The package TopoID and its applications to Higgs physics
|
|
- Susanna Webb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The package TopoID and its applications to Higgs physics Jens Hoff (DESY, KIT) Theory Seminar, University of Zurich 3rd of November, 2015
2 1 TopoID Polynomial ordering Topology classification Relations among Feynman integrals Topology merging Partial fractioning 2 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Optical theorem and Cutkosky s rules Calculation Results 3 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Differential factorization Soft-virtual approximation Asymptotic expansion Calculation Results 2 / 38
3 TopoID Topology IDentification ---> _ \ >--- \ \ \ + / \ _ \ / \ \ \ \ / /\ \ \ \ / /\ \ / / +--->--- \ \ \/ / _/ / \ \/ / _/ / / \ _ \ / / \ / _ / + \ / \ ---> _ >--- Idea: Generic, process independent Mathematica package Feynman diagrams reduced result (Laporta not included) Topology construction (identification, minimal sets; partial fractioning; factorization,... ) Handle properties (completeness, linear dependence; subtopologies, scalelessness, symmetries; graphs, unitarity cuts,... ) FORM code generator (diagram mapping, topology processing, integral reduction,... ) Master integral identification (base changes, non-trivial relations,... ) 3 / 38
4 TopoID Polynomial ordering Bring the polynomial P with m terms into unique form ˆP by renaming the n variables {x j}: [Pak; 12] 1 Convert P into m (n+1) matrix M (0) (row: term, 1st column: coefficient, remaining columns: powers of {x j }) 2 Start with considering the above M (0) and the 2nd column (k = 1) 3 Compute for all considered matrices M (k),σ all transpositions of columns k and k + 1,... (and collect perputations σ) 4 Sort rows in each matrix lexicographically by the first k columns 5 Extract in columns k the lexicographically largest vector 6 Keep only matrices with this maximal vector; If k < n 1: k k + 1 and goto Step 3 7 Each remaining matrix encodes the same unique ˆP σ and a permutation of variables σ 4 / 38
5 TopoID Polynomial ordering 1 Convert P into m (n+1) matrix M (0) (row: term, 1st column: coefficient, remaining columns: powers of {x j }) 2 Start with considering the above M (0) and the 2nd column (k = 1) P = x x 1x 2 + x2 2 + x3 2 M (0) = (Step 1) S (1) = { M (0)(123) = M (0)}, k = 1 (Step 2) 4 / 38
6 TopoID Polynomial ordering 3 Compute for all considered matrices M (k),σ all transpositions of columns k and k + 1,... (and collect perputations σ) S (1) : M (1)(123) = , M (1)(213) = , M (1)(321) = (Step 3-1) 4 / 38
7 TopoID Polynomial ordering 4 Sort rows in each matrix lexicographically by the first k columns S (1) : M (1)(123) = , M (1)(213) = , M (1)(321) = (Step 4-1) 4 / 38
8 TopoID Polynomial ordering 5 Extract in columns k the lexicographically largest vector 6 Keep only matrices with this maximal vector; If k < n 1: k k + 1 and goto Step 3 0 ˆM (1) 0 = 2 1 (Step 5-1) S (2) = { M (1)(123), M (1)(213)}, k = 2 (Step 6-1) 4 / 38
9 TopoID Polynomial ordering 3 Compute for all considered matrices M (k),σ all transpositions of columns k and k + 1,... (and collect perputations σ) S (2) : M (2)(123) = , M (2)(132) = , M (2)(213) = , M (2)(231) = (Step 3-2) 4 / 38
10 TopoID Polynomial ordering 4 Sort rows in each matrix lexicographically by the first k columns S (2) : M (2)(123) = , M (2)(132) = , M (2)(213) = , M (2)(231) = (Step 4-2) 4 / 38
11 TopoID Polynomial ordering 5 Extract in columns k the lexicographically largest vector 6 Keep only matrices with this maximal vector; If k < n 1: k k + 1 and goto Step 3 0 ˆM (2) 2 = 0 1 (Step 5-2) S (2) = { M (2)(123), M (2)(213)} (Step 6-2) 4 / 38
12 TopoID Polynomial ordering 7 Each remaining matrix encodes the same unique ˆP σ and a permutation of variables σ ˆP = P = x x x x 1x 2, ˆσ = {(123),(213)} (Step 7) 4 / 38
13 TopoID Polynomial ordering ˆP = P = x x x x 1x 2, ˆσ = {(123),(213)} (Step 7) P already in canonical form; two permutations {(123),(213)} (213) denotes (x 1, x 2, x 3) (x 2, x 1, x 3); symmetry of P under x 1 x 2 Application to Feynman integrals Use U + F from the Feynman representation Unique identifier Û + ˆF; independent of momentum space representation Returned permutations: symmetries of Feynman integrals Many useful applications 4 / 38
14 TopoID Topology classification Minimal set for NNLO Higgs production: Note: Sufficient for all diagrams 5 / 38
15 TopoID Relations among Feynman integrals Non-trivial relation for NNLO Higgs production: = + (...) + (...) Cross-topology relations; not from Laporta reduction Simplify calculation Usefull cross-checks 6 / 38
16 TopoID Topology classification Minimal set for NNLO Higgs production: 7 / 38
17 TopoID Topology merging 3-loop massless propagators: q 1 = k 1, q 2 = p k 1, q 3 = k 2, q 4 = p k 1 k 2, q 5 = k 3, q 6 = p k 1 k 2 k 3, q 7 = k 1 + k 2 + k 3, q 8 = k 1 + k 2, q 9 = k 1 + k 3. q 8 q 1 q 7 P 3 (a 1,..., a 8, 0) = p q 3 q p 5 q 2 q 4 q 4 q 6 P 3 (a 1, 0, a 3,..., a 9 ) = p q 5 p q 1 q 8 q9 q 7 q 1 q 7 P 3 (a 1,..., a 7, 0, a 9 ) = p p q 3 q 5 q 3 q 9 q 6 q 2 q 4 q 6 1 external, 3 internal momenta 9 scalar products 3 incomplete topologies with 8 lines Identify greatest common subtopology Find supertopology with these 3 different graphs as subtopologies 8 / 38
18 TopoID Partial fractioning Partial fractioning for NLO Higgs production: p 1 p 2 d2 p 2 d 3 d 4 d 1 p1 d d 2 2 d 3 d 4 d d 3 d 4 4 d 1 d 1 Via Gröbner basis: d 2 d 3 d 1 d 4 m 2 H + s + d 1 + d 2 d 3 d 3 ( ) 1 m 2 H d 4 d + s + d 1 + d 2 d 4 4 d 2 ( ) 1 m 2 H d 3 d 4 d 3 d s d 1 + d 3 + d 4 4 d 1 ( ) 1 m 2 H d 2 d 3 d 4 d 2 d 3 d s d 2 + d 3 + d ) (d 1 + d 2 d 3 d 4 ) d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 (m 2H s d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 9 / 38
19 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Motivation and introduction Higgs production at the LHC dominated by gluon fusion After [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann, Herzog, Mistlberger; 14, 15]: 2.2% corrections, 3% uncertainty at N 3 LO Cross-check Loop-induced process, dominated by top quark mass Effective field theory with top quark integrated out: L Y,eff = H v C1O1 and O1 = 1 4 Ga µνg a,µν M t M t s, mh C 1 s, mh Reduced numbers of scales and loops: single dimensionless variable x = m 2 H/s (soft: x 1) Finite matching coefficient C 1 needed to 4-loop [Chetyrkin, Kniehl, Steinhauser; 98] [Schröder, Steinhauser; 06] [Chetyrkin, Kühn, Sturm; 06] 10 / 38
