Chapter 15 A Model with Periodic Wage Contracts
|
|
- Rosamund Watkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper 15 A Model wih Periodic Wage Conracs In his chaper we analyze an alernaive model of aggregae flucuaions, which is based on periodic nominal wage conracs. The model is based on Gray (1976), Fischer (1977) and Taylor (1979), who emphasized he periodic adjusmen of nominal wages raher han he periodic adjusmen of prices. 1 In he Gray-Fischer-Taylor model, nominal wage conracs are assumed o be negoiaed a he beginning of every period, or a he beginning of alernae periods. In addiion, nominal wages are assumed o remain fixed for he duraion of he conrac. Nominal wages depend on prior expecaions abou he evoluion of he price level, produciviy and all oher shocks. If inflaion urns ou o be higher han expeced, hen real wages fall, firms demand more labor, and employmen rises. The opposie happens when inflaion urns ou o be lower han expeced. The model builds on one of he key insighs of he General Theory, namely he shor run rigidiy of nominal wages, as envisaged by labor marke conracs. In all oher respecs i is based on ineremporal opimizaion on he par of boh households and firms. The specific model inroduced in his chaper is a dynamic, sochasic general equilibrium model, in which non indexed nominal wage conracs are negoiaed periodically by insiders in he labor marke. There are wo disorions in he model compared o he new classical model wihou capial ha we analyzed in Chaper 13. The firs is a real disorion, arising from he fac ha ousiders are disenfranchised from he labor marke. As a resul, wage conracs do no seek o mainain full employmen and here is a posiive naural rae of unemploymen. The second is a nominal disorion, arising from he fac ha nominal wage conracs are no indexed, and can only be reopened a he beginning of each period, before he realizaion of curren nominal and real shocks. Thus, nominal wages are se on he basis of prior raional expecaions abou he various unobserved shocks. 2 The real disorion in our model makes he naural rae of unemploymen inefficienly high, while he nominal disorion allows for nominal shocks o have emporary real effecs. Thus, nominal shocks and, by exension, moneary policy, are able o affec flucuaions in boh inflaion and real variables such as oupu, employmen, unemploymen, real wages and he real ineres rae. 1 The Fischer (1977) and Taylor (1979) models are models wih saggered wage conracs. See Blanchard and Summers (1986), Lindbeck and Snower (1986) and Gofries (1992) for insider-ousider models of 2 he labor marke.
2 The model is characerized by an expecaions augmened Phillips curve, in which deviaions of oupu and employmen from heir naural level depend on unanicipaed curren inflaion, and unanicipaed produciviy shocks, which affec he relaion beween real wages and produciviy. Aggregae demand is deermined by he opimal behavior of a represenaive household, wih access o a compeiive financial marke, choosing he pah of consumpion and real money balances in order o maximize is ineremporal uiliy funcion. Thus, boh he consumpion funcion and he money demand funcion are derived from ineremporal microeconomic foundaions. The model is also characerized by exogenous shocks o produciviy and preferences for consumpion and money demand. Thus, he model is in essence a dynamic sochasic model ha incorporaes many of he feaures of he AS-AD version of he Keynesian model ha we presened in chaper 12. We analyze aggregae flucuaions in his model under wo alernaive moneary regimes. The firs is an exogenous process for he rae of growh of he money supply and he second is a feedback ineres rae rule, according o which he nominal ineres rae responds o deviaions of inflaion from he arge of he cenral bank, and deviaions of oupu from is naural level. Conrary o he new classical model, moneary shocks affec real variables in his model, causing emporary deviaions of oupu, employmen, unemploymen, real wages and he real ineres rae from heir naural levels. The exac variance of such deviaions depends on he moneary rule. Under an exogenous process for he rae of growh of he money supply, all shocks affec aggregae flucuaions. Under a feedback ineres rae rule, only produciviy and nominal ineres rae shocks affec aggregae flucuaions. We hus demonsrae he dependence of aggregae flucuaions no only on exogenous shocks, bu on he form of he moneary policy rule followed by he cenral bank. We also exend he model o accoun for persisence in deviaions of unemploymen and oupu from heir naural levels. The exension is based on a dynamic model of he Phillips Curve, in which unanicipaed shocks o inflaion and produciviy have persisen effecs on unemploymen, and hese persisen effecs are compaible wih full ineremporal opimizaion on he par of labor marke insiders. The propagaion mechanism ha causes unanicipaed nominal and real shocks o produce persisen deviaions of unemploymen and oupu from heir naural rae is he parial adjusmen of labor marke insiders o employmen shocks. We demonsrae ha under a Taylor rule, he only shocks ha canno be compleely neuralized by moneary policy are produciviy shocks and, of course, moneary policy shocks. Flucuaions of deviaions of unemploymen and oupu from heir naural raes display persisence and are driven by hese wo ypes of shocks. Because of he endogenous persisence of deviaions of unemploymen from is naural rae, he equilibrium inflaion rae also displays persisence around he inflaion arge of he cenral bank Insiders, Wage Seing and he Phillips Curve The wage seing model inroduced in his chaper combines and exends wo srands of he lieraure.!2
3 The firs srand of he lieraure is he insider-ousider heory of wage deerminaion of Lindbeck and Snower (1986), Blanchard and Summers (1986) and Gofries (1992). According o his approach, here is an asymmery in he wage seing process beween insiders, who already have jobs, and ousiders who are seeking employmen. Ousiders are disenfranchised from he labor marke, and wages are se by insiders, who seek o maximize he real wage consisen wih heir own employmen, and no wih he employmen of he full labor force. This causes he naural rae of unemploymen o be inefficienly high. Second, he model incorporaes he Gray (1976)-Fischer (1977) model of predeermined nominal wages, according o which nominal wage conracs are negoiaed a he beginning of each period, and wages remain fixed for one period. Because curren shocks, including curren inflaion, are no known when nominal wage conracs are negoiaed, unanicipaed inflaion reduces real wages and causes employmen o increase along a downward sloping labor demand curve. Thus, he model produces a posiive shor run relaion beween unanicipaed inflaion and oupu and employmen, i.e an expecaions augmened Phillips curve. Employmen and oupu are deermined by compeiive firms, which se employmen in each period a he level which equaes he real wage o he marginal produc of labor. The marginal produc of labor is subjec o persisen produciviy shocks, which affec boh labor demand, and he oupu produced for given employmen Oupu, Employmen and Labor Demand Consider an economy consising of compeiive firms, indexed by i, where i [0,1]. Labor is he only variable facor of producion, and firms deermine employmen by equaing he marginal produc of labor o he real wage. The producion funcion of firm i is given by, 1! Y (i) = A L(i) (15.1) where Y(i) is oupu, A is exogenous produciviy, and L(i) is employmen. is a ime index, where =0,1,. 0<1-<1 is he elasiciy of oupu wih respec o employmen. Employmen is deermined by firms, which maximize profis by equaing he marginal produc of labor o he real wage. Thus, employmen is deermined by he condiion ha,! (1 )A L(i) = W (i) (15.2) P where W(i) is he nominal wage of firm i, and P is he price for he produc of firm i. Since he produc marke is assumed o be compeiive, all firms face he same price, and P(i)=P for all firms. In log-linear form, (15.1) and (15.2) can be wrien as,! y(i) = a + (1 )l(i) (15.3)!3
4 ! l(i) = l _ 1 (15.4) (w(i) p a ) where! l _ = ln(1 ) Lowercase leers denoe he logarihms of he corresponding uppercase variables. (3) deermines oupu as a posiive funcion of employmen, and (4) deermines employmen as a negaive funcion of deviaions of real wages from produciviy Wage Seing and Employmen in an Insider Ousider Model Nominal wages are se by insiders in each firm, a he beginning of each period, before variables, such as curren produciviy and he curren price level are known. Thus, nominal wages are se on he basis of he raional expecaions of insiders abou hese shocks. Nominal wages remain consan for one period, and hey are rese a he beginning of he following period. Thus, his model is characerized by he real disorions emphasized by Lindbeck and Snower (1976), leading o an inefficienly high naural rae of unemploymen, and by he nominal wage sickiness of he Gray (1976), Fischer (1977), Gofries (1992) models. Employmen is deermined ex pos by firms, given he conrac wage, afer he curren price level and produciviy have been revealed. This se up leads o emporary real effecs of nominal shocks and moneary policy. The number of insiders, who a he beginning of each period deermine he conrac wage, is assumed exogenous. The key objecive of insiders is o se a nominal wage which, given heir raional expecaions abou he price level and produciviy, will minimize deviaions of expeced employmen from an employmen arge deermined by insiders in each firm. The expecaions on he basis of which wages are se depend on informaion available unil he end of period -1, bu no on informaion abou prices and produciviy in period. On he basis of he above, we assume ha he objecive of wage seers in each firm is o make expeced employmen saisfy a pah ha minimizes he following quadraic ineremporal loss funcion, min E 1 β s s=0 1 2 l(i) +s n_ (i) +s 2 (15.5) " is he logarihm of he number of insiders in each firm. β=1/(1+ρ)<1 is he discoun facor, wih ρ being he pure rae of ime preference. (5) is minimized subjec o he labor demand equaion (15.4). n _ We assume ha he oal number of insiders in he economy is always sricly smaller han he labor force. We hus assume ha, 1! n _ (i) di = n _ < n,! (15.6) i=0!4
