arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 14 Nov 2008

Transcription

1 Astron. Nachr. / AN 329, No. 9/10, (2008) / DOI /asna The Gaia Project - technique, performance and status S. Jordan 1, Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie (ZAH), Mönchhofstr , D Heideberg, Germany Received August 2008, accepted September hopefuy soon Pubished onine 2008 arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 14 Nov 2008 Key words 1 Introduction Astrometry space vehices: instruments Gaia is a sateite mission of the ESA, aiming at absoute astrometric measurements of about one biion stars (a stars down to 20 th magnitude, with unprecedented accuracy. Additionay, magnitudes and coors wi be obtained for a these stars, whie radia-veocities and spectra properties wi be determined ony for bright objects (V < 17.5). At 15 th magnitude Gaia aims at an anguar accuracy of 20 microarcseconds (µas). This goa can ony be reached if the geometry of the teescopes, the detectors, and the pointing of Gaia at each moment ( attitude ) can be inferred from the Gaia measurements itsef with µas accuracy. The orbit of the Gaia mission has been chosen to be a controed Lissajous orbit (ampitudes of 360,000 and 100,000 km aong and perpendicuar to the eciptic) around the Lagrangian point L2 of the Sun-Earth system (about 1.5 miion km in anti-sun direction) in order to have a quiet environment for the payoad in terms of thermo-mechanica stabiity. Another advantage of this position is the possibiity of uninterrupted observations, since the Earth, Moon and Sun a ie inside Gaia s orbit. The aim of Gaia is to perform absoute astrometry quasi-simutaneousy on the whoe ceestia sphere, rather than differentia measurements in a sma fied of view. Compared to the precursor mission HIPPARCOS ( ). the much arger teescope of Gaia, the much higher sensitivity of the detectors, the more stabe environment at L2, and other technica progress aows to measure 10,000 times more objects (a factor of 1000 improvement in imiting brightness) and reach a 50 times higher accuracy for 100 times fainter objects. The basic design of Gaia has been described by Perryman et a. (2001) and ESA (2000). However, in 2002 a major reduction in size, compexity, and cost (as we as a degradation of the astrometric performance by about a factor of two) was made. More than 300 scientists and computer experts from 18 different countries are working on the Gaia project, not incuded the work by empoyees at ESA or the industry. The main contractor on the industria side is EADS Astrium. The main purpose of this paper is to briefy describe the technique of the Gaia project, its performance and status. More detais and up-to-data-information on Gaia can at a Corresponding author: e-mai: jordan@ari.uni-heideberg.de Fig. 1 Artist s impression of the Gaia sateite scanning the stars of the Miky Way (Image: ESA Mediaab) time be retrieved from the ESA-RSSD homepage (the URL is provided at the end of the References). The scientific appications of Gaia wi be the topic of the contribution by N. Waton in these proceedings. 2 Gaia s schedue The first proposa for a HIPPARCOS successor was submitted to ESA in It was accepted as a Cornerstone Mission in In 2006 the industria phase began, and in 2007 the Preiminary Design Review was successfuy competed. Gaia is currenty schedued to be aunched from Kourou, French Guiana, in December 2011 with a Soyuz-ST rocket (which incudes a restartabe Fregat upper stage). Initiay the Fregat-Gaia composite wi be paced into a parking orbit, after which a singe Fregat boost injects Gaia on its

