arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 11 Jul 2017
|
|
- Ashlee Lamb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ELIMINATING FIELD QUANTIFIERS IN ALGEBRAICALLY MAXIMAL KAPLANSKY FIELDS YATIR HALEVI AND ASSAF HASSON arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 11 Jul 2017 Abstract. We prove elimination of field quantifiers for algebraically maximal Kaplansky fields. 1. introduction The aim of this note is to give a complete, essentially self-contained, proof that algebraically maximal Kaplansky fields eliminate field quantifiers (in the sense 1, e.g., of [8, Definition 1.14]). While probably folklore, we could not find a proof in the literature, though several closely related theorems do exist. In [5, Theorem 2.6] Kuhlmann proves that such valued fields admit quantifier elimination relative to a structure he calls an amc-structure of level 0. It is well known that this structure is essentially the RV-structure (see for instance [2, Section 3.2]). In this language, he proves that if L and F are models of a theory of an algebraically maximal Kaplansky field and K is a common substructure then RV L RVK RV F = (L,v) (K,v) (F,v), where the valued fields are considered, for instance, in the L div language. This is proved by showing that every embedding RV L RV F (over RV K ) lifts to an embedding (L, v) (F, v) (over (K, v)), when assuming that F is L -saturated, Using this result Bélair proves that, in equi-characteristic (p,p), every algebraically maximal Kaplansky field eliminates field quantifiers in the Denef-Pas language, the 3-sorted language enriched with an angular component map (see [1, Lemma 4.3]). It seems, though it is not claimed, that Bélair s proof may apply to the mixed characteristic case as well. In what follows we give an alternative proof, by reproducing Kuhlmann s proof from[5, Section 3] but working entirely in the Denef-Pas language. There is nothing essentially new in the results of this note and the proofs follow closely Khulmann s (with some ideas borrowed from the proof of the (0,0) henselian case, for instance from [9, Theorem 5.21]). 2. preliminaries We review some terminology and definitions. For a valued field (K,v) let vk denote the value group, Kv the residue field and res the residue map. Valued fields will be considered in the 3-sorted language, with a sort for the base field, the value group and the residue field, with the obvious functions and relations. Date: today. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ )/ERC Grant Agreement No Supported by ISF grant No. 181/16. 1 See also [7, Appandix A] for a more detailed discussion. 1
2 2 Y. HALEVI AND A. HASSON For a valued field (K, v) an angular component map is a multiplicative group homomorphism ac : K Kv such that ac(a) = res(a) whenever v(a) = 0, we extend it to ac : K Kv by setting ac(0) = 0. Fact 2.1. [9, Corollary 5.18] Every valued field (K, v) has an elementary extension with an angular component map on it. A valued field, admitting an angular component map will be referred to as an ac-valued field. The 3-sorted language of valued fields together with a function symbol for the ac-map (angular component map), is called the Denef-Pas language. Finally: Definition 2.2. A valued field (K,v) of residue characteristic p > 0 is a Kaplansky field if the value group is p-divisible, the residue field is perfect and the residue field does not admit any finite separable extensions of degree divisible by p. (K,v) is algebraically maximal if if does not admit any immediate algebraic extension. Fact 2.3. [3, Theorem 5] Every Kaplansky field has a unique immediate maximal extension. 3. extending embeddings The following results are proved in [9] for the (0,0) case. We use results from [4] to give some slight generalizations. Lemma 3.1. [9, Lemma 5.20] Let L,F be ac-valued fields, f : L F an isomorphism of ac-valued fields g : L F a valued-field isomorphism extending f to some ac-valued field extensions L /L and F /F such that vl = vl. Then g commutes with the ac-map. Proof. Let x L, we may write x = x 1 x 2 where x 1 L and x 2 O L and thus ac(x) = ac(x 1 )res(x 2 ) and f(ac(x)) = f(ac(x 1 ))f(res(x 2 )) = ac(f(x 1 ))res(f(x 2 )) = ac(f(x)). A field K has p-roots if K p = K. If K is a valued field it is Artin-Schreier closed if every irreducible polynomial of the form x p x c has a root in K for p = char(kv) > 0. Lemma 3.2. Let L 1 and L 2 be henselian ac-valued fields, K a common henselian ac-valued subfield and f : K L 2 be the embedding (so f commutes with the ac-map). Further assume that if char(kv) = p > 0 then L 1,L 2 are both either Artin-Schreier closed or have p-roots. If vl 1 vk vl 2 then for any γ i vl i with tp(γ 1 /vk) = tp(γ 2 /vk) there exist b i L i with v(b i ) = γ i such that f may be lifted to an isomorphism of ac-valued fields f : K(b 1 ) K(b 2 ), in particular K(b i ) are ac-valued fields. Proof. By the previous lemma we may, of course, assume that γ i / vk. We now break the proof in two: Case 1: Assume that nγ / vk for every n 1 and let b i L i be any elements with v(b i ) = γ i. Replacing b i, if needed, by b i /u i with u i O L i such that ac(u i ) = ac(b i ), we have ac(b i ) = 1.
