Results of Proficiency Test Benzene & Toluene March 2017

Transcription

1 Results of Proficiency Test Benzene & Toluene March 217 Organised by: Authors: Correctors: Report: Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis) Spijkenisse Netherlands ing. G.A. Oosterlaken-Buijs dr. R.G. Visser & ing. R.J. Starink iis17c4 & iis17c5 May 217

2 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May Empty page -- page 2 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

3 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SET UP ACCREDITATION PROTOCOL CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SAMPLES STABILITY OF THE SAMPLES ANALYSES RESULTS STATISTICS GRAPHICS Z-SCORES EVALUATION EVALUATION PER TEST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR THE GROUP OF LABORATORIES COMPARISON OF THE PROFICIENCY TEST OF MARCH 217 WITH PREVIOUS PTs Appendices: 1. Data and statistical results Number of participants per country Abbreviations and literature Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 3 of 59

4 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May INTRODUCTION Since 1999, the Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis) organizes proficiency tests for the analysis of Benzene and Toluene every year. During the annual proficiency testing program 216/217, it was decided to continue the round robins for the analysis of Benzene in accordance with the latest applicable version of the specification for Benzene: ASTM D2359 and Toluene in accordance with the latest applicable version of the specification for Toluene: ASTM D841. In the interlaboratory studies for Benzene 59 laboratories in 25 different countries and for Toluene 41 participants in 21 countries did register for participation. See appendix 2 for the number of participants per country. In this report, the results of the 217 proficiency tests Benzene and Toluene are presented and discussed. This report is also electronically available through the iis website 2 SET UP The Institute for Interlaboratory Studies (iis) in Spijkenisse, the Netherlands, was the organizer of this proficiency tests (PT). Sample analyses for fit-for-use and homogeneity testing were subcontracted to an ISO/IEC 1725 accredited laboratory. It was decided, depending on the registration, to send one sample of Benzene (1 litre bottle, labelled #172) and/or one sample of Toluene (1 litre bottle, labelled #1721). The participants were requested to report rounded and unrounded test results. The unrounded test results were preferably used for statistical evaluation. 2.1 ACCREDITATION The Institute for Interlaboratory Studies in Spijkenisse, the Netherlands, is accredited in agreement with ISO/IEC 1743:21 (R7), since January 2, by the Dutch Accreditation Council (Raad voor Accreditatie). This PT falls under the accredited scope. This ensures strict adherence to protocols for sample preparation and statistical evaluation and 1% confidentiality of participant s data. Feedback from the participants on the reported data is encouraged and customer s satisfaction is measured on regular basis by sending out questionnaires. 2.2 PROTOCOL The protocol followed in the organisation of this proficiency test was the one as described for proficiency testing in the report iis Interlaboratory Studies: Protocol for the Organisation, Statistics and Evaluation of March 217 (iis-protocol, version 3.4). This protocol is electronically available through the iis website from the FAQ page. page 4 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

5 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies 2.3 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT All data presented in this report must be regarded as confidential and for use by the participating companies only. Disclosure of the information in this report is only allowed by means of the entire report. Use of the contents of this report for third parties is only allowed by written permission of the Institute for Interlaboratory Studies. Disclosure of the identity of one or more of the participating companies will be done only after receipt of a written agreement of the companies involved. 2.4 SAMPLES BENZENE The necessary bulk material of Benzene was obtained from a local chemical supplier. The approximately 7 kg of Benzene was spiked with 11.9 mg 1-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone (for the Nitrogen determination), 51.1 mg o-chlorotoluene (for the Organic Chlorides determination), 73.2 mg Toluene and mg Methylcyclohexane. After homogenisation, 68 amber glass bottles of 1 litre were filled and labelled #172. The homogeneity of the subsamples #172 was checked by determination of Density at 2 C in accordance with ISO12185, Toluene in accordance with ASTM D4492 and Total Nitrogen in accordance with ASTM D669 on 8 stratified randomly selected samples. Density at 2 C in kg/l Toluene in mg/kg Total Nitrogen in mg/kg sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # Table 1: homogeneity test results of Benzene subsamples #172 From the above test results the repeatabilities were calculated and compared with.3 times the corresponding reproducibilities of the reference test methods in agreement with the procedure of ISO 13528, Annex B2 in the next table: Density at 2 C in kg/l Toluene in mg/kg Total Nitrogen in mg/kg r (observed) Reference test method ISO12185:96 ASTM 4492:1 ASTM D4629:12.3*R (reference test method) Table 2: evaluation of repeatabilities of subsamples #172 The calculated repeatabilities were in agreement with.3 times the corresponding reproducibilities of the reference test methods. Therefore, homogeneity of the subsamples was assumed. Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 5 of 59

