ECSE.6440 MIDTERM EXAM Solution Optimal Control. Assigned: February 26, 2004 Due: 12:00 pm, March 4, 2004

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ECSE.6440 MIDTERM EXAM Solution Optimal Control. Assigned: February 26, 2004 Due: 12:00 pm, March 4, 2004"

Transcription

1 ECSE.6440 MIDTERM EXAM Solution Optimal Control Assigned: February 26, 2004 Due: 12:00 pm, March 4, 2004 This is a take home exam. It is essential to SHOW ALL STEPS IN YOUR WORK. In NO circumstance is COLLABORATION allowed. There are FOUR problems with a total of 100 points. Problem Points Score Total 100 1

2 1. (25 points) (a) (10 points) Solve the following constrained optimization problem both analytically and graphically: for max x,y h(x, y) subject to x2 (2 y) 3, y 0 (a) : h(x, y) = x + y (b) : h(x, y) = x + 3y. i. Apply the Lagrange Multiplier method to find the solutions to (a) and (b) ii. On the x-y plane, show the feasible region and h(x, y) = c for several costants c. Show that the optimal solution may be found by using this graphical method and the solution coincides with your analytical solution. (b) (15 points) Let x k, u k, d k be the inventory, production, and demand at time k. Let x 0 be the initial inventory, and x and u be the goal level inventory and production. The inventory dynamics is x k+1 = x k + u k d k. Let h and c be inventory and production costs. The total cost over N-steps (N is fixed) is min u k,k=0,...,n 1 { J = 1 2 N 1 k=0 Find the optimal production schedule. ( h(xk x) 2 + c(u k u) 2)}. 2

3 Solution: 1(a)1.a: min x,y (x + y) subject to x 2 (2 y) 3 0, y 0. First form the Hamiltonian: First order condition: The Hessian is H(x, y) = (x + y) + λ 1 (x 2 (2 y) 3 ) λ 2 y. H x = 1 + 2λ 1x = 0 (1) H y = 1 + 3λ 1 (2 y) 2 λ 2 = 0. (2) 2 [ H x = 2λ λ 1 (2 y) The constraint conditions can be stated as ]. 1. λ 1 (x 2 (2 y) 3 ) = 0 (3) 2. λ 2 y = 0. (4) Now we examine all possible cases (if neither, either or both of the constraints are active). (a) Both constraints inactive (λ 1 = λ 2 = 0). This violates the first order condition (1). (b) Constraint 1 active (x 2 = (2 y) 3 ), constraint 2 inactive (λ 2 = 0, y > 0). Solve jointly, we obtain two solutions: x 2 = (2 y) 3, 1 = 2λ 1 x, 1 = 3λ 1 (2 y) 2, solution 1: x = (2/3) 3 =.2963, y = , andj = x + y = solution 2: x = 0, y = 2, andj = x + y = 2. (c) Constraint 1 inactive, constraint 2 active. This also leads to contradiction (1 = 0). (d) Both constraints active. In this case, we solve x 2 = (2 y) 3, y = 0, 1 = 2λ 1 x, 1 + λ 2 = 3λ 1 (2 y) 2, joint, and the solution is The corresponding cost is x = 2 2, y = 0. J = x + y = 2 2 = Clearly, this is the optimal solution. definite. Note that λ 1 is +. As a check, the Hessian is also positive 3

4 1(a)1.b: min x,y (x + 3y) subject to x 2 (2 y) 3 0, y 0. First form the Hamiltonian: H(x, y) = (x + 3y) + λ 1 (x 2 (2 y) 3 ) λ 2 y. First order condition: H x = 1 + 2λ 1x = 0 (5) H y = 3 + 3λ 1 (2 y) 2 λ 2 = 0. (6) Go through the 4 cases as before, we can immediately determine that the first constraint has to be active (i.e., x 2 = (2 y) 3 ). If constraint 1 is active and constraint is active, there are two solutions: solution 1: x = 2 2 = , y = 0, andj = x + 3y = solution 2: x = 0, y = 2, andj = x + 3y = 6. If both constraints are active, the solution is x = 2 2 = , y = 0, andj = x + 3y = Therefore, the optimal solution is (x = 0, y = 2). 1(a)2.a: Solution script is in midsol1.m. The graphical solution is the same as the analytical solution: 1(a)2.b: Solution script is in midsol1.m. The graphical solution is the same as the analytical solution: 4

5 1(b): Given x k+1 = x k + u k d k, and x 0. Find {u k : k = 0, 1,..., N 1} to minimize Form the Hamiltonian: J = 1 2 N 1 k=0 (h(x k x) 2 + c(u k u) 2 ). H k = 1 2 h(x k x) c(u k u) 2 + λ k+1 (x k + u k d k ). First solve for u k from H k u k = 0: Then solve for the co-state propagation: u k = u λ k+1 c. λ k = H k x k = h(x k x) + λ k+1. Putting the state and co-state together and substitute for u k, we get [ xk+1 λ k+1 Solving for λ N, we get ] [ 1 + h 1 ] = c c h 1 }{{} A [ xk λ k ] [ h + x + u d ] c k. hx }{{} w k λ N = [ 0 1 ] A N [ x0 λ 0 ] + [ 1 0 ] N 1 k=0 A N k 1 w k. Since there is no terminal cost, λ N = 0. Therefore, [ ] [ ] 0 1 A N 0 λ 1 0 = [ 0 1 ] [ 1 A N 0 }{{} Γ 5 ] x 0 [ 0 1 ] N 1 k=0 A N k 1 w k.