20 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Status LO calculation (exact) [Ellis et al.; 76] [Wilczek et at.; 77] [Georgi et al.; 78] [Rizzo; 80] NLO (exact) [Dawson; 91] [Djouadi, Spira, Zerwas; 91] NNLO (EFT) soft expansion to 3rd order valid to O(1%) [Harlander, Kilgore; 02] [Anastasiou, Melnikov; 02] [Ravindran, Smith, van Neerven; 03] NNLO O ( 1/M 2 t ) corrections NNLO +1% [Pak, Rogal, Steinhauser; 09-11] [Harlander, Mantler, Marzani, Ozeren; 09-10] N 3 LO IR counterterms 3-loop splitting functions [Moch, Vermaseren, Vogt; 02] NNLO master integrals to higher orders in ǫ [Pak, Rogal, Steinhauser; 11] [Anastasiou, Bühler, Duhr, Herzog; 12] Cross sections and convolution integrals [Höschele, JH, Pak, Steinhauser, Ueda; 12, 13] [Bühler, Lazopoulos; 13] N 3 LO scale variation O(2% 8%) [Bühler, Lazopoulos; 13] 11 / 38
21 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Status N 3 LO corrections VV 2 and V 3 3-loop gluon form factor [Baikov, Chetyrkin, Smirnov 2, Steinhauser; 09] [Gehrmann, Glover, Huber, Ikizlerli, Studerus; 09] VRV exact in x [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Herzog, Mistlberger; 13] [Kilgore; 14] V 2 R exact in x [Dulat, Mistlberger; 14] [Duhr, Gehrmann, Jaquier; 14] VR 2 expansion in x 1 [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann; 14] [Li, von Manteuffel, Schabinger, Zhu; 14], [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Herzog, Mistlberger; 15] R 3 expansion in x 1 [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Mistlberger; 13] 37 terms in the x 1 expansion [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann, Herzog, Mistlberger; 14, 15] Sufficient for phenomenology VV 2 V 3 qq -channel exact in x (VR 2, R 3 ) [Höschele, JH, Ueda; 14] [Anzai, Hasselhuhn, Höschele, JH, Kilgore, Steinhauser, Ueda; 15] Independent cross-check Many different resummations [Catani et al.] [Moch et al.] [Ahrens et al.] [de Florian et al.] [Ball et al.] [... ] 12 / 38
22 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Status N 3 LO corrections VV 2 and V 3 3-loop gluon form factor [Baikov, Chetyrkin, Smirnov 2, Steinhauser; 09] [Gehrmann, Glover, Huber, Ikizlerli, Studerus; 09] VRV exact in x [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Herzog, Mistlberger; 13] [Kilgore; 14] V 2 R exact in x [Dulat, Mistlberger; 14] [Duhr, Gehrmann, Jaquier; 14] VR 2 expansion in x 1 [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann; 14] [Li, von Manteuffel, Schabinger, Zhu; 14], [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Herzog, Mistlberger; 15] R 3 expansion in x 1 [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Mistlberger; 13] 37 terms in the x 1 expansion [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann, Herzog, Mistlberger; 14, 15] Sufficient for phenomenology qq -channel exact in x (VR 2, R 3 ) [Höschele, JH, Ueda; 14] [Anzai, Hasselhuhn, Höschele, JH, Kilgore, Steinhauser, Ueda; 15] Independent cross-check Many different resummations [Catani et al.] [Moch et al.] [Ahrens et al.] [de Florian et al.] [Ball et al.] [... ] VRV V 2 R 12 / 38
23 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Status N 3 LO corrections VV 2 and V 3 3-loop gluon form factor [Baikov, Chetyrkin, Smirnov 2, Steinhauser; 09] [Gehrmann, Glover, Huber, Ikizlerli, Studerus; 09] VRV exact in x [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Herzog, Mistlberger; 13] [Kilgore; 14] V 2 R exact in x [Dulat, Mistlberger; 14] [Duhr, Gehrmann, Jaquier; 14] VR 2 expansion in x 1 [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann; 14] [Li, von Manteuffel, Schabinger, Zhu; 14], [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Herzog, Mistlberger; 15] R 3 expansion in x 1 [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Mistlberger; 13] 37 terms in the x 1 expansion [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann, Herzog, Mistlberger; 14, 15] Sufficient for phenomenology qq -channel exact in x (VR 2, R 3 ) [Höschele, JH, Ueda; 14] [Anzai, Hasselhuhn, Höschele, JH, Kilgore, Steinhauser, Ueda; 15] Independent cross-check Many different resummations [Catani et al.] [Moch et al.] [Ahrens et al.] [de Florian et al.] [Ball et al.] [... ] VR 2 R 3 12 / 38
24 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Generalities 1 Reduction of integrals with full x-dependence Only contributing cuts 2 Construct differential equations for master integrals Canonical basis (in general: coupled system) 3 Soft limit x 1 as boundary condition Leading term using Mellin-Barnes representation Canonical differential equations: d dx mi(x, ǫ) = ǫ Aij(x) mj(x, ǫ) with d = 4 2 ǫ [Henn et al.; ] ǫ- and x-dependence factorize Solve order-by-order in ǫ A ij: alphabet of appearing functions E.g. Harmonic Polylogarithms (HPLs): H w (x) = x 0 dx f w1 ( x ) H wn 1 ( x ) and f 0 (x) = 1 x, f ±1(x) = 1 1 x 13 / 38
25 Optical theorem and Cutkosky s rules Higher-order corrections: Virtual More loop integrations Real Additional final state particles (different phase spaces) Optical theorem: σ(i f) f dπ f M(i f) 2 Disc M(i i) Cutkosky s rules: Consider only valid diagrammatic cuts for Disc Two connectivity components Separate in- and outgoing momenta (s-channel) Contribute to the process (1 or 2 Higgs, 0 to 3 parton lines) 14 / 38
26 Optical theorem and Cutkosky s rules E.g. to NNLO: dπ dπ dπ = / 38
27 Optical theorem and Cutkosky s rules Optical theorem: σ(i f) f dπ f M(i f) 2 Disc M(i i) Pros Cons Forward scattering simplified kinematics Common treatment of loop and phase space integrals Calculation of Disc only for master integrals More loops and diagrams Only total cross section (naively) Approach first used in [Anastasiou, Melnikov; 02] 16 / 38
28 Optical theorem and Cutkosky s rules Handling cut-diagrams: Filter diagrams Fast graph-based algorithm build into Perl script to process QGRAF output N 3 LO Higgs: NNLO Higgs pair (SV): Assist reduction 1 2 Build also into TopoID pass to Laporta reduction Typically: only O(10%) of subtopologies (or relations) 17 / 38
29 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Calculation: toolchain Reduction 1 Generate Feynman diagrams QGRAF [Nogueira; 93] 2 Select diagrams with specific cuts filter [JH, Pak; (unpublished)] 3 Map diagrams to topologies ( graph information) exp [Harlander, Seidensticker, Steinhauser; 98] reg [Pak; (unpublished)] 4 Reduction to scalar integrals ( generic topologies) FORM [Kuipers, Ueda, Vermaseren, Vollinga; 13] 5 Reduction to master integrals ( basic topologies) rows [JH, Pak; (unpublished)] FIRE [Smirnov] 6 Minimal basis of master integrals TopoID [JH, Pak; (unpublished)] 220 diagrams, e.g. 18 / 38
