Chern-Simons invariants, SO(3) instantons, and Z/2-homology cobordism

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Chern-Simons invariants, SO(3) instantons, and Z/2-homology cobordism"

Transcription

1 Chern-Simons invariants, SO(3) instantons, and Z/2-homology cobordism Matthew Hedden and Paul Kirk Abstract. We review the SO(3) instanton gauge theory of Fintushel and Stern and recast it in the context of 4-manifolds with cylindrical ends. Applications to the Z/2 homology cobordism group of Z/2 homology 3-spheres are given. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Adapted bundles and instantons Adapted bundles The Pontryagin charge, instantons, and Chern-Simons invariants The moduli space Calculation of the index Compactness Reducible connections Enumeration of reducible instantons The argument of Furuta Computing Atiyah-Patodi-Singer ρ invariants and Chern-Simons invariants of flat SO(2) connections on rational homology spheres Seifert fibered examples Example: non Seifert fibered homology 3-spheres 29 References Introduction Among the many results of instanton gauge theory, one, due to Furuta, stands out because no alternative proof has been found despite enormous progress in gauge theory made through the Seiberg-Witten and Ozsváth-Szabó theories Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 57M25. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grants , , , and

2 2 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK Theorem (Furuta [16], see also [14]). The Seifert fibered integer homology 3- spheres Σ(p, q, pqk 1), k = 1, 2, are linearly independent in the homology cobordism group, Θ 3 H. Furuta proved this theorem using the machinery of instantons on pseudofree orbifolds, as developed by Fintushel and Stern [13, 14]. In light of the (perhaps imprecise) expectation that the geometric information contained in Donaldson theory should coincide with that of the more recent approaches to gauge theory, the difficulty in proving this theorem in the context of Seiberg-Witten or Ozsváth-Szabó theory is quite mysterious, and motivates the present work. The aim of this article is to revisit the technique used in the proof of Furuta s result and to recast it in the light of advances in the theory of instantons on manifolds with cylindrical ends. It is our hope that understanding the result in this context will increase its power as a tool for studying smooth cobordism or knot concordance, and will perhaps shed light on how one could extract similar information from the modern invariants. Before describing some of the nuances involved in the cylindrical end reformulation, we present the following application afforded by the present approach (see Theorem 3.3 for a stronger statement and Section 4 for further applications). Theorem 1. Suppose that p, q, d are relatively prime positive odd integers. For k d large enough, the rational homology spheres obtained by d k 1 surgeries on the righthanded (p, q) torus knot are linearly independent in the Z/2 homology cobordism group Θ 3 Z/2. As mentioned, the mechanism underlying Furuta s argument relied on the use of orbifold connections and the machinery of instantons on manifolds with cylindrical ends, introduced in Taubes s ground-breaking article [33]. Here, we reformulate the entire argument in terms of gauge theory on 4-manifolds with cylindrical ends in the manner pioneered by Taubes [33] and Floer [15]. This yields additional flexibility, in particular providing cobordism obstructions outside of the realm of pseudofree orbifolds. In addition, however, our treatment allows us to carefully address several technical points. In the present context we are forced to consider the L 2 moduli space of instantons when addressing the issue of compactness, and hence must appeal to the results of [28]. Here, the Chern-Simons invariants of flat connections provide a lower bound on the quanta of energy that can escape in a non-convergent sequence of instantons. It is perhaps implicit (if not explicitly stated) in [16] and [14] that the boundary 3-manifolds should not admit degenerate flat SO(3) connections, and in any case this is automatic when the boundary manifolds are lens spaces or Seifert fibered homology spheres Σ(p, q, r) with three singular fibers. But for more general 3- manifolds extra care with hypotheses is needed, and we hope our exposition provides this. In addition, new wrinkles arise in the enumeration of reducible instantons (see Theorem 2.16). These and other points are presented in a context that eschews orbifolds in favor of manifolds with cylindrical ends. This material can also be considered as a generalization of the results of Ruberman and Matić, [27, 32], which correspond to the case p 1 (E, α) = 0. In a companion article [18], we will use this machinery to show that a certain infinite family of untwisted, positive-clasped Whitehead doubles of torus knots is

3 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 3 linearly independent in the smooth concordance group. We anticipate many more applications to the study of concordance and cobordism groups. Finally, we remark that the general argument is reminiscent of techniques that use Casson-Gordon invariants to establish linear independence in the topological knot concordance group [19], and this intriguing similarity provides motivation for further study. Roughly speaking, in the context of Casson-Gordon invariants arguments focus on one prime p at a time and corresponding D 2p (dihedral) representations. Knots whose branched covers have no p-torsion in their homology contribute nothing to the obstruction to linear independence. In the Furuta/Fintushel-Stern argument, one focuses on the smallest Chern-Simons invariant of flat SO(3) connections. Homology spheres whose smallest Chern-Simons invariant exceed this minimum contribute nothing to the obstruction to linear independence. Acknowledgments: It is our pleasure to thank Tom Mrowka, Charles Livingston, and Ron Fintushel for many interesting conversations. The second author thanks the organizers of the inspiring Chern-Simons Gauge Theory: 20 years after conference. 2. Adapted bundles and instantons 2.1. Adapted bundles. We begin by reviewing Donaldson s description [9] of gauge theory on adapted bundles over 4-manifolds with cylindrical ends, in the context of SO(3) bundles. Given a flat SO(3) connection α on a 3-manifold Y, denote by Hα (Y ) the cohomology of Y with coefficients in the corresponding flat R 3 bundle. The flat connection α is called non-degenerate if Hα 1 (Y ) = 0. If Y is a rational homology sphere, then the trivial connection is non-degenerate. Consider a compact oriented 4-manifold X with boundary X = Y = c i=1 Y i, a disjoint union of closed 3-manifolds. Endow X with a Riemannian metric which is isometric to [ 1, 0] Y in a collar neighborhood of the boundary. Throughout the rest of this section, we make the following assumption. The 4-manifold X is path connected, satisfies H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0, and has non-empty boundary Y = c i=1 Y i which is a disjoint union of rational homology 3-spheres. Form the non-compact manifold X = X Y ( [0, ) Y ) by adding an infinitely long collar to each boundary component. Choose a Riemannian metric on X whose restriction to each cylinder is the product metric. The submanifold [0, ) Y i will be called an end of X. Definition 2.1. An adapted bundle (E, α) over X is an SO(3) vector bundle E X, together with a fixed flat connection α i on each end [0, ) Y i. We use α as shorthand for the set {α i }. Two adapted bundles (E, α) and (E, α ) are called equivalent if there is a bundle isomorphism from E to E identifying the flat connections α and α over [r, ) Y for some r 0. Any adapted bundle (E, α) is equivalent to one in which the flat connection α i on each end [0, ) Y i is in cylindrical form, that is α i = π ( α i ) where α i is a flat connection on Y i and π : [0, ) Y i Y i is the projection to the second factor. Indeed, since α is flat, there always exists a gauge transformation g : E E which equals the identity on the interior of X so that g (α) has this form, obtained by parallel transport along rays [0, ) {y}. We will tacitly assume that each α i

4 4 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK is in cylindrical form whenever convenient, and use the same notation α i for the restriction of this flat connection to Y i. Since X has non-empty boundary, SO(3) vector bundles over X are isomorphic if and only if their second Stiefel-Whitney classes are equal. In particular, if (E, α) and (E, α ) are equivalent adapted bundles over X, then w 2 (E) = w 2 (E ) The Pontryagin charge, instantons, and Chern-Simons invariants. Given any SO(3) connection A on a bundle E over a (not necessarily compact) 4 manifold, Z, let F(A) denote its curvature 2-form. Define the Pontryagin charge of A to be the real number (2.1) p 1 (A) = 1 8π 2 Z Tr(F(A) F(A)), provided this integral converges. When Z is closed, p 1 (A) = p 1 (E), [Z] Z. Definition 2.2. An SO(3) connection A on a Riemannian manifold Z is called an instanton if its curvature form satisfies the equation If A is an instanton, then p 1 (A) = 1 8π 2 Z F(A) = F(A). Tr(F(A) F(A)) = 1 8π 2 F(A) 2 L 2 whence p 1 (A) is defined and non-negative for any instanton A whose curvature has finite L 2 norm. Given an adapted bundle (E, α) over X, choose an SO(3) connection A 0 on E which extends the given flat connection α on the union of the ends. Then its curvature F(A 0 ) is supported on the compact submanifold X, and so p 1 (A 0 ) R is defined. Given any other extension A 1 of α, then Chern-Weil theory shows that Tr(F(A 1 ) F(A 1 )) = Tr(F(A 0 ) F(A 0 )) + dγ where γ = 1 0 Tr ( (A 0 A 1 ) 2F(tA 0 + (1 t)a 1 ) ) dt. See, for example, [36, Lemma 3.3]. Since A 0 A 1 vanishes on the collar, Stokes theorem implies that p 1 (A 0 ) = p 1 (A 1 ), so we denote this quantity by p 1 (E, α). Definition 2.3. Given a pair α 0, α 1 of SO(3) connections on the same bundle E over closed 3-manifold Y, define the relative Chern-Simons invariant, cs(y, α 0, α 1 ) R, by cs(y, α 0, α 1 ) = p 1 (R E, α), where α equals α 0 on (, 0] Y and α 1 on [1, ) Y. Definition 2.4. Given a connection α on an SO(3) bundle E over a closed 3- manifold Y, the bundle extend to a bundle with connection A over some 4-manifold Z with boundary Y, since H 3 (BSO(3)) = 0. Define the Chern-Simons invariant of α modulo Z, cs(y, α) R/Z by cs(y, α) = p 1 (A) mod Z. Since the integral of the first Pontryagin form of a connection over a closed 4- manifold is an integer, it follows that cs(y, α) is well defined in R/Z.

