arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 17 Dec 2007
|
|
- Amelia Cameron
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 17 Dec 2007 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON Abstract. We evelo a clear connection between efinetti s theorem for exchangeable arrays (work of Alous Hoover Kallenberg) an the emerging area of grah limits (work of Lovász an many coauthors). Along the way, we translate the grah theory into more classical robability. 1. Introuction DeFinetti s rofoun contributions are now woven into many arts of robability, statistics an hilosohy. Here we show how eveloments from efinetti s work on artial exchangeability have a irect link to the recent eveloment of a limiting theory for large grahs. This introuction first recalls the theory of exchangeable arrays (Section 1.1). Then, the subject of grah limits is outline (Section 1.2). Finally, the link between these ieas, which forms the bulk of this aer, is outline (Section 1.3) Exchangeability, artial exchangeability an exchangeable arrays. Let {X i }, 1 i <, be a sequence of binary ranom variables. They are exchangeable if P(X 1 = e 1,...,X n = e n ) = P(X 1 = e σ(1),...,x n = e σ(n) ) for all n, ermutations σ S n an all e i {0,1}. The celebrate reresentation theorem says Theorem 1.1 (efinetti). If {X i }, 1 i <, is a binary exchangeable sequence, then: (i) With robability 1, X = lim 1 n (X 1 + +X n ) exists. (ii) If µ(a) = P{X A}, then for all n an e i, 1 i n, for s = e 1 + +e n. P(X 1 = e 1,...,X n = e n ) = 1 0 x s (1 x) n s µ(x) (1.1) It is natural to refine an exten efinetti s theorem to allow more general observables(x i withvalues inapolishsace) anothernotions ofsymmetry (artial exchangeability). A efinitive treatment of these eveloments is Date: December 10,
2 2 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON given in Kallenberg [15]. Of interest here is the extension of efinetti s theorem to two-imensional arrays. Definition. Let {X ij }, 1 i,j <, be binary ranom variables. They are searately exchangeable if P(X ij = e ij, 1 i,j n) = P(X ij = e σ(i)τ(j), 1 i,j n) (1.2) for all n, all ermutations σ,τ S n an all e ij {0,1}. They are (jointly) exchangeable if (1.2) hols in the secial case τ = σ. Equivalently, thearray{x ij }isjointlyexchangeableifthearray{x σ(i)σ(j) } has the same istribution as {X ij } for every ermutation σ of N, an similarly for searate exchangeability. The question of two-imensional versions of efinetti s theorem uner (searate) exchangeability arose from the statistical roblems of two-way analysis of variance. Early workers execte a version of(1.1) with erhas a two-imensional integral. The robabilist Davi Alous [1] an the logician Douglas Hoover [14] foun that the answer is more comlicate. Define a ranom binary array {X ij } as follows: Let U i,v j, 1 i,j <, be ineenent an uniform in [0,1]. Let W(x,y) be a function from [0,1] 2 to [0,1]. Let X ij be 1 or 0 as a W(U i,v j )-coin comes u heas or tails. Let P W bethe robability istribution of {X ij }, 1 i,j <. Thefamily {X ij } is searately exchangeable because of the symmetry of the construction. The Alous Hoover theorem says that any searately exchangeable binary array is a mixture of such P W : Theorem 1.2 (Alous Hoover). Let X = {X ij }, 1 i,j <, be a searately exchangeable binary array. Then, there is a robability µ such that P{X A} = P W (A)µ(W). There is a similar result for jointly exchangeable arrays. The uniqueness of µ resiste unerstaning; if Ŵ is obtaine from W by a measure-reserving change of each variable, clearly the associate rocess { X ij } has the same joint istribution as {X ij }. Using moel theory, Hoover [14] was able to show that this was the only source of non-uniqueness. A robabilist s roof was finally foun by Kallenberg, see [15, Sect. 7.6] for etails an references. These results hol for higher imensional arrays with X ij taking values in a Polish sace with minor change [15, Cha. 7]. The escrition above has not mentione several elegant results of the theory. In articular, Kallenberg s sreaable version of the theory relaces invariance uner a grou by invariance uner subsequences. A variety of tail fiels may be introuce to allow characterizing when W takes values in {0,1} [10, Sect. 4]. Much more general notions of artial exchangeability are stue in [11].
3 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS Grah limits. Large grahs, both ranom an eterministic, aboun in alications. They arise from the internet, social networks, gene regulation, ecology an in mathematics. It is natural to seek an aroximation theory: What oes it mean for a sequence of grahs to converge? When can a large comlex grah be aroximate by a small grah? In a sequence of aers [6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17, 18, 21, 20, 22, 19], Laszlo Lovász with coauthors (liste here in orer of frequency) V. T. Sós, B. Szegey, C. Borgs, J. Chayes, K. Vesztergombi, A. Schrijver, M. Freeman have eveloe a beautiful, unifying limit theory. This shes light on toics such as grah homomorhisms, Szemerei s regularity lemma, quasi-ranom grahs, grah testing an extremal grah theory. Their theory has been eveloe for ense grahs (number of eges comarable with the square of number of vertices) but arallel theories for sarse grahs are beginning to emerge [4]. Roughly, a growing sequence of finitegrahs G n converges if, for any fixe grah F, the roortion of coies of F in G n converges. Section 2 below has recise efinitions. Examle 1.3. Define a robability istribution on grahs on n-vertices as follows. Fli a θ-coin for each vertex(iviing vertices into boys an girls ). Connect two boys with robability. Connect two girls with robability. Connect a boy an a girl with robability. Thus, if = = 0, = 1, we have a ranom biartite grah. If = = 1, = 0, we have two isjoint comlete grahs. If = =, we have the Erös Renyi moel. As n grows, these moels generate a sequence of ranom grahs which converge almost surely to a limiting object escribe below. More substantial examles involving ranom threshol grahs are in [12]. If a sequence of grahs converges, what oes it converge to? For exchangeable ranom grahs (efine below), there is a limiting object which may be thought of as a robability measure on infinite ranom grahs. Suose W(x,y) = W(y,x) is a function from [0,1] 2 [0,1]. Choose {U i }, 1 i <, ineenent uniformly istribute ranom variables on [0,1]. Form an infinite ranom grah by utting an ege from i to j with robability W(U i,u j ). This measure on grahs (or alternatively W) is the limiting object. For the boys an girls examle above, W may be icture as θ 0 θ 1 The theory eveloe shows that various roerties of G n can be well aroximate by calculations with the limiting object. There is an elegant
4 4 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON characterization of these continuous grah roerties with alications to algorithms for grah testing (Does this grah contain an Eulerian cycle?) or arameter estimation (What is an aroximation to the size of the maximum cut?). Thereisaractical way tofinusefularoximationstoalargegrah by grahs of fixe size [6]. This aer also contains a useful review of the current state of the theory with roofs an references. We have sketche the theory for unweighte grahs. There are generalizations to grahs with weights on vertices an eges, to biartite, irecte an hyergrahs. The sketch leaves out many nice eveloments. For examle, the useful cut metric between grahs [19] an connections to statistical hysics [9] Overview of the resent aer. There is an aarent similarity between the measure P W of the Alous Hoover theorem an the limiting object W from grah limits. Roughly, working with symmetric W gives the grah limit theory; working with general W gives irecte grahs. The main results of this aer make these connections recise. Basic efinitions are in Section 2 which introuces a robabilist s version of grah convergence equivalent to the efinition using grah homomorhisms. Section 3 uses the well-establishe theory of weak convergence of a sequence of robability measures on a metric sace to get roerties of grah convergence. Section 4 carries things over to infinite grahs. The main results aear in Section 5. This introuces exchangeable ranom grahs an gives a one-to-one corresonence between infinite exchangeable ranom grahs an istributions on the sace of roer grah limits (Theorem 5.3), which secializes to a one-to-one corresonence between roer grah limits an extreme oints in the set of istributions of exchangeable ranom grahs (Corollary 5.4). A useful characterization of the extreme oints of the set of exchangeable ranom grahs is in Theorem 5.5. These results are translate to the equivalence between roer grah limits an the Alous Hoover theory in Section 6. The non-uniqueness of the reresenting W, for exchangeable ranom grahs an for grah limits, is iscusse in Section 7. The equivalence involves symmetric W(x, y) an a single ermutation σ taking W(U i,u j ) to W(U σ(i),u σ(j) ). The original Alous Hoover theorem, witherhasnon-symmetricw(x,y)anw(u i,v j )tow(u σ(i),v τ(j) )translates to a limit theorem for biartite grahs. This is eveloe in Section 8. The thir case of the Alous Hoover theory for two-imensional arrays, erhas non-symmetric W(x, y) an a single ermutation σ, corresons to irecte grahs; this is sketche in Section 9. The extensions to weighte grahs are covere by allowing X ij to take general values in the Alous Hoover theory. The extension to hyergrahs follows from the Alous Hoover theory for higher-imensional arrays. (The etails of these extensions are left to the reaer.)