30 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Calculation: 17 topologies with 3- and 4-particle cuts 19 / 38
31 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Calculation: e.g. sea snake topology = { 1} 20 / 38
32 N 3 LO Higgs production: qq -channel Results: functions beyond HPLs Laporta: 332 master integrals; TopoID: 108 and cancellation of ξ Some Feynman integrals generate functions with alphabet beyond HPLs: { } 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 x 1 x 1+x 1+4 x x 1+4 x Traced back to common subtopology: Numerical implementation in Mathematica: { ( )} 1 Change alphabet to x, 1 1 x, 1 1+x, x, 1 1 x 1+4 x 1 Use series expansions x 0 and x 1 10 digits in 1 second Note: x (1 x) /x 2 Cyclotomic Polylogarithms Representation as Goncharov Polylogarithms (linear denominators) { } Letters of 6th roots of unity; here only: 1 x, 1 1 x, 1 ( 1) 1 3 x 21 / 38
33 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Motivation Higgs Potential in the Standard Model: V(H) = 1 2 m2 HH 2 + λvh λh4, λ SM = m2 H 2v , v: Higgs vev. Verify mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the SM Measure the Higgs self-coupling sensitive process Σ LO gg HH fb a b c s GeV 2 (a) (b) + (c) / 38
34 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Theory status Prospects for the 14 TeV: b bγγ-channel, 600 fb 1 : λ 0 [Baur, Plehn, Rainwater; 04] b bγγ-, b bτ + τ -channels: promising ; b bw + W -channel: not promising [Baglio, Djouadi, Gröber, Mühlleitner, Quevillon, Spira; 13] 600 fb 1 : λ > 0; 3000 fb 1 : λ +30% 20% (ratio with Higgs cross section) [Goertz, Papaefstathiou, Yang, Zurita; 13] And many others, e.g.: [Dolan, Englert, Spannowsky; 12] [Papaefstathiou, Yang, Zurita; 13] [Barr, Dolan, Englert, Spannowsky; 13] [Barger, Everett, Jackson, Shaughnessy; 14] [Englert, Krauss, Spannowsky, Thompson; 15] [... ] Until now: Higgs pair production not observed in b bb b- and b bγγ-channels (as expected in the SM) [ATLAS; 15] [CMS; 15] Wait for HL-LHC 23 / 38
35 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Theory status Known since long: LO result with exact M t dependence [Glover, van der Bij; 88] [Plehn, Spira, Zerwas; 98] NLO result in M t limit [Dawson, Dittmaier, Spira; 98] σ H 20 LO fb+ 20 NLO,Mt fb for s H = 14 TeV, µ = 2m H More recently: NLO + NNLL (M t ) NLO +20% [Shao, Li, Li, Wang; 13] NNLO w/ or w/o soft-virtual approx. (M t ) NLO +20% [de Florian, Mazzitelli; 13] O ( 1/M 8 t ) corrections at NLO NLO +10% [Grigo, JH, Melnikov, Steinhauser; 13] NLO real exact in M t, NLO virt. for M t NLO 10% [Maltoni, Vryonidou, Zaro; 14] Cross-check of virtual NNLO corrs.; NNLO matching coefficient for gghh-coupling NNLO +1% [Grigo, Melnikov, Steinhauser; 14] Improved O ( ) ( ) 1/Mt 12 NLO, O 1/M 4 t NNLO soft-virt. corrections [Grigo, JH, Steinhauser; 15 ] 24 / 38
36 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Generalities Operate on full-theory diagrams at NLO and NNLO Virt. corrs. in two independent calculations: amplitude (differential; 2-/3-loop) forward scattering (total; 4-/5-loop) Real corrs.: only via forward scattering at NLO Perform expansion for M t ; improve upon effective theory results for NLO [Dawson, Dittmaier, Spira; 98], NNLO [de Florian, Mazzitelli; 13] Laporta reduction to master integrals for the soft subdiagrams Remaining hard massive tadpoles via MATAD Master integrals as series around s = 2m H (not in this talk) 25 / 38
37 Differential factorization Factorization of the LO result exact in M t for: Total cross section σ (i) = (i) σ (0) with Differential cross section σ (i) = s exact = σ(0) exact σ exp (0) 4m 2 H (i) = σ(i) exp s 4m 2 H dq 2 σ (0) exp, σ (i) exp = ( dσ (0) exact dq 2 ) ( (0) ) dσ exp dq 2 dq 2 dσ (i) exp dq 2 N n=0 dσ (i) exp dq 2 c (i) n ρ n, ρ = m2 H M 2 t Cure the invalidity of the M t expansion for the large-q 2 region Virt. corrs. via amplitude: access to Q 2 -dependence δ ( s Q 2) Real corrs. via optical theorem (naively): only total cross section Use the soft-virtual approximation [de Florian, Mazzitelli; 12] 26 / 38
38 Soft-virtual approximation Split σ into its contributions (works also for dσ/dq 2 ): σ = σ virt+ren + σ real+split = finite = Σ div +Σ fin + Σ }{{ soft +Σ }}{{} hard =Σ SV =finite =Σ H =finite Σ div universal for color-less final state [de Florian, Mazzitelli; 12] Compute σ virt+ren as ρ-expansion Solve σ virt+ren = Σ div +Σ fin for Σ fin Σ div and Σ soft (soft coll. counterterms + soft real corrs.) exact σ LO (include M t effects) Q 2 dσ dq = 2 σlo zg(z) with σ (SV) = 1 z = Q2 s, dzσ LO (zs) G (SV) (z) with 1 δ G(z) = G SV(z)+G H (z) δ = 1 4m2 H s G (i) SV (z) constructed from σ(i) [de Florian, Mazzitelli; 12] [Grigo, JH, Steinhauser; 15] fin and σlo only 27 / 38
39 Asymptotic expansion Expand at integrand level for all contributing regions series expansion in analytic result Hierarchy: Mt 2 s, mh 2 series in ρ = mh/m 2 t 2 Effectively reduce number of loops and scales Here: regions correspond to subgraphs (in general more than one) Hard mass expansion: subgraphs must contain all heavy lines Example: NLO real with one region { M 2 t, m 2 H, s } { M 2 t } { m 2 H, s } { M 2 t } 28 / 38
40 Asymptotic expansion Expand at integrand level for all contributing regions series expansion in analytic result Hierarchy: Mt 2 s, mh 2 series in ρ = mh/m 2 t 2 Effectively reduce number of loops and scales Here: regions correspond to subgraphs (in general more than one) Hard mass expansion: subgraphs must contain all heavy lines Example: NLO virt. with two regions { M 2 t, m 2 H, s } { M 2 t } { m 2 H, s } { M 2 t } + { M 2 t } { m 2 H, s } { M 2 t } 28 / 38
41 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Calculation (via optical theorem) LO topology: Virt. NLO topologies: Real NLO topologies: 29 / 38
42 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Calculation (via optical theorem) Virt. NNLO topologies: Note: Different regions in asymptotic expansion different loop-orders Here: multiplied with 1- to 3-loop massive tadpoles 30 / 38
43 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Calculation (via optical theorem) Virt. and real LO-NLO master integrals: Virt. NNLO master integrals (in addition): 31 / 38
