Output-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems
|
|
- Amice Grant
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 96 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 Output-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems Shanwei Su Abstract In this paper, an output-feedback tracking controller is proposed for a class of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. To keep the unstable internal dynamics bounded, the method of output redefinition is applied to let the stability of the internal dynamics depend on that of redefined output, thus we only need to consider the new external dynamics rather than internal dynamics in the process of designing control law. To overcome the explosion of complexity problem in traditional backstepping design, the dynamic surface control DSC method is firstly used to deal with the problem of tracking control for the nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. The proposed outputfeedback DSC controller not only forces the system output to asymptotically track the desired trajectory, but also drives the unstable internal dynamics to follow its corresponding bounded and causal ideal internal dynamics, which is solved via stable system center method. Simulation results illustrate the validity of the proposed output-feedback DSC controller. Index Terms Non-minimum phase system, output-feedback, trajectory tracking, internal dynamics, dynamic surface control DSC. I. INTRODUCTION It is well known that nonlinear systems with asymptotically unstable zero dynamics or internal dynamics are called non-minimum phase [ ]. This feature cannot be removed by feedback, and restricts the straightforward application of the powerful nonlinear control techniques such as feedback linearization, sliding mode control and backstepping method [3 4], which work well in minimum phase systems. Under this circumstance, the control problem of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems is more challenging and has been payed more attention by the control community. The existing research work concerning the nonlinear nonminimum phase systems can be divided into two main branches: stabilization control and tracking control. Firstly we give a brief description on stabilization control for nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. Based on backstepping control Manuscript received January 5, 05; accepted July 7, 05. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Aero-Science Foundation of China 05ZA5009. Recommended by Associate Editor Shengwei Mei. Citation: Shanwei Su. Output-feedback dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 06, 3: Shamwei Su is with the Research Institute of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Beihang University, Beijing 009, China sushanwei@aliyun.com. and inverse design with the combination of neural network [5], implemented the state-feedback adaptive stabilization for a class of non-affine single-input single-output SISO nonminimum phase systems [6]. achieved stabilization control for a class of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems in general output-feedback form via standard backstepping control and small-gain technique. In [7 0], different stabilization methods for non-minimum phase systems can be found, such as robust observer, neural network, and high-gain observer. Though the backstepping method cannot be directly used in non-minimum phase systems as described in [4], the aforementioned work properly introduced the backstepping into the stabilization control for those non-minimum phase systems under proper assumptions, and attained control aims. The common feature of these referred papers is that the outputs and the unstable internal dynamics are all stabilized to zero. As we all know, stabilization control is the basis of output tracking control, and output tracking can transformed into stabilization control problem of tracking errors [3], so the aforesaid stabilization control methods can lead to the creation of output tracking control methods for nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. Whereas the work such as [3, ] focus on another ambitious problem - trajectory tracking control of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems. When we design tracking control laws for minimum phase systems, the control aim is to let the system outputs to follow the desired output signals, and the internal dynamics are generally disregarded, because it will get stable when the external dynamics attains stability. However, this case is not applicable to non-minimum phase systems. For the tracking control of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems, the controller is designed to meet the following two demands: the output tracking errors asymptotically converge to zero; the unstable internal dynamics is rendered acceptable, that is, stabilized to zero [3 4] or kept bounded [5]. The output tracking problem of a nonlinear non-minimum phase VTOL aircraft was solved in [3] by a Lyapunov-based technique and a minimum-norm strategy. However, the internal dynamics which stands for the actual roll attitude of aircraft was directly stabilized to zero. In fact, this method is unfeasible for aircraft since it is impossible for its roll attitude to keep unchanged when it performs trajectory maneuver. Reference [5] pointed