3 FIELD-QE FOR KAPLANSKY FIELDS 3 Because γ is not in the divisible hull of vk, necessarily b i is transcendental over K. By [9, Lemma 3.23] (or [4, Lemma 6.35]), v extends uniquely to K(b i ), K(b i )v = Kv and vk(b i ) = vk Zγ i. It remains to show that this extension commutes with the ac-map. Let a K(b 1 ). Because vk(b 1 ) = vk Zγ 1 there exists c with v(c) vk such that v(a) = v(cb n 1) for some n Z. Thus a = (cb n 1) a/(cb n 1) and v(a/(cb n 1 )) = 0. So ac(a) = ac(cbn 1 )res(a/(cbn 1 )) = ac(c)res(a/(cbn 1 )) and f(ac(a)) = f(ac(c))f(res(a/(cb n 1))) = ac(f(c)f(b n 1)f(a/(cb n 1)))) = ac(f(a)). Case 2: Assume that qγ i vk for some prime q. Case 2.1: Assume that q char(kv). Let d K with v(d) = qγ. We may replace d by d/u with u O K such that ac(u) = ac(d) and then ac(d) = 1. Let a i L i with v(a i ) = γ i and ac(a i ) = 1. Then the polynomialp i (x) = x q d/a q i is overo L i and satisfies v(p(1)) > 0 and v(p (1)) = 0. Indeed, v(d/a q i ) = 0 and res(d/aq i ) = ac(d)/ac(aq i ) = 1, so P( 1) = 0. Since q char(kv) we automatically get that P is separable, so P (1) 0. This gives u i L i such that P i (u i ) = 0 and ū i = 1. Now let b i = a i u i, clearly b q i = d and ac(b i) = 1. By [4, Lemma 6.40], K(b i )v = Kv and vk(b i ) = vk (Z/qZ)γ i. Now f K(bi) commutes with the ac-map just as in case 1. Case 2.2: Assume that q = p = char(vk) > 0. Since both L 1 and L 2 are either Artin-Schreier closed or have p-roots, just as in Case 2.1 we may use [4, Lemma 6.40] to extend the isomorphism (see the statement of [4, Lemma 6.40]). Lemma 3.3. Let L 1 and L 2 be henselian ac-valued field, K a common henselian ac-valued subfield and f : K L 2 the embedding (so f commutes with the ac-map). Assume that L 1 v Kv L 2 v and let α i L i v, with α i separable over Kv if it is algebraic, and tp(α 1 /Kv) = tp(α 2 /Kv). Then there exist a i L i with ā i = α i such that f may be lifted to an isomorphism f : K(a 1 ) K(a 2 ) of ac-valued fields. In particular K(a i ) are ac-valued fields. Proof. It will suffice, by Lemma 3.1, to show that we can extend f to an isomorphism of valued field extensions preserving the value group of K. We break into two cases. Case 1: Assume that α i L i v are transcendental over Kv. Pick any a i O Li such that ā i = α i. They are necessarily transcendental over K. Either by [4, Lemma 6.35] or by [9, Lemma 3.22], v extends uniquely to K(a i ) and vk(a i ) = vk. Case 2: If α i is algerbaic, let P(X) O K [x] be monic such that P(x) is the minimal polynomial of α i over Kv. Pick b i O L such that b i = α i. As the α i are separable over Kv, P is separable and since v(p(b i )) > 0 and v(p (b i )) = 0 we may find a i O L such that P(a i ) = 0 and ā i = α. Either by [4, Lemma 6.41] or [9, Lemma 3.21], v extends uniquely to K(a i ) and vk(a i ) = vk. 4. eliminating field quantifiers Let T be the theory of an algebraically maximal Kaplansky field. We consider it in the Denef-Pas language. The proof of our main result follows [5, Section 3]
4 4 Y. HALEVI AND A. HASSON step-by-step. Throughout we verify that the embedding constructed respects the angular component map. Recall that a valuation transcendence basis T for an extension L/K is a transcendence basis for L/K of the form T = {x i,y i : i I,j J} such that the values vx i, i I form a maximal system of values in vl which are Q-linearly independent over vk and the residues ȳ j, j J form a transcendence basis of Lv/Kv. Alsorecallthat an algebraicextension ofhenselianfields L/K is tame iffor every finite subextension K /K: (1) K v/kv is separable. (2) if p = char(kv) > 0 then (vk : vk) is prime to p. (3) K /K is a defectless extension. K will be called tame if it is henselian and every algebraic extension is a tame field. Recall ([4, Lemma 13.37]) that algebraically maximal Kaplansky fields are tame. Lemma 4.1. Let L and F be henselian ac-valued fields and K a common acvalued field. Assume that L is a tame algebraic extension of the henselization of K. Then for every embedding τ = (τ Γ,τ k ) : (vl,lv) (vf,fv) over K, there is an embedding of L in F over K which induces τ and commutes with the ac-map. Proof. By Lemma 3.1, the uniqueness of the henselization of K and the fact that it is an immediate extension we may assume that K is henselian (the unique isomorphism of the henselisation of K in L with its henselisation in F respects the ac-map). Since every algebraic extension is the union of its finite sub-extensions we may further assume that L/K is finite. Since Lv/Kv isfinite anseparableit is simple (recalll/k is tame). Assume that Kv(α) = Lv. ByLemma3.3(Case2)thereexistsc Lwith c = α, K(c)v = Lv and vk(c) = vk such that we may extend the embedding of K F to an embedding K(c) F respecting the ac-map. Set K := K(c). Since L/K is finite, the group vl/vk is a finite torsion group: vl/vk = (γ 1 +vk)z (γ r +vk)z, and by tameness the order of each γ i is prime to p = char(kv). Using Lemma 3.2(Case 2.1) repeatedly there exist d 1,...,d r L with v(d i ) = γ i such that L/K (d 1,...,d r ) is an