A preview of GAMBIT. Pat Scott. Imperial College London. on behalf of the GAMBIT Collaboration
|
|
- William Lindsey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 he problem A preview of GAMB Pat Scott mperial College London on behalf of the GAMB Collaboration Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
2 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
3 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool So what is GAMB? Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
4 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool So what is GAMB? 3 things: Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
5 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool So what is GAMB? 3 things: A collaboration of about thirty theorists and experimentalists Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
6 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool So what is GAMB? 3 things: A collaboration of about thirty theorists and experimentalists A new public global fitting code Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
7 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool So what is GAMB? 3 things: A collaboration of about thirty theorists and experimentalists A new public global fitting code A program of physics analyses that we re carrying out using the code Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
8 he problem Let s begin with dessert. GAMB: he Global And Modular BSM nference ool So what is GAMB? 3 things: A collaboration of about thirty theorists and experimentalists A new public global fitting code A program of physics analyses that we re carrying out using the code First physics results and code release in a few months (i.e. late summer this year) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
9 Outline he problem 1 he problem 2 3 Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
10 Outline he problem 1 he problem 2 3 Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
11 he problem Combining searches Question How do we know which models are in and which are out? Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
12 he problem Combining searches Question How do we know which models are in and which are out? Answer Combine the results from different searches Simplest method: take different exclusions, overplot them, conclude things are allowed or excluded Simplest BSM example: the scalar singlet model (Cline, Kainulainen, PS & Weniger, PRD, ) log 10 λhs XENON100 (2012) XENON100 5 XENON1 XENON Γh SS ΩS/ΩDM = m S (GeV) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
13 he problem Combining searches hat s all well and good if there are only 2 parameters and few searches... Question What if there are many different constraints? Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
14 he problem Combining searches hat s all well and good if there are only 2 parameters and few searches... Question What if there are many different constraints? Answer Combine constraints in a statistically valid way composite likelihood log 10 λhs Excluded by Γh SS Future 1σ CL ΩS/ΩDM = 1 Future 90% CL (Fermi + CA + Planck) Current 1σ CL (Fermi + WMAP7) (Cline, Kainulainen, PS & Weniger, PRD, ) log 10 (m S/GeV) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
15 he problem Combining searches hat s all well and good if there are only 2 parameters and few searches... Question What if there are many parameters? Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
16 he problem Combining searches hat s all well and good if there are only 2 parameters and few searches... Question What if there are many parameters? Answer Need to scan the parameter space (smart numerics) interpret the combined results (Bayesian / frequentist) project down to parameter planes of interest (marginalise / profile) global fits Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
17 he problem Beyond-the-Standard-Model Scanning Goals: 1 Given multiple theories, determine which fit the data better, and quantify how much better 2 Given a particular theory, determine which parameter combinations fit all experiments, and how well Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
18 he problem Beyond-the-Standard-Model Scanning Goals: 1 Given multiple theories, determine which fit the data better, and quantify how much better = model comparison 2 Given a particular theory, determine which parameter combinations fit all experiments, and how well = parameter estimation Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
19 he problem Beyond-the-Standard-Model Scanning Goals: 1 Given multiple theories, determine which fit the data better, and quantify how much better = model comparison 2 Given a particular theory, determine which parameter combinations fit all experiments, and how well = parameter estimation Why simple N/OU analyses are not enough... Only partial goodness of fit, no measure of convergence, no idea how to generalise to regions or whole space. Frequency/density of models in N/OU scans is not proportional to probability = no statistical meaning. statements about a theory s general ability to do one thing or another, based on such scans, are statistically invalid Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
20 Outline he problem 1 he problem 2 3 Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
21 he problem he LHC likelihood monster ALAS CMS ime per point: O(minute) in best cases GAMB Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
22 he problem he LHC likelihood monster ALAS CMS ime per point: O(minute) in best cases ime per point for global fits to converge: O(seconds) in worst cases GAMB Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
23 he problem he LHC likelihood monster ALAS CMS ime per point: O(minute) in best cases ime per point for global fits to converge: O(seconds) in worst cases GAMB Challenge: About 2 orders of magnitude too slow to actually include LHC data in global fits properly Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
24 he problem he LHC likelihood monster ALAS CMS ime per point: O(minute) in best cases ime per point for global fits to converge: O(seconds) in worst cases GAMB Challenge: About 2 orders of magnitude too slow to actually include LHC data in global fits properly More in Martin s presentation Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
25 he problem Doing genuinely model-independent DM pheno All experimental limits in terms of simplified models: effective WMP, one annihilation channel, etc = need something to apply limits to arbitrary DD couplings and D decay/annihilation branching fractions = must include accurate treatment of experimental effects Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
26 he problem Doing genuinely model-independent DM pheno All experimental limits in terms of simplified models: effective WMP, one annihilation channel, etc = need something to apply limits to arbitrary DD couplings and D decay/annihilation branching fractions = must include accurate treatment of experimental effects mpacts of new unstable particles (e.g. extra Higgs) are hard = need to simulate decays on the fly Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
27 he problem Doing genuinely model-independent DM pheno All experimental limits in terms of simplified models: effective WMP, one annihilation channel, etc = need something to apply limits to arbitrary DD couplings and D decay/annihilation branching fractions = must include accurate treatment of experimental effects mpacts of new unstable particles (e.g. extra Higgs) are hard = need to simulate decays on the fly Calculating relic densities for general models also challenging = want to feed in partial annihilation rates, co-annihilations, resonances, etc (not only set up model in LanHEP) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
