SO(10) SUSY GUTs with family symmetries: the test of FCNCs
|
|
- Charlene Hawkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SO(10) SUSY GUTs with family symmetries: the test of FCNCs Outline Diego Guadagnoli Technical University Munich The DR Model: an SO(10) SUSY GUT with D 3 family symmetry Top down approach to the MSSM+ Successful fit to quark & lepton masses, CKM & PMNS matrices Including FCNCs: the only way to test the pattern of SUSY particles masses & mixings predicted by the model Details on the analysis: global fit to low energy observables, FCNCs directly in the 2 function
2 The Model The model by Dermíšek & Raby (DR) is an SO(10) SUSY GUT with an additional D 3 [U(1)Z 2 Z 3 ] family symmetry Dermíšek & Raby PLB ( 05), PRD( 00)
3 The Model The model by Dermíšek & Raby (DR) is an SO(10) SUSY GUT with an additional D 3 [U(1)Z 2 Z 3 ] family symmetry Dermíšek & Raby PLB ( 05), PRD( 00) Why SUSY GUTs Tantalizing unification of LEP measured SM couplings after MSSM running to high energies. Maybe just a coincidence. Maybe not.
4 The Model The model by Dermíšek & Raby (DR) is an SO(10) SUSY GUT with an additional D 3 [U(1)Z 2 Z 3 ] family symmetry Dermíšek & Raby PLB ( 05), PRD( 00) Why SUSY GUTs Tantalizing unification of LEP measured SM couplings after MSSM running to high energies. Maybe just a coincidence. Maybe not. Why SO(10) Complete quark lepton unification: single 16 representation for each family Natural inclusion of R in each 16. See saw mechanism easily incorporated. Can explain the pattern of quark/lepton masses and mixings, through family symmetries Dermíšek & Raby or (few) extra fermion multiplets Babu & Barr ( 95) many other authors
5 Why (discrete) family symmetries Global symmetries: are believed not to arise in string theory Local (i.e. gauge) symmetries: typically enhance FCNCs Discrete symmetries can arise e.g. as the remnant of spontaneously broken gauge symmetries directly from compactifications in string theory
6 Why (discrete) family symmetries Global symmetries: are believed not to arise in string theory Local (i.e. gauge) symmetries: typically enhance FCNCs Discrete symmetries can arise e.g. as the remnant of spontaneously broken gauge symmetries directly from compactifications in string theory Family symmetries: isospin example We know that in SO(10) the 16 i contains the fermions of the i th generation Let {16 1, 16 2 } transform as an isospin doublet and 16 3 as a singlet Then let us introduce: flavon fields : transform under the family isospin, are SO(10) singlets Froggatt Nielsen fields : transform under the family isospin, are 16 s of SO(10)
7 Now one can build up the following interactions: 16 1,2 [Higgs], 16 1,2, 16 1,2 [Higgs], Yukawa unification only for 3 rd generation fermions 16 3 [Higgs]16 3
8 Now one can build up the following interactions: 16 1,2 [Higgs], 16 1,2, 16 1,2 [Higgs], Yukawa unification only for 3 rd generation fermions 16 3 [Higgs]16 3 One then breaks spontaneously the family symmetry through = vev and integrates out the, with M GUT scale. Mass terms for, say, quarks are generated through diagrams like: Higgs 16 i 16 i q M q q q M Higgs q FN states implement a sort of see saw mechanism to make quark masses GUT scale Quark mass hierarchies are understood in terms of the sequential breaking of the family symmetry through = vev
9 Now one can build up the following interactions: 16 1,2 [Higgs], 16 1,2, 16 1,2 [Higgs], Yukawa unification only for 3 rd generation fermions 16 3 [Higgs]16 3 One then breaks spontaneously the family symmetry through = vev and integrates out the, with M GUT scale. Mass terms for, say, quarks are generated through diagrams like: Higgs 16 i 16 i q M q q q M Higgs q FN states implement a sort of see saw mechanism to make quark masses GUT scale Quark mass hierarchies are understood in terms of the sequential breaking of the family symmetry through = vev The DR model realizes the above mechanism with the smallest (non Abelian) discrete analogue of isospin, i.e. the D 3 group. With 11 family symmetry (real) parameters, it successfully describes quark & lepton masses and mixings. With a total of 24 parameters (less than in the SM+) the whole MSSM+ parameter space is fixed.
10 It is worthwhile to perform a more detailed analysis of the DR model. The aim is to test the SUSY mass spectrum and mixings predicted by the model. The SUSY spectrum will affect flavor changing neutral current (FCNC) processes. Albrecht, Altmannshofer, Buras, D.G., Straub, JHEP 07 Strategy: perform a global fit to the model parameters, including FCNCs among the observables in the fit.
11 It is worthwhile to perform a more detailed analysis of the DR model. The aim is to test the SUSY mass spectrum and mixings predicted by the model. The SUSY spectrum will affect flavor changing neutral current (FCNC) processes. Albrecht, Altmannshofer, Buras, D.G., Straub, JHEP 07 Strategy: perform a global fit to the model parameters, including FCNCs among the observables in the fit. One step back: how a GUT scale model is tested at the EW scale. scale Y s, soft SUSY pars, i, M Ri The DR model is specified in terms of coupling and unified scale: G, M G initial conditions M G soft SUSY breaking params at M G M Ri textures entering the Yukawa s at M G EW scale
12 It is worthwhile to perform a more detailed analysis of the DR model. The aim is to test the SUSY mass spectrum and mixings predicted by the model. The SUSY spectrum will affect flavor changing neutral current (FCNC) processes. Albrecht, Altmannshofer, Buras, D.G., Straub, JHEP 07 Strategy: perform a global fit to the model parameters, including FCNCs among the observables in the fit. One step back: how a GUT scale model is tested at the EW scale. scale Y s, soft SUSY pars, i, M Ri The DR model is specified in terms of coupling and unified scale: G, M G initial conditions M G MSSM+RH RGEs soft SUSY breaking params at M G M Ri integrate out RH textures entering the Yukawa s at M G right handed neutrino masses M Ri define see saw scale EW scale
13 It is worthwhile to perform a more detailed analysis of the DR model. The aim is to test the SUSY mass spectrum and mixings predicted by the model. The SUSY spectrum will affect flavor changing neutral current (FCNC) processes. Albrecht, Altmannshofer, Buras, D.G., Straub, JHEP 07 Strategy: perform a global fit to the model parameters, including FCNCs among the observables in the fit. One step back: how a GUT scale model is tested at the EW scale. scale Y s, soft SUSY pars, i, M Ri The DR model is specified in terms of coupling and unified scale: G, M G initial conditions M G MSSM+RH RGEs soft SUSY breaking params at M G M Ri integrate out RH textures entering the Yukawa s at M G right handed neutrino masses M Ri define see saw scale MSSM RGEs term and tan at the EW scale Compute observables enter EWSB EW scale integrate out SUSY SM RGEs
14 A closer look to the strategy We test the model, through the following observables O i : EW obs. quark masses lepton masses CKM & PMNS M W M Z G F e.m. s M Z M h 0 M t m b m b m c m c m s 2GeV m d 2 GeV m u 2 GeV M M M e 2 m 31 2 m 21 V us V ub V cb sin 2 sin sin sin
15 A closer look to the strategy We test the model, through the following observables O i : EW obs. quark masses lepton masses CKM & PMNS FCNCs M W M Z G F e.m. s M Z M h 0 M t m b m b m c m c m s 2GeV m d 2 GeV m u 2 GeV M M M e 2 m 31 2 m 21 V us V ub V cb sin 2 sin sin K BR [ B s + - ] BR [ B X s ] BR [ B X s l + l - ] BR [ B u ] M s / M d sin
16 A closer look to the strategy We test the model, through the following observables O i : EW obs. quark masses lepton masses CKM & PMNS FCNCs M W M Z G F e.m. s M Z M h 0 M t m b m b m c m c m s 2GeV m d 2 GeV m u 2 GeV M M M e 2 m 31 2 m 21 V us V ub V cb sin 2 sin sin K BR [ B s + - ] BR [ B X s ] BR [ B X s l + l - ] BR [ B u ] M s / M d sin These observables O i enter a 2 function, defined as 2 [ model pars] i=1 N obs f i [model pars] O i 2 i 2 exp i 2 theo f i : model prediction for O i The 2 function is then minimized upon variation of the model parameters.