44 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Splitting in soft-virtual and real contributions at NLO Partonic NLO correction; total factorization δσ NLO [fb] SV+H SV H ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 5 ρ s [GeV] Using µ = 2m H (also in the following) Different behavior for higher orders in ρ expansion: SV increasing H descreasing (flat for s 400 GeV) SV numerically dominant 32 / 38
45 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Total vs. differential factorization (DF) at NLO DF applied only to SV part; H treated via total factorization (i.e. identical) δσ NLO [fb] SV+H SV(DF)+H ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 5 ρ s [GeV] Maxima of DF curves at lower s; smaller cross sections Improvement of convergence: difference of ρ 0 and corrections to ρ 6 (for s = 400 GeV): 0.25 fb vs fb (Partonic K-factor: behavior at top quark pair threshold not washed out) 33 / 38
46 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Hadronic cross section and K-factor Technical upper cut on s (good proxy to Q 2 ): σ H (s H, s cut) = 1 4m 2 H /s H dτ scut : total cross section for 14 TeV ( ) dlgg (τ) σ(τs H ) θ(s cut τs H ) dτ σ NLO H [fb] K NLO ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 5 ρ scut [GeV] Spread of ρ-orders ±10% uncertainty of EFT at NLO due to M t 34 / 38
47 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Revisiting NLO Lessons from NLO for NNLO: SV approximation contructed for z 1; G SV (z) can be replaced by f(z) G SV (z) Splitting into SV and H not unique Tune f(z) at NLO such that σ Σ SV f(z) = z accurate to 2% Replace RGE logarithms ( s Q 2 in the soft limit): log ( µ 2 /s ) log ( µ 2 /Q 2) Discrepancy to [Maltoni, Vryonidou, Zaro; 14]: Real corrs.: treated exactly; Virt. corrs.: EFT result Claim: 10% correction at NLO But: Dominant positive shift from virtual 1/M t-corrections (c.f. backup slide) 35 / 38
48 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production NNLO SV corrections δσ [fb] LO exact NLO z NNLO-SV ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 EFT result plus ρ- and ρ 2 -terms Peaks at smaller s Same pattern of ρ-corrections s [GeV] 40 Conv. up to s cut 400 GeV σh [fb] LO NLO ρ 0 10 z NNLO-SV ρ 0 z NNLO-SV ρ 1 z NNLO-SV ρ scut [GeV] ρ- and ρ 2 -corrections: ±2.5% M t-uncertainty at NNLO: 5% (NNLO corrs. 20%) 36 / 38
49 NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production NNLO SV K-factor 5 NLO ρ 0 4 z NNLO-SV ρ 0 z NNLO-SV ρ 1 z NNLO-SV ρ 2 KH [fb] scut [GeV] Strong raise close to threshold steeper NNLO correction For total cross section: K NNLO H / 38
50 Conclusion TopoID: Generic, process independent Mathematica package for multiloop calculations; especially for many topologies Until now: two successful applications Works also for 5-loop propagators Publication planned for ACAT 2016 qq -channel in N 3 LO Higgs production: New iterated integrals beyond HPLs appear Agreement of leading logarithms with [Anastasiou, Duhr, Dulat, Furlan, Herzog, Mistlberger; 15] Full calculation underway... Higgs pair production: Real corrections at NLO via opt. theorem; employ SV approx. at NNLO Computed expansion to O ( ) ( ) 1/Mt 12 at NLO, O 1/M 4 t at NNLO Uncertainty of EFT results due to M t: 10% at NLO, 5% at NNLO Small- s behavior as benchmark for exact calculations 38 / 38
51 Backup: NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Partonic NLO K-factor K NLO SV(DF)+H SV+H ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 5 ρ s [GeV] Note: Behavior around top quark pair threshold not washed out 39 / 38
52 Backup: NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Splitting into real and virtual corrections at NLO δσ NLO [fb] s [GeV] V+R R V ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 5 ρ 6 Note: R and V separately divergent; only finite contributions shown 40 / 38
53 Backup: NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Total vs. differential factorization without hard contributions at NLO δσ NLO [fb] SV SV (df) ρ 0 ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 5 ρ s [GeV] 41 / 38
54 Backup: NLO and NNLO Higgs pair production Partonic NNLO cross section for different scales choices and f(z) δσ NNLO [fb] µ = 2m H µ = Q 2 NNLO-SV z NNLO-SV s [GeV] Note: f(z) = z (better proxy) leads to higher values 42 / 38
arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 20 Jul 2014
arxiv:407.67v [hep-ph] 0 Jul 04 Mass-corrections to double-higgs production & TopoID Jonathan Grigo and Institut für Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) E-mail: jonathan.grigo@kit.edu,
More informationPrecision Higgs physics. at hadron colliders
Precision Higgs physics at hadron colliders Claude Duhr in collaboration with C. Anastasiou, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog, A. Lazopoulos, B. Mistlberger RadCor/LoopFest 2015 UCLA, 16/06/2015
More informationggf Theory Overview For Highest Precision
ggf Theory Overview For Highest Precision Lumley Castle Franz Herzog Nikhef LHC Higgs Production in the Standard Model 2 LHC Higgs Data 3 Theoretical Formalism To compute cross sections we use the Factorisation
More informationgg! hh in the high energy limit
gg! hh in the high energy limit Go Mishima Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), TTP in collaboration with Matthias Steinhauser, Joshua Davies, David Wellmann work in progress gg! hh : previous works
More informationPSEUDO SCALAR FORM FACTORS AT 3-LOOP QCD. Taushif Ahmed Institute of Mathematical Sciences, India March 22, 2016
PSEUDO SCALAR FORM FACTORS AT 3-LOOP QCD Taushif Ahmed Institute of Mathematical Sciences, India March, 016 PROLOGUE: SM & MSSM SM Complex scalar doublet (4 DOF) 3 DOF transform into longitudinal modes
More informationEffects of Beyond Standard Model physics in Effective Field Theory approach on Higgs' pt spectrum
PhD Seminar 2015, PSI Effects of Beyond Standard Model physics in Effective Field Theory approach on Higgs' pt spectrum Agnieszka Ilnicka in collaboration with: M. Grazzini M. Spira M. Wiesemann Motivation
More informationHiggs boson production at the LHC: NNLO partonic cross sections through order ǫ and convolutions with splitting functions to N 3 LO
SFB/CPP-12-93 TTP12-45 LPN12-127 Higgs boson production at the LHC: NNLO partonic cross sections through order ǫ and convolutions with splitting functions to N 3 LO Maik Höschele, Jens Hoff, Aleey Pak,
More informationThreshold cross sections for Drell-Yan & Higgs productions in N 3 LO QCD
Narayan Rana 20/10/2016 1/46 Threshold cross sections for Drell-Yan & Higgs productions in N 3 LO QCD Narayan Rana 20/10/2016 in collaboration with T. Ahmed, M. C. Kumar, M. Mahakhud, M. K. Mandal, P.
