William C. Merrick From the Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
- Stephanie French
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2003 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 31, No. 6, pp , 2003 Mini-Series: Modern Metabolic Concepts Initiation of Protein Biosynthesis in Eukaryotes Received for publication, June 30, 2003 William C. Merrick From the Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio Initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotes is important both mechanically, because it selects the translation reading frame, and biologically, because it is the primary site for regulation of translation. For approximately 95 98% of the cellular mrnas, formation of an initiation complex follows a rather specific pathway that is broken down into seven discrete steps. Although almost 35 peptides in translation initiation factors participate in this process, three appear to have dominant roles: eukaryotic initiation factor (eif)3, in building a pool of 40S subunits; eif2, in binding the initiator trna (trna i ) to the 40S subunit; and eif4f in activating the mrna and binding it to the 40S subunit. This process requires both ATP and GTP. The resulting 80S initiation complex contains both the trna i and the mrna, with the anticodon of the trna i correctly base paired with the initiating AUG code word. Regulation of translation focuses mostly on controlling the activity of either eif2 or eif4f and this regulation has different consequences. Reduction in eif2 activity influences all mrna approximately the same, whereas reduction in eif4f activity drives competition between mrnas. Keywords: Ribosome, mrna, initiator trna, eukaryotic initiation factors, translational initiation, translational regulation, scanning, re-initiation, internal initiation, mrna competition. The intent of this article is to present the basics of eukaryotic protein biosynthesis as it relates to the translation of most of the cellular mrna. As such, this review will only explore in cursory detail the more rare but very interesting translation that occurs by alternate mechanisms (re-initiation or internal initiation). This level of presentation can readily be taught to undergraduates and, thus, could also be modified to accommodate either first year graduate or medical students. MECHANISM OF TRANSLATION INITIATION The overall process of initiation can be described as follows: 1. Preparation of a pool of small ribosomal subunits on which to build the initiation complex; 2. Binding of the initiator trna (Met-tRNA i ) 1 to the 40S subunit; 3. Activation of the mrna; 4. Binding of the mrna to the 40S subunit; 5. Scanning of the mrna to locate the initiating AUG code word; 6. Subunit joining to form the 80S initiation complex; 7. Recycling of eif2 GDP to eif2 GTP. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH (GM26796). To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: ; Fax: ; wcm2@po.cwru.edu. 1 The abbreviations used are: trna i, initiator trna; eif, eukaryotic initiation factor; mrnp, messenger RNA protein particle; 4E- BP, eif4e binding protein; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; ORF, open reading frame. 378 Each of these steps is described in more detail in the following paragraphs. Under normal physiological conditions, the two subunits of the ribosome (generally referred to as the large and small subunits, or by their physical size as measured by sedimentation, 60S and 40S, respectively) tend to remain associated as an inactive ribosome (80S), although the equilibrium allows a small portion of the subunits to exist free (Fig. 1). The building of a pool of small ribosomal subunits is achieved by the binding of eukaryotic initiation factor (eif)3, assisted by the binding of eif1a. These binding events shift the equilibrium position to the right, in large measure because once eif3 has bound to the 40S subunit, the 60S subunit can not bind. The second step is the binding of the trna i (Fig. 2). In this step, the trna i is bound to the 40S subunit as a ternary complex (eif2 GTP Met-tRNA i ). It is worth mentioning that there are two Met-tRNA species: Met-tRNA i and Met-tRNA m. The initiation process is specific for MettRNA i and the elongation process is specific for the MettRNA m. Because both Met-tRNAs respond to the code word AUG, this ensures that there will be independent pools of the trnas for both processes. Second, for both initiation and elongation, the aminoacyl-trnas are brought to the ribosome as ternary complexes (factor GTP aminoacyl-trna). The binding of the ternary complex is accomplished due to specific binding sites in eif2 for both the 40S subunit and for eif3, which is already on the ribosome. Step 3 is the activation of the mrna (Fig. 3). In most cellular systems, mrnas exist as complexes of RNA and This paper is available on line at
2 379 FIG. 1.Building the 40S subunit pool. FIG. 2.Binding the ternary complex (eif2 GTP Met-tRNA i ) to the 40S subunit. Note in the figure that the formation of the ternary complex is ordered, GTP is bound before the trna i. Second, the presence of eif3 on the 40S subunit stabilizes the binding of the ternary complex. FIG. 3.Structure of the m 7 G cap. Shown in the figure is the chemical structure for the m 7 G cap with an adenosine residue as the normal 5 terminal nucleotide in the mrna. FIG. 4. Activation of an mrna A. Depiction of a normal mrna coated with protein (small circles) is shown. The eif4e subunit recognizes specifically the m 7 G cap structure whereas the eif4a subunit unwinds RNA secondary structure (or removes proteins) in an ATP-dependent manner. protein (mrnp) (ribonuclear protein particles). The process of activation of the mrna appears to require the removal of proteins from the 5 end of the mrna and the removal of any secondary structure. This is accomplished by the binding of eif4f to the 5 m 7 G-cap of the mrna (Fig. 3). eif4f is composed of three subunits (eif4e, eif4a, and eif4g). The small subunit, eif4e, specifically recognizes the m 7 G cap with very high affinity (K d of approximately 10 8 to 10 9 M). This initial binding positions eif4f at the 5 terminus of the mrna and, thus, orients the activity of its resident helicase, eif4a, to use the energy in ATP to drive the unwinding of RNA secondary structure and to force the release of proteins from the 5 end of the mrna (Fig. 4) [1]. In the next step, the association of eif4f with the mrna directs mrna binding to the 40S subunit through the