17 Detailed chart of the fitting procedure scale M G Set initial conditions: {Y s, soft SUSY pars, i, M Ri } Variation of: textures soft SUSY pars [all but m Hu, m Hd ] MSSM+RH RGEs M G, G, 3 M Ri Integrate out Ri MSSM RGEs M Z Get all MSSM pars: {Y s, soft SUSY pars, i, M } Compute: SUSY spectrum EWSB conditions [including one loop corr. to masses and mixings] SM RGEs. Variation of: m Hu, m Hd,, tan [obtain correct EWSB] m b Compute: FCNC observables Evaluate 2 function
18 FCNCs considered in the analysis: Main features The DR model is characterized by tan50 because of SO(10). Hence all the FCNC observables need be computed in the MSSM at large tan.
19 FCNCs considered in the analysis: Main features The DR model is characterized by tan50 because of SO(10). Hence all the FCNC observables need be computed in the MSSM at large tan. BR [ B s + - ] For large tan (and sizable A t ), dominated by double penguins with neutral Higgses Enhancement going as: BR [ B s + - ] A t 2 tan 6 M A 4 (Old) upper bound from CDF BR [ B s + - ] exp M A > 450 GeV Generic bound valid for all the heavy Higgs masses
20 FCNCs considered in the analysis: Main features The DR model is characterized by tan50 because of SO(10). Hence all the FCNC observables need be computed in the MSSM at large tan. BR [ B s + - ] For large tan (and sizable A t ), dominated by double penguins with neutral Higgses Enhancement going as: BR [ B s + - ] A t 2 tan 6 M A 4 (Old) upper bound from CDF BR [ B s + - ] exp M A > 450 GeV Generic bound valid for all the heavy Higgs masses M s Again, double penguin dominance + other external chiralities Suppression going as: M s m b m s M W 2 2 tan 4 A t 2 M A Within the DR model, typical corrections to M s do not exceed 5%
21 BR [ B X s ] exp BR [ B X s ] E 1.6GeV SM BR [ B X s ] E 1.6GeV = 3.55± = 3.15± HFAG average Misiak et al., PRL 07 The theory prediction for b s must be SM like
22 BR [ B X s ] exp BR [ B X s ] E 1.6GeV SM BR [ B X s ] E 1.6GeV = 3.55± = 3.15± HFAG average Misiak et al., PRL 07 The theory prediction for b s must be SM like Very rough b s formula [ B X s ] G 2 F e.m. 32 V * 4 ts V tb 2 m b5 C eff 7 b Subleading corr s & contrib s negligible in the DR model with C eff eff 7 b = C 7, SM b C 7, DR b In order to end up with a SM like prediction, one must have either or eff C 7, DR b C 7, SM b eff C 7, DR b 2 C 7,SM b
23 BR [ B X s ] exp BR [ B X s ] E 1.6GeV SM BR [ B X s ] E 1.6GeV = 3.55± = 3.15± HFAG average Misiak et al., PRL 07 The theory prediction for b s must be SM like Very rough b s formula [ B X s ] G 2 F e.m. 32 V * 4 ts V tb 2 m b5 C eff 7 b Subleading corr s & contrib s negligible in the DR model with C eff eff 7 b = C 7, SM b C 7, DR b In order to end up with a SM like prediction, one must have either or eff C 7, DR b C 7, SM b eff C 7, DR b 2 C 7,SM b Notes This solution is highly conspired SUSY is here not a correction to the SM result The theoretical control on the SUSY part should then be at least as good as in the SM In absence of it, we find e.g. a strong sensitivity to the SUSY matching scale
24 BR [ B X s ] [continued] Within the DR model, dominant NP contributions are from charginos and Higgses. Gluinos play a minor role. C 7, DR b C 7 + b C 7 H + b small
25 BR [ B X s ] [continued] Within the DR model, dominant NP contributions are from charginos and Higgses. Gluinos play a minor role. C 7, DR b C 7 + b C 7 H + b small Main features: Higgs contrib s add up to the SM ones. However, Higgs contrib s are made small by the lower bound on M A placed by B s + -
26 BR [ B X s ] [continued] Within the DR model, dominant NP contributions are from charginos and Higgses. Gluinos play a minor role. C 7, DR b C 7 + b C 7 H + b small Main features: Higgs contrib s add up to the SM ones. However, Higgs contrib s are made small by the lower bound on M A placed by B s + - Contributions from charginos are the dominant ones, and behave like SM H + At 0 A t 0 C 7 + A t tan signc 7 SM
27 BR [ B X s ] [continued] Within the DR model, dominant NP contributions are from charginos and Higgses. Gluinos play a minor role. C 7, DR b C 7 + b C 7 H + b small Main features: Higgs contrib s add up to the SM ones. However, Higgs contrib s are made small by the lower bound on M A placed by B s + - Contributions from charginos are the dominant ones, and behave like SM H + At 0 A t 0 C 7 + A t tan signc 7 SM In the DR model, chargino contrib s can be very large. As a matter of fact: SM H + total A t 0 prefers the fine tuned case:
28 BR [ B X s l + l - ] At variance with b s, the decay b s l + l is sensitive to the sign of C 7 eff s= p + p - 2 /m b 2 d [ B X s l + l - ] d s 12 s C eff 9 s 2 C eff 10 s s C eff C 7 eff Re C 9 eff s
29 BR [ B X s l + l - ] At variance with b s, the decay b s l + l is sensitive to the sign of C 7 eff s= p + p - 2 /m b 2 d [ B X s l + l - ] d s 12 s C eff 9 s 2 C eff 10 s s C eff C 7 eff Re C 9 eff s BaBar & Belle average SM C 7 eff C 7 eff 10 6 BR[ B X s l + l - low s ] exp = 1.60± ± ±0.25 Gambino, Haisch, Misiak, PRL 05
30 BR [ B X s l + l - ] At variance with b s, the decay b s l + l is sensitive to the sign of C 7 eff s= p + p - 2 /m b 2 d [ B X s l + l - ] d s 12 s C eff 9 s 2 C eff 10 s s C eff C 7 eff Re C 9 eff s BaBar & Belle average SM C 7 eff C 7 eff 10 6 BR[ B X s l + l - low s ] exp = 1.60± ± ±0.25 Gambino, Haisch, Misiak, PRL 05 The sign of C 7 eff is the same as in the SM, unless C 9 and C 10 are significantly affected by NP
31 BR [ B X s l + l - ] At variance with b s, the decay b s l + l is sensitive to the sign of C 7 eff s= p + p - 2 /m b 2 d [ B X s l + l - ] d s 12 s C eff 9 s 2 C eff 10 s s C eff C 7 eff Re C 9 eff s BaBar & Belle average SM C 7 eff C 7 eff 10 6 BR[ B X s l + l - low s ] exp = 1.60± ± ±0.25 Gambino, Haisch, Misiak, PRL 05 The sign of C 7 eff is the same as in the SM, unless C 9 and C 10 are significantly affected by NP Maximal ranges within the MFV MSSM (to which the low energy DR model belongs) Zoom Gambino, Haisch, Misiak, PRL 05 Ali, Lunghi, Greub, Hiller, PRD 02
32 Some reference fits univ. scalar term m 16 = 4 TeV, univ. trilinear A 0 2 m 16, > 0 To fit m b, a cancellation between these terms is required: A t m g Helped by A0 2 m 16 The solution A 0 2 m 16 helps 3 rd generation Yukawa unification [ 0 m b M Z = m 1 tan 2 s b 3 m g 2 t 2 m b 16 2 A t m t 2 m b log]
33 Some reference fits univ. scalar term m 16 = 4 TeV, univ. trilinear A 0 2 m 16, > 0 To fit m b, a cancellation between these terms is required: A t m g Helped by A0 2 m 16 The solution A 0 2 m 16 helps 3 rd generation Yukawa unification [ 0 m b M Z = m 1 tan 2 s b 3 m g 2 t 2 m b 16 2 A t m t 2 m b log] The solution A 0 2 m 16 leads also to inverted mass hierarchy: m t m b Blazek, Dermisek, Raby, PRL & PRD ( 02)
34 Some reference fits univ. scalar term m 16 = 4 TeV, univ. trilinear A 0 2 m 16, > 0 To fit m b, a cancellation between these terms is required: A t m g Helped by A0 2 m 16 The solution A 0 2 m 16 helps 3 rd generation Yukawa unification [ 0 m b M Z = m 1 tan 2 s b 3 m g 2 t 2 m b 16 2 A t m t 2 m b log] The solution A 0 2 m 16 leads also to inverted mass hierarchy: m t m b Blazek, Dermisek, Raby, PRL & PRD ( 02) This solution prefers C 7 = 2 C 7 SM. Imposing C 7 > 0, one has: B s + - implies M A 450 GeV b s is chargino dominated
35 Some reference fits univ. scalar term m 16 = 4 TeV, univ. trilinear A 0 2 m 16, > 0 To fit m b, a cancellation between these terms is required: A t m g Helped by A0 2 m 16 The solution A 0 2 m 16 helps 3 rd generation Yukawa unification [ 0 m b M Z = m 1 tan 2 s b 3 m g 2 t 2 m b 16 2 A t m t 2 m b log] The solution A 0 2 m 16 leads also to inverted mass hierarchy: m t m b Blazek, Dermisek, Raby, PRL & PRD ( 02) This solution prefers C 7 = 2 C 7 SM. Imposing C 7 > 0, one has: B s + - implies M A 450 GeV Only way out: decoupling m t 2TeV b s is chargino dominated
36 Some reference fits: continued m 16 = 4 TeV, < > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Easy to fit m b, since in this case these two terms are both small In this case one has NO inverted mass hierarchy: One typically finds solutions with both heavy, and A t small m t, m b [ 0 m b M Z = m 1 tan 2 s b 3 m g 2 t 2 m b 16 2 A t m t 2 m b log]
37 Some reference fits: continued m 16 = 4 TeV, < > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Easy to fit m b, since in this case these two terms are both small In this case one has NO inverted mass hierarchy: One typically finds solutions with both heavy, and A t small m t, m b m b M Z = m b 0[ 1 tan 2 s 3 m g 2 t 2 m b 16 2 A t m t 2 m b log] Now b s is OK But typical masses are m t 2.6 TeV M A 1.5 TeV In this case EWSB finds generically very large masses for heavy Higgses
38 The Big Picture Fit strategy: choose m 16 [4,10] TeV, then let the fit determine the other param s. Benchmark Cases Dictionary m 16 = univ. soft scalar term A 0 = univ. trilinear term Fit Details Remarks sign(c 7 ) [GeV] b s b s l + l m t m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Inverted mass hierarchy (IMH) C 7 C 7 SM 400 OK 3 too large [Gambino et al.]
39 The Big Picture Fit strategy: choose m 16 [4,10] TeV, then let the fit determine the other param s. Benchmark Cases Dictionary m 16 = univ. soft scalar term A 0 = univ. trilinear term Fit Details Remarks sign(c 7 ) [GeV] b s b s l + l m t m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Inverted mass hierarchy (IMH) C 7 C 7 SM 400 OK 3 too large [Gambino et al.] m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 Like, but C A 0 2 m 16 forcing C 7 > too low OK
40 The Big Picture Fit strategy: choose m 16 [4,10] TeV, then let the fit determine the other param s. Benchmark Cases Dictionary m 16 = univ. soft scalar term A 0 = univ. trilinear term Fit Details Remarks sign(c 7 ) [GeV] b s b s l + l m t m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Inverted mass hierarchy (IMH) C 7 C 7 SM 400 OK 3 too large [Gambino et al.] m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 Like, but C A 0 2 m 16 forcing C 7 > too low OK m 16 = 6 TeV, > 0 Like, but try C A 0 2 m 16 increase m 7 > too low OK 16
41 The Big Picture Fit strategy: choose m 16 [4,10] TeV, then let the fit determine the other param s. Benchmark Cases Dictionary m 16 = univ. soft scalar term A 0 = univ. trilinear term Fit Details Remarks sign(c 7 ) [GeV] b s b s l + l m t m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Inverted mass hierarchy (IMH) C 7 C 7 SM 400 OK 3 too large [Gambino et al.] m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 Like, but C A 0 2 m 16 forcing C 7 > too low OK m 16 = 6 TeV, > 0 Like, but try C A 0 2 m 16 increase m 7 > too low OK 16 m 16 = 4 TeV, < 0 A 0 2 m 16 No IMH: A 0 < 2 m 16 small A t C 7 > OK OK
42 The Big Picture Fit strategy: choose m 16 [4,10] TeV, then let the fit determine the other param s. Benchmark Cases Dictionary m 16 = univ. soft scalar term A 0 = univ. trilinear term Fit Details Remarks sign(c 7 ) [GeV] b s b s l + l m t m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 A 0 2 m 16 Inverted mass hierarchy (IMH) C 7 C 7 SM 400 OK 3 too large [Gambino et al.] m 16 = 4 TeV, > 0 Like, but C A 0 2 m 16 forcing C 7 > too low OK m 16 = 6 TeV, > 0 Like, but try C A 0 2 m 16 increase m 7 > too low OK 16 m 16 = 4 TeV, < 0 A 0 2 m 16 No IMH: A 0 < 2 m 16 small A t C 7 > OK OK ➎ m 16 6 TeV, > 0 Like ➍, but > 0: C A 0 2 m 7 > requires larger m 16 OK OK
43 BR [ B u ]: a possible additional problem The DR model fits successfully quark & lepton masses and mixings. However, among the predictions one gets: V DR ub which is somehow too small The B u mode is a way to display the problem
44 BR [ B u ]: a possible additional problem The DR model fits successfully quark & lepton masses and mixings. However, among the predictions one gets: V DR ub In the SM which is somehow too small The B u mode is a way to display the problem The B u decay is affected by a large error due to the poor knowledge of F B + F B d One considers one of the Ikado ratios BR [ B u ] SM SM B + M d, s with reduced hadronic uncertainties [mostly ] B Bd
45 BR [ B u ]: a possible additional problem The DR model fits successfully quark & lepton masses and mixings. However, among the predictions one gets: V DR ub In the SM which is somehow too small The B u mode is a way to display the problem The B u decay is affected by a large error due to the poor knowledge of F B + F B d One considers one of the Ikado ratios BR [ B u ] SM SM B + M d, s with reduced hadronic uncertainties [mostly ] B Bd Correspondingly, one predicts 10 4 BR B u SM = 0.87±0.11, with V ub UTfit = ±0.23, with V ub incl = versus 10 4 BR B u exp = 1.31±0.48 Belle & BaBar average
46 BR [ B u ]: a possible additional problem The DR model fits successfully quark & lepton masses and mixings. However, among the predictions one gets: V DR ub In the SM which is somehow too small The B u mode is a way to display the problem The B u decay is affected by a large error due to the poor knowledge of F B + F B d One considers one of the Ikado ratios BR [ B u ] SM SM B + M d, s with reduced hadronic uncertainties [mostly ] B Bd Correspondingly, one predicts 10 4 BR B u SM = 0.87±0.11, with V ub UTfit = ±0.23, with V ub incl = In the DR model versus 10 4 BR B u exp = 1.31±0.48 Belle & BaBar average suppression: Hou; Akeroyd+Recksiegel; Isidori+Paradisi BR B u DR BR B u SM [ = 1 m 2 + B 2 m + H tan tan ]2 V DR ub SM 2 V ub further suppression Typical prediction: 10 4 BR B u DR 0.6
47 Conclusions The DR model, an SO(10) SUSY GUT with a D 3 family symmetry, provides detailed, testable predictions for the low energy MSSM. It successfully describes quark and lepton masses and mixings. The DR model is however challenged when probed against the simultaneous description of quark FCNC data. This test is accomplished through a global fit, with FCNCs appearing directly in the 2 function. FCNCs offer a unique probe to the SUSY mass spectrum predicted by the model. They turn out into a discriminating test for the model itself.
48 Conclusions The DR model, an SO(10) SUSY GUT with a D 3 family symmetry, provides detailed, testable predictions for the low energy MSSM. It successfully describes quark and lepton masses and mixings. The DR model is however challenged when probed against the simultaneous description of quark FCNC data. This test is accomplished through a global fit, with FCNCs appearing directly in the 2 function. FCNCs offer a unique probe to the SUSY mass spectrum predicted by the model. They turn out into a discriminating test for the model itself. Outlook The most evident FCNC problems should actually already arise when just considering 3 rd generation new physics.
49 Conclusions The DR model, an SO(10) SUSY GUT with a D 3 family symmetry, provides detailed, testable predictions for the low energy MSSM. It successfully describes quark and lepton masses and mixings. The DR model is however challenged when probed against the simultaneous description of quark FCNC data. This test is accomplished through a global fit, with FCNCs appearing directly in the 2 function. FCNCs offer a unique probe to the SUSY mass spectrum predicted by the model. They turn out into a discriminating test for the model itself. Outlook The most evident FCNC problems should actually already arise when just considering 3 rd generation new physics. They should then be universal problems in SO(10) SUSY GUTs, irrespective of the choice of the light flavors mechanism (family symmetry,...)
50 Conclusions The DR model, an SO(10) SUSY GUT with a D 3 family symmetry, provides detailed, testable predictions for the low energy MSSM. It successfully describes quark and lepton masses and mixings. The DR model is however challenged when probed against the simultaneous description of quark FCNC data. This test is accomplished through a global fit, with FCNCs appearing directly in the 2 function. FCNCs offer a unique probe to the SUSY mass spectrum predicted by the model. They turn out into a discriminating test for the model itself. Outlook The most evident FCNC problems should actually already arise when just considering 3 rd generation new physics. They should then be universal problems in SO(10) SUSY GUTs, irrespective of the choice of the light flavors mechanism (family symmetry,...) Work in progress in this direction. See David Straub s talk.
Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology
Little Higgs Models Theory Phenomenology Wolfgang Kilian (Karlsruhe) Karlsruhe January 2003 How to make a light Higgs (without SUSY) Minimal models The Littlest Higgs and the Minimal Moose Phenomenology
More informationCharged Higgs Beyond the MSSM at the LHC. Katri Huitu University of Helsinki
Charged Higgs Beyond the MSSM at the LHC Katri Huitu University of Helsinki Outline: Mo;va;on Charged Higgs in MSSM Charged Higgs in singlet extensions H ± à aw ± Charged Higgs in triplet extensions H
More informationYang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS)
Yang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS) Collaboration with Paolo Gondolo (Univ. of Utah) Appear to 1311.xxxxx The 3 rd KIAS workshop on Particle physics and Cosmology 1 The SM as an effective theory Several theoretical
More informationSteve King, DCPIHEP, Colima
!!! 1/6/11 Lecture I. The Flavour Problem in the Standard Model with Neutrino Mass Lecture II. Family Symmetry and SUSY Lecture III. SUSY GUTs of Flavour with Discrete Family Symmetry Steve King, DCPIHEP,
More informationA model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:
I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions
More informationMaria Dimou In collaboration with: C. Hagedorn, S.F. King, C. Luhn. Tuesday group seminar 17/03/15 University of Liverpool
Maria Dimou In collaboration with: C. Hagedorn, S.F. King, C. Luhn Tuesday group seminar 17/03/15 University of Liverpool 1 Introduction Outline The SM & SUSY Flavour Problem. Solving it by imposing a
More informationThe Constrained E 6 SSM
The Constrained E 6 SSM and its signatures at the LHC Work with Moretti and Nevzorov; Howl; Athron, Miller, Moretti, Nevzorov Related work: Demir, Kane, T.Wang; Langacker, Nelson; Morrissey, Wells; Bourjaily;
More informationNatural Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in NMSSM and Higgs at 100 GeV
Natural Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in NMSSM and Higgs at 100 GeV Radovan Dermíšek Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton R.D. and J. F. Gunion, hep-ph/0502105 R.D. and J. F. Gunion, hep-ph/0510322
More informationtan(beta) Enhanced Yukawa Couplings for Supersymmetric Higgs
tan(beta) Enhanced Yukawa Couplings for Supersymmetric Higgs Singlets at One-Loop Theoretical Particle Physics University of Manchester 5th October 2006 Based on RNH, A. Pilaftsis hep-ph/0612188 Outline
More informationSearch for new physics in rare D meson decays
Search for new physics in rare D meson decays Svjetlana Fajfer and Sasa Prelovsek Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia XXXIII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
More informationF. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King. arxiv:
F. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King S FLASY 2015 arxiv:1503.03306 Standard Model Gauge theory SU(3)C X SU(2)L X U(1)Y Standard Model Gauge theory SU(3)C X SU(2)L X U(1)Y SM:
More informationIntroduction to Supersymmetry
Introduction to Supersymmetry I. Antoniadis Albert Einstein Center - ITP Lecture 5 Grand Unification I. Antoniadis (Supersymmetry) 1 / 22 Grand Unification Standard Model: remnant of a larger gauge symmetry
More informationSearch for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories
Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories Gautier Hamel de Monchenault CEA-Saclay DAPNIA/SPP on behalf of the BABAR & BELLE Collaborations Moskow, 29 July 2006 New Physics in Flavor Sector
More informationProperties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry
Properties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry U. Ellwanger, LPT Orsay The quartic Higgs self coupling and Supersymmetry The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model Higgs
More informationHow high could SUSY go?
How high could SUSY go? Luc Darmé LPTHE (Paris), UPMC November 24, 2015 Based on works realised in collaboration with K. Benakli, M. Goodsell and P. Slavich (1312.5220, 1508.02534 and 1511.02044) Introduction
More informationPerspectives Flavor Physics beyond the Standard Model
Perspectives Flavor Physics beyond the Standard Model Invited Talk at FLASY13 (Jul 2013) OTTO C. W. KONG Nat l Central U, Taiwan Personal :- PhD. dissertation on horizontal/family symmetry Frampton & O.K.
More informationUnification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC Jürgen Reuter Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg W. Kilian, JR, PLB B642 (2006), 81; and work in progress (with F. Deppisch, W. Kilian)
More informationSplit Supersymmetry A Model Building Approach
Split Supersymmetry A Model Building Approach Kai Wang Phenomenology Institute Department of Physics the University of Wisconsin Madison UC Riverside HEP Seminar In Collaboration with Ilia Gogoladze (Notre
More informationEDMs and flavor violation in SUSY models
EDMs and flavor violation in SUSY models Junji Hisano Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR), University of Tokyo The 3rd International Symposium on LEPTON MOMENTS Cape Cod, June 2006 Contents of my
More informationYang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS)
Yang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS) Collaboration with Paolo Gondolo (Univ. of Utah) Appear to 1312.xxxxx 2013 Particle Theory Group @ Yonsei Univ. 1 The SM as an effective theory Several theoretical arguments (inclusion
More informationNucleon Decay. Stuart Raby. DUSEL 2010 Rapid City, SD October 2, 2010
Nucleon Decay Stuart Raby DUSEL 2010 Rapid City, SD October 2, 2010 Nucleon Decay Standard Model Baryon & Lepton number - anomalous global symmetries Weinberg - effective operators consistent with SM 1
More informationExceptional Supersymmetry. at the Large Hadron Collider
Exceptional Supersymmetry at the Large Hadron Collider E 6 SSM model and motivation Contents Why go beyond the Standard Model? Why consider non-minimal SUSY? Exceptional SUSY Structure, particle content
More informationUnification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC Jürgen Reuter Carleton University, Ottawa University of Freiburg W. Kilian, J. Reuter, PLB B642 (2006), 81, and work in progress (with
More informationHidden two-higgs doublet model
Hidden two-higgs doublet model C, Uppsala and Lund University SUSY10, Bonn, 2010-08-26 1 Two Higgs doublet models () 2 3 4 Phenomenological consequences 5 Two Higgs doublet models () Work together with
More informationFlavor Physics in the multi-higgs doublet models induced by the left-right symmetry
Flavor Physics in the multi-higgs doublet models induced by the left-right symmetry Yoshihiro Shigekami KEK HUST ( 華中科技大学 ), Wuhan ( 武漢 ) Syuhei Iguro (Nagoya U.), Yu Muramatsu (CCNU), Yuji Omura (Nagoya
More informationPhysics 662. Particle Physics Phenomenology. February 21, Physics 662, lecture 13 1
Physics 662 Particle Physics Phenomenology February 21, 2002 Physics 662, lecture 13 1 Physics Beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetry Grand Unified Theories: the SU(5) GUT Unification energy and weak
More informationGauged Flavor Symmetries
Gauged Flavor Symmetries NOW 2012 Julian Heeck Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg 15.9.2012 based on J.H., Werner Rodejohann, PRD 84 (2011), PRD 85 (2012); Takeshi Araki, J.H., Jisuke Kubo,
More informationLecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model
Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model Why is the Standard Model incomplete? Grand Unification Baryon and Lepton Number Violation More Higgs Bosons? Supersymmetry (SUSY) Experimental signatures for SUSY
More informationHiggs Signals and Implications for MSSM
Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM Shaaban Khalil Center for Theoretical Physics Zewail City of Science and Technology SM Higgs at the LHC In the SM there is a single neutral Higgs boson, a weak isospin
More informationStrings and Particle Physics
Strings and Particle Physics Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Germany Strings and Particle Physics, SUSY07 p.1/33 Questions What can we learn from strings for particle physics?
