The search for the self-optimizing control structure PLANTWIDE CONTROL:
|
|
- Rafe Parker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PLNTWIDE CONTROL: The search for the self-optimizing control structure Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) N-7491 Trondheim, Norway March 2 QUESTION: Why do we control all these variables for which there are no a priori specifications? (temperatures, pressures, internal compositions,... )
2 OUTLINE 1. Introduction: Theory and practice 2. Plantwide control and control structure design 3. Controlled variables 4. Self-optimizing control 5. Previous work on self-optimizing control. Procedure for selecting controlled variables 7. Distillation case study 8. Optimal operation: n ethical dilemma? 9. Conclusion
3 The Trondheim Plantwide control group : dun Faanes (ph-neutralization; control structure design) Marius Govatsmark (Refinery; HD plant) Ivar Halvorsen (Petlyuk distillation; self-optimizing control) Truls Larsson (methanol plants; control structure design) Tore Lid (Refinery) Sigurd Skogestad associated (earlier) members John Morud (Sintef Kjemi) Kjetil Havre (BB) Bjørn Glemmestad (Borealis) plus Morten Hovd, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, NTNU Stig Strand, Statoil
4 Ph.D. thesises of Morud (1995), Glemmestad (1997) and Havre (1998). review1.pdf review of plantwide control, S. Skogestad and T. Larsson, (Internal report, g. 1998). vailable at: Chapter 1: Control structure design (plantwide control) Chapter : Limations on performance in MIMO systems (more controllability) Chapter 5: Limations on performance in SISO systems (controllability) Multivariable Feedback Control, S. Skogestad and I. Postlethwaite, Wiley, Shorter version: Self-optimizing control: The missing link berween steady-state optimization and control, S. Skogestad, Symposium Process Systems Engineering PSE 2, Keystone, Colorado, July 2. vaialable at: Plantwide control: The search for the self-optimizing control structure, S. Skogestad (prepared for publication in J.Proc.Control). vaialable at: Written material:
5 to which counteracts the influence of : Disturbances ( : Manipulated inputs ( norm from Find a controller which based on the information in, generates a control signal on, thereby minimizing the closed-loop. : Control error, ) : Measurements ( ) and setpoints ( ) ) and setpoints ( ) control signals sensed outputs exogenous inputs (weighted) (weighted) exogenous outputs General controller design formulation (Ph.D.level) EXISTING CONTROL THEORY
6 PRCTICE Typical base level control structure PID level
7 PRCTICE Typical control hierarchy
8 Relevant questions in practice 1. Is the plant easy or difficult to control? (controllability analysis)? 2. How should the plant be controlled (plantwide control)? (THIS TLK) lan Foss ( Critique of chemical process control theory, IChE Journal, 1973): The central issue to be resolved... is the determination of control system structure. Which variables should be measured, which inputs should be manipulated and which links should be made between the two sets? The gap is present indeed, but contrary to the views of many, it is the theoretician who must close it.
9 PLNTWIDE CONTROL (Control structure design) The control philosphy for the overall plant with emphasis on the structural decisions: Not: Which boxes (controllers; decision makers) do we have and what information (signals) are send between them The inside of the boxes (design and tuning of all the controllers)
10 CONTROL STRUCTURE DESIGN TSKS 1. Selection of controlled outputs (a set of variables which are to be controlled to achieve a set of specific objectives) 2. Selection of manipulations and measurements (sets of variables which can be manipulated and measured for control purposes) 3. Selection of control configuration (a structure interconnecting measurements/commands and manipulated variables) 4. Selection of controller type (control law specification, e.g., PID, decoupler, LQG, etc.). Tasks 1 and 2 combined: input/output selection Task 3 (configuration): input/output pairing pproach Control structure design: Top-down consideration of control objectives and available degrees of freedom to meet these (tasks 1 and 2) Bottom-up design of the control system, starting with stabilization (tasks 3, 4, 5).
11 1 ( * (,-, * ( /..,.. *. ( $% $ &' & $ & $ & &! The setpoints of the controlled variables ( link two layers in a control hierarchy, whereby the upper layer computes the value of to be implemented by the lower layer. 1 ) are the (internal) variables that Figure.1: Typical control hierarchy in a chemical plant. control (seconds) Regulatory () Control layer *+, control (minutes) Supervisory Local optimization (hour) "# " " Site-wide optimization (day) Scheduling (weeks) Controlled variables
12 2 BUT second question: lmost no theory. Decisions mostly made on experience and intuition. First question: lot of theory. 2. Implementation: What should be the controlled variables? (includes open-loop by selecting ) )? 1. Optimization: What are the optimal values (e.g. Two distinct questions: TSK 1: Selection of controlled variables
13 B 2 B B B 2 B B C > < 8 < > ;: DFEG HH 354 JI4K L H Free degrees of freedom after satisfying constraints 354 B < Degrees of freedom for optimization Gives = = >,, etc.? = >@ (2) subject to constraints = (1) Minimize cost 8with respect to the degrees of freedom Optimization
14 M O N M O N O O O N N N N M P N. P N N N (c) Integrated optimization and control. Reoptimize = > (b) Closed-loop. Constant = Q > (a) Open-loop. Constant = RQ > (a) (b) (c) Measurement noise n n Disturbance d Process d Process d Process u u u Controller - c s c m Optimizer Optimizer Optimizing Controller Objective Objective Objective Implementation Measurements v.
