Energy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion
|
|
- Gwen Ryan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Energy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion Ravi N. Banavar Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai-476, India Telephone:(91)-(22) Fax:(91)-(22) Arun D. Mahindrakar Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai-476, India Abstract We present a control law for the swing-up of an acrobot with torque constraints on the actuator. The domain of the initial condition for the strategy to work is the entire manifold and we further guarantee that the system reaches a small neighbourhood about the upward equilibrium position. For a restricted domain of the initial condition, we observe that the control law is bang-bang in nature. This motivates us to verify the time-optimality of the control strategy. Necessary conditions for time-optimality are presented and these are subsequently verified numerically. Index Terms nonholonomic systems, underactuated manipulator, energy-based control, time-optimal. I. INTRODUCTION Many control strategies have been presented for the acrobot [1], [2], [3], [4]. Most of them do not account for actuator saturation. Further, the domain of the initial condition for many of these are restrictive. Notions of time-optimality [5], [6], [7] of the acrobot motions have not received much attention either. In this paper we initially present a swing-up strategy for the acrobot that brings it to a small region around the upward equilibrium point. The domain of the initial condition for this control strategy is the entire manifold. We then verify this strategy for time-optimality based on a restricted domain of the initial condition. The paper is organised as follows. In section 2 we formulate the acrobot dynamics in a Hamiltonian framework. The Hamiltonian framework is advantageous in verifying timeoptimality. Section 3 presents the global control law that places the acrobot in a certain energy level. Section 4 presents the discussion on time-optimality. Section 5 numerically verifies the time-optimality and section 6 concludes the paper. II. HAMILTONIAN FORMULATION OF THE ACROBOT g lc1 link 2 lc2 q 1 DYNAMICS m1, m 2 = link masses l 1, l2 = link lengths I1, I 2 = link moments of inertia l c1,l c2 = centers of masses q 2 link 1 Fig. 1. Actuator The Acrobot For our purpose it is advantageous to use the Hamiltonian framework since it results in a constant control vector field [8] and this special structure proves useful in verifying the necessary conditions for the time-optimal problem that we formulate later. We write the equations of motion of the acrobot (schematic shown in Figure 1) defined on the configuration manifold Q = S 1 S 1 using a Hamiltonian formulation. The configuration space Q is parametrized by the joint angles (q 1, q 2 ) and the generalized momentum is defined
2 as p = D(q) q, where D(q) is the inertia matrix defined as [ ] (c 1 + c 2 + 2c 3 cos q 2 ) (c 2 + c 3 cos q 2 ) D(q) =. (c 2 + c 3 cos q 2 ) c 2 The inertial parameters are collected in the following constants c i, i = 1,..., 5 as c 1 = m 1 l 2 c1 + m 2 l I 1, c 2 = m 2 l 2 c2 + I 2, c 3 = m 2 l 1 l c2, c 4 = m 1 l c1 + m 2 l 1, c 5 = m 2 l c2. With the state vector defined as z = (z 1 = (q 1 π/2), z 2 = q 2, z 3 = p 1, z 4 = p 2 ), the Hamiltonian system is given by ż = f(z) + bu, (1) where the state space manifold is M = S 1 S 1 IR 2 and the smooth vector fields f and b are given by [ ] D 1 z 3 z 4 f(z) = V 1 [ ] ; b = 1 2 [z z 3 z 4 ] D V 2 1 with V = c 4 g cos z 1 + c 5 g cos(z 1 + z 2 ) and u = τ 2 Ω, the class of admissible controls defined as z 4 Ω = {u IR : u β, β > }. The equilibrium solutions of (1) with the input equal to zero constitute an important class of solutions. The set of equilibrium solution z e corresponding to u = is given by {z e M : z e 1 = k 1 π, z e 2 = k 2 π, z e 3 = z e 4 = }, k 1, k 2 =, 1. III. A GLOBAL DISCONTINUOUS CONTROL LAW The control objective is to bring the acrobot to a desired energy level that corresponds to that at the upward equilibrium point. So the first objective is to pump in the requisite energy and then guarantee that the system reaches a small neighbourhood about the upward equilibrium point. The latter fact is proved using Birkhoff s theorem on Ω-limit points [9]. Denote the energy of the acrobot at the four equilibrium positions by E dd, E du, E ud, E uu where the first subscript denotes the position of the 1st link and the second subscript denotes the position of the second link; the subscript u denotes upright and the subscript d denotes downright position of the link. Let where E uu = (c 4 + c 5 )g. Ê(z) = E(z) E uu Theorem 1: Given the torque constraint u(t) β the control law { δ (δ is small) if z B u = β sign[ê(z) χ(z)] otherwise (2) where B = {( π,,, ), ( π, π,, ), (, π,, )} and χ(z) = (c 1 + c 2 + 2c 3 cos z 2 )z 4 (c 2 + c 3 cos z 2 )z 3 (c 2 c 1 c 2 3 cos2 z 2 ) moves the acrobot to an energy level Ê(z) =. Proof: Note that the positive definiteness of the inertia matrix ensures (c 1 c 2 c 2 3 cos z 2 2 ) > z 2 S 1 and so χ(z) is defined for all z M. Further, χ(z) = when z 3 = z 4 = and χ(z) only at the equilibrium points. Now let us examine the dynamics of Ê for which we consider a candidate Lyapunov function V 2 : M IR defined by We have V 2 (z) = 1 2Ê2 (z) (3) V 2 (z) = Ê(z) Ê (4) and using the passivity property of the acrobot, (4) becomes V 2 = Ê(z)χ(z)u (5) Substituting the control law (2) results in { if z B V 2 = β Ê(z) χ(z) otherwise Since V 2 is non-increasing, the trajectory is bounded and the solution of the closed loop system remains inside a compact set defined by Ω c = {z M : V 2 (z) V 2 (z())}. Let Q = {z Ω c : V 2 = }. The set Q is given by Q = {(z M : χ(z) = ) (z M : Ê(z) = )}. Let M be the largest invariant set in Q. Now we compute M. Suppose Ê(z) and χ(z) =. We have two cases. 