1
|
|
- Anna Mason
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 i
2 1
3 2
4 3
5 4
6 5
7 6
8 7
9 8
10 9
11 10
12 11
13 12
14 13
15 14
16 15
17 16
18 17
19 18
20 19
21 20
22 21
23 22
24 23
25 24
26 Foreign Liabilities/ Dependen Variabel Rasio Foreign Liabilities Total Debt (1) (2) Konstanta 0.216*** 0.219*** Ekspor/Total Sales Rasio Foreign Asset 0.538*** 1.785*** R-squared N Estimator FE FE Haussman Test
27 26
28 Variabel Dependen Rasio Ekuitas Konstanta FA*Nilai Tukar *** NFA (-1) *** Nilai Tukar (-1) *** Rasio Derivatif (-1) DL (-1) *** R-Squared N Estimator Hausman Test FE Dependen Variabel Rasio Net Income Rasio EBIT Rasio Operating Rasio Interest Expenditures Coverage (1) (2) (3) (4) Konstanta *** 0.65*** *** Rasio Transaksi Derivatif Rasio EBIT Rasio Ekspor Rasio Foreign Asset *** *** 0.563*** Rasio Foreign Liabilities *** 1.125*** -1.01*** * Rasio Liabilities *** *** 2.214*** Rasio Sales *** *** Changes GM 0.511** R-squared N Estimator FE FE FE RE Haussman Test
29 28
30 Variabel Level 1 st Difference CVAR * DERIVATIF_TOT * FORWARD_TOT * SWAP_TOT ** OPTION_TOT * DER_KORP * FORWARD_KORP * SWAP_KORP * OPTION_KORP * 29
31 30
32 31
33 32
34 33
35 34
36 35
37 . xtreg rfrli rexs rfras, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 890 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 5 between = avg = 7.0 overall = max = 7 F(2,760) = 8.19 corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = rfrli Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rfras _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 760) = 6.37 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg rfrli rexs rfras, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 890 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 5 between = avg = 7.0 overall = max = 7 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(2) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = rfrli Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rfras _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rexs rfras b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(2) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = Prob>chi2 =
38 . xtreg rfrtl rexs rfras, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 890 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 5 between = avg = 7.0 overall = max = 7 F(2,760) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = rfrtl Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rfras _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 760) = 9.96 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg rfrtl rexs rfras, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 890 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 5 between = avg = 7.0 overall = max = 7 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(2) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = rfrtl Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rfras _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rexs rfras b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(2) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = Prob>chi2 =
39 . xtreg rderb rexs rdfras rdfrli, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 758 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 F(3,627) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = rderb Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rdfras rdfrli _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 627) = 0.96 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg rderb rexs rdfras rdfrli, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 758 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(3) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = rderb Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rdfras rdfrli _cons sigma_u 0 sigma_e rho 0 (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rexs rdfras rdfrli b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(3) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = 0.20 Prob>chi2 =
40 . xtreg rderj rexs rdfras rdfrli, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 758 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 F(3,627) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = rderj Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rdfras rdfrli _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 627) = 0.96 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg rderj rexs rdfras rdfrli, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 758 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(3) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = rderj Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rexs rdfras rdfrli _cons sigma_u 0 sigma_e rho 0 (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rexs rdfras rdfrli b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(3) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = 0.19 Prob>chi2 =
41 Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 756 Group variable: id Number of groups = 126 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 6 between = avg = 6.0 overall = max = 6 F(6,624) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = req Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rnfadkurs L rnfa L dkurs L netkumderd~s L dli L rwc _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(125, 624) = 2.01 Prob > F =
42 . xtreg rni rdert rexs rfrli rfras rli rsa, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 761 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 F(6,627) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = rni Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rdert 3.19e rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 627) = 3.74 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg rni rdert rexs rfrli rfras rli rsa, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 761 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(6) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = rni Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rdert 4.00e rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Note: the rank of the differenced variance matrix (5) does not equal the number of coefficients being tested (6); be sure this is what you expect, or there may be problems computing the test. Examine the output of your estimators for anything unexpected and possibly consider scaling your variables so that the coefficients are on a similar scale. Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rdert 3.19e e e-07. rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(5) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = Prob>chi2 = (V_b-V_B is not positive definite) 41
