Lecture Notes: Industrial Organization Joe Chen 1. The Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) paradigm:
|
|
- Jeffrey Briggs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Joe Chen 1 1 Introduction 1.1 The Beginning Joe Bain and Edward Mason (the Harvard tradition): Empirical in nature (loose theories) The Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) paradigm: Structure (market structure): entry conditions, market concentration, number and size of firms, the degree of product differentiation, cost structure, the degree of vertical integration,...; Conduct (firm behavior): price, R&D expenditures, investment, advertisement, capacity utilization, collusion...; Performance: efficiency, price-cost margins, the variety of products, innovative rate, profits,...; The SCP paradigm was the brain child of the Harvard school of thought and popularized during with its empirical work involving the identification of correlations between industry structure and performance. The standard SCP paradigm asserts that there is a direct relationship between the degree of market concentration and the degree of competition among firms. This hypothesis will be supported if positive relationship between market concentration (measured by concentration ratio) and performance (measured by profits). Results: stylized facts: correlations, descriptive statistics, stories. Anyway, these are not causal relationship. New IO: During game theory took center stage with emphasis on strategic decision making and Nash equilibrium concept. Theoretical development: game theory, firm and market dynamics, and asymmetric information. New tools are used to re-examine many existing stories from the SCP paradigm.
2 Joe Chen 2 After 1990, empirical industrial organization with the use of economic theory and econometrics lead to complex empirical modeling of technological changes, merger analysis, entry-exit and identification of market power. New empirical approaches: the empirical renaissance in industrial economics (Bresnahan and Schmalensee, 1987): The importance of (economic) cost information; The estimation of causal relationship. 1.2 History of the field of I.O. 1. (a) 1930 s-1950 s: Case studies i. Detailed analyses of specific industries; heavy in institutional detail ii. Induction: sought to go from the specific to the general iii. Absence of a theory which seeks to cover a class of industries (b) 1950 s-1970 s: Introduction of econometric studies i. Basic unit is the industry ii. Mostly cross-sectional reduced form analyses iii. General inter-industry hypotheses but no formal theory iv. The hope was to show that certain general statement can be made across all manufacturing industries. This was unsuccessful. (c) 1970 s-1980 s: Theory i. Deduction: Developing general theory which has implications for a class of industries ii. Coincident with revival of game theory iii. Theory may be too general A. It may be trying to explain too many industries at once and thereby explaining none of them B. More institutional detail than is typically modelled may be vital to understanding behavior.
3 Joe Chen 3 (d) 1980 s present: Empirical renaissance i. Industry time-series studies that use formal theory to build empirical models. (Unfortunately, these theories have not usually been adequately tested as to their empirical validity.) ii. Much more disaggregated data iii. Case studies with econometrics iv. Recognizes the idiosyncratic institutional features v. But where is this empirical literature heading? Will it always be a collection of narrow case studies or will empirical regularities emerge that are applicable to a broad class of industries? 1.3 The Departure of IO from the General Equilibrium Theory The First Welfare Theorem: Competitive (Walrasian) equilibrium implies Pareto optimality. Problems : Price taking behavior: market power; Externality: network externality; Private goods: dispersion of new technology; Perfect information: product quality. Partial Equilibrium Framework: Look at markets and industries (theory of second best). What is a market? Correlation of product prices? Bottom-up? Theoretical vs. empirical work
4 Joe Chen 4 References [1] Bresnahan, T. F. and R. Schmalensee, "The Empirical Renaissance in Industrial Economics: An Overview", Journal of Industrial Economics, 35 (1987),
5 Joe Chen 5 2 Monopoly Pricing Basic assumption: goods are given (no product selection problem), qualities are known (no experience goods), same price for the same commodity (no price discrimination). 2.1 A single product monopoly The monopoly solves the following problem: max p pd(p) C(D(p)). FOC implies the inverse elasticity rule: p m C 0 p m =1/ε, where:ε = D 0 (P m )P m /D(P m ). Lerner index; p m >C 0, dead-weight loss; Rule-of-sum (constant mark-up) pricing ; non-profit maximization; ε>1, notethat:p m = εc 0 /(ε 1); p m is a nondecreasing function of marginal cost. Consider a more general setup. Let C2 0 (q) >C0 1 (q), forallq>0,and(pm i,qm i ) maximizes profit when the cost function is C i (q i ) so that: p m 1 qm 1 C 1(q1 m) pm 2 qm 2 C 1(q2 m). p m 2 qm 2 C 2(q2 m) pm 1 qm 1 C 2(q1 m) This implies: C 2 (q1 m ) C 1 (q1 m ) [C 2 (q2 m ) C 1 (q2 m )] 0; or, Hence, q m 1 qm 2 ;or,pm 1 pm 2. Z q m 1 q m 2 [C 0 2(q) C 0 1(q)]dq 0. How to tax the monopoly in order to induce social optimal?