More informationCalculating four-loop massless propagators with Forcer
Calculating four-loop massless propagators with Forcer Takahiro Ueda Nikhef, The Netherlands Collaboration with: Ben Ruijl and Jos Vermaseren 18 Jan. 2016 ACAT2016, UTFSM, Valparaíso 1 / 30 Contents Introduction
More informationThreshold Corrections To DY and Higgs at N 3 LO QCD
Threshold Corrections To DY and Higgs at N 3 LO QCD Taushif Ahmed Institute of Mathematical Sciences, India July 2, 2015 Threshold Corrections To DY and Higgs at N 3 LO QCD INFN Sezione Di Torino 1 Prologue
More informationThreshold Corrections To DY and Higgs at N 3 LO QCD
Threshold Corrections To DY and Higgs at N 3 LO QCD Taushif Ahmed Institute of Mathematical Sciences, India April 12, 2016 Threshold Corrections To DY and Higgs at N 3 LO QCD Bergische Universitat Wuppertal
More informationNLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion
Wir schaffen Wissen heute für morgen NLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion Seraina Glaus Theory Group LTP, Paul Scherrer Institute & University Zurich In collaboration with
More informationSM Predictions for Gluon- Fusion Higgs Production
SM Predictions for Gluon- Fusion Higgs Production Massimiliano Grazzini, Frank Petriello, Jianming Qian, Fabian Stoeckli Higgs Workshop, CERN, June 5, 2010 Outline Introduction: status of ggh Three updates:
More informationTHE STRONG COUPLING AND LHC CROSS SECTIONS
THE STRONG COUPLING AND LHC CROSS SECTIONS Frank Petriello Argonne National Laboratory and Northwestern University Workshop on Precision Measurements of α S February 11, 2011 Outline Focus of talk: customer
More informationPrecision calculations for collider processes Gudrun Heinrich Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich
Precision calculations for collider processes Gudrun Heinrich Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich Scientific Board Meeting July 27, 2016 Overview tools FeynArts/FormCalc, Cuba GoSam SecDec NLO phenomenology
More informationNew physics effects in Higgs cross sections
New physics effects in Higgs cross sections Robert Harlander Bergische Universität Wuppertal ERC Workshop Nov 2014, Mainz supported by rescaled couplings new Higgs bosons BSM particle effects new processes
More informationUniversality of transverse-momentum and threshold resummations,
Universality of transverse-momentum and threshold resummations, 3 3 and results up to N LO and N LL Leandro Cieri La Sapienza - Università di Roma High Precision for Hard Processes Firenze, Italia September
More informationPrecision Calculations for Collider Physics
SFB Arbeitstreffen März 2005 Precision Calculations for Collider Physics Michael Krämer (RWTH Aachen) Radiative corrections to Higgs and gauge boson production Combining NLO calculations with parton showers
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 25 Sep 2002
hep-ph/0209302 Direct Higgs production at hadron colliders arxiv:hep-ph/0209302v1 25 Sep 2002 Massimiliano Grazzini (a,b) (a) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Firenze, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence,
More informationFrom Tensor Integral to IBP
From Tensor Integral to IBP Mohammad Assadsolimani, in collaboration with P. Kant, B. Tausk and P. Uwer 11. Sep. 2012 Mohammad Assadsolimani From Tensor Integral to IBP 1 Contents Motivation NNLO Tensor
More informationHiggs theory. Achilleas Lazopoulos (ETH Zurich) ATLAS HSG2 meeting Athens, 7 Sep Friday, December 30, 11
Higgs theory Achilleas Lazopoulos (ETH Zurich) ATLAS HSG2 meeting Athens, 7 Sep. 2011 Why is Higgs production different In the dominant channel, gluon fusion, it starts already at second order in as, so
More informationH + jet(s) (fixed order)
Mass effects in gg H + jet(s) (fixed order) Gudrun Heinrich Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich Higgs+jets workshop, IPPP Durham December 9, 2014 Higgs Effective Theory (HEFT) m t L eff = c 1 G µν,a
More informationRecent theoretical issues in Higgs production
Recent theoretical issues in Higgs production Frank Petriello MCTP Spring Symposium on Higgs Physics April 16, 2012 The Higgs search from LEP to the LHC In early 2000: MH
More informationMultiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple
Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple Johannes M. Henn Institute for Advanced Study based on PRL 110 (2013) [arxiv:1304.1806], JHEP 1307 (2013) 128 [arxiv:1306.2799] with A. V.