28 he problem Doing genuinely model-independent DM pheno All experimental limits in terms of simplified models: effective WMP, one annihilation channel, etc = need something to apply limits to arbitrary DD couplings and D decay/annihilation branching fractions = must include accurate treatment of experimental effects mpacts of new unstable particles (e.g. extra Higgs) are hard = need to simulate decays on the fly Calculating relic densities for general models also challenging = want to feed in partial annihilation rates, co-annihilations, resonances, etc (not only set up model in LanHEP) nulike, gamlike, DDcalc, cascade sim Christoph s talk Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
29 he problem Parameter space heory space CMSSM, MSSM, Simplified Models BSM Want to do model comparison to actually work out which theory is the best... Challenge: How do easily adapt a global fit to different BSM theories? Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
30 he problem Parameter space heory space CMSSM, MSSM, Simplified Models BSM Want to do model comparison to actually work out which theory is the best... Challenge: How do easily adapt a global fit to different BSM theories? Somehow, we must recast things quickly to a new theory data likelihood functions scanning code housekeeping even predictions = a new, very abstract global fitting framework Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
31 Hitting the wall he problem ssues with current global fit codes: Strongly wedded to a few theories (e.g. constrained MSSM / msugra) Strongly wedded to a few theory calculators All datasets and observables basically hardcoded Rough or non-existent treatment of most experiments (astroparticle + collider especially) Sub-optimal statistical methods / search algorithms = already hitting the wall on theories, data & computational methods Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
32 Outline he problem 1 he problem 2 3 Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
33 he problem GAMB: a second-generation global fit code GAMB: Global And Modular BSM nference ool Overriding principles of GAMB: flexibility and modularity General enough to allow fast definition of new datasets and theoretical models Plug and play scanning, physics and likelihood packages Extensive model database not just small modifications to constrained MSSM (NUHM, etc), and not just SUSY! Extensive observable/data libraries (likelihood modules) Many statistical options Bayesian/frequentist, likelihood definitions, scanning algorithms A smart and fast LHC likelihood calculator Massively parallel Full open-source code release Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
34 he problem he GAMB Collaboration 26 Members, 15 institutions, 9 countries 8 Experiments, 4 major theory codes Fermi-LA ALAS CA HESS LHCb cecube AMS-02 CDMS, DM-CE XENON/DARWN heory J. Conrad, J. Edsjö, G. Martinez P. Scott A. Buckley, P. Jackson, C. Rogan, A. Saavedra, M. White C. Balázs,. Bringmann, J. Conrad, M. White J. Conrad M. Chrza szcz, N. Serra J. Edsjö, C. Savage, P. Scott A. Putze L. Hsu J. Conrad P. Athron, C. Balázs,. Bringmann, J. Cornell, L. Dal, J. Edsjö, B. Farmer, A. Krislock, A. Kvellestad, M. Pato, F. Mahmoudi, A. Raklev, C. Savage, P. Scott, C. Weniger, M. White Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
35 he problem he GAMB Collaboration 26 Members, 15 institutions, 9 countries 8 Experiments, 4 major theory codes Fermi-LA ALAS CA HESS LHCb cecube AMS-02 CDMS, DM-CE XENON/DARWN heory J. Conrad, J. Edsjö, G. Martinez P. Scott A. Buckley, P. Jackson, C. Rogan, A. Saavedra, M. White C. Balázs,. Bringmann, J. Conrad, M. White J. Conrad M. Chrza szcz, N. Serra J. Edsjö, C. Savage, P. Scott A. Putze L. Hsu J. Conrad P. Athron, C. Balázs,. Bringmann, J. Cornell, L. Dal, J. Edsjö, B. Farmer, A. Krislock, A. Kvellestad, M. Pato, F. Mahmoudi, A. Raklev, C. Savage, P. Scott, C. Weniger, M. White Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
36 Modules he problem Physics Modules ColliderBit (Martin s talk) DarkBit (Christoph s talk) FlavBit flavour physics inc. g 2, b sγ, B decays (new channels, theory uncerts, LHCb likelihoods) SpecBit generic BSM spectrum object, providing RGE running, masses, mixings, etc via interchangeable interfaces to different RGE codes DecayBit decay widths for all relevant SM & BSM particles EWPOBit precision tests (mostly by interface to FeynHiggs, alt. SUSY-POPE) +ScannerBit: manages statistics, parameter sampling and optimisation algorithms Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
37 he problem Backends: mix and match GAMB modules consist of a number of standalone module functions Module functions can depend on each other, or they can require specific functions from backends Backends are external code libraries (DarkSUSY, FeynHiggs, etc) that include different functions GAMB automates and abstracts the interfaces to backends backend functions are tagged according to what they calculate with appropriate module design, different backends and their functions can be used interchangeably GAMB dynamically adapts to use whichever backends are actually present on a user s system (+ provides details of wtf it did of course) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
38 he problem Backends: mix and match GAMB modules consist of a number of standalone module functions Module functions can depend on each other, or they can require specific functions from backends Backends are external code libraries (DarkSUSY, FeynHiggs, etc) that include different functions GAMB automates and abstracts the interfaces to backends backend functions are tagged according to what they calculate with appropriate module design, different backends and their functions can be used interchangeably GAMB dynamically adapts to use whichever backends are actually present on a user s system (+ provides details of wtf it did of course) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
39 he problem GAMB: a toy example Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
40 he problem Dependency Resolution nuclear_params_fnq_parameters ype: ModelParameters Function: primary_parameters Module: nuclear_params_fnq DD_couplings ype: DarkBit::DD_couplings Function: DD_couplings_DarkSUSY sigma_sd_p ype: double Function: sigma_sd_p_simple capture_rate_sun ype: double DarkSUSY_5_1_1_init ype: void Function: DarkSUSY_5_1_1_init Module: BackendniBit sigma_s_p ype: double Function: sigma_s_p_simple Function: capture_rate_sun_constant_xsec equilibration_time_sun ype: double Function: equilibration_time_sun C79SL_data ype: nudata Function: C79SL_full annihilation_rate_sun ype: double Function: annihilation_rate_sun C79SL_loglike ype: double Function: C79SL_loglike DarkSUSY_Pointnit ype: bool Function: DarkSUSY_Pointnit_MSSM mwimp ype: double Function: mwimp_generic nulike_1_0_0_init ype: void Function: nulike_1_0_0_init Module: BackendniBit C79WH_data ype: nudata Function: C79WH_full C79WH_loglike ype: double Function: C79WH_loglike cecube_likelihood ype: double Function: C79_loglike MSSM25atQ_parameters ype: ModelParameters Function: primary_parameters MSSM_spectrum ype: easlha Module: MSSM25atQ Function: get_mssm_spectrum_from_file