5 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 5 Desite these arallels, the theories have much to contribute to each other. The algorithmic, grah testing, Szemerei artitioning ersective is new to exchangeability theory. Inee, the boys an girls ranom grah was introuce to stuy the sychology of vision in Diaconis Freeman (1981). As far as we know, its grah theoretic roerties have not been stuie. The various eveloments aroun shell-fiels in exchangeability, which characterize zero/one W(x, y), have yet to be translate into grah-theoretic terms. Acknowlegements. This lecture is an extene version of a talk resente by PD at the 100th anniversary of efinetti s birth in Rome, We thank the organizers. This work was artially fune by the French ANR s Chaire excellence grant to PD. SJ thanks Christian Borgs an Jennifer Chayes for insiration from lectures an iscussions uring the Oberwolfach meeting Combinatorics, Probability an Comuting, hel in November, Parts of the research were comlete uring a visit by SJ to the Université e Nice - Sohia Antiolis in January Definitions an basic roerties All grahs will be simle. Infinite grahs will be imortant in later sections, but will always be clearly state to be infinite; otherwise, grahs will be finite. We enote the vertex an ege sets of a grah G by V(G) an E(G), an the numbers of vertices an eges by v(g) := V(G) an e(g) := E(G). We consier both labelle an unlabelle grahs; the labels will be the integers 1,...,n, where n is the number of vertices in the grah. A labelle grah is thus a grah with vertex set [n] := {1,...,n} for some n 1; we let L n enote the set of the 2 (n 2) labelle grahs on [n] an let L := n=1 L n. An unlabelle grah can be regare as a labelle grah where we ignore the labels; formally, we efine U n, the set of unlabelle grahs of orer n, as the quotient set L n / = of labelle grahs moulo isomorhisms. We let U := n=1 U n = L/ =, the set of all unlabelle grahs. Note that we can, an often will, regar a labelle grah as an unlabelle grah. If G is an (unlabelle) grah an v 1,...,v k is a sequence of vertices in G, then G(v 1,...,v k ) enotes the labelle grah with vertex set [k] where we ut an ege between i an j if v i an v j are ajacent in G. We allow the ossibility that v i = v j for some i an j. (In this case, there is no ege ij because there are no loos in G.) We let G[k], for k 1, be the ranom grah G(v 1,...,v k ) obtaine by samling v 1,...,v k uniformly at ranom among the vertices of G, with relacement. In other wors, v 1,...,v k are ineenent uniformly istribute ranom vertices of G. For k v(g), we further let G[k] be the ranom grah G(v 1,...,v k ) where we samle v 1,...,v k uniformly at ranom without relacement; the
6 6 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON sequence v 1,...,v k is thus a uniformly istribute ranom sequence of k istinct vertices. Thegrahlimittheoryin[19]ansubsequentaersisbaseonthestuy of the functional t(f,g) which is efine for two grahs F an G as the roortion of all maings V(F) V(G) that are grah homomorhisms F G, i.e., ma ajacent vertices to ajacent vertices. In robabilistic terms, t(f,g) is the robability that a uniform ranom maing V(F) V(G) is a grah homomorhism. Using the notation introuce above, we can, equivalently, write this as, assuming that F is labelle an k = v(f), t(f,g) := P ( F G[k] ). (2.1) Note that both F an G[k] are grahs on [k], so the relation F G[k] is well-efine as containment of labelle grahs on the same vertex set, i.e. as E(F) E(G[k]). Although the relation F G[k] may een on the labelling of F, the robability in (2.1) oes not, by symmetry, so t(f,g) is really well efine by (2.1) for unlabelle F an G. With F, G an k as in (2.1), we further efine, again following [19] (an the notation of [8]) but stating the efinitions in ifferent but equivalent forms, an t inj (F,G) := P ( F G[k] ) (2.2) t in (F,G) := P ( F = G[k] ), (2.3) rovief angare(unlabelle)grahswithv(f) v(g). Ifv(F) > v(g) we set t inj (F,G) := t in (F,G) := 0. Since the robability that a ranom samle v 1,...,v k of vertices in G contains some reeate vertex is k 2 /(2v(G)), it follows that [19] t(f,g) tinj (F,G) v(f) 2 2v(G). (2.4) Hence, when consiering asymtotics with v(g), it oes not matter whether we use t or t inj. Moreover, if F L k, then, as ointe out in [8] an [19], t inj (F,G) = t in (F,G) (2.5) an, by inclusion-exclusion, t in (F,G) = F L k, F F F L k, F F ( 1) e(f ) e(f) t inj (F,G). (2.6) Hence, the two families {t inj (F, )} F U an {t in (F, )} F U of grah functionals contain the same information an can relace each other. The basic efinition of Lovász an Szegey[19] an Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós an Vesztergombi [8] is that a sequence (G n ) of grahs converges if
7 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 7 t(f,g n ) converges for every grah F. We can exress this by consiering the ma τ : U [0,1] U efine by τ(g) := (t(f,g)) F U [0,1] U. (2.7) Then (G n ) converges if an only if τ(g n ) converges in [0,1] U, equie with the usual rouct toology. Note that [0,1] U is a comact metric sace; as is well known, a metric can be efine by, for examle, ( (x F ),(y F ) ) := 2 i x Fi y Fi, (2.8) i=0 where F 1,F 2,... is some enumeration of all unlabelle grahs. We efine U := τ(u) [0,1] U to be the image of U uner this maing τ, an let U be the closure of U in [0,1] U. Thus U is a comact metric sace. (For exlicit escritions of the subset U of [0,1] U as a set of grah functionals, see Lovász an Szegey [19].) As ointe out in [19] an [8] (in equivalent terminology), τ is not injective; for examle, τ(k n,n ) is the same for all comlete biartite grahs K n,n. Nevertheless, as in [19] an [8], we can consier a grah G as an element of U by ientifying G an τ(g) (thus ientifying grahs with the same τ(g)), an then convergence of (G n ) as efine above is equivalent to convergence in U. The limit is thus an element of U, but tyically not a grah in U. The main result of Lovász an Szegey [19] is a reresentation of the elements in U to which we will return in Section 6. Remark 2.1. As sai above, U is a comact metric sace, an it can be given several equivalent metrics. One metric is the metric (2.8) inherite from [0,1] U, which for grahs becomes (G,G ) = i 2 i t(f i,g) t(f i,g ). Anothermetric, shownbyborgs, Chayes, Lovász, SósanVesztergombi [8] to be equivalent, is the cut-istance δ, see [8] for efinitions. Further characterizations of convergence of sequences of grahs in U are given in Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós an Vesztergombi [8, 9]. The ientification of grahs with the same image in U (i.e., with the same t(f, ) for all F) is sometimes elegant but at other times inconvenient. It can be avoie if we instea let U + be the union of U an some one-oint set { } an consier the maing τ + : U [0,1] U+ = [0,1] U [0,1] efine by τ + (G) = ( τ(g), v(g) 1). (2.9) Then τ + is injective, because if τ(g 1 ) = τ(g 2 ) for two grahs G 1 an G 2 with the same number of vertices, then G 1 an G 2 are isomorhic an thus G 1 = G 2 as unlabelle grahs. (This can easily be shown irectly: it follows from (2.1) that G 1 [k] = G 2 [k] for every k, which imlies G 1 [k] = G2 [k] for every k v(g 1 ) = v(g 2 ); now take k = v(g 1 ). It is also a consequence of [8, Theorem 2.7 an Theorem 2.3 or Lemma 5.1].)
8 8 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON Consequently, we can ientify U with its image τ + (U) [0,1] U+ an efine U [0,1] U+ as its closure. It is easily seen that a sequence (G n ) of grahsconverges in U if an only if either v(g n ) an(g n ) converges in U, or the sequence (G n ) is constant from some n 0 on. Hence, convergence in U is essentially the same as the convergence consiere by by Lovász an Szegey [19], but without any ientification of non-isomorhic grahs of ifferent orers. Alternatively, we can consier τ inj or τ in efine by τ inj (G) := (t inj (F,G)) F U [0,1] U, τ in (G) := (t in (F,G)) F U [0,1] U. It is easy to see that both τ inj an τ in are injective maings U [0,1] U. (If τ inj (F,G 1 ) = τ inj (F,G 2 ) for all F, we take F = G 1 an F = G 2 an conclue G 1 = G 2, using our secial efinition above when v(f) > v(g).) Hence, we can again ientify U with its image an consier its closure U in [0,1] U. Moreover, using (2.4), (2.5), an (2.6), it is easily shown that if (G n ) is a sequence of unlabelle grahs, then τ + (G n ) converges τ in (G n ) converges τ inj (G n ) converges. Hence, thethreecomactificationsτ + (U), τ inj (U),τ in (U)arehomeomorhic an we can use any of them for U. We let U := U \U; this is the set of all limit objects of sequences (G n ) in U with v(g n ). (I.e., it is the set of all roer grah limits.) We will in the sequel refer to use U rather than U, thus not ientifying some grahs of ifferent orers, nor ientifying finite grahs with some limit objects in U. For every fixe grah F, the functions t(f, ), t inj (F, ) an t in (F, ) have unique continuous extensions to U, for which we use the same notation. We similarly exten v( ) 1 continuously to U by efining v(g) = an thus v(g) 1 = 0 for G U := U \ U. Then (2.4), (2.5) an (2.6) hol for all G U, where (2.4) means that t inj (F,G) = t(f,g), G U. (2.10) Note that U is a comact metric sace. Different, equivalent, metrics are given by the embeings τ +, τ inj, τ in into [0,1] U+ an [0,1] U. Another equivalent metric is, by Remark 2.1 an the efinition of τ +, δ (G 1,G 2 )+ v(g 1 ) 1 v(g 2 ) 1. We summarize the results above on convergence. Theorem 2.1. A sequence (G n ) of grahs converges in the sense of Lovász an Szegey [19] if an only if it converges in the comact metric sace U. Moreover, if v(g n ), the sequence (G n ) converges in this sense if an only if it converges in U.
9 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 9 The rojection π : [0,1] U+ = [0,1] U [0,1] [0,1] U mas τ + (G) to τ(g) for every grah G, so by continuity it mas U into U. For grah G U, π(g) = τ(g) is the object in U corresoning to G consiere above, an we will in the sequel enote this object by π(g); recall that this rojection U U is not injective. (We thus istinguish between a grah G an its ghost π(g) in U. Recall that when grahs are consiere as elements of U as in [19] an [8], certain grahs are ientifie with each other; we avoi this.) On the other han, an element G of U is by efinition etermine by τ(g) an v(g) 1, cf. (2.9), so the restriction π : U n U is injective for each n. In articular, π : U U is injective. Moreover, this ma is surjective because every element G U is the limit of some sequence (G n ) of grahs in U with v(g n ) ; by Theorem 2.1, this sequence converges in U to some element G, an then π(g ) = G. Since U is comact, the restriction of π to U is thus a homeomorhism, an we have the following theorem, saying that we can ientify the set U of roer grah limits with U. Theorem 2.2. The rojection π mas the set U := U \U of roer grah limits homeomorhically onto U. 3. Convergence of ranom grahs A ranom unlabelle grah is a ranom element of U (with any istribution; we o not imly any articular moel). We consier convergence of a sequence (G n ) of ranom unlabelle grahs in the larger sace U; recall that this is a comact metric sace so we may use the general theory set forth in, for examle, Billingsley [2]., a.s. We use the stanar notations, for convergence in istribution, robability, an alsmost surely, resectively. We will only consier the case when v(g n ), at least in robability. (The reaer may think of the case when G n has n vertices, although that is not necessary in general.) We begin with convergence in istribution. Theorem 3.1. Let G n, n 1, be ranom unlabelle grahs an assume that v(g n ). The following are equivalent, as n. (i) G n Γ for some ranom Γ U. (ii) For every finite family F 1,...,F m of (non-ranom) grahs, the ranom variables t(f 1,G n ),...,t(f m,g n ) converge jointly in istribution. (iii) For every (non-ranom) F U, the ranom variables t(f,g n ) converge in istribution. (iv) For every (non-ranom) F U, the exectations Et(F,G n ) converge. If these roerties hol, then the limits in (ii), (iii) an (iv) are ( t(f i,γ) ) m i=1, t(f,γ) an Et(F,Γ), resectively. Furthermore, Γ U a.s.
