arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 26 Nov 2013
|
|
- Mark Carroll
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Self-generated interior blow-up solutions in fractional elliptic equation with absorption Huyuan Chen, Patricio Felmer arxiv:3.667v [math.ap] 6 Nov 3 Departamento de Ingeniería Matemática and Centro de Modelamiento Matemático UMR7 CNRS-UChile, Universidad de Chile Casilla 7 Correo 3, Santiago, Chile. (hchen@dim.uchile.cl, pfelmer@dim.uchile.cl) and Alexander Quaas Departamento de Matemática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María Casilla: V-, Avda. España 68, Valparaíso, Chile (alexander.quaas@usm.cl) Abstract In this paper we study positive solutions to problem involving the fractional Laplacian ( ) α u(x)+ u p u(x) =, x Ω\C, u(x) =, x Ω c, (.) lim x Ω\C, x C u(x) = +, where p > and Ω is an open bounded C domain in R N, C Ω is a compact C manifold with N multiples dimensions and withoutboundary, theoperator ( ) α withα (,) isthefractional Laplacian. We consider the existence of positive solutions for problem (.). Moreover, we further analyze uniqueness, asymptotic behaviour and nonexistence. Key words: Fractional Laplacian, Existence, Uniqueness, Asymptotic behavior, Blow-up solution.
2 Introduction In 957, a fundamental contribution due to Keller in [] and Osserman in [9] is the study of boundary blow-up solutions for the non-linear elliptic equation { u+h(u) = in Ω, (.) lim x Ω,x Ω u(x) = +. They proved the existence of solutions to (.) when h : R [,+ ) is a locally Lipschitz continuous function which is nondecreasing and satisfies the so called Keller-Osserman condition. From then on, the result of Keller and Osserman has been extended by numerous mathematicians in various ways, weakening the assumptions on the domain, generalizing the differential operator and the nonlinear term for equations and systems. The case of h(u) = u p + with p = N+ is studied by Loewner and Nirenberg [5], where N in particular uniqueness and asymptotic behavior were obtained. After that, Bandle and Marcus [] obtained uniqueness and asymptotic for more general non-linearties h. Later, Le Gall in [9] established a uniqueness result of problem (.)inthe domainwhose boundaryisnon-smoothwhen h(u) = u +. Marcus and Véron [6, 8] extended the uniqueness of blow-up solution for (.) in general domains whose boundary is locally represented as a graph of a continuous function when h(u) = u p + for p >. Under this special assumption on h, Kim[] studied the existence and uniqueness of boundary blow-up solution to (.) in bounded domains Ω satisfying Ω = Ω. For another interesting contributions to boundary blow-up solutions see for example Kondratev, Nikishkin [3], Lazer, McKenna [4], Arrieta and Rodríguez-Bernal [], Chuaqui, Cortázar, Elgueta and J. García-Melián [4], del Pino and Letelier [5], Díaz and Letelier [6], Du and Huang [7], García-Melián [], Véron [], and the reference therein. In a recent work, Felmer and Quaas [8] considered a version of Keller and Osserman problem for a class of non-local operator. Being more precise, they considered as a particular case the fractional elliptic problem ( ) α u(x)+ u p u(x) = f(x), x Ω, u(x) = g(x), x Ω c, lim x Ω, x Ω u(x) = +, (.) where p >, f and g are appropriate functions and Ω is a bounded domain with C boundary. The operator ( ) α is the fractional Laplacian which is defined as ( ) α u(x) = δ(u,x,y) dy, x Ω, (.3) R y N N+α
3 with α (,) and δ(u,x,y) = u(x+y)+u(x y) u(x). In [8] the authors proved the existence of a solution to (.) provided that g explodes at the boundary and satisfies other technical conditions. In case the function g blows up with an explosion rate as d(x) β, with β [ α,) p and d(x) = dist(x, Ω), it is shown that the solution satisfies < liminf x Ω,x Ω u(x)d(x) β limsup u(x)d(x) α p < +. x Ω,x Ω Here the explosion is driven by the external value g and the external source f has a secondary role, not intervening in the explosive character of the solution. More recently, Chen, Felmer and Quaas [3] extended the results in [8] studying existence, uniqueness and non-existence of boundary blow-up solutions when the function g vanishes and the explosion on the boundary is driven by the external source f, with weak or strong explosion rate. Moreover, the results are extended even to the case where the boundary blow-up solutions in driven internally, when the external source and value, f and g, vanish. Existence, uniqueness, asymptotic behavior and non-existence results for blow-up solutions of (.) are considered in [3]. In the analysis developed in [3], a key role is played by the function C : (,] R, that governs the behavior of the solution near the boundary. The function C is defined as C(τ) = + χ (,) (t) t τ +(+t) τ t +α dt (.4) and it possess exactly one zero in (,) andwe call it τ (α). In what follows we explain with more details the results in the case of vanishing external source and values, that is f = in Ω and g = in Ω c, which is the case we will consider in this paper. In Theorem. in [3], we proved that whenever +α < p < α τ (α), then problem (.) admits a unique positive solution u such that α < liminf u(x)d(x) p limsup u(x)d(x) α p < +. x Ω,x Ω x Ω,x Ω On the other hand, we proved that when p, then problem (.) does not admit any solution u such that < liminf x Ω,x Ω u(x)d(x) τ limsup u(x)d(x) τ < +, (.5) x Ω,x Ω 3
4 for any τ (,)\{τ (α), α }. We observe that the non-existence result p does not include the case when u has an asymptotic behavior of the form d(x) τ(α), where τ (α) is precisely where C vanishes. We have a a special existence result in this case, precisely if max{ α τ (α) + τ (α)+,} < p < α τ (α) τ (α), then, for any t >, problem (.) admits a positive solution u such that lim x Ω,x Ω u(x)d(x) τ (α) = t. Motivated by these results and in view of the non-local character of the fractional Laplacian we are interested in another class of blow-up solutions. We want to study solutions that vanish at the boundary of the domain Ω but that explodes at the interior of the domain, near a prescribed embedded manifold. From now on, we assume that Ω is an open bounded domain in R N with C boundary, and that there is a C, (N )-dimensional manifold C without boundary, embedded in Ω, such that, it separates Ω\C in exactly two connected components. Wedenote byω theinner component andbyω the external component, that is Ω Ω = and Ω Ω = Ω. Throughout the paper we will consider the distance function D : Ω\C R +, D(x) = dist(x,c). (.6) Let us consider the equations, for i =,, ( ) α u(x)+ u p u(x) =, x Ω i, u(x) =, x Ω c i, lim x Ωi, x Ω i u(x) = +, (.7) which have solutions u and u, for i =, respectively, in the appropriate range of the parameters. In the local case, that is, α =, these two solutions certainly do not interact among each other, but when α (,), due to the non-local character of the fractional Laplacian and the non-linear character of the equation the solutions on each side of Ω interact and it is precisely the purpose of this paper to study their existence, uniqueness and non-existence. In precise terms we consider the equation ( ) α u(x)+ u p u(x) =, x Ω\C, u(x) =, x Ω c, (.8) lim x Ω\C, x C u(x) = +, 4
5 where p >, Ω and C Ω are as described above. The explosion of the solution near C is governed by a function c : (,] R, defined as c(τ) = + t τ +(+t) τ t +α dt. (.9) This function plays the role of the function C used in [3], but it has certain differences. In Section we prove the existence of a number α (,) such thatα [α,)thefunctioncisalwayspositivein(,), whileifα (,α ) then there exists exists a unique τ (α) (,) such that c(τ (α)) = and c(τ) > in (,τ (α)) and c(τ) < in (τ (α),), see Proposition.. We notice here that τ (α) > τ (α) if α (,α ). Now we are ready to state our main theorems on the existence uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of interior blow-up solutions to equation (.8). These theorems deal separately the case α (,α ) and α [α,). Theorem. Assume that α (,α ) and the assumptions on Ω and C. Then we have: (i) If +α < p < α τ (α), (.) then problem (.8) admits a unique positive solution u satisfying (ii) If α < liminf u(x)d(x) p limsup u(x)d(x) α p < +. (.) x Ω\C,x C x Ω\C,x C max{ α τ (α) + τ (α)+,} < p < α τ (α) τ (α). (.) Then, for any t >, there is a positive solution u of problem (.8) satisfying lim u(x)d(x) τ(α) = t. (.3) x Ω\C,x C (iii) If one of the following three conditions holds a) < p +α and τ (,)\{τ (α)}, b) +α < p < α τ (α) and τ (,)\{τ (α), α p } or c) p α τ (α) and τ (,), then problem (.8) does not admit any solution u satisfying < liminf x Ω\C,x C u(x)d(x) τ limsup u(x)d(x) τ < +. (.4) x Ω\C,x C 5