H_ProcessCatalog ype: DarkBit::H_ProcessCatalog Function: H_ProcessCatalog_CMSSM sigmav ype: double Function: sigmav_late_universe nuyield_ptr ype: nuyield_functype Function: nuyield_from_ds C79WL_data ype: nudata Function: C79WL_full C79WL_loglike ype: double Function: C79WL_loglike DarkMatter_D ype: DarkMatter_D_type Function: DarkMatter_D_MSSM25atQ pi_plus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: pi_plus_decays eta_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: eta_decays rho_0_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: rho_0_decays rho_minus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: rho_minus_decays rho_plus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: rho_plus_decays omega_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: omega_decays gluino_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: gluino_decays h0_2_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: h0_2_decays A0_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: A0_decays Hplus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: Hplus_decays stop_1_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: stop_1_decays stop_2_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: stop_2_decays sbottom_1_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sbottom_1_decays sbottom_2_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sbottom_2_decays MSSM78atQ_parameters ype: ModelParameters Function: MSSM78atQ_parameters Module: MSSM25atQ SUSY_H_1_4_init ype: void Function: SUSY_H_1_4_init Module: BackendniBit sdown_l_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sdown_l_decays sup_l_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sup_l_decays StandardModel_SLHA2_parameters ype: ModelParameters Function: primary_parameters Module: StandardModel_SLHA2 SMNPUS ype: SMnputs Function: get_smnpus Module: SpecBit MSSM_spectrum ype: const SMplusUV* Function: get_mssmatq_spectrum Module: SpecBit sup_r_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sup_r_decays decay_rates ype: Decayable Function: all_decays scharm_r_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: scharm_r_decays sdown_r_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sdown_r_decays scharm_l_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: scharm_l_decays sstrange_l_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sstrange_l_decays sstrange_r_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: sstrange_r_decays Higgs_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: MSSM_h0_1_decays W_minus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: W_minus_decays W_plus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: W_plus_decays Z_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: Z_decays t_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: t_decays tbar_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: tbar_decays mu_minus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: mu_minus_decays mu_plus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: mu_plus_decays tau_minus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: tau_minus_decays tau_plus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: tau_plus_decays pi_0_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: pi_0_decays pi_minus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: pi_minus_decays Module functions and backend functions get arranged into a dependency tree Starting with requested observables and likelihoods, fills each dependency and backend requirement Obeys rules at each step: allowed models, allowed backends, constraints from input file, etc tree constitutes a directed acyclic graph GAMB uses graph-theoretic methods to solve the graph to determine function evaluation order Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
41 he problem Dependency Resolution DarkSUSY_5_1_1_init MSSM_spectrum Module functions and backend ype: functions void ype: get easlha arranged into Function: DarkSUSY_5_1_1_init Function: get_mssm_spectrum_from_file Module: BackendniBit a dependency tree nuclear_params_fnq_parameters DarkSUSY_Pointnit DarkMatter_D ype: ModelParameters ype: bool ype: DarkMatter_D_type Function: primary_parameters Function: DarkSUSY_Pointnit_MSSM Function: DarkMatter_D_MSSM25atQ Module: nuclear_params_fnq Starting with requested observables and likelihoods, fills DD_couplings H_ProcessCatalog ype: DarkBit::DD_couplings ype: DarkBit::H_ProcessCatalog Function: DD_couplings_DarkSUSY Function: H_ProcessCatalog_CMSSM each dependency and backend requirement ype: double Function: mwimp_generic Obeys rules at each step: allowed models, allowed sigma_sd_p sigma_s_p sigmav ype: double ype: double ype: double backends, constraints Function: from sigma_sd_p_simple input Function: sigma_s_p_simple file, etcfunction: sigmav_late_universe capture_rate_sun ype: double tree constitutes a directed Function: capture_rate_sun_constant_xsec acyclic graph nuyield_ptr ype: nuyield_functype Function: nuyield_from_ds equilibration_time_sun ype: double GAMB uses graph-theoretic Function: equilibration_time_sun methods to solve the graph to determine functionannihilation_rate_sun evaluation nulike_1_0_0_init order ype: double Function: annihilation_rate_sun mwimp ype: void Function: nulike_1_0_0_init Module: BackendniBit MSSM25atQ_parameters ype: ModelParameters Function: primary_parameters Module: MSSM25atQ pi_plus_decay_rates ype: Decayable::Entry Function: pi_plus_decays eta_decay_ra ype: Decayable:: Function: eta_dec Module: DecayB C79SL_data ype: nudata Function: C79SL_full C79WH_data ype: nudata Function: C79WH_full C79WL_data ype: nudata Function: C79WL_full C79SL_loglike ype: double Function: C79SL_loglike C79WH_loglike ype: double Function: C79WH_loglike cecube_likelihood ype: double Function: C79_loglike C79WL_loglike ype: double Function: C79WL_loglike Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
42 he problem Hierarchical Model Database Models are defined by their parameters and relations to each other Models can inherit from parent models Points in child models can be automatically translated to ancestor models Friend models also allowed (cross-family translation) Model dependence of every module/backend function is tracked = maximum safety, maximum reuse MSSM78atQ MSSM25atQ SingletDM StandardModel_SLHA2 nuclear_params_fnq nuclear_params_sigma0_sigmapin nuclear_params_sigmas_sigmapin DMHalo_base_demo Gaussian_Halo_demo NormalDist SomeOther_Halo_demo CMSSM_demo test_parent_ MSSM_demo CMSSM demo WOHDM_demo_parent WOHDM_demo WOHDM_sub_demo MSSM78atMGU CMSSM extracmssm Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
43 he problem nterface: yaml file Basic interface for a scan is a YAML initialisation file - specify parameters, ranges, priors - select likelihood components - select other observables to calculate - define generic rules for how to fill dependencies - define generic rules for options to be passed to module functions - set global options (scanner, errors/warnings, logging behaviour, etc) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
44 he problem nterface: yaml file Basic interface for a scan is a YAML initialisation file - specify parameters, ranges, priors - select likelihood components - select other observables to calculate - define generic rules for how to fill dependencies - define generic rules for options to be passed to module functions - set global options (scanner, errors/warnings, logging behaviour, etc) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
