The Complete Intersection Theorem for Systems of Finite Sets
|
|
- Julian Parrish
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Europ. J. Combinatorics (1997) 18, The Complete Intersection Theorem for Systems of Finite Sets R UDOLF A HLSWEDE AND L EVON H. K HACHATRIAN 1. H ISTORIAL B ACKGROUND AND THE N EW T HEOREM We are concerned here with one of the oldest problems in combinatorial extremal theory. It is readily described after we have made a few conventions. denotes the set of positive integers and, for i, j, i j, the set i, i 1,..., j is abbreviated as [ i, j ]. For k, n, k n, we set 2 [ n ] F : F [1, n ], [ n ] k F 2 [ n ] : F k. (1. 1) A system of sets ( [ n ] k ) is called t - intersecting if and I ( n, k, t ) denotes the set of all such systems. The investigation of the function A 1 A 2 t for all A 1, A 2, (1. 2) M ( n, k, t ) max, 1 t k n, (1. 3) I ( n,k,t) and the structure of maximal systems was initiated by Erdö s, Ko and Rado. According to reference [7], they had already proved the following theorem by the year 1938, although it was only published in 1961 in their famous paper [9]. T HEOREM EKR. For 1 t k and n n o ( k, t ) ( suitable ) M ( n, k, t ) n t. (1. 4) k t Clearly, the system ( n, k, t ) A [ n ] k : [1, t ] A (1. 5) has cardinality ( n t k t ) and is therefore optimal for n n o ( k, t ). The smallest n o ( k, t ) for which this is the case has been determined by Frankl [10] for t 15 and subsequently by Wilson [13] for all t : n o ( k, t ) ( k t 1)( t 1). (1. 6) Moreover, for n ( k t 1)( t 1), there is up to obvious permutations on the ground set [1, n ] only one optimal system. In the present paper we settle all of the remaining cases n ( k t 1)( t 1) / 97 / $ / 0 ej Academic Press Limited
2 126 R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian In particular, we prove the so-called 4 m - Conjecture (Erdö s, Ko and Rado, 1938 ; see [7, page 56] and the survey [6]) Thus, obviously, M (4 m, 2 m, 2) F [4 m ] 2 m : F [1, 2 m ] m 1. (1. 7) M (4 m, 2 m, 2) m 2 m 2. (1. 8) 2 m m The previously best upper bound on M (4 m, 2 m, 2) is due to Calderbank and Frankl [5]. There is a natural extension of the 4 m -Conjecture in terms of the systems to all possible parameters. i F [ n ] k : F [1, t 2 i ] t i for 0 i n t 2 G ENERAL C ONJECTURE [10]. For 1 t k n, (1. 9) M ( n, k, t ) max 0 i n t 2 i. (1. 10) Notice that for n 4 m, k 2 m, t 2 the maximum is assumed for i m 1 and so the 4 m -Conjecture is covered. For n ( k t 1)( t 1) the maximum is assumed for i 0. A further step towards proving the General Conjecture was taken in [10] for t 15, where the cases 0 8( k t 1)( t 1) n ( k t 1)( t 1) are settled. Here 1 is (up to permutations) the only optimal system. Some other cases have been settled in [12]. Our main result establishes the validity of the General Conjecture and provides an even more specific answer concerning uniqueness. T HEOREM. For 1 t k n : (i) With ( k t 1)(2 r t 1 1 ) n ( k t 1)(2 t 1 r ) for some r 0, we ha e M ( n, k, t ) r and r is up to permutations the unique optimum. ( By con ention, r 0.) (ii) With ( k t 1)(2 r t 1 1 ) n for r 0 we ha e M ( n, k, t ) r r 1 and an optimal system equals up to permutations either r or r 1. t 1 r for C ONVENTION. In the sequel, we write 1 2 if the systems 1 and 2 are equal up to permutations. R EMARKS. (1) It suf fices to treat the cases because for n 2 k t the whole system ( [ n ] k ) is t -intersecting. n 2 k t, (1. 11)
3 The complete intersection theorem 127 (2) Our method of proof follows ideas in our work in Number Theory (see [2], [3], [4]). They led to the concept of generating sets in Section 2 and related pushing techniques in later sections, which go considerably beyond known techniques in Combinatorial Extremal Theory (see [11]). (3) The t -intersecting systems in I ( n, k, t ) can be understood as systems with a diameter less than 2 k 2 t in the Hamming distance. Instead of Intersection Theorems one can then speak of Diametric Theorems a concept of geometrical meaning. This and relations to Isoperimetric Theorems have been discussed in [1]. (4) In [8], Erdö s mentions the 4 m -Conjecture as the last open problem from [9]. We begin with well-known notions. 2. G ENERATING S ETS AND T HEIR P ROPERTIES D EFINITION For A 1 i 1, i 2,..., i s ( [ n s ] ), i 1 i 2 i s, and A 2 j 1, j 2,..., j s ( [ n s ] ), j 1 j 2 j s, we write A 1 A 2 if f i l j l for all 1 l s ; that is, A 1 can be obtained from A 2 by left - pushing. Furthermore, let ( A 2 ) be the set of all sets obtained this way from A 2. Also, set ( )! A ( A ). D EFINITION [ n ] is said to be left compressed if f ( ). D EFINITION We denote by LI ( n, k, t ) I ( n, k, t ) the set of all left compressed systems from I ( n, k, t ). It is well-known and easily follows with the shifting technique of [9] that M ( n, k, t ) max max. (2. 1) I ( n, k, t ) LI ( n, k, t ) D EFINITION For any B 2 [ n ] we define the upset ( B ) B 2 [ n ] : B B. More generally, for 2 [ n ] we define the upset Now we introduce new concepts. ( )! ( B ). B D EFINITION For any ( [ n k ] ) a set g ( )! i k ( [ n i ] ) is called a generating set of, if ( g ( )) ( [ n k ] ). Furthermore, G ( ) is the set of all generating sets of. ( G ( ), because G ( )). A first auxiliary result is readily established. L EMMA 1. For I ( n, k, t ), n 2 k t, E 1 E 2 t for E 1, E 2 g ( ) G ( ).