43 . xtreg rebit rdert rexs rfrli rfras rli rsa, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 761 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 F(6,627) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = rebit Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rdert 5.42e rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 627) = 4.24 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg rebit rdert rexs rfrli rfras rli rsa, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 761 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(6) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = rebit Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rdert 4.88e rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Note: the rank of the differenced variance matrix (5) does not equal the number of coefficients being tested (6); be sure this is what you expect, or there may be problems computing the test. Examine the output of your estimators for anything unexpected and possibly consider scaling your variables so that the coefficients are on a similar scale. Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rdert 5.42e e e-06. rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(5) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = Prob>chi2 = (V_b-V_B is not positive definite) 42
44 . xtreg ropx rdert rexs rfrli rfras rli rsa, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 761 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 F(6,627) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = ropx Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] rdert -1.16e rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(127, 627) = 5.15 Prob > F = estimates store fixed. xtreg ropx rdert rexs rfrli rfras rli rsa, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 761 Group variable: id Number of groups = 128 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 5.9 overall = max = 6 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(6) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = ropx Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] rdert -2.76e rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). estimates store random. hausman fixed random Note: the rank of the differenced variance matrix (5) does not equal the number of coefficients being tested (6); be sure this is what you expect, or there may be problems computing the test. Examine the output of your estimators for anything unexpected and possibly consider scaling your variables so that the coefficients are on a similar scale. Coefficients (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E. rdert -1.16e e e-06. rexs rfrli rfras rlia rsa b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic chi2(5) = (b-b)'[(v_b-v_b)^(-1)](b-b) = Prob>chi2 = (V_b-V_B is not positive definite) 43
45 44
46 45
47 46
48 47
49 48
50 49
51 50
52 51
53 52
54 53
55 54
56 55
57 56
58 57
59 58
60 59
61 60
62 61
Fixed and Random Effects Models: Vartanian, SW 683
: Vartanian, SW 683 Fixed and random effects models See: http://teaching.sociology.ul.ie/dcw/confront/node45.html When you have repeated observations per individual this is a problem and an advantage:
More informationProblem Set 10: Panel Data
Problem Set 10: Panel Data 1. Read in the data set, e11panel1.dta from the course website. This contains data on a sample or 1252 men and women who were asked about their hourly wage in two years, 2005
More informationPlease discuss each of the 3 problems on a separate sheet of paper, not just on a separate page!
Econometrics - Exam May 11, 2011 1 Exam Please discuss each of the 3 problems on a separate sheet of paper, not just on a separate page! Problem 1: (15 points) A researcher has data for the year 2000 from
More informationpoint estimates, standard errors, testing, and inference for nonlinear combinations
Title xtreg postestimation Postestimation tools for xtreg Description The following postestimation commands are of special interest after xtreg: command description xttest0 Breusch and Pagan LM test for
More informationLecture 3 Linear random intercept models
Lecture 3 Linear random intercept models Example: Weight of Guinea Pigs Body weights of 48 pigs in 9 successive weeks of follow-up (Table 3.1 DLZ) The response is measures at n different times, or under
More informationMicroeconometrics (PhD) Problem set 2: Dynamic Panel Data Solutions
Microeconometrics (PhD) Problem set 2: Dynamic Panel Data Solutions QUESTION 1 Data for this exercise can be prepared by running the do-file called preparedo posted on my webpage This do-file collects
More informationExercices for Applied Econometrics A
QEM F. Gardes-C. Starzec-M.A. Diaye Exercices for Applied Econometrics A I. Exercice: The panel of households expenditures in Poland, for years 1997 to 2000, gives the following statistics for the whole
More informationEconometrics Homework 4 Solutions
Econometrics Homework 4 Solutions Computer Question (Optional, no need to hand in) (a) c i may capture some state-specific factor that contributes to higher or low rate of accident or fatality. For example,
More information****Lab 4, Feb 4: EDA and OLS and WLS
****Lab 4, Feb 4: EDA and OLS and WLS ------- log: C:\Documents and Settings\Default\Desktop\LDA\Data\cows_Lab4.log log type: text opened on: 4 Feb 2004, 09:26:19. use use "Z:\LDA\DataLDA\cowsP.dta", clear.