6 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 TOLUENE The necessary bulk material of Toluene was purchased from a local chemical supplier. The approximately 6 litre, after homogenisation, was divided over 58 brown glass bottles of 1 litre and labelled #1721. The homogeneity of the subsamples #1721 was checked by determination of Density at 2 C, according to ISO12185 on 8 stratified randomly selected samples. Toluene Density at 2 C in kg/l sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # Table 3: homogeneity test results of Toluene subsamples #1721 From the above test results the repeatability was calculated and compared with.3 times the corresponding reproducibility of the reference test method in agreement with the procedure of ISO 13528, Annex B2 in the next table: Density at 2 C in kg/l r (observed).4 Reference test method ISO12185:96.3*R (reference test method).15 Table 4: evaluation of repeatability of subsamples #1721 The calculated repeatability was in agreement with.3 times the corresponding reproducibility of the reference test method. Therefore, homogeneity of the subsamples was assumed. Depending on their registration to each of the participating laboratories one 1 litre bottle of Benzene labelled #172 and/or one 1 litre bottle of Toluene labelled #1721 was sent on February 15, 217. An SDS was added to the sample package. 2.5 STABILITY OF THE SAMPLES The stabilities of Benzene and Toluene, packed in amber glass bottles, were checked. The materials were found sufficiently stable for the period of the proficiency test. page 6 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

7 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies 2.6 ANALYSES The participants were requested to determine on the Benzene sample #172: Acid Wash Color, Acidity, Appearance, Bromine Index, Total Chlorides, Organic Chlorides, Color Pt- Co, Density at 2 C, Distillation, Total Nitrogen, Purity, Methylcyclohexane, Toluene, Nonaromatics and Solidification Point. On Toluene sample #1721 was requested: Acid Wash Color, Appearance, Color Pt-Co, Copper Corrosion, Density at 2 C, Distillation, Purity, Benzene, Nonaromatics and Refractive Index. It was explicitly requested to treat the samples as if they were routine samples and to report the test results using the indicated units on the report form and not to round the test results, but report as much significant figures as possible. It was also requested not to report less than test results, which are above the detection limit, because such test results cannot be used for meaningful statistical calculations. To get comparable test results, a detailed report form and a letter of instructions are prepared. On the report form the reporting units are given as well as the reference test methods that will be used during the evaluation. The detailed report form and the letter of instructions are both made available on the data entry portal The participating laboratories are also requested to confirm the sample receipt on this data entry portal. The letter of instructions can also be downloaded from the iis website 3 RESULTS During five weeks after sample dispatch, the test results of the individual laboratories were gathered via the data entry portal The reported test results are tabulated per determination in appendix 1 of this report. The laboratories are presented by their code numbers. Directly after the deadline, a reminder was sent to those laboratories that had not reported test results at that moment. Shortly after the deadline, the available test results were screened for suspect data. A test result was called suspect in case the Huber Elimination Rule (a robust outlier test) found it to be an outlier. The laboratories that produced these suspect data were asked to check the reported test results (no reanalysis). Additional or corrected test results are used for data analysis and the original test results are placed under Remarks in the test result tables in appendix 1. Test results that came in after the deadline were not taken into account in this screening for suspect data and thus these participants were not requested for checks. Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 7 of 59