10 10 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON The same results hol if t is relace by t inj or t in. Proof. (i) (ii). Since U is a close subset of [0,1] U+, convergence in istributioninu isequivalenttoconvergenceofτ + (G n ) = ( (t(f,g n )) F U, v(g n ) 1) in [0,1] U+, Since we assume v(g n ) 1 0, this is equivalent to convergence of (t(f,g n )) F U in [0,1] U [2, Theorem 4.4], which is equivalent to convergence in istribution of all finite families (t(f i,g n )) m i=1. (ii) = (iii). Trivial. (iii) = (iv). Immeiate, since t is boune (by 1). (iv) = (ii). Let F 1,...,F m be fixe grahs an let l 1,...,l m be ositive integers. Let F be the isjoint union of l i coies of F i, i = 1,...,m. Then, for every G U, from the efinition of t, an hence E t(f,g) = m t(f i,g) l i, i=1 m t(f i,g) l i = Et(F,G). (3.1) i=1 Consequently, if (iv) hols, then every joint moment E m i=1 t(f i,g) l i of t(f 1,G n ),...,t(f m,g n ) converges. Since t(f i,g n ) are boune (by 1), this imlies joint convergence in istribution by the metho of moments. The ientification of the limits is immeiate. Since v(g n ), (i) imlies that v(γ) = a.s., an thus Γ U. Finally, it follows from (2.4), (2.5) an (2.6) that we can relace t by t inj or t in in (ii) an (iv), an the imlications (ii) = (iii) an (iii) = (iv) are immeiate for t inj an t in too. Secializing to the case of a non-ranom limit G U, we obtain the corresoning result for convergence in robability. Corollary 3.2. Let G n, n 1, be ranom unlabelle grahs such that v(g n ), an let G U. The following are equivalent, as n. (i) G n G. (ii) t(f,g n ) t(f,g) for every (non-ranom) F U. (iii) Et(F,G n ) t(f,g) for every (non-ranom) F U. The same result hols if t is relace by t inj or t in. Note further that uner the same assumtions, it follows irectly from a.s. Theorem 2.1 that G n G if an only if t(f,g n ) a.s. t(f,g) for every F U. We observe another corollary to Theorem 3.1 (an its roof).
11 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 11 Corollary 3.3. If Γ is a ranom element of U = U \ U = U, then, for every sequence F 1,...,F m of grahs, ossibly with reetitions, m E t(f i,γ) = Et( m i=1 F i,γ), (3.2) i=1 where m i=1 F i enotes the isjoint union of F 1,...,F m. As a consequence, the istribution of Γ is uniquely etermine by the numbers Et(F,Γ), F U. Alternatively, the istribution of Γ is uniquely etermine by the numbers Et in (F,Γ), F U. Proof. Since U is ense in U U, there exists ranom unlabelle grahs a.s. G n such that G n Γ. In articular, G n Γ an v(g n ) (in fact, we may assume v(g n ) = n), so Theorem 3.1 an its roof aly, an (3.2) follows from (3.1) alie to G n by letting n. For the final statement, note that (3.2) shows that the exectations Et(F,Γ), F U, etermine all moments E m i=1 t(f i,γ), an thus the joint istribution of t(f,γ), F U, which is the same as the istribution of τ(γ) = ( t(f,γ) ) F U [0,1]U, an we have efine U such that we ientify Γ an τ(γ). Finally, the numbers Et in (F,Γ), F U, etermine all Et(F,Γ) by (2.5), recalling that t inj (F,Γ) = t(f,γ) by (2.10). Remark 3.1. The numbers Et(F,Γ) for a ranom Γ U thus lay a role similar to the one laye by moments for a ranom variable. (An the relation between Et(F,Γ) an Et in (F,Γ) has some resemblance to the relation between moments an cumulants.) 4. Convergence to infinite grahs We will in this section consier also labelle infinite grahs with the vertex set N = {1,2,...}. Let L enote the set of all such grahs. These grahs are etermine by their ege sets, so L can be ientifie with the ower set P(E(K )) of all subsets of the ege set E(K ) of the comlete infinite grah K, an thus with the infinite rouct set {0,1} E(K ). We give this sace, an thus L, the rouct toology. Hence, L is a comact metric sace. It is sometimes convenient to regar L n for a finite n as a subset of L : we can ientify grahs in L n an L with the same ege set. In other wors, if G L n is a grah with vertex set [n], we a an infinite number of isolate vertices n+1,n+2,... to obtain a grah in L. Conversely, if H L is an infinite grah, we let H [n] L n be the inuce subgrah of H with vertex set [n]. If G is a (finite) grah, let Ĝ be the ranom labelle grah obtaine by a ranom labelling of the vertices of G by the numbers 1,...,v(G). (If G is labelle, we thus ignore the labels an ranomly relabel.) Thus Ĝ is a ranom finite grah with the same number of vertices as G, but as just sai, we can (an will) also regar Ĝ as a ranom grah in L.
12 12 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON We use the same notation Ĝ also for a ranom (finite) grah G given a ranom labelling. Theorem 4.1. Let (G n ) be a sequence of ranom grahs in U an assume that v(g n ). Then the following are equivalent. (i) G n Γ in U for some ranom Γ U. (ii) Ĝn H in L for some ranom H L. If these hol, then P(H [k] = F) = Et in (F,Γ) for every F L k. Furthermore, Γ U a.s. Proof. Let G be a labelle grah an consier the grah Ĝ [k], assuming k v(g). This ranom grah equals G[k] = G(v 1,...,v k ), where v 1,...,v k are k vertices samle at ranom without relacement as in Section 2. Hence, by (2.3), for every F L k, P(Ĝ [k] = F) = t in (F,G), Alie to the ranom grah G n, this yiels if k v(g). Et in (F,G n ) P(Ĝn [k] = F) Et in (F,G n )+P ( v(g n ) < k ). (4.1) By assumtion, P (v(g n ) < k) 0 as n, an it follows from (4.1) an Theorem 3.1 that G n Γ in U if an only if P(Ĝn [k] = F) Et in (F,Γ) (4.2) for every k 1 an every F L k. Since L k is a finite set, (4.2) says that, for every k, Ĝ n [k] H k for some ranom grah H k L k with P(H k = F) = Et in (F,Γ) for F L k. Since L has the rouct toology, this imlies Ĝn H in L for some ranom H L with H [k] = Hk. Conversely, if Ĝn H in L, then Ĝn [k] H [k] so the argument above shows that Et in (F,G n ) = P(Ĝn [k] = F)+o(1) P(H [k] = F) as n, for every F L k, an Theorem 3.1 yiels the existence of some ranom Γ U U with G n Γ an Et in (F,Γ) = P(H [k] = F). 5. Exchangeable ranom grahs Definition. A ranominfinitegrahh L is exchangeable if its istribution is invariant uner every ermutation of the vertices. (It is well-known that it is equivalent to consier only finite ermutations, i.e., ermutations σ of N that satisfy σ(i) = i for all sufficiently large i, so σ may be regare as a ermutation in S n for some n.) Equivalently, if X ij := 1[ij H] is the inicator of there being an ege ij in H, then the array {X ij }, 1 i,j, is (jointly) exchangeable as efine in Section 1.