5 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 5 These two invariants are related by cs(y, α 0, α 1 ) = cs(y, α 1 ) cs(y, α 0 ) mod Z whenever the left side is defined. If α extends to a flat connection A over some 4-manifold then p 1 (A) = 0, and hence the Chern-Simons invariant modulo Z is a flat cobordism invariant. In particular, if E Y is the trivial bundle and α a flat connection on E, then cs(y, α) has a canonical lift to R, namely cs(y, θ, α), where θ denotes the trivial connection with respect to the given trivialization of E. Bundle automorphisms h : E E covering the identity which preserve the SO(3) structure group are called gauge transformations. The group G(E) of gauge transformations acts on the space of SO(3) connections A(E) by pullback. If g : E E is a gauge transformation, then cs(y, α, g (α)) equals p 1 (Ẽ), where Ẽ is the bundle over Y S1 obtained by taking the mapping torus of g. Since Y S 1 is closed, Chern-Weil theory implies that p 1 (Ẽ) is an integer, and so we conclude that cs(y, α, g (α)) Z. Notice that if g is homotopic to the identity gauge transformation, then the bundle Ẽ is isomophic to the pullback of E over Y via the projection π : Y S 1 Y, and hence cs(y, α, g (α)) = p 1 (π (E)) = 0. A similar argument shows that the integer cs(y, α, g (α)) depends only on the path component of g in G(E). It follows easily that the reduction modulo Z of cs(y, α 0, α 1 ) depends only on the orbits of α 0 and α 1 under the action of G(E). Similarly, cs(y, α) R/Z depends only on the orbit of α. Dold and Whitney proved that SO(3) bundles over 4-complexes are determined up to isomorphism by their second Stiefel-Whitney class w 2 and their first Pontryagin class p 1 [7]. Moreover, these are related by p 1 P(w 2 ) mod 4, where P : H 2 ( ; Z/2) H 4 ( ; Z/4) denotes the Pontryagin square, a cohomology operation which lifts the cup square H 2 ( ; Z/2) H 4 ( ; Z/2), y y 2. As a consequence, if Y is a Z/2 homology 3-sphere, then H 2 (Y S 1 ; Z/2) = 0, and so cs(y, α, g (α)) 4Z for any gauge transformation g The moduli space. Let (E, α) be an adapted bundle over X. The elliptic operators d αi d αi acting on even degree E Yi valued forms on Y i are selfadjoint with discrete spectrum. Choose (and fix for the remainder of this section) a δ > 0 smaller than the absolute value of any non-zero eigenvalue of any of the d αi d αi. Let f : X [0, ) be a smooth function which equals 0 on X and tδ on {t} Y i for t > 1. Then define the weighted Sobolev spaces L p,δ n of sections of bundles over X as the completion of the space of compactly supported sections with respect to the norm φ L p,δ := ef φ n L p n. Fix an extension A 0 of α to E. Identify E with so(e) via the identification R 3 = so(3) of SO(3) representations, and let SO(E) denote the SO(3) bundle automorphisms. Connections on E take the form A 0 + a for a 1-form a with values in E. Following [9, Chapter 4], define A δ (E, α) = {A 0 + a a L 3,δ 1 (Ω1 X (E))} and G δ (E, α) = {g SO(E) A0 g L 3,δ 1 (T X End(E))} (where A0 denotes the covariant derivative associated to A 0 ). Then pulling back connections extends to an action of the completions G δ (E, α) on A δ (E, α). The

6 6 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK moduli space M(E, α) of instantons on (E, α) is defined to be M(E, α) = {A A δ (E, α) F(A) = F(A)}/G δ (E, α). The idea underlying these definitions is that A δ (E, α) consists of connections that limit exponentially along the ends of X to α, and G δ (E, α) consists of gauge transformations that limit exponentially along the ends of X to a gauge transformation that stabilizes α. Definition 2.5. A reducible connection on (E, α) is a connection A in A δ (E, α) whose stabilizer Γ A G δ is non-trivial. Let M(E, α) red M(E, α) denote the subset of gauge equivalence classes of reducible instantons. Its complement M(E, α) \ M(E, α) red is denoted M(E, α). Restricting a gauge transformation to the fiber of E over a base point in X embeds the stabilizer Γ A in SO(3) and identifies it with the centralizer of the holonomy group of A at the base point. In particular, the subgroup G δ 0(E, α) G δ (E, α) of gauge transformations which restrict to the identity in the fiber of E over the base point of X acts freely on A δ (E, α), and the quotient SO(3) = G δ (E, α)/g δ 0(E, α) acts on A δ (E, α)/g δ 0(E, α) with stabilizers Γ A. The restriction of this action to the irreducible instantons defines a principal SO(3) bundle E M(E, α) called the base point fibration [13, Section 9] Calculation of the index. Define Ind + (E, α) to be the Fredholm index of the operator S δ A 0 = d A 0 d + A 0 : L 3,δ 1 (Ω1 X (E)) L 3,δ (Ω 0 X (E) Ω + X (E)) where Ω + denotes the self-dual 2-forms: ω = ω. The Atiyah-Patodi-Singer theorem can be used to calculate this index. Let η(y, α) denote the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer spectral invariant η(b α, 0) of the operator on Y : and let B α : Ω 0 Y (E Y ) Ω 1 Y (E Y ) Ω 0 Y (E Y ) Ω 1 Y (E Y ), B α (φ 0, φ 1 ) = ( d αφ 1, d α φ 0 + d α φ 1 ), ρ(y, α) = η(y, α) 3η(Y ), denote the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer ρ invariant of (Y, α). (In general, for a connection γ on a bundle V Y, ρ(y, γ) = η(y, γ) dim(v ) η(y, θ), where θ is the trivial connection on the trivial 1-dimensional line bundle.) The real number ρ(y, α) depends only on the gauge equivalence class of α. In general, the kernel of B αi equals the direct sum Hα 0 i (Y i ) Hα 1 i (Y i ) of the d αi -harmonic 0- and 1-forms on Y i with coefficients in the flat bundle supporting α i (see [9, Section 2.5.4]). The assumption that each flat connection α i is nondegenerate and the Hodge theorem imply that kerb α = c i=1 Hα 0 i (Y i ). Setting h α = dimhα 0(Y ) and h α i = dimhα 0(Y i) we conclude that h α = h αi. Note that ρ(y i, α i ) = 0 and h αi = 3 when α i has trivial holonomy, as such a connection is gauge equivalent to the trivial connection. The discussion following the proof of Proposition 3.15 of [2] shows that the index Ind + (E, α) is equal to the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer index IndS APS A 0 of the corresponding operator on (the compact manifold) X with Atiyah-Patodi-Singer boundary conditions. This uses the non-degeneracy of the α i to conclude that L 2 solutions

7 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 7 of S A0 φ = 0 decay along the ends faster than e tδ. Thus Ind + (E, α) can be computed using the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer theorem. For the convenience of the reader we outline the calculation; similar calculations can be found in the literature; for example it is a consequence of (the more general) [28, Proposition 8.4.1]. Let b + (X) denote the dimension of a maximal positive definite subspace of H 2 (X; R) with respect to the intersection form (see Section 2.6 below for the definition of the intersection form in this context). Proposition 2.6. Let (E, α) be an adapted bundle over a path connected 4- manifold X with c 1 boundary components. Assume further that the flat connection α i on each Y i is non-degenerate, and that H 1 (X; Q) = 0 = H 1 (Y ; Q). Then Ind + (E, α) = 2p 1 (E, α) 3(1 + b + (X)) (3 h αi ρ(y i, α i )). α inontrivial Proof. We use the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer index theorem [2] twice, once on the bundle E with operator S APS A 0 = d A 0 d + A 0 : L 2 1(Ω 1 X(E); P + α ) L 2 (Ω 0 X(E) Ω + X (E)) with index IndSA APS 0 = f X,E (R X, F(A 0 )) 1 2 (h α + η(y, α)), X and again on the trivial 1-dimensional R bundle with trivial connection with index S APS = d d + : L 2 1 (Ω1 X ; P + ) L 2 (Ω 0 X Ω+ X ) IndS APS = X f X,ǫ (R X, θ) 1 2 (h + η(y )). In these formulas P α + denotes the spectral projection onto the non-negative eigenspace of B α, and η(y i, α i ) and h α, are as above. The corresponding unadorned symbols refer to their analogues on the trivial, untwisted R bundle ǫ. Since Y i is a rational homology sphere, h = c. The (inhomogeneous) differential form f X,E (R X, F(A)) is a function of the Riemannian curvature R X and the curvature F(A) of a connection A. It equals ( dime 1 8π Tr(F(A) F(A)) )( (χ(r X) + σ(r X )) ), where χ(r X ) is the Euler form and σ(r X ) is the Hirzebruch signature form. Hence f X,E (R X, F(A)) = 2p 1 (A 0 ) + 3 f X,ǫ (R X, θ). X By convention, the integral of an inhomogeneous form over an n-manifold is defined to be the integral of its n-dimensional component. Since Ind + (E, α) is equal to IndSA APS 0, subtracting 3 IndS APS from IndSA APS 0 and simplifying yields (2.2) Ind + (E, α) = 2p 1 (E, α) + 3 IndS APS 1 2 ρ(y, α) (3c h α). To obtain the desired formula, we must show IndS APS = 1 b + (X). The kernel of S APS consists of L 2 harmonic 1-forms on X. Proposition 4.9 of [2] identifies this space with the image H 1 (X, Y ; R) H 1 (X; R). The hypothesis that H 1 (X; Q) = 0 (which holds, in any event, by our standing assumption that H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0) implies that H 1 (X; R) = 0, and so kers APS = 0. X