5 where n is he log of he labor force. From he firs order condiions for a minimum of (15.5), wages are se so ha expeced employmen for each firm saisfies,! E 1 l(i) = n _ (i) (15.7) Inegraing over i, expeced aggregae employmen mus hen saisfy,! E 1 l = n _ (15.8) (15.8) is he same as (15.7) wihou he i index. (15.8) deermines he naural level of employmen, solely on he basis of he number of insiders in he wage seing process. Since he number of insiders is assumed o always be smaller han he labor force, he naural level of employmen is inefficienly low. Acual employmen is deermined by firms, afer he nominal wage has been se, and afer informaion abou curren prices, produciviy and oher shocks has been revealed. Inegraing he labour demand funcion over he number of firms i, aggregae employmen is given by,! l = l _ 1 (15.9) (w p a ) From (15.8) and (15.9), he conrac wage saisfies,! w = E 1 p + E 1 a (n _ l _ ) (15.10) The wage is se so as o make expeced employmen equal o he number of insiders, and is based on one period ahead expecaions abou he price level and produciviy An Expecaions Augmened Phillips Curve Subsiuing (15.10) in (15.9), acual employmen evolves according o, ( ) = n _ + 1 ( π E 1π + a E 1 a )! l = n _ + 1 (15.11) p E p + a E a 1 1 where,! π = p p 1 is he rae of inflaion. From (15.11), employmen deviaes from is naural level o he exen ha here are unanicipaed shocks o inflaion and produciviy. Unanicipaed increases in inflaion cause a reducion in real wages and increase labour demand and employmen, while, unanicipaed increases in produciviy increase produciviy relaive o real wages, and hus also increase labour demand and employmen. We can define he unemploymen rae as,!5
6 ! u! n l (15.12) We can define he naural rae of unemploymen as, 3! u N! n n _ (15.13) From (11), (12) and (13), i follows ha,! u = u N 1 (15.14) π E 1π + a E 1 a The unemploymen rae deviaes from is naural rae as a resul of unexpeced shocks o inflaion and produciviy, because boh reduce real wages relaive o produciviy, compared wih he prior expecaions of wage seers. (15.14) has he form of an expecaions augmened Phillips curve, which arises because nominal wages are se for one period and before curren inflaion and produciviy are known. We can also express his expecaions augmened Phillips curve in erms of oupu. From he loglinear version of he firm producion funcion in (15.3), aggregaing over firms, we ge an aggregae producion funcion in log-linear form, as,! y = a + (1 )l (15.15) Subsiuing (15.11) in he log-linear version of he producion funcion (15.15), oupu supply evolves according o,! y = y N + 1 ( (15.16) π E 1π + a E 1 a ) where, ( )! y N = (1 )n _ + a (15.17) is he naural level of oupu. Unexpeced shocks o inflaion and produciviy cause oupu o be higher han is naural level, as hey cause employmen o be higher han is own naural level. (15.16) can be seen as he oupu version of he expecaions augmened Phillips curve, or as a shor run oupu supply funcion. I is worh noing ha, if wage seing did no ake place in advance bu during he acual period, here would be no real effecs from unexpeced inflaion and no employmen effecs from shocks o produciviy. Essenially, we would have a quasi classical model, wih a posiive naural rae of unemploymen and no Phillips curve. Thus, he assumpion ha nominal wages are se in 3 The concep of he naural rae of unemploymen is due o Friedman (1968) and was analyzed in he conex of an expecaions augmened Phillips curve in Chaper 12.!6
7 advance, and before curren shocks o inflaion and produciviy become known o wage seers, is very imporan for he properies of his model The Naural Rae of Unemploymen and he Naural Level of Oupu I is worh disinguishing beween he naural level of oupu and he full employmen level oupu. Full employmen oupu is given by,! y F = (1 )n + a (15.18) Full employmen oupu is always higher han he naural level of oupu in his model. The reason is ha equilibrium employmen is lower han full employmen, since he pool of insiders, who are ones who deermine equilibrium employmen hrough heir wage seing behavior, is smaller han he labor force. Thus, because of his real disorion in he labor marke, he naural level of oupu is inefficienly low, and he naural rae of unemploymen is inefficienly high. From (15.17) and (15.18), he relaion beween he naural rae of unemploymen and deviaions of oupu from full employmen oupu is given by,! y F y N = (1 )(n n _ N ) = (1 )u (15.19) This is he real disorion in his model. Because of he inefficiency in he labor marke, due o he marke power of insiders, he equilibrium level ( naural level ) of employmen is lower han full employmen, he naural level of oupu is lower han full employmen oupu, and he naural rae of unemploymen is posiive. Furhermore, equilibrium unemploymen is involunary, as he unemployed ousiders would be prepared o work a he prevailing real wage The Deerminaion of Aggregae Consumpion and Money Demand We nex urn o he deerminaion of aggregae demand. We assume ha he economy consiss of a large number of idenical households j, where j [0,1]. Each household member supplies one uni of labor, and unemploymen impacs all households in he same manner. Thus, if H is he number of households and N is he aggregae labor force, each household has N/H members. Of hose, some are insiders in he labor marke, and he res are ousiders. The proporion of insiders is he same for all households. In addiion, he proporion of he unemployed is also assumed o be he same for all households. The represenaive household chooses (aggregae) consumpion and real money balances in order o maximize, s 1 θ 1 1! E (15.20) s=0 1+ ρ 1 θ V C +sc 1 θ M M +s + V +s P +s subjec o he sequence of expeced budge consrains,!7
8 ! E F +s+1 (1+ i +s ) F +s i +s M +s + P +s ( Y +s C +s T +s ) (15.21) 1+ i +s = 0 where! F = B + M. ρ denoes he pure rae of ime preference, θ is he inverse of he elasiciy of ineremporal subsiuion, i he nominal ineres rae, F he curren value of he financial asses of he household (one period nominal bonds B and money M), Y real non ineres income and T real axes ne of ransfers. V C and V M denoe exogenous sochasic shocks in he uiliy from consumpion and real money balances respecively. From he firs order condiions for a maximum,! V C C θ = λ (1+ i )P (15.22) θ M M! V (15.23) P = λ i P 1+ ρ! E λ +1 = E (15.24) 1+ i +1 λ where λ is he Lagrange muliplier in period. (15.22)-(15.24) have he sandard inerpreaions. (15.22) suggess ha a he opimum he household equaes he marginal uiliy of consumpion o he value of savings. (15.23) suggess ha he household equaes he marginal uiliy of real money balances o he opporuniy cos of money. Finally, (15.24) suggess ha a he opimum, he real ineres rae, adjused for he expeced increase in he marginal uiliy of consumpion, is equal o he pure rae of ime preference. From (15.22), (15.23) and (15.24), eliminaing λ, 1 θ C M V! (15.25) P = C i M V 1+ i ( ) θ ( ) θ V C! E +1 C +1 = 1+ ρ V C C (15.26) P i P (15.25) is he money demand funcion, which is proporional o consumpion and a negaive funcion of he nominal ineres rae, and (15.26) is he familiar Euler equaion for consumpion. Log-linearizing (15.25) and (15.26),! m p = c 1 (15.27) θ ln i 1+ i + 1 θ v M C ( v )!8
9 ( ) + 1 θ (v C E v +1! c = E c +1 1 (15.28) θ i E π +1 ρ C ) where lowercase leers denoe naural logarihms, and, π = p p 1 is he rae of inflaion. 4 We hen urn o he deerminaion of equilibrium in he produc and money markes Equilibrium in he Produc and Money Markes Since here is no capial and invesmen in his model, and no governmen expendiure, produc marke equilibrium implies ha oupu is equal o consumpion.! Y = C (15.29) This produc marke equilibrium condiion allows us o subsiue oupu for consumpion in he money demand funcion and he Euler equaion for consumpion, and derive he new keynesian LM and IS curves The New Keynesian IS and LM Curves Subsiuing (15.29) in (15.27) and (15.28), we ge he money and produc marke equilibrium condiions,! m p = y 1 (15.30) θ ln i 1+ i + 1 θ v M C ( v ) ( ) + 1 θ (v C E v +1! y = E y +1 1 (15.31) θ i E π +1 ρ C ) (15.30) is he money marke equilibrium condiion, he equivalen of he LM Curve in he radiional Keynesian model, and (15.31) is he produc marke equilibrium condiion, he equivalen of he IS Curve. (15.30) and (15.31) are ofen referred o as he new keynesian LM curve and he new keynesian IS curve respecively The Naural and he Curren Real Ineres Rae Since oupu demand depends on deviaions of he real ineres from he pure rae of ime preference, he real ineres rae is he relaive price ha adjuss o equilibrae oupu demand wih oupu supply. No oher relaive price can play his role, as he real wage is deermined in order o make expeced labor demand equal o he number of insiders in he labor marke. 4 Technically, since he logarihm of he expecaion of a produc (or raio) of wo random variables is no equal o he sum (or difference) of he expecaions of he logarihms of he relevan random variables, (15.28) mus also conain second order erms, depending on he covariance marix of consumpion, inflaion and shocks o preferences for consumpion and inflaion. Assuming ha all exogenous shocks are independen saionary sochasic processes, hese second order erms are consan and can be ignored.!9