45 he problem nterface: yaml file Basic interface for a scan is a YAML initialisation file - specify parameters, ranges, priors - select likelihood components - select other observables to calculate - define generic rules for how to fill dependencies - define generic rules for options to be passed to module functions - set global options (scanner, errors/warnings, logging behaviour, etc) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
46 he problem nterface: yaml file Basic interface for a scan is a YAML initialisation file - specify parameters, ranges, priors - select likelihood components - select other observables to calculate - define generic rules for how to fill dependencies - define generic rules for options to be passed to module functions - set global options (scanner, errors/warnings, logging behaviour, etc) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
47 he problem nterface: yaml file Basic interface for a scan is a YAML initialisation file - specify parameters, ranges, priors - select likelihood components - select other observables to calculate - define generic rules for how to fill dependencies - define generic rules for options to be passed to module functions - set global options (scanner, errors/warnings, logging behaviour, etc) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
48 he problem Expansion: adding new functions Adding a new module function is easy: 1 Declare the function to GAMB in a module s rollcall header Choose a capability Declare any dependencies Declare any backend requirements Declare any specific allowed models other more advanced declarations also available 2 Write the function as a simple C++ function (one argument: the result) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
49 he problem Other nice technical features Scanners: MultiNest, Diver (diff. evolution), PKAA (genetic algorithms), GreA (MCMC) Statistics: Bayesian, Profile Likelihood, later full Neyman Mixed-mode MP + openmp, mostly automated diskless generalisation of various Les Houches Accords BOSS: dynamic loading of C++ classes from backends (!) all-in or module standalone modes easily implemented from single cmake script automatic getters for obtaining, configuring + compiling backends 1 flexible output streams (ASC, databases, binary,... ) more more more... 1 if a backend breaks, won t compile and/or kills your dog, blame the authors (not us... unless we are the authors... ) Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
50 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
51 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
52 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
53 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
54 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
55 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
56 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
57 he problem GAMB vs the rest in a nutshell Aspect GAMB MasterCode SuperBayeS Fittino Rizzo et al. Design Modular, Adaptive Monolithic Monolithic ( )Monolithic Monolithic Statistics Frequentist, Bayesian Frequentist Freq./Bayes. Frequentist None Scanners Differential evolution, genetic algorithms, random forests, t-walk, t- nest, particle swarm, nested sampling, MCMC, gradient descent heories (p)mssm-25, CMSSM±ɛ, GMSB, AMSB, gaugino mediation, E6MSSM, NMSSM, BMSSM, PQMSSM, effective operators, idm, XDM, ADM, UED, Higgs portals/extended Higgs sectors Astroparticle Event-level: cecube, Fermi, LUX, XENON, CDMS, DM-CE. AMS-02, COUPP, KMS, CRESS, CoGeN, SMPLE, PAMELA, Planck, HESS. Predictions: CA, DARWN, GAPS LHC ALAS+CMS multi-analysis with neural net and fast detector simulation. Higgs multi-channel with correlations and no SM assumptions. Full flavour inc. complete B X sll and B K ll angular set. SM, theory m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic and related matrix elements, detector responses, uncerts. QCD+EW corrections (LHC+DM signal+bg), astro BGs, cosmic ray hadronisation, coalescence and p gation. Nested sampling, MCMC, grad. descent CMSSM±ɛ LUX, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t, m Z, α EM, hadronic matrix elements Nested sampling, MCMC (p)mssm-15, CMSSM±ɛ, mued Fermi, cecube, XENON ALAS direct sim, Higgs mass only, basic flavour. m t, m b, α s, α EM, DM halo, hadronic matrix elems. MCMC None (random) CMSSM±ɛ Fermi, HESS, XENON ALAS resim, HiggsSignals, basic flavour. m t (p)mssm-19 Event-level: Fermi. cecube, CA ALAS+CMS +evatron direct sim, basic flavour. None Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
58 Closing remarks he problem Robust analysis of dark matter and BSM physics requires multi-messenger global fits GAMB is coming: Global fits to many models for the first time Better global fits to familiar ones Highly modular, usable and extendable public code Faster, more complete and more consistent theory explorations + experimental analysis prototyping Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
59 he problem Pat Scott April 2015 F Madrid A preview of GAMB
Beyond the Standard Model global fits: then, now and tomorrow
Beyond the Standard Model global fits: then, now and tomorrow Pat Scott Imperial College London Outline The problem 1 The problem 2 Present limits Coverage Scanning challenges 3 Respectable LHC likelihoods
More informationBeyond the Standard Model or Bust
Pat Scott McGill University / Imperial College London Slides available from www.physics.mcgill.ca/ patscott Outline The Problem 1 The Problem 2 Gamma-rays Neutrinos CMB constraints 3 Respectable LHC likelihoods
More informationBeyond the Standard Model or Bust
Pat Scott McGill University / Imperial College London Slides available from www.physics.mcgill.ca/ patscott Outline The Problem 1 The Problem 2 Gamma-rays Neutrinos CMB constraints 3 Respectable LHC likelihoods
More informationStatistical challenges in astroparticle physics
Pat Scott Department of Physics, McGill University Slides available from http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/ patscott Outline 1 New physics Global fits 2 Systematisation: Parameter space Theory space New physics
More informationSampling in high dimensional spaces (with the Global and Modular BSM Inference Tool)
Sampling in high dimensional spaces (with the Global and Modular BSM Inference Tool) Martin White Leiden 2018 Outline Brief introduction to global fits of beyond-sm physics theories and the Global and
More informationGlobal SUSY Fits with IceCube
Global SUSY Fits with IceCube Chris Savage * Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics Stockholm University For the IceCube Collaboration * associate member Overview All processes depend on WIMP mass
More informationA profile likelihood analysis of the CMSSM with Genetic Algorithms
A profile likelihood analysis of the CMSSM with Genetic Algorithms TeVPA 2009 / SLAC / July 13, 2009 Yashar Akrami Collaborators: Pat Scott, Joakim Edsjö, Jan Conrad and Lars Bergström Oskar Klein Center
More informationSUSY scans and dark matter
SUSY scans and dark matter Pat Scott Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics & Department of Physics, Stockholm University May 27 2010 Mostly based on: JCAP 1001:031 (2010; arxiv:0909.3300) JHEP 1004:057
More informationLHC recasting & reinterpretation tools
LHC recasting & reinterpretation tools Eric Conte (IPHC-GRPHE) Tools 2017: Tools for the SM and the New Physics 10-13 September 2017 @ Corfu (Greece) Outlines 1. Motivations 2. Recasting based on SMS 3.