4 128 R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian P ROOF. Since 2 k t n, E 1 E 2 t would allow k -element extensions of E 1 and E 2 which are not t -intersecting. Next, we introduce further basic concepts. D EFINITION For B b 1, b 2,..., b B [1, n ], b 1 b 2 b B, write the largest element b B as s ( B ). Also, for 2 [ n ] set s ( ) max s ( B ). B D EFINITION Let ( [ n ] k ) be left compressed, i. e. ( ). For any generating set g ( ) G ( ), consider ( g ( )) and introduce its set of minimal (in the sense of set-theoretical inclusion) elements * ( g ( )). Furthermore, define G * ( ) g ( ) G ( ) : * ( g ( )) g ( ). (Notice that G * ( )). We continue with simple properties. L EMMA 2. For a left compressed ( [ n ] k ) and any g ( ) G ( ) : (i) * ( g ( )) G ( ) ; (ii) s ( * ( g ( )) s ( g ( ))) ; (iii) for A * ( g ( )) and B A, we ha e either B * ( g ( )) or there exists a B * ( g ( )) with B B. The next important properties immediately follow from the definition of G * ( ) and the left-compressedness of. L EMMA 3. For a left compressed ( [ n ] k ) and g ( ) G * ( ), is a disjoint union where! ( E ), E g ( ) ( E ) B [ n ] k : B E B 1, B 1 [ s ( E ) 1, n ], B 1 k E. L EMMA 4. For a left compressed ( [ n ] k ) and g ( ) G * ( ), choose E g ( ) such that s ( E ) s ( g ( )) and consider the set of elements of which are only generated by E ; that is, E ( ( E ) ( g ( ) E )) [ n ] k. Then e ( E ) and E n s ( E ) k E. L EMMA 5. Let LI ( n, k, t ), g ( ) G ( ), and let E * 1, E 2 g ( ) ha e the properties i E 1 E 2, j E 1 E 2
5 The complete intersection theorem 129 for some i, j [1, n ] with j j. Then E 1 E 2 t 1. Finally, we use the following convention. D EFINITION For LI ( n, k, t ), we set s m i n ( G ( )) min s ( g ( )). g ( A ) G ( ) 3. T HE M AIN T WO A UXILIARY R ESULTS L EMMA 6. Let n 2 k t, LI ( n, k, t ), with A M ( n, k, t ), and let n for some r 0. Then ( k t 1)( t 2 r 1) ( k t 1) 2 t 1 (3. 1) r 1 r 1 s m i n ( G ( )) t 2 r. (3. 2) P ROOF. We can assume that n 2 k t 2, because in the case n 2 k t 1 we have, from (3. 1), r k t 1, and hence (3. 2) trivially holds. By Lemma 2 we have, for some g ( ) G * ( ), s ( g ( )) s min ( G ( )). Now assume that, in the opposite to (3. 2), s ( g ( )) t 2 r for some 0. (3. 3) We shall show that under the assumptions (3. 1) and (3. 3) there exists an A I ( n, k, t ) with M ( n, k, t ), which is a contradiction. For this, we start with the partition g ( ) g 0 ( ) g 1 ( ), where g 0 ( ) B g ( ) : s ( B ) t 2 r and g 1 ( ) g ( ) g 0 ( ). Obviously, for every B 1 g 0 ( ) and B 2 g 1 ( ) we have ( B 1 t 2 r ) B 2 t. (3. 4) The elements in g 0 ( ) have an important property, which follows immediately from Lemma 5 : (P) For any E 1, E 2 g 0 ( ) with E 1 E 2 t, necessarily E 1 E 2 2 t 2 r. Now, we partition g 0 ( ) according to the cardinalities of its members : g 0 ( )! i, i g 0 ( ) [ n ]. t i t 2 r i (Here we have used that in case t, by Lemma 1 and left-compressedness, necessarily t [1, t ] g ( ) and (3. 2) holds. Furthermore, if t 2 r, then t 2 r [1, t 2 r ] g ( ), and by optimality of necessarily r 0 and again (3. 2) holds. ) Of course, some of the i s can be empty.
6 130 R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian Next, we omit the element t 2 r ; that is, we consider i E [1, t 2 r 1] : E t 2 r i. So i i and, for E i, E i 1 ( i ). From property (P) we know that, for any E 1 i, E 2 j with i j 2 t 2 r, E 1 E 2 t. (3. 5) We shall prove that (under conditions (3. 1) and (3. 3)) all i s are empty. First we notice that the equation E 1 E 2 2 t 2 r, for E 1, E 2 g 0 ( ), implies that E j k ( ) for j 1, 2, because otherwise, for instance, E 1 k ( ) implies that E 2 2 t 2 r E 1 n k t, which, together with E 2 k, contradicts n 2 k t. Hence, if for all i, i k ( ), we have i, then ( g ( ) g 0 ( )) ( t i t 2 r i ) I ( n, t ), the set of all (unrestricted) t -intersecting systems in 2 [ n ], ( ) ( [ n k ] ), and s ( ) s ( g ( )), which is a contradiction. Suppose, then, that for some i, k ( ) i t 2 r, i or, equivalently, i. We distinguish two cases : (a) i (2 t 2 r ) / 2 and (b) i (2 t 2 r ) / 2. Case ( a ). We consider the sets f 1 g 1 ( ) ( g 0 ( ) ( i 2 t 2 r i )) i, f 2 g 1 ( ) ( g 0 ( ) ( i 2 t 2 r i )) 2 t 2 r i. We know already (see property (P) and (3. 5)) that and hence f 1, f 2 I ( n, t ) i ( f i ) [ n ] k I ( n, k, t ) for i 1, 2. The desired contradiction will take the form max i. (3. 6) i 1, 2 We consider the set 1. From the construction of f 1 and i, it follows that 1 consists of those elements of ( [ n k ] ) which are extensions only of the elements from 2 t 2 r i. We determine their number : 1 ( ( 2 t 2 r i ) ( g ( ) 2 t 2 r i ))) [ n ] k and, by Lemma 4, 1 2 t 2 r i. (3. 7) k 2 t 2 r i Symmetrically, we consider the set 1. Let B 1 be any element of i, so B 1 i 1. Clearly, B 1 g ( ), because B 1 t 2 r g ( ) and g ( ) G * ( ). Therefore, for every A ( [ n ] k ) in the form A B 1 B 2, where B 2 k i 1 and