2 SU: OUTPUT-FEEDBACK DYNAMIC SURFACE CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR NON-MINIMUM PHASE SYSTEMS 97 out that the proper method for presenting acceptable internal dynamics lies in finding a bounded solution for the unstable internal dynamics to follow, rather than directly stabilizing the internal dynamics to zero. The bound solution to the internal dynamics is originally called the ideal internal dynamics IID in [ ] proposed noncausal stable inversion NSI method to construct the bounded IID for non-minimum phase systems. To obtain the causal IID for the unstable internal dynamics [3], originated the stable system center SSC method, which was used to solve the IID of non-minimum phase VTOL aircraft in [6]. The output regulation OR method in [7] can be used to find IID of non-minimum phase systems by solving partial differential algebraic equations. As a survey on the control of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems [8], discussed the features of three methods for the IID solution as follows: NSI is an iterative solution method, the desired trajectories and any of their changes must be exactly known in advance, the offline pre-computing procedure is conducted backward in time, thus it can only get numerical and noncausal solutions, so it is of limited practical use; Compared with NSI approach, SSC method does not necessarily require the future information of the desired trajectories which must be generated by a exosystem, the online solving procedure for bounded IID is performed forward in time, so the obtained numerical solutions are causal; OR method is applied to tackle the system with linear internal dynamics, and can provide accurate and analytical solutions. Until now, there is few work about the output tracking control for nonlinear non-minimum phase systems in outputfeedback form. This paper aims to solve this problem, and the contributions of this work can be summarized as follows: To keep the unstable internal dynamics bounded, the method of output redefinition is introduced, thus the stability of the internal dynamics depends on that of the newly defined output. In the process of designing the control law, we only care about the external dynamics which includes the newly defined output, and disregard the internal dynamics, because it will get stable along with the stability of the external dynamics. To overcome the explosion of complexity problem in traditional backstepping design, the dynamic surface control DSC [9] method is firstly used to deal with the problem of tracking control for the nonlinear non-minimum phase systems in output-feedback form. 3 Benefiting from the bounded IID solved via SSC method, the paper realizes the casual output tracking for a class of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. The paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the class of controlled nonlinear non-minimum phase system in output-feedback form is introduced, and the control purpose is formulated. In Section III, the methods of observer-based output redefinition and the solution of IID are presented. In Section IV, the output feedback DSC design procedure is provided. Section V gives the stability analysis. In Section VI, a simulation example is given to show the effectiveness of the proposed design method. Section VII draws the conclusions. II. PROBLEM FORMULATION In the paper, we consider a class of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems in the following output-feedback form: η = A η η + B η x, ẋ = x + ϕ y,. ẋ n = x n + ϕ n y, ẋ n = E η η + ϕ n y + βyu, y = x, where η R m is internal dynamics; x,..., x n is the external dynamics; u is the control input; y is the output signal; Nonlinear items ϕ i y only depend on the output y, i =,..., n. For all y R, the function βy 0. We assume the matrix A η is non-hurwitz, so when x = 0, the corresponding zero dynamics η = A η η is not asymptotically stable, thus η is the unstable internal dynamics, system can be called non-minimum phase. Since that the internal dynamics η is unstable and only output y is measured, the control object is to design an output feedback controller so that the system output y can track the desired trajectory signal y d t, while the unstable internal dynamics η can follow its causal and bounded IID. III. OBSERVE-BASED OUTPUT REDEFINITION A. Observer Design Since only the output signal y in is available for measurement, a set of observers must be constructed to provide estimates of the unmeasured state variables η, x,..., x n. To proceed, rewrite system as in which ẋ = Ax + ϕy + bβyu, y = cx, x = [ η m, x,..., x n ] T, ϕy = [ 0 m, ϕ y,..., ϕ n y ] T, A η B η 0 m n A = 0 n m 0 n I n, E η 0 0 n b = [ 0 m 0 n ] T, c = [ 0 m 0 n ], 3 and 0, I respectively stand for zero matrix and identity matrix.
3 98 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 By choosing vector k such that A 0 = A kc is a Hurwitz matrix, the following full-order observer is proposed for the purpose of the tracking control: ˆx = Aˆx + ky ŷ + ϕy + bβyu, ŷ = cˆx, 4 where the parameter k = k T η, k,..., k n T, and k η = k η,..., k ηm T. Subtracting 4 from, the observer error can be derived as x = A 0 x, 5 where x = x ˆx. Since A 0 is Hurwitz, the observer error x can exponentially converge to zero. B. Output Redefinition From 4, the observer equation of the internal dynamics can be written as ˆη = A η ˆη + B η ˆx + k η x. 6 To tackle the unstable internal dynamics ˆη, the new output is defined as Thus 6 shows x = ˆx + M ˆη, 7 ˆη = A η0ˆη + B η x + k η x, 8 where choosing M to let A η0 = A η B η M be Hurwitz. Since the observer error x 0, the stability of internal dynamics ˆη in 8 depends on the newly defined output x. After output redefinition, system 4 can be separated into the following two parts: new external dynamics x = ˆx + ϕ y + k x + M ˆη, ˆx = ˆx 3 + ϕ y + k x,. ˆx n = ˆx n + ϕ n y + k n x, ˆx n = E η ˆη + ϕ n y + k n x + βyu, 9 and the internal dynamics 8. Hereafter, we only design control law for the external dynamics x, ˆx,..., ˆx n in 9, rather than the internal dynamics ˆη, because it will get stable with the stability of the external dynamics. Remark. Note that the method of output redefinition originated from [] is slightly revised in this paper, and the new output is based on the output observer system, rather than the original system. C. Solution of IID It is necessary to know the desired value of new output x before we design the output tracking control law. In Equation 7, the desired value of output observer ˆx is y d, but what is the desired value of ˆη? In 6, A η is non-hurwitz, so the internal dynamics does not have stable numerical solution. However, this does not mean that a bounded solution cannot be found for such an unstable system [5]. In fact, under suitable assumptions, via NSI approach [] or the SSC method [3], a bounded solution can be obtained. As to 6, setting ˆx = y d, x = 0, we can get a bounded solution of internal dynamics η d = A η η d + B η y d, 0 where η d is the so-called IID. For the IID equation 0, we turn to the causal SSC method to solve η d. For convenience, 0 can be rewritten as η d = A η η d + θ d y d, where θ d y d = B η y d. We assume θ d can be generated by a known exosystem Its characteristic polynomial is ẇ = Sw, θ d = Cw. P λ = detλi S = λ k + p k λ k + + p λ + p 0. 