bit , ( Gupta, Verhoeven, 1999 ; Afonso, Aubyn, 2006 ) ( Hsu Hsueh,2008) ( Prieto Zofio,2001),, (2004) (2006) , (2008) X - Feb.

Transcription

1 Chinese Journal of Management Science : (2010) , No. 1 Vol. Feb., 2010 : 1,2 (11, ; 21, ) : DEA - TOBIT, ;, ; TOBIT,, : ; ; DEA ; TOBIT : F81217 ; C931 :A 1, (De Borger, Kerstens, Moes2 en Vanneste, 1994 ; De Borger, Kerstens, 1996 ; At hanassopoulos Triantis, 1998 ; Afonso, Schuknecht Tanzi, 2005 ; Afonso Fernandes, 2005 ; Angelopoulos, Philippopoulos Tsionas, 2008 ; Borge, Falch Tovmo, 2008 ; Angelopou2 los, Philippopoulos Tsionas, 2008 ;,,2008 ;,,,2008),( Gupta, Verhoeven, 1999 ; Afonso, Aubyn, 2006 ) ( Hsu Hsueh,2008) ( Prieto Zofio,2001),, (2004) (2008) (2006) (2008), DEA,(2008), 16 () , (2008) D EA X - ( : ; : : (09XJ Y023) : ( ),( ),,,, : 1 ), (10 ), ( ), (2008) DEA 14 () 2005,To2 bit,,,, 4, ( ) 4,,,

2 1 :: 27,,,,,,,D EA - TOBIT,,, 2 ( Performance) ( Efficiency) Samuelson,,, (allocative efficiency),,,,, 1,,,,,, 2. 1, :, ;,, ;,, (,1999),,, 1,, 50, Malmquist,, , ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ), () () ( ),,,,,

3 ,,,, 26,,, 3 DEA - TOBIT (DEA),,,,, DEA,,( Far2,,pech > 1,, ;pech = 1,;pech < 1,, rell,1957 [14 ] ;Charnes, Cooper, Rhodes, 1978 [15 ] ) D EA,,,,,,,, D EA 0,, Caves, Christensen, Diewert 1,(OL S) (1982) [16 ] Fare. Grosskopf, Lindgren Ross,Tobit (1992) [17 ] Malmquist ( MPI) : 01, M ( y t + 1, x t + 1, y t, x t) = D t ( x t + 1, y t + 1 ) D t + 1 ( x t + 1, y t + 1 ) D t ( x t, y t) D t + 1 ( x t, y t) : M ( y t + 1, x t + 1, y t, x t ) Malmquist,t t + 1 ; D t ( x t + 1, y t + 1 ) t ( t ) t + 1 ; D t ( x t, y t) t ; D t+1 ( x t+1, y t+1 ) t + 1 (t + 1 ) ; D t+1 ( x t, y t) t + 1 t Malmquist, M o ( X t + 1, Y t + 1, X t, Y t ) = effch techch = pech sech techch,effch, techch,pech, sech 1,,, 1,, Malmquist D EA (,1995 [18 ] ),, : Y i 3 = X i + i, i = 1,2,, n Y i Y i 3, OL S,, Tobit i 4 DEA 1997,,,,

4 1 :: 29 29,,, 2000,,, Malmquist,, DEA P2. 1 : 4. 1 (,, ), 1, 10 1,, 0. 5, X -, ,,, ,, , ,, :,, 4. 2,, ,, 4. 3 Mal2 mquist, Malmquist 1, ,, 2002 Malmquist : , Malmquist 1, Malmquist 1, ; ,, Malmquist 1, Malmquist 1, 2002,,, ;,, ;,, 5 TOBIT,,,, ;, ;,,

5 ;,,, ;,,, : (L F TZ),, (J YNX),, (LJ DL), (CZHL),, ( ZYZF),, 5,,, STA TA10. 0, ( 2007,,) ( ) TOBIT,: (1),, 100, VRS ,,,, (2),,, VRS ,,, (3),,,,,,,,, 1 TOBIT J YNX L FTZ LJDL CZHL ( 3 3 ) ( 3 3 ) : p < ; 3 3 p < ; 3 p < 0. 1 _u _e

6 1 :: 31 (4),,,, (5), 6, , :,, ,,,,,,,,,,, : [1 ] De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., Moesen, W.,Vanneste, J.. Explaining differences in productive efficiency : An application to Belgian Municipalities[J ]. Public Choice, 1994, 80 (3/ 4) : [ 2 ] De Borger, B., Kerstens, K.. Cost efficiency of Belgian local government s : A comparative analysis of FD H, DEA, and econometric approaches[j ]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,1996a, 26 : [ 3 ] Athanassopoulos, A., Triantis, K.. Assessing aggre2 gate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities [ J ]. IN FOR, 1998, 36 (3) : [ 4 ] Afonso, Fernandes. Assessing and explaining the rela2 tive efficiency of local government : Evidence for the Portuguese Municipalities[ R]. ISEG economics working paper, [ 5 ] Afonso, Schuknecht, Tanzi. Public sector efficiency : An international comparison[j ]. Public Choice, 123. [ 6 ] Angelopoulos, K., Philippopoulos, A., Tsionas, E.. Does public sector efficiency matter? Revisiting the rela2 tion between fiscal size and economic growth in a world sample[j ]. Public Choice, 2008, 137 : [7 ] Borge,L. E., Falch, T., Tovmo, P.. Public sector ef2 ficiency : The roles of political and budgetary institu2 tions, fiscal capacity, and democratic participation [J ]. Public Choice, 2008, 136 : [ 8 ] Hauner, D.. Explaining differences in public sector effi2 ciency : Evidence from Russia s regions[j ]. World De2 velopment, 2008, 36 (10) : [9 ], 1 : [J ]1,2008, (4) : [10 ],, 1 () DEA [J ]1,2008, (11) : [ 11 ], 1 DEA [J ]1,2006, (9) : [12 ], 1 [J ]1,2008, (4) : [13 ] 1 DEA - TOBIT [J ]1,2008, (9) : [ 14 ] Farrell, M. J.. The measurement of productive effi2 ciency[j ]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Se2 ries A,1957, 120, (3) : [15 ] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E.. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2 : [16 ] Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., Diewert, W. E.. The economic theory of index numbers and the meas2 urement of input,output, and productivity [J ]. Econ2 ometrica, 1982, 50 (6) : [17 ] Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., Ross, P.. Productivity changes in swedish pharmacies : A non - parametric malmquist approach [ J ]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,1992, 3 : [18 ],1 [J ]1,1995, (7) :30-371

7 An Evaluation on Allocation Perf ormance of Regional Fiscal Support to Agriculture Since from the Chinese Ref orm of Tax Distribution System :From Prospect of Grade WANG Sheng 1,2 (1. Chongqing Acodemy of Social Science, Chongqing , China ; 2. College of Economics and Management, Southwest University, Chongqing , China) Abstract : Based on the t heoretical f ramework to evaluate the performance, t his paper analyzes t he alloca2 tion performance of regional fiscal support to agriculture, from 1993 to 2007, with t he method of Data En2 velop ment Analysis (D EA). The V RS technical efficiency of regio nal fiscal support to agricult ure show s t hat t he DMU Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Henan are always at the frontier and f ully efficiencty, while t he DMU Inner Mongolia, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Shanxi and Heilongjiang are far f rom t he f rontier and inefficient. Regionally, the efficiency of western region is lower than t hat of t he eastern, middle and natio nal average level. The Malmquist Index shows t hat t he allocatio n performance of regio nal fiscal sup2 port to agricult ure improved in an overall level. The paper proves t hat t he degree of urbanization is an im2 portant exogenous factor which impact s t he efficiency of regional fiscal support to agricult ure in every re2 gion, and has t he biggest contribution to Middle area. The invest ment in fixed asset s of rural households, t he level of agricult ural mechanization and t he education period of rural labors also have significant effect s on t he efficiency of some particular area. Key words : Chinese sub - national fiscal expendit ure to agricult ure ; performance ; D EA ; TOBIT