arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 1 Jul 2013
|
|
- Catherine Richard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Second law of the information thermodynamics with entanglement transfer Hiroyasu Tajima 1 1 Department of Physics, The University of Toyo, Komaba, Meguro, Toyo We present a new inequality which holds in the thermodynamical processes with measurement and feedbac controls with using only the Helmholtz free energy and the entanglement of formation: W ext BT E. The quantity E, which is positive, expresses the amount of entanglement transfer from the system S to the probe P through the interaction ÛSP during the measurement. It is easier to achieve the upper bound in the new inequality than in the Sagawa-Ueda inequality [6]. The new inequality has clear physical meaning: in the above thermodynamical processes, the wor which we can extract from the thermodynamic system is greater than the upper bound in the conventional thermodynamics by the amount of the entanglement extracted by the measurement. arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 1 Jul 2013 I. INTRODUCTION The second law of thermodynamics appears to be violated in thermodynamic processes that include measurements and feedbacs. This well-nown fact has been the center of attention and numerous studies have long been conducted on such processes [1 12]. The second law of information thermodynamics [6] derived by Sagawa and Ueda is a monumental landmar of such studies; in the case of an isothermal process, it is expressed as W ext + B TI QC, (1) where I QC is the QC-mutual information content [6]. This inequality gives a new upper bound for the wor extracted from a thermodynamic system when measurement and feedbac are permitted on the system. [ When the measurement is classical ( ρ, M M ] () () = 0, where{ M () } is the measurement and ρ is the density matrix of the system with the baths), the QC-mutual information reduces to the classical mutual information content. Therefore, in the classical world, the wor that we can extract from information thermodynamic processes is greater than the upper bound of the conventional thermodynamics by the amount of information which we obtain from the measurement. On the other hand, when the measurement is not classical, the physical meaning of the QC-mutual information is unclear. We will also show below that when we use finite systems for the heat baths, the upper bound of (1) is not necessarily achievable. In this paper, we present a new information thermodynamic inequality with using only the Helmholtz free energy and the entanglement of formation: W ext B T E, (2) where the difference E of the entanglement is taen between before and after the unitary interaction ÛSP between the system S and the probe P during the measurement. The quantity E is always nonnegative and expresses the amount of entanglement transfer from S to P through ÛSP. Hence, the inequality (2) has clear physical meaning: the wor that we can extract from information thermodynamic processes is greater than the upper bound of the conventional thermodynamics by the amount of entanglement which we obtain from the measurement. In other words, from a thermodynamical point of view, we can interpret the entanglement transfer as the information transfer. In the above context, we introduce a new information content I E = E, to which we refer as the entanglement information. It has a clear physical meaning even wheni QC does not. We also show that, the condition for the achievement of the upper bound of the new inequality (2) is looser than that of the inequality (1). II. SET UP O THE WHOLE SYSTEM As the setup, we consider a thermodynamic system S that is in contact with heat bathsb m form = 1,2,...,n which are at temperatures T 1,c,T n, respectively. We refer to the whole set of heat baths {B m } as B. Except when we perform measurement or feedbac control, we express the Hamiltonian of the whole system as Ĥ( λ(t)) = ĤS ( λ S (t))+ [ĤSBm ( λ SBm (t))+ĥbm ], (3) whereĥs ( λ S (t)) is the Hamiltonian of the systems,ĥbm is the Hamiltonian of the bath B m, and ( λ ĤSBm SBm (t)) is the interaction Hamiltonian between the system S and the heat bath B m. The Hamiltonian is controlled through the external parameters λ S (t) and λ SBm (t). We assume that there exists a value of λ SBm (t) = λ 0 such that ĤSBm ( λ 0 ) = 0. We call the time evolution of the whole system with controlled values of λ S (t) and λ SBm (t) a thermodynamic operation. We further assume that we can realize a thermodynamic equilibrium state at temperaturet m by connectings andb m and waiting. Note that the equilibrium state may not be a canonical distribution. We define the energy U of a state ρ as ρĥ] and define the Helmholtz free energy for an equilibrium state at a temperature T as B T logz(β), where β ( B T) 1 andz(β) exp( βĥ)]. III. INORMATION THERMODYNAMIC PROCESS Under the setup in Section 2, we consider the following thermodynamic processes from t = t i to t = t f (ig. 1). At
2 i thermodynamics process U init interaction U SP 2 I is determined here E projective measurement {P } on probe I feedbac control {U } on system and baths () () is determined here thermodynamics Process U fin f IG. 1: Schematic of the thermodynamic processes from t i tot f. t = t i, we start the process with the following canonical initial state: where S(ρ) ρlog ρ], ρ tr P [ ψ P ψ P ], (8) ande SB-R ( ρ) is the entanglement of formation [14] between SB andr; E SB-R (ρ) min ρ q j E SB-R ( φ j ) (9) = q j φ j φ j with E SB-R ( φ j ) being the entanglement entropy [13] between SB and R for a pure state φ j. Note that E SB-R ( ψ ψ ) and E SB-R (ρ ) indicate the amount of entanglement between SB and R at t = t 1 and t = t 1, respectively. To put it simply, we can express I E as follows: I E E SB-R = E SB-R before ÛSP E SB-R after ÛSP. (10) We also note that E SB-R ( ψ ψ ) is equal to the amount of entanglement betweensb and the rest of the whole system at t = t 1. Thus, we can interpret I E as the amount of entanglement