10 " George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper 15 The real ineres rae is defined by he Fisher (1896) equaion, 5 r = i E π +1 (15.32) The naural real ineres rae is deermined by he produc marke equilibrium condiion, when oupu is a is naural level. From (15.17) and (15.31), he naural real ineres rae is deermined by, ( )! r N = ρ θ (1 ) n _ E n _ +1 (15.33) + a E a ( +1) + v C C E v +1 The naural real ineres rae is equal o he pure rae of ime preference, bu also depends posiively on deviaions of curren shocks o consumpion from anicipaed fuure shocks, and negaively on deviaions of curren produciviy shocks from anicipaed fuure shocks, as well as deviaions of he curren naural level of employmen from is anicipaed fuure level. Thus, real shocks ha cause a emporary increase in he naural level of oupu reduce he naural real rae of ineres, in order o bring abou an corresponding reducion in consumpion and mainain produc marke equilibrium. On he oher hand, real shocks ha cause a emporary increase in consumpion, require an increase in he naural real rae of ineres, in order o induce lower consumpion, and mainain produc marke equilibrium. 6 Because of he nominal rigidiy of wages for one period, he curren equilibrium real ineres deviaes from is naural rae. The curren real ineres rae is deermined by he equaion of he oupu demand funcion (15.31) wih he oupu supply funcion (15.16). I is hus deermined as, ( )! r = r N θ 1 ( π E 1 π + a E 1 a ) (15.34) Unanicipaed shocks o inflaion or produciviy, which cause a emporary rise in curren oupu relaive o is naural level, also reduce he curren real ineres rae relaive o is naural rae. This is he Wicksellian mechanism in his model. We shall reurn o his mechanism when we discuss alernaive ineres rae rules Equilibrium Flucuaions wih Exogenous Real Shocks In wha follows, we shall assume ha he logarihms of he exogenous shocks o preferences and produciviy follow saionary AR(1) processes.! v C = η C v C C 1 + ε (15.35) 5 See he quoaion from Fisher (1896) in Chaper 6, on he disincion beween nominal and real ineres raes. The concep of a naural rae of ineres was inroduced by Wicksell (1898). To quoe, There is a cerain rae of 6 ineres on loans which is neural in respec o commodiy prices, and ends neiher o raise nor o lower hem. This is necessarily he same as he rae of ineres which would be deermined by supply and demand if no use were made of money and all lending were effeced in he form of real capial goods. I comes o much he same hing o describe i as he curren value of he naural rae of ineres (p. 102). I is worh noing ha Friedman (1968) defined he naural rae of unemploymen in direc analogy o he definiion of he naural rae of ineres by Wicksell (1898). He made a direc reference o Wicksell, and was fully aware of he analogy beween he wo conceps.!10
11 !! v M = η M v M 1 + ε (15.36) A a = η A a 1 + ε (15.37) where he auoregressive parameers saisfy, processes. 0 < η, and ε C, ε M, ε A C,η M,η A < 1, are whie noise We shall furher assume ha he (log of he) labor force and he number of insiders are fixed. We hus assume ha, is fixed a n, and ha he exogenous number of insiders also follows a saionary AR(1) process, of he form,! 0 < n _ < n (15.38) From (15.38), and he definiion of he naural rae of unemploymen in (15.13), we also have ha,! u N = u N = n n _! (15.39) Thus, he naural rae of unemploymen is assumed consan. Wih hese assumpions, curren employmen, unemploymen, oupu, real wages and he real ineres rae, as funcions of he exogenous shocks and shocks o inflaion, evolve according o, ( )! l = n _ + 1 (15.40) π E A 1π + ε where! n _ is given by (15.38). ( )! u = u N 1 (15.41) π E A 1π + ε where! u _ is given by (15.39).! y = y N + 1 (15.42) π E A ( 1π + ε ) where,! y N = (1 )n _ + a. ( )! w p = (w p) N π E 1 π (15.43) where,!(w p) N = η A a 1 (n _ l _ ). ( )! r = r N θ 1 A ( π E 1 π + ε ) (15.44) where! r N C = ρ θ(1 η A )a + (1 η C )v!11
12 The naural raes (or levels) of real variables evolve as funcions of he exogenous real shocks. In he absence of he nominal rigidiy due o he assumpion ha nominal wages are se in advance and remain fixed for one period, he evoluion of real variables would be equal o heir naural levels. The model would in all respecs be similar o a new classical model. However, unanicipaed inflaion, and innovaions in produciviy, by reducing real wages relaive o produciviy, cause a emporary increase in employmen and oupu above heir naural level, and a emporary reducion in unemploymen and he real ineres rae below heir naural raes. Since inflaion is also affeced by nominal shocks, unanicipaed nominal shocks have real effecs in his model Aggregae Flucuaions under an Exogenous Money Supply Rule In order o close he model, we mus make assumpions abou he evoluion of nominal variables such as he money supply. We shall iniially assume ha he money supply follows a random walk wih drif, of he form, S! m = µ + m 1 + ε (15.45) where µ is a consan and ε S a whie noise shock o he money supply. (15.45) can be viewed as a sochasic consan growh rule for he money supply, followed by he cenral bank. For example, Friedman (1960) proposed such a rule for moneary policy. Wih his assumpion, he seady sae rae of growh of he money supply is equal o µ, and since growh is equal o zero in his model, seady sae inflaion is also equal o µ, and he seady sae nominal ineres rae is equal o ρ+µ. Τhe money demand funcion (15.30) can be approximaed around he seady sae nominal ineres rae ρ+µ as,! m p = y 1 (15.46) θ ln i 1+ i + 1 θ (vm v C )! m 0 + y ζ (r + E π +1 ) + 1 θ (v M v C ) where! m 0 = 1, and,! > 0. θ ln ρ + µ 1+ ρ + µ ρ + µ ζ = θ(ρ + µ)(1+ ρ + µ) ζ is he semi-elasiciy of money demand wih respec o he nominal ineres rae. Subsiuing for real oupu and he real ineres rae from (15.42) and (15.44) and solving for he price level, we ge ha,! p 1+ζ + (1+ζθ)(1 ) (1+ζθ)(1 ) (15.47) E 1 p ζ E p +1 = z!12
13 ! George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper 15 where! z = m y N +ζ r N (1+ζθ)(1 ) ε A 1 θ (vm v C ) m The Real Effecs of Moneary Shocks In order o solve for he price level and inflaion, we shall firs absrac from real shocks and assume ha he only shocks are moneary shocks, i.e. shocks o he money supply process ε S and shocks o money demand v M. Moneary shocks do no affec he naural level of oupu or he naural real rae of ineres, so we can normalize hem o zero. In he presence of moneary shocks, he raional expecaions soluion of (15.47) is given by, p = µ + m (1 )(1+ζθ) ε S η M ( ) v 1 θ 1+ζ (1 η M ) From (15.48), unanicipaed inflaion is given by, (15.48)! π E 1 π = (15.49) + (1 )(1+ζθ) ε S M θ 1+ζ (1 η M ) M θ 1+ζ (1 η M ) ( ( ) + (1 )(1+ζθ)) ε ( ( ) + (1 )(1+ζθ)) ε M Subsiuing (15.49) in (15.42), we ge ha real oupu is deermined by, 1! y = y N + (15.50) + (1+ζθ)(1 ) ε 1 S M θ 1+ζ (1 η M ) ( ( ) + (1 )(1+ζθ)) ε Purely moneary shocks, such as shocks o he money supply and money demand, by causing unanicipaed changes in inflaion, cause emporary deviaions of oupu from is naural level. The reason is ha nominal wages are predeermined, based on expeced inflaion a he beginning of each period. By causing unanicipaed changes in inflaion, moneary shocks affec real wages and employmen, oupu and he real ineres rae. Thus, in his model, because of he nominal disorion of predeermined nominal wages, purely moneary shocks have emporary real effecs on oupu, employmen, unemploymen, real wages and he real ineres rae The Effecs of Real and Moneary Shocks on Prices and Oupu Real shocks would also affec inflaion, unanicipaed inflaion and flucuaions in real variables hrough z in (15.47). Real shocks in his model affec boh he naural level of oupu and he real ineres rae, and deviaions of oupu and he real ineres rae from heir naural levels, eiher hrough unanicipaed inflaion, or, in he case of produciviy shocks, direcly. We can use (15.47) o solve for he price level in erms of all he shocks. The soluion akes he following form.!13
14 ! p = p _ + m 1 + χ A a 1 + χ C v C 1 + χ M v M 1 +ψ A ε A +ψ C ε C +ψ S ε S M +ψ M ε (15.51) where,! p _ = µ m 0 (1 )n _ +ζρ (15.52 a)! χ A = 1+ζθ(1 η ) A (15.52 b) 1+ζ (1 η A ) η A! χ C = 1+ζθ(1 η ) C η C (15.52 c) 1+ζ (1 η C ) θ 1 η! χ M = M (15.52 d) 1+ζ (1 η M ) θ ( )! ψ A = (1+ζθ)(1 ) 1+ζθ(1 η + A ) (15.52 e) (1+ζ (1 η A )) + (1+ζθ)(1 ) ( ) 1+ζθ(1 η! ψ C = C ) 1 (15.52 f) (1+ζ (1 η C )) + (1+ζθ)(1 ) θ! ψ S = (15.52 g) + (1 )(1+ζθ)! ψ M = (15.52 h) θ 1+ζ (1 η M ) ( ( ) + (1 )(1+ζθ)) From (15.51), unanicipaed inflaion is deermined by,! π E 1 π =ψ A ε A +ψ C ε C +ψ S ε S M +ψ M ε (15.53) All he relevan shocks, real and nominal, affec unanicipaed inflaion. Thus, all he relevan shocks affec oupu flucuaions as well. Subsiuing (15.53) in he oupu supply funcion we ge ha flucuaions of oupu around is naural level are given by,! y = y N + 1 (15.54) (1+ψ )ε A A +ψ C ε C +ψ S ε S M ( +ψ M ε ) Thus, innovaions in produciviy, consumpion demand, he money supply and money demand, cause deviaions of oupu from is naural level. The variance of oupu around is naural level is given by, 2! Var(y y N ) = 1 (15.55) (1+ψ A ) 2 σ 2 A +ψ C2 σ 2 C +ψ S2 σ 2 2 ( S +ψ M2 σ M )!14
15 Thus, under an exogenous money supply rule, all shocks affec he variance of oupu around is naural level, as he money supply does no adjus o counerac he effecs on hese shocks on unanicipaed inflaion Aggregae Flucuaions under a Feedback Nominal Ineres Rae Rule In realiy, modern cenral banks do no allow he money supply o follow an exogenous process of he form of (15.45). Moneary policy usually reacs o deviaions of inflaion from arge, and/or o deviaions of oupu and unemploymen from arge. In addiion, cenral banks usually conduc moneary policy by conrolling he nominal ineres rae raher han he money supply. This is because of he difficulies in conrolling he money supply, and because he money demand funcion is subjec o shocks due o financial innovaions. 7 In wha follows we shall hus examine he behavior of he model under he assumpion ha he cenral bank follows a feedback rule for he nominal ineres rae. In paricular, we shall assume ha he cenral bank follows a feedback rule of he form,! i = r N + µ + (π µ) + φ 2 (y y _ ) + ε i (15.56) i where!,φ 2 > 0 are policy parameers, and! ε is a whie noise policy shock (error). This is a generalizaion of he Wicksell rule ha we examined in he case of he new classical model of Chaper 12 and similar o he rule we used in Chaper 15. The generalizaion is due o Taylor (1993, 1999) who showed ha in he las 35 years or so, he Federal Reserve, and oher cenral banks, follow such feedback ineres rae rules. According o his rule, he cenral bank aims for a nominal ineres rae which is equal o he naural real rae of ineres, plus a arge inflaion rae equal o µ. If acual inflaion is higher han he arge µ, hen he cenral bank raises ineres raes in order o reduce inflaion. In addiion, if oupu is higher han is naural level, and unemploymen lower han is naural rae, hen he cenral bank also raises ineres raes, in order o bring oupu back o is naural level and unemploymen back o is naural rae. Under his assumpion, our new keynesian model hus consiss of he oupu supply funcion (15.42), he Fisher equaion (15.32), he real ineres rae equaion (15.44), and he policy rule (15.51). These equaions can help deermine he price level and inflaion, oupu and he real ineres rae. Once we deermine inflaion, we can also deermine unanicipaed inflaion, and he evoluion of employmen, unemploymen and real wages, hrough equaions (15.40). (15.41) and (15.43). Subsiuing he policy rule (15.56) in he Fisher equaion (15.32), and using he real ineres rae equaion (15.44) and he oupu supply funcion (15.42), we ge he following process for inflaion.! π = γ 1 E 1 π + γ 2 E π +1 + ( 1)γ 2 µ γ 1 ε A i γ 2 ε (15.57) 7 See Bernanke (2006) for how he Federal Reserve has been conducing moneary policy.!15