2 876 Fig. 2 Scanning principe of Gaia: The constant spin rate of 6000 /s corresponds to one revoution (great-circe scans) in six hours. The ange between the sowy precessing spin axis and the Sun is maintained at an aspect ange of 45. The basic ange is between the two fieds of view is constant at Figure courtesy Karen O Faherty, ESA) transfer trajectory towards the L2 Lagrange point. In order to keep Gaia in an orbit around L2, the spacecraft must perform sma maneuvers every month. After a commissioning phase Gaia wi measure the sky for five years with a possibe extension for another year. Subsequenty, the fina cataog, which incudes astrometric and photometric information, near-infrared spectroscopy, radia-veocity determinations, and a cassification of the objects, wi be produced. The competion of the Gaia project is intended to be around It is panned to produce one or more intermediate cataogues in the course of operations. The exact dates for such data reeases wi be carefuy decided on to avoid disseminating insufficienty vaidated data. 3 The measurement principe In order to perform high-precision absoute astrometry, Gaia ike its predecessor Hipparcos (see Lindegren 2004) simutaneousy observes in two fieds of view (FoVs) separated by a arge basic ange (106.5 ), This aows arge-ange measurements to be as precise as sma-scae ones. In this way it is possibe to use the many references stars at arge anguar separation which have a very different paraax movement, so that the distance determinations do not suffer from the uncertainties of differentia (sma-fied) anguar measurements. roughy scans aong great circes eading to strong mathematica cosure conditions. This one-dimensionaity aso has the advantage that the measured ange between c 2008 WILEY-VCH Verag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim S. Jordan: The Gaia Project - technique, performance and status Fig. 3 During its operationa ifetime, Gaia wi continuousy scan the sky, roughy aong great circes, according to a carefuy seected pre-defined scanning aw. The characteristics of this aw, combined with the across-scan dimension of the astrometric fieds of view, resut in the above pattern for the distribution of the predicted number of transits on the sky in eciptic coordinates. Figure courtesy J. de Bruijne, ESA. two stars, projected aong-scan, is to first order independent of the orientation of the instrument., scans the same area of sky many times during the mission under varying orientations. The anguar precision σ of a singe astrometric onedimensiona measurement is determined by the size of the aperture of each of Gaia s two teescopes (D = 1.4 m in aong-scan direction), the waveength λ of the incident ight from the source, and the number of photons N reaching the foca pane (which depends on the brightness of the measured source) during the integration time of the CCD detector: λ 1 σ. D N In reaity, the rea accuracy that can be reached must take into account the spatia samping of the signa, attitude high-frequency disturbances and other instrumenta imitations. Doing many such measurements for each object at different times and in different directions (position anges on the sky) wi aow to derive a five astrometric parameters (two mean coordinates, two proper motion components, and the paraax), pus additiona parameters in the case of binaries. 4 The nomina scanning aw The conditions mentioned in the previous section are fufied by Gaia s so-caed nomina scanning aw (see Fig. 2). The sateite wi spin around its axis with a constant rotationa period of 6 hours. The spin axis wi precess around the soar direction with a fixed aspect ange of 45 every days. A somewhat arger soar-aspect ange woud be optimum, but therma stabiity and power requirements imit it to 45.

3 Astron. Nachr. / AN (2008) 877 Fig. 4 Gaia s foca pane. The images of the stars move from eft to right. The two CCD strips (2 7) to the eft correspond to the Sky Mapper (SM), adjacent to the right are the 62 CCDs of the Astrometric Fied (AF), foowed by the CCDs of the Bue Photometer (BP), Red Photometer (RP), and the Radia-veocity Instrument (RVS). Additionay two CCDs of the Wavefront Sensor and two for the Basic Ange Monitor are shown. Figure courtesy A. Short & J. de Bruijne, ESA. On average, each object in the sky is transiting the foca pane about 70 times during the 5 year nomina mission duration. Most of the times, an object transiting through one FoV is measured again after or minutes (according to the basic ange of ) in the other FoV. At each transit of the image of of an object, ten singe measurements with ten CCDs are performed. The essentia measurements are performed aong-scan, the across-scan positions ony sighty increase the fina precision. Since, due to the nomina scanning aw, a objects are measured under different scan directions in the course of the mission, the aong-scan ones aone can buid up a rigid sphere of coordinate measurements. After about six months every point of the sky is scanned at three or more distinct epochs so that after about 18 months the five astrometric parameters can be separated from each other. 