6 Joe Chen 6 Intuition: positive or negative tax (subsidy)? Consider the following problem: max p pd(p + t) C(D(p + t)). FOC implies: (p C 0 )D(p + t)+d(p + t) =0; or, (p + t C 0 )D 0 (p + t)+d(p + t) td 0 (p + t) =0. Social optimal requires: p + t = C 0 ; hence, t = D(p c )/D 0 (p c ) < Monopoly with multiple products Now, consider a monopoly with n products. Let p =(p 1,...,p n ). The monopoly s problem is: FOC implies: D i + p i D i (p) P i max p 1,...,p n + X j6=i nx i=1 p j D j (p) P i = p i D i (p) C(D 1 (p),...,d n (p)). nx j=1 C(D 1 (p),...,d n (p)) D j (p), for all i. q j p i Independent demands, separable costs: if D i (p) =D i (p i ),andifc(d 1 (p),...,d n (p)) = X n j=1 C i(d i (p)), then: Same as before: the maximization of each product is equivalent to the maximization of the aggregate profit. Dependent demands, separable costs: C(D 1 (p),...,d n (p)) = X n C i(d i (p)) j=1 FOC becomes: D i + p i D i (p) P i Ci 0 D i (p) = X (p j C p j) 0 D j(p) ; i P i j6=i
7 Joe Chen 7 and, p i Ci 0 = 1 X (p j Cj 0)D jε ij ; p i ε ii R i ε ii j6=i where: ε ij = ( D j (p)/ p i )(p i /D j (p)) for all i, j, andr i = p i D i (p). Substitutes: D j (p)/ p i > 0. This implies ε ij < 0. If the monopoly were decentralized, there will be de facto competition. Complements: D j (p)/ p i < 0. This implies ε ij > 0. It is likely that in some market k, p k Ck 0. An example: (Good will). Consider the following problem for a monopoly producer of a single good: max p 1 D 1 (p 1 ) C 1 (D 1 (p 1 )) + δ [p 2 D 2 (p 2,p 1 ) C 2 (D 2 (p 2, p 1 ))]. p 1,p 2 Let e D 2 = δd 2 and e C 2 = δc 2. Then it is the same problem when demands are dependent and costs are separable. If there exists good will: D 2 (p 2,p 1 )/ p 1 < 0; and, it is the complement goods case. Independent demands, dependent costs: D i (p) =D i (p i ). Let s consider an example: max p 1 D 1 (p 1 ) C 1 (D 1 (p 1 )) + δ [p 2 D 2 (p 2 ) C 2 (D 2 (p 2 ),D 1 (p 1 ))] p 1,p 2 Learning by doing: C 2 (q 2,q 1 )/ q 1 < 0; The FOC for p 1 : (p 1 C 0 1)D 0 1(p 1 )+D 1 (p 1 ) δ C 2 q 1 D 0 1(p 1 )=0; hence, p 1 C1 0 = 1 + δ C 2. p 1 ε 1 p 1 q {z 1 } <0 2.3 Durable good monopoly Durability of the product creates competition for the monopoly.