15 S S Used in practice. Insensitive to changes ( self-optimizing ). Optimizer : Cook book (look-up table) oven temperature 2. Closed-loop implementation: Constant temperature Problem: Sensitive to uncertainty and optimal value depends strongly on size of oven 1. Open-loop implementation: Constant heat input Implementation: Degree of freedom: Heat input Goal (purpose): Well-baked inside and nice outside Example: Cake baking
16 Self-optimizing control C = constant 2,s Cost J Loss C = constant 1,s Reoptimized J opt(d) d * Disturbance d Figure.2: Loss imposed by keeping constant setpoint for the controlled variable Self-optimizing control is when we can achieve an acceptable loss with constant setpoint values for the controlled variables (without the need to reoptimize when disturbances occur)
17 Effect of implementation error J J J [ c c c (a) (b) (c) Figure.3: Implementing the controlled variable (a) Implementation easy: ctive constraint control (b) Implementation easy: Insensitive to error in (c) Implementation difficult: Look for another controlled variable]
18 Previous work on self-optimzing control Morari, Stephanopoulos and rkun (198): Translate ecomomic objectives into control objectives Find a function of process variables, which when held constant leads automatically to the optimal adjustment of the manipulated variables Shinnar (1981); rbel, Rinard and Shinnar (199): Dominant variables (= natural choice for controlled variables ) Luyben (1988): Eigenstructure (= the best self-regulationg and self-optimizing structure) Fisher, Dohert and Douglas (1988, part 3): HD example Rijnsdorp (1991): on-line algorithms for adjusting the degrees of freedom for optimization Narraway and Perkins (1991, 1993, 1994): Base control structure selection on process economics Marlin and Hrymak (1997): Implementation of optimal solution; active constraints Zheng, Mahajannam and Douglas (1999): Minimize economic penalty
19 X Variables (and thus U) are scaled such that requirements 1 and 2) = > XZY [(takes care of W 7 U W (linearized model) Here Prefer a set of controlled variables with a large minimum singular value of the scaled gain matrix,. T =VU = > > The four requirements may be combined into the singular value rule: 4. Be independent (not closely correlated) (Equivalently, the optimum should be flat with respect to ). 3. Should be sensitive to the manipulated inputs ( ), i.e. have a large range. 2. Be easy to control accurately (small implementation error) 1. Have a small variation in optimal setpoints The selected set of variables should: Skogestad and Postlethwaite (199; Chapter 1). Requirements for controlled variables
20 Selecting controlled variables Today: Steady-state optimization is performed routinely Thus: Have the main tools needed for a proper selection of controlled variables: Steady-state model Information about operational constraints Well-defined economic objective (scalar cost function 8to be minimized)
21 BLeaves B 2 B HHdegrees of freedom: Typically, consider measured variables or simple combinations thereof. Want to use constant. Use above requirements, e.g look for variables where is constant ^5_ ] = > 1 ^5_ ] = RQ > D EG Normally implement active constraints Step 5: Identify candidate controlled variables. Find the optimal steady-state operation for various disturbances. Step 4: Optimization. Implementation errors ( Disturbances Q that occur after the optimization Step 3: Identify important disturbances (uncertainty). Step 2: Cost function and constraints. Define the optimal operation problem by formulating a scalar cost function 8to be minimized for optimal operation, and specify the constraints that need to be satisfied. Step 1: Degree of freedom analysis. Determine the number of degrees of freedom ( ) for the degrees of freedom. 354 < ) available for optimization, and identify a base set ( \ ) in controlled variables Procedure for selecting controlled variables