8 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May STATISTICS The protocol followed in the organisation of this proficiency test was the one as described for proficiency testing in the report 'iis Interlaboratory Studies: Protocol for the Organisation, Statistics and Evaluation' of March 217 (iis-protocol, version 3.4). For the statistical evaluation the unrounded (when available) figures were used instead of the rounded test results. Test results reported as '< ' or '> ' were not used in the statistical evaluation. First, the normality of the distribution of the various data sets per determination was checked by means of the Lilliefors-test, a variant of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and by the calculation of skewness and kurtosis. Evaluation of the three normality indicators in combination with the visual evaluation of the graphic Kernel density plot, lead to judgement of the normality being either unknown, OK, suspect or not OK. After removal of outliers, this check was repeated. If a data set does not have a normal distribution, the (results of the) statistical evaluation should be used with due care. According to ISO 5725 the original test results per determination were submitted to Dixon s and/or Grubbs' and/or Rosner s outlier tests. Outliers are marked by D(.1) for the Dixon s test, by G(.1) or DG(.1) for the Grubbs test and by R(.1) for the Rosner s test. Stragglers are marked by D(.5) for the Dixon s test, by G(.5) or DG(.5) for the Grubbs test and by R(.5) for the Rosner s test. Both outliers and stragglers were not included in the calculations of averages and standard deviations. For each assigned value the uncertainty was determined in accordance with ISO Subsequently the calculated uncertainty was evaluated against the respective requirement based on the target reproducibility in accordance with ISO When the uncertainty passed the evaluation no remarks are made in the report. However, when the uncertainty failed the evaluation it is mentioned in the report and it will have consequences for the evaluation of the test results. Finally, the reproducibilities were calculated from the standard deviations by multiplying these with a factor of GRAPHICS In order to visualize the data against the reproducibilities from literature, Gauss plots were made, using the sorted data for one determination (see appendix 1). On the Y-axis the reported analysis results are plotted. The corresponding laboratory numbers are on the X- axis. The straight horizontal line presents the consensus value (a trimmed mean). The four striped lines, parallel to the consensus value line, are the +3s, +2s, -2s and -3s target reproducibility limits of the selected standard. Outliers and other data, which were excluded page 8 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

9 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies from the calculations, are represented as a cross. Accepted data are represented as a triangle. Furthermore, Kernel Density Graphs were made. The Kernel Density Graph is a method for producing a smooth density approximation to a set of data that avoids some problems associated with histograms. Also a normal Gauss curve was projected over the Kernel Density Graph for reference. 3.3 Z-SCORES To evaluate the performance of the participating laboratories the z-scores were calculated. As it was decided to evaluate the performance of the participants in this proficiency test (PT) against the literature requirements, e.g. ASTM reproducibilities, the z-scores were calculated using a target standard deviation. This results in an evaluation independent of the variation in this interlaboratory study. This target standard deviation was calculated from the literature reproducibility by division with 2.8. In case no literature reproducibility was available, other target values were used. In some cases, a reproducibility based on former iis proficiency tests could be used. When a laboratory did use a test method with a reproducibility that is significantly different from the reproducibility of the reference test method used in this report, it is strongly advised to recalculate the z-score, while using the reproducibility of the actual test method used, this in order to evaluate whether the reported test result is fit-for-use. The z-scores were calculated according to: z (target) = (test result - average of PT) / target standard deviation The z (target) scores are listed in the result tables of appendix 1. Absolute values for z<2 are very common and absolute values for z>3 are very rare. Therefore, the usual interpretation of z-scores is as follows: z < 1 good 1 < z < 2 satisfactory 2 < z < 3 questionable 3 < z unsatisfactory 4 EVALUATION In this interlaboratory study, some problems were encountered with dispatch of the samples. Participants in Brazil, Portugal, India, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Vietnam received the sample late or not at all. For samples #172 (Benzene) and #1721 (Toluene), respectively seven and five participants did not report any test results and six other Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 9 of 59