More informationNeutrino Models with Flavor Symmetry
Neutrino Models with Flavor Symmetry November 11, 2010 Mini Workshop on Neutrinos IPMU, Kashiwa, Japan Morimitsu Tanimoto (Niigata University) with H. Ishimori, Y. Shimizu, A. Watanabe 1 Plan of my talk
More informationAndreas Crivellin. Flavor Physics beyond the Standard Model
Andreas Crivellin Flavor Physics beyond the Standard Model Outline: Introduction: Flavour anomalies * B D s h b a Possible New Physics Explanations Z Extended Higgs sector Leptoquarks Simultaneous Explanations
More informationThe discrete beauty of local GUTs
The discrete beauty of local GUTs Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn The discrete beauty of local grand unification, GUTs and Strings, MPI München, February 2010 p. 1/33 Outline
More informationCrosschecks for Unification
Crosschecks for Unification Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Crosschecks for Unification, Planck09, Padova, May 2009 p. 1/39 Questions Do present observations give us hints for
More informationSUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches
SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches Slides available at: Alex Tapper http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~tapper/lecture.html Objectives - Know what Supersymmetry (SUSY) is - Understand qualitatively the
More informationKoji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) KEK 16-18/2/2012
Koji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) @ KEK 16-18/2/2012 Outline: -Two-Higgs-doublet model -Leptophilic Higgs boson S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, arxiv:1111.6089 M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K.
More informationFlavour and CP Violation Phenomenology in SUSY with an SU(3) Flavour Symmetry
Flavour and CP Violation Phenomenology in SUSY with an SU(3) Flavour Symmetry Joel Jones-Pérez INFN Frascati In collaboration with L. Calibbi, A. Masiero, J.-h. Park, W. Porod, O. Vives 0804.4620 [hep-ph]
More informationYasunori Nomura. UC Berkeley; LBNL. hep-ph/ [PLB] hep-ph/ [PLB] hep-ph/ [PRD] Based on work with Ryuichiro Kitano (SLAC)
Yasunori Nomura UC Berkeley; LBNL Based on work with Ryuichiro Kitano (SLAC) hep-ph/0509039 [PLB] hep-ph/0509221 [PLB] hep-ph/0602096 [PRD] We will be living in the Era of Hadron Collider Exploring highest
More informationPhenomenology of the flavour messenger sector
ULB, Bruxelles October 12th 2012 Phenomenology of the flavour messenger sector Lorenzo Calibbi ULB based on: L.C., Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski, R. Ziegler, arxiv:1203.1489 [hep-ph] & arxiv:1204.1275 [hep-ph]
More informationHeterotic Supersymmetry
Heterotic Supersymmetry Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Heterotic Supersymmetry, Planck2012, Warsaw, May 2012 p. 1/35 Messages from the heterotic string Localization properties
More informationThe Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons
The Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons Tevatron LHC LHC LC LC 15fb -1 100fb -1 14TeV 1ab -1 14TeV 0.5TeV 1ab -1 P - =0.8 P + =0.6 0.8TeV 1ab -1 P - =0.8 P + =0.6 χ ψ η LR SSM 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2σ m Z'
More informationSplit SUSY and the LHC
Split SUSY and the LHC Pietro Slavich LAPTH Annecy IFAE 2006, Pavia, April 19-21 Why Split Supersymmetry SUSY with light (scalar and fermionic) superpartners provides a technical solution to the electroweak
More informationThe Standard Model and Beyond
The Standard Model and Beyond Nobuchika Okada Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Alabama 2011 BCVSPIN ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE IN PARTICLE PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Huê, Vietnam, 25-30,
More informationNon-Abelian SU(2) H and Two-Higgs Doublets
Non-Abelian SU(2) H and Two-Higgs Doublets Technische Universität Dortmund Wei- Chih Huang 25 Sept 2015 Kavli IPMU arxiv:1510.xxxx(?) with Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, Tzu-Chiang Yuan Plea Please do not take any
More informationSUSY and Exotics. UK HEP Forum"From the Tevatron to the LHC, Cosener s House, May /05/2009 Steve King, UK HEP Forum '09, Abingdon 1
SUSY and Exotics Standard Model and the Origin of Mass Puzzles of Standard Model and Cosmology Bottom-up and top-down motivation Extra dimensions Supersymmetry - MSSM -NMSSM -E 6 SSM and its exotics UK
More informationKoji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.)
Koji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.) Toyama mini WS 20-21/2/2012 S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, arxiv:1111.6089 M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K. Yagyu, Phys. Rev. D80 015017 (2009) Outline The
More informationTheoretical Particle Physics Yonsei Univ.
Yang-Hwan Ahn (KIAS) Appear to arxiv : 1409.xxxxx sooooon Theoretical Particle Physics group @ Yonsei Univ. Introduction Now that the Higgs boson has been discovered at 126 GeV, assuming that it is indeed
More informationThe Super-little Higgs
The Super-little Higgs Csaba Csaki (Cornell) with Guido Marandella (UC Davis) Yuri Shirman (Los Alamos) Alessandro Strumia (Pisa) hep-ph/0510294, Phys.Rev.D73:035006,2006 Padua University, July 4, 2006
More informationTeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw mechanism and its collider signatures at the LHC
TeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw mechanism and its collider signatures at the LHC Wei Chao (IHEP) Outline Brief overview of neutrino mass models. Introduction to a TeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw model. EW precision
More informationNatural SUSY and the LHC
Natural SUSY and the LHC Clifford Cheung University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab N = 4 SYM @ 35 yrs I will address two questions in this talk. What is the LHC telling us about
More informationSUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS
Dark Matter: From the Cosmos to the Laboratory SUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 29 Jul 1 Aug 2007 SLAC Summer Institute 30 Jul 1 Aug 07 Feng 1 Graphic: N.
More informationFLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL
SFB Colloquium DESY Hamburg, July 3rd, 2008 FLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL Gudrun Hiller, Dortmund University of Technology Standard Model of Particle Physics renormalizable quantum field theory
More informationE 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale
E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale Instituts-Seminar Kerne und Teilchen, TU Dresden Alexander Knochel Uni Freiburg 24.06.2010 Based on: F. Braam, AK, J. Reuter, arxiv:1001.4074 [hep-ph], JHEP06(2010)013 Outline
More informationSUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC
SUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC David Curtin bla arxiv:1004.5350, arxiv:xxxx.xxxx In Collaboration with Maxim Perelstein, Monika Blanke bla Cornell Institute for High Energy Phenomenology SUSY 2010 Parallel
More informationA realistic model of gauge-mediated SUSY-breaking scenario with superconformal hidden sector
A realistic model of gauge-mediated SUSY-breaking scenario with superconformal hidden sector Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) arxiv:08104601 Collaborator: Junji Hisano (ICRR), Takashi Okada (ICRR),
More informationFlavor Physics Part 2
Flavor Physics Part 2 Wolfgang Altmannshofer altmanwg@ucmail.uc.edu Summer School on Symmetries, Fundamental Interactions and Cosmology 2016, Abtei Frauenwörth, September 20, 2016 Wolfgang Altmannshofer
More informationSupersymmetry Breaking
Supersymmetry Breaking LHC Search of SUSY: Part II Kai Wang Phenomenology Institute Department of Physics University of Wisconsin Madison Collider Phemonology Gauge Hierarchy and Low Energy SUSY Gauge
More informationUniversal Extra Dimensions
Universal Extra Dimensions Add compact dimension(s) of radius R ~ ant crawling on tube Kaluza-Klein tower of partners to SM particles due to curled-up extra dimensions of radius R n = quantum number for
More informationBeyond the MSSM (BMSSM)
Beyond the MSSM (BMSSM) Nathan Seiberg Strings 2007 SUSY 2012 Based on M. Dine, N.S., and S. Thomas, to appear Assume The LHC (or the Tevatron) will discover some of the particles in the MSSM. These include
More informationD - physics. Svjetlana Fajfer. Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
D - physics Svjetlana Fajfer Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia Heavy quarks and leptons, 16.10. 20.10. 2006, Munich, Germany 1 Outline Strong decays
More informationQuark flavour observables in the flavor precision era: 331 models vs other NP scenarios
Quark flavour observables in the flavor precision era: 331 models vs other NP scenarios Fulvia De Fazio INFN- Bari Vienna, March 25th 2014 Summary Experimental results that challenge SM predicfons Anatomy
More informationFermion Mixing Angles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries
Fermion Mixing ngles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries C. Hagedorn hagedorn@mpi-hd.mpg.de Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany. Blum, CH, M. Lindner numerics:.
More informationAndrey Katz C. Brust, AK, S. Lawrence, and R. Sundrum; arxiv:
SUSY, the Third Generation and the LHC Andrey Katz C. Brust, AK, S. Lawrence, and R. Sundrum; arxiv:1011.6670 Harvard University January 9, 2012 Andrey Katz (Harvard) SUSY petite January 9, 2012 1 / 27
More informationHow does neutrino confine GUT and Cosmology? July T. Fukuyama Center of Quantum Universe, Okayama-U
How does neutrino confine GUT and Cosmology? July 11 08 T. Fukuyama (Rits) @ Center of Quantum Universe, Okayama-U 1. Introduction Neutrino oscillation breaks SM. Then is OK? does not predict 1. Gauge
More informationSpontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra
PROCEEDINGS Spontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra CERN-TH, CH-111 Geneva 3 E-mail: ulrich.nierste@cern.ch Abstract: A general theorem relating Higgs spectra to spontaneous CP phases is presented.
More informationRare beauty and charm decays at LHCb
Rare beauty and charm decays at LHCb Marcin Chrząszcz 1,2 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 1 University of Zurich, 2 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2014 August 25, 2014
More informationCP Violation Beyond the Standard Model
CP Violation Beyond the Standard Model 5th Recontres du Vietnam Hanoi August 7, 2004 Yossi Nir (Weizmann Institute of Science) Thanks to: Sandrine Laplace, Zoltan Ligeti CPV BSM 1/21 Motivation Why do
More informationLecture 3. A. Yu. Smirnov International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
Lecture 3 A. Yu. Smirnov International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy 25 Spring School on Particles and Fields, National Taiwan University, Taipei April 5-8, 2012 E, GeV contours of constant
More informationA Domino Theory of Flavor
A Domino Theory of Flavor Peter Graham Stanford with Surjeet Rajendran arxiv:0906.4657 Outline 1. General Domino Framework 2. Yukawa Predictions 3. Experimental Signatures General Domino Framework Inspiration
More informationComposite Higgs/ Extra Dimensions
Composite Higgs/ Extra Dimensions Eduardo Pontón Instituto de Física Teórica -UNESP & ICTP-SAIFR Snowmass on the Pacific, KITP May 30, 2013 Fundamental Question raised by the SM How and why is the Electroweak
More informationThe Standard Model Part. II
Our Story Thus Far The Standard Model Part. II!!We started with QED (and!)!!we extended this to the Fermi theory of weak interactions! Adding G F!!Today we will extended this to Glashow-Weinberg-Salam
More informationAndreas Crivellin ITP Bern. Rare decays and MSSM phenomenology
Andreas Crivellin ITP Bern Rare decays and MSSM phenomenology Outline: The SUSY flavor and CP problem Constraints from flavour observables Where are large effects still possible? SUSY_FLAVOUR v2.0 07.03.12
More informationMinimal SUSY SU(5) GUT in High- scale SUSY
Minimal SUSY SU(5) GUT in High- scale SUSY Natsumi Nagata Nagoya University 22 May, 2013 Planck 2013 Based on J. Hisano, T. Kuwahara, N. Nagata, 1302.2194 (accepted for publication in PLB). J. Hisano,
More informationSYMMETRY BEHIND FLAVOR PHYSICS: THE STRUCTURE OF MIXING MATRIX. Min-Seok Seo (Seoul National University)
SYMMETRY BEHIND FLAVOR PHYSICS: THE STRUCTURE OF MIXING MATRIX Min-Seok Seo (Seoul National University) INTRODUCTION Flavor Issues in Standard Model: 1. Mass hierarchy of quarks and leptons 2. Origin of
More informationFlavour physics beyond the Standard Model
Young Experimentalists and Theorists Institute, IPPP Durham, 15 January 2014 Flavour physics beyond the Standard Model David M. Straub Junior Research Group New Physics Excellence Cluster Universe, Munich
More informationUpdated S 3 Model of Quarks
UCRHEP-T56 March 013 Updated S 3 Model of Quarks arxiv:1303.698v1 [hep-ph] 7 Mar 013 Ernest Ma 1 and Blaženka Melić 1, 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, California
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017
Flavon-induced lepton flavour violation arxiv:1703.05579v1 hep-ph] 16 Mar 017 Venus Keus Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki,
More informationgeneration Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion Nejc Košnik
th Discovery Discovery of of the the 4 4th generation generation Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion 1 Introduction Introduction
More informationPHYSICS BEYOND SM AND LHC. (Corfu 2010)
PHYSICS BEYOND SM AND LHC (Corfu 2010) We all expect physics beyond SM Fantastic success of SM (LEP!) But it has its limits reflected by the following questions: What is the origin of electroweak symmetry
More information+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2
I. THE HIGGS POTENTIAL AND THE LIGHT HIGGS BOSON In the previous chapter, it was demonstrated that a negative mass squared in the Higgs potential is generated radiatively for a large range of boundary
More informationChaehyun Yu. in collaboration with P. Ko (KIAS) and Yuji Omura (Nagoya University) The 16 th LHC Physics Monthly Meeting, KIAS, Korea, Jun 01,
Top FCNC Chaehyun Yu (Academia Sinica) in collaboration with P. Ko (KIAS) and Yuji Omura (Nagoya University) The 16 th LHC Physics Monthly Meeting, KIAS, Korea, Jun 01, 2015 1 Flavor changing neutral currents
More informationBeyond Standard Model Effects in Flavour Physics: p.1
Beyond Standard Model Effects in Flavour Physics: Alakabha Datta University of Mississippi Feb 13, 2006 Beyond Standard Model Effects in Flavour Physics: p.1 OUTLINE Standard Model (SM) and its Problems.