3 380 BAMBED, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp , 2003 FIG. 5.Binding and scanning of the mrna. FIG. 6.Subunit joining. Note that this step requires the utilization of two GTP molecules, one in the ternary complex and one via the action of eif5b. It is possible that the hydrolysis of the second GTP by eif5b is concomitant with the joining of the 60S subunit. interaction of eif4g with 40S-bound eif3 (Fig. 5). This results in the binding of the 5 end of the mrna to the 40S subunit, but at this point, there has not been the correct match of the anticodon of the Met-tRNA i with the initiating AUG codon. The correct matching is achieved by an ATPdependent process termed scanning [2]. Although the details are vague here, it appears that the 40S subunit moves ina3 direction, testing each possible codon for a match to the anticodon of the trna i. Genetic studies in yeast have confirmed that it is the trna i anticodon that recognizes the initiating AUG, not one of the translation factors (although translation factors can influence the accuracy of this process) [3 6]. This recognition of the AUG codon explains why the trna i must bind before the mrna. And, perhaps not as obviously, this also explains why the location of the initiating AUG is simply described as the AUG codon nearest the 5 end of the mrna (or the first AUG encountered). Having established a correct match of the trna i with the initiating AUG codon, the major remaining event is to remove the translation factors from the surface of the 40S subunit. This is achieved through the actions of eif5 and eif5b, which are associated with two GTP hydrolysis events: the hydrolysis of the GTP in the ternary complex, and a second hydrolysis event by eif5b (Fig. 6) [7 10]. These two events are sufficient to release the other translation initiation factors from the 40S subunit and allow the joining of the 60S subunit. This yields an 80S ribosome capable of beginning the many elongation steps in protein biosynthesis. Although this would appear to complete the initiation pathway, there is still one final step. The hydrolysis of the GTP in the ternary complex leads to the release of eif2 GDP from the 40S subunit. eif2 is much like the classical G proteins in that it binds the product GDP approximately 100 times more tightly than the substrate GTP (relative K d values of 10 8 and 10 6 M, respectively). To achieve the release of GDP and the rebinding of GTP, the nucleotide recycling protein eif2b catalyzes the exchange of eif2 bound GDP for GTP. REGULATION OF TRANSLATION INITIATION There are two major points of regulation in eukaryotic translation: regulation through the modulation of either eif2 and/or eif4f activity. The simplest is the regulation of eif2 activity. There are four known protein kinases that phosphorylate eif2: a heme-regulated inhibitor (HIR), which responds to heme deficiency; GCN2 (from the name of the yeast gene first identified in this regulation), which responds to amino acid starvation; PKR, which responds to the generic calling card of viral infection, dsrna; and pancreatic endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), which responds to stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (although this kinase is essentially in all tissues). With appropriate stimulation, these kinases phosphorylate eif2. When this phosphorylated eif2 exits the initiation pathway, it binds more tightly than eif2 GDP to eif2b, but nucleotide exchange does not occur. Thus, the limiting amounts of eif2b end up as an inactive pool of eif2-po 4 GDP eif2b. In the absence of the recycling activity, eif2 GDP builds up, and the lack of ternary complexes leads to a decrease
4 381 FIG. 7.Regulation of eif4f activity via the sequestration of eif4e by 4E-BP. The protein kinases that regulate the phosphorylation state of 4E-BP emanate from the mtor and S6 kinase pathways. In general, these pathways are activated by conditions that favor growth and are inactivated by stress conditions. Name Molecular weight 10 3 Number of Subunits TABLE I Eukaryotic initiation factors Function(s) eif AUG recognition eif1a S pool, a ternary complex binding to 40S, IF1 homolog eif GTP-dependent binding of Met-tRNA i eif2a 65 1 Represses IRES-mediated translation eif2b Guanine nucleotide exchange factor for eif2 eif S pool, orients ternary and eif4f mrna complexes on 40S subunit, general bridging function b eif4a 45 1 ATP-dependent RNA helicase (scanning?) c eif4b Stimulates eif4a and eif4f activities eif4f m 7 G recognition, RNA helicase, 3 to 5 bridging function b eif4h 28 1 Stimulates eif4a and eif4f activities eif GTPase activating protein d for the ternary complex (eif2 GTP Met-tRNA i ) eif5a 18 1 Stimulates subunit joining, facilitates conformation change of 80S eif5b Ribosome-dependent GTPase, subunit joining, IF2 homolog eif (Binds 60S to help 40S pool formation?) c a 40S pool, facilitates the generation of free 40S subunits for the initiation pathway. b Bridging function, binds to and helps orient other translation factors on the surface of the 40S subunit and, with the poly(a) binding protein, facilitates enhanced translation in polysomes. c functions in parentheses are suggested, but not proven. d GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) trigger the hydrolysis of GTP bound to other proteins, generally referred to as G proteins, which display a much greater binding affinity for the product GDP than the substrate GTP. in 40S ternary complexes, which slows the overall process of initiation. The reduction in the level of 40S ternary complexes reduces translation of essentially all mrnas equally. That is, if the level of 40S ternary complexes is reduced by 50%, the level of translation of each mrna is reduced by 50%. Thus, the level of total amino acid incorporation is also reduced 50%. This direct correlation also points out that, overall, initiation is the rate-limiting step in protein biosynthesis (in keeping with the general biological paradigm that it is the first committed step in a pathway in which most of the regulation occurs). In contrast, the regulation of eif4f activity has a different consequence. In general, the major pathway for eif4f regulation is the availability of the eif4e subunit, which has the potential to bind to either eif4g (and with eif4a to form active eif4f) or 4E-BP, a protein that binds to eif4e and thereby blocks its association with eif4g (Fig. 7). The ability of 4E-BP to bind eif4e is regulated by its state of phosphorylation, and in general, increased phosphorylation of 4E-BP inhibits its ability to bind to eif4e. There appear to be several pathways that lead to the inactivation of 4E-BP via phosphorylation, which include the target of rapamycin (TOR), which is a drug that specifically blocks the action of certain kinases, and S6 (named after the ribosomal protein S6) kinase pathways. In general, conditions that favor growth (elevated insulin, specific growth factors, etc.) favor the activation of these two kinase cascades, whereas conditions that are stressful (heat shock, apoptosis, nutritional deprivation, etc.) down-regulate these pathways and, thus, down-regulate protein synthesis [11 13]. An immediate assumption might be that such regulation would lead to the same reduction in protein synthesis as seen with eif2 phosphorylation, an across-the-board reduction in the translation of all mrnas. This is not the
5 382 BAMBED, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp , 2003 FIG. 8.The real 80S pathway. This initiation pathway demonstrates the full utilization of the many initiation factors (for greater detail on the description of this pathway, please see one of the books or reviews cited at the end of this article). case. To the translational machinery (mostly eif4f), not all mrnas are created equal. Although there are many elements that will influence how efficiently an mrna will be translated, the most dominant is accessibility of the m 7 G cap structure in an mrna [14]. Although this has been tested experimentally, it is difficult to predict given the sequence of the mrna because current RNA folding programs are not very good at predicting weak, tertiary inter-