13 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 13 Lemma 5.1. Let H be a ranom infinite grah in L. Then the following are equivalent. (i) H is exchangeable. (ii) H [k] has a istribution invariant uner all ermutations of [k], for every k 1. (iii) P ( H [k] = F ) eens only on the isomorhism tye of F, an can thus be seen as a function of F as an unlabelle grah in U k, for every k 1. Proof. (i) = (ii). Immeiate. (ii) = (i). If σ is a finite ermutation of N, then σ restricts to a ermutation of [k] for every large k, an it follows that if H σ is H with the vertices ermute by σ, then, for all large k H σ [k] = H [k] σ = H [k], which imlies H σ = H. (ii) (iii). Trivial. Theorem 5.2. The limit H is Theorem 4.1 is exchangeable. Proof. H satisfies Lemma 5.1(iii). Moreover, Theorem 4.1 imlies the following connection with ranom elements of U. Theorem 5.3. There is a one-to-one corresonence between istributions of ranom elements Γ U (or U ) an istributions of exchangeable ranom infinite grahs H L given by Et in (F,Γ) = P(H [k] = F) (5.1) for every k 1 an every F L k, or, equivalently, Et(F,Γ) = P(H F) (5.2) for every F L. Furthermore, H [n] Γ in U as n. Proof. Note first that (5.1) an (5.2) are equivalent by (2.5) an (2.6), since t(f,γ) = t inj (F,Γ) by (2.10), an H F if an only if H [k] F when F L k. Suose that Γ is a ranom element of U U. Since U is ense in U, there exist (as in the roof of Corollary 3.3) ranom unlabelle grahs G n a.s. such that G n Γ in U an thus v(g n ) a.s. an G n Γ. Hence, Theorems 4.1 an 5.2 show that Ĝn H for some ranom exchangeable infinite grah H satisfying (5.1). Furthermore, (5.1) etermines the istribution of H [k] for every k, an thus the istribution of k. Conversely, if H is an exchangeable ranom infinite grah, let G n = H [n]. By Lemma 5.1(ii), the istribution of each G n is invariant uner ermutations of the vertices, so if Ĝn is G n with a ranom (re)labelling, we have Ĝn = G n. Since G n H in L (because L has a rouct
14 14 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON toology), we thus have Ĝn H in L, so Theorem 4.1 alies an shows the existence of a ranom Γ U such that G n Γ an (5.1) hols. Finally (5.1) etermines the istribution of Γ by Corollary 3.3. Remark 5.1. Moreover, H [n] converges a.s. to some ranom variable Γ U, becauset in (F,H [n] ), n v(f), isareversemartingaleforeveryf Γ. Alternatively, this follows by concentration estimates from the reresentation in Section 6, see Lovász an Szegey [19, Theorem 2.5]. Corollary 5.4. There is a one-to-one corresonence between elements Γ of U = U an extreme oints of the set of istributions of exchangeable ranom infinite grahs H L. This corresonence is given by t(f,γ) = P(H F) (5.3) for every F L. Furthermore, H [n] a.s. Γ in U as n. Proof. The extreme oints of the set of istributions on U are the oint masses, whichareinone-to-onecorresonencewiththeelements ofu. We can characterize these extreme oint istributions of exchangeable ranom infinite grahs as follows. Theorem 5.5. Let H be an exchangeable ranom infinite grah. Then the following are equivalent. (i) The istribution of H is an extreme oint in the set of exchangeable istributions in L. (ii) If F 1 an F 2 are two (finite) grahs with isjoint vertex sets V(F 1 ), V(F 2 ) N, then P(H F 1 F 2 ) = P(H F 1 )P(H F 2 ). (iii) The restrictions H [k] an H [k+1, ) are ineenent for every k. (iv) Let F n be the σ-fiel generate by H [n, ). Then the tail σ-fiel n=1 F n is trivial, i.e., contains only events with robability 0 or 1. Proof. (i) = (ii). By Corollary 5.4, H corresons to some (non-ranom) Γ U such that P(H F) = t(f,γ) (5.4) for every F L. We have efine L such that a grah F L is labelle by 1,...,v(F), but both sies of (5.4) are invariant uner relabelling of F by arbitrary ositive integers; the left han sie because H is exchangeable an the right han sie because t(f,γ) only eens on F as an unlabelle grah. Hence (5.4) hols for every finite grah F with V(F) N. Furthermore, since Γ is non-ranom, Corollary 3.3 yiels t(f 1 F 2,Γ) = t(f 1,Γ)t(F 2,Γ). Hence, P(H F 1 F 2 ) = t(f 1 F 2,Γ) = t(f 1,Γ)t(F 2,Γ) = P(H F 1 )P(H F 2 ). (ii) = (iii). By inclusion exclusion, as for (2.3), (ii) imlies that if 1 k < l <, then for any grahs F 1 an F 2 with V(F 1 ) = {1,...,k}
15 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 15 an V(F 2 ) = {k +1,...,k +l}, the events H [k] = F 1 an H {k+1,...,l} = F 2 are ineenent. Hence H [k] an H {k,...,l} are ineenent for every l > k, an the result follows. (iii) = (iv). Suose A is an event in the tail σ-fiel n=1 F n. Let Fn be the σ-fiel generate by H [n]. By (iii), A is ineenent of Fn for every n, an thus of the σ-fiel F generate by Fn, which equals the σ-fiel F 1 generate by H. However, A F 1, so A is ineenent of itself an thus P(A) = 0 or 1. (iv) = (i). Let F L k for some k an let F n be F with all vertices shiftebyn. ConsierthetwoinicatorsI = 1[H F]anI n = 1[H F n ]. Since I n is F n -measurable, P(H F F n ) = E(II n ) = E ( E(I F n )I n ). (5.5) Moreover, E(I F n ), n = 1,2,..., is a reverse martingale, an thus a.s. ( ) E(I F n ) E I F n = EI, using (iv). Hence, ( E(I F n ) EI ) I n 0 a.s., an by ominate convergence ( (E(I E Fn ) EI ) ) I n 0. Consequently, (5.5) yiels n=1 P(H F F n ) = EIEI n +o(1) = P(H F)P(H F n )+o(1). Moreover, since H is exchangeable, P(H F F n ) (for n v(f)) an P(H F n ) o not een on n, an we obtain as n P(H F F k ) = P(H F) 2. (5.6) Let Γ be a ranom element of U corresoning to H as in Theorem 5.3. By (5.2) an (3.2), (5.6) can be written Et(F,Γ) 2 = ( Et(F,Γ) ) 2. Hence the ranom variable t(f,γ) has variance 0 so it is a.s. constant. Since this hols for every F L, it follows that Γ is a.s. constant, i.e., we can take Γ non-ranom, an (i) follows by Corollary Reresentations of grah limits an exchangeable grahs As sai in the introuction, the exchangeable infinite ranom grahs were characterize by Alous [1] an Hoover [14], see also Kallenberg [15], an the grah limits in U = U were characterize in a very similar way by Lovász an Szegey [19]. We can now make the connection between these two characterizations exlicit. Let W be the set of all measurable functions W : [0,1] 2 [0,1] an let W s be the subset of symmetric functions. For every W W s, we efine
16 16 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON an infinite ranom grah G(,W) L as follows: we first choose a sequence X 1,X 2,... of i.i.. ranom variables uniformly istribute on [0,1], an then, given this sequence, for each air (i,j) with i < j we raw an ege ij with robability W(X i,x j ), ineenently for all airs (i,j) with i < j (conitionally given {X i }). Further, let G(n,W) be the restriction G(,W) [n], which is obtaine by the same construction with a finite sequence X 1,...,X n. It is evient that G(,W) is an exchangeable infinite ranom grah, an the result by Alous an Hoover is that every exchangeable infinite ranom grah is obtaine as a mixtureof such G(,W); in other wors as G(,W) with a ranom W. Consiering again a eterministic W W s, it is evient that Theorem5.5(ii)hols,anthusTheorem5.5anCorollary5.4showthatG(,W) corresons to an element Γ W U. Moreover, by Theorem 5.3 an Remark 5.1, G(n,W) Γ W a.s. as n, an (5.3) shows that if F L k, then t(f,γ W ) = P ( F G(k,W) ) = W(x i,x j )x 1... x k. (6.1) [0,1] k ij E(F) Themainresultof Lovász anszegey [19] isthat every element ofu = U can be obtaine as Γ W satisfying (6.1) for some W W s. It is now clear that the reresentation theorems of Alous Hoover [1, 14] an Lovász an Szegey[19] are connecte by Theorem 5.3 an Corollary 5.4 above, an that one characterization easily follows from the other. Remark 6.1. The reresentations by W are far from unique, see Section 7. Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós an Vesztergombi [8] call an element W W s a grahon. They furtherefineaseuometric (calle thecut-istance) on W s an show that if we consier the quotient sace Ŵs obtaine by ientifying elements with cut-istance 0, we obtain a comact metric sace, an the maing W Γ W yiels a bijection Ŵs U = U, which furthermore is a homeomorhism. Remark 6.2. As remarke in Lovász an Szegey [19], we can more generally consier a symmetric measurable function W : S 2 [0,1] for any robability sace (S,µ), an efine G(,W) as above with X i i.i.. ranom variables in S with istribution µ. This oes not give any new limit objectsg(,w)orγ W, sincewejustsaithateverylimitobjectisobtaine from some W W s, but they can sometimes give useful reresentations. An interesting case is when W is the ajacency matrix of a (finite) grah G, with S = V(G) an µ the uniform measure on S; we thus let X i be i.i.. ranom vertices of G an G(n,W) equals the ranom grah G[n] efine in Section 2. It follows from (6.1) an (2.1) that t(f,γ W ) = t(f,g) for every F U, an thus Γ W = G as elements of U. In other wors, Γ W U = π(g), the ghost of G in U = U.
17 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 17 Remark 6.3. For the asymtotic behavior of G(n,W) in another, sarse, case, with W eening on n, see [3]. 7. Non-uniqueness The functions W on [0,1] 2 use to reresent grah limits or exchangeable arrays are far from unique. (For a secial case when there is a natural canonical choice, which much simlifies an hels alications, see [12].) For examle, it is obvious that if ϕ : [0,1] [0,1] is any measure reserving ma, then W an W ϕ, efine by W ϕ(x,y) := W ( ϕ(x),ϕ(y) ), efine the same grah limit an the same (in istribution) exchangeable array. Although in rincile, this is the only source on non-uniqueness, the etails are more comlicate, mainly because the measure reserving ma ϕ oes not have to be a bijection, an thus the relation W = W ϕ is not symmetric: it can hol without there being a measure reserving ma ϕ such that W = W ϕ. (For a 1-imensional examle, consier f(x) = x an f (x) = ϕ(x) = 2x mo 1; for a 2-imensional examle, let W(x,y) = f(x)f(y) an W (x,y) = f (x)f (y).) For exchangeable arrays, the equivalence roblem was solve by Hoover [14], who gave a criterion which in our case reuces to (vi) below; this criterion involves an auxiliary variable, an can be interrete as saying W = W ϕ for a ranom ϕ. This work was continue by Kallenberg, see [15], who gave a robabilistic roof an ae criterion(v). For grah limits, Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós an Vesztergombi [8] gave the criterion (vii) in terms of the cut-istance, an Bollobás an Rioran [4] foun the criterion (v) in this context. Further, Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós an Vesztergombi [8] announce the relate criterion that there exists a measurable function U : [0,1] 2 [0,1] an two measure reserving mas ϕ,ϕ : [0,1] [0,1] such that W = U ϕ an W = U ϕ a.e.; the roof of this will aear in [5]. As in Section 6, these two lines of work are connecte by the results in Section 5, an we can combine the revious results as follows. Theorem 7.1. Let W,W W s. Then the following are equivalent. (i) Γ W = Γ W for the grah limits Γ W,Γ W U. (ii) t(f,γ W ) = t(f,γ W ) for every grah F. (iii) The exchangeable ranom infinite grahs G(,W) an G(,W ) have the same istribution. (iv) The ranom grahs G(n,W) an G(n,W ) have the same istribution for every finite n. (v) There exist measure reserving mas ϕ,ϕ : [0,1] [0,1] such that W ϕ = W ϕ a.e. on [0,1] 2, i.e., W ( ϕ(x),ϕ(y) ) = W ( ϕ (x),ϕ (y) ) a.e. (vi) There exists a measure reserving ma ψ : [0,1] 2 [0,1] such that W(x 1,x 2 ) = W ( ψ(x 1,y 1 ),ψ(x 2,y 2 ) ) a.e. on [0,1] 4. (vii) δ (W,W ) = 0, where δ is the cut-istance efine in [8].