8 8 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK We now identify the cokernel of S APS. The cokernel is isomorphic to the kernel of the adjoint which, in turn, is isomorphic to the extended L 2 solutions to S φ = 0, i.e., the space of pairs φ = (φ 0, φ + ) Ω 0 X Ω + X satisfying dφ 0 + d φ + = 0 and for which (φ 0, φ + ) {t} Y γ decays exponentially on the collar for some harmonic form γ = (γ 0, γ 1 ) kerb on Y [2]. Since Y is a rational homology sphere, kerb = H 0 (Y ). It follows that γ = (γ 0, 0) where γ 0 is a harmonic 0-form, that is, a locally constant function on Y. Thus φ 0 {t} Y γ 0 and φ + {t} Y are exponentially decaying forms. Let X(t) = X ([0, t] Y ). Then dφ 0, d φ + L 2 (X(t)) = ± dφ 0 {t} Y, φ + {t} Y L 2 ({t} Y ) t 0 This implies that dφ 0 and d φ + are L 2 -orthogonal. Therefore, dφ 0 + d φ + = 0 implies that φ 0 is a harmonic 0 form (that is, a constant function) and φ + is an exponentially decaying harmonic self-dual 2-form. Since X is connected we conclude cokers APS = 1 + b + (X), and hence IndS APS = 1 b + (X). If α i has trivial holonomy, then ρ(y, α i ) = 0 and h αi = dimhα 0 i (Y ) = 3. Therefore, (2.3) ρ(y, α) + 3c h α = 3 h αi ρ(y i, α i ) = 3 h αi ρ(y i, α i ) i α inontrivial Combining Equations (2.2) and (2.3) yields the result. Suppose that one of the flat connections, say α 1, on the boundary component Y 1 is trivial with respect to some trivialization of E over Y 1. Suppose further that Z is a compact, negative definite 4 manifold with boundary Y 1 j W j, with the trivialized bundle Z R 3 Z over it. Then glue X to Z along Y 1 to produce the manifold X = X Y1 Z. Let E be the bundle over X obtained by gluing E to the trivial bundle using the given trivializations over Y 1. Extending the connection A 0 over X by the trivial connection over Z gives a new adapted bundle (E, α ) over X. Since p 1(E, α) = p 1 (E, α ), Proposition 2.6 then shows that Ind + (E, α) = Ind + (E, α ). If Ind + (E, α) 0, p 1 (E, α) > 0, and each α i is non-degenerate, then by varying the Riemannian metric inside X if necessary, M(E, α) is a smooth orientable manifold of dimension Ind + (E, α). In the present context this is a consequence of Lemma 8.8.4, Theorem and Remark of [28]. When consulting [28], it is useful to note that because we assume the flat connections α i are non-degenerate, the appropriate path components of the L 2 moduli spaces and thickened moduli spaces of [28] coincide with M(E, α). When p 1 (E, α) = 0, then M(E, α) is the moduli space of flat connections and hence is unchanged by varying the Riemannian metric on X. In this situation one can instead perturb the equation F(A) + F(A) = 0 to make M(E, α) a smooth orientable manifold of dimension Ind + (E, α); see [17, 9] Compactness. A critical question about M(E, α) is whether it is compact. To understand this, we define an invariant ˆτ(Y, α) (0, 4], essentially the minimal relative SO(3) Chern-Simons invariant over the path components of Y. This invariant provides a sufficient condition to guarantee compactness of M(E, α) (Proposition 2.9 below).

9 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 9 We first introduce some notation. For any path connected space Z and compact Lie group G, denote by χ(z, G) the space χ(z, G) = Hom(π 1 (Z), G)/conjugation. This space is a compact real algebraic variety and is analytically isomorphic to the space of gauge equivalence classes of flat G connections [12]. To a flat G connection α we associate its holonomy hol α χ(z, G). Notice that χ(z, G) is partitioned into disjoint compact subspaces corresponding to the isomorphism classes of G-bundles over Z which support the various flat connections. When Z is not path connected then take χ(z, G) to be the product of the χ(z i, G) over the path components Z i of Z. We can now define the invariant ˆτ(Y, α) (0, 4], which is an adaptation of invariants found in [16, 14] and [28, Definition 6.3.5] to our context. For each boundary component Y i of X, the bundle E Yi carries the flat connection α i and is determined up to isomorphism by the gauge equivalence class of α i. Hence α i determines its second Stiefel-Whitney class. Thus the holonomy gives a decomposition into a disjoint union (2.4) χ(y i, SO(3)) = w H 2 (Y i;z/2) χ(y i, SO(3)) w If γ is any flat connection on E Yi and g any gauge transformation of E Yi, then cs(y i, α i, γ) cs(y i, α i, g (γ)) is an integer, as explained in Section 2.2. This implies that cs(y i, α i, ) descends to a well-defined R/Z valued function on the compact subspace χ(y i, SO(3)) w2(e Yi ) χ(y i, SO(3)). This function is locally constant, see e.g. [21], and hence takes finitely many values in R/Z. This in turn implies that the set S(α i ) = {cs(y i, α i, γ) mod 4 γ a flat connection on E Yi } R/4Z is finite, since it is contained in the preimage of a finite set under R/4Z R/Z. At the moment, taking Chern-Simons invariants mod 4 might seem unmotivated, but it occurs for two reasons. First, in the compactness result below, energy can only bubble off at interior points in multiples of 4. Second, if Y i is a Z/2 homology sphere, then cs(y i, α i, γ) cs(y i, α i, g (γ)) = cs(y i, g (γ), γ) is in fact always four times an integer, as explained in Section 2.2. Definition 2.7. Let b : R/4Z (0, 4] be the obvious bijection. Define τ(y i, α i ) (0, 4] to be the minimal value which b attains on the set S(α i ). Informally, τ(y i, α i ) is the minimal relative Chern-Simons invariant cs(y i, α i, γ) for γ χ(y i, SO(3)) w2(e Yi ), taken modulo 4. Then define (2.5) ˆτ(Y, α) = min Y i X {τ(y i, α i )} (0, 4] Note that ˆτ(Y, α) depends only on Y = i Y i and the gauge equivalence classes of the flat connections α i. The following lemma will prove useful for estimating ˆτ(Y, α). We omit the proof, which is a simple consequence of the remarks in the paragraph following Definition 2.3.

10 10 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK Lemma 2.8. Let E Y be an SO(3) vector bundle over a closed 3-manifold and α, γ two flat connections on E. Choose any pair (W α, E α ) where W α is a 4- manifold with boundary Y, E α W α is a vector bundle extending E. Similarly choose (W γ, E γ ). Then cs(y, α, γ) mod 4, taken in (0, 4], is greater than or equal to the fractional part of p 1 (E γ, γ) p 1 (E α, α), taken in (0, 1]. In particular, if p 1 (E γ, γ) is rational with denominator dividing k Z >0 for all flat connections γ on E, then τ(y, α) 1 k for all α. As mentioned, ˆτ(Y, α) provides a sufficient condition for compactness of the moduli space. Proposition 2.9. Suppose that (E, α) is an adapted bundle with each α i nondegenerate and 0 p 1 (E, α) < ˆτ(Y, α). Then M(E, α) is compact. Proof. This follows from the convergence with no loss of energy theorem of Morgan-Mrowka-Ruberman [28, Theorem 6.3.3] which says that a sequence of gauge equivalence classes of finite energy instantons on (E, α) have a geometric limit which is the union of an idealized instanton on X and a union of finite energy instantons on tubes (see also [33] and [15] for earlier versions of this result). We give an outline and refer the reader to [28] for details. This result states that any sequence of gauge equivalence classes of instantons {[A i ]} i=1 in M(E, α) has a subsequence which converges in the following sense. The limit is a sequence of connections (A, B 1,, B k ), where A is an idealized instanton on an adapted bundle (E, α ) over X, and B j, j = 1,, k are instantons on the bundle R E Yij over R Y ij. Here i j {1, 2,, c}. More precisely, A is a smooth instanton away from a finite set of points {x m } in X, and the curvature density F(A ) 2 is the sum of a non-negative smooth function and a Dirac measure supported on these points with weight 32π 2 n m for some non-negative integers n m. The instantons B j on the cylinders have finite, positive energy: 0 < F(B j ) 2 <. In particular none of the B j are flat. The connections A and B j have compatible boundary values, which means that the formal sums of gauge equivalence classes of flat connections on Y = X are equal α α c = α α c + k j=1 ( lim r B j(r) lim r B j(r) ), where B j (r) = B j {r} Yij. Finally, no energy is lost, i.e. there is an equality of non-negative numbers (2.6) p 1 (E, α) = p 1 (E, α ) + k 4n m + p 1 (B j ). {x m} Since p 1 (E, α) < 4 and every term in (2.6) is non-negative, the idealized instanton A is necessarily an (honest) instanton, that is, each n m is zero, the set {x m } is empty, the bundle E equals E, and A is a smooth instanton on E. Informally, no energy can bubble off at interior points. Next, suppose that k > 0. Then the identification of the limiting flat connections implies that one of the instantons B j on R E Yij over R Y ij has left handed limit one of the α i, that is, lim r B j (r) = α ij. Denote by γ the limit j=1