3 Thus the causal IID η d can be solved by the following matrix differential equation η k d + c k η k d + + c η d + c 0 η d = P k θ k d + + P θ d + P 0 θ d, 4 where the parameters c k,..., c, c 0 depend on the desired eigenvalues, the matrix P k,..., P, P 0 R n r n r can be computed by the formula in [3]. IV. CONTROL LAW DESIGN In this section, we design control law for the external dynamics x, ˆx,..., ˆx n via dynamic surface method. Step. Let the first error surface of new output be defined as S = x x d, 5 where x d = y d + Mη d. The time derivative of S is Ṡ = x x d = ˆx + ϕ y + k x + M ˆη x d. 6 Then a virtual control signal is selected as ˆx d = l S ϕ y k x M ˆη + x d, 7 and the error between ˆx and ˆx d is defined as x d = ˆx ˆx d. 8
4 SU: OUTPUT-FEEDBACK DYNAMIC SURFACE CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR NON-MINIMUM PHASE SYSTEMS 99 So 6 becomes Ṡ = l S + x d. 9 To avoid the explosion of terms in the process of computing ˆx d, we let ˆx d pass through a low-pass filter τ x d + x d = ˆx d, x d 0 = ˆx d 0, 0 where τ is a time constant. Thus x d is the filtered signal of ˆx d. Step i i n. Define the i-th error surface as then the time derivative of S i satisfies S i = ˆx i x id, Ṡ i = ˆx i x id = ˆx i+ + ϕ i y + k i x x id. Choose a virtual control signal ˆx i+d as ˆx i+d = l i S i ϕ i y k i x + x id, 3 and define the error between ˆx i+ and ˆx i+d as Thus we can get x i+d = ˆx i+ ˆx i+d. 4 Ṡ i = l i S i + x i+d. 5 Letting x i+d be the filtered signal of ˆx i+d, that is, τ i+ x i+d + x i+d = ˆx i+d, x i+d 0 = ˆx i+d 0, 6 where τ i+ is a positive time constant. Step n. Finally, define the n-th error surface as thus Ṡ n = ˆx n x nd S n = ˆx n x nd, 7 = E η ˆη + ϕ n y + k n x + βyu x nd. 8 The actual control signal is thus chosen as u = l ns n E η ˆη ϕ n y k n x + x nd. 9 βy It could be readily checked that Ṡ n = l n S n. 30 Remark. According to the conventional backstepping method [4, 0], the actual control signal shows u = α n E η ˆη + x n d, 3 βy where αn α n = l n S n S n d n S i k i x y α n ˆx + ϕ y y n j= m j= α n ˆx j ˆx j+ + ϕ y + k j x α n ˆη j n ˆηj j= α n x j+ x j d, 3 d S n = ˆx n α n x n d, 33 α = l S d k + Mk η S ϕ y MA η ˆη MB η ˆx, 34 S = x x d, 35 and S i, α i i =,..., n have similar forms as S n, α n. Obviously, compared with the backstepping method, the proposed DSC scheme is simpler, and is easier to be realized in the practical systems with the increase of the dimension m of internal dynamics and system relative order n. V. STABILITY ANALYSIS In this section, we will give the stability analysis for the proposed output-feedback DSC scheme. While the control law design procedure is simple, the stability analysis is relatively complicated due to the derivation of low-pass filter. Firstly, define the filter error as z i = ˆx id x id, i =,..., n. 36 Taking 6 into consideration, the time derivative of x id shows Thus x id = τ i ˆx id x id = τ i z i. 37 ż i = ˆx id x id = τ i z i + ˆx id. 38 By considering and 36, x id in 4 can be rewritten as x id = ˆx i ˆx id = ˆx i x id + x id ˆx id = S i z i. 39 So the error surface in 9 and 5 can be described as Ṡ i = l i S i + S i+ z i+, i =,..., n. 40 On the other side, from 5-7, -3, we can obtain ż i + τ i z i = ˆx id B i S i, S i, z i, x, x i d, x i d, x i d, i =,..., n, 4
5 00 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 where B i, i =,..., n, are continuous positive functions. Thus z i ż i τ i z i + B i z i B i zi + α i τ i α i, i =,..., n, 4 where α i are positive constants. Secondly, define the tracking error of internal dynamics as η = ˆη η d. 43 According to 8, 0 and 5, we can get η = A η0 η + B η S + k η x. 44 By considering the aforementioned equations, the resulting closed-loop system can be expressed as x = A 0 x, 45 η = A η0 η + B η S + k η x, 46 Ṡ i = l i S i + S i+ z i+, i =,..., n, 47 Ṡ n = l n S n, 48 B z i ż i i zi + α i τ i α i, i =,..., n. 49 Next, we present the following theorem. Theorem. Consider the Lyapunov function candidate as where V = n V i, 50 i=0 V 0 = η T P η η + x T P 0 x, 5 V i = S i + d i z i+, i n, 5 V n = S n, 53 and P η = Pη T, P 0 = P0 T respectively stand for the symmetric positive solutions of P η A η0 + A T η0p η = I, P 0 A 0 + A T 0 P 0 = I, A η0 is defined by 8. For the given compact set Ω, if V 0 = n V i 0 R 0, 54 i=0 then there exist γ, r, l i i =,..., n, d i i =,..., n, and τ i i =,..., n to let all signals of the closed-loop system be bounded, the tracking errors can converge to some residual sets that can be made arbitrarily small by properly choosing certain design parameters. Proof. The time derivative of V 0 is V 0 = η T A T η0p η η + η T P η A η0 η + S B T η P η η + η T P η B η S + x k T η P η η + η T P η k η x + x T A T 0 P 0 x + x T P 0 A 0 x = η Tˆη + γs + γ ηt P T η B η B T η P η η + γ x + γ ηt P T η k η k T η P η η x T x λ max P η λ maxpη T B η Bη T P γλ min P η λ maxpη T k η kη T P η η T P η η γλ min P η + γs λ max P 0 γ x T P 0 x. 55 λ min P 0 The derivative of V i satisfies V i = S i l i S i + S i+ z i+ + d i z i+ ż i+ l i Si + Si + Si+ + d i d i z i+ B + d i+ i zi+ + d i α i+ τ i+ α i+ l i S i + d i S i+ d i τ i+ B i+ α i+ Define the compact set as Ω = z i+ + d i α i+. 56 { S,..., S n, z,..., z n, x, η d, x d,..., x n d, x d,..., x n d, x d,..., x n d : n n Si + zi + x T x n + ηd T η d + i= + i= i= i= i= x i d n n x i d + } x i d R 0, 57 where R 0 is a positive constant. Since B i+ defined by 4 is continuous, it has a maximum value in Ω, i.e., M i+. So the derivative of V i shows V i l i S i + d i S i+ d i τ i+ M i+ α i+ z i+ + d i α i+. 58 Finally, in view of 30, the derivative of V n yields So V n = S n Ṡ n = l n S n. 59