10 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 laboratories (three for Benzene and three for Toluene) reported the test results after the final reporting date. Not all laboratories were able to perform all analyses requested. Finally, for sample #172 (Benzene) and sample #1721 (Toluene) in total 743 numerical test results were reported by 67 participants. Observed were 32 outlying results, which is 4.3% of the total of numerical test results. In proficiency studies, outlier percentages of 3% - 7.5% are quite normal. Not all original data sets proved to have a normal Gaussian distribution. These are referred to as not OK or suspect. The statistical evaluation of these data sets should be used with due care, see also paragraph EVALUATION PER SAMPLE AND TEST In this section, the reported test results are discussed per sample and per test. The test methods, which were used by the various laboratories were taken into account for explaining the observed differences when possible and applicable. These methods are also in the tables together with the original data. The abbreviations, used in these tables, are listed in appendix 3. Unfortunately, a suitable standard test method, providing the precision data, is not available for all determinations. For the tests, that have no available precision data, the calculated reproducibility was compared against the reproducibility estimated from the Horwitz equation. In the iis PT reports, ASTM methods are referred to with a number (e.g. D588) and an added designation for the year that the method was adopted or revised (e.g. D588:9a). If applicable, a designation in parentheses is added to designate the year of reapproval (e.g. D588:9a(214)). In the results tables of Appendix 1 only the method number and year of adoption or revision e.g. D588:9a will be used. For Benzene sample #172 Acid Wash Color: This determination was not problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D848:14. For the statistical analysis, a result expressed as y- or y+ was changed into a numerical value as follows: y- changed into y-.25 and y+ into y+.25. Acidity: This determination was not problematic. The majority of laboratories report no free acid (NFA) or Pass in accordance with ASTM D847:15. page 1 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

11 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Appearance: Bromine Index: No analytical problems were observed. All labs agreed about the appearance of the sample #172, which was bright, clear and free of suspended matter (Pass). This determination was not problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D5776:14a. Total Chlorides: This determination was not problematic. Two statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D5194:13. The average recovery of Organic Chloride (theoretical increment of 2.5 mg/kg) may be good: less than <145% (the actual blank is unknown). Organic Chlorides: This determination was not problematic. Two statistical outliers were observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D588:9a(214). The average recovery of Organic Chloride (theoretical increment of 2.5 mg/kg) may be good: less than 141% (the actual blank is unknown). Color Pt-Co: This determination was not problematic. One statistical outlier was observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outlier is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D129:5e1(211) and of ASTM D5386:16. Density at 2 C: This determination was not problematic. Three statistical outliers were observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in agreement with the requirements of ISO12185:96. Distillation: Total Nitrogen: This determination was not problematic. In total seven statistical outliers were observed and three test results were excluded. However, all calculated reproducibilities after rejection of the suspect data is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D85:11. From the reported results of the 5% recovered, it appears that three participants probably did not correct the results for barometric pressure and thermometer inaccuracy as described in ASTM D85 (paragraph 11). This determination was not problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility is in full agreement with the requirements of ASTM D4629:12. The average recovery of Total Nitrogen (theoretical increment of 2.3 mg/kg) may be good: less than 13% (the actual blank is unknown). Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 11 of 59

12 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Purity: This determination was problematic. Three statistical outliers were observed and one test result is excluded. The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the suspect data is not in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D4492:1. Methylcyclohexane: This determination may not be problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility is in almost agreement with the estimated reproducibility calculated using the Horwitz equation. The average recovery of Methylcyclohexane (theoretical increment of 3.97 mg/kg) may be good: less than 124% (the actual blank is unknown). It is remarkable that twenty-four of the thirty-five laboratories used ASTM D4492, a method which may be not applicable for the determination of Methylcyclohexane, while only six laboratories used ASTM D5713 a method that is suitable for the determination of Methylcyclohexane in Benzene. Toluene: Nonaromatics: This determination was not problematic. Three statistical outliers were observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in good agreement with the requirements of ASTM D4492:1. The average recovery of Toluene (theoretical increment of 1.32 mg/kg) may be good: less than 13% (the actual blank is unknown). This determination was problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. However, the calculated reproducibility is not in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D4492:1. Solidification Point: This determination was not problematic. Two statistical outliers were observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D852:16. For Toluene sample #1721 Acid Wash Color: This determination was not problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D848:14. For the statistical analysis, a result expressed as y- or y+ was changed into a numerical value as follows: y- changed into y-.25 and y+ into y+.25. Appearance: No analytical problems were observed. All labs agreed about the appearance of the sample #1721, which was bright, clear and free of suspended matter (Pass). page 12 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