8 Joe Chen 8 Let s start with an example. Consider a market for an infinitely durable good. The good costs nothing for the monopoly firminthemarkettoproduce. Thereare7 consumers with valuations (discounted value of the flow of services) of the good, v i, being 1,2,..., 7. What s the monopoly price for an once-and-for-all offer? p m Demand Now, consider the multiperiod case. Suppose the monopoly charge p m =4in the first period. At the second period, it faces a residual demand of: p m Demand So for consumers such that: v i 4 <δ(v i 2), or,v i < (4 2δ)/(1 δ), waiting is worthwhile (when δ =0.95, v i < 42). To find an equilibrium, one has to find a sequence of prices and consumer expectations such that: the prices are optimal given the consumer s expectation, and the expectations are rational given the firm s prices. Let s do this for a two-period case. Let D(p) =1 p in each period, so that the inverse demand function each period is P (q) =1 q. Say the monopoly supply q 1 in the first
9 Joe Chen 9 period. In the second period, it then solves: FOC gives us: max q 2 [(1 q 1 ) q 2 ]) {z } q 2 p 2 =residual inverse demand q 2 =(1 q 1 )/2. Given this result, let s move back to the first period. Note that consumers are willing to pay: p 1 =1 q 1 + δp a 2. Rational expectation requires: p a 2 = p 2,andp 2 =(1 q 1 ) q 2 =(1 q 1 )/2. Thus, The monopoly solves: Hence: p 1 =1 q 1 + δp a 2 =1 q 1 + δp 2 =(1+δ/2)(1 q 1 ). max (1 + δ/2)(1 q 1 )q 1 + δ( 1 q 1 ) 2. q 1 2 q 1 = 2 4+δ p 1 = (2+δ)2 2(4+δ) Note that: p 1 >p 2 = (2+δ) 2(4+δ). In general, the equilibrium price sequence is a decreasing one. What if the monopoly leases out the infinitely durable good instead of selling it? In each period t, the monopolist maximizes p t D(P t ),andtherfore,p 1 = p 2 = 1/2, andq 1 =1/2 and q 2 =0(no depreciation). The profit of leasing is then: 1/4+δ 1/4 =(1+δ) /4.. Coase conjecture: when price adjustments become more and more frequent, the monopoly s profit converges to zero. All trades take place almost instantaneously at prices close to marginal cost. (See the Appendix of Chapter 1 for a proof if you are interested).
10 Joe Chen 10 The monopoly would better off if it could lease the product or it could ex ante commit itself to no-haggle. Leasing has its own problems. In general, without a commitment device, no-haggle is not credible (not subgame perfect). Some commitment devices are: Arbitrators: third-party arbitration; Money back guarantee; Reputation; Destroy factory; Decreasing returns to scale; In formation asymmetry: the consumers do not know if the cost is high or low; New customers arrive each period; Planned obsolescence. Bottom line: one should not take it for granted that a durable good monopoly would charge the competitive price and makes no profit. 2.4 How bad is monopoly? In general, monopoly is not good : Dead-weight loss: p m >C 0 ; X-inefficiency (Leibenstein, 1966): No competition, the managers of monopoly firms are more likely to engage in slacking. This inflates the cost (theoretical foundation is shaky); Rent seeking (wasteful expenses): A group of firms engage in acquisition and maintenance of the monopoly franchise: Rent dissipation: the total expenditure firms are willing to pay equals the total amount of the rent;
11 Joe Chen 11 Socially wasteful dissipation: this expenditure has no socially valuable by-products (lobbying). Possible other distortions as well. Well, maybe we are too pessimistic. Some mitigating factors: For X-inefficiency: Yardstick or tournament, Align the manager s incentive to that of the monopoly shareholders : stock option for CEOs; Increasing returns to scale: fixed-cost vs. dead-weight loss; R&D: patent protection.
Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power. Chapter 1: Monopoly. Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination.
Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power Chapter 1: Monopoly Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination. Best known monopoly distortion: p>mc DWL (section 1). Other
More informationDurable goods monopolist
Durable goods monopolist Coase conjecture: A monopolist selling durable good has no monopoly power. Reason: A P 1 P 2 B MC MC D MR Q 1 Q 2 C Q Although Q 1 is optimal output of the monopolist, it faces
More informationLecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) -
Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) - What is the old empirical IO? The old empirical IO refers to studies that tried to draw inferences about the relationship
More informationOligopoly. Oligopoly. Xiang Sun. Wuhan University. March 23 April 6, /149
Oligopoly Xiang Sun Wuhan University March 23 April 6, 2016 1/149 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Game theory 3 Oligopoly models 4 Cournot competition Two symmetric firms Two asymmetric firms Many symmetric firms
More informationBertrand Model of Price Competition. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1
Bertrand Model of Price Competition Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1 ҧ Bertrand Model of Price Competition Consider: An industry with two firms, 1 and 2, selling a homogeneous product Firms face market
More informationLecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden
Lecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden http://io.tholden.org/ Email: t.holden@surrey.ac.uk Standard office hours: Thursday, 12-1PM + 3-4PM, 29AD00 However, during term: CLASSES will be run in the first
More informationClassic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot
Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot Class Note: There are supplemental readings, including Werden (008) Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers I: Basic Concepts and Models, that
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress Daron Acemoglu MIT September 15, 2016. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Competition, Policy and Innovation September 15, 2016.