6 SU: OUTPUT-FEEDBACK DYNAMIC SURFACE CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR NON-MINIMUM PHASE SYSTEMS 0 V λ max P η λ maxpη T B η Bη T P γλ min P η λ maxpη T k 0 k0 T P η ˆη T P η ˆη γλ min P η λ max P 0 γ x T P 0 x λ min P 0 + n n d i α i+ i= i= n M i+ τ i= i+ α i+ + l n Then let the design parameters λ max P η = r + λ maxp T η B η B T η P γλ min P η c i d i γ d i z i+ S i S n. 60 λ maxpη T k η kη T P η, 6 γλ min P η λ max P 0 = r + γ λ min P 0, 6 l i = r + d i + + γ, 63 τ i+ = r + M i+ α i+ +, 64 l n = r +, 65 where r is a positive constant, it follows that where V rv + M, 66 M = n d i α i. 67 i= So when V = R 0, we have V rr 0 + M. That is, if r is chosen such that r > M R 0, 68 we have V < 0 on V = R 0, which implies that if V 0 R 0, then V t R 0 for all t 0, i.e., V R 0 is an invariant set. Moreover, solving 66 yields 0 V M r + V 0 M e rt. 69 r Hence lim T 0 V t M r. 70 That is, by properly choosing γ, l i i =,..., n, d i i =,..., n, τ i i =,..., n to make M sufficiently small, r sufficiently large, the tracking error S i i =,..., n can converge to any arbitrary small residual set. Since the observer error x exponentially converges to zero, and the desired output signal y d and the IID η d are all bounded, so all the signals of the closed-loop system are uniformly bounded. VI. SIMULATION RESULTS We consider the following nonlinear non-minimum phase system: ẋ = x + sin y, ẋ = x 3 + y, ẋ 3 = η + 00y + u, η = η + x, y = x, 7 where η is the unstable internal dynamics. The goal is to apply the proposed output-feedback DSC scheme to 7 so that the system output y and the internal dynamics η can respectively track their desired signals y d and η d. A. IID Solution via SSC Method At the beginning of the simulation, we firstly need to solve the IID η d of system 7 according to the SSC method described as -4. As to the internal dynamics equation η = η + x, by setting x = y d, its corresponding IID equation shows η d = η d + y d. 7 By selecting the desired trajectory signal y d = R cosωt, it can be generated by the following exosystem ẇ = Sw, 0 ω S = ω 0 whose characteristic polynomial is, 73 P λ = λi S = λ + ω. 74 According to the above equation, we can get k =, p = 0 and p 0 = ω. By setting the desired eigenvalues s, =, thus the parameters of the characteristic polynomial are c 0 =, c =. Via the SSC method in [3], we can get P = I + Q + Q I + ω Q I = 3 ω + ω, P 0 = c 0 Q P + Ip 0 Q = 3ω + ω, 75 where Q = A η =. By taking the parameters c 0, c, P and P 0 into the matrix differential equation 4, the IID η d can be solved from the following equation: η d + c η d + c 0 η d = P θd + P 0 θ d. 76
7 0 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 B. IID Comparison Here through the IID equation 7, we give a detailed comparison of IID solved via the aforementioned methods: NSI, SSC, OR. Through OR method, the accurate and analytical bounded solution is η d = Rω cosωt + Rω sinωt + ω. 77 Detailed solution procedure of NSI and OR methods can be found in [7]. By selecting R =, ω =, the solved IID η d of the system 7 can be seen in Fig.. internal dynamics does not converge to zero at all. From this simulation case, we can see that it is unavoidable to solve the IID η d which plays an important pole in acquiring fine output tracking performance. Fig.. Desired trajectory y d and actual output y in Case. Fig.. Comparison of IID η d solved via three methods. From Fig., it can be seen that the IID solved via SSC method gradually converge to the accurate and analytical IID solved via OR method, while the IID solved NSI method would diverge from the IID solved via OR method at the end of simulation time, because the off-line pre-computing procedure of NSI method is conducted backward in time. Due to the limited practical use of NSI method, we turn to the SSC method to get the causal IID of 7. C. Simulation Results The system initial states are selected as x0 = 0.95, 0, 0, 0 T, ˆx0 =, 0, 0, 0 T, η d 0 = 0.8; The observer gain is selected as k = 3, 67, 75, 57 T to let the eigenvalues of A 0 be 3; The controller parameters l = l = l 3 = 5, the filter time constant τ = τ 3 = 0.0; The output transformation matrix is chosen as M = to place the eigenvalues of A η0 at. The desired output signal is selected as y d = R cosωt. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme, the simulations are done under the following two cases. Case. Without solving the IID η d, we directly set η d = 0, and simultaneously select R =, ω = 0.5. Under this circumstance, we mean to stabilize the internal dynamics to zero. However, from the simulation results Figs. and 3, it can be seen that the tracking performance is poor, and the Fig. 3. The IID η d and internal dynamics η in Case. Case. The IID η d is solved via the SSC method, and the amplitude R and the frequency ω of the desired output trajectory y d switch from to. and 0.5 to, respectively, at random time T = rand. Such switches may occur in the case of obstacle avoidance. From the simulation results Figs. 4-6, it can be concluded that the output tracking performance is fine, and the internal dynamics can track its corresponding casual IID despite the fact that the amplitude and frequency of the desired signal y d change at any random time. Through the simulation cases, the following conclusions can be drawn: It is necessary to solve the IID which is fundamental to achieve desired tracking performance when dealing with non-
