Modal and Harmonic analysis of L.P. Turbine of a small Turbo- Fan engine using Finite Element Method

Transcription

1 Failure of Engineering Materials & Structures Code 04 UET TAXILA MECHNICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Modal and Harmonic analysis of L.P. Turbine of a small Turbo- Fan engine using Finite Element Method H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan 2 Undergraduate Student and 2 Associate Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, College of Aeronautical Engineering, NUST ABSTRACT History speaks of many accidents which occurred and whose cause could not be ascertained. Later it was revealed that there is a phenomenon of vibration called resonance which can occur in any engineering structure which has mass and elasticity. Different techniques, experimental and theoretical have been developed to analyze problems related to vibration. But in the present era computational techniques are quite common and are very reliable as far as the vibration analysis is concerned. In this work, the low pressure turbine of a small turbo-fan engine is analyzed for its vibration behavior using finite element method (FEM). The geometry of the turbine has been provided by the aero-propulsion designers, which was modeled in ANSYS. To save computational time, the turbine has been modeled as a 2-D plate type of structure utilizing 4-noded Shell 63 element of ANSYS. Constraints were applied keeping in view the actual operating conditions. The turbine was modeled with more than one FE meshes. Mesh sensitivity analysis was carried out to ensure the quality of results. Modal analysis was conducted to calculate few initial natural frequencies. Results were studied in depth against operating frequency of the turbine. After carrying out the modal analysis, harmonic analysis was done to see the response of the turbine under dynamic loading. Nature and cause of the dynamic loading is also discussed in relation to dynamic behavior.it was observed that turbine is safe in its entire range of operation as far as phenomenon of resonance is concerned. Also it was observed that maximum harmonic response of the turbine on the application of dynamic loading is far lesser than its failure limit within specified operating range. INTRODUCTION Vibration deals with the oscillatory motion of dynamic systems. A dynamic system is a combination of matter possessing mass and whose parts are capable of relative motion. All bodies possessing mass and elasticity are capable of vibrating at specific natural frequency. The phenomenon of resonance occurs if the natural frequency of structural system matches with the frequency of dynamic loading, which may result in failure of structure. In order to avoid such failure, the study of vibrational behavior of the system is essential and in fact, absolutely necessary. Today computational power is much larger, more reliable, and relatively cheap and as most technological related setups have access to computers, the popularity of using numerical

2 H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan FEMS (2007) methods is an ever increasing phenomenon. Especially FE methods are being used at large extent for structural analysis. V. Ramamurti, D. A. Subramani and K. Sridhara [] have analyzed vibration using FE methods. Also A. M. Khan, Malik Nazir Ahmed and Shehnaz Mushtaq [2] have used FE methods for stress analysis. Other than discussed, ANSYS Inc. has verified FE methods by solving several problems and provided number of verification manuals related to static, modal, harmonic, etc analyses [6, 7]. The primary objective of our study is to carry out the vibration analysis of L.P. turbine. This turbine is subjected to high RPM which may cause undesirable vibration. The ultimate goal in the study of vibration is to determine its effect on the performance and safety of the system under consideration. In this work, FE method was used for the vibration analysis of turbine using commercially available software ANSYS. CAD model was developed as per the design specification provided by the aero-propulsion experts. Material for turbine was specified as Inconel 78 [8], whose mechanical properties were taken for analysis. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING AND APPLIED CONSTRAINTS For this work, the geometry was built in Pro-E CAD software, which can be seen in Figure. This geometry was imported into ANSYS modeling environment by converting CAD file into IGES format. Additional trimming was done in ANSYS modeling environment. To save computational time, the turbine has been modeled as a 2-D plate type of structure. This was mshed with 4-noded Shell 63 element of ANSYS. Figure. CAD Model of Turbine Cyclic symmetry was utilized to decrease the computational requirement for analyses. Complete turbine was divided into 53 cyclic symmetric sectors according to the number of blades in the turbine. Figure 2 shows the finite elment mesh of a single sector. For the purpose of analysis, constraint equations are developed to correctly simulate the turbine disc and blade joints. After that one sector is solved and result can be expanded to the complete turbine.

3 H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan FEMS (2007) Figure 2. Finite Element of Turbine Sector In order to gain confidence on the results, tubine was modelled with more than one mesh. Mesh sensitivity analysis were then carried out to have a mesh with an optimum number of nodes and elements. An optimized mesh should be capable of giving accurate results with minimum utilization of computational resources. As far as boundary conditions are concerned, all nodes at turbine shaft-linkage as shown in Fig. 3 were constraint in all DOFs (Degree of Freedoms). Node coupling was used to connect nodes at blade-hub Joint (see Fig. 4). Both analyses were carried out using linear-elastic material model. MODAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED LOADS Modal analysis is used to determine the natural frequencies of a structure. The natural frequencies and mode shapes are important parameters in the design for dynamic loading conditions. Modal analyses can be performed on a pre-stressed structure, such as a spinning turbine blade. For the modal analysis of a turbine, loads and constraints were applied keeping in view the actual situation. Loads and operating conditions of turbine as per the aero-propulsion experts are specified in Table. Figure 3. Illustration of Blade Hub Joint (Single Blade) Figure 4.Illustration of Turbine Shaft Linkage

4 H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan FEMS (2007) Table. Operating Conditions of Turbine Maximum Pressure Maximum Temperature Operating RPM (Inertia) MPa K RPM MODAL ANALYSIS RESULTS First five natural frequencies were calculated for both the cases i.e. with stress stiffening on and with stress stiffening off. Results of modal analysis have not been affected much because of applied loads. The comparison of both the results is given in Table 2. We found that there is not much difference in both the results. We also observed that operating RPM of turbine is far lesser in value than first modal frequency as shown in comparison Table 3. Mode shapes obtained for turbine are described Table 4. Table 2. Modal Analysis Results Mode No. Natural Frequencies With Stress-Stiffening Effect (Hz) Natural Frequencies Without Stress-Stiffening Effect (Hz) Mode Nomenclature st Bending nd Bending st Twisting rd Bending th Bending Table 3. Comparison of minimum modal frequency and operating RPM Operating RPM(Hz) First Modal RPM(Hz) (537) (2250) HARMONIC ANALYSIS Any sustained cyclic load will produce a sustained cyclic response (a harmonic response) in a structural system. Harmonic response analysis is used to predict the sustained dynamic behavior of the structure, thus verifying whether or not structure will successfully overcome resonance, fatigue, and other harmful effects of forced vibration. Harmonic analyses require cyclic load data for the analysis. This load data was gathered as per the aerodynamic analyses of turbine carried out earlier by aero-propulsion experts. It was found out that pressure load is the only load which is cyclic in nature under steady state operation. Reason for this variation is the existence of wake due to the presence of nozzle guide vanes (stators) before turbine rotors. Whenever the rotor passes by a stator it has to pass in low pressure region (wake). The repetition of this low pressure region is equal to the number of stators before the turbine. Frequency of this dynamic loading is equal to product of number of stators and turbine RPM. This phenomenon is explained in Figures 5 (a) & (b). This analysis was carried out for normal and over run operation (32200 & 38000) X 3 RPM or 6636 to 9633 Hz. The number of stators before turbine rotors is 3.

5 H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan FEMS (2007) HARMONIC ANALYSIS RESULTS Harmonic analysis results are in the form of a graph commonly known as FRF (frequency response function). FRF for this analysis is shown in Fig. 6. This FRF is specific to the node at the trailing edge of the tip of the turbine blade, which showed the most aggressive behavior to cyclic loading. Other nodes were also analyzed, as they showed similar response but value of displacement was lesser compare to selected node, so shown FRF is associated to tip trailing edge node. Location of specific node is shown in Fig.7. Mode No. st Mode (st Turbine Mode (Oblique View) STEP= SUB = FREQ=269 DMX = :07:22 Description of Mode 2nd Mode (2nd STEP= SUB =2 FREQ=5996 DMX = :06:49 3rd Mode (st Torsion) STEP= SUB =3 FREQ=8077 DMX = :05:47 4th Mode (3rd STEP= SUB =4 FREQ=9988 DMX = :04:53 5th Mode (4th STEP= SUB =5 FREQ=4728 DMX = :04:05 Table 4. Turbine Mode s with Description

6 H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan FEMS (2007) (a) Rotor positioning according to the stators location (b) Rotor in the wake of stator Figure 5. Illustration of pressure variation on rotor blades due to the wake of stator blades Value of the maximum displacement indicated by FRF is very small as compared to the value of maximum displacement calculated using static analyses of turbine, under which turbine blade is safe for operation. The comparison of displacements at maximum RPM, obtained through analyses is shown Table 5. Figure 6. FRF (Frequency Response Function) Figure 7. Node at Trailing Edge of the Tip of the Turbine Blade

7 H. A. Khawaja and A. M. Khan FEMS (2007) CONCLUSION Table 5. Comparison of value of maximum displacements at 9633Hz Maximum Displacement Maximum Displacement (Harmonic Analysis) (Static Analysis) mm 0.40 mm Natural frequencies as per the modal analysis are shown Table 2. This turbine has to operate at RPM or 536 Hz as per the design specification provided by aero-propulsion experts. The evaluation shows that the first natural frequency is far higher than maximum operating frequency, this gives clear indication that turbine is safe against resonance phenomenon. Also harmonic response within specified range is also acceptable, as maximum value of displacement is far lesser than static displacement. Also FRF indicates no chances of the occurrence of resonance within this range. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Authors acknowledge Mr. Faisal Siddiqui and Mr. Shahzad Saleem, graduate students at College of Aeronautical Engineering, NUST, Pakistan, for help in addressing modeling and FEM problems using ANSYS software. REFERENCES. V. Ramamurti, D. A. Subramani and K. Sridhara (998) J. of Mech. Mach. Theory 30, Abdul Munem Khan, Malik Nazir Ahmed and Shehnaz Mushtaq (2006) J. of Eng. & App. Sc. 25, Francis S. Tse, Ivan E. Morse, Rolland T. Hinkle (978) Mechanical Vibration 2 nd Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, Massachusettes. 4. Ernest E. Sechler (963) Elasticity In Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, USA. 5. ANSYS Inc. Version 9.0, Multiphysics. 6. ANSYS Inc. Version 9.0, Theory Reference, Structures, 2 Modal Analysis, 3 Harmonic Analysis. 7. ANSYS Inc. Release 9.0 Documentation, Structural Analysis Guide, and 2 Verification Manuals. 8. Material Handbook of High Performance Alloys, Special Metals Corp., (200)