSimplified Method for Mechanical Analysis of Safety Class 1 Piping
Simplified Method for Mechanical Analysis of Safety Class 1 Piping ZHANG Zheng-ming *, WANG Min-zhi, HE Shu-yan Division of Reactor Structure & Mechanics, Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology, Tsinghua
More informationPressure Vessel Engineering Ltd. ASME Calculation CRN Services Finite Element Analysis Solid Modeling & Drafting
Pressure Vessel Engineering Ltd. ASME Calculation CRN Services Finite Element Analysis Solid Modeling & Drafting Design Conditions: Cust: Pressure Vessel Engineering Ltd. Code: ASME VIII-2 File: PVEfea-9128-1.0
More information[5] Stress and Strain
[5] Stress and Strain Page 1 of 34 [5] Stress and Strain [5.1] Internal Stress of Solids [5.2] Design of Simple Connections (will not be covered in class) [5.3] Deformation and Strain [5.4] Hooke s Law
More informationDesign of a Multi-Storied RC Building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More informationMECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 1
MECE 3321 MECHANICS O SOLIDS CHAPTER 1 Samantha Ramirez, MSE WHAT IS MECHANICS O MATERIALS? Rigid Bodies Statics Dynamics Mechanics Deformable Bodies Solids/Mech. Of Materials luids 1 WHAT IS MECHANICS
More informationStress Transformation Equations: u = +135 (Fig. a) s x = 80 MPa s y = 0 t xy = 45 MPa. we obtain, cos u + t xy sin 2u. s x = s x + s y.
014 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently 9 7. Determine the normal stress and shear stress acting
More informationEMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 3 Torsion
EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 3 Torsion Introduction Stress and strain in components subjected to torque T Circular Cross-section shape Material Shaft design Non-circular
More informationMECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola Mechanics of materials branch of mechanics that studies the internal effects of stress and strain in a solid body. stress is associated with the
More informationLab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages
Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages Pre-lab assignment: Yes No Goals: 1. To evaluate tension and bending stress models and Hooke s Law. a. σ = Mc/I and σ = P/A 2. To determine material
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationSteel Post Load Analysis
Steel Post Load Analysis Scope The steel posts in 73019022, 73019024, and 73019025, are considered to be traditional building products. According to the 2015 International Building Code, this type of product
More informationtwenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete
More informationModule 11 Design of Joints for Special Loading. Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur
Module 11 Design of Joints for Special Loading Version ME, IIT Kharagpur Lesson Design of Eccentrically Loaded Welded Joints Version ME, IIT Kharagpur Instructional Objectives: At the end of this lesson,
More informationSpherical Pressure Vessels
Spherical Pressure Vessels Pressure vessels are closed structures containing liquids or gases under essure. Examples include tanks, pipes, essurized cabins, etc. Shell structures : When essure vessels
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationMechanics of Materials II. Chapter III. A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection
Mechanics of Materials II Chapter III A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection Outline Introduction Assumtions and limitations Axial loading Torsion of circular shafts
More information8. Combined Loadings
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES qanalyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels qreview the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding axial load, torsion, bending and shear qdiscuss the
More informationSub. Code:
Important Instructions to examiners: ) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. ) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may
More informationPERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK
PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310
More informationASME BPVC VIII Example E E PTB
Table of contents Comparison - Form for equations... 2 Example E4.16.1 - Integral Type... 3 E 4.16.1 - Bolted flanges ASME BPVC VIII DIVISION 1 APP. 2, 2017 Edition... 5 Example E4.16.2 - Loose Type...
More information4. BEAMS: CURVED, COMPOSITE, UNSYMMETRICAL
4. BEMS: CURVED, COMPOSITE, UNSYMMETRICL Discussions of beams in bending are usually limited to beams with at least one longitudinal plane of symmetry with the load applied in the plane of symmetry or
More informationStresses Analysis of Petroleum Pipe Finite Element under Internal Pressure
ISSN : 48-96, Vol. 6, Issue 8, ( Part -4 August 06, pp.3-38 RESEARCH ARTICLE Stresses Analysis of Petroleum Pipe Finite Element under Internal Pressure Dr.Ragbe.M.Abdusslam Eng. Khaled.S.Bagar ABSTRACT
More informationIf you take CT5143 instead of CT4143 then write this at the first of your answer sheets and skip problem 4 and 6.
Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural Mechanics Section Write your name and study number at the top right-hand of your work. Exam CT4143 Shell Analysis
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationMechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002
student personal identification (ID) number on each sheet. Do not write your name on any sheet. #1. A homogeneous, isotropic, linear elastic bar has rectangular cross sectional area A, modulus of elasticity
More informationCHAPTER 2 Failure/Fracture Criterion
(11) CHAPTER 2 Failure/Fracture Criterion (12) Failure (Yield) Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress Designer engineer: 1- Analysis of loading (for simple geometry using what you learn here
More informationME311 Machine Design
ME311 Machine Design Lecture : Materials; Stress & Strain; Power Transmission W Dornfeld 13Sep018 airfield University School of Engineering Stress-Strain Curve for Ductile Material Ultimate Tensile racture
More informationExperimental Study and Numerical Simulation on Steel Plate Girders With Deep Section
6 th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering 11 th International Workshop on Advanced Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology August 1-2, 2015, University of
More informationProcedure for Performing Stress Analysis by Means of Finite Element Method (FEM)
Procedure for Performing Stress Analysis by Means of Finite Element Method (FEM) Colaboração dos engºs Patrício e Ediberto da Petrobras 1. Objective This Technical Specification sets forth the minimum
More informationMandatory Appendices
Mandatory Appendices MANDATORY APPENDICES A99 Appendix 1 Supplementary Design Formulas... 315 Appendix 2 Rules for Bolted Flange Connections With Ring Type Gaskets... 331 Appendix 3 Definitions... 351
More informationSafety Analysis of a Class 3 Component by ANSYS
Safety Analysis of a Class 3 Component by ANSYS D. L. Wang Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A & M Z. X. Tian Key Laboratory for Power Machinery and Engineering of Ministry Education Shanghai
More informationStress and fatigue analyses of a PWR reactor core barrel components
Seite 1 von 10 Stress and fatigue analyses of a PWR reactor core barrel components L. Mkrtchyan, H. Schau, H. Eggers TÜV SÜD ET Mannheim, Germany Abstract: The integrity of the nuclear reactor core barrel
More informationStress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy
Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring 2017-2018 Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Axial Stress 2 Beam under the action of two tensile forces 3 Beam under the action of two tensile forces 4 Shear Stress
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT - I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More informationNAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:
NME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: EXM 3 PST PROBLEMS (LESSONS 21 TO 28) 100 points Thursday, November 16, 2017, 7pm to 9:30, Room 200 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only.
More informationAdvanced Structural Analysis EGF Cylinders Under Pressure
Advanced Structural Analysis EGF316 4. Cylinders Under Pressure 4.1 Introduction When a cylinder is subjected to pressure, three mutually perpendicular principal stresses will be set up within the walls
More informationIDE 110 Mechanics of Materials Spring 2006 Final Examination FOR GRADING ONLY
Spring 2006 Final Examination STUDENT S NAME (please print) STUDENT S SIGNATURE STUDENT NUMBER IDE 110 CLASS SECTION INSTRUCTOR S NAME Do not turn this page until instructed to start. Write your name on
More informationME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.
ME 323 - Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM-12:20PM Ghosh 2:30-3:20PM Gonzalez 12:30-1:20PM Zhao 4:30-5:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2
More informationStress Analysis of Radial and Non- Radial Nozzle Connections in Ellipsoidal Head Pressure Vessel
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 10, No. 1, 67-83, 2013 Stress Analysis of Radial and Non- Radial Nozzle Connections in Ellipsoidal Head Pressure Vessel Haszeme Abu Kasim 1, a Professor Dr. Ir. Wahyu
More informationPressure Vessels Stresses Under Combined Loads Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials and Fracture Criteria for Brittle Materials
Pressure Vessels Stresses Under Combined Loads Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials and Fracture Criteria for Brittle Materials Pressure Vessels: In the previous lectures we have discussed elements subjected
More informationBOLLARD STRENGTH CHECK
BOLLARD STRENGTH CHECK Bollards are used for mooring and towing purposes. Their strength check forms an important exercise in tow gear selection and design This spreadsheet can be used to perform a strength
More informationStress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy
Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 76 Spring 017-018 Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Shear and Moment Diagrams Beam Sign Convention The positive directions are as follows: The internal shear force causes a
More informationFRACTURE ANALYSIS FOR REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL NOZZLE CORNER CRACKS
Transactions, SMiRT-22 FRACTURE ANALYSIS FOR REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL NOZZLE CORNER CRACKS Shengjun Yin 1, Gary L. Stevens 2, and B. Richard Bass 3 1 Senior Research Staff, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationParametric Study Of The Material On Mechanical Behavior Of Pressure Vessel
Parametric Study Of The Material On Mechanical Behavior Of Pressure Vessel Dr. Mohammad Tariq Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering Department SSET, SHIATS-Deemed University, Naini, Allahabad, U.P.,
More informationSTRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS
1 UNIT I STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define: Stress When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation. At the same time the body resists deformation. The
More informationTorsion of shafts with circular symmetry
orsion of shafts with circular symmetry Introduction Consider a uniform bar which is subject to a torque, eg through the action of two forces F separated by distance d, hence Fd orsion is the resultant
More informationD e s i g n o f R i v e t e d J o i n t s, C o t t e r & K n u c k l e J o i n t s
D e s i g n o f R i v e t e d J o i n t s, C o t t e r & K n u c k l e J o i n t s 1. Design of various types of riveted joints under different static loading conditions, eccentrically loaded riveted joints.