8 SU: OUTPUT-FEEDBACK DYNAMIC SURFACE CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR NON-MINIMUM PHASE SYSTEMS 03 Based on output redefinition, the proposed outputfeedback DSC controller for nonlinear non-minimum phase systems is effective. VII. CONCLUSION Fig. 4. Desired trajectory y d and actual output y in Case. The paper has proposed an output-feedback tracking control scheme for a class of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems via DSC method. After output redefinition, we directly design control law for the external dynamics rather than the internal dynamics, because the internal dynamics will get stable with the stability of the external dynamics. The proposed outputfeedback DSC controller not only drives the system output signal to track the desired trajectory, but also makes the unstable internal dynamics to follow its corresponding bounded IID. The stability analysis has proved that the tracking errors can converge to zero and the closed-loop system is semi-globally stable. The effectiveness of the proposed output-feedback DSC control scheme has been illustrated by the simulation results. REFERENCES [] Isidori A. Nonlinear Control of Systems. London: Spring-Verlag, 995. [] Marino R, Tomei P. Nonlinear Control Design: Geometric, Adaptive and Robust. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 995. [3] Shkolnikov I A, Shtessel Y B. Tracking in a class of nonminimum-phase systems with nonlinear internal dynamics via sliding mode control using method of system center. Automatica, 00, 385: [4] Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotovic P V, Morse A S. Adaptive output-feedback control of a class of nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control. Brighton, England: IEEE, Fig. 5. The IID η d and internal dynamics η in Case. [5] Yang B J, Calise A J. Adaptive stabilization for a class of non-affine non-minimum phase systems using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 006 American Control Conference. Minneapolis, USA: IEEE, [6] Karagiannis D, Jiang Z P, Ortega R, Astolfi A. Output-feedback stabilization of a class of uncertain non-minimum-phase nonlinear systems. Automatica, 005, 49: [7] Xie B, Yao B. Robust output feedback stabilization of a class of nonminimum phase nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the 006 American Control Conference. Minneapolis, USA: IEEE, 006: [8] Hoseini S M, Farrokhi M, Koshkouei A J. Adaptive neural network output feedback stabilization of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 00, 4: 65 8 [9] Isidori A. A tool for semi-global stabilization of uncertain nonminimum-phase nonlinear systems via output feedback. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 000, 450: [0] Nazrulla S, Khalil H K. Robust stabilization of non-minimum phase nonlinear systems using extended high-gain observers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 0, 564: Fig. 6. The control signal u in Case. minimum phase systems. [] Gopalswamy S, Hedrick J K. Tracking nonlinear non-minimum phase systems using sliding control. International Journal of Control, 993, 575: 4 58 [] Devasia S, Chen D G, Paden B. Nonlinear inversion-based output tracking. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 996, 47:
9 04 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 [3] Huang C S, Yuan K. Output tracking of a non-linear non-minimum phase PVTOL aircraft based on non-linear state feedback control. International Journal of Control, 00, 756: [4] Zhu B, Wang X H, Cai K Y. Approximate trajectory tracking of input-disturbed PVTOL aircraft with delayed attitude measurements. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 00, 04: 60 6 [5] Al-Hiddabi S A, McClamroch N H. Tracking and maneuver regulation control for nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: application to flight control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 00, 06: [6] Su S W, Lin Y. Robust output tracking control of a class of non-minimum phase systems and application to VTOL aircraft. International Journal of Control, 0, 84: [7] Isidori A, Byrnes C I. Output regulation of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 990, 35: , 4: 9 in Chinese [9] Swaroop D, Hedrick J K, Yip P P, Gerdes J C. Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 000, 450: [0] Kristic M, Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotovic P V. Nonlinear design of adaptive controllers for linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 994, 394: Shanwei Su received the Ph. D. degree in control theory and control engineering from Beihang University, China in 0. He is a lecturer at the Research Institute of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Beihang University. His research interests include nonminimum phase systems and flight control. [8] Su Shan-Wei, Zhu Bo, Xiang Jin-Wu, Lin Yan. A survey on the control of nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. Acta Automatica Sinica,
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationUDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationMULTI-AGENT TRACKING OF A HIGH-DIMENSIONAL ACTIVE LEADER WITH SWITCHING TOPOLOGY
Jrl Syst Sci & Complexity (2009) 22: 722 731 MULTI-AGENT TRACKING OF A HIGH-DIMENSIONAL ACTIVE LEADER WITH SWITCHING TOPOLOGY Yiguang HONG Xiaoli WANG Received: 11 May 2009 / Revised: 16 June 2009 c 2009
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationDynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems
Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems ZHANG Sheng *, QIAN Wei-qi (7.6) Computational Aerodynamics Institution, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang, 6,
More informationarxiv: v2 [nlin.ao] 5 Jan 2012
1 Additive-State-Decomposition-Based Output Feedback Tracking Control for Systems with Measurable Nonlinearities and Unknown Disturbances Quan Quan, Kai-Yuan Cai, Hai Lin Abstract arxiv:119.4516v2 [nlin.ao]