5 The payoad The Gaia payoad consists of two teescopes, a heavy onboard data processing and storage faciity, and three scientific instruments mounted on a singe optica bench: The astrometric instrument, the photometers, and a spectrograph to measure radia veocities. Gaia has two teescopes, one for each FoV, which consist of one primary mirror of size 1.45 m 0.5 m, a secondary and a tertiary mirror. The ight from both teescopes, which are made up of siicon carbide, is combined to a common foca pane with 106 CCDs by a beam combiner at their exit pupi. An intermediate image is used for fied discrimination. The tota foca ength is 35 m. The torus, on which the teescopes and instruments are mounted, requires a therma stabiity of some µk, which is reached by a passive therma design. A sunshied of 11 m diameter, which is partiay covered with soar ces to produce eectricity, protects against the incident sun ight. The size of the foca pane is 420 mm 850 mm (see Fig. 4). It consists of 14 Sky Mapper (SM) CCDs, 62 Astrometric Fied (AF) CCDs, 7 CCDs for the Bue Photometer (BP), 7 for the Red Photometer (RP), and 12 for the Radia Veocity Spectrometer (RVS). Additionay, two CCDs are used for the Wave Front Sensor and two for the Basic Ange Monitor. A CCDs operate in the so caed Time Deay Integration (TDI) mode, i.e. accumuated charges of the CCD are transported across the CCD in synchrony with the images. During a transit through either fied of view the image of a star (or an asteroid or quasar) is first registered by one of the SM CCD strips (SM1, if a star passes through FoV 1, SM2 for FoV 2). The SM sha automaticay detect a objects down to 20 th magnitude (incuding variabe stars, supernovae, micoensing events, and soar system objects). It aso has to reject prompt-partice events ( cosmics ). The on-board processing of the SM images aso performs the first astrometric measurement in aong- and across-scan direction. In order to additionay fiter out fase detections, the image of an object must be confirmed on the first strip of the AF in order to be processed any further. If this check is passed, the other AF CCDs can perform their main goa, the high-precision measurement of the aong-scan position. This measurement actuay consists of the time when the centroid of the image is entering the CCD s read-out register. Since Gaia has 9 AF strips, every FoV transit deivers 9 such measurements from the AF and 1 from the respective SM. Additionay, the centroid s across-scan position is measured in AF1 and, for caibrationa purposes in a other AF strips as we for a sma sampe of images. In order to reduce the data rate and the read-out noise, ony sma windows around each target star, additionay binned in across-scan direction depending on the object s magnitude, are read out and transmitted to the ground (faintstar windows consist of 6 aong-scan TDI pixes, bright stars have an extension of 18). 24 hours of observation data are downinked during the 7-8 hours of ground contact per day. The data rate to the ground station Cebreros in Spain is about five Mbit/s. When Gaia scans aong the pane of the Miky Way, the seven hours of contact per day is not enough to downoad a data even taking into account the arge onboard memory buffer. Therefore, it is panned to increase the downink capacity with a second ground station (New Norcia in Austraia) during these times of gaactic pane scans. The maximum stear density, important for scans over gobuar custers or Baade s window, where Gaia can perform measurements is 3 miion stars down to 20 th magnitude, but ony 600,000 stars per square degree (or one star per six square arcseconds) can actuay be measured.