6 λ 0 can then be readily solved: λ 0 = Γ 1 ( [ 0 1 ] A N [ 1 0 ] x 0 [ 0 1 ] N 1 k=0 A N k 1 w k ). Once we have λ 0, λ k can be found from the co-state equation, and u k can in turn be solved. 6

7 2. (25 points) (a) (10 points) Consider a continuous time linear time invariant system Suppose that the performance index is J = ẋ = Ax + Bu, x R n, u R m. (x(t) T Qx(t) + 2x(t) T Nu(t) + u T (t)ru(t)), where Q R n n is symmetric positive semi-definitie, R R m m is symmetric positive definite, and N R n m. Find the optimal controller as a constant gain full state feedback. (b) (15%) Consider a continuous time linear time varying system ẋ = A(t)x + B(t)u. Suppose that the goal is to track a specified desired state and control trajectories (x d (t), u d (t)) for 0 t T, T is fixed. Let the optimization index be J = 1 2 (x(t ) x d(t )) T Q(T )(x(t ) x d (T )) + 1 T ( (x(t) xd (t)) T Q(t)(x(t) x d (t)) + (u(t) u d (t)) T R(t)(u(t) u d (t)) ) dt. 2 0 Find the necessary condition for optimality. Apply the sweep method to solve the resulting two-point boundary value problem. 7

8 Solution: (a) First form the Hamiltonian H = 1 2 xt Qx + x T Nu ut Ru + λ T (Ax + Bu). Solve for optimal control from H u = 0: Co-state equation: λ = u = R 1 (B T λ + N T x). ( ) T H = (Qx + Nu + A T λ) = (Qx NR 1 (B T λ + N T x) + A T λ). x State equation: Let λ = P x. Then ẋ = Ax BR 1 (B T λ + N T x). λ = P ẋ = P Ax P BR 1 (B T λ + N T x) = (Qx NR 1 (B T λ + N T x) + A T λ). Rearrange terms, we get P (A BR 1 N T ) + (A BR 1 N T ) T P + (Q NR 1 N T ) P BR 1 B T P = 0. or A T P + P A + Q (P B + N)R 1 (P B + N) T. (b) Let Then x(t) = x(t) x d (t), ũ(t) = u(t) u d (t). x = A x + Bu ẋ d = A x + Bũ + Ax d + Bu d ẋ }{{ d. } w The optimization index becomes J = 1 2 xt (T )Q(T ) x(t ) Form the Hamiltonian: T 0 ( x T (t)q(t) x(t) + ũ T (t)r(t)ũ(t) ) dt. H = 1 2 ( xt Q x + ũ T Rũ) + λ T (A x + Bũ + w). Optimal control: ũ = R 1 B T λ. 8

9 Co-state equation: State equation: λ = Q x A T λ. x = A x BR 1 B T λ + w. Let Then λ = P x + β. λ = P x + P x + β. From the state and co-state equations, we get Boundary condition: P + P A + A T P + Q P BR 1 B T P = 0 β + (A BR 1 B T P ) T β + P w = 0. P (T ) = Q(T ), β(t ) = Q(T )x d. 9

10 3. (25 points) Consider the harmonic oscillator ẍ + ω 2 ox = ω 2 ou. (a) (5 points) Show through time scaling, the problem can be equivalently transformed to the normalized problem z + z = u. (b) (20 points) For the normalized problem, solve the optimal control problem with the optimization index J = T 0 (1 + u(t) 2 ) dt, with (x(0), ẋ(0)) = (0, 0), (x(t ), ẋ(t )) = (2, 0) and T free. Sketch the solution trajectories in the phase space (i.e., ẋ vs. x). 10

11 Solution: (a) Given Define Then Let ẍ + ω 2 0x = ω 2 0u. z(t) = x(at). dz(t) = a dx(τ) dt dτ τ=at d 2 z(t) = a 2 d2 x(τ) dt 2 dτ 2 = a 2 ω 0x(at) 2 + a 2 ω0u(at). 2 τ=at a = 1 ω. Then d 2 z(t) = z(t) + u(t). dt 2 To recover x, just apply the inverse transformation: (b) Let z 1 = z, z 2 = ż. Hamiltonian: Optimal control: x(t) = z(ωt). H = 1 + u 2 + λ 1 z 2 + λ 2 ( z 1 + u). H u = 0 = u = λ 2 2. Co-state equation, λ = H x λ1 = λ2 State equation: λ 2 = λ 1. ż 1 = z 2 ż 2 = z 1 λ 2 2. Since the final time is free, we need the transversality condition: H(t) = 0 t [0, T ]. 11

12 Choose t = 0 to simplify the expression: H(0) = 0 = (1 + u 2 + λ 2 u) = 1 λ2 2(0) = 0 t=0 4 or λ 2 (0) = ±2. From the co-state equation, λ 2 (t) = a sin t + b cos t. Using the transversality condition, we get The optimal control is therefore λ 2 (t) = a sin t ± 2 cos t. u(t) = λ 2(t) = a sin t cos t. 2 2 By using the state equation, the final state (z 1 (T ), z 2 (T )) can be expressed in terms of (a, T ). Since the final state is given to be (2, 0), we can use the two equations to solve for the two unknowns. The MATLAB solution script may be found in midsol3.m or midsol3a.m. It turns out that only λ 2 (0) = 2 has a solution (with T = 2.508sec). Usage: [a,t,xterror,t,y,u]=midsol3;xterror or midsol3a The optimal control, optimal z, and z 1 vs. z 2 are shown below 12