1) χ(z) = and z B. In this case the small control δ perturbs the system out of these equilibria. 2) χ(z) = and z / B. The dynamics of the system ensures that the system moves out of such points. Hence M = {z Q : Ê(z) = } is the largest invariant set. Remark 1: Note that the control law given by (2) reduces to u = βsign[ê(z)χ(z)] (6)
3 if the initial condition satisfies Ê(z()) max{(e dd E uu ), (E du E uu ), (E ud E uu )}. This condition would ensure that the acrobot does not get stuck at any of the intermediate equilibrium positions. In practice we would like to capture the acrobot in a region close to its upward equilibrium position. Let ˆT > be the instant at which Ê(z) = ɛ 1 where ɛ 1 > is sufficiently small. We let the control u(t) =, t > ˆT and thus the state z evolves on the set defined by Π = {z M : E(z) = E uu ɛ 1 }. (7) Lemma 3.1: Π is the one and only one non-empty, closed and invariant set in Π. Proof : We return to the Lagrangian formulation for this proof. Let (x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4 ) be the state variables and let K be any arbitrary, non-empty, closed set in Π. Then K is of the form K = {[a 1, a 2 ] [b 1, b 2 ] Π} where a 1, a 2, b 1, b 2 [, 2π). Note that once the link angles (a p, b p ) are specified, the link velocities (d p, e p ) must satisfy the equation where V (a p, b p ) + T (b p, d p, e p ) = E uu ɛ 1 (8) V (a p, b p ) = c 4 g cos a p + c 5 g cos(a p + b p ) T (d p, e p ) = d2 p 2 (c 1 + c 2 + 2c 3 cos b p ) +d p e p (c 2 + c 3 cos b p ) + c 2e 2 p 2 Notice that (8) is quadratic in both d p and e p. Define κ 1 = c 2 /2 > κ 2 = d p (c 2 + c 3 cos b p ) κ 3 = E uu ɛ 1 d2 p 2 (c 1 + c 2 + 2c 3 cos b p ) c 4 g cos a p c 5 g cos(a p + b p ) and rewrite the quadratic equation as A permissible d p satisfies κ 3 + κ 2 e p + κ 1 e 2 p = κ κ 1 κ 3 and there exist two value of e p given by ẋ 2 (ap,b p,d p) = κ 2 ± κ κ 1κ 3 2κ 1 (9) Now consider the left-extreme link angles (a 1, b 1 ) K and an admissible d 1. Two cases are possible κ 3. Then one of the solutions is e 1 < and the trajectory originating at (a 1, b 1, d 1, e 1 ) K leaves K. κ 3 =. Then one of the solutions is e 1 = and the other κ 2 κ 1. If κ 2 > then once again the trajectory originating at (a 1, b 1, d 1, e 1 ) K leaves K. If κ 2, we cannot reach any conclusion and we then consider a pair of link angles (a p, b 2 ) such that a p > a 1 and κ 3. Note that such an a p exists since κ 3 is not a constant function with respect to a p. Then one of the values of e p < and the trajectory originating at (a p, b 1, d p, e p ) K leaves K. Hence the set K is not invariant. But K is any arbitrary, nonempty, closed set in Π. Hence Π is the only invariant set. Definition 3.1: Let y (t) denote an integral curve of a system ẏ = G(y) which is assumed to be defined for all t <. A point ȳ is said to be a ω-limit point of y o (t) if there exists an increasing sequence of values of t such that t 1 < t 2 < t 3... < t k, lim k t k =, lim k yo (t k ) = ȳ. The set Ω o of all ω-limit points of y o (t) is the ω-limit set of y o (t). Theorem 2: [G. D. Birkhoff] Suppose y o (t) is a bounded trajectory. Its ω-limit set Ω o is nonempty, closed and invariant under the flow φ t G. Theorem 3: Let ξ = (a exti, b exti,, ) Π. Then ξ is an ω-limit point of any trajectory that begins in the set Π. Proof: Any trajectory that originates in the set Π is bounded. From Birkhoff s theorem [9], the Ω-limit set of any such bounded trajectory is nonempty, closed and invariant. From lemma 3.1, the only set that satisfies these properties is Π. It follows that ξ is an ω-limit point. Remark 2: Note that for ɛ 1 =, the upward equilibrium point is an ω-limit point of any trajectory that originates in Π. Once the system is in the neighbourhood of the upward equilibrium point, a linear feedback control can be switched on to balance the acrobot at the desired configuration. In the following section we investigate the time-optimality of the proposed control. IV. TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL Consider the energy-pumping control law as in (6) with a restriction in the domain of the initial condition. The