13 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Color Pt-Co: This determination was not problematic. Two statistical outliers were observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D5386:16 and of ASTM D129:5e1(211) Copper Corrosion: No problems have been observed. All participants agreed on a result of 1, 1A or pass. Density at 2 C: This determination was not problematic. One statistical outlier was observed. However, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outlier is in agreement with the requirements of ISO12185:96. Distillation: Purity: Benzene: Nonaromatics: This determination was problematic. In total four statistical outliers were observed. For Initial Boiling Point (IBP), the calculated reproducibility of the after rejection of the statistical outlier is not in agreement with the requirements of D85:16. For 5% recovered, the calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is in agreement with the requirements of D85:16. For the Dry Point (DP) no comparison between the calculated reproducibility and the reproducibility of reference test method (D85:16) has been made. The reproducibility of the Dry Point of the reference method is most likely not applicable for sample #1721 due to the lower purity level of sample #1721. Four test results were excluded. No comparison between the calculated reproducibility and the reproducibility of reference test method (D754:16) has been made. The reproducibility of the reference method is based on a purity level much higher than the purity level of sample #1721. This determination was problematic. One statistical outlier was observed. The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outlier is not in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D754:16. This determination may not be problematic. No statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility is in agreement with the estimated requirements of ASTM D236:11. However in the literature the reproducibility is given at a concentration level which is far below the concentration level of sample #1721. Refractive Index: This determination may not be problematic. One statistical outlier was observed. The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outlier is in agreement with the requirements of ASTM D1218:12. Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 13 of 59

14 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR THE GROUP OF LABORATORIES A comparison has been made between the reproducibility as declared by the relevant standard and the reproducibility as found for the group of participating laboratories. The average results per sample, calculated reproducibilities and reproducibilities derived from literature standards (in casu ASTM, ISO standards) are compared in the next tables. Parameter unit n Average 2.8 *sd R R (lit) Acid Wash Color 4.8(1-) Acidity mg NaOH/1ml 38 NFA n.a. n.a. Appearance 38 Pass n.a. n.a. Bromine Index mg Br/1g Total Chlorides mg/kg Organic Chlorides mg/kg Color Pt-Co Density at 2ºC kg/l Distillation, IBP C Distillation, 5% rec. C Distillation, DP C Total Nitrogen mg/kg Purity %M/M Methylcyclohexane mg/kg Toluene mg/kg Nonaromatics mg/kg Solidification Point C Table 5: reproducibilities on Benzene sample #172 Parameter unit n average 2.8 *sd R R (lit) Acid Wash Color (1+) Appearance 28 Pass n.a. n.a. Color Pt-Co Copper corrosion 24 1 (1A) n.a. n.a. Density at 2ºC kg/l Distillation, IBP C Distillation, 5% rec. C Distillation, DP C (.5) *) Purity %M/M (.13) *) Benzene mg/kg Nonaromatics mg/kg Refractive Index at 25 C Table 6: reproducibilities on Toluene sample #1721 *) purity of sample #1721 may be too low Without further statistical calculations, it can be concluded that for most of the tests there is a compliance of the group of participating laboratories with the relevant standards. The tests that are problematic have been discussed in paragraph 4.1. page 14 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

15 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies 4.3 COMPARISON OF THE PROFICIENCY TEST OF MARCH 217 WITH PREVIOUS PTS March 217 March 216 Feb 215 Feb 214 April 213 Total Number of reporting labs Number of results reported Statistical outliers Percentage outliers 4.3% 2.4% 2.1% 4.5% 3.9% Table 7: comparison with previous proficiency tests. In proficiency tests, outlier percentages of 3% - 7.5% are quite normal. The performance of the determinations of the proficiency tests was compared against the requirements of the respective standards. The conclusions are given the following tables: March 217 March 216 Feb 215 Feb 214 April 213 Acid Wash Color n.e. n.e. Acidity n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. Appearance n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. Bromine Index Total Chloride +/ Organic Chloride Color Pt-Co Density at 2ºC Distillation, IBP /- ++ Distillation, 5% Distillation, DP Total Nitrogen +/ /- Purity +/- - +/ Methylcyclohexane +/- *) +/- *) n.e. n.e. -- *) Toluene Nonaromatics - +/ Solidification Point + +/- +/- -- +/- Table 8: comparison determinations on Benzene against the standards *) against the strict Horwitz equation March 217 March 216 Feb 215 Feb 214 April 213 Acid Wash Color /- n.e. Appearance n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. Color Pt-Co Copper Corrosion n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e Density at 2 ºC Distillation, IBP Distillation, 5% +/ Distillation, DP n.e. *) Purity n.e. *) /- Benzene -- +/- **) + **) +/- **) - **) Nonaromatics Refractive Index at 25 C + - n.e. n.e. n.e. Table 9: comparison determinations on Toluene against the standards *) purity of sample #1721 is too low **) against the strict Horwitz equation Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 15 of 59