immediate extension and we may extend the embedding of K F to an embedding K (d 1,...,d r ) F that preserves the ac-map. Finally, K (d 1,...,d r ) is a tame field since it is an algebraic extension of a tame field, thus L/K (d 1,...,d r ) is defectless and immediate. Since henselian defectless fields are algebraically maximal, it follows that K (d 1,...,d r ) = L and we are done. Lemma 4.2. Let L and F by henselian ac-valued field and K a common ac-valued field. Assume that L admits a valuation transcendence basis T such that L is a tame extension of K(T ) h. Then for every embedding τ = (τ Γ,τ k ) : (vl,lv) (vf,fv) over K, there is an embedding of ac-valued fields L F over K inducing τ. Proof. By using Lemma 3.2(Case 1) and Lemma 3.3(Case 1) repeatedly we may extend the embedding K F to an embedding K(T ) F over K respecting the ac-map, and inducing the embedding τ. The result now follows from Lemma 4.1 The next lemma is now key:
5 FIELD-QE FOR KAPLANSKY FIELDS 5 Lemma 4.3. Let K be an algebraically maximal Kaplansky field with char(kv) = p > 0. Then K contains p-roots, i.e. K p = K. Proof. If char(k) = p then this follows from the fact that K is perfect ([6, Corrolaries 3.3, 3.4]). If char(k) = 0 Kaplansky [3, Lemma 15] proves this for maximal Kaplansky fields. He shows it by constructing a pc-sequence of algebraic type. The same proof follows through verbatim for algebraically maximal Kaplansky fields. Alternatively, one may use Kaplansky s result for maximal fields and then apply [6, Theorem 7.1]. Fact 4.4. [5, Lemma 3.12] Let L and F be two algebraically maximal Kaplansky fields (and hence defectless) and K a common henselian subfield. Assume that both vl/vk and vf/vk are torsion groups and both Lv/Kv and Fv/Kv are algebraic extensions. If K does not admit any non-trivial tame algebraic extension inside L or F, then the relative algebraic closures of K in L and F are isomorphic. The following embedding theorem is, as usual, the main result: Theorem 4.5. Let L,F = T with F L + -saturated and K a common subfield, all with angular component maps and in the Denef-Pas language. Then for every embedding τ = (τ Γ,τ k ) : (vl,lv) (vf,fv) over K, there is an embedding of L in F over K which induces τ and preserve s the ac-map. Proof. In ordered to embed L in F (over K) it is suffices to embed every finitely generated sub-extension. So we may assume that L/K is a finitely generated extension. Let T = {x i,y i : i I,j J} be such that {vx i : i I} is a maximal system of Q-linearly independent values in vl over vk and the residues {ȳ j : j J} are a transcendence basis of Lv/Kv. T is algebraically independent over K by[4, Lemma 6.30]. Let L be the maximal tame algebraic extension of the henselization K(T ) h in L. By definition it is an algebraic extension so T is a transcendence basis for L /K and it is a tame extension of K(T ) h. We may use Lemma 4.2 and embed L in F over K, this embedding induces τ and commutes with the ac-map. Since L is the maximal tame algebraic extension of K(T ) h, necessarily vl/vl is a p-group and Lv/L v is a purely inseparable algebraic extension. By Fact 4.4, we may extend the embedding to L, its relative algebraic closure in L. By [4, 13.40] L/L is immediate (use the maximality of T ) and thus vl /vl is a p- group, L v/l v is a purely inseparable algebraic extension and L is an ac-valued algebraically maximal Kaplansky field. We must show that the embedding L F preserves the ac-map. By Lemma 4.3, L contains p-roots and hence by repeatedly applying Lemma 3.2(Case 2.2) we may extend the embedding of L F to the intermediary ac-valued field L L L with vl = vl, in such a way that it commutes with the ac-map. By uniqueness of the extension of the valuation this agrees with the embedding L F. Now use Lemma 3.1. Recall that L is also an algebraically maximal Kaplansky ac-valued field and L/L is immediate. By the uniqueness of the maximal immediate extension of L (and of L) we may extend the embedding to L, it preserves the ac-map by Lemma 3.1. Corollary 4.6. Let L,F = T and K a common substructure. If (vl,lv) (vk,kv) (vf,fv)
6 6 Y. HALEVI AND A. HASSON then L K F. As a result, T eliminates field quantifiers and the value group and residue field are stably embedded as pure structures. Proof. There exists elementary extension L and F over L and F such that vl = vk vf and L v = Kv F v. Since L K F implies L K F, we may assume from the start that τ = (τ Γ,τ k ) : (vl,lv) = (vk,kv) (vf,fv). The rest is standard and follows from the theorem. References [1] Luc Bélair. Types dans les corps valués munis d applications coefficients. Illinois J. Math., 43(2): , [2] Joseph Doyle Flenner. The relative structure of henselian valued fields. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, Thesis (Ph.D.) University of California, Berkeley. [3] Irving Kaplansky. Maximal fields with valuations. Duke Math. J., 9: , [4] Frantz-Victor Kuhlmann. Valuation theory. Available on fvk/fvkbook.htm, [5] Franz-Viktor Kuhlmann. Quantifier elimination for Henselian fields relative to additive and multiplicative congruences. Israel J. Math., 85(1-3): , [6] Franz-Viktor Kuhlmann. The algebra and model theory of tame valued fields. J. Reine Angew. Math., 719:1 43, [7] Silvain Rideau. Some properties of analytic difference valued fields. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 16(3): , [8] Saharon Shelah. Dependent first order theories, continued. Israel J. Math., 173:1 60, [9] Lou van den Dries. Lectures on the model theory of valued fields. In Model theory in algebra, analysis and arithmetic, volume 2111 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages Springer, Heidelberg, Einstein Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, GivatRam, Jerusalem 91904, Israel, address: yatir.halevi@mail.huji.ac.il URL: Department of mathematics, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be er Sehva, Israel address: hassonas@math.bgu.ac.il URL:
arxiv: v3 [math.lo] 5 Nov 2018
ELIMINATING FIELD QUANTIFIERS IN STRONGLY DEPENDENT HENSELIAN FIELDS YATIR HALEVI AND ASSAF HASSON arxiv:1707.03188v3 [math.lo] 5 Nov 2018 Abstract. We prove elimination of field quantifiers for strongly
More informationTHE ALGEBRA AND MODEL THEORY OF TAME VALUED FIELDS
THE ALGEBRA AND MODEL THEORY OF TAME VALUED FIELDS FRANZ VIKTOR KUHLMANN Abstract. A henselian valued field K is called a tame field if its algebraic closure K is a tame extension, that is, the ramification
More informationTHE ALGEBRA AND MODEL THEORY OF TAME VALUED FIELDS
THE ALGEBRA AND MODEL THEORY OF TAME VALUED FIELDS FRANZ VIKTOR KUHLMANN Abstract. A henselian valued field K is called a tame field if its algebraic closure K is a tame extension, that is, the ramification
More informationNotes on QE for ACVF
Notes on QE for ACVF Fall 2016 1 Preliminaries on Valuations We begin with some very basic definitions and examples. An excellent survey of this material with can be found in van den Dries [3]. Engler
More informationA CLASSIFICATION OF ARTIN-SCHREIER DEFECT EXTENSIONS AND CHARACTERIZATIONS OF DEFECTLESS FIELDS
A CLASSIFICATION OF ARTIN-SCHREIER DEFECT EXTENSIONS AND CHARACTERIZATIONS OF DEFECTLESS FIELDS FRANZ-VIKTOR KUHLMANN Abstract. We classify Artin-Schreier extensions of valued fields with non-trivial defect
More informationDense subfields of henselian fields, and integer parts
Dense subfields of henselian fields, and integer parts Franz-Viktor Kuhlmann 26. 6. 2005 Abstract We show that every henselian valued field L of residue characteristic 0 admits a proper subfield K which
More informationAdditive Polynomials over Perfect Fields
Additive Polynomials over Perfect Fields Salih Durhan Abstract. Additive polynomials in one variable over valued fields of positive characteristic are sufficiently well understood in terms of their approximation
More informationELIMINATION OF RAMIFICATION II: HENSELIAN RATIONALITY
ELIMINATION OF RAMIFICATION II: HENSELIAN RATIONALITY FRANZ-VIKTOR KUHLMANN Abstract. We prove in arbitrary characteristic that an immediate valued algebraic function field F of transcendence degree 1
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.lo] 5 Aug 2017
DEFINABLE VALUATIONS INDUCED BY MULTIPLICATIVE SUBGROUPS AND NIP FIELDS arxiv:1704.02910v3 [math.lo] 5 Aug 2017 KATHARINA DUPONT, ASSAF HASSON, AND SALMA KUHLMANN Abstract. We study the algebraic implications
More informationALGEBRAIC INDEPENDENCE OF ELEMENTS IN IMMEDIATE EXTENSIONS OF VALUED FIELDS
ALGEBRAIC INDEPENDENCE OF ELEMENTS IN IMMEDIATE EXTENSIONS OF VALUED FIELDS ANNA BLASZCZOK AND FRANZ-VIKTOR KUHLMANN Abstract. Refining a constructive combinatorial method due to MacLane and Schilling,
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF EXTREMAL VALUED FIELDS
CHARACTERIZATION OF EXTREMAL VALUED FIELDS SALIH AZGIN, FRANZ-VIKTOR KUHLMANN, AND FLORIAN POP Abstract. We characterize those valued fields for which the image of the valuation ring under every polynomial
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.lo] 11 Jul 2016
WHEN DOES NIP TRANSFER FROM FIELDS TO HENSELIAN EXPANSIONS? arxiv:1607.02953v1 [math.lo] 11 Jul 2016 FRANZISKA JAHNKE Abstract. Let K be an NIP field and let v be a henselian valuation on K. We ask whether
More informationA criterion for p-henselianity in characteristic p
A criterion for p-henselianity in characteristic p Zoé Chatzidakis and Milan Perera Abstract Let p be a prime. In this paper we give a proof of the following result: A valued field (K, v) of characteristic
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.lo] 17 Jan 2019
DEFINABLE V-TOPOLOGIES, HENSELIANITY AND NIP YATIR HALEVI, ASSAF HASSON, AND FRANZISKA JAHNKE arxiv:1901.05920v1 [math.lo] 17 Jan 2019 Abstract. We show that if (K,v 1,v 2 ) is a bi-valued NIP field with
More informationFields and model-theoretic classification, 2
Fields and model-theoretic classification, 2 Artem Chernikov UCLA Model Theory conference Stellenbosch, South Africa, Jan 11 2017 NIP Definition Let T be a complete first-order theory in a language L.