More informationDescription Quick start Menu Syntax Options Remarks and examples Stored results Methods and formulas Acknowledgment References Also see
Title stata.com hausman Hausman specification test Description Quick start Menu Syntax Options Remarks and examples Stored results Methods and formulas Acknowledgment References Also see Description hausman
More information4 Instrumental Variables Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 4 Instrumental Variables 2 4.1 Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2 4.2 Single endogenous variable more than one continuous instrument..........................
More informationSimultaneous Equations with Error Components. Mike Bronner Marko Ledic Anja Breitwieser
Simultaneous Equations with Error Components Mike Bronner Marko Ledic Anja Breitwieser PRESENTATION OUTLINE Part I: - Simultaneous equation models: overview - Empirical example Part II: - Hausman and Taylor
More information4 Instrumental Variables Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 4 Instrumental Variables 2 4.1 Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2 4.2 Single endogenous variable more than one continuous instrument..........................
More informationApplied Econometrics. Lecture 3: Introduction to Linear Panel Data Models
Applied Econometrics Lecture 3: Introduction to Linear Panel Data Models Måns Söderbom 4 September 2009 Department of Economics, Universy of Gothenburg. Email: mans.soderbom@economics.gu.se. Web: www.economics.gu.se/soderbom,
More informationExam ECON3150/4150: Introductory Econometrics. 18 May 2016; 09:00h-12.00h.
Exam ECON3150/4150: Introductory Econometrics. 18 May 2016; 09:00h-12.00h. This is an open book examination where all printed and written resources, in addition to a calculator, are allowed. If you are
More informationProblem Set 5 ANSWERS
Economics 20 Problem Set 5 ANSWERS Prof. Patricia M. Anderson 1, 2 and 3 Suppose that Vermont has passed a law requiring employers to provide 6 months of paid maternity leave. You are concerned that women
More informationEconometrics. 8) Instrumental variables
30C00200 Econometrics 8) Instrumental variables Timo Kuosmanen Professor, Ph.D. http://nomepre.net/index.php/timokuosmanen Today s topics Thery of IV regression Overidentification Two-stage least squates
More informationЭконометрика, , 4 модуль Семинар Для Группы Э_Б2015_Э_3 Семинарист О.А.Демидова
Эконометрика, 2017-2018, 4 модуль Семинар 3 160418 Для Группы Э_Б2015_Э_3 Семинарист ОАДемидова * Stata program * copyright C 2010 by A Colin Cameron and Pravin K Trivedi * used for "Microeconometrics
More informationFortin Econ Econometric Review 1. 1 Panel Data Methods Fixed Effects Dummy Variables Regression... 7
Fortin Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 1 Panel Data Methods 2 1.1 Fixed Effects......................... 2 1.1.1 Dummy Variables Regression............ 7 1.1.2 First Differencing Methods.............
More informationPanel Data: Very Brief Overview Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ Last revised April 6, 2015
Panel Data: Very Brief Overview Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ Last revised April 6, 2015 These notes borrow very heavily, often verbatim, from Paul Allison
More informationQuantitative Methods Final Exam (2017/1)
Quantitative Methods Final Exam (2017/1) 1. Please write down your name and student ID number. 2. Calculator is allowed during the exam, but DO NOT use a smartphone. 3. List your answers (together with
More informationMonday 7 th Febraury 2005
Monday 7 th Febraury 2 Analysis of Pigs data Data: Body weights of 48 pigs at 9 successive follow-up visits. This is an equally spaced data. It is always a good habit to reshape the data, so we can easily
More informationUniversity of California at Berkeley Fall Introductory Applied Econometrics Final examination. Scores add up to 125 points
EEP 118 / IAS 118 Elisabeth Sadoulet and Kelly Jones University of California at Berkeley Fall 2008 Introductory Applied Econometrics Final examination Scores add up to 125 points Your name: SID: 1 1.