More informationSUSY GUTs, DM and the LHC
SUSY GUTs, DM and the LHC Smaragda Lola Dept. of Physics, University of Patras Collaborators [JCAP 1603 (2016) and in progress] R. de Austri, M.Canonni, J.Ellis, M. Gomez, Q. Shafi Outline Ø No SUSY signal
More informationNon-Minimal SUSY Computation of observables and fit to exp
Non-Minimal SUSY Computation of observables and fit to experimental data + Peter Athron, Alexander Voigt Dresden Fittino Workshop, 24th November 2010, DESY Outline 1 Introduction 2 Motivation 3 Outline
More informationDarkSUSY. Joakim Edsjö With Torsten Bringmann, Paolo Gondolo, Lars Bergström, Piero Ullio and Gintaras Duda. APS Meeting
DarkSUSY Joakim Edsjö edsjo@fysik.su.se With Torsten Bringmann, Paolo Gondolo, Lars Bergström, Piero Ullio and Gintaras Duda APS Meeting 160830 Ways to search for dark matter Accelerator searches LHC Rare
More informationAn update on scalar singlet dark matter
Pat Scott Department of Physics, McGill University With: Jim Cline, Kimmo Kainulainen & Christoph Weniger (arxiv:1306.4710) Slides available from http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/ patscott What is the scalar
More informationFlip Tanedo, Experiments 1
1 2 Flavour in RS Models Cornell Flip Tanedo 16 April 2009 University 2 Flavour in RS Models Cornell Flip Tanedo 16 April 2009 University 3 Theory vs. Experiment in our generation Cornell Flip Tanedo 16
More informationUse of event-level IceCube data in SUSY scans
Use of event-level IceCube data in SUSY scans Pat Scott Department of Physics, McGill University July 3, 202 Based on: PS, Chris Savage, Joakim Edsjö and The IceCube Collaboration (esp. Matthias Danninger
More informationTHE STATUS OF NEUTRALINO DARK MATTER
THE STATUS OF NEUTRALINO DARK MATTER BIBHUSHAN SHAKYA CORNELL UNIVERSITY CETUP 2013 Workshop June 25, 2013 Based on hep-ph 1208.0833, 1107.5048 with Maxim Perelstein, hep-ph 1209.2427 The favorite / most
More informationSupersymmetry at the LHC
Supersymmetry at the LHC What is supersymmetry? Present data & SUSY SUSY at the LHC C. Balázs, L. Cooper, D. Carter, D. Kahawala C. Balázs, Monash U. Melbourne SUSY@LHC.nb Seattle, 23 Sep 2008 page 1/25
More informationGlobal (SUSY) Fits in 2012 (Frequentist Approach)
Global (SUSY) Fits in 2012 (Frequentist Approach) Oliver Buchmueller Imperial College London darkattack2012 1 Confronting a theory with data Recipe: Combine measurements Compare with predictions Constrain
More informationDark matter, supersymmetry and global fits
Pat Scott Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics (OKC) & Department of Physics, Stockholm University Collaborators: Joakim Edsjö, Jan Conrad, Lars Bergström, Yashar Akrami (OKC/Stockholm), Sofia
More informationTools for SUSY Summary and Outlook
Tools for SUSY Summary and Outlook Fawzi BOUDJEMA OUTLINE LAPTH-Annecy, France What s a tool and what it takes to make one How tools should talk to each other Talks and Issues discussed in Barcelona Organising
More informationFlip Tanedo, No CHAMPS at DØ 1
/9 2 /9 No CHAMPs at DØ Flip Tanedo Presenting: 0809.4472 7 December 2009 Physics 766, Fall 2009 Collider Physics Cornell University 3 /9 WTF is a CHAMP Kobe Bryant 4x NBA CHAMPion 2009 NBA Finals MVP
More informationSeminar IKTP, TU Dresden January 07, 2010
1 Predicting and understanding supersymmetry Peter Wienemann University of Bonn Work in collaboration with: Philip Bechtle (DESY), Klaus Desch and Mathias Uhlenbrock (U Bonn) Seminar IKTP, TU Dresden January
More informationpmssm Dark Matter Searches On Ice! Randy Cotta (Stanford/SLAC) In collaboration with: K.T.K. Howe (Stanford) J.L. Hewett (SLAC) T.G.
pmssm Dark Matter Searches On Ice! χ ~ 0 1 Randy Cotta (Stanford/SLAC) In collaboration with: K.T.K. Howe (Stanford) J.L. Hewett (SLAC) T.G. Rizzo (SLAC) Based on: 1104.XXXX (next week or bust.) In case
More informationDark Matter WIMP and SuperWIMP
Dark Matter WIMP and SuperWIMP Shufang Su U. of Arizona S. Su Dark Matters Outline Dark matter evidence New physics and dark matter WIMP candidates: neutralino LSP in MSSM direct/indirect DM searches,
More informationSearches for Dark Matter at the ATLAS experiment
EPJ Web of Conferences 10, 04001 (016) DOI:.1/ epjconf/0161004001 ISMD 01 Searches for Dark Matter at the ALAS experiment Henso Abreu 1 on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration a 1 echnion Israel Institute
More informationWhither SUSY? G. Ross, Birmingham, January 2013
Whither SUSY? G. Ross, Birmingham, January 2013 whither Archaic or poetic adv 1. to what place? 2. to what end or purpose? conj to whatever place, purpose, etc. [Old English hwider, hwæder; related to
More informationSupersymmetry Without Prejudice at the LHC
Supersymmetry Without Prejudice at the LHC Conley, Gainer, JLH, Le, Rizzo arxiv:1005.asap J. Hewett, 10 09 Supersymmetry With or Without Prejudice? The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model has ~120 parameters
More informationDark matter and LHC: complementarities and limitations
Dark matter and LHC: complementarities and limitations,1,2, F. Mahmoudi 1,2,3, A. Arbey 1,2,3, M. Boudaud 4 1 Univ Lyon, Univ Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon UMR5574,
More information- A Bayesian approach
DM in the Constrained MSSM - A Bayesian approach Leszek Roszkowski CERN and Astro Particle Theory and Cosmology Group, Sheffield, England with Roberto Ruiz de Austri (Autonoma Madrid), Joe Silk and Roberto
More informationPerspectives on public data. Sabine Kraml (LPSC Grenoble) Sezen Sekmen (CERN) Joint DASPOS/DPHEP Meeting, March 2013, CERN
Perspectives on public data Sabine Kraml (LPSC Grenoble) Sezen Sekmen (CERN) Joint DASPOS/DPHEP Meeting, 21-22 March 2013, CERN 1 Motivation LHC is the high energy frontier machine to explore the TeV scale
More informationDark Matter Implications for SUSY
Dark Matter Implications for SUSY Sven Heinemeyer, IFCA (CSIC, Santander) Madrid, /. Introduction and motivation. The main idea 3. Some results 4. Future plans Sven Heinemeyer, First MultiDark workshop,
More informationThe inert doublet model in light of LHC and XENON
The inert doublet model in light of LHC and XENON Sara Rydbeck 24 July 212 Identification of Dark Matter, IDM 212, Chicago 1 The CERN Large Hadron Collider Only discovery so far. If no new strongly interacting
More informationDark matter Andreas Goudelis. Journée Théorie CPTGA 2017, Grenoble. LPTHE - Jussieu
Dark matter 2017 Journée Théorie, Grenoble LPTHE - Jussieu Wednesday 24/5/2017 What I ll try to summarise Why we need dark matter and what we know about it The most popular ways to look for it What we
More informationExploring Universal Extra-Dimensions at the LHC