6 We observe that this theorem is similar to Theorem. in [3], where the role of τ (α) is played here by τ (α). A quite different situation occurs when α [α,) and the function c never vanishes in (,). Precisely, we have Theorem. Assume that α [α,) and the assumptions on Ω and C. Then we have: (i) If p > + α, then problem (.8) admits a unique positive solution u satisfying (.). (ii) If p >, then problem (.8) does not admit any solution u satisfying (.4) for any τ (,)\{ α p }. Comparing Theorem. with Theorem. we see that the range of existence for the absorption term is quite larger for the second one, no constraint from above. The main difference with the results in [3], Theorem., with vanishing f and g occurs when α is large and the function c does not vanish, allowing thus for existence for all p large. This difference comes from the fact that the fractional Laplacian is a non-local operator so that in the interior blow-up, in each of the domains Ω and Ω there is a non-zero external value, the solutions itself acting on the other side of C. The proof of our theorems is obtained through the use of super and subsolutions as in [3]. The main difficulty here is to find the appropriate super and sub-solutions to apply the iteration technique to fractional elliptic problem (.8). Here we make use of some precise estimates based on the function c and the distance function D near C. This article is organized as follows. In section, we introduce some preliminaries and we prove the main estimates of the behavior of the fractional Laplacian when applied to suitable powers of the function D. In section 3 we prove the existence of solution to problem (.8) as given in Theorem. and Theorem.. Finally, in Section 4 we prove the uniqueness and nonexistence statements of these theorems. Preliminaries In this section, we recall some basic results from [3] and obtain some useful estimate, which will be used in constructing super and sub-solutions of problem (.8). The first result states as: Ū and sub- Theorem. Assume that p > and there are super-solution solution U of problem (.8) such that Ū U in Ω\C, liminf U(x) = +, Ū = U = in x Ω\C,x C Ωc. 6
7 Then problem (.8) admits at least one positive solution u such that U u Ū in Ω\C. Proof. The procedure is similar to the proof of Theorem.6 in [3], here we give the main differences. Let us define Ω n := {x Ω D(x) > /n} then we solve ( ) α u n (x)+ u n p u n (x) =, x Ω n, u n (x) = U, x Ω c n. (.) To find these solutions of (.) we observe that for fix n the method of section 3 of [8] applies even if the domain is not connected since the estimate of Lemma 3. holds with δ < /n (see also Proposition 3. part ii) in [3]), form here sub and super-solution can be construct for the Dirichlet problem and then existence holds for (.) by an iteration technique (see also section of [3] for that procedure). Then as in Theorem.6 in [3] we have U u n u n+ Ū in Ω. By monotonicity of u n, we can define u(x) := lim n + u n(x), x Ω and u(x) :=, x Ω c. Which, by a stability property, is a solution of problem (.8) with the desired properties. In order to prove our existence result, it is crucial to have available super and sub-solutions to problem (.8). To this end, we start describing the properties of c(τ) defined in (.9), which is a C function in (,). Proposition. There exists a unique α (,) such that (i) For α [α,), we have c(τ) >, for all τ (,); (ii) For any α (,α ), there exists unique τ (α) (,) satisfying >, if τ (,τ (α)), c(τ) =, if τ = τ (α), <, if τ (τ (α),) and lim α α τ (α) = and (.) lim α +τ (α) =. (.3) Moreover, τ (α) > τ (α), for all α (,α ), where τ (α) (,) is the unique zero of C(τ), defined in (.4). 7
8 Proof. From (.9), differentiating twice we find that c (τ) = + t τ (log t ) +(+t) τ (log(+t)) t +α dt >, (.4) so that c is strictly convex in (,). We also see easily that c() = and lim τ +c(τ) =. (.5) Thus, if c () then c(τ) > for τ (,) and if c () >, then there exists τ (α) (,) such that c(τ) > for τ (,τ (α)), c(τ) < for τ (τ (α),) and c(τ (α)) =. In order to complete our proof, we have to analyze the sign of c (), which depends on α and to make this dependence explicit, we write c () = T(α). We compute T(α) from (.9), differentiating and evaluating in τ = T(α) = + log t t +α dt. (.6) We have to prove that T possesses a unique zero in the interval (,). For this purpose we start proving that lim α T(α) = and lim +T(α) = +. (.7) The first limit follows from the fact that log( s) s, for all s [,/4], and so log( t ) lim dt lim t α dt = α t +α α α and the fact that exists a constant t such that + The second limit in (.7) follows from + lim α + log t t +α dt t, for all α (/,). log t + dt log3 lim t α dt = + t +α α + and the fact that there exists a constant t such that log t t +α dt t, for all α (,/). 8
9 On the other hand we claim that T (α) = + log t t +α logtdt <, α (,). (.8) In fact, since log t logt is negative only for t (, ), we have + log t t +α logtdt > = log( t ) t +α t logtdt+ t+α logtdt+ t α logtdt+ t α logtdt+ log(t )logtdt log(t )logtdt log(+t)logtdt tlogtdt >. Then, (.7)and(.8)theexistence ofthedesiredα (,)withtherequired properties follows, completing (i) and (.) in (ii). To continue with the proof of our proposition, we study the first limit in (.3). We assume that there exist a sequence α n (,α ) and τ (,) such that lim α n = α and lim τ (α n ) = τ n + n + and so c( τ) =. Moreover c() = and c () = T(α ) =, contradicting the strict convexity of c given by (.4). Next we prove the second limit in (.3). We proceed by contradiction, assuming that there exist a sequence {α n } (,) and τ (,) such that lim α n = and τ (α n ) τ >, for all n N. n + Then there exist C,C >, depending on τ, such that and t τ (α n) +(+t) τ (α n) t +αn dt C + lim n t τ (α n) +(+t) τ (α n) + dt C lim t +αn n t+αndt =. Then c(τ (α n )) as n +, which is impossible since c(τ (α n )) =. 9
10 We finally prove the last statement of the proposition. Since τ (α) (,) is such that C(τ (α)) = and we have, by definition, that c(τ) = C(τ)+ + (t ) τ dt, t+α we find that c(τ (α)) >, which together with (.), implies that τ (α) (,τ (α)). Next we prove the main proposition in this section, which is on the basis of the construction of super and sub-solutions. By hypothesis on the domain Ω and the manifold C, there exists δ > such that the distance functions d( ), to Ω, and D( ), to C, are of class C in B δ and A δ, respectively, and dist(a δ,b δ ) >, where A δ = {x Ω D(x) < δ} and B δ = {x Ω d(x) < δ}. Now we define the basic function V τ as follows D(x) τ, x A δ \C, d(x), x B δ, V τ (x) := l(x), x Ω\(A δ B δ ),, x Ω c, (.9) where τ is a parameter in (,) and the function l is positive such that V τ is of class C in R N \C. Proposition. Let α and τ (α) be as in Proposition.. (i) If (α,τ) [α,) (,) or (α,τ) (,α ) (,τ (α)), then there exist δ (,δ] and C > such that C D(x)τ α ( ) α V τ (x) CD(x) τ α, x A δ \C. (ii) If (α,τ) (,α ) (τ (α),), then there exist δ (,δ] and C > such that C D(x)τ α ( ) α V τ (x) CD(x) τ α, x A δ \C. (iii) If (α,τ) (,α ) {τ (α)}, then there exist δ (,δ] and C > such that ( ) α V τ (x) CD(x) min{τ,τ α+}, x A δ \C. This proposition and its proof has many similarities with Proposition 3. in [3], but it has also important differences so we give a complete proof of it.