More informationCRE METHODS FOR UNBALANCED PANELS Correlated Random Effects Panel Data Models IZA Summer School in Labor Economics May 13-19, 2013 Jeffrey M.
CRE METHODS FOR UNBALANCED PANELS Correlated Random Effects Panel Data Models IZA Summer School in Labor Economics May 13-19, 2013 Jeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University 1. Introduction 2. Linear
More information1 The basics of panel data
Introductory Applied Econometrics EEP/IAS 118 Spring 2015 Related materials: Steven Buck Notes to accompany fixed effects material 4-16-14 ˆ Wooldridge 5e, Ch. 1.3: The Structure of Economic Data ˆ Wooldridge
More informationmultilevel modeling: concepts, applications and interpretations
multilevel modeling: concepts, applications and interpretations lynne c. messer 27 october 2010 warning social and reproductive / perinatal epidemiologist concepts why context matters multilevel models
More informationxtdpdqml: Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of linear dynamic short-t panel data models
xtdpdqml: Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of linear dynamic short-t panel data models Sebastian Kripfganz University of Exeter Business School, Department of Economics, Exeter, UK UK Stata Users Group
More informationECON 497 Final Exam Page 1 of 12
ECON 497 Final Exam Page of 2 ECON 497: Economic Research and Forecasting Name: Spring 2008 Bellas Final Exam Return this exam to me by 4:00 on Wednesday, April 23. It may be e-mailed to me. It may be
More informationOutline. Linear OLS Models vs: Linear Marginal Models Linear Conditional Models. Random Intercepts Random Intercepts & Slopes
Lecture 2.1 Basic Linear LDA 1 Outline Linear OLS Models vs: Linear Marginal Models Linear Conditional Models Random Intercepts Random Intercepts & Slopes Cond l & Marginal Connections Empirical Bayes
More informationJeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University
Fractional Response Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables and Heterogeneity Jeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University 1. Introduction 2. Fractional Probit with Heteroskedasticity 3. Fractional
More informationDynamic Panel Data Models
Models Amjad Naveed, Nora Prean, Alexander Rabas 15th June 2011 Motivation Many economic issues are dynamic by nature. These dynamic relationships are characterized by the presence of a lagged dependent
More informationLongitudinal Data Analysis. RatSWD Nachwuchsworkshop Vorlesung von Josef Brüderl 25. August, 2009
Longitudinal Data Analysis RatSWD Nachwuchsworkshop Vorlesung von Josef Brüderl 25. August, 2009 Longitudinal Data Analysis Traditional definition Statistical methods for analyzing data with a time dimension
More informationEmpirical Application of Panel Data Regression
Empirical Application of Panel Data Regression 1. We use Fatality data, and we are interested in whether rising beer tax rate can help lower traffic death. So the dependent variable is traffic death, while
More informationConfidence intervals for the variance component of random-effects linear models
The Stata Journal (2004) 4, Number 4, pp. 429 435 Confidence intervals for the variance component of random-effects linear models Matteo Bottai Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina
More informationPractice 2SLS with Artificial Data Part 1
Practice 2SLS with Artificial Data Part 1 Yona Rubinstein July 2016 Yona Rubinstein (LSE) Practice 2SLS with Artificial Data Part 1 07/16 1 / 16 Practice with Artificial Data In this note we use artificial
More informationMaria Elena Bontempi Roberto Golinelli this version: 5 September 2007
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES (IV) ESTIMATION A Maria Elena Bontempi e.bontempi@economia.unife.it Roberto Golinelli roberto.golinelli@unibo.it this version: 5 September 2007 1. The instrumental variables approach
More informationINTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL
INTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL 13 September 2011 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL In general, regression models estimate the effect
More informationSTATA Commands for Unobserved Effects Panel Data
STATA Commands for Unobserved Effects Panel Data John C Frain 21st February 2005 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Estimation usingxtreg 9 3 Testing afterxtreg 13 4 Prediction after xtreg 15 5 Faster estimation
More informationInstrumental Variables, Simultaneous and Systems of Equations
Chapter 6 Instrumental Variables, Simultaneous and Systems of Equations 61 Instrumental variables In the linear regression model y i = x iβ + ε i (61) we have been assuming that bf x i and ε i are uncorrelated
More informationLecture 3.1 Basic Logistic LDA
y Lecture.1 Basic Logistic LDA 0.2.4.6.8 1 Outline Quick Refresher on Ordinary Logistic Regression and Stata Women s employment example Cross-Over Trial LDA Example -100-50 0 50 100 -- Longitudinal Data
More informationProblem Set #3-Key. wage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval]
Problem Set #3-Key Sonoma State University Economics 317- Introduction to Econometrics Dr. Cuellar 1. Use the data set Wage1.dta to answer the following questions. a. For the regression model Wage i =
More informationLecture#17. Time series III
Lecture#17 Time series III 1 Dynamic causal effects Think of macroeconomic data. Difficult to think of an RCT. Substitute: different treatments to the same (observation unit) at different points in time.