11 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 11 lim r B j (r). Then p 1 (B j ) cs(y ij, α ij, γ) mod 4, and since B j is not flat, p 1 (B j ) > 0. Therefore p 1 (B j ) τ(y ij, α ij ) ˆτ(Y, α) > p 1 (E, α), which is impossible, since every term in (2.6) is non-negative. Therefore k = 0. Informally, no energy can escape down the ends of X. Thus A M(E, α), as desired Reducible connections. We now discuss reducible adapted bundles and reducible connections. We first remind the reader of the extended intersection form of a 4-manifold whose boundary is a union of rational homology spheres. Start with the pairing H 2 (X; Z) H 2 (X, Y ; Z) Z, x y = (x y) [X, Y ]. Let d be any positive integer so that d H 2 (Y ; Z) = 0. Then this produces a well-defined pairing (2.7) H 2 (X; Z) H 2 (X; Z) 1 d Z by x y := 1 d (x z), where z H2 (X, Y ; Z) satisfies i (z) = d y. This can also be described as the restriction of the composite H 2 (X; Z) H 2 (X; Z) H 2 (X; R) H 2 (X; R) = H 2 (X, Y ; R) H 2 (X, Y ; R) H 4 (X, Y ; R) = R. Note that x y = 0 if x or y is a torsion class. Thus we say X has a negative definite intersection form or more briefly X is negative definite if x x < 0 whenever x is not a torsion class. One defines positive definite analogously. Call X indefinite if it is neither positive nor negative definite. Let b + (X) denote the maximal dimension of any subspace of H 2 (X; R) on which the intersection form is positive definite, and similarly define b (X). The assumption that X has boundary a union of rational homology 3-spheres implies that dim(h 2 (X; R)) = b + (X) + b (X). Therefore b + (X) = 0 if and only if X is negative definite. If X is indefinite, then for a generic Riemannian metric the moduli space M(E, α) is a smooth manifold. However, in contrast to some arguments in gauge theory, the argument of [14, 16] makes use of the fact that reducibles cannot be perturbed away when X is negative definite. This technique originates in Donaldson s proof of his celebrated theorem that definite intersection forms of closed smooth 4-manifolds are diagonalizable [8]. Therefore we make the following assumption for the remainder of this section: The intersection form of X is negative definite; that is, x x < 0 unless x is a torsion class. Near the orbit of a reducible instanton A, an application of the slice theorem shows that M(E, α) has the structure V/Γ A for a vector space V of dimension Ind + (E, α) + dimγ A [9, Theorem 4.13]. This is understood by considering the base point fibration (described above) SO(3) A δ (E, α)/g0 δ (E, α) A δ (E, α)/g δ (E, α). Restricting to M(E, α) gives an SO(3) action on a smooth manifold of dimension Ind + (E, α) + 3 with quotient M(E, α) and stabilizer Γ A over the instanton A.

12 12 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK Subgroups of SO(3) have several possible centralizers, and this can lead to different types of singularities in the instanton moduli space. For our purposes, it is sufficient to deal solely with orbit types of reducibles that have SO(2)-stabilizers. In light of our assumption that H 1 (X) has no 2-torsion, we can ensure this with the following (which, hereafter, will be assumed unless otherwise stated): The adapted bundle (E, α) is non-trivial. Equivalently, α does not extend to a connection on E with trivial holonomy. In typical applications either the bundle E is non-trivial, or else one of the α i has non-trivial holonomy, and so the assumption holds. With this assumption, the singularities of M(E, α) are cones on CP n, where 2n + 1 = Ind + (E, α). If n > 0 the second Stiefel-Whitney class of the base point fibration E M(E, α) restricts on the link of each reducible instanton to the generator of H 2 (CP n ; Z/2) = Z/2 [13, Section 9]. Suppose there exists a reducible connection A A δ (E, α). Since Γ A centralizes the holonomy group of A, the assumptions that (E, α) is non-trivial and H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0 imply that Γ A is conjugate to SO(2) SO(3). Moreover, for each boundary component Y i, α i is a reducible flat connection on Y i whose stabilizer contains a maximal torus. The action of Γ A on the fiber E x of E over a point x X gives a splitting E x = L x ǫ x, where ǫ x is the 1-eigenspace of Γ A and L x is its 2-dimensional orthogonal complement on which Γ A acts non-trivially. Parallel transport using A then gives a decomposition E = L A ǫ A into the sum of an orthogonal plane bundle bundle L A and a real line bundle ǫ A. The bundle ǫ A is trivial since H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0. A choice of trivialization of ǫ A together with the orientation of E determines an orientation (and hence the structure of an SO(2) vector bundle) on L A. The connection A splits correspondingly as the direct sum of connections A = a θ, where s an SO(2) connection on L A and θ is the trivial connection on the trivial bundle. In particular, the connection α i on each end splits as α i = β i θ on L A Yi ǫ, where β i = lim r a {r} Yi. The flat connection β i is essentially uniquely determined by the subbundle L A Y E Y, as the following lemma shows. Lemma Every SO(2) vector bundle L over a rational homology sphere Z admits a flat SO(2) connection. Moreover, given any two flat SO(2) connections β, β on L, there exists a path of SO(2) gauge transformations g t with g 0 the identity and g 1 (β ) = β. Proof. For simplicity identify SO(2) with U(1). Choose any U(1) connection b on L. Since H 2 (Z; R) = 0, the real form i 2πF(b) is exact. Adding a 1-form iω to b changes F(b) to F(b)+idω, and so there exists an ω for which F(b + iω) = 0, i.e. β = b + iω is flat. The group of gauge transformations of the bunlde L, G(L) = C (Z, U(1)), has a single path component, since [Z, U(1)] = H 1 (Z; Z) = 0. A flat connection β on L has a holonomy representation hol β χ(π 1 Z, U(1)) = Hom(π 1 Z, U(1)) = H 1 (Z; R/Z). The Bockstein in the coefficient exact sequence H 1 (Z; R/Z) H 2 (Z; Z) takes hol β to c 1 (L) (see below) and is an isomorphism since Z is a rational homology sphere.

13 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 13 Since the holonomy determines the gauge equivalence class of a flat connection, it follows that any two flat connections β, β on L are gauge equivalent, and that there is a path g t of gauge transformations with g 0 = Id and g1 (β ) = β. The relationship between the holonomy U(1) representation and the first Chern class used in the proof of Lemma 2.10 can be explained in the following way. Let U(1) d denote U(1) with the discrete topology. The identity map i : U(1) d U(1) induces a map Bi : BU(1) d BU(1) on classifying spaces. Since BU(1) d = K(R/Z, 1) and BU(1) = K(Z, 2), we have a sequence of (natural) isomorphisms for any finite abelian group A Hom(A, U(1)) = H 1 (K(A, 1); R/Z) = [K(A, 1), BU(1) d ] Bi [K(A, 1), BU(1)] = H 2 (K(A, 1); Z). The identity map BU(1) BU(1), viewed as a class in H 2 (BU(1); Z), is the first Chern class of the universal line bundle, and so naturality implies that a homomorphism h : A U(1) is sent to c 1 (L), where L is the pull back of the universal bundle via K(A, 1) Bh K(U(1) d, 1) Bi BU(1). Moreover, the map Bi can be identified with the Bockstein. Given a manifold W equipped with a homomorphism h : π 1 (W) U(1) with finite image, view h as an element of H 1 (W; R/Z). Then h is sent by the Bockstein to the first Chern class of the U(1) bundle that supports a flat connection with holonomy h. In the case of a rational homology 3-sphere Z, we have a sequence of isomorphisms Hom(π 1 (Z), Q/Z) = Hom(H 1 (Z), Q/Z) = H 1 (Z; Q/Z) B H 2 (Z; Z) [Z] H 1 (Z; Z) with B the Bockstein and the last isomorphism Poincaré duality. The inverse of this composite is given by the linking form, m lk(m, ) : H 1 (Z; Z) Q/Z. Thus we have shown the following. Lemma Suppose Z is a rational homology 3-sphere and c 1 H 2 (Z; Z) a class with Poincaré dual m H 1 (Z; Z). Then the holonomy of the flat U(1) bundle with first Chern class c 1 is given by hol(γ) = lk(m, γ), where is the linking form. lk : H 1 (Z; Z) H 1 (Z; Z) Q/Z exp(2πi ) U(1) Identifying U(1) and SO(2) via C = R 2 allows us to make the analogous statement, substituting the Euler class for c 1. Suppose that (E, α) is an adapted bundle which admits a reducible connection A. Then (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ), where β is unique in the sense of Lemma Conversely, if ǫ E is a trivializable real line bundle and L the orthogonal 2-plane bundle, then orient ǫ (and hence L). Let β denote the flat SO(2) connection carried by L over the end and set α = β θ. Extend β to a connection a on L. Then A = a θ is a reducible connection in A(E, α). This establishes the first assertion in the following lemma. Lemma An adapted bundle (E, α) supports a reducible connection if and only if there exists a nowhere zero section s of E, and hence a splitting E = L ǫ

14 14 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK with L the orthogonal complement of ǫ = spans, and, on the ends, α = β θ where β is the (unique up to homotopy) flat connection on L. If an adapted bundle (E, α) supports a reducible connection inducing a splitting E = L ǫ, it supports a reducible instanton in M(E, α) inducing the same splitting. Proof. The first part was justified in the preceding paragraph. Suppose that (E, α) = (L, β θ). Since Y is a union of rational homology spheres, Proposition 4.9 of [2] shows that the space of L 2 harmonic 2-forms {ω L 2 (Ω 2 X ) dω = 0 = d ω} maps isomorphically to H 2 (X; R). Thus there exists an L 2 harmonic 2-form ω on X representing the class e(l) H 2 (X; R). In light of the facts that X is negative definite, the Hodge -operator preserves L 2 harmonic 2-forms, and 2 = 1, it follows that ω = ω. Choose a connection a on L. Then 1 2π Pf(F(a)) and ω are cohomologous by Chern-Weil Theory, where Pf denotes the pfaffian of an so(2) matrix. By adding an so(2) valued 1-form to a one can change Pf(F(a)) arbitrarily within its cohomology class. Thus we may choose a so that 1 2π Pf(F(a)) = ω. The connection a limits to a flat connection on L along the ends. Thus Lemma 2.10 implies a limits to h 1 (β) for some gauge transformation h : L Y L Y which can be connected to the identity by a path of gauge transformations. Extend h to a gauge transformation h of all of L by the identity on X, the path from the identity to h on [0, 1] Y, and h on [1, ) Y. Replacing a by h(a) does not change F(a) since SO(2) is abelian, and h(a) limits to β. Let A = h(a) θ on the SO(3) vector bundle L ǫ. Then A is a reducible instanton on (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ) with L 2 -curvature. Since we assumed that the flat connection α on Y is non-degenerate, it follows from [9, Theorem 4.2] that A L p,δ 1 and so A M(E, α). The following proposition determines the Pontryagin charge of a reducible instanton in terms of the intersection form. Proposition Let e H 2 (X; Z). Let L X be the SO(2) vector bundle with Euler class e. Let β be the flat connection on the restriction L Y, and (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ) the corresponding adapted bundle. Then p 1 (E, α) = e e 1 d Z and w 2(E) e mod 2. Proof. Choose (arbitrarily) a connection a 0 on L which extends the flat connection β on the ends, and let A 0 = a 0 θ be the corresponding connection on E = L ǫ; this connection agrees with α = β θ over the ends, and hence lies in A δ (E, α). Let ê denote the differential 2-form on X ê = 1 2π Pf(F(a 0)). A straightforward calculation starting with the formula for the inclusion of Lie algebras so(2) so(3) gives 1 8π 2 Tr(F(A 0) F(A 0 )) = 1 2 Tr( 1 2π F(A 0) 1 2π F(A 0)) = 1 2π Pf(F(a 0)) 1 2π Pf(F(a 0)) = ê ê.