More informationTop mass effects in gluon fusion processes
Top mass effects in gluon fusion processes Thomas Rauh AEC, University of Bern Ramona Gröber, Andreas Maier, TR arxiv:1709.07799 JHEP 1803 (2018) 020 Outline 2 Gluon fusion processes Validity of approximations
More informationFully exclusive NNLO QCD computations
Fully exclusive NNLO QCD computations Kirill Melnikov University of Hawaii Loopfest V, SLAC, June 2006 Fully exclusive NNLO QCD computations p. 1/20 Outline Introduction Technology Higgs boson production
More informationPoS(DIS2017)295. Hadronic Higgs boson decay at order α 4 s and α 5 s
Institut für Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 7618 Karlsruhe, Germany E-mail: joshua.davies@kit.edu Matthias Steinhauser Institut für Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Karlsruhe
More informationThe rare decay H Zγ in perturbative QCD
The rare decay H Zγ in perturbative QCD [arxiv: hep-ph/1505.00561] Thomas Gehrmann, Sam Guns & Dominik Kara June 15, 2015 RADCOR 2015 AND LOOPFEST XIV - UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Z Z H g q
More informationPhysics at LHC. lecture seven. Sven-Olaf Moch. DESY, Zeuthen. in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden
Physics at LHC lecture seven Sven-Olaf Moch Sven-Olaf.Moch@desy.de DESY, Zeuthen in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden Humboldt-Universität, December 03, 2007, Berlin Sven-Olaf Moch Physics at LHC p.1
More informationHIGH ENERGY BEHAVIOUR OF FORM FACTORS
HIGH ENERGY BEHAVIOUR OF FORM FACTORS Taushif Ahmed Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany Skype Seminar IIT Hyderabad May 10, 018 With Johannes Henn & Matthias Steinhauser Ref: JHEP 1706 (017) 15
More informationHiggs + Jet angular and p T distributions : MSSM versus SM
Higgs + Jet angular and p T distributions : MSSM versus SM Oliver Brein ( Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Durham, UK ) in collaboration with Wolfgang Hollik e-mail: oliver.brein@durham.ac.uk
More informationThe Higgs pt distribution
The Higgs pt distribution Chris Wever (TUM) In collaboration with: F. Caola, K. Kudashkin, J. Lindert, K. Melnikov, P. Monni, L. Tancredi GGI: Amplitudes in the LHC era, Florence 16 Oktober, 2018 Outline
More informationPrecision QCD at the LHC
Precision QCD at the LHC Prakash Mathews Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata March 8, 2018 Sangam@HRI 2018 1/62 Outline Motivation Essential ingredients of pqcd NNLO top pair production NNNLO inclusive
More informationHeavy Quark Production at High Energies
Heavy Quark Production at High Energies Andrea Ferroglia Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz OpenCharm@PANDA Mainz, 19 November 29 Outline 1 Heavy Quarks, High Energies, and Perturbative QCD 2 Heavy Quark
More informationA. Mitov 3-loop time-like splitting functions in Mellin space and NNLO fragmentation
Three-loop time-like splitting functions in Mellin space and NNLO fragmentation Alexander Mitov DESY Work in progress with: M. Cacciari; Lance Dixon; S-O. Moch Also based on: hep-ph/0604160 (with Sven
More informationReduction to Master Integrals. V.A. Smirnov Atrani, September 30 October 05, 2013 p.1
Reduction to Master Integrals V.A. Smirnov Atrani, September 30 October 05, 2013 p.1 Reduction to Master Integrals IBP (integration by parts) V.A. Smirnov Atrani, September 30 October 05, 2013 p.1 Reduction
More informationThe forward-backward asymmetry in electron-positron annihilation. Stefan Weinzierl
The forward-backward asymmetry in electron-positron annihilation Stefan Weinzierl Universität Mainz Introduction: I.: II: III: IV.: Electroweak precision physics Higher order corrections Infrared-safe
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 4 Aug 2014
Prepared for sumission to JHEP HRI-RECAPP-014-018 Higgs oson production through annihilation at threshold in N LO QCD arxiv:1408.0787v1 [hep-ph] 4 Aug 014 Taushif Ahmed, a Narayan Rana a and V. Ravindran
More informationNLO for Higgs signals
NLO for Higgs signals Gudrun Heinrich Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich P.Meridiani, EPS 2017 P.Meridiani, EPS 2017 we need to be sure about the systematic uncertainties to see something like this
More informationSelf coupling. Tilman Plehn. why? how? required? when? An Introduction. Tilman Plehn. Universität Heidelberg. Mainz, April 2015
An Introduction Universität eidelber Mainz, April 2015 is self couplin Link to fundamental questions Standard Model possibly consistent to Planck scale renormalizable theory tool to probe fundamental physics
More informationNumerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals with SecDec 3
Numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals with SecDec 3 Sophia Borowka University of Zurich Project in collaboration with G. Heinrich, S. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, T. Zirke 152.6595 [hep-ph] (CPC,
More informationTop pair production near threshold at LHC (NLO/NLL analysis in NRQCD)
Top@LHC LHC TTbar-Threshold Threshold@ILC/LHC Green Functions Top pair production near threshold at LHC (NLO/NLL analysis in NRQCD) Yuichiro Kiyo TTP, Universität Karlsruhe Collaboration with: J. H. Kühn(KA),
More informationMT: a Mathematica package to compute convolutions
SFB/CPP-13-50 TTP13-27 LPN13-052 MT: a Mathematica package to compute convolutions Maik Höschele a, Jens Hoff a, Alexey Pak a, Matthias Steinhauser a,, Takahiro Ueda a a Institut für Theoretische Teilchenphysik,
More informationQCD threshold corrections for gluino pair production at NNLL
Introduction: Gluino pair production at fixed order QCD threshold corrections for gluino pair production at NNLL in collaboration with Ulrich Langenfeld and Sven-Olaf Moch, based on arxiv:1208.4281 Munich,
More informationTowards Jet Cross Sections at NNLO
Towards Jet Cross Sections at HP.4, September, MPI Munich Expectations at LHC Large production rates for Standard Model processes single jet inclusive and differential di-jet cross section will be measured
More informationCross sections for SM Higgs boson production
Cross sections for SM Higgs boson production Massimiliano Grazzini (INFN & ETH Zurich) Higgs MiniWorkshop, Torino, november 24, 2009 Outline Introduction Total cross section: - The NNLL+NNLO calculation
More informationReduction of Feynman integrals to master integrals
Reduction of Feynman integrals to master integrals A.V. Smirnov Scientific Research Computing Center of Moscow State University A.V. Smirnov ACAT 2007 p.1 Reduction problem for Feynman integrals A review
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 18 May 2016
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERION CP3-16-12, ZU-TH-11/16, NIKHEF 2016-013, CERN-TH-2016-085, NF-KITP-16-039 CP-even scalar boson production via gluon fusion at the LHC arxiv:1605.05761v1 [hep-ph]
More informationHigher Order QCD Lecture 2
Higher Order QCD Lecture 2 Lance Dixon, SLAC SLAC Summer Institute The Next Frontier: Exploring with the LHC July 21, 2006 Lecture 2 Outline NLO NNLO L. Dixon, 7/21/06 Higher Order QCD: Lect. 2 2 What
More informationTHE TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION OF THE HIGGS BOSON AT THE LHC
THE TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION OF THE HIGGS BOSON AT THE LHC Massimiliano Grazzini (INFN, Firenze) Les Houches, may 2005 Outline Introduction The Higgs spectrum The program HqT NLL+LO and NNLL+NLO
More informationTwo-loop QCD Corrections to the Heavy Quark Form Factors p.1
Two-loop QCD Corrections to the Heavy Quark Form Factors Thomas Gehrmann Universität Zürich UNIVERSITAS TURICENSIS MDCCC XXXIII Snowmass Linear Collider Worksho005 Two-loop QCD Corrections to the Heavy
More informationHigher Order Corrections to the Drell-Yan Cross Section in the Mellin Space
Higher Order Corrections to the Drell-Yan Cross Section in the Mellin Space Petra Kovačíková (DESY, Zeuthen) petra.kovacikova@desy.de Corfu Summer School 4 th September 21 Higher Order Corrections to the
More informationHiggs production: theory overview
Higgs production: theory overview Massimiliano Grazzini* University of Zurich Higgs Hunting 2011, Paris *On leave of absence from INFN, Sezione di Firenze Where we were... Tevatron combination of Winter
More informationSimplified differential equations approach for the calculation of multi-loop integrals
Simplified differential equations approach for the calculation of multi-loop integrals Chris Wever (N.C.S.R. Demokritos) 1 C. Papadopoulos [arxiv: 1401.6057 [hep-ph]] C. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini, C.