18 18 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON Proof. (i) (ii). By our efinition of U U. (i) (iii). By Corollary 5.4. (iii) (iv). Obvious. (v) = (iii). If X 1,X 2,... are i.i.. ranom variables uniformly istribute on [0,1], then so are ϕ(x 1 ),ϕ(x 2 ),..., an thus G(,W) G(,W ϕ) = G(,W ϕ ) = G(,W ). (iii) = (v). The general form of the reresentation theorem as state in [15, Theorem 7.15, see also. 304] is (in our two-imensional case) X ij = f(ξ,ξ i,ξ j,ξ ij ) for a function f : [0,1] 4 [0,1], symmetric in the two mile variables, an ineenent ranom variables ξ, ξ i (1 i) an ξ ij (1 i < j), all uniformly istribute on [0,1], an where we further let ξ ji = ξ ij for j > i. We can write the construction of G(,W) in this form with f(ξ,ξ i,ξ j,ξ ij ) = 1[ξ ij W(ξ i,ξ j )]. (7.1) Note that this f oes not een on ξ. (In general, ξ is neee for the case of a ranom W, which can be written as a eterministic function of ξ, but this is not neee in the resent theorem.) Suosethat G(,W) = G(,W ), let f begiven by W by (7.1), anlet similarly f be given by W ; for notational convenience we write W 1 := W, W 2 := W, f 1 := f an f 2 := f. The equivalence theorem [15, Theorem 7.28] takes the form, using (7.1), that there exist measurable functions g k,0 : [0,1] [0,1], g k,1 : [0,1] 2 [0,1] an g k,2 : [0,1] 4 [0,1], for k = 1,2, that are measure reserving in the last coorinate for any fixe values of the other coorinates, an such that the two functions (for k = 1 an k = 2) f k ( gk,0 (ξ ),g k,1 (ξ,ξ 1 ),g k,1 (ξ,ξ 2 ),g k,2 (ξ,ξ 1,ξ 2,ξ 12 ) ) = 1 [ W k ( gk,1 (ξ,ξ 1 ),g k,1 (ξ,ξ 2 ) ) g k,2 (ξ,ξ 1,ξ 2,ξ 12 ) ] area.s.equal. Conitioneonξ,ξ 1 anξ 2, theranomvariableg k,2 (ξ,ξ 1,ξ 2,ξ 12 ) is uniformly istribute on [0,1], an it follows (e.g., by taking the conitional exectation) that a.s. W 1 ( g1,1 (ξ,ξ 1 ),g 1,1 (ξ,ξ 2 ) ) = W 2 ( g2,1 (ξ,ξ 1 ),g 2,1 (ξ,ξ 2 ) ). For a.e. value x 0 of ξ, this thus hols for a.e. values of ξ 1 an ξ 2, an we may choose ϕ(x) = g 1,1 (x 0,x) an ϕ (x) := g 2,1 (x 0,x) for some such x 0. (iii) (vi). Similar, using [15, Theorem 7.28(iii)]. (ii) (vii). See [8]. 8. Biartite grahs The efinitions an results above have analogues for biartite grahs, which we give in this section, leaving some etails to the reaer. The roofs are straightforwar analogues of the ones given above an are omitte. Alications of the results of this section to ranom ifference grahs are in [12]. =
19 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 19 A biartite grah will be a grah with an exlicit biartition; in other wors, a biartite grah G consists of two vertex sets V 1 (G) an V 2 (G) an an ege set E(G) V 1 (G) V 2 (G); we let v 1 (G) := V 1 (G) an v 2 (G) := V 2 (G) be the numbers of vertices in the two sets. Again we consier both the labelle an unlabelle cases; in the labelle case we assume the labels of the vertices in V j (G) are 1,...,v j (G) for j = 1,2. Let B L n 1 n 2 be the set of the 2 n 1n 2 labelle biartite grahs with vertex sets [n 1 ] an [n 2 ], an let B n1 n 2 be the quotient set B L n 1 n 2 / = of unlabelle biartite grahs with n 1 an n 2 vertices in the two arts; further, let B L := n 1,n 2 1 BL n 1 n 2 an B := n 1,n 2 1 B n 1 n 2. We let G[k 1,k 2 ] be the ranom grah in B L k 1 k 2 obtaine by samling k j vertices from V j (G) (j = 1,2), uniformly with relacement, an let, roviek j v j (G), G[k 1,k 2 ] bethecorresoningranom grahobtaine by samling without relacement. We then efine t(f,g), t inj (F,G) an t in (F,G) for (unlabelle) biartite grahs F an G in analogy with (2.1) (2.3). Then (2.4) (2.6) still hol, mutatis mutanis; for examle, t(f,g) tinj (F,G) v 1 (F) 2 2v 1 (G) + v 2(F) 2 2v 2 (G). (8.1) In analogy with (2.7), we now efine τ : B [0,1] B by τ(g) := (t(f,g)) F B [0,1] B. (8.2) We efine B := τ(b) [0,1] B to be the image of B uner this maing τ, an let B be the closure of B in [0,1] B ; this is a comact metric sace. Again, τ is not injective; we may consier a grah G as an element of B by ientifying G an τ(g), but this imlies ientification of some grahs of ifferent orers an we refer to avoi it. We let B + be the union of B an some two-oint set { 1, 2 } an consier the maing τ + : B [0,1] B+ = [0,1] B [0,1] [0,1] efine by τ + (G) = ( τ(g), v 1 (G) 1, v 2 (G) 1). (8.3) Then τ + is injective an we can ientify B with its image τ + (B) [0,1] B+ an efine B [0,1] B+ as its closure; this is a comact metric sace. The functions t(f, ), t inj (F, ), t in (F, ) an v j ( ) 1, for F B an j = 1, 2, have unique continuous extensions to B. We let B := {G B : v 1 (G) = v 2 (G) = }; this is the set of all limit objects of sequences (G n ) in B with v 1 (G n ),v 2 (G n ). By (8.1), t inj (F,G) = t(f,g) for every G B an every F B. The rojection π : B B restricts to a homeomorhism B = B. Remark 8.1. Note that in the biartite case there are other limit objects too in B; in fact, B can be artitione into B, B, an the sets B n, B n, for n = 1,2,..., where, for examle, B n1 is the set of limits of sequences (G n ) of biartitegrahssuch thatv 2 (G n ) butv 1 (G n ) = n 1 is constant. We will not consier such egenerate limits further here, but we remark that
20 20 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON in the simlest case n 1 = 1, a biartite grah in B L 1n 2 can be ientifie with a subset of [n 2 ], an an unlabelle grah in B 1n2 thus with a number in m {0,...,n 2 }, the number of eges in the grah, an it is easily seen that a sequence of such unlabelle grahs with n 2 converges in B if an only if the roortion m/n 2 converges; hence we can ientify B 1 with the interval [0,1]. We have the following basic result, cf. Theorem 2.1. Theorem 8.1. Let (G n ) be a sequence of biartite grahs with v 1 (G n ), v 2 (G n ). Then the following are equivalent. (i) t(f,g n ) converges for every F B. (ii) t inj (F,G n ) converges for every F B. (iii) t in (F,G n ) converges for every F B. (iv) G n converges in B. In this case, the limit G of G n belongs to B an the limits in (i), (iii) an (iii) are t(f,g), t inj (F,G) an t in (F,G). For convergence of ranom unlabelle biartite grahs, the results in Section 3 hol with trivial changes. Theorem 8.2. Let G n, n 1, be ranom unlabelle biartite grahs an assume that v 1 (G n ),v 2 (G n ). The following are equivalent, as n. (i) G n Γ for some ranom Γ B. (ii) For every finite family F 1,...,F m of (non-ranom) biartite grahs, the ranom variables t(f 1,G n ),...,t(f m,g n ) converge jointly in istribution. (iii) For every (non-ranom) F B, the ranom variables t(f,g n ) converge in istribution. (iv) For every (non-ranom) F B, the exectations Et(F,G n ) converge. If these roerties hol, then the limits in (ii), (iii) an (iv) are ( t(f i,γ) ) m i=1, t(f,γ) an Et(F,Γ), resectively. Furthermore, Γ B a.s. The same results hol if t is relace by t inj or t in. Corollary 8.3. Let G n, n 1, be ranom unlabelle biartite grahs such that v 1 (G n ),v 2 (G n ), an let G B. The following are equivalent, as n. (i) G n G. (ii) t(f,g n ) t(f,g) for every (non-ranom) F B. (iii) Et(F,G n ) t(f,g) for every (non-ranom) F B. The same result hols if t is relace by t inj or t in. As above, the istribution of Γ is uniquely etermine by the numbers Et(F,Γ), F B.
21 GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS 21 Let B L enote the set of all labelle infinite biartite grahs with the vertex sets V 1 (G) = V 2 (G) = N. B L is a comact metric sace with the natural rouct toology. If G is a biartite grah, let Ĝ be the ranom labelle biartite grah obtaine by ranom labellings of the vertices in V j (G) by the numbers 1,...,v j (G), for j = 1,2. This is a ranom finite biartite grah, but we can also regar it as a ranom element of B L by aing isolate vertices. Definition. A ranom infinite biartite grah H B L is exchangeable if its istribution is invariant uner every air of finite ermutations of V 1 (H) an V 2 (H). Theorem 8.4. Let (G n ) be a sequence of ranom grahs in B an assume that v 1 (G n ),v 2 (G n ). Then the following are equivalent. (i) G n Γ in B for some ranom Γ B. (ii) Ĝn H in B L for some ranom H BL. If these hol, then P(H [k1 ] [k 2 ] = F) = Et in (F,Γ) for every F B L k 1 k 2. Furthermore, Γ B a.s., an H is exchangeable. Theorem 8.5. There is a one-to-one corresonence between istributions of ranom elements Γ B (or B ) an istributions of exchangeable ranom infinite grahs H B L given by Et in (F,Γ) = P(H [k1 ] [k 2 ] = F) (8.4) for every k 1,k 2 1 an every F B L k 1 k 2, or, equivalently, for every F B L. Furthermore, H [n1 ] [n 2 ] Et(F,Γ) = P(H F) (8.5) Γ in B as n 1,n 2. Corollary 8.6. There is a one-to-one corresonence between elements Γ of B = B an extreme oints of the set of istributions of exchangeable ranom infinite grahs H B L. This corresonence is given by for every F B L. Furthermore, H [n1 ] [n 2 ] t(f,γ) = P(H F) (8.6) Γ in B as n 1,n 2. a.s. Remark 8.2. We have not checke whether H [n1 ] [n 2 ] Γ in B as n 1,n 2. This hols at least for a subsequence (n 1 (m),n 2 (m)) with both n 1 (m) an n 2 (m) non-ecreasing because then t inj (F,H [n1 ] [n 2 ]) is a reverse martingale. Theorem 8.7. Let H be an exchangeable ranom infinite biartite grah. Then the following are equivalent. (i) The istribution of H is an extreme oint in the set of exchangeable istributions in B L.