15 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 15 Hence p 1 (A 0 ) = p 1 (E, α) = ê ê. X Chern-Weil theory implies that ê is a closed 2-form. It vanishes on the ends since a 0 is flat on the ends. On a closed 4-manifold Z Chern-Weil theory implies that ê represents (in DeRham cohomology) the image of the Euler class e under the coefficient homomorphism H 2 (Z; Z) H 2 (Z; R). Since H 2 (X; R) = Hom(H 2 (X; Z), R) and every class in H 2 (X; Z) is represented by a closed surface, it follows that ê represents the image of e in H 2 (X; R). For x, y H 2 (X, Y ; R) represented by closed forms that vanish on the boundary, x y = X x y. Since H2 (X, Y ; R) H 2 (X; R) is an isomorphism, it follows that p 1 (E, α) = ê ê = e e. X The congruence w 2 (E) e mod 2 follows from the general congruence w 2 (L ǫ) e(l) mod 2, which is valid for any SO(2) bundle L over any space Enumeration of reducible instantons. We next address the problem of enumerating the reducible instantons in M(E, α). The results of the previous section allow us to reduce this problem to the enumeration of bundle reductions. These in turn determine certain cohomology classes and motivate the following definition. Definition Let (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ) with L non-trivial. Fix an orientation of ǫ, orienting L. Let e = e(l) H 2 (X; Z) denote the Euler class of L. Define C(e) = {e H 2 (X; Z) e e = e e, e e mod 2, i j (e ) = ±i j (e), j = 1,, c}/±1 where i j : Y j Y X denotes the inclusion of the jth boundary component. Our standing assumption that X is negative definite implies that C(e) is a finite set. Suppose that L, L are two orthogonal plane subbundles of E and that (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ) = (L ǫ, β θ). Orient L and L arbitrarily and let e = e(l), e = e(l ). Then e e mod 2 and e e = e e by Proposition Fix a boundary component Y j of X. If α j is non-trivial, then since β j θ = α j = β j θ, the unoriented subbundles L Yj and L Yj are equal, since their orthogonal complements coincide. But if α j is the trivial connection, L Yi and L Yi need not coincide, although they are both trivial bundles. In either case, i j (e) = ±i j (e ). Changing the orientation of L changes the sign of e. Since X is connected, it follows that the function taking a reducible connection A A δ (L ǫ, β θ) red to e(l A ) C(e) is well-defined. Proposition The function Φ : M(E, α) red C(e) defined by Φ([A]) = e(l A )/±1 is well-defined and injective. If C(e) consists of a single point then Φ is a bijection. Proof. We first show that Φ is well-defined on gauge equivalence classes. Suppose that A is a reducible instanton on (E, α) and g G δ (E, α) a gauge transformation. Then the decomposition E = L A ǫ is sent to E = g(l A ) g(ǫ). Hence L A and g(l A ) are isomorphic bundles over X, and so Φ(A) = Φ(g(A)). Thus Φ is well-defined on gauge equivalence classes.

16 16 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK Suppose that A and B are reducible instantons on (E, α) which satisfy Φ(A) = Φ(B). Then, after reorienting L B and ǫ B if needed, e(l A ) = e(l B ). Since SO(2) bundles are determined up to isomorphism by their Euler class, there exists a bundle isomorphism h : L A L B. Extending by the unique orthogonal orientationpreserving isomorphism I : ǫ A ǫ B produces a bundle isomorphism g = h I : E = L A ǫ A L B ǫ B = E. Since the decompositions agree on the ends with the given decomposition (E, α), lim r g {r} Yj exists and lies in the stabilizer of α j, so that g G δ (E, α). Therefore, A and B represent the same point in M(E, α). Lemma 2.12 shows that M(L ǫ, β θ) is non-empty, and so if C(e) = {e}, Φ is surjective. Determining the image of Φ can be tricky when Y is not a union of Z/2 homology spheres. Lemma 2.12 shows that e = e(l) itself is always in the image, and hence, as noted in Proposition 2.15, if C(e) consists of a single point, then Φ is a bijection. Theorem Let (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ) be a reducible adapted bundle with Euler class e = e(l) and let Φ : M(E, α) red C(e) be the injective function defined above. (1) If H 2 (X; Z) splits orthogonally with respect to the intersection form as H 2 (X; Z) = span(e) W with span(e) = Z and W free abelian, then C(e) consists of a single point and so Φ is a bijection. (2) To each e C(e) one can assign an obstruction in H 1 (Y ; Z/2) whose vanishing implies that e = Φ([A]) has a solution [A] M(E, α) red. (3) If each component of Y is a Z/2 homology sphere, then Φ is a bijection. Proof. Suppose first that H 2 (X; Z) splits orthogonally with respect to the intersection form as H 2 (X; Z) = span(e) W. Then any class e satisfying e e mod 2 takes the form e = (1 + 2k)e + 2w, with w W. Hence e e = (1 + 4k + 4k 2 )e e + 4w w. If e C(e) then e e = e e, so that 4(k 2 + k)e e + 4w w = 0. Since e e < 0 and w w 0, this is possible if and only if k = 0 or 1 and w = 0, so that e = ±e, as claimed. We turn now to the second assertion, which clearly implies the third assertion. Given a class e C(e), let L X be an SO(2) vector bundle with e = e(l ). Then since e e mod 2, the bundles E = L ǫ and L ǫ over X are isomorphic. Fix an identification E = L ǫ = L ǫ. Let β j be the unique flat connection on L Yj, β j be the unique flat connection on L Yj. Then α j = β j θ and α j = β j θ are two flat connections on E Yj. If there exists a gauge transformation g : E E so that g Y j (α j ) = α j, then Lemma 2.12 implies that there exists an instanton A M(E, α) inducing the splitting E = g(l ) g(ǫ ), and hence e = Φ(A ) has the solution A. So we seek to construct such a gauge transformation g. We construct g first on the boundary and the try to extend over the interior. For each j, choose an isomorphism h j : L Yj L Yj which preserves or reverses orientation according to whether i j (e ) = i j (e) or i j (e ) = i j (e) (if 2i j (e) = 0 choose h j to preserve orientation, for definiteness). Then h j (β j ) and β j are flat connections on L Yj and so we may assume, by modifying β j if needed, that h j (β j ) = β j. Let g j : E Yj = L Yj ǫ E = L Yj ǫ be the unique orientationpreserving orthogonal extension (so that on the trivial R factors, the orientation is

17 CHERN-SIMONS INVARIANTS, INSTANTONS, AND Z/2-HOMOLOGY COBORDISM 17 preserved or reversed according to the sign). By construction, gj (α j ) = α j. Let g = j g j : E Y E Y. The stabilizer of α j is connected except for those j for which i j (e) has order 2, in which case the stabilizer is isomorphic to O(2). Thus the desired gauge transformation exists if and only if g can be extended to a gauge transformation over X, after perhaps composing g j with an appropriate gauge transformation k j for those path components such that i j (e) has order 2. Let P be the principal SO(3) bundle associated to E X, so that gauge transformations are sections of P Ad SO(3). Obstruction theory identifies the primary obstruction to extending g to all of X as a class ψ H 2 (X, Y ; π 1 (SO(3))) = H 2 (X, Y ; Z/2). Naturality of primary obstructions, together with the fact that P Ad SO(3) admits sections (e.g. the identity transformation) shows that ψ is in kerh 2 (X, Y ; Z/2) H 2 (X; Z/2), hence ψ lies in the image of the injection H 1 (Y ; Z/2) H 2 (X, Y ; Z/2). Let ϑ H 2 (Y ; Z/2) denote the unique element mapped to ψ. When ϑ = 0, then g extends over the 2-skeleton of X. It further extends further to the 3-skeleton, because π 2 (SO(3)) = 0. The last obstruction to extending g over X lies in H 4 (X, Y ; π 3 (SO(3))) = H 4 (X, Y ; Z); the coefficients are untwisted since our standing assumption that H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0 implies that π 1 (X) admits no nontrivial homomorphisms to Aut(Z) = Z/2. This class is the obstruction to extending g over the top cell of X/Y. Suppose that D X is a fixed 4-ball, and that g : E X\D E X\D is the gauge transformation which we wish to extend to all of E. Choose a connection A A δ (L ǫ, β L θ). The connection g (A X\D ) extends to a connection B A δ (L ǫ, β L θ ). Since Tr(F(g (A)) F(g (A))) = Tr(F(A) F(A)) pointwise (on X \ D), it follows that (2.8) p 1 (A) p 1 (B) = 1 8π 2 D Tr(F(A) F(A)) 1 8π 2 D Tr(F(B) F(B)), The condition e e = e e implies that p 1 (A) = p 1 (B), and hence the left side of Equation (2.8) is zero. But Chern-Weil theory implies that the right side of Equation (2.8) equals p 1 (V ), where V is the bundle over S 4 obtained by clutching two copies of E D using g D. Since p 1 (V ) = 0, the bundle V is trivial, and thus the restriction of g to D extends over D, giving the desired gauge transformation g. Thus we have seen that there is a class ϑ H 1 (Y ; Z/2) whose vanishing guarantees that g extends over X The argument of Furuta. With all the necessary machinery in place, we can now describe our variant of the argument of Furuta. Theorem 2.17 provides the mechanism to establish that certain definite 4-manifolds cannot exist. Furuta used this argument to prove the linear independence of the Seifert fibered homology spheres {Σ(p, q, pqk 1)} k=1 in Θ3 H. We will give further applications below. Recall from Section 2.6 that if X is a negative definite four-manifold satisfying H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0, and X consists of a union of rational homology spheres, then any SO(2) bundle L determines a unique adapted SO(3) bundle (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ). Letting e(l) denote the Euler class of L, Proposition 2.13 shows that p 1 (E, α) =