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationOVER THE past 20 years, the control of mobile robots has
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2010 1199 A Simple Adaptive Control Approach for Trajectory Tracking of Electrically Driven Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Bong Seok
More informationResearch Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
Applied Mathematics Volume 202, Article ID 689820, 3 pages doi:0.55/202/689820 Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
More informationACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationOutput Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System
Vol. 0, No. 05, 00, 60-608 Output Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan R & D Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi-Alamathi Road, Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationOutput Regulation of the Tigan System
Output Regulation of the Tigan System Dr. V. Sundarapandian Professor (Systems & Control Eng.), Research and Development Centre Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-6 6, Tamil Nadu,
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationTHE nonholonomic systems, that is Lagrange systems
Finite-Time Control Design for Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Subject to Spatial Constraint Yanling Shang, Jiacai Huang, Hongsheng Li and Xiulan Wen Abstract This paper studies the problem of finite-time stabilizing
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationIN THIS paper, we study the problem of asymptotic stabilization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 49, NO 11, NOVEMBER 2004 1975 Nonlinear Control of Feedforward Systems With Bounded Signals Georgia Kaliora and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract The stabilization
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationRobust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 14-16, 26 FrB3.2 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Bo Xie and Bin
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationState and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems
State and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems Mehdi Tavan, Kamel Sabahi, and Saeid Hoseinzadeh Abstract This paper addresses the problem of state and
More informationEL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)
EL 625 Lecture 0 EL 625 Lecture 0 Pole Placement and Observer Design Pole Placement Consider the system ẋ Ax () The solution to this system is x(t) e At x(0) (2) If the eigenvalues of A all lie in the
More informationOn Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems
On Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems Bao-Zhu Guo 1, Zhi-Liang Zhao 2, 1 Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Academia Sinica, Beijing, 100190, China E-mail:
More informationNeural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input saturation Gao, Shigen; Dong, Hairong; Ning, Bin; Chen, Lei
Neural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input saturation Gao, Shigen; Dong, Hairong; Ning, Bin; Chen, Lei DOI:.6/j.neucom.5.. License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document
More informationAdaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 3, MAY 2010 723 Adaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach Guozhu Zhang,
More informationAnti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem
Anti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem Xiao Jian( ) College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China (Received 8 February 2010; revised
More informationUDE-based Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation
UDEbased Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation DAI Jiguo, REN Beibei, ZHONG QingChang. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationMulti-Robotic Systems
CHAPTER 9 Multi-Robotic Systems The topic of multi-robotic systems is quite popular now. It is believed that such systems can have the following benefits: Improved performance ( winning by numbers ) Distributed
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 2 Separation Principle
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 2 Separation Principle High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 2Separation Principle p. 1/4 The Class of Systems ẋ = Ax + Bφ(x,
More informationMin-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain Systems
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July -3, 27 FrC.4 Min-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain
More informationMultiple-mode switched observer-based unknown input estimation for a class of switched systems
Multiple-mode switched observer-based unknown input estimation for a class of switched systems Yantao Chen 1, Junqi Yang 1 *, Donglei Xie 1, Wei Zhang 2 1. College of Electrical Engineering and Automation,
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY invertible, that is (1) In this way, on, and on, system (3) becomes
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY 2013 1269 Sliding Mode and Active Disturbance Rejection Control to Stabilization of One-Dimensional Anti-Stable Wave Equations Subject to Disturbance
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationDynamical analysis and circuit simulation of a new three-dimensional chaotic system
Dynamical analysis and circuit simulation of a new three-dimensional chaotic system Wang Ai-Yuan( 王爱元 ) a)b) and Ling Zhi-Hao( 凌志浩 ) a) a) Department of Automation, East China University of Science and
More informationFurther results on global stabilization of the PVTOL aircraft
Further results on global stabilization of the PVTOL aircraft Ahmad Hably, Farid Kendoul 2, Nicolas Marchand, and Pedro Castillo 2 Laboratoire d Automatique de Grenoble, ENSIEG BP 46, 3842 Saint Martin
More informationRobust Gain Scheduling Synchronization Method for Quadratic Chaotic Systems With Channel Time Delay Yu Liang and Horacio J.