22 \ > b \ \ > region of feasibility expected dynamic control performance (input-output controllability) See if they are adequate with respect to other criteria that may be relevant, such like Select for further consideration the sets of controlled variables with acceptable loss. Step 7: Further analysis and selection. with fixed setpoints errors. d e \ 1 for the defined disturbances d eand implementation ` = > 8 = > 8 = ^5_ ] = >a = 1c (3) Step : Evaluation of loss. Compute the mean value of the loss for alternative sets of controlled variables. This is done by evaluating the loss
23 B 2 v B yx f qp i g o h rp n (e.g. selected as}and ~, or`and ~) 354 B < Step 1: Degree of freedom analysis Given pressure and feedrate w {z [ [ a B w t u[ v[ Propylene-propane splitter m l s q s r m l i jk l Case study: Distillation
24 ˆ [ (andƒ ˆ ~ Š Œ Ž ) v Š Œ Ž (Maximum capacity) y y {(Distillate purity specification) Step 2b: Constraints. Maximum acceptable loss `:.4 $/min = 2 $/year Typical profit: Y $/min v a [ v a w [ Prices [$/kmol] 8 } c w ƒ Step 2a: Cost function
25 ~ v Y Implementation trivial : Constant drop (avoid flooding) and increase ~until achieve max. pressure kmol/min (to maximize yield of valueable distillate product) y y {(never overpurify valueable product) Both constraints active ~ Case 1: Cheap energy ( ) Case 3: Same as Case 2, but with feed rate as degree of freedom Case 2: [[$/kmol] Case 1: (cheap energy) Will consider three cases:
26 \ In addition : 2% implementation errors for : Safety margin on : increase purity from.995 to.99 : Liquid fraction from 1. (pure liquid) to.5 (5% vaporized) : w from.5 to.75 : w from.5 to.5 : 3% increase inƒ Step 3: Disturbances. More detailed analysis needed ~ Case 2: Trade-off between energy and yield ( [$/kmol])
27 Œ ` B [ ª «{[ { u u x { u x [ x [ { u { {[ { u v { v yu ƒ u {z u ž œ u {z u ž ` Œ } a } Œ ƒ a ` a ` Œ ƒ a ~ Œ ƒ a } Six alternative controlled variables are considered Control From Table 1: BUT: Expensive and control problems at.4 One unconstrained degree of freedom, DFEG HH Bottom product purity constraint always active: y y { Step 5: Candidate controlled variables. Table 1. Optimal operating point (with maximum profit Œ ƒ) Nominal values:,, y y z y y z v vu[ ž y [ zu v xv v u ž w y y { z yx {[ {[ vu žv v xu z Ÿ u { ž [ w {ž y y { { ž [ x {[ vu Ÿ y[ u zv { u zv w y y { xv Ÿ z {[ vu v x vu[ Ÿ ž Ÿ u[ x y y { z yx {[ {[ v {xu ž u { v Ÿ š ;:9 y y { z yx {[ {[ v {xu ž u { v Ÿ } Œ ƒ ` Œ ƒ ~ Œ ƒ Œ ƒ Step 4: Optimization
28 Œ `Relatively poor: } ~ ` Ä Å Å Å Å ªÅ ;: { { ;: ƒ œ u {z u {z u ž ` Œ } } ll insesnitive to feed enthalpy ( w ) Poor: lso small loss: Œ ƒ(or Œ ƒor constant }) constant Œ ƒconstant. Loss small with Table 2. Loss [$/min] for distillation case study. Unacceptable loss (larger than.4) shown in bold face 2% impl.error: Â Ã Æ Ç m È Ç m Å É Å Ç Ç m Æ Å Å ÁÀ denotes infeasible operation v º: 9» u ¼½ ½ ½ v[ u² ² µ u² ² µ u² ¾ u² y y z u ¹ u ¹ µ u µ ² u µ ² u µ ² u µ w [ [ x w {ž y[ u ± z z u² µ w v x [ ² u µ u[ x u ±² ³ š ;:9 z yx {[ {[ {[ v {xu ž } Œ ƒ ` ` Œ ƒ ~ Œ ƒ Step : Evaluation of loss
29 `ƒfor Include feedforward from and ~
30 f qp i g o h rp n Ì Ì ` Ì ~ Ë Ê Î Ë Ê Î Ë Ê Î Í Í Í m l s q s r m l i jk l ~ Œ ƒ {[ u ž is kept constant (because ~may reach constraint). `is used to keep y y {. Proposed control system. One-point or preferred Two-point structure : Difficult (interactive) control problem Ï a Œ ƒ Ï a Œ ƒ Ï a Step 7: Selection of controlled variables. Lowest loss:
31 ÑÐ sƒ ƒ ~~is kept at v ƒ ~~is adjusted to keep ƒ is increased from to 1.5, the optimal value.4 and.9. of increases from is kept at its maximum available valueƒ ÑÐ(active constraint). ÑÐ (active constraint). `is used to keep y y {(active constraint). Proposed control system: 2. Intermediate available feed rates; vu[ ž Ò ƒ ÑÐ Ò { u[ z z[kmol/min]. is kept at its maximum available valueƒ ÑÐ(active constraint). Œ ƒ {[ u ž constant `is used to keep y y {(active constraint). Proposed control system: 1. Low available feed rates;ƒ vu[ ž [kmol/min]). (Same as above) Consider available feed rateƒ ÑÐas a parameter. ÑÐ dditional constraint Three degrees of freedom Case 3: Feedrate as degree of freeedom
32 ~ ~ ƒ v In this case: y Œ ƒis better if the value of u[ { z ƒis adjusted to keep zconstant, but using ~ Œ ƒ v[ u ž žconstant (alternatively, we may keep ÑÐchanges) ÑÐ ~~is kept at (active constraint). `is used to keep y y {(active constraint). Proposed control system: 3. Large available feed rates;ƒ ÑÐ Ó { u[ z z[kmol/min]).