More informationRicerca Indiretta di Supersimmetria nei Decadimenti dei Mesoni B
Ricerca Iniretta i Supersimmetria nei Decaimenti ei Mesoni B L. Silvestrini INFN, Roma Introuction to CP Violation in the SM Introuction to CP Violation in the MSSM A moel-inepenent analysis of SUSY effects
More informationS 3 Symmetry as the Origin of CKM Matrix
S 3 Symmetry as the Origin of CKM Matrix Ujjal Kumar Dey Physical Research Laboratory October 25, 2015 Based on: PRD 89, 095025 and arxiv:1507.06509 Collaborators: D. Das and P. B. Pal 1 / 25 Outline 1
More informationHeterotic Brane World
Heterotic Brane World Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Germany Based on work with S. Förste, P. Vaudrevange and A. Wingerter hep-th/0406208, to appear in Physical Review D Heterotic
More informationLHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics
LHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics SUSY 2013, 31 st August 2013 Mitesh Patel (Imperial College London) On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Introduction The interest in B physics : Virtual contributions
More informationProbing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments
Probing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments Shinya KANEMURA (U. of Toyama) M. Aoki, SK and O. Seto, PRL 102, 051805 (2009). M. Aoki, SK and O. Seto, PRD80, 033007 (2009).
More informationB-meson anomalies & Higgs physics in flavored U(1) model
B-meson anomalies & Higgs physics in flavored U(1) model Hyun Min Lee Chung-Ang University, Korea L. Bian, S.-M. Choi, Y.-J. Kang, HML, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 075038; L. Bian, HML, C.B. Park, arxiv:1711.08930
More informationMarc Sher. Physics Department. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Abstract
August 1999 WM-99-114 Fourth Generation b decays into b + Higgs Marc Sher Physics Department College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA 23187 Abstract If a fourth generation quark exists whose mass is
More informationBuried Higgs Csaba Csáki (Cornell) with Brando Bellazzini (Cornell) Adam Falkowski (Rutgers) Andi Weiler (CERN)
Buried Higgs Csaba Csáki (Cornell) with Brando Bellazzini (Cornell) Adam Falkowski (Rutgers) Andi Weiler (CERN) Rutgers University, December 8, 2009 Preview Found a SUSY model, where: Weird higgs decays
More informationSU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs
SU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs Florian Hartmann in collaboration with Wolfgang Kilian and Karsten Schnitter Universität Siegen Theoretische Physik I Dortmund, 03.07.2012 Outline 1 Running couplings
More informationLecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part III Extensions of the Standard Model
Lecture 03 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Part III Extensions of the Standard Model Where the SM Works Excellent description of 3 of the 4 fundamental forces Explains nuclear structure, quark confinement,
More informationComposite Higgs and Flavor
Composite Higgs and Flavor Xiaohong Wu East China University of Science and Technology Seminar @ ICTS, Jun. 6, 2013 125GeV SM-like Higgs Discovered p 0 5 3-3 -5-7 -9 1 3 Combined observed γγ observed llll
More informationPhenomenology of new neutral gauge bosons in an extended MSSM
Phenomenology of new neutral gauge bosons in an extended MSSM Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di oma, La Sapienza, INFN Outline Motivation
More informationLepton Flavor Violation
Lepton Flavor Violation I. The (Extended) Standard Model Flavor Puzzle SSI 2010 : Neutrinos Nature s mysterious messengers SLAC, 9 August 2010 Yossi Nir (Weizmann Institute of Science) LFV 1/39 Lepton
More informationSEARCHES FOR THE NEUTRAL HIGGS BOSONS OF THE MSSM
SEARCHES FOR THE NEUTRAL HIGGS BOSONS OF THE MSSM USING LEP DATA Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA Saclay Representing LEP Collaborations 1 Outline LEP performance Theoretical framework Search for neutral Higgs
More informationStrings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification
Strings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Strings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification, Planck11, Lisbon, June 2011 p. 1/39 Outline
More informationPseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G
and Signatures of D-Type Gauge Mediation Ken Hsieh Michigan State Univeristy KH, Ph. D. Thesis (2007) ArXiv:0708.3970 [hep-ph] Other works with M. Luty and Y. Cai (to appear) MSU HEP Seminar November 6,
More informationSupersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos
Supersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos The Standard Model and Supersymmetry Dark Matter Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics The Physics of Supersymmetry Gauge Theories Gauge symmetry requires existence
More informationFlavour Physics Beyond the Standard Model: (Minimal Flavour Violation)
Flavour Physics Beyond the Standard Model: (Minimal Flavour Violation) Federico Mescia ECM & ICC, Universitat de Barcelona - Outline Introduction: Standard Model and Flavour Physics What we understand
More information