Exploring Universal Extra-Dimensions at the LHC Southampton University & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Problems to be addressed by the underlying theory The Nature of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking The
More informationBeyond the Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at DØ
Beyond the Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at DØ Nicolas Osman On behalf of the DØ Collaboration Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille 28th July, 2011 PANIC11 2 Outline Tevatron and DØ Neutral
More informationBSM Higgs Searches at ATLAS
BSM Higgs Searches at ATLAS Martin zur Nedden Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin for the ATLAS Collaboration SUSY Conference 2014 Manchester July 20 th July 25 th, 2014 Introduction Discovery of a scalar Boson
More informationLHC Impact on DM searches
LHC Impact on DM searches Complementarity between collider and direct searches for DM Outline Introduction (complementarity of DM searches) Dark Matter signals at the LHC (missing ET, jets, etc... ) Particular
More informationA Bayesian approach to supersymmetry phenomenology
Corfu Summer Institute 2009 - Sept 1st 2009 A Bayesian approach to supersymmetry phenomenology Imperial College London, Astrophysics Group In collaboration with: R. Ruiz de Austri, L. Roszkowski, M. Hobson,
More informationDark LHC 2018 Search for dark matter in the channel of Mono-H(γγ) at the ATLAS experiment and truth-level reweighting
Dark Matter @ LHC 2018 Search for dark matter in the channel of Mono-H(γγ) at the ALAS experiment and truth-level reweighting Kristian Bjørke on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration kristian.bjoerke@cern.ch
More informationPseudoscalar-mediated dark matter models: LHC vs cosmology
Pseudoscalar-mediated dark matter models: LHC vs cosmology Based on: S. Banerjee, D. Barducci, G. Bélanger, B. Fuks, A. G., B. Zaldivar, arxiv:1705.02327 Birmingham, 15/11/2017 LPTHE - Jussieu Outline
More informationmicromegas : A tool for dark matter studies
micromegas : A tool for dark matter studies G. Bélanger LAPTH G. B, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov hep-ph/0112278, hep-ph/0405253, hep-ph/0607059, arxiv:08032360[hep-ph] Outline - Motivation Relic
More informationSearches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Jay Wacker. APS April Meeting SLAC. A Theoretical Perspective. May 4, 2009
Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model A Theoretical Perspective Jay Wacker SLAC APS April Meeting May 4, 2009 1 The Plan Motivations for Physics Beyond the Standard Model New Hints from Dark Matter
More informationEarly SUSY searches at the LHC
on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Imperial College London E-mail: a.tapper@imperial.ac.uk Supersymmetry may give rise to striking events that could be discovered early in LHC running. Search
More informationLHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch
LHC searches for dark matter! Uli Haisch Evidence for dark matter Velocity Observed / 1 p r Disk 10 5 ly Radius Galaxy rotation curves Evidence for dark matter Bullet cluster Mass density contours 10 7
More informationIndirect constraints on the (C)MSSM parameter space
Indirect constraints on the (C)MSSM parameter space Frédéric Ronga ETH Zurich Switzerland CKM Workshop, Rome September 11, 2008 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Combining today s constraints 3 Prospects for LHC
More informationSupersymmetry at the LHC
Supersymmetry at the LHC What is supersymmetry? Present data & SUSY SUSY at the LHC C. Balázs L. Cooper D. Carter D. Kahawala C. Balázs, Monash U. Melbourne SUSY@LHC.nb Beijing, 8 Oct 2008 page 1/25 What
More informationPhysics Beyond the. Texas A&M University. For the. Mini-Symposium May, 2009
Physics Beyond the Standard Model David Toback Texas A&M University For the David Toback, Texas CDF A&M and University DØ collaborations 1 Mini-Symposia on Searches Exciting New Search Results from the
More informationSearches for long-lived particles at CMS
Searches for long-lived particles at CMS After a few year s of LHC running, CMS has published several searches for long-lived, exotic particles. What motivates these searches? What strengths & weaknesses
More informationSven Heinemeyer GK Seminar, University of Freiburg,
Sven Heinemeyer GK Seminar, University of Freiburg, 09.02.2017 1 SUSY and its Higgs Bosons at the LHC Sven Heinemeyer, IFT/IFCA (CSIC, Madrid/Santander) Freiburg, 02/2017 Motivation SUSY after LHC Run
More informationInterconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC
Interconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC Selections from the Cosmo Secret Cube Catalogue Transformer Cube Standard Model Cube PPC Cube Premiere Props Teruki Kamon Mitchell Institute
More informationSearches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS
Searches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS (University of Liverpool) on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations 1 Why beyond SM? In 2012 the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM) particle content
More informationWhither SUSY? G. Ross, RAL, January 2013
Whither SUSY? G. Ross, RAL, January 2013 whither Archaic or poetic adv 1. to what place? 2. to what end or purpose? conj to whatever place, purpose, etc. [Old English hwider, hwæder; related to Gothic
More informationSUSY naturalness with implications for LHC, ILC, axion and WIMP detection. Howard Baer University of Oklahoma
SUSY naturalness with implications for LHC, ILC, axion and WIMP detection Howard Baer University of Oklahoma 1 is 2 fine-tuned? 2 is 2 fine-tuned? 2=2 b + b 3 is 2 fine-tuned? 2=2 b + b lim =? b 4 Prime
More information14th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, 24 August 2009
M. Biglietti University of Rome Sapienza & INFN On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 14th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, 24 August 2009 Theoretically favored candidates for
More informationCMS Searches for SUSY in Final States with Taus. Alfredo Gurrola (Vanderbilt) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration
CMS Searches for SUSY in Final States with Taus Alfredo Gurrola (Vanderbilt) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Why SUSY with Taus? 2 Theoretical motivation ( Naturalness ) SUSY can cancel top loop corrections
More informationSEARCH FOR PHYSICS BEYOND STANDARD MODEL AT THE LHC. Daniele del Re Sapienza Università & INFN Sezione Roma
SEARCH FOR PHYSICS BEYOND STANDARD MODEL AT THE LHC Daniele del Re Sapienza Università & INFN Sezione Roma WHY BSM Several open issues implying Physics beyond Standard Model. Some examples: 1. Why only
More informationPoS(ICHEP2012)238. Search for B 0 s µ + µ and other exclusive B decays with the ATLAS detector. Paolo Iengo