More informationAdvanced Topics in Maximum Likelihood Models for Panel and Time-Series Cross-Section Data 2009 ICPSR Summer Program
Advanced Topics in Maximum Likelihood Models for Panel and Time-Series Cross-Section Data 2009 ICPSR Summer Program Gregory Wawro Associate Professor Department of Political Science Columbia University
More informationAdvanced Topics in Maximum Likelihood Models for Panel and Time-Series Cross-Section Data 2006 ICPSR Summer Program
Advanced Topics in Maximum Likelihood Models for Panel and Time-Series Cross-Section Data 2006 ICPSR Summer Program Gregory Wawro Associate Professor Department of Political Science Columbia University
More informationERSA Training Workshop Lecture 5: Estimation of Binary Choice Models with Panel Data
ERSA Training Workshop Lecture 5: Estimation of Binary Choice Models with Panel Data Måns Söderbom Friday 16 January 2009 1 Introduction The methods discussed thus far in the course are well suited for
More informationLab 07 Introduction to Econometrics
Lab 07 Introduction to Econometrics Learning outcomes for this lab: Introduce the different typologies of data and the econometric models that can be used Understand the rationale behind econometrics Understand
More information8. Nonstandard standard error issues 8.1. The bias of robust standard errors
8.1. The bias of robust standard errors Bias Robust standard errors are now easily obtained using e.g. Stata option robust Robust standard errors are preferable to normal standard errors when residuals
More informationUnderstanding the multinomial-poisson transformation
The Stata Journal (2004) 4, Number 3, pp. 265 273 Understanding the multinomial-poisson transformation Paulo Guimarães Medical University of South Carolina Abstract. There is a known connection between
More informationLecture#12. Instrumental variables regression Causal parameters III
Lecture#12 Instrumental variables regression Causal parameters III 1 Demand experiment, market data analysis & simultaneous causality 2 Simultaneous causality Your task is to estimate the demand function
More informationProblem Set #5-Key Sonoma State University Dr. Cuellar Economics 317- Introduction to Econometrics
Problem Set #5-Key Sonoma State University Dr. Cuellar Economics 317- Introduction to Econometrics C1.1 Use the data set Wage1.dta to answer the following questions. Estimate regression equation wage =
More informationCorrelation and Simple Linear Regression
Correlation and Simple Linear Regression Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Ph.D Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University E-mail: sasivimol.rat@mahidol.ac.th 1 Outline
More informationLecture 4: Generalized Linear Mixed Models
Dankmar Böhning Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute University of Southampton, UK S 3 RI, 11-12 December 2014 An example with one random effect An example with two nested random effects
More information2.1. Consider the following production function, known in the literature as the transcendental production function (TPF).
CHAPTER Functional Forms of Regression Models.1. Consider the following production function, known in the literature as the transcendental production function (TPF). Q i B 1 L B i K i B 3 e B L B K 4 i
More informationMeasurement Error. Often a data set will contain imperfect measures of the data we would ideally like.