4 bang-bang nature of the law motivates us to pose the question Is the control (6) optimal in a sense that it achieves energypumping in minimum time? While obtaining necessary and sufficient conditions for this problem is not trivial, we suggest a procedure to satisfy the necessary conditions for time-optimality. Time optimal problem: Minimize the performance measure J(t f ) = t f (1) for the system (1) with the initial condition {z() M : Ê(z()) max{(e dd E uu ), (E du E uu ), (E ud E uu )}} and the constraint that the final state lies on the surface S(z(t f )) = where S : M IR is defined by The control belongs to the set S(z) = E(z) E uu + ɛ 1. (11) {u( ) : IR IR : u(t) β} Writing the Hamiltonian for the above problem as H(z, u, λ) = λ T [f(z) + bu] (12) where λ(t) R 4 is the co-state vector and denoting the optimal trajectories and control law by, from Pontryagin s minimum principle (PMP) the optimal control law satisfies H(z, u, λ ) H(z, u, λ ) for all admissible u. The above inequality leads to a bang-bang control law of the form u = β sign [ λ T b ]. (13) The necessary conditions for optimality are 1) z and λ are the solutions of the canonical equations ż = H λ (z, u, λ ) (14) = f(z ) + bu [ f λ = + b ] T with the boundary conditions z () = z. (z=z ) λ (15) 2) The variation δz f should be such that it satisfies the transversality condition [1] S(z) T δz f = (16) (z=z (t f )) and λ (t f ) T δz f =. (17) 3) The Hamiltonian at the final time t f is H(z (t f ), u (t f ), λ (t f )) = 1 (18) Theorem 4: Let z b be the trajectory generated by the control law given by (6). Suppose the switching times are t s1,..., t sp. Let Φ(t, t f ) be the state-transition matrix of the equation ( f(z) ) T ψ = ψ, ψ(t) R 4 t [, t f ] (z=z b ) A necessary condition for time-optimality of the trajectory z b is that the vector [α 1 α 2 α 3 1] T where ( S α i = / S ), i = 1, 2, 3. i 4 (z=z b (t f )) is orthogonal to the subspace spanned by the vectors {Φ(t si, t f ) T b}. S Proof: We firts note that 4 = χ(z) and χ(z b (t f )). Therefore α i z=zb (t f ), i = 1, 2, 3 are well-defined. Now, equations (16) and (17) can be recast into a single one as where λ(t f ) T Q(z b (t f )) Q(z b (t f )) = δz 1f δz 2f δz 3f = α 1 α 2 α 3. (19) Since [δz 1f δz 2f δz 3f ] T is arbitrary, its coefficient must be zero. Accordingly, we have Q T (z b (t f ))λ(t f ) = or λ(t f ) N (Q T (z b (t f )) where N denotes the null space. The non-trivial solution of the above equation is of the form λ(t f ) = α 1 α 2 α 3 1 λ 4(t f ) λ 4 (t f ) (2)
5 In view of the constant control vector field, the costate equation (15) becomes ( f(z) ) T λ = λ. (21) ( ) Denote A(z b ) = T f the form (z=z b ) (z=z b ). The solution to (21) is of λ(t) = Φ(t, t f )λ(t f ) (22) where Φ(t, t f ) IR 4 4 is the state transition matrix, which is nonsingular and satisfies Φ(t, t f ) = A(z b )Φ(t, t f ), Φ(t f, t f ) = I. (23) Suppose the switching times are t s1,..., t sp. Then from the necessary condition (13) we have or b T λ(t si ) = b T Φ(t si, t f )λ(t f ) = for each i = 1,..., p (24) < Φ(t si, t f ) T b, [α 1 α 2 α 3 1] T >= for each i = 1,..., p Remark 3: Note that the Hamiltonian at the final time is λ T (t f )(f(z b (t f )) + bu(t f )) = 1 Now < f(z b (t f )), λ(t f ) >= since [ ] I 2 2 S f(z) = I 2 2. and the condition on the Hamiltonian reduces to u(t f ) < b, λ(t f ) >= 1 Hence λ 4 (t f ) = 1 u(t f ) where u(t f ) = ±β. We next present the numerical verification of these results. V. NUMERICAL VERIFICATION OF PONTRYAGIN S MINIMUM PRINCIPLE To verify the necessary condition for the time-optimality of the proposed control law (6), we follow these steps. 1) Fix β and the initial condition z(). 2) Apply the control (6) to the system till the instant Ê = ɛ 1. Denote that instant as t f. Store the resulting time histories of the state z b from to t f. Define s(t) = Ê(z b )χ(z b ). 3) Compute α 1, α 2, α 3. 4) Numerically solve (23) over the interval [, t f ] to obtain Φ(t, t f ). The costate is obtained as λ(t) = Φ(t, t f )λ(t f ), t [, t f ]. 5) The generated switching function is given by s a (t) =< b, λ(t) >= λ 4 (t). 6) Verify the orthogonality condition (24 ). This requires that the switching functions s and s a match. By matching it is meant that they satisfy s(t si ) = s a (t si ) =, i = 1,..., p. A. Simulation results The acrobot parameters used in the simulations are l 1 = 1 m, l 2 = 2 m, m 1 = 1 kg, m 2 = 2 kg, I 1 =.83 kg m 2, I 2 =.667 kg m 2. We let β = 4 and the initial vector is z() = ( π,,.5,.5). With these we have one switching (p = 1). The control u(t) is switched off when Ê =.1. The final time is t f = seconds. The costate vector at the final time t f is given by λ(t f ) = (.9993,.585,.58,.25). We repeat the steps (1-6) outlined in section V for different initial conditions (see Table I). We have the following observations. Numerical results TABLE I EFFECT OF THE NUMBER OF SWITCHINGS p ON THE MATCHING OF SWITCHING FUNCTIONS Case z() p s and s a match? 1 ( π,,.5,.5) 1 Yes 2 ( π,,, 1) 3 Yes 3 ( π, π, 1, 1) 5 No indicate that the number of switchings p influences the timeoptimality property. In particular, it is seen that for p 3, the control law (6) satisfies the necessary conditions for optimality. Joint angles (rad) Lyapunov function V Torque (Nm) z 1 z Fig. 2. Angular momentum kg m 2 s 1 Energy profile Switching function s 2 2 z 3 z E d Energy build-up phase
