arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 12 Nov 1997

Transcription

1 CERN-T/97-68 hep-ph/ QCD Effects in is Physics arxiv:hep-ph/ v 1 Nov 1997 Michael Spira Theoretical Physics Division, CERN, C-111 Geneva 3, Switzerland Abstract is boson production at the LC within the Standard Model and its minimal supersymmetric extension is reviewed. The predictions for decay rates and production cross sections are updated by choosin the present value of the top quark mass and recent parton density sets. Moreover, all relevant hiher order corrections, some of which have been obtained only recently, are included in a consistent way. CERN-T/97-68 hep-ph/ April 1997

2 Contents 1 Introduction Standard Model Supersymmetric Extension Oranization of the Paper Standard Model 8.1 Decay Modes Lepton and heavy quark pair decays of the SM is particle is decay into luons is decay to photon pairs is decay to photon and Z boson Intermediate aue boson decays Three-body decay modes Total decay width and branchin ratios is Boson Production at the LC Gluon fusion: Vector-boson fusion: qq qqv V qq is-strahlun: q q V V is bremsstrahlun off top quarks Cross sections for is boson production at the LC Minimal Supersymmetric Extension of the Standard Model Decay Modes Decays into lepton and heavy quark pairs Gluonic decay modes Decays into photon pairs Decays into Z boson and photon Decays into intermediate aue bosons Decays into is particles Total decay widths and branchin ratios of non-susy particle decays Decays into SUSY particles Neutral is Boson Production at the LC Gluon fusion: Φ [Φ = h,, A] Vector boson fusion: qq qqv V qqh/qq is-strahlun: q q V V h/v is bremsstrahlun off top and bottom quarks Cross sections for is boson production at the LC Summary 91

3 1 Introduction 1.1 Standard Model The is mechanism is a cornerstone of the Standard Model (SM). To formulate the standard electroweak theory consistently, the introduction of the fundamental is field is necessary [1]. It allows the particles of the Standard Model to be weakly interactin up to hih eneries without violatin the unitarity bounds of scatterin amplitudes. The unitarity requirement determines the couplins of the is particle to all the other particles. These basic ideas can be cast into an eleant and physically deep theory by formulatin the electroweak theory as a spontaneously broken aue theory. Due to the fact that the aue symmetry, thouh hidden, is still preserved, the theory is renormalizable []. The massive aue bosons and the fermions acquire their masses throuh the interaction with the is field [1]. The minimal model requires the introduction of one weak isospin doublet leadin, after the spontaneous symmetry breakin, to the existence of one elementary scalar is boson. Since all the couplins are predetermined, the properties of this particle are fixed by its mass, which is the only unknown parameter of the Standard Model is sector. Once the is mass will be known, all decay widths and production processes of the is particle will be uniquely determined [3]. The discovery of the is particle will be the experimentum crucis for the standard formulation of the electroweak theory. Althouh the is mass cannot be predicted in the Standard Model, there are several constraints that can be deduced from consistency conditions on the model [4 6]. Upper bounds can be derived from the requirement that the Standard Model can be extended up to a scale Λ, before perturbation theory breaks down and new non-perturbative phenomena dominate the predictions of the theory. If the SM is required to be weakly interactin up to the scale of rand unified theories (GUTs), which is of O(10 16 GeV), the is mass has to be less than 00 GeV. For a minimal cut-off Λ 1 TeV and the condition M < Λ, a universal upper bound of 700 GeV can be obtained from renormalization roup analyses [4, 5] and lattice simulations of the SM is sector [6]. If the top quark mass is lare, the is potential may become unbounded from below, renderin the SM vacuum unstable and thus inconsistent. The neative contribution of the top quark, however, can be compensated by a positive contribution due to the is self-interaction, which is proportional to the is mass. Thus for a iven top mass M t = 175 GeV [7, 8] a lower bound of 55 GeV can be obtained for the is mass, if the SM remains weakly interactin up to scales Λ 1 TeV. For Λ M GUT this lower bound is enhanced to M > 130 GeV. owever, the assumption that the vacuum is metastable, with a lifetime larer than the ae of the Universe, decreases these lower bounds sinificantly for Λ 1 TeV, but only slihtly for Λ M GUT [5]. The direct search in the LEP experiments via the process e + e Z yields a lower bound of 77 GeV on the is mass [9]. This search is bein extended at the present LEP experiments, which probe is masses up to about 95 GeV via the isstrahlun process Z Z [10 1]. After LEP the search for the SM is particle 3

4 will be continued at the LC for is masses up to the theoretical upper limit [13, 14]. The dominant is production mechanism at the LC will be the luon-fusion process [15] pp, which provides the larest production cross section for the whole is mass rane of interest. For lare is masses the W and Z boson-fusion processes [16, 17] pp qq qq + WW/ZZ qq become competitive. In the intermediate mass rane M Z < M < M Z is-strahlun off top quarks [18] and W, Z aue bosons [19, 0] provide alternative sinatures for the is boson search. The detection of the is boson at the LC will be divided into two mass reions: (i) For M W < M < 140 GeV the only promisin decay mode is the rare photonic one, γγ, which will be discriminated aainst the lare QCD continuum backround by means of excellent enery and anular resolutions of the detectors [14]. Alternatively excellent µ-vertex detectors miht allow the detection of the dominant b b decay mode [1], althouh the overwhelmin QCD backround remains very difficult to reject []. In order to reduce the backround it may be helpful to ta the additional W boson in the is-strahlun process pp W [19, 0] or the t t pair in is bremsstrahlun off top quarks, pp t t [18]. (ii) In the mass rane 140 GeV < M < 800 GeV the search for the is particle can be performed by lookin for final states containin 4 chared leptons, which oriinate from the is decay ZZ ( ) [14]. The QCD backround will be small so that the sinal can be extracted quite easily. For the is mass reion 155 GeV < M < 180 GeV another possibility arises from the is decay WW( ) l + l ν ν [3], because the W boson decay mode is dominatin by more than one order of manitude in this mass rane, while the Z pair decay mode may be difficult to detect due to a stron dip in the branchin ratio BR( ZZ ) for is masses around the W pair threshold. For is masses above 800 GeV the search may be extended by lookin for the decay chains ZZ, WW llνν. A is boson search up to 1 TeV seems to be feasible at the LC [14]. In order to investiate the is search potential of the LC, it is of vital importance to have reliable predictions for the production cross sections and decay widths of the is boson. In the past hiher order corrections have been evaluated for the most important processes. They are in eneral dominated by QCD corrections. The present level leads to a sinificantly improved and reliable determination of the sinal processes involved in the is boson search at the LC. 4