More informationA Summary of Economic Methodology
A Summary of Economic Methodology I. The Methodology of Theoretical Economics All economic analysis begins with theory, based in part on intuitive insights that naturally spring from certain stylized facts,
More informationECO 2901 EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION
ECO 2901 EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION Lecture 7 & 8: Models of Competition in Prices & Quantities Victor Aguirregabiria (University of Toronto) Toronto. Winter 2018 Victor Aguirregabiria () Empirical
More informationIndustrial Organization Lecture 3: Game Theory
Industrial Organization Lecture 3: Game Theory Nicolas Schutz Nicolas Schutz Game Theory 1 / 43 Introduction Why game theory? In the introductory lecture, we defined Industrial Organization as the economics
More informationTrade policy III: Export subsidies
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies - wiiw June 25, 2015 Overview Overview 1 1 Under perfect competition lead to welfare loss 2 Effects depending on market structures 1 Subsidies to
More informationWelfare consequence of asymmetric regulation in a mixed Bertrand duopoly
Welfare consequence of asymmetric regulation in a mixed Bertrand duopoly Toshihiro Matsumura Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo June 8, 2010 Abstract I investigate an asymmetric duopoly where
More informationPERISHABLE DURABLE GOODS
PERISHABLE DURABLE GOODS IN-KOO CHO AND LEONARDO REZENDE Abstract. We examine whether the Coase conjecture [7, 12, 4, 10] is robust against slight ability of commitment of the monopolist not to sell the
More informationResearch and Development
Chapter 9. March 7, 2011 Firms spend substantial amounts on. For instance ( expenditure to output sales): aerospace (23%), o ce machines and computers (18%), electronics (10%) and drugs (9%). is classi
More information5. Externalities and Public Goods. Externalities. Public Goods types. Public Goods
5. Externalities and Public Goods 5. Externalities and Public Goods Externalities Welfare properties of Walrasian Equilibria rely on the hidden assumption of private goods: the consumption of the good
More informationCEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 3: Gravity Models
CEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 3: Gravity Models Dave Donaldson (MIT) CEMMAP MC July 2018 1 All material based on earlier courses taught
More informationBasics of Game Theory
Basics of Game Theory Giacomo Bacci and Luca Sanguinetti Department of Information Engineering University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy {giacomo.bacci,luca.sanguinetti}@iet.unipi.it April - May, 2010 G. Bacci and
More information5. Externalities and Public Goods
5. Externalities and Public Goods Welfare properties of Walrasian Equilibria rely on the hidden assumption of private goods: the consumption of the good by one person has no effect on other people s utility,
More informationVolume 29, Issue 3. Strategic delegation and market competitiveness
Volume 29, Issue Strategic delegation and market competitiveness Caterina Colombo Università di Ferrara Alessandra Chirco Università del Salento Marcella Scrimitore Università del Salento Abstract Within
More informationOverview. Producer Theory. Consumer Theory. Exchange
Overview Consumer Producer Exchange Edgeworth Box All Possible Exchange Points Contract Curve Overview Consumer Producer Exchange (Multiplicity) Walrasian Equilibrium Walrasian Equilibrium Requirements:
More informationOligopoly Theory. This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of...
This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of... John Asker Econ 170 Industrial Organization January 23, 2017 1 / 1 We will cover the following topics: with Sequential Moves
More informationDesign Patent Damages under Sequential Innovation
Design Patent Damages under Sequential Innovation Yongmin Chen and David Sappington University of Colorado and University of Florida February 2016 1 / 32 1. Introduction Patent policy: patent protection
More informationChapter 7. Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change
Chapter 7 Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change 225 Economic Growth: Lecture Notes 7.1 Expanding Product Variety: The Romer Model There are three sectors: one for the final good sector, one
More informationPERISHABLE DURABLE GOODS
PERISHABLE DURABLE GOODS IN-KOO CHO Abstract. We examine whether the Coase conjecture (Coase (1972), Stokey (1981), Bulow (1982), Gul, Sonnenschein, and Wilson (1986)) is robust against a slight ability
More informationIn the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.