16 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 The performance of the determinations against the requirements of the respective standards is listed in the above table. The following performance categories were used: ++: group performed much better than the standard + : group performed better than the standard +/-: group performance equals the standard - : group performed worse than the standard -- : group performed much worse than the standard n.e.: not evaluated page 16 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

17 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies APPENDIX 1 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 17 of 59

18 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Acid Wash Color (acid layer) on Benzene sample #172 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D848 No D848 No D848 NO D848 No D848 No D848 No D848 No D848 No D D D D D D848 < D D848 No D848 < D D D D D D848 < D D normality not OK n 4 outliers mean (n).84 (1-) st.dev. (n).237 R(calc.).66 R(D848:14) 2.9 *) In the calculation of the mean, standard deviation, reproducibility and in the graphs, a reported value of y- or <y is changed into y-.25 (for example 1- into.75) and y+ is changed into y+.25 (for example + into.25). page 18 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

19 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 19 of 59

20 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Acidity on Benzene sample #172; results in mg NaOH per 1mL lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D847 NIL D847 No Free Acid D D847 pass D847 PASS D847 NFANEOA D847 No free acid D847 No free acid D847 No free acid D847 pass D847 Pass D847 no free acid D847 No Free Acid D847 No free acid D847 No free acid D847 No free acid D847 No free acid D847 Pass D847 PASS D847 No Free Acid D847 Pass D847 Pass D D D847 nill D847 NFA D847 No Free Acid D D847 NFA D847 No free acid D847 nfa D847 ABSENT D847 no free acid D847 No free acid D847 NFA D847 NFA D847 No Free Acid D847 NFA normality n.a. n 38 outliers n.a. mean (n) No acid present st.dev. (n) n.a. R(calc.) n.a. R(D847:15) n.a. Abbreviation NFA = No free acid NFANEOA = No free acid, no evidence of acidity page 2 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

21 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Determination of Appearance on Benzene sample #172 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D4176 Pass E268 Pass Visual Clear and free from suspended matter E268 CFSM INH-42 bright & clear D4176 Pass Visual PASS D4176 C&B E268 PASS E268 Pass E268 Pass E268 Pass Visual clear & bright Visual B&C E268 Pass E268 Pass E268 Pass E268 Pass Visual Pass E268 Pass E268 Pass E268 PASS E268 Pass Clear and bright C Reported: clear, bright and visually free from solid matter and undissolved water at ambient temp. First reported E268 Clear and Bright D4176 Pass D4176 Clear and bright Visual Clear and Bright Visual Clear Visual Clear liquid free of sediment and haze E268 C&B E268 Clear + bright Visual c&b Visual CLEAR D4176 Clear/FFSM/No free water Visual Pass Visual Clear Visual Clear liquid normality n.a. n 38 outliers n.a. mean (n) Pass (C&B) st.dev. (n) n.a. R(calc.) n.a. R(E268:9) n.a. Abbreviations: C&B / B&C = clear and bright / bright and clear CFSM = clear and free from suspended matter FFSM = free from suspended matter Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 21 of 59

22 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Bromine Index on Benzene sample #172; results in mg Br/1g lab method Value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D5776 < D5776 < D D DIN C -.3 First reported as Appearance 141 DIN DIN51774 < D D D D D D D D D1492 < D UOP D D D D D D normality OK n 41 outliers mean (n) 1.74 st.dev. (n).739 R(calc.) 2.7 R(D5776:14a) 4.6 page 22 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