4 878 S. Jordan: The Gaia Project - technique, performance and status The technica reason for this imitation is that Gaia can read out ony five active windows at each moment (TDI beat) on each CCD. In principe it is possibe to temporay activate a mode of reduced precession speed so that more frequent scans over e.g. Baade s windows woud be possibe. Since the data-oss of stars is random, more stars have a good chance to be measured that way. However, it is not decided yet whether such a mode wi be actuay switched on. Muti-coour photometry is provided by two ow-resootion fused-siica prisms dispersing a the ight entering the fied of view in the aong-scan direction prior to detection. The Bue Photometer (BP) operates in the waveength range Å; the Red Photometer (RP) covers the waveength range Å. The RVS is a near- infrared ( Å), medium resoution spectrograph: R = λ/ λ = It is iuminated by the same two teescopes as the astrometric and photometric instruments. 6 The astrometric soution The astrometric core soution wi be based on about 10 8 primary stars, which means to sove for some astrometric parameters (positions, proper motions, and paraaxes). However, the attitude of the sateite (parametrised into 10 8 attitude parameters over five years) must aso ony be determined with high accuracy from the measurements itsef. Additionay, a few miion caibrationa parameters must be soved for to describe the geometry of the instruments, and finay, deviations from genera reativity are accounted for by soving for some post-newtonian parameters. The number of observations for the 10 8 primary stars is about The condition equations connecting the unknowns to the observed data are non-inear but we inearised at the sub-arcsec eve. Direct soution of the corresponding east-squares probem is infeasibe, because the arge number of unknowns and their strong inter-connectivity prevents any usefu decomposition of the probem into manageabe parts. The proposed method is a bock-iterative scheme. Intensive tests are currenty under way and have aready demonstrated its feasibiity with 10 6 stars assuming reaistic random and systematic errors in the initia conditions. The th time measurement on an SM or AF CCD t (the read-out time of the aong-scan image centroid) depends on the parameters of the source on the sky s i (position α, δ, proper motion µ α, µ δ, and the paraax ϖ), the attitude parameters (spine coefficients) a j, geometric caibration parameters (e.g. basic ange; position, distortion, and orientation of the CCDs) c k, goba parameters (e.g. the post-newtonian parameter γ), and some auxiiary data (ephemeris of soar-system objects, Gaia s orbit, etc) A (Lindegren et a. in prep.): t = f AL (s i.a j, c k, g, A) + noise. In an anaogous way the across-scan position p L (pixe position of the aong-scan centroid) is given by p = f AC (s i.a j, c k, g, A) + noise. For Gaia, the ight defection from the Sun is very arge a over the sky. In the direction perpendicuar to the Sun, the anguar change of position is sti 4 miiarcseconds, about 200 times Gaia s accuracy. In the Gaia project even the bending of ight due to the major panets cannot be negected. Moreover, the accuracy of the Einstein s theory of genera reativity to predict the ight-defection can be tested with an accuracy of some 10 7 (in the PPN parameter γ). With provisiona vaues of the source, attitude, caibration, and goba parameters, the modes for the functiona aong-scan fac and across-scan behaviour f AC of Gaia aows to predict vaues for t and p. The difference between the observed and predicted vaues aows a correction of the provisiona parameter vaues with a east-squares method. A inearisation eads to the observation equations t obs p obs t pred and p pred = f AL s i = f AC s i + f AL a j + f AC a j + f AL c k + f AC c k + f AL g + f AC g + noise + noise. A the parameters are strongy connected to each other, so that it cannot be easiy broken into a number of independent soutions. There is aso no simpe way to reduce the equations to a smaer structure and size using sparse matrix agebra. Therefore, a direct mathematica soution seems unfeasibe. Note, however, that the strong connectivity is a desired feature that makes the astrometric soution rigid and accurate. Since no direct soution is possibe, the practica approach is to cacuate the corrections (updates) separatey for s, a, c, and g, keeping the other vaues constant (bock iteration). Each partia probem is reativey easy to sove, because the connectivity is given up. Cycicay the four partia probems are soved unti convergence is reached. Due to the strong correations between the four bock (particuary the two bocks between attitude and source parameters), a arge number of iterations are needed. However, it has been demonstrated that it is possibe to reduce the computing time to a manageabe eve by convergence acceeration techniques. This bock-iterative scheme is caed the Astrometric Goba Iterative Soution (AGIS). This mathematica approach eads to an astrometric sef-caibration. In order to reach this caibrationa task, the instrument must be very stabe over onger time scaes. Later on, with a good soution for the attitude and the geometric parameters based on the measurements of the 10 8