18 18 MATTHEW HEDDEN AND PAUL KIRK e(l) e(l) 1 d Z, where d is an integer which annihilates H 1(Y i ; Z) for each i. Finally, recall the invariant ˆτ(Y, α) (0, 4] of Definition 2.7. Theorem Let X be a negative definite 4-manifold with H 1 (X; Z/2) = 0 whose boundary consists of a union of rational homology spheres. Let L be an SO(2) bundle over X with Euler class e = e(l), and let (E, α) = (L ǫ, β θ) be the corresponding adapted bundle. Assume that (1) Each α i = β i θ is non-degenerate, (2) Ind + (E, α) 0, where Ind + (E, α) = 2e e (3) 0 < e e < ˆτ(Y, α) 4. β inontrivial (3 h αi ρ(y i, α i )). Then the number of gauge equivalence classes of reducible instantons on (E, α) is even, greater than 1, and Ind + (E, α) is odd. Proof. The irreducible moduli space M(E, α) is a smooth oriented manifold of dimension Ind + (E, α). Let k denote the number of singular points in the full moduli space. Proposition 2.15 identifies k with the image of Φ : M(E, α) red C(L), and shows that k 1. Each singular point A M(E, α) red has a neighborhood homeomorphic to a cone on CP n for some n, and so 2n + 1 = Ind + (E, α). Proposition 2.9 implies that M(E, α) is compact. Removing cone neighborhoods of the k singular points yields a 2n + 1 dimensional compact manifold M 0, whose boundary consists of a disjoint union of k copies of CP n (perhaps with differing orientations). This manifold is equipped with an SO(3) bundle E M 0 that restricts to a bundle on each CP n with nontrivial second Stiefel-Whitney class. Since H (CP n ; Z/2) is a polynomial ring on w 2, 0 w 2 (E CP n) n for each boundary component. But since ( k i=1 CP n, E) extends to (M 0, E), it follows that k is even, as this is the only way for the Stiefel-Whitney numbers of ( k i=1 CP n, E) to vanish Computing Atiyah-Patodi-Singer ρ invariants and Chern-Simons invariants of flat SO(2) connections on rational homology spheres. Before we turn to applications and examples we discuss the use of flat cobordisms to compute the ρ invariants and Chern-Simons invariants which appear in the expression for Ind + (E, α) and the definition of ˆτ(Y, α). The Atiyah-Patodi-Singer ρ invariants of flat SO(3) connections on 3-manifolds can be difficult to compute. However, in Theorem 2.17 we require Y to be a union of rational homology spheres and the flat connection α to be reducible; in fact, to take the form α = β θ for θ the trivial connection. Thus, what is required in applications of this theorem is a calculation of ρ invariants of such reducible flat SO(3) connections on rational homology spheres. This is an easier task, and can often be accomplished as follows. Since ρ(y, α) depends only on the gauge equivalence class of α, and taking the holonomy induces a 1-1 correspondence from gauge equivalence classes of flat connections to conjugacy classes of homomorphisms π 1 (Y ) SO(3), we henceforth use the notation α for both a flat connection and its holonomy.

Rohlin s Invariant and 4-dimensional Gauge Theory. Daniel Ruberman Nikolai Saveliev

Rohlin s Invariant and 4-dimensional Gauge Theory. Daniel Ruberman Nikolai Saveliev Rohlin s Invariant and 4-dimensional Gauge Theory Daniel Ruberman Nikolai Saveliev 1 Overall theme: relation between Rohlin-type invariants and gauge theory, especially in dimension 4. Background: Recall

More information

Cobordant differentiable manifolds

Cobordant differentiable manifolds Variétés différentiables cobordant, Colloque Int. du C. N. R. S., v. LII, Géométrie différentielle, Strasbourg (1953), pp. 143-149. Cobordant differentiable manifolds By R. THOM (Strasbourg) Translated

More information

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang Mathematical Research Letters 2, 305 310 (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS Shuguang Wang Abstract. It is shown that the quotients of Kähler surfaces under free anti-holomorphic involutions

More information

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula 20 VASILY PESTUN 3. Lecture: Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer Index theorems 3.. Index for a holomorphic vector bundle. For a holomorphic vector bundle E over a complex variety of dim

More information

Introduction (Lecture 1)

Introduction (Lecture 1) Introduction (Lecture 1) February 2, 2011 In this course, we will be concerned with variations on the following: Question 1. Let X be a CW complex. When does there exist a homotopy equivalence X M, where

More information

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 1. Basic elements of J-holomorphic curve theory Let (M, ω) be a symplectic manifold of dimension 2n, and let J J (M, ω) be

More information

NOTES ON FIBER BUNDLES

NOTES ON FIBER BUNDLES NOTES ON FIBER BUNDLES DANNY CALEGARI Abstract. These are notes on fiber bundles and principal bundles, especially over CW complexes and spaces homotopy equivalent to them. They are meant to supplement

More information

Hans U. Boden, Christopher M. Herald, and Paul Kirk

Hans U. Boden, Christopher M. Herald, and Paul Kirk Mathematical Research Letters 8, 589 603 (2001) AN INTEGER VALUED SU(3) CASSON INVARIANT Hans U. Boden, Christopher M. Herald, and Paul Kirk Abstract. We define an integer valued invariant of homology

More information

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY M. F. ATIYAH, V. K. PATODI AND I. M. SINGER 1 Main Theorems If A is a positive self-adjoint elliptic (linear) differential operator on a compact manifold then

More information

Exotic spheres. Overview and lecture-by-lecture summary. Martin Palmer / 22 July 2017

Exotic spheres. Overview and lecture-by-lecture summary. Martin Palmer / 22 July 2017 Exotic spheres Overview and lecture-by-lecture summary Martin Palmer / 22 July 2017 Abstract This is a brief overview and a slightly less brief lecture-by-lecture summary of the topics covered in the course

More information

L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S

L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S L A U R E N T I U M A X I M U N I V E R S I T Y O F W I S C O N S I N - M A D I S O N L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S i Contents 1 Basics of Homotopy

More information

Scalar curvature and the Thurston norm

Scalar curvature and the Thurston norm Scalar curvature and the Thurston norm P. B. Kronheimer 1 andt.s.mrowka 2 Harvard University, CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CAMBRIDGE MA 02139 1. Introduction Let Y be a closed,

More information

Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons

Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons Lincoln College Oxford University (slides posted at users.ox.ac.uk/ linc4221) The ASD Equation in Low Dimensions, 17 November 2017 Moduli and Invariants

More information

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4) Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4) February 5, 2014 Let k be an algebraically closed field, let X be a algebraic curve over k (always assumed to be smooth and complete), and

More information

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year Part II Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2017 Paper 3, Section II 18I The n-torus is the product of n circles: 5 T n = } S 1. {{.. S } 1. n times For all n 1 and 0

More information

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f)) 1. Basic algebra of vector fields Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over R. Recall that V = {L : V R} is defined to be the set of all linear maps to R. V is isomorphic to V, but there is no canonical

More information

Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem

Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem Richard Wong Differential Topology Term Paper December 2, 2016 1 Introduction Given the classification of low dimensional manifolds up to equivalence relations such

More information

An introduction to cobordism

An introduction to cobordism An introduction to cobordism Martin Vito Cruz 30 April 2004 1 Introduction Cobordism theory is the study of manifolds modulo the cobordism relation: two manifolds are considered the same if their disjoint

More information

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES 1 CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES Andrew Ranicki Index theory seminar 14th February, 2011 2 The Index Theorem identifies Introduction analytic index = topological index for a differential operator on a compact

More information

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = a M T am, called the tangent bundle, is itself a smooth manifold, dim T M = 2n. Example 1.

More information

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD () Instanton (definition) (2) ADHM construction (3) Compactification. Instantons.. Notation. Throughout this talk, we will use the following notation:

More information

Cohomology and Vector Bundles

Cohomology and Vector Bundles Cohomology and Vector Bundles Corrin Clarkson REU 2008 September 28, 2008 Abstract Vector bundles are a generalization of the cross product of a topological space with a vector space. Characteristic classes

More information

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero. Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group

More information

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties David Baraglia The University of Adelaide Adelaide, Australia 29 May 2014 GEAR Junior Retreat, University of Michigan David Baraglia (ADL) Higgs Bundles and Character

More information

4-MANIFOLDS: CLASSIFICATION AND EXAMPLES. 1. Outline

4-MANIFOLDS: CLASSIFICATION AND EXAMPLES. 1. Outline 4-MANIFOLDS: CLASSIFICATION AND EXAMPLES 1. Outline Throughout, 4-manifold will be used to mean closed, oriented, simply-connected 4-manifold. Hopefully I will remember to append smooth wherever necessary.