More informationChapter 13. The tame and the wild valuation theory Tame and purely wild extensions
Chapter 13 The tame and the wild valuation theory 13.1 Tame and purely wild extensions Lemma 7.29 motivates the following definition. An algebraic extension (L K, v) of henselian fields is called tame
More informationTOPOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIAL FIELDS
TOPOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIAL FIELDS NICOLAS GUZY AND FRANÇOISE POINT Abstract. First, we consider first-order theories of topological fields admitting a model-completion and their expansion to differential
More informationHENSELIAN RESIDUALLY p-adically CLOSED FIELDS
HENSELIAN RESIDUALLY p-adically CLOSED FIELDS NICOLAS GUZY Abstract. In (Arch. Math. 57 (1991), pp. 446 455), R. Farré proved a positivstellensatz for real-series closed fields. Here we consider p-valued
More informationCHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998
CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic
More informationExtension theorems for homomorphisms
Algebraic Geometry Fall 2009 Extension theorems for homomorphisms In this note, we prove some extension theorems for homomorphisms from rings to algebraically closed fields. The prototype is the following
More informationOn convergent power series
Peter Roquette 17. Juli 1996 On convergent power series We consider the following situation: K a field equipped with a non-archimedean absolute value which is assumed to be complete K[[T ]] the ring of
More informationGeometric representation in the theory of pseudo-finite fields
Geometric representation in the theory of pseudo-finite fields arxiv:1602.07462v2 [math.lo] 25 Feb 2016 Özlem Beyarslan Zoé Chatzidakis Abstract We study the automorphism group of the algebraic closure
More informationChapter 12. Additive polynomials Definition and basic properties
Chapter 12 Additive polynomials 12.1 Definition and basic properties A polynomial f K[X] is called additive if f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b) (12.1) for all elements a, b in every extension field L of K, that
More informationA study of irreducible polynomials over henselian valued fields via distinguished pairs
A study of irreducible polynomials over henselian valued fields via distinguished pairs Kamal Aghigh, Department of Mathematics, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran aghigh@kntu.ac.ir, Anuj
More informationTRUNCATION IN HAHN FIELDS
TRUNCATION IN HAHN FIELDS LOU VAN DEN DRIES 1. Introduction Let k be a field and Γ an (additive) ordered 1 abelian group. Then we have the Hahn field K := k((t Γ )) whose elements are the formal series
More informationExtensions of Discrete Valuation Fields
CHAPTER 2 Extensions of Discrete Valuation Fields This chapter studies discrete valuation fields in relation to each other. The first section introduces the class of Henselian fields which are quite similar
More informationValuation bases for generalized algebraic series
Valuation bases for generalized algebraic series fields Franz-Viktor Kuhlmann, Salma Kuhlmann and Jonathan W. Lee January 28, 2008 Abstract We investigate valued fields which admit a valuation basis. Given
More informationSome generalizations of Abhyankar lemma. K.N.Ponomaryov. Abstract. ramied extensions of discretely valued elds for an arbitrary (not
Some generalizations of Abhyankar lemma. K.N.Ponomaryov Abstract We prove some generalizations of Abhyankar lemma about tamely ramied extensions of discretely valued elds for an arbitrary (not nite, not
More informationAlgebraic function fields
Algebraic function fields 1 Places Definition An algebraic function field F/K of one variable over K is an extension field F K such that F is a finite algebraic extension of K(x) for some element x F which
More informationNotes on p-divisible Groups
Notes on p-divisible Groups March 24, 2006 This is a note for the talk in STAGE in MIT. The content is basically following the paper [T]. 1 Preliminaries and Notations Notation 1.1. Let R be a complete
More informationValued Differential Fields. Matthias Aschenbrenner
Valued Differential Fields Matthias Aschenbrenner Overview I ll report on joint work with LOU VAN DEN DRIES and JORIS VAN DER HOEVEN. About three years ago we achieved decisive results on the model theory
More informationRecursive definitions on surreal numbers
Recursive definitions on surreal numbers Antongiulio Fornasiero 19th July 2005 Abstract Let No be Conway s class of surreal numbers. I will make explicit the notion of a function f on No recursively defined
More informationInseparable local uniformization. Conference on valuation theory, El Escorial
Inseparable local uniformization M. Temkin July 27, 2011 Conference on valuation theory, El Escorial Outline 1 General paradigm of desingularization The state of the art Main result of the talk Generalizations
More informationA WEAK VERSION OF ROLLE S THEOREM
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 125, Number 11, November 1997, Pages 3147 3153 S 0002-9939(97)03910-5 A WEAK VERSION OF ROLLE S THEOREM THOMAS C. CRAVEN (Communicated by Wolmer
More informationRepresenting Scott Sets in Algebraic Settings