In the Name of God Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Microeconomics 1 44715 (1396-97 1 st term) - Group 1 Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi Chapter 10: Competitive Markets
More informationAnswer Key: Problem Set 3
Answer Key: Problem Set Econ 409 018 Fall Question 1 a This is a standard monopoly problem; using MR = a 4Q, let MR = MC and solve: Q M = a c 4, P M = a + c, πm = (a c) 8 The Lerner index is then L M P
More informationBresnahan, JIE 87: Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Industry: 1955 Price War
Bresnahan, JIE 87: Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Industry: 1955 Price War Spring 009 Main question: In 1955 quantities of autos sold were higher while prices were lower, relative
More information4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition
4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition Partial equilibrium studies the existence of equilibrium in the market of a given commodity and analyzes its properties. Prices in other markets as well
More informationGrowing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure
Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure Hiroaki Ino Institute of Intellectual Property and Toshihiro Matsumura Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo [Preliminary
More informationOligopoly. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product.
Oligopoly Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Max qi P(Q)q i C i (q i ) P(Q): inverse demand curve: p = P(Q)
More informationMarkov Perfect Equilibria in the Ramsey Model
Markov Perfect Equilibria in the Ramsey Model Paul Pichler and Gerhard Sorger This Version: February 2006 Abstract We study the Ramsey (1928) model under the assumption that households act strategically.
More informationMonopoly Regulation in the Presence of Consumer Demand-Reduction
Monopoly Regulation in the Presence of Consumer Demand-Reduction Susumu Sato July 9, 2018 I study a monopoly regulation in the setting where consumers can engage in demand-reducing investments. I first
More informationBackwards Induction. Extensive-Form Representation. Backwards Induction (cont ) The player 2 s optimization problem in the second stage
Lecture Notes II- Dynamic Games of Complete Information Extensive Form Representation (Game tree Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium Repeated Games Trigger Strategy Dynamic Games of Complete Information Dynamic
More informationPERISHABLE DURABLE GOODS
PERISHABLE DURABLE GOODS IN-KOO CHO Abstract. We examine whether the Coase conjecture [7, 14, 4, 10] is robust against slight ability of commitment of the monopolist not to sell the durable goods to consumers.
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Competition and Innovation
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Competition and Innovation Daron Acemoglu MIT September 19, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Competition and Innovation September 19, 2011. 1 / 51 Competition and Innovation
More informationMicroeconomics II Lecture 4: Incomplete Information Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics November 2016
Microeconomics II Lecture 4: Incomplete Information Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics November 2016 1 Modelling incomplete information So far, we have studied games in which information was complete,
More informationMoral Hazard: Part 1. April 9, 2018
Moral Hazard: Part 1 April 9, 2018 Introduction In a standard moral hazard problem, the agent A is characterized by only one type. As with adverse selection, the principal P wants to engage in an economic
More informationMixed duopolies with advance production
Mixed duopolies with advance production Tamás László Balogh Department of Economic Analysis and Business Informatics, University of Debrecen and Attila Tasnádi MTA-BCE Lendület Strategic Interactions Research
More informationStatic Models of Oligopoly
Static Models of Oligopoly Cournot and Bertrand Models Mateusz Szetela 1 1 Collegium of Economic Analysis Warsaw School of Economics 3 March 2016 Outline 1 Introduction Game Theory and Oligopolies 2 The
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012 The time limit for this exam is 4 hours. It has four sections. Each section includes two questions. You are
More informationGame theory lecture 4. September 24, 2012
September 24, 2012 Finding Nash equilibrium Best-response or best-reply functions. We introduced Nash-equilibrium as a profile of actions (an action for each player) such that no player has an incentive
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6
Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO April 10, 017 Administrative Stuff Homework # is due at the end of class. I will post the solutions on the website later today. The midterm
More informationInternational Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory)
14.581 International Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory) 14.581 Week 9 Spring 2013 14.581 (Week 9) Gravity Models (Theory) Spring 2013 1 / 44 Today s Plan 1 The Simplest Gravity Model: Armington
More informationThe TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?