5 Astron. Nachr. / AN (2008) 879 primary stars, the remaining stars can be inked into the system. Currenty, the AGIS is tested with simuated data (bearing systematic and random errors) for 10 6 primary sources (which means 1% of the fu probem). A parae computer custer with 22 nodes is used on which 45 AGIS iterations take about 70 hours. The system wi be successivey upgraded to cope with the fu probem in about In the end, AGIS wi determine about 5 biion astrometric parameters, about 150 miion unknowns for the attitude, and miion other caibration parameters from individua astrometric measurements. The precision of the astrometric parameters of individua stars depends on their magnitude and coor, and to a esser extent on their ocation in the sky. Sky-averaged vaues for the expected paraax precision are dispayed in Tabe 1. The corresponding figures for the coordinates and for the annua proper motions are simiar but sighty smaer (by about 15 and 25%). Note, that a paraax accuracy of 20 microarcseconds (the thickness of a human hair seen from a distance of 200 km) for a 15 th magnitude star transates into an accuracy of the distance determination of 0.1% for 50 pc, and 1% for 500 pc. Tabe 1 End-of-mission paraax precision in microarcseconds. Representative vaues are shown for unreddened stars of the indicated spectra types and V magnitudes. The vaues are computed using the actua Gaia design as input. The performance cacuation used does not incude the effects of radiation damage to the CCDs. Star type V magnitude nomina performance < B1V < G2V < M6V What does this accuracy mean? In order iustrate picture what an accuracy of 20 µas means, consider the foowing exampes: Proper motion: M = +10: A star with an absoute magnitude of +10 has 15 th at 100 pc. At this distance, an accuracy of the proper motion of 20 µas/year corresponds to 10 m/s, i.e. panets can be found around about haf a miion stars (Jupiter moves the sun by 15 m/s). M = 0: Stars with an absoute magnitude of zero coud be measured down to 1 km/s at 10 kpc (i.e. that even the owest-veocity stear popuations can be kinematicay studied throughout the entire gaaxy). M = 3.5: The motion of bright stars with M = 3.5 can be studied down to 5 km/sec, i.e. that the interna kinematics of the Mageanic Couds at 50 kpc can be studied in as much detai as the soar neighbourhood can be now (5 km/s=2.5 mas/a at 400 pc). M = 10: For the brightest stars veocities of 100 km/s can be sti detected at 1 Mpc, i.e. a handfu of very uminous stars in M 31 wi show that gaaxy s rotation. Paraaxes: 20 µas=1% of 0.5 kpc, i.e. the six-dimensiona structure of the Orion compex can be studied with 5 pc depth resoution. 20 µas=10% of 5 kpc, i.e. a direct high-precision distance determination is possibe even for very sma stear groups throughout most of our Gaaxy., 20 µas=100% of 50 kpc, i.e. a direct distance determination of the Mageanic Couds is at the edge. Linear sizes: 20 µas=1 soar diameter at 0.5 kpc, i.e. norma sunspots just do not disturb the measurements, but Jupiters do, what makes them detectabe to some extend. 8 The spectro-photometric and RV observations The most precise photometry for each source wi be based on the unfitered AF observations with a broad passband between ,000 Å. Coour information wi be avaiabe from the red (RP) and bue (BP) spectrophotometric fieds for a sources these data wi be in the form of mission-averaged owresoution spectra. Athough the astrometric instrument contains no refractive optics, the images are sighty chromatic because of the waveength dependence of diffraction. Therefore, the photometric coour determinations are not ony nice to have astrophysicay, but are needed to correct for the reative dispacement between eary-type and very red stars (chromaticity) which may be as arge as 1 miiarcsecond. The photometry provided by Gaia wi be unprecedented in homogeneity and depth. The precision of the brightness determination with the AF wi be between 1 and 10 miimag at 19 th magnitude. Moreover, radia veocities are measured with a precision between 1 km/sec (V=11.5) and 30 km/sec (V=17.5). The measurements of radia veocities are important to correct for perspective acceeration which is induced by the motion aong the ine of sight. The spectroscopic RVS measurements compement the astrometric ones, so that a three spatia and a three veocity components are avaiabe, at east for the brighter stars. By anaysing the RVS spectra and the BP/RP photometry,