7 The complete intersection theorem 131 B 2 [ t 2 r 1, n ], we have A 1 and A, because s ( g ( )) t 2 r. We also notice that, for B 1, B 1 i, B 1 B 1, we have Therefore Analogously, we have B 1 B 2 B 1 B 2 for all B 2, B 2 [ t 2 r 1, n ]. 1 i i. (3. 8) k i 1 k i 1 2 i, (3. 9) k i 2 2 t 2 r i k 2 t 2 r i 1. (3. 10) Actually, it is easy to show that there are equalities in (3. 8) and in (3. 10). However, that is not needed here. Now (3. 7) (3. 10) enable us to state the negation of (3. 6) in the form i 2 t 2 r i k i 1 k 2 t 2 r i and 2 t 2 r i k 2 t 2 r i 1 i. k i (3. 11) Since, by assumption, i, we can also assume that 2 t 2 r i, because otherwise the first inequality in (3. 11) is false. Furthermore, (3. 11) implies that ( n t k i )( k i ) ( k i 1)( k 2 t 2 r i 1). However, this is false, because n 2 k t 2 and, consequently, n t k i k i 1 as well as k i k 2 t 2 r i 1. Hence, (3. 6) holds, in contradiction to the optimality of. Therefore, necessarily, i for all i (2 t 2 r ) / 2. (In this case (a) we did not use the condition (3. 1), and not even the condition 0). Case ( b ). i (2 t 2 r ) / 2. Here, necessarily, 2 3. We consider the set t r / 2 and recall that for B t r / 2 B t r / 2 1 and B [1, t 2 r 1]. By the pigeon-hole principle, there exists an i [1, t 2 r 1] and a t r / 2 such that i B for all B and r / 2 t 2 r 1 t r / 2 r / 2 t 2 r 1 t r /2. (3. 12) By Lemma 5, we have B 1 B 2 t for all B 1, B 2, and since by case (a) i for i t r / 2, we obtain f ( g ( ) t r /2 ) I ( n, t ). We show now that under condition (3. 1) we have ( f ) [ n ] k. (3. 13) Indeed, let us write ( g ( )) ( [ n k ] ) 1 2, where 1 ( g ( ) t r /2) ( [ n k ] ), 2 ( ( t r /2) ( g ( ) t r /2)) ( [ n k ] ) and ( f ) ( [ n k ] ) 1 3,
8 132 R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian where 3 ( ( ) ( g ( ) t r / 2 )) ( [ n k ] ). In this terminology, the following is equivalent to (3. 13) : 3 2. (3. 14) We know (see Lemma 4) that 2 t r /2 (3. 15) k t r / 2 and estimate now 3 from below. Consider any B, B t r / 2 1. Clearly, B g ( ), because B t 2 r g ( ) and g ( ) G * ( ). Hence, for every A ( [ n k ] ) in the form A B C 1, where C 1 k B and C 1 [ t 2 r, n ], we have A 3. We also notice that, for all B 1, B 2, B 1 B 2, one has B 1 C 1 B 2 C 2 for all C 1, C 2 [ t 2 r, n ]. Therefore 1 3. (3. 16) k t r / 2 1 In the light of (3. 12) and (3. 14) (3. 16), it is suf ficient for (3. 13) that r / 2 1 t 2 r 1 k t r 2 1 k t r 2 (3. 17) or, equivalently, that r ( 1) k t r 1 ( t 2 r 1), (3. 18) 2 2 which in turn is equivalent to ( k t 1)( t 2 r 1) n. r / 2 This is true by (3. 1), because is even and t 2 r 1 t 2 r 1 for 2. r 1 r / 2 Hence 0 and the lemma is proved. C OROLLARY (for the 4 m Conjecture). Let LI (4 m, 2 m, 2) and M (4 m, 2 m, 2). Then s m i n ( G ( )) 2 m. P ROOF. Just choose r m 1 and notice that (3. 1) in Lemma 6 holds : 4 m Finally, we present the second auxiliary result. (2 m 1)(2 m 1). m
9 The complete intersection theorem 133 L EMMA 7. For any ( not necessarily maximal ) I ( n, k, t ), consider any generating set g ( ) G ( ). Furthermore, for the complemented system I ( n, n k, n 2 k t ), let f ( ) be any generating set from G( ). Then, for all A g ( ) and B f ( ), we have A B n k t. (3. 19) P ROOF. Assume that (3. 19) does not hold : A B n k t 1. Choose any F A B with F n k t 1. We know that and ( B ) [ n ] ( A ) [ n ] k n k. Since n 2 k t, t 0, and n k t 1 max( k, n k ), we can choose A * ( A ) ( [ n k ] ) and B * ( B ) ( n [ n ] k ) in such a way that A * F and B * F. Consider B * and observe that A * B * ( n k t 1) ( n k ) t 1, contradicting I ( n, k, t ). 4. P ROOF OF THE 4 m -C ONJECTURE We treat this famous case here separately, even though it is covered by the proof of the Theorem. Let LI (4 m, 2 m, 2), let M (4 m, 2 m, 2) and let g ( ) G ( ) such that s ( g ( )) s m i n ( G ( )). From the corollary we know that s ( g ( )) 2 m, that is, for B g ( ) necessarily B [1, 2 m ]. We consider the complemented : A [1, 4 m ]:[1, 4 m ] A. Clearly, I (4 m, 2 m, 2), M (4 m, 2 m, 2), and is right-compressed. From the left right symmetry and the corollary we conclude that there exists a generating set f ( ) such that for every B f ( ) necessarily B [2 m 1, 4 m ]. Now, if for all B 1 g ( ) we have B 1 m 1 then, necessarily, m 1 and m 1. The same conclusion holds if, for all B 2 f ( ), we have B 2 m 1. However, if neither of these two cases occurs then, for some B 1 g ( ) and B 2 f ( ), we have B 1, B 2 m. Finally, for every A ( [4 2 m m ] ) of the form A B 1 B 2, necessarily A, a contradiction to. R EMARK 5. Instead of the last step of the proof, one can argue that B 1 B 2 2 m 2 m 2 n k t is in contradiction with Lemma 7. C ASE (i) : 5. P ROOF OF THE T HEOREM ( k t 1) 2 t 1 r 1 n ( k t 1) 2 t 1 r. (5. 1) Choose LI ( n, k, t ) with M ( n, k, t ) and let g ( ) G ( ) with s ( g ( )) s m i n ( G ( )).