11 Proof. By compactness of C, we just need to prove that the corresponding inequality holds in a neighborhood of any point x C and, without loss of generality, we may assume x =. For a given < η δ, we define = ( η,η) R R N, where denotes the ball centered at the origin and with radius η in R N. We observe that Ω. Let ϕ : R N R be a C function such that (z,z ) C Q δ if and only if z = ϕ(z ). We further assume that e is normal to C at x and then there exists C > such that ϕ(z ) C z for z δ. Thus, choosing η > smaller if necessary we may assume that ϕ(z ) < η for z η. In the proof of our inequalities, we will consider a generic point along the normal x = (x,) A η/4, with < x < η/4. We observe that x x = D(x) = x. By definition we have ( ) α V τ (x) = δ(v τ,x,y) y dy + N+α δ(v τ,x,y) dy. (.) R N \ y N+α It is not difficult to see that the second integral is bounded by Cx τ, for an appropriate constant C >, so that we only need to study the first integral, that from now on we denote by E(x ). Our first goal is to obtain positive constants c,c so that lower bound for E(x ) E(x ) c c(τ) x τ α c x min{τ,τ α+} (.) holds, for all x η/4. For this purpose we assume that < η δ/, then for all y = (y,y ) we have that x±y Q δ, so that D(x±y) x ±y ϕ(±y ), for all y. From here and the fact that τ (,), we have that δ(v τ,x,y) I(y) E(x ) = dy y N+α y N+αdy + J(y)+J( y) dy, (.) y N+α where the functions I and J are defined, for y, as and I(y) = x y τ + x +y τ x τ (.3) J(y) = x +y ϕ(y ) τ x +y τ. (.4) In what follows we assume x > (the case x < is similar). For the first term of the right hand side in (.), we have I(y) z τ + +z τ y N+αdy = xτ α dz. z N+α x
12 On one hand we have that, for a constant c, we have z τ + +z τ dz = c(τ) dz = c R z N N+α R N ( z +) N+α c(τ), and, on the other hand, for constants C and C 3 we have η x z τ + +z τ dz η z x η z N+α x η x ( z τ + +z τ +)dz η x and z τ + +z τ z η R z x N N+α + z τ + +z τ + η z +α dz x z η x dz dz z C x α N+α R N (+ z ) N+α dz C 3 x α. Consequently, for an appropriate constant c I(y) y N+αdy c c(τ)x τ α c x τ. (.5) Next we estimate the second term of the right hand side in (.). Since J( y) y N+αdy = J(y) y N+αdy, we only need to estimate J(y) y N+αdy = η η x +y ϕ(y ) τ x +y τ dy (y + y ) N+α dy. (.6) We notice that x +y ϕ(y ) x +y if and only if ϕ(y )(x +y ϕ(y ) ). From here and (.6), we have J(y) y N+αdy + x + ϕ + (y ) η η x + ϕ (y ) = E (x )+E (x ), x +y ϕ + (y ) τ x +y τ dy (y + y ) N+α dy x +y ϕ (y ) τ x +y τ dy (y + y ) N+α dy
13 where ϕ + (y ) = max{ϕ(y ),}andϕ (y ) = min{ϕ(y ),}. Weonlyestimate E (x ) (E (x ) is similar). Using integration by parts, we obtain = = = E (x ) ϕ + (y ) x η + τ + y ϕ + (y ) τ y τ ((y x ) + y ) N+α dy dy (ϕ + (y ) y ) τ ( y ) τ dy ((y x ) + y ) N+α dy x η ϕ + (y ) [ N +α τ + + τ + + N +α τ + τ τ + + N +α τ + (ϕ + (y ) y ) τ y τ dy ((y x ) + y ) N+α dy ϕ + (y ) τ+ (x + y ) N+α [ x η + (η x +ϕ + (y )) τ+ (η x ) τ+ ]dy (η + y ) N+α (ϕ + (y ) y ) τ+ ( y ) τ+ (y ((y x ) + y ) N+α x )dy dy + τ ϕ + (y ) τ+ (( ϕ +(y ) x ) + y ) N+α ϕ + (y ) + ϕ + (y ) τ+ (x + y ) N+α ]dy (ϕ + (y ) y ) τ+ +y τ+ ((y x ) + y ) (y N+α x )dy dy + ϕ + (y Bη ) τ+ dy (( ϕ +(y ) x ) + y ) N+α min{ ϕ + (y ),x } (ϕ + (y ) y ) τ+ +y τ+ ((y x ) + y ) (y N+α x )dy dy + = A (x )+A (x ). (.7) In order to estimate A(x ), we split in O = {y : ϕ +(y ) x x and \O. On one hand we have y τ+ dy x τ α+ z O (( ϕ +(y ) x ) + y ) N+α Bη/x τ+ dz (/4+ z ) N+α C(x τ α+ +x τ ). On the other hand, for y \ O we have that y c x, for some constant c, and then y τ+ dy y τ+ N α dy \O (( ϕ +(y ) x ) + y ) N+α \B c x 3 }
14 C(x τ α+ +). Thus, for some C >, A (x ) Cx min{τ,τ α+}. (.8) Next we estimate A (x ): (N +α) x ϕ + (y ) τ+ (y x ) A (x ) τ + ((y x ) + y ) dy dy N+α + x y τ+ (y x ) C ((y x ) + y ) dy dy N+α + Cx τ α+ /x C x min{τ,τ α+}, z τ+ (z ) ((z ) + z ) dz dz N+α + for some C,C >. From here, (.7) and (.8) we obtain, for some C > E (x ) Cx min{τ,τ α+}. Using the similar estimate for E (x ), we obtain J(y)+J( y) dy Cx min{τ,τ α+} y N+α. (.9) Thus, from (.), (.5), (.9) and noticing that these inequalities also hold with x < with the obvious changes, we conclude the lower bound for E(x ) we gave in (.). Our second goal is to get an upper bound for E(x ) and for this, we first recall Lemma 3. in [3] to obtain D(x±y) τ (x ±y ϕ(y )) τ (+C y ), for all x η/4,y = (y,y ). From here we see that E(x ) I(y) y N+αdy + +C J(y)+J( y) y N+α dy I(y)+J(y)+J( y) y N+α y dy. (.) We denote by E 3 (x ) the third integral above. The first integral was studied in (.5), so we study the second integral and that we only need to consider 4
15 the term J(y), since the other is completely analogous. We see that x + y ϕ(y ) x +y if and only if ϕ(y )(x +y ϕ(y ) ). As before, we will consider only the case x >, since the other one is analogous. From (.6) we have J(y) y N+αdy + x + ϕ (y ) η η x + ϕ + (y ) = F (x )+F (x ). x +y ϕ (y ) τ x +y τ dy (y + y ) N+α dy x +y ϕ + (y ) τ x +y τ dy (y + y ) N+α dy Next we estimate F (x ) (F (x ) is similar), using integration by parts = = = F (x ) ϕ (y ) x η ϕ (y ) + τ + x η ϕ (y ) ϕ (y ) [ N +α τ + + τ + + N +α τ + τ + y ϕ (y ) τ y τ ((y x ) + y ) N+α dy dy (ϕ (y ) y ) τ ( y ) τ dy ((y x ) + y ) N+α dy (y ϕ (y )) τ ( y ) τ dy ((y x ) + y ) N+α dy ( ϕ (y )) τ+ ((x ϕ (y )) + y ) N+α [ ϕ (y ) x η + (η x +ϕ (y )) τ+ (η x ) τ+ ]dy (η + y ) N+α (ϕ (y ) y ) τ+ ( y ) τ+ (y ((y x ) + y ) N+α x )dy dy + τ ( ϕ (y )) τ+ (( ϕ (y ) x ) + y ) N+α ϕ (y ) + ( ϕ (y )) τ+ ((x ϕ (y )) + y ) N+α (y ϕ (y )) τ+ +( y ) τ+ (y ϕ (y ) ((y x ) + y ) N+α x )dy dy + Bη τ ( ϕ (y )) τ+ dy = B(x (( ϕ (y ) x ) + y ) N+α ). Since ( ϕ (y ) x ) x, we have B(x ) τ τ + Bη ( ϕ (y )) τ+ (x + y ) N+α 5 dy ]dy