22 22 PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON (ii) If F 1 an F 2 are two (finite) biartite grahs with the vertex sets V j (F 1 ) an V j (F 2 ) isjoint subsets of N for j = 1,2, then P(H F 1 F 2 ) = P(H F 1 )P(H F 2 ). The construction in Section 6 takes the following form; note that there is no nee to assume symmetry of W. For every W W, we efine an infinite ranom biartite grah G(,,W) B L as follows: we first choose two sequence X 1,X 2,... an Y 1,Y 2,... of i.i.. ranom variables uniformly istribute on [0, 1], an then, given these sequences, for each air (i,j) N N we raw an ege ij with robability W(X i,y j ), ineenently for all airs (i,j). Further, let G(n 1,n 2,W) be the restriction G(,,W) [n1 ] [n 2 ], which is obtaine by the same construction with finite sequences X 1,...,X n1 an Y 1,...,Y n2. It is evient that G(,,W) is an exchangeable infinite ranom biartite grah. Furthermore, it satisfies Theorem 8.7(ii). Theorem 8.5 an Corollary 8.6 yiel a corresoning element Γ W B = B such that G(n 1,n 2,W) Γ W as n 1,n 2 an, for every F Bk L 1 k 2, t(f,γ W ) = W(x i,y j )x 1... x k1 y 1... y k2. (8.7) [0,1] k 1 +k 2 ij E(F) The result by Alous [1] in the non-symmetric case is that every exchangeable infinite ranom biartite grah is obtaine as a mixture of such G(,,W); in other wors as G(,,W) with a ranom W. By Theorem 8.5 an Corollary 8.6 above, this imlies (an is imlie by) the fact that every element of B equals Γ W for some (non-unique) W W; the biartite version of the characterization by Lovász an Szegey [19]. 9. Directe grahs A irecte grah G consists of a vertex set V(G) an an ege set E(G) V(G) V(G); the ege inicators thus form an arbitrary zero one matrix {X ij }, i,j V(G). Note that we allow loos, corresoning to the iagonal inicators X ii. Theefinitions an results above have analogues for irecte grahs too, with mainly notational ifferences. We sketch these in this section, leaving the etails to the reaer. Let D L n be the set of the 2n2 labelle irecte grahs with vertex set [n] an let D n be the quotient set D L n/ = of unlabelle irecte grahs with n vertices; further, let D L := n 1 DL n an D := n 1 D n. The efinitions in Section 2 aly to irecte grahs too, with at most notational ifferences. G[k] an G[k] now are ranom irecte grahs an t(f,g), t inj (F,G) an t in (F,G) are efine for (unlabelle) irecte grahs F an G by (2.1) (2.3). We now efine τ : D [0,1] D by, cf. (2.7), τ(g) := (t(f,g)) F D [0,1] D. (9.1)
GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS
GRAPH LIMITS AND EXCHANGEABLE RANDOM GRAPHS PERSI DIACONIS AND SVANTE JANSON Abstract. We evelo a clear connection between efinetti s theorem for exchangeable arrays (work of Alous Hoover Kallenberg) an
More informationLecture 6 : Dimensionality Reduction
CPS290: Algorithmic Founations of Data Science February 3, 207 Lecture 6 : Dimensionality Reuction Lecturer: Kamesh Munagala Scribe: Kamesh Munagala In this lecture, we will consier the roblem of maing
More informationMod p 3 analogues of theorems of Gauss and Jacobi on binomial coefficients
ACTA ARITHMETICA 2.2 (200 Mo 3 analogues of theorems of Gauss an Jacobi on binomial coefficients by John B. Cosgrave (Dublin an Karl Dilcher (Halifax. Introuction. One of the most remarkable congruences
More informationConvergence of random variables, and the Borel-Cantelli lemmas
Stat 205A Setember, 12, 2002 Convergence of ranom variables, an the Borel-Cantelli lemmas Lecturer: James W. Pitman Scribes: Jin Kim (jin@eecs) 1 Convergence of ranom variables Recall that, given a sequence
More informationConsistency and asymptotic normality
Consistency an asymtotic normality Class notes for Econ 842 Robert e Jong March 2006 1 Stochastic convergence The asymtotic theory of minimization estimators relies on various theorems from mathematical
More informationON CONVERGENCE FOR GRAPHEXES
ON CONVERGENCE FOR GRAPHEXES SVANTE JANSON Abstract. We stuy four ifferent notions of convergence for graphexes, recently introuce by Borgs, Chayes, Cohn an Holen, an by Veitch an Roy. We give some properties
More information7. Introduction to Large Sample Theory
7. Introuction to Large Samle Theory Hayashi. 88-97/109-133 Avance Econometrics I, Autumn 2010, Large-Samle Theory 1 Introuction We looke at finite-samle roerties of the OLS estimator an its associate
More informationLenny Jones Department of Mathematics, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania Daniel White
#A10 INTEGERS 1A (01): John Selfrige Memorial Issue SIERPIŃSKI NUMBERS IN IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS Lenny Jones Deartment of Mathematics, Shiensburg University, Shiensburg, Pennsylvania lkjone@shi.eu
More informationElementary Analysis in Q p
Elementary Analysis in Q Hannah Hutter, May Szedlák, Phili Wirth November 17, 2011 This reort follows very closely the book of Svetlana Katok 1. 1 Sequences and Series In this section we will see some
More informationColin Cameron: Brief Asymptotic Theory for 240A
Colin Cameron: Brief Asymtotic Theory for 240A For 240A we o not go in to great etail. Key OLS results are in Section an 4. The theorems cite in sections 2 an 3 are those from Aenix A of Cameron an Trivei
More informationColin Cameron: Asymptotic Theory for OLS
Colin Cameron: Asymtotic Theory for OLS. OLS Estimator Proerties an Samling Schemes.. A Roama Consier the OLS moel with just one regressor y i = βx i + u i. The OLS estimator b β = ³ P P i= x iy i canbewrittenas
More informationBivariate distributions characterized by one family of conditionals and conditional percentile or mode functions
Journal of Multivariate Analysis 99 2008) 1383 1392 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmva Bivariate istributions characterize by one family of conitionals an conitional ercentile or moe functions Barry C. Arnol
More informationThe Effect of a Finite Measurement Volume on Power Spectra from a Burst Type LDA
The Effect of a Finite Measurement Volume on Power Sectra from a Burst Tye LDA Preben Buchhave 1,*, Clara M. Velte, an William K. George 3 1. Intarsia Otics, Birkerø, Denmark. Technical University of Denmark,
More information6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first order ODE
6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first orer ODE Here we embark on stuying the autonomous system of two first orer ifferential equations of the form ẋ 1 = f 1 (, x 2 ), ẋ 2 = f 2 (, x
More informationLearning Markov Graphs Up To Edit Distance
Learning Markov Grahs U To Eit Distance Abhik Das, Praneeth Netraalli, Sujay Sanghavi an Sriram Vishwanath Deartment of ECE, The University of Texas at Austin, USA Abstract This aer resents a rate istortion
More informationEconometrics I. September, Part I. Department of Economics Stanford University
Econometrics I Deartment of Economics Stanfor University Setember, 2008 Part I Samling an Data Poulation an Samle. ineenent an ientical samling. (i.i..) Samling with relacement. aroximates samling without
More informationDigitally delicate primes
Digitally elicate rimes Jackson Hoer Paul Pollack Deartment of Mathematics University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 30602 Tao has shown that in any fixe base, a ositive roortion of rime numbers cannot have
More information3 Properties of Dedekind domains
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #3 09/15/2016 3 Proerties of Dedekind domains In the revious lecture we defined a Dedekind domain as a noetherian domain A that satisfies either of the following
More informationA method of constructing the half-rate QC-LDPC codes with linear encoder, maximum column weight three and inevitable girth 26
Communications 20; 2(): 22-4 Publishe online January 1 2015 (htt://www.scienceublishinggrou.com/j/com) oi: 10.11648/j.com.20020.11 ISSN: 228-5966 (Print); ISSN: 228-592 (Online) A metho of constructing
More informationProbabilistic Learning
Statistical Machine Learning Notes 11 Instructor: Justin Domke Probabilistic Learning Contents 1 Introuction 2 2 Maximum Likelihoo 2 3 Examles of Maximum Likelihoo 3 3.1 Binomial......................................