10 134 R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian We know from Lemma 6 that s ( g ( )) t 2 r and we also know that, the complemented, is right compressed, an element of I ( n, n k, n 2 k t ) and satisfies M ( n, n k, n 2 k t ). An easy calculation leads from (5. 1) to n 2 k t 1 ( k t 1) 2 k t r 1 and to n 2 k t 1 n ( k t 1) 2 for k t r (5. 2) k t r ( k t 1)( n 2 k t 1) n for k t r. (5. 3) Since n 2 k t, (5. 1) implies that always k t r. Therefore, for k n k and t n 2 k t we obtain the dual relations and t 1 ( k t 1) t 1 2 n ( k t 1) 2 for r k t r r 1 r ( k t 1)( t 1) n for k t r. Using the dual version (with respect to right compressed sets) of Lemma 6, we obtain an f ( ) G( ) with the property : every B f ( ) satisfies B [ n ( t 2 r ) 1, n ] [ t 2 r 1, n ], because t n 2 k t and r k t r. Now, if for all B 1 g ( ) we have B 1 t r, then clearly r, r (for k n k, t n 2 k t ) and the optimal sets are unique up to permutations. The same sets are obtained if, for all B 2 f ( ), the inequality B 2 t r holds. If none of the cases occurs, then for some B 1* g ( ), B 2* f ( ), B 1* t r 1 and B 2* t r 1 n k r 1 and, by Lemma 7, we will have a contradiction, because B 1* B 2* n k t 2. C ASE (ii) : n ( k t 1) 2 t 1. (5. 4) r 1 Let LI ( n, k, t ) and let M ( n, k, t ). Since n ( k t 1)(2 r t 1 2 ), we conclude with Lemma 6 that s m i n ( G ( )) t 2 r 2. Now choose g ( ) G ( ) with s ( g ( )) s m i n ( G ( )). We again consider, which is again right compressed and of maximal cardinality within I ( n, n k, n 2 k t ). From (5. 4), we derive n ( k t 1) 2 t 1 r 1 t 1 ( k t 1) 2, r where k n k, t n 2 k t and r k t r. ( k t 1) 2 n 2 k t 1 k t r
11 The complete intersection theorem 135 t 1 Since n ( k t 1)(2 t 1 r ) ( k t 1)(2 r 1 ), from the dual version (with respect to right compressed sets) of Lemma 6 one has an f ( ) G( ) the elements B 1 of which satisfy B 1 [ n t 2 r 1, n ] [ t 2 r 1, n ]. Now, if for all B 2 g ( ), B 2 t r 1, then uniquely r 1 and r 1 (for k n k, t n 2 k t, r k t r ). Also, if for all B 1 f ( ), B 1 t r, then uniquely r and r. Otherwise, if for some B 2 g ( ) and B 1 f ( ), B 2 t r and B 1 t r 1, then B 1 B 2 t r t r 1 n k t 1. This again contradicts Lemma 7. This finishes the proof, if we allow only left compressed systems as competitors. We thank K. Engel for asking for an argument for not left compressed competitors. We follow an idea of [10] to prove the uniqueness, stated in the theorem. We use the well-known exchange operation S i j, i j, defined for any family 2 [ n ] as follows : for A, i ( A j ) S i j ( A ) A S i j ( ) S i j ( A ) : A. if i A, j A, i ( A j ), otherwise, P ROPOSITION. Suppose that I ( n, k, t ) and that gets transformed by finitely many exchange operations to the set r ( see (1. 9)) for some 0 r ( n t ) / 2. Then, necessarily, r, pro ided that n 2 k t 2 for t 2, n 2 k t 1 for t 2 and k t r or k t r 1, n 2 k 1 for t 1 and r 0 or r 1. ( ) P ROOF. Without loss of generality, we can assume that S i j ( ) r. (5. 5) It is clear that, if i, j [1, t 2 r ] (or i, j [1, t 2 r ]), then r and the Proposition is true. Assume, then, that i t 2 r and j n. Let 1 A : j A, i A, (( A j ) i ), 2 A : j A, i A, (( A i ) j ). Clearly, if 1, then r, and if 2, then is obtained from r by exchanging the co-ordinates i t 2 r and j n, so the proposition is true. Suppose, then, that A 1, 2, and let us show that I ( n, k, t ) (under conditions ( )). We consider [ n ] i, j H : H [1, t 2 r 1] t r 1. k 1 We observe that, for any B 1 2, B [1, t 2 r 1] t r 1 holds. This fact follows from (5. 5). Moreover, from the same assumption (5. 5) we have the following : for every H either H j 1 or H i 2. Now we form a graph G ( V, E ) as follows : V and e ( H 1, H 2 ) E if f ( H 1 H 2 ) t 1.
12 136 R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian It can be verified that the graph G ( V, E ) is connected if f the conditions ( ) hold. Hence, under conditions ( ), if 1 and 2, then there exist B 1 1 and B 2 2 with B 1 B 2 t 1, which contradicts I ( n, k, t ). P ROOF OF THE U NIQUENESS. Let n 2 k t, I ( n, k, t ) and M ( n, k, t ), and after finitely many exchange operations S i j, i j let be transformed to the left-compressed set, LI ( n, k, t ), M ( n, k, t ). We already know that r for r 0, where r is defined by the conditions in the theorem. It can be easily verified that these r s satisfy the conditions ( ) stated in the proposition, and hence that r. R EFERENCES 1. R. Ahlswede and G. Katona, Contributions to the geometry of Hamming spaces, Discr. Math., 17, (1977), R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian, Maximal sets of numbers not containing k 1 pairwise coprime integers, Acta Arithmetica LXX, 1, (1995), R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian, Sets of integers and quasi-integers with pairwise common divisor, Acta Arithmetica LXXIV, 2, (1996), R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian, Sets of integers with pairwise common divisor and a factor from a specified set of primes, Acta Arithmetica LXXV, 3, (1996), A. R. Calderbank and P. Frankl, Improved upper bounds concerning the Erdö s Ko Rado Theorem, Combin. Prob. Comput., 1, (1992), M. Deza and P. Frankl, Erdö s Ko Rado Theorem 22 years later, SIAM J. Algebra Discr. Math., 4 (4) (1983), P. Erdö s, My joint work with Richard Rado, in : Sur eys in Combinatorics, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser., 123 (1987), P. Erdö s, Some of my favourite unsolved problems, in : A Tribute to Paul Erdö s, A. Baker, B. Bollobá s, and A. Hajnal (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P. Erdö s, Chao Ko and R. Rado, Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Q. J. Math. Oxford, 12 (1961), P. Frankl, The Erdö s Ko Rado Theorem is true for n ckt, Coll. Soc. Math. J. Bolyai, 11 (1978), P. Frankl, The shifting technique in extremal set theory, in : Sur eys in Combinatorics, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser., 123 (1987), P. Frankl and Z. Fü redi, Beyond the Erdö s Ko Rado Theorem, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A, 56 (1991), R. M. Wilson, The exact bound on the Erdö s Ko Rado Theorem, Combinatorica, 4 (1984), Recei ed 2 0 June and accepted 1 4 February R UDOLF A HLSWEDE AND L EVON H. K HACHATRIAN Uni ersitä t Bielefeld, Fakultä t fü r Mathematik, Postfach , Bielefeld, Germany
The Intersection Theorem for Direct Products
Europ. J. Combinatorics 1998 19, 649 661 Article No. ej9803 The Intersection Theorem for Direct Products R. AHLSWEDE, H.AYDINIAN AND L. H. KHACHATRIAN c 1998 Academic Press 1. INTRODUCTION Before we state
More informationA diametric theorem for edges. R. Ahlswede and L.H. Khachatrian
A diametric theorem for edges R. Ahlswede and L.H. Khachatrian 1 1 Introduction Whereas there are vertex and edge isoperimetric theorems it went unsaid that diametric theorems are vertex diametric theorems.