33 Œ ƒ ~ ¼ Ù Ü ÜÖ n environmental and ethical dilemma? Question: Less effective use of raw materials and energy than design Œ ƒthan design Smaller specific value increase Maximize profit limiting value increase; Often:ƒa degree of freedom (with no effect on prices) Operation Œ ƒ = maximize value increase Maximize profit [$/kg] ƒgiven Design } c w ƒ For example ½Ô Õ Ö ½Ô Ø Ù ÚÖ Øœ ¼ Û ¼ ¼ Ù Ü Ö Ý œ½: Þœ Both design and operation: Maximize profit [$/min] Optimal operation: n ethical dilemma? ƒ: Operate at capacity constraint(s) and increase until zero
34 2. PRODUCTION RTE: Where should the throughput be set? The throughput manipulator cannot be used for other control tasks, thus this choice will have a large effect on the structure of the control system. The optimal choice may follow from steadystate optimization, but may require continuous reconfiguration (may use MPC to avoid this) The throughput manipulator should have a strong and direct effect on the production rate. ßàâá What is the control objective and which variables should be controlled? Goal: Obtain primary controlled variables ( ã) Steady-state model and operational objectives Degree of freedom analysis. Determine the major distrubances. Evaluate the (economic) loss, with constant controlled variables and look for selfoptimizing control structure. Step Tools (in addition to insight) Top-down analysis: 1. CONTROLLED VRIBLES: plantwide control design procedure
35 ßä ) so that the ßà ) plantwide control design procedure Bottom up design: (With given controlled and manipulated variables) nalysis 1. REGULTORY CONTROL LYER. The purpose of this control layer is to enable manual operation of the plant Stabilization. Selection of measurements and inputs for stabilization (including slowly drifting modes). Pole vectors Give insight about which measurements and inputs can be used for each unstable mode. Select large elements: Small input energy needed and large noise tolerated. Local disturbance rejection. Often based on secondary measurements. Partially controlled plant Select secondary measurements ( effect of disturbances on the primary output ( can be handled by the operators. 2. SUPERVISORY CONTROL LYER. The purpose of this control layer is to control the primary control variables ( ã). Decentralized control. We use a decentralized control structure if the process is noninteracting and the constraints are not changing. Feed-forward control and ratio control may be useful here. Controllability analysis for decentralized control Pair on relative gain array close to identity matrix at crossover frequency, provided not negative at stead-state. Closed loop disturbance gain (CLDG) and performance gain array (PRG) may be used to analyze the interactions. Multivariable control Use for interacting process (coordination including feed-forward control). MPC is useful for tracking the active constraints (if the steady-state optimization shows that the active constraints are changing with disturbances).
36 CONCLUSION QUESTION Why do we control all these variables for which there are no a priori specifications? (temperatures, pressures, internal compositions,... ) NSWER: We have degrees of freedom that need to be specified to achieve optimal operation The controlled variables are the links between steady-state economics and process control Select the controlled variables to achieve self-optimizing control
The dos and don ts of distillation column control
The dos and don ts of distillation column control Sigurd Skogestad * Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Abstract The paper discusses
More informationTHE DOS AND DON TS OF DISTILLATION COLUMN CONTROL
THE DOS AND DON TS OF DISTILLATION COLUMN CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway The paper discusses distillation
More informationThe dos and don ts of distillation column control
The dos and don ts of distillation column control Sigurd Skogestad * Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Abstract The paper discusses
More informationECONOMIC PLANTWIDE CONTROL: Control structure design for complete processing plants
ECONOMIC PLANTWIDE CONTROL: Control structure design for complete processing plants Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway
More informationCOMBINATIONS OF MEASUREMENTS AS CONTROLLED VARIABLES: APPLICATION TO A PETLYUK DISTILLATION COLUMN.
COMBINATIONS OF MEASUREMENTS AS CONTROLLED VARIABLES: APPLICATION TO A PETLYUK DISTILLATION COLUMN. V.Alstad, S. Skogestad 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
More informationImplementation issues for real-time optimization of a crude unit heat exchanger network
1 Implementation issues for real-time optimization of a crude unit heat exchanger network Tore Lid a, Sigurd Skogestad b a Statoil Mongstad, N-5954 Mongstad b Department of Chemical Engineering, NTNU,
More informationCONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION
CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway Bratislava, Nov. 2010 1 NTNU, Trondheim
More informationTime scale separation and the link between open-loop and closed-loop dynamics
Time scale separation and the link between open-loop and closed-loop dynamics Antonio Araújo a Michael Baldea b Sigurd Skogestad a,1 Prodromos Daoutidis b a Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian
More informationEconomic Plant-wide Control. Sigurd Skogestad
JWST-c JWST-Rangaiah November, 0 : Printer: Yet to come 0 0 0 Economic Plant-wide Control. Introduction Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationOptimizing Control of Petlyuk Distillation: Understanding the Steady-State Behavior
Optimizing Control of Petlyuk Distillation: Understanding the Steady-State Behavior Ivar J. Halvorsen and Sigurd Skogestad Abstract. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Chemical
More informationStudies on Selection of Controlled Variables
Vidar Alstad Studies on Selection of Controlled Variables Doctoral thesis for the degree of doktor ingeniør Trondheim, May 2005 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Natural Sciences
More informationPRACTICAL CONTROL OF DIVIDING-WALL COLUMNS
Distillation Absorption 2010. Strandberg, S. Skogestad and I.. Halvorsen All rights reserved by authors as per DA2010 copyright notice PRACTICAL CONTROL OF DIVIDING-WALL COLUMNS ens Strandberg 1, Sigurd