13 4. (25 points) A factory has received an order to produce B units of merchandise in time T. Assume that the unit cost of production is proportional to the rate of production and the unit cost of holding the inventory is constant. The goal is to find a production schedule that minimizes cost. This may be posed by a calculus of variation problem. Let x(t) be the # of units at time t. Then the total cost is J = T 0 (c 1 ẋ(t) 2 + c 2 x(t)) dt, where the first term is the cost of production (cost for producing dx units is c 1 ẋ) and the second term is the inventory cost. The boundary conditions are x(0) = 0 and x(t ) = B. Find the optimal production schedule, i.e., {x(t) : t [0, T ]} that minimizes J. 13

14 Solution: Optimization index: State equation: Boundary conditions: Hamiltonian: Optimal control: Co-state equation: Therefore, J = Substituting into the state equation: T 0 (c 1 u 2 + c 2 x) dt. ẋ = u x(0) = 0, x(t ) = B. H = c 1 u 2 + c 2 x + λu. u = λ 2c 1. λ = H x = c 2. λ = c 2 t + λ 0. ẋ = c 2 2c 1 t λ 0 2c 1. Solution: Set t = T, we get Solve for λ 0 : x = c 2 4c 1 t 2 λ 0 2c 1 t. B = c 2 4c 1 T 2 λ 0 2c 1 T. λ 0 = 2c 1 T ( c 2 4c 1 T 2 B). 14

Homework Solution # 3

Homework Solution # 3 ECSE 644 Optimal Control Feb, 4 Due: Feb 17, 4 (Tuesday) Homework Solution # 3 1 (5%) Consider the discrete nonlinear control system in Homework # For the optimal control and trajectory that you have found

More information

Lecture 4 Continuous time linear quadratic regulator

Lecture 4 Continuous time linear quadratic regulator EE363 Winter 2008-09 Lecture 4 Continuous time linear quadratic regulator continuous-time LQR problem dynamic programming solution Hamiltonian system and two point boundary value problem infinite horizon

More information

Duality and dynamics in Hamilton-Jacobi theory for fully convex problems of control

Duality and dynamics in Hamilton-Jacobi theory for fully convex problems of control Duality and dynamics in Hamilton-Jacobi theory for fully convex problems of control RTyrrell Rockafellar and Peter R Wolenski Abstract This paper describes some recent results in Hamilton- Jacobi theory

More information

Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) Controllers and Kalman Filters

Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) Controllers and Kalman Filters Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) Controllers and Kalman Filters Emo Todorov Applied Mathematics and Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Winter 204 Emo Todorov (UW) AMATH/CSE 579, Winter

More information

Solutions to homework assignment #3 Math 119B UC Davis, Spring = 12x. The Euler-Lagrange equation is. 2q (x) = 12x. q(x) = x 3 + x.

Solutions to homework assignment #3 Math 119B UC Davis, Spring = 12x. The Euler-Lagrange equation is. 2q (x) = 12x. q(x) = x 3 + x. 1. Find the stationary points of the following functionals: (a) 1 (q (x) + 1xq(x)) dx, q() =, q(1) = Solution. The functional is 1 L(q, q, x) where L(q, q, x) = q + 1xq. We have q = q, q = 1x. The Euler-Lagrange

More information

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1 Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +

More information

Introduction to numerical simulations for Stochastic ODEs

Introduction to numerical simulations for Stochastic ODEs Introduction to numerical simulations for Stochastic ODEs Xingye Kan Illinois Institute of Technology Department of Applied Mathematics Chicago, IL 60616 August 9, 2010 Outline 1 Preliminaries 2 Numerical

More information

OPTIMAL CONTROL. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 28

OPTIMAL CONTROL. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 28 OPTIMAL CONTROL Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 28 (Example from Optimal Control Theory, Kirk) Objective: To get from

More information

Mathematical Economics. Lecture Notes (in extracts)

Mathematical Economics. Lecture Notes (in extracts) Prof. Dr. Frank Werner Faculty of Mathematics Institute of Mathematical Optimization (IMO) http://math.uni-magdeburg.de/ werner/math-ec-new.html Mathematical Economics Lecture Notes (in extracts) Winter

More information

9 Controller Discretization

9 Controller Discretization 9 Controller Discretization In most applications, a control system is implemented in a digital fashion on a computer. This implies that the measurements that are supplied to the control system must be

More information

Joint work with Nguyen Hoang (Univ. Concepción, Chile) Padova, Italy, May 2018

Joint work with Nguyen Hoang (Univ. Concepción, Chile) Padova, Italy, May 2018 EXTENDED EULER-LAGRANGE AND HAMILTONIAN CONDITIONS IN OPTIMAL CONTROL OF SWEEPING PROCESSES WITH CONTROLLED MOVING SETS BORIS MORDUKHOVICH Wayne State University Talk given at the conference Optimization,

More information

Optimal Control. Quadratic Functions. Single variable quadratic function: Multi-variable quadratic function:

Optimal Control. Quadratic Functions. Single variable quadratic function: Multi-variable quadratic function: Optimal Control Control design based on pole-placement has non unique solutions Best locations for eigenvalues are sometimes difficult to determine Linear Quadratic LQ) Optimal control minimizes a quadratic

More information

Optimal Control. Lecture 18. Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation, Cont. John T. Wen. March 29, Ref: Bryson & Ho Chapter 4.