16 (φ where,! γ 1 = 2 +θ)(1 ), and,!. + (φ 2 +θ)(1 ) < 1 γ = 2 + (φ 2 +θ)(1 ) The inflaionary process depends on he policy parameers of he Taylor rule and he oher srucural parameers of he model, such as and θ. I is driven by wo shocks. Shocks o produciviy, as hese shocks cause deviaions of oupu from is naural level, due o he fac ha nominal wages were deermined before he realizaion of hese shocks, and also shocks o he policy rule (15.51). No oher shocks affec he inflaionary process under his rule, as he nominal ineres rae adjuss o reflec changes in he naural rae of ineres, which is affeced by he oher shocks. The inflaion process (15.57) is sable if! γ 1 + γ 2 < 1. This requires ha,! > 1 (15.58) Condiion (15.58), is usually referred o as he Taylor principle, and requires ha he nominal ineres rae reacs more han one o one o deviaions of curren inflaion from is arge µ. This is a sufficien condiion for a sable and deerminae inflaion process, and we shall assume ha i is saisfied by he cenral bank. If (15.58) is saisfied, hen he raional expecaions soluion of he inflaion process akes he form,! π = µ γ 1 ε A i γ 2 ε (15.59) Inflaion deviaes from he cenral bank arge µ, only in response o curren shocks o produciviy and shocks o he seing of he nominal ineres rae. From (15.59) unanicipaed inflaion is hus given by,! π E 1 π = γ 1 ε A i γ 2 ε (15.60) Subsiuing (15.60) in he oupu supply funcion (15.42), we ge ha,! y = y N + 1 (15.61) (1 γ )ε A i ( 1 γ 2 ε ) Flucuaions of oupu around is naural level depend posiively on unanicipaed shocks o produciviy and negaively on nominal ineres rae shocks. The impac of he shocks depends on he policy parameers of he cenral bank rule, which affec γ1 and γ2. From (15.61) he variance of deviaions of oupu from is naural level is given by, 2! Var(y y N ) = 1 (15.62) (1 γ 1 ) 2 σ 2 2 ( A + γ 22 σ i ) Subsiuing (15.60) in he employmen equaion (15.40), he unemploymen equaion (15.41), he real wage equaion (15.43) and he real ineres rae equaion (15.44), we see ha unanicipaed!16
17 shocks o produciviy and he nominal ineres rae, also affec deviaions of hese variables from heir naural levels as well. From (15.41), he deviaion of unemploymen from is naural rae is deermined by, ( )! u u N = 1 (15.41 ) π E A 1π + ε Since unanicipaed inflaion and unanicipaed produciviy shocks are no persisen, deviaions of unemploymen from is naural rae will be non persisen eiher. For example, under a Taylor (1993) moneary policy rule, deviaions of unemploymen from is naural rae are deermined by, ( )! u u N = 1 (15.63) (1 γ )ε A i 1 + γ 2 ε From (15.61) and (15.63) we can confirm ha under a Taylor rule, only produciviy and moneary policy shocks affec flucuaions in real variables, such as oupu and unemploymen, around heir naural level. This is in conras o he exogenous rule for moneary growh, which resuls in all shocks affecing deviaions of oupu from is naural rae, and hus a higher poenial variance of oupu. Furhermore, he impac of hese shocks in (15.61) and (15.62) depends on he parameers of he moneary policy rule (15.51), which can affec γ1 and γ2. Thus, in his model here is scope for moneary policy o affec he shor run flucuaions of real variables by appropriae choice of he policy parameers. We shall reurn o he issue of he appropriae role of moneary policy in Chaper 16. A final remark is in order hough. We can see from (15.59, (15.61) and (15.63) ha flucuaions of inflaion from arge, and oupu and unemploymen around heir naural levels and are he sum of wo whie noise processes, i.e whie noise processes hemselves. All deviaions las for one period and here is no persisence. This lack of persisence is a serious weakness of he model, as he persisence of aggregae flucuaions is one of he main characerisics of business cycles Unemploymen Persisence, Inflaion and Moneary Policy As we have presened i so far, his model can accoun for flucuaions of inflaion around he arge of he moneary auhoriies and oupu, employmen and unemploymen around heir naural raes, bu hese flucuaions are no persisen. Ye, persisence of aggregae flucuaions is one of he main characerisics of business cycles. To accoun for persisence in his model, he model mus be generalized o inroduce a propagaion mechanism for he effecs of he various shocks Nominal Wage Conracs in a Dynamic Insider Ousider Model!17
18 One way o inroduce unemploymen persisence in a model wih periodic wage seing has been proposed by Blanchard and Summers (1986). We shall examine a fully dynamic version of heir model. 8 Following Blanchard and Summers (1986), we assume ha he employmen objecive which deermines he nominal wage in he conrac depends on boh he exogenous number of core insiders in each firm, bu also hose who were employed in period -1. The expecaions on he basis of which wages are se depend on informaion available unil he end of period -1, bu no on informaion abou prices and produciviy in period. On he basis of he above, we assume ha he objecive of insiders is o make expeced employmen saisfy a pah ha minimizes he following quadraic ineremporal loss funcion, 2 1! min E 1 β s (15.64) s=0 2 l(i) +s n_ (i) + ω ( 2 l(i) l(i) +s +s 1) 2 (15.64) is minimized subjec o he sequence of labor demand equaions (15.4), as employmen in each period is deermined ex pos by he firm. " is he logarihm of he number of core insiders. β=1/(1+ρ)<1 is he discoun facor, wih ρ being he pure rae of ime preference. ω is he weigh of recen employees relaive o core insiders in he wage seing process. As can be seen from (15.64), ousiders, i.e he unemployed of he previous period, have no influence on he wage seing process. 9 n _ We shall assume ha he oal number of core insiders in he economy is always sricly smaller han he labor force. We shall hus assume ha, 1! n _ (i)di = n _ < n,! (15.65) i=0 where n is he log of he labor force. From he firs order condiions for a minimum of (15.64), wages are se so ha expeced employmen for each firm saisfies,!( 1+ ω(1+ β) )E 1 l(i) βωe 1 l(i) +1 ωl(i) 1 = n _ (i) (15.66) Inegraing over he number of firms i, expeced aggregae employmen mus hen saisfy,!( 1+ ω(1+ β) )E 1 l βωe 1 l +1 ωl 1 = n _ (15.67) 8 The model we analyze in his secion is due o Alogoskoufis (2015). Noe ha (15.5) is a special case of (15.64) wih ω=0. Thus, in (15.5) only core insiders and no hose recenly 9 employed affec he wage seing process. An alernaive inerpreaion of (15.64) would be in erms of adjusmen coss. Insiders seek o minimize deviaions of expeced employmen from heir number, bu here is a cos o adjusing employmen from period o period. Then, ω can be inerpreed as he relaive imporance of adjusmen coss relaive o coss of deviaions from he employmen of core insiders.!18
19 ! George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper 15 (15.67) is he same as (15.66) wihou he i index and refers o aggregae employmen. (15.67) helps explain he differences of our dynamic wage seing model from he model in he previous secion, where only core insiders, and no he employees of he previous period affeced wage conracs. In he model where only core insiders affec wage conracs, ω=0, as recen employees do no exer any separae influence in he wage seing process. Seing ω=0 in (15.67), nominal wages would be se in order o ensure ha, E 1 l = n _ which is he same as equaion (15.8). Thus, he dynamic model we are considering now, conains he saic model of he previous secions as a special case. In our more general forward looking dynamic model, from (15.67), expeced employmen is given by, 1 ω! E 1 l = (15.68) 1+ ω(1+ β) n_ + 1+ ω(1+ β) l + βω 1 1+ ω(1+ β) E l 1 +1 Thus, in our dynamic wage seing model, insiders se nominal wages in order o achieve an employmen arge which depends on core insiders, hose previously employed, bu also on expeced fuure employmen, as expeced fuure employmen will affec fuure wage seing behavior Wage Deerminaion, Unemploymen Persisence and he Phillips Curve Subracing (15.67) from he log of he labor force n, afer some rearrangemen, we ge,!( 1+ ω(1+ β) )E 1 u βωe 1 u +1 ωu 1 = u N (15.69) where,! u! n l is he unemploymen rae, and! u N! n n _ >0 is he naural unemploymen rae. The naural rae of unemploymen in his model is defined in erms of he difference beween he labor force and he number of core insiders. This is he equilibrium rae owards which he economy would converge in he absence of shocks. To solve (15.69) for expeced unemploymen, define he operaor F, as,! F s u = E 1 u +s (15.70) We can hen rewrie (15.69) as,!(( 1+ ω(1+ β) )F 0 βωf ωf 1 )u = u N (15.71) (15.71) can be rearranged as,!19
20 ! George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper ω(1+ β)! βωf 1 F 2 F + 1 (15.72) βω β u = u N I is sraighforward o show ha if 0<β<1 and ω>0 and finie, he characerisic equaion of he quadraic in he forward shif operaor (in brackes) has wo disinc real roos, which lie on eiher side of uniy. The wo roos saisfy, 1+ ω(1+ β)! λ 1 + λ 2 = and! λ 1 λ 2 = 1 (15.73) βω β Using (15.73) we can rewrie (15.72), as,! (F λ 1 )(F λ 2 )u = 1 (15.74) βω u N Assuming λ1 is he smaller roo, we can solve (15.74) as, λ 1! E 1 u = λ 1 u 1 + (15.75) ω(1 βλ 1 ) u_ = λ 1 u 1 + (1 λ 1 )u N (15.75), which is he raional expecaions soluion of (15.69), deermines he pah of expeced unemploymen implied by he wage seing behavior of insiders. From (15.73), i is sraighforward o show ha an increase in ω, he relaive weigh of recen employees in he wage seing process, resuls in an increase in λ1, he coefficien ha deermines he persisence of expeced unemploymen. From (15.73), which defines he wo roos, i follows ha, λ 1 ω = λ 1 ω 2 > 0 Thus, he higher he weigh of recen employees relaive o core insiders in he wage seing process, he higher he persisence of unemploymen. 10 Acual unemploymen, is deermined from he employmen decisions of firms, afer informaion abou prices, produciviy and oher shocks has been revealed. Inegraing he labour demand funcion (15.4) over he number of firms i, aggregae employmen is given by,! l = l _ 1 (15.76) (w p a ) 10 For example, assuming β=0.99, wih ω=1, λ1=0.38. Wih ω=2, λ1=0.50, wih ω=10, λ1=0.73 and wih ω=100, λ1=0.91.!20