More informationElvira Marie B. Aske
Elvira Marie B. Aske Design of plantwide control systems with focus on maximizing throughput Doctoral thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim, September 2008 Norwegian University of Science
More informationElvira Marie B. Aske
Elvira Marie B. Aske Design of plantwide control systems with focus on maximizing throughput Thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim, March 2009 Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationFeedback: Still the simplest and best solution
Feedback: Still the simplest and best solution Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian Univ. of Science and Tech. (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway skoge@ntnu.no Abstract Most engineers are
More informationSELECTION OF VARIABLES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL USING POLE VECTORS. Kjetil Havre 1 Sigurd Skogestad 2
SELECTION OF VARIABLES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL USING POLE VECTORS Kjetil Havre 1 Sigurd Skogestad 2 Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology N-734 Trondheim, Norway. Abstract:
More informationIncorporating Feedforward Action into Self-optimizing Control Policies
Incorporating Feedforward Action into Self-optimizing Control Policies Lia Maisarah Umar, Yi Cao and Vinay Kariwala School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
More information3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions
3. Multivariable 3.1 Overview 3.2 and control-loop interactions 3.2.1 Interaction analysis 3.2.2 Closed-loop stability 3.3 Decoupling control 3.3.1 Basic design principle 3.3.2 Complete decoupling 3.3.3
More informationDesign and Analysis of Feedback Structures in Chemical Plants and Biochemical Systems HENNING SCHMIDT
Design and Analysis of Feedback Structures in Chemical Plants and Biochemical Systems HENNING SCHMIDT Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2004 TRITA-S3-REG-0405 ISSN 1404-2150 ISBN 91-7283-869-8 KTH Signals,
More informationDesign of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
More informationOptimal operation of dividing wall columns
Jens Strandberg Optimal operation of dividing wall columns Doctoral thesis for the degree of doctor philosophiae Trondheim, February 2011 Norwegian University of Science and Technology 2 NTNU Norwegian
More informationDirect and Indirect Gradient Control for Static Optimisation
International Journal of Automation and Computing 1 (2005) 60-66 Direct and Indirect Gradient Control for Static Optimisation Yi Cao School of Engineering, Cranfield University, UK Abstract: Static self-optimising
More informationSTUDIES ON CONTROLLABILITY ANALYSIS AND CONTROL STRUCTURE DESIGN
STUDIES ON CONTROLLABILITY ANALYSIS AND CONTROL STRUCTURE DESIGN by Kjetil Havre A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Dr. Ing. Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationMinimum Energy Requirements in Complex Distillation Arrangements
Minimum Energy Requirements in Complex Distillation Arrangements by A thesis submitted for the degree of Dr.Ing. May 2001 Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationActive vapor split control for dividing-wall columns
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Active vapor split control for dividing-wall columns Journal: Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Manuscript ID: ie--.r Manuscript Type: Article Date
More informationOptimal Controlled Variables for Parallel Process Units
Parallel Process Johannes Jäschke, Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU Trondheim, Norway NPCW 2012 NPCW 2012 1 / 20 Main Idea & Outline of this talk Main idea Avoid online re-optimization
More informationIMPROVED CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR DIVIDING-WALL COLUMNS
Distillation bsorption 200.. de Haan, H. Kooijman and. Górak (Editors) ll rights reserved by authors as per D200 copyright notice IMPROVED ONTROL STRTEGIES FOR DIVIDING-WLL OLUMNS nton. Kiss, Ruben. van
More informationOptimal operation of simple refrigeration cycles Part II: Selection of controlled variables
Computers and Chemical Engineering 31 (2007) 1590 1601 Optimal operation of simple refrigeration cycles Part II: Selection of controlled variables Jørgen Bauck Jensen, Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical
More informationPrinciples and Practice of Automatic Process Control
Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control Third Edition Carlos A. Smith, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Chemical Engineering University of South Florida Armando B. Corripio, Ph.D., P.E. Gordon A.
More informationPROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Offset-Free Tracking of Model Predictive Control with Model Mismatch: Experimental Results
3966 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 3966-3972 PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Offset-Free Tracking of Model Predictive Control with Model Mismatch: Experimental Results Audun Faanes and Sigurd Skogestad* Department
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationSecond Edition This version: August 29, 2001
MULTIVARIABLE FEEDBACK CONTROL Analysis and design Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science and Technology Ian Postlethwaite University of Leicester Second Edition This version: August 29, 2001
More informationRobust control for a multi-stage evaporation plant in the presence of uncertainties
Preprint 11th IFAC Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems including Biosystems June 6-8 16. NTNU Trondheim Norway Robust control for a multi-stage evaporation plant in the presence of uncertainties
More informationFramework for functional tree simulation applied to 'golden delicious' apple trees
Purdue University Purdue e-pubs Open Access Theses Theses and Dissertations Spring 2015 Framework for functional tree simulation applied to 'golden delicious' apple trees Marek Fiser Purdue University
More informationEconomic Model Predictive Control Historical Perspective and Recent Developments and Industrial Examples