Measurement Error Often a data set will contain imperfect measures of the data we would ideally like. Aggregate Data: (GDP, Consumption, Investment are only best guesses of theoretical counterparts and
More informationLab 3: Two levels Poisson models (taken from Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, p )
Lab 3: Two levels Poisson models (taken from Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, p. 376-390) BIO656 2009 Goal: To see if a major health-care reform which took place in 1997 in Germany was
More informationLab 11 - Heteroskedasticity
Lab 11 - Heteroskedasticity Spring 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Heteroskedasticity 2 3 Addressing heteroskedasticity in Stata 3 4 Testing for heteroskedasticity 4 5 A simple example 5 1 1 Introduction
More informationECON2228 Notes 10. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 48
ECON2228 Notes 10 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 10 2014 2015 1 / 48 Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions Chapter 12:
More informationPanel Threshold Model
Panel Threshold Model 黃河泉淡江大學財務金融系 June 5 7, 2016 Ho-Chuan (River) Huang 面板門檻模型 June 5 7, 2016 1 / 62 1 Linear Model 2 Threshold Model 3 Panel Threshold Model Single-Threshold Model Multiple-Threshold
More informationEconometrics Midterm Examination Answers
Econometrics Midterm Examination Answers March 4, 204. Question (35 points) Answer the following short questions. (i) De ne what is an unbiased estimator. Show that X is an unbiased estimator for E(X i
More informationInterpreting coefficients for transformed variables
Interpreting coefficients for transformed variables! Recall that when both independent and dependent variables are untransformed, an estimated coefficient represents the change in the dependent variable
More informationECON2228 Notes 10. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 54
ECON2228 Notes 10 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 10 2014 2015 1 / 54 erial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions Chapter 12:
More informationUsing Stata for a memory saving fixed effects estimation of the three-way error component model
Methodische Aspekte zu Arbeitsmarktdaten Nr. 3/2006 Using Stata for a memory saving fixed effects estimation of the three-way error component model Thomas Cornelißen Nr. 3/2006 Contents 1 Introduction...
More informationEditor Nicholas J. Cox Department of Geography Durham University South Road Durham City DH1 3LE UK
The Stata Journal Editor H. Joseph Newton Department of Statistics Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843 979-845-3142; FAX 979-845-3144 jnewton@stata-journal.com Associate Editors Christopher
More informationEcon 836 Final Exam. 2 w N 2 u N 2. 2 v N
1) [4 points] Let Econ 836 Final Exam Y Xβ+ ε, X w+ u, w N w~ N(, σi ), u N u~ N(, σi ), ε N ε~ Nu ( γσ, I ), where X is a just one column. Let denote the OLS estimator, and define residuals e as e Y X.
More informationEcmt 675: Econometrics I
Ecmt 675: Econometrics I Assignment 7 Problem 1 a. reg hours lwage educ age kidslt6 kidsge6 nwifeinc, r Linear regression Number of obs = 428 F( 6, 421) = 3.93 Prob > F = 0.0008 R-squared = 0.0670 Root
More informationLecture 8: Instrumental Variables Estimation
Lecture Notes on Advanced Econometrics Lecture 8: Instrumental Variables Estimation Endogenous Variables Consider a population model: y α y + β + β x + β x +... + β x + u i i i i k ik i Takashi Yamano
More informationHandout 11: Measurement Error
Handout 11: Measurement Error In which you learn to recognise the consequences for OLS estimation whenever some of the variables you use are not measured as accurately as you might expect. A (potential)
More informationNew Developments in Econometrics Lecture 11: Difference-in-Differences Estimation
New Developments in Econometrics Lecture 11: Difference-in-Differences Estimation Jeff Wooldridge Cemmap Lectures, UCL, June 2009 1. The Basic Methodology 2. How Should We View Uncertainty in DD Settings?