6 VI. CONCLUSIONS A global discontinuous control law has been presented for the acrobot and it guarantees that the system reaches a small neighbourhood around the upward equilibrium point of interest. For a certain domain of the initial conditions that is based on an energy requirement, necessary conditions for time-optimality of the control law are presented. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST) as a Sponsored Research & Development project (Sanction No. 1/IFD/28/21-2). REFERENCES [1] M. W. Spong, The swing up control problem for the acrobot, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 15, pp , February [2] K. J. Åström and K. Furuta, Swinging up a pendulum by energy control, in Proceedings of the 13 th IFAC World Congress, vol. E, (San Francisco), pp , [3] A. S. Shiriaev, H. Ludvigsen, O. Egeland, and A. L. Fradkov, Swinging up of non-affine in control pendulum, in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, (San Diego, California), pp , 199. [4] I. Fantoni, R. Lozano, and M. W. Spong, Energy based control of the pendubot, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 45, pp , April 2. [5] K. G. Shin and N. D. McKay, Minimum-time control of robotic manipulators with geometric path constraints, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 3, pp , June [6] E. D. Sontag and H. J. Sussmann, Time-optimal control of manipulators, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp , [7] G. Sahar and J. M. Hollerbach, Planning of minimum-time trajectories for robot-arms, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (St. Louis, Missouri), pp , [8] Y. Chen and A. A. Descrochers, A Proof of the structure of the minimum-time control law of robotic manipulator using a Hamiltonian formulation, IEEE Trans. on Robotics & Automation, vol. 6, pp , June 199. [9] A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems. New York: Spinger Verlag, [1] F. L. Lewis and V. L. Syrmos, Optimal Control. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
Efficient Swing-up of the Acrobot Using Continuous Torque and Impulsive Braking
American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 9 - July, Efficient Swing-up of the Acrobot Using Continuous Torque and Impulsive Braking Frank B. Mathis, Rouhollah Jafari
More informationCONTROL OF THE NONHOLONOMIC INTEGRATOR
June 6, 25 CONTROL OF THE NONHOLONOMIC INTEGRATOR R. N. Banavar (Work done with V. Sankaranarayanan) Systems & Control Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai -INDIA. banavar@iitb.ac.in Outline
More informationStabilization of a 3D Rigid Pendulum
25 American Control Conference June 8-, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThC5.6 Stabilization of a 3D Rigid Pendulum Nalin A. Chaturvedi, Fabio Bacconi, Amit K. Sanyal, Dennis Bernstein, N. Harris McClamroch Department
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationRobotics, Geometry and Control - A Preview
Robotics, Geometry and Control - A Preview Ravi Banavar 1 1 Systems and Control Engineering IIT Bombay HYCON-EECI Graduate School - Spring 2008 Broad areas Types of manipulators - articulated mechanisms,
More informationControl of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum by Bounded Torques
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 ThC6.5 Control of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum by Bounded Torques Victor
More informationSwinging-Up and Stabilization Control Based on Natural Frequency for Pendulum Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrC. Swinging-Up and Stabilization Control Based on Natural Frequency for Pendulum Systems Noriko Matsuda, Masaki Izutsu,
More informationA Normal Form for Energy Shaping: Application to the Furuta Pendulum
Proc 4st IEEE Conf Decision and Control, A Normal Form for Energy Shaping: Application to the Furuta Pendulum Sujit Nair and Naomi Ehrich Leonard Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Princeton
More informationavailable online at CONTROL OF THE DOUBLE INVERTED PENDULUM ON A CART USING THE NATURAL MOTION
Acta Polytechnica 3(6):883 889 3 Czech Technical University in Prague 3 doi:.43/ap.3.3.883 available online at http://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap CONTROL OF THE DOUBLE INVERTED PENDULUM ON A CART USING
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationStable Limit Cycle Generation for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Application: Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum
Stable Limit Cycle Generation for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Application: Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum Sébastien Andary Ahmed Chemori Sébastien Krut LIRMM, Univ. Montpellier - CNRS, 6, rue Ada
More informationA GLOBAL STABILIZATION STRATEGY FOR AN INVERTED PENDULUM. B. Srinivasan, P. Huguenin, K. Guemghar, and D. Bonvin
Copyright IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A GLOBAL STABILIZATION STRATEGY FOR AN INVERTED PENDULUM B. Srinivasan, P. Huguenin, K. Guemghar, and D. Bonvin Labaratoire d Automatique,
More informationAngular Momentum Based Controller for Balancing an Inverted Double Pendulum
Angular Momentum Based Controller for Balancing an Inverted Double Pendulum Morteza Azad * and Roy Featherstone * * School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract.