1 Economic Model Predictive Control Historical Perspective and Recent Developments and Industrial Examples Public Trial Lecture Candidate: Vinicius de Oliveira Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty
More informationMinimum Energy Requirements in Complex Distillation Arrangements
Minimum Energy Requirements in Complex Distillation Arrangements by A thesis submitted for the degree of Dr.Ing. May 2001 Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationCBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL
What is Model Predictive Control (MPC)? CBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University * Some parts are from
More informationDYNAMIC SIMULATOR-BASED APC DESIGN FOR A NAPHTHA REDISTILLATION COLUMN
HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY AND CHEMISTRY Vol. 45(1) pp. 17 22 (2017) hjic.mk.uni-pannon.hu DOI: 10.1515/hjic-2017-0004 DYNAMIC SIMULATOR-BASED APC DESIGN FOR A NAPHTHA REDISTILLATION COLUMN LÁSZLÓ SZABÓ,
More informationAN IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHM FOR ARMAX SYSTEMS
AN IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHM FOR ARMAX SYSTEMS First the X, then the AR, finally the MA Jan C. Willems, K.U. Leuven Workshop on Observation and Estimation Ben Gurion University, July 3, 2004 p./2 Joint
More informationReal-Time Feasibility of Nonlinear Predictive Control for Semi-batch Reactors
European Symposium on Computer Arded Aided Process Engineering 15 L. Puigjaner and A. Espuña (Editors) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Real-Time Feasibility of Nonlinear Predictive Control
More informationLocal Self-Optimizing Control with Average Loss Minimization
Local Self-Optimizing Control with Average Loss Minimization Vinay Kariwala, Yi Cao and S. Janardhanan Division of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637459
More informationMIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time
MIMO robustness MIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time y 1 y 2 P (s) + + K 2 (s) r 1 r 2 K 1 (s) Plant: P (s) = 1 s 2 + α 2 s α 2 α(s + 1) α(s + 1) s α 2. (take α = 10 in the following numerical analysis) Controller:
More informationSimulation of Quadruple Tank Process for Liquid Level Control
Simulation of Quadruple Tank Process for Liquid Level Control Ritika Thusoo 1, Sakshi Bangia 2 1 M.Tech Student, Electronics Engg, Department, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad 2 Assistant
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #36 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Friday, April 4, 2003 3. Cascade Control Next we turn to an
More information3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 REDCLIFF MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION FOR COMMENT/DISCUSSION DATE: TOPIC: April 27 th, 2018 Bylaw 1860/2018, proposed amendments to the Land Use Bylaw regarding cannabis
More informationA Definition for Plantwide Controllability. Process Flexibility
A Definition for Plantwide Controllability Surya Kiran Chodavarapu and Alex Zheng Department of Chemical Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 Abstract Chemical process synthesis typically
More informationI would like to thank the following people for their contributions to this project:
1 Abstract This report presents optimization and control structure suggestions for a model of petroleum production wells. The model presented in the report is based the semi-realistic model of the Troll
More informationSelf-Optimizing Control of a Two-Stage Refrigeration Cycle
Preprint, 11th IFAC Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems, including Biosystems June 6-8, 16. NTNU, Trondheim, Norway Self-Optimizing Control of a Two-Stage Refrigeration Cycle Adriaen Verheyleweghen,
More informationSTUDIES ON CONTROLLABILITY ANALYSIS AND CONTROL STRUCTURE DESIGN
SUDIES ON CONROLLABILIY ANALYSIS AND CONROL SRUCURE DESIGN by Kjetil Havre A hesis Submitted for the Degree of Dr. Ing. Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and echnology
More informationConnection equations with stream variables are generated in a model when using the # $ % () operator or the & ' %
7 9 9 7 The two basic variable types in a connector potential (or across) variable and flow (or through) variable are not sufficient to describe in a numerically sound way the bi-directional flow of matter
More informationDynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems
Dynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems M.Bharathi, C.Selvakumar HOD, Department of Electronics And Instrumentation, Bharath University Chennai 600073, India Prof & Head, St.Joseph s College
More informationRobust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room
Robust Control Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) 2nd class Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room 2. Nominal Performance 2.1 Weighted Sensitivity [SP05, Sec. 2.8,
More informationInvariants for Optimal Operation of Process Systems
Johannes Jäschke Invariants for Optimal Operation of Process Systems Doctoral thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim, June 2011 Norwegian University of Science and Technology The Faculty
More informationRedoing the Foundations of Decision Theory
Redoing the Foundations of Decision Theory Joe Halpern Cornell University Joint work with Larry Blume and David Easley Economics Cornell Redoing the Foundations of Decision Theory p. 1/21 Decision Making:
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationFeedback Structures for Vapor Compression Cycle Systems
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at imes Square New York City, USA, July 11-, 27 FrB5.1 Feedback Structures for Vapor Compression Cycle Systems Michael C. Keir,
More informationA FAST, EASILY TUNED, SISO, MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER. Gabriele Pannocchia,1 Nabil Laachi James B. Rawlings
A FAST, EASILY TUNED, SISO, MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER Gabriele Pannocchia, Nabil Laachi James B. Rawlings Department of Chemical Engineering Univ. of Pisa Via Diotisalvi 2, 5626 Pisa (Italy) Department
More informationHere represents the impulse (or delta) function. is an diagonal matrix of intensities, and is an diagonal matrix of intensities.