More informationLinear independence, a unifying approach to shadow theorems
Linear independence, a unifying approach to shadow theorems by Peter Frankl, Rényi Institute, Budapest, Hungary Abstract The intersection shadow theorem of Katona is an important tool in extremal set theory.
More informationThe edge-diametric theorem in Hamming spaces
Discrete Applied Mathematics 56 2008 50 57 www.elsevier.com/locate/dam The edge-diametric theorem in Hamming spaces Christian Bey Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Institut für Algebra und Geometrie,
More information1 The Erdős Ko Rado Theorem
1 The Erdős Ko Rado Theorem A family of subsets of a set is intersecting if any two elements of the family have at least one element in common It is easy to find small intersecting families; the basic
More informationDAVID ELLIS AND BHARGAV NARAYANAN
ON SYMMETRIC 3-WISE INTERSECTING FAMILIES DAVID ELLIS AND BHARGAV NARAYANAN Abstract. A family of sets is said to be symmetric if its automorphism group is transitive, and 3-wise intersecting if any three
More informationAn Erdős-Ko-Rado problem on the strip
An Erdős-Ko-Rado problem on the strip Steve Butler 1 1 Department of Mathematics University of California, San Diego www.math.ucsd.edu/~sbutler GSCC 2008 12 April 2008 Extremal set theory We will consider
More informationErdős-Ko-Rado theorems on the weak Bruhat lattice
Erdős-Ko-Rado theorems on the weak Bruhat lattice Susanna Fishel, Glenn Hurlbert, Vikram Kamat, Karen Meagher December 14, 2018 Abstract Let L = (X, ) be a lattice. For P X we say that P is t-intersecting
More informationA Hilton-Milner-type theorem and an intersection conjecture for signed sets
A Hilton-Milner-type theorem and an intersection conjecture for signed sets Peter Borg Department of Mathematics, University of Malta Msida MSD 2080, Malta p.borg.02@cantab.net Abstract A family A of sets
More informationCross-Intersecting Sets of Vectors
Cross-Intersecting Sets of Vectors János Pach Gábor Tardos Abstract Given a sequence of positive integers p = (p 1,..., p n ), let S p denote the set of all sequences of positive integers x = (x 1,...,
More informationNon-trivial intersecting uniform sub-families of hereditary families
Non-trivial intersecting uniform sub-families of hereditary families Peter Borg Department of Mathematics, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta p.borg.02@cantab.net April 4, 2013 Abstract For a family
More informationAhlswede Khachatrian Theorems: Weighted, Infinite, and Hamming
Ahlswede Khachatrian Theorems: Weighted, Infinite, and Hamming Yuval Filmus April 4, 2017 Abstract The seminal complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian gives the maximum cardinality of
More informationTowards a Katona type proof for the 2-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem
Towards a Katona type proof for the 2-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem Ralph Howard Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, USA howard@math.sc.edu Gyula Károlyi Department
More informationMinimal Paths and Cycles in Set Systems
Minimal Paths and Cycles in Set Systems Dhruv Mubayi Jacques Verstraëte July 9, 006 Abstract A minimal k-cycle is a family of sets A 0,..., A k 1 for which A i A j if and only if i = j or i and j are consecutive
More informationA DEGREE VERSION OF THE HILTON MILNER THEOREM
A DEGREE VERSION OF THE HILTON MILNER THEOREM PETER FRANKL, JIE HAN, HAO HUANG, AND YI ZHAO Abstract An intersecting family of sets is trivial if all of its members share a common element Hilton and Milner
More informationIntersecting integer partitions
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 66(2) (2016), Pages 265 275 Intersecting integer partitions Peter Borg Department of Mathematics University of Malta Malta peter.borg@um.edu.mt Abstract If
More informationR u t c o r Research R e p o r t. Uniform partitions and Erdös-Ko-Rado Theorem a. Vladimir Gurvich b. RRR , August, 2009
R u t c o r Research R e p o r t Uniform partitions and Erdös-Ko-Rado Theorem a Vladimir Gurvich b RRR 16-2009, August, 2009 RUTCOR Rutgers Center for Operations Research Rutgers University 640 Bartholomew
More informationDistance-regular Subgraphs in a Distance-regular Graph, IV
Europ. J. Combinatorics (1997) 18, 635 645 Distance-regular Subgraphs in a Distance-regular Graph, IV A KIRA H IRAKI Let be a distance-regular graph with a 1 0, r max j 3 ( c j, a j, b j ) ( c 1, a 1,
More informationc 2010 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
SIAM J. DISCRETE MATH. Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1038 1045 c 2010 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics SET SYSTEMS WITHOUT A STRONG SIMPLEX TAO JIANG, OLEG PIKHURKO, AND ZELEALEM YILMA Abstract. A
More informationKatarzyna Mieczkowska
Katarzyna Mieczkowska Uniwersytet A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Erdős conjecture on matchings in hypergraphs Praca semestralna nr 1 (semestr letni 010/11 Opiekun pracy: Tomasz Łuczak ERDŐS CONJECTURE ON MATCHINGS
More informationEdge Isoperimetric Theorems for Integer Point Arrays
Edge Isoperimetric Theorems for Integer Point Arrays R. Ahlswede, S.L. Bezrukov Universität Bielefeld, Fakultät für Mathematik Postfach 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany Abstract We consider subsets of
More informationThe maximum product of sizes of cross-t-intersecting uniform families
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 60(1 (2014, Pages 69 78 The maximum product of sizes of cross-t-intersecting uniform families Peter Borg Department of Mathematics University of Malta Malta
More informationAlmost Cross-Intersecting and Almost Cross-Sperner Pairs offamilies of Sets
Almost Cross-Intersecting and Almost Cross-Sperner Pairs offamilies of Sets Dániel Gerbner a Nathan Lemons b Cory Palmer a Balázs Patkós a, Vajk Szécsi b a Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Alfréd Rényi Institute
More informationOn the chromatic number of q-kneser graphs
On the chromatic number of q-kneser graphs A. Blokhuis & A. E. Brouwer Dept. of Mathematics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 53, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands aartb@win.tue.nl, aeb@cwi.nl
More informationCocliques in the Kneser graph on line-plane flags in PG(4, q)
Cocliques in the Kneser graph on line-plane flags in PG(4, q) A. Blokhuis & A. E. Brouwer Abstract We determine the independence number of the Kneser graph on line-plane flags in the projective space PG(4,
More informationA Family of One-regular Graphs of Valency 4
Europ. J. Combinatorics (1997) 18, 59 64 A Family of One-regular Graphs of Valency 4 D RAGAN M ARUSä ICä A graph is said to be one - regular if its automorphism group acts regularly on the set of its arcs.