Optimal Control. Lecture 18. Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation, Cont. John T. Wen. March 29, Ref: Bryson & Ho Chapter 4. Optimal Control Lecture 18 Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation, Cont. John T. Wen Ref: Bryson & Ho Chapter 4. March 29, 2004 Outline Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation Iterative solution of HJB Equation

More information

EN Applied Optimal Control Lecture 8: Dynamic Programming October 10, 2018

EN Applied Optimal Control Lecture 8: Dynamic Programming October 10, 2018 EN530.603 Applied Optimal Control Lecture 8: Dynamic Programming October 0, 08 Lecturer: Marin Kobilarov Dynamic Programming (DP) is conerned with the computation of an optimal policy, i.e. an optimal

More information

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4.

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4. Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, 7 (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems). Consider the following initial value problem: { y + y + y cos(x y) =, y() = y. Find all the values y such that the

More information

Advanced Mechatronics Engineering

Advanced Mechatronics Engineering Advanced Mechatronics Engineering German University in Cairo 21 December, 2013 Outline Necessary conditions for optimal input Example Linear regulator problem Example Necessary conditions for optimal input

More information

Problem 1 Cost of an Infinite Horizon LQR

Problem 1 Cost of an Infinite Horizon LQR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO EE 5243 INTRODUCTION TO CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS H O M E W O R K # 5 Ahmad F. Taha October 12, 215 Homework Instructions: 1. Type your solutions in the LATEX homework

More information

= m(0) + 4e 2 ( 3e 2 ) 2e 2, 1 (2k + k 2 ) dt. m(0) = u + R 1 B T P x 2 R dt. u + R 1 B T P y 2 R dt +

= m(0) + 4e 2 ( 3e 2 ) 2e 2, 1 (2k + k 2 ) dt. m(0) = u + R 1 B T P x 2 R dt. u + R 1 B T P y 2 R dt + ECE 553, Spring 8 Posted: May nd, 8 Problem Set #7 Solution Solutions: 1. The optimal controller is still the one given in the solution to the Problem 6 in Homework #5: u (x, t) = p(t)x k(t), t. The minimum

More information

Deterministic Dynamic Programming

Deterministic Dynamic Programming Deterministic Dynamic Programming 1 Value Function Consider the following optimal control problem in Mayer s form: V (t 0, x 0 ) = inf u U J(t 1, x(t 1 )) (1) subject to ẋ(t) = f(t, x(t), u(t)), x(t 0

More information

EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014

EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket

More information

Theorem 1. ẋ = Ax is globally exponentially stable (GES) iff A is Hurwitz (i.e., max(re(σ(a))) < 0).

Theorem 1. ẋ = Ax is globally exponentially stable (GES) iff A is Hurwitz (i.e., max(re(σ(a))) < 0). Linear Systems Notes Lecture Proposition. A M n (R) is positive definite iff all nested minors are greater than or equal to zero. n Proof. ( ): Positive definite iff λ i >. Let det(a) = λj and H = {x D

More information

Suppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation:

Suppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation: Dynamic Optimisation Discrete Dynamic Systems A single stage example Suppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation: x 1 = ax 0 + bu 0, x 0 = x i (1) where

More information

2015 Math Camp Calculus Exam Solution

2015 Math Camp Calculus Exam Solution 015 Math Camp Calculus Exam Solution Problem 1: x = x x +5 4+5 = 9 = 3 1. lim We also accepted ±3, even though it is not according to the prevailing convention 1. x x 4 x+4 =. lim 4 4+4 = 4 0 = 4 0 = We

More information

EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam

EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam Professor C. Tomlin Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley Fall 2016 12/16/16, 8-11am Your answers must be supported by analysis,

More information

Calculus of Variations

Calculus of Variations ECE 68 Midterm Exam Solution April 1, 8 1 Calculus of Variations This exam is open book and open notes You may consult additional references You may even discuss the problems (with anyone), but you must

More information

1. The accumulated net change function or area-so-far function

1. The accumulated net change function or area-so-far function Name: Section: Names of collaborators: Main Points: 1. The accumulated net change function ( area-so-far function) 2. Connection to antiderivative functions: the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus 3. Evaluating

More information

Linear Quadratic Optimal Control Topics

Linear Quadratic Optimal Control Topics Linear Quadratic Optimal Control Topics Finite time LQR problem for time varying systems Open loop solution via Lagrange multiplier Closed loop solution Dynamic programming (DP) principle Cost-to-go function

More information

BEEM103 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER. BUSINESS School. January 2009 Mock Exam, Part A. OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR ECONOMISTS solutions

BEEM103 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER. BUSINESS School. January 2009 Mock Exam, Part A. OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR ECONOMISTS solutions BEEM03 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER BUSINESS School January 009 Mock Exam, Part A OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR ECONOMISTS solutions Duration : TWO HOURS The paper has 3 parts. Your marks on the rst part will be

More information

06/12/ rws/jMc- modif SuFY10 (MPF) - Textbook Section IX 1

06/12/ rws/jMc- modif SuFY10 (MPF) - Textbook Section IX 1 IV. Continuous-Time Signals & LTI Systems [p. 3] Analog signal definition [p. 4] Periodic signal [p. 5] One-sided signal [p. 6] Finite length signal [p. 7] Impulse function [p. 9] Sampling property [p.11]

More information

Pontryagin s maximum principle

Pontryagin s maximum principle Pontryagin s maximum principle Emo Todorov Applied Mathematics and Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Winter 2012 Emo Todorov (UW) AMATH/CSE 579, Winter 2012 Lecture 5 1 / 9 Pontryagin

More information

ME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. 1. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. e Aτ BB e A τ dτ

ME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. 1. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. e Aτ BB e A τ dτ ME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. (a) Let A and B be matrices of appropriate dimension. Show that (A, B) is controllable if and

More information

FINITE-DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS AND OPTIMAL CONTROL OF THE SWEEPING PROCESS. BORIS MORDUKHOVICH Wayne State University, USA

FINITE-DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS AND OPTIMAL CONTROL OF THE SWEEPING PROCESS. BORIS MORDUKHOVICH Wayne State University, USA FINITE-DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS AND OPTIMAL CONTROL OF THE SWEEPING PROCESS BORIS MORDUKHOVICH Wayne State University, USA International Workshop Optimization without Borders Tribute to Yurii Nesterov

More information

Minimum Fuel Optimal Control Example For A Scalar System

Minimum Fuel Optimal Control Example For A Scalar System Minimum Fuel Optimal Control Example For A Scalar System A. Problem Statement This example illustrates the minimum fuel optimal control problem for a particular first-order (scalar) system. The derivation

More information

State Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules

State Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state

More information

Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2016

Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2016 Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2016 Lecture 14 Universität des Saarlandes 28. Juni 2016 c Daria Apushkinskaya (UdS) Calculus of variations lecture 14 28. Juni 2016 1 / 31 Purpose of Lesson Purpose

More information

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension 105A Practice Final Solutions March 13, 01 William Kelly Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension S = dtl = mc dt 1

More information

Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control

Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive

More information

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels) GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DATE: 30-Apr-14 COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels) NAME: STUDENT #: LAST, FIRST Write your name on the front page

More information

Notes on Control Theory

Notes on Control Theory Notes on Control Theory max t 1 f t, x t, u t dt # ẋ g t, x t, u t # t 0, t 1, x t 0 x 0 fixed, t 1 can be. x t 1 maybefreeorfixed The choice variable is a function u t which is piecewise continuous, that

More information

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General Information: This midterm is a sample midterm. This means: The sample midterm contains problems that are of similar,

More information

MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 6: The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, Artem

MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 6: The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, Artem MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 6: The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, Artem Pulemotov, September 12, 2012 Unit Outline Goal 1: Outline linear

More information

Midterm 2 Nov 25, Work alone. Maple is allowed but not on a problem or a part of a problem that says no computer.

Midterm 2 Nov 25, Work alone. Maple is allowed but not on a problem or a part of a problem that says no computer. Math 416 Name Midterm 2 Nov 25, 2008 Work alone. Maple is allowed but not on a problem or a part of a problem that says no computer. There are 5 problems, do 4 of them including problem 1. Each problem

More information

Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2015

Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2015 Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2015 Lecture 14 Universität des Saarlandes 24. Juni 2015 c Daria Apushkinskaya (UdS) Calculus of variations lecture 14 24. Juni 2015 1 / 20 Purpose of Lesson Purpose

More information

Observability and state estimation

Observability and state estimation EE263 Autumn 2015 S Boyd and S Lall Observability and state estimation state estimation discrete-time observability observability controllability duality observers for noiseless case continuous-time observability

More information

Solving Dynamic Equations: The State Transition Matrix

Solving Dynamic Equations: The State Transition Matrix Overview Solving Dynamic Equations: The State Transition Matrix EGR 326 February 24, 2017 Solutions to coupled dynamic equations Solutions to dynamic circuits from EGR 220 The state transition matrix Discrete

More information

In view of (31), the second of these is equal to the identity I on E m, while this, in view of (30), implies that the first can be written

In view of (31), the second of these is equal to the identity I on E m, while this, in view of (30), implies that the first can be written 11.8 Inequality Constraints 341 Because by assumption x is a regular point and L x is positive definite on M, it follows that this matrix is nonsingular (see Exercise 11). Thus, by the Implicit Function

More information

Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016

Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016 CDT Autonomous and Intelligent Machines & Systems Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016 Alessandro Abate Lecture 2 First-order ordinary differential equations (ODE) Solution of a linear ODE Hints to nonlinear

More information

A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems

A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,

More information

minimize x subject to (x 2)(x 4) u,

minimize x subject to (x 2)(x 4) u, Math 6366/6367: Optimization and Variational Methods Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. Suppose that f : [, L] R is a C 2 -function with f () on (, L) and that you have explicit formulae for

More information

Chapter 2 Optimal Control Problem

Chapter 2 Optimal Control Problem Chapter 2 Optimal Control Problem Optimal control of any process can be achieved either in open or closed loop. In the following two chapters we concentrate mainly on the first class. The first chapter

More information

4F3 - Predictive Control

4F3 - Predictive Control 4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 3 p 1/21 4F3 - Predictive Control Lecture 3 - Predictive Control with Constraints Jan Maciejowski jmm@engcamacuk 4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 3 p 2/21 Constraints on

More information

Steady State Kalman Filter

Steady State Kalman Filter Steady State Kalman Filter Infinite Horizon LQ Control: ẋ = Ax + Bu R positive definite, Q = Q T 2Q 1 2. (A, B) stabilizable, (A, Q 1 2) detectable. Solve for the positive (semi-) definite P in the ARE:

More information

MATH 4211/6211 Optimization Basics of Optimization Problems

MATH 4211/6211 Optimization Basics of Optimization Problems MATH 4211/6211 Optimization Basics of Optimization Problems Xiaojing Ye Department of Mathematics & Statistics Georgia State University Xiaojing Ye, Math & Stat, Georgia State University 0 A standard minimization

More information

Lecture 19 Observability and state estimation

Lecture 19 Observability and state estimation EE263 Autumn 2007-08 Stephen Boyd Lecture 19 Observability and state estimation state estimation discrete-time observability observability controllability duality observers for noiseless case continuous-time

More information

NO CALCULATOR 1. Find the interval or intervals on which the function whose graph is shown is increasing:

NO CALCULATOR 1. Find the interval or intervals on which the function whose graph is shown is increasing: AP Calculus AB PRACTICE MIDTERM EXAM Read each choice carefully and find the best answer. Your midterm exam will be made up of 8 of these questions. I reserve the right to change numbers and answers on

More information

March 8, 2010 MATH 408 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE

March 8, 2010 MATH 408 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE March 8, 200 MATH 408 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE EXAM OUTLINE The final exam for this course takes place in the regular course classroom (MEB 238) on Monday, March 2, 8:30-0:20 am. You may bring two-sided 8 page

More information

ECE 680 Fall Test #2 Solutions. 1. Use Dynamic Programming to find u(0) and u(1) that minimize. J = (x(2) 1) u 2 (k) x(k + 1) = bu(k),

ECE 680 Fall Test #2 Solutions. 1. Use Dynamic Programming to find u(0) and u(1) that minimize. J = (x(2) 1) u 2 (k) x(k + 1) = bu(k), ECE 68 Fall 211 Test #2 Solutions 1. Use Dynamic Programming to find u() and u(1) that minimize subject to 1 J (x(2) 1) 2 + 2 u 2 (k) k x(k + 1) bu(k), where b. Let J (x(k)) be the minimum cost of transfer

More information

Lecture 1: Pragmatic Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations

Lecture 1: Pragmatic Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations Lecture 1: Pragmatic Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations Simo Särkkä Aalto University, Finland (visiting at Oxford University, UK) November 13, 2013 Simo Särkkä (Aalto) Lecture 1: Pragmatic

More information

Automatic Control 2. Nonlinear systems. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2. Nonlinear systems. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year Automatic Control 2 Nonlinear systems Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011 1 / 18

More information

Z i Q ij Z j. J(x, φ; U) = X T φ(t ) 2 h + where h k k, H(t) k k and R(t) r r are nonnegative definite matrices (R(t) is uniformly in t nonsingular).

Z i Q ij Z j. J(x, φ; U) = X T φ(t ) 2 h + where h k k, H(t) k k and R(t) r r are nonnegative definite matrices (R(t) is uniformly in t nonsingular). 2. LINEAR QUADRATIC DETERMINISTIC PROBLEM Notations: For a vector Z, Z = Z, Z is the Euclidean norm here Z, Z = i Z2 i is the inner product; For a vector Z and nonnegative definite matrix Q, Z Q = Z, QZ

More information

ECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #5 Solutions

ECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #5 Solutions ECEEN 5448 Fall 211 Homework #5 Solutions Professor David G. Meyer December 8, 211 1. Consider the 1-dimensional time-varying linear system ẋ t (u x) (a) Find the state-transition matrix, Φ(t, τ). Here

More information

Dynamical systems: basic concepts

Dynamical systems: basic concepts Dynamical systems: basic concepts Daniele Carnevale Dipartimento di Ing. Civile ed Ing. Informatica (DICII), University of Rome Tor Vergata Fondamenti di Automatica e Controlli Automatici A.A. 2014-2015

More information

Optimal Control, TSRT08: Exercises. This version: October 2015

Optimal Control, TSRT08: Exercises. This version: October 2015 Optimal Control, TSRT8: Exercises This version: October 215 Preface Acknowledgment Abbreviations The exercises are modified problems from different sources: Exercises 2.1, 2.2,3.5,4.1,4.2,4.3,4.5, 5.1a)

More information

This exam will be over material covered in class from Monday 14 February through Tuesday 8 March, corresponding to sections in the text.

This exam will be over material covered in class from Monday 14 February through Tuesday 8 March, corresponding to sections in the text. Math 275, section 002 (Ultman) Spring 2011 MIDTERM 2 REVIEW The second midterm will be held in class (1:40 2:30pm) on Friday 11 March. You will be allowed one half of one side of an 8.5 11 sheet of paper

More information

Review session Midterm 1

Review session Midterm 1 AS.110.109: Calculus II (Eng) Review session Midterm 1 Yi Wang, Johns Hopkins University Fall 2018 7.1: Integration by parts Basic integration method: u-sub, integration table Integration By Parts formula

More information

Half of Final Exam Name: Practice Problems October 28, 2014

Half of Final Exam Name: Practice Problems October 28, 2014 Math 54. Treibergs Half of Final Exam Name: Practice Problems October 28, 24 Half of the final will be over material since the last midterm exam, such as the practice problems given here. The other half

More information

Lyapunov Stability Theory

Lyapunov Stability Theory Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous

More information

AA 242B / ME 242B: Mechanical Vibrations (Spring 2016)