The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam? Jean Louis Brillet, France For presentation at the LINK 2014 Conference New York, 22nd 24th October, 2014 Advertisement!!! The model uses EViews The
More informationBlocking Development
Blocking Development Daron Acemoglu Department of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology October 11, 2005 Taking Stock Lecture 1: Institutions matter. Social conflict view, a useful perspective
More informationOligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games
1/10 Oligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games May 4, 2014 2/10 Outline 1 Bertrand Market Game 2 Bertrand Paradox 3 Asymmetric Firms 3/10 Bertrand Duopoly Market Game Discontinuous Payoff Functions (1 p
More informationEmpirical Industrial Organization (ECO 310) University of Toronto. Department of Economics Fall Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria
Empirical Industrial Organization (ECO 30) University of Toronto. Department of Economics Fall 208. Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria FINAL EXAM Tuesday, December 8th, 208. From 7pm to 9pm (2 hours) Exam
More informationChapter 5. The Engine of Growth. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko
Chapter 5. The Engine of Growth Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko Endogenous growth theory. The Romer model Where does the technological progress come from? Is there limit to economic growth and technological
More informationLecture 8: Incomplete Contracts
Lecture 8: Incomplete Contracts Cheng Chen School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong (Cheng Chen (HKU)) Econ 6006 / 23 Introduction Motivation Development of microeconomics theory: General
More informationProfitability of R&D main explanatory factor of neo-schumpeterian growth
Profitability of R&D main explanatory factor of neo-schumpeterian growth Profitability of R&D related to: Market power of producers of innovation goods Distinguish between: Pre-innovation market power
More informationThe ambiguous impact of contracts on competition in the electricity market Yves Smeers
The ambiguous impact of contracts on competition in the electricity market Yves Smeers joint work with Frederic Murphy Climate Policy and Long Term Decisions-Investment and R&D, Bocconi University, Milan,
More informationEcon 8601: Industrial Organization (Thomas J. Holmes) Lecture 1. Part 1: The Cost of Monopoly in General Equilibrium. μ 1
Econ 8601: Industrial Organization (Thomas J. Holmes) Lecture 1 Part 1: The Cost of Monopoly in General Equilibrium Set of goods [0, 1], x [0, 1] aparticulargood. Utility function of representative consumer
More informationY j R L divide goods into produced goods (outputs) > 0 output, call its price p < 0 input, call its price ω
4 PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS 4.1 Perfectly Competitive Market Ref: MWG Chapter 10.C and 10.F (but also read 10.A &10.B) Recall: consumers described by preferences over consumption bundles represented
More informationAdvanced Macroeconomics
Advanced Macroeconomics The Ramsey Model Marcin Kolasa Warsaw School of Economics Marcin Kolasa (WSE) Ad. Macro - Ramsey model 1 / 30 Introduction Authors: Frank Ramsey (1928), David Cass (1965) and Tjalling
More informationManagerial delegation in multimarket oligopoly
Managerial delegation in multimarket oligopoly Arup Bose Barnali Gupta Statistics and Mathematics Unit Department of Economics Indian Statistical Institute Miami University, Ohio INDIA USA bosearu@gmail.com
More informationExpanding Variety Models
Expanding Variety Models Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 2012 References: Acemoglu (2009) ch13 Introduction R&D and technology adoption are purposeful activities The simplest
More informationPass-Through as an Economic Tool
as an Economic Tool E. Glen Weyl Harvard Society of Fellows and Toulouse School of Economics Oliver E. Williamson Seminar on Institutional Analysis Institute of Management, Innovation & Organization Haas
More informationAnswer Key: Problem Set 1
Answer Key: Problem Set 1 Econ 409 018 Fall Question 1 a The profit function (revenue minus total cost) is π(q) = P (q)q cq The first order condition with respect to (henceforth wrt) q is P (q )q + P (q
More informationModeling Technological Change
Modeling Technological Change Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 202 References: Acemoglu (2009) ch2 Concepts of Innovation Innovation by type. Process innovation: reduce cost,
More informationField Course Descriptions
Field Course Descriptions Ph.D. Field Requirements 12 credit hours with 6 credit hours in each of two fields selected from the following fields. Each class can count towards only one field. Course descriptions
More informationPartial Privatization under Multimarket Price Competition
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Partial Privatization under Multimarket Price Competition Taku Masuda and Susumu Sato Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Economics,
More informationInformation Choice in Macroeconomics and Finance.
Information Choice in Macroeconomics and Finance. Laura Veldkamp New York University, Stern School of Business, CEPR and NBER Spring 2009 1 Veldkamp What information consumes is rather obvious: It consumes
More informationINVESTMENT EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION
INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION Neal M. Stoughton WU-Vienna University of Economics and Business Kit Pong Wong University of Hong Kong Long Yi Hong Kong Baptist University QUESTION
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016 More on strategic games and extensive games with perfect information Block 2 Jun 12, 2016 Food for thought LUPI Many players
More informationEssays in Durable Goods Monopolies
Essays in Durable Goods Monopolies Başak Altan A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel ill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
More informationEC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2
EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2 Leonardo Felli 32L.G.06 19 January 2015 Moral Hazard: Consider the contractual relationship between two agents (a principal and an agent) The principal
More informationIntroduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.
Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Economy: I consumers, i = 1,...I. J firms, j = 1,...J. L goods, l = 1,...L Initial Endowment of good l in the economy: ω l 0, l = 1,...L. Consumer i : preferences
More informationGeneral Equilibrium and Welfare
and Welfare Lectures 2 and 3, ECON 4240 Spring 2017 University of Oslo 24.01.2017 and 31.01.2017 1/37 Outline General equilibrium: look at many markets at the same time. Here all prices determined in the
More informationTrade and Domestic Policy in Models with Monopolistic Competition
Trade and Domestic Policy in Models with Monopolistic Competition Alessia Campolmi Università di Verona Harald Fadinger University of Mannheim and CEPR Chiara Forlati University of Southampton February
More informationThe Economics of E-commerce and Technology
The Economics of E-commerce and Technology Industry Analysis 1 9/25/16 Industry Profits } In Econ 11, Economic Profits = 0 } In reality, many industries have much higher profits: 2 9/25/16 Industry Analysis
More informationVertical Product Differentiation and Credence Goods: Mandatory Labeling and Gains from International Integration
Vertical Product Differentiation and Credence Goods: Mandatory Labeling and Gains from International Integration Ian Sheldon and Brian Roe (The Ohio State University Quality Promotion through Eco-Labeling:
More informationInternation1al Trade
4.58 International Trade Class notes on 4/8/203 The Armington Model. Equilibrium Labor endowments L i for i = ; :::n CES utility ) CES price index P = i= (w i ij ) P j n Bilateral trade ows follow gravity
More informationCournot and Bertrand Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Endogenous Technology Adoption *
ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE 16-1, 231 253 (2015) Cournot and Bertrand Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Endogenous Technology Adoption * Hongkun Ma School of Economics, Shandong University,
More information3.3.3 Illustration: Infinitely repeated Cournot duopoly.
will begin next period less effective in deterring a deviation this period. Nonetheless, players can do better than just repeat the Nash equilibrium of the constituent game. 3.3.3 Illustration: Infinitely
More informationproblem. max Both k (0) and h (0) are given at time 0. (a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming
1. Endogenous Growth with Human Capital Consider the following endogenous growth model with both physical capital (k (t)) and human capital (h (t)) in continuous time. The representative household solves
More informationCapacity Constraints as a Commitment Device in Dynamic Pipeline Rent Extraction
Capacity Constraints as a Commitment Device in Dynamic Pipeline Rent Extraction Lucia Vojtassak, John R. oyce, Jeffrey R. Church # Department of Economics University of Calgary Calgary A TN N4 Canada September
More information1 The Basic RBC Model
IHS 2016, Macroeconomics III Michael Reiter Ch. 1: Notes on RBC Model 1 1 The Basic RBC Model 1.1 Description of Model Variables y z k L c I w r output level of technology (exogenous) capital at end of
More informationAre innocuous Minimum Quality Standards really innocuous?