More informationMultiply Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem
arxiv:1712.09942v1 [math.co] 28 Dec 2017 Multiply Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem Carl Feghali Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway feghali.carl@gmail.com December 29, 2017 Abstract A
More informationOn the intersection of infinite matroids
On the intersection of infinite matroids Elad Aigner-Horev Johannes Carmesin Jan-Oliver Fröhlich University of Hamburg 9 July 2012 Abstract We show that the infinite matroid intersection conjecture of
More informationProof of a Conjecture of Erdős on triangles in set-systems
Proof of a Conjecture of Erdős on triangles in set-systems Dhruv Mubayi Jacques Verstraëte November 11, 005 Abstract A triangle is a family of three sets A, B, C such that A B, B C, C A are each nonempty,
More informationMore complete intersection theorems
More complete intersection theorems Yuval Filmus April 4, 2017 Abstract The seminal complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian gives the maximum cardinality of a k-uniform t-intersecting
More informationChapter 1 : The language of mathematics.
MAT 200, Logic, Language and Proof, Fall 2015 Summary Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics. Definition. A proposition is a sentence which is either true or false. Truth table for the connective or :
More informationAn Infinite Highly Arc-transitive Digraph
Europ. J. Combinatorics (1997) 18, 281 286 An Infinite Highly Arc-transitive Digraph D AVID M. E VANS 1. I NTRODUCTION The main purpose of this note is to construct an infinite, highly arc-transitive digraph
More informationDefinitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations
Page 1 Definitions Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:23 AM Notations " " means "equals, by definition" the set of all real numbers the set of integers Denote a function from a set to a set by Denote the image of
More informationRegular bipartite graphs and intersecting families
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 155 (2018 180 189 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A wwwelseviercom/locate/jcta Regular bipartite graphs and intersecting
More informationInduced subgraphs of prescribed size
Induced subgraphs of prescribed size Noga Alon Michael Krivelevich Benny Sudakov Abstract A subgraph of a graph G is called trivial if it is either a clique or an independent set. Let q(g denote the maximum
More informationThe Erd s-ko-rado property of various graphs containing singletons
The Erd s-ko-rado property of various graphs containing singletons Peter Borg and Fred Holroyd Department of Mathematics, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom p.borg.02@cantab.net
More informationCycle Length Parities and the Chromatic Number
Cycle Length Parities and the Chromatic Number Christian Löwenstein, Dieter Rautenbach and Ingo Schiermeyer 2 Institut für Mathematik, TU Ilmenau, Postfach 00565, D-98684 Ilmenau, Germany, emails: christian.loewenstein@tu-ilmenau.de,
More informationFamilies that remain k-sperner even after omitting an element of their ground set
Families that remain k-sperner even after omitting an element of their ground set Balázs Patkós Submitted: Jul 12, 2012; Accepted: Feb 4, 2013; Published: Feb 12, 2013 Mathematics Subject Classifications:
More informationTowards a Katona type proof for the 2-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem
Towards a Katona type proof for the 2-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem Ralph Howard Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, USA howard@math.sc.edu Gyula Károlyi Department
More informationOn primitive sets of squarefree integers
On primitive sets of suarefree integers R. Ahlswede and L. Khachatrian Fakultät für Mathematik Universität Bielefeld Postfach 003 3350 Bielefeld and A. Sárközy * Eötvös Loránd University Department of
More informationTwo Problems in Extremal Set Theory
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research Papers in Mathematics Mathematics, Department of April 2007 Two Problems in
More informationMULTIPLICITIES OF MONOMIAL IDEALS
MULTIPLICITIES OF MONOMIAL IDEALS JÜRGEN HERZOG AND HEMA SRINIVASAN Introduction Let S = K[x 1 x n ] be a polynomial ring over a field K with standard grading, I S a graded ideal. The multiplicity of S/I
More informationMaximal Symmetric Difference-Free Families of Subsets of [n]
arxiv:1010.2711v1 [math.co] 13 Oct 2010 Maximal Symmetric Difference-Free Families of Subsets of [n] Travis G. Buck and Anant P. Godbole Department of Mathematics and Statistics East Tennessee State University
More informationForbidding complete hypergraphs as traces
Forbidding complete hypergraphs as traces Dhruv Mubayi Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science University of Illinois Chicago, IL 60607 Yi Zhao Department of Mathematics and Statistics
More information4 CONNECTED PROJECTIVE-PLANAR GRAPHS ARE HAMILTONIAN. Robin Thomas* Xingxing Yu**
4 CONNECTED PROJECTIVE-PLANAR GRAPHS ARE HAMILTONIAN Robin Thomas* Xingxing Yu** School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA May 1991, revised 23 October 1993. Published
More informationErdös-Ko-Rado theorems for chordal and bipartite graphs
Erdös-Ko-Rado theorems for chordal and bipartite graphs arxiv:0903.4203v2 [math.co] 15 Jul 2009 Glenn Hurlbert and Vikram Kamat School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences Arizona State University,
More informationMaximum union-free subfamilies
Maximum union-free subfamilies Jacob Fox Choongbum Lee Benny Sudakov Abstract An old problem of Moser asks: how large of a union-free subfamily does every family of m sets have? A family of sets is called
More informationSome Nordhaus-Gaddum-type Results
Some Nordhaus-Gaddum-type Results Wayne Goddard Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, USA Michael A. Henning Department of Mathematics University of Natal Pietermaritzburg,
More informationThe Turán number of sparse spanning graphs
The Turán number of sparse spanning graphs Noga Alon Raphael Yuster Abstract For a graph H, the extremal number ex(n, H) is the maximum number of edges in a graph of order n not containing a subgraph isomorphic
More informationNonnegative k-sums, fractional covers, and probability of small deviations
Nonnegative k-sums, fractional covers, and probability of small deviations Noga Alon Hao Huang Benny Sudakov Abstract More than twenty years ago, Manickam, Miklós, and Singhi conjectured that for any integers
More informationConstructions of digital nets using global function fields
ACTA ARITHMETICA 105.3 (2002) Constructions of digital nets using global function fields by Harald Niederreiter (Singapore) and Ferruh Özbudak (Ankara) 1. Introduction. The theory of (t, m, s)-nets and
More informationNear-domination in graphs
Near-domination in graphs Bruce Reed Researcher, Projet COATI, INRIA and Laboratoire I3S, CNRS France, and Visiting Researcher, IMPA, Brazil Alex Scott Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford
More informationGraphs with large maximum degree containing no odd cycles of a given length
Graphs with large maximum degree containing no odd cycles of a given length Paul Balister Béla Bollobás Oliver Riordan Richard H. Schelp October 7, 2002 Abstract Let us write f(n, ; C 2k+1 ) for the maximal
More informationSection 2: Classes of Sets
Section 2: Classes of Sets Notation: If A, B are subsets of X, then A \ B denotes the set difference, A \ B = {x A : x B}. A B denotes the symmetric difference. A B = (A \ B) (B \ A) = (A B) \ (A B). Remarks
More informationThe cocycle lattice of binary matroids