More informationSpecification Error: Omitted and Extraneous Variables
Specification Error: Omitted and Extraneous Variables Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ Last revised February 5, 05 Omitted variable bias. Suppose that the correct
More informationMultilevel Modeling (MLM) part 1. Robert Yu
Multilevel Modeling (MLM) part 1 Robert Yu a few words before the talk This is a report from attending a 2 day training course of Multilevel Modeling by Dr. Raykov Tenko, held on March 22 23, 2012, in
More information. *DEFINITIONS OF ARTIFICIAL DATA SET. mat m=(12,20,0) /*matrix of means of RHS vars: edu, exp, error*/
. DEFINITIONS OF ARTIFICIAL DATA SET. mat m=(,,) /matrix of means of RHS vars: edu, exp, error/. mat c=(5,-.6, \ -.6,9, \,,.) /covariance matrix of RHS vars /. mat l m /displays matrix of means / c c c3
More informationHomework Solutions Applied Logistic Regression
Homework Solutions Applied Logistic Regression WEEK 6 Exercise 1 From the ICU data, use as the outcome variable vital status (STA) and CPR prior to ICU admission (CPR) as a covariate. (a) Demonstrate that
More informationFinal Exam. 1. Definitions: Briefly Define each of the following terms as they relate to the material covered in class.
Name Answer Key Economics 170 Spring 2003 Honor pledge: I have neither given nor received aid on this exam including the preparation of my one page formula list and the preparation of the Stata assignment
More informationProblem set - Selection and Diff-in-Diff
Problem set - Selection and Diff-in-Diff 1. You want to model the wage equation for women You consider estimating the model: ln wage = α + β 1 educ + β 2 exper + β 3 exper 2 + ɛ (1) Read the data into
More informationAn explanation of Two Stage Least Squares
Introduction Introduction to Econometrics An explanation of Two Stage Least Squares When we get an endogenous variable we know that OLS estimator will be inconsistent. In addition OLS regressors will also
More informationQuestion 1 carries a weight of 25%; question 2 carries 25%; question 3 carries 20%; and question 4 carries 30%.
UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA School of Economics Main Series PGT Examination 2017-18 FINANCIAL ECONOMETRIC THEORY ECO-7024A Time allowed: 2 HOURS Answer ALL FOUR questions. Question 1 carries a weight of
More information4/9/2014. Outline for Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Stochastic Frontier Production Function. Stochastic Frontier Production Function
Productivity Measurement Mini Course Stochastic Frontier Analysis Prof. Nicole Adler, Hebrew University Outline for Stochastic Frontier Analysis Stochastic Frontier Production Function Production function
More informationFinal Exam. Question 1 (20 points) 2 (25 points) 3 (30 points) 4 (25 points) 5 (10 points) 6 (40 points) Total (150 points) Bonus question (10)
Name Economics 170 Spring 2004 Honor pledge: I have neither given nor received aid on this exam including the preparation of my one page formula list and the preparation of the Stata assignment for the
More informationDynamic Panels. Chapter Introduction Autoregressive Model
Chapter 11 Dynamic Panels This chapter covers the econometrics methods to estimate dynamic panel data models, and presents examples in Stata to illustrate the use of these procedures. The topics in this
More informationRecent Developments in Multilevel Modeling
Recent Developments in Multilevel Modeling Roberto G. Gutierrez Director of Statistics StataCorp LP 2007 North American Stata Users Group Meeting, Boston R. Gutierrez (StataCorp) Multilevel Modeling August
More informationSTATISTICS 110/201 PRACTICE FINAL EXAM
STATISTICS 110/201 PRACTICE FINAL EXAM Questions 1 to 5: There is a downloadable Stata package that produces sequential sums of squares for regression. In other words, the SS is built up as each variable
More informationLecture 5. In the last lecture, we covered. This lecture introduces you to
Lecture 5 In the last lecture, we covered. homework 2. The linear regression model (4.) 3. Estimating the coefficients (4.2) This lecture introduces you to. Measures of Fit (4.3) 2. The Least Square Assumptions
More informationSection Least Squares Regression
Section 2.3 - Least Squares Regression Statistics 104 Autumn 2004 Copyright c 2004 by Mark E. Irwin Regression Correlation gives us a strength of a linear relationship is, but it doesn t tell us what it
More informationWarwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation
Warwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation Michele Aquaro University of Warwick This version: July 21, 2016 1 / 31 Reading material Textbook: Introductory