AA 242B / ME 242B: Mechanical Vibrations (Spring 2016) AA 242B / ME 242B: Mechanical Vibrations (Spring 206) Solution of Homework #3 Control Tab Figure : Schematic for the control tab. Inadequacy of a static-test A static-test for measuring θ would ideally

More information

3 Space curvilinear motion, motion in non-inertial frames

3 Space curvilinear motion, motion in non-inertial frames 3 Space curvilinear motion, motion in non-inertial frames 3.1 In-class problem A rocket of initial mass m i is fired vertically up from earth and accelerates until its fuel is exhausted. The residual mass

More information

MATH 4211/6211 Optimization Constrained Optimization

MATH 4211/6211 Optimization Constrained Optimization MATH 4211/6211 Optimization Constrained Optimization Xiaojing Ye Department of Mathematics & Statistics Georgia State University Xiaojing Ye, Math & Stat, Georgia State University 0 Constrained optimization

More information

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam Solution

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam Solution Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam Solution January 31, 011, 1:00 pm 5:pm Solve the following six problems. In the following problems, e x, e y, and e z are unit vectors in the x, y, and z directions,

More information

LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control

LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 15: Nonlinear Systems and Lyapunov Functions Overview Our next goal is to extend LMI s and optimization to nonlinear

More information

Homework 2. Due Friday, July We studied the logistic equation in class as a model of population growth. It is given by dn dt = rn 1 N

Homework 2. Due Friday, July We studied the logistic equation in class as a model of population growth. It is given by dn dt = rn 1 N Problem 1 (10 points) Homework Due Friday, July 7 017 We studied the logistic equation in class as a model of population growth. It is given by dn dt = rn 1 N, (1) K with N(0) = N 0. (a) Make the substitutions

More information

Math 106: Calculus I, Spring 2018: Midterm Exam II Monday, April Give your name, TA and section number:

Math 106: Calculus I, Spring 2018: Midterm Exam II Monday, April Give your name, TA and section number: Math 106: Calculus I, Spring 2018: Midterm Exam II Monday, April 6 2018 Give your name, TA and section number: Name: TA: Section number: 1. There are 6 questions for a total of 100 points. The value of

More information

6 Linear Equation. 6.1 Equation with constant coefficients

6 Linear Equation. 6.1 Equation with constant coefficients 6 Linear Equation 6.1 Equation with constant coefficients Consider the equation ẋ = Ax, x R n. This equating has n independent solutions. If the eigenvalues are distinct then the solutions are c k e λ

More information

The University of British Columbia Midterm 1 Solutions - February 3, 2012 Mathematics 105, 2011W T2 Sections 204, 205, 206, 211.

The University of British Columbia Midterm 1 Solutions - February 3, 2012 Mathematics 105, 2011W T2 Sections 204, 205, 206, 211. 1. a) Let The University of British Columbia Midterm 1 Solutions - February 3, 2012 Mathematics 105, 2011W T2 Sections 204, 205, 206, 211 fx, y) = x siny). If the value of x, y) changes from 0, π) to 0.1,

More information

z x = f x (x, y, a, b), z y = f y (x, y, a, b). F(x, y, z, z x, z y ) = 0. This is a PDE for the unknown function of two independent variables.

z x = f x (x, y, a, b), z y = f y (x, y, a, b). F(x, y, z, z x, z y ) = 0. This is a PDE for the unknown function of two independent variables. Chapter 2 First order PDE 2.1 How and Why First order PDE appear? 2.1.1 Physical origins Conservation laws form one of the two fundamental parts of any mathematical model of Continuum Mechanics. These

More information

MATH 32A: MIDTERM 2 REVIEW. sin 2 u du z(t) = sin 2 t + cos 2 2

MATH 32A: MIDTERM 2 REVIEW. sin 2 u du z(t) = sin 2 t + cos 2 2 MATH 3A: MIDTERM REVIEW JOE HUGHES 1. Curvature 1. Consider the curve r(t) = x(t), y(t), z(t), where x(t) = t Find the curvature κ(t). 0 cos(u) sin(u) du y(t) = Solution: The formula for curvature is t

More information

EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems

EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems Lecture Additional Material Introduction to Model Predictive Control Maximilian Balandat Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of

More information

Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization

Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization 72 CHAPTER 7 Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization 1. First Order Conditions In this section we consider first order optimality conditions for the constrained problem P : minimize f 0 (x)

More information

EE363 homework 2 solutions

EE363 homework 2 solutions EE363 Prof. S. Boyd EE363 homework 2 solutions. Derivative of matrix inverse. Suppose that X : R R n n, and that X(t is invertible. Show that ( d d dt X(t = X(t dt X(t X(t. Hint: differentiate X(tX(t =

More information

Dynamic Optimal Control!