23 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 23 of 59

24 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Chlorides, Total on Benzene sample #172; results in mg/kg lab method value mark z(targ) remarks D D D(.1) EN D D(.5) UOP C First reported D INH-D3-S D C 1.7 Was reported as organic Chlorides, used test method is for total Chlorides 79 D4929&D See test result in next table; used test method is for organic Chlorides normality OK n 8 outliers 2 Spike mean (n) Recovery < 145% st.dev. (n).353 R(calc.).988 R(D5194:13).9 page 24 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

25 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 25 of 59

26 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Chlorides, Organic on Benzene sample #172; results in mg/kg lab method value mark z(targ) remarks D D D UOP D D D4929B D C,R(.1) -4.4 First reported IP IP D D UOP D D D D D D UOP D D C,R(.5) -3. First reported D D D D D D See test result in previous table; used test method is for total Chlorides 79 D4929&D C -.74 Was reported as total Chloride, used test method is for org. Chlorides 98 D normality OK n 28 outliers 2 Spike mean (n) Recover < 141% st.dev. (n).3658 R(calc.) 1.24 R(D588:9a) 1.3 page 26 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

27 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 27 of 59

28 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Color (Pt-Co scale) on Benzene sample #172 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D D D D D129 < D129 < D129 < D D D D D D D D D D129 < D D129 < D129 < D D129 < D D D ISO6271 < ISO D129 < D D D D129 < D D D D129 Less than D D ISO6271 < D129 R(.5) D D D D D normality OK n 32 outliers 1 mean (n) 4.5 st.dev. (n) 1.23 R(calc.) 3.37 R(D129:5) 7 Compare R(D5386:16) = 5.3 page 28 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

29 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 29 of 59

30 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Density at 2 C on Benzene sample #172; results in kg/l lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D ISO D D D D D ISO ISO D D D R(.1) D D ISO C.6 First reported 879. kg/l D ISO D D D D D D D D ISO C.17 First reported kg/l D D D D D R(.1) D D D D ISO D R(.1) D ISO D ISO D D D normality suspect n 42 outliers 3 mean (n) st.dev. (n).64 R(calc.).18 R(ISO12185:96).5 page 3 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

31 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 31 of 59

32 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Distillation on Benzene sample #172; results in C Lab method mode IBP mark z(targ) 5% mark z(targ) DP mark z(targ) 52 D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Manual D85 Automated 79.4 C, ex R(.1) C,R(.1) Automated D85 Automated D85 Manual D85 Manual D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Manual D85 Manual 79.6 ex R(.1) R(.5) D85 Manual D D85 Manual D85 Manual D85 Manual D85 Manual D85 Manual D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Automated 79.7 ex R(.1) R(.1) D85 Manual D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Manual D R(.1) D85 Automated D85 Automated D85 Automated normality OK not OK OK n outliers 1 (+3 ex) 3 3 mean (n) st.dev. (n) R(calc.) R(D85:16) Lab 334: First reported IBP=79.2 and DP=79.6 page 32 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

33 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Theoretical mid boiling point = 8.1 C After manual correction: 334 D85 Automated D85 Manual D85 Automated normality OK not OK OK n outliers 1 3 mean (n) st.dev. (n) R(calc.) R(D85:16) Initial Boiling Point Kernel Density % recovered 1 9 Kernel Density Dry Point 7 6 Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 33 of 59

34 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Total Nitrogen on Benzene sample #172; results in mg/kg lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D normality OK n 31 outliers Spike mean (n) Recovery < 13% st.dev. (n).3656 R(calc.) 1.24 R(D4629:12) 1.27 page 34 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5

35 Spijkenisse, May 217 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Kernel Density Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5 page 35 of 59

36 Institute for Interlaboratory Studies Spijkenisse, May 217 Determination of Purity on Benzene sample #172; results in %M/M lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 52 D D D R(.1) D D D D D R(.1) D D D D D D ex 1. Result excluded: reported result of Nonaromatic is a false negative 453 D D C 1. First reported D D D D D D D D D D R(.1) D D In house In house D C -.84 First reported D D D D D D D D In house D D D D4492&D D normality OK n 43 outliers 3 (+1 ex) mean (n) st.dev. (n).159 R(calc.).45 R(D4492:1).3 page 36 of 59 Benzene iis17c4 & Toluene iis17c5