5 1. Supersymmetric Extension Supersymmetric extensions of the SM [4, 5] are stronly motivated by the idea of providin a solution of the hierarchy problem in the SM is sector. They allow for a liht is particle in the context of GUTs [6], in contrast with the SM, where the extrapolation requires an unsatisfactory fine-tunin of the SM parameters. Supersymmetry is a symmetry between fermionic and bosonic derees of freedom and thus the most eneral symmetry of the S-matrix. The minimal supersymmetric extension of the SM (MSSM) yields a prediction of the Weinber anle in areement with present experimental measurements in the context of GUTs [7]. Moreover, it does not exhibit any quadratic diverences, in contrast with the SM is sector. Throuhout this review we will concentrate on the MSSM only, althouh most of the results will also be qualitatively valid for non-minimal supersymmetric extensions [8]. In the MSSM two isospin is doublets have to be introduced in order to preserve supersymmetry [9]. After the electroweak symmetry-breakin mechanism, three of the eiht derees of freedom are absorbed by the Z and W aue bosons, leadin to the existence of five elementary is particles. These consist of two CP-even neutral (scalar) particles h,, one CP-odd neutral (pseudoscalar) particle A, and two chared particles ±. In order to describe the MSSM is sector one has to introduce four masses M h, M, M A and M ± and two additional parameters, which define the properties of the scalar particles and their interactions with aue bosons and fermions: the mixin anle β, related to the ratio of the two vacuum expectation values, tβ = v /v 1, and the mixin anle α in the neutral CP-even sector. Due to supersymmetry there are several relations amon these parameters, and only two of them are independent. These relations lead to a hierarchical structure of the is mass spectrum [in lowest order: M h < M Z, M A < M and M W < M ±]. This is, however, broken by radiative corrections, which are dominated by top-quark-induced contributions [30, 31]. The parameter tβ will in eneral be assumed to be in the rane 1 < tβ < m t /m b [π/4 < β < π/], consistent with the assumption that the MSSM is the low-enery limit of a superravity model. The input parameters of the MSSM is sector are enerally chosen to be the mass M A of the pseudoscalar is boson and tβ. All other masses and the mixin anle α can be derived from these basic parameters [and the top and squark masses, which enter throuh radiative corrections]. In the followin qualitative discussion of the radiative corrections we shall nelect, for the sake of simplicity, non-leadin effects due to non-zero values of the supersymmetric is mass parameter µ and of the mixin parameters A t and A b in the soft symmetry-breakin interaction. The radiative corrections are then determined by the parameter ǫ, which rows with the fourth power of the top quark mass M t and loarithmically with the squark mass M S, ǫ = 3G F Mt 4 π sin β lo ( 1 + M S M t ). (1) These corrections are positive and they increase the mass of the liht neutral is boson h. The dependence of the upper limit of M h on the top quark mass M t can be expressed 5

6 as M h M Z cos β + ǫ sin β. () In this approximation, the upper bound on M h is shifted from the tree level value M Z up to 140 GeV for M t = 175 GeV. Takin M A and tβ as the basic input parameters, the mass of the lihtest scalar state h is iven by Mh = 1 [ M A + MZ + ǫ ] (MA + MZ + ǫ) 4MAM Z cos β 4ǫ(MA sin β + MZ cos β). (3) The masses of the heavy neutral and chared is bosons are determined by the sum rules M = M A + M Z M h + ǫ M ± = M A + M W. (4) The mixin parameter α is fixed by tβ and the is mass M A, MA tα = tβ + M Z MA MZ + ǫ/ cos β with π < α < 0. (5) The couplins of the various neutral is bosons to fermions and aue bosons depend on the anles α and β. Normalized to the SM is couplins, they are listed in Table 1. The pseudoscalar particle A does not couple to aue bosons at tree level, and its couplins to down (up)-type fermions are (inversely) proportional to tβ. Φ Φ u Φ d Φ V SM MSSM h cosα/ sin β sin α/ cosβ sin(β α) sin α/ sin β cosα/ cosβ cos(β α) A 1/tβ tβ 0 Table 1: is couplins in the MSSM to fermions and aue bosons [V = W, Z] relative to SM couplins. Recently the radiative corrections to the MSSM is sector have been calculated up to the two-loop level in the effective potential approach [31]. The two-loop corrections are dominated by the QCD corrections to the top-quark-induced contributions. They decrease the upper bound on the liht scalar is mass M h by about 10 GeV. The variation of M h with the top quark mass is shown in Fi. 1a for M S = 1 TeV and two representative 6

7 160 M h [GeV] a) M h [GeV] b) tβ = tβ = tβ = tβ = M t [GeV] M A [GeV] M [GeV] c) 1000 M ± [GeV] d) tβ = 1.5 tβ = tβ = 30 tβ = 1.5 M A [GeV] M A [GeV] Fiure 1: (a) The upper limit on the liht scalar is pole mass in the MSSM as a function of the top quark mass for two values of tβ = 1.5, 30. The top quark mass has been chosen as M t = 175 GeV and the common squark mass as M S = 1 TeV. The full lines correspond to the maximal mixin case [A t = 6M S, A b = µ = 0] and the dashed lines to vanishin mixin. The pole masses of the other is bosons,, A, ±, are shown as a function of the pseudoscalar mass in (b d) for two values of tβ = 1.5, 30 and vanishin mixin. 7