Dynamic Optimal Control! Dynamic Optimal Control! Robert Stengel! Robotics and Intelligent Systems MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017 Learning Objectives Examples of cost functions Necessary conditions for optimality Calculation

More information

Final Exam December 20, 2011

Final Exam December 20, 2011 Final Exam December 20, 2011 Math 420 - Ordinary Differential Equations No credit will be given for answers without mathematical or logical justification. Simplify answers as much as possible. Leave solutions

More information

1 Steady State Error (30 pts)

1 Steady State Error (30 pts) Professor Fearing EECS C28/ME C34 Problem Set Fall 2 Steady State Error (3 pts) Given the following continuous time (CT) system ] ẋ = A x + B u = x + 2 7 ] u(t), y = ] x () a) Given error e(t) = r(t) y(t)

More information

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control 6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May

More information

1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole

1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole EECS C8/ME C34 Fall Problem Set 9 Solutions (3 pts) Dominant Pole For the following transfer function: Y (s) U(s) = (s + )(s + ) a) Give state space description of the system in parallel form (ẋ = Ax +

More information

Solution via Laplace transform and matrix exponential

Solution via Laplace transform and matrix exponential EE263 Autumn 2015 S. Boyd and S. Lall Solution via Laplace transform and matrix exponential Laplace transform solving ẋ = Ax via Laplace transform state transition matrix matrix exponential qualitative

More information

MAT 211 Final Exam. Spring Jennings. Show your work!

MAT 211 Final Exam. Spring Jennings. Show your work! MAT 211 Final Exam. pring 215. Jennings. how your work! Hessian D = f xx f yy (f xy ) 2 (for optimization). Polar coordinates x = r cos(θ), y = r sin(θ), da = r dr dθ. ylindrical coordinates x = r cos(θ),

More information

Physics 351 Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Physics 351 Wednesday, April 22, 2015 Physics 351 Wednesday, April 22, 2015 HW13 due Friday. The last one! You read Taylor s Chapter 16 this week (waves, stress, strain, fluids), most of which is Phys 230 review. Next weekend, you ll read

More information

Time-Optimal Output Transition for Minimum Phase Systems

Time-Optimal Output Transition for Minimum Phase Systems Time-Optimal Output Transition for Minimum Phase Systems Jennifer Haggerty Graduate Research Assistant Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University at Buffalo Buffalo, NY 460 Email: jrh6@buffalo.edu

More information

Alberto Bressan. Department of Mathematics, Penn State University

Alberto Bressan. Department of Mathematics, Penn State University Non-cooperative Differential Games A Homotopy Approach Alberto Bressan Department of Mathematics, Penn State University 1 Differential Games d dt x(t) = G(x(t), u 1(t), u 2 (t)), x(0) = y, u i (t) U i

More information

Lecture 3: Basics of set-constrained and unconstrained optimization

Lecture 3: Basics of set-constrained and unconstrained optimization Lecture 3: Basics of set-constrained and unconstrained optimization (Chap 6 from textbook) Xiaoqun Zhang Shanghai Jiao Tong University Last updated: October 9, 2018 Optimization basics Outline Optimization

More information

Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering M. E- CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERING CL7101 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Unit I- BASICS AND ROOT-LOCUS DESIGN PART-A (2 marks) 1. What are the

More information

PHYS2330 Intermediate Mechanics Fall Final Exam Tuesday, 21 Dec 2010

PHYS2330 Intermediate Mechanics Fall Final Exam Tuesday, 21 Dec 2010 Name: PHYS2330 Intermediate Mechanics Fall 2010 Final Exam Tuesday, 21 Dec 2010 This exam has two parts. Part I has 20 multiple choice questions, worth two points each. Part II consists of six relatively

More information

Observability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u)

Observability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u) Observability Dynamic Systems Lecture 2 Observability Continuous time model: Discrete time model: ẋ(t) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t), u(t)) x(t + 1) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t)) Reglerteknik, ISY,

More information

Multiple Choice Answers. MA 113 Calculus I Spring 2018 Exam 2 Tuesday, 6 March Question

Multiple Choice Answers. MA 113 Calculus I Spring 2018 Exam 2 Tuesday, 6 March Question MA 113 Calculus I Spring 2018 Exam 2 Tuesday, 6 March 2018 Name: Section: Last 4 digits of student ID #: This exam has 12 multiple choice questions (five points each) and 4 free response questions (ten

More information

CHAPTER 3 THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE: MIXED INEQUALITY CONSTRAINTS. p. 1/73

CHAPTER 3 THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE: MIXED INEQUALITY CONSTRAINTS. p. 1/73 CHAPTER 3 THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE: MIXED INEQUALITY CONSTRAINTS p. 1/73 THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE: MIXED INEQUALITY CONSTRAINTS Mixed Inequality Constraints: Inequality constraints involving control and possibly

More information

EE 16B Final, December 13, Name: SID #:

EE 16B Final, December 13, Name: SID #: EE 16B Final, December 13, 2016 Name: SID #: Important Instructions: Show your work. An answer without explanation is not acceptable and does not guarantee any credit. Only the front pages will be scanned

More information

MAT 311 Midterm #1 Show your work! 1. The existence and uniqueness theorem says that, given a point (x 0, y 0 ) the ODE. y = (1 x 2 y 2 ) 1/3

MAT 311 Midterm #1 Show your work! 1. The existence and uniqueness theorem says that, given a point (x 0, y 0 ) the ODE. y = (1 x 2 y 2 ) 1/3 MAT 3 Midterm # Show your work!. The existence and uniqueness theorem says that, given a point (x 0, y 0 ) the ODE y = ( x 2 y 2 ) /3 has a unique (local) solution with initial condition y(x 0 ) = y 0

More information

MATH 173: PRACTICE MIDTERM SOLUTIONS

MATH 173: PRACTICE MIDTERM SOLUTIONS MATH 73: PACTICE MIDTEM SOLUTIONS This is a closed book, closed notes, no electronic devices exam. There are 5 problems. Solve all of them. Write your solutions to problems and in blue book #, and your

More information