21 Subracing he aggregae employmen equaion (15.76) from he log of he labor force n, acual unemploymen is deermined by,! u = n l _ + 1 (15.77) (w p a ) Taking expecaions on he basis of informaion available a he end of period -1, he wage is se in order o make expeced unemploymen equal o he expression in (15.75), which defines he rae of unemploymen consisen wih he wage seing behavior of insiders. From (15.77), he wage is hus se in order o saisfy,! w = E 1 p + E 1 a + E 1 u n + l _ (15.78) where! E 1 u is deermined by (15.75). Subsiuing for he nominal wage in (15.77), using (15.78), hen he unemploymen rae evolves according o,! u = E 1 u 1 (15.79) (p E p + a E a ) 1 1 Subsiuing (15.75) in (15.79) hus gives us he soluion for he unemploymen rae.! u = λ 1 u 1 + (1 λ 1 )u N 1 (15.80) (p E p + a E a ) 1 1 From (15.80), he unemploymen rae is equal o he expeced unemploymen rae, as deermined by he behavior of insiders in he labor marke, and depends negaively on unanicipaed shocks o inflaion and produciviy. Unanicipaed shocks o inflaion reduce unemploymen by a facor which depends on he elasiciy of labor demand wih respec o he real wage, as unanicipaed inflaion reduces real wages. Unanicipaed shocks o produciviy also reduce unemploymen, as hey reduce he difference beween real wages and produciviy and increase labor demand. We can express (15.80) in erms of inflaion, by adding and subracing he lagged log of he price level in he las parenhesis. Thus, (15.80) akes he form of a dynamic, expecaions augmened Phillips Curve.! u = λ 1 u 1 + (1 λ 1 )u N 1 (15.81) (π E 1π + a E 1 a ) where π is he inflaion rae. (15.81) can be expressed in erms of deviaions of unemploymen from is naural rae, as,!21
22 ! u u N = λ 1 (u 1 u N ) 1 (15.82) (π E 1π + a E 1 a ) From (15.82), deviaions of unemploymen from is naural level depend negaively on unanicipaed shocks o inflaion and produciviy, as hese cause a discrepancy beween real wages and produciviy, due o he fac ha nominal wages are predeermined. Unanicipaed shocks o inflaion reduce real wages and induce firms o increase labor demand and employmen beyond heir naural level. Thus, unemploymen falls relaive o is naural rae. Unanicipaed shocks o produciviy, given inflaion, cause an increase in produciviy relaive o real wages, and also cause firms o increase labor demand, employmen and oupu, beyond heir naural levels, which reduces unemploymen beyond is naural rae. I can easily be confirmed from (15.82) ha following a shock o inflaion or produciviy, unemploymen will converge gradually back o is naural rae, wih he speed of adjusmen being (1-λ1) per period. Thus, following shocks o inflaion or produciviy, deviaions of unemploymen from is naural rae will display persisence The Relaion beween Oupu and Unemploymen Persisence The persisence of employmen and unemploymen, will also be ranslaed ino persisen oupu flucuaions. Aggregaing he firm producion funcions (3), he aggregae producion funcion can be wrien as,! y = a + (1 )l (15.83) Adding and subracing!(1 )(n n _ ), he producion funcion can be wrien as,! y = y N (1 )(u u N ) (15.84) where,! y N = (1 )n _ + a (15.85) is he log of he naural level of oupu. (15.84) is an Okun (1962) ype of relaion, which suggess ha flucuaions of oupu around is naural level will be negaively relaed o flucuaions of he unemploymen rae around is own naural rae. From (15.84) and (15.82), deviaions of oupu from is naural level will be deermined by,! y y N = λ 1 (y 1 y N 1 ) + 1 (15.86) (π E 1π + a E 1 a )!22
23 (15.86) shows ha deviaions of oupu from is naural level, also display persisence, because of he persisence of employmen and unemploymen. (15.86) is a dynamic oupu supply funcion. Deviaions of oupu from is naural level depend posiively on unanicipaed shocks o inflaion and produciviy, as hese cause a discrepancy beween real wages and produciviy, due o he fac ha nominal wages are predeermined. Unanicipaed shocks o inflaion reduce real wages and induce firms o increase labor demand, employmen and oupu. Unanicipaed shocks o produciviy, given inflaion, cause an increase in produciviy relaive o real wages, and also cause firms o increase labor demand, employmen and oupu, beyond heir naural levels. On he oher hand, anicipaed shocks o produciviy increase boh oupu and is naural level by he same proporion. Under unemploymen persisence, curren employmen, unemploymen, oupu, real wages and he real ineres rae, as funcions of he exogenous shocks and shocks o inflaion, evolve according o,! l = (1 λ 1 )n _ + λ 1 l (15.87) π E A 1π + ε where! is he naural level of employmen. n _! u = (1 λ 1 )u N + λ 1 u 1 1 (15.88) π E A 1π + ε where! u N is he naural rae of unemploymen.! y = y N + λ 1 (y 1 y N 1 ) + 1 (15.89) π E A ( 1π + ε ) where,! y N = (1 )n _ + a.! w p = (w p) N + λ 1 (u 1 u N A ) π E 1 π + ε (15.90) where,!(w p) N = a (n _ l _ ). ( ) ( ) ( )! r = r N +θ(1 )(1 λ 1 )(u u _ ) (15.91) where! r N C = ρ θ(1 η A )a + (1 η C )v. The naural raes (or levels) of real variables evolve as funcions of he exogenous real shocks. However, unanicipaed inflaion, and innovaions in produciviy, by reducing real wages relaive o heir naural level, cause persisen increases in employmen and oupu above heir naural level, and persisen reducions in unemploymen, real wages and he real ineres rae, below heir naural raes Flucuaions of Unemploymen and Inflaion under a Taylor Rule Assume ha deviaions in he unemploymen rae persis as in (15.82), and ha he cenral bank follows a Taylor rule of he form,!23
24 !!!!!!! George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper 15! i = r N + µ + π π * (15.92) i where!,φ 2 > 0 and! ε is a whie noise ineres rae policy shock. We have now expressed he Taylor rule in erms of deviaions of unemploymen and no oupu from is naural rae. This does no affec he resuls, as hrough he Okun ype relaion (15.84), deviaions of unemploymen from is naural rae are a linear funcion of deviaions of oupu from is naural level. Subsiuing (15.92) in he Fisher equaion, afer using he real ineres rae equaion (15.91) and he dynamic Phillips curve (15.88), we ge he following process for inflaion,! π = γ 1 E π +1 + γ 2 E 1 π + γ 3 π 1 + γ 4 µ + γ 5 ε A + γ 6 ε i i + γ 7 ε 1 (15.93) where, γ 1 = ( ) φ 2 (u u N ) + ε i + φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) + λ 1 φ γ 2 = 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) + φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) + λ 1 λ γ 3 = 1 + φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) + λ 1 γ 4 = γ 5 = γ 2 γ 6 = γ 1 γ 7 = λ 1 γ 1 ( 1)(1 λ 1 ) + φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) + λ 1 Noe ha, because of he persisence of unemploymen, he inflaionary process also displays persisence. I also depends on he curren expecaions abou fuure inflaion, hrough he definiion of he real ineres rae and on boh parameers of he Taylor rule, as unanicipaed inflaion causes he unemploymen rae and he real ineres rae o deviae from heir naural raes. Finally, because of he persisence in unemploymen boh curren and pas nominal ineres rae shocks affec he inflaionary process. The effecs of produciviy and nominal ineres rae shocks on inflaion also depend on he parameers of he Taylor rule. 11 In order o solve for inflaion, we firs ake expecaions of (15.93) condiional on informaion available up o he end of period -1. This yields, 1! E 1 π = E 1 π +1 + λ 1 π 1 + (φ 1)(1 λ ) 1 1 λ µ + 1 i ε 1 (15.94) + λ 1 + λ 1 + λ 1 + λ 1 (15.93) being he inflaionary process from a dynamic sochasic general equilibrium model, in which he policy rule 11 of he moneary auhoriies is aken ino accoun when agens form heir expecaions, i does no suffer from he Lucas (1976) criique. Changing he parameers of he policy rule, would also change he parameers of he inflaionary process.!24
25 !!! George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomics, 2016 Chaper 15 The process (15.94) has wo roos,! λ 1 and!, and will be sable if he wo roos lie on eiher side of uniy. Since! λ 1 < 1, he expeced inflaion process will be sable if,! > 1 (15.95) Condiion (15.95), is he Taylor principle. I requires ha nominal ineres raes over-reac o deviaions of curren inflaion from arge inflaion, in order o affec expeced real raes. This is a sufficien condiion for a sable and deerminae process for expeced (and acual) inflaion. 12 If (15.95) is saisfied, hen he soluion for he expeced inflaion process (15.94) is given by,! E 1 π = (1 λ 1 )µ + λ 1 π 1 + λ 1 i ε 1 (15.96) From (15.96), i follows ha,! E π +1 = (1 λ 1 )µ + λ 1 π + λ 1 i ε (15.97) Subsiuing (15.96) and (15.97) in he inflaion process (15.93), he raional expecaions soluion for inflaion is given by,! π = (1 λ 1 )µ + λ 1 π 1 ψ 1 ε A ψ 2 ε i i +ψ 3 ε 1 (15.98) where, ψ 1 = φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) + φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) < 1 ψ 2 = λ 1 + φ 2 +θ(1 λ 1 )(1 ) > 0 ψ 3 = λ 1 > 0 From (15.98), he flucuaions of inflaion around he arge of he moneary auhoriies µ are persisen, and depend on he curren innovaion in produciviy and curren and pas ineres rae shocks. Furhermore, he persisence of inflaion is equal o he persisence of deviaions of unemploymen and oher real variables, such as oupu, from heir naural level. The flucuaions of unemploymen and oupu around heir naural level are driven by unanicipaed inflaion and innovaions in produciviy. From (15.98), unanicipaed inflaion is deermined by, 12 Woodford (2003), among ohers, conains a deailed discussion of he Taylor principle, and is significance for he resoluion of he price level and inflaion indeerminacy problem highlighed by Sargen and Wallace (1975) for non coningen ineres rae rules.!25
Chapter 13 A New Keynesian Model with Periodic Wage Contracts
George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory, 2015 Chaper 13 A New Keynesian Model wih Periodic Wage Conracs The realizaion of he insabiliy of he original Phillips curve has gradually led o a paradigm
More informationOn the Taylor Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model. George Alogoskoufis*
On he Taylor Rule and Opimal Moneary Policy in a Naural Rae Model by George Alogoskoufis* June 015. Revised May 016 Absrac This paper invesigaes he sabilizing role of moneary policy in a dynamic, sochasic
More informationChapter 14 A Model of Imperfect Competition and Staggered Pricing
George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory, 205 Chaper 4 A Model of Imperfec Compeiion and Saggered Pricing In his chaper we presen he srucure of an alernaive new Keynesian model of aggregae flucuaions.