betweensb andrthat is taen by the probep during the interactionûsp. rom t = t 1 to t = t 2, we perform a projective measurement {P () = i,i P,i P } on the probe, where {,i P } are pure states of the probe. At t = t 2, we obtain a result with probabilityp, and then the state ofsb becomes ρ 2 = j p ρ () 2 = q i,ρ i 2, (11) i, ρ i = exp[ βĥs i ] Zi S(β) exp[ β ] 1ĤB1 Z B1 (β 1 )... exp[ β ] nĥbn,(4) Z Bn (β n ) where ĤS i = ĤS ( λ S (t i )), Zi S = exp[ βĥs i ]], β m = ( B T m ) 1 and Z Bm = exp[ β m Ĥ Bm ]] (m = 1,...,n). rom t = t i to t = t 1, we perform a thermodynamic operation Ûinit. At t = t 1, the state is therefore given by ρ 1 = Ûinitρ i Û init. Adding a proper reference system R, we can find a pure state ψ which satisfies tr R [ ψ ψ ] = ρ 1. (5) romt = t 1 tot = t 1, we introduce a unitary interactionûsp between the system S and the probe P, which is initialized to a state 0 P. At t = t 1, the state of the whole system is expressed as ψ P = (ÛSP 1 B 1 R )( 0 P ψ ), (6) where1 B and1 R are the identity operators. At this point, we define the new quantity I E, namely the entanglement information, as follows: I E E SB-R ( ψ ψ ) E SB-R (ρ ) (7) = S(ρ 1 ) E SB-R (ρ ), where qi, ψ i = (,ip 1 ) ψ P, (12) ρ i 2 = tr R [ ψ i ψ i ], (13) p ρ () 2 = tr PR [ i q i, ψ i ψ i ], (14) with ψ i and ρ () 2 being normalized. We can interpret the above as performing a measurement{ M () }, where M () = i,i P ÛSP 0 P, (15) ons fromt = t 1 tot = t 2. The QC-mutual information [6, 8] is determined here for the first time. It is expressed as I QC S(ρ 1 )+H{p } + D ρ SB D log D ρ SB D ],(16) where D M () M (). We emphasize the following two points. irst, we can determine the unitary interaction ÛSP and the projective measurements P () for any measurement M(). Hence, if we can
3 3 evaluate the QC-mutual information I QC, then we can also evaluate I E. Second, the timings at which I E and I QC are defined are different. The information I E is defined when only ÛSP is completed, whereas the information I QC is defined when the measurement{ M () } is also completed. Thus, for two measurements with the same ÛSP, I E taes the same value buti QC may tae different values. rom t = t 2 to t = t 3, we perform a feedbac control depending on the measurement result. To be precise, we perform a unitary transformationsû() onsb. At t = t 3, the state ofsb is given by ρ 3 p Û ()ρ () 2 Û (). (17) rom t = t 3 to t = t f, we choose a thermodynamic operation Ûfin whose final state is assumed to be equilibrium and perform it. We also assume that by t f system S and heat bath B m will have reached thermodynamic equilibrium at temperaturest andt m, respectively. Note that we only assume that the final state is macroscopically equilibrium; the final state may not be a canonical distribution given by ρ can f exp[ β Ĥf S] Zf S exp[ β1ĥb1 ]... exp[ βnĥbn ], (β ) Z B1 (β 1 ) Z Bn (β n ) (18) where β is the inverse temperature of the final state of the system. We hereafter call the above process as the information thermodynamic process. IV. MAIN RESULTS or the above information thermodynamic processes, we present five results. The first theorem is the new second law of information thermodynamics: Theorem 1 or any information thermodynamic process, the following inequality holds: U S S + T Q m U S S T m T + B I E, (19) where Q m (ρ ĤBm i ρ f )] and the quantities U S, S, U S and S the energy and the Helmholtz free energy at t i and t f, respectively. When the the system undergoes an isothermal process in contact with a single heat bath B at temperature T, the inequality (19) reduces to W ext + B TI E (20) = B T E SB R (21) The second theorem shows that we can always achieve the upper bound of (19) when we use infinite systems for the heat baths. Theorem 2 When we use infinite systems as the heat baths, there is at least one set of projective measurement{p () } and feedbac {Û()} which achieve the upper bound of (19) for any interactionûsp. With the third, fourth and fifth results, we will see that the condition for the achievement of the upper bound of the new inequality (19) is looser than that of the inequality U S S + T Q m U S S T m T + B I QC, (22) when we use finite systems for the heat baths. irst, let us present the third result: Theorem 3 If we can always achieve the upper bound of (22) with a proper feedbac{û()}, we can always achieve the upper bound of (19) with a proper set of projective measurement {P () } and feedbac{û()}. The fourth and fifth results show that the converse of Theorem 3 is not true. Theorem 4 When the following conditions are satisfied, we can always achieve the equality of (19) with proper choices of{p () } and{û()} for anyûsp : Condition1: The system S is a two-level system. Condition2: The thermodynamic operationsûinit andûfin satisfy the equation of the following inequality U S S + T Q m U S S T m T. (23) Condition3: λ SB (t) = λ 0 is satisfied fort 1 t t 2. Condition 2 dictates that we do not waste energy during the thermodynamic processes. Condition 3 implies that the system and baths do not interact during the measurement; if the system and baths interact during the measurement, the information obtained by the probe contains the information about the system as well as about the baths. Thus, we can interpret Theorem 4 as follows: We can completely use the information obtained by the probe with a proper interpretation{p () } and a proper feedbac {Û()}, if we do not waste energy during the thermodynamic processes and if the information describes only the system. Theorem 5 Under Conditions 1 3, there is a measurement { M () } for which we cannot achieve the equality of (22) with anyû(). V. PROOS O MAIN RESULTS Let us prove Theorems1 5. Proof of Theorem 1: Theorem 1 is directly given by the following lemma:
4 4 Lemma 1 or any measurement { M () }, the following inequality holds: I QC I E. (24) The inequalities (22) and (24) give (19). Lemma 1 and Theorems4and5seem to contradict each other. Though the upper bound of (19) is always achievable and though the inequality (24) exists, there is a case in which the upper bound of (22) is not achievable. However, the contradiction is only spurious. Note that when I E is determined, we can tae {P () } freely; in other words, we can choose the best interpretation of the information obtained by the probe. On the other hand, when I QC is determined, {P () } is also determined already, and thus our interpretation of the probe s information is fixed uniquely. Let us prove Lemma 1. Because of the definitions (7) and (16), we prove E SB-R (ρ ) H{p } (25) D ρ SB D log D ρ SB D ]. We can express the above as follows: = i, H{p } p S(ρ () 2 ) = D ρ SB D log D ρ SB D ] p S( i q i, p ρ (i) 2 ) q i, S(ρ (i) 2 ) = q i, E SB-R ( ψ i ) i, E SB-R (ρ ), (26) where ρ = q i, ψ i ψ i = trp [ ψ P ψ P ]. i, (27) Proof of Theorems 2 and 3: irst we prove Theorem 3. Let us tae an ensemble{q (), } which satisfies E SB-R (ρ ) ψ () q E SB-R ( φ ), (28) ρ = q φ φ. (29) Then, we can tae an orthonormal basis{ P } which satisfies ψ P = q P φ. (30) Let us tae the projective measurement {P () } as { P P }. Then,p reduces toq, and thus I QC S(ρ 1 )+H{p } + D ρ SB = S(ρ 1 ) p S(ρ () 2 ) D log D ρ SB D ], = S(ρ 1 ) q E SB-R ( φ ) = S(ρ 1 ) E SB-R (ρ ) = I E. (31) Thus, for an arbitrary unitary ÛSP, there is a projective measurement{p () } that satisfies I E = I QC. Theorem 2 directly follows from Theorem 3. When we use infinite systems for the heat baths, we can always achieve the upper bound of (22) for any measurement { M () } [7]. Because of the above and Theorem 3, we can always achieve the upper bound of (19). Proof of Theorem 4: As in the derivation of (22) in Ref. [6], we can obtain the inequality (19) by transforming S(ρ i ) ρ f log ρ can f ]+I E. (32) Thus, we only have to prove that for anyûsp, we can always tae{p () } and{û()} that satisfy S(ρ i ) = ρ f log ρ can f ]+I E. (33) irst, we prove that if ρ 3 in (17) is a canonical distribution, we can transform (33) into E S-R (ρ SR ) = S(ρ S 3), (34) where ρ SR tr B [ρ ], ρ S 3 tr B[ρ 3 ], and E S-R is the entanglement of formation between S and R. Thans to (7) ands(ρ i ) = S(ρ 1 ), we can transform (33) into 0 = ρ f log ρ can f ] E SB-R (ρ ). (35) Note that a thermodynamic operation from a canonical distribution to an equilibrium state achieves the equality of (23) if and only if the final state is a canonical distribution too [6]. Thus, because of Condition 2, if ρ 3 is a canonical distribution, ρ f is the canonical distribution ρ can f in (18). Then we can transform (35) into E SB-R (ρ ) = S(ρ 3 ), (36) where we use S(ρ 3 ) = S(ρ f ). Thus, we only have to transform (36) into (34). If the following three equations hold, (36) and (34) are equivalent; E SB-R (ρ ) = E S-R1 (ρ SR1 )+E B-R2 ( ψ BR2 ),(37) E S-R (ρ SR ) = E S-R1 (ρ SR1 ), (38) S(ρ 3 ) = S(ρ S 3)+E B-R2 ( ψ BR2 ), (39) where we divider into a two-level subsystemr 1 and the rest R 2.
5 5 Let us first prove (37). Owing to Condition 2 and the fact that ρ i is a canonical distribution, ρ 1 is a canonical distribution as well. Because of Condition 3,Ĥ(t 1) = ĤS ĤB is valid. Thus, because of Condition 1, under the proper basis of R we can divide R into a two-level subsystem R 1 and a subsystem R 2 and express ψ as follows: ψ = ψ SR1 ψ BR2. (40) Owing to (6) and (40), we can express ψ P as follows: ψ P = ψ PSR1 ψ BR2. Thus, we can express ρ as ρ = ρ SR1 ψ BR2 ψ BR2, (41) where ρ SR1 tr P [ ψ PSR1 ψ PSR1 ]. We have (37) and (38) from (41). Next, we prove (39). Note that S has been isolated for t 1 t t 3 with proper {Û()}. We can therefore express ρ 3 as ρ S 3 ψ BR2 ψ BR2 with E B-R 2 ( ψ BR2 ) = E B-R2 ( ψ BR2 ). Thus, we have (39). Now, we only have to find {P () } on P and {Û()} on S such that ρ 3 and ρ S 3 are canonical distributions and that (34) holds. We first prove that if ρ S 3 is a canonical distribution, ρ 3 is also a canonical distribution. To prove this, we only have to note that tr R2 [ ψ BR 2 ψ BR2 ] is a canonical distribution because B has been isolated for t 1 t t 3 and because tr S [ρ 1 ] is a canonical distribution. We second find {P () } on P and {Û()} on S such that ρ S 3 is a canonical distribution and that (34) holds. Because both S and R 1 are twolevel systems, we can treat the state ψ PSR1 as a three-qubit pure state under a proper basis of P. In Appendix, we prove the following with the approach used in Ref. [15]: we can perform a projective measurement { P () } =0,1 on the probe P such that the results P () ψ PSR1 are LU-equivalent for = 0,1 and E S-R1 ( P () ψ PSR1 ) = E S-R1 (ρ SR1 ) is valid. Because the results P () ψ PSR1 are LU-equivalent, there exists {V () } =0,1 on S, which satisfies ρ pre 3 V ()ρ S() 2 V (), where ρ S() 2 tr R1 [ P () ψ PSR1 ψ PSR1 P () ]. Owing to Condition 1, if E S-R1 ( P () ψ PSR1 ) 0, we can mae the state ρ S 3 = V ρ pre 3 V a canonical distribution with a unitary transformation V ons. Thus,{ P () } and{v () } are the measurement and feedbac that we want. Proof of Theorem 5: It is sufficient to prove the existence of a counterexample of the measurement{ M () }. The equality of (22) is valid only if there exists a set of unitary transformations {Û()} that satisfy p S(ρ () 2 ) = S(ρ 3) [6]. We can transforms(ρ 3 ) as follows: S(ρ 3 ) = S( = =0,1 =0,1 p Û ()ρ () 2 Û () ) (42) p S(ρ () 2 )+ =0,1 p D(Û()ρ () 2 Û () ρ 3), whered(ρ ρ ) ρ(log ρ log ρ )]. BecauseD(ρ ρ ) = 0 if and only if ρ = ρ and because of (42), the equation p S(ρ () 2 ) = S(ρ 3) is valid if and only if {ρ () 2 } are LUequivalent for = 0,1, in other words, if and only if the measurement { M () } is a deterministic measurement. Because of this logic, if Theorem 5 were not valid, any measurement { M () } would be deterministic. This is clearly false, and thus Theorem 5 holds. VI. CONCLUSION To conclude, we obtain a new information thermodynamic inequality. In this inequality, the information gain is the entanglement gain; the new information content I E represents the amount of the entanglement between the system and the reference system which the probe taes from the system. The new information content depends only on the premeasurement state of the system and the unitary interaction between the probe and the system, and thus when I E is determined, we can tae{p () } freely. The QC-mutual informationi QC does not have this freedom. Theorems 4 and 5 follow from this difference of the freedom between I E and I QC. Thus, in the above context, we can state that the substance of information is the entanglement. The information gain is already completed when the unitary interaction is over and the projective measurement is only the interpretation of the information. Acnowledgements This wor was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) ellows (Grant No. 24E8116). The author thans Prof. Naomichi Hatano for useful discussions. Appendix A In the present appendix, we prove the following theorem: Theorem 6 or an arbitrary three-qubit pure state ψ PSR1, there exists a projective measurement {P () } =0,1 such that the results P () ψ PSR1 are LU-equivalent for = 0,1 and is valid. E S-R1 (P () ψ PSR1 ) = E S-R1 (ρ SR1 ) (A1) Proof: Because ρ SR1 is a two-qubit mixed state, we can expresse S-R1 (ρ SR1 ) in the form of the concurrence [16]: 1+ 1 CSR 2 1 (ρ SR1 ) E S-R1 (ρ SR1 ) = h 2, (A2) where C SR1 (ρ SR1 ) is the concurrence of ρ SR1 and h(x) xlogx (1 x)log(1 x). Thus, we only have to find a projective measurement { P () } =0,1 such that
6 6 P () ψ PSR1 for = 0,1 are LU-equivalent to each other andc SR1 ( P () ψ PSR1 ) = C SR1 (ρ SR1 ). Before giving the projective measurement { P () }, we first present preparations. irst we express ψ PSR1 in the form of the generalized Schmidt decomposition [17]: ψ PSR1 = λ λ 1 e iϕ 100 +λ λ λ (0 ϕ π) (A3) and introduce the following eight parameters [15]; K PS C 2 PS +τ PSR 1, K PR1 C 2 PR 1 +τ PSR1, K SR1 C 2 SR 1 +τ PSR1, (A4) (A5) (A6) J 5 4λ 2 0 ( λ 1λ 4 e iϕ λ 2 λ 3 2 +λ 2 2 λ2 3 λ2 1 λ2 4 ),(A7) K 5 J 5 +τ PSR1, J K5 2 K PSK PR1 K SR1, (A8) (A9) e i ϕ5 λ 2λ 3 λ 1 λ 4 e iϕ λ 2 λ 3 λ 1 λ 4 e iϕ, (A10) [ ( )] Qe sgn sinϕ λ 2 0 τ PSR1 +J 5 2(CSR 2 (A11), 1 +τ PSR1 ) where τ PSR1 is the tangle of ψ PSR1 and sgn[x] is the sign function, { } x/ x (x 0) sgn[x] =. (A12) 0 (x = 0) When Qe = 0, there are two possible decompositions which satisfy (A3). We then choose the decomposition with a greater coefficientλ 0. Now we have completed the preparation. In the basis of (A3), the projective measurement{ P () } =0,1 is given as follows; P (0) = ( a e iθ e iθ b ) ( ), P 1 a e iθ (1) = e iθ (A13), 1 b where the measurement parameters a, b, and θ are defined as follows: a = 1 2 K 5 τ PSR1 ± J CSR 2 1, (A14) 2K SR1 K5 2 K PSK PR1 CSR 2 1 b = 1 a, = a(1 a), θ = ϕ 5, (A15) (A16) (A17) and whenqe 0 the mar ± means Qe and whenqe = 0 the mar ± means. With using (A14) (A17) and Lemma 1 of Ref. [15] and after straightforward algebra, we can confirm that the measurement{ P () } is the measurement that we sought. [1] L. Szilard, Z. Phys. 53, 840 (1929). [2] R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183 (1961). [3] C. H. Bennett, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 905 (1982). [4] B. Piechocinsa, Phys. Rev. A 61, (2000). [5] M. A. Nielsen, C. M. Caves, B. Schumacher, and H. Barnum, Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 277 (1998). [6] T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008). [7] K. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. A 80, (2009). [8] T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, (2009). [9]. J. Cao and M. eito, Phys. Rev. E 79, (2009). [10] S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyui and M. Sano, Nature Phys. 6, 988 (2010). [11] J. M. Horowitz and J. M. R. Parrondo, New J. Phys. 13, (2011). [12] S. De Liberato and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. E 84, (2011). [13] C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996). [14] C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996). [15] H. Tajima, Ann. Phys. 329, 1 (2013). [16] W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). [17] A. Acín, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jané, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. Lett (2000).
arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 30 Jul 2012
Thermodynamic Wor Gain from Entanglement arxiv:1207.6872v1 [quant-ph] 30 Jul 2012 Ken Funo, 1 Yu Watanabe, 2 and asahito Ueda 1 1 Department of Physics, The University of Toyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, unyo-u, Toyo,
More informationQuantum-information thermodynamics
Quantum-information thermodynamics Taahiro agawa Department of Basic cience, University of Toyo YITP Worshop on Quantum Information Physics (YQIP2014 4 August 2014, YITP, Kyoto Collaborators on Information
More informationMultipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation. Abstract
Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation Xian Shi Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese
More informationSome Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels
Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels arxiv:quant-ph/0303141v3 16 Apr 003 Mary Beth Ruskai Department of Mathematics, Tufts University Medford, Massachusetts 0155 USA marybeth.ruskai@tufts.edu
More informationarxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 16 Mar 2012
arxiv:119.658v2 cond-mat.stat-mech] 16 Mar 212 Fluctuation theorems in presence of information gain and feedback Sourabh Lahiri 1, Shubhashis Rana 2 and A. M. Jayannavar 3 Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar
More informationEmergent Fluctuation Theorem for Pure Quantum States
Emergent Fluctuation Theorem for Pure Quantum States Takahiro Sagawa Department of Applied Physics, The University of Tokyo 16 June 2016, YITP, Kyoto YKIS2016: Quantum Matter, Spacetime and Information
More informationQuantum Thermodynamics
Quantum Thermodynamics In this chapter we wish to give some insights to quantum thermodynamics. It can be seen as an introduction to the topic, however not a broad one but rather an introduction by examples.