6 383 FIG. 9.Re-initiation. In this sequence, the translation initiation of the first ORF (AUG-[XYZ] UAA) occurs as described in the text and as shown in total in Fig. 8. Following termination, the 40S subunit scans to the next AUG, acquiring a ternary complex in the process. Subsequent subunit joining allows translation of the downstream or second open reading frame. actions (i.e. pseudoknots) and are poor predictors of three-dimensional structure. There is also the added complication, noted above, that most mrnas exist as mrnps that are 50% protein and 50% RNA, and the protein composition of mrnps is not known. As a consequence of RNA structure and protein binding, mrnas have different affinities for the translational machinery, probably varying by at least 20-fold. Under conditions optimal for growth and maximal eif4f activity, mrnas are generally translated in accordance with their abundance. However, when eif4f becomes limiting, mrnas must compete for the few eif4f molecules available, and as might be anticipated, the most efficiently translated mrnas out-compete the poorly translated mrnas [15 17]. A simple example of this is given below for the efficient mrna A, which has an apparent K d for the translational machinery of 10 8 M and a poor mrna B, whose apparent K d is 10 7 M. As can be seen from the numbers in Table II, even though the number of A and B mrna molecules remains constant, the ratio of synthesis of the resulting proteins shifts from 1:1 (100 eif4f molecules) to 10:1 (50 or fewer eif4f molecules). Thus, although a 50% reduction in eif4f activity leads to the predicted 50% reduction in the incorporation of amino acids, the reduced eif4f activity drives competition for the most efficient mrnas, and, as noted in the above example, the most immediate loss of translation is observed for the poor mrna. OKAY, SO MAYBE PROTEIN SYNTHESIS ISN T THIS SIMPLE The two presentations above on the pathway of 80S initiation complex formation and regulation of this pathway are complete enough to obtain a general idea of the interplay of initiation factors with mrna, Met-tRNA i and the 40S subunit, and the overall regulation of translation via regulation of either ternary complex levels or eif4f activity. In real, quantitative terms, there are inadequacies in this pathway that require a more sophisticated presentation (i.e. the ratio of translation factors associated with ribosomes varies almost 100-fold, with eif4a being the most abundant initiation factor and eif5b being among the least abundant). However, this type of pathway is useful in orienting the reader to the temporal order of utilization of the mrna, Met-tRNA i and initiation factors. Number of active eif4f molecules TABLE II Ratio of protein synthesis 50 mrna A relative amount of protein made 50 mrna B relative amount of protein made The above description has focused on the major players: eif3 for providing the pool of 40S subunits, eif2 for binding the trna i ; and eif4f as activating and binding the mrna to 40S subunits. For the terminally curious, a complete list of the translation factors is shown in Table I, and the initiation pathway using these translation factors is shown in Figure 8. The key feature of the initiation factors not mentioned in the first two parts of this article is that they enhance the kinetic rate of initiation complex formation, and they enhance the accuracy of this process (correct identification of the initiating AUG). When tested in the yeast system, the absence of almost any one of the factors (or a protein subunit in an initiation factor composed of multiple subunits) was incompatible with growth. Thus, kinetic rate and accuracy are essential for living organisms. Finally, there are two rare initiation schemes that appear to be crucially important but for which we currently lack the kind of detail that is available for the cap-dependent initiation pathway. The first is re-initiation. In this scheme (shown diagrammatically in Fig. 9), there is a normal initiation process that initiates at an AUG and then after polymerizing 3 50 amino acids, goes through the normal termination pathway. Following termination and the loss of the 60S subunit, the 40S scans in a 3 direction looking for the next AUG start codon. In the process of this scanning, a new ternary complex is acquired to allow the accurate identification of the second AUG. Following the match of this AUG with the anticodon of the trna i, subunit joining occurs, likely in a manner very similar to that seen in the cap-dependent pathway described in the beginning of this article. In general, this pathway is inefficient, with at best only 25% of the 40S subunits that terminate going on to initiate at the second AUG. In most instances, removal of the upstream AUG would lead to at least a 10-fold increase
7 384 BAMBED, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp , 2003 FIG. 10. Internal initiation. In this scheme, the 40S subunit (with the ternary complex, eif3 and eif1a) binds directly to an internal portion of the mrna described as an IRES. in production of the protein in question. Therefore, the purpose of re-initiation is not to provide an efficient process for protein expression but, rather, a regulated process for protein expression. The second rare initiation scheme is termed internal initiation (Fig. 10). In this scheme, the 40S subunit binds directly to an internal portion of the mrna at an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). In most cellular mrnas, this process is not very efficient. However, the down-regulation of eif4f activity and the commensurate down-regulation of cap-dependent translation make initiation factors available for internal initiation and, thus, although total protein synthesis is decreased, IRES-mediated translation is increased. Many of the IRES-containing mrnas encode proteins that facilitate a cell s recovery from stress. As noted above, eif4f activity is generally down-regulated under conditions of stress. In this manner, by the regulation of eif4f activity, the cell has the capability to immediately respond to stressing agents without the need for transcription. At present, the exact details of the mechanism for re-initiation and internal initiation appear to vary, depending on the mrna in question. In some instances of re-initiation, the position of the small upstream open reading frame (ORF) is important, and in some instances the amino acid sequence of the ORF is important [18, 19]. In the case of internal initiation, for the few examples studied to date, the initiation factors required for optimal in vitro 80S complex formation vary from a requirement for all of the normal factors to the requirement for none of the initiation factors [20]. This variety for both of these rare schemes make it likely that we will only know the mechanistic details for initiation of these mrnas in the years to come. POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF PROTEIN EXPRESSION From the above presentation, one might infer that 3 5% of the cellular mrnas are regulated at the level of translation, rather than at the level of their synthesis. In fact, translational regulation is involved (by mass) in the synthesis of approximately 30% of the normal cellular proteins. This additional regulation comes from cis-acting sequences in either the 5 or 3 end of the mrna (for which there is, of course, a trans-acting factor). Thus, the regulated expression of proteins by transcription accounts for approximately two thirds of the cellular proteins, and translation accounts for approximately one third. This increase from the predominant transcriptional regulation in bacterial systems likely reflects the compartmentalization of mrna synthesis and translation in the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively, in contrast to both events occurring in a coupled fashion in the cytoplasm of the bacteria. Second, many viral infections lead to an alteration of the translational machinery to favor the translation of the viral mrnas over the translation of cellular mrnas. (This appears to be especially true for lytic viruses that in essence are trying to replicate and then lyse the cell in 6 24hto release progeny.) As a consequence, the translational status of the cell may very well be taken as the thermometer for the health of the cell. This often under-appreciated fact has left open many doors to revisit translation as it relates to both general molecular mechanisms and a wide variety of clinical situations, especially viral infection. Hopefully this short review has provided the reader with a general understanding of the initiation and regulation of translation so that he/she may be prepared to incorporate some of these findings into their own efforts. Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Dr. Anton A. Komar for his preparation of the figures used in this article and Drs. Anton A. Komar and C. Raman Bhasker for their critical reading and helpful suggestions on this article. REFERENCES [1] G. W. Rogers Jr., N. J Richter, W. F. Lima, W. C. Merrick (2001) Modulation of the helicase activity of eif4a by eif4b, eif4h and eif4f, J. Biol. Chem. 276, [2] M. Kozak (1989) The scanning model for translation: An update, J. Cell Biol. 108, [3] T. F. Donahue., A. M. Cigan, E. K. Pabich, B. C. Valavicius (1988) Mutations at a Zn(II) finger motif in the yeast eif-2 beta gene alter ribosomal start-site selection during the scanning process, Cell 54, [4] A. M. Cigan, E. K. Pabich, L. Feng, T. F. Donahue (1989) Yeast translation initiation suppressor sui2 encodes the subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 and shares sequence identity with the human subunit, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, [5] N. P Williams, A. G. Hinnebusch, T. F. Donahue (1989) Mutations in the structural genes for eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha and 2 beta of Saccharomyces cerevisiae disrupt translation control of GCN4 mrna, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, [6] A. M. Cigan, L Feng, T. F. Donahue (1988) trnai(met) functions in directing the scanning ribosome to the start site of translation, Science 242, [7] B. S. Shin, D. Maag, A. Roll-Mecak, M. S. Arefin, S. K. Burley, J. R. Lorsch, T. E. Dever (2002) Uncoupling of initiation factor eif5b/if2 GTPase and translational activities by mutations that lower ribosome affinity, Cell 111,
8 385 [8] J. R. Lorsch, D. Herschlag (1999) Kinetic dissection of fundamental processes of eukaryotic translation initiation in vitro, EMBO J. 18, [9] J. H Lee, T. V Pestova, B. S. Shin, C. Cao, S. K. Choi, T. E. Dever (2002) Initiation factor eif5b catalyzes the second GTP-dependent step in eukaryotic translation initiation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, [10] T. V. Pestova, I. B. Lomakin, J. H. Lee, S. K. Choi, T. E. Dever, C. U. Hellen (2000) The joining of ribosomal subunits in eukaryotes requires eif5b, Nature 403, [11] M. Kleijn, G. C. Scheper, H. O. Voorma, A. A. M. Thomas (1998) Regulation of translation initiation factors by signal transduction, Eur. J. Biochem. 253, [12] B. Raught, A-C. Gringras (1999) eif4e activity is regulated at multiple levels, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, [13] A-C. Gingas, B. Raught, N. Sonenberg (2001) Regulation of translation initiation by FRAP/mTOR, Genes Dev. 15, [14] T. Godefroy-Colburn, M. Ravelonandro, L. Pinck (1985) Cap accessibility correlates with the initiation efficiency of alfalfa mosaic virus RNAs, Eur. J. Biochem. 147, [15] T. G. Lawson, M. H. Cladaras, B. K. Ray, K. A. Lee, R. D. Abramson, W. C. Merrick, R. E. Thach (1988) Discriminatory interaction of purified eukaryotic initiation factors 4F plus 4A with the 5 ends of reovirus messenger RNAs, J. Biol. Chem. 263, [16] B. K. Ray, T. G. Brendler, S. Adya, S. Daniels-McQueen, J. K. Miller, J. W. Hershey, J. A. Grifo, W. C. Merrick, R. E. Thach (1983) Role of mrna competition in regulating translation: further characterization of mrna discriminatory initiation factors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, [17] T. Godefroy-Colburn, R. E. Thach (1981) The role of mrna competition in regulating translation. IV. Kinetic model, J. Biol. Chem. 256, [18] A. G. Hinnebusch, K. Natarajan (2002) Gcn4p, a master regulator of gene expression, is controlled at multiple levels by diverse signals of starvation and stress, Eukaryotic Cell 1, [19] G. L. Law, A. Raney, C. Heusner, D. R. Morris (2001) Polyamine regulation of ribosome pausing at the upstream open reading frame of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, J. Biol. Chem. 276, [20] C. U. Hellen, P. Sarnow (2001) Internal ribosome entry sites in eukaryotic mrna molecules, Genes Dev. 15, BOOKS ON PROTEIN SYNTHESIS [1] D. Soll, U. RajBhandary, Eds. (1995) trna: Structure, Biosynthesis and Function, ASM Press, Washington, D. C. [2] J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Mathews, N. Sonenberg, Eds. (1996) Translational Control, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. [3] N. Sonenberg, J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Mathews, Eds. (2000) Translational Control of Gene Expression, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. [4] J. B. Harford, D. R. Morris, Eds. (1997) mrna Metabolism and Post- Transcriptional Gene Regulation, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y. [5] J. Ilan, Ed. (1992) Translational Regulation of Gene Expression II, Plenum Publishing Corp. New York, N.Y. [6] R. E. Thach, Ed. (1991) Translationally Regulated Genes in Higher Eukaryotes, S. Karger AG, New York, N.Y. [7] R. A. Garrett, S. R. Douthwaite, A. Liljas, A. T. Metheson, P. B. Moore, H. F Noller, Eds. (2000) The ribosome: Structure, Function, Antibiotics and Cellular Interactions, American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, D.C. REVIEWS ON PROTEIN SYNTHESIS [1] B. D. Keiper, W. Gan, R. E. Rhoads (1999) Protein synthesis initiation factor 4G, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, [2] M. Kozak (1999) Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, Gene 234, [3] T. V. Pestova, C. U. T Hellen (2000) The structure and function of initiation factors in eukaryotic protein synthesis, Cell Mol. Life Sci. 57, [4] T. E. Dever (1999) Translation initiation: Adept at adapting, Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, [5] A. G. Hinnebusch (1997) Translational regulation of GCN4: A window on factors that control initiator-trna binding to the ribosome, J. Biol. Chem. 272, [6] J. E. G. McCarthy (1998) Posttranslational control of gene expression in yeast, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, [7] D. R. Morris, A. P. Geballe (2000) Upstream open reading frames as regulators of mrna translation, Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, [8] C. U. Hellen, P. Sarnow (2001) Internal ribosome entry sites in eukaryotic mrna molecules, Genes Dev. 15, [9] V. M. Pain (1996) Initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells, Eur. J. Biochem. 236, [10] H. A. Meijer, A. A. M. Thomas (2002) Control of eukaryotic protein synthesis by upstream open reading frames in the 5 -untranslated region of an mrna, Biochem. J. 367, [11] G. Dreyfuss, V. N. Kim, N. Kataoka (2002) Messenger RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry, Nature Rev. 3,
Translational Initiation
Translational Initiation Lecture Outline 1. Process of Initiation. Alternative mechanisms of Initiation 3. Key Experiments on Initiation 4. Regulation of Initiation Translation is a process with three
Chapter 17 The Mechanism of Translation I: Initiation
Chapter 17 The Mechanism of Translation I: Initiation Focus only on experiments discussed in class. Completely skip Figure 17.36 Read pg 521-527 up to the sentence that begins "In 1969, Joan Steitz..."