More informationA Dynamic Model of Economic Fluctuations
CHAPTER 15 A Dynamic Model of Economic Flucuaions Modified for ECON 2204 by Bob Murphy 2016 Worh Publishers, all righs reserved IN THIS CHAPTER, OU WILL LEARN: how o incorporae dynamics ino he AD-AS model
More informationE β t log (C t ) + M t M t 1. = Y t + B t 1 P t. B t 0 (3) v t = P tc t M t Question 1. Find the FOC s for an optimum in the agent s problem.
Noes, M. Krause.. Problem Se 9: Exercise on FTPL Same model as in paper and lecure, only ha one-period govenmen bonds are replaced by consols, which are bonds ha pay one dollar forever. I has curren marke
More informationMacroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Fall 2005 ANSWER EACH PART IN A SEPARATE BLUE BOOK. PART ONE: ANSWER IN BOOK 1 WEIGHT 1/3
Macroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examinaion Fall 2005 Comprehensive Examinaion UCLA Dep. of Economics You have 4 hours o complee he exam. There are hree pars o he exam. Answer all pars. Each par has
More informationProblem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims
Problem Se 5 Graduae Macro II, Spring 2017 The Universiy of Nore Dame Professor Sims Insrucions: You may consul wih oher members of he class, bu please make sure o urn in your own work. Where applicable,
More informationLecture Notes 3: Quantitative Analysis in DSGE Models: New Keynesian Model
Lecure Noes 3: Quaniaive Analysis in DSGE Models: New Keynesian Model Zhiwei Xu, Email: xuzhiwei@sju.edu.cn The moneary policy plays lile role in he basic moneary model wihou price sickiness. We now urn
More informationDifferent assumptions in the literature: Wages/prices set one period in advance and last for one period
Øisein Røisland, 5.3.7 Lecure 8: Moneary policy in New Keynesian models: Inroducing nominal rigidiies Differen assumpions in he lieraure: Wages/prices se one period in advance and las for one period Saggering
More informationFinal Exam Advanced Macroeconomics I
Advanced Macroeconomics I WS 00/ Final Exam Advanced Macroeconomics I February 8, 0 Quesion (5%) An economy produces oupu according o α α Y = K (AL) of which a fracion s is invesed. echnology A is exogenous
More information1 Answers to Final Exam, ECN 200E, Spring
1 Answers o Final Exam, ECN 200E, Spring 2004 1. A good answer would include he following elemens: The equiy premium puzzle demonsraed ha wih sandard (i.e ime separable and consan relaive risk aversion)
More informationPolicy regimes Theory
Advanced Moneary Theory and Policy EPOS 2012/13 Policy regimes Theory Giovanni Di Barolomeo giovanni.dibarolomeo@uniroma1.i The moneary policy regime The simple model: x = - s (i - p e ) + x e + e D p
More informationA New-Keynesian Model
Deparmen of Economics Universiy of Minnesoa Macroeconomic Theory Varadarajan V. Chari Spring 215 A New-Keynesian Model Prepared by Keyvan Eslami A New-Keynesian Model You were inroduced o a monopolisic
More informationUNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Exam: ECON4325 Moneary Policy Dae of exam: Tuesday, May 24, 206 Grades are given: June 4, 206 Time for exam: 2.30 p.m. 5.30 p.m. The problem se covers 5 pages
More information1 Price Indexation and In ation Inertia
Lecures on Moneary Policy, In aion and he Business Cycle Moneary Policy Design: Exensions [0/05 Preliminary and Incomplee/Do No Circulae] Jordi Galí Price Indexaion and In aion Ineria. In aion Dynamics
More informationOnline Appendix to Solution Methods for Models with Rare Disasters
Online Appendix o Soluion Mehods for Models wih Rare Disasers Jesús Fernández-Villaverde and Oren Levinal In his Online Appendix, we presen he Euler condiions of he model, we develop he pricing Calvo block,
More informationLecture Notes 5: Investment
Lecure Noes 5: Invesmen Zhiwei Xu (xuzhiwei@sju.edu.cn) Invesmen decisions made by rms are one of he mos imporan behaviors in he economy. As he invesmen deermines how he capials accumulae along he ime,
More information3.1.3 INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION: DISCRETE TIME PROBLEMS. A. The Hamiltonian and First-Order Conditions in a Finite Time Horizon
3..3 INRODUCION O DYNAMIC OPIMIZAION: DISCREE IME PROBLEMS A. he Hamilonian and Firs-Order Condiions in a Finie ime Horizon Define a new funcion, he Hamilonian funcion, H. H he change in he oal value of
More informationANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 6 SECTION 6.1: LIFE CYCLE CONSUMPTION AND WEALTH T 1. . Let ct. ) is a strictly concave function of c
John Riley December 00 S O EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPER 6 SECION 6: LIFE CYCLE CONSUMPION AND WEALH Eercise 6-: Opimal saving wih more han one commodiy A consumer has a period uiliy funcion δ u (
More informationSophisticated Monetary Policies. Andrew Atkeson. V.V. Chari. Patrick Kehoe
Sophisicaed Moneary Policies Andrew Akeson UCLA V.V. Chari Universiy of Minnesoa Parick Kehoe Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and Universiy of Minnesoa Barro, Lucas-Sokey Approach o Policy Solve Ramsey
More informationCooperative Ph.D. Program in School of Economic Sciences and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS. August 8, :45 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Cooperaive Ph.D. Program in School of Economic Sciences and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS Augus 8, 213 8:45 a.m. o 1: p.m. THERE ARE FIVE QUESTIONS ANSWER ANY FOUR OUT OF FIVE PROBLEMS.
More informationThe Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model
c December 3, 208, Chrisopher D. Carroll BrockMirman The Brock-Mirman Sochasic Growh Model Brock and Mirman (972) provided he firs opimizing growh model wih unpredicable (sochasic) shocks. The social planner
More informationSolutions Problem Set 3 Macro II (14.452)
Soluions Problem Se 3 Macro II (14.452) Francisco A. Gallego 04/27/2005 1 Q heory of invesmen in coninuous ime and no uncerainy Consider he in nie horizon model of a rm facing adjusmen coss o invesmen.
More informationIntroduction D P. r = constant discount rate, g = Gordon Model (1962): constant dividend growth rate.
Inroducion Gordon Model (1962): D P = r g r = consan discoun rae, g = consan dividend growh rae. If raional expecaions of fuure discoun raes and dividend growh vary over ime, so should he D/P raio. Since
More informationProblem 1 / 25 Problem 2 / 20 Problem 3 / 10 Problem 4 / 15 Problem 5 / 30 TOTAL / 100
eparmen of Applied Economics Johns Hopkins Universiy Economics 602 Macroeconomic Theory and Policy Miderm Exam Suggesed Soluions Professor Sanjay hugh Fall 2008 NAME: The Exam has a oal of five (5) problems
More informationLABOR MATCHING MODELS: BASIC DSGE IMPLEMENTATION APRIL 12, 2012
LABOR MATCHING MODELS: BASIC DSGE IMPLEMENTATION APRIL 12, 2012 FIRM VACANCY-POSTING PROBLEM Dynamic firm profi-maimizaion problem ma 0 ( ) f Ξ v, n + 1 = 0 ( f y wn h g v ) Discoun facor beween ime 0
More informationEconomics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 6
Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Reciaion 6 Conor Ryan Ocober 11h, 2016 Ouline: Opimal Taxaion wih Governmen Invesmen 1 Governmen Expendiure in Producion In hese noes we will examine a model in which
More informationDiebold, Chapter 7. Francis X. Diebold, Elements of Forecasting, 4th Edition (Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2006). Chapter 7. Characterizing Cycles
Diebold, Chaper 7 Francis X. Diebold, Elemens of Forecasing, 4h Ediion (Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 006). Chaper 7. Characerizing Cycles Afer compleing his reading you should be able o: Define covariance
More informationBOKDSGE: A DSGE Model for the Korean Economy
BOKDSGE: A DSGE Model for he Korean Economy June 4, 2008 Joong Shik Lee, Head Macroeconomeric Model Secion Research Deparmen The Bank of Korea Ouline 1. Background 2. Model srucure & parameer values 3.