Representing Scott Sets in Algebraic Settings Alf Dolich Kingsborough Community College Julia F. Knight University of Notre Dame Karen Lange Wellesley College David Marker University of Illinois at Chicago
More informationSYMMETRICALLY COMPLETE ORDERED SETS, ABELIAN GROUPS AND FIELDS
SYMMETRICALLY COMPLETE ORDERED SETS, ABELIAN GROUPS AND FIELDS KATARZYNA & FRANZ-VIKTOR KUHLMANN, SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. We characterize linearly ordered sets, abelian groups and fields that are symmetrically
More informationZEROS OF SPARSE POLYNOMIALS OVER LOCAL FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC p
ZEROS OF SPARSE POLYNOMIALS OVER LOCAL FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC p BJORN POONEN 1. Statement of results Let K be a field of characteristic p > 0 equipped with a valuation v : K G taking values in an ordered
More informationLOCAL-GLOBAL PRINCIPLES FOR ZERO-CYCLES ON HOMOGENEOUS SPACES OVER ARITHMETIC FUNCTION FIELDS
LOCAL-GLOBAL PRINCIPLES FOR ZERO-CYCLES ON HOMOGENEOUS SPACES OVER ARITHMETIC FUNCTION FIELDS J.-L. COLLIOT-THÉLÈNE, D. HARBATER, J. HARTMANN, D. KRASHEN, R. PARIMALA, AND V. SURESH Abstract. We study
More informationSpecialization of difference equations in positive characteristic. Ehud Hrushovski March 7, 2018
Specialization of difference equations in positive characteristic Ehud Hrushovski March 7, 2018 1 Abstract A difference equation over an increasing transformal valued field is known to be analyzable over
More information5 Dedekind extensions
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #5 09/22/2016 5 Dedekind extensions In this lecture we prove that the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of its fraction field is also
More informationRepresenting Scott Sets in Algebraic Settings
Wellesley College Wellesley College Digital Scholarship and Archive Faculty Research and Scholarship 8-2015 Representing Scott Sets in Algebraic Settings Alf Dolich Julia F. Knight Karen Lange klange2@wellesley.edu
More informationDefinable henselian valuation rings
Definable henselian valuation rings Alexander Prestel Abstract We give model theoretic criteria for the existence of and - formulas in the ring language to define uniformly the valuation rings O of models
More informationNorm Groups with Tame Ramification
ECTURE 3 orm Groups with Tame Ramification et K be a field with char(k) 6=. Then K /(K ) ' {continuous homomorphisms Gal(K) Z/Z} ' {degree étale algebras over K} which is dual to our original statement
More informationA MODEL-THEORETIC PROOF OF HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ
A MODEL-THEORETIC PROOF OF HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ NICOLAS FORD Abstract. The goal of this paper is to present a proof of the Nullstellensatz using tools from a branch of logic called model theory. In
More informationEmbedding Henselian fields into power series
Embedding Henselian fields into power series Antongiulio Fornasiero 28th March 2005 Abstract Every Henselian field of residue characteristic 0 admits a truncation-closed embedding in a field of generalised
More informationThus, the integral closure A i of A in F i is a finitely generated (and torsion-free) A-module. It is not a priori clear if the A i s are locally
Math 248A. Discriminants and étale algebras Let A be a noetherian domain with fraction field F. Let B be an A-algebra that is finitely generated and torsion-free as an A-module with B also locally free
More informationSection V.6. Separability
V.6. Separability 1 Section V.6. Separability Note. Recall that in Definition V.3.10, an extension field F is a separable extension of K if every element of F is algebraic over K and every root of the
More informationMODEL THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL FIELDS: FROM COMMUTING TO NONCOMMUTING DERIVATIONS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 MODEL THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL FIELDS: FROM COMMUTING TO NONCOMMUTING DERIVATIONS MICHAEL
More informationFields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.
Fields and Galois Theory Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory. This should be a reasonably logical ordering, so that a result here should
More informationProof of the Shafarevich conjecture
Proof of the Shafarevich conjecture Rebecca Bellovin We have an isogeny of degree l h φ : B 1 B 2 of abelian varieties over K isogenous to A. We wish to show that h(b 1 ) = h(b 2 ). By filtering the kernel
More information55 Separable Extensions
55 Separable Extensions In 54, we established the foundations of Galois theory, but we have no handy criterion for determining whether a given field extension is Galois or not. Even in the quite simple
More informationFields. Victoria Noquez. March 19, 2009
Fields Victoria Noquez March 19, 2009 5.1 Basics Definition 1. A field K is a commutative non-zero ring (0 1) such that any x K, x 0, has a unique inverse x 1 such that xx 1 = x 1 x = 1. Definition 2.
More informationP-CONVEXLY VALUED RINGS
P-CONVEXLY VALUED RINGS NICOLAS GUZY Abstract. In [3], L. Bélair developed a theory analogous to the theory of real closed rings in the p-adic context, namely the theory of p-adically closed integral rings.