More informationTable of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level
Preface...xvii Part 1. Level 1... 1 Chapter 1. The Basics of Linear Elastic Behavior... 3 1.1. Cohesion forces... 4 1.2. The notion of stress... 6 1.2.1. Definition... 6 1.2.2. Graphical representation...
More informationLecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension
Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension Module. General Field Equations General Field Equations [] Equilibrium Equations in Elastic bodies xx x y z yx zx f x 0, etc [2] Kinematics xx u x x,etc. [3]
More informationChapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis
Chapter 3 Load and Stress Analysis 2 Shear Force and Bending Moments in Beams Internal shear force V & bending moment M must ensure equilibrium Fig. 3 2 Sign Conventions for Bending and Shear Fig. 3 3
More informationAnalysis of Shear Lag Effect of Box Beam under Dead Load
Analysis of Shear Lag Effect of Box Beam under Dead Load Qi Wang 1, a, Hongsheng Qiu 2, b 1 School of transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, 430063, Wuhan Hubei China 2 School of transportation,
More information(Refer Slide Time: 2:43-03:02)
Strength of Materials Prof. S. K. Bhattacharyya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture - 34 Combined Stresses I Welcome to the first lesson of the eighth module
More informationExternal Pressure... Thermal Expansion in un-restrained pipeline... The critical (buckling) pressure is calculated as follows:
External Pressure... The critical (buckling) pressure is calculated as follows: P C = E. t s ³ / 4 (1 - ν ha.ν ah ) R E ³ P C = Critical buckling pressure, kn/m² E = Hoop modulus in flexure, kn/m² t s
More informationMEMS Project 2 Assignment. Design of a Shaft to Transmit Torque Between Two Pulleys
MEMS 029 Project 2 Assignment Design of a Shaft to Transmit Torque Between Two Pulleys Date: February 5, 206 Instructor: Dr. Stephen Ludwick Product Definition Shafts are incredibly important in order
More informationPES Institute of Technology
PES Institute of Technology Bangalore south campus, Bangalore-5460100 Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty name : Madhu M Date: 29/06/2012 SEM : 3 rd A SEC Subject : MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Subject
More informationUNIT 1 STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define stress. When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation.
UNIT 1 STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define stress. When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation. At the same time the body resists deformation. The magnitude
More informationCHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS
(74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are
More informationThe LAT Electronics consists of five distinct box assemblies as follows:
I. SYNOPSIS The preliminary stress analyses for the DAQ Electronics assemblies have been performed per the conditions specified in the Environmental Specification LAT-SS-00778. The analysis considered
More informationARTICLE A-8000 STRESSES IN PERFORATED FLAT PLATES
ARTICLE A-8000 STRESSES IN PERFORATED FLAT PLATES Delete endnote 18, which says "Express metric values in exponential form" A-8100 INTRODUCTION A-8110 SCOPE (a) This Article contains a method of analysis
More informationOnly for Reference Page 1 of 18
Only for Reference www.civilpddc2013.weebly.com Page 1 of 18 Seat No.: Enrolment No. GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY PDDC - SEMESTER II EXAMINATION WINTER 2013 Subject Code: X20603 Date: 26-12-2013 Subject
More informationCOURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5
COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5 TIME SCHEDULE MODULE TOPICS PERIODS 1 Simple stresses
More informationChapter 8. Chapter Spherical Pressure Vessels
Chapter 8 Chapter 8-1-8-3 Spherical Pressure Vessels Here are examples of spherical pressure vessels. Let s determine how to analyze them. Consider Figures 8-2 and 8-3 below. 1 Figure 8-2 illustrates the
More informationChapter 5 Torsion STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203. Notes are based on Mechanics of Materials: by R. C. Hibbeler, 7th Edition, Pearson
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203 Chapter 5 Torsion Notes are based on Mechanics of Materials: by R. C. Hibbeler, 7th Edition, Pearson Dr B. Achour & Dr Eng. K. El-kashif Civil Engineering Department, University
More information7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces
7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in
More information2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN
Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures
More informationFEA A Guide to Good Practice. What to expect when you re expecting FEA A guide to good practice
FEA A Guide to Good Practice What to expect when you re expecting FEA A guide to good practice 1. Background Finite Element Analysis (FEA) has transformed design procedures for engineers. Allowing more
More informationFundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures
Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,
More information