More information

Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions

Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions 1. Definitions and an example Let A be a ring, I an ideal, and M an A-module. In class we defined the I-adic completion of M to be M = lim M/I n M. We will soon show

More information

RIMS-1897 On multiframings of 3-manifolds By Tatsuro SHIMIZU December 2018 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan

RIMS-1897 On multiframings of 3-manifolds By Tatsuro SHIMIZU December 2018 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan RIMS-1897 On multiframings of 3-manifolds By Tatsuro SHIMIZU December 2018 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan On multiframings of 3 manifolds Tatsuro Shimizu 1

More information

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997 CW-complexes Stephen A. Mitchell November 1997 A CW-complex is first of all a Hausdorff space X equipped with a collection of characteristic maps φ n α : D n X. Here n ranges over the nonnegative integers,

More information

HOMOLOGY AND COHOMOLOGY. 1. Introduction

HOMOLOGY AND COHOMOLOGY. 1. Introduction HOMOLOGY AND COHOMOLOGY ELLEARD FELIX WEBSTER HEFFERN 1. Introduction We have been introduced to the idea of homology, which derives from a chain complex of singular or simplicial chain groups together

More information

Topological rigidity for non-aspherical manifolds by M. Kreck and W. Lück

Topological rigidity for non-aspherical manifolds by M. Kreck and W. Lück Topological rigidity for non-aspherical manifolds by M. Kreck and W. Lück July 11, 2006 Abstract The Borel Conjecture predicts that closed aspherical manifolds are topological rigid. We want to investigate

More information

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory Part V 7 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets Lebesgue Integration Theory Definition 7. (Preliminary). A measure on a set is a function :2 [ ] such that. () = 2. If { } = is a finite

More information

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties Dylan Attwell-Duval Department of Mathematics and Statistics McGill University Montreal, Quebec attwellduval@math.mcgill.ca April 9, 2011 A Topological Point

More information

Classifying complex surfaces and symplectic 4-manifolds

Classifying complex surfaces and symplectic 4-manifolds Classifying complex surfaces and symplectic 4-manifolds UT Austin, September 18, 2012 First Cut Seminar Basics Symplectic 4-manifolds Definition A symplectic 4-manifold (X, ω) is an oriented, smooth, 4-dimensional

More information

Stable complex and Spin c -structures

Stable complex and Spin c -structures APPENDIX D Stable complex and Spin c -structures In this book, G-manifolds are often equipped with a stable complex structure or a Spin c structure. Specifically, we use these structures to define quantization.

More information

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem PETER B. GILKEY Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem Second Edition CRC PRESS Boca Raton Ann Arbor London Tokyo Contents

More information

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES NILAY KUMAR In these lectures I want to introduce the Chern-Weil approach to characteristic classes on manifolds, and in particular, the Chern classes.

More information

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas Index theory on singular manifolds I p. 1/4 Index theory on singular manifolds I Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas Paul Loya Index theory on singular manifolds I

More information

TRANSITIVE HOLONOMY GROUP AND RIGIDITY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE. Luis Guijarro and Gerard Walschap

TRANSITIVE HOLONOMY GROUP AND RIGIDITY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE. Luis Guijarro and Gerard Walschap TRANSITIVE HOLONOMY GROUP AND RIGIDITY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE Luis Guijarro and Gerard Walschap Abstract. In this note, we examine the relationship between the twisting of a vector bundle ξ over a manifold

More information

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

We have the following immediate corollary. 1 1. Thom Spaces and Transversality Definition 1.1. Let π : E B be a real k vector bundle with a Euclidean metric and let E 1 be the set of elements of norm 1. The Thom space T (E) of E is the quotient E/E

More information

Math 6510 Homework 10

Math 6510 Homework 10 2.2 Problems 9 Problem. Compute the homology group of the following 2-complexes X: a) The quotient of S 2 obtained by identifying north and south poles to a point b) S 1 (S 1 S 1 ) c) The space obtained

More information

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall 2014 Problems Please note: This list was last updated on November 30, 2014. Problems marked with * are challenge problems. Some problems are adapted from the course texts;

More information

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Journal of Algebra 219, 625 657 (1999) Article ID jabr.1998.7909, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Simon R. Blackburn*

More information

Cup product and intersection

Cup product and intersection Cup product and intersection Michael Hutchings March 28, 2005 Abstract This is a handout for my algebraic topology course. The goal is to explain a geometric interpretation of the cup product. Namely,

More information

Topological K-theory

Topological K-theory Topological K-theory Robert Hines December 15, 2016 The idea of topological K-theory is that spaces can be distinguished by the vector bundles they support. Below we present the basic ideas and definitions

More information

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS BRIAN OSSERMAN We discuss the inverse limit construction, and consider the special case of inverse limits of finite groups, which should best be considered as topological

More information

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very non-linear. However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice partial linear structures.

More information

Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = 2 SYM

Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = 2 SYM Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = SYM Brian Williams April 3, 013 We ve began to see what it means to twist a supersymmetric field theory. I will review Donaldson theory and

More information

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces Classifying Spaces 1. Classifying Spaces. To make our lives much easier, all topological spaces from now on will be homeomorphic to CW complexes. Fact: All smooth manifolds are homeomorphic to CW complexes.

More information

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017 Dirac Operator Göttingen Mathematical Institute Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017 Five lectures: 1. Dirac operator 2. Atiyah-Singer revisited 3. What is K-homology? 4. The Riemann-Roch theorem 5. K-theory

More information

Orientation transport

Orientation transport Orientation transport Liviu I. Nicolaescu Dept. of Mathematics University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556-4618 nicolaescu.1@nd.edu June 2004 1 S 1 -bundles over 3-manifolds: homological properties Let

More information

Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture III

Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture III Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture III Jeff Viaclovsky Park City Mathematics Institute July 18, 2013 Lecture Outline Today we will discuss the following: Complete the local description of the moduli

More information

SOME EXERCISES IN CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

SOME EXERCISES IN CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES SOME EXERCISES IN CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES 1. GAUSSIAN CURVATURE AND GAUSS-BONNET THEOREM Let S R 3 be a smooth surface with Riemannian metric g induced from R 3. Its Levi-Civita connection can be defined

More information

Holomorphic line bundles

Holomorphic line bundles Chapter 2 Holomorphic line bundles In the absence of non-constant holomorphic functions X! C on a compact complex manifold, we turn to the next best thing, holomorphic sections of line bundles (i.e., rank

More information

THEp 1 -CENTRALEXTENSIONOF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP OF ORIENTABLE SURFACES

THEp 1 -CENTRALEXTENSIONOF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP OF ORIENTABLE SURFACES KNOT THEORY BANACH CENTER PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 42 INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WARSZAWA 1998 THEp 1 -CENTRALEXTENSIONOF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP OF ORIENTABLE SURFACES SYLVAIN GERVAIS

More information

Division Algebras and Parallelizable Spheres, Part II

Division Algebras and Parallelizable Spheres, Part II Division Algebras and Parallelizable Spheres, Part II Seminartalk by Jerome Wettstein April 5, 2018 1 A quick Recap of Part I We are working on proving the following Theorem: Theorem 1.1. The following

More information

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick Math 231b Lecture 16 G. Quick 16. Lecture 16: Chern classes for complex vector bundles 16.1. Orientations. From now on we will shift our focus to complex vector bundles. Much of the theory for real vector

More information

Introduction to surgery theory

Introduction to surgery theory Introduction to surgery theory Wolfgang Lück Bonn Germany email wolfgang.lueck@him.uni-bonn.de http://131.220.77.52/lueck/ Bonn, 17. & 19. April 2018 Wolfgang Lück (MI, Bonn) Introduction to surgery theory

More information

3-manifolds and their groups

3-manifolds and their groups 3-manifolds and their groups Dale Rolfsen University of British Columbia Marseille, September 2010 Dale Rolfsen (2010) 3-manifolds and their groups Marseille, September 2010 1 / 31 3-manifolds and their

More information

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations Page 1 Definitions Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:23 AM Notations " " means "equals, by definition" the set of all real numbers the set of integers Denote a function from a set to a set by Denote the image of

More information

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X. Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2

More information

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds The topology of symplectic four-manifolds Michael Usher January 12, 2007 Definition A symplectic manifold is a pair (M, ω) where 1 M is a smooth manifold of some even dimension 2n. 2 ω Ω 2 (M) is a two-form

More information

3. Signatures Problem 27. Show that if K` and K differ by a crossing change, then σpk`q

3. Signatures Problem 27. Show that if K` and K differ by a crossing change, then σpk`q 1. Introduction Problem 1. Prove that H 1 ps 3 zk; Zq Z and H 2 ps 3 zk; Zq 0 without using the Alexander duality. Problem 2. Compute the knot group of the trefoil. Show that it is not trivial. Problem

More information

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C :

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C : TOEPLITZ OPERATORS EFTON PARK 1. Introduction to Toeplitz Operators Otto Toeplitz lived from 1881-1940 in Goettingen, and it was pretty rough there, so he eventually went to Palestine and eventually contracted

More information

MONOPOLES AND LENS SPACE SURGERIES

MONOPOLES AND LENS SPACE SURGERIES MONOPOLES AND LENS SPACE SURGERIES PETER KRONHEIMER, TOMASZ MROWKA, PETER OZSVÁTH, AND ZOLTÁN SZABÓ Abstract. Monopole Floer homology is used to prove that real projective three-space cannot be obtained

More information

REAL INSTANTONS, DIRAC OPERATORS AND QUATERNIONIC CLASSIFYING SPACES PAUL NORBURY AND MARC SANDERS Abstract. Let M(k; SO(n)) be the moduli space of ba