More informationSoc 63993, Homework #7 Answer Key: Nonlinear effects/ Intro to path analysis
Soc 63993, Homework #7 Answer Key: Nonlinear effects/ Intro to path analysis Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ Last revised February 20, 2015 Problem 1. The files
More informationGMM Estimation in Stata
GMM Estimation in Stata Econometrics I Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Master in Industrial Economics and Markets 1 Outline Motivation 1 Motivation 2 3 4 2 Motivation 3 Stata and
More informationECON2228 Notes 7. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 41
ECON2228 Notes 7 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 6 2014 2015 1 / 41 Chapter 8: Heteroskedasticity In laying out the standard regression model, we made
More informationAnalyzing spatial autoregressive models using Stata
Analyzing spatial autoregressive models using Stata David M. Drukker StataCorp Summer North American Stata Users Group meeting July 24-25, 2008 Part of joint work with Ingmar Prucha and Harry Kelejian
More informationSuggested Answers Problem set 4 ECON 60303
Suggested Answers Problem set 4 ECON 60303 Bill Evans Spring 04. A program that answers part A) is on the web page and is named psid_iv_comparison.do. Below are some key results and a summary table is
More informationEconometrics II Censoring & Truncation. May 5, 2011
Econometrics II Censoring & Truncation Måns Söderbom May 5, 2011 1 Censored and Truncated Models Recall that a corner solution is an actual economic outcome, e.g. zero expenditure on health by a household
More informationHandout 12. Endogeneity & Simultaneous Equation Models
Handout 12. Endogeneity & Simultaneous Equation Models In which you learn about another potential source of endogeneity caused by the simultaneous determination of economic variables, and learn how to
More informationSpatial Regression Models: Identification strategy using STATA TATIANE MENEZES PIMES/UFPE
Spatial Regression Models: Identification strategy using STATA TATIANE MENEZES PIMES/UFPE Intruduction Spatial regression models are usually intended to estimate parameters related to the interaction of
More informationsociology sociology Scatterplots Quantitative Research Methods: Introduction to correlation and regression Age vs Income
Scatterplots Quantitative Research Methods: Introduction to correlation and regression Scatterplots can be considered as interval/ratio analogue of cross-tabs: arbitrarily many values mapped out in -dimensions
More informationGraduate Econometrics Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity
Graduate Econometrics Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity Department of Economics University of Gothenburg November 30, 2014 1/43 and Autocorrelation Consequences for OLS Estimator Begin from the linear model
More informationMeta-analysis of epidemiological dose-response studies
Meta-analysis of epidemiological dose-response studies Nicola Orsini 2nd Italian Stata Users Group meeting October 10-11, 2005 Institute Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Rino Bellocco Dept.
More informationProblem Set 1 ANSWERS
Economics 20 Prof. Patricia M. Anderson Problem Set 1 ANSWERS Part I. Multiple Choice Problems 1. If X and Z are two random variables, then E[X-Z] is d. E[X] E[Z] This is just a simple application of one
More informationHeteroskedasticity Example
ECON 761: Heteroskedasticity Example L Magee November, 2007 This example uses the fertility data set from assignment 2 The observations are based on the responses of 4361 women in Botswana s 1988 Demographic
More informationECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC METHODS PRELIM EXAM Statistics and Econometrics August 2013
ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC METHODS PRELIM EXAM Statistics and Econometrics August 2013 Instructions: Answer all six (6) questions. Point totals for each question are given in parentheses. The parts within
More informationModel and Working Correlation Structure Selection in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data
The 3rd Australian and New Zealand Stata Users Group Meeting, Sydney, 5 November 2009 1 Model and Working Correlation Structure Selection in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data Dr Jisheng Cui Public Health
More informationFrom the help desk: Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models
The Stata Journal (2002) 2, Number 3, pp. 301 313 From the help desk: Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models Mario A. Cleves, Ph.D. Department
More information