8 values of tβ = 1.5 and 30. While the dashed curves correspond to the case of vanishin mixin parameters µ = A t = A b = 0, the solid lines correspond to the maximal mixin case, defined by the is mass parameter µ = 0 and the Yukawa parameters A b = 0, A t = 6M S. The upper bound on M h amounts to 130 GeV for M t = 175 GeV. For the two values of tβ introduced above, the is masses M h, M and M ± are presented in Fis. 1b-d as a function of the pseudoscalar mass M A for vanishin mixin parameters. The dependence on the mixin parameters µ, A t, A b is rather weak and the effects on the masses are limited by a few GeV [3]. The MSSM couplins of Table 1 are shown in Fi. as functions of the pseudoscalar mass M A for two values of tβ = 1.5 and 30 and vanishin mixin parameters. The mixin effects are weak and thus phenomenoloically unimportant. For lare values of tβ the Yukawa couplins to (up) down-type quarks are (suppressed) enhanced and vice versa. Moreover, it can be inferred from Fi. that the couplins of the liht scalar is particle approach the SM values for lare pseudoscalar masses, i.e. in the decouplin reime. Thus it will be difficult to distinuish the liht scalar MSSM is boson from the SM is particle, in the reion where all is particles except the liht scalar one are very heavy. 1.3 Oranization of the Paper In this work we will review and update all is decay widths and branchin ratios as well as all relevant is boson production cross sections at the LC within the SM and MSSM. Previous reviews can be found in Refs. [33, 34]. owever, this work contains substantial improvements due to our use of new results. Moreover, we will use recent parametrizations of parton densities for the production cross sections at the LC. This paper is oranized as follows. In Section we will review the decay rates and production processes of the SM is particle at the LC. Section 3 will present the correspondin decay rates and production cross sections for the is bosons of the minimal supersymmetric extension. A summary will be iven in Section 4. Standard Model.1 Decay Modes The strenth of the is-boson interaction with SM particles rows with their masses. Thus the is boson predominantly couples to the heaviest particles of the SM, i.e. W, Z aue bosons, top and bottom quark. The decays into these particles will be dominant, if they are kinematically allowed. All decay modes discussed in this section are obtained by means of the FORTRAN proram DECAY [35, 36] 1. 1 The proram can be obtained from mspira/. 8

9 tβ = 30 0 tβ = hdd: sinα/cosβ 10 dd: cosα/cosβ 5 5 tβ = 1.5 M A [GeV] tβ = 1.5 M A [GeV] tβ = tβ = huu: cosα/sinβ 0. uu: sinα/sinβ tβ = 30 M A [GeV] tβ = M A [GeV] tβ = 1.5 hvv: sin(β-α) VV: cos(β-α) tβ = M A [GeV] tβ = tβ = 30 M A [GeV] Fiure : The couplin parameters of the neutral MSSM is bosons as a function of the pseudoscalar mass M A for two values of tβ = 1.5, 30 and vanishin mixin. They are defined in Table 1. 9

10 .1.1 Lepton and heavy quark pair decays of the SM is particle In lowest order the leptonic decay width of the SM is boson is iven by [10, 37] Γ[ l + l ] = G FM 4 π m l β 3 (6) with β = (1 4m l /M )1/ bein the velocity of the leptons. The branchin ratio of decays into τ leptons amounts to about 10% in the intermediate mass rane. Muonic decays can reach a level of a few 10 4, and all other leptonic decay modes are phenomenoloically unimportant. Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q t Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Fiure 3: Typical diarams contributin to Q Q at lowest order and one-, two- and three-loop QCD. For lare is masses the particle width for decays to b, c quarks [directly couplin to the SM is particle] is iven up to three-loop QCD corrections [typical diarams are depicted in Fi. 3] by the well-known expression [38 40] Γ[ QQ] = 3G FM 4 π m Q(M ) [ QCD + t ] (7) 10

11 with QCD = α s(m ) π t = + ( N F ) +( N F N F) ( ) [ αs (M ) 1.57 π 3 lo M Mt ( αs (M ) π ( αs (M ) π ) 3 ) lo m Q(M ) M in the MS renormalization scheme; the runnin quark mass and the QCD couplin are defined at the scale of the is mass, absorbin in this way lare mass loarithms. The quark masses can be nelected in eneral, except for heavy quark decays in the threshold reion. The QCD corrections in this case are iven, in terms of the quark pole mass M Q, by [38] Γ[ Q Q ] = 3G FM 4 π M Q β3 [ ] α s 3 π where β = (1 4M Q/M ) 1/ denotes the velocity of the heavy quarks Q. To leadin order, the QCD correction factor reads as [38] = 1 β A(β) β 3(3 + 34β 13β 4 ) lo 1 + β 1 β + 3 8β (7β 1), (9) ] (8) with [ ( ) ( 1 β A(β) = (1 + β ) 4Li + Li 1 + β lo 1 + β ] 1 β lo β 3β lo 1 β 1 + β ) 4 4β lo β. 1 β 3 lo 1 + β 1 β lo 1 + β [Li denotes the Spence function, Li (x) = x 0 dyy 1 lo(1 y).] Recently the full massive two-loop corrections of O(N F αs ) have been computed; they are part of the full massive two-loop result [41]. The relation between the perturbative pole mass M Q of the heavy quarks and the MS mass m Q (M Q ) at the scale of the pole mass can be expressed as [4] m Q (M Q ) = M Q ( ), (10) α s (M Q ) αs (M Q ) + K Q 3 π π where the numerical values of the NNLO coefficients are iven by K t 10.9, K b 1.4 and K c Since the relation between the pole mass M c of the charm quark and the MS mass m c (M c ) evaluated at the pole mass is badly converent [4], the runnin quark 11