More informationCombinatorica 9(1)(1989) A New Lower Bound for Snake-in-the-Box Codes. Jerzy Wojciechowski. AMS subject classification 1980: 05 C 35, 94 B 25
Combinatorica 9(1)(1989)91 99 A New Lower Boun for Snake-in-the-Box Coes Jerzy Wojciechowski Department of Pure Mathematics an Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambrige, 16 Mill Lane, Cambrige, CB2
More informationON THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF DIVISORS OF REDUCIBLE QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS
ON THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF DIVISORS OF REDUCIBLE QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS KOSTADINKA LAPKOVA Abstract. We give an asymtotic formula for the ivisor sum c
More informationApproximating min-max k-clustering
Aroximating min-max k-clustering Asaf Levin July 24, 2007 Abstract We consider the roblems of set artitioning into k clusters with minimum total cost and minimum of the maximum cost of a cluster. The cost
More informationLECTURE 7 NOTES. x n. d x if. E [g(x n )] E [g(x)]
LECTURE 7 NOTES 1. Convergence of random variables. Before delving into the large samle roerties of the MLE, we review some concets from large samle theory. 1. Convergence in robability: x n x if, for
More informationApplication of Measurement System R&R Analysis in Ultrasonic Testing
17th Worl Conference on Nonestructive Testing, 5-8 Oct 8, Shanghai, China Alication of Measurement System & Analysis in Ultrasonic Testing iao-hai ZHANG, Bing-ya CHEN, Yi ZHU Deartment of Testing an Control
More informationMATH 6210: SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM SET #3
MATH 6210: SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM SET #3 Rudin, Chater 4, Problem #3. The sace L (T) is searable since the trigonometric olynomials with comlex coefficients whose real and imaginary arts are rational form
More informationSECTION 5: FIBRATIONS AND HOMOTOPY FIBERS
SECTION 5: FIBRATIONS AND HOMOTOPY FIBERS In this section we will introduce two imortant classes of mas of saces, namely the Hurewicz fibrations and the more general Serre fibrations, which are both obtained
More informationu!i = a T u = 0. Then S satisfies
Deterministic Conitions for Subspace Ientifiability from Incomplete Sampling Daniel L Pimentel-Alarcón, Nigel Boston, Robert D Nowak University of Wisconsin-Maison Abstract Consier an r-imensional subspace
More informationConsistency and asymptotic normality
Consistency an ymtotic normality Cls notes for Econ 842 Robert e Jong Aril 2007 1 Stochtic convergence The ymtotic theory of minimization estimators relies on various theorems from mathematical statistics.
More informationThe Longest Run of Heads
The Longest Run of Heads Review by Amarioarei Alexandru This aer is a review of older and recent results concerning the distribution of the longest head run in a coin tossing sequence, roblem that arise
More informationProbabilistic Learning
Statistical Machine Learning Notes 10 Instructor: Justin Domke Probabilistic Learning Contents 1 Introuction 2 2 Maximum Likelihoo 2 3 Examles of Maximum Likelihoo 3 3.1 Binomial......................................
More informationOn the Toppling of a Sand Pile
Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Comuter Science Proceedings AA (DM-CCG), 2001, 275 286 On the Toling of a Sand Pile Jean-Christohe Novelli 1 and Dominique Rossin 2 1 CNRS, LIFL, Bâtiment M3, Université
More informationA Simple Exchange Economy with Complex Dynamics
FH-Kiel Universitf Alie Sciences Prof. Dr. Anreas Thiemer, 00 e-mail: anreas.thiemer@fh-kiel.e A Simle Exchange Economy with Comlex Dynamics (Revision: Aril 00) Summary: Mukherji (999) shows that a stanar
More informationLecture 6. 2 Recurrence/transience, harmonic functions and martingales
Lecture 6 Classification of states We have shown that all states of an irreducible countable state Markov chain must of the same tye. This gives rise to the following classification. Definition. [Classification
More informationOn the number of isolated eigenvalues of a pair of particles in a quantum wire
On the number of isolate eigenvalues of a pair of particles in a quantum wire arxiv:1812.11804v1 [math-ph] 31 Dec 2018 Joachim Kerner 1 Department of Mathematics an Computer Science FernUniversität in
More informationTHE ZEROS OF A QUADRATIC FORM AT SQUARE-FREE POINTS
THE ZEROS OF A QUADRATIC FORM AT SQUARE-FREE POINTS R. C. BAKER Abstract. Let F(x 1,..., x n be a nonsingular inefinite quaratic form, n = 3 or 4. Results are obtaine on the number of solutions of F(x
More informationMATH 2710: NOTES FOR ANALYSIS
MATH 270: NOTES FOR ANALYSIS The main ideas we will learn from analysis center around the idea of a limit. Limits occurs in several settings. We will start with finite limits of sequences, then cover infinite
More informationThe thermal wind 1. v g
The thermal win The thermal win Introuction The geostrohic win is etermine by the graient of the isobars (on a horizontal surface) or isohyses (on a ressure surface). On a ressure surface the graient of
More informationConvergence Analysis of Terminal ILC in the z Domain
25 American Control Conference June 8-, 25 Portlan, OR, USA WeA63 Convergence Analysis of erminal LC in the Domain Guy Gauthier, an Benoit Boulet, Member, EEE Abstract his aer shows how we can aly -transform
More informationHe s Homotopy Perturbation Method for solving Linear and Non-Linear Fredholm Integro-Differential Equations
nternational Journal of Theoretical an Alie Mathematics 2017; 3(6): 174-181 htt://www.scienceublishinggrou.com/j/ijtam oi: 10.11648/j.ijtam.20170306.11 SSN: 2575-5072 (Print); SSN: 2575-5080 (Online) He
More informationLinear First-Order Equations
5 Linear First-Orer Equations Linear first-orer ifferential equations make up another important class of ifferential equations that commonly arise in applications an are relatively easy to solve (in theory)
More informationTowards understanding the Lorenz curve using the Uniform distribution. Chris J. Stephens. Newcastle City Council, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Towards understanding the Lorenz curve using the Uniform distribution Chris J. Stehens Newcastle City Council, Newcastle uon Tyne, UK (For the Gini-Lorenz Conference, University of Siena, Italy, May 2005)
More informationALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY MASTERMATH (FALL 2014) Written exam, 21/01/2015, 3 hours Outline of solutions
ALGERAIC TOPOLOGY MASTERMATH FALL 014) Written exam, 1/01/015, 3 hours Outline of solutions Exercise 1. i) There are various definitions in the literature. ased on the discussion on. 5 of Lecture 3, as
More informationJUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) A.J.Hobson
JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 10.2 DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) by A.J.Hobson 10.2.1 Introuction 10.2.2 Average rates of change 10.2.3 Instantaneous rates of change 10.2.4 Derivatives 10.2.5 Exercises
More informationSurvey Sampling. 1 Design-based Inference. Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University. February 19, 2013
Survey Sampling Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University February 19, 2013 Survey sampling is one of the most commonly use ata collection methos for social scientists. We begin by escribing
More informationElliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #1 Due: 02/13/2015
18.783 Ellitic Curves Sring 2015 Problem Set #1 Due: 02/13/2015 Descrition These roblems are related to the material covered in Lectures 1-2. Some of them require the use of Sage, and you will need to
More informationChromatic number for a generalization of Cartesian product graphs
Chromatic number for a generalization of Cartesian prouct graphs Daniel Král Douglas B. West Abstract Let G be a class of graphs. The -fol gri over G, enote G, is the family of graphs obtaine from -imensional
More informationON FREIMAN S 2.4-THEOREM
ON FREIMAN S 2.4-THEOREM ØYSTEIN J. RØDSETH Abstract. Gregory Freiman s celebrated 2.4-Theorem says that if A is a set of residue classes modulo a rime satisfying 2A 2.4 A 3 and A < /35, then A is contained
More informationSharp Thresholds. Zachary Hamaker. March 15, 2010
Sharp Threshols Zachary Hamaker March 15, 2010 Abstract The Kolmogorov Zero-One law states that for tail events on infinite-imensional probability spaces, the probability must be either zero or one. Behavior
More informationA review of the foundations of perfectoid spaces
A review of the foundations of erfectoid saces (Notes for some talks in the Fargues Fontaine curve study grou at Harvard, Oct./Nov. 2017) Matthew Morrow Abstract We give a reasonably detailed overview
More informationVarious Proofs for the Decrease Monotonicity of the Schatten s Power Norm, Various Families of R n Norms and Some Open Problems
Int. J. Oen Problems Comt. Math., Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2010 ISSN 1998-6262; Coyright c ICSRS Publication, 2010 www.i-csrs.org Various Proofs for the Decrease Monotonicity of the Schatten s Power Norm, Various
More informationWitt#5: Around the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 (21 April 2013), not completed, not proofread]
Witt vectors. Part 1 Michiel Hazewinkel Sienotes by Darij Grinberg Witt#5: Aroun the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 21 April 2013, not complete, not proofrea In [1, section 9.93, Hazewinkel states
More informationSums of independent random variables
3 Sums of indeendent random variables This lecture collects a number of estimates for sums of indeendent random variables with values in a Banach sace E. We concentrate on sums of the form N γ nx n, where
More informationSubmitted to the Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, January, 2006 NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF PLUNGING OF DENSITY FLOWS
Submitte to the Journal of Hyraulic Engineering, ASCE, January, 006 NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF PLUNGING OF DENSITY FLOWS Gary Parker 1, Member, ASCE an Horacio Toniolo ABSTRACT This note is evote to the correction
More informationMath 751 Lecture Notes Week 3
Math 751 Lecture Notes Week 3 Setember 25, 2014 1 Fundamental grou of a circle Theorem 1. Let φ : Z π 1 (S 1 ) be given by n [ω n ], where ω n : I S 1 R 2 is the loo ω n (s) = (cos(2πns), sin(2πns)). Then
More informationAcute sets in Euclidean spaces
Acute sets in Eucliean spaces Viktor Harangi April, 011 Abstract A finite set H in R is calle an acute set if any angle etermine by three points of H is acute. We examine the maximal carinality α() of
More informationSelection principles and the Minimal Tower problem
Note i Matematica 22, n. 2, 2003, 53 81. Selection principles an the Minimal Tower problem Boaz Tsaban i Department of Mathematics an Computer Science, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel tsaban@macs.biu.ac.il,
More informationIterated Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially
Iterate Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially Joshua Cooper an Mark Walters July 9, 008 Abstract Begin with a set of four points in the real plane in general position. A to this collection
More informationIMPROVED BOUNDS IN THE SCALED ENFLO TYPE INEQUALITY FOR BANACH SPACES
IMPROVED BOUNDS IN THE SCALED ENFLO TYPE INEQUALITY FOR BANACH SPACES OHAD GILADI AND ASSAF NAOR Abstract. It is shown that if (, ) is a Banach sace with Rademacher tye 1 then for every n N there exists
More informationRobust hamiltonicity of random directed graphs
Robust hamiltonicity of random directed grahs Asaf Ferber Rajko Nenadov Andreas Noever asaf.ferber@inf.ethz.ch rnenadov@inf.ethz.ch anoever@inf.ethz.ch Ueli Peter ueter@inf.ethz.ch Nemanja Škorić nskoric@inf.ethz.ch
More informationLECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES
LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES In this section we will introduce the interesting class o ibrations given by iber bundles. Fiber bundles lay an imortant role in many geometric contexts. For examle, the Grassmaniann
More informationThe average number of spanning trees in sparse graphs with given degrees
The average number of spanning trees in sparse graphs with given egrees Catherine Greenhill School of Mathematics an Statistics UNSW Australia Syney NSW 05, Australia cgreenhill@unsweuau Matthew Kwan Department
More informationApplications to stochastic PDE
15 Alications to stochastic PE In this final lecture we resent some alications of the theory develoed in this course to stochastic artial differential equations. We concentrate on two secific examles:
More informationThe Exact Form and General Integrating Factors
7 The Exact Form an General Integrating Factors In the previous chapters, we ve seen how separable an linear ifferential equations can be solve using methos for converting them to forms that can be easily
More informationRobust Forward Algorithms via PAC-Bayes and Laplace Distributions. ω Q. Pr (y(ω x) < 0) = Pr A k
A Proof of Lemma 2 B Proof of Lemma 3 Proof: Since the support of LL istributions is R, two such istributions are equivalent absolutely continuous with respect to each other an the ivergence is well-efine
More informationQuaternionic Projective Space (Lecture 34)
Quaternionic Projective Sace (Lecture 34) July 11, 2008 The three-shere S 3 can be identified with SU(2), and therefore has the structure of a toological grou. In this lecture, we will address the question
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.pr] 28 Jan 2018
Submitte to the Annals of Probability WAVELET ANALYSIS OF THE BESOV REGULARITY OF LÉVY WHITE NOISES arxiv:80.09245v [math.pr] 28 Jan 208 By Shayan Azizneja, Julien Fageot an Michael Unser Ecole olytechnique
More informationLeast-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces
Least-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces Yuri Grinberg, Mahi Milani Far, Joelle Pineau School of Computer Science McGill University Montreal, Canaa {ygrinb,mmilan1,jpineau}@cs.mcgill.ca 1 Introuction
More informationON THE NORM OF AN IDEMPOTENT SCHUR MULTIPLIER ON THE SCHATTEN CLASS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 000-9939XX)0000-0 ON THE NORM OF AN IDEMPOTENT SCHUR MULTIPLIER ON THE SCHATTEN CLASS WILLIAM D. BANKS AND ASMA HARCHARRAS
More information4. Score normalization technical details We now discuss the technical details of the score normalization method.
SMT SCORING SYSTEM This document describes the scoring system for the Stanford Math Tournament We begin by giving an overview of the changes to scoring and a non-technical descrition of the scoring rules
More informationConvergence of Random Walks
Chapter 16 Convergence of Ranom Walks This lecture examines the convergence of ranom walks to the Wiener process. This is very important both physically an statistically, an illustrates the utility of
More informationUniform Law on the Unit Sphere of a Banach Space
Uniform Law on the Unit Shere of a Banach Sace by Bernard Beauzamy Société de Calcul Mathématique SA Faubourg Saint Honoré 75008 Paris France Setember 008 Abstract We investigate the construction of a
More informationLower Bounds for the Smoothed Number of Pareto optimal Solutions
Lower Bouns for the Smoothe Number of Pareto optimal Solutions Tobias Brunsch an Heiko Röglin Department of Computer Science, University of Bonn, Germany brunsch@cs.uni-bonn.e, heiko@roeglin.org Abstract.
More informationSkiba without unstable equlibrium in a linear quadratic framework
Skiba without unstable equlibrium in a linear quaratic framework Richar F. Hartl Institute of Management, University of Vienna, Brünnerstraße 8, -0 Vienna, ustria Richar.Hartl@univie.ac.at Tel. +43--477-3809
More informationCMSC 425: Lecture 4 Geometry and Geometric Programming
CMSC 425: Lecture 4 Geometry and Geometric Programming Geometry for Game Programming and Grahics: For the next few lectures, we will discuss some of the basic elements of geometry. There are many areas
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 15, JULY 10
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 15, JULY 10 5. Levi-Civita connection From now on we are intereste in connections on the tangent bunle T X of a Riemanninam manifol (X, g). Out main result will be a construction
More informationLATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION
The Annals of Statistics 1997, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2313 2327 LATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION By Eva Riccomagno, 1 Rainer Schwabe 2 an Henry P. Wynn 1 University of Warwick, Technische
More informationMath 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan
Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan 6 Wave equation: solution In this lecture we will solve the wave equation on the entire real line x R. This correspons to a string of infinite
More informationSolution sheet ξi ξ < ξ i+1 0 otherwise ξ ξ i N i,p 1 (ξ) + where 0 0
Advanced Finite Elements MA5337 - WS7/8 Solution sheet This exercise sheets deals with B-slines and NURBS, which are the basis of isogeometric analysis as they will later relace the olynomial ansatz-functions
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 16 Nov 2018
arxiv:1811.07052v1 [math.gt] 16 Nov 2018 A New Aroach to the Automorhism Grou of a Platonic Surface Davi Aulicino Abstract We borrow a classical construction from the stuy of rational billiars in ynamical
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.pr] 27 Nov 2018
Range an spee of rotor wals on trees arxiv:15.57v [math.pr] 7 Nov 1 Wilfrie Huss an Ecaterina Sava-Huss November, 1 Abstract We prove a law of large numbers for the range of rotor wals with ranom initial
More informationTopic 7: Using identity types
Toic 7: Using identity tyes June 10, 2014 Now we would like to learn how to use identity tyes and how to do some actual mathematics with them. By now we have essentially introduced all inference rules
More informationElementary theory of L p spaces
CHAPTER 3 Elementary theory of L saces 3.1 Convexity. Jensen, Hölder, Minkowski inequality. We begin with two definitions. A set A R d is said to be convex if, for any x 0, x 1 2 A x = x 0 + (x 1 x 0 )
More informationA secure approach for embedding message text on an elliptic curve defined over prime fields, and building 'EC-RSA-ELGamal' Cryptographic System
International Journal of Comuter Science an Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 5, No. 6, June 7 A secure aroach for embeing message tet on an ellitic curve efine over rime fiels, an builing 'EC-RSA-ELGamal'
More informationStone Duality for Skew Boolean Algebras with Intersections
Stone Duality for Skew Boolean Algebras with Intersections Andrej Bauer Faculty of Mathematics and Physics University of Ljubljana Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com Karin Cvetko-Vah Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
More informationMATH 248A. THE CHARACTER GROUP OF Q. 1. Introduction
MATH 248A. THE CHARACTER GROUP OF Q KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The characters of a finite abelian grou G are the homomorhisms from G to the unit circle S 1 = {z C : z = 1}. Two characters can be multilied
More informationMonotonicity for excited random walk in high dimensions
Monotonicity for excite ranom walk in high imensions Remco van er Hofsta Mark Holmes March, 2009 Abstract We prove that the rift θ, β) for excite ranom walk in imension is monotone in the excitement parameter
More informationA Sketch of Menshikov s Theorem
A Sketch of Menshikov s Theorem Thomas Bao March 14, 2010 Abstract Let Λ be an infinite, locally finite oriente multi-graph with C Λ finite an strongly connecte, an let p
More informationMath Notes on differentials, the Chain Rule, gradients, directional derivative, and normal vectors
Math 18.02 Notes on ifferentials, the Chain Rule, graients, irectional erivative, an normal vectors Tangent plane an linear approximation We efine the partial erivatives of f( xy, ) as follows: f f( x+
More informationLecture Introduction. 2 Examples of Measure Concentration. 3 The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. CS-621 Theory Gems November 28, 2012
CS-6 Theory Gems November 8, 0 Lecture Lecturer: Alesaner Mąry Scribes: Alhussein Fawzi, Dorina Thanou Introuction Toay, we will briefly iscuss an important technique in probability theory measure concentration
More informationNotes on Instrumental Variables Methods
Notes on Instrumental Variables Methods Michele Pellizzari IGIER-Bocconi, IZA and frdb 1 The Instrumental Variable Estimator Instrumental variable estimation is the classical solution to the roblem of
More informationδ(xy) = φ(x)δ(y) + y p δ(x). (1)
LECTURE II: δ-rings Fix a rime. In this lecture, we discuss some asects of the theory of δ-rings. This theory rovides a good language to talk about rings with a lift of Frobenius modulo. Some of the material
More informationTime-of-Arrival Estimation in Non-Line-Of-Sight Environments
2 Conference on Information Sciences an Systems, The Johns Hopkins University, March 2, 2 Time-of-Arrival Estimation in Non-Line-Of-Sight Environments Sinan Gezici, Hisashi Kobayashi an H. Vincent Poor
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ac] 5 Jan 2018
Random Monomial Ideals Jesús A. De Loera, Sonja Petrović, Lily Silverstein, Desina Stasi, Dane Wilburne arxiv:70.070v [math.ac] Jan 8 Abstract: Insired by the study of random grahs and simlicial comlexes,
More informationPETER J. GRABNER AND ARNOLD KNOPFMACHER
ARITHMETIC AND METRIC PROPERTIES OF -ADIC ENGEL SERIES EXPANSIONS PETER J. GRABNER AND ARNOLD KNOPFMACHER Abstract. We derive a characterization of rational numbers in terms of their unique -adic Engel
More informationA construction of bent functions from plateaued functions
A construction of bent functions from lateaued functions Ayça Çeşmelioğlu, Wilfried Meidl Sabancı University, MDBF, Orhanlı, 34956 Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey. Abstract In this resentation, a technique for
More informationStochastic integration II: the Itô integral
13 Stochastic integration II: the Itô integral We have seen in Lecture 6 how to integrate functions Φ : (, ) L (H, E) with resect to an H-cylindrical Brownian motion W H. In this lecture we address the
More informationALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS
ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS MARK SCHACHNER Abstract. When consiere as an algebraic space, the set of arithmetic functions equippe with the operations of pointwise aition an
More informationRamsey numbers of some bipartite graphs versus complete graphs
Ramsey numbers of some bipartite graphs versus complete graphs Tao Jiang, Michael Salerno Miami University, Oxfor, OH 45056, USA Abstract. The Ramsey number r(h, K n ) is the smallest positive integer
More informationBy completing this chapter, the reader will be able to:
hater 4. Mechanics of Particles Particle mechanics governs many rinciles of article measurement instrumentation an air cleaning technologies. Therefore, this chater rovies the funamentals of article mechanics.
More information