Published in: Europ. J. Comb. 14 (1993), 241 250. The cocycle lattice of binary matroids László Lovász Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary, H-1088 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Ákos Seress*
More informationA LOWER BOUND FOR THE SIZE OF A MINKOWSKI SUM OF DILATES. 1. Introduction
A LOWER BOUND FOR THE SIZE OF A MINKOWSKI SUM OF DILATES Y. O. HAMIDOUNE AND J. RUÉ Abstract. Let A be a finite nonempty set of integers. An asymptotic estimate of several dilates sum size was obtained
More informationRANDOM GRAPHS AND QUASI-RANDOM GRAPHS: AN INTRODUCTION
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume, Number 1, June 001, Pages 101 107 RANDOM GRAPHS AND QUASI-RANDOM GRAPHS: AN INTRODUCTION CHANGWOO LEE Abstract. This article is
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.co] 23 Jun 2008
BOUNDING MULTIPLICATIVE ENERGY BY THE SUMSET arxiv:0806.1040v3 [math.co] 23 Jun 2008 Abstract. We prove that the sumset or the productset of any finite set of real numbers, A, is at least A 4/3 ε, improving
More informationArithmetic Progressions with Constant Weight
Arithmetic Progressions with Constant Weight Raphael Yuster Department of Mathematics University of Haifa-ORANIM Tivon 36006, Israel e-mail: raphy@oranim.macam98.ac.il Abstract Let k n be two positive
More informationEquidivisible consecutive integers
& Equidivisible consecutive integers Ivo Düntsch Department of Computer Science Brock University St Catherines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada duentsch@cosc.brocku.ca Roger B. Eggleton Department of Mathematics
More informationVERTEX DEGREE SUMS FOR PERFECT MATCHINGS IN 3-UNIFORM HYPERGRAPHS
VERTEX DEGREE SUMS FOR PERFECT MATCHINGS IN 3-UNIFORM HYPERGRAPHS YI ZHANG, YI ZHAO, AND MEI LU Abstract. We determine the minimum degree sum of two adjacent vertices that ensures a perfect matching in
More informationMath 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008
Math 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008 Closed sets We have been operating at a fundamental level at which a topological space is a set together
More informationContainment restrictions
Containment restrictions Tibor Szabó Extremal Combinatorics, FU Berlin, WiSe 207 8 In this chapter we switch from studying constraints on the set operation intersection, to constraints on the set relation
More informationIntersecting families of sets and permutations: a survey
Intersecting families of sets and permutations: a survey arxiv:1106.6144v1 [math.co] 30 Jun 2011 Peter Borg Department of Mathematics, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta p.borg.02@cantab.net August
More informationDecomposing oriented graphs into transitive tournaments
Decomposing oriented graphs into transitive tournaments Raphael Yuster Department of Mathematics University of Haifa Haifa 39105, Israel Abstract For an oriented graph G with n vertices, let f(g) denote
More informationArithmetic progressions in sumsets
ACTA ARITHMETICA LX.2 (1991) Arithmetic progressions in sumsets by Imre Z. Ruzsa* (Budapest) 1. Introduction. Let A, B [1, N] be sets of integers, A = B = cn. Bourgain [2] proved that A + B always contains
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 28 Oct 2016
More on foxes arxiv:1610.09093v1 [math.co] 8 Oct 016 Matthias Kriesell Abstract Jens M. Schmidt An edge in a k-connected graph G is called k-contractible if the graph G/e obtained from G by contracting
More informationAn exact Turán result for tripartite 3-graphs
An exact Turán result for tripartite 3-graphs Adam Sanitt Department of Mathematics University College London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom adam@sanitt.com John Talbot Department of Mathematics University College
More informationPlanar and Affine Spaces
Planar and Affine Spaces Pýnar Anapa İbrahim Günaltılı Hendrik Van Maldeghem Abstract In this note, we characterize finite 3-dimensional affine spaces as the only linear spaces endowed with set Ω of proper
More informationPowers of 2 with five distinct summands
ACTA ARITHMETICA * (200*) Powers of 2 with five distinct summands by Vsevolod F. Lev (Haifa) 0. Summary. We show that every sufficiently large, finite set of positive integers of density larger than 1/3
More informationA RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM IN TROPICAL GEOMETRY
A RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM IN TROPICAL GEOMETRY ANDREAS GATHMANN AND MICHAEL KERBER ABSTRACT. Recently, Baker and Norine have proven a Riemann-Roch theorem for finite graphs. We extend their results to metric
More informationCSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Winter 2017 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi17/cse20-ab/ Today's learning goals Evaluate which proof technique(s) is appropriate for a given proposition Direct proof Proofs by contraposition
More informationCycles in 4-Connected Planar Graphs
Cycles in 4-Connected Planar Graphs Guantao Chen Department of Mathematics & Statistics Georgia State University Atlanta, GA 30303 matgcc@panther.gsu.edu Genghua Fan Institute of Systems Science Chinese
More informationSUMSETS MOD p ØYSTEIN J. RØDSETH
SUMSETS MOD p ØYSTEIN J. RØDSETH Abstract. In this paper we present some basic addition theorems modulo a prime p and look at various proof techniques. We open with the Cauchy-Davenport theorem and a proof
More informationList Decomposition of Graphs
List Decomposition of Graphs Yair Caro Raphael Yuster Abstract A family of graphs possesses the common gcd property if the greatest common divisor of the degree sequence of each graph in the family is
More information#A34 INTEGERS 13 (2013) A NOTE ON THE MULTIPLICATIVE STRUCTURE OF AN ADDITIVELY SHIFTED PRODUCT SET AA + 1
#A34 INTEGERS 13 (2013) A NOTE ON THE MULTIPLICATIVE STRUCTURE OF AN ADDITIVELY SHIFTED PRODUCT SET AA + 1 Steven Senger Department of Mathematics, University of Delaware, Newark, Deleware senger@math.udel.edu
More informationSome Bounds for the Distribution Numbers of an Association Scheme
Europ. J. Combinatorics (1988) 9, 1-5 Some Bounds for the Distribution Numbers of an Association Scheme THOMAS BIER AND PHILIPPE DELSARTE We generalize the definition of distribution numbers of an association
More informationOn Subsets with Cardinalities of Intersections Divisible by a Fixed Integer
Europ. J. Combinatorics (1983) 4,215-220 On Subsets with Cardinalities of Intersections Divisible by a Fixed Integer P. FRANKL AND A. M. ODLYZKO If m(n, I) denotes the maximum number of subsets of an n-element
More informationMONOCHROMATIC VS. MULTICOLORED PATHS. Hanno Lefmann* Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Emory University. Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
MONOCHROMATIC VS. MULTICOLORED PATHS Hanno Lefmann* Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA and School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology
More informationBalanced bipartitions of graphs
2010.7 - Dedicated to Professor Feng Tian on the occasion of his 70th birthday Balanced bipartitions of graphs Baogang Xu School of Mathematical Science, Nanjing Normal University baogxu@njnu.edu.cn or
More informationFINITE FIELDS AND APPLICATIONS Additive Combinatorics in finite fields (3 lectures)
FINITE FIELDS AND APPLICATIONS Additive Combinatorics in finite fields (3 lectures) Ana Zumalacárregui a.zumalacarregui@unsw.edu.au November 30, 2015 Contents 1 Operations on sets 1 2 Sum-product theorem
More informationON A TWO-DIMENSIONAL SEARCH PROBLEM. Emil Kolev, Ivan Landgev
Serdica Math. J. 21 (1995), 219-230 ON A TWO-DIMENSIONAL SEARCH PROBLEM Emil Kolev, Ivan Landgev Communicated by R. Hill Abstract. In this article we explore the so-called two-dimensional tree search problem.