More informationq HYBRID CONTROL FOR BALANCE 0.5 Position: q (radian) q Time: t (seconds) q1 err (radian)
Hybrid Control for the Pendubot Mingjun Zhang and Tzyh-Jong Tarn Department of Systems Science and Mathematics Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA mjz@zach.wustl.edu and tarn@wurobot.wustl.edu
More informationExperimental Results for Almost Global Asymptotic and Locally Exponential Stabilization of the Natural Equilibria of a 3D Pendulum
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 4-6, 26 WeC2. Experimental Results for Almost Global Asymptotic and Locally Exponential Stabilization of the Natural
More informationReverse Order Swing-up Control of Serial Double Inverted Pendulums
Reverse Order Swing-up Control of Serial Double Inverted Pendulums T.Henmi, M.Deng, A.Inoue, N.Ueki and Y.Hirashima Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima-Naka, Okayama, Japan inoue@suri.sys.okayama-u.ac.jp
More informationStabilization and Passivity-Based Control
DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive
More informationENERGY BASED CONTROL OF A CLASS OF UNDERACTUATED. Mark W. Spong. Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1308 West Main Street,
ENERGY BASED CONTROL OF A CLASS OF UNDERACTUATED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Mark W. Spong Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1308 West Main Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA Abstract. In
More informationStabilization of a Specified Equilibrium in the Inverted Equilibrium Manifold of the 3D Pendulum
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 ThA11.6 Stabilization of a Specified Equilibrium in the Inverted Equilibrium
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationControl of the Underactuated Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum for Stable Limit Cycle Generation
Advanced Robotics 23 (2009) 1999 2014 www.brill.nl/ar Full paper Control of the Underactuated Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum for Stable Limit Cycle Generation Sébastien Andary, Ahmed Chemori and Sébastien
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationKINETIC ENERGY SHAPING IN THE INVERTED PENDULUM
KINETIC ENERGY SHAPING IN THE INVERTED PENDULUM J. Aracil J.A. Acosta F. Gordillo Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Universidad de Sevilla Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n 49 - Sevilla, Spain email:{aracil,
More informationTransverse Linearization for Controlled Mechanical Systems with Several Passive Degrees of Freedom (Application to Orbital Stabilization)
Transverse Linearization for Controlled Mechanical Systems with Several Passive Degrees of Freedom (Application to Orbital Stabilization) Anton Shiriaev 1,2, Leonid Freidovich 1, Sergey Gusev 3 1 Department
More informationSWING UP A DOUBLE PENDULUM BY SIMPLE FEEDBACK CONTROL
ENOC 2008, Saint Petersburg, Russia, June, 30 July, 4 2008 SWING UP A DOUBLE PENDULUM BY SIMPLE FEEDBACK CONTROL Jan Awrejcewicz Department of Automatics and Biomechanics Technical University of Łódź 1/15
More informationHybrid Control of the Pendubot
IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 7, NO. 1, MARCH 2002 79 Hybrid Control of the Pendubot Mingjun Zhang, Student Member, IEEE, and Tzyh-Jong Tarn, Fellow, IEEE Abstract Swing up and balance control
More informationWeak Input-to-State Stability Properties for Navigation Function Based Controllers
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers MEAM) Department of Mechanical Engineering & Applied Mechanics December 2006 Weak Input-to-State Stability Properties for Navigation Function
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions
More informationSWINGING UP A PENDULUM BY ENERGY CONTROL
Paper presented at IFAC 13th World Congress, San Francisco, California, 1996 SWINGING UP A PENDULUM BY ENERGY CONTROL K. J. Åström and K. Furuta Department of Automatic Control Lund Institute of Technology,
More informationA Fuzzy Control Strategy for Acrobots Combining Model-Free and Model-Based Control
IEE Proceedings --Control Theory and Applications--, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 55-5, 999 A Fuzzy Control Strategy for Acrobots Combining Model-Free and Model-Based Control Xuzhi AI*, Jin-Hua SHE** $, Yasuhiro
More informationRobust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft
Robust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft AER1503 Spacecraft Dynamics and Controls II April 24, 2015 Christopher Au Agenda Introduction Model Formulation Controller Designs Simulation Results 2
More informationAcrobot stable walking in Hybrid systems notation*
4 UKSim-AMSS 6th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation Acrobot stable walking in Hybrid systems notation* Milan Anderle Institute of Information Theory and Automation Academy of
More informationEl péndulo invertido: un banco de pruebas para el control no lineal. XXV Jornadas de Automática