Are innocuous Minimum Quality Standards really innocuous? Paolo G. Garella University of Bologna 14 July 004 Abstract The present note shows that innocuous Minimum Quality Standards, namely standards that
More informationSome Notes on Adverse Selection
Some Notes on Adverse Selection John Morgan Haas School of Business and Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley Overview This set of lecture notes covers a general model of adverse selection
More informationSolutions to problem set 11 (due Tuesday, April 29 1st, before class)
Econ 30 Intermediate Microeconomics Prof. Marek Weretka Solutions to problem set (due Tuesday, April 9 st, before class) Problem (Oligopolistic Industry) a) Big four index (concentration ratio) of the
More informationOblivious Equilibrium: A Mean Field Approximation for Large-Scale Dynamic Games
Oblivious Equilibrium: A Mean Field Approximation for Large-Scale Dynamic Games Gabriel Y. Weintraub, Lanier Benkard, and Benjamin Van Roy Stanford University {gweintra,lanierb,bvr}@stanford.edu Abstract
More informationCompetition Policy - Spring 2005 Monopolization practices I
Prepared with SEVI S LIDES Competition Policy - Spring 2005 Monopolization practices I Antonio Cabrales & Massimo Motta May 25, 2005 Summary Some definitions Efficiency reasons for tying Tying as a price
More informationLecture 2F: Hotelling s Model
Econ 46 Urban Economics Lecture F: Hotelling s Model Instructor: Hiroki Watanabe Spring Hiroki Watanabe / 6 Hotelling s Model Monopoly (N = ) 3 (N = ) 4 Nash Equilibrium 5 Oligopoly (N ) N 4 6 Summary
More informationBargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm. Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College
Bargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College 2015 Course Overview 1. Bargaining 2. Hidden information and self-selection Optimal contracting with hidden information
More information3. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition Competitive Equilibrium
3. Imperfect Competition 3. Partial Equilirium under Imperfect Competition Competitive Equilirium Partial equilirium studies the existence of equilirium in the market of a given commodity and analyzes
More informationOptimal Insurance of Search Risk
Optimal Insurance of Search Risk Mikhail Golosov Yale University and NBER Pricila Maziero University of Pennsylvania Guido Menzio University of Pennsylvania and NBER November 2011 Introduction Search and
More informationInducing Efficiency in Oligopolistic Markets with. Increasing Returns to Scale
Inducing Efficiency in Oligopolistic Markets with Increasing Returns to Scale Abhijit Sengupta and Yair Tauman February 6, 24 Abstract We consider a Cournot Oligopoly market of firms possessing increasing
More informationIndustrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October
Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October 23 2011 1 Scores The exam was long. I know this. Final grades will definitely be curved. Here is a rough
More informationMonopoly, Pareto and Ramsey Mark-ups
J Ind Compet Trade (2009) 9:57 63 DOI 10.1007/s10842-008-0030-5 Monopoly, Pareto and Ramsey Mark-ups Thijs ten Raa Received: 28 November 2007 / Revised: 23 December 2007 / Accepted: 14 January 2008 / Published
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics Leonardo Felli EC441: Room D.106, Z.332, D.109 Lecture 8 bis: 24 November 2004 Monopoly Consider now the pricing behavior of a profit maximizing monopolist: a firm that is the only
More informationRobust Predictions in Games with Incomplete Information
Robust Predictions in Games with Incomplete Information joint with Stephen Morris (Princeton University) November 2010 Payoff Environment in games with incomplete information, the agents are uncertain
More informationPart A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.
Ph.D. Core Exam -- Macroeconomics 5 January 2015 -- 8:00 am to 3:00 pm Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3. A1 (required): Ending Quantitative Easing Now that the U.S.
More informationBayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium
Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium Harsanyi [1967] What happens when players do not know one another s payoffs? Games of incomplete information versus games of imperfect
More informationPollution Tax and Social Welfare in Oligopoly. Asymmetric Taxation on Identical Polluters
Pollution Tax and Social Welfare in Oligopoly Asymmetric Taxation on Identical Polluters Satoshi HONMA Abstract We study asymmetric pollution taxation on identical polluting oligopolists engaged in Cournot
More informationEfficiency and Braess Paradox under Pricing
Efficiency and Braess Paradox under Pricing Asuman Ozdaglar Joint work with Xin Huang, [EECS, MIT], Daron Acemoglu [Economics, MIT] October, 2004 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dept. Massachusetts
More informationRalph s Strategic Disclosure 1
Ralph s Strategic Disclosure Ralph manages a firm that operates in a duopoly Both Ralph s (privatevalue) production cost and (common-value) inverse demand are uncertain Ralph s (constant marginal) production
More informationCredence Goods and Vertical Product Differentiation: The Impact of Labeling Policies* Ian Sheldon (Ohio State University)
Credence Goods and Vertical Product Differentiation: The Impact of Labeling Policies* Ian Sheldon (Ohio State University) Seminar: North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, May, 6 * Draws on Roe and Sheldon
More informationEconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018
EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 018 Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. NAME 1. Consider the market for smart pencil in which only one firm (Superapiz) enjoys a
More informationDSGE-Models. Calibration and Introduction to Dynare. Institute of Econometrics and Economic Statistics
DSGE-Models Calibration and Introduction to Dynare Dr. Andrea Beccarini Willi Mutschler, M.Sc. Institute of Econometrics and Economic Statistics willi.mutschler@uni-muenster.de Summer 2012 Willi Mutschler
More information