12 masses m Q (M Q ) have to be adopted as startin points. [They have been extracted directly from QCD sum rules evaluated in a consistent O(α s ) expansion [43].] In the followin we will denote the pole mass correspondin to the full NNLO relation in eq. (10) by M pt3 Q and the pole mass correspondin to the NLO relation [omittin the contributions of K Q ] by M pt Q accordin to Ref. [43]. Typical values of the different mass definitions are presented in Table. It is apparent that the NNLO correction to the charm pole mass is comparable to the NLO contribution startin from the MS mass. Q m Q (M Q ) M pt Q M pt3 Q m Q (100 GeV) c 1.3 GeV 1.4 GeV 1.64 GeV 0.6 GeV b 4.3 GeV 4.6 GeV 4.87 GeV.9 GeV t GeV GeV GeV GeV Table : Quark mass values for the MS mass and the two different definitions of the pole masses. The stron couplin has been chosen as α s (M Z ) = 0.118, and the bottom and charm mass values are taken from Ref. [43]. The last column shows the values of the runnin MS masses at a typical scale µ = 100 GeV. The evolution from M Q upwards to a renormalization scale µ can be expressed as m Q (µ) = m Q (M Q ) c [α s (µ)/π] c [α s (M Q )/π] (11) with the coefficient function [44, 45] c(x) = c(x) = c(x) = c(x) = ( 9 x ) 4 9 [ x x x 3 ] for M s < µ < M c ( )1 5 6 x 5 [ x x x 3 ] for M c < µ < M b ( )1 3 6 x 3 [ x x x 3 ] for M b < µ < M t ( ) 4 7 x 7 [ x x x 3 ] for M t < µ. For the charm quark mass the evolution is determined by eq. (11) up to the scale µ = M b, while for scales above the bottom mass the evolution must be restarted at M Q = M b. The values of the runnin b, c masses at the scale µ = 100 GeV, characteristic of the relevant is masses, are typically 35% (60%) smaller than the bottom (charm) pole masses M pt b ) as can be inferred from the last column in Table. Thus the QCD corrections (M pt c turn out to be lare in the lare is mass reime reducin the lowest order expression 1

13 [in terms of the quark pole masses] by about 50% (75%) for bottom (charm) quarks. The QCD corrections are moderate in the threshold reions apart from a Coulomb sinularity at threshold, which however is reularized by the finite heavy quark decay width in the case of the top quark. In the threshold reion mass effects are important so that the preferred expression for the heavy quark decay width is iven by eq. (8). Far above the threshold the massless O(αs 3 ) result of eq. (7) fixes the most improved result for this decay mode. The transition between the two reions is performed by a linear interpolation as can be inferred from Fi. 4, thus yieldin an optimized description of the mass effects in the threshold reion and the renormalization roup improved lare is mass reime. 10 _ Γ( bb) [MeV] M b = 4.6 GeV NLO massive 1 NNNLO (RG) M [GeV] Fiure 4: Interpolation between the full massive NLO expression (dashed line) for the b b decay width of the Standard is boson and the renormalization roup improved NNNLO result (dotted line). The interpolated curve is presented by the full line. Electroweak corrections to heavy quark and lepton decays are well under control [46, 47]. In the intermediate mass rane they can be approximated by [48] δ elw = 3 ( ) α 3 π e f lo M + G [ F {k Mf 8π f M t + M W ] lo c s W M 6vf a } f Z W (1) with v f = I 3f 4e f s W and a f = I 3f. I 3f denotes the third component of the electroweak isospin, e f the electric chare of the fermion f and s W = sin θ W the Weinber anle; α 13

14 denotes the QED couplin, M t the top quark mass and M W the W boson mass. The lare loarithm lo M /M f can be absorbed in the runnin fermion mass analoous to the QCD corrections. The coefficient k f is equal to 7 for decays into leptons and liht quarks; for b quarks it is reduced to 1 due to additional contributions involvin top quarks inside the vertex corrections. Recently the two- and three-loop QCD corrections to the k f terms have been computed by means of low-enery theorems [49]. The results imply the replacements { k f k f 1 1 ( ) } ζ αs (M t ) for f b π { k b k b 1 4 (1 + ζ ) α } s(m t ). (13) π The three-loop QCD corrections to the k f term can be found in [50]. The electroweak corrections are small in the intermediate mass rane and can thus be nelected, but we have included them in the analysis. owever, for lare is masses the electroweak corrections may be important due to the enhanced self-couplin of the is bosons. In the lare is mass reime the leadin contributions can be expressed as [51] with the couplin constant Γ( f f) = Γ LO ( f f) { 1 +.1ˆλ 3.66ˆλ } (14) ˆλ = G FM 16 π. (15) For is masses of about 1 TeV these corrections enhance the partial decay widths by about %. In the case of t t decays of the Standard is boson, below-threshold decays t t t bw into off-shell top quarks may be sizeable. Thus we have included them below the t t threshold. Their Dalitz plot density reads as [5] dγ ( tt Wtb) = 3G F dx 1 dx 3π 3M t M 3 Γ 0 y 1 + γ t κ t (16) with the reduced eneries x 1, = E t,b /M and the scalin variables y 1, = 1 x 1,, κ i = M i /M and the reduced decay widths of the virtual particles γ i = Γ i /M. The squared amplitude can be written as Γ 0 = y 1 (1 y 1 y + κ W 5κ t ) + κ W (y 1 y κ W κ t y 1 + 4κ t κ W ) κ t y 1 y + κ t (1 4κ t )(y 1 + κ W + κ t ). (17) The differential decay width in eq. (16) has to be interated over the x 1, x reion, which is bounded by (1 x 1 x + κ t + κ b κ W ) + x 1 x x 1 4κ t x 4κ 1. (18) b The transition from below to above the threshold is provided by a smooth cubic interpolation. Below-threshold decays yield a t t branchin ratio far below the per cent level for is masses M < M t. 14

15 .1. is decay into luons t, b Fiure 5: Diarams contributin to at lowest order. The decay of the is boson into luons is mediated by heavy quark loops in the Standard Model, see Fi. 5; at lowest order the partial decay width [10, 53, 54, 55] is iven by with the form factor Γ LO [ ] = G F α s M3 36 π 3 A Q(τ Q ) Q (19) A Q (τ) = 3 τ [1 + (1 τ)f(τ)] arcsin 1 τ τ 1 f(τ) = 1 [ lo 1 + ] 1 τ τ iπ τ < 1 (0) The parameter τ Q = 4M Q /M is defined by the pole mass M Q of the heavy loop quark q t, b t, b t, b q Fiure 6: Typical diarams contributin to the QCD corrections to. Q. For lare quark masses the form factor approaches unity. QCD radiative corrections 15