16 C Bη y τ+ (x + y ) N+α dy Cx min{τ,τ α+}, for some C > independent of x. Thus we have obtained that F (x ) Cx min{τ,τ α+}. (.) Similarly, we can get an analogous estimate for F (x ) and these two estimates imply J(y)+J( y) dy Cx min{τ,τ α+} y N+α. (.) Finally we obtain I(y) dy = x τ α+ y N+α y and, in a similar way, x Cx min{τ,τ α+} Qη J(y) y From the last two inequalities we obtain dy Cxmin{τ,τ α+} y N+α. z τ + +z τ z dz z N+α E 3 (x ) Cx min{τ,τ α+}. (.3) Then, taking into account (.), (.5), (.), (.3) and considering also the case x <, we obtain E(x ) c c(τ) x τ α +c x min{τ,τ α+}. (.4) From inequalities (.), (.4) and Proposition. the result follows. 3 Existence of large solution This section is devoted to use Proposition. to prove the existence of solution of problem (.8). To this purpose, our main goal is to construct appropriate sub-solution and super-solution of problem (.8) under the hypotheses of Theorem. (i), (ii) and Theorem. (i). We begin with a simple lemma that reduces the problem to find them only in A δ \C. 6
17 Lemma 3. Let U and W be classical ordered super and sub-solution of (.8) in the sub-domain A δ \ C. Then there exists λ large such that U λ = U + λ V and W λ = W λ V, are ordered super and sub-solution of (.8), where V is the solution of { ( ) α V(x) =, x Ω, V(x) =, x Ω c. (3.) Remark 3. Here U,W : IR N R are classical ordered of super and subsolution of (.8) in the sub-domain A δ \C if U satisfies ( ) α U + U p U in A δ \C and W satisfies the reverse inequality. Moreover, they satisfy U W in Ω\C, liminf W(x) = +, U = W = in Ω c. x Ω\C,x C Proof. Notice that by the maximum principle V is nonnegative in Ω, therefore U λ U and W λ W, so they are still ordered. In addition U λ satisfies ( ) α U λ + U λ p U λ ( ) α U + U p U +λ >, in Ω\C. This inequality holds because of our assumption in A δ \C and the fact that ( ) α U + U p U is continuous in Ω\A δ and by taking λ large enough. By the same type of arguments we find that W λ is a sub-solution. Proof of existence results in Theorem. (i) and Theorem. (i). We define U µ (x) = µv τ (x) and W µ (x) = µv τ (x), x R N \C, (3.) where V τ is defined in (.9) with τ = α q. U µ is Super-solution. By hypotheses of Theorem. (i) and Theorem. (i), we notice that τ (,), for α [α,), τ (,τ (α)), for α (,α ) and τp = τ α, then we use Proposition. part (i) to obtain that there exist δ (,δ] and C > such that ( ) α U µ (x)+u p µ (x) CµD(x)τ α +µ p D(x) τp, x A δ \C. 7
18 Then there exist µ > such that for µ µ, we have ( ) α U µ (x)+u p µ (x), x A δ \C.. W µ is Sub-solution. We use Proposition. part (i) to obtain that there exist δ (,δ] and C > such that for x A δ \C, we have ( ) α W µ (x)+ W µ p W µ (x) µ C D(x)τ α +µ p D(x) τp ( µ C +µp )D(x) τ α. Then there exists µ 3 (,) such that for all µ (,µ 3 ), it has ( ) α W µ (x)+ W µ p W µ (x), x A δ \C. To conclude the proof we use Lemma 3. and Proposition.. Proof of Theorem. (ii). For any given t >, we denote U(x) = tv τ (α)(x), x R N \C, W µ (x) = tv τ (α)(x) µv τ (x), x R N \C where τ = min{τ (α)p+α, τ (α)} <. By (.), we have τ (τ (α),), τ α < min{τ (α),τ (α) α+} and τ α < τ (α)p. (3.3). U is Super-solution. We use Proposition. (iii) to obtain that for any x A δ \C, ( ) α U(x)+U p (x) CtD(x) min{τ (α),τ (α) α+} +t p D(x) τ (α)p, together with τ (α)p < min{τ (α),τ (α) α + }, then there exists δ (,δ ] such that ( ) α U(x)+U p (x), x A δ \C.. W µ is Sub-solution. We use Proposition. (ii) and (iii) to obtain that for x A δ \C, ( ) α W µ (x)+ W µ p W µ (x) CtD(x) min{τ (α),τ (α) α+} µ C D(x) τ α +t p D(x) τ (α)p. Then there exists δ (,δ ] such that for any µ, we have ( ) α W µ (x)+ W µ p W µ (x), x A δ \C. To conclude the proof we use Lemma 3. and Proposition.. 8
19 4 Uniqueness and nonexistence We prove the uniqueness statement by contradiction. Assume that u and v are solutions of problem (.8) satisfying (.). Then there exist C and δ (,δ) such that C v(x)d(x) τ, u(x)d(x) τ C, x A δ \C, (4.4) where τ = α. We denote p A = {x Ω\C u(x) > v(x)}. (4.5) Then A is open and A Ω. Then the uniqueness in Theorem. (i) and Theorem. (i) is a consequence of the following result: Proposition 4. Under the hypotheses of Theorem. (i) and Theorem. (i), we have A = Ø. Proof. The procedure of proof is similar as Section 5 in [3], noting that we need to replace d(x) by D(x) and Ω by C. From Proposition 4., we can prove uniqueness part in Theorem. (i) and Theorem. (i). The final goal in this note is to consider the nonexistence of solutions of problem (.8) under the hypotheses of Theorem. (iii) and Theorem. (ii). Proposition 4. Under the hypotheses of Theorem. (iii) and Theorem. (ii), we assume that U and U are both sub-solutions (or both supersolutions) of (.8) satisfying that U = U = in Ω c and < liminf U (x)d(x) τ limsup U (x)d(x) τ x Ω\C, x C x Ω\C, x C < lim inf U (x)d(x) τ limsup U (x)d(x) τ < +, x Ω\C, x C x Ω\C, x C for τ (,). For the case τp > τ α, we further assume that (i) if U,U are sub-solutions, there exist C > and δ >, ( ) α U (x) CD(x) τ α, x A δ \C; (4.6) or (ii) if U,U are super-solutions, there exist C > and δ >, ( ) α U (x) CD(x) τ α, x A δ \C. (4.7) 9
20 Then there doesn t exist any solution u of (.8) such that U (x) lim sup x Ω\C, x C u(x) < < liminf U (x) x Ω\C, x C u(x). (4.8) Proof. The proof is similar as Proposition 6. in [3], noting again that we need to replace d(x) by D(x) and Ω by C. With the help of Proposition., for given t > t >, we construct two sub-solutions (or both super-solutions) U and U of (.8) such that lim U (x)d(x) τ = t, x Ω\C,x C lim U (x)d(x) τ = t. x Ω\C,x C So what we have to do is to prove that for any t >, we can construct super-solution (sub-solution) of problem (.8). Proof of Theorem. (iii) and Theorem. (ii). We divide our proof of the nonexistence results into several cases under the assumption p >. Zone : We consider τ (τ (α),) and α (,α ). By Proposition. (ii), there exists δ > such that ( ) α V τ (x) C D(x)τ α, x A δ \C. (4.9) Since V τ is C in Ω\C, then there exists C > such that ( ) α V τ (x) C, x Ω\A δ. (4.) Let Ū := V τ +C V in R N \C, then we have Ū > in Ω\C, ( ) α Ū in Ω\C and ( ) α Ū(x) C D(x)τ α, x A δ \C. Then, we have that tū is super-solution of (.8) for any t >. Using Proposition 4., we see that there is no solution of (.8) satisfying (.4). Zone : We consider τ α < τp and { (,), α [α,), τ (,τ (α)), α (,α ). Let us define W µ,t = tv τ µ V in R N \C, where t,µ >. By Proposition. (i), for x A δ \C, ( ) α W µ,t (x)+ W µ,t p W µ,t (x) t C D(x)τ α +t p D(x) τp.