Search for B s µ + µ and other exclusive B decays with the ATLAS detector. On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration INFN Naples, Italy E-mail: paolo.iengo@cern.ch The ATLAS experiment, collecting data in pp
More informationRecent results from the LHCb experiment
Recent results from the LHCb experiment University of Cincinnati On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Brief intro to LHCb The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) proton-proton collisions NCTS Wksp. DM 2017, Shoufeng,
More informationThe search for particle dark matter
Pat Scott Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics (OKC) & Department of Physics, Stockholm University Collaborators: Joakim Edsjö, Jan Conrad, Lars Bergström, Yashar Akrami (OKC/Stockholm), Sofia
More informationSearches for Supersymmetry at ATLAS
Searches for Supersymmetry at ATLAS Renaud Brunelière Uni. Freiburg On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration pp b b X candidate 2 b-tagged jets pt 52 GeV and 96 GeV E T 205 GeV, M CT (bb) 20 GeV Searches for
More informationCollider Physics Analysis Procedures
Collider Physics Analysis Procedures Alex Tapper Slides available at: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~tapper/lecture.html Aim Overview of analysis techniques at CMS Contrast with Tevatron (see DØ lecture)
More informationSneutrino dark matter and its LHC phenomenology
Sneutrino dark matter and its LHC phenomenology Chiara Arina Physics challenges in the face of LHC-14 workshop @ IFT 1 September 23 th 2014 Bolshoi simulation, NASA Sneutrino dark matter in the MSSM? Left-handed
More informationEW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data. Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March
EW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March 3 SM Higgs: Lagrangian and Physical Parameters The SM Higgs potential has two terms two parameters: Higgs
More informationConstraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations
Constraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations Tanushree Basak Physical Research Laboratory, India 10th PATRAS Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs CERN Geneva, Switzerland July 3, 2014
More informationActivités au LAPTh. G. Bélanger
Activités au LAPTh G. Bélanger Equipes / Research - Teams Fields, Strings and Symmetries (Math-Phys) L. Frappat, L.Gallot. E. Ragoucy, F. Thuillier, E. Sokatchev, P. Sorba Particle Physics Astroparticles
More informationB8: Global fits with Gfitter and Fittino
Annual SFB and GrK Meeting Hamburger Sternwarte 4 th march 2009 B8: Global fits with Gfitter and Fittino Johannes Haller (Universität Hamburg) sub-project B8 New sub-project B8 approved in Oct 2008 Interpretation
More informationDark matter in split extended supersymmetry
Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry Vienna 2 nd December 2006 Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) based on AP, M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) hep ph/0609059 Dark matter: experimental clues
More informationImplications of LHC Higgs results
Implications of LHC Higgs results Giuseppe Degrassi Universita' di Roma Tre, I.N.F.N. Sezione Roma Tre Frascati, May 17th, 2012 Outline Past and present information on the Higgs boson Discussing the hypothesis:
More informationGamma-rays constraint on Higgs Production from Dark Matter Annihilation
Gamma-rays constraint on Higgs Production from Dark Matter Annihilation Takashi Toma IPPP Durham University Based on arxiv:1211.2639 in collaboration with N. Bernal, C. Boehm, S. Palomales-Ruiz and J.
More informationDarkSUSY 6 Tutorial Part I
DarkSUSY 6 Tutorial Part I Joakim Edsjö edsjo@fysik.su.se With Torsten Bringmann, Paolo Gondolo, Piero Ullio and Lars Bergström KMI School, Nagoya 2018-02-28 2018-03-02 Question Have you managed to install
More informationSimplified models in collider searches for dark matter. Stefan Vogl
Simplified models in collider searches for dark matter Stefan Vogl Outline Introduction/Motivation Simplified Models for the LHC A word of caution Conclusion How to look for dark matter at the LHC? experimentally
More informationDARK MATTER. Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki Tvärminne summer school 1
DARK MATTER Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki 28.05.2010 Tvärminne summer school 1 Energy budget of the Universe 73,4% - Dark Energy WMAP fits to the ΛCDM model Distant supernova 23% - Dark
More informationLeaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter
Leaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter Alexander Natale Korea Institute for Advanced Study Nucl. Phys. B914 201-219 (2017), arxiv:1608.06999. High1 2017 February 9th, 2017 1/30
More informationDark Matter Searches and Fine-Tuning in Supersymmetry. Maxim Perelstein, Cornell University PACIFIC 2011 Symposium September 9, 2011
Dark Matter Searches and Fine-Tuning in Supersymmetry Maxim Perelstein, Cornell University PACIFIC 2011 Symposium September 9, 2011 Bibliography Primary reference: MP, Shakya, arxiv:1107.5048 [hep-ph]
More informationEmerging the 7 TeV LHC & the LC
Emerging BSM @ the 7 TeV LHC & the LC T.G. Rizzo 03/16/11 THE QUESTIONS: How is electroweak symmetry broken? How is the hierarchy stabilized? What is the origin of flavor? Are there more than 4 dimensions?
More informationKaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea. Fig. from B. Greene, 00
Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea Fig. from B. Greene, 00 Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea mued mass spectrum Figure 3.2: (Taken from [46]). The full spectrum of the UED model at the first KK level,
More informationSUSY and Exotica. Talk outline. Ben Allanach (University of Cambridge)
SUSY and Exotica by Ben Allanach (University of Cambridge) Talk outline SUSY Fits Impact of LHC data SUSY Tactics Exotica and A FB (t t) Please ask questions while I m talking SUSY and Exotica B.C. Allanach
More informationKoji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.)
Koji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.) Toyama mini WS 20-21/2/2012 S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, arxiv:1111.6089 M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K. Yagyu, Phys. Rev. D80 015017 (2009) Outline The
More informationKoji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) KEK 16-18/2/2012
Koji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) @ KEK 16-18/2/2012 Outline: -Two-Higgs-doublet model -Leptophilic Higgs boson S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, arxiv:1111.6089 M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K.
More informationLecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY)
Lecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY) Christopher S. Hill University of Bristol Warwick Flavour ++ Week April 11-15, 2008 Recall the Hierarchy Problem In order to avoid the significant finetuning
More informationBSM Higgs in ATLAS and CMS
BSM Higgs in ATLAS and CMS A.-M. Magnan Imperial College London 11/01/2012, BSM 4 LHC UK Workshop A.-M. Magnan BSM Higgs in ATLAS and CMS Durham, 11/01/2012 1 / 32 Introduction Extensions to Standard Model:
More informationStatus of Supersymmetric Models
Status of Supersymmetric Models Sudhir K Vempati CHEP, IISc Bangalore Institute of Physics, Bhubhaneswar Feb, 203 Outline Why Supersymmetry? Structure of MSSM Experimental Status New models of SUSY S/(S+B)
More informationSearching for Non-Colored SUSY at CMS. Alfredo Gurrola Vanderbilt University Dark Matter Workshop at Mitchell Institute TAMU, May 25, 2016
Searching for Non-Colored SUSY at CMS Alfredo Gurrola Vanderbilt University Dark Matter Workshop at Mitchell Institute TAMU, May 25, 2016 1 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in 350 billion large galaxies
More informationThe Higgs boson and the scale of new physics
The Higgs boson and the scale of new physics Giuseppe Degrassi Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università di Roma Tre, I.N.F.N. Sezione di Roma Tre Corfu Summer School and Workshop on The Standard
More informationThe WIMPless Miracle and the DAMA Puzzle
The WIMPless Miracle and the DAMA Puzzle Jason Kumar University of Hawaii w/ Jonathan Feng, John Learned and Louis Strigari (0803.4196,0806.3746,0808.4151) Relic Density matter in early universe in thermal
More informationExotica in CMS. ICNFP 2015 Kolymbari, Crete 25 August Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CMS Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna
Exotica in ICNFP 5 Kolymbari, Crete 5 August 5 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna Overview Selected recent results: - Dark matter searches EXO4-4, EXO-54, EXO-48,
More informationSho IWAMOTO. 15 Sep Osaka University. Based on [ ] in collaboration with M. Abdullah, J. L. Feng, and B. Lillard (UC Irvine)
MSSM scenario Sho IWAMOTO 15 Sep. 2016 Seminar @ Osaka University Based on [1608.00283] in collaboration with M. Abdullah, J. L. Feng, and B. Lillard (UC Irvine) The Standard Model of Particle Physics
More informationWino dark matter breaks the siege
Wino dark matter breaks the siege Shigeki Matsumoto (Kavli IPMU) In collaboration with M. Ibe, K. Ichikawa, and T. Morishita 1. Wino dark matter (Motivation & Present limits) 2. Wino dark matter is really
More informationLuis & SUSY. G. Ross, Madrid, March 2013
Luis & SUSY G. Ross, Madrid, March 2013 Luis @ 60! Luis @ 60! Still a kid! Luis @ 27 - Oxford Golden era Luis, Paco del Aguila, Tony Mendez, Tony Grifols, Alberto Casas, Carlos Munoz, Jose Valle, Dominic
More informationThe Sun as a Particle Physics Laboratory
Pat Scott Department of Physics, McGill University Dec 14, 2012 Based on: Vincent, PS & Trampedach 1206.4315 (JCAP submitted) PS, Savage, Edsjö & IceCube Collab. 1207.0810 (JCAP 11:57 2012) Silverwood,
More informationNatural explanation for 130 GeV photon line within vector boson dark matter model
Natural explanation for 130 GeV photon line within vector boson dark matter model Yasaman Farzan IPM, TEHRAN Plan of talk Direct and indirect dark matter searches 130 or 135 GeV line in FermiLAT data Challenges
More informationSupersymmetry at the ILC
Supersymmetry at the ILC Abdelhak DJOUADI (LPT Paris Sud). Introduction 2. High precision measurements 3. Determination of the SUSY lagrangian 4. Connection to cosmology 5. Conclusion For more details,
More informationAlternative New Physics at the LHC
Alternative New Physics at the LHC Andrew Askew for ATLAS and CMS 1 Alternative New Physics at the LHC (not SUSY) Andrew Askew for ATLAS and CMS 2 Motivation: Many, MANY new models: MSSM, msugra, NUHM,
More informationSupersymmetry at the LHC
Supersymmetry at the LHC Howard Baer Florida State University SUSY at LHC SUSY signatures SM backgrounds GEANT figure msugra : ~ g m 0 = 1000 GeV, m 1/2 = 500 GeV, A 0 = 0, ~ ul ~ t1 t - W + b ( jet4,
More informationBeyond Simplified Models
Pseudoscalar Portal to Dark Matter: Beyond Simplified Models Jose Miguel No King's College London J.M.N. PRD 93 (RC) 031701 (1509.01110) D. Goncalves, P. Machado, J.M.N. 1611.04593 M. Fairbairn, J.M.N.,
More informationOn behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations
On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Reza Goldouzian Université libre de Bruxelles 1 Ø There are several models of physics beyond the standard model require new particles that couple to quarks
More informationSearches for low-mass Higgs and dark bosons at BaBar
Searches for low-mass Higgs and dark bosons at BaBar Benjamin Oberhof, INFN & Università di Pisa, on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration QCD 2012, 2-6 July 2012, Montpellier, France Outline The BaBar experiment
More informationElectroweak baryogenesis in the MSSM. C. Balázs, Argonne National Laboratory EWBG in the MSSM Snowmass, August 18, /15
Electroweak baryogenesis in the MSSM C. Balázs, Argonne National Laboratory EWBG in the MSSM Snowmass, August 18, 2005 1/15 Electroweak baryogenesis in the MSSM The basics of EWBG in the MSSM Where do
More informationGravitino LSP as Dark Matter in the Constrained MSSM
Gravitino LSP as Dark Matter in the Constrained MSSM Ki Young Choi The Dark Side of the Universe, Madrid, 20-24 June 2006 Astro-Particle Theory and Cosmology Group The University of Sheffield, UK In collaboration
More informationHigh tanβ Grid Search
October 21, 2011 About me About me Started my 4 year PhD in january 2011 at the university of Bergen under the DAMARA project About me About me Started my 4 year PhD in january 2011 at the university of
More information