16 are built up by the exchane of virtual luons, luon radiation from the quark trianle and the splittin of a luon into two luons or a quark antiquark pair, see Fi. 6. If all quarks u,, b are treated as massless at the renormalization scale µ M 100 GeV, the radiative corrections can be expressed as [53 55] [ Γ N F [ (), qq] = Γ LO α (N F ) s (M ) ] { 1 + E N α(n F ) F s (M ) π E N F N F for M 4M Q with N F = 5 liht quark flavors. The full massive result can be found in [53]. The radiative corrections are plotted in Fi. 7 aainst the is boson mass. They turn out to be very lare: the decay width is shifted by about 60 70% upwards in the intermediate mass rane. The dashed line shows the approximated QCD corrections defined by takin the coefficient E N F in the limit of a heavy loop quark Q as presented in eq. (1). It can be inferred from the fiure that the approximation is valid for the partial luonic decay width within about 10% for the whole relevant is mass rane up to 1 TeV. The reason for the suppressed quark mass dependence of the relative QCD corrections is the dominance of soft and collinear luon contributions, which do not resolve the is couplin to luons and are thus leadin to a simple rescalin factor. Recently the three-loop QCD corrections to the luonic decay width have been evaluated in the limit of a heavy top quark [56]. They contribute a further amount of O(0%) relative to the lowest order result and thus increase the full NLO expression by O(10%). The reduced size of these corrections sinals a sinificant stabilization of the perturbative result and thus a reliable theoretical prediction. The QCD corrections in the heavy quark limit can also be obtained by means of a low-enery theorem [10, 57]. The startin point is that, for vanishin is momentum p 0, the entire interaction of the is particle with W, Z bosons and fermions can be enerated by the substitution M i M i [ 1 + ] v } (1) (i = f, W, Z), () where the is field acts as a constant complex number. At hiher orders this substitution has to be expressed in terms of bare parameters [53, 58]. Thus there is a relation between a bare matrix element with and without an external scalar is boson [X denotes an arbitrary particle confiuration]: lim M(X) = 1 m 0 M(X). (3) p 0 v 0 m 0 In most of the practical cases the external is particle is defined as bein on-shell, so that p = M and the mathematical limit of vanishin is momentum coincides with the limit of small is masses. In order to calculate the is couplin to two luons one starts from the heavy quark Q contribution to the bare luon self-enery 16

17 δ( ) Γ = Γ LO (1+δ) µ = M M t = 175 GeV M [GeV] Fiure 7: The size of the QCD correction factor for, defined as Γ = Γ LO (1+δ). The full line corresponds to the full massive result, while the dashed line shows the heavy top quark limit. The top and bottom masses have been chosen as M t = 175 GeV, M b = 5 GeV and the NLO stron couplin constant is normalized as α s (M Z ) = M(). The differentiation with respect to the bare quark mass m 0 can be replaced by the differentiation by the renormalized MS quark mass m Q (m Q ). In this way a finite contribution from the quark anomalous mass dimension γ m (α s ) arises: m 0 = m Q(m Q ) m γ m (α s ) m Q (m Q ). (4) The remainin mass differentiation of the luon self-enery results in the heavy quark contribution β Q (α s ) to the QCD β function at vanishin momentum transfer and to an additional contribution of the anomalous dimension of the luon field operators, which can be expressed in terms of the QCD β function [54]. The final matrix element can be converted into the effective Laranian [53, 54, 56, 58, 59, 91] L eff = α s 4 β(α s )/αs β Q (α s )/[αs] t β(αs t)/[αt s ] 1 + γ m (α s ) G aµν G a µν v (5) with α s = α (6) s [m t(m t )] and α t s = α(5) s [m t(m t )]. The stron couplin α s of the effective theory includes only N F = 5 flavors. The effective Laranian of eq. (5) is valid for the 17

18 limitin case M 4M Q. The anomalous mass dimension is iven by [60] γ m (α s ) = α s π + ( [N F + 1] ) ( αs π ) + O(α 3 s). (6) Up to NLO the heavy quark contribution to the QCD β function coincides with the correspondin part of the MS result. But at NNLO an additional piece arises from a threshold correction due to a mismatch between the MS scheme and the result for vanishin momentum transfer [61 64]: β Q (α s ) = βq MS (α s ) 11 [ 7 βq MS (α s ) = α s 3π N F 6 α 4 s α s π N F 88 π + 3 O(α5 s) ( ) ] αs π + O(α 5 s) (7) The stron couplin constant α s of eq. (5) includes 6 flavors, and its scale is set by the top quark mass m t (m t ). In order to decouple the top quark from the couplins in the effective Laranian, the six-flavor couplin α s (6) has to be replaced by the five-flavor expression α s (5). They are related by [63 65] α s (6) [m t(m t )] = α s (5) [m t(m t )] 1 11 ( ) α (5) s [m t (m t )] + O(αs 3 7 π ). (8) Finally the perturbative expansion of the effective Laranian can be cast into the form [56, 91] L eff = α(5) s v 1 + β 1 α s (5) β 0 π + β ( ) α (5) s β 0 π 1π Gaµν G a µν { 1 + ( 11 4 β 1 + β 0 ) α (5) s (M t ) π [ NF 88 + β ( 1 β1 11 ) β ] ( α (5) β 0 β 0 4 β 0 s (M t ) π ), (9) where we have introduced the top quark pole mass M t. The coefficients of the QCD β function in eq. (9) are iven by [61] β 0 β 1 = 33 N F 1 = N F 4 β = 1 18 { N F N F }. (30) It should be noted that eq. (8) differs from the result of Ref. [63]. owever, the difference can be traced back to the Abelian part of the matchin relation, which has been extracted by the author from the analoous expression for the photon self-enery [66]. 18

19 [The four-loop contribution has also been obtained recently [6].] N F denotes the number of liht quark flavors and will be identified with 5. For the calculation of the heavy quark limit iven in eq. (1) the effective couplin has to be inserted into the blobs of the effective diarams shown in Fi. 8. After evaluatin these effective massless one-loop contributions the result coincides with the explicit calculation of the two-loop corrections in the heavy quark limit of eq. (1) at NLO. Fiure 8: Typical effective diarams contributin to the QCD corrections to in the heavy quark limit. Usin the discussed low-enery theorem, the electroweak corrections of O(G F Mt ) to the luonic decay width, which are mediated by virtual top quarks, can be obtained easily. For this purpose the leadin top mass corrections to the luon self-enery have to be computed. The result has to be differentiated by the bare top mass and the renormalization will be carried out afterwards. The final result leads to a simple rescalin of the lowest order decay width [67] [ ] Γ( ) = Γ LO ( ) 1 + G FM t 8 π. (31) They enhance the luonic decay width by about 0.3% and are thus neliible. Q Q Fiure 9: Typical diaram contributin to Q Q. The final states bb and cc are also enerated throuh processes in which the b, c quarks directly couple to the is boson, see Fi. 9. Gluon splittin bb in 19