More informationProblem set 3: Endogenous Innovation - Solutions
Problem se 3: Endogenous Innovaion - Soluions Loïc Baé Ocober 25, 22 Opimaliy in he R & D based endogenous growh model Imporan feaure of his model: he monopoly markup is exogenous, so ha here is no need
More informationAppendix to The Macroeconomics of Trend Inflation Journal of Economic Literature, September 2014
Appendix o The Macroeconomics of Trend Inflaion Journal of Economic Lieraure, Sepember 204 Guido Ascari Universiy of Oxford and Universiy of Pavia Argia M. Sbordone Federal Reserve Bank of New York Sepember
More informationProblem Set #3: AK models
Universiy of Warwick EC9A2 Advanced Macroeconomic Analysis Problem Se #3: AK models Jorge F. Chavez December 3, 2012 Problem 1 Consider a compeiive economy, in which he level of echnology, which is exernal
More informationSuggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (REQUIRED) Submisson Deadline and Location: March 27 in Class
EC 450 Advanced Macroeconomics Insrucor: Sharif F Khan Deparmen of Economics Wilfrid Laurier Universiy Winer 2008 Suggesed Soluions o Assignmen 4 (REQUIRED) Submisson Deadline and Locaion: March 27 in
More informationThe general Solow model
The general Solow model Back o a closed economy In he basic Solow model: no growh in GDP per worker in seady sae This conradics he empirics for he Wesern world (sylized fac #5) In he general Solow model:
More informationA User s Guide to Solving Real Business Cycle Models. by a single representative agent. It is assumed that both output and factor markets are
page, Harley, Hoover, Salyer, RBC Models: A User s Guide A User s Guide o Solving Real Business Cycle Models The ypical real business cycle model is based upon an economy populaed by idenical infiniely-lived
More informationMacroeconomics I, UPF Professor Antonio Ciccone SOLUTIONS PROBLEM SET 1
Macroeconomics I, UPF Professor Anonio Ciccone SOUTIONS PROBEM SET. (from Romer Advanced Macroeconomics Chaper ) Basic properies of growh raes which will be used over and over again. Use he fac ha he growh
More informationMONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION IN A DSGE MODEL: PART II OCTOBER 4, 2011 BUILDING THE EQUILIBRIUM. p = 1. Dixit-Stiglitz Model
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION IN A DSGE MODEL: PART II OCTOBER 4, 211 Dixi-Sigliz Model BUILDING THE EQUILIBRIUM DS MODEL I or II Puing hings ogeher impose symmery across all i 1 pzf k( k, n) = r & 1 pzf n(
More informationLecture 19. RBC and Sunspot Equilibria
Lecure 9. RBC and Sunspo Equilibria In radiional RBC models, business cycles are propagaed by real echnological shocks. Thus he main sory comes from he supply side. In 994, a collecion of papers were published
More informationEcon107 Applied Econometrics Topic 7: Multicollinearity (Studenmund, Chapter 8)
I. Definiions and Problems A. Perfec Mulicollineariy Econ7 Applied Economerics Topic 7: Mulicollineariy (Sudenmund, Chaper 8) Definiion: Perfec mulicollineariy exiss in a following K-variable regression
More informationLicenciatura de ADE y Licenciatura conjunta Derecho y ADE. Hoja de ejercicios 2 PARTE A
Licenciaura de ADE y Licenciaura conjuna Derecho y ADE Hoja de ejercicios PARTE A 1. Consider he following models Δy = 0.8 + ε (1 + 0.8L) Δ 1 y = ε where ε and ε are independen whie noise processes. In
More informationMacroeconomics Qualifying Examination
Macroeconomics Qualifying Examinaion January 205 Deparmen of Economics UNC Chapel Hill Insrucions: This examinaion consiss of four quesions. Answer all quesions. If you believe a quesion is ambiguously
More informationA Dual-Target Monetary Policy Rule for Open Economies: An Application to France ABSTRACT
A Dual-arge Moneary Policy Rule for Open Economies: An Applicaion o France ABSRAC his paper proposes a dual arges moneary policy rule for small open economies. In addiion o a domesic moneary arge, his
More informationEssential Microeconomics : OPTIMAL CONTROL 1. Consider the following class of optimization problems
Essenial Microeconomics -- 6.5: OPIMAL CONROL Consider he following class of opimizaion problems Max{ U( k, x) + U+ ( k+ ) k+ k F( k, x)}. { x, k+ } = In he language of conrol heory, he vecor k is he vecor
More informationOptimal Monetary Policy in the New Keynesian Model
Opimal Moneary Policy in he New Keynesian Model Eric Sims Universiy of Nore Dame Spring 217 1 Inroducion These noes describe opimal moneary policy in he basic New Keynesian model. 2 Re-wriing he Basic
More informationAppendix 14.1 The optimal control problem and its solution using
1 Appendix 14.1 he opimal conrol problem and is soluion using he maximum principle NOE: Many occurrences of f, x, u, and in his file (in equaions or as whole words in ex) are purposefully in bold in order
More information( ) (, ) F K L = F, Y K N N N N. 8. Economic growth 8.1. Production function: Capital as production factor
8. Economic growh 8.. Producion funcion: Capial as producion facor Y = α N Y (, ) = F K N Diminishing marginal produciviy of capial and labor: (, ) F K L F K 2 ( K, L) K 2 (, ) F K L F L 2 ( K, L) L 2
More informationUnemployment and Mismatch in the UK
Unemploymen and Mismach in he UK Jennifer C. Smih Universiy of Warwick, UK CAGE (Cenre for Compeiive Advanage in he Global Economy) BoE/LSE Conference on Macroeconomics and Moneary Policy: Unemploymen,
More informationOptimal Monetary Policy with the Cost Channel: Appendix (not for publication)
Opimal Moneary Policy wih he Cos Channel: Appendix (no for publicaion) Federico Ravenna andcarlewalsh Nov 24 Derivaions for secion 2 The flexible-price equilibrium oupu (eq 9) When price are flexible,
More informationExplaining Total Factor Productivity. Ulrich Kohli University of Geneva December 2015
Explaining Toal Facor Produciviy Ulrich Kohli Universiy of Geneva December 2015 Needed: A Theory of Toal Facor Produciviy Edward C. Presco (1998) 2 1. Inroducion Toal Facor Produciviy (TFP) has become
More information1 Consumption and Risky Assets
Soluions o Problem Se 8 Econ 0A - nd Half - Fall 011 Prof David Romer, GSI: Vicoria Vanasco 1 Consumpion and Risky Asses Consumer's lifeime uiliy: U = u(c 1 )+E[u(c )] Income: Y 1 = Ȳ cerain and Y F (
More informationACE 562 Fall Lecture 4: Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation. by Professor Scott H. Irwin
ACE 56 Fall 005 Lecure 4: Simple Linear Regression Model: Specificaion and Esimaion by Professor Sco H. Irwin Required Reading: Griffihs, Hill and Judge. "Simple Regression: Economic and Saisical Model
More information1. Consider a pure-exchange economy with stochastic endowments. The state of the economy
Answer 4 of he following 5 quesions. 1. Consider a pure-exchange economy wih sochasic endowmens. The sae of he economy in period, 0,1,..., is he hisory of evens s ( s0, s1,..., s ). The iniial sae is given.
More informationHas the Inflation Process Changed? A Comment *
Has he Inflaion Process Changed? A Commen * Jordi Galí CREI, UPF, CEPR and NBER Augus 2004 * Based on he discussion of Cecchei and Debelle s paper Has he Inflaion Process Changed? presened a he Third BIS
More informationFINM 6900 Finance Theory
FINM 6900 Finance Theory Universiy of Queensland Lecure Noe 4 The Lucas Model 1. Inroducion In his lecure we consider a simple endowmen economy in which an unspecified number of raional invesors rade asses
More informationCOMPETITIVE GROWTH MODEL
COMPETITIVE GROWTH MODEL I Assumpions We are going o now solve he compeiive version of he opimal growh moel. Alhough he allocaions are he same as in he social planning problem, i will be useful o compare
More informationThe Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model
c November 20, 207, Chrisopher D. Carroll BrockMirman The Brock-Mirman Sochasic Growh Model Brock and Mirman (972) provided he firs opimizing growh model wih unpredicable (sochasic) shocks. The social
More informationIntroduction to DSGE modelling. Nicola Viegi. University of Pretoria
Inroducion o DSGE modelling Nicola Viegi Universi of reoria Dnamic Sochasic General Equilibrium Dnamic - expecaions Sochasic Impulses ropagaion Flucuaions General equilibrium Monear auhori Firms Households
More information14 Autoregressive Moving Average Models
14 Auoregressive Moving Average Models In his chaper an imporan parameric family of saionary ime series is inroduced, he family of he auoregressive moving average, or ARMA, processes. For a large class
More informationInflation-Targeting, Price-Path Targeting and Indeterminacy
WORKING PAPER SERIES Inflaion-Targeing, Price-Pah Targeing and Indeerminacy Rober D. Dimar and William T. Gavin Working Paper 2004-007B hp://research.slouisfed.org/wp/2004/2004-007.pdf March 2004 Revised
More informationDSGE methods. Introduction to Dynare via Clarida, Gali, and Gertler (1999) Willi Mutschler, M.Sc.
DSGE mehods Inroducion o Dynare via Clarida, Gali, and Gerler (1999) Willi Muschler, M.Sc. Insiue of Economerics and Economic Saisics Universiy of Münser willi.muschler@uni-muenser.de Summer 2014 Willi
More informationECON 482 / WH Hong Time Series Data Analysis 1. The Nature of Time Series Data. Example of time series data (inflation and unemployment rates)
ECON 48 / WH Hong Time Series Daa Analysis. The Naure of Time Series Daa Example of ime series daa (inflaion and unemploymen raes) ECON 48 / WH Hong Time Series Daa Analysis The naure of ime series daa
More informationGraduate Macro Theory II: Notes on Neoclassical Growth Model
Graduae Macro Theory II: Noes on Neoclassical Growh Model Eric Sims Universiy of Nore Dame Spring 2015 1 Basic Neoclassical Growh Model The economy is populaed by a large number of infiniely lived agens.