Lecture 13: PROTEIN SYNTHESIS II- TRANSLATION
http://smtom.lecture.ub.ac.id/ Password: https://syukur16tom.wordpress.com/ Password: Lecture 13: PROTEIN SYNTHESIS II- TRANSLATION http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/organic/imgorg/translation2.gif
TRANSLATION: How to make proteins?
TRANSLATION: How to make proteins? EUKARYOTIC mrna CBP80 NUCLEUS SPLICEOSOME 5 UTR INTRON 3 UTR m 7 GpppG AUG UAA 5 ss 3 ss CBP20 PABP2 AAAAAAAAAAAAA 50-200 nts CYTOPLASM eif3 EJC PABP1 5 UTR 3 UTR m 7
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Alberts Johnson Lewis Morgan Raff Roberts Walter Molecular Biology of the Cell Sixth Edition Chapter 6 (pp. 333-368) How Cells Read the Genome: From DNA to Protein Copyright Garland Science 2015 Genetic
CHAPTER4 Translation
CHAPTER4 Translation 4.1 Outline of Translation 4.2 Genetic Code 4.3 trna and Anticodon 4.4 Ribosome 4.5 Protein Synthesis 4.6 Posttranslational Events 4.1 Outline of Translation From mrna to protein
Lecture 3 Regulation of Initiation: Met-tRNA-binding
Institut für Biochemie und Molekulare Medizin Lecture 3 Regulation of Initiation: Met-tRNA-binding Michael Altmann FS 2010 Model of initiation eif4g eif4e AAA AAA PABP cap AAA AUG mrna eif4a eif4b ATP
Newly made RNA is called primary transcript and is modified in three ways before leaving the nucleus:
m Eukaryotic mrna processing Newly made RNA is called primary transcript and is modified in three ways before leaving the nucleus: Cap structure a modified guanine base is added to the 5 end. Poly-A tail
Chapter
Chapter 17 17.4-17.6 Molecular Components of Translation A cell interprets a genetic message and builds a polypeptide The message is a series of codons on mrna The interpreter is called transfer (trna)
Molecular Biology (9)
Molecular Biology (9) Translation Mamoun Ahram, PhD Second semester, 2017-2018 1 Resources This lecture Cooper, Ch. 8 (297-319) 2 General information Protein synthesis involves interactions between three
From gene to protein. Premedical biology
From gene to protein Premedical biology Central dogma of Biology, Molecular Biology, Genetics transcription replication reverse transcription translation DNA RNA Protein RNA chemically similar to DNA,
Reading Assignments. A. Genes and the Synthesis of Polypeptides. Lecture Series 7 From DNA to Protein: Genotype to Phenotype
Lecture Series 7 From DNA to Protein: Genotype to Phenotype Reading Assignments Read Chapter 7 From DNA to Protein A. Genes and the Synthesis of Polypeptides Genes are made up of DNA and are expressed
Molecular Biology - Translation of RNA to make Protein *
OpenStax-CNX module: m49485 1 Molecular Biology - Translation of RNA to make Protein * Jerey Mahr Based on Translation by OpenStax This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative
Protein synthesis II Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 25, 2004
Protein synthesis II Biochemistry 302 Bob Kelm February 25, 2004 Two idealized views of the 70S ribosomal complex during translation 70S cavity Fig. 27.25 50S tunnel View with 30S subunit in front, 50S
-14. -Abdulrahman Al-Hanbali. -Shahd Alqudah. -Dr Ma mon Ahram. 1 P a g e
-14 -Abdulrahman Al-Hanbali -Shahd Alqudah -Dr Ma mon Ahram 1 P a g e In this lecture we will talk about the last stage in the synthesis of proteins from DNA which is translation. Translation is the process
GENETICS - CLUTCH CH.11 TRANSLATION.
!! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: GENETIC CODE Nucleotides and amino acids are translated in a 1 to 1 method The triplet code states that three nucleotides codes for one amino acid - A codon is a term for
TRANSLATION: How to make proteins?
TRANSLATION: How to make proteins? EUKARYOTIC mrna CBP80 NUCLEUS SPLICEOSOME 5 UTR INTRON 3 UTR m 7 GpppG AUG UAA 5 ss 3 ss CBP20 PABP2 AAAAAAAAAAAAA 50-200 nts CYTOPLASM eif3 EJC PABP1 5 UTR 3 UTR m 7
Gene Expression: Translation. transmission of information from mrna to proteins Chapter 5 slide 1
Gene Expression: Translation transmission of information from mrna to proteins 601 20000 Chapter 5 slide 1 Fig. 6.1 General structural formula for an amino acid Peter J. Russell, igenetics: Copyright Pearson
TRANSLATION (III): INITIATION AND TRANSLATION CONTROL
BioReg Raul Andino March 1, 2018 TRANSLATION (III): INITIATION AND TRANSLATION CONTROL MAJOR POINTS 1. In prokaryotes, mrnas that encode a product whose primary function is to bind RNA are often autogenously
BCH 4054 Spring 2001 Chapter 33 Lecture Notes
BCH 4054 Spring 2001 Chapter 33 Lecture Notes Slide 1 The chapter covers degradation of proteins as well. We will not have time to get into that subject. Chapter 33 Protein Synthesis Slide 2 Prokaryotic
BME 5742 Biosystems Modeling and Control
BME 5742 Biosystems Modeling and Control Lecture 24 Unregulated Gene Expression Model Dr. Zvi Roth (FAU) 1 The genetic material inside a cell, encoded in its DNA, governs the response of a cell to various
9 The Process of Translation
9 The Process of Translation 9.1 Stages of Translation Process We are familiar with the genetic code, we can begin to study the mechanism by which amino acids are assembled into proteins. Because more
Information Content in Genetics:
Information Content in Genetics: DNA, RNA and protein mrna translation into protein (protein synthesis) Francis Crick, 1958 [Crick, F. H. C. in Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., The Biological Replication of Macromolecules,
Review Article Insights from a Paradigm Shift: How the Poly(A)-Binding Protein Brings Translating mrnas Full Circle
New Journal of Science, Article ID 873084, 16 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/873084 Review Article Insights from a Paradigm Shift: How the Poly(A)-Binding Protein Brings Translating mrnas Full Circle
Section 7. Junaid Malek, M.D.
Section 7 Junaid Malek, M.D. RNA Processing and Nomenclature For the purposes of this class, please do not refer to anything as mrna that has not been completely processed (spliced, capped, tailed) RNAs
Chapter 17. From Gene to Protein. Biology Kevin Dees
Chapter 17 From Gene to Protein DNA The information molecule Sequences of bases is a code DNA organized in to chromosomes Chromosomes are organized into genes What do the genes actually say??? Reflecting
What is the central dogma of biology?
Bellringer What is the central dogma of biology? A. RNA DNA Protein B. DNA Protein Gene C. DNA Gene RNA D. DNA RNA Protein Review of DNA processes Replication (7.1) Transcription(7.2) Translation(7.3)
RNA & PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. Making Proteins Using Directions From DNA
RNA & PROTEIN SYNTHESIS Making Proteins Using Directions From DNA RNA & Protein Synthesis v Nitrogenous bases in DNA contain information that directs protein synthesis v DNA remains in nucleus v in order
Protein synthesis I Biochemistry 302. February 17, 2006
Protein synthesis I Biochemistry 302 February 17, 2006 Key features and components involved in protein biosynthesis High energy cost (essential metabolic activity of cell Consumes 90% of the chemical energy
Activation of a receptor. Assembly of the complex
Activation of a receptor ligand inactive, monomeric active, dimeric When activated by growth factor binding, the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylates the neighboring receptor. Assembly
Seminar 1 Components and Regulation of Initiation of Translation
Institut für Biochemie und Molekulare Medizin Seminar 1 Components and Regulation of Initiation of Translation Michael Altmann FS 2015 Seminar 1 - What are the biol. consequences of mrna transport and
Gene Control Mechanisms at Transcription and Translation Levels
Gene Control Mechanisms at Transcription and Translation Levels Dr. M. Vijayalakshmi School of Chemical and Biotechnology SASTRA University Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc Funded by MHRD Page 1 of 9
Prokaryotic Regulation
Prokaryotic Regulation Control of transcription initiation can be: Positive control increases transcription when activators bind DNA Negative control reduces transcription when repressors bind to DNA regulatory
Lecture 25: Protein Synthesis Key learning goals: Be able to explain the main stuctural features of ribosomes, and know (roughly) how many DNA and
Lecture 25: Protein Synthesis Key learning goals: Be able to explain the main stuctural features of ribosomes, and know (roughly) how many DNA and protein subunits they contain. Understand the main functions
From Gene to Protein
From Gene to Protein Gene Expression Process by which DNA directs the synthesis of a protein 2 stages transcription translation All organisms One gene one protein 1. Transcription of DNA Gene Composed
Peptide And Protein Synthesis Research References
Peptide And Protein Synthesis Research References Altmann M, Muller P, and Trachsel H. (1993) A S. cerevisiae homologue of mammalian translation initiation factor 4B contributes to RNA helicase activity.
Ribosome readthrough
Ribosome readthrough Starting from the base PROTEIN SYNTHESIS Eukaryotic translation can be divided into four stages: Initiation, Elongation, Termination and Recycling During translation, the ribosome
Types of RNA. 1. Messenger RNA(mRNA): 1. Represents only 5% of the total RNA in the cell.
RNAs L.Os. Know the different types of RNA & their relative concentration Know the structure of each RNA Understand their functions Know their locations in the cell Understand the differences between prokaryotic
Translation Part 2 of Protein Synthesis
Translation Part 2 of Protein Synthesis IN: How is transcription like making a jello mold? (be specific) What process does this diagram represent? A. Mutation B. Replication C.Transcription D.Translation
1. In most cases, genes code for and it is that
Name Chapter 10 Reading Guide From DNA to Protein: Gene Expression Concept 10.1 Genetics Shows That Genes Code for Proteins 1. In most cases, genes code for and it is that determine. 2. Describe what Garrod
Multiple Choice Review- Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Multiple Choice Review- Eukaryotic Gene Expression 1. Which of the following is the Central Dogma of cell biology? a. DNA Nucleic Acid Protein Amino Acid b. Prokaryote Bacteria - Eukaryote c. Atom Molecule
Videos. Bozeman, transcription and translation: https://youtu.be/h3b9arupxzg Crashcourse: Transcription and Translation - https://youtu.
Translation Translation Videos Bozeman, transcription and translation: https://youtu.be/h3b9arupxzg Crashcourse: Transcription and Translation - https://youtu.be/itsb2sqr-r0 Translation Translation The
Translation. Genetic code
Translation Genetic code If genes are segments of DNA and if DNA is just a string of nucleotide pairs, then how does the sequence of nucleotide pairs dictate the sequence of amino acids in proteins? Simple
Molecular Mechanism of Scanning and Start Codon Selection in Eukaryotes
MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, Sept. 2011, p. 434 467 Vol. 75, No. 3 1092-2172/11/$12.00 doi:10.1128/mmbr.00008-11 Copyright 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Molecular
Translation and Operons
Translation and Operons You Should Be Able To 1. Describe the three stages translation. including the movement of trna molecules through the ribosome. 2. Compare and contrast the roles of three different
Initiation of translation in eukaryotic cells:connecting the head and tail
Initiation of translation in eukaryotic cells:connecting the head and tail GCCRCCAUGG 1: Multiple initiation factors with distinct biochemical roles (linking, tethering, recruiting, and scanning) 2: 5
Regulation and signaling. Overview. Control of gene expression. Cells need to regulate the amounts of different proteins they express, depending on
Regulation and signaling Overview Cells need to regulate the amounts of different proteins they express, depending on cell development (skin vs liver cell) cell stage environmental conditions (food, temperature,
Regulation of Gene Expression at the level of Transcription
Regulation of Gene Expression at the level of Transcription (examples are mostly bacterial) Diarmaid Hughes ICM/Microbiology VT2009 Regulation of Gene Expression at the level of Transcription (examples
Chapter 16 Lecture. Concepts Of Genetics. Tenth Edition. Regulation of Gene Expression in Prokaryotes
Chapter 16 Lecture Concepts Of Genetics Tenth Edition Regulation of Gene Expression in Prokaryotes Chapter Contents 16.1 Prokaryotes Regulate Gene Expression in Response to Environmental Conditions 16.2
Lesson Overview. Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis 13.2
13.2 The Genetic Code The first step in decoding genetic messages is to transcribe a nucleotide base sequence from DNA to mrna. This transcribed information contains a code for making proteins. The Genetic
TRANSLATION: How to make proteins?
TRANSLATION: How to make proteins? EUKARYOTIC mrna CBP80 NUCLEUS SPLICEOSOME 5 UTR INTRON 3 UTR m 7 GpppG AUG UAA 5 ss 3 ss CBP20 PABP2 AAAAAAAAAAAAA 50-200 nts CYTOPLASM eif3 EJC PABP1 5 UTR 3 UTR m 7
BIOLOGY STANDARDS BASED RUBRIC
BIOLOGY STANDARDS BASED RUBRIC STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND THAT THE FUNDAMENTAL PROCESSES OF ALL LIVING THINGS DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF SPECIALIZED CELL STRUCTURES AND CHEMICAL PROCESSES. First Semester Benchmarks:
Introduction. Gene expression is the combined process of :
1 To know and explain: Regulation of Bacterial Gene Expression Constitutive ( house keeping) vs. Controllable genes OPERON structure and its role in gene regulation Regulation of Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Computational Biology: Basics & Interesting Problems
Computational Biology: Basics & Interesting Problems Summary Sources of information Biological concepts: structure & terminology Sequencing Gene finding Protein structure prediction Sources of information
Chapter 6- An Introduction to Metabolism*
Chapter 6- An Introduction to Metabolism* *Lecture notes are to be used as a study guide only and do not represent the comprehensive information you will need to know for the exams. The Energy of Life
UNIT 5. Protein Synthesis 11/22/16
UNIT 5 Protein Synthesis IV. Transcription (8.4) A. RNA carries DNA s instruction 1. Francis Crick defined the central dogma of molecular biology a. Replication copies DNA b. Transcription converts DNA
Gene regulation II Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 28, 2005
Gene regulation II Biochemistry 302 Bob Kelm February 28, 2005 Catabolic operons: Regulation by multiple signals targeting different TFs Catabolite repression: Activity of lac operon is restricted when
Posttranscriptional Control of Gene Expression in Yeast
MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, Dec. 1998, p. 1492 1553 Vol. 62, No. 4 1092-2172/98/$04.00 0 Copyright 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Posttranscriptional Control
ومن أحياها Translation 2. Translation 2. DONE BY :Nisreen Obeidat
Translation 2 DONE BY :Nisreen Obeidat Page 0 Prokaryotes - Shine-Dalgarno Sequence (2:18) What we're seeing here are different portions of sequences of mrna of different promoters from different bacterial
Lecture 9 Translation.
1 Translation Summary of important events in translation. 2 Translation Reactions involved in peptide bond formation. Lecture 9 3 Genetic code Three types of RNA molecules perform different but complementary
GCD3033:Cell Biology. Transcription
Transcription Transcription: DNA to RNA A) production of complementary strand of DNA B) RNA types C) transcription start/stop signals D) Initiation of eukaryotic gene expression E) transcription factors
Translation. A ribosome, mrna, and trna.
Translation The basic processes of translation are conserved among prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Prokaryotic Translation A ribosome, mrna, and trna. In the initiation of translation in prokaryotes, the Shine-Dalgarno
Advanced Topics in RNA and DNA. DNA Microarrays Aptamers
Quiz 1 Advanced Topics in RNA and DNA DNA Microarrays Aptamers 2 Quantifying mrna levels to asses protein expression 3 The DNA Microarray Experiment 4 Application of DNA Microarrays 5 Some applications
GENE ACTIVITY Gene structure Transcription Transcript processing mrna transport mrna stability Translation Posttranslational modifications
1 GENE ACTIVITY Gene structure Transcription Transcript processing mrna transport mrna stability Translation Posttranslational modifications 2 DNA Promoter Gene A Gene B Termination Signal Transcription
L I F E S C I E N C E S
1a L I F E S C I E N C E S 5 -UUA AUA UUC GAA AGC UGC AUC GAA AAC UGU GAA UCA-3 5 -TTA ATA TTC GAA AGC TGC ATC GAA AAC TGT GAA TCA-3 3 -AAT TAT AAG CTT TCG ACG TAG CTT TTG ACA CTT AGT-5 NOVEMBER 7, 2006
Translation and the Genetic Code
Chapter 11. Translation and the Genetic Code 1. Protein Structure 2. Components required for Protein Synthesis 3. Properties of the Genetic Code: An Overview 4. A Degenerate and Ordered Code 1 Sickle-Cell
The Eukaryotic Genome and Its Expression. The Eukaryotic Genome and Its Expression. A. The Eukaryotic Genome. Lecture Series 11
The Eukaryotic Genome and Its Expression Lecture Series 11 The Eukaryotic Genome and Its Expression A. The Eukaryotic Genome B. Repetitive Sequences (rem: teleomeres) C. The Structures of Protein-Coding
Recycling of eucaryotic ribosomes
PRACE PRZEGL DOWE Recycling of eucaryotic ribosomes Agata Tyczewska 1, Kamilla B¹kowska- ywicka 2 1 Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznañ 2 Innsbruck Biocenter, Division
Chapter 19 Overview. Protein Synthesis. for amino acid. n Protein Synthesis genetic info encoded in nucleic acids translated into standard amino acids
Chapter 19 Overview Protein Synthesis n Protein Synthesis genetic info encoded in nucleic acids translated into standard amino acids n Genetic code dictionary defining meaning for base sequence n Codon
CONJOINT 541. Translating a Transcriptome at Specific Times and Places. David Morris. Department of Biochemistry
CONJOINT 541 Translating a Transcriptome at Specific Times and Places David Morris Department of Biochemistry http://faculty.washington.edu/dmorris/ Lecture 1 The Biology and Experimental Analysis of mrna
Genetics 304 Lecture 6
Genetics 304 Lecture 6 00/01/27 Assigned Readings Busby, S. and R.H. Ebright (1994). Promoter structure, promoter recognition, and transcription activation in prokaryotes. Cell 79:743-746. Reed, W.L. and
Protein synthesis I Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 23, 2004
Protein synthesis I Biochemistry 302 Bob Kelm February 23, 2004 Key features of protein synthesis Energy glutton Essential metabolic activity of the cell. Consumes 90% of the chemical energy (ATP,GTP).