604 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: REGULAR PAPERS, VOL. 56, NO. 3, MARCH 2009 Robust Gain Scheduling Synchronization Method for Quadratic Chaotic Systems With Channel Time Delay Yu Liang
More informationAdaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems
Adaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio Mora-Camino To cite this version: Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationRobust Tracking Control of Uncertain MIMO Nonlinear Systems with Application to UAVs
IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 2, NO. 1, JANUARY 2015 25 Robust Tracking Control of Uncertain MIMO Nonlinear Systems with Application to UAVs Yanlong Zhou, Mou Chen, and Changsheng Jiang Abstract
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.oc] 14 Dec 2015
Cooperative Output Regulation of Discrete-Time Linear Time-Delay Multi-agent Systems Yamin Yan and Jie Huang arxiv:1510.05380v2 math.oc 14 Dec 2015 Abstract In this paper, we study the cooperative output
More informationControl design using Jordan controllable canonical form
Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form Krishna K Busawon School of Engineering, Ellison Building, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK email: krishnabusawon@unnacuk
More informationRobust Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Input Unmodeled Dynamics
International Journal of Automation Computing 5(3), July 28, 37-312 DOI: 117/s11633-8-37-5 Robust Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Input Unmodeled Dynamics Ming-Zhe Hou 1,
More informationFurther Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation
Proceedings of the 7 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City USA July -3 7 ThA5 Further Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation Zhen Zhang Andrea Serrani
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationA Recurrent Neural Network for Solving Sylvester Equation With Time-Varying Coefficients
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL 13, NO 5, SEPTEMBER 2002 1053 A Recurrent Neural Network for Solving Sylvester Equation With Time-Varying Coefficients Yunong Zhang, Danchi Jiang, Jun Wang, Senior
More informationOutput Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Output Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers Shahid Nazrulla Hassan K Khalil Electrical & Computer Engineering,
More informationAdaptive Dynamic Inversion Control of a Linear Scalar Plant with Constrained Control Inputs
5 American Control Conference June 8-, 5. Portland, OR, USA ThA. Adaptive Dynamic Inversion Control of a Linear Scalar Plant with Constrained Control Inputs Monish D. Tandale and John Valasek Abstract
More informationNONLINEAR PATH CONTROL FOR A DIFFERENTIAL DRIVE MOBILE ROBOT
NONLINEAR PATH CONTROL FOR A DIFFERENTIAL DRIVE MOBILE ROBOT Plamen PETROV Lubomir DIMITROV Technical University of Sofia Bulgaria Abstract. A nonlinear feedback path controller for a differential drive
More informationResearch Article Stabilization Analysis and Synthesis of Discrete-Time Descriptor Markov Jump Systems with Partially Unknown Transition Probabilities
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 7(4): 728-734, 214 DOI:1.1926/rjaset.7.39 ISSN: 24-7459; e-issn: 24-7467 214 Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. Submitted: February 25,
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationNonlinear Controller Design of the Inverted Pendulum System based on Extended State Observer Limin Du, Fucheng Cao
International Conference on Automation, Mechanical Control and Computational Engineering (AMCCE 015) Nonlinear Controller Design of the Inverted Pendulum System based on Extended State Observer Limin Du,
More informationA ROBUST ITERATIVE LEARNING OBSERVER BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF TIME DELAY NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A ROBUST ITERATIVE LEARNING OBSERVER BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF TIME DELAY NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Wen Chen, Mehrdad Saif 1 School of Engineering
More informationRobust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States
obust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States John A Akpobi, Member, IAENG and Aloagbaye I Momodu Abstract Compressors for jet engines in operation experience
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): -7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationAerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 77 218 49 418 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aerospace Science and Technology www.elsevier.com/locate/aescte Two-degree-of-freedom attitude tracking control
More informationRECENTLY, the study of cooperative control of multiagent
24 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL., NO. 2, APRIL 24 Consensus Robust Output Regulation of Discrete-time Linear Multi-agent Systems Hongjing Liang Huaguang Zhang Zhanshan Wang Junyi Wang Abstract
More informationEvent-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems
Event-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems Pavankumar Tallapragada Nikhil Chopra Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 2742 MD,
More informationFinite-time hybrid synchronization of time-delay hyperchaotic Lorenz system
ISSN 1746-7659 England UK Journal of Information and Computing Science Vol. 10 No. 4 2015 pp. 265-270 Finite-time hybrid synchronization of time-delay hyperchaotic Lorenz system Haijuan Chen 1 * Rui Chen
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control Allocation of. Non-minimum Phase Uncertain Systems
2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12, 2009 ThA18.3 Adaptive Nonlinear Control Allocation of Non-minimum Phase Uncertain Systems Fang Liao, Kai-Yew Lum,
More informationA Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Control Direction
Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 16 Vol I, IMECS 16, March 16-18, 16, Hong Kong A Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of
More informationTime-delay feedback control in a delayed dynamical chaos system and its applications
Time-delay feedback control in a delayed dynamical chaos system and its applications Ye Zhi-Yong( ), Yang Guang( ), and Deng Cun-Bing( ) School of Mathematics and Physics, Chongqing University of Technology,
More informationModeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems
Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Dr. Guillaume Ducard Fall 2017 Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control ETH Zurich, Switzerland G. Ducard c 1 / 57 Outline 1 Lecture 13: Linear System - Stability
More informationDiscontinuous Backstepping for Stabilization of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots
Discontinuous Backstepping for Stabilization of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Herbert G. Tanner GRASP Laboratory University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, 94, USA. tanner@grasp.cis.upenn.edu Kostas J.
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationNEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in
1630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 4, AUGUST 2004 Adaptive Neural Network Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Disturbances in Discrete-Time
More informationGeneralized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with uncertain parameters
Vol 16 No 5, May 2007 c 2007 Chin. Phys. Soc. 1009-1963/2007/16(05)/1246-06 Chinese Physics and IOP Publishing Ltd Generalized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with
More informationAdaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 0, OCTOBER 003 87 Adaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization Zhihua Qu Abstract Two classes of partially known
More informationTrajectory tracking & Path-following control
Cooperative Control of Multiple Robotic Vehicles: Theory and Practice Trajectory tracking & Path-following control EECI Graduate School on Control Supélec, Feb. 21-25, 2011 A word about T Tracking and
More informationProblem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)
Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%) Consider the kinematic equations: Figure 1: NTNU s research vessel, R/V Gunnerus, and Nomoto model: T ṙ + r = Kδ (1) with T = 22.0 s and K = 0.1 s 1.
More informationAn Adaptive LQG Combined With the MRAS Based LFFC for Motion Control Systems
Journal of Automation Control Engineering Vol 3 No 2 April 2015 An Adaptive LQG Combined With the MRAS Based LFFC for Motion Control Systems Nguyen Duy Cuong Nguyen Van Lanh Gia Thi Dinh Electronics Faculty
More informationTerminal Sliding Mode Control for Cyber Physical System Based on Filtering Backstepping
International Journal of Automation and Computing 125), October 2015, 497-502 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-015-0903-0 Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Cyber Physical System Based on Filtering Backstepping Fei
More informationCONTROLLING CHAOTIC DYNAMICS USING BACKSTEPPING DESIGN WITH APPLICATION TO THE LORENZ SYSTEM AND CHUA S CIRCUIT
Letters International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 9, No. 7 (1999) 1425 1434 c World Scientific Publishing Company CONTROLLING CHAOTIC DYNAMICS USING BACKSTEPPING DESIGN WITH APPLICATION TO THE
More informationAn asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability
1 An asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability Daniel Liberzon and Hyungbo Shim Abstract For continuous-time nonlinear systems with inputs, we introduce the notion of an asymptotic
More informationCHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL AUXILIARY SURFACES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEM WITH STATE CONSTRAINTS. Jian Fu, Qing-Xian Wu and Ze-Hui Mao
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2013 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 9, Number 12, December 2013 pp. 4793 4809 CHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL
More informationChaos Suppression in Forced Van Der Pol Oscillator
International Journal of Computer Applications (975 8887) Volume 68 No., April Chaos Suppression in Forced Van Der Pol Oscillator Mchiri Mohamed Syscom laboratory, National School of Engineering of unis
More informationDesign and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 30, NO. 2, APRIL 2000 303 Design and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller Byung-Jae Choi, Seong-Woo Kwak,
More informationH 2 Adaptive Control. Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan. WeA03.4
1 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, 1 WeA3. H Adaptive Control Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan Abstract Model reference adaptive
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationOn the Convergence of Extended State Observer for Nonlinear Systems with Uncertainty
On the Convergence of Extended State Observer for Nonlinear Systems with Uncertainty Bao-Zhu Guo a,b,c,d, Zhi-liang Zhao a a Department of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More informationSTABILIZABILITY AND SOLVABILITY OF DELAY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS USING BACKSTEPPING METHOD. Fadhel S. Fadhel 1, Saja F. Noaman 2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 118 No. 2 2018, 335-349 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu doi: 10.12732/ijpam.v118i2.17
More informationIs Monopoli s Model Reference Adaptive Controller Correct?
Is Monopoli s Model Reference Adaptive Controller Correct? A. S. Morse Center for Computational Vision and Control Department of Electrical Engineering Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 USA April 9,
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More information