20 increases the inclusive decay probabilities Γ( b b +...) etc. Since b quarks, and eventually c quarks, can in principle be taed experimentally, it is physically meaninful to consider the particle width of is decays to luon and liht u, d, s quark final jets separately. If one naively subtracts the final state luon splittin contributions for b and c quarks and keeps the quark masses finite to reulate the emerin mass sinularities, one ends up with lare loarithms of the b, c quark masses [in the limit of heavy loop quark masses M Q ] [ ] δe b,c = lo M M b + lo M M c, (3) which have to be added to the b b and c c decay widths [the finite part emeres from the nonsinular phase-space interations]. On the other hand the KLN theorem [68] ensures that all final-state mass sinularities of the real corrections cancel aainst a correspondin part of the virtual corrections involvin the same particle. Thus the mass-sinular loarithms lo M /M b,c in eq. (3) have to cancel aainst the correspondin heavy quark loops in the external luons, i.e. the sum of the cuts 1,, 3 in Fi. 10 has to be finite for small quark masses M Q. [The blobs at the vertices in Fi. 10 represent the effective couplins in the heavy top quark limit. In the eneral massive case they have to be replaced by the top and bottom trianle loops 3.] Thus in order to resum these lare final-state mass loarithms in the luonic decay width, the heavy quarks Q = b, c have to be decoupled from the runnin stron couplin constant, which has to be defined with three liht flavors, if b, c quark final states are subtracted, Q Im = Fiure 10: Cut diarams, involvin heavy quark Q loops, contributin to the imainary part of the is self-enery at the two-loop level. 3 It should be noted that the bottom quark trianle loop develops a loarithmic behaviour Mb /M lo M /M b, which arises from the interation reion of the loop momentum, where the b quark, exchaned between the two luons, becomes nearly on-shell. These mass loarithms do not correspond to final-state mass sinularities in pure QCD and are thus not required to cancel by the KLN theorem. 0

21 α (5) s (M ) = α (4) s (M ) α (4) s (M ) = α (3) s (M ) { { 1 + α(4) s (M ) lo M 6π Mb 1 + α(3) s (M ) lo M 6π Mc + O(α s ) } + O(α s) } (33) Expressed in terms of three liht flavors, the luonic decay width is free of explicit mass sinularities in the bottom and charm quark masses. The resummed contributions of b, c quark final states are iven by the difference of the luonic widths [eq. (1)] for the correspondin number of flavors N F [36], δγ[ c c +...] = Γ 4 Γ 3 δγ[ b b +...] = Γ 5 Γ 4 (34) in the limit M M b,c. In this way lare mass loarithms lo M /M c,b in the remainin luonic decay mode are absorbed into the stron couplin by chanin the number of active flavors accordin to the number of contributin flavors in the final states. It should be noted that by virtue of eqs. (33) the lare loarithms are implicitly contained in the stron couplins for different numbers of active flavors. The subtracted parts may be added to the partial decay widths into c and b quarks. In α s (4)(M Z) the contribution of the b quark is subtracted and in α s (3) (M Z ) the contributions of both the b and c quarks are. The values for α s (4)(M Z) are typically 5% smaller and those of α s (3)(M Z) about 15% smaller than α s (5) (M Z ), see Table 3. α (5) s (M Z ) α (4) s (M Z ) α (3) s (M Z ) Table 3: Stron couplin constants α s (M Z ) for different numbers of flavors contributin to the scale dependence. In α s (4) the b quark contribution is subtracted and in α s (3) the b and c quark contributions are..1.3 is decay to photon pairs The decay of the is boson to photons is mediated by W and heavy fermion loops in the Standard Model, see Fi. 11; the partial decay width [57] can be cast into the form Γ [ γγ] = G F α M 3 18 π 3 N cf e fa f (τ f ) + A W(τ W ) f 1 (35)

22 γ γ W γ f W γ γ γ Fiure 11: Typical diarams contributin to γγ at lowest order. with the form factors A f (τ) = τ [1 + (1 τ)f(τ)] A W(τ) = [ + 3τ + 3τ( τ)f(τ)] and the function f(τ) defined in eq. (0). The parameters τ i = 4Mi /M (i = f, W) are defined by the correspondin masses of the heavy loop particles. For lare loop masses the form factors approach constant values: A f 4 3 for M 4M Q A W 7 for M 4M W (36) The W loop provides the dominant contribution in the intermediate is mass rane, and the fermion loops interfere destructively. Only far above the thresholds, for is masses M 600 GeV, does the top quark loop become competitive, nearly cancellin the W loop contribution. γ t, b γ Fiure 1: Typical diaram contributin to the QCD corrections to γγ. In the past the two-loop QCD corrections to the quark loops have been calculated [53, 69]. They are built up by virtual luon exchane inside the quark trianle [see Fi. 1]. Owin to chare conjuation invariance and color conservation, radiation of a