El péndulo invertido: un banco de pruebas para el control no lineal Javier Aracil and Francisco Gordillo Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Universidad de Sevilla XXV Jornadas de Automática Ciudad Real, 8-1
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationCommun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat
Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 14 (9) 319 37 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cnsns Switched control of a nonholonomic
More informationStability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms
Stability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms Yoshikatsu HOSHI, Mitsuji SAMPEI, Shigeki NAKAURA Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology 2
More informationAverage-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control
Outline Background Preliminaries Consensus Numerical simulations Conclusions Average-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control Email: lzhx@nankai.edu.cn, chenzq@nankai.edu.cn
More informationLecture Note 7: Switching Stabilization via Control-Lyapunov Function
ECE7850: Hybrid Systems:Theory and Applications Lecture Note 7: Switching Stabilization via Control-Lyapunov Function Wei Zhang Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ohio
More informationSwinging Up a Pendulum by Energy Control
Paper from 13th IFAC World Congress, San Francisco, CA, 1996 Swinging Up a Pendulum by Energy Control K. J. Åström and K. Furuta Department of Automatic Control Lund Institute of Technology, Box 118, Lund,
More informationObserver Design for a Flexible Robot Arm with a Tip Load
5 American Control Conference June 8-, 5. Portland, OR, USA WeC7.6 Observer Design for a Flexible Robot Arm with a Tip Load Tu Duc Nguyen and Olav Egeland Abstract In this paper, we consider the observer
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis
Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of
More informationLecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design. Course Outline. Exact linearization: example [one-link robot] Exact Feedback Linearization
Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design Course Outline Eact-linearization Lyapunov-based design Lab Adaptive control Sliding modes control Literature: [Khalil, ch.s 13, 14.1,14.] and [Glad-Ljung,ch.17] Lecture
More informationCase Study: The Pelican Prototype Robot
5 Case Study: The Pelican Prototype Robot The purpose of this chapter is twofold: first, to present in detail the model of the experimental robot arm of the Robotics lab. from the CICESE Research Center,
More informationTrajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems
25 American Control Conference June 8-1, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThB17.4 Trajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems Kazunori Sakurama, Toshiharu Sugie and Kazushi Nakano Abstract This
More informationClosed Loop Control of a Gravity-assisted Underactuated Snake Robot with Application to Aircraft Wing-Box Assembly
Robotics: Science and Systems 2007 Atlanta, GA, USA, June 27-30, 2007 Closed Loop Control of a Gravity-assisted Underactuated Snake Robot with Application to Aircraft Wing-Box Assembly Binayak Roy and
More informationMinimizing Cable Swing in a Gantry Crane Using the IDA-PBC Methodology
3 th National Conference on Mechanisms and Machines (NaCoMM7), IISc, Bangalore, India. December -3, 7 NaCoMM-7-65 Minimizing Cable Swing in a Gantry Crane Using the IDA-PBC Methodology Faruk Kazi, Ravi
More informationLyapunov-Based Controller for the Inverted Pendulum Cart System
Nonlinear Dynamics (2005) 40: 367 374 c Springer 2005 Lyapunov-Based Controller for the Inverted Pendulum Cart System CARLOS AGUILAR IBAÑEZ,O.GUTIÉRREZ FRIAS, and M. SUÁREZ CASTAÑÓN Centro de Investigación
More informationASTATISM IN NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ROBOTICS
dx dt DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND CONTROL PROCESSES N 1, 1997 Electronic Journal, reg. N P23275 at 07.03.97 http://www.neva.ru/journal e-mail: diff@osipenko.stu.neva.ru Control problems in nonlinear systems
More informationImpulsive Stabilization and Application to a Population Growth Model*
Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory, 2(2) (2002) 173 184 Impulsive Stabilization and Application to a Population Growth Model* Xinzhi Liu 1 and Xuemin Shen 2 1 Department of Applied Mathematics, University
More informationAsymptotic Smooth Stabilization of the Inverted 3D Pendulum
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL 1 Asymptotic Smooth Stabilization of the Inverted 3D Pendulum Nalin A. Chaturvedi, N. Harris McClamroch, Fellow, IEEE, and Dennis S. Bernstein, Fellow, IEEE Abstract
More informationLecture 4. Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability. Eugenio Schuster. Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University.