More informationNumerical Evaluation of Multi-loop Integrals
Numerical Evaluation of Multi-loop Integrals Sophia Borowka MPI for Physics, Munich In collaboration with: J. Carter and G. Heinrich Based on arxiv:124.4152 [hep-ph] http://secdec.hepforge.org DESY-HU
More informationQCD resummation for jet and hadron production
QCD resummation for jet and hadron production Werner Vogelsang Univ. Tübingen UCL, 14 Feb 2014 Outline: Introduction: QCD threshold resummation Drell-Yan process Resummation in QCD hard-scattering Hadron
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO QCD
AN INTRODUCTION TO QCD Frank Petriello Northwestern U. & ANL TASI 2013: The Higgs Boson and Beyond June 3-7, 2013 1 Outline We ll begin with motivation for the continued study of QCD, especially in the
More informationN-jettiness as a subtraction scheme for NNLO
N-jettiness as a subtraction scheme for NNLO! Xiaohui Liu based on:! arxiv:1504.02131, Boughezal, Focke, XL and Petriello arxiv:1505.03893, Boughezal, Focke, Giele, XL and Petriello arxiv:1504.02540, Boughezal,
More informationStatus of Higgs plus one jet at NNLO
Status of Higgs plus one jet at NNLO Matthieu Jaquier Physics Institute University of Zürich Radcor-Loopfest UCLA 7 th June 205 Based on work with X. Chen, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover Matthieu Jaquier
More informationTF 2 -Contributions to 3-Loop Deep-Inelastic Wilson Coefficients and the Asymptotic Representation of Charged Current DIS
1/30 TF 2 -Contributions to 3-Loop Deep-Inelastic Wilson Coefficients and the Asymptotic Representation of Charged Current DIS Alexander Hasselhuhn RISC (LHCPhenonet) 26.9.2013 in collaboration with: J.
More informationTowards improved predictions for electroweak vector boson pair production at the LHC
Towards improved predictions for electroweak vector boson pair production at the LHC Kirill Melnikov TTP KIT Based on collaboration with M. Dowling, F. Caola, J. Henn, A. Smirnov, V. Smirnov Outline 1)
More informationTwo-Loop Corrections to Top-Quark Pair Production
Two-Loop Corrections to Top-Quark Pair Production Andrea Ferroglia Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz Padova, June 2, 29 Outline 1 Top-Quark Pair Production at Hadron Colliders 2 NNLO Virtual Corrections
More informationNNLO antenna subtraction with one hadronic initial state
antenna subtraction with one hadronic initial state Alejandro Daleo, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zürich E-mail: adaleo@phys.ethz.ch, gehra@phys.ethz.ch Thomas Gehrmann,
More informationTheoretical description of Higgs production and decay
Theoretical description of Higgs production and decay Kirill Melnikov TTP KIT PITT -PACC Workshop ``Higgs and beyond, Pittsburgh, December 3-5, 2015 N Y X X Introduction The number of Higgs-related events
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 29 Aug 2006
IPPP/6/59 August 26 arxiv:hep-ph/6837v1 29 Aug 26 Third-order QCD results on form factors and coefficient functions A. Vogt a, S. Moch b and J.A.M. Vermaseren c a IPPP, Physics Department, Durham University,
More informationThe Two-Loop Five-Point Amplitude in N=4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory and N=8 Supergravity
The Two-Loop Five-Point Amplitude in N=4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory and N=8 Supergravity Lance Dixon (SLAC) S. Abreu, LD, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng 1812.08941, 1901.nnnnn DESY Zeuthen, 24 January 2019
More informationTop-Antitop Production at Hadron Colliders
Top-Antitop Production at Hadron Colliders Roberto BONCIANI Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Université Joseph Fourier/CNRS-INP3/INPG, F-3806 Grenoble, France HP.3rd GGI-Florence,
More informationδm W = 15 MeV δm top = 1 GeV
Precision SM physics at the LHC... what we hope to see (Bentvelsen, Grünewald) Repeat the electroweak fit changing the uncertainties δm W = 15 MeV δm top = 1 GeV same central values Michael Krämer Page
More informationSearching for Supersymmetric Higgs Bosons at the LHC
Searching for Supersymmetric Higgs Bosons at the LHC Tilman Plehn CERN Light neutral Higgs: no-lose-theorem Charged Higgs: bottom induced processes Heavy neutral Higgs: decay to two light Higgses MSSM
More informationSingle Higgs production at LHC as a probe for an anomalous Higgs self coupling
Single Higgs production at LHC as a probe for an anomalous Higgs self coupling Brookhaven National Laboratory E-mail: pgiardino@bnl.gov We explore the possibility of probing the trilinear Higgs self coupling
More informationAnomalous dimensions and splitting functions beyond the next-to-next-to-leading order
Anomalous dimensions and splitting functions beyond the next-to-next-to-leading order Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK E-mail: Andreas.Vogt@liverpool.ac.uk
More informationHiggs Pair Production: NLO Matching Uncertainties
Higgs Pair Production: NLO Matching Uncertainties Silvan Kuttimalai in collaboration with Stephen Jones November 7th, 2017 Higgs Couplings Workshop, Heidelberg Introduction Motivation: the Higgs Potential
More informationMadGolem: Automated NLO predictions for SUSY and beyond
David López-Val D. Gonçalves Netto (MPI, Munich), T. Plehn (Heidelberg U.), I. Wigmore (Edinburgh U.), K. Mawatari (Vrije U.) together with ITP - Universität Heidelberg SUSY 2013, Trieste (Italy) - August
More informationm H tanβ 30 LHC(40fb -1 ): LEP2: e + e Zh m A (GeV)
Charged Higgs Bosons Production in Bottom-Gluon Fusion Tilman Plehn, Madison MSSM Higgs Bosons at the LHC Why Bottom Parton Description? QCD Corrections -QCD Corrections MSSM Higgs Bosons at the LHC MSSM
More informationAssociated Higgs Production with Bottom Quarks at Hadron Colliders
Associated Higgs Production with Bottom Quarks at Hadron Colliders Michael Krämer (RWTH Aachen) Kickoff Meeting of the working group on Higgs and heavy quarks Wuppertal 1.-2.3. 2010 1 /25 Higgs production
More informationNNLO antenna subtraction with two hadronic initial states
NNLO antenna subtraction with two hadronic initial states Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland E-mail: radja@physik.uzh.ch Aude Gehrmann-De
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 1 Feb 2016
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION CP3-16-01, ZU-TH 27/15, NIKHEF 2016-004, CERN-TH-2016-006 High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC arxiv:1602.00695v1