More informationJeong-Hyun Kang Department of Mathematics, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA
#A33 INTEGERS 10 (2010), 379-392 DISTANCE GRAPHS FROM P -ADIC NORMS Jeong-Hyun Kang Department of Mathematics, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118 jkang@westga.edu Hiren Maharaj Department
More informationCLIQUES IN THE UNION OF GRAPHS
CLIQUES IN THE UNION OF GRAPHS RON AHARONI, ELI BERGER, MARIA CHUDNOVSKY, AND JUBA ZIANI Abstract. Let B and R be two simple graphs with vertex set V, and let G(B, R) be the simple graph with vertex set
More informationBetter bounds for k-partitions of graphs
Better bounds for -partitions of graphs Baogang Xu School of Mathematics, Nanjing Normal University 1 Wenyuan Road, Yadong New District, Nanjing, 1006, China Email: baogxu@njnu.edu.cn Xingxing Yu School
More informationEven Cycles in Hypergraphs.
Even Cycles in Hypergraphs. Alexandr Kostochka Jacques Verstraëte Abstract A cycle in a hypergraph A is an alternating cyclic sequence A 0, v 0, A 1, v 1,..., A k 1, v k 1, A 0 of distinct edges A i and
More informationABOUT THE CLASS AND NOTES ON SET THEORY
ABOUT THE CLASS AND NOTES ON SET THEORY About the Class Evaluation. Final grade will be based 25%, 25%, 25%, 25%, on homework, midterm 1, midterm 2, final exam. Exam dates. Midterm 1: Oct 4. Midterm 2:
More informationIrredundant Families of Subcubes
Irredundant Families of Subcubes David Ellis January 2010 Abstract We consider the problem of finding the maximum possible size of a family of -dimensional subcubes of the n-cube {0, 1} n, none of which
More informationA Lemma on the Minimal Counter-example of Frankl s Conjecture
A Lemma on the Minimal Counter-example of Frankl s Conjecture Ankush Hore email: ankushore@gmail.com Abstract Frankl s Conjecture, from 1979, states that any finite union-closed family, containing at least
More informationOn infinite permutations
On infinite permutations Dmitri G. Fon-Der-Flaass, Anna E. Frid To cite this version: Dmitri G. Fon-Der-Flaass, Anna E. Frid. On infinite permutations. Stefan Felsner. 2005 European Conference on Combinatorics,
More informationThe Lefthanded Local Lemma characterizes chordal dependency graphs
The Lefthanded Local Lemma characterizes chordal dependency graphs Wesley Pegden March 30, 2012 Abstract Shearer gave a general theorem characterizing the family L of dependency graphs labeled with probabilities
More informationGame saturation of intersecting families
Cent. Eur. J. Math. 129) 2014 1382-1389 DOI: 10.2478/s11533-014-0420-3 Central European Journal of Mathematics Game saturation of intersecting families Research Article Balázs Patkós 1, Máté Vizer 1 1
More informationReport Documentation Page
Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
More informationThis paper was published in Connections in Discrete Mathematics, S. Butler, J. Cooper, and G. Hurlbert, editors, Cambridge University Press,
This paper was published in Connections in Discrete Mathematics, S Butler, J Cooper, and G Hurlbert, editors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018, 200-213 To the best of my knowledge, this is the
More informationTheorems of Erdős-Ko-Rado type in polar spaces
Theorems of Erdős-Ko-Rado type in polar spaces Valentina Pepe, Leo Storme, Frédéric Vanhove Department of Mathematics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 28-S22, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Abstract We consider Erdős-Ko-Rado
More informationSequences of height 1 primes in Z[X]
Sequences of height 1 primes in Z[X] Stephen McAdam Department of Mathematics University of Texas Austin TX 78712 mcadam@math.utexas.edu Abstract: For each partition J K of {1, 2,, n} (n 2) with J 2, let
More informationGame saturation of intersecting families
Game saturation of intersecting families Balázs Patkós Máté Vizer November 30, 2012 Abstract We consider the following combinatorial game: two players, Fast and Slow, claim k-element subsets of [n] = {1,
More informationGraph Classes and Ramsey Numbers
Graph Classes and Ramsey Numbers Rémy Belmonte, Pinar Heggernes, Pim van t Hof, Arash Rafiey, and Reza Saei Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Norway Abstract. For a graph class G and any
More informationMonochromatic Solutions to Equations with Unit Fractions
Monochromatic Solutions to Equations with Unit Fractions Tom C. Brown and Voijtech Rödl Citation data T.C. Brown and V. Rödl, Monochromatic solutions to equations with unit fractions, Bull. Aus. Math.
More informationNote Erdős Ko Rado from intersecting shadows
Note Erdős Ko Rado from intersecting shadows Gyula O. H. Katona Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences 1053 Budapest, Reáltanoda u. 13 15., Hungary e-mail: ohatona@renyi.hu
More information