REAL INSTANTONS, DIRAC OPERATORS AND QUATERNIONIC CLASSIFYING SPACES PAUL NORBURY AND MARC SANDERS Abstract. Let M(k; SO(n)) be the moduli space of ba REAL INSTANTONS, DIRAC OPERATORS AND QUATERNIONIC CLASSIFYING SPACES PAUL NORBURY AND MARC SANDERS Abstract. Let M(k; SO(n)) be the moduli space of based gauge equivalence classes of SO(n) instantons on

More information

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 LIAT KESSLER Let (M, ω) be a connected compact symplectic manifold, T a torus, T M M a Hamiltonian action of T on M, and Φ: M t the assoaciated moment map. Theorem 0.1 (The

More information

Exercises for Algebraic Topology

Exercises for Algebraic Topology Sheet 1, September 13, 2017 Definition. Let A be an abelian group and let M be a set. The A-linearization of M is the set A[M] = {f : M A f 1 (A \ {0}) is finite}. We view A[M] as an abelian group via

More information

Nonabelian Poincare Duality (Lecture 8)

Nonabelian Poincare Duality (Lecture 8) Nonabelian Poincare Duality (Lecture 8) February 19, 2014 Let M be a compact oriented manifold of dimension n. Then Poincare duality asserts the existence of an isomorphism H (M; A) H n (M; A) for any

More information

The Classification of Nonsimple Algebraic Tangles

The Classification of Nonsimple Algebraic Tangles The Classification of Nonsimple Algebraic Tangles Ying-Qing Wu 1 A tangle is a pair (B, T ), where B is a 3-ball, T is a pair of properly embedded arcs. When there is no ambiguity we will simply say that

More information

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory Nikolai Nowaczyk December 4, 2014 Abstract. The aim of this text is to give an overview of the Index Theorems by Atiyah and Singer. Our primary motivation is to understand

More information

Spherical three-dimensional orbifolds

Spherical three-dimensional orbifolds Spherical three-dimensional orbifolds Andrea Seppi joint work with Mattia Mecchia Pisa, 16th May 2013 Outline What is an orbifold? What is a spherical orientable orbifold? What is a fibered orbifold? An

More information

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS PAVEL SAFRONOV, TALK AT 2011 TALBOT WORKSHOP 1.1. Basic definitions. 1. Hyperkähler manifolds Definition. A hyperkähler manifold is a C Riemannian manifold together with three covariantly

More information

Combinatorial Heegaard Floer Theory

Combinatorial Heegaard Floer Theory Combinatorial Heegaard Floer Theory Ciprian Manolescu UCLA February 29, 2012 Ciprian Manolescu (UCLA) Combinatorial HF Theory February 29, 2012 1 / 31 Motivation (4D) Much insight into smooth 4-manifolds

More information

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the There are two Eilenberg-Moore spectral sequences that we shall consider, one for homology and the other for cohomology. In contrast with the situation for the Serre spectral sequence, for the Eilenberg-Moore

More information

Pin (2)-monopole theory I

Pin (2)-monopole theory I Intersection forms with local coefficients Osaka Medical College Dec 12, 2016 Pin (2) = U(1) j U(1) Sp(1) H Pin (2)-monopole equations are a twisted version of the Seiberg-Witten (U(1)-monopole) equations.

More information

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press 1 Introduction Outline Section 3: Topology of 2-orbifolds: Compact group actions Compact group actions Orbit spaces. Tubes and slices. Path-lifting, covering homotopy Locally smooth actions Smooth actions

More information

EXOTIC SMOOTH STRUCTURES ON TOPOLOGICAL FIBRE BUNDLES B

EXOTIC SMOOTH STRUCTURES ON TOPOLOGICAL FIBRE BUNDLES B EXOTIC SMOOTH STRUCTURES ON TOPOLOGICAL FIBRE BUNDLES B SEBASTIAN GOETTE, KIYOSHI IGUSA, AND BRUCE WILLIAMS Abstract. When two smooth manifold bundles over the same base are fiberwise tangentially homeomorphic,

More information

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE JOHANNES EBERT 1.1. October 11th. 1. Recapitulation from differential topology Definition 1.1. Let M m, N n, be two smooth manifolds

More information

Khovanov homology is an unknot-detector

Khovanov homology is an unknot-detector Khovanov homology is an unknot-detector P. B. Kronheimer and T. S. Mrowka Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139 Abstract. We prove that a knot

More information

The Hopf Bracket. Claude LeBrun SUNY Stony Brook and Michael Taylor UNC Chapel Hill. August 11, 2013

The Hopf Bracket. Claude LeBrun SUNY Stony Brook and Michael Taylor UNC Chapel Hill. August 11, 2013 The Hopf Bracket Claude LeBrun SUY Stony Brook and ichael Taylor UC Chapel Hill August 11, 2013 Abstract Given a smooth map f : between smooth manifolds, we construct a hierarchy of bilinear forms on suitable

More information

ALF spaces and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on the K3 surface

ALF spaces and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on the K3 surface ALF spaces and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on the K3 surface Lorenzo Foscolo Stony Brook University Simons Collaboration on Special Holonomy Workshop, SCGP, Stony Brook, September 8 2016 The Kummer construction

More information

Topology of the space of metrics with positive scalar curvature

Topology of the space of metrics with positive scalar curvature Topology of the space of metrics with positive scalar curvature Boris Botvinnik University of Oregon, USA November 11, 2015 Geometric Analysis in Geometry and Topology, 2015 Tokyo University of Science

More information

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology 1. Motivation Let {Γ i } be an inverse system of finite groups with surjective transition maps, and define Γ = Γ i equipped with its inverse it topology (i.e., the

More information

LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM

LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society Submitted Paper Paper 14 June 2011 LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM MICHAEL C. CRABB AND PEDRO L. Q. PERGHER Institute of Mathematics,

More information

MORSE HOMOLOGY. Contents. Manifolds are closed. Fields are Z/2.

MORSE HOMOLOGY. Contents. Manifolds are closed. Fields are Z/2. MORSE HOMOLOGY STUDENT GEOMETRY AND TOPOLOGY SEMINAR FEBRUARY 26, 2015 MORGAN WEILER 1. Morse Functions 1 Morse Lemma 3 Existence 3 Genericness 4 Topology 4 2. The Morse Chain Complex 4 Generators 5 Differential

More information

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, ) II.3 : Eilenberg-Steenrod properties (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, 8.3 8.5 Definition. Let U be an open subset of R n for some n. The de Rham cohomology groups (U are the cohomology groups

More information

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic

More information

PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL

PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL Abstract. We give a summary for the proof of Picard s Theorem. The proof is for the most part an excerpt of [F]. 1. Introduction Definition. Let U C be an open subset. A

More information

Atiyah-Singer Revisited

Atiyah-Singer Revisited Atiyah-Singer Revisited Paul Baum Penn State Texas A&M Universty College Station, Texas, USA April 1, 2014 From E 1, E 2,..., E n obtain : 1) The Dirac operator of R n D = n j=1 E j x j 2) The Bott generator

More information

TRANSVERSAL DIRAC OPERATORS ON DISTRIBUTIONS, FOLIATIONS, AND G-MANIFOLDS LECTURE NOTES

TRANSVERSAL DIRAC OPERATORS ON DISTRIBUTIONS, FOLIATIONS, AND G-MANIFOLDS LECTURE NOTES TRANSVERSAL DIRAC OPERATORS ON DISTRIBUTIONS, FOLIATIONS, AND G-MANIFOLDS LECTURE NOTES KEN RICHARDSON Abstract. In these lectures, we investigate generalizations of the ordinary Dirac operator to manifolds

More information

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 1. Blowing up and symplectic cutting In complex geometry the blowing-up operation amounts to replace a point in

More information

Lecture on Equivariant Cohomology

Lecture on Equivariant Cohomology Lecture on Equivariant Cohomology Sébastien Racanière February 20, 2004 I wrote these notes for a hours lecture at Imperial College during January and February. Of course, I tried to track down and remove

More information

Compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7) Compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7) D.D. Joyce The Mathematical Institute, 24-29 St. Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LB. Published as Invent. math. 123 (1996), 507 552. 1 Introduction In Berger s classification

More information

Introduction to Poincare Conjecture and the Hamilton-Perelman program

Introduction to Poincare Conjecture and the Hamilton-Perelman program Introduction to Poincare Conjecture and the Hamilton-Perelman program David Glickenstein Math 538, Spring 2009 January 20, 2009 1 Introduction This lecture is mostly taken from Tao s lecture 2. In this

More information

Cohomological Formulation (Lecture 3)

Cohomological Formulation (Lecture 3) Cohomological Formulation (Lecture 3) February 5, 204 Let F q be a finite field with q elements, let X be an algebraic curve over F q, and let be a smooth affine group scheme over X with connected fibers.

More information

Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-lipschitz invariant

Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-lipschitz invariant Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-lipschitz invariant Misha Verbitsky Joint work with L. Birbrair, A. Fernandes, J. E. Sampaio Geometry and Dynamics Seminar Tel-Aviv University, 12.12.2018 1 Zariski

More information

Lecture 8: More characteristic classes and the Thom isomorphism

Lecture 8: More characteristic classes and the Thom isomorphism Lecture 8: More characteristic classes and the Thom isomorphism We begin this lecture by carrying out a few of the exercises in Lecture 1. We take advantage of the fact that the Chern classes are stable

More information

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7) Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7) Dominic Joyce, Oxford University Simons Collaboration meeting, Imperial College, June 2017. Based on Invent. math. 123 (1996), 507 552; J. Diff. Geom.

More information

Remarks on the Milnor number

Remarks on the Milnor number José 1 1 Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Liverpool, U. K. March, 2016 In honour of Victor!! 1 The Milnor number Consider a holomorphic map-germ f : (C n+1, 0) (C, 0)

More information

Embedded contact homology and its applications

Embedded contact homology and its applications Embedded contact homology and its applications Michael Hutchings Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley International Congress of Mathematicians, Hyderabad August 26, 2010 arxiv:1003.3209

More information