23 sinle luon is not possible. ence the QCD corrections simply rescale the lowest order quark amplitude by a factor that only depends on the ratios of the is and quark masses [ A Q (τ Q) A Q (τ Q) 1 + C (τ Q ) α ] s π C (τ Q ) 1 for M 4MQ (37) Accordin to the low-enery theorem discussed before, the NLO QCD corrections in the heavy quark limit can be obtained from the effective Laranian [53, 58] L eff = e Q 4 βα Q /α 1 + γ m (α s ) F µν F µν v, (38) where βα Q/α = (α/π)[1 + α s/π + ] denotes the heavy quark Q contribution to the QED β function and γ m (α s ) the anomalous mass dimension iven in eq. (6). The NLO expansion of the effective Laranian reads as [53, 58] [ L eff = e α Q π F µν F µν 1 α ] s v π + O(α s ), (39) which arees with the C-value of eq. (37) in the heavy quark limit. The QCD corrections for finite is and quark masses are presented in Fi. 13 as a function of the is mass. In order to improve the perturbative behaviour of the quark loop contributions they should be expressed preferably in terms of the runnin quark masses m Q (M /), which are normalized to the pole masses M Q via m Q (µ Q = M Q ) = M Q ; (40) their scale is identified with µ Q = M / within the photonic decay mode. These definitions imply a proper definition of the Q Q thresholds M = M Q, without artificial displacements due to finite shifts between the pole and runnin quark masses, as is the case for the runnin MS masses. It can be inferred from Fi. 13 that the residual QCD corrections are moderate, of O(10%), apart from a broad reion around M 600 GeV, where the W loop nearly cancels the top quark contributions in the lowest order decay width. Consequently the relative QCD corrections are only artificially enhanced, and the perturbative expansion is reliable in this mass reion, too. Since the QCD corrections are small in the intermediate mass rane, where the photonic decay mode is important, they are nelected in this analysis. Recently the three-loop QCD corrections to the effective Laranian of eq. (39) have been calculated [70]. They lead to a further contribution of a few per mille. The electroweak corrections of O(G F Mt ) have been evaluated recently. This part of the correction arises from all diarams, which contain a top quark couplin to a is particle or would-be Goldstone boson. The final expression results in a rescalin factor to the top quark loop amplitude, iven by [71] A t (τ t) A t (τ t) [ 1 3 4e t 3 ( 4e t e b ) GF M 3 e t t 8 π ], (41)

24 δ [10 - ] Γ = Γ LO (1+δ) µ Q = M / M t = 175 GeV M [GeV] Fiure 13: The size of the QCD correction factor for γγ, defined by Γ = Γ LO (1+δ). The top and bottom masses have been chosen as M t = 175 GeV, M b = 5 GeV and the stron couplin constant has been normalized to α s (M Z ) = at NLO. The quark masses are replaced by their runnin masses at the scale µ Q = M /. where e t,b are the electric chares of the top and bottom quarks. The effect is an enhancement of the photonic decay width by less than 1%, so that these corrections are neliible. In the lare is mass reime the leadin electroweak corrections to the W loop have been computed by means of the equivalence theorem [1, 7]. This ensures that for lare is masses the dominant contributions arise from lonitudinal would-be Goldstone interactions, whereas the contributions of the transverse W and Z components are suppressed. The final result decreases the W form factor by a finite amount [73], A W (τ W) A W (τ W) [ G FM 8 π ] for M 4M W. (4) These electroweak corrections are only sizeable in the reion around M 600 GeV, where the lowest order decay width develops a minimum due to the stron cancellation of the W and t loops and for very lare is masses M 1 TeV. Since the photonic branchin ratio is only important in the intermediate mass rane, where it reaches values of a few 10 3, the electroweak corrections are nelected in the present analysis. 4

25 .1.4 is decay to photon and Z boson Z Z W Z f W γ γ γ Fiure 14: Typical diarams contributin to Zγ at lowest order. The decay of the is boson to a photon and a Z boson is mediated by W and heavy fermion loops, see Fi. 14; the partial decay width can be obtained as [3, 74] Γ [ Zγ] = G F M W α M3 64 π 4 with the form factors ( ) 3 1 M Z M A f (τ f, λ f ) + A W(τ W, λ W ), (43) f A f (τ, λ) = N e f (I 3f e f sin θ W ) cf [I 1 (τ, λ) I (τ, λ)] cos θ W A W (τ, λ) = cos θ { W 4(3 tan θ W )I (τ, λ) [( ) ( tan θ W 5 + )] } I 1 (τ, λ). (44) τ τ The functions I 1, I are iven by τλ I 1 (τ, λ) = (τ λ) + τ λ (τ λ) [f(τ) f(λ)] + τ λ [(τ) (λ)] (τ λ) I (τ, λ) = τλ [f(τ) f(λ)] (τ λ) where the function (τ) can be expressed as 1 τ 1 arcsin τ τ 1 (τ) = [ 1 τ lo 1 + ] 1 τ 1 1 τ iπ τ < 1 (45) and the function f(τ) is defined in eq. (0). The parameters τ i = 4Mi /M and λ i = 4Mi /MZ (i = f, W) are defined in terms of the correspondin masses of the heavy loop 5

26 Z t, b γ Fiure 15: Typical diaram contributin to the QCD corrections to Zγ. particles. Due to chare conjuation invariance, only the vectorial Z couplin contributes to the fermion loop so that problems with the axial γ 5 couplin do not arise. The W loop dominates in the intermediate is mass rane, and the heavy fermion loops interfere destructively. The two-loop QCD corrections to the top quark loops have been calculated [75] in complete analoy to the photonic case. They are enerated by virtual luon exchane inside the quark trianle [see Fi. 15]. Due to chare conjuation invariance and color conservation, radiation of a sinle luon is not possible. ence the QCD corrections can simply be expressed as a rescalin of the lowest order amplitude by a factor that only depends on the ratios τ i and λ i (i = f, W), defined above: [ A Q (τ Q, λ Q ) A Q (τ Q, λ Q ) 1 + D (τ Q, λ Q ) α ] s π D (τ Q, λ Q ) 1 for MZ M 4M Q. (46) In the limit M Z 0 the quark amplitude approaches the correspondin form factor of the photonic decay mode [modulo couplins], which has been discussed before. ence the QCD correction in the heavy quark limit for small Z masses has to coincide with the heavy quark limit of the photonic decay mode of eq. (37). The QCD corrections for finite is, Z and quark masses are presented in [75] as a function of the is mass. They amount to less than 0.3% in the intermediate mass rane, where this decay mode is relevant, and can thus be nelected..1.5 Intermediate aue boson decays Above the WW and ZZ decay thresholds, the partial decay widths into pairs of massive aue bosons (V = W, Z) at lowest order [see Fi. 16] are iven by [1] Γ( V V ) = δ V G F M 3 16 π β(1 4x + 1x ), (47) with x = M V /M, β = 1 4x and δ V = (1) for V = W (Z). 6