More informationMaxwell's Demon in Biochemical Signal Transduction
Maxwell's Demon in Biochemical Signal Transduction Takahiro Sagawa Department of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo New Frontiers in Non-equilibrium Physics 2015 28 July 2015, YITP, Kyoto Collaborators
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2014
REE From EOF Eylee Jung 1 and DaeKil Park 1, 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea Department of Physics, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea arxiv:1404.7708v3
More informationEntanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems
Boston University OpenBU College of General Studies http://open.bu.edu BU Open Access Articles 2003-08-01 Entanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems Jaeger, Gregg AMER PHYSICAL
More informationClassification of Tripartite Entanglement with one Qubit. Marcio F. Cornelio and A. F. R. de Toledo Piza
Classification of Tripartite Entanglement with one Qubit Marcio F. Cornelio and A. F. R. de Toledo Piza Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Física, CP 66318, 05315 São Paulo, S.P., Brazil July 05,
More informationBOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS
BOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS P. Caban, K. Podlaski, J. Rembieliński, K. A. Smoliński and Z. Walczak Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Lodz Pomorska 149/153,
More informationQuantum heat engine using energy quantization in potential barrier
Quantum heat engine using energy quantization in potential barrier Sibasish Ghosh Optics and Quantum Information Group The Institute of Mathematical Sciences C.I.T. Campus, Taramani Chennai 600113. [In
More informationMutual information-energy inequality for thermal states of a bipartite quantum system
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Mutual information-energy inequality for thermal states of a bipartite quantum system To cite this article: Aleksey Fedorov and Evgeny Kiktenko 2015 J.
More informationQUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING THEOREM p.1/36
QUANTUM INFORMATION - THE NO-HIDING THEOREM Arun K Pati akpati@iopb.res.in Instititute of Physics, Bhubaneswar-751005, Orissa, INDIA and Th. P. D, BARC, Mumbai-400085, India QUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING
More informationarxiv:cond-mat/ v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 25 Sep 2000
technical note, cond-mat/0009244 arxiv:cond-mat/0009244v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 25 Sep 2000 Jarzynski Relations for Quantum Systems and Some Applications Hal Tasaki 1 1 Introduction In a series of papers
More informationPACS Nos a, Bz II. GENERALIZATION OF THE SCHMIDT DECOMPOSITION I. INTRODUCTION. i=1
Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms A. Acín, A. Andrianov,E.Jané and R. Tarrach Departament d Estructura i Constituents de la Matèria, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 647, E-0808 Barcelona, Spain.
More informationOn PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 25 222 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 2, August 5, 2004 On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems WANG Xiao-Hong, FEI
More informationThermodynamics of Information Processing in Small Systems )
INVITED PAPERS 1 Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 127, No. 1, January 2012 Thermodynamics of Information Processing in Small Systems ) Taahiro Sagawa 1,2 1 The Haubi Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2016
Improved Uncertainty Relation in the Presence of Quantum Memory Yunlong Xiao, 1, Naihuan Jing, 3,4 Shao-Ming Fei, 5, and Xianqing Li-Jost 1 School of Mathematics, South China University of Technology,
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 17 Jun 1996
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices arxiv:quant-ph/9604005v2 17 Jun 1996 Asher Peres Department of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel Abstract A quantum system
More informationEnsembles and incomplete information
p. 1/32 Ensembles and incomplete information So far in this course, we have described quantum systems by states that are normalized vectors in a complex Hilbert space. This works so long as (a) the system
More informationAsymptotic Pure State Transformations
Asymptotic Pure State Transformations PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 18, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Asymptotic Pure State Transformations April 18, 2017 1 / 15 Entanglement
More informationSecond law, entropy production, and reversibility in thermodynamics of information
Second law, entropy production, and reversibility in thermodynamics of information Takahiro Sagawa arxiv:1712.06858v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 19 Dec 2017 Abstract We present a pedagogical review of the fundamental
More informationBoundary of the Set of Separable States
Boundary of the Set of Separale States Mingjun Shi, Jiangfeng Du Laoratory of Quantum Communication and Quantum Computation, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China,
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 22 Jan 2019
Article TWO-QUBITS I A LARGE-S EVIROMET arxiv:1901.07416v1 [quant-ph] 22 Jan 2019 Eliana Fiorelli 1,2, ID, Alessandro Cuccoli 3,4 and Paola Verrucchi 5,3,4 * 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University
More informationBipartite and Tripartite Entanglement in a Three-Qubit Heisenberg Model
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 46 (006) pp. 969 974 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 46, No. 6, December 5, 006 Bipartite and Tripartite Entanglement in a Three-Qubit Heisenberg Model REN
More informationGLOBAL ENTANGLEMENT IN MULTIPARTICLE SYSTEMS
1 June 2001 quant-ph/0108104 GLOBAL ENTANGLEMENT IN MULTIPARTICLE SYSTEMS David A. Meyer and Nolan R. Wallach Project in Geometry and Physics Department of Mathematics University of California/San Diego
More informationFrom fully quantum thermodynamical identities to a second law equality
From fully quantum thermodynamical identities to a second law equality Alvaro Alhambra, Lluis Masanes, Jonathan Oppenheim, Chris Perry Fluctuating States Phys. Rev. X 6, 041016 (2016) Fluctuating Work
More informationEntanglement of projection and a new class of quantum erasers
PHYSICAL REVIEW A VOLUME 60, NUMBER 2 AUGUST 1999 Entanglement of projection and a new class of quantum erasers Robert Garisto BNL Theory Group, Building 510a, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New
More informationConnections of Coherent Information, Quantum Discord, and Entanglement
Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (212) 589 59 Vol. 57, No., April 15, 212 Connections of Coherent Information, Quantum Discord, and Entanglement FU Hui-Juan ( ), LI Jun-Gang (Ó ), ZOU Jian (Õ ), and SHAO Bin (ÅÉ)
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Feb 2017
Reexamination of strong subadditivity: A quantum-correlation approach Razieh Taghiabadi, 1 Seyed Javad Ahtarshenas, 1, and Mohsen Sarbishaei 1 1 Department of Physics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad,
More informationBell inequality, Bell states and maximally entangled states for n qubits
7 September 1998 Physics Letters A 26 (1998) 116 Bell inequality, Bell states and maximally entangled states for n qubits N. Gisin, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva,
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/2 PARTICLES
CLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/ PARTICLES S. Ghosh, G. Kar, and A. Roy Physics and Applied Mathematics Unit Indian Statistical Institute 03, B. T. Road Calcutta 700 035 India. E
More informationEntropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory
Entropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory William Fedus Physics Department, University of California, San Diego. Entropy is a central concept in both classical and quantum information theory,
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann
Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Theoretische Physik III Summer school Bleubeuren July 014 Contents 1 Quantum Mechanics...........................
More informationVacuum Entanglement. A. Retzker (Tel-Aviv Univ.) J. I. Cirac (Max Planck Inst., Garching.) B. Reznik (Tel-Aviv Univ.) J. Silman (Tel-Aviv Univ.
Vacuum Entanglement. Retzker (Tel-viv Univ.) J. I. Cirac (Max Planck Inst., Garching.). Reznik (Tel-viv Univ.) J. Silman (Tel-viv Univ.) International summer school on Quantum Information ugust 9 September
More information6.1 Main properties of Shannon entropy. Let X be a random variable taking values x in some alphabet with probabilities.
Chapter 6 Quantum entropy There is a notion of entropy which quantifies the amount of uncertainty contained in an ensemble of Qbits. This is the von Neumann entropy that we introduce in this chapter. In
More informationVacuum Entanglement. B. Reznik (Tel-Aviv Univ.)
Vacuum Entanglement. Reznik (Tel-viv Univ.). otero (Los ndes. Univ. Columbia.) J. I. Cirac (Max Planck Inst., Garching.). Retzker (Tel-viv Univ.) J. Silman (Tel-viv Univ.) Quantum Information Theory: Present
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2
Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 8, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 April 8, 2017 1 / 13 Entanglement
More informationNullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality. Yu Guo
Jul. 18-22, 2011, at Taiyuan. Nullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality Yu Guo (Joint work with Pro. Jinchuan Hou) 1 1 27 Department of Mathematics Shanxi Datong University Datong, China guoyu3@yahoo.com.cn
More informationQuantum entanglement and symmetry
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Quantum entanglement and symmetry To cite this article: D Chrucisi and A Kossaowsi 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 87 012008 View the article online for updates and enhancements.
More informationEntanglement in nuclear quadrupole resonance
Hyperfine Interact DOI 10.1007/s10751-010-016-1 G. B. Furman V. M. Meerovich V. L. Sokolovsky Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 010 Abstract Entangled quantum states are an important element of quantum
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 1 Oct 2017
Stochastic thermodynamics of quantum maps with and without equilibrium Felipe Barra and Cristóbal Lledó Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago,
More informationOn balance of information in bipartite quantum communication systems: entanglement-energy analogy
On balance of information in bipartite quantum communication systems: entanglement-energy analogy Ryszard Horodecki 1,, Micha l Horodecki 1, and Pawe l Horodecki 2, 1 Institute of Theoretical Physics and
More informationQuantum Entanglement and Measurement
Quantum Entanglement and Measurement Haye Hinrichsen in collaboration with Theresa Christ University of Würzburg, Germany 2nd Workhop on Quantum Information and Thermodynamics Korea Institute for Advanced
More informationBONA FIDE MEASURES OF NON-CLASSICAL CORRELATIONS
BON FIDE MESURES OF NON-CLSSICL CORRELTIONS New J. Phys. 16, 073010 (2014). De Pasquale in collaboration with. Farace, L. Rigovacca and V. Giovannetti Outline MIN IDE: Introduction of measures of non-classical
More informationInformation Thermodynamics on Causal Networks
1/39 Information Thermodynamics on Causal Networks FSPIP 2013, July 12 2013. Sosuke Ito Dept. of Phys., the Univ. of Tokyo (In collaboration with T. Sagawa) ariv:1306.2756 The second law of thermodynamics
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006
1 Ph 219/CS 219 Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006 1.1 How far apart are two quantum states? Consider two quantum states described by density operators ρ and ρ in an N-dimensional Hilbert space, and
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014
Quantum Chernoff bound as a measure of efficiency of quantum cloning for mixed states arxiv:1404.0915v [quant-ph] 7 Apr 014 Iulia Ghiu Centre for Advanced Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, University
More informationRealizing probabilistic identification and cloning of quantum states via universal quantum logic gates
Realizing probabilistic identification and cloning of quantum states via universal quantum logic gates Chuan-Wei Zhang, Zi-Yang Wang, Chuan-Feng Li,* and Guang-Can Guo Laboratory of Quantum Communication
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 12 Mar 2016
One-way Quantum Deficit Decoherence for Two-qubit X States Biao-Liang Ye, 1 Yao-Kun Wang,, 3 Shao-Ming Fei 1, 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 18, China Institute of
More informationMP 472 Quantum Information and Computation
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation http://www.thphys.may.ie/staff/jvala/mp472.htm Outline Open quantum systems The density operator ensemble of quantum states general properties the reduced density
More informationGeneralized Second Law of Black Hole Thermodynamics and Quantum Information Theory
Generalized Second Law of Thermodynamics and Quantum Information Theory A. Hosoya, A. Carlini and T. Shimomura Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Oh-Okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550,
More informationLecture: Quantum Information
Lecture: Quantum Information Transcribed by: Crystal Noel and Da An (Chi Chi) November 10, 016 1 Final Proect Information Find an issue related to class you are interested in and either: read some papers
More informationTheory of Quantum Entanglement
Theory of Quantum Entanglement Shao-Ming Fei Capital Normal University, Beijing Universität Bonn, Bonn Richard Feynman 1980 Certain quantum mechanical effects cannot be simulated efficiently on a classical
More informationMaximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits
Maximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits arxiv:1711.04415v1 [quant-ph] 13 Nov 2017 Su-Kuan Chu a 1, Chen-Te Ma b 2, Rong-Xin Miao c 3 and Chih-Hung Wu b 4 a Joint Quantum Institute and
More informationThe first law of general quantum resource theories
The first law of general quantum resource theories Carlo Sparaciari 1, Lídia del Rio 2, Carlo Maria Scandolo 3, Philippe Faist 4, and Jonathan Oppenheim 1 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University
More informationTransmitting and Hiding Quantum Information
2018/12/20 @ 4th KIAS WORKSHOP on Quantum Information and Thermodynamics Transmitting and Hiding Quantum Information Seung-Woo Lee Quantum Universe Center Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) Contents
More informationQuantum NP - Cont. Classical and Quantum Computation A.Yu Kitaev, A. Shen, M. N. Vyalyi 2002
Quantum NP - Cont. Classical and Quantum Computation A.Yu Kitaev, A. Shen, M. N. Vyalyi 2002 1 QMA - the quantum analog to MA (and NP). Definition 1 QMA. The complexity class QMA is the class of all languages
More informationFlocks of Quantum Clones: Multiple Copying of Qubits
Fortschr. Phys. 46 (998) 4 ±5, 5 ±5 Flocks of Quantum Clones: Multiple Copying of Qubits V. BuzÏek ;, M. Hillery and P. L. Knight 4 Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, DuÂbravska cesta 9,
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 Jan 2008
A paradigm for entanglement theory based on quantum communication Jonathan Oppenheim 1 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge U.K. arxiv:0801.0458v1 [quant-ph]
More informationPrinciples of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2
Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 9, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 February 9, 2017 1 / 13 The
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ Oct 2002
Measurement of the overlap between quantum states with the use of coherently addressed teleportation Andrzej Grudka* and Antoni Wójcik** arxiv:quant-ph/00085 Oct 00 Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 8 Jul 1998
Unambiguous Discrimination Between Linearly-Independent Quantum States Anthony Chefles Department of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, Scotland e-mail: tony@phys.strath.ac.u
More informationarxiv: v4 [quant-ph] 11 May 2010
Non-Marovian Dynamics of Quantum Discord arxiv:0911.1096v4 [quant-ph] 11 May 2010 F. F. Fanchini, 1, T. Werlang, 2 C. A. Brasil, 3 L. G. E. Arruda, 3 and A. O. Caldeira 1 1 Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin,
More informationEntanglement from the vacuum
Entanglement from the vacuum arxiv:quant-ph/0212044v2 27 Jan 2003 Benni Reznik School of Physics and Astronomy Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. e-mail:reznik@post.tau.ac.il July 23, 2013 We
More informationDerivation of Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac statistics from quantum mechanics: Gauge-theoretical structure
Derivation of Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac statistics from quantum mechanics: Gauge-theoretical structure Yuho Yokoi 2,3,4 *) and Sumiyoshi Abe Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, Mie 54-8507,
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Apr 1998
On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states Karol Życzkowski Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 USA Pawe l Horodecki Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics
More informationThermal quantum discord in Heisenberg models with Dzyaloshinski Moriya interaction
Thermal quantum discord in Heisenberg models with Dzyaloshinski Moriya interaction Wang Lin-Cheng(), Yan Jun-Yan(), and Yi Xue-Xi() School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, Dalian University of
More informationResource Theory of Work and Heat
C. Sparaciari and J. Oppenheim T. Fritz Resource Theory of Work and Heat ArXiv 1607.01302 University College London - Dep. Physics and Astrophysics Motivations Work and heat as resources INFINITE THERMAL
More informationSteering and Entropic Uncertainty Relations
Steering and Entropic Uncertainty Relations Ana C. S. Costa, Roope Uola, Otfried Gühne Department of Physics, University of Siegen - Germany September 5, 2017 na C. S. Costa, Roope Uola, Otfried Gühne
More informationarxiv: v3 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 7 Jan 2015
Entanglement Entropies of Non-Equilibrium Finite-Spin Systems Koichi Nakagawa Hoshi University, Tokyo 14-8501, Japan arxiv:1410.6988v3 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 7 Jan 015 Abstract For the purpose of clarifying
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 27 May 2004
arxiv:quant-ph/0405166v1 27 May 2004 Separability condition for the states of fermion lattice systems and its characterization Hajime Moriya Abstract We introduce a separability condition for the states
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 21 Feb 2002
QUANTUM DISCORD AND MAXWELL S DEMONS Wojciech Hubert Zurek Theory Division, T-6, MS B288, LANL, Los Alamos, NM87545 Abstract arxiv:quant-ph/0202123v1 21 Feb 2002 Quantum discord was proposed as an information
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 16 Nov 2018
aaacxicdvhlsgmxfe3hv62vvswncwelkrmikdlgi7cqc1yfwyro+mthmasibkjlgg+wk3u/s2/wn8wfsxs1qsjh3nuosckjhcuhb8fry5+yxfpejyawv1bx2jxnm8tto1hftcs23ui7aohciwcjnxieojjf/xphvrdcxortlqhqykdgj6u6ako5kjmwo5gtsc0fi/qtgbvtaxmolcnxuap7gqihlspyhdblqgbicil5q1atid3qkfhfqqo+1ki6e5f+cyrt/txh1f/oj9+skd2npbhlnngojzmpd8k9tyjdw0kykioniem9jfmxflvtjmjlaseio9n9llpk/ahkfldycthdga3aj3t58/gwfolthsqx2olgidl87cdyigsjusbud182x0/7nbjs9utoacgfz/g1uj2phuaubx9u6fyy7kljdts8owchowj1dsarmc6qvbi39l78ta8bw9nvoovjv1tsanx9rbsmy8zw==
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 15 Dec 2004
Entanglement in the XX Spin Chain with Energy Current V. Eisler, and Z. Zimborás 2, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Eötvös University, 7 Budapest, Pázmány sétány /a, Hungary 2 Research Institute for
More informationBorromean Entanglement Revisited
Borromean Entanglement Revisited Ayumu SUGITA Abstract An interesting analogy between quantum entangled states and topological links was suggested by Aravind. In particular, he emphasized a connection
More informationCritical entanglement and geometric phase of a two-qubit model with Dzyaloshinski Moriya anisotropic interaction
Chin. Phys. B Vol. 19, No. 1 010) 010305 Critical entanglement and geometric phase of a two-qubit model with Dzyaloshinski Moriya anisotropic interaction Li Zhi-Jian 李志坚 ), Cheng Lu 程璐 ), and Wen Jiao-Jin
More informationInformation and Physics Landauer Principle and Beyond
Information and Physics Landauer Principle and Beyond Ryoichi Kawai Department of Physics University of Alabama at Birmingham Maxwell Demon Lerner, 975 Landauer principle Ralf Landauer (929-999) Computational
More informationFidelity of Quantum Teleportation through Noisy Channels
Fidelity of Quantum Teleportation through Noisy Channels Sangchul Oh, Soonchil Lee, and Hai-woong Lee Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejon, 305-701, Korea (Dated:
More informationGisin s theorem for three qubits Author(s) Jing-Ling Chen, Chunfeng Wu, L. C. Kwek and C. H. Oh Source Physical Review Letters, 93,
Title Gisin s theorem for three qubits Author(s) Jing-Ling Chen, Chunfeng Wu, L. C. Kwek and C. H. Oh Source Physical Review Letters, 93, 140407 This document may be used for private study or research
More informationQuantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar
Quantum Computing Lecture 3 Principles of Quantum Mechanics Anuj Dawar What is Quantum Mechanics? Quantum Mechanics is a framework for the development of physical theories. It is not itself a physical
More informationLanguage of Quantum Mechanics
Language of Quantum Mechanics System s Hilbert space. Pure and mixed states A quantum-mechanical system 1 is characterized by a complete inner-product space that is, Hilbert space with either finite or
More informationEntropies and correlations in classical and quantum systems
IL NUOVO CIMENTO 38 C (2015) 167 DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2015-15167-1 Colloquia: VILASIFEST Entropies and correlations in classical and quantum systems Margarita A. Man ko( 1 ), Vladimir I. Man ko( 2 )andgiuseppe
More informationDistinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states
Distinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states Chandan Datta Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar chandan@iopb.res.in YouQu-2017, HRI Chandan Datta (IOP) Tripartite Entanglement
More informationQuantum Computing with Para-hydrogen
Quantum Computing with Para-hydrogen Muhammad Sabieh Anwar sabieh@lums.edu.pk International Conference on Quantum Information, Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar, March 12, 28 Joint work with: J.A. Jones
More informationProbabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract
Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling Arun Kumar Pati Quantum Optics and Information Group, SEECS, Dean Street, University of Wales, Bangor LL 57 IUT, UK (August 5, 999) Abstract
More informationMultilinear Singular Value Decomposition for Two Qubits
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 10(S) August: 69 83 (2016) Special Issue: The 7 th International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics (ICREM7) MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL
More informationEntanglement: Definition, Purification and measures
Entanglement: Definition, Purification and measures Seminar in Quantum Information processing 3683 Gili Bisker Physics Department Technion Spring 006 Gili Bisker Physics Department, Technion Introduction
More informationQuantum thermodynamics
Quantum thermodynamics a primer for the curious quantum mechanic Lídia del Rio, ETH Zurich QIP 2017 Seattle This talk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Why quantum
More informationOn the power of unentangled measurements on two antiparallel spins
On the power of unentangled measurements on two antiparallel spins arxiv:quant-ph/0611201v1 19 Nov 2006 T. Vértesi Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-4001 Debrecen, P.O.
More informationSingle-Particle Interference Can Witness Bipartite Entanglement
Single-Particle Interference Can Witness ipartite Entanglement Torsten Scholak 1 3 Florian Mintert 2 3 Cord. Müller 1 1 2 3 March 13, 2008 Introduction Proposal Quantum Optics Scenario Motivation Definitions
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 12 Jun 2018
Masing quantum information is impossible arxiv:1608.01695v3 [quant-ph] 12 Jun 2018 Kavan Modi, 1, run Kumar Pati, 2, diti Sen(De), 2, and Ujjwal Sen 2, 1 School of Physics & stronomy, Monash University,
More informationConditioning, Correlation and Entropy Generation in Maxwell s Demon
Entropy 2013, 15, 4243-4265; doi:10.3390/e15104243 Article Conditioning, Correlation and Entropy Generation in Maxwell s Demon Neal G. Anderson OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 19 Jul 2011
The Ultimate Solution to the Quantum Battle of the Sexes game arxiv:0906.0599v2 [quant-ph] 19 Jul 2011 Piotr Fr ackiewicz Institute of Mathematics of the Polish Academy of Sciences 00-956, Warsaw, Poland
More informationOn the structure of a reversible entanglement generating set for three partite states
On the structure of a reversile entanglement generating set for three partite states A. Acín 1, G. Vidal and J. I. Cirac 3 1 GAP-Optique, University of Geneva, 0, Rue de l École de Médecine, CH-111 Geneva
More informationThe Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
p. 1/23 The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics We have reviewed the mathematics (complex linear algebra) necessary to understand quantum mechanics. We will now see how the physics of quantum mechanics fits
More informationINSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner
i f INSTITUT FOURIER Quantum correlations and Geometry Dominique Spehner Institut Fourier et Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés, Grenoble Outlines Entangled and non-classical
More informationQuantum Data Compression
PHYS 476Q: An Introduction to Entanglement Theory (Spring 2018) Eric Chitambar Quantum Data Compression With the basic foundation of quantum mechanics in hand, we can now explore different applications.
More information