19 KALMAN FILTER 19.1 Introduction In the previous section, we derived the linear quadratic regulator as an optimal solution for the fullstate feedback control problem. The inherent assumption was that
More informationReal-Time Optimization (RTO)
Real-Time Optimization (RTO) In previous chapters we have emphasized control system performance for disturbance and set-point changes. Now we will be concerned with how the set points are specified. In
More informationLA PRISE DE CALAIS. çoys, çoys, har - dis. çoys, dis. tons, mantz, tons, Gas. c est. à ce. C est à ce. coup, c est à ce
> ƒ? @ Z [ \ _ ' µ `. l 1 2 3 z Æ Ñ 6 = Ð l sl (~131 1606) rn % & +, l r s s, r 7 nr ss r r s s s, r s, r! " # $ s s ( ) r * s, / 0 s, r 4 r r 9;: < 10 r mnz, rz, r ns, 1 s ; j;k ns, q r s { } ~ l r mnz,
More informationDECENTRALIZED PI CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR NON LINEAR MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS BASED ON IDEAL DECOUPLER
th June 4. Vol. 64 No. 5-4 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved. ISSN: 99-8645 www.jatit.org E-ISSN: 87-395 DECENTRALIZED PI CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR NON LINEAR MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS BASED ON IDEAL DECOUPLER
More informationDecoupled Feedforward Control for an Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration System
American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, FrB1.4 Decoupled Feedforward Control for an Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration System Neera Jain, Member, IEEE, Richard
More informationControl of MIMO processes. 1. Introduction. Control of MIMO processes. Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes
Control of MIMO processes Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes Statistical Process Control Feedforward and ratio control Cascade control Split range and selective control Control
More informationData reconciliation and optimal operation of a catalytic naphtha reformer
Data reconciliation and optimal operation of a catalytic naphtha reformer Tore Lid Statoil Mongstad 5954 Mongstad Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology
More informationCHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES
180 CHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES Improvement of closed-loop performance needs proper tuning of controller parameters that requires process model structure and the estimation of respective parameters which
More information! " # $! % & '! , ) ( + - (. ) ( ) * + / 0 1 2 3 0 / 4 5 / 6 0 ; 8 7 < = 7 > 8 7 8 9 : Œ Š ž P P h ˆ Š ˆ Œ ˆ Š ˆ Ž Ž Ý Ü Ý Ü Ý Ž Ý ê ç è ± ¹ ¼ ¹ ä ± ¹ w ç ¹ è ¼ è Œ ¹ ± ¹ è ¹ è ä ç w ¹ ã ¼ ¹ ä ¹ ¼ ¹ ±
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 6: Robust stability and performance in MIMO systems [Ch.8] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 6: Robust Stability and Performance () FEL3210
More informationQuantitative methods for controlled variables selection
Ramprasad Yelchuru Quantitative methods for controlled variables selection Doctoral thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim, May 2012 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Natural
More informationImproved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback
CEAI, Vol.17, No.4 pp. 23-32, 2015 Printed in Romania Improved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback D.Kalpana, T.Thyagarajan, R.Thenral Department of Instrumentation Engineering,
More informationConsistent inventory control
Consistent inventory control Elvira Marie B. Aske,, and Sigurd Skogestad, Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway Abstract Inventory or material
More informationQUESTIONS ON QUARKONIUM PRODUCTION IN NUCLEAR COLLISIONS
International Workshop Quarkonium Working Group QUESTIONS ON QUARKONIUM PRODUCTION IN NUCLEAR COLLISIONS ALBERTO POLLERI TU München and ECT* Trento CERN - November 2002 Outline What do we know for sure?
More informationMULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 1, No. 8 (215) 113-1115 School of Engineering, Taylor s University MULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
More informationProcess Unit Control System Design
Process Unit Control System Design 1. Introduction 2. Influence of process design 3. Control degrees of freedom 4. Selection of control system variables 5. Process safety Introduction Control system requirements»
More informationOptimal Control of PDEs
Optimal Control of PDEs Suzanne Lenhart University of Tennessee, Knoville Department of Mathematics Lecture1 p.1/36 Outline 1. Idea of diffusion PDE 2. Motivating Eample 3. Big picture of optimal control
More informationPlantwide Control of Chemical Processes Prof. Nitin Kaistha Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Plantwide Control of Chemical Processes Prof. Nitin Kaistha Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture - 41 Cumene Process Plantwide Control (Refer Slide Time: 00:18)
More informationMIMO Identification and Controller design for Distillation Column
MIMO Identification and Controller design for Distillation Column S.Meenakshi 1, A.Almusthaliba 2, V.Vijayageetha 3 Assistant Professor, EIE Dept, Sethu Institute of Technology, Tamilnadu, India 1 PG Student,
More informationExpansion and examination of the stationary model of an ammonia refrigeration cycle with emphasis on optimal operation / self-optimizing control
Rheinisch Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik Professor Dr. Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt Expansion and examination of the stationary model of an ammonia refrigeration cycle
More informationAutomatic Control III (Reglerteknik III) fall Nonlinear systems, Part 3
Automatic Control III (Reglerteknik III) fall 20 4. Nonlinear systems, Part 3 (Chapter 4) Hans Norlander Systems and Control Department of Information Technology Uppsala University OSCILLATIONS AND DESCRIBING
More informationA Survey for the Selection of Control Structure for Distillation Columns Based on Steady State Controllability Indexes
Iranian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 6, No. 2 (Spring), 2009, IAChE A Survey for the Selection of Control Structure for Distillation Columns Based on Steady State Controllability Indexes K. Razzaghi,
More informationApplication of Decomposition Methodology to Solve Integrated Process Design and Controller Design Problems for Reactor-Separator-Recycle Systems
Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems (DYCOPS 2010), Leuven, Belgium, July 5-7, 2010 Mayuresh Kothare, Moses Tade, Alain Vande Wouwer, Ilse Smets (Eds.)
More informationCHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER
114 CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Robust control is a branch of control theory that explicitly deals with uncertainty in its approach to controller design. It also refers
More informationProcess Modelling, Identification, and Control
Jan Mikles Miroslav Fikar 2008 AGI-Information Management Consultants May be used for personal purporses only or by libraries associated to dandelon.com network. Process Modelling, Identification, and
More informationTHE THEORY, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PARTITIONED ERROR CONTROL. Mark Leland Rutherford. Dissertation. Submitted to the Faculty of the
THE THEORY, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PARTITIONED ERROR CONTROL By Mark Leland Rutherford Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment
More informationPrincipal Secretary to Government Haryana, Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana, Chandigarh.
1 From To Principal Secretary to Government Haryana, Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana, Chandigarh. The Director General, Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana, Chandigarh. Memo No. Misc-2339
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,350 108,000 1.7 M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our
More informationChapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs
Chapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs This Chapter reviews several flight controller designs for unmanned rotorcraft. 1 Flight control systems have been proposed and tested on a wide
More informationAdditional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. Closed-Loop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationOptimal dynamic operation of chemical processes: Assessment of the last 20 years and current research opportunities
Optimal dynamic operation of chemical processes: Assessment of the last 2 years and current research opportunities James B. Rawlings Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering April 3, 2 Department
More informationSelf-consistent inventory control
Elvira Marie B. Aske,, and Sigurd Skogestad, Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway E-mail: skoge@ntnu.no Abstract Inventory or material balance
More informationIndex. INDEX_p /15/02 3:08 PM Page 765
INDEX_p.765-770 11/15/02 3:08 PM Page 765 Index N A Adaptive control, 144 Adiabatic reactors, 465 Algorithm, control, 5 All-pass factorization, 257 All-pass, frequency response, 225 Amplitude, 216 Amplitude
More informationDesign of Multivariable Neural Controllers Using a Classical Approach
Design of Multivariable Neural Controllers Using a Classical Approach Seshu K. Damarla & Madhusree Kundu Abstract In the present study, the neural network (NN) based multivariable controllers were designed
More informationIndex Accumulation, 53 Accuracy: numerical integration, sensor, 383, Adaptive tuning: expert system, 528 gain scheduling, 518, 529, 709,
Accumulation, 53 Accuracy: numerical integration, 83-84 sensor, 383, 772-773 Adaptive tuning: expert system, 528 gain scheduling, 518, 529, 709, 715 input conversion, 519 reasons for, 512-517 relay auto-tuning,
More informationMinimum Energy Consumption in Multicomponent Distillation. 3. More Than Three Products and Generalized Petlyuk Arrangements
616 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 616-629 Minimum Energy Consumption in Multicomponent Distillation. 3. More Than Three Products and Generalized Petlyuk Arrangements Ivar J. Halvorsen and Sigurd Skogestad*
More informationMax. Input Power (W) Input Current (Arms) Dimming. Enclosure
Product Overview XI025100V036NM1M Input Voltage (Vac) Output Power (W) Output Voltage Range (V) Output urrent (A) Efficiency@ Max Load and 70 ase Max ase Temp. ( ) Input urrent (Arms) Max. Input Power
More informationIMPROVED MULTI-MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL TO REJECT VERY LARGE DISTURBANCES ON A DISTILLATION COLUMN. Abdul Wahid 1*, Arshad Ahmad 2,3
International Journal of Technology (2016) 6: 962-971 ISSN 2086-9614 IJTech 2016 IMPROVED MULTI-MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL TO REJECT VERY LARGE DISTURBANCES ON A DISTILLATION COLUMN Abdul Wahid 1*, Arshad
More informationManifold Regularization
Manifold Regularization Vikas Sindhwani Department of Computer Science University of Chicago Joint Work with Mikhail Belkin and Partha Niyogi TTI-C Talk September 14, 24 p.1 The Problem of Learning is
More informationAdvanced control If single-loop feedback control (PID) alone is not good enough
The decision hierarchy is based on time scale separation setpoints Advanced control (MPC) setpoints Fast regulatory control (PID) PROCESS Advanced control If single-loop feedback control (PID) alone is
More informationMulti-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
Multi-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 1: Introduction. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1. Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 1: Introduction Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 22, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationFAULT-TOLERANT CONTROL OF CHEMICAL PROCESS SYSTEMS USING COMMUNICATION NETWORKS. Nael H. El-Farra, Adiwinata Gani & Panagiotis D.
FAULT-TOLERANT CONTROL OF CHEMICAL PROCESS SYSTEMS USING COMMUNICATION NETWORKS Nael H. El-Farra, Adiwinata Gani & Panagiotis D. Christofides Department of Chemical Engineering University of California,
More information