6 880 S. Jordan: The Gaia Project - technique, performance and status aso the atmospheric parameters T eff, og g, and the chemica composition can be determined for a arge fraction of the observed stars. 9 Radiation-induced CCD damages At L2 Gaia is outside the Earth s magnetosphere and fuy exposed to high-energy partices (mosty protons) from cosmic rays and the Sun. With its imited weight budget for a Soyuz-Fregat aunch and the arge size of the CCD array, ony minima shieding for the detectors is possibe. The major effect on the CCDs comes from protons from the Sun during soar fares, which may be quite frequent during the Gaia mission, because Gaia wi be aunched cose to the next soar maximum. These protons can coide with the siicon atoms of the CCD and may generate a point defect in the crysta attice. As a resut, charge traps are produced which can capture the eectrons during the read-out in TDI mode. These eectrons are reeased again at a sighty ate time. By this re-distribution of charges within a recorded image, the point spread function, or one-dimensiona ine spread function (LSF) of a source is distorted and the position of the centroids (which are the main quantities in the astrometric measurements) is strongy shifted with respect to an undamaged CCD. Since ony a sma window around each star is downinked to the ground, the tai of trapped charges reeased outside the windows reduces the (photometric) fux measurements, additionay to the astrometric effect. Ground-based investigations of irradiated CCDs are currenty undertaken in order to find out the exact behaviour of the CCDs under various conditions. Of particuar importance is that the effect on the LSF depends on the the history: If another image has passed the same region of the CCD seconds before, the traps are sti partiay fied. This interdependence can strongy be reduced if arge extra charges are periodicay inserted into the CCDs to fi the traps (e.g. every few seconds). Then fewer empty traps are encountered and the centroid shifts as we as the distortions of the LSFs are minimised. Additionay, ony the CCD charge history between two charge injections need to be taken into account for the correction of the effects. The hope is that, from the ground-based measurement, the radiation damage effects can be so we understood that a fu correction for the centroid shifts and the fux reduction is possibe. However, the data processing of Gaia is strongy compicated, since a arge number of extra parameters have to be taken into account: The density of the traps at each instance, the magnitude of the source, the time since charge injection, and the time since previous sources moved through the same CCD coumn. It is very probabe, that the vaues for the astrometric end-of-mission performance are degraded somewhat, but a reaistic estimation is not yet possibe. Additionay, the imiting magnitude for the RVS may be brighter than originay panned. 10 Computationa effort The tota raw data voume is estimated to be of the order of 100 TB, the tota amount of processed and archived data is of the order of 1 PB. Current estimated for the computationa voume is foating-point operations, but this may actuay be a ower imit and wi probaby increase due to the correction tasks for the radiation-induced CCD damages. If the processing of one star (with typicay 1000 measurement per star) woud need 1 second, 30 years of the data anaysis woud be needed. However, with massivey distributed computation and the faster computers of the time of Gaia s data anaysis, this task wi be feasibe. 11 Concusion Since distance determinations are of such fundamenta importance in astronomy, it is cear that Gaia s high-accuracy paraax measurements wi infuence basicay a fieds in astronomy. Together with the radia-veocity data, the proper motion determinations wi be of particuar importance for our understanding of the stear dynamics of the Miky Way. For detais on the expected progress, see the foowing paper by N. Waton. Acknowedgements. Work on Gaia data processing in Heideberg is supported by the DLR grant 50 QG The figures are courtesy of EADS Astrium and ESA. The author thanks U. Bastian for the carefu reading and vauabe discussions and for a draft of Sect. 7. References ESA 2000, GAIA: Composition, Formation and Evoution of the Gaaxy, Technica Report ESA- SCI(2000)4, (onine: fies/files/report-march.pdf) Lindegren, L., Proceedings of the Gaia Symposium The Three- Dimensiona Universe with Gaia (ESA SP-576). Hed at the Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 4-7 October Editors: C. Turon, K.S. O Faherty, M.A.C. Perryman, p.29 Lindegren, L., O Muane, W., Hobbs, D., Lammers, U., A&A, in prep. Perryman, M.A.C., de Boer, K.S., Gimore, G., et a.: 2001, A&A 369, 339 ESA-RSSD Gaia homepage: