Quantum optics of many-body systems

Transcription

1 Quantum optics of many-body systems Igor Mekhov Université Paris-Saclay (SPEC CEA) University of Oxford, St. Petersburg State University Lecture 4

2 Previous lectures Classical optics light waves material devices light matter Atom optics matter waves light forces Quantum optics classical (hot) atoms quantum light states Quantum atom optics quantum atomic states classical light Quantum measurements Quantum optics of quantum gases and of other systems

3 Further plan Synthetic many-body systems with short-range interactions - Arrays of coupled cavities - Bose-Hubbard and Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard models - Strongly interacting photons in free space (without a cavity) Many-body cavity QED with collective long-range interactions - Dicke phase transition - From classical optical lattices to dynamical and quantum optical lattices - Quantum measurement-induces phenomena and control methods for many-body states

4 Arrays of coupled cavities Building an artificial lattice of strongly interacting particles: on-site interaction and tunnelling - Tunnelling of photons between neighbouring cavities - On-site nonlinearity due to the nonlinear atoms - Open system: dissipative and driven

5 Proposals with various systems Mirrors Photonic crystals with quantum dots Array of fibres Reviews: M. Hartmann; D. Jaksch; D. Angelakis

6 Circuit QED systems: microwave resonators with superconducting qubits Various lattice geometries: kagome lattice (no Prof. Kagome!) Reviews: M. Hartmann; D. Jaksch; D. Angelakis

7 A chain of 72 microwave cavities with qubits A. Houck group, Phys. Rev. X. (2017)

8 Coupled semiconductor cavities with exciton-polaritons J. Bloch s group, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016)

9 Various systems: the goal is to achieve the strong-light matter coupling regime Reviews: M. Hartmann; D. Jaksch; D. Angelakis

10 Targeted models: Bose-Hubbard model: Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard model

11 Open systems: dissipation and external drive Master equation: Hamiltonian evolution and dissipation (non-hermitian evolution + quantum jumps) Atomic spontaneous emission: Coherent drive (pump):

12 Master equation with local dissipation Local vs global dissipation Global jump operators (global dissipation and measurements): Global projection (dissipation) does not destroy the quantum coherence (superposition) in many-body systems: - Preserving and creating the long-range entanglement - Quantum measurement-induced preparation and control of many-body states

13 Cavity QED reminder (lecture 2) Dynamics: vacuum Rabi oscillations (e.g. of photon number and population difference) Vacuum Rabi frequency

14 Dressed states, photon blokade Weak coupling Strong coupling Antibunching (photon blockade)

15 Interaction energy in the BH and JCH models: nonlinearity of interaction JCH: photon blockade leads to the photon-photon repulsion Reviews: M. Hartmann; D. Jaksch; D. Angelakis

16 Self-trapping, localization-delocalization transition (related to the repulsively bound pairs in optical lattices) No analogy in standard condensed matter physics (interaction + isolation form the environment) Exciton-polaritons (J. Bloch s group)

17 Circuit QED (A. Houck s group, 2014) Bistability in circuit QED (A. Houck s group, 2017)

18 Strongly interacting photons in 1D Atoms in fibers, Tonks-Girardeau gas D. Chang, V. Gritsev, G. Morigi, V. Vuletic, M. Lukin, E. Demler Lieb-Liniger model: fermionization of strongly repulsive bosons Fermionization: antibunching in space (Friedel oscillations)

19 Classical optical lattices The light is not only nonclassical, It is not even quantized. No light fluctuation No light-matter entanglement Quantum gases in cavities Optical lattices with quantized light: Key new opportunities and physical effects Reviews: I. Mekhov & H. Ritsch, J. Phys. B (2012), H. Ritsch et. al., Rev. Mod. Phys. (2013) Nondestructive (QND) probing of many-body atomic states State preparation and control by the quantum measurement backaction probe scattered Quantum optical lattices (quantum trapping potentials)

20 Towards quantum optical lattices Dynamical optical lattices (self-consistent solution for atomic and light states) Current experimental state of the art. T. Esslinger (ETH Zurich), A. Hemmerich (Hamburg), C. Zimmermann (Tubingen), B. Lev (Stanford), Ph. Bouyer & A. Bertoldi (IOGS) Quantum optical lattices Using the quantum fluctuations of light and light-matter correlations/ entanglement Quantum measurements by light Quantum nondemolition (QND) measurements (expectation values) Preparation of many-body states Quantum weak measurements as a novel source of competitions in manybody systems. Non-Hermitian dynamics (beyond standard dissipation) Feedback control of many-body states (beyond dissipative phase transitions)

21 Quantum and dynamical lattices Many-body Hamiltonian (second quantisation form): Single-atom Hamiltonian (Jaynes-Cummings model with motion): Adiabatic elimination of the atom polarization (or excited state): Expansion in localised Wannier functions:

22 Generalized Bose-Hubbard model Origin of the long-range interaction: Enrichment of the physical picture due to the light quantization: Tunneling coefficients dynamically depend on the atomic state Long-range cavity-mediated interaction Joint light and atom quantum fluctuations (entanglement) Broader quantum simulations, quantum control of many-body states

23 Light scattering model Light depends on the density operator: Diffraction beyond Bragg peaks On-site densities and inter-site matter-field interference (phase, tunnelling) Diffraction maxima (Bragg peaks) are classical. Diffraction minima show the quantum fluctuation of atomic state. Scientific Rep. 7, (2017)

24 Generation of multiple matter modes For angles at diffraction minima, groups of atoms scatter light with equal phases. Thus, they are indistinguishable for light scattering (no which-path information) Ex. R=2 modes: (odd and even sites) (sum of smaller number of macroscopic modes) PRL 114, (2015) Spatial structure of scattering enables the competition between global and short-range processes

25 Interaction of global modes (density and bond modes) PRL 115, (2015) PRA 93, (2016) Total Hamiltonian: Contribution from quantum / dynamical potential (light scattering): Effective interaction between atomic modes

26 Two-mode example: phase transition Phase transition: homogeneous gas turns into a checkerboard pattern: self-organization, Dicke phase transition, supersolid state. T. Esslinger, P. Domokos In the ground state, light scattering tends to be maximized (or minimized) Typical case: B=0 Interaction between two nonlocal modes (supersolid-like state) standard supersolid appears due to the density interaction at neighbouring sites:

27 Two-mode example: phase transition Dicke phase transition (BEC, without a lattice): T. Esslinger, Nature (2010) Lattice supersolid (with a lattices): T. Esslinger, Nature (2016), A. Hemmerich, PRL (2015) 4 phases: MI, SF, SS, DW Supersolid in two crossed cavities: T. Donner & T. Esslinger, Nature (2017)

28 Superradiant Dicke phase transition Dicke Hamiltonian: Coupling: the pump strength Motional levels: T. Esslinger, Nature (2010) Interference of matter waves in a standing wave cavity

29 Novel phases: properties of both long- and short-range models Structured global scattering mimics the long-range interactions (much longer than for Rydberg atoms, dipolar molecules, or spins) The mode interaction length can be tuned Density coupling: multimode density waves (DW) multimode supersolids (SS) Bond coupling: superfluid dimers (SFD), trimers, etc. supersolid dimers (SSD), trimers, etc. PRL 115, (2015); NJP 17, (2015); PRA 93, (2016)

30 Self-organization of quantum matter waves Phase transition: matter-field phase alternates for different sites. PRL 115, (2015) Matter-field phases compete with the imposed light-field phases. Competition between the kinetic energy and light-matter interaction. Superfluid dimers Supersolid dimers

31 Quantum vs dynamical optical lattice Semiclassical approximation (similar to optics): light is classical (and dynamical) atoms are quantum (here, the motion) Ground state for maximized scattering, build-up of strong light, quantum fluctuations can be neglected Dynamical, but NOT quantum OL (self-organization) Ground state for minimized scattering, NO strong light, quantum fluctuations play the leading role: Quantum OL

32 Density coupling: quantum OL No light build-up: fluctuations define physics Renormalization of the interaction strength: Shift of the MI-SF transition point: Suppression of light fluctuation leads to suppression of atomic fluctuations Fluctuations in SF can be suppressed as well (QS) Purely light-induced effective on-site interaction (beyond BH model) PRL 115, (2015)

33 Quantum OL for bond modes PRL 115, (2015) No light build-up: fluctuations define physics New terms (not present in BH model) lead to the supersolid state Solely due to the quantum light-matter correlations Supersolid without a cavity: W. Ketterle, Nature (2017)

34 Fully quantum trapping potential Leaving the MI ground state (quantum optical lattices) average photon number in a cavity < 1 Dynamics: light fluctuations drive the atomic fluctuations Superposition of MI + SF + free particle??? EPJD 46, 545 (2008)

35 Other many-body states Overlap of the Mott insulator lobes (dynamical lattice) J. Larson, B. Damski, G. De Chiara, G. Morigi, M. Lewenstein,

36 Other many-body states Bose and spin glasses (disorder): G. Morigi, S. Sachdev, Ph. Strack, S. Diehl, Fermions in a cavity: J. Keeling, F. Piazza, Multimode cavities: B. Lev, S. Gopalakrishnan,

37 Quantum measurement Cavity QED S. Haroche setup Probing light state by atoms Many-body cavity QED Probing atomic state by light light probe matter cavity ~ lattice site scattered Analogy: strongly correlated states of thousands of cavities Matter waves: natural nonclassical states, interacting, can be fermions

38 Quantum measurements Quantum nondemolition (QND) measurements (expectation values) Preparation of many-body states Quantum weak measurements as a novel source of competitions in manybody systems. Non-Hermitian dynamics (beyond standard dissipation) Feedback control of many-body states (beyond dissipative phase transitions)

39 QND measurements of expectation values QND Hamiltonian for negligible tunneling Various QND variables The conjugate variable (matter phase) is destroyed, but does not affect dynamics) Photon number: density and tunnelling correlations:, Photon number variance: 4- and 8-point correlations:,

40 Spectrum: number distribution mapping Δ p Photon number Nature Phys. 3, 319 (2007) Mott insulator Superfluid Probe detuning p /(g 2 / 1a ) Ensemble average vs Single run measurements Expectation values: multiple measurements required SINGLE RUN single quantum trajectory measurement back-action (entanglement)

41 Weak measurement vs unitary dynamics competition Measurement strength Strong projective measurement Q. Zeno effect (one level) Q. Zeno dynamics (degenerate subspace) Weak measurement: competition not QND! Beyond Q. Zeno dynamics Near free evolution Free many-body unitary dynamics

42 Light-matter entanglement Usual 2-slits Young experiment λ/2 Young experiment with ONE slit in the superposition of TWO positions SF for 1 atom at 2 sites Light-matter entanglement Measurement backaction: measuring light one affects the atomic state

43 Global structured measurement backaction Due to the light-matter entanglement, measurement of one subsystem (light) affects another subsystem (quantum gas) 0. Initial light-matter state 1. No-count process: non-hermitian evolution 2. One-count process: global quantum jump (Coherent light states are correlated with atomic Fock states) Quantum trajectory after m photocounts Projection to a region of the initial Hilbert space still contains quantum superpositions. Quantum Zeno dynamics (and beyond!).

44 QND measurements: State preparation Bragg angle Diffraction minimum Many-body Fock state (number squeezing) Schrödinger cat state (superposition) Characteristics at a single quantum trajectory (Quantum Monte Carlo) Quantum state collapse is pre-selected by the optical geometry Introducing and tailoring decoherence in many-body systems

45 Weaker measurement: beyond Q. Zeno dynamics PRA 93, (2016) PRA 94, (2016) Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian: Non-Hermitian evolution via Raman-like transitions Rate: tunnelling out / measurement strength Levels in a Q. Zeno subspace

46 Quantum Zeno and long-range correlated tunneling Suppression of the standard tunnelling (quantum Zeno dynamics). Long-range correlated tunnelling (via virtual processes, beyond QZD). Engineered extended Hamiltonians Entangled systems and nonlocal correlated baths PRA 93, (2016) PRA 94, (2016)

47 Very weak measurement 2 modes (odd and even sites) NJP 18, (2016) Without measurement: spreading of the distribution With measurement: competition leads to giant oscillations multimode Schrödinger cat (NOON) states 1 mode 2 modes 3 modes

48 Fermions: Measurement-induced AFM order Similar to the measurement of density fluctuations in real space: in diffraction minimum, the light scattering can be sensitive to the spin magnetization M: Staggered magnetization: Competition of weak measurement backaction with tunnelling leads to giant oscillations of staggered magnetization: antiferromagnetic order Feedback control Scientific Rep. 6, (2016) Optica (OSA) 3, 1213 (2016)

49 Fermions: Break-up and protection of pairs Ground state: pairs of strongly interacting fermions PRA 93, (2016) Density measurement leads to the break-up of the pairs Adding the magnetization measurement, leads to the protection of the pairs

50 Imperfect detection Stochastic master equation: from dissipation to measurements NJP 18, (2016) Scientific Rep. 7, (2017) Detector effeciency

51 Feedback control (beyond dissipative transitions) Optica (OSA) 3, 1213 (2016) Single trajectory Average - Stabilization - Frequency tuning

52 Conclusions New systems at the crossroad of several disciplines Opportunities for novel phenomena and methods Quantum engineering and technologies Quantum simulations (broader range of trial Hamiltonians) Quantum metrology and sensing (NOON states, inertial sensors) Ph. Bouyer and A. Bertoldi (IOGS, Bordeaux) Quantum computation (genuinely murtipartite entanglement) Quantum machine learning (hidden Markov chains, Bayesian networks, reinforcement learning, feedback)

53 References (for all lectures) Books P. Meystre, Atom optics (2001); M. Scully and S. Zubairy, Quantum optics (1997); S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Exploring quantum (2006); Reviews I. B. Mekhov and H. Ritsch, Journ. Phys. B. 45, (2012); H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 553 (2013); M. J. Hartmann, J. Opt. 18, (2016); C. Noh, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, D. G. Angelakis, arxiv: (2017); M. Greiner, PhD Thesis (2003); Quantum optical lattices S. Caballero Benitez & I. B. Mekhov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, (2015); S. Caballero-Benitez, G. Mazzucchi, & I. B. Mekhov, Phys. Rev. A 93, (2016); Quantum measurements and feedback control of many-body systems I. B. Mekhov & H. Ritsch, Nature Phys. 3, 319 (2007); T. Elliott, W. Kozlowski, S. Caballero-Benitez, I. B. Mekhov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, (2015); G. Mazzucchi, S. Caballero-Benitez, D. Ivanov, & I. B. Mekhov, Optica (OSA), 3, 1213 (2016); W. Kozlowski, S. Caballero-Benitez, & I. B. Mekhov, Scientific Rep. 7, (2017).