Conceptofcolinearity: a continuous sequence of nucleotides in DNA encodes a continuous sequence of amino acids in a protein
Translation Conceptofcolinearity: a continuous sequence of nucleotides in DNA encodes a continuous sequence of amino acids in a protein Para além do fenómeno do wobble, há que considerar Desvios ao código
Laith AL-Mustafa. Protein synthesis. Nabil Bashir 10\28\ First
Laith AL-Mustafa Protein synthesis Nabil Bashir 10\28\2015 http://1drv.ms/1gigdnv 01 First 0 Protein synthesis In previous lectures we started talking about DNA Replication (DNA synthesis) and we covered
CHAPTER 13 PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON
PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON CHAPTER 13 CHAPTER 13 PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON Figure 1. Electron micrograph of growing E. coli. Some show the constriction at the location where daughter
Computational Cell Biology Lecture 4
Computational Cell Biology Lecture 4 Case Study: Basic Modeling in Gene Expression Yang Cao Department of Computer Science DNA Structure and Base Pair Gene Expression Gene is just a small part of DNA.
RNA Synthesis and Processing
RNA Synthesis and Processing Introduction Regulation of gene expression allows cells to adapt to environmental changes and is responsible for the distinct activities of the differentiated cell types that
9/11/18. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 3. The Cell From Genes to Proteins. key processes
Molecular and Cellular Biology Animal Cell ((eukaryotic cell) -----> compare with prokaryotic cell) ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM (ER) Rough ER Smooth ER Flagellum Nuclear envelope Nucleolus NUCLEUS Chromatin
Biochemistry Prokaryotic translation
1 Description of Module Subject Name Paper Name Module Name/Title Dr. Vijaya Khader Dr. MC Varadaraj 2 1. Objectives 2. Understand the concept of genetic code 3. Understand the concept of wobble hypothesis
Cellular IRES-mediated translation
Cell Cycle ISSN: 1538-4101 (Print) 1551-4005 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/kccy20 Cellular IRES-mediated translation Anton A Komar & Maria Hatzoglou To cite this article: Anton
9/2/17. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 3. The Cell From Genes to Proteins. key processes
Molecular and Cellular Biology Animal Cell ((eukaryotic cell) -----> compare with prokaryotic cell) ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM (ER) Rough ER Smooth ER Flagellum Nuclear envelope Nucleolus NUCLEUS Chromatin
3078 GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Release of initiation factors from 48S complexes during ribosomal subunit joining and the link between establishment of codon anticodon base-pairing and hydrolysis of eif2-bound GTP Anett Unbehaun, 1 Sergei
Part IV => DNA and RNA. 4.6 RNA Translation 4.6a Genetic Code 4.6b Translational Machinery
Part IV => DNA and RNA 4.6 RNA Translation 4.6a Genetic Code 4.6b Translational Machinery Section 4.6a: Genetic Code Synopsis 4.6a - In order to translate the genetic information (or genetic code) carried
Signal Transduction. Dr. Chaidir, Apt
Signal Transduction Dr. Chaidir, Apt Background Complex unicellular organisms existed on Earth for approximately 2.5 billion years before the first multicellular organisms appeared.this long period for
Chapter 20. Initiation of transcription. Eukaryotic transcription initiation
Chapter 20. Initiation of transcription Eukaryotic transcription initiation 2003. 5.22 Prokaryotic vs eukaryotic Bacteria = one RNA polymerase Eukaryotes have three RNA polymerases (I, II, and III) in
Gene regulation I Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 25, 2005
Gene regulation I Biochemistry 302 Bob Kelm February 25, 2005 Principles of gene regulation (cellular versus molecular level) Extracellular signals Chemical (e.g. hormones, growth factors) Environmental
ATP. P i. trna. 3 Appropriate trna covalently bonds to amino acid, displacing AMP. Computer model Hydrogen bonds
mino acid attachment site nticodon Hydrogen bonds mino acid T i denosine i i denosine minoacyl-trn synthetase (enzyme) trn 1 ctive site binds the amino acid and T. 2 T loses two groups and bonds to the
Organization of Genes Differs in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic DNA Chapter 10 p
Organization of Genes Differs in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic DNA Chapter 10 p.110-114 Arrangement of information in DNA----- requirements for RNA Common arrangement of protein-coding genes in prokaryotes=
4. Why not make all enzymes all the time (even if not needed)? Enzyme synthesis uses a lot of energy.
1 C2005/F2401 '10-- Lecture 15 -- Last Edited: 11/02/10 01:58 PM Copyright 2010 Deborah Mowshowitz and Lawrence Chasin Department of Biological Sciences Columbia University New York, NY. Handouts: 15A
Gene regulation II Biochemistry 302. February 27, 2006
Gene regulation II Biochemistry 302 February 27, 2006 Molecular basis of inhibition of RNAP by Lac repressor 35 promoter site 10 promoter site CRP/DNA complex 60 Lewis, M. et al. (1996) Science 271:1247
(Lys), resulting in translation of a polypeptide without the Lys amino acid. resulting in translation of a polypeptide without the Lys amino acid.
1. A change that makes a polypeptide defective has been discovered in its amino acid sequence. The normal and defective amino acid sequences are shown below. Researchers are attempting to reproduce the
Regulation of Gene Expression
Chapter 18 Regulation of Gene Expression Edited by Shawn Lester PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY BIOL 021 SEMESTER 2 (2015) COURSE OUTLINE
COURSE OUTLINE 1 COURSE GENERAL INFORMATION 1 Course Title & Course Code Molecular Biology: 2 Credit (Contact hour) 3 (2+1+0) 3 Title(s) of program(s) within which the subject is taught. Preparatory Program
Bacterial Genetics & Operons
Bacterial Genetics & Operons The Bacterial Genome Because bacteria have simple genomes, they are used most often in molecular genetics studies Most of what we know about bacterial genetics comes from the
Dynamic Model of the Process of Protein Synthesis in Eukaryotic Cells
Nadav Skjøndal-Bar a,1 David R.Morris b a Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department for engineering cybernetics, Trondheim, Norway b University of Washington, Biochemistry Department,
Eukaryotic vs. Prokaryotic genes
BIO 5099: Molecular Biology for Computer Scientists (et al) Lecture 18: Eukaryotic genes http://compbio.uchsc.edu/hunter/bio5099 Larry.Hunter@uchsc.edu Eukaryotic vs. Prokaryotic genes Like in prokaryotes,
ومن أحياها Translation 1. Translation 1. DONE BY :Maen Faoury
Translation 1 DONE BY :Maen Faoury 0 1 ومن أحياها Translation 1 2 ومن أحياها Translation 1 In this lecture and the coming lectures you are going to see how the genetic information is transferred into proteins
BCMB Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis)
BCMB 3100 - Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis) Translation Genetic code trna Amino acyl trna Ribosomes Initiation Elongation Termination How is the nucleotide code translated into a protein
BCMB Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis)
BCMB 3100 - Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis) Translation Genetic code trna Amino acyl trna Ribosomes Initiation Elongation Termination How is the nucleotide code translated into a protein