Lecture 4 Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 4 p. 1/86 Autonomous Systems Consider the autonomous system ẋ
More informationREMARKS ON THE TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A CLASS OF HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS. Eduardo D. Sontag. SYCON - Rutgers Center for Systems and Control
REMARKS ON THE TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A CLASS OF HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS Eduardo D. Sontag SYCON - Rutgers Center for Systems and Control Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903
More informationHigh gain observer for embedded Acrobot
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control High gain observer for embedded Acrobot Milan Anderle Sergej Čelikovský Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty
More informationLecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design
Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design Exact-linearization Lyapunov-based design Lab 2 Adaptive control Sliding modes control Literature: [Khalil, ch.s 13, 14.1,14.2] and [Glad-Ljung,ch.17] Course Outline
More informationMinimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality
Minimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality Christian Ebenbauer Institute for Systems Theory in Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany ce@ist.uni-stuttgart.de
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationExponential Controller for Robot Manipulators
Exponential Controller for Robot Manipulators Fernando Reyes Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Grupo de Robótica de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Electrónica Apartado Postal 542, Puebla 7200, México
More informationRelaxed Matching for Stabilization of Mechanical Systems
Relaxed Matching for Stabilization of Mechanical Systems D.A. Long, A.M. Bloch, J.E. Marsden, and D.V. Zenkov Keywords: Controlled Lagrangians, kinetic shaping Abstract. The method of controlled Lagrangians
More informationAttitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis
AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, & Dynamics Revised Submission, December, 22 Attitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis Jonathan Lawton Raytheon Systems Inc. Tucson, Arizona 85734 Randal W. Beard
More informationComputing Optimized Nonlinear Sliding Surfaces
Computing Optimized Nonlinear Sliding Surfaces Azad Ghaffari and Mohammad Javad Yazdanpanah Abstract In this paper, we have concentrated on real systems consisting of structural uncertainties and affected
More informationResearch Article On the Stabilization of the Inverted-Cart Pendulum Using the Saturation Function Approach
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 211, Article ID 85615, 14 pages doi:1.1155/211/85615 Research Article On the Stabilization of the Inverted-Cart Pendulum Using the Saturation Function Approach
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationGlobal stabilization of an underactuated autonomous underwater vehicle via logic-based switching 1
Proc. of CDC - 4st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, December Global stabilization of an underactuated autonomous underwater vehicle via logic-based switching António Pedro Aguiar
More informationUnderwater vehicles: a surprising non time-optimal path
Underwater vehicles: a surprising non time-optimal path M. Chyba Abstract his paper deals with the time-optimal problem for a class of underwater vehicles. We prove that if two configurations at rest can
More informationq 1 F m d p q 2 Figure 1: An automated crane with the relevant kinematic and dynamic definitions.
Robotics II March 7, 018 Exercise 1 An automated crane can be seen as a mechanical system with two degrees of freedom that moves along a horizontal rail subject to the actuation force F, and that transports
More informationProblem Description The problem we consider is stabilization of a single-input multiple-state system with simultaneous magnitude and rate saturations,
SEMI-GLOBAL RESULTS ON STABILIZATION OF LINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT RATE AND MAGNITUDE SATURATIONS Trygve Lauvdal and Thor I. Fossen y Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7 Trondheim, NORWAY.
More informationRigid body stability and Poinsot s theorem
Rigid body stability Rigid body stability and Ravi N Banavar banavar@iitb.ac.in 1 1 Systems and Control Engineering, IIT Bombay, India November 7, 2013 Outline 1 Momentum sphere-energy ellipsoid 2 The
More informationRobust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators
Robust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators Marcel Bergerman * Yangsheng Xu +,** Yun-Hui Liu ** * Automation Institute Informatics Technology Center Campinas SP Brazil + The Robotics Institute
More informationConstructive Invariant Manifolds to Stabilize Pendulum like systems Via Immersion and Invariance
Constructive Invariant Manifolds to Stabilize Pendulum like systems Via Immersion and Invariance J.Á. Acosta, R. Ortega, A. Astolfi, and I. Sarras Dept. de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Escuela
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationModel Orbit Robust Stabilization (MORS) of Pendubot with Application to Swing up Control
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December 1-15, 5 WeIC18.1 Model Orbit Robust Stabilization (MORS) of Pendubot with
More informationApplications of Controlled Invariance to the l 1 Optimal Control Problem
Applications of Controlled Invariance to the l 1 Optimal Control Problem Carlos E.T. Dórea and Jean-Claude Hennet LAAS-CNRS 7, Ave. du Colonel Roche, 31077 Toulouse Cédex 4, FRANCE Phone : (+33) 61 33
More informationConvergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems
Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems Philippe JOUAN and Saïd NACIRI arxiv:1511.01737v1 [math.oc] 5 Nov 2015 January 23, 2018 Abstract This paper is concerned with the convergence rate of the
More informationAn Explicit Characterization of Minimum Wheel-Rotation Paths for Differential-Drives
An Explicit Characterization of Minimum Wheel-Rotation Paths for Differential-Drives Hamidreza Chitsaz 1, Steven M. LaValle 1, Devin J. Balkcom, and Matthew T. Mason 3 1 Department of Computer Science
More informationControl of Mobile Robots
Control of Mobile Robots Regulation and trajectory tracking Prof. Luca Bascetta (luca.bascetta@polimi.it) Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria Organization and
More informationNavigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Mathias Bürger, Frank Allgöwer Abstract We study backstepping controllers
More informationFINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS 1. Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ
Copyright IFAC 5th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain FINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ Λ Institute of Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
More informationThrowing Motion Control of the Pendubot and Instability Analysis of the Zero Dynamics
2011 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December 12-15, 2011 Throwing Motion Control of the Pendubot and Instability Analysis of the
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationRepresent this system in terms of a block diagram consisting only of. g From Newton s law: 2 : θ sin θ 9 θ ` T
Exercise (Block diagram decomposition). Consider a system P that maps each input to the solutions of 9 4 ` 3 9 Represent this system in terms of a block diagram consisting only of integrator systems, represented
More informationModelling and Control of Mechanical Systems: A Geometric Approach
Motivation Mathematical preliminaries Submanifolds Optional Modelling and Control of Mechanical Systems: A Geometric Approach Ravi N Banavar banavar@iitb.ac.in 1 1 Systems and Control Engineering, IIT
More informationHybrid active and semi-active control for pantograph-catenary system of high-speed train
Hybrid active and semi-active control for pantograph-catenary system of high-speed train I.U. Khan 1, D. Wagg 1, N.D. Sims 1 1 University of Sheffield, Department of Mechanical Engineering, S1 3JD, Sheffield,
More informationIN this paper we consider the stabilization problem for
614 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 42, NO 5, MAY 1997 Exponential Stabilization of Driftless Nonlinear Control Systems Using Homogeneous Feedback Robert T M Closkey, Member, IEEE, and Richard
More informationStabilization of Nonlinear Systems via Forwarding
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 46, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 200 46 Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems via Forwarding Forwarding builds upon this basic idea to stabilize cascaded systems of the form
More informationDynamic Modeling of Rotary Double Inverted Pendulum Using Classical Mechanics
ISBN 978-93-84468-- Proceedings of 5 International Conference on Future Computational echnologies (ICFC'5) Singapore, March 9-3, 5, pp. 96-3 Dynamic Modeling of Rotary Double Inverted Pendulum Using Classical
More informationRigid-Body Attitude Control USING ROTATION MATRICES FOR CONTINUOUS, SINGULARITY-FREE CONTROL LAWS
Rigid-Body Attitude Control USING ROTATION MATRICES FOR CONTINUOUS, SINGULARITY-FREE CONTROL LAWS 3 IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE» JUNE -33X//$. IEEE SHANNON MASH Rigid-body attitude control is motivated
More informationNonholonomic Constraints Examples
Nonholonomic Constraints Examples Basilio Bona DAUIN Politecnico di Torino July 2009 B. Bona (DAUIN) Examples July 2009 1 / 34 Example 1 Given q T = [ x y ] T check that the constraint φ(q) = (2x + siny
More informationApplied Math Qualifying Exam 11 October Instructions: Work 2 out of 3 problems in each of the 3 parts for a total of 6 problems.
Printed Name: Signature: Applied Math Qualifying Exam 11 October 2014 Instructions: Work 2 out of 3 problems in each of the 3 parts for a total of 6 problems. 2 Part 1 (1) Let Ω be an open subset of R
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationNonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1
Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems p. 1/1 p. 2/1 Converse Lyapunov Theorem Exponential Stability Let x = 0 be an exponentially stable equilibrium
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More informationThe Acrobot and Cart-Pole
C H A P T E R 3 The Acrobot and Cart-Pole 3.1 INTRODUCTION A great deal of work in the control of underactuated systems has been done in the context of low-dimensional model systems. These model systems
More informationFunnel control in mechatronics: An overview
Funnel control in mechatronics: An overview Position funnel control of stiff industrial servo-systems C.M. Hackl 1, A.G. Hofmann 2 and R.M. Kennel 1 1 Institute for Electrical Drive Systems and Power Electronics
More informationUnit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft without velocity measurement
Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel San Diego, CA, USA, December 3-5, 6 Unit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft
More informationAn introduction to Birkhoff normal form
An introduction to Birkhoff normal form Dario Bambusi Dipartimento di Matematica, Universitá di Milano via Saldini 50, 0133 Milano (Italy) 19.11.14 1 Introduction The aim of this note is to present an
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationHybrid Systems Techniques for Convergence of Solutions to Switching Systems
Hybrid Systems Techniques for Convergence of Solutions to Switching Systems Rafal Goebel, Ricardo G. Sanfelice, and Andrew R. Teel Abstract Invariance principles for hybrid systems are used to derive invariance
More informationRobust Control of Robot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 511-513, Nov./Dec. 2003 obust Control of obot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation Keywords : obot manipulators, MBDA, position control,
More information