21 For any fixed t >, there exists δ (,δ ], for all µ, ( ) α W µ,t (x)+ W µ,t p W µ,t (x), A δ \C. (4.) To consider x Ω\A δ, in fact, there exists C > such that and t ( ) α V τ (x) +t p V p τ (x) C, x Ω\A δ ( ) α W µ,t (x)+ W µ,t p W µ,t (x) C t µ, x Ω\A δ For given t >, there exists µ(t) > such that ( ) α W µ(t),t (x)+ W µ,t p W µ(t),t (x), x Ω\A δ. (4.) Therefore, together with (4.) and (4.), for any given t >, there subsolutions W µ(t),t of problem (.8) and by Proposition 4., we see that there is no solution u of (.8) satisfying (.4). Zone 3: We consider τ α > τp and { (,), α [α,), τ (,τ (α)), α (,α ). We denote that U µ,t = tv τ +µ V in R N \C, where t,µ >. Here U µ,t > in Ω\C. By Proposition. (i), ( ) α U µ,t (x)+u p µ,t(x) CtD(x) τ α +t p D(x) τp, x A δ \C. For any fixed t >, there exists δ (,δ ], for all µ, ( ) α U µ,t (x)+u p µ,t(x), x A δ \C. (4.3) For x Ω\A δ, we see that ( ) α V τ is bounded and ( ) α U µ,t (x)+u p µ,t(x) Ct+µ. For given t >, there exists µ(t) > such that ( ) α U µ(t),t (x)+u p µ(t),t (x), x Ω\A δ. (4.4)
22 Combining with (4.3) and (4.4), we have that for any t >, there exists µ(t) > such that ( ) α U µ(t),t (x)+u p µ(t),t (x), x Ω\C. Therefore, foranygivent >, thereisasuper-solutionu µ(t),t ofproblem(.8) and by Proposition 4., we see that there is no solution of (.8) satisfying (.4). We see that Zones and cover Theorem. part (iii) a) since τ > α/(p ). From Zones, and 3 we cover Theorem. part (iii) b) since τ (α) > α/(p ). Moreover, from Zone to Zone 3, we cover the parameters in part (iii) c) of Theorem., since τ (α) < α/(p ). Finally Theorem. part ii) can be obtained from Zone and Zone 3. This complete the proof. Acknowledgements. The authors thanks Peter Bates for proposing the problem. H.C. was partially supported by Conicyt Ph.D. scholarship. P.F. was partially supported by Fondecyt # 9 and Programa BASAL- CMM U. de Chile. A.Q. was partially supported by Fondecyt # and Programa BASAL-CMM U. de Chile. References [] J. M. Arrieta and A. Rodríguez-Bernal, Localization on the boundary of blow-up for reaction-diffusion equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, Comm. Partial Diff. Eqns., 9, 7-48, 4. [] C. Bandle and M. Marcus, Large solutions of semilinear elliptic equations: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behaviour, J. Anal. Math., 58, 9-4, 99. [3] H. Chen, P. Felmer and A. Quaas, Large solution to elliptic equations involving fractional Laplacian, Preprint. [4] M. Chuaqui, C. Cortázar, M. Elgueta and J. García-Melián, Uniqueness and boundary behaviour of large solutions to elliptic problems with singular weights, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 3, , 4. [5] M. del Pino and R. Letelier, The influence of domain geometry in boundary blow-up elliptic problems, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 48(6), ,.
23 [6] G. Díaz and R. Letelier, Explosive solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations: existence and uniqueness, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, (), 97-5, 993. [7] Y. Du and Q. Huang, Blow-up solutions for a class of semilinear elliptic and parabolic equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 3, -8, 999. [8] P. Felmer and A. Quaas, Boundary blow up solutions for fractional elliptic equations. Asymptotic Analysis, Volume 78 (3), 3-44,. [9] J. F. Le Gall, A path-valued Markov process and its connections with parital differential equations. In Proc. First European Congress of Mathematics, Vol. II (A. Joseph, F. Mignot, F. Murat, B. Prum and R. Rentschler, eds.) 85-, 994. Birkhaüser, Boston. [] J. García-Melián, Nondegeneracy and uniqueness for boundary blow-up elliptic problems, J. Diff. Eqns., 3(), 8-7, 6. [] J. B. Keller, On solutions of u = f(u), Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,, 53-5, 957. [] S. Kim, A note onboundary blow-up problem of u = u p, IMA preprint No., 8-,. [3] V. A. Kondratev, V. A. Nikishkin, Asymptotics near the boundary, of a solution of a singular boundary value problem for a semilinear elliptic equation, Differential Equations 6 (99), [4] A. C. Lazer, P. J. McKenna, Asymptotic behaviour of solutions of boundary blow-up problems, Differential Integral Equations 7 (994), -9. [5] C. Loewner and L. Nirenberg, Parital differential equations invariant under conformal or projective transformations, In Contributions to analysis, Academic Press, New York, 45-7, 974. [6] M. Marcus and L. Véron, Uniqueness of solutions with blow up at the boundary for a class of nonlinear elliptic equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris sér. I Math. 37(6), , 993. [7] M. Marcus and L. Véron, Existence and uniqueness results for large solutions of general nonlinear elliptic equation, J. Evol. Equ. 3, , 3. 3
24 [8] M. Marcus and L. Véron, Uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of solutions with boundary blow-up for a class of nonlinear elliptic equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 4(), 37-74, 997. [9] R. Osserman, On the inequality u = f(u), Pac. J. Math. 7, , 957. [] L. Véron, Semilinear elliptic equations with uniform blow-up on the boundary, J. Anal. Math., 59(), 3-5, 99. 4
Symmetry and non-uniformly elliptic operators
Symmetry and non-uniformly elliptic operators Jean Dolbeault Ceremade, UMR no. 7534 CNRS, Université Paris IX-Dauphine, Place de Lattre de Tassigny, 75775 Paris Cédex 16, France E-mail: dolbeaul@ceremade.dauphine.fr
More informationEXISTENCE AND NONEXISTENCE OF ENTIRE SOLUTIONS TO THE LOGISTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION
EXISTENCE AND NONEXISTENCE OF ENTIRE SOLUTIONS TO THE LOGISTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION MARIUS GHERGU AND VICENŢIURĂDULESCU Received 26 February 23 We consider the one-dimensional logistic problem r α A u
More informationHOW TO APPROXIMATE THE HEAT EQUATION WITH NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS BY NONLOCAL DIFFUSION PROBLEMS. 1. Introduction
HOW TO APPROXIMATE THE HEAT EQUATION WITH NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS BY NONLOCAL DIFFUSION PROBLEMS CARMEN CORTAZAR, MANUEL ELGUETA, ULIO D. ROSSI, AND NOEMI WOLANSKI Abstract. We present a model for
More informationA CONVEX-CONCAVE ELLIPTIC PROBLEM WITH A PARAMETER ON THE BOUNDARY CONDITION
A CONVEX-CONCAVE ELLIPTIC PROBLEM WITH A PARAMETER ON THE BOUNDARY CONDITION JORGE GARCÍA-MELIÁN, JULIO D. ROSSI AND JOSÉ C. SABINA DE LIS Abstract. In this paper we study existence and multiplicity of
More informationLocalization phenomena in degenerate logistic equation
Localization phenomena in degenerate logistic equation José M. Arrieta 1, Rosa Pardo 1, Anibal Rodríguez-Bernal 1,2 rpardo@mat.ucm.es 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain 2 Instituto de Ciencias
More informationNon-radial solutions to a bi-harmonic equation with negative exponent
Non-radial solutions to a bi-harmonic equation with negative exponent Ali Hyder Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC V6TZ2, Canada ali.hyder@math.ubc.ca Juncheng Wei
More informationEquilibria with a nontrivial nodal set and the dynamics of parabolic equations on symmetric domains
Equilibria with a nontrivial nodal set and the dynamics of parabolic equations on symmetric domains J. Földes Department of Mathematics, Univerité Libre de Bruxelles 1050 Brussels, Belgium P. Poláčik School
More informationATTRACTORS FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN VARYING DOMAINS. Emerson A. M. de Abreu Alexandre N.