More informationThis document was generated at 7:34 PM, 07/27/09 Copyright 2009 Richard T. Woodward
his documen was generaed a 7:34 PM, 07/27/09 Copyrigh 2009 Richard. Woodward 15. Bang-bang and mos rapid approach problems AGEC 637 - Summer 2009 here are some problems for which he opimal pah does no
More informationThe Real Exchange Rate, Real Interest Rates, and the Risk Premium. Charles Engel University of Wisconsin
The Real Exchange Rae, Real Ineres Raes, and he Risk Premium Charles Engel Universiy of Wisconsin How does exchange rae respond o ineres rae changes? In sandard open economy New Keynesian model, increase
More informationT. J. HOLMES AND T. J. KEHOE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PAYMENTS THEORY FALL 2011 EXAMINATION
ECON 841 T. J. HOLMES AND T. J. KEHOE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PAYMENTS THEORY FALL 211 EXAMINATION This exam has wo pars. Each par has wo quesions. Please answer one of he wo quesions in each par for a
More informationA Note on Raising the Mandatory Retirement Age and. Its Effect on Long-run Income and Pay As You Go (PAYG) Pensions
The Sociey for Economic Sudies The Universiy of Kiakyushu Working Paper Series No.2017-5 (acceped in March, 2018) A Noe on Raising he Mandaory Reiremen Age and Is Effec on Long-run Income and Pay As You
More informationWorker flows and matching efficiency
Worker flows and maching efficiency Marcelo Veraciero Inroducion and summary One of he bes known facs abou labor marke dynamics in he US economy is ha unemploymen and vacancies are srongly negaively correlaed
More informationThis document was generated at 1:04 PM, 09/10/13 Copyright 2013 Richard T. Woodward. 4. End points and transversality conditions AGEC
his documen was generaed a 1:4 PM, 9/1/13 Copyrigh 213 Richard. Woodward 4. End poins and ransversaliy condiions AGEC 637-213 F z d Recall from Lecure 3 ha a ypical opimal conrol problem is o maimize (,,
More informationSeminar 4: Hotelling 2
Seminar 4: Hoelling 2 November 3, 211 1 Exercise Par 1 Iso-elasic demand A non renewable resource of a known sock S can be exraced a zero cos. Demand for he resource is of he form: D(p ) = p ε ε > A a
More informationd 1 = c 1 b 2 - b 1 c 2 d 2 = c 1 b 3 - b 1 c 3
and d = c b - b c c d = c b - b c c This process is coninued unil he nh row has been compleed. The complee array of coefficiens is riangular. Noe ha in developing he array an enire row may be divided or
More informationIntroduction to choice over time
Microeconomic Theory -- Choice over ime Inroducion o choice over ime Individual choice Income and subsiuion effecs 7 Walrasian equilibrium ineres rae 9 pages John Riley Ocober 9, 08 Microeconomic Theory
More informationOptimal Government Spending at the Zero Bound: Nonlinear and Non-Ricardian Analysis
Opimal Governmen Spending a he Zero Bound: Nonlinear and Non-Ricardian Analysis Taisuke Nakaa New York Universiy Firs Draf: May 9 This Draf : April Absrac This paper characerizes opimal governmen spending
More informationA Test of Identification for Government Spending Shocks.
A Tes of Idenificaion for Governmen Spending Shocks. Anna Kormilisina December 14, 2015 Absrac The response of consumpion o an increase in governmen spending in SVAR models may be influenced by he shock
More informationFull file at
Full file a hps://frasockeu SOLUTIONS TO CHAPTER 2 Problem 2 (a) The firm's problem is o choose he quaniies of capial, K, and effecive labor, AL, in order o minimize coss, wal + rk, subjec o he producion
More informationADVANCED MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS /2013 Sheet 3: Di erential equations
ADVANCED MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS - /3 Shee 3: Di erenial equaions Check ha x() =± p ln(c( + )), where C is a posiive consan, is soluion of he ODE x () = Solve he following di erenial equaions: (a) x
More informationA Note on Public Debt, Tax-Exempt Bonds, and Ponzi Games
WP/07/162 A Noe on Public Deb, Tax-Exemp Bonds, and Ponzi Games Berhold U Wigger 2007 Inernaional Moneary Fund WP/07/162 IMF Working Paper Fiscal Affairs Deparmen A Noe on Public Deb, Tax-Exemp Bonds,
More informationProblem Set #1 - Answers
Fall Term 24 Page of 7. Use indifference curves and a curved ransformaion curve o illusrae a free rade equilibrium for a counry facing an exogenous inernaional price. Then show wha happens if ha exogenous
More informationDynamic firm profit-maximization problem. max ( ( )) Total output sold in perfectlycompetitive
LABOR SEARCH MODELS: BASIC DSGE IMPLEMENTATION NOVEMBER 2, 200 FIRM VACANCY-POSTING PROBLEM Dynamic firm profi-maimizaion problem f f Ξ 0 y wn g v v, n + = 0 ma ( ( Discoun facor beween ime 0 and because
More informationSeminar 5 Sustainability
Seminar 5 Susainabiliy Soluions Quesion : Hyperbolic Discouning -. Suppose a faher inheris a family forune of 0 million NOK an he wans o use some of i for himself (o be precise, he share ) bu also o beques
More information10. State Space Methods
. Sae Space Mehods. Inroducion Sae space modelling was briefly inroduced in chaper. Here more coverage is provided of sae space mehods before some of heir uses in conrol sysem design are covered in he
More informationBU Macro BU Macro Fall 2008, Lecture 4
Dynamic Programming BU Macro 2008 Lecure 4 1 Ouline 1. Cerainy opimizaion problem used o illusrae: a. Resricions on exogenous variables b. Value funcion c. Policy funcion d. The Bellman equaion and an
More information3 Optimal Informational Interest Rate Rule 3.1. Introduction
3 Opimal Informaional Ineres Rae Rule 3.1. Inroducion Any public policy may be undersood as a public signal of he curren sae of he economy as i informs he views of he governmenal auhoriy o all agens. This
More informationSZG Macro 2011 Lecture 3: Dynamic Programming. SZG macro 2011 lecture 3 1
SZG Macro 2011 Lecure 3: Dynamic Programming SZG macro 2011 lecure 3 1 Background Our previous discussion of opimal consumpion over ime and of opimal capial accumulaion sugges sudying he general decision
More informationMacroeconomic Theory III: Competitive Equilibrium (Real) Business Cycles
Macroeconomic Theory III: Compeiive Equilibrium (Real) Business Cycles Gavin Cameron Lady Margare Hall Michaelmas Term 2004 inroducion Real business cycle models are Walrasian hey feaure compeiive markes,
More informationRANDOM LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS AND TRANSVERSALITY
ECO 504 Spring 2006 Chris Sims RANDOM LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS AND TRANSVERSALITY 1. INTRODUCTION Lagrange muliplier mehods are sandard fare in elemenary calculus courses, and hey play a cenral role in economic
More informationFinal Spring 2007
.615 Final Spring 7 Overview The purpose of he final exam is o calculae he MHD β limi in a high-bea oroidal okamak agains he dangerous n = 1 exernal ballooning-kink mode. Effecively, his corresponds o
More informationDoes External Habit Formation Help Increase Real Exchange Rate
Does Exernal Habi Formaion Help Increase Real Exchange Rae Persisence? An Analyical Characerizaion Yu-Ning Hwang a, Deparmen of Economics Naional Chengchi Universiy March 2007 Absrac The objecive of his
More informationGraduate Macro Theory II: A New Keynesian Model with Price Stickiness
Graduae Macro Theory II: A New Keynesian Model wih Price Sickiness Eric Sims Universiy of Nore Dame Spring 215 1 Inroducion This se of noes lays and ou and analyzes he canonical New Keynesian NK model.
More information13.3 Term structure models
13.3 Term srucure models 13.3.1 Expecaions hypohesis model - Simples "model" a) shor rae b) expecaions o ge oher prices Resul: y () = 1 h +1 δ = φ( δ)+ε +1 f () = E (y +1) (1) =δ + φ( δ) f (3) = E (y +)
More information= ( ) ) or a system of differential equations with continuous parametrization (T = R
XIII. DIFFERENCE AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Ofen funcions, or a sysem of funcion, are paramerized in erms of some variable, usually denoed as and inerpreed as ime. The variable is wrien as a funcion of
More informationT L. t=1. Proof of Lemma 1. Using the marginal cost accounting in Equation(4) and standard arguments. t )+Π RB. t )+K 1(Q RB
Elecronic Companion EC.1. Proofs of Technical Lemmas and Theorems LEMMA 1. Le C(RB) be he oal cos incurred by he RB policy. Then we have, T L E[C(RB)] 3 E[Z RB ]. (EC.1) Proof of Lemma 1. Using he marginal
More informationCurrency Misalignments and Optimal Monetary Policy: A Reexamination
Appendix: No for Publicaion Currency Misalignmens and Opimal Moneary Policy: A eexaminaion Charles Engel Universiy of isconsin July 8, Appendix A Model Equaions Aa Households The represenaive household
More informationPhysics 235 Chapter 2. Chapter 2 Newtonian Mechanics Single Particle
Chaper 2 Newonian Mechanics Single Paricle In his Chaper we will review wha Newon s laws of mechanics ell us abou he moion of a single paricle. Newon s laws are only valid in suiable reference frames,
More informationMath 333 Problem Set #2 Solution 14 February 2003
Mah 333 Problem Se #2 Soluion 14 February 2003 A1. Solve he iniial value problem dy dx = x2 + e 3x ; 2y 4 y(0) = 1. Soluion: This is separable; we wrie 2y 4 dy = x 2 + e x dx and inegrae o ge The iniial
More informationLinear Response Theory: The connection between QFT and experiments
Phys540.nb 39 3 Linear Response Theory: The connecion beween QFT and experimens 3.1. Basic conceps and ideas Q: How do we measure he conduciviy of a meal? A: we firs inroduce a weak elecric field E, and
More informationIntermediate Macro In-Class Problems
Inermediae Macro In-Class Problems Exploring Romer Model June 14, 016 Today we will explore he mechanisms of he simply Romer model by exploring how economies described by his model would reac o exogenous
More information23.2. Representing Periodic Functions by Fourier Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Represening Periodic Funcions by Fourier Series 3. Inroducion In his Secion we show how a periodic funcion can be expressed as a series of sines and cosines. We begin by obaining some sandard inegrals
More informationProblem Set on Differential Equations
Problem Se on Differenial Equaions 1. Solve he following differenial equaions (a) x () = e x (), x () = 3/ 4. (b) x () = e x (), x (1) =. (c) xe () = + (1 x ()) e, x () =.. (An asse marke model). Le p()
More informationThe Simple Linear Regression Model: Reporting the Results and Choosing the Functional Form
Chaper 6 The Simple Linear Regression Model: Reporing he Resuls and Choosing he Funcional Form To complee he analysis of he simple linear regression model, in his chaper we will consider how o measure
More informationFall 2015 Final Examination (200 pts)
Econ 501 Fall 2015 Final Examinaion (200 ps) S.L. Parene Neoclassical Growh Model (50 ps) 1. Derive he relaion beween he real ineres rae and he renal price of capial using a no-arbirage argumen under he
More information