27 W, Z W, Z Fiure 16: Diaram contributin to V V [V = W, Z]. The electroweak corrections have been computed in [46, 76] at the one-loop level. They are small and amount to less than about 5% in the intermediate mass rane. Furthermore the QCD corrections to the leadin top mass corrections of O(G F Mt ) have been calculated up to three loops. They rescale the WW, ZZ decay widths by [58, 77] [ Γ( ZZ) = Γ LO ( ZZ) {1 x t 5 (15 ζ ) α ]} s, (48) π [ Γ( WW) = Γ LO ( WW) {1 x t 5 (9 ζ ) α ]} s, (49) π with x t = G F M t /(8 π ). The three-loop corrections can be found in [78]. Since the electroweak corrections are small in the intermediate mass reime, they are nelected in the analysis. For lare is masses, hiher order corrections due to the self-couplins of the is particles are relevant. They are iven by [79] Γ( V V ) = Γ LO ( V V ) { ˆλ ˆλ } (50) with the couplin constant ˆλ defined in eq. (15). They start to be sizeable for M > 400 GeV and increase the decay width by about 0% at is masses of the order of 1 TeV. Below threshold the decays into off-shell aue particles are important. The partial decay widths into sinle off-shell aue bosons can be obtained in analytic form [80] Γ( V V ) = δ V 3G FMV 4 M R 16π 3 with δ W = 1, δ Z = 7/1 10 sin θ W / sin 4 θ W /7 and ( ) 1 8x + 0x 3x 1 R(x) = 3 arccos 4x 1 x 3/ ( M V M ) (51) 1 x x ( 13x + 47x ) (5) 3 (1 6x + 4x ) lo x. For is masses slihtly larer than the correspondin aue boson mass the decay widths into pairs of off-shell aue bosons play a sinificant role. Their contribution can 7

28 be cast into the form [81] Γ( V V ) = 1 π M 0 dq 1 M V Γ V (Q 1 M V ) + M V Γ V (M Q 1 ) 0 dq M V Γ V Γ (Q MV ) + MV 0 Γ V (53) with Q 1, Q bein the squared invariant masses of the virtual aue bosons, M V and Γ V their masses and total decay widths; Γ 0 is iven by G F M 3 [ ] Γ 0 = δ V 16 λ(q 1, Q ; M) λ(q 1, Q ; M) + 1 Q 1 Q, (54) π M 4 with the phase-space factor λ(x, y; z) = (1 x/z y/z) 4xy/z. The branchin ratios of double off-shell decays reach the per cent level for is masses above about 100 (110) GeV for off-shell W(Z) boson pairs. They are therefore included in the analysis..1.6 Three-body decay modes The branchin ratios of three-body decay modes may reach the per cent level for lare is masses [8]. The decays W + W γ, t tγ() are already contained in the QED (QCD) corrections to the correspondin decay widths W + W, t t. owever, the decay modes W + W Z, t tz are not contained in the electroweak corrections to the WW, t t decay widths. Their branchin ratios can reach values of up to about 10 for is masses M 1 TeV. As they do not exceed the per cent level, they are nelected in the present analysis. The analytical expressions are rather involved and can be found in [8]..1.7 Total decay width and branchin ratios In Fi. 17 the total decay width and branchin ratios of the Standard Model is boson are shown as a function of the is mass. For is masses below 140 GeV, where the total width amounts to less than 10 MeV, the dominant decay mode is the b b channel with a branchin ratio up to 85%. The remainin 10 0% are supplemented by the τ + τ, c c and decay modes, the branchin ratios of which amount to 6.6%, 4.6% and 6% respectively, for M = 10 GeV [the b b branchin ratio is about 78% for this is mass]. The γγ (Zγ) branchin ratio turns out to be sizeable only for is masses 80 (10) GeV < M < 150 (160) GeV, where they exceed the 10 3 level. Startin from M 140 GeV the WW decay takes over the dominant rôle joined by the ZZ decay mode. Around the WW threshold of 150 GeV < M < 180 GeV, where the W pair of the dominant WW channel becomes on-shell, the ZZ branchin ratio drops down to a level of % and reaches aain a branchin ratio 30% above the ZZ threshold. Above the t t threshold M = M t, the t t decay mode opens up quickly, but never exceeds a branchin ratio of 0%. This is caused by the fact that the leadin WW and ZZ decay widths row with the third power of the is mass [due to the lonitudinal W, Z components, which are dominatin for lare is masses], whereas 8

29 10 Γ() [GeV] M [GeV] bb _ BR() WW ZZ τ + τ cc _ tt γγ Zγ M [GeV] Fiure 17: (a) Total decay width (in GeV) of the SM is boson as a function of its mass. (b) Branchin ratios of the dominant decay modes of the SM is particle. All relevant hiher order corrections are taken into account. 9

30 the t t decay width increases only with the first power. Consequently the total is width rows rapidly at lare is masses and reaches a level of 600 GeV at M = 1 TeV, renderin the is width of the same order as its mass. At M = 1 TeV the WW (ZZ) branchin ratio approximately reaches its asymptotic value of /3 (1/3).. is Boson Production at the LC..1 Gluon fusion: The luon-fusion mechanism [15] pp provides the dominant production mechanism of is bosons at the LC in the entire relevant is mass rane up to about 1 TeV. As in the case of the luonic decay mode, the luon couplin to the is boson in the SM is mediated by trianular loops of top and bottom quarks, see Fi. 18. Since the Yukawa couplin of the is particle to heavy quarks rows with the quark mass, thus balancin the decrease of the amplitude, the form factor reaches a constant value for lare loop quark masses. If the masses of heavier quarks beyond the third eneration are fully enerated by the is mechanism, these particles would add the same amount to the form factor as the top quark in the asymptotic heavy quark limit. Thus luon fusion can serve as a counter of the number of heavy quarks, the masses of which are enerated by the conventional is mechanism. On the other hand, if these novel heavy quarks will not be produced directly at the LC, luon fusion will allow to measure the top quark Yukawa couplin. This, however, requires a precise knowlede of the cross section within the SM with three enerations of quarks. t, b Fiure 18: Diarams contributin to at lowest order. The partonic cross section, Fi. 18, can be expressed by the luonic width of the is boson at lowest order [15], ˆσ LO ( ) = σ 0 δ(1 z) (55) σ 0 = π Γ 8M 3 LO ( ) = G Fαs (µ) 88 A Q(τ Q ) π 30 Q