ATTRACTORS FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN VARYING DOMAINS Emerson A. M. de Abreu Alexandre N. Carvalho Abstract Under fairly general conditions one can prove that
More informationBlow-up for a Nonlocal Nonlinear Diffusion Equation with Source
Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas Volumen 46(2121, páginas 1-13 Blow-up for a Nonlocal Nonlinear Diffusion Equation with Source Explosión para una ecuación no lineal de difusión no local con fuente Mauricio
More informationAsymptotic behavior of infinity harmonic functions near an isolated singularity
Asymptotic behavior of infinity harmonic functions near an isolated singularity Ovidiu Savin, Changyou Wang, Yifeng Yu Abstract In this paper, we prove if n 2 x 0 is an isolated singularity of a nonegative
More informationFinite-time Blowup of Semilinear PDEs via the Feynman-Kac Representation. CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN MATEMÁTICAS GUANAJUATO, MEXICO
Finite-time Blowup of Semilinear PDEs via the Feynman-Kac Representation JOSÉ ALFREDO LÓPEZ-MIMBELA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN MATEMÁTICAS GUANAJUATO, MEXICO jalfredo@cimat.mx Introduction and backgrownd
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationBOUNDARY FLUXES FOR NON-LOCAL DIFFUSION
BOUNDARY FLUXES FOR NON-LOCAL DIFFUSION CARMEN CORTAZAR, MANUEL ELGUETA, JULIO D. ROSSI, AND NOEMI WOLANSKI Abstract. We study a nonlocal diffusion operator in a bounded smooth domain prescribing the flux
More informationSYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS. M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 12, 1998, 47 59 SYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy
More informationRadial Symmetry of Minimizers for Some Translation and Rotation Invariant Functionals
journal of differential equations 124, 378388 (1996) article no. 0015 Radial Symmetry of Minimizers for Some Translation and Rotation Invariant Functionals Orlando Lopes IMECCUNICAMPCaixa Postal 1170 13081-970,
More informationA Hopf type lemma for fractional equations
arxiv:705.04889v [math.ap] 3 May 207 A Hopf type lemma for fractional equations Congming Li Wenxiong Chen May 27, 208 Abstract In this short article, we state a Hopf type lemma for fractional equations
More informationThe Maximum Principles and Symmetry results for Viscosity Solutions of Fully Nonlinear Equations
The Maximum Principles and Symmetry results for Viscosity Solutions of Fully Nonlinear Equations Guozhen Lu and Jiuyi Zhu Abstract. This paper is concerned about maximum principles and radial symmetry
More informationNONLINEAR FREDHOLM ALTERNATIVE FOR THE p-laplacian UNDER NONHOMOGENEOUS NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITION
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 210, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu NONLINEAR FREDHOLM ALTERNATIVE FOR THE p-laplacian
More informationLandesman-Lazer type results for second order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations
Author manuscript, published in "Journal of Functional Analysis 258, 12 (2010) 4154-4182" Landesman-Lazer type results for second order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations Patricio FELMER, Alexander QUAAS,
More informationBoundedness and blow-up of solutions for a nonlinear elliptic system
International Journal of Mathematics Vol. 25, No. 9 (2014) 1450091 (12 pages) c World Scientific Publishing Company DOI: 10.1142/S0129167X14500918 Boundedness and blow-up of solutions for a nonlinear elliptic
More informationMINIMAL GRAPHS PART I: EXISTENCE OF LIPSCHITZ WEAK SOLUTIONS TO THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH C 2 BOUNDARY DATA
MINIMAL GRAPHS PART I: EXISTENCE OF LIPSCHITZ WEAK SOLUTIONS TO THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH C 2 BOUNDARY DATA SPENCER HUGHES In these notes we prove that for any given smooth function on the boundary of
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO P-LAPLACE EQUATIONS WITH LOGARITHMIC NONLINEARITY
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2009(2009), No. 87, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR THE p-laplace EQUATION WITH NONLINEAR BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2006(2006), No. 37, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) MULTIPLE
More informationBLOW-UP AND EXTINCTION OF SOLUTIONS TO A FAST DIFFUSION EQUATION WITH HOMOGENEOUS NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 36, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu BLOW-UP AND EXTINCTION OF SOLUTIONS TO A FAST
More informationEXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF POSITIVE SOLUTION OF A LOGISTIC EQUATION WITH NONLINEAR GRADIENT TERM
EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF POSITIVE SOLUTION OF A LOGISTIC EQUATION WITH NONLINEAR GRADIENT TERM DAVID RUIZ AND ANTONIO SUÁREZ Abstract. The main goal of this work is to study the existence and uniqueness
More informationSome nonlinear elliptic equations in R N
Nonlinear Analysis 39 000) 837 860 www.elsevier.nl/locate/na Some nonlinear elliptic equations in Monica Musso, Donato Passaseo Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita di Pisa, Via Buonarroti,, 5617 Pisa,
More informationLocal and global nonexistence of solutions to semilinear evolution equations
2002-Fez conference on Partial Differential Equations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 09, 2002, pp 149 160. http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu
More informationResearch Article Nonlinear Systems of Second-Order ODEs
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Boundary Value Problems Volume 28, Article ID 236386, 9 pages doi:1.1155/28/236386 Research Article Nonlinear Systems of Second-Order ODEs Patricio Cerda and Pedro Ubilla
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 017 (017), No. 15, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC
More informationHARDY INEQUALITIES WITH BOUNDARY TERMS. x 2 dx u 2 dx. (1.2) u 2 = u 2 dx.
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 003(003), No. 3, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 107-6691. UL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) HADY INEQUALITIES
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR AN INDEFINITE KIRCHHOFF-TYPE EQUATION WITH SIGN-CHANGING POTENTIAL
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2015 (2015), o. 274, pp. 1 9. ISS: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIOS
More informationBLOW-UP FOR PARABOLIC AND HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS WITH VARIABLE EXPONENTS. 1. Introduction In this paper we will study the following parabolic problem
BLOW-UP FOR PARABOLIC AND HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS WITH VARIABLE EXPONENTS JUAN PABLO PINASCO Abstract. In this paper we study the blow up problem for positive solutions of parabolic and hyperbolic problems
More informationA Dirichlet problem in the strip
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 1996(1996), No. 10, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp (login: ftp) 147.26.103.110 or 129.120.3.113
More informationSymmetry of nonnegative solutions of elliptic equations via a result of Serrin
Symmetry of nonnegative solutions of elliptic equations via a result of Serrin P. Poláčik School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 Abstract. We consider the Dirichlet problem
More informationREGULARITY FOR INFINITY HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN TWO DIMENSIONS
C,α REGULARITY FOR INFINITY HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN TWO DIMENSIONS LAWRENCE C. EVANS AND OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We propose a new method for showing C,α regularity for solutions of the infinity Laplacian
More informationA note on W 1,p estimates for quasilinear parabolic equations
200-Luminy conference on Quasilinear Elliptic and Parabolic Equations and Systems, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 08, 2002, pp 2 3. http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
More informationNonexistence of solutions for quasilinear elliptic equations with p-growth in the gradient
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2002(2002), No. 54, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Nonexistence
More informationExistence of Multiple Positive Solutions of Quasilinear Elliptic Problems in R N
Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications. ISSN 0973-5321 Volume 2 Number 1 (2007), pp. 1 11 c Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/adsa.htm Existence of Multiple Positive Solutions
More informationExistence of Positive Solutions to Semilinear Elliptic Systems Involving Concave and Convex Nonlinearities
Journal of Physical Science Application 5 (2015) 71-81 doi: 10.17265/2159-5348/2015.01.011 D DAVID PUBLISHING Existence of Positive Solutions to Semilinear Elliptic Systems Involving Concave Convex Nonlinearities
More informationNon-homogeneous semilinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponent
Non-homogeneous semilinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponent Yūki Naito a and Tokushi Sato b a Department of Mathematics, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan b Mathematical
More informationNONHOMOGENEOUS ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT AND WEIGHT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 08, pp. 1 1. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NONHOMOGENEOUS ELLIPTIC
More informationUniqueness of Positive Solutions for a Class of p-laplacian Systems with Multiple Parameters
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 2, 2008, no. 2, 005-03 Uniqueness of Positive Solutions for a Class of p-laplacian Systems with Multiple Parameters G. A. Afrouzi and E. Graily Department of Mathematics,
More informationA fixed point theorem for weakly Zamfirescu mappings
A fixed point theorem for weakly Zamfirescu mappings David Ariza-Ruiz Dept. Análisis Matemático, Fac. Matemáticas, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1160, 41080-Sevilla, Spain Antonio Jiménez-Melado Dept.
More informationExistence and Multiplicity of Positive Solutions to a Quasilinear Elliptic Equation with Strong Allee Effect Growth Rate
Results. Math. 64 (213), 165 173 c 213 Springer Basel 1422-6383/13/1165-9 published online February 14, 213 DOI 1.17/s25-13-36-x Results in Mathematics Existence and Multiplicity of Positive Solutions
More informationSimultaneous vs. non simultaneous blow-up
Simultaneous vs. non simultaneous blow-up Juan Pablo Pinasco and Julio D. Rossi Departamento de Matemática, F..E y N., UBA (428) Buenos Aires, Argentina. Abstract In this paper we study the possibility
More informationHomogenization and error estimates of free boundary velocities in periodic media
Homogenization and error estimates of free boundary velocities in periodic media Inwon C. Kim October 7, 2011 Abstract In this note I describe a recent result ([14]-[15]) on homogenization and error estimates
More informationTHE NEUMANN PROBLEM FOR THE -LAPLACIAN AND THE MONGE-KANTOROVICH MASS TRANSFER PROBLEM
THE NEUMANN PROBLEM FOR THE -LAPLACIAN AND THE MONGE-KANTOROVICH MASS TRANSFER PROBLEM J. GARCÍA-AZORERO, J. J. MANFREDI, I. PERAL AND J. D. ROSSI Abstract. We consider the natural Neumann boundary condition
More informationRobustness for a Liouville type theorem in exterior domains
Robustness for a Liouville type theorem in exterior domains Juliette Bouhours 1 arxiv:1207.0329v3 [math.ap] 24 Oct 2014 1 UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75005, Paris,
More informationOn Smoothness of Suitable Weak Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations
On Smoothness of Suitable Weak Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations G. Seregin, V. Šverák Dedicated to Vsevolod Alexeevich Solonnikov Abstract We prove two sufficient conditions for local regularity
More informationSEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH DEPENDENCE ON THE GRADIENT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 139, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC
More informationCRITICAL EXPONENTS FOR A SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATION WITH VARIABLE REACTION.
CRITICAL EXPONENTS FOR A SEMILINEAR PARAOLIC EQUATION WITH VARIALE REACTION. R. FERREIRA, A. DE PALO, M. PÉREZ-LLANOS AND J. D. ROSSI Abstract. In this paper we study the blow-up phenomenon for nonnegative
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 25 Jul 2012
THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM FOR THE FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN: REGULARITY UP TO THE BOUNDARY XAVIER ROS-OTON AND JOAQUIM SERRA arxiv:1207.5985v1 [math.ap] 25 Jul 2012 Abstract. We study the regularity up to the boundary
More informationPublication IV. c 2011 arxiv.org. Reprinted with permission.
Publication IV A. Pulkkinen, Some comments concerning the blow-up of solutions of the exponential reaction-diffusion equation, arxiv:1102.4275v2 [math.ap] (2011), 1-18. c 2011 arxiv.org. Reprinted with
More informationOn the Local Convergence of Regula-falsi-type Method for Generalized Equations
Journal of Advances in Applied Mathematics, Vol., No. 3, July 017 https://dx.doi.org/10.606/jaam.017.300 115 On the Local Convergence of Regula-falsi-type Method for Generalized Equations Farhana Alam
More informationA REMARK ON LEAST ENERGY SOLUTIONS IN R N. 0. Introduction In this note we study the following nonlinear scalar field equations in R N :
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 131, Number 8, Pages 399 408 S 000-9939(0)0681-1 Article electronically published on November 13, 00 A REMARK ON LEAST ENERGY SOLUTIONS IN R N LOUIS
More informationRegularity and nonexistence results for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations in convex domains
Regularity and nonexistence results for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations in convex domains Ilaria FRAGALÀ Filippo GAZZOLA Dipartimento di Matematica del Politecnico - Piazza L. da Vinci - 20133
More informationHeat equations with singular potentials: Hardy & Carleman inequalities, well-posedness & control
Outline Heat equations with singular potentials: Hardy & Carleman inequalities, well-posedness & control IMDEA-Matemáticas & Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain enrique.zuazua@uam.es Analysis and control
More informationVariational eigenvalues of degenerate eigenvalue problems for the weighted p-laplacian
Variational eigenvalues of degenerate eigenvalue problems for the weighted p-laplacian An Lê Mathematics Sciences Research Institute, 17 Gauss Way, Berkeley, California 94720 e-mail: anle@msri.org Klaus
More informationChanging sign solutions for the CR-Yamabe equation
Changing sign solutions for the CR-Yamabe equation Ali Maalaoui (1) & Vittorio Martino (2) Abstract In this paper we prove that the CR-Yamabe equation on the Heisenberg group has infinitely many changing
More informationIN this paper, we study the corrector of the homogenization
, June 29 - July, 206, London, U.K. A Corrector Result for the Homogenization of a Class of Nonlinear PDE in Perforated Domains Bituin Cabarrubias Abstract This paper is devoted to the corrector of the
More informationVarious behaviors of solutions for a semilinear heat equation after blowup
Journal of Functional Analysis (5 4 7 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Various behaviors of solutions for a semilinear heat equation after blowup Noriko Mizoguchi Department of Mathematics, Tokyo Gakugei University,
More informationA comparison theorem for nonsmooth nonlinear operators
A comparison theorem for nonsmooth nonlinear operators Vladimir Kozlov and Alexander Nazarov arxiv:1901.08631v1 [math.ap] 24 Jan 2019 Abstract We prove a comparison theorem for super- and sub-solutions
More informationHESSIAN MEASURES III. Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia
HESSIAN MEASURES III Neil S. Trudinger Xu-Jia Wang Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia 1 HESSIAN MEASURES III Neil S. Trudinger Xu-Jia
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE BLOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION
DETERMINATION OF THE LOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION y FRANK MERLE and HATEM ZAAG Abstract. In this paper, we find the optimal blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation with a power nonlinearity.
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR CRITICAL ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS WITH FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 97, pp. 1 11. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS
More informationA GENERAL CLASS OF FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEMS FOR FULLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS
A GENERAL CLASS OF FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEMS FOR FULLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS ALESSIO FIGALLI AND HENRIK SHAHGHOLIAN Abstract. In this paper we study the fully nonlinear free boundary problem { F (D
More informationLarge time behavior of reaction-diffusion equations with Bessel generators
Large time behavior of reaction-diffusion equations with Bessel generators José Alfredo López-Mimbela Nicolas Privault Abstract We investigate explosion in finite time of one-dimensional semilinear equations
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ap] 12 Apr 2019
A new method of proving a priori bounds for superlinear elliptic PDE arxiv:1904.03245v2 [math.ap] 12 Apr 2019 Boyan SIRAKOV 1 PUC-Rio, Departamento de Matematica, Gavea, Rio de Janeiro - CEP 22451-900,
More informationAsymptotic Behavior of Infinity Harmonic Functions Near an Isolated Singularity
Savin, O., and C. Wang. (2008) Asymptotic Behavior of Infinity Harmonic Functions, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2008, Article ID rnm163, 23 pages. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnm163 Asymptotic
More informationGlobal unbounded solutions of the Fujita equation in the intermediate range
Global unbounded solutions of the Fujita equation in the intermediate range Peter Poláčik School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Eiji Yanagida Department of Mathematics,
More informationPartial Differential Equations
Part II Partial Differential Equations Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2015 Paper 4, Section II 29E Partial Differential Equations 72 (a) Show that the Cauchy problem for u(x,
More informationNON-EXTINCTION OF SOLUTIONS TO A FAST DIFFUSION SYSTEM WITH NONLOCAL SOURCES
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2016 (2016, No. 45, pp. 1 5. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NON-EXTINCTION OF
More informationREGULARITY AND COMPARISON PRINCIPLES FOR p-laplace EQUATIONS WITH VANISHING SOURCE TERM. Contents
REGULARITY AND COMPARISON PRINCIPLES FOR p-laplace EQUATIONS WITH VANISHING SOURCE TERM BERARDINO SCIUNZI Abstract. We prove some sharp estimates on the summability properties of the second derivatives
More informationBLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED
BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED TAOUFIK HMIDI AND SAHBI KERAANI Abstract. In this note we prove a refined version of compactness lemma adapted to the blowup analysis
More informationLIFE SPAN OF BLOW-UP SOLUTIONS FOR HIGHER-ORDER SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 21(21), No. 17, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu LIFE SPAN OF BLOW-UP
More informationNecessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Global Existence in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Global Existence in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Pascal Bégout aboratoire Jacques-ouis ions Université Pierre et Marie Curie Boîte Courrier 187,
More informationON NONHOMOGENEOUS BIHARMONIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 56 Fasc. 3 1999 ON NONHOMOGENEOUS BIHARMONIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT M. Guedda Abstract: In this paper we consider the problem u = λ u u + f in, u = u
More informationFast convergent finite difference solvers for the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation
Fast convergent finite difference solvers for the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation Adam Oberman Simon Fraser University BIRS February 17, 211 Joint work [O.] 28. Convergent scheme in two dim. Explicit solver.
More informationProbabilistic Approach to a Class of Semilinear Partial Differential Equations
Contemporary Mathematics Probabilistic Approach to a Class of Semilinear Partial Differential Equations Jean-François Le Gall Dedicated to Professor Haïm Brézis. Abstract. We discuss the recent progress
More informationANISOTROPIC EQUATIONS: UNIQUENESS AND EXISTENCE RESULTS
ANISOTROPIC EQUATIONS: UNIQUENESS AND EXISTENCE RESULTS STANISLAV ANTONTSEV, MICHEL CHIPOT Abstract. We study uniqueness of weak solutions for elliptic equations of the following type ) xi (a i (x, u)
More informationA Semilinear Elliptic Problem with Neumann Condition on the Boundary
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 8, 2013, no. 6, 283-288 A Semilinear Elliptic Problem with Neumann Condition on the Boundary A. M. Marin Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Cartagena
More informationTechnische Universität Graz
Technische Universität Graz Stability of the Laplace single layer boundary integral operator in Sobolev spaces O. Steinbach Berichte aus dem Institut für Numerische Mathematik Bericht 2016/2 Technische
More informationA TWO PARAMETERS AMBROSETTI PRODI PROBLEM*
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 53 Fasc. 3 1996 A TWO PARAMETERS AMBROSETTI PRODI PROBLEM* C. De Coster** and P. Habets 1 Introduction The study of the Ambrosetti Prodi problem has started with the paper
More informationVISCOSITY SOLUTIONS OF ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS
VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS OF ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS LUIS SILVESTRE These are the notes from the summer course given in the Second Chicago Summer School In Analysis, in June 2015. We introduce the notion of viscosity
More informationREGULARITY RESULTS FOR THE EQUATION u 11 u 22 = Introduction
REGULARITY RESULTS FOR THE EQUATION u 11 u 22 = 1 CONNOR MOONEY AND OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We study the equation u 11 u 22 = 1 in R 2. Our results include an interior C 2 estimate, classical solvability
More informationOn a weighted total variation minimization problem
On a weighted total variation minimization problem Guillaume Carlier CEREMADE Université Paris Dauphine carlier@ceremade.dauphine.fr Myriam Comte Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Université Pierre et Marie
More informationThe Brézis-Nirenberg Result for the Fractional Elliptic Problem with Singular Potential
arxiv:1705.08387v1 [math.ap] 23 May 2017 The Brézis-Nirenberg Result for the Fractional Elliptic Problem with Singular Potential Lingyu Jin, Lang Li and Shaomei Fang Department of Mathematics, South China
More informationAhmed Mohammed. Harnack Inequality for Non-divergence Structure Semi-linear Elliptic Equations
Harnack Inequality for Non-divergence Structure Semi-linear Elliptic Equations International Conference on PDE, Complex Analysis, and Related Topics Miami, Florida January 4-7, 2016 An Outline 1 The Krylov-Safonov
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 28 Aug 2018
Note on semiclassical states for the Schrödinger equation with nonautonomous nonlinearities Bartosz Bieganowski Nicolaus Copernicus University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, ul. Chopina
More informationA NOTE ON ZERO SETS OF FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE POWER OF INTEGRABILITY. 1. Introduction
A NOTE ON ZERO SETS OF FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE POWER OF INTEGRABILITY ARMIN SCHIKORRA Abstract. We extend a Poincaré-type inequality for functions with large zero-sets by Jiang and Lin
More informationJournal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ Volume 3, Issue 3, Article 46, 2002 WEAK PERIODIC SOLUTIONS OF SOME QUASILINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS WITH DATA MEASURES N.
More informationLecture I.: (Simple) Basic Variational and Topological Methods (an introductory lecture for graduate students and postdocs)
Lecture I.: (Simple) Basic Variational and Topological Methods (an introductory lecture for graduate students and postdocs) Lecture II.: Regular and Singular Systems with the p- and q-laplacians (an advanced
More informationGENERALIZED FRONTS FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL REACTION-DIFFUSION EQUATIONS
GENERALIZED FRONTS FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL REACTION-DIFFUSION EQUATIONS ANTOINE MELLET, JEAN-MICHEL ROQUEJOFFRE, AND YANNICK SIRE Abstract. For a class of one-dimensional reaction-diffusion equations, we establish
More informationRecent developments in elliptic partial differential equations of Monge Ampère type
Recent developments in elliptic partial differential equations of Monge Ampère type Neil S. Trudinger Abstract. In conjunction with applications to optimal transportation and conformal geometry, there
More information1. Introduction Boundary estimates for the second derivatives of the solution to the Dirichlet problem for the Monge-Ampere equation
POINTWISE C 2,α ESTIMATES AT THE BOUNDARY FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN Abstract. We prove a localization property of boundary sections for solutions to the Monge-Ampere equation. As a consequence
More informationESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS. Zhongwei Shen
W,p ESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS Zhongwei Shen Abstract. Let L = div`a` x, > be a family of second order elliptic operators with real, symmetric coefficients on a
More informationSimultaneous vs. non simultaneous blow-up
Simultaneous vs. non simultaneous blow-up Juan Pablo Pinasco and Julio D. Rossi Departamento de Matemática, F.C.E y N., UBA (428) Buenos Aires, Argentina. Abstract In this paper we study the possibility
More informationA GENERAL CLASS OF FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEMS FOR FULLY NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
A GENERAL CLASS OF FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEMS FOR FULLY NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS ALESSIO FIGALLI AND HENRIK SHAHGHOLIAN Abstract. In this paper we consider the fully nonlinear parabolic free boundary
More information