More informationDedekind Domains. Mathematics 601
Dedekind Domains Mathematics 601 In this note we prove several facts about Dedekind domains that we will use in the course of proving the Riemann-Roch theorem. The main theorem shows that if K/F is a finite
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More informationON GALOIS GROUPS OF ABELIAN EXTENSIONS OVER MAXIMAL CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS. Mamoru Asada. Introduction
ON GALOIS GROUPS OF ABELIAN ETENSIONS OVER MAIMAL CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS Mamoru Asada Introduction Let k 0 be a finite algebraic number field in a fixed algebraic closure Ω and ζ n denote a primitive n-th root
More informationAbsolute Values and Completions
Absolute Values and Completions B.Sury This article is in the nature of a survey of the theory of complete fields. It is not exhaustive but serves the purpose of familiarising the readers with the basic
More informationARTIN-SCHREIER EXTENSIONS IN DEPENDENT AND SIMPLE FIELDS. 1. Introduction
ARTIN-SCHREIER EXTENSIONS IN DEPENDENT AND SIMPLE FIELDS ITAY KAPLAN, THOMAS SCANLON AND FRANK O. WAGNER Abstract. We show that dependent elds have no Artin-Schreier extension, and that simple elds have
More informationROOTS OF IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIALS IN TAME HENSELIAN EXTENSION FIELDS. Ron Brown
ROOTS OF IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIALS IN TAME HENSELIAN EXTENSION FIELDS Ron Brown Department of Mathematics 2565 McCarthy Mall University of Hawaii Honolulu, HI 96822, USA (email: ron@math.hawaii.edu) Abstract.
More informationPart II Galois Theory
Part II Galois Theory Theorems Based on lectures by C. Birkar Notes taken by Dexter Chua Michaelmas 2015 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly) after
More informationLocal Fields. Chapter Absolute Values and Discrete Valuations Definitions and Comments
Chapter 9 Local Fields The definition of global field varies in the literature, but all definitions include our primary source of examples, number fields. The other fields that are of interest in algebraic
More informationDefinability in fields Lecture 2: Defining valuations
Definability in fields Lecture 2: Defining valuations 6 February 2007 Model Theory and Computable Model Theory Gainesville, Florida Defining Z in Q Theorem (J. Robinson) Th(Q) is undecidable. Defining
More informationDimension Theory. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013
Dimension Theory Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we prove some of the standard results of commutative ring theory that lead up to proofs of the main theorem of dimension theory and of the Nullstellensatz.
More informationTheorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.
5. Fields 5.1. Field extensions. Let F E be a subfield of the field E. We also describe this situation by saying that E is an extension field of F, and we write E/F to express this fact. If E/F is a field
More information7 Orders in Dedekind domains, primes in Galois extensions
18.785 Number theory I Lecture #7 Fall 2015 10/01/2015 7 Orders in Dedekind domains, primes in Galois extensions 7.1 Orders in Dedekind domains Let S/R be an extension of rings. The conductor c of R (in
More information1 Absolute values and discrete valuations
18.785 Number theory I Lecture #1 Fall 2015 09/10/2015 1 Absolute values and discrete valuations 1.1 Introduction At its core, number theory is the study of the ring Z and its fraction field Q. Many questions
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationHASSE ARF PROPERTY AND ABELIAN EXTENSIONS. Ivan B. Fesenko
Math. Nachrichten vol. 174 (1995), 81 87 HASSE ARF PROPERTY AND ABELIAN EXTENSIONS Ivan B. Fesenko Let F be a complete (or Henselian) discrete valuation field with a perfect residue field of characteristic
More informationLECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL
LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL In this lecture we discuss a criterion for non-stable-rationality based on the decomposition of the diagonal in the Chow group. This criterion
More information1 Separability and splitting fields
Supplementary field theory notes E/F is a finite field extension throughout. We also fix an algebraic closure F in which all our extensions live, although it will rarely be explicitly mentioned. Further
More informationFormal power series with cyclically ordered exponents
Formal power series with cyclically ordered exponents M. Giraudet, F.-V. Kuhlmann, G. Leloup January 26, 2003 Abstract. We define and study a notion of ring of formal power series with exponents in a cyclically
More informationMAXIMALLY COMPLETE FIELDS. This article has been published in L Enseign. Math. 39 (1993),
MAXIMALLY COMPLETE FIELDS BJORN POONEN This article has been published in L Enseign. Math. 39 (1993), 87 106. Abstract. Kaplansky proved in 1942 that among all fields with a valuation having a given divisible
More informationINTRODUCTION TO MODEL THEORY OF VALUED FIELDS
INTRODUCTION TO MODEL THEORY OF VALUED FIELDS MOSHE KAMENSKY Abstract. These are lecture notes from a graduate course on p-adic and motivic integration (given at BGU). The main topics are: Quantifier elimination
More informationAn introduction to o-minimality
An introduction to o-minimality Notes by Tom Foster and Marcello Mamino on lectures given by Alex Wilkie at the MODNET summer school, Berlin, September 2007 1 Introduction Throughout these notes definable
More informationTHE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter
THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter Abstract. In previous work, the second author introduced a topology, for spaces of irreducible representations,
More informationElliptic Curves Spring 2017 Lecture #5 02/22/2017
18.783 Elliptic Curves Spring 017 Lecture #5 0//017 5 Isogenies In almost every branch of mathematics, when considering a category of mathematical objects with a particular structure, the maps between
More information12 Ramification, Haar measure, the product formula
18.785 Number theory I Lecture #12 Fall 2015 10/22/2015 12 Ramification, Haar measure, the product formula 12.1 Ramification in terms of the different and discriminant We conclude our discussion of the
More informationGALOIS THEORY AT WORK: CONCRETE EXAMPLES
GALOIS THEORY AT WORK: CONCRETE EXAMPLES KEITH CONRAD 1. Examples Example 1.1. The field extension Q(, 3)/Q is Galois of degree 4, so its Galois group has order 4. The elements of the Galois group are
More informationClassifying classes of structures in model theory
Classifying classes of structures in model theory Saharon Shelah The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, and Rutgers University, NJ, USA ECM 2012 Saharon Shelah (HUJI and Rutgers) Classifying classes
More informationAdic Spaces. Torsten Wedhorn. June 19, 2012
Adic Spaces Torsten Wedhorn June 19, 2012 This script is highly preliminary and unfinished. It is online only to give the audience of our lecture easy access to it. Therefore usage is at your own risk.
More informationNONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN
NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN The primary goal of this note is to prove that every abstract nonsingular curve can be realized as an open subset of a (unique) nonsingular projective curve. Note that
More information11. Dimension. 96 Andreas Gathmann
96 Andreas Gathmann 11. Dimension We have already met several situations in this course in which it seemed to be desirable to have a notion of dimension (of a variety, or more generally of a ring): for
More informationORBITAL INTEGRALS ARE MOTIVIC. 1. Introduction
ORBITAL INTEGRALS ARE MOTIVIC THOMAS C. HALES Abstract. This article shows that under general conditions, p-adic orbital integrals of definable functions are represented by virtual Chow motives. This gives
More informationChapter 9. Hensel s Lemma. 9.1 Equivalent forms of Hensel s Lemma
Chapter 9 Hensel s Lemma 9.1 Equivalent forms of Hensel s Lemma For a valued field K = (K, v), the property of being henselian is equivalent to a variety of criteria for polynomials f O K [X] to admit
More informationIntroduction to Model Theory
Introduction to Model Theory Martin Hils Équipe de Logique Mathématique, Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu Université Paris Diderot Paris 7 Second International Conference and Workshop on Valuation
More informationA NOTE ON RETRACTS AND LATTICES (AFTER D. J. SALTMAN)
A NOTE ON RETRACTS AND LATTICES (AFTER D. J. SALTMAN) Z. REICHSTEIN Abstract. This is an expository note based on the work of D. J. Saltman. We discuss the notions of retract rationality and retract equivalence
More informationOn a conjecture of Vorst
On a conjecture of Vorst Thomas Geisser Lars Hesselholt Abstract Let k be an infinite perfect field of positive characteristic and assume that strong resolution of singularities holds over k. We prove
More informationx by so in other words ( )
Math 210B. Norm and trace An interesting application of Galois theory is to help us understand properties of two special constructions associated to field extensions, the norm and trace. If L/k is a finite
More informationLecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman
Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman October 31, 2006 TALK SLOWLY AND WRITE NEATLY!! 1 0.1 Symbolic Adjunction of Roots When dealing with subfields of C it is easy to
More informationThe pro-p Hom-form of the birational anabelian conjecture
The pro-p Hom-form of the birational anabelian conjecture Scott Corry at Appleton and Florian Pop at Philadelphia Abstract We prove a pro-p Hom-form of the birational anabelian conjecture for function
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #24 12/03/2013
18.78 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 013 Lecture #4 1/03/013 4.1 Isogenies of elliptic curves Definition 4.1. Let E 1 /k and E /k be elliptic curves with distinguished rational points O 1 and
More informationGalois Theory. Torsten Wedhorn. July 13, These lecture notes contain the final third of my lecture on abstract algebra.
Galois Theory Torsten Wedhorn July 13, 2015 These lecture notes contain the final third of my lecture on abstract algebra. Notation: If not otherwise stressed, all rings and all algebras are commutative.
More informationMore Model Theory Notes
More Model Theory Notes Miscellaneous information, loosely organized. 1. Kinds of Models A countable homogeneous model M is one such that, for any partial elementary map f : A M with A M finite, and any
More information5 Dedekind extensions
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2017 Lecture #5 09/20/2017 5 Dedekind extensions In this lecture we prove that the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of its fraction field is also
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local
More informationNotes on graduate algebra. Robert Harron
Notes on graduate algebra Robert Harron Department of Mathematics, Keller Hall, University of Hawai i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA E-mail address: rharron@math.hawaii.edu Abstract. Graduate algebra
More informationABSOLUTE VALUES AND VALUATIONS
ABSOLUTE VALUES AND VALUATIONS YIFAN WU, wuyifan@umich.edu Abstract. We introduce the basis notions, properties and results of absolute values, valuations, discrete valuation rings and higher unit groups.
More informationFinite Fields. [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT]
Finite Fields [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT] Lemma [Ch 16, 4.6] Assume F is a finite field. Then the multiplicative group F := F \ {0} is cyclic. Proof Recall from basic group theory
More informationINSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS THE CZECH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Rigid models of Presburger arithmetic. Emil Jeřábek
INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS THE CZECH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Rigid models of Presburger arithmetic Emil Jeřábek Preprint No. 55-2018 PRAHA 2018 Rigid models of Presburger arithmetic Emil Jeřábek Institute of
More information