More informationHiggs Production at LHC
Higgs Production at LHC Vittorio Del Duca INFN Torino Havana 3 April 2006 1 In proton collisions at 14 TeV, and for the Higgs is produced mostly via M H > 100 GeV gluon fusion gg H largest rate for all
More informationWeak boson scattering at the LHC
Weak boson scattering at the LHC RADCOR 2009 Barbara Jäger University of Würzburg outline weak boson fusion at the LHC: Higgs production at high precision V V jj production @ NLO QCD strongly interacting
More informationMultiloop scattering amplitudes in the LHC Era
Multiloop scattering amplitudes in the LHC Era Francesco Moriello Based on arxiv:1609.06685 In collaboration with: R. Bonciani, V. Del Duca, H. Frellesvig, J.M. Henn, V. Smirnov October 26, 2016 Outline
More informationNNLO Phenomenology Using Jettiness Subtraction
NNLO Phenomenology Using Jettiness Subtraction Radja Boughezal Radcor/Loopfest 2015, June 15-19, UCLA 1 Outline Motivation IR subtraction schemes at NNLO (local and non-local subtractions) The N-jettiness
More informationThe Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach
The Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach Costas G. Papadopoulos INPP, NCSR Demokritos Zurich, August 25, 2016 C.G.Papadopoulos (INPP) 5box QCD@LHC 2016 1 / 36 Introduction
More informationPhenomenology for Higgs Searches at the LHC
Phenomenology for Higgs Searches at the LHC in Composite Higgs Models Margherita Ghezzi Supervisor: dott. Roberto Contino Roma, 21/02/2012 Introduction Standard Model: SU(2) L U(1) Y U(1) Q Higgs mechanism
More informationAnalytic 2-loop Form factor in N=4 SYM
Analytic 2-loop Form factor in N=4 SYM Gang Yang University of Hamburg Nordic String Theory Meeting Feb 20-21, 2012, NBI Based on the work Brandhuber, Travaglini, GY 1201.4170 [hep-th] Brandhuber, Gurdogan,
More informationHIGGS BOSONS AT THE LHC
IGGS BOSONS AT TE LC Dieter Zeppenfeld Universität Karlsruhe, Germany SUSY06 UC Irvine, June 12-17, 2006 Goals of iggs Physics SM Channels MSSM: /A and ± Coupling measurements QCD Corrections VV vertex
More informationHigher-order QCD corrections to the Higgs-boson qt distribution
Higher-order QCD corrections to the Higgs-boson qt distribution Jun Gao Argonne National Laboratory June 5, 05 In collaboration with Radja Boughezal and Frank Petriello Radcor/Loopfest, UCLA 05 qq Motivation
More informationDiscontinuities of Feynman Integrals
CEA Saclay Brown University, Twelfth Workshop on Non-Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics June 10, 2013 Outline Landau and Cutkosky Classic unitarity cuts I I I Dispersion relations Modern unitarity method,
More informationAutomation of NLO computations using the FKS subtraction method
Automation of NLO computations using the FKS subtraction method Institute for Theoretical Physics, Universität Zürich E-mail: frederix@physik.uzh.ch In this talk the FKS subtraction method for next-to-leading
More informationComputing of Charged Current DIS at three loops
Computing of Charged Current DIS at three loops Mikhail Rogal Mikhail.Rogal@desy.de DESY, Zeuthen, Germany ACAT 2007, Amsterdam, Netherlands, April 23-28, 2007 Computing of Charged CurrentDIS at three
More informationTowards a more accurate prediction of W +b jets with an automatized approach to one-loop calculations
Towards a more accurate prediction of W +b jets with an automatized approach to one-loop calculations Laura Reina Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory Wernigerode, April 2012 Outline Motivations: W +b-jet
More informationIntroduction to perturbative QCD and factorization
Introduction to perturbative QCD and factorization Part 1 M. Diehl Deutsches Elektronen-Synchroton DESY Ecole Joliot Curie 2018 DESY Plan of lectures 0. Brief introduction 1. Renormalisation, running coupling,
More informationAlessandro Vicini University of Milano, INFN Milano
Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM Alessandro Vicini University of Milano, INFN Milano Padova, 15 febbraio 12 in collaboration with: E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi,
More informationPhysics at LHC. lecture one. Sven-Olaf Moch. DESY, Zeuthen. in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden
Physics at LHC lecture one Sven-Olaf Moch Sven-Olaf.Moch@desy.de DESY, Zeuthen in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden Humboldt-Universität, October 22, 2007, Berlin Sven-Olaf Moch Physics at LHC p.1 LHC
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 26 Nov 2017
Recent Developments in Higher-Order Calculations: Hard Functions at NLO with GoSam arxiv:1711.09462v1 [hep-ph] 26 Nov 2017 Alessandro Broggio a alessandro.broggio@tum.de Andrea Ferroglia b,c aferroglia@citytech.cuny.edu
More informationSummary and Outlook. Davison E. Soper University of Oregon. LoopFest V, June 2006
Summary and Outlook Davison E. Soper University of Oregon LoopFest V, June 2006 Parton Showers & jet matching R. Erbacher emphasized how important this issue is for CDF analyses. CDF has been using a somewhat
More informationSPLITTING FUNCTIONS AND FEYNMAN INTEGRALS
SPLITTING FUNCTIONS AND FEYNMAN INTEGRALS Germán F. R. Sborlini Departamento de Física, FCEyN, UBA (Argentina) 10/12/2012 - IFIC CONTENT Introduction Collinear limits Splitting functions Computing splitting
More informationUnderstanding Parton Showers
Understanding Parton Showers Zoltán Nagy DESY in collaboration with Dave Soper Introduction Pile-up events 7 vertices 2009 single vertex reconstructed! 2011 2010 4 vertices 25 vertices 2012 Introduction
More informationW/Z production with 2b at NLO
W/Z production with b at NLO Laura Reina Eugene, September 9 Motivations: main background to W H/ZH associated production; single-top production; H/A + b b and other signals of new physics; t t production;
More informationNon-planar two-loop Feynman integrals contributing to Higgs plus jet production
Non-planar two-loop Feynman integrals contributing to Higgs plus jet production Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics (TTP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Engesserstraße 7, D-76128 Karlsruhe,
More informationBACKGROUND EXPERIENCE AND THEORY INNOVATION FOR LHC
BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE AND THEORY INNOVATION FOR LHC Babis Anastasiou ETH Zurich PADOVA 20-01-2010 A theory revolution Deeper understanding of the structure of gauge theories Sharp theoretical predictions
More information